Next Article in Journal
The Strategies of Development of New Non-Toxic Inhibitors of Amyloid Formation
Next Article in Special Issue
Oxidized Mitochondrial DNA Engages TLR9 to Activate the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Previous Article in Journal
Voghera Sweet Pepper: A Potential Ally against Oxidative Stress and Aging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pentatricopeptide Protein PTCD2 Regulates COIII Translation in Mitochondria of the HeLa Cell Line
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms24043783
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mitochondrial DNA Deficiency and Supplementation in Sus scrofa Oocytes Influence Transcriptome Profiles in Oocytes and Blastocysts

by
Takashi Okada
,
Stephen McIlfatrick
and
Justin C. St. John
*
Mitochondrial Genetics Group, Robinson Research Institute, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(4), 3783; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043783
Submission received: 25 January 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 14 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Mitochondria and Mitochondrial Derived Peptides)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deficiency correlates with poor oocyte quality and fertilisation failure. However, the supplementation of mtDNA deficient oocytes with extra copies of mtDNA improves fertilisation rates and embryo development. The molecular mechanisms associated with oocyte developmental incompetence, and the effects of mtDNA supplementation on embryo development are largely unknown. We investigated the association between the developmental competence of Sus scrofa oocytes, assessed with Brilliant Cresyl Blue, and transcriptome profiles. We also analysed the effects of mtDNA supplementation on the developmental transition from the oocyte to the blastocyst by longitudinal transcriptome analysis. mtDNA deficient oocytes revealed downregulation of genes associated with RNA metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation, including 56 small nucleolar RNA genes and 13 mtDNA protein coding genes. We also identified the downregulation of a large subset of genes for meiotic and mitotic cell cycle process, suggesting that developmental competence affects the completion of meiosis II and first embryonic cell division. The supplementation of oocytes with mtDNA in combination with fertilisation improves the maintenance of the expression of several key developmental genes and the patterns of parental allele-specific imprinting gene expression in blastocysts. These results suggest associations between mtDNA deficiency and meiotic cell cycle and the developmental effects of mtDNA supplementation on Sus scrofa blastocysts.

1. Introduction

The mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) is a double stranded circular DNA that is approximately 16.6 kb in size and encodes 13 of the subunits of the electron transfer chain, which generates the vast majority of cellular ATP through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) [1]. It also encodes 2 rRNAs and 22 tRNAs and has one major non-coding region, the D-Loop, that is the site of interaction for the nuclear-encoded transcription and replication factors that translocate to the mitochondrion to drive first transcription and then replication [2]. Furthermore, mtDNA is inherited from the population present in the oocyte at the time of fertilisation and is, thus, a maternally-only inherited genome [3].
In human and other mammalian species, including the pig, there are associations between mtDNA copy number, low levels of ATP content, and the ability of the oocyte to fertilise and give rise to embryos [4,5,6,7,8]. For example, oocytes with low mtDNA are more likely to fail to fertilise or arrest during preimplantation development. Indeed, mitochondrial deficiency can lead to dysfunction in a number of cell types [9,10]. In the oocyte, mtDNA deficiency appears to be one of the causes of female factor infertility [4,5,8]. To overcome this problem, several approaches have been proposed and adopted. For example, oocytes can be supplemented with either ooplasm [11,12] or purified populations of mitochondria from autologous or heterologous sources. These sources can include sister (derived from the same ovary) or donor (third party) oocytes, cumulus cells and egg precursor cells [13,14,15,16].
The supplementation of oocytes at the time of fertilisation with mtDNA, packaged within mitochondria derived from sister oocytes, has shown to improve the rates of the fertilisation and development of mammalian embryos [13,14,17,18]. This process adds approximately an extra 800 copies of mtDNA [13], which represents 0.3% of the fertilisable oocyte’s total mtDNA content (~300,000). Consequently, this process is unlikely to increase mitochondrial bioenergetics. Instead, in mtDNA-deficient oocytes, it triggers an mtDNA replication event whereby mtDNA copy number is increased by 4.4-fold by the 2-cell stage of embryo development and increases the oocyte’s potential to develop to the blastocyst stage, the final stage of preimplantation development [13]. The induction of early mtDNA replication in mtDNA-deficient oocytes could improve embryo quality by stabilising the embryo prior to embryonic genome activation [13]. Indeed, we have shown that mtDNA supplementation alters the DNA methylation profile of over 2000 nuclear genomic regions in blastocysts and influenced the expression of a subset of nuclear-encoded genes [13,19,20]. However, it is still not known how mtDNA supplementation affects the developmental transition from the oocyte to blastocyst at the transcript level, such as the expression profiles of key developmental and imprinted genes.
One approach to distinguish between oocytes with low and high mtDNA copy number is to label oocytes once harvested from ovaries with Brilliant Cresyl Blue (BCB) and prior to in vitro culture to the metaphase II stage. This provides a non-invasive visual assessment of oocyte quality and developmental competence [14,21,22,23]. The use of BCB determines the intracellular levels of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), an indicator of developmental competence. G6PDH activity is high in the developing, immature oocyte and breaks down the label, resulting in a colourless cytoplasm (BCB negative, BCB−). On the other hand, oocytes that have completed their growth phase have low levels of G6PDH activity, are unable to break down the label, and exhibit a blue cytoplasm (BCB positive, BCB+) (Figure 1A). BCB labelling is associated with fertilization outcome and blastocyst formation rates [14,21,24]. Developmentally incompetent, BCB− oocytes usually fail to mature to the metaphase II stage, exhibit small cytoplasmic volumes, low levels of mtDNA copy number and mitochondrial activity, and changes in gene expression [13,14,21,22,23,24,25], indicative of insufficient cytoplasmic maturation [26,27]. BCB+ oocytes more readily reach the metaphase II stage, fertilise, have higher mtDNA copy number, larger cytoplasmic volumes, and express genes more indicative of a fertilisable oocyte. Nevertheless, some BCB− oocytes progress to the metaphase II stage after in vitro maturation [14,21,28] and appear to have cytoplasmic volumes similar to BCB+ oocytes [24]. However, they have significantly fewer copies of mtDNA and are, thus, indicative of mtDNA deficiency [13]. Consequently, these metaphase II oocytes derived from BCB− cumulus-oocyte complex exhibit discordant nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation [27,29]. Therefore, the molecular analysis of accumulated transcripts in BCB+ and BCB− oocytes at the metaphase II stage would help to understand the underlying mechanisms of developmental incompetence associated with mtDNA deficiency.
We have previously shown that genes associated with mtDNA replication are downregulated in BCB− porcine oocytes [30] and that there are global differences in gene expression between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes at the metaphase II stage, though this analysis was restricted by limited annotation of older pig genome assemblies [31,32]. Recently, single-cell RNAseq analysis of BCB+/− porcine germinal vesicle (GV) stage oocytes identified 155 differentially expressed genes and highlighted the downregulation of the cell division cycle 5-like protein (CDC5L) gene in BCB− oocytes [33]. Indeed, inhibition of CDC5L by siRNA and antibody microinjection impaired porcine oocyte maturation. More recently, BCB stained bovine oocytes at the mature metaphase II stage have been investigated by single-cell RNAseq, but there were no significant differences in gene expression profiles between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes [34]. Therefore, it is still largely unknown why mature metaphase II BCB− oocytes have low competency and how mtDNA deficiency contributes to oocyte quality, especially at the transcript level and whether the mitochondrial genome can influence the oocyte’s nuclear genome.
This study aimed to address two key questions using the pig as our model. First, we sought to determine the association between mtDNA deficiency and the transcription profiles of metaphase II oocytes. We undertook this utilising the most up to date version of the Sus scrofa reference genome and its annotations [35], and we included all the Ensembl annotated genes [36] to analyse single cell oocyte data [31]. Second, we sought to determine if the transcriptomic profiles during the developmental transition from the oocyte to the blastocyst would be affected following mtDNA supplementation. This was undertaken by employing a longitudinal analysis of differentially expressed genes [37,38]. Our analysis uncovered functional pathways affected in BCB− oocytes and altered the developmental gene expression in blastocysts as a result of mtDNA supplementation.

2. Results

2.1. mtDNA Deficient Oocytes Revealed Downregulation of OXPHOS Genes

mtDNA deficiency in Sus scrofa oocytes correlates significantly with BCB staining [13,14]. We previously analysed RNAseq data sets comprising BCB positive (BCB+) and negative (BCB−) oocytes (Methods Section 4.1 and Figure 1A) to address the effect of mtDNA deficiency on global oocyte transcriptome profiles [31] using the Sus scrofa reference genome Sscrofa10.2 (Accession No. GCF_000003025.5, released on 7 September 2011) [32]. However, more than half of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) did not have proper annotation with gene symbols, and the results did not include read counts for the mtDNA encoded genes [31]. We reanalysed these BCB+ and BCB− oocyte data sets (Table S1) using the latest reference genome Sscrofa11.1 Accession No. GCF_000003025.6 [35] and Ensembl annotation release 105 [36] to determine if there would be greater clarity about the genes affected and the associated functional pathways and networks.
Single oocyte RNAseq data contained high numbers of sample replicates, i.e., 15 BCB+ and 14 BCB− oocytes (Methods Section 4.1 and Section 4.4). In all, 10 to 30 million reads per sample were analysed, and the levels of read mapping and assignment of annotation (Table S1) were comparable with previous analyses [39,40]. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed high consistency for oocyte RNAseq profiles relative to blastocyst RNAseq data, as previously shown [19] (Figure S1A). We found that the RNAseq profiles of the oocytes were significantly affected by ovary source (Figure S1B, left panel) suggesting a significant effect of genetic background on each oocyte’s transcriptome profile. Therefore, ovary source was included in the data analysis, and the effect of batch was removed (Figure S1B, right panel).
An analysis of the transcriptome profiles between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes identified 402 DEGs at a significance of FDR < 0.05 (Table 1 and Table S2). Amongst those, mtDNA encoded genes were abundant, including 11 protein coding genes and five tRNAs that were all significantly downregulated in BCB− oocytes (Figure 2A). In addition, cytochrome c oxidase I (COXI) and NADH dehydrogenase 3 (ND3) also showed downregulation at an FDR < 0.1 indicating all protein coding genes of mtDNA were downregulated in BCB− oocytes. This is consistent with the lower levels of mtDNA copy number found in BCB− oocytes [13] resulting in reduced transcriptional activity for the mitochondrial genome. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the whole DEG data sets identified genes involved in OXPHOS including ATP synthesis coupled electron transport, oxidative phosphorylation, and mitochondrial ATP synthesis, which were enriched (Table S3). Therefore, mtDNA deficiency in BCB− oocytes not only affected mtDNA encoded gene transcription, but also resulted in the downregulation of the majority of OXPHOS genes, which includes genes encoded by the nucleus (Figure 2B and Figure S2).

2.2. RNA Metabolism and Meiosis/Mitosis Related Gene Expression Were Affected in BCB− Oocytes

DEG analysis also identified 308 protein coding nuclear genes as well as 74 non-coding transcripts (Table S2). Ten out of the top 30 DEGs were small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNA) (Table 1) with a total of 56 snoRNA found to be downregulated in BCB− oocytes (Table 2). The primary function of snoRNA is the chemical modification of RNAs, mainly ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA, and small RNAs [41,42]. A recent study identified a noncanonical function for snoRNA, such as the regulation of chromatin structure and mRNA splicing. Consequently, the downregulation of a large subset of snoRNAs could affect RNA metabolism. Indeed, genes associated with mRNA processing and metabolism were enriched in the DEGs (Table S2), and therefore, corresponding GO and REACTOME terms (Tables S4 and S5) were identified as functional network groups (Figure 3B).
The most affected functional network in BCB− oocytes was the meiosis and mitosis cell cycle process (Figure 3A). A total of ten groups of GO terms associated with oocyte maturation and processes of cell division were found to be enriched in DEGs (Table S4). This suggests that poor oocyte quality is associated with the mis-regulation of genes required for the completion of metaphase II and following the first zygotic cell division after fertilization with the male gamete. Overall, mtDNA deficiency in BCB− oocytes affects the transcription of genes encoded by the nuclear genome that are essential for oocyte development and maturation and RNA metabolism, which, in turn, could result in the oocyte being defective.

2.3. The Use of mtDNA Supplementation in Oocytes Influences the Expression of Genes Involved in Development and Differentiation in Blastocysts

Transcriptional profiles change greatly during the developmental transition from a quiescent state in the oocyte to an active state in the developing embryo [43,44]. We have previously demonstrated the use of longitudinal analysis by assessing differentially methylated regions of the Sus scrofa genome from oocytes to blastocysts, which provided an additional layer of information and insights into the effect of mitochondrial supplementation [19]. We utilized this approach to analyse our RNAseq data sets of oocytes and blastocysts generated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection accompanied by (MT+) or without mtDNA (MT−) supplementation (Figure 1B). We hypothesized that the longitudinal analysis [37,38] would highlight the effect of mtDNA supplementation on blastocyst generation. To do this, DEGs between oocytes and blastocysts without mtDNA supplementation and between oocytes and blastocysts with supplementation were identified independently (Methods Section 4.1, Section 4.2, Section 4.3 and Section 4.4 and Figure 1B). We then compared the two lists of DEGs to determine if there were any unique DEGs in either of the developmental transition processes (Figure 1B and Figure 4A).
Approximately 11,000 genes were differentially expressed between the oocyte stage and blastocyst stage, of which 90% of DEGs (10,000 genes) were common irrespective of whether mtDNA supplementation had taken place (Figure 4A). In all, 891 genes were identified from the list of DEGs for the transition from oocyte to blastocyst generated without additional mtDNA. Of those genes, 136 had an FDR < 0.01 (Table 3 and Table S6). However, this subset of genes was not significantly different between the transition from oocytes to blastocysts that were supplemented (Figure S3A). Similarly, 1547 genes were only identified in the DEGs from the transition from oocyte to blastocysts supplemented with mtDNA. Of these, 475 genes had an FDR < 0.01, and most were highly expressed in the blastocysts (Figure S3B and Table S7). Some of these genes have been previously identified with a direct comparison between supplemented and non-supplemented blastocysts through RNAseq. For example, these include several tRNAs, sestrin 1 (SESN1), glycerophosphocholine phosphodiesterase 1 (GPCPD1), and NIMA related kinase 2 (NEK2) [19]. Many others were successfully uncovered through the longitudinal analysis, complementing the direct comparison method, and further addressing the effect of mtDNA supplementation in a developmental context.
The non-supplemented blastocysts showed slightly less transcriptional change during transition and the relatively lower number of DEGs were unique to this transition (Figure 4A). Only four associated GO and REACTOME terms were enriched (Table S8). On the other hand, mtDNA supplementation of oocytes induced greater levels of gene activation in blastocysts, mainly nuclear-encoded protein coding genes (Table S7) and 211 GO and REACTOME terms, which consisted of 53 functional annotation groups that were enriched in this subset of DEGs (Table S9). Genes involved in cell differentiation and various tissue development, including the pancreas, glands, and neurons, were abundant and uniquely regulated in the process of transition to blastocyst development following supplementation (Figure 4B,C). Several of these genes, such as BCL2 antagonist/killer 1 (BAK1), neuregulin 1 (NRG1), platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA), and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4A), have critical roles in developmental processes [45,46,47,48]. The lack of activation of these genes in the non-supplemented blastocysts might have detrimental effects on early embryo development or be indictive of the premature expression of genes of early differentiation. Overall, the results of the longitudinal DEG analysis highlighted a novel aspect of the oocyte-to-blastocyst transition process.

2.4. Effect of mtDNA Supplementation on Parent of Origin Gene Expression Patterns

We have previously shown that mtDNA supplementation was associated with only minor differences in the DNA methylation of imprinted genes in Sus scrofa, and no differences were found in the levels of imprinted gene expression between supplemented and non-supplemented blastocysts [19]. However, it is still unknown if they showed parent of origin imprinted gene expression patterns. Therefore, we investigated the allele-specific expression of imprinted genes and neighbouring genes by analysing the frequency of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) [49]. Since we used commercial pig sperm and oocytes collected from ovaries processed in a local Australian abattoir, it was not feasible to track parental genotypes from available resources. Therefore, we analysed SNPs in the transcripts, which reflect the expression of both parental alleles. If only one of the parental alleles is dominantly active for transcription as in imprinted genes, we would expect to find no or low numbers of SNPs in the transcript.
The method requires genetic variations between the two parental pigs. Average SNP frequency in the human genome is about one in every 300 base pairs with a minor allele frequency greater than 1% [50,51,52], and an NGS analysis of four swine breeds using reduced representation genomic libraries identified 372K SNPs [53]. Therefore, it seems feasible that the allele-specific expression could be analysed by SNP identification with the depth of our blastocyst RNAseq data. We set up detection criteria for the number of reads per transcript, depth of sequence reads, number of SNPs per transcript, and level of a variant, as described in the Methods, to analyse allele-specific expression of genes at the imprinting loci. For example, insulin like growth factor 2 receptor (IGF2R) on Sus scrofa chromosome 1, one of the most characterized imprinted genes in human and mouse genomes [54,55,56], encodes 7560 bp transcripts (Accession no NM_001244473). In blastocyst sample MT+ #5, derived through supplementation, its RNAseq data identified three SNPs with a mean variant frequency of 52% (Figure 5A). In the same data, 27 SNPs were identified in a total transcript length of 29,281 bp containing 10 neighbouring genes. SNP frequency, calculated by SNP number divided by transcript length (kb), was used as an indicator of mono-allelic or bi-allelic expression at low and high frequency, respectively. In the RNAseq data set MT+ #5 (mtDNA supplemented blastocyst), the SNP frequency for IGF2R was 0.40 SNP per kb transcript (SNP/kb) whilst there was a 0.92 SNP/kb frequency for its neighbouring genes. This suggests that IGF2R was biased to mono-allelic expression as expected for imprinted genes. Similarly, in RNAseq data set MT− #3 (non-supplemented), the SNP frequency for IGF2R was 1.98 SNP/kb and 0.61 SNP/kb for its neighbouring genes. The even higher SNP frequency for IGF2R than its neighbouring genes suggests that both parental alleles were actively transcribed for this gene in this blastocyst.
It is possible that a low or high SNP frequency may simply reflect the genetic variation of parents for specific genes and genomic regions. To minimize distribution bias of the SNPs in specific genomic regions, which affects bi-allelic expression, we analysed 10 imprinted genes and 73 non-imprinted neighbouring genes at six imprinting loci across four chromosomes. Total transcript lengths of 57,219 bp and 273,582 bp were analysed for imprinted genes and non-imprinted neighbouring genes, respectively, and we normalized SNP data by length for comparison. Table S10 summarises the SNP analysis results, and the sex of each blastocyst was included in the model of statistical analysis. For genes with bi-allelic expression, about 50% variant frequency is expected, and we found ~40% variant frequency in non-imprinted genes from both supplemented and non-supplemented blastocysts (Figure 5B). Variant frequency in imprinted genes was similar, and this was understandable as we filtered and kept SNPs with the signature of bi-allelic expression. As mentioned above, it would be SNP frequency (SNP number per transcript length) that provides the status of allelic expression. In MT− blastocysts, there were no differences in SNP frequency between imprinted and non-imprinted genes (Figure 5C, left panel). This was interesting as the mono-allelic expression of imprinted genes is expected to contribute to a lower SNP frequency more than non-imprinted genes. Indeed, supplemented blastocysts showed a significantly lower SNP frequency in imprinted genes than non-imprinted genes (Figure 5C, right panel). As we analysed over 330 kb total transcript length for 83 genes, these were unlikely to be caused by specific genotype combinations of specific genes in non-supplemented blastocysts. However, this might suggest that blastocysts generated without mtDNA supplementation have delayed or disturbed imprinted gene expression or partial inactivation of one of the parental genomes for regular bi-allelic expression, or a combination of both.

3. Discussion

In this study, we have analysed RNAseq data sets from Sus scrofa oocytes and blastocysts generated by injecting sperm into a mature oocyte with or without mtDNA supplementation. RNAseq data were analysed globally using tagwise dispersion estimation and Generalized Linear Models (Methods Section 4.4) which provide unbiased estimates of the gene-specific dispersions. This approach is suitable for replicates with high variation, such as blastocyst RNAseq data. We thought validation by other tests, such as qRT-PCR, would be difficult for ultra-low quantity materials considering the associated technical and handling errors, selection of appropriate controls and detection thresholds, and variations amongst samples. The use of the most up-to-date Sus scrofa reference genome sequence and associated annotations identified differentially expressed genes in BCB− oocytes, including a large subset of snoRNAs as well as genes associated with meiotic and mitotic cell cycle processes, that were not identified in our previous analysis [31]. Furthermore, using a longitudinal transcriptome analysis approach [37,38] likely provided a greater range of DEGs and revealed activation of subsets of developmental genes in mtDNA supplemented blastocysts. This approach circumvented the issue of fewer genes being identified as a result of the direct comparison between MT+ and MT− blastocysts due to the high FDR values associated with high sample variations [19].

3.1. mtDNA Deficiency in BCB− Oocytes Associates with Downregulation of OXPHOS Genes

The developmental competence of oocytes has been assessed with BCB labelling in various mammals with BCB− oocytes reportedly associated with a lower fertilisation potential, lower frequency of development to blastocyst, lower levels of mitochondrial activity, changes in expression of genes involved in apoptosis, and lower levels of mtDNA copy number [21,24,25,28,30,57]. Our results provide further evidence that BCB− oocytes have highly distinct transcription profiles compared to BCB+ oocytes (Table 1 and Table S2 and Figure 2). A total of 16 mtDNA encoded genes, including 11 protein coding and 5 t-RNAs, were significantly downregulated in BCB− oocytes with two mtDNA protein coding genes, COXI and ND3, also downregulated but to levels of lower significance (FDR < 0.1). Since mtDNA copy number in pig BCB− metaphase II oocytes is ~3-fold lower than in BCB+ oocytes [13] and that there are strong associations in other species, such as the human [8], pig [58], and mouse [59], with mtDNA copy number and fertilisation outcome, this was not particularly surprising. However, it confirmed low levels of expression for all of the mtDNA-encoded genes that are associated with OXPHOS and that the majority of nuclear-encoded genes associated with OXPHOS were also downregulated in BCB− oocytes (Table 1 and Table S2 and Figure 2 and Figure S2). On the other hand, we did not find differences in the expression of genes involved in mtDNA replication, such as DNA polymerase gamma (POLG), mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM), and nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF1), which have been previously reported to be differentially expressed in BCB− oocytes [30,57], although it should be pointed out that the previous studies analysed these genes in isolation with qRT-PCR and not as part of large data sets. Overall, the association between BCB− oocytes and the downregulation of OXPHOS-related genes are consistent with the previous observations that BCB− oocytes have lower levels of mtDNA copy number and mitochondrial activity [13,21,24,25].

3.2. Downregulation of RNA Metabolism and Meiotic and Mitotic Cell Cycle Process Genes in mtDNA Deficient Oocytes

One of the most striking differences between the transcriptome profiles for BCB+ and BCB− oocytes was the downregulation of a large subset of snoRNAs (Table 2). snoRNAs play a central role in ribosome biogenesis, guiding the sequence-specific chemical modification of pre-rRNA and its processing [41,42,60]. snoRNAs are components of ribonucleoprotein complexes and are divided into two main classes based on highly conserved sequences, namely box C/D and box H/ACA motifs. In addition, some snoRNAs of both classes are localized in Cajal bodies, known as small Cajal body-associated RNAs (scaRNA). We determined these three types of snoRNAs were downregulated in BCB− oocytes (Table 2). The main functions of canonical snoRNAs and scaRNAs are their catalysation of 2’-O-ribose methylation (box C/D) and guidance of the pseudouridylation (box H/ACA) of rRNA and small nuclear RNAs, respectively. Subsets of snoRNAs have noncanonical functions, including the regulation of splicing, mediators of oxidative stress, and regulation of chromatin structure [41,61]. In vertebrates, snoRNAs are encoded in the introns of host genes, protein coding mRNA or long noncoding RNA, and released from the host gene precursor RNAs by splicing. After the splicing and production of snoRNAs, host gene RNAs are directed to degradation via nonsense-mediated RNA decay (NMD) [62], and NMD genes were significantly affected in BCB− oocytes (REACTOME Group 3 in Table S5). Although there are known functions for snoRNAs in RNA biogenesis and metabolism, as mentioned above, the functional annotations of snoRNA genes (SNORD and SNORA) themselves were not readily available for the GO and REACTOME enrichment analysis [63,64]. Therefore, snoRNAs did not contribute to the enrichment analysis results, and no SNORD and SNORA genes were found in Tables S3–S5 (in ‘Associated Genes’ columns). Despite this, the RNA metabolic process, catabolic process, and splicing and processing were still found to be significantly enriched (Tables S4 and S5 and Figure 3B) indicating that RNA metabolism is largely affected in BCB− oocytes.
The most affected functional network in BCB− oocytes was meiotic and mitotic cell cycle processes, including chromosome segregation, spindle organization, DNA replication, centrosome duplication, and cell cycle phase transition (Figure 3A and Tables S4 and S5). After maturation in the ovary or in medium, oocyte development is arrested at the metaphase II stage prior to fertilisation [65]. Fertilisation triggers the completion of metaphase II by segregating half of the sister chromatids into the second polar body and forming a female haploid pronucleus to fuse with the male pronucleus. The zygote then assembles the first mitotic spindle for the first cell division. Genes involved in these cell cycle processes were differentially expressed in BCB− oocytes and were mostly downregulated (Tables S2 and S5). It is reasonable to assume that the lack of these critical gene transcripts in readiness for the completion of meiosis II and following the first mitotic division could cause significant developmental defects at fertilisation and during embryogenesis. These might include failed chromosomal segregation and subsequent aneuploidies that lead to embryonic arrest or spontaneous abortion [66,67]. The downregulation of RNA metabolism and processing is likely to be part of the cause of the under-representation of those critical cell cycle gene transcripts.

3.3. mtDNA Supplementation Maintains Expression of Genes Necessary for Embryogenesis

Longitudinal DEG analysis identified subsets of genes that are differentially expressed in mtDNA supplemented-derived blastocysts, developed from quiescent state oocytes (Table S7). Those genes were mostly upregulated in the supplemented blastocysts and involved in various developmental processes (Figure 4 and Table S9). These include BAK1 which functions as a pro-apoptotic regulator involved in a wide variety of cellular activities and shaping tissue and organ morphologies via apoptosis [48,68,69]. In addition, PDGFRA is a receptor kinase binding to PDGF that stimulates the growth and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, and glial cells [46,70,71]. On the other hand, deletion of PDGFRA induces embryonic lethality and causes the defective development of many endoderm- and mesoderm-derived structures [72,73]. Zinc finger protein 792 (ZNF792) is a paralogue of ZNF304, which recruits repressive cofactors and induces DNA hypermethylation and transcriptional silencing [74]. HNF4A is a nuclear transcription factor that regulates the expression of several hepatic genes for the development of the liver, kidney, and intestines. Mutations in HNF4A are associated with a monogenic form of type 2 diabetes and the loss of function in mice, causing severe hepatomegaly and steatosis and resulting in premature death [45,75]. Moreover, NRG1 is a trophic factor that contains an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain and NRG1 signalling is required for embryonic development. The loss of function of NRG1 can cause homozygous lethality and behavioural abnormalities in heterozygous mutant mice [47,76] whilst the addition of NRG1 to the oocyte in vitro maturation media results in improved embryo development [58]. These genes were activated in the supplemented blastocyst during the oocyte-to-blastocyst transition process, but not significantly upregulated in the non-supplemented blastocysts. Since mtDNA supplementation induces mtDNA replication in early embryogenesis and improves embryo quality [13], this likely enhances developmental gene expression during progression to the blastocyst stage.
Communication between the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes is important for effective cellular function. It is well-documented that ATP generated through OXPHOS requires the replication of the mitochondrial genome to have taken place [77] and that mtDNA copy is not uniform across all cell types but rather reflects the requirements of each cell type for OXPHOS-derived ATP [78]. Indeed, throughout development, there are changes in mtDNA copy that reflect the metabolic requirements of the developing embryo and foetus. For example, undifferentiated (pluripotent) cells have a requirement for low levels of OXPHOS-derived ATP [79], as is the case for tumour-initiating cells [80] whilst heart cells and neurons have high levels of the mtDNA copy number to support their complex functions [81]. A failure to mediate the interactions between the two genomes will inhibit key developmental processes, such as differentiation, and result in cellular arrest. However, the modulation of one genome can impact the other. For example, the use of DNA demethylation agents on tumour-initiating cells can result in increased differentiation potential and increased mtDNA copy number that take place in a synchronous fashion [82]. Likewise, the short-term depletion of mtDNA copy number can reset the differentiation potential of tumour-initiating cells whilst longer term depletion can inhibit tumorigenesis with both outcomes exhibiting differences in nuclear gene expression [80]. mtDNA deficiency in oocytes likely provides another example of how one genome is asynchronous with the other. Indeed, BCB− oocytes are indicative of poor developmental competence where nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation are not in synchrony. As a result, these oocytes frequently either fail to fertilise or arrest during preimplantation development [14,30], but they can be rescued through mtDNA supplementation [13]. Developmental competence can also be rescued through the addition of agents like NRG1 [58] or the glycoside mogroside V [83] to the oocyte maturation media, which impact the mtDNA copy number and enhance embryo development.

3.4. mtDNA Supplementation Might Improve Imprinted Gene Expression

Accumulated evidence suggests that assisted reproductive technologies, for example, in vitro embryo culture, in vitro fertilisation, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection affect imprinted gene methylation and expression compared to the children from spontaneous conception [84,85,86,87]. Embryos generated by in vitro fertilisation and cultured in medium can either show the bi-allelic expression of H19 or limited paternal expression [85,88]. Moreover, differential DNA methylation and expression of IGF2/H19 and IGF2R in placenta and cord blood have been reported for in vitro conceived children [89]. Furthermore, altered expression of H19 and Pleckstrin homology-like domain family A member 2 (PHLDA2) has been observed in human placentas following in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but this was not due to the loss of the pattern of imprinted gene expression [90]. Our previous study identified differentially methylated regions throughout the nuclear genome between blastocysts derived through either mtDNA supplementation or without, but they showed only minor differences in DNA methylation in imprinting control regions (ICRs) [19]. Differential DNA methylation patterns of ICRs, inherited from paternal and maternal genomes, are essential for imprinted gene expression and maintained in somatic cell lineages [55]. Although there was no difference in the level of imprinted gene expression associated with mtDNA supplementation [19], we observed a potential delay or disturbance of the establishment of the patterns of parental allele-specific imprinted gene expression in the non-supplemented blastocysts (Figure 5 and Table S10). We thought the effect of blastocyst sample variation on the imprinted gene expression pattern was minimal as DNA methylation of ICRs was already established prior to fertilisation and maintained in the blastocysts [19]. Blastocysts derived from mtDNA supplementation showed less bi-allelic expression in imprinted genes and higher levels in neighbouring non-imprinted genes, suggesting an improved establishment of parental allele-specific expression patterns. Combining mtDNA supplementation with specific embryo culture conditions [91] might be a potential approach to improve gene expression profiles so that they more closely resemble the profiles of naturally conceived embryos. However, this would require a full understanding of how the mtDNA supplementation approach enhances embryo development.
We have shown that mtDNA deficiency in Sus scrofa oocytes significantly affects the expression of genes involved in RNA metabolism and processing. Furthermore, the downregulation of genes associated with meiotic and mitotic cell cycle processes are likely to be one of the direct causes of poor oocyte quality and poor fertilisation outcome. However, further understanding of how mtDNA deficiency influences nuclear gene expression with respect to communication between the two genomes needs to be established. We also showed that the mtDNA supplementation of oocytes in combination with sperm injection improves the maintenance of developmental gene expression and patterns of parental allele-specific imprinted gene expression in blastocysts. These results further support the concept that the addition of extra copies of mtDNA has a significant impact on the overall gene expression profiles during oocyte-to-blastocyst transition and contribute to improved fertilisation and preimplantation development outcomes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Oocyte Collection and BCB Staining

Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were collected from gilt ovaries obtained from a local abattoir and cultured as previously described [19,31]. Briefly, porcine ovaries were transported to the laboratory in warm 0.9% NaCl solution. The COCs were then aspirated from follicles with diameters of between 3 and 6 mm using an 18 G needle. The COCs were then washed 3 times in handling media (25 mM Hepes–TCM199, Gibco®, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% sow follicular fluid (SFF). The COCs were incubated in 12 μM BCB in in vitro maturation (IVM) medium for selection as described in [13], and BCB+ and BCB− COCs were then washed and cultured separately for 42–44 h in pre-equilibrated IVM medium. To collect metaphase II (MII) oocytes, expanded COCs following IVM were briefly treated with 0.1% (0.5mg/mL) of hyaluronidase and gentle pipetting. The resultant denuded oocytes were washed using a narrow glass pipette to completely remove all cumulus cells (Figure 1A). Cohorts of single MII oocytes were collected and stored at −80 °C prior to RNA extraction [31].

4.2. Generation of Blastocysts by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) with (MT+) or without (MT−) mtDNA Supplementation

Expanded blastocyst stage Sus scrofa embryos were generated from in vitro matured oocytes by ICSI; and mitochondrial supplementation in combination with ICSI using third-party oocytes (heterologous) or sister oocytes (autologous) as the source of the mitochondrial isolate as previously described in [13,19]. Briefly, 15 oocytes were homogenised in mitochondrial isolation buffer (20 mM Hepes pH 7.6, 220 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA) containing 2 mg/mL BSA by a drill-fitted Teflon pestle. The homogenate was centrifuged at 800× g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove cell debris, and then, supernatants were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C to pellet the mitochondrial fraction. Following two washing steps, the mitochondrial pellet was resuspended in 5 μL of mitochondrial buffer. For ICSI with mitochondrial supplementation, 3 pl of mitochondrial isolate along with a single sperm was injected into the oocyte as described [13]. Single embryos were stored in 0.2 mL PCR tubes in a −80 °C freezer prior to RNA extraction.

4.3. RNA Extraction, RNAseq Library Preparation, and Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from single oocytes or single expanded blastocysts using the PicoPure RNA isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of total RNA was assessed using High Sensitivity RNA ScreenTape (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Next generation sequencing (NGS) libraries were prepared using Ovation® RNA-Seq system V2 and Ovation® Ultralow System V2 (NuGEN Technologies, Männedorf, Switzerland) for single MII oocytes [31] and the Trio RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit (Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland) for single blastocysts [19]. NGS libraries were sequenced using 100 bp paired-end sequencing chemistry.

4.4. RNAseq Data Analysis and Differentially Expressed Gene (DEG) Identification

Single oocyte (NCBI Sequence Read Archive IDs: SRR6451030—SRR6451058) and blastocyst (SRR16706437—SRR16706452) RNAseq data from our previous studies [19,31] were used. Oocyte (14 BCB− oocytes and 15 BCB+ oocytes) and blastocyst (5 MT− and 5 MT+) RNAseq sample metadata can be found in Table S1. RNAseq raw fastq files were quality checked with ‘fastqc’ (version 0.11.9) [92], and trimming of adapters and quality filtering were then performed with ‘fastp’ (version 0.20.1) [93] with options: --detect_adapter_for_pe, -q 20, --length_required 30. Trimmed and quality filtered paired-end reads were aligned to the Sus scrofa reference genome sequence Sscrofa11.1 accession No. GCF_000003025.6 [35] and Ensembl annotation release 105 [36] using ‘STAR’ (version 2.7) [94] with default parameters. Gene expression was quantified by counting the number of reads aligned to each Ensembl gene model using ‘featureCounts’ (version 1.5.2) [95], and output results were assessed for mapping quality by MultiQC version 1.9 [96]. Summary statistics for the RNAseq data are shown in Table S1. The Trimmed Mean of M-values (TMM) normalisation method from edgeR was applied to normalise read counts according to library size differences between samples. PCA was performed to visualise the summary of gene expression profiles for all RNAseq data. We found that the source of the ovary affected gene expression profiles identified by PCA; therefore, this was included in the linear mixed model as a covariate and batch effect was successfully corrected in the expression data.
For comparisons between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes, genes with low expression were filtered out prior to DEG analysis, keeping genes with at least 1 count per million (CPM) reads in more than eight samples. Data were analysed by using generalized linear models ‘glmfit’ and ‘glmLRT’ in edgeR version 3.32.0 [97] in R version 4.0.3 with the source of ovary as a covariate factor in the model. Genes were considered differentially expressed if their FDR (false discovery rate) or adjusted p-value was <0.05 (Table S2). Similarly for longitudinal DEG analysis, DEG analysis was carried out on RNAseq data from BCB+ oocytes and blastocysts generated with (MT+) or without (MT−) mtDNA supplementation, independently (Figure 1B). Then, two subsets of DEGs were compared to identify unique DEGs for the transition from oocyte to either MT− or MT+ blastocysts. In this analysis, genes with low expression were filtered out prior to DEG analysis, keeping genes with at least 1 count per million (CPM) reads in more than four samples. DEGs between BCB+ oocyte and MT− or MT+ blastocysts were identified using the limma-voom method (version 3.46.0) [98,99] to maintain consistency with the analysis tool used in a previous report [19]. An FDR threshold < 0.1 was used for significant DEGs between BCB+ oocytes and blastocysts with or without mtDNA supplementation and compared two subsets of DEGs for the efficient elimination of common DEGs. A Venn diagram was generated to show common and unique subsets of DEGs for each comparison (Figure 4A), and high confidence (FDR < 0.01) unique DEGs are listed in Tables S6 and S7. Results were visualized with jittered-boxplot, using ggplot2 [100].

4.5. Functional Pathway Enrichment and Gene Network Analysis

Functional pathway enrichment analyses for DEGs were performed using the GSEA v4.2.3 [64] and Enrichment Map [101] as described in [102]. Briefly, Sus scrofa Ensembl gene IDs were used to search for corresponding human orthologue gene symbols using the Ensembl BioMart database [103] and used for pathway enrichment analysis input. Annotation gene set file, Human_GO_AllPathways_with_GO_iea_May_25_2022_symbol.gmt from Bader lab gene sets collections (http://download.baderlab.org/EM_Genesets/current_release/, accessed on 8 February 2023), was used for GSEA analysis with a default FDR threshold of 0.25 (Table S3). The enrichment analysis results for GO biological process [104] and REACTOME pathway [105] were then visualized with the Enrichment Map app in Cytoscape [106]. We also used ClueGO [63] for pathway enrichment analysis with subsets of DEGs (Tables S4, S5, S8 and S9). For protein–protein interaction network analysis, the STRING [107] app in Cytoscape was used.

4.6. Bi-Allelic Expression Analysis of Genes in Imprinting Loci

Imprinted genes and neighbouring genes at the locus were analysed for the level of bi-allelic expression by identifying single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the mtDNA supplemented (MT+) and non-supplemented (MT−) blastocyst transcripts. Sus scrofa imprinted genes (https://www.geneimprint.com/site/genes-by-species.Sus+scrofa, accessed on 8 February 2023) with sufficient read depth were selected for analysis. We set a total of 5000 reads or more per imprinted gene transcript from ten blastocyst RNAseq data sets (MT−: n = 5 and MT+: n = 5) as a threshold to obtain sufficient read counts for SNP identification (Table S10). We analysed 10 imprinted genes and 73 non-imprinted neighbouring genes at six imprinting loci across four chromosomes. Imprinted genes and loci selected for investigation were: Chr1: IGF2R and NDN loci, Chr6: OSBPL1A and DIRAS3 loci (including SGIP1), Chr9: PEG10 locus (including CASD1, PPP1R9A), Chr14: INPP5F locus (including TACC2).
SNPs were identified and counted using ‘samtools mpileup’ for mapped reads pileup [108] and ‘VarScan’ version 2.3.8 [109] for variant sequence search. Imprinted gene locus sequences, including 2Mb upstream and downstream sequences of the Sus scrofa reference genome sequence Sscrofa11.1 accession No. GCF_000003025.6, were used for read pileup. Variant call by VarScan was made with the options: --min-avg-qual 20 –min-var-freq 0.01 –min-reads2 10, and the results were further filtered by keeping variant calls if there were >25 read counts per site and variant frequency was between 20–80%. Furthermore, if there were more than three SNPs per transcript, they were kept for further analysis as confident SNPs indicating bi-allelic expression status. SNPs less than three per transcript were discarded as they might be associated with technical issues, such as PCR and sequencing errors. SNP frequency was calculated by number of SNP counts per kb of transcript and mean variant frequency was also calculated (Table S10). ANOVA test was carried out to see statistical significance associated with blastocyst type (MT− and MT+) and imprinting status by including sex of blastocyst, date of sampling, and date of RNAseq library construction as covariate factors. Sex of each blastocyst was determined by assessing read counts of selected chromosome X- and Y-linked genes [110].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24043783/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.S.J.; Data curation, T.O.; Formal analysis, T.O.; Funding acquisition, J.C.S.J.; Investigation, T.O. and S.M.; Project administration, J.C.S.J.; Supervision, J.C.S.J.; Writing—original draft, T.O. and J.C.S.J.; Writing—review & editing, T.O., S.M. and J.C.S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by The National Health and Medical Research Council grants GNT1136065, GNT1160106 and GNT2000723.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental procedures were approved by The University of Adelaide Animal Ethics Committee (Approval number 32293).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra, accessed on 8 February 2023) under the two BioProject IDs PRJNA429045 and PRJNA777282.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported with supercomputing resources provided by the Phoenix HPC service at the University of Adelaide.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ursing, B.M.; Arnason, U. The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the pig (Sus scrofa). J. Mol. Evol. 1998, 47, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kucej, M.; Butow, R.A. Evolutionary tinkering with mitochondrial nucleoids. Trends Cell Biol. 2007, 17, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Giles, R.E.; Blanc, H.; Cann, H.M.; Wallace, D.C. Maternal inheritance of human mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 6715–6719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. May-Panloup, P.; Chretien, M.F.; Jacques, C.; Vasseur, C.; Malthiery, Y.; Reynier, P. Low oocyte mitochondrial DNA content in ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Reynier, P.; May-Panloup, P.; Chretien, M.F.; Morgan, C.J.; Jean, M.; Savagner, F.; Barriere, P.; Malthiery, Y. Mitochondrial DNA content affects the fertilizability of human oocytes. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2001, 7, 7425–7429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tarazona, A.M.; Rodriguez, J.I.; Restrepo, L.F.; Olivera-Angel, M. Mitochondrial activity, distribution and segregation in bovine oocytes and in embryos produced in vitro. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2006, 41, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Van Blerkom, J.; Davis, P.W.; Lee, J. ATP content of human oocytes and developmental potential and outcome after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 1995, 10, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Santos, T.A.; El Shourbagy, S.; St John, J.C. Mitochondrial content reflects oocyte variability and fertilization outcome. Fertil. Steril. 2006, 85, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barthelemy, C.; Ogier de Baulny, H.; Diaz, J.; Cheval, M.A.; Frachon, P.; Romero, N.; Goutieres, F.; Fardeau, M.; Lombes, A. Late-onset mitochondrial DNA depletion: DNA copy number, multiple deletions, and compensation. Ann. Neurol. 2001, 49, 607–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Magda, D.; Lecane, P.; Prescott, J.; Thiemann, P.; Ma, X.; Dranchak, P.K.; Toleno, D.M.; Ramaswamy, K.; Siegmund, K.D.; Hacia, J.G. mtDNA depletion confers specific gene expression profiles in human cells grown in culture and in xenograft. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Acton, B.M.; Lai, I.; Shang, X.; Jurisicova, A.; Casper, R.F. Neutral mitochondrial heteroplasmy alters physiological function in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 77, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cohen, J.; Scott, R.; Schimmel, T.; Levron, J.; Willadsen, S. Birth of infant after transfer of anucleate donor oocyte cytoplasm into recipient eggs. Lancet 1997, 350, 186–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cagnone, G.L.; Tsai, T.S.; Makanji, Y.; Matthews, P.; Gould, J.; Bonkowski, M.S.; Elgass, K.D.; Wong, A.S.; Wu, L.E.; McKenzie, M.; et al. Restoration of normal embryogenesis by mitochondrial supplementation in pig oocytes exhibiting mitochondrial DNA deficiency. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. El Shourbagy, S.H.; Spikings, E.C.; Freitas, M.; St John, J.C. Mitochondria directly influence fertilisation outcome in the pig. Reproduction 2006, 131, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fakih, M.; El Shmoury, M.; Szeptycki, J.; dela Cruz, D.B.; Lux, C.; Verjee, S.; Burgess, C.M.; Cohn, G.M.; Casper, R.F. The AUGMENT treatment: Physician reported outcomes of the initial global patient experience. JFIV Reprod. Med. Genet. 2015, 3, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tzeng, C.R.; Hsieh, R.H.; Au, H.K.; Yen, Y.H.; Chang, S.J.; Cheng, Y.F. Mitochondria transfer (MIT) into oocyte from autologous cumulus granulosa cells (cGCs). Fertil. Steril. 2004, 82, S53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mobarak, H.; Heidarpour, M.; Tsai, P.J.; Rezabakhsh, A.; Rahbarghazi, R.; Nouri, M.; Mahdipour, M. Autologous mitochondrial microinjection; a strategy to improve the oocyte quality and subsequent reproductive outcome during aging. Cell Biosci. 2019, 9, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. St John, J.C.; Okada, T.; Andreas, E.; Penn, A. The role of mtDNA in oocyte quality and embryo development. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Okada, T.; McIlfatrick, S.; Hin, N.; Aryamanesh, N.; Breen, J.; St John, J.C. Mitochondrial supplementation of Sus scrofa metaphase II oocytes alters DNA methylation and gene expression profiles of blastocysts. Epigenet. Chromatin 2022, 15, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tsai, T.S.; St John, J.C. The effects of mitochondrial DNA supplementation at the time of fertilization on the gene expression profiles of porcine preimplantation embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2018, 85, 490–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alm, H.; Torner, H.; Lohrke, B.; Viergutz, T.; Ghoneim, I.M.; Kanitz, W. Bovine blastocyst development rate in vitro is influenced by selection of oocytes by brillant cresyl blue staining before IVM as indicator for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 2194–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ericsson, S.A.; Boice, M.L.; Funahashi, H.; Day, B.N. Assessment of porcine oocytes using brilliant cresyl blue. Theriogenology 1993, 39, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Torner, H.; Ghanem, N.; Ambros, C.; Holker, M.; Tomek, W.; Phatsara, C.; Alm, H.; Sirard, M.A.; Kanitz, W.; Schellander, K.; et al. Molecular and subcellular characterisation of oocytes screened for their developmental competence based on glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. Reproduction 2008, 135, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Catala, M.G.; Izquierdo, D.; Uzbekova, S.; Morato, R.; Roura, M.; Romaguera, R.; Papillier, P.; Paramio, M.T. Brilliant Cresyl Blue stain selects largest oocytes with highest mitochondrial activity, maturation-promoting factor activity and embryo developmental competence in prepubertal sheep. Reproduction 2011, 142, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Opiela, J.; Katska-Ksiazkiewicz, L. The utility of Brilliant Cresyl Blue (BCB) staining of mammalian oocytes used for in vitro embryo production (IVP). Reprod. Biol. 2013, 13, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pawlak, P.; Warzych, E.; Chabowska, A.; Lechniak, D. Differences in cytoplasmic maturation between the BCB+ and control porcine oocytes do not justify application of the BCB test for a standard IVM protocol. J. Reprod. Dev. 2014, 60, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Watson, A.J. Oocyte cytoplasmic maturation: A key mediator of oocyte and embryo developmental competence. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, E1–E3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wongsrikeao, P.; Otoi, T.; Yamasaki, H.; Agung, B.; Taniguchi, M.; Naoi, H.; Shimizu, R.; Nagai, T. Effects of single and double exposure to brilliant cresyl blue on the selection of porcine oocytes for in vitro production of embryos. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eppig, J.J. Coordination of nuclear and cytoplasmic oocyte maturation in eutherian mammals. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 1996, 8, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Spikings, E.C.; Alderson, J.; St John, J.C. Regulated mitochondrial DNA replication during oocyte maturation is essential for successful porcine embryonic development. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 76, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tsai, T.S.; Tyagi, S.; St John, J.C. The molecular characterisation of mitochondrial DNA deficient oocytes using a pig model. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 942–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Groenen, M.A.; Archibald, A.L.; Uenishi, H.; Tuggle, C.K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Rothschild, M.F.; Rogel-Gaillard, C.; Park, C.; Milan, D.; Megens, H.J.; et al. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature 2012, 491, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, X.M.; Wang, Y.K.; Liu, Y.H.; Yu, X.X.; Wang, P.C.; Li, X.; Du, Z.Q.; Yang, C.X. Single-cell transcriptome sequencing reveals that cell division cycle 5-like protein is essential for porcine oocyte maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 1767–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Walker, B.N.; Nix, J.; Wilson, C.; Marrella, M.A.; Speckhart, S.L.; Wooldridge, L.; Yen, C.N.; Bodmer, J.S.; Kirkpatrick, L.T.; Moorey, S.E.; et al. Tight gene co-expression in BCB positive cattle oocytes and their surrounding cumulus cells. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2022, 20, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Warr, A.; Affara, N.; Aken, B.; Beiki, H.; Bickhart, D.M.; Billis, K.; Chow, W.; Eory, L.; Finlayson, H.A.; Flicek, P.; et al. An improved pig reference genome sequence to enable pig genetics and genomics research. Gigascience 2020, 9, giaa051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ensembl Index of /Pub/Release-105/Fasta/Sus_Scrofa/Dna. Available online: http://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-105/fasta/sus_scrofa/dna/ (accessed on 5 December 2022).
  37. Bouquet, J.; Soloski, M.J.; Swei, A.; Cheadle, C.; Federman, S.; Billaud, J.N.; Rebman, A.W.; Kabre, B.; Halpert, R.; Boorgula, M.; et al. Longitudinal transcriptome analysis reveals a sustained differential gene expression signature in patients treated for acute lyme disease. mBio 2016, 7, e00100-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yu, L.; Wei, M.; Li, F. Longitudinal analysis of gene expression changes during cervical carcinogenesis reveals potential therapeutic targets. Evol. Bioinform. Online 2020, 16, 1176934320920574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gu, C.; Liu, S.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Guo, F. Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptome, DNA methylome and chromatin accessibility in mouse oocytes. Cell Res. 2019, 29, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, F.; Li, L.; Li, J.; Wu, X.; Hu, B.; Zhu, P.; Wen, L.; Tang, F. Single-cell multi-omics sequencing of mouse early embryos and embryonic stem cells. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 967–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dupuis-Sandoval, F.; Poirier, M.; Scott, M.S. The emerging landscape of small nucleolar RNAs in cell biology. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2015, 6, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kufel, J.; Grzechnik, P. Small nucleolar RNAs tell a different tale. Trends Genet. 2019, 35, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Evsikov, A.V.; Graber, J.H.; Brockman, J.M.; Hampl, A.; Holbrook, A.E.; Singh, P.; Eppig, J.J.; Solter, D.; Knowles, B.B. Cracking the egg: Molecular dynamics and evolutionary aspects of the transition from the fully grown oocyte to embryo. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 2713–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Svoboda, P.; Franke, V.; Schultz, R.M. Sculpting the transcriptome during the oocyte-to-embryo transition in mouse. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2015, 113, 305–349. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen, W.S.; Manova, K.; Weinstein, D.C.; Duncan, S.A.; Plump, A.S.; Prezioso, V.R.; Bachvarova, R.F.; Darnell, J.E., Jr. Disruption of the HNF-4 gene, expressed in visceral endoderm, leads to cell death in embryonic ectoderm and impaired gastrulation of mouse embryos. Genes Dev. 1994, 8, 2466–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Matsui, T.; Heidaran, M.; Miki, T.; Popescu, N.; La Rochelle, W.; Kraus, M.; Pierce, J.; Aaronson, S. Isolation of a novel receptor cDNA establishes the existence of two PDGF receptor genes. Science 1989, 243, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mei, L.; Xiong, W.C. Neuregulin 1 in neural development, synaptic plasticity and schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9, 437–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Singh, R.; Letai, A.; Sarosiek, K. Regulation of apoptosis in health and disease: The balancing act of BCL-2 family proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 175–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Babak, T.; Deveale, B.; Armour, C.; Raymond, C.; Cleary, M.A.; van der Kooy, D.; Johnson, J.M.; Lim, L.P. Global survey of genomic imprinting by transcriptome sequencing. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, 1735–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kruglyak, L.; Nickerson, D.A. Variation is the spice of life. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27, 234–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stephens, J.C.; Schneider, J.A.; Tanguay, D.A.; Choi, J.; Acharya, T.; Stanley, S.E.; Jiang, R.; Messer, C.J.; Chew, A.; Han, J.H.; et al. Haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in 313 human genes. Science 2001, 293, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nelson, M.R.; Marnellos, G.; Kammerer, S.; Hoyal, C.R.; Shi, M.M.; Cantor, C.R.; Braun, A. Large-scale validation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in gene regions. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1664–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Ramos, A.M.; Crooijmans, R.P.; Affara, N.A.; Amaral, A.J.; Archibald, A.L.; Beever, J.E.; Bendixen, C.; Churcher, C.; Clark, R.; Dehais, P.; et al. Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Delaval, K.; Feil, R. Epigenetic regulation of mammalian genomic imprinting. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2004, 14, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Marcho, C.; Bevilacqua, A.; Tremblay, K.D.; Mager, J. Tissue-specific regulation of Igf2r/Airn imprinting during gastrulation. Epigenet. Chromatin 2015, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wutz, A.; Smrzka, O.W.; Schweifer, N.; Schellander, K.; Wagner, E.F.; Barlow, D.P. Imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island. Nature 1997, 389, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Opiela, J.; Lipinski, D.; Slomski, R.; Katska-Ksiazkiewicz, L. Transcript expression of mitochondria related genes is correlated with bovine oocyte selection by BCB test. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2010, 118, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mao, J.; Whitworth, K.M.; Spate, L.D.; Walters, E.M.; Zhao, J.; Prather, R.S. Regulation of oocyte mitochondrial DNA copy number by follicular fluid, EGF, and neuregulin 1 during in vitro maturation affects embryo development in pigs. Theriogenology 2012, 78, 887–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wai, T.; Ao, A.; Zhang, X.; Cyr, D.; Dufort, D.; Shoubridge, E.A. The role of mitochondrial DNA copy number in mammalian fertility. Biol. Reprod. 2010, 83, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jorjani, H.; Kehr, S.; Jedlinski, D.J.; Gumienny, R.; Hertel, J.; Stadler, P.F.; Zavolan, M.; Gruber, A.R. An updated human snoRNAome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 5068–5082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wajahat, M.; Bracken, C.P.; Orang, A. Emerging Functions for snoRNAs and snoRNA-Derived Fragments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lykke-Andersen, S.; Chen, Y.; Ardal, B.R.; Lilje, B.; Waage, J.; Sandelin, A.; Jensen, T.H. Human nonsense-mediated RNA decay initiates widely by endonucleolysis and targets snoRNA host genes. Genes Dev. 2014, 28, 2498–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Bindea, G.; Mlecnik, B.; Hackl, H.; Charoentong, P.; Tosolini, M.; Kirilovsky, A.; Fridman, W.H.; Pages, F.; Trajanoski, Z.; Galon, J. ClueGO: A Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1091–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Subramanian, A.; Tamayo, P.; Mootha, V.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Ebert, B.L.; Gillette, M.A.; Paulovich, A.; Pomeroy, S.L.; Golub, T.R.; Lander, E.S.; et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 15545–15550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mogessie, B.; Scheffler, K.; Schuh, M. Assembly and positioning of the oocyte meiotic spindle. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 34, 381–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Vazquez-Diez, C.; FitzHarris, G. Causes and consequences of chromosome segregation error in preimplantation embryos. Reproduction 2018, 155, R63–R76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Webster, A.; Schuh, M. Mechanisms of aneuploidy in human eggs. Trends Cell Biol. 2017, 27, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ke, F.F.S.; Vanyai, H.K.; Cowan, A.D.; Delbridge, A.R.D.; Whitehead, L.; Grabow, S.; Czabotar, P.E.; Voss, A.K.; Strasser, A. Embryogenesis and adult life in the absence of intrinsic apoptosis effectors BAX, BAK, and BOK. Cell 2018, 173, 1217–1230.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Knudson, C.M.; Tung, K.S.; Tourtellotte, W.G.; Brown, G.A.; Korsmeyer, S.J. Bax-deficient mice with lymphoid hyperplasia and male germ cell death. Science 1995, 270, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Heidaran, M.A.; Pierce, J.H.; Yu, J.C.; Lombardi, D.; Artrip, J.E.; Fleming, T.P.; Thomason, A.; Aaronson, S.A. Role of alpha beta receptor heterodimer formation in beta platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor activation by PDGF-AB. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 20232–20237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Qian, C.; Wong, C.W.Y.; Wu, Z.; He, Q.; Xia, H.; Tam, P.K.H.; Wong, K.K.Y.; Lui, V.C.H. Stage specific requirement of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha in embryonic development. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hoch, R.V.; Soriano, P. Roles of PDGF in animal development. Development 2003, 130, 4769–4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Soriano, P. The PDGF alpha receptor is required for neural crest cell development and for normal patterning of the somites. Development 1997, 124, 2691–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Serra, R.W.; Fang, M.; Park, S.M.; Hutchinson, L.; Green, M.R. A KRAS-directed transcriptional silencing pathway that mediates the CpG island methylator phenotype. eLife 2014, 3, e02313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yamagata, K.; Furuta, H.; Oda, N.; Kaisaki, P.J.; Menzel, S.; Cox, N.J.; Fajans, S.S.; Signorini, S.; Stoffel, M.; Bell, G.I. Mutations in the hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha gene in maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY1). Nature 1996, 384, 458–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bjarnadottir, M.; Misner, D.L.; Haverfield-Gross, S.; Bruun, S.; Helgason, V.G.; Stefansson, H.; Sigmundsson, A.; Firth, D.R.; Nielsen, B.; Stefansdottir, R.; et al. Neuregulin1 (NRG1) signaling through Fyn modulates NMDA receptor phosphorylation: Differential synaptic function in NRG1+/− knock-outs compared with wild-type mice. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 4519–4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Trounce, I. Genetic control of oxidative phosphorylation and experimental models of defects. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 15 (Suppl. S2), 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Cagnone, G.; Tsai, T.S.; Srirattana, K.; Rossello, F.; Powell, D.R.; Rohrer, G.; Cree, L.; Trounce, I.A.; St John, J.C. Segregation of naturally occurring mitochondrial DNA variants in a mini-pig model. Genetics 2016, 202, 931–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kelly, R.D.; Mahmud, A.; McKenzie, M.; Trounce, I.A.; St John, J.C. Mitochondrial DNA copy number is regulated in a tissue specific manner by DNA methylation of the nuclear-encoded DNA polymerase gamma A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 10124–10138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dickinson, A.; Yeung, K.Y.; Donoghue, J.; Baker, M.J.; Kelly, R.D.; McKenzie, M.; Johns, T.G.; St John, J.C. The regulation of mitochondrial DNA copy number in glioblastoma cells. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 1644–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Miller, F.J.; Rosenfeldt, F.L.; Zhang, C.; Linnane, A.W.; Nagley, P. Precise determination of mitochondrial DNA copy number in human skeletal and cardiac muscle by a PCR-based assay: Lack of change of copy number with age. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, e61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sun, X.; Johnson, J.; St John, J.C. Global DNA methylation synergistically regulates the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes in glioblastoma cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 5977–5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Nie, J.; Yan, K.; Sui, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, X.; Lu, S.; Lu, K.; Liang, X. Mogroside V improves porcine oocyte in vitro maturation and subsequent embryonic development. Theriogenology 2020, 141, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Choux, C.; Binquet, C.; Carmignac, V.; Bruno, C.; Chapusot, C.; Barberet, J.; Lamotte, M.; Sagot, P.; Bourc'his, D.; Fauque, P. The epigenetic control of transposable elements and imprinted genes in newborns is affected by the mode of conception: ART versus spontaneous conception without underlying infertility. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Doherty, A.S.; Mann, M.R.; Tremblay, K.D.; Bartolomei, M.S.; Schultz, R.M. Differential effects of culture on imprinted H19 expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gardner, D.K.; Lane, M. Ex vivo early embryo development and effects on gene expression and imprinting. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2005, 17, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Katari, S.; Turan, N.; Bibikova, M.; Erinle, O.; Chalian, R.; Foster, M.; Gaughan, J.P.; Coutifaris, C.; Sapienza, C. DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro or in vivo. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 3769–3778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sasaki, H.; Ferguson-Smith, A.C.; Shum, A.S.; Barton, S.C.; Surani, M.A. Temporal and spatial regulation of H19 imprinting in normal and uniparental mouse embryos. Development 1995, 121, 4195–4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Turan, N.; Katari, S.; Gerson, L.F.; Chalian, R.; Foster, M.W.; Gaughan, J.P.; Coutifaris, C.; Sapienza, C. Inter- and intra-individual variation in allele-specific DNA methylation and gene expression in children conceived using assisted reproductive technology. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Nelissen, E.C.; Dumoulin, J.C.; Busato, F.; Ponger, L.; Eijssen, L.M.; Evers, J.L.; Tost, J.; van Montfoort, A.P. Altered gene expression in human placentas after IVF/ICSI. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 2821–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Canovas, S.; Ivanova, E.; Romar, R.; Garcia-Martinez, S.; Soriano-Ubeda, C.; Garcia-Vazquez, F.A.; Saadeh, H.; Andrews, S.; Kelsey, G.; Coy, P. DNA methylation and gene expression changes derived from assisted reproductive technologies can be decreased by reproductive fluids. eLife 2017, 6, e23670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Andrews, S. Babraham Bioinformatics: FastQC. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 5 December 2022).
  93. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ewels, P.; Magnusson, M.; Lundin, S.; Kaller, M. MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 3047–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Law, C.W.; Chen, Y.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  101. Merico, D.; Isserlin, R.; Stueker, O.; Emili, A.; Bader, G.D. Enrichment map: A network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Reimand, J.; Isserlin, R.; Voisin, V.; Kucera, M.; Tannus-Lopes, C.; Rostamianfar, A.; Wadi, L.; Meyer, M.; Wong, J.; Xu, C.; et al. Pathway enrichment analysis and visualization of omics data using g:Profiler, GSEA, Cytoscape and EnrichmentMap. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 482–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Herrero, J. Ensembl Blog: How to Get All the Orthologous Genes between Two Species. Available online: https://www.ensembl.info/2009/01/21/how-to-get-all-the-orthologous-genes-between-two-species/ (accessed on 5 December 2022).
  104. Gene Ontology, C. The Gene Ontology resource: Enriching a GOld mine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D325–D334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gillespie, M.; Jassal, B.; Stephan, R.; Milacic, M.; Rothfels, K.; Senff-Ribeiro, A.; Griss, J.; Sevilla, C.; Matthews, L.; Gong, C.; et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Res 2022, 50, D687–D692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Lyon, D.; Junge, A.; Wyder, S.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Doncheva, N.T.; Morris, J.H.; Bork, P.; et al. STRING v11: Protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D607–D613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R.; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Koboldt, D.C.; Zhang, Q.; Larson, D.E.; Shen, D.; McLellan, M.D.; Lin, L.; Miller, C.A.; Mardis, E.R.; Ding, L.; Wilson, R.K. VarScan 2: Somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gershoni, M.; Pietrokovski, S. The landscape of sex-differential transcriptome and its consequent selection in human adults. BMC Biol. 2017, 15, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 24 03783 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the materials used for RNAseq and data analysis. (A) Brilliant Cresyl Blue (BCB) labelling of cumulus-oocyte-complexes to assess cytoplasmic maturity of oocytes. After labelling of oocytes, BCB+ and BCB− oocytes were washed and cultured separately. Denuded metaphase II oocytes were pooled and used for RNAseq. (B) Schematic representation of the mtDNA supplementation procedure, i.e., fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with (MT+) or without (MT−) extra copies of mtDNA. RNAseq data from BCB+ oocytes and individual blastocysts generated with or without mtDNA supplementation were used to perform longitudinal differential gene expression (DEG) analysis by comparing the transition from oocyte to either MT− or MT+ blastocysts. Details of the procedure to undertake the analysis are found in the Materials and Methods.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the materials used for RNAseq and data analysis. (A) Brilliant Cresyl Blue (BCB) labelling of cumulus-oocyte-complexes to assess cytoplasmic maturity of oocytes. After labelling of oocytes, BCB+ and BCB− oocytes were washed and cultured separately. Denuded metaphase II oocytes were pooled and used for RNAseq. (B) Schematic representation of the mtDNA supplementation procedure, i.e., fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with (MT+) or without (MT−) extra copies of mtDNA. RNAseq data from BCB+ oocytes and individual blastocysts generated with or without mtDNA supplementation were used to perform longitudinal differential gene expression (DEG) analysis by comparing the transition from oocyte to either MT− or MT+ blastocysts. Details of the procedure to undertake the analysis are found in the Materials and Methods.
Ijms 24 03783 g001
Ijms 24 03783 g002 550
Figure 2. The expression of the mtDNA encoded and OXPHOS related genes in Sus scrofa oocytes. (A) mtDNA encoded genes and RNAs were differentially expressed between BCB+ and BCB− at significance (FDR < 0.05) and presented by jittered-boxplot. The results of individual transcripts are presented by positional order in the mitochondrial genome from top left to bottom right. Levels of expression were plotted on the y-axis as log2CPM value. (B) Potential protein interactions of identified DEGs involved in OXPHOS electron transport chain complexes III and IV and ATP synthase. The entire OXPHOS related protein interaction network is shown in Figure S2. Levels of differential gene expression between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes are shown as fold change by colour scale. Red and blue represent up- and down-regulation in BCB− oocytes. Genes in grey box have no DEG data due to low or no expression.
Figure 2. The expression of the mtDNA encoded and OXPHOS related genes in Sus scrofa oocytes. (A) mtDNA encoded genes and RNAs were differentially expressed between BCB+ and BCB− at significance (FDR < 0.05) and presented by jittered-boxplot. The results of individual transcripts are presented by positional order in the mitochondrial genome from top left to bottom right. Levels of expression were plotted on the y-axis as log2CPM value. (B) Potential protein interactions of identified DEGs involved in OXPHOS electron transport chain complexes III and IV and ATP synthase. The entire OXPHOS related protein interaction network is shown in Figure S2. Levels of differential gene expression between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes are shown as fold change by colour scale. Red and blue represent up- and down-regulation in BCB− oocytes. Genes in grey box have no DEG data due to low or no expression.
Ijms 24 03783 g002
Ijms 24 03783 g003 550
Figure 3. Functional pathway and gene network for DEGs between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes. (A) Enrichment of genes associated with meiosis and mitosis related functional pathways in GO biological process, identified by ClueGO. (B) Enrichment of genes associated with mRNA metabolism and intracellular transport related functional pathways. GO biological process terms in the same group are coloured and presented with their representative group names. The number associated with each group name corresponds to the GO group number in Table S4.
Figure 3. Functional pathway and gene network for DEGs between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes. (A) Enrichment of genes associated with meiosis and mitosis related functional pathways in GO biological process, identified by ClueGO. (B) Enrichment of genes associated with mRNA metabolism and intracellular transport related functional pathways. GO biological process terms in the same group are coloured and presented with their representative group names. The number associated with each group name corresponds to the GO group number in Table S4.
Ijms 24 03783 g003
Ijms 24 03783 g004 550
Figure 4. Functional pathways enriched in the DEGs were only found in oocyte to MT supplemented blastocyst transition, identified by longitudinal analysis. (A) Venn diagram representing common and unique DEGs from the two oocyte-blastocyst transition processes shown in Figure 1B. Numbers indicated in red are highly significant DEGs with FDR < 0.01 within unique DEGs from one of the transition processes. (B) Network associated with differentiation and development to blastocyst. (C) Network associated with gland and pancreas development. GO biological process and REACTOME terms in the same group are coloured and presented with their representative group name. The number for each group name corresponds to the GO and REACTOME group number in Table S9.
Figure 4. Functional pathways enriched in the DEGs were only found in oocyte to MT supplemented blastocyst transition, identified by longitudinal analysis. (A) Venn diagram representing common and unique DEGs from the two oocyte-blastocyst transition processes shown in Figure 1B. Numbers indicated in red are highly significant DEGs with FDR < 0.01 within unique DEGs from one of the transition processes. (B) Network associated with differentiation and development to blastocyst. (C) Network associated with gland and pancreas development. GO biological process and REACTOME terms in the same group are coloured and presented with their representative group name. The number for each group name corresponds to the GO and REACTOME group number in Table S9.
Ijms 24 03783 g004
Ijms 24 03783 g005 550
Figure 5. Bi-allelic expression of genes on imprinted loci from blastocysts with (MT+) or without (MT−) mtDNA supplementation. (A) Schematic representation of the IGF2R imprinting locus showing levels of bi-allelic transcripts. Boxes represent imprinted (red) and non-imprinted (black) genes on the locus. Identified SNP number/frequency of variants (%) in representative blastocyst RNAseq data are shown above (imprinted gene, red) or below (sum of non-imprinted genes, black) the boxes. Transcript size of IGF2R and sum of transcript size for non-imprinted genes at the locus are also presented. (B) Level of variant frequency of SNPs in imprinted and non-imprinted genes is shown by jittered-boxplot for MT− and MT+ blastocyst RNAseq. (C) Identified SNP frequency normalized by size of transcript (per kb) in imprinted and non-imprinted genes as shown in (B). Significant difference (**, p < 0.05) identified by ANOVA and Tukey test is indicated by asterisks.
Figure 5. Bi-allelic expression of genes on imprinted loci from blastocysts with (MT+) or without (MT−) mtDNA supplementation. (A) Schematic representation of the IGF2R imprinting locus showing levels of bi-allelic transcripts. Boxes represent imprinted (red) and non-imprinted (black) genes on the locus. Identified SNP number/frequency of variants (%) in representative blastocyst RNAseq data are shown above (imprinted gene, red) or below (sum of non-imprinted genes, black) the boxes. Transcript size of IGF2R and sum of transcript size for non-imprinted genes at the locus are also presented. (B) Level of variant frequency of SNPs in imprinted and non-imprinted genes is shown by jittered-boxplot for MT− and MT+ blastocyst RNAseq. (C) Identified SNP frequency normalized by size of transcript (per kb) in imprinted and non-imprinted genes as shown in (B). Significant difference (**, p < 0.05) identified by ANOVA and Tukey test is indicated by asterisks.
Ijms 24 03783 g005
Table
Table 1. Differentially expressed genes between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes. Top 30 genes are short listed from Table S2.
Table 1. Differentially expressed genes between BCB+ and BCB− oocytes. Top 30 genes are short listed from Table S2.
gene_id aSymbol bDescriptionChr/Scaffold cgene_biotype dlogFC elogCPM fFDR g
ENSSSCG00000018196SNORD57Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 57 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:10207]17snoRNA−1.6073.1308.85 × 10−9
ENSSSCG00000018086ND4LNADH dehydrogenase subunit 4L [Source:NCBI gene (formerly Entrezgene);Acc:808509]MTprotein_coding−1.0569.1732.91 × 10−6
ENSSSCG00000018076tRNA-Serproduct=tRNA-SerMTMt_tRNA−0.9286.8115.00 × 10−6
ENSSSCG00000018715Y_RNAY RNA [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00019]9Y_RNA−1.6814.7417.51 × 10−6
ENSSSCG00000035954ATAD5ATPase family AAA domain containing 5 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:85601]12protein_coding−0.4908.0501.13 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000027476 Novel gene17snoRNA−1.7473.1811.51 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000019375Y_RNAY RNA [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00019]9Y_RNA−1.9585.4461.63 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000018080ATP8mitochondrially encoded ATP synthase membrane subunit 8 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:99789]MTprotein_coding−1.2526.5761.63 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000038361 Novel gene4scaRNA−1.4003.8343.28 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000007427ZSWIM3zinc finger SWIM-type containing 3 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:95761]17protein_coding0.3928.2183.37 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000018864SNORD89Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 89 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32750]3snoRNA−1.0264.7293.37 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000001075DEKDEK proto-oncogene [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:2768]7protein_coding−0.4128.2867.78 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000018402 Novel gene6snoRNA−1.2544.8427.78 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000018672U5U5 spliceosomal RNA [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00020]1snRNA−1.5484.4377.78 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000022137 Novel gene6snoRNA−1.4452.8718.33 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000019644 Novel gene9snoRNA−1.4022.8648.33 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000014075NSA2NSA2 ribosome biosis factor [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:100315]2protein_coding−0.5717.3358.33 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000000782C12orf40chromosome 12 open reading frame 40 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:26846]5protein_coding−0.4597.2858.49 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000016488SSBP1single stranded DNA binding protein 1 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:93479]18protein_coding−0.6165.0671.03 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000022479UBR5ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 5 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:94671]4protein_coding0.3567.5851.55 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000032111RPL7ribosomal protein L7 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:98850]4protein_coding−0.4126.8881.70 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000000863SYCP3synaptonemal complex protein 3 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:18130]5protein_coding−0.4845.8531.70 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000013249CKAP5cytoskeleton associated protein 5 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:86717]2protein_coding0.5097.4811.79 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000040136 NULL12snoRNA−1.7451.5122.23 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000030175SNORD8Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 8 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:20159]7snoRNA−1.1175.1602.27 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000005201UHRF2ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domains 2 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:94692]1protein_coding0.43710.4622.27 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000025540SNORD33Small nucleolar RNA Z195/SNORD33/SNORD32 family [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00133]6snoRNA−1.1473.1882.67 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000003820USP1ubiquitin specific peptidase 1 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:94742]6protein_coding−0.3848.6923.01 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000018456SNORD49ASmall nucleolar RNA, C/D box 49A [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:10189]12snoRNA−1.3483.0243.01 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000022145RPF1ribosome production factor 1 homolog [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:92421]6protein_coding−0.4275.9883.09 × 10−4
a, Ensembl (https://m.ensembl.org/index.html, accessed on 8 February 2023) gene ID. b, Gene symbol. c, Chromosome or scaffold number where gene is located. d, A gene or transcript classification. Mt_tRNA, mitochondrial genome encoded tRNA; protein_coding, protein coding genes; snoRNA, small nucleolar RNAs; Y_RNA, small non-coding RNAs that are components of the Ro60 ribonucleoprotein particle. e, Log2 fold change relative to BCB+ oocytes. f, Average expression levels, shown in TMM-normalised log2 count per million (CPM) sequence reads. g, Significant difference in expression between BCB− and BCB+ oocytes by FDR test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Small nucleolar RNA differentially expressed between BCB+ and BCB− Sus scrofa oocytes.
Table 2. Small nucleolar RNA differentially expressed between BCB+ and BCB− Sus scrofa oocytes.
gene_id aSymbol bDescriptionChr/Scaffold cFamily dTarget RNA elogFC flogCPM gFDR h
ENSSSCG00000018196SNORD57Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 57 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:10207]17C/D18S rRNA−1.6073.1308.85 × 10−9
ENSSSCG00000027476 NULL17na −1.7473.1811.51 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000038361 NULL4scaRNA −1.4003.8343.28 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000018864SNORD89Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 89 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32750]3C/Dunknown−1.0264.7293.37 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000018402 NULL6na −1.2544.8427.78 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000022137 NULL6na −1.4452.8718.33 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000019644 NULL9na −1.4022.8648.33 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000040136 NULL12na −1.7451.5122.23 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000030175SNORD8Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 8 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:20159]7C/DU6 snRNA−1.1175.1602.27 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000025540SNORD33Small nucleolar RNA Z195/SNORD33/SNORD32 family [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00133]6C/D18S rRNA−1.1473.1882.67 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000018456SNORD49ASmall nucleolar RNA, C/D box 49A [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:10189]12C/D28S rRNA−1.3483.0243.01 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000028483SNORD33Small nucleolar RNA Z195/SNORD33/SNORD32 family [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00133]6C/D18S rRNA−1.0023.7773.66 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000040143SNORA58BSmall nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 58B [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:52208]4H/ACA28S rRNA−1.7161.3604.32 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000019590SNORA27small nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 27 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32617]11H/ACA28S rRNA−1.1943.3764.82 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000033614 NULL6na −2.0000.9845.45 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000035503 NULLAEMK02000697.1na −1.0005.2187.66 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000019612SNORD24Small nucleolar RNA SNORD24 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00069]9C/D28S rRNA−1.3312.7508.09 × 10−4
ENSSSCG00000019338 NULL4na −1.5771.8481.35 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000020458 NULLXscaRNA −1.6682.9031.60 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000029549SNORD22Small nucleolar RNA SNORD22 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00099]2C/D18S rRNA−1.1822.7351.60 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000019780SNORD83Small nucleolar RNA SNORD83 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00137]7C/Dunknown−1.4991.5121.60 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000028290SNORD27Small nucleolar RNA SNORD27 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00086]2C/D18S rRNA−1.3831.6163.12 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000019046SNORD110Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 110 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32775]17C/D18S rRNA−2.0870.9454.35 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000019944SNORD97Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 97 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32760]2C/Dunknown−0.9884.5404.53 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000024084 NULL17na −1.5101.0484.59 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000018197 NULL6na −1.2432.6435.82 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000025513SNORD22Small nucleolar RNA SNORD22 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00099]2C/D18S rRNA−1.0713.2518.62 × 10−3
ENSSSCG00000026212SNORD29Small nucleolar RNA SNORD29 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00070]2C/D28S rRNA−1.4401.5140.010
ENSSSCG00000037405SNORD36Small nucleolar RNA SNORD36 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00049]1C/D18S rRNA−1.0312.6040.011
ENSSSCG00000039700 NULL6na −1.3302.2290.011
ENSSSCG00000032033SNORD116Small nucleolar RNA SNORD116 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00108]AEMK02000602.1C/Dunknown−0.8774.0430.011
ENSSSCG00000019956SNORD105BSmall nucleolar RNA, C/D box 105B [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:33572]2C/D18S rRNA−1.6600.4510.014
ENSSSCG00000020372 NULL5scaRNA −1.2622.9780.015
ENSSSCG00000019894SNORA62Small nucleolar RNA SNORA62/SNORA6 family [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00091]13H/ACA28S rRNA−1.2102.3910.015
ENSSSCG00000030032 NULL13na −1.8461.1110.016
ENSSSCG00000018563SNORA48small nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 48 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32641]12H/ACA28S rRNA−0.9833.4040.016
ENSSSCG00000018699 NULL7na −0.9652.7440.016
ENSSSCG00000031232SNORD60Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 60 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:10217]3C/D28S rRNA−1.0961.5380.017
ENSSSCG00000018462SNORD65Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 65 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32726]12C/D18S rRNA−1.1251.2200.018
ENSSSCG00000018650SNORD56Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 56 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:10206]17C/D18S rRNA−1.0102.2270.018
ENSSSCG00000033121SNORD38BSmall nucleolar RNA, C/D box 38B [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:30356]6C/D28S rRNA−1.904−0.1650.021
ENSSSCG00000018934SNORD61Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 61 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:10218]XC/D18S rRNA−1.4321.2630.023
ENSSSCG00000023906 NULL6scaRNA −1.5931.1270.025
ENSSSCG00000031725SNORD14Small nucleolar RNA SNORD14 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00016]9C/D18S rRNA−0.8012.4530.025
ENSSSCG00000018591SNORD105Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 105 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32769]2C/D18S rRNA−1.3800.1930.025
ENSSSCG00000018494SNORD83Small nucleolar RNA SNORD83 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00137]7C/Dunknown−1.0850.9130.032
ENSSSCG00000020093 NULL1scaRNA −1.4921.0910.036
ENSSSCG00000018553 NULL3na −1.7870.3740.036
ENSSSCG00000021904SNORA5ASmall nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 5A [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32588]18H/ACA18S rRNA−1.1343.3600.037
ENSSSCG00000038146SNORD9BSmall nucleolar RNA, C/D box 49B [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32721]12C/DU6 snRNA−1.2180.6480.037
ENSSSCG00000018868SNORD87Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 87 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32746]4C/D28S rRNA−1.1110.9730.038
ENSSSCG00000018501SNORA72Small nucleolar RNA SNORA72 [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00139]4H/ACA5.8S rRNA−1.1792.3250.041
ENSSSCG00000034185SNORA73Small nucleolar RNA SNORA73 family [Source:RFAM;Acc:RF00045]6H/ACAunknown0.8381.5280.041
ENSSSCG00000019634SNORA49Small nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 49 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32642]14H/ACAunknown−0.8941.7650.041
ENSSSCG00000019629SNORA5CSmall nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 5C [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32590]18H/ACA18S rRNA−1.1781.1870.043
ENSSSCG00000019738SNORA79Small nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 79 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:32665]7H/ACAU6 snRNA−2.2140.1730.044
a, Ensembl (https://m.ensembl.org/index.html, accessed on 8 February 2023) gene ID. b, Gene symbol. c, Chromosome or scaffold number where gene is located. d, Family type of snoRNAs. C/D box and H/ACA box snoRNAs. scaRNA, small Cajal body-associated RNAs. na, snoRNA predicted by RFAM and miRBase and family type is unknown. e, Potential target RNAs reported in human orthologs in snOPY database (http://snoopy.med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp/snorna_db.cgi, accessed on 8 February 2023). f, Log2 fold change relative to BCB+ oocytes. g, Average expression levels, shown in TMM-normalised log2 count per million (CPM) sequence reads. h, Significant difference in expression between BCB− and BCB+ oocytes by FDR test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Longitudinal DEG analysis of the effect of MT supplementation during oocyte to blastocyst transition. Top 15 genes were short listed from Tables S6 and S7.
Table 3. Longitudinal DEG analysis of the effect of MT supplementation during oocyte to blastocyst transition. Top 15 genes were short listed from Tables S6 and S7.
gene_id aSymbol bDescriptionChr/Scaffold clogFC dlogCPM eFDR f
Only in oocyte vs MT− balstocyst DEGs
ENSSSCG00000018070tRNA-Trpproduct=tRNA-TrpMT8.098−2.8369.01 × 10−17
ENSSSCG00000018073tRNA-Cysproduct=tRNA-CysMT8.414−2.5161.32 × 10−16
ENSSSCG00000018071tRNA-Alaproduct=tRNA-AlaMT7.828−3.0042.39 × 10−16
ENSSSCG00000018062tRNA-Valproduct=tRNA-ValMT9.163−0.6521.30 × 10−15
ENSSSCG00000018072tRNA-Asnproduct=tRNA-AsnMT6.784−3.0612.33 × 10−12
ENSSSCG00000050090 NULL156.195−2.5801.87 × 10−6
ENSSSCG00000003523EPHA8EPH receptor A8 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:87735]65.328−2.9252.35 × 10−6
ENSSSCG00000045445 NULL115.320−2.8056.20 × 10−6
ENSSSCG00000000439KIF5Akinesin family member 5A [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:89472]54.870−2.8451.34 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000035495KITLGKIT ligand [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:98061]52.0826.3001.39 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000001750PAQR8progestin and adipoQ receptor family member 8 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:91178]73.5982.2261.41 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000026861NECTIN4nectin cell adhesion molecule 4 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:90664]45.308−2.3412.49 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000004390SESN1sestrin 1 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:92753]11.2885.7583.17 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000027372SAMD9sterile alpha motif domain containing 9 [Source:HGNC Symbol;Acc:HGNC:1348]94.991−2.9776.06 × 10−5
ENSSSCG00000008765PCDH7protocadherin 7 [Source:NCBI gene (formerly Entrezgene);Acc:100520035]84.794−3.2797.96 × 10−5
Only in oocyte vs MT+ balstocyst DEGs
ENSSSCG00000048420 Novel geneAEMK02000602.16.8190.9742.76 × 10−12
ENSSSCG00000041004 Novel gene45.747−3.4284.61 × 10−10
ENSSSCG00000018084ND3mitochondrially encoded NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit 3 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:99794]MT1.99510.3711.78 × 10−9
ENSSSCG00000043677 NULL46.122−2.1293.82 × 10−9
ENSSSCG00000039862TRIB3tribbles pseudokinase 3 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:95791]174.2541.5095.51 × 10−9
ENSSSCG00000028913 Novel geneX5.950−3.1479.18 × 10−9
ENSSSCG00000039947KCNJ2potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 2 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:89357]126.374−2.6961.50 × 10−8
ENSSSCG00000042056 NULL65.426−3.1682.14 × 10−8
ENSSSCG00000049454 Novel gene15.488−2.8662.71 × 10−8
ENSSSCG00000004673SLC28A2solute carrier family 28 member 2 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:93042]16.691−2.3023.34 × 10−8
ENSSSCG00000031101METTL21Cmethyltransferase like 21C [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:90159]115.905−3.0686.28 × 10−8
ENSSSCG00000027387MS4A12membrane spanning 4-domains A12 [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:90408]25.392−2.7527.14 × 10−8
ENSSSCG00000047877 Novel gene135.268−3.3337.82 × 10−8
ENSSSCG00000002867CEBPGCCAAT enhancer binding protein gamma [Source:VGNC Symbol;Acc:VGNC:86534]62.0655.1531.49 × 10−7
ENSSSCG00000050874 NULLAEMK02000598.15.882−2.8071.50 × 10−7
a, Ensembl (https://m.ensembl.org/index.html, accessed on 8 February 2023) gene ID. b, Gene symbol. c, Chromosome or scaffold number where gene is located. d, Log2 fold change relative to BCB+ oocytes. e, Average expression levels, shown in TMM-normalised log2 count per million (CPM) sequence reads. f, Significant difference in expression between BCB+ oocytes and blastocysts by FDR test (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okada, T.; McIlfatrick, S.; St. John, J.C. Mitochondrial DNA Deficiency and Supplementation in Sus scrofa Oocytes Influence Transcriptome Profiles in Oocytes and Blastocysts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043783

AMA Style

Okada T, McIlfatrick S, St. John JC. Mitochondrial DNA Deficiency and Supplementation in Sus scrofa Oocytes Influence Transcriptome Profiles in Oocytes and Blastocysts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(4):3783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043783

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okada, Takashi, Stephen McIlfatrick, and Justin C. St. John. 2023. "Mitochondrial DNA Deficiency and Supplementation in Sus scrofa Oocytes Influence Transcriptome Profiles in Oocytes and Blastocysts" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 4: 3783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043783

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop