Next Article in Journal
Identification of Phenolics Profile in Freeze-Dried Apple Peel and Their Bioactivities during In Vitro Digestion and Colonic Fermentation
Previous Article in Journal
Unraveling the Nature of Hydrogen Bonds of “Proton Sponges” Based on Car-Parrinello and Metadynamics Approaches
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Determinants of Antagonistic Interactions and the Response of New Endophytic Strain Serratia quinivorans KP32 to Fungal Phytopathogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Soil-Borne Neosartorya spp.: A Heat-Resistant Fungal Threat to Horticulture and Food Production—An Important Component of the Root-Associated Microbial Community

Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1543; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021543
Submission received: 20 December 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023

Abstract

:
Soil-borne Neosartorya spp. are the highly resilient sexual reproductive stage (teleomorph) of Aspergillus spp. Fungi of this genus are relevant components of root-associated microbial community, but they can also excrete mycotoxins and exhibit great resistance to high temperatures. Their ascospores easily transfer between soil and crops; thus, Neosartorya poses a danger to horticulture and food production, especially to the postharvest quality of fruits and vegetables. The spores are known to cause spoilage, mainly in raw fruit produce, juices, and pulps, despite undergoing pasteurization. However, these fungi can also participate in carbon transformation and sequestration, as well as plant protection in drought conditions. Many species have been identified and included in the genus, and yet some of them create taxonomical controversy due to their high similarity. This also contributes to Neosartorya spp. being easily mistaken for its anamorph, resulting in uncertain data within many studies. The review discusses also the factors shaping Neosartorya spp.’s resistance to temperature, preservatives, chemicals, and natural plant extracts, as well as presenting novel solutions to problems created by its resilient nature.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Conventional farming, the use of synthetic fertilizers, harsh pesticides, and commercial preservatives have proven to have a detrimental influence on the natural environment. This introduced an era of promoting sustainability and ecologically sound manufacturing methods. The European Union urges its member states to develop and practice solutions incorporating natural substances, dependences, and structures, which have an advantageous impact on the environment and human health. Numerous economical branches can “go green”; however, the paramount ones are horticulture and food production [1]. Therefore, it is crucial to identify common problems in these areas and search for optimal solutions. Predominantly reported issues include contamination and spoilage during the production and storage of food, mostly attributed to microbes. Technological advances have resolved some concerns; nonetheless, efficient methods of combating durable species are still to be established. In this review, one of the most important groups of fungi, heat-resistant fungi, is presented to explain the role of these microorganisms not only as harmful microbes for postharvest plant and fruit quality, but also as potentially beneficial organisms. Neosartorya spp., one of this fungal group, inhabits the rhizosphere; therefore, it has a role in shaping plant quality and sustainable horticulture.
Many countries in the European Union are large producers of strawberries. In addition, those with a share exceeding 50% of EU production are the leading producers of frozen fruits, including strawberries and concentrated juices from soft fruit [2]. These data place many European Union countries in the position of a market leader in berry production worldwide; this requires the producers and processors of fruits to monitor the quality of their raw materials, intermediates and products at every stage of postharvest production, processing and distribution, to ensure food security and enhance their market position [3]. Therefore, the issues connected with maintaining a high quality of raw materials and fruit products for both national and international markets are an important field of study, not only for the consumers and producers of food, but also for scientists. Moreover, in accordance with the latest policy initiatives and laws, such as The European Green Deal and EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, very important targets include reducing the use of fertilizers by 20% and making 25% of EU agriculture organic by the year 2030 [4]. Therefore, one of the aims in modern horticulture is the application of natural methods to protect crops and food, and therefore it is necessary to deepen the knowledge about the metabolic, morphological and genetic properties of Neosartorya fungal strains that shape their resistance to natural plant extracts, preservatives and compounds. This is important for healthy food production, given this is one of the main members of the fungal community in the plant rhizosphere, and so could be useful to developing solutions to sustainable horticulture and improving the postharvest quality of crops.
The complex morphology of ascospores and their high thermal resistance enables these fungi to survive high temperatures, including industrial pasteurization processes. Neosartorya spp. colonizes soil, rhizosphere and crop residues, and has the additional ability to degrade various chemical compounds, even toxic ones [5]. They overcome these barriers and are able to infect fruit; they may also pose a potential threat to thermally processed fruit products. Organisms belonging to the genus Neosartorya, which are present in fresh fruit, despite the lack of visible mould growth, can produce heat-resistant ascospores and, in favourable conditions, may cause the spoilage of processed fruit through rapid mycelium growth and metabolism.
Fungi have developed various adaptations that allow for them to survive when exposed to fungicides and climate change. Initially, these were mainly adaptations for protection against the harmful effects of various natural environmental stressors. However, they can also allow for them to survive in postharvest crops as dormant forms. With regards to evolution, fungi have developed additional mechanisms of response to temperature, light, humidity, oxygen, or to the presence of chemical compounds [6], which allowed for them to effectively adapt to changing environmental conditions, including resistance to high temperatures. Due to the chemical sensitivity of Neosartorya spp., only partial data are available. There are articles concerning the thermal death rates of ascospores of N. fischeri under the influence of organic acids [7] and preservatives [8]. It has been established that citric and tartaric acids destroy ascospores in fruit juices. Preservatives such as potassium sorbate and sodium benzoate are also used to control this fungus in fruit juices [9]. Delgado et al. [10] reported that hydrogen peroxide must be considered to reduce the probability of package contamination by N. fischeri. In recent years, the occurrence of fungal infections has been increasing everywhere; this may be explained by the changing climatic conditions and the resistance of fungi to fungicides due to their extensive use in agriculture and horticulture [11]. Bromley et al. [11] reported that the use of the most dominant class of antifungal agents, azoles, may lead to resistance in environmental fungi, which is of clinical importance. They also isolated azole-resistant examples of the N. fischeri species. Due to these cases, it is reasonable to carry out a study that may lead to the control of Neosartorya spp. by finding substances that can be used as alternative to the active compounds of plant protection agents. Therefore, this may also be achieved by testing the influence of plant extracts and food preservatives on fungal growth, and metabolic, morphological and genetic changes in these fungi. Although heat-resistant fungi have been an object of intense research, the specific nature of their metabolic profile and morphology, as well as their genome and transcriptome under the impact of chemicals, plant extracts and preservatives, is almost unknown. This review summarizes the existing knowledge concerning an important fungal group, Neosartorya spp., including negative and positive aspects for the environment. This review is in line with the implementation of certain research directions decided on by the European Commission, and complies with the FAO policy related to improving postharvest crops and food quality, to understand signalling mechanisms via root exudates and interactions between plant–rhizospheric microbial communities.

2. Characteristic of Neosartorya spp.

Neosartorya spp. are known as Ascomycetes and belong to the Aspergillaceae family. They exhibit unique heat-resistance abilities, allowing for them to withstand high temperatures. Neosartorya spp. fungi are considered to be a teleomorph (sexual state) of Aspergillus spp. and, therefore, produce ascospores. The spores are formed in groups of eight inside asci, which, in turn, are covered by an ascocarp, a large fruiting body. The ornamentation of ascospores is one of the key features enabling differentiation between Neosartorya species [12]. Usually, asci are differentiated into cleistothecium or gymnothecium. For example, the asci of N. fischeri are covered with cleistothecium, which helps them survive in a hot environment [13]. A cleistothecium is a smooth-walled, completely closed fruiting body with no designated opening. As spores are not automatically released into the environment, fungi rely on outside forces to disseminate their spores. Gymnothecium is similar to cleistothecium, with no openings and also containing asci. However, its peridial wall is a loose clump of hyphae, often entwined with coils or spines [14].
The Neosartorya spp. life-cycle contains various phases. In general, filamentous fungi reproduce sexually and asexually. Asexual reproduction involves mitotic processes, creating conidia, whereas sexual reproduction involves meiotic processes, creating spores [15]. When a species can access both the asexual and sexual life cycles, the stages of reproduction are usually dependent on distinct environmental and nutritional circumstances. Despite the numerous benefits of sexual reproduction, over one-fifth of all fungi are only known to reproduce asexually, with no ‘teleomorph’ identified [16]. The life-cycle of Neosartorya spp. fungi is presented in Figure 1.
Although this approach is heavily discussed, in some cases it enables emphasis to be place on certain aspects of reproduction, e.g., the creation of ascospores. In the case of Neosartorya, it is the ascospores that pose the biggest obstacle, as their high thermal resistance makes them more resilient than mycelium and able to survive the high-temperature treatments used in food preservation and the postharvest storage of fruits and vegetables.
23 Aspergillus species enter the sexual stage and produce the Neosartorya teleomorph. They can all complete their sexual cycle in from approximately 2 to 3 weeks at 25 °C on a traditional mycological medium such as Malt Extract Agar (MEA) or Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA). Depending on species, strains complete the sexual cycle and generate cleistothecia with ascospores in from four weeks to six months. The cleistothecia generated by A. fumigatus include ascospores that are morphologically indistinguishable from those seen in other Neosartorya species unless studied under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The patterns on the ascospore surface are modest yet distinct to each species [17].
Fungal isolates identified by the β-tubulin gene sequence (Sanger sequencing, NCBI Blast) as Neosartorya glabra can create ascospores and cleistothecia that can be seen by the naked eye after approximately one month of culturing (Figure 2). However, they differ in the early stages of mycelium growth (A,E), producing either broad and woolly-like, floccose growth (A) or dense, velutinous colonies (E). Colonies produce larger globular ascospores that are loosely binded to mycelium (C) or finer, more powdery-like ascospores, which are better attached to mycelium (G). After a month, most ascospores can be easily detached from mycelium.

3. Biodiversity of Neosartorya spp.

To better systematize fungi, section Fumigati was created [18]. This consists of species with “uniseriate aspergilli, columnar conidial heads in shades of green and flask shaped vesicles”. The section includes 23 Neosartorya species. However, there are more Neosartorya species that are classified as doubtful and require further research, e.g., N. australensis, N. ferenczii, N. papuaensis, and N. warcupii. Usually, they differ from other taxa; in this instance based, on either their β-tubulin, calmodulin or actin gene sequences [18].
The most well-known species of the genus are Neosartorya fischeri and Neosartorya pseudofischeri, belonging to section Fumigati. They are morphologically very similar to A. fumigatus. The genetic diversity of A. fumigatus is remarkably low, especially compared to N. fischeri and N. spinosa. Moreover, A. fumigatus shows no geographic pattern for genetic differentiation [19]. There have been reports of Neosartorya spp. being mistaken for Aspergillus spp., proving that the differentiation between them is not obvious [20]. Despite their many close similarities, more species have been isolated and classified. For example, Neosartorya nishimurae and Neosartorya otanii, isolated from African forest soil, were characterized by their morphological differences. Both exhibited rapid growth on Czapek and Malt Extract Agars, had broad equatorial crests and lenticular ascospores. The differences between structures of cleistothecia surfaces and walls of conidia were visible. Due to their morphological affinity, some researchers question the distinctiveness of certain species. Some examples of species regarded as synonymous are presented in the table below (Table 1).
N. spinosa, N. glabra, N. assulata, N. quadricincta, N. hiratsukae and N. laciniosa are commonly isolated from fruit and soil surfaces (Table 2). They have been previously isolated from Polish soil and strawberry samples [3]. Analyses of β-tubulin gene and EcoRI RFLP patterns were most helpful in their indentification. These species, in particular, are responsible for the spoilage of food processed by heating [23].
N. fisheri was isolated from sunflower rhizosphere, especially after exposing plants to adverse environmental conditions, and was able to produce inulinase, which is important for the food industry as an alternative for the production of fructose syrups [24]. N. hiratsukae has also been reported indoors, in the air, on drywall in an Italian hospital. The small white colonies were hardly visible on white walls, so the spores could easily spread. Their presence in the environment caused a health risk, as they could lead to aspergillosis and other infectious diseases [25].
Table 2. Common Neosartorya spp. species and their properties.
Table 2. Common Neosartorya spp. species and their properties.
NameTelomorphRelation to Other SpeciesKey CharacteristicsType of GrowthReference
N. spinosaAspergillus fischeri var. spinosusHas identical partial beta-tubulin and calmodulin gene sequences to N. botucatensis and N. paulistensisRough ascosporesOn MEA: broad growth in pale yellow or yellowish white colour; thin layer of mycelium and abundant, granular cleistothecia[12,26,27]
N. laciniosaAspergillus laciniosusClosely related to N. coreanaMicrotuberculate ascospores with two bent crests and two distinct equatorial rings of small projectionsOn MAA: beige with light yellow ascospores; on CYA: light yellow and white growth[12,22,26]
N. glabraAspergillus fischeri var. GlaberExtrolites typical for N. fennelliae, but is more closely related to N. denticulate, despite having divergent ornamentations of ascosporesConfirmed to be a disease agent; homothallic speciesYellow–white to pale yellow cleistothecia, smooth ascospores[12,22,28]
N. assulataAspergillus assulatusClosely related to A. waksmanii with only 2% bp difference in the act1 locusCommon extrolites produced by its colonies are indole alkaloids and apolar metabolitesSnow-white growth on MEA medium[22,29]

4. Two Sides of the Same Coin

The Neosartorya genus consists of extraordinarily heat-resistant fungi, which are immune to high temperatures and, consecutively, food preservation techniques, utilizing them. Acidic crops and produce that cannot undergo thermal conditions higher than 60–65 °C are especially vulnerable. In these circumstances, Neosartorya spp. can sporulate with great efficiency. Certain species require high temperatures to sporulate, meaning that thermal processing may result in the sudden appearance of new fungal growth [30]. This leads to the secretion of mycotoxins, e.g., aflatoxins, fumitremorgins and gliotoxin, which can pose a threat to both plant and human livelihood [31]. Fornal et al. [32] developed a method that enables the fast and easy quantification of mycotoxins typical for Neosartorya spp. isolates, including fumitremorgin C and verruculogen in strawberries, strawberry juice, potato dextrose broth and soil. As Neosartorya spp. is present in the soil, the transference and subsequent contamination of plants that come into contact with the ground is effortless. Contaminated plants pass the pollutant to crops, which, in turn, are harvested, processed, and eaten by humans. Without effectively breaking the life-cycle of Neosartorya, its extrolites can be transmitted to the food chain, posing a threat to peoples’ well-being. As a precaution, new laws have been established regarding the quality of produce. In accordance with these principles, food that is not of satisfactory purity is not utilized [33,34].
It is important to discriminate between the species of Neosartorya and A. fumigatus in the food industry. Even subtle differences in genotype may lead to different reactions to chemical agents and treatment methods. Moreover, Aspergillus fumigatus has never been reported as a spoilage agent in heat-processed food products, meaning that its detection may not foreshadow future concerns [23]. Furthermore, although N. fischeri and A. fumigatus are phylogenetically close, they have different patterns of carbon sources’ metabolism [35].
Neosartorya spp. is also an infectious agent. Recent studies show that, due to the misidentification of fungi, Neosartorya genus may be as infectious as Aspergillus spp. Aspergillosis, an illness caused by Aspergillus, is a major cause of human morbidity and mortality, with over 200,000 life-threatening infections each year worldwide [36]. There had been reports of Neosartorya hiratsukae causing the same disease. It is often wrongly identified as A. fumigatus due to its close morphological similarity. It also cannot be differentiated by the popular matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) that is used in many medical analyses [37].
A comparable situation arose with Neosartorya udagawae, which is also often mistaken for A. fumigatus. In 2014, it was reported to cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in a 43-year-old woman [38]. It was distinguished by sequencing ITS, calmodulin and β-tubulin genes. Due to this fact, further research about identification tactics is needed for therapeutics to be more successful, because of differences in the susceptibility to antifungal drugs. Neosartorya has also been proven to cause other diseases, such as endocarditis (N. fischeri) [39] or dermatitis (N. hiratsukae) [40].
Neosartorya spp. is notoriously known for producing durable, toxic metabolites. N. fischeri can synthetize acid protease and glycoside hydrolase (GH) 27, which, if left uncontrolled, may be potentially dangerous to wood, fiber and plants [41,42], but also very useful for industry. The Neosartorya spp. strain BL4 is known to biodegrade petroleum hydrocarbons. This might be useful when developing bioremediation techniques; however, it also proves how unsusceptible these fungi really are [43]. A. flavus and A. parasiticus produce aflatoxins that are toxic to the liver and are carcinogenic: the consumption of contaminated groundnuts has been linked with hepatic carcinoma in the populations of Africa and Asia [44]. Furthermore, Neosartorya pseudofischeri produces dangeurously cytotoxic metabolites, which are proven to cause harm to Sf9 cells from S. frugiperda [45]. This, in combination with enzymes, mycotoxins and other extrolites, suggests that Neosartorya spp. can be seen as a health hazard, and a possible threat to food production and the economy.
However, in a controlled environment, Neosartorya spp. may prove useful in agriculture, horticulture and medicine (Figure 3). It exhibits antibacterial and antifungal properties [46,47] and can be used to produce nanoparticles to control brown spot in rice [48]. New research suggests that Neosartorya spp. could be used to develop novel cancer treatments [49,50]. It can also help in the production of medicine for diabetes [51].
Neosartorya spp., as with most filamentous and heat-resistant moulds, can be seen as either a threat or a tool (Figure 3). On the one hand, molecular biology can utilize Neosartorya-derived proteins or use it as a binding factor in environment protection. On the other hand, its potential as a general health and economic hazard makes it an unwanted contaminant.

5. Heat Response in Neosartorya spp. Fungi

Heat resistance, or thermotolerance, is facilitated by a range of factors and processes. These include the presence of heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, chaperonins, protective substances, the innate properties of proteins that contribute to making them thermostable, cell-wall stoichiometry and architecture, the formation of multicellular structures, and the development of spores [52]. In general, there are two primal types of thermotolerance: basal and acquired. The first describes an organisms’ ability to survive high temperatures without prior acclimation. The latter refers to thermotolerance acquired during prior exposure to mild temperatures, which are not harmful to the organism [53]. To more precisely describe the types of heat responses, organisms can be further divided into different categories. We can observe a variety of lifeforms, such as: (a) cryophiles (psychrophiles), which are capable of life functions at −20 °C [54]; (b) sychrotolerants (psychrotrophiles), which are capable of growth at low temperatures but possess optimal and maximal growth temperatures at the 15–20 °C range [55]; (c) mesophiles, which are capable of growth at moderate temperatures between 20 °C and 45 °C, with an optimum growth temperature in the range of 30–39 °C [56]; (d) thermoduric organisms, which are capable of growth in the mesophilic temperature range (15–37 °C), yet retain the ability to grow at refrigeration temperatures [57]; (e) thermophile, which possess the ability to resist elevated temperatures, enabling them to colonize new environmental hyperthermic niches. The developement of thermophilia was probably based on pre-existing molecular blocks, as it shares many mechanisms with the heat shock (HS) response [58]. Both thermoduric and thermophilic microorganisms can withstand pasteurization, especially as spores [59].
In dimorphic fungi (e.g., H. capsulatum), morphology and temperature are linked with each other. This connection enables a conversion from filamentous to yeast at an elevated temperature and vice versa [60]. Moreover, heat resistance can differ between the strains of a species [61].
The vast majority of yeasts and moulds are resistant to heat in the same way as mesophilic vegetative bacteria. The heat resistance of sexual spores and asexual conidia is not greater than that of vegetative cells. However, ascospores of some moulds, such as Byssochlamys, Neosartorya, and Talaromyces species, have a relatively high heat resistance, with a 7–22-min D value at 88 °C, and may survive 30 min of heat treatment at 90 °C, causing microbial spoilage in processed fruit drinks and canned fruits [61].

5.1. Impact of the Environment

Alvarenga et al. [62] extracted data from publications between 1969 and 2017 about thermal resistance parameters and their effects on heat-resistant fungi belonging to the Neosartorya genus. Data included a comparison of the effects of decimal reduction time (D), inactivation method, temperature of inactivation, pH, °Brix, maturity of spores, and kind of medium (model, juice, concentrates). Each of these parameters can impact fungal heat resistance [62]. These results also indicated that, for Neosartorya spp., the estimate for pooled D* values (D at 90 °C, pH 3.5 and 12° Brix) was: 5.35 min; 95% CI: 4.10–7.08 min. Moreover, increasing the content of soluble solids in concentrates tends to cause a smaller decrease in the heat resistance of Neosartorya and ascospores appear to be more thermal-sensitive to a decrease in medium pH [62].
Brix can be defined as a measurement of the dissolved sugar-to-water mass ratio. Thus, it can be connected with the dilution of medium. Naturally, freshly squeezed vegetable juice has a lower Brix value, between 5 to 12. Concentrates, caused by the thermal evaporation of water, have higher Brix values, between 25 and 60 [63]. Results obtained by Lane Paixão dos Santos et al. [64] confirmed that increasing °Brix lowers the livelihood chances of Neosartorya. Within tested species, N. udagawae was the most resilient and possessed the ability to grow at the highest evaluated °Brix (59°/aw = 0.86) [65]. Similarly to sugars, the concentration of other substances can have an effect on heat resistance. For example, NaCl, used to decrease the water activity (aw), causes an increase in the heat resistance of some microorganisms. NaCl, used in up to 10%, increases the thermotolerance of Salmonella and acts as a heat-protectant for L. monocytogenes [66]. To summarize, a reduction in water activity considerably boosts heat resistance. This is a common issue with foods abundant in sugar, proteins, or fat. However, acidic pH substantially lowers heat resistance. The pH of 4.5 marks a crossing point, as goods with a pH of less than 4.5 can be pasteurized at 100 °C or lower, but foods with pH greater than 4.5 must be sterilized at temperatures higher than 100 °C. The primary reason for this is a microbe, C. botulinum, which cannot grow or create toxins at pH 4.5, and any of its spores that survive heat treatment cannot germinate properly. The interplay between heat and other variables can be advantageously used in food production [61].

5.2. Heat Shock Proteins—HSPs

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are part of the protective mechanism of cells in case of stress. They have a biological function and are involved in transcription, translation, protein folding and posttranslational modifications. HSPs maintain the quality of proteins. In fungi, HSPs are triggered by either specific (temperature shock) or general (pH, starvation, other stress factors) mechanisms [66].
The most common HSPs in fungi are: Hsp90, Hsp70, and Hsp20–40. They play a crucial role in changes in the morphology, adaptation procurement and shaping of anti-fungal resistance [60]. Hsp90 has been studied in A. fumigatus by Lamoth et al. [67]. Hsp90 plays a key role in morphogenesis, helps with transcriptional regulation and controls conidation [67,68]. According to the UniProt Database, the repression of its gene showed decreased spore viability, decreased hyphal growth and defects in germination and conidiation. Moreover, Hsp90 is distributed throughout cytosol and moves to specific organs during stress. Hsp90 and Hsp70 were found in N. fumigata. Alone or combined, they play a major role in morphogenesis and dimorphism. N. fumigata also produces Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40, which play a role in replication [60]. HSPs 70 exhibit ATPase activity and disaggregate denatured proteins, which, in turn, helps with proper chain folding de novo [69].

5.3. Trehalose and Mannitol

The processes utilized by thermophiles to create resistance to increased temperatures are similar to those used by mesophilic fungi in the heat shock response. For example, under heat shock conditions, mesophilic fungi increase the amount of trehalose up to 6–8% of dry weight, which is similar to the values in the thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora thermophila (up to 3.5%) under optimum temperature conditions. Mesophilic fungi can acquire thermotolerance by HSP synthesis, trehalose accumulation, changes in the state of water in cell compartments, and membrane composition [58].
Trehalose is the most widespread naturally occurring disaccharide. In some fungi, only acid (unregulated) trehalase has been found (e.g., in Aspergillus oryzae) [69]. Wyatt et al. [70] identified and characterized a series of trehalose-containing oligosaccharides responsible for the unique preservation properties of Neosartorya fischeri ascospores. In vivo, they acted as a shield for cytosolic biomolecules [71].
The activity of trehalose gene NTH1 is multiplied by ten during the heat shock reaction. During the conidia germination of A. nidulans, neutral trehalase is responsible for trehalose mobilization and glycerol build-up. According to tests on Aspergillus oryzae, mannitol substantially inhibits acid trehalase from conidia cell walls. Trehalose accumulates during the idiophase, when growth activities are inhibited. Having reached its peak in resting form, it is known as the dormancy sugar. In the early stages of A. niger conidia germination, trehalose levels are found to be significantly lower. A. niger has proven to be capable of modifying its trehalose and glycerol levels in conidia, indicating the existence of adaptation mechanisms comparable to those seen in vegetative cells. The antioxidant defense process under heat shock comprises not only of the activation of desaturase activity but also the stimulation of trehalose production [69].
Increasing the heat resistance capacity has as much to do with trehalose as it has to do with mannitol. These substances and their relationship are involved in securing the livelihood of cells during oxidative stress. The mannitol and trehalose metabolism cycles are closely connected. Lowering the concentration of mannitol causes an increase in the amount of trehalose and trehalose-based oligosaccharides present [70].

5.4. Other Metabolites

Neosartorya spp. produce many resilient metabolites, which can upkeep the metabolism even under high temperatures. For example, a purified exo-polygalacturonase (EplNg) of Neosartorya glabra was effectively identified. The enzyme was active from 30 to 90 °C, with the highest activity at 65 °C and pH 5.0 [27]. Another highly active thermophilic enzyme has been discovered in N. fischeri P1. It has been dubbed the soybean isoflavone glycoside-degrading-glucosidase of GH3. The enzyme exhibited a greater optimal temperature and specific activity than any other known fungal homologue, was stable across a wider pH and temperature range, and was resistant to the majority of tested compounds. It had broad substrate specificity, including glucosidase, cellobiase, xylanase, and glucanase activity [72]. Neosartorya fischeri M-1 developed a thermophilic glucoamylase that was most active at temperatures ranging from 55 to 60 °C, and had the maximum activity at pH levels ranging from 4.0 to 4.4. Producing enzymes that are stable in hot conditions are definitely beneficial for the heat-resistance shaping of fungi. These enzymes can act as tools, enabling survival and growth in a heated environment [73].

6. Interactions between Neosartorya and Plants

Representatives of Neosartorya genus are a widely detected fungal group, mostly inhabiting soil. Therefore, it is easily transmittable to plants, impacting their postharvest quality. There are numerous studies in which either Aspergillus or Neosartorya phases were detected on plants and fruit, e.g., strawberry [30,32,35], coffee plants [74], apples [75], grapes [76]. The spectrum of fungus–plant interaction is broad, beginning with the roots and ending with the very top aboveground plant organs. The presence of Neosartorya on plant roots can either be characterized as opportunistic for the fungus or mutually beneficial for both parties. In the first instance, the fungus may be attracted to damaged or diseased roots due to its saprophytic nature. It then accelerates rot and spoils the plant further. Such a situation has been described by [77], where pineapple plants suffering from the red leaf disease had reduced root systems and tested positively for Neosartorya fischeri, which does not cause said disease. In this case, the mycelium did not spread to aboveground organs. Often, Neosartorya can create a symbiosis with its host, acting as a natural antimicrobial agent or promoting plant growth by enzyme secretion. Neosartorya fischeri has been reported to inhabit a traditional medicinal herb Macleaya cordata, mainly distributed in China [78]. Interestingly, it acted as an endophytic organism, providing its antibacterial properties to both the plant and, later, to people consuming the plant for its medicinal value. The antimicrobial activity of N. fischeri in this study has been proven against eight bacteria: Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Salmonella typhimurium and Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Hamayun et al. [79] reported gibberellins’ production and the growth-promoting capacity of another endophytic Neosartorya strain (CC-8), which was isolated from the roots of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa). The fungus cultures significantly promoted plant length and biomass gain.
Neosartorya spp. can migrate to plant organs other than the roots (Figure 4). It has been reported on leaves of kale, where, in consortium with Talaromyces, it was showed to control leaf spot in kale, caused by Alternaria brassicicola [80]. N. spinosa yielded the best results against this pathogen amongst all tested strains (others were N. hiratsukae, N. pseudofischeri, N. aureola, N. spinosa, N. fennelliae, Neosartorya sp., T. trachyspermus, T. muroii). Genus Neosartorya is also one of the five main groups of fungi present on fresh common reed (P. australis) leaves, where they exhibit co-occurrences with other members of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota [81]. They also act as saprotrophs, transforming dead plant matter into compost.

7. Fruit and Vegetable Production in the European Union

7.1. Organic Crop Production

Organic farming can be seen as a viable alternative to high-input horticultural systems relying on synthetic fertilizers, fungicides, and insecticides. It is built on the premise that the soil is a living system, closely intertwined with fauna and flora. It considers the microbiome and its interactions with the soil–plant system. Laws define the word “organic” mostly in terms of ‘natural’ vs. ‘synthetic’ inputs [82]. The most common practices used in sustainable horticulture are crop rotation, utilizing animal manure, and biological pest management [83]. There are many ways of delivering additional nutrients to the soil, e.g., mineral fertilization (increases the ground’s mineral content) and organic manuring (upkeeping the soil’s biological fertility) [84].
Organic crops possess more value than regular fruits and vegetables. They are often richer in nutrients [85] and contain fewer heavy metals [86]. Due to the current holistic view of ecological behaviours, the volume of organic crops is steadily growing. Organic horticulture promotes not only the production of food, but also the production of fibre and timber [83]. The branding of produce as “organic” is heavily controlled. Organic farming methods are sustainable, have a minimal environmental effect and may be viewed as a means of cleaning up and rehabilitating deteriorated agricultural land [82].
Horticultural goods are an important aspect of the European Unions’ regional and cultural character. According to Eurostat data from 2019, Poland was one of the European producers with the highest yield of organic crops. The most important producers in the EU were France, Spain and Italy. According to Eurostat in these countries the total amount of harvested crops in the EU in 2019 included grain (299.3 mln t), vegetables (61.5 mln t) and fruit, berries, nuts (25.2 mln t), respectively. Furthermore, in this year, organic crop farming accounted for 8.5% of the EU’s total utilised agricultural area, with 13.8 million hectares available for growing organic crops.

7.2. Poland as a Leader in Fruit Production in the European Union

The food industry in Poland was among those sectors that saw significant upheavals and rebounded quickly following the country’s political revolution in the 1980s. As a result, the industry became an important part of the economy, influencing economic growth. Poland has evolved into a sophisticated and innovative food manufacturer in Europe as a result of technical and organizational advancements. This is proven by the increase in food exports. Another significant aspect that aided the growth of this business was Poland’s entrance to the European Union and the resulting prospects for the greater exploration of other markets. Polish food makers were eligible for various forms of grants and subsidies as a result of their EU membership. The standards for food production in Poland are mostly established by European Union legislation. Compliance with EU rules and regulations is especially critical for food exporters, since about 80% of Polish food exports are destined for EU markets. In addition to strict norms and novel pro-ecological legislation, consumers’ interest in food produced by industrial methods has rapidly declined. Chemical-plant-manufactured goods or genetic alterations being utilized in production make customers hesitant to purchase. Thus, it is important to implement new, ecological technologies in food production and preservation [87]. Ecologically sound alternatives should not omit the threat posed by thermoresistant organisms. As reported by Eurostat, statistically, in 2016, Poland harvested over 1 of every 4 apples produced in the EU. Poland was also the main EU-producer of cherries and the second most important producer of strawberries, right after Spain. In general, according to the National Centre of Agricultural Support (KOWR) Poland is a major producer of strawberries, gooseberries, and chokeberries. The fruit harvest from orchards was estimated to be 4.5 million tonnes in 2018. Based on data reported by FAO, Figure 5 and Figure 6 present fruit production in 2020 in Poland and Europe, respectively.
The production of cherries and apples accounted for a sizable portion of this total. In 2017, Spain represented the most noteworthy extent (40.1%) of the region inside the EU in terms of organic food production, due to high yield of nuts and citrus products. Italy represented the following most noteworthy country (17.5%), followed by Poland (9.6%). According to KOWR, the current estimate is that 350,000 tonnes of apple juice concentrate are produced, representing a 29% growth over the years 2014–2017. While these numbers seem optimistic at first, it is important to remember that a high yield does not always equal rapid income. After harvest, fruit is still susceptible to rot and pests, which can generate economic losses.

7.3. European Union Policy Framework

The European Union is currently focused on supporting ecological solutions in many sectors, including horticulture. Legal documents backing the EU’s support for sustainable farming include, e.g., regulation no. 1308/2013, focused on the common organisation of the markets in horticultural products, directive 2009/128/E, touching on the subject of pesticide usage, and Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (WFD), directly impacting which substances may be used in plant protection in relation to water quality and purity. The “umbrella” directive that summarizes the EU’s goals is the common agricultural policy (CAP). The CAP aims to combat climate change, conserve natural resources, and promote variety in the EU. It supports sustainable agriculture and horticulture by recommending reduced pesticide and fertilizer usage and supporting organic farming. The CAP greatly contributes to the decrease in the overall impacts of food manufacturing. It is important to uphold EU standards regarding horticultural development, and especially important to follow the trends of sustainability and creating positive environmental impact. Inventing novel, greener alternatives to commonly used preservation methods of obtained crops can further help to implement these policies in real life [88,89,90].

7.4. Common Problems in Fruit Production

Fruit production faces many difficult challenges. The issues can be divided into the following: (a) biological, including vulnerability to pest, diseases, microbes, and postharvest losses due to these factors, and (b) economical, including poor pricing and low fertilizer use, the unavailability of horticultural credit, land tenure insecurity, the slow development of horticultural research, infrastructure, the productivity of labour, and consumer expectations [91,92,93].
Looking at the presented data, it is crucial to develop new technologies for food protection, harvest and processing. This can be achieved with further research on pathogens’ heat resistance, methods of detection and natural food preservatives. As explained before, fruit production plays a major role in European and Poland’s economy, and any losses in this sector could be grossly disadvantageous.

7.5. Methods of Postharvest Food Preservation

The destruction caused by postharvest microbiological food contaminants, including heat-resistant fungi and diseases, amounts to a 20–25% yield reduction, depending on the country [94]. Therefore, the methods, strategies and ways of postharvest food protection are very important. The current postharvest strategies of microbiological contaminants’ mitigation heavily rely on chemicals, which pose a threat to the environment and human health. Several techniques can be used to protect against deteriorating factors, e.g., freezing or chilling, pasteurization, canning, or dehydrating [30,61]. Pasteurization and canning usually have little effect on ascospores, which later sprout into fungi and create mycotoxins that contaminate the produce. Mould ruins the product by developing colonies on the surface, floating mycelia, or clarifying the material. As a result of their microaerophile nature, they destroy fruit juices even when stored under low-oxygen conditions. N. fischeri is frequently responsible for the deterioration in apple juice, strawberry pulp, and passion fruit juice. As previously mentioned, harvest losses in these commodities can cause serious economic problems in Poland, which is a key producer of apples, cherries, and strawberries in the EU.
In accordance with European Union laws and suggestions touching on the subject of sustainable horticulture and food production, the use of heat or natural preservatives to protect the produce is highly recommended. Plant extracts may present a valid means of protection against fungi. It has been confirmed that Calendula arvensis hydrosol extracts possess antifungal properties, mainly against Penicillium expansum and Aspergillus niger. However, it is unclear whether essential oils or hydrosols have the best antifungal properties. This pertains to the concentration of substances, but also the type of plant material. Extracts diluted in water are generally seen as milder and safer to use in food production than highly concentrated essential oils, which mainly dominate the field of cosmetics [95]. Despite marigold being more active as a hydrosol, plants such as mint [96], thyme and lavender [97] express wider antifungal properties in the form of essential oils [98].
Tipping the heat-resistance temperature point may be another green alternative to chemical protection. For example, raising the pasteurization temperature to 95 °C for at least 45 s successfully lowers the risk of purees being spoiled by A. fischeri. Furthermore, it increases the microbiological stability of such purees [30].
Subsequently, simply editing the environment of fungal growth may be enough to stop its growth altogether. Previously mentioned variables, such as °Brix/acidity ratio [99], pH [100], °Brix [101], alternating temperatures, and the concentration of soluble dry matter can all be altered to elicit a reaction from fungi [102]. There are also studies that show the prospect of using the UV-C light as a form of non-thermal food processing. This is considered to cause few quality alterations while reducing microbial burden [103]. During transport, it has been proven that using a coating with lipopeptides and nisin on cardboard boxes can diminish the duration of Neosartorya hiratsukae [104], which might prove advantageous during the shipment and delivery phase of production. Coating composites are used to improve the postharvest quality of fruits [105,106,107], and can be effective in the control of fungi, including the genus of Neosartorya [108].

8. Conclusions and Future Directions

Neosartorya spp. fungi are riveting and extraordinary organisms, which require more focus and research. Being easily mistaken for Aspergillus has masked their actual contribution to food spoilage and effects on human health. They simultaneously pose dangers to crops and offer novel perspectives in medicine. In the future, more studies focused on Neosartorya are needed to estimate its inactivation parameters in food industry, and deepen the knowledge of its infectious properties and possible medicinal uses.
Moreover, future research directions should focus on heat-resistant fungal threats to horticulture and postharvest food security to develop new approaches to ensuring a robust global food supply chain. An important issue of future research is to consider and obtain insight into the plant mycobiome as important player in enhancing resistance to microbiological food contaminants and pathogens. Another challenge is to determine how to protect crops from postharvest fungal damage, especially from the Neosartorya genus. The best strategy at present may be to focus on studying natural fungicides and substances, such as microbial-based solutions, plant extracts, and essential oils, which have little to no effect on the environment and do not lead to the decay of postharvest horticultural products and food, but do affect thermoresistant moulds such as Neosartorya.
Finally, effort should be taken to find connections between heat-resistant fungi and climate change, including responses to the question of how new and existing fungi can be identified, whose geographic range is expanding due to climate change, and how they adapt to these changes and increase temperatures, considering global trade’s ability to exacerbate the spread of postharvest fungal contaminants of crops. Another important future direction is to fill the knowledge gap regarding the role of heat-resistant fungi (mainly belonging to the Neosartorya genus) in the enhancement of carbon sequestration, given the prospects and challenges of prolonging the postharvest shelf life of fruits, vegetables, crops, and food.

Author Contributions

W.M.: Conceptualization, Writing—Original Draft Preparation; G.P.: Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing, Supervision; M.F.: Conceptualization, Resources and Funding acquisition, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, Preludium Bis-2, 2020/39/O/NZ9/03421, project title: The role of the metabolic, morphological and genetic properties of Neosartorya spp. fungi in shaping their resistance to preservatives, chemicals and natural plant extracts.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gomiero, T.; Pimentel, D.; Paoletti, M.G. Environmental Impact of Different Agricultural Management Practices: Conventional vs. Organic Agriculture. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30, 95–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Igras, J.; Pokojski, Z.; Kowalski, A.; Krasowicz, S.; Labetowicz, J.; Matyka, M.; Wijaszka, T. 25 Years of Polish Agriculture Food Security in Europe; Conference Centre: Puławy, Poland, 2014; p. 75. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  3. Frąc, M.; Jezierska-Tys, S.; Yaguchi, T. Occurrence, Detection, and Molecular and Metabolic Characterization of Heat-Resistant Fungi in Soils and Plants and Their Risk to Human Health. Adv. Agron. 2015, 132, 161–204. [Google Scholar]
  4. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-friendly Food System; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; ISBN 9789896540821. [Google Scholar]
  5. Panek, J.; Frąc, M.; Bilińska-Wielgus, N. Comparison of Chemical Sensitivity of Fresh and Long-Stored Heat Resistant Neosartorya fischeri Environmental Isolates Using BIOLOG Phenotype MicroArray System. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Li, S.; Smith, K.D.; Davis, J.H.; Gordon, P.B.; Breaker, R.R.; Strobel, S.A. Eukaryotic resistance to fluoride toxicity mediated by a widespread family of fluoride export proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 19018–19023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kikoku, Y.; Tagashira, N.; Gabriel, A.A.; Nakano, H. Heat activation of Neosartorya and Talaromyces ascospores and enhancement by organic acids. Biol. Sci. 2009, 14, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chipley, J.R. Sodium benzoate and benzoic acid. In Antimicrobials in Food, 3rd ed.; Davidson, P.M., Sofos, J.N., Branen, A.L., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2005; Volume 145, pp. 11–48. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nielsen, P.V. Preservative and Temperature Effect on Growth of Three Varieties of the Heat-Resistant Mold, Neosartorya fischeri, as Measured by an Impedimetric Method. J. Food Sci. 1991, 56, 1735–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bromley, M.J.; van Muijlwijk, G.; Fraczek, M.G.; Robson, G.; Verweij, P.E.; Denning, D.W.; Bowyer, P. Occurrence of azole resistant species of Aspergillus in the UK environment. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2014, 2, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Delgado, D.A.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Granato, D.; Massaguer, P.R. Inactivation of Neosartorya fischeri and Paecilomyces variotii on paperboard packing material by hydrogen peroxide and heat. Food Control 2012, 23, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hong, S.B.; Cho, H.S.; Shin, H.D.; Frisvad, J.C.; Samson, R.A. Novel Neosartorya species isolated from soil in Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56 Pt 2, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. De Cássia, M.S.B. Chapter 16—Pathogens and Spoilage Microorganisms in Fruit Juice: An Overview. In Fruit Juices; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2018; pp. 291–308. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pitt, J.I.; Hocking, A.D. Fungi and Food Spolage. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 1689–1699. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wyatt, T.T.; Wösten, H.; Dijksterhuis, J. Fungal spores for dispersion in space and time. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 85, 42–91. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dyer, P.S.; Paoletti, M. Reproduction in Aspergillus fumigatus: Sexuality in a supposedly asexual species? Med. Mycol. 2005, 43 (Suppl. 1), S7–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Sugui, J. Sexual Life Cycle of Aspergillus fumigatus. Korean J. Med. Mycol. 2011, 16, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hong, S.-B.; Shin, H.-D.; Hong, J.; Frisvad, J.C.; Nielsen, P.V.; Varga, J.; Samson, R.A. New taxa of Neosartorya and Aspergillus in Aspergillus section Fumigati. Int. J. Gen. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 93, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rydholm, C.; Szakacs, G.; Lutzoni, F. Low Genetic Variation and No Detectable Population Structure in Aspergillus fumigatus Compared to Closely Related Neosartorya Species. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 650–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Balajee, S.A.; Gribskov, J.; Brandt, M.; Ito, J.; Fothergill, A.; Marr, K.A. Mistaken Identity: Neosartorya pseudofischeri and Its Ana-morph Masquerading as Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5996–5999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Takada, M.; Horie, Y.; Abliz, P. Two new heterothallic Neosartorya from African soil. Mycoscience 2001, 42, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Samson, R.A.; Hong, S.; Peterson, S.W.; Frisvad, J.C.; Varga, J. Polyphasic taxonomy of Aspergillus section Fumigati and its teleo-morph Neosartorya. Stud. Mycol. 2007, 59, 147–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yaguchi, T.; ImanishiI, Y.; Matsuzawa, T.; Hosoya, K.; Hitomi, J.; Nakayama, M. Method for Identifying Heat-Resistant Fungi of the Genus Neosartorya. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75, 1806–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Souza-Motta, C.M.; Cavalcanti, M.A.Q.; Porto, A.L.F.; Moreira, K.A.; Lima Filho, J.L. Aspegillus niveus Blochwitz 4128URM: New source for inulinase production. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2005, 48, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Prigitano, A.; Esposto, M.C.; Carnevali, D.; Catena, E.; Auxilia, F.; Castaldi, S.; Romanò, L. Neosartorya hiratsukae: Environmental isolation from intensive care units in an Italian hospital. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2021, 43, 949–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Samson, R.A.; Hong, S.B.; Frisvad, J.C. Old and new concepts of species differentiation in Aspergillus. Med. Mycol. 2006, 44 (Suppl. 1), 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. DesDesagiacomo, C.C.V.; Alnoch, R.C.; Pinheiro, V.E.; Cereia, M.; Machado, C.B.; Damasio, A.; Augusto, M.J.; Pedersoli, W.; Silva, R.N.; Polizeli, M.D.L.T.D.M. Structural model and functional properties of an exo-polygalacturonase from Neosartorya glabra. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 186, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Horie, Y.; Miyaji, M.; Nishimura, K.; Franco, M.F.; Coelho, K.I.R. Two new species of Neosartorya from Brazilian soil. Mycoscience 1995, 36, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hubka, V.; Peterson, S.W.; Frisvad, J.C.; Yaguchi, T.; Kubátová, A.; Kolařík, M. Aspergillus waksmanii sp. nov. and Aspergillus marvanovae sp. nov., two closely related species in section Fumigati. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63 Pt 2, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. dos Santos, J.L.P.; Membré, J.-M.; Jacxsens, L.; Samapundo, S.; Van Impe, J.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Devlieghere, F. Quantitative microbial spoilage risk assessment (QMSRA) of pasteurized strawberry purees by Aspergillus fischeri (teleomorph Neosartorya fischeri). Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 333, 108781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liang, W.-L.; Le, X.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.; Yang, X.; Chen, J.-X.; Xu, J.; Liu, H.-L.; Wang, L.-Y.; Wang, K.-T.; Hu, K.-C.; et al. Exploring the chemodiversity and biological activities of the secondary metabolites from the marine fungus Neosartorya pseudofischeri. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 5657–5676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Fornal, E.; Parfieniuk, E.; Czeczko, R.; Bilinska-Wielgus, N.; Frąc, M. Fast and easy liquid chromatography—Mass spectrometry method for evaluation of postharvest fruit safety by determination of mycotoxins: Fumitremorgin C and verruculogen. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2017, 131, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Van Egmond, H.; Schothorst, R.; Jonker, M. Regulations relating to mycotoxins in food. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Van Egmond, H. Worldwide Regulations for Mycotoxins. Mycotoxins Food Saf. 2002, 504, 257–269. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pertile, G.; Frąc, M.; Fornal, E.; Oszust, K.; Gryta, A.; Yaguchi, T. Molecular and metabolic strategies for postharvest detection of heat-resistant fungus Neosartorya fischeri and its discrimination from Aspergillus fumigatus. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 161, 111082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mead, M.E.; Knowles, S.L.; Raja, H.A.; Beattie, S.R.; Kowalski, C.H.; Steenwyk, J.L.; Silva, L.P.; Chiaratto, J.; Ries, L.N.; Goldman, G.H.; et al. Characterizing the Pathogenic, Genomic, and Chemical Traits of Aspergillus fischeri, a Close Relative of the Major Human Fungal Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. mSphere 2019, 4, e00018-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Guarro, J.; Kallas, E.G.; Godoy, P.; Karenina, A.; Gené, J.; Stchigel, A.; Colombo, A.L. Cerebral Aspergillosis Caused by Neosartorya hiratsukae, Brazil. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 989–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Farrell, J.J.; Kasper, D.J.; Taneja, D.; Baman, S.; O’rourke, L.M.; Lowery, K.S.; Sampath, R.; Bonomo, R.A.; Peterson, S.W. Acute Respiratory Distress caused by Neosartorya udagawae. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2014, 6, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Summerbell, R.C.; de Repentigny, L.; Chartrand, C.; St Germain, G. Graft-related endocarditis caused by Neosartorya fischeri var. spinosa. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992, 30, 1580–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Han, J.I.; Na, K.J. Dermatitis Caused by Neosartorya hiratsukae Infection in a Hedgehog. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 3119–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wu, L.C.; Hang, Y.D. Acid Protease Production from Neosartorya fischeri. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 33, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, H.; Ma, R.; Shi, P.; Huang, H.; Yang, P.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Yao, B. Insights into the substrate specificity and synergy with mannanase of family 27 α-galactosidases from Neosartorya fischeri P1. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 1261–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yi, T.; Lee, E.H.; Park, H.; Cho, K.S. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by Neosartorya sp. BL4. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox Hazard Subst. Environ. Eng. 2011, 46, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Akharenegbe, P.; Chuku, A.; Mawak, J.; Sani, B.; Nsemoh, H.E.; Fadayomi, V.K. Fungal biodiversity associated with groundnuts stored in Nasarawa State. GSC Biol. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 18, 023–029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lan, W.J.; Fu, S.J.; Xu, M.Y.; Liang, W.L.; Lam, C.K.; Zhong, G.H.; Xu, J.; Yang, D.P.; Li, H.J. Five New Cytotoxic Metabolites from the Marine Fungus Neosartorya pseudofischeri. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lin, S.; He, Y.; Li, F.; Yang, B.; Liu, M.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Qi, C.; Wang, J.; et al. Structurally diverse and bioactive alkaloids from an insect-derived fungus Neosartorya fischeri. Phytochemistry 2020, 175, 112374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kovács, R.; Nagy, F.; Tóth, Z.; Forgács, L.; Tóth, L.; Váradi, G.; Tóth, G.; Vadászi, K.; Borman, A.; Majoros, L.; et al. The Neosartorya fischeri Antifungal Protein 2 (NFAP2): A New Potential Weapon against Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Unthuraloet, K.; Soytong, K. Nanoparticles Constructed from Neosartorya hiratsukae to Control Drechslera oryzae Causing Brown Spot of Rice. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Promoting Local Resources for Sustainable Agriculture and Development (ISPLRSAD 2020), Bengkulu, Indonesia, 8 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, Y.Y.; Zheng, S.N.; Tian, T.; Zheng, Z.Z.; Ma, L.F.; Shan, W.G.; Zhan, Z.J.; Ying, Y.M. Bioassay-Guided Isolation of Cytotoxic Steroids from Neosartorya fischeri. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2020, 56, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kijjoa, A.; Santos, S.; Dethoup, T.; Manoch, L.; Almeida, A.P.; Vasconcelos, M.H.; Silva, A.; Gales, L.; Herz, W. Sartoryglabrins, Analogs of Ardeemins, from Neosartorya Glabra. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011, 6, 807–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, S.L.; Yu, H.F.; Xu, Y.L.; Tian, T.; Zhan, Z.J.; Shan, W.G.; Ying, Y.M. Identification of Aszonalenin Derivatives as α-Glucosidase In-hibitors from Neosartorya fischeri NRRL 181. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2020, 56, 780–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Macario, A.J.L.; Conway de Macario, E. Heat Resistance. In Encyclopedia of Stress, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 278–283. [Google Scholar]
  53. Park, H.J.; Yun, D.J. Chapter Five—New Insights into the Role of the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) in Plants. In International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology; Jeon, K.W., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; Volume 300, pp. 161–209. [Google Scholar]
  54. Clarke, A.; Morris, G.J.; Fonseca, F.; Murray, B.J.; Acton, E.; Price, H.C. A Low Temperature Limit for Life on Earth. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. de Oliveira, G.B.; Favarin, L.; Luchese, R.H.; McIntosh, D. Psychrotrophic bacteria in milk: How much do we really know? Braz. J. Microbiol. 2015, 46, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schiraldi, C.; De Rosa, M. Mesophilic Organisms. In Encyclopedia of Membranes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mendonca, A.; Thomas-Popo, E.; Gordon, A. Microbiological considerations in food safety and quality systems implementation. In Food Safety and Quality Systems in Developing Countries; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 185–260. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ianutsevich, E.A.; Danilova, O.A.; Groza, N.V.; Kotlova, E.R.; Tereshina, V.M. Heat shock response of thermophilic fungi: Membrane lipids and soluble carbohydrates under elevated temperatures. Microbiology 2016, 162, 989–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Manners, J.; Craven, H. MILK | Processing of Liquid Milk. In Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 2nd ed.; Caballero, B., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 3951–3957. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tiwari, S.; Thakur, R.; Shankar, J. Role of Heat-Shock Proteins in Cellular Function and in the Biology of Fungi. Biotechnol. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 132635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Deák, T. Food Technologies: Pasteurization. In Encyclopedia of Food Safety; Motarjemi, Y., Ed.; Academic Press: Waltham, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 219–224, 245–252. [Google Scholar]
  62. Alvarenga, V.O.; Gonzales-Barron, U.; do Prado Silva, L.; Cadavez, V.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Using extended Bigelow meta-regressions for modelling the effects of temperature, pH, °Brix on the inactivation of heat resistant moulds. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 338, 108985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kosters, P.S.R.; Waldron, K.W. Production of high-value functional vegetable juices from food co-products. In Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing; Waldron, K., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2009; pp. 376–390. [Google Scholar]
  64. Lane Paixão dos Santos, J.; Samapundo, S.; Van Impe, J.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Devlieghere, F. Effect of sugar concentration (°Brix) and storage temperature on the time to visible growth of individual ascospores of six heat-resistant moulds isolated from fruit products. Food Control 2020, 108, 106880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ravishankar, S.; Juneja, V.K. PRESERVATIVES | Traditional Preservatives—Sodium Chloride. In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lindquist, S.; Craig, E.A. The heat-shock proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1988, 22, 631–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lamoth, F.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Steinbach, W.J. Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90): A novel antifungal target against Aspergillus fumigatus. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 42, 310–321. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lamoth, F.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Fortwendel, J.R.; Steinbach, W.J. Heat shock protein 90 is required for conidiation and cell wall integrity in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 1324–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Tereshina, V.M. Thermotolerance in Fungi: The Role of Heat Shock Proteins and Trehalose. Microbiology 2005, 74, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wyatt, T.T.; van Leeuwen, M.R.; Golovina, E.A.; Hoekstra, F.A.; Kuenster, E.J.; Palumbo, E.A.; Snyder, N.L.; Visagie, C.; Verkennis, A.; Hallsworth, J.E.; et al. Functionality and prevalence of trehalose-based oligosaccharides as novel compatible solutes in ascospores of Neosartorya fischeri (Aspergillus fischeri) and other fungi. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kuenstner, E.; Palumbo, E.; Levine, J.; Snyder, N. Synthesis of isobemisiose, neosartose, and fischerose: Three α-1,6-linked treha-lose-based oligosaccharides identified from Neosartorya fischeri. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 22726–22729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, X.; Ma, R.; Shi, P.; Huang, H.; Bai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, P.; Fan, Y.; Yao, B. Molecular Characterization of a Highly-Active Thermophilic β-Glucosidase from Neosartorya fischeri P1 and Its Application in the Hydrolysis of Soybean Isoflavone Glycosides. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hang, Y.D.; Woodams, E.E. Characterization of Glucoamylase from Neosartorya fischeri. Lwt—Food Sci. Technol. 1993, 26, 483–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Vega, F.E.; Simpkins, A.; Aime, M.C.; Posada, F.; Peterson, S.W.; Rehner, S.A.; Infante, F.; Castillo, A.; Arnold, A.E. Fungal endophyte diversity in coffee plants from Colombia, Hawai’i, Mexico and Puerto Rico. Fungal Ecol. 2010, 3, 122–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Evelyn Kim, H.J.; Silva, F.V.M. Modeling the inactivation of Neosartorya fischeri ascospores in apple juice by high pressure, power ultrasound and thermal processing. Food Control 2016, 59, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yıldırım, K.F.; Ulusoy, H.B.; Hamed, S.N. Heat-resistant moulds: Assessment, prevention and their conse-quences for food safety and public health. Czech J. Food Sci. 2022, 40, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Awuah, R.T.; Adzim, E. Etiological and epidemiological studies on the red leaf disease of pineapple in Ghana. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 2004, 12, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shan, T.; Sun, W.; Lou, J.; Gao, S.; Mou, Y.; Zhou, L. Antibacterial activity of the endophytic fungi from medicinal herb, Macleaya cordata. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 4354–4359. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hamayun, M.; Khan, S.A.; Khan, A.L.; Ahmad, N.; Nawaz, Y.; Sher, H.; Lee, I.-J. Gibberellin producing Neosartorya sp. CC8 reprograms Chinese cabbage to higher growth. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 129, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Punyanobpharat, A.; Soytong, K.; Poeaim, S. Effective of Neosartorya and Talaromyces to control Alternaria brassicicola causing leaf spot of kale. Int. J. Agric. Technol. 2018, 14, 1709–1718. [Google Scholar]
  81. Likar, M.; Grašič, M.; Stres, B.; Regvar, M.; Gaberščik, A. Original Leaf Colonisers Shape Fungal Decomposer Communities of Phragmites australis in Intermittent Habitats. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Seufert, V.; Ramankutty, N.; Mayerhofer, T. What is this thing called organic?—How organic farming is codified in regulations. Food Policy 2017, 68, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Litterick, A.M.; Watson, C.A. Organic Farming. In Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 311–317. [Google Scholar]
  84. Crinnion, W.J. Organic foods contain higher levels of certain nutrients, lower levels of pesticides, and may provide health benefits for the consumer. Altern. Med. Rev. 2010, 15, 4–12. [Google Scholar]
  85. Pandey, J.; Pandey, U. Accumulation of heavy metals in dietary vegetables and cultivated soil horizon in organic farming system in relation to atmospheric deposition in a seasonally dry tropical region of India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 148, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lockeretz, W. Organic Farming: An International History; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  87. Wrzesińska-Kowal, J.; Drabarczyk, K. Food production in Poland, compared to selected European Union Member States. Sci. J. Wars. Univ. Life Sci.-SGGW Probl. World Agric. 2014, 14, 205–214. [Google Scholar]
  88. Rossi, R. The EU Fruit and Vegetable Sector. Main Features, Challenges and Prospects; European Parliamentary Research Service: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  89. Jess, S.; Kildea, S.; Moody, A.; Rennick, G.; Murchie, A.K.; Cooke, L.R. European Union policy on pesticides: Implications for agri-culture in Ireland. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1646–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shucksmith, M.; Thomson, K.J.; Roberts, D. The CAP and the Regions: The Territorial Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  91. Ibeawuchi, I.I.; Okoli, N.A.; Alagba, R.A.; Ofor, M.O.; Emma-Okafor, L.C.; Peter-Onoh, C.A.; Obiefuna, J.C. Fruit and Vegetable Crop Production in Nigeria: The Gains, Challenges and The Way Forward. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc. 2015, 5, 194–209. [Google Scholar]
  92. Retamales, J.B. World temperate fruit production: Characteristics and challenges. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2011, 33, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Perricone, M.; Bevilacqua, A.; Altieri, C.; Sinigaglia, M.; Corbo, M.R. Challenges for the Production of Probiotic Fruit Juices. Beverages 2015, 1, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Sharma, R.R.; Singh, D.; Singh, R. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: A review. Biol. Control 2009, 50, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Belabbes, R.; Dib, M.E.A.; Djabou, N.; Ilias, F.; Tabti, B.; Costa, J.; Muselli, A. Chemical Variability, Antioxidant and Antifungal Activities of Essential Oils and Hydrosol Extract of Calendula arvensis L. from Western Algeria. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Jayan, L.; Priyadharsini, N.; Ramya, R.; Rajkumar, K. Evaluation of antifungal activity of mint, pomegranate and coriander on fluconazole-resistant Candida glabrata. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2020, 24, 517–522. [Google Scholar]
  97. Behmanesh, F.; Pasha, H.; Sefidgar, A.A.; Taghizadeh, M.; Moghadamnia, A.A.; Rad, H.A.; Shirkhani, L. Antifungal Effect of Lavender Essential Oil (Lavandula angustifolia) and Clotrimazole on Candida albicans: An In Vitro Study. Scientifica 2015, 2015, 261397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Ale, A.; Bacchetta, C.; Cazenave, J. Feb—Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2017, 26, 4082–4087. [Google Scholar]
  99. Salomão, B.; Slongo, A.P.; Aragao, G. Heat resistance of Neosartorya fischeri in various juices. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Makovitzki, A.; Shai, Y. pH-Dependent Antifungal Lipopeptides and Their Plausible Mode of Action. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 9775–9784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fang, S.W.; Li, C.F.; Shih, D.Y.C. Antifungal Activity of Chitosan and Its Preservative Effect on Low-Sugar Candied Kumquat. J. Food Prot. 1994, 57, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kondratenko, V.; Trishkaneva, M.; Levshenko, M.; Pozdnyakova, T.; Kolokolova, A. Study of thermal stability of ascospores As-pergillus (Neosartorya) fischeri depending on the concentration of soluble solids in apple juice. Proc. Voronezh State Univ. Eng. Technol. 2019, 81, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Menezes, N.M.C.; Tremarin, A.; Junior, A.F.; de Aragão, G.M.F. Effect of soluble solids concentration on Neosartorya fischeri inac-tivation using UV-C light. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 296, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Uttara, V.; Ankulkar, R.; Ahmed, Z.; Mirza, Y. Synergistic Inhibitory Activity of Bacillomycin D, Surfactin and Nisin against Thermoascus crustaceus, Neosartorya hiratsukae and Bacillus subtilis, Responsible for Cardboard Spoilage. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 14, 2555–2567. [Google Scholar]
  105. Khalid, M.A.; Niaz, B.; Saeed, F.; Afzaal, M.; Islam, F.; Hussain, M.; Mahwish Khalid, H.M.S.; Siddeeg, A.; Al-Farga, A. Edible coatings for enhancing safety and quality attributes of fresh produce: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2022, 25, 1817–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Salsabiela, S.; Sukma Sekarina, A.S.; Bagus, H.; Audiensi, A.; Azizah, F.; Heristika, W.; Manikharda Susanto, E.; Munawaroh, H.S.H.; Show, P.L.; Ningrum, A. Development of Edible Coating from Gelatin Composites with the Addition of Black Tea Extract (Camellia sinensis) on Minimally Processed Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Polymers 2022, 14, 2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Vieira, T.M.; Moldão-Martins, M.; Alves, V.D. Composite Coatings of Chitosan and Alginate Emulsions with Olive Oil to Enhance Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life of Fresh Figs (Ficus carica L. cv. ‘Pingo De Mel’). Foods 2021, 10, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Szymańska-Chargot, M.; Chylińska, M.; Pertile, G.; Pieczywek, P.M.; Cieślak, K.J.; Zdunek, A.; Frąc, M. Influence of chitosan addition on the mechanical and antibacterial properties of carrot cellulose nanofiber film. Cellulose 2019, 26, 9613–9629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Life cycle of Neosartorya spp. with the stages of sexual and asexual reproduction (own elaboration by W. Maj and M. Frąc using BioRender, Toronto, ON, Canada).
Figure 1. Life cycle of Neosartorya spp. with the stages of sexual and asexual reproduction (own elaboration by W. Maj and M. Frąc using BioRender, Toronto, ON, Canada).
Ijms 24 01543 g001
Figure 2. Neosartorya spp. growth on Potato Dextrose Agar with antibiotics (streptomycin, chlortetracycline). Strain G150/14 (AD) after 4 days of culturing at 30 °C (A,B) and a month after (C,D). Strain G151/14 (EH) after 4 days of culturing at 30 °C (E,F) and a month after (G,H). The number of strains: G150/14; G150/14; G151/14; G151/14 are visible on the plates presented on the photographs.
Figure 2. Neosartorya spp. growth on Potato Dextrose Agar with antibiotics (streptomycin, chlortetracycline). Strain G150/14 (AD) after 4 days of culturing at 30 °C (A,B) and a month after (C,D). Strain G151/14 (EH) after 4 days of culturing at 30 °C (E,F) and a month after (G,H). The number of strains: G150/14; G150/14; G151/14; G151/14 are visible on the plates presented on the photographs.
Ijms 24 01543 g002
Figure 3. Positive and negative aspects of Neosartorya spp. (a) Positive aspects, (b) negative aspects; Own elaboration by W. Maj and M. Frąc using BioRender, Toronto, Canada. Aflatoxin B1 structure molview.org (accessed on 12 October 2022).
Figure 3. Positive and negative aspects of Neosartorya spp. (a) Positive aspects, (b) negative aspects; Own elaboration by W. Maj and M. Frąc using BioRender, Toronto, Canada. Aflatoxin B1 structure molview.org (accessed on 12 October 2022).
Ijms 24 01543 g003
Figure 4. Ways of causing postharvest food spoilage by Neosartorya spp. (own elaboration by W. Maj and M. Frąc using BioRender, Toronto, ON, Canada).
Figure 4. Ways of causing postharvest food spoilage by Neosartorya spp. (own elaboration by W. Maj and M. Frąc using BioRender, Toronto, ON, Canada).
Ijms 24 01543 g004
Figure 5. Polish fruit production in 2020 (data from fao.org) (accessed on 12 October 2022).
Figure 5. Polish fruit production in 2020 (data from fao.org) (accessed on 12 October 2022).
Ijms 24 01543 g005
Figure 6. European fruit production in 2020 (data from fao.org) (accessed on 12 October 2022).
Figure 6. European fruit production in 2020 (data from fao.org) (accessed on 12 October 2022).
Ijms 24 01543 g006
Table 1. Synonymous Neosartorya spp. species.
Table 1. Synonymous Neosartorya spp. species.
Species NameSynonymous SpeciesHigh Similarity or Identical FeaturesStatusRef.
Neosartorya otaniiN. fennelliaeIdentical β-tubulin gene sequences, no differences in ascosporesMating experiments needed for proof[21]
N. spinosaN. botucatensis, N. paulistensis, N. takakiCircular arrangements on the convex walls of ascosporesAccepted[22]
Neosartorya primulinaN. quadricinctaNearly identical gene sequences for β-tubulin, calmodulin and actin, morphology, ascospore ornamentation, restricted growth on Czapek agarAccepted[22]
Neosartorya delicataN. tatenoiIdentical ascospore morphology, nearly identical gene sequences for β-tubulin, calmodulin and actinAccepted[22]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maj, W.; Pertile, G.; Frąc, M. Soil-Borne Neosartorya spp.: A Heat-Resistant Fungal Threat to Horticulture and Food Production—An Important Component of the Root-Associated Microbial Community. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021543

AMA Style

Maj W, Pertile G, Frąc M. Soil-Borne Neosartorya spp.: A Heat-Resistant Fungal Threat to Horticulture and Food Production—An Important Component of the Root-Associated Microbial Community. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(2):1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021543

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maj, Wiktoria, Giorgia Pertile, and Magdalena Frąc. 2023. "Soil-Borne Neosartorya spp.: A Heat-Resistant Fungal Threat to Horticulture and Food Production—An Important Component of the Root-Associated Microbial Community" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 2: 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021543

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop