Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Regulation of Redox Balance via the Induction of the PIN1/NRF2/ARE Axis in Pancreatic Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficient Strategies to Use β-Cationic Porphyrin-Imidazolium Derivatives in the Photoinactivation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Previous Article in Journal
Integrative mRNA and microRNA Analysis Exploring the Inducing Effect and Mechanism of Diallyl Trisulfide (DATS) on Potato against Late Blight
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Porphyrin Photosensitizers Grafted in Cellulose Supports: A Review

by
Carlos J. P. Monteiro
1,*,
Maria G. P. M. S. Neves
1,
Cristina Nativi
2,
Adelaide Almeida
3 and
Maria Amparo F. Faustino
1,*
1
LAQV-Requimte and Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3010-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
Department of Chemistry “Ugo Schiff”, University of Florence, via della Lastruccia, 3-13, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
3
CESAM and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(4), 3475; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043475
Submission received: 4 January 2023 / Revised: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 9 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis, Characterization and Phyto-Function of Nanophotocatalysts)

Abstract

:
Cellulose is the most abundant natural biopolymer and owing to its compatibility with biological tissues, it is considered a versatile starting material for developing new and sustainable materials from renewable resources. With the advent of drug-resistance among pathogenic microorganisms, recent strategies have focused on the development of novel treatment options and alternative antimicrobial therapies, such as antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT). This approach encompasses the combination of photoactive dyes and harmless visible light, in the presence of dioxygen, to produce reactive oxygen species that can selectively kill microorganisms. Photosensitizers for aPDT can be adsorbed, entrapped, or linked to cellulose-like supports, providing an increase in the surface area, with improved mechanical strength, barrier, and antimicrobial properties, paving the way to new applications, such as wound disinfection, sterilization of medical materials and surfaces in different contexts (industrial, household and hospital), or prevention of microbial contamination in packaged food. This review will report the development of porphyrinic photosensitizers supported on cellulose/cellulose derivative materials to achieve effective photoinactivation. A brief overview of the efficiency of cellulose based photoactive dyes for cancer, using photodynamic therapy (PDT), will be also discussed. Particular attention will be devoted to the synthetic routes behind the preparation of the photosensitizer-cellulose functional materials.

1. Introduction

Functionalized cellulose-based materials have attracted special attention from the scientific community, mainly in the field of biological and medical sciences [1,2,3]. As cellulose demonstrates a carbohydrate nature, it has inherent compatibility with biological tissues and, consequently, possesses unique applicability with respect to its bioavailability, biocompatibility, and biodegradability considerations [3,4].
Cellulose is the most abundant natural biopolymer, considered a valuable starting material for developing new materials from renewable resources [5,6,7], with an estimated annual production of 7.5 × 1010 tons [8]. Cellulose is available from several natural sources, mainly from trees and green plant cell walls, but also from some types of algae and tunicates or bacteria [9].
Cellulose in higher vascular plants consists of the xylem tissues, which are known as wood, where cellulosic microfibrils are embedded in a matrix of hemicellulose (an amorphous and complex mixture of linear and branched polysaccharides) and lignin, an unstructured phenolic polymer, randomly branched and crosslinked with cellulose. In nature, this β-O-(1 → 4) homopolymer does not occur as a single chain but as multiple chains (Figure 1A,B) [5,6]. Lignin is commonly derived from wood and one of most abundant organic compounds on Earth, after cellulose and chitin [10,11].
The ribbon-like character observed for cellulose biopolymer chains, are tightly bundled by van der Waals and hydrogen bonds, allowing adjacent cellulose chains to fit closely together (Figure 1B), assembling three-dimensional networks known as microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) [12]. In these cellulose fibrils, some regions can be found with highly ordered chains (crystalline domain) and others with chains randomly and highly disordered (amorphous domain) (Figure 1B) [13]. The separation or extraction of the crystalline regions from amorphous segments is usually performed by treating the cellulose fibres with an acid (e.g., sulfuric, nitric, or hydrochloric acids), leading principally to the disruption of amorphous regions while leaving the crystalline segments intact. From this disintegration, either cellulose nanofibers (CNF) or nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) can be obtained, the latter also known as cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). These CNCs possess unique properties, such as high surface area, high mechanical strength, and a liquid crystalline nature [14,15,16,17] with applications in several fields, such as biomedicine [18,19], wastewater treatment [20,21], biobased adsorbents of metals [22,23,24], energy [25,26], and photonic platforms [27,28].
As mentioned before, bacteria, are also able to synthesize cellulose in aqueous culture media. Bacterial cellulose (BC), firstly identified in 1886 by A.J. Brown [29] appears as a jelly-like translucent polymer of excellent chemical purity. Under special culturing conditions, BC can be produced extracellularly, in the form of nanofibers, through fermentation mediated by Gram-(−) bacterial cultures of Gluconacetobacter, Acetobacter, Agrobacterium, Achromobacter, Aerobacter, Sarcina, Azobacter, Rhizobium, Pseudomonas, Salmonella and Alcaligenes. The most efficient bacterial strain for BC production belongs to the Gluconacetobacter type [30,31]. During biosynthesis, BC forms a thick gelatinous membrane called pellicle, controllable through the alteration of fermentation parameters, constituted by a random microfibrillar network of cellulose chains aligned in parallel, scattered among amorphous regions that occupy 90% of the materials total volume (Figure 2A) [32].
Bacterial cellulose has the same molecular formula as plant cellulose, but it is characterized by peculiar three-dimensional porous net-work structures with a high degree of polymerization (up to 8000), high crystallinity (70–80%), high water content (up to 99%), and high mechanical stability, [33]. Depending on the BC biofabrication approach (i.e., fermentation process, type of strain, carbon source, and additives), BC shape and supramolecular structure can give rise to different film forms, sizes or thicknesses, being precisely tailored for diverse applications [31]. The inclusion of additives in the nutrient media components during biosynthesis can influence the assembly and microstructure of BC, including the crystallinity, crystalline polymorphism, crystal size, and ribbon width [34]. The BC feature properties, such as controlled porosity, biocompatibility biodegradability, flexibility, ease of production, and absence of contaminants (e.g., lignin and hemicellulose), have raised the interest of academic and pharmaceutical industry communities for its utilization as a competitive product. The high biocompatibility of this hydrogel material has a high impact on its ubiquitous applications in the medical field [3,35]. In fact, this natural polymer is being successfully utilized in the reconstruction and regeneration of tissues as artificial skin (Figure 2B,C) [35], in vivo implants [36], artificial blood vessels [37], wound healing scaffolds [38], hemostatic materials [39], energy storage [40], and in electronic devices [41]. In addition to CNC and BC, cellulose fibres, as fabrics or as paper sheets present unique mechanical and physical properties to be applied as functional materials for medical applications. According to the literature, cellulose fibres are among the most interesting basic materials for functionalization with antimicrobial agents [4]. The grafting of antimicrobials, as photosensitisers or biocides, would confer exclusive features for medical applications, such as wound healing patches to treat infected diabetic foot/leg ulcers or regeneration of damaged tissue in burn wounds [7,42,43]. The functionalization/immobilization of cellulose fibres with photoactive compounds can be an advantage in the mitigation of nosocomial pathogenic microorganisms. Furthermore, functionalized cellulose fibres with photoactive antimicrobials have also been considered for protective clothing (e.g., surgical masks, caps, gowns) and hospital linen, providing the mitigation of harmful microorganism transmission and spreading of secondary infections. All this can minimize risks for developing a serious illness, to prolong the healing of patients, and consequently reduce economic losses and extra costs to the health.
Antimicrobial drugs have had a tremendous impact on modern medicine and have been viewed as a panacea for several infectious diseases, over the last 80 years [44,45].
Sulfonamides or sulfa drugs were the first effective synthetic drugs used systematically against a broad bacterial spectrum [46,47]. Since their discovery in 1935 [48,49], that microbial resistance to antibiotics is a major concern. The widespread, excessive dispensing and irresponsible use of antibiotics, their dissemination in the environment, associated with the globalization of pathogenic microorganism transmission have resulted in the development of resistant bacterial strains [50,51,52].
It was estimated that, if no urgent actions are taken shortly, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) will have a full impact in terms of human and economic losses: between 2015 and 2050, 100 × 1012 USD would be lost, and by 2050 microbial resistance will kill 10 × 106 people per year, outweighing the death caused by cancer [53]. In fact, a recent study confirms these predictions, with 4.95 million (3.62–6.57 million) deaths associated with bacterial AMR in 2019 was estimated, showing that AMR bacteria represent a health problem with a magnitude at least as large as major diseases, such as HIV and malaria, being a problem in all world regions [54].
Recent strategies have focused on the development of novel antimicrobial treatment options and alternative therapies. So, the new alternative strategies must encompass different mechanism of action, circumventing resistance issues of conventional antimicrobials.
In the last few years, the development and biological assessment of new photosensitizers (PS) for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) were accompanied by their immobilization in different supports considering applications, such as wound disinfection and healing, sterilization of medical devices and surfaces in different contexts (industrial, household and hospital), or the prevention of microbial contamination in packaged food [42,43,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. Photosensitizers for aPDT can become more efficacious when adsorbed, entrapped, or linked to cellulose-like supports [64,65,66,67,68,69]. In addition, these cellulose-based systems provide an increase in the surface area, and to improve the targeted drug delivery [70,71], can be used to develop packaging materials with better mechanical strength, barrier, and antimicrobial properties [72,73].
aPDT is a non-antibiotic therapeutic approach that like PDT involves the combination of photoactive dyes or PS, harmless visible light, and dioxygen (O2) [44,64,65,74,75]. The photoactive drug (PS), is a non-toxic molecule in the dark, but when electronically excited can transfers an electron to O2 or other electron acceptors leading to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide anions (O2−●) and other radicals (e.g., HO, type I reaction), or transfers its electronic energy to ground-state dioxygen (3O2) generating singlet oxygen (1O2) (type II reaction) [76,77,78,79]. These ROS can oxidize biomolecules, such as DNA, proteins, and lipids, causing oxidative cellular damage, leading to pathogen inactivation [80].
Since the photodynamic action is a multi-target mechanism, it is highly unlikely that this approach causes microorganisms to develop resistance, as happens with conventional antimicrobials that generally work on a one-target principle [81,82,83,84,85]. Furthermore, photodynamic action can impair the activity and/or production of many virulence factors, leading to the decrease of bacterial pathogenicity, contrasting antibiotic therapy, which can induce the build-up of virulence factors, leading to their release upon antibiotic treatment [86,87,88,89].
Despite the known aPDT advantages and its efficacy, there is still room for new improvements, maximizing the full potential for translational research and development.
This review will report on recent advances in the development of a diversity of porphyrin photosensitizers (PS) supported on cellulose/cellulose derivative materials to achieve effective antimicrobial materials. In addition to aPDT, cellulose-based hybridized carriers have been found in the literature for other biomedical applications. Thus, in this review paper, we have considered a few examples of cellulose multifunctional nanostructures for application in cancer photodynamic therapy (PDT). The improvement of treatment outcomes using cellulose as PDT photosensitizer carriers will also be described and discussed.
Particular attention will be devoted to the synthetic routes behind the preparation of the photosensitizer-cellulose functional materials.
So, after a brief discussion concerning the chemical modifications of cellulose to allow the mobilization of the photoactive dye, this review is organized considering first the porphyrin and analogues of natural origin and then the synthetic counterparts according to their charges.

2. Functionalization of Cellulose Supports

Their unique properties, availability, and surface chemical flexibility make cellulose an attractive and versatile raw material for well-known features and uses in many industrial applications [59,72,90]. Cellulose is being used in dietary fibres and food additives [91], personal care products [3], templates for electronic components [41,92], separation membranes [93,94], batteries [40], and supercapacitors [95]. Nowadays, cellulose is also being recognised as an important component for more advanced purposes, such as photocatalytic materials [96,97,98,99], biomedical implants [100,101], pharmaceuticals [4,102], drug delivery [3,103], and for the development of antibacterial biomaterials [38,60,104,105,106,107].
Most of these applications are strongly dependent on specific transformations of the cellulose backbone. Many hydroxyl groups present in the cellulose structure can be chemically modified, providing a platform with functional features suitable for a plethora of applications. The most common modifications are: (i) grafting of new active units for further functionalization via covalent linkages; or (ii) modification of the surface charge density for electrostatic/noncovalent interactions with surfactants, polymers, and counter ion salts. Figure 3 displays the cellulose chemical modifications that will be discussed in the following sections of the current review.
One of the most common approaches used to obtain highly negative charged cellulose sulphate is through cellulose degradation mediated by sulphuric acid, affording CNCs decorated with sulphate esters (Figure 3, path b) [108]. Although the presence of sulphate esters (obtained by esterification of some hydroxyl groups) compromises the CNCs thermal stability, they are useful for the formation of stable colloidal suspensions by electrostatic interaction between charged surfactants, such as cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) [5,6].
The phosphorylation of cellulose conducts to the formation of phosphate esters and consequently to negatively charged cellulose (Figure 3, path i), accountable for important applications [109,110]. For instance, the extraordinary binding ability of phosphate groups to calcium ions or growth factors is being explored in different biological applications [111]. In addition, these functional materials can be used to make materials with flame-resistant and flame-proof properties [112], to be used as supercapacitors [95] or in environmental applications [93,94].
TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical) can also be used to introduce negative charges on cellulose surface (Figure 3, path a), by converting primary hydroxymethyl groups into carboxylic residues [113,114,115]. The oxidation of cellulose with a catalytic amount of TEMPO, NaBr, and NaClO selectively transforms cellulose C6 primary hydroxyl groups into aldehyde groups and carboxyl groups [111,116].
Periodate-mediated oxidation of cellulose is a different approach to make carbonyl-modified cellulose derivatives. Unlike TEMPO, the reaction of cellulose with periodate leads to the cleavage of C2 and C3 bond of glucose monomer units affording 2,3-dialdehyde cellulose (DAC) (Figure 3, path c) [117]. These aldehyde functionalities in DAC can be further converted into sulfonic acids, carboxylic acids, and imines [107,118]. Moreover, the treatment of cellulose with periodate makes cellulose more flexible, with an improvement in dispersibility.
Organosilyl units have also been used to decorate cellulose surface [119,120]. In general, these entities are introduced by making use of silicon reactants bearing hydrolysable groups (typically alkoxy, acyloxy, amine, or chlorine) that can react with hydroxyl groups on cellulose (Figure 3, path g). The non-hydrolysable unit typically holds a moiety that can react with a biologically active molecule [121,122].
The reaction with 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine (also known as cyanuric chloride) is a good approach to deliver a very flexible platform to covalently couple active molecules to cellulosic substrates (Figure 3, path h) [73,123,124,125]. The stepwise substitution of chlorine atoms with nucleophiles (such as amines, phenols, and thiols) is facile, proceeds under smooth reaction conditions, and can be controlled by temperature since the reactivity decreases with the increase in the number of substituents linked to the cellulose framework [126,127].
Cu(I)-catalyzed Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition (Click-Chemistry reaction) was also considered an attractive approach to covalently conjugate functional molecules onto the cellulose surface. In this click reaction, the coupling of an azide moiety, previously introduced (Figure 3, path d) with a terminal alkyne, leads to the formation of a stable 1,2,3-triazole ring (Figure 3, path e) [128,129]. In this approach, cellulose primary hydroxyl groups are first converted into tosylate (-OTs) leaving groups, followed by their nucleophilic substitution with sodium azide (NaN3) in dimethylformamide (DMF), affording cellulose displaying azide functionalities (Figure 3, path d). A click reaction involving a molecule bearing a propargylic unit can then produce cellulose bearing triazole moieties (Figure 3, path e). However, this strategy can proceed in a different way i.e., the cellulose support can be first functionalized with the alkynyl unit via propargyl bromide and then the molecule to be appended can contain the azide functionality [130].
The acylation of hydroxyl groups present at cellulose surface is another widely used modification [131]. This functionalization can occur through the reaction with acids or with succinic, maleic, or phthalic anhydrides (Figure 3, path f) [132]. With these cyclic anhydrides, the functionalization results in a pendant carboxylic moiety attached to the cellulose via a covalent ester bond, providing reactive moieties for further functionalization [133].

3. Synthetic Access to Cellulose-Based Photosensitizers

3.1. Natural Porphyrin and Reduced Derivatives: Protoporphyrin IX and Hydroporphyrins

3.1.1. Protoporphyrin IX Derivatives

Tetrapyrrolic macrocycles, e.g., protoporphyrin IX (PPIX), play a key role in life [134,135]. PPIX can chelate transition metals, affording metalloporphyrins, which accomplish a variety of biological functions. For instance, the complexation of PPIX with Fe(II) forms Heme, a constituent of hemoproteins with significant roles in dioxygen transportation, cellular oxidations and reductions, electron transportation, and drug metabolism. PPIX has some biological functions of its own, and PPIX-based compounds have been used as PS for cancer and aPDT [136].
Considering the photobiological features of PPIX, the development of cellulose based photoactive hybrid materials has attracted the attention of several research groups.
In 2006, Krausz and co-workers [137] developed photobactericidal films 2 obtained by “one-pot, two-steps” esterification of cellulose with PPIX and lauric acid (Figure 4). The first step comprises the esterification of cellulose with PPIX using tosyl chloride (TsCl) plus pyridine to activate the primary hydroxyl groups, followed by a second step, under similar conditions, concerning the esterification of the remaining OH groups present on the cellulose-appended PPIX with the lauric acid.
The biological results on the inactivation of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus strains revealed that the observed antibacterial activity, upon 24 h of light irradiation (irradiance of 1.7 mW cm−2) of the prepared plastic films 2, was reliant on the porphyrin grafting percentage, attaining sterile areas (no bacteria growth) under the plastic film disks 2. In the absence of PPIX, the films did not hamper a massive growth of bacteria. The authors stated that these photoactive materials could be applied in industrial, household, and medical environments, and more generally in areas that would benefit from permanent and efficient surface disinfection.
In 2018, Wei [138] research group prepared a photoactive material comprising PPIX covalently grafted onto a bacterial cellulose (BC) surface via diamine spacer arms with different chain lengths. Thus, three diamine spacers, with backbone chain lengths of four (ethylenediamine), ten [1,2-bis(2-aminoethoxy)ethane], and 14 [1,4-bis(3-aminopropoxy)butane] atoms were applied in order to analyze their influence on BC surface functionalization and subsequent bacterial photoinactivation performance.
Oxidation of BC was mediated by sodium periodate (NaIO4) in an aqueous solution and then treated with 1,2-ethanediol overnight to remove the excess of periodate, giving material 3 (Figure 5). The incorporation of amines on 3 was carried out by the “one pot, two steps” method, consisting of the cellulose membrane immersion in a solution of the respective diamine (ethylenediamine, 1,2-bis(2-aminoethoxy)ethane and 1,4-bis(3-aminopropoxy)butane) for 12 h, followed by the addition of the reducing agent sodium cyanoborohydride. The reaction continued for additional 24 h. Finally, after washing steps, the material functionalized with NH2 groups 4 was coupled with the PPIX derivative 5 previously activated with carbonyldiimidazole (CDI), (Figure 5) giving the photoactive material PPIX@BC. After 24 h, the remaining free PPIX was thoroughly washed, and the resulting membrane dried under vacuum.
Antibacterial efficacy was evaluated under white light irradiation (Xenon lamp, 30 min, λ > 420 nm) against both S. aureus and E. coli strains as a function of the diamine spacer unit. The best inactivation results were obtained for the PPIX@BC membranes with diamine spacers with backbone chain lengths of 10 atoms [1,2-bis(2-aminoethoxy)ethane], attaining 99.999% (5 log of reduction in CFU mL−1) of photoinactivation efficiency against E. coli meanwhile S. aureus was inactivated by 98.5% (~1.5 log reduction in CFU mL−1) by the same photosensitizing material. The results obtained are very interesting since the photodynamic effect of PPIX immobilized on BC is higher for the Gram-(−) bacterium E. coli than that of the non-immobilized PPIX under similar experimental conditions. The authors explained these results due to the incomplete grafting of PPIX onto the aminated BC surface, leading to the pronation (in buffer) of free primary amine groups on BC-spacer -NH2, giving -NH3+, that would result in a positively charged surface. As a consequence, negatively charged bacteria would adhere onto the supported surface. Therefore, it would lead to a stronger interaction of E. coli to the surface, bringing it in closer proximity to the PS molecules and to the site of 1O2 formation, leading to higher photodynamic inactivation.
The reusability of PPIX@BC membranes was explored through the repetition of aPDT assays. A gradual decreasing of the antibacterial efficacy was observed for E. coli, with aPDT efficiency reduced from the original 99.999% (5 log of reduction, 1st cycle) to approximately 45% for the 4th cycle. In spite of the need to improve the reusability of materials, the aforementioned work provides a powerful strategy for efficient Gram-(−) bacteria photodynamic inactivation.
The promising results of aPDT accomplished by Wei and co-authors motivated the same authors to extend the strategy to the preparation of an improved photoactive material [139] with enhanced mechanical properties, high efficacy under low light conditions, and robustness towards photobleaching and reusability. The synthetic route employed was slightly different from the previous one: cellulose acetate (CelAc) was electrospun to produce nanofibers, thermally treated to enhance mechanical strength, and finally hydrolyzed to produce regenerated cellulose (RC) nanofibers that possessed a high surface area and nanofibrous structure. Covalent grafting of the activated PPIX 5 on epichlorohydrin/triethylenetetramine (TETA) functionalized cellulose 6, followed by zinc(II) complexation of porphyrinic macrocycle, afforded material 7 with a loading of 412 nmol Zn(II)PPIX/mg material (Figure 6). Antibacterial efficacy was evaluated against S. aureus (ATCC 6538) and E. coli (ATCC 8099), with results achieving detection limit inactivation (99.999%, >5 log of reduction) for both bacteria after 20 min of white light illumination (Xe lamp, 500 W, λ > 420 nm, 10 cm distance between lamp and sample). No statistically significant loss in antibacterial activity was observed when using nanofibers that had been photo-aged with 5 h of pre-illumination to simulate the effects of photobleaching. Taken together, the results suggest that such systems may employ cost-effective neutral PS paired with a wide range of polymeric scaffolds for the development of robust and durable self-sterilizing materials based on a photodynamic mode of action.
In 2018, Sol research group [140] developed a new antimicrobial material consisting of PPIX amino derivative, 9 bearing aminoethyleneglycol spacer arms immobilized in cotton/polymethacrylic support 10 (Figure 7). The authors polymerized methacrylic acid on cotton material, mediated by Ce(IV) as a redox radical polymerization system, affording the support 10. Aminoethyleneglycol spacer arms were appended on PPIX to facilitate its grafting to the carboxylic acid groups present at the polymethacrylic acid polymerized /cotton fabric. The first step involved the functionalization of PPIX with 1,2-bis(2-aminoethoxy)ethane monoprotected with tert-butyloxycarbonyl (Boc) in the presence of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC)/1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) giving 8. After acid deprotection of the amino groups, the desired PPIX amino derivative 9, obtained in quantitative yield, was successfully attached to 10 using classical peptide linkage conditions, yielding the material 11 (Figure 7). The photodynamic activity of photoactive cotton was evaluated against S. aureus and E. coli. Experimental data show that this cotton textile 11 bearing the PPIX derivative exerts only a photo-antibacterial effect against S. aureus, with inactivation of 99.9% (3 log reduction in CFU mL−1) after 24 h of white light irradiation (total light dose 9.5 J cm−2). Concerning Gram-(−) bacterium E. coli, the photosensitizing material did not show any photoactivity.
Zhang research group [69] prepared a water-soluble hybrid photoactive material introducing PPIX and quaternary ammonium salt (QAS) groups onto a cellulose backbone by means of an esterification reaction.
The introduction of positively charged quaternary amines led to a synergistic effect, increasing water-solubility and electrostatic repulsion between quaternary positive charge groups, which effectively inhibits the π–π stacking of immobilized PPIX, thus enhancing ROS yield (Figure 8).
The inhibition efficiencies of material 12 toward the drug-resistant E. coli and S. aureus were respectively 84% (~0.79 log of reduction) and 98% (~1.70 log of reduction) upon 1 min of white light irradiation at an irradiance of 40 mW cm−2. After 2 min of white light irradiation, the inhibition efficiencies toward E. coli and S. aureus increased to 93% (~1.15 log of reduction) and >99% (>2 log of reduction), respectively.
The applicability and broad use of the photoactive cellulose-PPIX material 12 were proved in different substrates (e.g., slide glass, scissors, tweezers, gauze, and paper) and in personal bioprotective equipment, e.g., face masks, protective suits, and gloves (Figure 9).
In these assays, two areas on a face mask, a protective suit, and a glove, were chosen and one of these areas was coated with the photoactive cellulose-PPIX material 12. The selected areas were inoculated with a bacterial suspension and irradiated with white light and sunlight. Then, bacteria survival rates were assessed in these areas. There were almost no colony forming units of E. coli and S. aureus on the coated areas of the face mask, protective suit, and glove after 15 min of white light and sunlight irradiation, corresponding to around 3–4 log of bacterial inactivation. Indeed, the water-soluble and nontoxic cellulose-based PPIX material 12 exhibited excellent antibacterial activity to drug-resistant bacterial strains with promising applications as wearable and robust sunlight-driven antibacterial coatings.
Recently, Ghiladi, Wang and co-workers [141], developed a porous photoactive material based on PPIX-embedded cellulose diacetate (PPIX@CA) microfibers (Figure 10). The photodynamic antimicrobial membrane was prepared by an electrospinning method with two different PPIX loadings: 5 and 10 wt.% PPIX with respect to CA (85 and 170 nmol PPIX/mg membrane, respectively). The antibacterial activity of the new material was evaluated towards Gram-(+) and Gram-(−) bacterial models. Despite the good efficacy of PPIX@CA porous microfibers against S. aureus after 30 min of white light irradiation (Xe lamp, λ ≥ 420 nm at an irradiance of 65 ± 5 mW cm−2), accomplishing 99.8% (~2.7 log) of bacterial reduction, the bacterial reduction observed for E. coli was lower (86.6%, ~0.87 log of reduction) using the same experimental protocol. The combined use of KI with the PPIX@CA porous microfibers showed to be beneficial since it further enhances the antimicrobial efficacy of the PPIX@CA microfiber membrane, achieving up to 99.9999% (6 log of reduction) photoinactivation of both S. aureus and E. coli strains in the presence of 25 and 100 mM KI, respectively.

3.1.2. Hydroporphyrin Derivatives

Chlorins (e.g., chlorophylls) and bacteriochlorins (e.g., bacteriochlorophylls) are tetrapyrrolic macrocycles derived from porphyrins by the reduction of one or two diagonally opposite pyrrole ring double bonds, respectively [142].
Naturally occurring chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls are essential constituents of plants and bacteria, often called the “pigments of life” [134,135] owing to their important role in photosynthetic processes. Nowadays, their synthetic counterparts also present multiple applications essentially due to their absorbance of light in a broad range of the spectrum, particularly in the red (chlorins) and near infra-red region, NIR (bacteriochlorins) [65,143,144,145,146]. Intense red and NIR photons absorption is a desirable feature for biomedical applications (Imaging, PDT, aPDT), since the phototherapeutic window (650–900 nm) for electromagnetic radiation is the most penetrating and least harmful to human tissues [147,148]. Despite the interesting biological applications of natural semi-synthetic or synthetic hydroporphyrins, they are not naturally water-soluble and may aggregate in aqueous media [149,150]. Thus, several studies have been carried out to improve water solubility or dispersibility of hydroporphyrins and cellulose or cellulose-like supports have been employed as suitable carrier systems.
Despite not being used in microorganism inactivation, it is worthwhile to mention the seminal works of Roman and co-workers, where a hydroporphyrin, pheophorbide-a 13, was recognized to have the potential to be combined with cellulose [151]. Solid samples of 13 (Figure 11) adsorbed on microcrystalline cellulose were prepared by adding weighed masses of cellulose to ethanol stock solutions of 13 (pheophorbide-a concentrations from 7.1 nmol to 8.9 μmol). After solvent evaporation by vacuum drying, the samples were studied and the absorption and luminescence properties of 13 adsorbed on cellulose support were investigated as a function of the dye concentration.
As an extension of the previous work, the same authors [152] investigated the behavior of cellulose particles loaded with 13 in aqueous media.
The previously prepared samples of pheophorbide-a, 13, adsorbed on microcrystalline cellulose (characterized in the solid state in previous work) were washed with water, leading to stable suspensions of micrometric particles (d < 2 μm) carrying photoactive and monomeric dye molecules. Suspensions were fluorescent and generated 1O2 efficiently. A similar effect has been observed on washing samples containing hematoporphyrin IX (HP) adsorbed on the same support. With this study, the authors conclude that, using cellulose as a heterogeneous carrier, it is possible to introduce hydrophobic PS into the aqueous medium while avoiding aggregation, thus preserving their photophysical properties. Results denote that cellulose can be employed as a suitable carrier system for 13. It was also demonstrated that the same principle can be applied to carry HP into the water in its monomeric form. This fact opens the possibility of applying the same strategy to different hydrophobic PS.
In 2017, Sol and collaborators [67] developed a new strategy to devise photoactive material with effectiveness against infections caused by Gram-(−) multidrug resistant bacterial strains. A combination of two well-known concepts to eradicate microbes, aPDT and antibiotic prophylaxis, has been developed based on the fabrication of photobactericidal organic material, consisting of cellulose nanocrystals to which the purpurin 18 (16, see Figure 11) and the polypeptide polymyxin B (PMB) were covalently attached. The photoactive nanocrystals were prepared in three steps: (i) cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) were first obtained by oxidation of commercial cotton (with TEMPO as oxidant) to enable after hydrolysis CNCsox, (Figure 12); (ii) purpurin 18 (16) was selected as PS and the reaction of cyclic anhydride with the free amine of spermine linker yielded a chlorin e6 (14) bearing a linker able to form amide grafting group with nanocrystaline cellulose support CNCse6 (Figure 12); (iii) the antimicrobial PMB was covalently attached to the same cellulose support, yielding the photobactericidal organic material, CNCsc6-PMB, (Figure 12). In parallel, cellulose nanocrystals functionalized only with polymyxin B (CNCsPMB) were also synthesized, for comparison with the hybrid material bearing chlorin e6 CNCsc6-PMB (Figure 12).
Following visible light irradiation (15 h at an irradiance of 0.8 mW cm−2), the photoactive material CNCsc6-PMB (0.191 mg mL−1) demonstrated high antibacterial efficiency (6 log units decrease) against Gram-(+) bacteria, S. aureus and S. epidermidis. A bacterial photoinactivation >6 log units was achieved against Gram-(−) bacterium E. coli when CNCsc6-PMB was exposed to the same light conditions (15 h, 0.8 mW cm−2) for both tested concentrations (0.191 mg mL−1 and 0.019 mg mL−1). Similar results of bacterial growth inhibition (>6 log of reduction in CFU/mL) were obtained for P. aeruginosa when the concentrations 0.191 mg mL−1 and 0.080 mg mL−1 of CNCsc6-PMB were used under light irradiation.
An amplifying and synergistic effect of chlorin e6 has been highlighted against these Gram-(−) strains, based on membrane weakening and a potential docking effect from the polymyxin B moiety. Such results confirm the importance of using an antimicrobial peptide to broaden the spectrum of aPDT.
Later on, Gavara and coworkers [90] reported the possibility of utilizing copper(II) and magnesium(II) metal complexes of chlorin e6 (14a, 14b in Figure 11) incorporated in (hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose (HPMC) for applications as photoactive coatings in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) packages. The antimicrobial properties of 14a and 14b in HPMC as coatings in PET packages were analyzed against Listeria monocytogenes and E. coli. The antimicrobial results indicated that 14b [M = Mg(II)] was more active than 14a [M = Cu(II)]) and that it was more effective against Gram-(+) bacterium L. monocytogenes (7 log reduction) than against E. coli where no significant growth reduction was observed.

3.2. Synthetic Meso-Substituted Porphyrins

3.2.1. Neutral Porphyrins

Synthetic meso-tetraarylporphyrins (tArPs) are versatile compounds (Figure 13), readily accessible by facile and straightforward condensation reactions using pyrrole and aldehydes or dipyrromethanes/tripyrranes as starting materials [153,154]. Their chemical stability, photophysical features, and ability to fine-tune the electronic properties, makes tArPs a multipurpose platform for the preparation of materials with light-harvesting properties capable to generate ROS, namely 1O2 [76,155].
One of the seminal works reporting a functionalized tArP derivative immobilized on cellulose support was reported by Krausz and co-workers [156], who developed photobactericidal plastic films by appending porphyrins through the acylation approach (Figure 14). Two series of porphyrinic cellulose laurate esters (18a and 18b), with PS covalently linked to the cellulosic polymer, were prepared in “one-pot, two-steps” esterification reactions: (i) the tri-tolylporphyrin derivative was first covalently bounded to the cellulosic polymer and (ii) the porphyrin containing plastic films were then obtained by the second esterification with lauric acid (Figure 14). The antimicrobial properties of new photoactive cellulosic polymers were assessed against Gram-(+) and Gram-(−) bacterial strains (S. aureus and E. coli, respectively) under white light conditions (24 h irradiation at an irradiance of 1.7 mW cm−2) and the qualitative preliminary results are presented. The porphyrinic cellulose laurate esters 18a and 18b were found effective towards S. aureus and E. coli (no bacterial growth was observed under the films) when the grafting percentage of porphyrin was higher than 0.16% whereas the non-porphyrinic film control allowed full growth of bacteria. The biological data showed that the bacterial inactivation of the immobilized PS was mostly mediated by 1O2 which ultimately damages the cell wall since there is no penetration of the PS into the bacterial cell.
Later on, Krausz, Sol and co-workers [157] explored the “Click-Chemistry” synthetic approach to immobilize the Zn(II) complex 19 bearing a propynyloxy substituent on a cellulose cotton fabric functionalized with azide units (Figure 15). The new photoactive material 20 was characterized by ATR-FTIR and the antibacterial properties were evaluated. The authors showed for the fabric a similar antibacterial activity upon visible light irradiation against E. coli and S. aureus (reductions of ~5 log units).
Based on the versatility, reactivity, and availability for stepwise substitution of chlorine atoms by different nucleophiles, Sol and collaborators [158] used cyanuric chloride (2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine), as a grafting agent between porphyrins and cellulose fabrics. The unsymmetric 5-(4-aminophenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin derivative 21 was linked to triazine in the presence of a base, N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) at 0 °C (Figure 16). Then, porphyrin-triazine 22 was grafted onto cellulose square fabrics, in this case using DIPEA plus piperidine, and was tested in vitro against S. aureus.
Experimental data showed that the cotton–PS material 23 produced a photobactericidal effect at quantity as low as ~0.8 μmol cm−2 of PS on the fabric sample. After 24 h exposure to white light and a total light dose of 9.5 J cm−2, a reduction of 93.7% (~1.2 log reduction) of bacterial abundance was achieved when compared with the initial bacterial concentration.
During the experiment, the bacterial growth increased by 4 logs for all the untreated (without PS) cotton samples either in the dark or under light irradiation. The same bacterial growth profile was observed for the cotton-PS material 23 in the dark (used as control). These controls demonstrated that either chemical modification of cotton alone or light exposure alone had no influence on bacterial reduction.
In 2022, Chen and collaborators [159] reported the development of the porous fiber CEL-THPP@Zn with promising antibacterial features (Figure 17). The authors used microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) to obtain, via oxidation with sodium periodate, the oxidized cellulose containing aldehyde groups (DAC), which was used to immobilize through imine bonds the porphyrin 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-hydrazinecarbonylphenyl)porphyrin (THPP). Then, the self-assembly of the resulting hybrid CEL-THPP in the presence Zn(II) ions afforded the desired composite CEL-THPP@Zn as a rod-shaped crystalline fiber loaded with porous porphyrin-zinc nanospheres. The antibacterial activity of the new prepared material was assessed against Gram-(+) S. aureus and Gram-(−) E. coli selected as bacterial models. A time-dependent correlation of bacterial inhibition as well as a correlation with antibacterial material concentration were found. The viability of E. coli incubated with 5 or 20 µg mL−1 concentrations of CEL-THPP@Zn decreases from 82% to 1%. In the case of S. aureus, a higher CEL-THPP@Zn concentration (200 µg mL−1) was needed to achieve total bacteria inactivation. The antibacterial behavior was justified considering the destruction of the bacterial membrane through the porphyrin zinc nanospheres. The ability of these porous fibers to adsorb both bacteria was also evaluated, opening the possibility of these composites to be used not only on bacterial inhibition, but also in filtration processes.

3.2.2. Cationic Porphyrins

Meso-substituted porphyrins, bearing positively charged groups have shown remarkable photodynamic activity against both, Gram-(−) and Gram-(+) bacteria [66,81,160]. Positive charges are able to induce a strong electrostatic interaction with the external negatively charged structures of the bacterial cells, thus facilitating their interaction with the bacteria [161,162]. However, other PS properties, such as amphiphilicity, cell membrane interaction, and internalization, can also play a role to account for the therapeutic effect [161,163].
In the pivotal work of Bonnett and Galia [164] (1994), regenerated cellulose (“cellophane” films) was considered as a low cost support for the impregnation of cationic porphyrins 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin tetra-tosylate (24) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N,N,N-trimethylanilinium-4-yl)porphyrin tetra-tosylate (25) (Figure 18).
Commercially available cellophane sheets of 50 μm thickness were kept in contact with the porphyrin solutions of water or water/methanol at 50 °C. The uptake of positively charged porphyrin was estimated by UV-Vis spectroscopy after washing the cellophane films thoroughly. The authors confirmed that the films containing the cationic porphyrins 24 and 25, after exposure to a 1500 W xenon lamp for 50 h, retained their mechanical properties (flexibility and strength) and were not photobleached. No bacterial growth was verified when the cellophane films impregnated with porphyrin 24 (18 μg cm−2) were maintained in contact with a bacterial inoculum of S. aureus, Proteus vulgaris, and E. coli for 24 h under visible white light (8W fluorescent lamp) irradiation.
Similar photobactericidal results were reported with the 25 cellophane films only towards S. aureus. The authors highlighted that the attempts to impregnate the cellophane films with anionic porphyrins were not successful.
Later on, Krausz and co-workers [165] prepared and characterized photobactericidal materials 26 through the immobilization of 5-(pyridin-4-yl)-10,15,20-tris(p-tolyl)porphyrin in chloroacetyl cellulose esters (Figure 19A).
First, cellulose was dissolved in dimethylacetamide (DMAc)/LiCl and was reacted with chloroacetyl chloride leading to a functionalized plastic film with 2-chloroacetoxy units. The modified polymer was isolated by precipitation with water. Purification was carried out by successive dissolution–precipitation cycles and plastic films were then obtained by casting. The grafting of 5-(pyridin-4-yl)-10,15,20-tris(p-tolyl)porphyrin on chloroacetyl cellulose esters was achieved by a reaction of the plastic film previously synthesized, dissolved in anhydrous DMF, with the porphyrin derivative, at room temperature. The plastics films obtained after quaternization of the pyridine units were obtained by casting in a Petri dish after the adequate work-up (Figure 19B).
The photoactive material 26 was tested against E. coli and S. aureus and the results showed that the high photobactericidal activity of the plastic films 26 prepared (no bacterial growth) was attributed to 1O2 generation and was dependent on the amount of porphyrin grafting (≥0.2 porphyrin content). In the absence of porphyrinic PS, the films allowed the full growth of bacteria.
In 2010, the same group [158] reported the covalent grafting of a cationic amino porphyrin 27a on cotton fabrics via a 1,3,5-triazine linker 28a without any preliminary chemical modification of the cellulosic material (Figure 20). In fact, several research groups have explored 1,3,5-triazine linkers for the fabrication of covalently linked porphyrin-cellulose antimicrobial materials. The resulting porphyrin-triazine derivative grafted on cotton fabrics 29a was tested in vitro against S. aureus. When the prepared cationic material 29a was exposed to a white light for 24 h with a total light dose of 9.5 J cm2, a very high photoinactivation performance against S. aureus was achieved, with the limit detection of the method attained (>6 log of reduction).
The authors also assessed the efficacy of the photomaterial 29a towards the gram-(−) bacterial strain E. coli [166]. After 24 h of exposure to white light (a total light dose of 9.5 J cm−2) of photomaterial 29a and E. coli, no photoactivity was found. However, in the same photodynamic conditions, high growth inhibition rates of S. aureus (>4 log reduction) were reached. Despite the good results achieved for light activated PS, the material 29a showed toxicity in the dark (80%) towards S. aureus. The authors attribute this fact to the presence of positively charged groups in the porphyrin macrocycle, known for their membrane disruption action on bacteria, even without light activation [166].
An extension of the previous studies was reported by the same research group [167]. The authors used the same approach (cyanuric chloride as a grafting agent) to immobilize 27b in filter paper (Figure 21) and evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of this bactericidal paper 29b against S. aureus and E. coli bacterial strains. The authors showed that the untreated paper in the dark, or under white light irradiation, as well as the treated paper in the dark, allowed a bacterial growth of 4 and 2 log units for S. aureus and E. coli, respectively, when compared with the initial bacterial concentration. However, no survival of either type of bacteria was detected on the paper bearing the porphyrin 27b after white light exposure for 24 h with a total light dose of 9.5 J cm−2 (inhibition of ~4 and 2 log units for S. aureus and E. coli, respectively).
Studies conducted by Ghiladi group [125], reported the development of self-disinfecting materials through the covalent attachment of 27b to nano-fibrillated cellulose (NFC) and paper (Pap) (Figure 22). The grafting strategy was centered on an environmentally sustainable method where the treatment of cellulose supports was mediated by an aqueous solution of cyanuric chloride, avoiding the use of organic solvents. Then, the 27b and its Zn(II) complex 27c were covalently attached by means of 1,3,5-triazine linkage to NFC or paper giving the materials 29b@NFC, 29c@NFC, 29b@Pap, and 29c@Pap (Figure 20).
In vitro aPDT assays employing the PS–cellulose conjugated materials (29b@NFC, 29c@NFC, 29b@Pap, and 29c@Pap) (Figure 22) were performed under fixed illumination conditions (1 h, white light (400–700 nm) at an irradiance of 65 ± 5 mW cm−2 towards four multiresistant bacteria strains (S. aureus; Enterococcus faecium, Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and two enveloped viruses (Dengue-1 and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)). Table 1 summarizes the efficacy of prepared materials against the bacterial strains and viruses tested.
It was observed that against Gram-(+) bacteria, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and E. faecium, all photoactive materials achieved the detection limit of the inactivation method (99.9999%, 6 log unit reduction in CFU mL−1). In terms of killing Gram-(−) bacterium A. baumannii, most of the materials achieved the method detection limit (99.9999%, 6 log of abundance reduction) with exception of 29b@NFC which was able to inhibit 4.5 log units (99.994% of reduction). For 29b@NFC, no antibacterial activity was found against K. pneumoniae whereas photoinactivation with 29c@NFC reached ~82% (0.73 log of reduction in CFU mL−1). On the other hand, when paper supports have been employed against K. pneumoniae photoinactivations of 99.9994% (~5.3 log of reduction) in the presence of 29b@Pap and 99.47% (~2.3 log of reduction) for 29c@Pap have been achieved.
The antiviral photodynamic inactivation studies employing 29b@NFC and 29c@NFC were conducted towards the two model enveloped viruses, (VSV and dengue-1), using similar photodynamic conditions to those of the antibacterial studies. Impressively, both materials 29b@NFC and 29c@NFC exhibited photoinactivation of the viral particles: dengue-1 by 99.99% (4 log reduction in PFU mL−1), and VSV by 99.9999% (6 log reduction in PFU mL−1). However, a dark viral inactivation of ~90% (~1 log of reduction in PFU mL−1) was also revealed in the dark controls.
Ghiladi research group [168,169] also employed the “Click Chemistry” approach [Cu(I)-catalyzed Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition] to immobilize covalently the tricationic porphyrin 30 bearing an alkynyl function to cellulose nanocrystals bearing azide moieties, giving material 31 (Figure 23). The authors prepared the cellulose nanocrystals by hydrolysis of Whatman #1 filter paper (98% α-cellulose, 80% crystallinity) previously blended using aqueous HBr. After removing the excess of acid, water-soluble fragments and ultrafine particles were obtained with an average length of 100–400 nm. These nanocrystals were then functionalized with the azide moieties for further reaction with the alkynylporphyrin 30. It was demonstrated that a suspension of material 31 showed an excellent photodynamic inactivation efficacy toward Mycobacterium smegmatis and S. aureus. However, only slight activity against E. coli was attained.
In the first aPDT assays, the bacterial cultures were irradiated with white light (400–700 nm at an irradiance of 60 mW cm−2) for 30 min (total light dose 108 J cm−2) in PBS with 20 µM of 31 after a dark incubation period and the results showed a 6 log reduction in viable cells against S. aureus (5 min incubation), 3.5 log for M. smegmatis (45 min incubation), and 2 log for E. coli (60 min incubation) [168].
As an extension of the previous work, in order to gain insight into the photodynamic action mechanism, the same group used the same photoactive material against different bacterial strains [169]. In that view, photoactive material 31 (20 µM) was used in the inactivation of multidrug resistant A. baumannii, S. aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (≈108 CFU mL−1) with visible light at an irradiance of 65 mW cm−2 [169]. A decrease of 6 log in viable cells was observed for S. aureus (5 min incubation), 5–6 log units for sensitive A. baumannii (30 min incubation) and multidrug resistant A. baumannii (15 min incubation) and 2.5 log units for P. aeruginosa (60 min incubation) after receiving a total light dose of 118 J cm−2 (30 min of irradiation). Confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of samples of A. baumannii or S. aureus incubated with the photoactive material 31 suggested a lack of PS internalization by the bacteria. Considering both studies, the authors commented that material 31 was able to mediate the photodynamic inactivation of all the tested bacterial strains studied. Confocal microscopy demonstrated that the mode of action for 31 did not proceed through a PS-binding or uptake mechanism. The cytotoxic species (e.g., 1O2 and other ROS) generated by the photodynamic process damaged the bacteria wall, leading to cell inactivation. These results corroborate other studies that highlight the inactivation efficiency of porphyrins towards bacteria without PS internalization requirement [161].
Considering the promising results, and having in mind scalability for the production of anti-infective or self-sterilizing materials, Ghiladi and co-authors [170] also employed cellulose paper activated with azide moieties to graft other porphyrin derivatives (neutral and negatively charged) and BODIPYs bearing an alkynyl unit via the “Click-Chemistry” approach. The bactericidal papers obtained with a dye load of ca. 8 mg g−1 (12.4 nmol mg−1) were fully characterized and their antibacterial efficacy was evaluated against “ESKAPE” pathogens, e.g., S. aureus, vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae. However, from all the bactericidal papers prepared, the best results were obtained with the material 31 (positive charged porphyrin derivative) that was able to photoinactivate >4 log (99.99%) of all bacterial strains studied upon illumination for 30 min with white light (400−700 nm) at an irradiance of 65 mW cm−2. The same material 31 was also able to photoinactivate dengue-1 virus by >4 log, influenza A virus by ~2.5 log (~99.5%), and human adenovirus-5 by ~2 log (~99%).
Zerrouk research groups [171] also used the concept of “click chemistry”, as a strategy for grafting propargylated cationic porphyrins in azide modified cellulose materials. Zerrouk considered Kraft Pulp (KrP) as cellulose raw-material for the preparation of antimicrobial photoactive material. The material was first functionalized, via hydroxyl group tosylation, following by the azide group insertion in the presence of sodium azide, yielding 6-azido-6-deoxycellulose (Figure 24). Then, the treatment 5,10,15,20-tetra(pyridin-4-yl)porphyrin 32 with an excess of propargyl bromide at room temperature afforded the propargylated porphyrin derivative 33 in quantitative yield that after coordination with Zn(II) afforded the corresponding metalloporphyrin 34.
The covalent linkage between the azide kraft pulp and the propargylated cationic metalloporphyrin 34 was carried out using Cu(I)-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition (CuAAC) approach. The photodynamic antimicrobial activity of new cellulose material 35 was evaluated against the S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa bacterial strains under white light irradiation (400–800 nm) at an irradiance of 0.16 mW cm−2 and a total light dose of 13.8 J cm−2. The functionalized kraft pulp precursors, untreated, tosylated, and azidated were used as control materials and no dark or light antibacterial activity was achieved for all controls. Furthermore, material 35 did not show activity against Gram-(−) bacteria E. coli and P. aeruginosa under dark and light conditions. However, bacteriostatic activity against Gram-(+) bacterium S. aureus was observed (99% of abundance reduction, 2 log reduction in CFU mL−1) after dark exposure to the material 35, which changed to a bactericidal effect of (>99.9% of abundance reduction; 3 log reduction) under light conditions.
A similar approach was used by Guesmi to obtain material 37 from the mono-propargylated cationic fluoroporphyrin 36 and cellulose functionalized with azide units (Figure 25) [172]. The catalytic coupling reaction was performed in water and in the presence of copper nanoparticles (CuNP).
Although photodynamic inactivation was not accessed in this study, the antimicrobial activity of the newly porphyrin-cellulose material 37 was evaluated in the dark after incubation with E. coli and S. aureus, along with the non-functionalized textiles as a comparison, at different times. The results showed that the bactericidal efficacy was time dependent: after 20 min of bacterial strain incubation with material 37, a 3 log (99.9%) reduction on bacterial growth was noticed, whereas a 6 log (99.9999%) reduction was obtained after 80 min of photodynamic treatment.
In addition, in 2016, Rahimi, Rassa and Fayyaz [104,173] reported the antimicrobial properties of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N,N,N-trimethylanilinium-4-yl)porphyrin, 25 and of its Zn(II) complex 25a after being just embedded in cellulosic fabrics. The process involved the soaking of a 100% cellulosic fabric, pre-treated with an aqueous solution of Na2CO3, with solutions of porphyrins 25 and 25a in PBS for 30 min at 50 °C. After this period, the unbound porphyrin was thoroughly washed, and the molar embedding ratio was calculated by UV-Vis. The authors reported that the embedding yield was dependent on the initial concentration of the PS and its presence in the cellulosic fabrics was confirmed by spectroscopic techniques. The antimicrobial activity of the new materials was tested under visible light irradiation (100 W tungsten lamp with an average irradiance of ~0.36 mW.cm−2) towards S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli. The results showed that the irradiation period and the PS concentration were important factors to be taken into account. S. aureus was full inactivated (>3 log reduction) with both prepared cellulose fabrics at PS concentration of 100 µM after 30 min of irradiation while for P. aeruginosa (20% of reduction), at the same PS concentration, the full inactivation (>3 log reduction, >99.9%) was only attained in the presence of Zn(II) complex 25a after 90 min of irradiation. The worse efficiency of these materials was observed towards E. coli (58.5% for 25 and 30% for 25a, <0.4 log reduction) at the same concentration and after 90 min of irradiation.

3.2.3. Anionic Porphyrins

The above-mentioned section clearly demonstrates that aPDT research efforts have been focused on the development of cationic complexes, as their biocide efficacy arises from the possibility of interaction of these compounds with the bacterial cell membrane. The development of anionic porphyrins, regardless of their high efficiency to produce ROS, does not receive great attention because of their low interaction on the membrane. Anionic porphyrins carry typically sulfonated [174,175,176,177], carboxylic acid/carboxylate [178,179] or phosphonate/phosphinate groups [180,181,182]. These negatively charged functional groups induce an inherent solubility of the porphyrins in aqueous media, which would greatly benefit their application in biological or environmental contexts.
Although there are several reports dealing with the immobilization of cationic and neutral porphyrins onto cellulosic materials, to date, there have been only two studies that describe the covalent linking of an anionic porphyrin derivative onto a cellulose scaffold and its use in light-promoted inactivation of bacteria.
In this context, Sol and co-workers [158] developed a study where the anionic porphyrin 5-(4-aminophenyl)-10,15,20-tris(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin trisodium 38 was compared with 27a and 27b (Figure 20) counterparts for aPDT application. The anionic derivative 38, after reaction with cyanuric chloride, afforded porphyrin 39, which was then grafted on a cotton surface through 1,3,5-triazine linkage, yielding material 40 (Figure 26).
The photodynamic efficacy of anionic porphyrin-grafted in cotton 40 was tested in vitro, against S. aureus. When functional cellulose-based material 40 (~10 μmol of PS) was incubated for 24 h and exposed to white light with a total light dose of 9.5 J/cm2, the bacterial reductions were 37% (~0.2 log reduction), 94.7% (~1.3 log reduction), and >99.99% (>4 log reduction) for anionic, neutral, and cationic materials, respectively. The experimental data suggest that results are dependent on the PS charge. It was highlighted that the cationic material 29a showed the highest antimicrobial effect against S. aureus, probably due to the presence of a positive charge, responsible for disrupting cell walls.
Later on, Carofiglio and co-workers [183] explored the features and properties of the photoactive material obtained by conjugating the anionic and water-soluble amino porphyrin 38 with nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC).
The NCC support selected was produced by sulfuric acid treatment of commercial microcrystalline cellulose (66% of crystallinity). The oxidation with TEMPO in the presence of NaOCl–NaBr selectively converted some primary hydroxyl groups on the NCC surface to carboxylic functionalities. The conjugation of 38 to the obtained NCC-COOH via amide linkage (Figure 27) was performed using carbodiimide crosslinker chemistry in an acidic aqueous solution of 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES, 50 mM, pH = 4) in the presence of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC.HCl) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS). The 38@NCC material was isolated after three days under stirring, followed by centrifugation, and washing work-up. Additionally, the authors evaluated the potential of this photoactive material as PS by evaluating the 1O2 generation. However, no photoinactivaton studies against bacteria have been presented until now.

4. Other Cellulose Based Biopolymer and Other Cellulose-like Fibres as Supports

In addition to cellulose, other non-toxic and biodegradable supports, such as chitosan, chitin, xylan or lignin biomaterials (Figure 28), and organic synthetic polymers as supports for PS to be used in aPDT, deserve to be discussed since they have an impact in this research field [184,185].
In the grafting of PS to synthetic polymers, different approaches could be considered: (i) covalent or non-covalent linking of the macrocycle with polymers, or (ii) the co-polymerization of PS with polymerizable moieties with monomers or electrospinning techniques.
The quest for affordable and industrially robust fabrication technologies of antimicrobial surfaces and biomaterials led Ghiladi and co-workers [186] to employ electrospinning in the preparation of a non-woven textile comprised of polyacrylonitrile nanofibers (PAN) embedded with a porphyrin-based cationic photosensitizer 39, termed PAN-39 (Figure 29). Antibacterial efficacy of PAN-39 material (PS loading 34.8 nmol mg−1 of material) was evaluated against multiresistant bacterial models: S. aureus; vancomycin-resistant E. faecium; A. baumannii; K. pneumonia, as well as E. coli. The results obtained showed a broad photodynamic inactivation of all multiresistant bacterial strains studied upon white light exposure (400–700 nm, 30 min of exposure at an irradiance of 65 ± 5 mW cm−2) by a minimum of 99.9996% (>5.8 log of abundance reduction) regardless of taxonomic classification. PAN-39 also inactivated human adenovirus-5 (~99.8% reduction in PFU/mL, ~3 log reduction) and VSV particles (>7 log reduction in PFU mL−1). When compared to previous studies with cellulose-based materials employing this same PS (porphyrin 30) [168,169,170], the higher photodynamic inactivation performance achieved here with PAN-39 is likely due to the combined effects of higher PS loading and a greater surface area imparted by the use of nanofibers.
The work of Rodgers and collaborators [187] consisted in the immobilization of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin 40 on a chitin support (the second most abundant natural polysaccharide, after cellulose, a linear polymer composed of repeating β(1→4)-N-acetylglucosamine units) using ionic liquids (ILs) as solvent. In this study, the Ils were used for chitin extraction and partial deacetylation, as well as a medium for grafting 40 on chitin support. Chitin was first extracted from shrimp shells using the 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([C2mim][OAc]), coagulated in water, and then deacetylated. The deacetylated-chitin (DA-chitin) was dissolved in [C2mim][OAc] and the covalent attachment between the amino groups of DA-chitin and the carboxyl groups of 40 was performed in the presence of the activators EDC and N-hydroxy-succinimide (NHS) (Figure 30). The resulting polymeric composites were cast as a film and coagulated with water to remove the IL and the excess of reagents, resulting in homogeneous 40@DA-chitin films. Further modifications of the optical properties were achieved by the incorporation of metal ions (Cu2+, Zn2+, Gd3+, and Fe3+) into the 40@DA-chitin films. In addition, the 40@DA-chitin films, with and without chelating metal ions, exhibited efficient 1O2 production under light irradiation.
Since these films showed interesting optical and photophysical properties (good 1O2 generation and tunable optical properties), the authors anticipated that such films have a great potential to be used in aPDT.
Hetteger and co-workers [121] selected a cellulose-based fiber, namely Lyocell, to support porphyrins according to the azide-alkyne “click” concept (Figure 31). First, azido-modified Lyocell fibers 41 and alkynylated PPIX 42 building blocks were prepared through alkoxysilane chemistry and Steglich esterification (DCC/4-dimethylaminopyridine), respectively. Lyocell fibers were pre-activated by swelling in organic solvents to increase the accessibility of hydroxyl groups in the subsequent silanization process. Then, both building blocks were combined under the “Click Chemistry” approach affording photoactive Lyocell fibers 43 (Figure 31) which after a full characterization, by FTIR, NMR, UV/Vis spectroscopy, and elemental analysis, was biologically screened. The photobactericidal activity of the photoactive Lyocell fibers 43 against S. aureus and B. subtilis was confirmed by the diminishing bacterial growth rate of both Gram-(+) strains. These achievements corroborated the potential envisaged for these fibers as antimicrobial textiles to be applicable at home, hospitals, and health care facilities.
Following the same “Click Chemistry” approach, Zerrouki and co-workers [130] grafted the Zn(II) complex of 5-(4-azidophenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin 45a onto Kraft pulp fibers. The Kraft pulp material was modified with propargyl bromide giving propargylated pulp fibers 46 (Figure 32). The functionalized support 46 was characterized by FTIR to evaluate the presence of C-C triple bond and by XPS to determine the degree of substitution. The 5-(4-azidophenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrinatozinc(II) 45a was prepared in four sequential steps: (i) condensation of pyrrole with nitrobenzaldehyde and benzaldehyde, giving 5-(4-nitrophenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin 44; (ii) reduction of nitro group with Sn(II) chloride in acidic media, affording the 5-(4-aminophenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin 21; (iii) diazotization of the aminoporphyrin 21 in the presence of NaN3 affording the azidoporphyrin 5-(4-azidophenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin 45, and, finally, (iv) metalation with Zn(II) acetate in THF. The Zn(II) metalloporphyrin complex 45a was grafted by the azide moiety on the propargylated Kraft pulp fibers 46 using a copper(I)-catalyzed coupling reaction, giving the photoactive Kraft fiber material 47.
The antimicrobial activity of material 47 was tested under visible light irradiation against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa used as Gram-(+) and Gram-(−) bacterial models, respectively. The two bacterial strains deposited on the photosensitizing Kraft pulp material 47 were efficiently killed (no surviving bacteria were detected, against to 4.5 log in the controls) after 24 h exposure to white light (total light dose of 9.5 J cm−2).
Abdelraouf and Senge [188] recently developed a photoactive material based on the loading of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(3-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin (3-THPP) onto an ethylcellulose (EC)/chitosan (Chs) nanocomposite. Chitosan is an amino polysaccharide, produced from the deacetylation of chitin. The obtained conjugate involving 3-THPP and the nanocomposite EC/Chs was characterized by different techniques as FT-IR, SEM, EDX, XRD, DLS, and UV–NIR absorption. The authors compared the photodynamic activity of 3-THPP before and after being embedded on the nanocomposite (3-THPP vs. 3-THPP@EC/Chs). When the non-supported 3-THPP was irradiated with laser light in the blue region of the electromagnetic spectrum (458 nm, 488 nm, and 476 nm; power of 70 mW) for only 15 min, reductions of 83.6 ± 1.2%, 83.4 ± 0.5%, and 87.0 ± 0.9% (<1 log reduction) in the microbial survival rates of fungus Candida albicans and bacterial strains of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were achieved, respectively. A lower performance was observed for 3-THPP@EC/Chs material when irradiated in the same blue light conditions, with microbial survival rates reductions of 56.1 ± 0.7%, 59.2 ± 0.9%, and 55.5 ± 0.8%, respectively.
On the other hand, when 635 nm (red light) was chosen to irradiate 3-THPP@EC/Chs (15 min at 5 mW), the microbial survival rates of C. albicans, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus was lower than in the presence of free 3-THPP.
In 2020, Leroy-Lhez and co-workers [189] used acetylated lignin nanoparticles (AcLi) to encapsulate 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin (4-THPP) (Figure 33). It was shown that this system (4-THPP@AcLi) was effective to produce ROS and presented a photodynamic effect against the three Gram-(+) strains tested (S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and Enterococcus faecalis), being capable to reduce bacterial abundance in 99.9% (3 log reduction) when exposed to white light and a total light dose of 4.16 J cm−2, with 4-THPP concentrations below 5.0 μM.
Despite the significant photodynamic action against Gram-(+) bacteria, the newly prepared material 4-THPP@AcLi has not shown any antimicrobial activity against, Gram-(−) bacteria (E. coli and P. aeruginosa). The authors also proved by TEM, once again, that nanoparticles did not penetrate inside the bacterial cell, suggesting that the inactivation effect was elicited on the outside of bacterial wall.
The results of aPDT accomplished by Leroy-Lhez and co-authors motivated the same authors to extend the strategy on the preparation of photoactive material with acetylated lignin containing other porphyrin derivatives. In 2022 [190], they reported the encapsulation of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin and four other porphyrin derivatives (5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-acetyloxyphenyl)porphyrin; 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrinatozinc(II), 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-(3-(N,N,N-trimethylammoniumpropoxy)phenyl)porphyrin tetra-bromide and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(1-(3-hydroxypropyl)pyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin tetra-bromide) inside acetylated lignin nanoparticles (AcLi).
Although all these porphyrin derivatives were successfully encapsulated, the resulting acetylated lignin nanoparticles disclosed a limited photodynamic bactericide effect under blue-LED light, 450–460 nm, 15 J cm−2 on S. aureus and E. coli.
Having in mind the possibility of using the aPDT approach to prevent food spoilage and deterioration or to be used in a clinical context, Castro and collaborators [61,179] considered and developed photoactive materials using porphyrin derivatives incorporated into chitosan films in view of having a high degree of reusability, without any great loss of photodynamic efficacy.
Aiming to prepare new materials for preventing the development of bacterial biofilm in the food industry, the authors prepared a set of photoactive antimicrobial films obtained by the grafting of 5,10,15,20-tetraarylporphyrins in chitosan with different functionalities, e.g., phenyl units bearing carboxyl groups or pentafluorophenyl units without or with 3- or 4-mercaptobenzoic acid groups, as shown in Figure 34 [61]. The efficiency of these antimicrobial films was assessed on the prevention of Listeria innocua attachment and consequent biofilm formation under different irradiation protocols. L. innocua biofilm growth was nearly completely inhibited in two of the porphyrin-chitosan films, one containing the 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin 48 and the other the thio-carboxylate porphyrin 50 after being exposed to white light (at an irradiance of 10 mW cm−2) for 24 h followed by incubation in the dark for 48 h.
Later on, the same research group functionalized 5,10,15-tris(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)-20-(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin tri-iodide 51 with 3- or 4-mercaptobenzoic acid, yielding two new tricationic porphyrins, 52 and 53, with suitable carboxylic pending groups to be incorporated on chitosan (Figure 35).
The cationic porphyrins 51, 52 and 53 were immobilized on chitosan by adding each porphyrin dissolved in THF to a solution of chitosan in an aqueous acetic acid solution.
The new materials 51@chitosan, 52@chitosan, and 53@chitosan were evaluated under white light towards the recombinant bioluminescent E. coli (3.0 µM under 3.0 mW cm−2 of white light irradiation) The most effective material against E. Coli was 51@chitosan, which showed a bacterial inactivation of 4.1 log reduction in CFU/mL (>99.99% of reduction) after 90 min of irradiation. In comparison, when the bacteria were exposed to 52@chitosan and 53@chitosan, the bacterial reduction was almost negligible (decrease of 0.63 (76%) and 0.31 log (~50%) reduction in CFU/mL, respectively). The authors concluded that these porphyrins, in general, have lost their capacity to produce 1O2 when entrapped on a chitosan material.

5. Cellulose Based Photoactive Materials for Application in Cancer Therapy

As mentioned above, in addition to bacterial infections, the photodynamic approach can be applied with success to treat other diseases or to improve health conditions. In fact, photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved treatment for oncologic, non-oncologic diseases, and tumor diagnoses [191]. Similarly to aPDT, it is based on the interaction of a photosensitizing dye (PS), light, or dioxygen, and involves the production of cytotoxic ROS, which trigger a cascade of reactions, leading to the destruction of abnormal cells [192]. The main advantages of PDT compared with traditional oncological therapies are due to its spatio-temporal nature, relatively non-invasive nature, lower systemic toxicity, relatively selective destruction of undesired cells, good cosmetic outcome, and its ability to stimulate the immune system, as well as its good tolerability profile [77,193].
However, PDT has also some limitations, e.g., the poor solubility of PS agents in biological media, which led the scientific community to search for better delivery systems. PS for PDT can become more efficacious when adsorbed, entrapped, or linked to cellulose-like supports which are characterized by biocompatibility and biodegradability [194]. In addition, these cellulose-based systems provide an increased surface area, a very interesting feature for a platform targeted drug delivery [195].
In 2012, Sol and collaborators [68], with a view to improving tumor selectivity and cancer cell targeting of PSs, reported the synthesis, characterization, and biological applications of cellulose nanocrystal materials prepared from three different lengths polyethyleneimine (PEI) scaffolds (54600, 542000, and 5425,000) with purpurin 18 (16) (Figure 36).
In parallel, nanocrystalline cellulose material was obtained by the hydrolysis of cellulose (cotton) with sulfuric acid/sodium periodate treatment, to covalently attach the amino groups of 54 to the resulting carbonyl groups under reductive conditions (Figure 36).
The cytotoxicity potential of the new photoactive materials 55600-25,000 was evaluated in the dark on a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCat) and compared with Photofrin II® used as control. The results showed that the photoactive material 55600 (PEI 600 Da) displayed the lowest dark cytotoxicity, close to that of Photofrin II®. Photocytotoxicity studies revealed the best IC50 (7.4 nM) for photoactive material 55600 towards HaCat cell line when compared with the 23 nM for Photofrin II®, showing that material 55600 is a very active PS in a nanomolar concentration range. Further studies demonstrated that the photodynamic action of 55600 induced apoptosis in a large fraction of treated HaCat. This cell death pathway is considered an advantage because apoptosis allows tumor cell destruction and subsequent elimination by phagocytosis.
Moreover, nanoparticles (NP) have been used as drug carriers, demonstrating an outstanding ability to improve PS drug delivery [196]. The encapsulation in NP of PSs with low solubility in water can enhance the overall delivery to targeted sites, improving biological properties such as tissue distribution and absorption rates.
Under this context, Epple and co-workers [197] prepared a positively charged hybrid NP consisting of a calcium phosphate core and an organic shell. The calcium phosphate hybrid NP was prepared by precipitation from water and then functionalized with a mixture of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(3-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin (3-THPP) and the biocompatible anionic polymer carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). The negative charge of the inner shell was then reversed by adding an outer shell of the positively charged polymer, polyethyleneimine (PEI) encapsulating the photoactive dye 3-THPP (Figure 37). The hybrid NP, carrying the photoactive dye, was dispersed in water and the photodynamic activity against HT29 cells (human colon adenocarcinoma cells), HIG-82 cells (rabbit synoviocytes), and J774A.1 cells (murine macrophages) was accessed. A high photodynamic activity together with a very low dark toxicity was observed for both cell lines HIG-82 and J774A.1 at a concentration of 2.0 μM of 3-THPP. This killing efficiency was equivalent to the non-immobilized 3-THPP. The authors ascribed the high efficacy observed for the new materials to the positive charge of the NP surface (facilitating the transport through the negatively charged cell membrane) and to the high loading of 3-THPP into the NP.
The enhancement of PS solubility and the improvement of photodynamic activity observed using a core-shell hybrid NP formed by a silica core and xylan NP was corroborated by Chaleix and co-workers in 2019 [198]. To afford drug delivery control and to increase the drug bioavailability on blood circulation, 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin 56 was functionalized with ethyl 4-bromobutyrate through nucleophilic substitution giving 57. After ester hydrolysis, in a basic medium, the resulting compound 58 was then covalently attached to xylan by esterification using 1′1’-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) as a coupling reagent to afford the material 59 (Figure 38). Finally, 59 was used to coat the silica NP (SNP) affording 59@SNP (Figure 38). The obtained nanomaterials were characterized and their therapeutic potential for PDT was evaluated against colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116 and HT-29 cell lines). In vitro studies showed that 59@SNP was 40-fold and 10-fold more effective against HCT116 cells and HT-29 cells, respectively, compared to free porphyrin 56. The authors stated that, at a cellular level, the conjugation of 56 to SNPs (59@SNP) significantly enhanced its solubility and, consequently, the uptake by cancer cells.

6. Conclusions

This review intends to cover the literature data regarding the immobilization of porphyrin-like molecules on cellulose-based supports. We discussed the typical methods employed for: cellulose modification, functionalization of porphyrins by inserting groups allowing immobilization, as well as the synthetic routes to prepare the photosensitizer-cellulose functional materials. The new photoactive hybrid materials reported herein demonstrate unique properties, including improved mechanical strength and rheological features. These characteristics are excellent for medical applications, such as wound healing photoactive patches to treat diabetic feet, pressure ulcers, or burn wounds, but also for the antimicrobial photoinactivation of multiresistant bacteria in vast clinical contexts (surfaces, gloves, catheters, fabrics). The technological approach discussed herein for photosensitizer-cellulose functional materials offers the possibility to recover and reuse the photosensitizing system in a sustainable manner.
Concerning the application of photoactive cellulose as material in the field of aPDT, its effectiveness has clearly been proven in several contexts. Nonetheless, there still is room for new improvements, maximizing the full potential for translational research and forefront development.
Infections perpetrated by multiresistant bacteria are a current major concern. Improving the PS properties in terms of amphiphilicity, cell membrane interaction, and internalization are indeed important features to exert an effective therapeutical effect. These issues might be addressed by the development of new PS structures, but also through the development of new formulations and site-directed drug delivery cellulose.
We hope that this review might contribute towards providing new insights regarding PS-graphed cellulose and motivate medical and scientific communities to devote further efforts to this topic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.J.P.M. and M.A.F.F.; writing—original draft preparation, C.J.P.M., M.G.P.M.S.N. and M.A.F.F.; writing—review and editing, C.J.P.M., M.G.P.M.S.N., A.A., C.N. and M.A.F.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received support from PT national funds (FCT/MCTES, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior) through the projects UIDB/50006/2020 and UIDP/50006/2020 (LAQV-REQUIMTE); UIDP/50017/2020 + UIDB/50017/2020 + LA/P/0094/2020 (CESAM) and the Project FCT PREVINE—FCT-PTDC/ASP-PES/29576/2017. This publication is based upon work from COST Action GLYCONanoPROBES (CA18132), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the University of Aveiro and FCT/MCT for the financial support provided to LAQV-REQUIMTE (UIDB/50006/2020, UIDP/50006/2020), CESAM (UIDP/50017/2020 + UIDB/50017/2020 + LA/P/0094/2020) and to Project PREVINE-FCT-PTDC/ASP-PES/29576/2017, through national funds (OE) and where applicable co-financed by the FEDER-Operational Thematic Program for Competitiveness and Internationalization-COMPETE 2020, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement. Thanks are also due to the Portuguese NMR and Mass Networks.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Halib, N.; Perrone, F.; Cemazar, M.; Dapas, B.; Farra, R.; Abrami, M.; Chiarappa, G.; Forte, G.; Zanconati, F.; Pozzato, G.; et al. Potential Applications of Nanocellulose-Containing Materials in the Biomedical Field. Materials 2017, 10, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. van Zyl, E.M.; Coburn, J.M. Hierarchical structure of bacterial-derived cellulose and its impact on biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2019, 24, 122–130. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ludwicka, K.; Jedrzejczak-Krzepkowska, M.; Kubiak, K.; Kolodziejczyk, M.; Pankiewicz, T.; Bielecki, S. Chapter 9—Medical and Cosmetic Applications of Bacterial NanoCellulose. In Bacterial Nanocellulose; Gama, M., Dourado, F., Bielecki, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 145–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shankaran, D.R. Chapter 14—Cellulose Nanocrystals for Health Care Applications. In Applications of Nanomaterials; Mohan Bhagyaraj, S., Oluwafemi, O.S., Kalarikkal, N., Thomas, S., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018; pp. 415–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Habibi, Y.; Lucia, L.A.; Rojas, O.J. Cellulose Nanocrystals: Chemistry, Self-Assembly, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3479–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moon, R.J.; Martini, A.; Nairn, J.; Simonsen, J.; Youngblood, J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3941–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bacakova, L.; Pajorova, J.; Bacakova, M.; Skogberg, A.; Kallio, P.; Kolarova, K.; Svorcik, V. Versatile Application of Nanocellulose: From Industry to Skin Tissue Engineering and Wound Healing. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Thomas, B.; Raj, M.C.; Athira, K.B.; Rubiyah, M.H.; Joy, J.; Moores, A.; Drisko, G.L.; Sanchez, C. Nanocellulose, a Versatile Green Platform: From Biosources to Materials and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 11575–11625. [Google Scholar]
  9. Osullivan, A.C. Cellulose: The structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 1997, 4, 173–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jedvert, K.; Heinze, T. Cellulose modification and shaping—A review. J. Polym. Eng. 2017, 37, 845. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mondal, S. Preparation, properties and applications of nanocellulosic materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 163, 301–316. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shaghaleh, H.; Xu, X.; Wang, S.F. Current progress in production of biopolymeric materials based on cellulose, cellulose nanofibers, and cellulose derivatives. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 825–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tayeb, A.H.; Amini, E.; Ghasemi, S.; Tajvidi, M. Cellulose Nanomaterials-Binding Properties and Applications: A Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 2684. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Sharma, A.; Thakur, M.; Bhattacharya, M.; Mandal, T.; Goswami, S. Commercial application of cellulose nano-composites—A review. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 21, e00316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tang, J.T.; Sisler, J.; Grishkewich, N.; Tam, K.C. Functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals for advanced applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 494, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jiang, S.; Ma, B.C.; Huang, W.; Kaltbeitzel, A.; Kizisavas, G.; Crespy, D.; Zhang, K.A.I.; Landfester, K. Visible light active nanofibrous membrane for antibacterial wound dressing. Nanoscale Horiz. 2018, 3, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Khalil, H.; Bhat, A.H.; Yusra, A.F.I. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 963–979. [Google Scholar]
  18. Aziz, T.; Ullah, A.; Fan, H.; Ullah, R.; Haq, F.; Khan, F.U.; Iqbal, M.; Wei, J. Cellulose Nanocrystals Applications in Health, Medicine and Catalysis. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 2062–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pelegrini, B.L.; Re, F.; de Oliveira, M.M.; Fernandes, T.; de Oliveira, J.H.; Oliveira, A.G.; Girotto, E.M.; Nakamura, C.V.; Sampaio, A.R.; Valim, A.; et al. Cellulose Nanocrystals as a Sustainable Raw Material: Cytotoxicity and Applications on Healthcare Technology. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2019, 304, 1900092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aoudi, B.; Boluk, Y.; El-Din, M.G. Recent advances and future perspective on nanocellulose-based materials in diverse water treatment applications. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 843, 156903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abouzeid, R.E.; Khiari, R.; El-Wakil, N.; Dufresne, A. Current State and New Trends in the Use of Cellulose Nanomaterials for Wastewater Treatment. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 573–597. [Google Scholar]
  22. Si, R.R.; Pu, J.W.; Luo, H.G.; Wu, C.J.; Duan, G.G. Nanocellulose-Based Adsorbents for Heavy Metal Ion. Polymers 2022, 14, 5479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ibrahim, H.; Sazali, N.; Salleh, W.N.W.; Ismail, A.F. Nanocellulose-Based Materials and Recent Application for Heavy Metal Removal. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 305. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hao, F.; Du, J.; Peng, L.; Zhang, M.; Dong, Z.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, L. Selective and Effective Gold Recovery from Printed Circuit Boards and Gold Slag Using Amino-Acid-Functionalized Cellulose Microspheres. Polymers 2023, 15, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dias, O.A.T.; Konar, S.; Leao, A.L.; Yang, W.M.; Tjong, J.; Sain, M. Current State of Applications of Nanocellulose in Flexible Energy and Electronic Devices. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Calle-Gil, R.; Castillo-Martínez, E.; Carretero-González, J. Cellulose Nanocrystals in Sustainable Energy Systems. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2022, 6, 2100395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, S.Q.; Xing, L.X.; Li, G.H.; Yuan, Z.W. Composites of Silver Nanoclusters and Cellulose Nanocrystals with Tunable Emission as Multicolor Inks. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 6585–6596. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, T.; Tang, C.M.; Wang, Y.F.; Wang, C.X.; Zhang, Y.W.; Qi, W.; Su, R.X.; He, Z.M. Circularly Polarized Luminescent Chiral Photonic Films Based on the Coassembly of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Gold Nanoclusters. Langmuir 2022, 38, 4147–4155. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Brown, A.J. XLIII.—On an acetic ferment which forms cellulose. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 1886, 49, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Campano, C.; Balea, A.; Blanco, A.; Negro, C. Enhancement of the fermentation process and properties of bacterial cellulose: A review. Cellulose 2016, 23, 57–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chawla, P.R.; Bajaj, I.B.; Survase, S.A.; Singhal, R.S. Microbial Cellulose: Fermentative Production and Applications. Food. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 47, 107–124. [Google Scholar]
  32. Koizumi, S.; Yue, Z.; Tomita, Y.; Kondo, T.; Iwase, H.; Yamaguchi, D.; Hashimoto, T. Bacterium organizes hierarchical amorphous structure in microbial cellulose. Eur. Phys. J. E 2008, 26, 137–142. [Google Scholar]
  33. Barud, H.S.; Regiani, T.; Marques, R.F.C.; Lustri, W.R.; Messaddeq, Y.; Ribeiro, S.J.L. Antimicrobial Bacterial Cellulose-Silver Nanoparticles Composite Membranes. J. Nanomater. 2011, 2011, 721631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gorgieva, S.; Trcek, J. Bacterial Cellulose: Production, Modification and Perspectives in Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Picheth, G.F.; Pirich, C.L.; Sierakowski, M.R.; Woehl, M.A.; Sakakibara, C.N.; de Souza, C.F.; Martin, A.A.; da Silva, R.; de Freitas, R.A. Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 97–106. [Google Scholar]
  36. Park, S.N.; Kim, J.K.; Suh, H. Evaluation of antibiotic-loaded collagen-hyaluronic acid matrix as a skin substitute. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 3689–3698. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Huang, W.Y.; Yeh, C.L.; Lin, J.H.; Yang, J.S.; Ko, T.H.; Lin, Y.H. Development of fibroblast culture in three-dimensional activated carbon fiber-based scaffold for wound healing. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2012, 23, 1465–1478. [Google Scholar]
  38. Orlando, I.; Basnett, P.; Nigmatullin, R.; Wang, W.X.; Knowles, J.C.; Roy, I. Chemical Modification of Bacterial Cellulose for the Development of an Antibacterial Wound Dressing. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 557885. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu, Y.D.; He, J.M.; Cheng, W.L.; Gu, H.B.; Guo, Z.H.; Gao, S.; Huang, Y.D. Oxidized regenerated cellulose-based hemostat with microscopically gradient structure. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 1023–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, C.J.; Hu, L.B. Nanocellulose toward Advanced Energy Storage Devices: Structure and Electrochemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 3154–3165. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fortunato, E.; Gaspar, D.; Duarte, P.; Pereira, L.; Águas, H.; Vicente, A.; Dourado, F.; Gama, M.; Martins, R. Chapter 11—Optoelectronic Devices from Bacterial NanoCellulose. In Bacterial Nanocellulose; Gama, M., Dourado, F., Bielecki, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 179–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vallejo, M.C.S.; Moura, N.M.M.; Ferreira Faustino, M.A.; Almeida, A.; Gonçalves, I.; Serra, V.V.; Neves, M.G.P.M.S. An Insight into the Role of Non-Porphyrinoid Photosensitizers for Skin Wound Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vallejo, M.C.S.; Moura, N.M.M.; Gomes, A.; Joaquinito, A.S.M.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Almeida, A.; Goncalves, I.; Serra, V.V.; Neves, M.G.M.P.S. The Role of Porphyrinoid Photosensitizers for Skin Wound Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 43. [Google Scholar]
  44. Almeida, A. Photodynamic Therapy in the Inactivation of Microorganisms. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cook, M.A.; Wright, G.D. The past, present, and future of antibiotics. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eabo7793. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. da Cunha, B.R.; Fonseca, L.P.; Calado, C.R.C. Antibiotic Discovery: Where Have We Come from, Where Do We Go? Antibiotics 2019, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Haller, J.S., Jr. The First Miracle Drugs: How the Sulfa Drugs Transformed Medicine. J. Hist. Med. Allied Sci. 2007, 63, 119–121. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bentley, R. Different roads to discovery; Prontosil (hence sulfa drugs) and penicillin (hence beta-lactams). J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 36, 775–786. [Google Scholar]
  49. Feng, M.H.; Tang, B.Q.; Liang, S.H.; Jiang, X.F. Sulfur Containing Scaffolds in Drugs: Synthesis and Application in Medicinal Chemistry. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2016, 16, 1200–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Davies, J.; Davies, D. Origins and Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010, 74, 417–433. [Google Scholar]
  51. Levy, S.B.; Marshall, B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: Causes, challenges and responses. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, S122–S129. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nathan, C. Resisting antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 259–260. [Google Scholar]
  53. O’Neill, J. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations; Wellcome Trust: London, UK, 2016; p. 80. [Google Scholar]
  54. Murray, C.J.L.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Robles Aguilar, G.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Craig, R.A.; McCoy, C.P.; Gorman, S.P.; Jones, D.S. Photosensitisers—The progression from photodynamic therapy to anti-infective surfaces. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2015, 12, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Sobotta, L.; Skupin-Mrugalska, P.; Piskorz, J.; Mielcarek, J. Non-porphyrinoid photosensitizers mediated photodynamic inactivation against bacteria. Dyes Pigment. 2019, 163, 337–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sobotta, L.; Skupin-Mrugalska, P.; Piskorz, J.; Mielcarek, J. Porphyrinoid photosensitizers mediated photodynamic inactivation against bacteria. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 175, 72–106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Arora, D.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, V.; Abrol, V.; Shankar, R.; Jaglan, S. An update on polysaccharide-based nanomaterials for antimicrobial applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bharimalla, A.K.; Deshmukh, S.P.; Vigneshwaran, N.; Patil, P.G.; Prasad, V. Nanocellulose-Polymer Composites for Applications in Food Packaging: Current Status, Future Prospects and Challenges. Polymer Plast. Tech. Eng. 2017, 56, 805–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, J.J.; Cha, R.T.; Mou, K.W.; Zhao, X.H.; Long, K.Y.; Luo, H.Z.; Zhou, F.S.; Jiang, X.Y. Nanocellulose-Based Antibacterial Materials. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, e1800334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Castro, K.A.D.F.; Moura, N.M.M.; Fernandes, A.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Simões, M.M.Q.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Nakagaki, S.; Almeida, A.; Cunha, Â.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; et al. Control of Listeria innocua biofilms by biocompatible photodynamic antifouling chitosan based materials. Dyes Pigm. 2017, 137, 265–276. [Google Scholar]
  62. Mesquita, M.Q.; Dias, C.J.; Neves, M.G.P.M.S.; Almeida, A.; Faustino, M.A.F. The Role of Photoactive Materials Based on Tetrapyrrolic Macrocycles in Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy. In Handbook of Porphyrin Science; World Scientific: Singapore, 2022; Volume 46, pp. 201–277. [Google Scholar]
  63. Habermeyer, B.; Chilingaryan, T.; Guilard, R. Bactericidal efficiency of porphyrin systems. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2021, 25, 359–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yin, R.; Agrawal, T.; Khan, U.; Gupta, G.K.; Rai, V.; Huang, Y.Y.; Hamblin, M.R. Antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation in nanomedicine: Small light strides against bad bugs. Nanomedicine 2015, 10, 2379–2404. [Google Scholar]
  65. Mesquita, M.Q.; Dias, C.J.; Neves, M.; Almeida, A.; Faustino, M.A.F. Revisiting Current Photoactive Materials for Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy. Molecules 2018, 23, 2424. [Google Scholar]
  66. Alves, E.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Neves, M.; Cunha, A.; Nadais, H.; Almeida, A. Potential applications of porphyrins in photodynamic inactivation beyond the medical scope. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C-Photochem. Rev. 2015, 22, 34–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Le Guern, F.; Ouk, T.S.; Grenier, K.; Joly, N.; Lequart, V.; Sol, V. Enhancement of photobactericidal activity of chlorin-e6-cellulose nanocrystals by covalent attachment of polymyxin B. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 6953–6962. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Drogat, N.; Granet, R.; Le Morvan, C.; Begaud-Grimaud, G.; Krausz, P.; Sol, V. Chlorin-PEI-labeled cellulose nanocrystals: Synthesis, characterization and potential application in PDT. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 3648–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Jia, R.N.; Tian, W.G.; Bai, H.; Zhang, J.M.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J. Sunlight-Driven Wearable and Robust Antibacterial Coatings with Water-Soluble Cellulose-Based Photosensitizers. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, e1801591. [Google Scholar]
  70. Klausen, M.; Ucuncu, M.; Bradley, M. Design of Photosensitizing Agents for Targeted Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy. Molecules 2020, 25, 5239. [Google Scholar]
  71. Spagnul, C.; Turner, L.C.; Boyle, R.W. Immobilized photosensitizers for antimicrobial applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2015, 150, 11–30. [Google Scholar]
  72. Luksiene, Z.; Brovko, L. Antibacterial Photosensitization-Based Treatment for Food Safety. Food Eng. Rev. 2013, 5, 185–199. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang, T.T.; Xu, L.; Shen, H.Y.; Cao, X.M.; Wei, Q.F.; Ghiladi, R.A.; Wang, Q.Q. Photoinactivation of bacteria by hypocrellin-grafted bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 2020, 27, 991–1007. [Google Scholar]
  74. Vatansever, F.; de Melo, W.; Avci, P.; Vecchio, D.; Sadasivam, M.; Gupta, A.; Chandran, R.; Karimi, M.; Parizotto, N.A.; Yin, R.; et al. Antimicrobial strategies centered around reactive oxygen species—Bactericidal antibiotics, photodynamic therapy, and beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 955–989. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hamblin, M.R.; Hasan, T. Photodynamic therapy: A new antimicrobial approach to infectious disease? Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2004, 3, 436–450. [Google Scholar]
  76. Ogilby, P.R. Singlet oxygen: There is indeed something new under the sun. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3181–3209. [Google Scholar]
  77. Dabrowski, J.M.; Arnaut, L.G. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer: From local to systemic treatment. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2015, 14, 1765–1780. [Google Scholar]
  78. Maisch, T.; Baier, J.; Franz, B.; Maier, M.; Landthaler, M.; Szeimies, R.M.; Baumler, W. The role of singlet oxygen and oxygen concentration in photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 7223–7228. [Google Scholar]
  79. Bauer, G. The Antitumor Effect of Singlet Oxygen. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 5649–5663. [Google Scholar]
  80. Jiang, L.; Gan, C.R.R.; Gao, J.; Loh, X.J. A Perspective on the Trends and Challenges Facing Porphyrin-Based Anti-Microbial Materials. Small 2016, 12, 3609–3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Almeida, A.; Cunha, A.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Tomé, A.C.; Neves, M.G.P.M.S. Chapter 5 Porphyrins as Antimicrobial Photosensitizing Agents. In Photodynamic Inactivation of Microbial Pathogens: Medical and Environmental Applications; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2011; Volume 11, pp. 83–160. [Google Scholar]
  82. Almeida, A.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Tome, J.P.C. Photodynamic inactivation of bacteria: Finding the effective targets. Future Med. Chem. 2015, 7, 1221–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Costa, L.; Tome, J.P.C.; Neves, M.; Tome, A.C.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Cunha, A.; Gomes, N.C.M.; Almeida, A. Evaluation of resistance development and viability recovery by a non-enveloped virus after repeated cycles of aPDT. Antivir. Res. 2011, 91, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kashef, N.; Hamblin, M.R. Can microbial cells develop resistance to oxidative stress in antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation? Drug Resist. Updat. 2017, 31, 31–42. [Google Scholar]
  85. Tavares, A.; Carvalho, C.M.B.; Faustino, M.A.; Neves, M.; Tome, J.P.C.; Tome, A.C.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Cunha, A.; Gomes, N.C.M.; Alves, E.; et al. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy: Study of Bacterial Recovery Viability and Potential Development of Resistance after Treatment. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wozniak, A.; Grinholc, M. Combined Antimicrobial Activity of Photodynamic Inactivation and Antimicrobials-State of the Art. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bartolomeu, M.; Rocha, S.; Cunha, A.; Neves, M.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Almeida, A. Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on the Virulence Factors of Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Fekrirad, Z.; Kashef, N.; Arefian, E. Photodynamic inactivation diminishes quorum sensing-mediated virulence factor production and biofilm formation of Serratia marcescens. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 191. [Google Scholar]
  89. Kossakowska-Zwierucho, M.; Kazmierkiewicz, R.; Bielawski, K.P.; Nakonieczna, J. Factors Determining Staphylococcus aureus Susceptibility to Photoantimicrobial Chemotherapy: RsbU Activity, Staphyloxanthin Level, and Membrane Fluidity. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1141. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Lopez-Carballo, G.; Hernandez-Munoz, P.; Gavara, R. Photoactivated Self-Sanitizing Chlorophyllin-Containing Coatings to Prevent Microbial Contamination in Packaged Food. Coatings 2018, 8, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shi, Z.J.; Zhang, Y.; Phillips, G.O.; Yang, G. Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Delgado-Lima, A.; Borges, J.P.; Ferreira, I.M.; Machado, A.V. Fluorescent and conductive cellulose acetate-based membranes with porphyrins. Mater. Today Commun. 2017, 11, 26–37. [Google Scholar]
  93. Carpenter, A.W.; de Lannoy, C.F.; Wiesner, M.R. Cellulose Nanomaterials in Water Treatment Technologies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 5277–5287. [Google Scholar]
  94. Qu, J.H. Research progress of novel adsorption processes in water purification: A review. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  95. Rana, H.H.; Park, J.H.; Gund, G.S.; Park, H.S. Highly conducting, extremely durable, phosphorylated cellulose-based ionogels for renewable flexible supercapacitors. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 25, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  96. Selishchev, D.; Stepanov, G.; Sergeeva, M.; Solovyeva, M.; Zhuravlev, E.; Komissarov, A.; Richter, V.; Kozlov, D. Inactivation and Degradation of Influenza A Virus on the Surface of Photoactive Self-Cleaning Cotton Fabric Functionalized with Nanocrystalline TiO2. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1298. [Google Scholar]
  97. Manivannan, R.; Park, S.H.; Ryu, J.; Park, J.Y.; Shin, H.J.; Son, Y.A. Ultrasonic assisted surface modified cellulose: Photocatalytic effect for the disinfection of microbes using porphyrin dyes. Dyes Pigm. 2022, 204, 110393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yang, J.Y.; Liu, D.L.; Song, X.F.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Rao, L.; Fu, L.L.; Wang, Z.J.; Yang, X.J.; Li, Y.S.; et al. Recent Progress of Cellulose-Based Hydrogel Photocatalysts and Their Applications. Gels 2022, 8, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Mafra, G.; Brognoli, R.; Carasek, E.; Lopez-Lorente, A.I.; Luque, R.; Lucena, R.; Cardenas, S. Photocatalytic Cellulose-Paper: Deepening in the Sustainable and Synergic Combination of Sorption and Photodegradation. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 9577–9586. [Google Scholar]
  100. Cherian, B.M.; Leão, A.L.; de Souza, S.F.; de Olyveira, G.M.; Costa, L.M.M.; Brandão, C.V.S.; Narine, S.S. Bacterial Nanocellulose for Medical Implants. In Advances in Natural Polymers: Composites and Nanocomposites; Thomas, S., Visakh, P.M., Mathew, A.P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 337–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hickey, R.J.; Pelling, A.E. Cellulose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  102. Dominguez-Robles, J.; Stewart, S.A.; Rendl, A.; Gonzalez, Z.; Donnelly, R.F.; Larraneta, E. Lignin and Cellulose Blends as Pharmaceutical Excipient for Tablet Manufacturing via Direct Compression. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Samaroo, D.; Perez, E.; Aggarwal, A.; Wills, A.; O’Connor, N. Strategies for Delivering Porphyrinoid-Based Photosensitizers in Therapeutic Applications. Ther. Deliv. 2014, 5, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rahimi, R.; Fayyaz, F.; Rassa, M. The study of cellulosic fabrics impregnated with porphyrin compounds for use as photo-bactericidal polymers. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016, 59, 661–668. [Google Scholar]
  105. Amirrah, I.N.; Wee, M.; Tabata, Y.; Idrus, R.B.H.; Nordin, A.; Fauzi, M.B. Antibacterial-Integrated Collagen Wound Dressing for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers: An Evidence-Based Review of Clinical Studies. Polymers 2020, 12, 2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Moradali, M.F.; Rehm, B.H.A. Bacterial biopolymers: From pathogenesis to advanced materials. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 195–210. [Google Scholar]
  107. Tavakolian, M.; Jafari, S.M.; van de Ven, T.G.M. A Review on Surface-Functionalized Cellulosic Nanostructures as Biocompatible Antibacterial Materials. Nanomicro Lett. 2020, 12, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Habibi, Y. Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1519–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Yang, Y.; Lu, Y.T.; Zeng, K.; Heinze, T.; Groth, T.; Zhang, K. Recent Progress on Cellulose-Based Ionic Compounds for Biomaterials. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2000717. [Google Scholar]
  110. Reid, J.D.; Mazzeno, L.W. Preparation and Properties of Cellulose Phosphates. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1949, 41, 2828–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Granja, P.L.; De Jeso, B.; Bareille, R.; Rouais, F.; Baquey, C.; Barbosa, M.A. Cellulose phosphates as biomaterials. In vitro biocompatibility studies. React. Funct. Polym. 2006, 66, 728–739. [Google Scholar]
  112. Ghanadpour, M.; Carosio, F.; Larsson, P.T.; Wagberg, L. Phosphorylated Cellulose Nanofibrils: A Renewable Nanomaterial for the Preparation of Intrinsically Flame-Retardant Materials. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 3399–3410. [Google Scholar]
  113. Yang, S.I.; Seth, J.; Strachan, J.-P.; Gentemann, S.; Kim, D.; Holten, D.; Lindsey, J.S.; Bocian, D.F. Ground and excited state electronic properties of halogenated tetraarylporphyrins. Tuning the building blocks for porphyrin-based photonic devices. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 1999, 3, 117–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yi, T.; Zhao, H.Y.; Mo, Q.; Pan, D.L.; Liu, Y.; Huang, L.J.; Xu, H.; Hu, B.; Song, H.N. From Cellulose to Cellulose Nanofibrils-A Comprehensive Review of the Preparation and Modification of Cellulose Nanofibrils. Materials 2020, 13, 5062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Saito, T.; Kimura, S.; Nishiyama, Y.; Isogai, A. Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2485–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Okita, Y.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A. Entire Surface Oxidation of Various Cellulose Microfibrils by TEMPO-Mediated Oxidation. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 1696–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kim, U.J.; Kuga, S.; Wada, M.; Okano, T.; Kondo, T. Periodate oxidation of crystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2000, 1, 488–492. [Google Scholar]
  118. Kasai, W.; Morooka, T.; Ek, M. Mechanical properties of films made from dialcohol cellulose prepared by homogeneous periodate oxidation. Cellulose 2014, 21, 769–776. [Google Scholar]
  119. Robles, E.; Csóka, L.; Labidi, J. Effect of Reaction Conditions on the Surface Modification of Cellulose Nanofibrils with Aminopropyl Triethoxysilane. Coatings 2018, 8, 139. [Google Scholar]
  120. Cordova, A.; Afewerki, S.; Alimohammadzadeh, R.; Sanhueza, I.; Tai, C.W.; Osong, S.H.; Engstrand, P.; Ibrahem, I. A sustainable strategy for production and functionalization of nanocelluloses. Pure Appl. Chem. 2019, 91, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fadavi, F.; Abdulkhani, A.; Hamzeh, Y.; Bacher, M.; Gorfer, M.; Bandian, D.; Rosenau, T.; Hettegger, H. Photodynamic Antimicrobial Cellulosic Material Through Covalent Linkage of Protoporphyrin IX onto Lyocell Fibers. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2019, 39, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Araujo, A.R.L.; Tome, A.C.; Santos, C.I.M.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Neves, M.; Simoes, M.M.Q.; Moura, N.M.M.; Abu-Orabi, S.T.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S. Azides and Porphyrinoids: Synthetic Approaches and Applications. Part 1-Azides, Porphyrins and Corroles. Molecules 2020, 25, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Gorgieva, S. Bacterial Cellulose as a Versatile Platform for Research and Development of Biomedical Materials. Processes 2020, 8, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hou, A.Q.; Zhou, M.E.; Wang, X.J. Preparation and characterization of durable antibacterial cellulose biomaterials modified with triazine derivatives. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 75, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Alvarado, D.R.; Argyropoulos, D.S.; Scholle, F.; Peddinti, B.S.T.; Ghiladi, R.A. A facile strategy for photoactive nanocellulose-based antimicrobial materials. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 3424–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Warren, J.; Reid, J.D.; Hamalainen, C. Action of Cyanuric Chloride on Cotton Cellulose. Text. Res. J. 1952, 22, 584–591. [Google Scholar]
  127. Jain, S.; Dwivedi, J.; Jain, P.; Kishore, D. Use of 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine (TCT) as organic catalyst in organic synthesis. Synth. Commun. 2016, 46, 1155–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Rostovtsev, V.V.; Green, L.G.; Fokin, V.V.; Sharpless, K.B. A stepwise Huisgen cycloaddition process: Copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tornoe, C.W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal, M. Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: 1,2,3 -triazoles by regiospecific copper(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3057–3064. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  130. Keki, J.; Ouk, T.S.; Zerrouki, R.; Faugeras, P.A.; Sol, V.; Brouillette, F. Synthesis and photobactericidal properties of a neutral porphyrin grafted onto lignocellulosic fibers. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016, 62, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  131. Cumpstey, I. Chemical Modification of Polysaccharides. ISRN Org. Chem. 2013, 2013, 417672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Heinze, T.; Liebert, T.; Koschella, A. Esterification of Polysaccharides; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  133. Wang, Y.G.; Wang, X.J.; Xie, Y.J.; Zhang, K. Functional nanomaterials through esterification of cellulose: A review of chemistry and application. Cellulose 2018, 25, 3703–3731. [Google Scholar]
  134. Battersby, A.R. Tetrapyrroles: The pigments of life. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 507–526. [Google Scholar]
  135. Milgrom, L.R. The Colours of Life: An Introduction to the Chemistry of Porphyrins and Related Compounds, 249th ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  136. Sachar, M.; Anderson, K.E.; Ma, X. Protoporphyrin IX: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2016, 356, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Krouit, M.; Granet, R.; Branland, P.; Verneuil, B.; Krausz, P. New photoantimicrobial films composed of porphyrinated lipophilic cellulose esters. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1651–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Dong, J.C.; Ghiladi, R.A.; Wang, Q.Q.; Cai, Y.B.; Wei, Q.F. Protoporphyrin IX conjugated bacterial cellulose via diamide spacer arms with specific antibacterial photodynamic inactivation against Escherichia coli. Cellulose 2018, 25, 1673–1686. [Google Scholar]
  139. Dong, J.C.; Ghiladi, R.A.; Wang, Q.Q.; Cai, Y.B.; Wei, Q.F. Protoporphyrin-IX conjugated cellulose nanofibers that exhibit high antibacterial photodynamic inactivation efficacy. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 265601. [Google Scholar]
  140. Ringot, C.; Saad, N.; Bregier, F.; Bressollier, P.; Poli, E.; Chaleix, V.; Ouk, T.S.; Sol, V. Antibacterial activity of a photosensitive hybrid cellulose fabric. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2018, 17, 1780–1786. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  141. Wang, T.T.; Ke, H.Z.; Chen, S.P.; Wang, J.; Yang, W.S.; Cao, X.M.; Liu, J.Y.; Wei, Q.F.; Ghiladi, R.A.; Wang, Q.Q. Porous protoporphyrin IX-embedded cellulose diacetate electrospun microfibers in antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 118, 111502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Pucelik, B.; Sulek, A.; Dabrowski, J.M. Bacteriochlorins and their metal complexes as NIR-absorbing photosensitizers: Properties, mechanisms, and applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 416, 213340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. De Annunzio, S.R.; Costa, N.C.S.; Mezzina, R.D.; Graminha, M.A.S.; Fontana, C.R. Chlorin, Phthalocyanine, and Porphyrin Types Derivatives in Phototreatment of Cutaneous Manifestations: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Arnaut, L.G. Design of porphyrin-based photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. In Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, Volume 63: Inorganic Photochemistry; VanEldik, R.S.G., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; Volume 63, pp. 187–233. [Google Scholar]
  145. Mesquita, M.Q.; Menezes, J.; Neves, M.; Tome, A.C.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Cunha, A.; Almeida, A.; Hackbarth, S.; Roder, B.; Faustino, M.A.F. Photodynamic inactivation of bioluminescent Escherichia coli by neutral and cationic pyrrolidine-fused chlorins and isobacteriochlorins. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 808–812. [Google Scholar]
  146. Castro, K.; Ramos, L.; Mesquita, M.; Biazzotto, J.C.; Moura, N.M.M.; Mendes, R.F.; Paz, F.A.A.; Tome, A.C.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Simoes, M.M.Q.; et al. Comparison of the Photodynamic Action of Porphyrin, Chlorin, and Isobacteriochlorin Derivatives toward a Melanotic Cell Line. ACS Appl. Biol. Mater. 2021, 4, 4925–4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Luo, S.L.; Zhang, E.L.; Su, Y.P.; Cheng, T.M.; Shi, C.M. A review of NIR dyes in cancer targeting and imaging. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 7127–7138. [Google Scholar]
  148. Escobedo, J.O.; Rusin, O.; Lim, S.; Strongin, R.M. NIR dyes for bioimaging applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Luciano, M.; Bruckner, C. Modifications of Porphyrins and Hydroporphyrins for Their Solubilization in Aqueous Media. Molecules 2017, 22, 980. [Google Scholar]
  150. Mesquita, M.Q.; Ferreira, A.R.; Neves, M.; Ribeiro, D.; Fardilha, M.; Faustino, M.A.F. Photodynamic therapy of prostate cancer using porphyrinic formulations. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2021, 223, 112301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lagorio, M.G.; San Roman, E.; Zeug, A.; Zimmermann, J.; Roder, B. Photophysics on surfaces: Absorption and luminescence properties of Pheophorbide-a on cellulose. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001, 3, 1524–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zeug, A.; Zimmermann, J.; Roder, B.; Lagorio, M.G.; San Roman, E. Microcrystalline cellulose as a carrier for hydrophobic photosensitizers in water. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2002, 1, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Pereira, M.M.; Monteiro, C.J.P.; Peixoto, A.F. Meso-substituted porphyrin synthesis from monopyrrole: An overview. In Targets in Heterocyclic Systems-Chemistry and Properties; Attanasi, O.A., Spinelli, D., Eds.; Italian Society of Chemistry: Rome, Italy, 2009; Volume 12, pp. 258–278. [Google Scholar]
  154. Lindsey, J.S. Synthesis of meso-Substituted Porphyrins. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K.M., Smith, K.M., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000; Volume 1, pp. 45–118. [Google Scholar]
  155. Ogilby, P.R. Singlet oxygen: There is still something new under the sun, and it is better than ever. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2010, 9, 1543–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Krouit, M.; Granet, R.; Krausz, P. Photobactericidal films from porphyrins grafted to alkylated cellulose—Synthesis and bactericidal properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar]
  157. Ringot, C.; Sol, V.; Granet, R.; Krausz, P. Porphyrin-grafted cellulose fabric: New photobactericidal material obtained by "Click-Chemistry" reaction. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 1889–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Ringot, C.; Saad, N.; Granet, R.; Bressollier, P.; Sol, V.; Krausz, P. Meso-functionalized aminoporphyrins as efficient agents for photo-antibacterial surfaces. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2010, 14, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Wang, J.; Wu, K.; Chen, C.H.; Chen, Q.Y.; Liu, Q.S. Composite Nanoarchitectonics of Cellulose with Porphyrin-Zn for Antibacterial Properties. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2022, 33, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Vallejo, M.C.S.; Reis, M.J.A.; Pereira, A.; Serra, V.V.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Moura, N.M.M.; Neves, M. Merging pyridine(s) with porphyrins and analogues: An overview of synthetic approaches. Dyes Pigm. 2021, 191, 109298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Preuss, A.; Zeugner, L.; Hackbarth, S.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Neves, M.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Roeder, B. Photoinactivation of Escherichia coli (SURE2) without intracellular uptake of the photosensitizer. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 114, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Silva, E.M.P.; Ramos, C.I.V.; Pereira, P.M.R.; Giuntini, F.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Tome, J.P.C.; Tome, A.C.; Silva, A.M.S.; Santana-Marques, M.G.; Neves, M.; et al. Cationic beta-vinyl substituted meso-tetraphenylporphyrins: Synthesis and non-covalent interactions with a short poly(dGdC) duplex. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2012, 16, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Simoes, C.; Gomes, M.C.; Neves, M.; Cunha, A.; Tome, J.P.C.; Tome, A.C.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Almeida, A.; Faustino, M.A.F. Photodynamic inactivation of Escherichia coli with cationic meso-tetraarylporphyrins—The charge number and charge distribution effects. Catal. Today 2016, 266, 197–204. [Google Scholar]
  164. Bonnett, R.; Galia, A. Photobactericidal Films Based on Regenerated Cellulose. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 1994, 8, 68–74. [Google Scholar]
  165. Krouit, M.; Granet, R.; Krausz, P. Photobactericidal plastic films based on cellulose esterified by chloroacetate and a cationic porphyrin. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 10091–10097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Ringot, C.; Sol, V.; Barriere, M.; Saad, N.; Bressollier, P.; Granet, R.; Couleaud, P.; Frochot, C.; Krausz, P. Triazinyl Porphyrin-Based Photoactive Cotton Fabrics: Preparation, Characterization, and Antibacterial Activity. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 1716–1723. [Google Scholar]
  167. Mbakidi, J.P.; Herke, K.; Alves, S.; Chaleix, V.; Granet, R.; Krausz, P.; Leroy-Lhez, S.; Ouk, T.S.; Sol, V. Synthesis and photobiocidal properties of cationic porphyrin-grafted paper. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 333–338. [Google Scholar]
  168. Feese, E.; Sadeghifar, H.; Gracz, H.S.; Argyropoulos, D.S.; Ghiladi, R.A. Photobactericidal Porphyrin-Cellulose Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Characterization, and Antimicrobial Properties. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 3528–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Carpenter, B.L.; Feese, E.; Sadeghifar, H.; Argyropoulos, D.S.; Ghiladi, R.A. Porphyrin-Cellulose Nanocrystals: A Photobactericidal Material that Exhibits Broad Spectrum Antimicrobial Activity. Photochem. Photobiol. 2012, 88, 527–536. [Google Scholar]
  170. Carpenter, B.L.; Scholle, F.; Sadeghifar, H.; Francis, A.J.; Boltersdorf, J.; Weare, W.W.; Argyropoulos, D.S.; Maggard, P.A.; Ghiladi, R.A. Synthesis, Characterization, and Antimicrobial Efficacy of Photomicrobicidal Cellulose Paper. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 2482–2492. [Google Scholar]
  171. Khaldi, Z.; Nzambe Takeki, J.K.; Ouk, T.-S.; Lucas, R.; Zerrouk, R. Synthesis and photo-bactericidal properties of a cationic porphyrin grafted onto kraft pulp fibers. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2019, 23, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Guesmi, A. New fluoro triazol porphyrin-cellulose: Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2016, 27, 1517–1522. [Google Scholar]
  173. Fayyaza, F.; Rahimi, R.; Rassa, M. Preparation of Photo-Bactericidal Cellulosic Fabrics Impregnated with Tetra- Cationic Porphyrin Compounds. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 2, 4. [Google Scholar]
  174. Dabrowski, J.M.; Arnaut, L.G.; Pereira, M.M.; Monteiro, C.J.P.; Urbanska, K.; Simoes, S.; Stochel, G. New Halogenated Water-Soluble Chlorin and Bacteriochlorin as Photostable PDT Sensitizers: Synthesis, Spectroscopy, Photophysics, and in vitro Photosensitizing Efficacy. Chemmedchem 2010, 5, 1770–1780. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  175. Dabrowski, J.M.; Pereira, M.M.; Arnaut, L.G.; Monteiro, C.J.P.; Peixoto, A.F.; Karocki, A.; Urbanska, K.; Stochel, G. Synthesis, photophysical studies and anticancer activity of a new halogenated water-soluble porphyrin. Photochem. Photobiol. 2007, 83, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  176. Monteiro, C.J.P.; Pereira, M.M.; Azenha, M.E.; Burrows, H.D.; Serpa, C.; Arnaut, L.G.; Tapia, M.J.; Sarakha, M.; Wong-Wah-Chung, P.; Navaratnam, S. A comparative study of water soluble 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(2,6-dichloro-3-sulfophenyl)porphyrin and its metal complexes as efficient sensitizers for photodegradation of phenols. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2005, 4, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Srivastava, T.S.; Tsutsui, M. Unusual metalloporphyrins. XVI. Preparation and purification of tetrasodium meso-tetra(p-sulfophenyl)porphine. Easy procedure. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Monteiro, C.J.P.; Pereira, M.M.; Vicente, M.G.H.; Arnaut, L.G. Photophysical properties of unsymmetric meso-substituted porphyrins synthesized via the Suzuki coupling reaction. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 8783–8788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Castro, K.; Moura, N.M.M.; Figueira, F.; Ferreira, R.I.; Simoes, M.M.Q.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Freire, C.S.R.; Tome, J.P.C.; et al. New Materials Based on Cationic Porphyrins Conjugated to Chitosan or Titanium Dioxide: Synthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Efficacy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Venkatramaiah, N.; Pereira, C.F.; Mendes, R.F.; Paz, F.A.A.; Tomé, J.P.C. Phosphonate Appended Porphyrins as Versatile Chemosensors for Selective Detection of Trinitrotoluene. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 4515–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Erbacher, M.; Montforts, F.P. Synthesis of novel porphyrin and chlorin phosphonic acids and their immobilization on metal oxides. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2011, 15, 1070–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Wedel, M.; Walter, A.; Montforts, F.-P. Synthesis of Metalloporphyrins and Metallochlorins for Immobilization on Electrode Surfaces. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2001, 1681–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Chauhan, P.; Hadad, C.; Sartorelli, A.; Zarattini, M.; Herreros-Lopez, A.; Mba, M.; Maggini, M.; Prato, M.; Carofiglio, T. Nanocrystalline cellulose-porphyrin hybrids: Synthesis, supramolecular properties, and singlet-oxygen production. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8525–8527. [Google Scholar]
  184. Ebringerova, A. Structural diversity and application potential of hemicelluloses. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 232, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Marchand, G.; Fabre, G.; Maldonado-Carmona, N.; Villandier, N.; Leroy-Lhez, S. Acetylated lignin nanoparticles as a possible vehicle for photosensitizing molecules. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 5648–5658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Stanley, S.L.; Scholle, F.; Zhu, J.D.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X.W.; Situ, X.C.; Ghiladi, R.A. Photosensitizer-Embedded Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers as Antimicrobial Non-Woven Textile. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Li, K.; Berton, P.; Kelley, S.P.; Rogers, R.D. Singlet Oxygen Production and Tunable Optical Properties of Deacetylated Chitin-Porphyrin Crosslinked Films. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 3291–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Hasanin, M.S.; Abdelraof, M.; Fikry, M.; Shaker, Y.M.; Sweed, A.M.K.; Senge, M.O. Development of Antimicrobial Laser-Induced Photodynamic Therapy Based on Ethylcellulose/Chitosan Nanocomposite with 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(m-Hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin. Molecules 2021, 26, 3551. [Google Scholar]
  189. Maldonado-Carmona, N.; Marchand, G.; Villandier, N.; Ouk, T.S.; Pereira, M.M.; Calvete, M.J.F.; Calliste, C.A.; Zak, A.; Piksa, M.; Pawlik, K.J.; et al. Porphyrin-Loaded Lignin Nanoparticles Against Bacteria: A Photodynamic Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Application. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 606185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Maldonado-Carmona, N.; Ouk, T.S.; Villandier, N.; Calliste, C.A.; Calvete, M.J.F.; Pereira, M.M.; Leroy-Lhez, S. Photophysical and Antibacterial Properties of Porphyrins Encapsulated inside Acetylated Lignin Nanoparticles. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. van Straten, D.; Mashayekhi, V.; de Bruijn, H.S.; Oliveira, S.; Robinson, D.J. Oncologic Photodynamic Therapy: Basic Principles, Current Clinical Status and Future Directions. Cancers 2017, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hamblin, M.R. Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer: What’s Past is Prologue. Photochem. Photobiol. 2020, 96, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Simoes, J.C.S.; Sarpaki, S.; Papadimitroulas, P.; Therrien, B.; Loudos, G. Conjugated Photosensitizers for Imaging and PDT in Cancer Research. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 14119–14150. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  194. Karimian, A.; Parsian, H.; Majidinia, M.; Rahimi, M.; Mir, S.M.; Kafil, H.S.; Shafiei-Irannejad, V.; Kheyrollah, M.; Ostadi, H.; Yousefi, B. Nanocrystalline cellulose: Preparation, physicochemical properties, and applications in drug delivery systems. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Sun, B.; Zhang, M.; Shen, J.; He, Z.B.; Fatehi, P.; Ni, Y.H. Applications of Cellulose-based Materials in Sustained Drug Delivery Systems. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 2485–2501. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  196. Mesquita, M.Q.; Dias, C.J.; Gamelas, S.; Fardilha, M.; Neves, M.; Faustino, M.A.F. An Insight on the role of photosensitizer nanocarriers for Photodynamic Therapy. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2018, 90, 1101–1130. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  197. Klesing, J.; Wiehe, A.; Gitter, B.; Grafe, S.; Epple, M. Positively charged calcium phosphate/polymer nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010, 21, 887–892. [Google Scholar]
  198. Bouramtane, S.; Bretin, L.; Pinon, A.; Leger, D.; Liagre, B.; Richard, L.; Bregier, F.; Sol, V.; Chaleix, V. Porphyrin- xylan-coated silica nanoparticles for anticancer photodynamic therapy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 213, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of cellulose: (A) Molecular structure of cellulose with cellobiose as a repeating unit and (B) inter (red dotted line) and intra molecular hydrogen bonds (blue dotted line) interactions between cellulose chains within the crystalline region of the cellulose microfibrils.
Figure 1. Structure of cellulose: (A) Molecular structure of cellulose with cellobiose as a repeating unit and (B) inter (red dotted line) and intra molecular hydrogen bonds (blue dotted line) interactions between cellulose chains within the crystalline region of the cellulose microfibrils.
Ijms 24 03475 g001
Figure 2. Medical and cosmetic applications of bacterial nanocellulose: (A) cellulose layer grown on the top of bacterial culture; (B) wound dressing prepared form purified cellulosic membrane; (C) application of cellulose hydrogel patch (clinical context) in a burn injury. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [3], 2016, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 2. Medical and cosmetic applications of bacterial nanocellulose: (A) cellulose layer grown on the top of bacterial culture; (B) wound dressing prepared form purified cellulosic membrane; (C) application of cellulose hydrogel patch (clinical context) in a burn injury. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [3], 2016, Elsevier Ltd.
Ijms 24 03475 g002
Figure 3. Common chemical modifications of cellulose discussed in the current review.
Figure 3. Common chemical modifications of cellulose discussed in the current review.
Ijms 24 03475 g003
Figure 4. Synthetic approach for preparation of photobactericidal films 2 by “one-pot, two-step” esterification of cellulose with PPIX and lauric acid (adapted from Ref. [137]).
Figure 4. Synthetic approach for preparation of photobactericidal films 2 by “one-pot, two-step” esterification of cellulose with PPIX and lauric acid (adapted from Ref. [137]).
Ijms 24 03475 g004
Figure 5. Preparation of PPIX covalently grafted onto a bacterial cellulose surface (3) via diamine spacer arms with different chain lengths, (adapted from Ref. [138]).
Figure 5. Preparation of PPIX covalently grafted onto a bacterial cellulose surface (3) via diamine spacer arms with different chain lengths, (adapted from Ref. [138]).
Ijms 24 03475 g005
Figure 6. Covalent grafting of activated PPIX 5 using epichlorohydrin functionalized cellulose nanofibers 6 (adapted from Ref. [139]).
Figure 6. Covalent grafting of activated PPIX 5 using epichlorohydrin functionalized cellulose nanofibers 6 (adapted from Ref. [139]).
Ijms 24 03475 g006
Figure 7. Synthetic strategy adopted by Sol: aminoethyleneglycol spacer arms modified PPIX 9 in cotton/polymethacrylic supports 10 (adapted form Ref. [140]).
Figure 7. Synthetic strategy adopted by Sol: aminoethyleneglycol spacer arms modified PPIX 9 in cotton/polymethacrylic supports 10 (adapted form Ref. [140]).
Ijms 24 03475 g007
Figure 8. Strategy for preparation of water-soluble hybrid photoactive material 12 containing PPIX and QAS groups onto a cellulose support (adapted from Ref. [69]).
Figure 8. Strategy for preparation of water-soluble hybrid photoactive material 12 containing PPIX and QAS groups onto a cellulose support (adapted from Ref. [69]).
Ijms 24 03475 g008
Figure 9. Images of cellulose-based PS 12 on different substrates. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [69]. 2008, Elsevier.
Figure 9. Images of cellulose-based PS 12 on different substrates. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [69]. 2008, Elsevier.
Ijms 24 03475 g009
Figure 10. Scheme for the preparation of the porous PPIX-cellulose diacetate (PPIX@CA) membrane by electrospinning. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [141]. 2021, Elsevier.
Figure 10. Scheme for the preparation of the porous PPIX-cellulose diacetate (PPIX@CA) membrane by electrospinning. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [141]. 2021, Elsevier.
Ijms 24 03475 g010
Figure 11. Structure of pheophorbide-a (13) chlorin e6 (14), 6-N-(2-aminoethylamido)chlorin e6 dimethyl ester (15) purpurin 18 (16) and chlorin p6, (17) and some metal complexes.
Figure 11. Structure of pheophorbide-a (13) chlorin e6 (14), 6-N-(2-aminoethylamido)chlorin e6 dimethyl ester (15) purpurin 18 (16) and chlorin p6, (17) and some metal complexes.
Ijms 24 03475 g011
Figure 12. Synthetic route to cellulose nanocrystals CNCsc6-PMB coated with chlorin-e6 and polymyxin B and to cellulose nanocrystals CNCsPMB just coated with polymyxin B. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [67]. 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 12. Synthetic route to cellulose nanocrystals CNCsc6-PMB coated with chlorin-e6 and polymyxin B and to cellulose nanocrystals CNCsPMB just coated with polymyxin B. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [67]. 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Ijms 24 03475 g012
Figure 13. Structure of 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP), the first meso-tetraarylporphyrin (tArPs) synthesized in laboratory.
Figure 13. Structure of 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP), the first meso-tetraarylporphyrin (tArPs) synthesized in laboratory.
Ijms 24 03475 g013
Figure 14. (A) Structure of tri-tolyl porphyrin derivative immobilized in ester laureate cellulosic polymer hybrid material (18a and 18b) prepared by Krausz and co-workers (adapted from reference [156]). (B) Porphyrinic cellulose laurate ester plastic. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [156]. 2008, Elsevier.
Figure 14. (A) Structure of tri-tolyl porphyrin derivative immobilized in ester laureate cellulosic polymer hybrid material (18a and 18b) prepared by Krausz and co-workers (adapted from reference [156]). (B) Porphyrinic cellulose laurate ester plastic. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [156]. 2008, Elsevier.
Ijms 24 03475 g014
Figure 15. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft complex 19 with a propynyloxy substituent in azido cellulose fabric. (adapted from reference [157]).
Figure 15. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft complex 19 with a propynyloxy substituent in azido cellulose fabric. (adapted from reference [157]).
Ijms 24 03475 g015
Figure 16. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft 5-(4-aminophenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin 21 on cellulose fabrics (cotton) via cyanuric chloride as grafting agent (Adapted from reference [158]).
Figure 16. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft 5-(4-aminophenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin 21 on cellulose fabrics (cotton) via cyanuric chloride as grafting agent (Adapted from reference [158]).
Ijms 24 03475 g016
Figure 17. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft porphyrin 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-hydrazinecarbonylphenyl)porphyrin (THPP) on oxidized cellulose containing aldehyde groups (DAC), Reprinted with permission from Ref. [159]. 2009, Springer Nature.
Figure 17. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft porphyrin 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-hydrazinecarbonylphenyl)porphyrin (THPP) on oxidized cellulose containing aldehyde groups (DAC), Reprinted with permission from Ref. [159]. 2009, Springer Nature.
Ijms 24 03475 g017
Figure 18. Tetracationic porphyrin derivatives used as PS in Bonnett and Galia studies [164].
Figure 18. Tetracationic porphyrin derivatives used as PS in Bonnett and Galia studies [164].
Ijms 24 03475 g018
Figure 19. (A) Structure of material 26 used by Krausz and co-workers [165] as photobactericidal materials. (B) Porphyrinic plastic film prepared. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [165]. 2008 Elsevier.
Figure 19. (A) Structure of material 26 used by Krausz and co-workers [165] as photobactericidal materials. (B) Porphyrinic plastic film prepared. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [165]. 2008 Elsevier.
Ijms 24 03475 g019
Figure 20. Synthetic methodology used to prepare the cellulose fabrics 29ac from cationic amino porphyrins using cyanuric chloride to introduce the grafting unit (Adapted from references [158,166]).
Figure 20. Synthetic methodology used to prepare the cellulose fabrics 29ac from cationic amino porphyrins using cyanuric chloride to introduce the grafting unit (Adapted from references [158,166]).
Ijms 24 03475 g020
Figure 21. Photographs of (A) filter paper; (B) filter paper after reaction with 28b giving 29b. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [167]. 2012, Elsevier.
Figure 21. Photographs of (A) filter paper; (B) filter paper after reaction with 28b giving 29b. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [167]. 2012, Elsevier.
Ijms 24 03475 g021
Figure 22. PS–cellulose conjugate materials (A) 29b@Pap; (B) 29b@NFC; (C) 29c@Pap; (D) 29c@NFC. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [125]. © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019.
Figure 22. PS–cellulose conjugate materials (A) 29b@Pap; (B) 29b@NFC; (C) 29c@Pap; (D) 29c@NFC. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [125]. © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019.
Ijms 24 03475 g022
Figure 23. Ghiladi grafting method to prepare material 31 by covalently grafting the tricationic porphyrin 30 bearing an alkynyl function to cellulose nanocrystals or cellulose fibers (Whatman #1 filter paper) bearing azide moieties (Adapted from Refs. [168,169,170]).
Figure 23. Ghiladi grafting method to prepare material 31 by covalently grafting the tricationic porphyrin 30 bearing an alkynyl function to cellulose nanocrystals or cellulose fibers (Whatman #1 filter paper) bearing azide moieties (Adapted from Refs. [168,169,170]).
Ijms 24 03475 g023
Figure 24. Synthetic strategy adopted by Zerrouk and co-workers to obtain the propargylated cationic porphyrin 34 and to graft it into the azide kraft pulp (adapted form [171]).
Figure 24. Synthetic strategy adopted by Zerrouk and co-workers to obtain the propargylated cationic porphyrin 34 and to graft it into the azide kraft pulp (adapted form [171]).
Ijms 24 03475 g024
Figure 25. Synthesis of cellulose fluoro triazole-porphyrin conjugate 37 by “click chemistry” approach (Adapted from Ref. [172]).
Figure 25. Synthesis of cellulose fluoro triazole-porphyrin conjugate 37 by “click chemistry” approach (Adapted from Ref. [172]).
Ijms 24 03475 g025
Figure 26. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft the anionic amino porphyrin 38 on cellulose fabrics via cyanuric chloride approach (Adapted from reference [158]).
Figure 26. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft the anionic amino porphyrin 38 on cellulose fabrics via cyanuric chloride approach (Adapted from reference [158]).
Ijms 24 03475 g026
Figure 27. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft via an amide bond porphyrin 5-(4-aminophenyl)-10,15,20-tris(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin trisodium 38 on oxidized commercial microcrystalline cellulose. (Adapted from reference [183]).
Figure 27. Synthetic methodology used to covalently graft via an amide bond porphyrin 5-(4-aminophenyl)-10,15,20-tris(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin trisodium 38 on oxidized commercial microcrystalline cellulose. (Adapted from reference [183]).
Ijms 24 03475 g027
Figure 28. General structures for biopolymers also considered as supports in this review.; (A) Chitin, (B) Chitosan; (C) Xylan; (D) Lignin.
Figure 28. General structures for biopolymers also considered as supports in this review.; (A) Chitin, (B) Chitosan; (C) Xylan; (D) Lignin.
Ijms 24 03475 g028
Figure 29. Electrospinning schematic (left), PAN-39 (middle), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (right). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [186]. © 2022 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved.
Figure 29. Electrospinning schematic (left), PAN-39 (middle), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (right). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [186]. © 2022 Frontiers Media S.A. All rights reserved.
Ijms 24 03475 g029
Figure 30. Strategy used by Rodgers to immobilize 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (40) on chitin support, using ionic liquids (Ils) as solvents for both, chitin extraction and deacetylation (adapted form Ref. [187]).
Figure 30. Strategy used by Rodgers to immobilize 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (40) on chitin support, using ionic liquids (Ils) as solvents for both, chitin extraction and deacetylation (adapted form Ref. [187]).
Ijms 24 03475 g030
Figure 31. Synthetic route to immobilize alkynylated PPIX 42 on alkoxysilane azido-modified Lyocell fibers 41 (adapted from Ref. [121]).
Figure 31. Synthetic route to immobilize alkynylated PPIX 42 on alkoxysilane azido-modified Lyocell fibers 41 (adapted from Ref. [121]).
Ijms 24 03475 g031
Figure 32. Synthetic route for the preparation of metalloporphyrin 45a and conditions used for its grafting on modified cellulose 46 (adapted from Ref. [130]).
Figure 32. Synthetic route for the preparation of metalloporphyrin 45a and conditions used for its grafting on modified cellulose 46 (adapted from Ref. [130]).
Ijms 24 03475 g032
Figure 33. Preparation of acetylated lignin nanoparticles (AcLi) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin (4-THPP)-loaded on acetylated lignin nanoparticles (4-THPP@AcLi). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [189]. 2022, Frontiers Media S.A.
Figure 33. Preparation of acetylated lignin nanoparticles (AcLi) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin (4-THPP)-loaded on acetylated lignin nanoparticles (4-THPP@AcLi). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [189]. 2022, Frontiers Media S.A.
Ijms 24 03475 g033
Figure 34. Porphyrinic derivatives 40, 48, 49, 50 immobilized on chitosan. Adapted from Ref. [61].
Figure 34. Porphyrinic derivatives 40, 48, 49, 50 immobilized on chitosan. Adapted from Ref. [61].
Ijms 24 03475 g034
Figure 35. (A) Synthesis of porphyrinic derivatives 51, 52, 53 and their immobilization on chitosan giving 51@chitosan, 52@chitosan and 53@chitosan. (B) From left to right: Images of chitosan, 51@chitosan, 52@chitosan and 53@chitosan under ultraviolet light. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [179]. 2019, MDPI, Basel.
Figure 35. (A) Synthesis of porphyrinic derivatives 51, 52, 53 and their immobilization on chitosan giving 51@chitosan, 52@chitosan and 53@chitosan. (B) From left to right: Images of chitosan, 51@chitosan, 52@chitosan and 53@chitosan under ultraviolet light. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [179]. 2019, MDPI, Basel.
Ijms 24 03475 g035
Figure 36. Synthetic methodology adopted by Sol and co-workers to fabricate new cellulose nanocrystals materials (55600-25,000), bearing purpurin 18 (16), conjugated with polyethyleneimine scaffolds (adapted from Ref. [68]).
Figure 36. Synthetic methodology adopted by Sol and co-workers to fabricate new cellulose nanocrystals materials (55600-25,000), bearing purpurin 18 (16), conjugated with polyethyleneimine scaffolds (adapted from Ref. [68]).
Ijms 24 03475 g036
Figure 37. Schematic representation of NP containing calcium phosphate core with shells of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, anionic), poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI, cationic) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(3-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin (3-THPP). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [197]. 2009, Springer Nature.
Figure 37. Schematic representation of NP containing calcium phosphate core with shells of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, anionic), poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI, cationic) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(3-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin (3-THPP). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [197]. 2009, Springer Nature.
Ijms 24 03475 g037
Figure 38. (A) Schematic procedure for the coating of silica NP with 56. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [198]. 2008, Elsevier. (B) Synthetic route used to immobilize 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin 56 on Xylan (adapted from Ref. [198]).
Figure 38. (A) Schematic procedure for the coating of silica NP with 56. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [198]. 2008, Elsevier. (B) Synthetic route used to immobilize 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin 56 on Xylan (adapted from Ref. [198]).
Ijms 24 03475 g038
Table 1. Photodynamic antimicrobial and antiviral efficacies, of prepared materials (29b@NFC, 29c@NFC and 29b@Pap, 29c@Pap).
Table 1. Photodynamic antimicrobial and antiviral efficacies, of prepared materials (29b@NFC, 29c@NFC and 29b@Pap, 29c@Pap).
29b@NFC
(Log CFU mL−1)
29c@NFC
(Log CFU mL−1)
29b@Pap
(Log CFU mL−1)
29c@Pap
(Log CFU mL−1)
MRSA6666
E. faecium6666
A. baumanii4.5666
K. pneumoniae*0.735.3 2.3
Dengue-1 virus44nd **nd **
VSV66nd **nd **
aPDT Protocol conditions: irradiance of 65 ± 5 mW cm−2; white light (400–700 nm); 60 min of irradiation; PS concentration of 5.0 μM. * no statistically significant inactivation; ** not determined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Monteiro, C.J.P.; Neves, M.G.P.M.S.; Nativi, C.; Almeida, A.; Faustino, M.A.F. Porphyrin Photosensitizers Grafted in Cellulose Supports: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043475

AMA Style

Monteiro CJP, Neves MGPMS, Nativi C, Almeida A, Faustino MAF. Porphyrin Photosensitizers Grafted in Cellulose Supports: A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(4):3475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Monteiro, Carlos J. P., Maria G. P. M. S. Neves, Cristina Nativi, Adelaide Almeida, and Maria Amparo F. Faustino. 2023. "Porphyrin Photosensitizers Grafted in Cellulose Supports: A Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 4: 3475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop