Next Article in Journal
Identification and Functional Analysis of an Epsilon Class Glutathione S-Transferase Gene Associated with α-Pinene Adaptation in Monochamus alternatus
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Nanoparticle-Assisted Chemo-Photothermal Therapy and Photoacoustic Imaging in a Three-Dimensional Breast Cancer Cell Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dopaminergic Projections from the Hypothalamic A11 Nucleus to the Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus Are Involved in Bidirectional Migraine Modulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

In Search of More Leaps to Realize the Precision Medicine of Migraine

Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(24), 17375; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417375
Submission received: 27 November 2023 / Revised: 6 December 2023 / Accepted: 8 December 2023 / Published: 12 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology of Migraine 2.0)
Migraine, clinically characterized by recurrent headache attacks of moderate-to-severe intensity, is the second most disabling disease in terms of years lived with disability [1]. As a physician–scientist, I should emphasize that migraine is not just a headache. Migraine headache is a manifestation of a hyperactivated trigeminal pain system. In addition, most migraine sufferers complain of photophobia, phonophobia, and osmophobia in the ictal period [2]. Some patients suffer from allodynia, which may occur in extracephalic locations [3]. Taken together, the clinical picture of migraine attacks can be interpreted as an uncontrollable state of multiple sensory modalities [4]. Pain induces negative emotions and autonomic reactions, which aggravates the agony of migraine attacks. The presence of aura adds another layer of throes. Scintillating scotoma, the most common symptom of migraine aura, not only impairs visual function but also causes severe anxiety and even terror. Migraine aura is known to be caused by cortical spreading depolarization (CSD), a wave of abrupt, near-complete breakdown of neuronal transmembrane ion gradients in the cerebral cortex accompanied by dynamic changes in cerebral blood flow [5]. This is a clear indication that migraine pathophysiology involves the central nervous system (CNS). Moreover, people with migraine, not infrequently, report appetite changes and fatigability in the phase commencing up to 48 h before the onset of pain in migraine without aura (MO) and before the aura in migraine with aura (MA), which is called the prodromal/premonitory phase [6,7]. Functional imaging data point to the role of the hypothalamus in the emergence of prodromal/premonitory symptoms [8,9]. Clearly, multiple neural system perturbations amalgamate to generate the complex symptomatology of migraine.
Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) is known to be caused by genetic mutations in CACNA1A, ATP1A2, and SCN1A, all of which lead to enhanced neuronal excitability [10]. Meanwhile, ordinary migraine is considered a polygenic disorder [11]. Recent genome-wide association studies have identified more than 120 risk loci for developing migraine [12]. The results show that neuronal and vascular abnormalities may contribute to migraine pathogenesis, which is congruent with the tenet that migraine is a very complex disorder. Intriguingly, evidence is emerging that MO and MA have distinct genetic backgrounds [13]. It is envisioned that genetic analysis for each phenotype of migraine will clarify the molecular mechanism underlying its complex symptomatology.
There have been numerous reports on the alterations in brain structure and network in patients with migraine, although it remains unclear whether each of these abnormalities is a cause or a consequence of the disease state associated with migraine [14]. Aberrant sensory signal processing has been observed in a manner dependent on the phase. Intriguingly, the trigeminal nociceptive signal processing pattern is shown to exhibit a lack of habituation during the interictal phase [15,16], and the trigeminal nociceptive transmission becomes increasing enhanced toward the subsequent ictal phase [17]. These dynamic functional changes likely lead to the development of the cyclicity of migraine attacks.
Where does the migraine headache occur? The trigeminal afferents innervating the dura mater are regarded as important loci of migraine headache generation [18,19]. The dural meninges, especially around the sinuses, are enriched in mast cells and lymphocytes and serve as a neuroimmune interface [20]. Moreover, within the trigeminal ganglion (TG) tissue, satellite glial cells, which surround TG neurons, are known to actively produce immune mediators and nitric oxide [21]. However, the precise role of inflammation in migraine pathogenesis remains undetermined. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37-amino acid neuropeptide derived from a CALCA splice variant, is released from trigeminal afferents and TG neurons, which somehow results in the activation of the trigeminal system [22,23]. The importance of this molecule in migraine pathogenesis is highlighted by the therapeutic success of CGRP blockade in treating and preventing migraine attacks [24]. Surprisingly, the inhibition of only one molecule provides a significant protective effect against the complex disorder. Whether the blockade of other neuropeptides, such as pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), amylin, and adrenomedullin, exerts an antimigraine effect is a matter of great interest among researchers [25]. The activation of nociceptive TG neurons conveys pain signals to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and then to other brainstem nuclei, the hypothalamus, the basal ganglia, and the thalamus [26]. This bottom-up signal transmission-associated activation and basal CNS dysfunction should play a pivotal role in the complex clinical manifestations of migraine.
To decipher the complexity of migraine pathophysiology, more research is required in the form of system biology. This Special Issue entitled “Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology of Migraine 1” is a collection of noteworthy research contributions that provide important insight to this end.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Steiner, T.J.; Stovner, L.J.; Jensen, R.; Uluduz, D.; Katsarava, Z. Lifting the Burden: The Global Campaign against H. Migraine remains second among the world’s causes of disability, and first among young women: Findings from GBD2019. J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dodick, D.W. Migraine. Lancet 2018, 391, 1315–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Burstein, R.; Jakubowski, M.; Garcia-Nicas, E.; Kainz, V.; Bajwa, Z.; Hargreaves, R.; Becerra, L.; Borsook, D. Thalamic sensitization transforms localized pain into widespread allodynia. Ann. Neurol. 2010, 68, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Goadsby, P.J.; Holland, P.R.; Martins-Oliveira, M.; Hoffmann, J.; Schankin, C.; Akerman, S. Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing. Physiol. Rev. 2017, 97, 553–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dreier, J.P.; Fabricius, M.; Ayata, C.; Sakowitz, O.W.; William Shuttleworth, C.; Dohmen, C.; Geaf, R.; Vajkoczy, P.; Hlebok, R.; Suzuki, M.; et al. Recording, analysis, and interpretation of spreading depolarizations in neurointensive care: Review and recommendations of the COSBID research group. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 1595–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Olesen, J. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia 2018, 38, 1–211. [Google Scholar]
  7. Eigenbrodt, A.K.; Christensen, R.H.; Ashina, H.; Iljazi, A.; Christensen, C.E.; Steiner, T.J.; Lipton, R.B.; Ashina, M. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting prevalence or relative frequency. J. Headache Pain 2022, 23, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maniyar, F.H.; Sprenger, T.; Monteith, T.; Schankin, C.; Goadsby, P.J. Brain activations in the premonitory phase of nitroglycerin-triggered migraine attacks. Brain 2014, 137, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schulte, L.H.; May, A. The migraine generator revisited: Continuous scanning of the migraine cycle over 30 days and three spontaneous attacks. Brain 2016, 139, 1987–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nandyala, A.; Shah, T.; Ailani, J. Hemiplegic Migraine. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2023, 23, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sutherland, H.G.; Albury, C.L.; Griffiths, L.R. Advances in genetics of migraine. J. Headache Pain 2019, 20, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hautakangas, H.; Winsvold, B.S.; Ruotsalainen, S.E.; Bjornsdottir, G.; Harder, A.V.; Kogelman, L.J.; Thomas, L.F.; Noordam, R.; Benner, C.; Gormley, P.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of 102,084 migraine cases identifies 123 risk loci and subtype-specific risk alleles. Nat. Genet. 2022, 54, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rahmioglu, N.; Mortlock, S.; Ghiasi, M.; Møller, P.L.; Stefansdottir, L.; Galarneau, G.; Turman, C.; Danning, R.; Law, M.H.; Sapkota, Y.; et al. The genetic basis of endometriosis and comorbidity with other pain and inflammatory conditions. Nat. Genet. 2023, 55, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brennan, K.C.; Pietrobon, D. A Systems Neuroscience Approach to Migraine. Neuron 2018, 97, 1004–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Katsarava, Z.; Giffin, N.; Diener, H.C.; Kaube, H. Abnormal habituation of ‘nociceptive’ blink reflex in migraine--evidence for increased excitability of trigeminal nociception. Cephalalgia 2003, 23, 814–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. De Tommaso, M.; Libro, G.; Guido, M.; Losito, L.; Lamberti, P.; Livrea, P. Habituation of single CO2 laser-evoked responses during interictal phase of migraine. J. Headache Pain 2005, 6, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Stankewitz, A.; Aderjan, D.; Eippert, F.; May, A. Trigeminal nociceptive transmission in migraineurs predicts migraine attacks. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 1937–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Edvinsson, J.C.A.; Vigano, A.; Alekseeva, A.; Alieva, E.; Arruda, R.; De Luca, C.; D’Ettore, N.; Frattale, I.; Kurnukhina, M.; Macerola, N.; et al. The fifth cranial nerve in headaches. J. Headache Pain 2020, 21, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ashina, M.; Hansen, J.M.; Do, T.P.; Melo-Carrillo, A.; Burstein, R.; Moskowitz, M.A. Migraine and the trigeminovascular system-40 years and counting. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rustenhoven, J.; Drieu, A.; Mamuladze, T.; de Lima, K.A.; Dykstra, T.; Wall, M.; Papadopoulus, Z.; Kanamori, M.; Salvador, A.F.; Baker, W.; et al. Functional characterization of the dural sinuses as a neuroimmune interface. Cell 2021, 184, 1000–1016.e1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Messlinger, K.; Balcziak, L.K.; Russo, A.F. Cross-talk signaling in the trigeminal ganglion: Role of neuropeptides and other mediators. J. Neural. Transm. 2020, 127, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Edvinsson, L.; Haanes, K.A.; Warfvinge, K.; Krause, D.N. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies—Successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 14, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tang, C.; Unekawa, M.; Kitagawa, S.; Takizawa, T.; Kayama, Y.; Nakahara, J.; Shibata, M. Cortical spreading depolarisation-induced facial hyperalgesia, photophobia and hypomotility are ameliorated by sumatriptan and olcegepant. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Messina, R.; Huessler, E.M.; Puledda, F.; Haghdoost, F.; Lebedeva, E.R.; Diener, H.C. Safety and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway and gepants in migraine prevention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 2023, 43, 3331024231152169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Silvestro, M.; Iannone, L.F.; Orologio, I.; Tessitore, A.; Tedeschi, G.; Geppetti, P.; Russo, A. Migraine Treatment: Towards New Pharmacological Targets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Malick, A.; Strassman, R.M.; Burstein, R. Trigeminohypothalamic and reticulohypothalamic tract neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord and caudal medulla of the rat. J. Neurophysiol. 2000, 84, 2078–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shibata, M. In Search of More Leaps to Realize the Precision Medicine of Migraine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417375

AMA Style

Shibata M. In Search of More Leaps to Realize the Precision Medicine of Migraine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(24):17375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shibata, Mamoru. 2023. "In Search of More Leaps to Realize the Precision Medicine of Migraine" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 24: 17375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242417375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop