Next Article in Journal
Epstein–Barr Virus DNA Exacerbates Arthritis in a Mouse Model via Toll-like Receptor 9
Previous Article in Journal
A Mass Spectrometry Strategy for Protein Quantification Based on the Differential Alkylation of Cysteines Using Iodoacetamide and Acrylamide
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Deciphering the Impact of Defecation Frequency on Gut Microbiome Composition and Diversity

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(9), 4657; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25094657
by Gwoncheol Park 1,2,3,†, Seongok Kim 1,2,†, WonJune Lee 1,2, Gyungcheon Kim 1,2 and Hakdong Shin 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(9), 4657; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25094657
Submission received: 20 February 2024 / Revised: 2 April 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 25 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Molecular Insights into the Gut Microbiome)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Sufficient, only minor corrections needed

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I think that this is a nice study with a lot of bioinformatics and not very much of biological analysis. It is interesting to read about the enterotypes of the group under study but there is no association between the enterotypes and stool frequency. Or may be it does exists but was not analyzed. Than what was the reason to analyze enterotypes which did not appear not in the introduction or results. It is interesting that  Ruminococcus enterotype did not appear in the study but later the authors mentioned that infrequent group was associated with this enterotype. Regarding the experimental setup I would not suggest to call the people in the group with infrequent a healthy volunteers, because it is hard to  call them really healthy according to all gastrointestinal criteria. Metabolic part of the study looks nice and convincing however the number of participants might be low.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop