Next Article in Journal
Biomarkers Related to Synaptic Dysfunction to Discriminate Alzheimer’s Disease from Other Neurological Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Characteristics, Receptor Specificity, and Pathogenicity of Avian Influenza Viruses Isolated from Wild Ducks in Russia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

OsHsfB4b Confers Enhanced Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis and Rice

1
College of Life Sciences, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang 641004, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, and Center for Crop Genome Engineering, Longzi Lake Campus, College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10830; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810830
Submission received: 11 August 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 10 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Heat shock factors (Hsfs) play pivotal roles in plant stress responses and confer stress tolerance. However, the functions of several Hsfs in rice (Oryza sativa L.) are not yet known. In this study, genome-wide analysis of the Hsf gene family in rice was performed. A total of 25 OsHsf genes were identified, which could be clearly clustered into three major groups, A, B, and C, based on the characteristics of the sequences. Bioinformatics analysis showed that tandem duplication and fragment replication were two important driving forces in the process of evolution and expansion of the OsHsf family genes. Both OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d showed strong responses to the stress treatment. The results of subcellular localization showed that the OsHsfB4b protein was in the nucleus whereas the OsHsfB4d protein was located in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. Over-expression of the OsHsfB4b gene in Arabidopsis and rice can increase the resistance to drought stress. This study provides a basis for understanding the function and evolutionary history of the OsHsf gene family, enriching our knowledge of understanding the biological functions of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d genes involved in the stress response in rice, and also reveals the potential value of OsHsfB4b in rice environmental adaptation improvement.

1. Introduction

As sessile organisms, plants cannot escape from a disadvantageous environment so they have evolved their developmental plasticity to optimize their growth and development [1]. Under harsh conditions, complex stress regulation and response networks have been developed in plants [2]. The response of plants to various stresses is mainly through the sensing and transduction of stress signals through signal elements, resulting in the expression of a large number of stress-related genes and the synthesis of various functional proteins [3]. Many physiological and biochemical changes occur in response and through adaptation to adverse environmental conditions. Many functional proteins, such as osmoregulatory proteins, ion channel proteins, transporters, antioxidants, and detoxifying proteins, are highly expressed under stress, and these functional proteins are largely regulated by specific transcription factors [4,5]. Among these plant transcription factors, Hsfs heat shock factors (Hsfs) are the terminal components of the signal transduction chain that are involved in various abiotic stress responses, and are essential for the maintenance of protein homeostasis as well as during normal growth conditions [6,7,8]. The basic structure and mode of promoter recognition of Hsfs are conserved throughout the prokaryotes and the eukaryotes kingdom [9,10,11].
Since the cloning of Hsf genes in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) [12], the Hsf gene family has been identified in many plant species. For example, 21 Hsf genes have been identified in Arabidopsis, 78 in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [13,14], 25 in maize (Zea mays L.) [15], 25 in rice [16,17,18], 35 in Brassica oleracea [19], and 29 in buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum L.) [20]. Although the number and the sequence size of Hsf proteins vary among species, their protein structures are conserved [16]. Based on their sequence structures, plant Hsfs were categorized into three classes (A, B, and C) and could be further divided into several subclasses [9,21]. Class A Hsfs contains a DNA-binding domain (DBD), oligomerization domain (OD), nuclear localization/export signals (NLS and NES), and transcriptional activation domains (AHA motifs) [6,9]. However, the Hsfs of classes B and C lack the AHA domains, and they have no evident function as transcriptional activators [6]. Moreover, the C terminus of class B Hsfs contains a highly conserved -LFGV- tetrapeptide, and previous research suggests that it functions as a repressor domain [22]. Hsfs are known to recognize and bind to the promoter sequences of many heat-induced genes that contains heat shock elements (HSE, palindromic sequence of nGAAn) to regulate their expression [6,17,23].
Recent studies indicate that Hsfs are involved in the response to various environmental stresses, such as heat, salt, cold, and drought challenge [24,25,26,27]. HsfA1s have been identified as master regulators of the heat stress response in Arabidopsis and tomatoes [28,29,30]. Four homologs of HsfsA1s genes (AtHsfA1a, AtHsfA1b, AtHsfA1d, and AtHsfA1e) have been reported in Arabidopsis, and single, double, or triple knockout of these genes have no marked effect on the HSR and the long-term thermotolerance level of Arabidopsis [31]. Over-expression of LpHsfA1a in tomatoes increases the acquired thermotolerance [29]. It is well known that AtHsfA2 serves as a transcriptional activators for the high-level induction of HSR, playing an important role in acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis [32]. AtHsfA3 and OsHsfA3 exhibited drought- and heat-induced expression [33,34,35]. AtHsfA5 functions as a specific repressor of AtHsfA4 [36], and AtHsfA6a is reported as a transcriptional activator which is involved in the ABA-dependent signaling pathway in Arabidopsis [37]. AtHsfA9 is highly expressed during seed development and contributes to embryogenesis and seed maturation in sunflowers and Arabidopsis [38,39]. Most of class B Hsfs have a repressor domain at the C-terminus and lack activator functions. AtHsfB1 and AtHsfB2b are transcriptional repressors that repress the expression of heat shock-responsive genes in Arabdopsis [9,40]. However, OsHsfB4d binds to the promoter and activates the expression of OsHsp18.0-CI gene expression in rice [41]. However, AtHsfB1 and AtHsfA1a could form a co-activator complex and regulate target gene expression in tomatoes [42]. Apart from participating in various stress responses, Hsfs were also found to be involved in the regulation of plant growth and development. The root hair and lateral root of OsHsfA7 over-expression rice were shorter than those of the wild-type, indicating that OsHsfA7 plays an important role in root growth and development [43]. In Arabidopsis, AtHsfB4 controls the asymmetry of root stem cell divisions. Previous studies have reported that the AtHsfB4 mutant (scz-2) is defective in AtHsfB4 expression and exhibits a short root [44,45,46]. Seedlings of hsfb1-1 hsfb2b-1 double mutant Arabidopsis possess longer hypocotyls than wild-type seedlings under normal growth conditions [22], and AtHsfB2a is required for plant fertility gametophyte development [47]; in tomatoes, during microsporogenesis, LpHsfA2 plays a role in reproductive tissue development [48].
The Hsf family has been extensively studied in Arabidopsis; however, the functions of most Hsf family genes in crop species have not been fully elucidated. Members of the Hsf family have been identified in many crop species, but the lack of sufficient information has hindered in-depth studies on the stress resistance mechanisms related to Hsfs. Twenty-five typical Hsfs members have been identified in rice, and the expression patterns, genomic organization, and evolutionary processes of the Hsf family have been studied in rice [18,49]. The functions of most Hsfs in rice are still not known.
In this study, a genome-wide analysis of the OsHsf gene family was conducted. The phylogenetic relationships, collinearity, functional annotation, and gene expression profiles of the OsHsf family were determined. The results of the phylogenetic studies provide a basis for understanding the function and evolutionary history of the OsHsf gene family. In addition, two drought-responsive genes, OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d, were identified using a public database and transcriptional expression analysis, and a subcellular localization analysis of these two proteins was performed. The function of OsHsfB4b was further characterized using transgenic Arabidopsis lines. Our study may facilitate subsequent studies of the evolutionary history and biological functions of the OsHsf gene family in rice, as well as reveal the potential value of OsHsfB4b in rice genetic stress adaptation improvement.

2. Results

2.1. Phylogenetic Analysis of Hsf Families in Different Species

The hidden Markov model of DBD domain (Pfam: PF00447) specific for the Hsf protein was utilized to screen rice Hsf proteins. Candidate proteins were further identified using the NCBI Batch CD-search and Pfam databases. Combined with previous studies [16,18], a total of 25 OsHsf proteins were obtained. Detailed information regarding the identified OsHsf genes is provided in Table S1. To investigate the phylogenetic relationships of the Hsf gene in rice (monocot model plant), maize (monocot model plant), and Arabidopsis (dicot model plant), phylogenetic analysis was performed. The phylogenetic tree showed that the Hsf proteins could be classified into three groups (A, B, and C) (Figure 1), and further divided into 15 subclasses according to bootstrap values and phylogenetic relationships. Previous studies have confirmed that because of gene duplications in the monocot lineage, the HsfC group in monocots is more complex than in dicots [9]. Compared with one C class Hsf gene in Arabidopsis, there were four HsfC class members in rice and five in maize. In addition, HsfA7, HsfA8, and HsfB3 were found only in Arabidopsis. These results imply that the different evolutionary patterns in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize may occur after their divergence.

2.2. Conserved Motifs of OsHsfs

To further explore the information on OsHsfs, the conserved motifs of OsHsf protein were analyzed using the NCBI conserved domain database (Figure S1). Analysis of the protein domains revealed that all OsHsf proteins contained the HSF conserved domain, which is important for OsHsfs protein functions. To further explore the potential function of OsHsf proteins, we performed conserved motif analysis using the MEME online tool (Figure S2). Motif 1 was found in all OsHsf proteins, suggesting that these regions are vital for OsHsf protein function.

2.3. Chromosomal Localization and Synteny Analyses of OsHsf Genes

To further understand the evolutionary history and gene expansion of OsHsf family genes, 25 OsHsf genes were mapped to rice chromosomes. The results showed that 25 Hsf genes were randomly located on 10 chromosomes, and the distribution positions and numbers of these genes were not uniform (Figure 2). There were no OsHsf genes on chromosomes 11 and 12. In terms of their overall distribution, chromosome 3 contained the most OsHsf genes (6), whereas the other chromosomes contained 0 to 4 genes. Tandem gene duplication events often occur during plant evolution, resulting in the expansion of gene families [50]. In this study, two OsHsf genes, OsHsfB4c and OsHsfB1, were clustered as tandem duplication event regions. The results indicated that gene duplication events played a driving role in the evolution of the OsHsf family.
In addition to tandem gene duplication events, segmental gene duplication is another driving force for gene family expansion [51]. BLASTP, MCScanX, and other software were used to identify seven segmental duplication OsHsf gene pairs (Figure 3a). These results suggest that segmental duplication and gene tandem events are two driving forces for OsHsf family evolution and expansion.

2.4. Collinearity Analysis of Hsf Family Genes in Different Species

The collinearity of gene families can provide a basis for understanding the evolutionary history of gene families in different species. A collinearity map associated with wheat, maize, and rice was constructed to further study the collinearity of the Hsf family in the representative crop species (Figure 3b). The results showed that the OsHsf genes had 40 homologous pairs in the wheat genome (including 20 OsHsf genes) and 33 homologous gene pairs in the maize genome (including 25 OsHsf genes). Homologous family gene members from different species were usually gathered in a group [52]. Some collinear pairs (containing 20 OsHsf genes) were present in both wheat and maize, suggesting that these homologous genes may have existed before the differentiation of the ancestral species. Additionally, most OsHsf genes had three homologous pairs in wheat and two homologous pairs in the maize genome; however, we found that OsHsfB2c had nine homologous gene pairs in wheat and three homologous gene pairs in maize, indicating that the OsHsfB2c gene was critical for the evolution of the OsHsf gene family. Interestingly, five OsHsfs genes had no homologous gene pairs in wheat. Several homologous gene pairs (containing 20 OsHsf genes) were found between rice and wheat, and between rice and maize, which indicated that these orthologous pairs were formed before the ancestral divergence of monocots. These results provide a basis for further understanding the developmental mechanism of the Hsf family in rice.

2.5. Cis-Elements Analysis of Hsf Gene Promoters in Rice

The promoter regions of genes usually contain many cis-acting elements that participate in various pathways [53]. Cis-element analysis can shed light on gene functions. Previous studies have confirmed that some Hsf genes can be induced by various stresses and phytohormones [13,49,54,55]. To further understand the cis-element information of rice Hsf gene promoters, the 2 kb 5′ upstream region of the 25 OsHsf genes was analyzed using the PlantCARE database. The results showed that, in addition to some basic core components, OsHsf genes contained a series of cis-elements such as ABA response element (ABRE), G-box (Sp1), MeJA response element, anoxic or anaerobic induction element, SA response element, GA response element, auxin response element, and photoperiod related response element (Figure S3). These elements are important components of abiotic stress response. In addition, the promoters of OsHsfA1 and OsHsfA2a genes specifically contained a meristem expression related element, suggesting that these genes may be involved in meristem development. Furthermore, transcription factor binding sites, and MYB binding sites, were also found in some OsHsf promoter regions, suggesting that the OsHsf gene may be regulated by the MYB transcription factor. In general, the results indicate that the promoters of OsHsf family genes have multiple cis-elements, which may be affected by a variety of factors, and some OsHsf genes may be target genes for transcription factors such as MYB.

2.6. Functional Annotation Analysis of OsHsf Genes

To identify the potential functions of the OsHsf genes, the Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis was performed. According to GO enrichment, OsHsf family genes were classified into three main categories, cellular component (CC), molecular function (MF), and biological process (BP) (Figure S4). The most significant MF GO terms for OsHsf family genes were DNA-binding transcription factor activity, transcription regulator activity, and identical protein binding, consistent with the fact that Hsfs are transcription factors. In addition, the main CC GO term for OsHsf family genes was the nucleus, and the main MP GO terms were regulation of transcription, DNA-templated, regulation of nucleic acid-templated transcription, and regulation of RNA biosynthetic processes.

2.7. Expression Pattern Analysis of OsHsf Genes

The expression of some Hsf genes in Arabidopsis is tissue- or organ-specific [9]. To investigate the temporal and spatial transcription patterns of OsHsf genes in the rice life cycle, the expression patterns of OsHsf genes in 48 samples of transcriptome data from different tissues at different developmental stages of rice were selected for microarray analysis, and the expression patterns of OsHsfs were obtained (Figure 4). The expression pattern analysis results revealed that OsHsfA4d, OsHsfC1a, OsHsfC2a, OsHsfA6, and OsHsfA9 genes showed low expression levels in all samples whereas OsHsfA2c, OsHsfA1 and OsHsfA2b were highly expressed in all samples. OsHsfA2d, OsHsfA2b, OsHsfA3, OsHsfB2b, OsHsfB2c, OsHsfB2a, OsHsfA5, and OsHsfA4a were clustered into a subgroup with moderate expression levels in all tested samples. Some genes showed tissue specific expression patterns; for example, OsHsfB4b, OsHsfB4d, and OsHsfB4c were highly expressed in the pistil, inflorescence, and embryo. Furthermore, the expression data revealed that some duplicated OsHsf gene pairs (OsHsfB4b/B4d, OsHsfB2a/2C, OsHsfB4a/B4c, and OsHsfB2b/B2c) exhibited similar expression patterns between the two members, but other gene pairs and gene trios did not (OsHsfA2c/A2d, OsHsfA2a/A2e/A2b). This suggests that the functions of some duplicated OsHsf gene pairs changed during long-term evolution.

2.8. Expression of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d under Abiotic Stress

There are relatively few studies on the function of the class B Hsfs in rice. To investigate whether the expression of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d was affected by abiotic stress and ABA treatment, 14-day-old rice seedlings were subjected to a low temperature (4 °C), high temperature (42 °C), drought (20% PEG 6000), salt (200 mM NaCl), and abscisic acid (100 μM ABA) treatments. RNA was extracted at different time points and RT-qPCR experiments were conducted to analyze the gene expression patterns under different treatments. Analysis of the expression patterns revealed that OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d showed similar expression patterns (Figure 5). Both OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d were upregulated by heat, ABA, NaCl, and PEG treatments; however, under low-temperature treatment, in comparison with the control group, OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d genes showed a reduction in their expression levels at 0–8 h but increased after 24 h of treatment. Under high-temperature treatment, OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d genes were induced quickly and peaked after 0.5 h of treatment, and then the transcript levels decreased gradually. In the presence of ABA and PEG, OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d were quickly induced and peaked after 1 h or 2 h of treatment, and then decreased gradually. The expression of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d was strongly induced by NaCl, and peaked after 12 h of treatment. The expression patterns of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d under different treatments implied that they play important roles in the response to stress conditions and signal transduction. The reliability of the transcriptome data was further validated by qRT-PCR experiments, which were carried out on three representative samples for six selected OsHsf genes.

2.9. Subcellular Localization Analysis of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d

To further understand the subcellular localization of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d, AtHY5-mCherry, OsHsfB4b-GFP, and OsHsfb4d-GFP fusion vectors driven by the 35S (CaMV 35S) promoter were transferred into rice protoplasts. The AtHY5 gene of Arabidopsis was used as a nuclear marker gene, and the empty 35S: GFP vector was used as a negative control. Fluorescence signals of the transformed rice protoplasts were observed using laser scanning confocal microscopy. As shown in Figure 6, the GFP signals of 35S-GFP spread throughout the whole cell, but the fluorescence signal of OsHsfB4b-GFPcompletely overlapped with that of the nuclear marker HY5-mCherry, indicating that the OsHsfB4b protein was highly expressed in the nucleus. However, the fluorescence signal of OsHsfB4d-GFP was observed not only in the nucleus, which completely overlapped with the HY5-mCherry signal, but also in the cytoplasm near the nucleus. The similarity of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d protein sequences was 61.06%, and the sequence alignment result was shown in Figure S8. However, the subcellular localization of these two proteins requires further characterization using other assays.

2.10. Over-Expression of OsHsfB4b Gene in Arabidopsis and Rice Increases Drought Resistance

The potential function of OsHsfB4b and full-length OsHsfB4b CDS driven by the CaMV 35S promoter was introduced into Arabidopsis, and three homozygous T3 generation lines were selected for subsequent investigation. Next, the phenotypic characteristics of these lines under different stress conditions were analyzed. Seedlings grown on ½ MS medium for 5 d showed no difference between transgenic Arabidopsis and wild-type (Col-0) plants (Figure 7). However, when grown on a ½ MS medium containing 300 mM mannitol, the germination rate and root length of the transgenic lines were significantly higher than those of the wild-type. The seedlings were clustered into three categories, big (B), moderate (M), and small (S). Compared with the wild-type, the percentage of B seedlings in OsHsB4b-over-expressed lines was significantly increased, and M seedlings were significantly decreased in a 1/2 MS with 300 mM mannitol (Figure 7f). There was no significant difference between transgenic lines and wild-type plants grown on a 1/2 MS medium containing different concentrations of ABA (0.5, 1, and 2 μM) and NaCl (100, 150 and, 200 mM) (Figure S6). The results showed that the OsHsfB4b gene was involved in the drought stress response and heterologous expression of the OsHsfB4b gene displayed better drought tolerance than the wild-type.
To further investigate the role of OsHsfB4b in drought stress in rice, we generated 13 independent transgenic rice lines that over-expressed OsHsfB4b driven by the 35S promoter (Figure S7). Three over-expression (OE) lines (OE1, OE3, and OE5) were selected for further analyses research. Analysis of drought stress tolerance showed that there were no significant differences in rice seedling growth between the WT (ZH11) and the OE lines under control conditions (Figure 7g). In contrast, OE lines treated with 20% PEG performed better than the WT, with greater fresh weight, higher chlorophyll content (Figure 7h,i), and higher expression levels of the drought induced genes (CAT2, APX2, and DREB) (Figure 7j–l). Taken together, these results indicated that OsHsfB4b confers tolerance to drought stress in rice.

3. Discussion

Hsf is a gene family of transcription factors that is widely present in all plant species. The Hsf family genes have been identified in the whole genome of many species [9,15,19,54]. Class B Hsfs are generally considered to be negative regulators of plant responses to abiotic stresses [22,42,56]. In Arabidopsis, AtHsfB1 and AtHsfB2b inhibit the expression of Pdf1.2a and Pdf1.2b genes to negatively regulate pathogen resistance [22]. In addition, under salt stress, soybean HsfB2b not only inhibits GmNAC2 expression, but also acts as a positive regulator to activate GmC4H gene expression and promote flavonoid synthesis [57]. OsHsfA2d (OsHSF7) functions as a high temperature receptive and responsive factor in rice plants [58]. The Hsf genes has also been found to participate in plant development. Studies have shown that Arabdopsis HsfB4 controls an asymmetric cell division of root stem cells, but has almost no response to stress conditions [44,45,46,59]. Previous studies have shown that OsHsfB4d can increase rice resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae by inducing OsHsf18.0-CI expression [41]. ClpB (Hsp100) is an very important stress-responsive molecular chaperone, which facilitates proper protein folding in response to external and internal stresses [7,60]. OsHsfA2c and OsHsfB4b are in involved in transcriptional regulation of the cytoplasmic OsClpB gene in rice [61]. OsHsfC1b positively regulates salt and osmotic stress tolerance [62]. However, the functions of some Hsfs in rice are not yet known. With the development of sequencing technology, the release of whole genome sequence data of multiple species enables the systematic identification and analysis of Hsf family genes at the genome level.

3.1. Identification and Characteristic Analysis of OsHsf Genes

In this study, 25 OsHsfs were identified in the proteome of rice by comprehensive genome analysis. Phylogenetic analysis of rice, maize, and Arabidopsis was performed to classify OsHsfs into three major classes (A, B, and C) and 12 subclasses. Phylogenetic analysis revealed divergent expansion patterns of Hsfs in class C. The number of C class Hsf members in Arabidopsis, maize, and rice was one, five, and four respectively, indicating that the expansion rate of the HsfC subfamily differed after species differentiation. It is believed that the HsfC group from monocots is more complex than that from eudicots [10], which strongly supports the results of our study.
Tandem gene duplication and segmental replication events are two key mechanisms of gene family expansion [51]. In this study, two OsHsf genes (OsHsfB1 and OsHsfB4c) were clustered into a tandem duplication event (Figure 2). Collinearity analysis showed that there were seven fragment replication events in the rice OsHsf family genes (Figure 3a). These results suggest that tandem duplication and segmental replication events play critical roles in the evolution and expansion of the OsHsf gene family. Collinearity maps of the rice and two other typical crop species, wheat, and maize were constructed and 20 OsHsf genes showed syntenic relationships with those in wheat, followed by 25 genes in maize (Figure 3b). Interestingly, these five OsHsfs had no homologous gene pairs in wheat. Several homologous gene pairs (containing 20 OsHsf genes) were found between rice and wheat and between rice and maize, which indicated that these orthologous pairs were formed before the ancestral divergence of monocots. These results provide a basis for further understanding the developmental mechanism of the Hsf family in rice. The promoter regions of genes usually contain many cis-acting elements that participate in various pathways [53]. Previous studies have confirmed that some Hsf genes can be induced by various stresses and phytohormones [13,19,54,55]. Furthermore, analysis of the promoter components of OsHsf genes revealed that they contained some cis-acting elements related to stress response and, anoxic or anaerobic induction elements. Moreover, some elements of meristem expression, such as the ABA response element (ABRE), G-box (Sp1), and MeJA response element were also found. OsHsfB4a and OsHsfB4d also contained seed-specific regulatory elements. Some OsHsf promoters also include MYB-binding sites (MBS), suggesting that some OsHsfs may be regulated by MYB transcription factors.
The expression of some Hsf genes expressions in Arabidopsis is tissue- or organ-specific [9]. In addition, different developmental stages of different rice tissues were selected for microarray analysis, and the expression patterns of OsHsfs were obtained (Figure 4). Some OsHsf genes are highly expressed in specific tissues and periods; for example, OsHsfB4b, OsHsfB4d, and OsHsfB4c are highly expressed in the pistil, inflorescence, and embryo. Furthermore, the expression data revealed that some duplicated OsHsf gene pairs (OsHsfB4b/B4d, OsHsfB2a/2C, OsHsfB4a/B4c, OsHsfB2b/B2c) exhibited similar expression patterns between the two members, but other gene pairs did not (OsHsfA2c/A2d, OsHsfA2a/A2e/A2b). This suggests changes in the functions of some duplicated gene pairs during long-term evolution.

3.2. OsHsfB4b Enhanced Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Plants

Relatively few studies have been conducted on the function of class B Hsf in rice. In this study, we detected the expression patterns of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d in response to five treatments. RT-qPCR assays of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d showed similar expression patterns (Figure 5). The expression of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d was increased under ABA, PEG, heat, and NaCl treatments, whereas transcript levels decreased under cold treatment. However, previous studies have shown that the AtHsfB4 gene in Arabidopsis has almost no response under various stress conditions [45,63], suggesting that it may be integrated into a signaling pathway not directly related to the stress response. In this study, OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d were found to have significant responses to high temperature, low temperature, NaCl, and other treatments, indicating that the functions of HsfB4 in Arabidopsis and rice may be different.
Transcriptional factors are active in the nucleus and, therefore, often contain a nuclear localization signal that enables their transport to the nucleus for transcriptional activity [37]. It has been proposed that many Hsfs can travel between the nucleus and cytoplasm to regulate their transcriptional activity [64]. AtHsfA6a proteins in Arabidopsis can migrate from the cytoplasm to the nucleus during salt stress [37]. The ability of AtHsfA2 to bind to HSE also requires its localization to the nucleus [65]. In this study, subcellular localization analysis of the OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d proteins was performed in rice protoplasts. The results indicated that OsHsfB4b was localized in the nucleus whereas OsHsfB4d was found in both the nucleus and cytoplasm (Figure 6). This suggests that OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d may have different activities and functions.
In this study, we analyzed the drought tolerance performance of OsHsfB4b gene transgenic Arabidopsis and rice lines and found that over-expression of the OsHsfB4b gene had opposite effects under drought stress (Figure 7). However, the mechanism by which OsHsfB4b enhances drought tolerance in plants needs to be further explored.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of Hsf GENES

The nucleotide sequences, protein sequences, and the gene annotation (GFF3) files of Triticum aestivum (iwgsc_refseqv1.0), rice (IRGSP-1.0), maize (Zm-B73-REFERENCE-NAM-5.0), and Arabdopsis (TAIR 10) were downloaded from the EnsemblPlants database (http://plants.ensembl.org/info/data/ftp/index.html/ accessed on 11 August 2022). The hidden Markov model of DBD domain (Pfam: PF00447) specific for the Hsf protein was downloaded from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/ accessed on 11 August 2022) and employed to search for possible homologous genes encoded in wheat, rice, maize, and the Arabdopsis genome. Subsequently, all candidate proteins were further verified using the NCBI Conserved Domain database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/ accessed on 11 August 2022). After removing the redundant sequences, the remaining sequences were submitted to Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/ accessed on 11 August 2022) to reconfirm the presence and integrity of the DBD domain. The incorrectly proteinsequences were then manually curated. Finally, Hsf gene family members were obtained. The Expasy database (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/ accessed on 20 March 2022) was utilized to compute the isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (MW). The conserved motifs of OsHsfs were analysed using the MEME online software (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme/ accessed on 20 March 2022).

4.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of Hsfs

To clarify the evolutionary relationships, Hsf proteins sequences of Arabdopsis, rice, and maize were aligned using MUSCLE [66]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA-X software with 1000 bootstrap replications using the neighbor-joining (NL) method. Evolview v2 online tool (https://evolgenius.info//evolview-v2/ accessed on 20 March 2022) [67] was used to further modify the tree.

4.3. Chromosomal Localization and Collinearity of OsHsf Genes

By analyzing their chromosomal positions in the rice GFF3 profile, the OsHsf genes were mapped onto the rice chromosomes and the gene density of chromosomes were obtained. The Multiple Collinearity Scan (MCScanX) toolkit was used to identify the gene duplication. Then, the TBtools software was used to visualize the chromosomal localizations and gene duplication events [68].

4.4. Cis-acting Element Analysis of OsHsfs Promoters Regions

To predict the cis-acting elements of OsHsfs promoters, 2 kb genomic DNA sequences upstream of the start codon were obtained using the Tbtools software. Then, the obtained sequences were further submitted to the PlantCARE databases (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/ accessed on 20 March 2022) to analyze the various putative cis-regulatory elements.

4.5. Spatiotemporal Expression Patterns of OsHsfs in Rice from RNA-Seq Data

To explore the spatiotemporal expression patterns of OsHsfs, published rice transcriptomic data were downloaded from the Rice Annotation Project Database (RAP-DB) (https://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/ accessed on 20 March 2022) [69]. Data from 48 different developmental stages of different tissues were collected for gene expression profiling. The normalized expression levels of OsHsf genes were calculated by transcripts per million (TPM). A heatmap was displayed using the log2 (TPM + 1) values.

4.6. Plant Material, Growth Conditions, and Treatments

Seeds of the rice cultivar Zhonghua11 (ZH11) were sterilized and germinated in distilled water for 2 days in a chamber under a photoperiod of 16 h light/8 h dark, 30 °C, 60% humidity, and light intensity of 120 μmol/m2/s. The seedlings were then transferred to a modified Hoagland liquid nutrient solution. After 14 days, the seedlings were exposed to different stress treatments. For heat and cold stress, seedlings were transferred to culture chambers at 37 °C or 4 °C, and transferred to Hoagland liquid nutrient solution with 200 mM ABA, 200 mM NaCl, and 20% PEG for ABA, NaCl, and PEG treatments, respectively. Leaves were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h and stored at −80 °C.
The OsHsfB4b (gene ID: Os03g0366800) gene was cloned into pCAMBIA2300-GFP vector, and the constructs were transformed to the Arabdopsis cultivar Col-0 using the floral dip method by floral dip method. T1 plants were used to check the OsHsfB4b gene expression level (Figure S5). Finally, three independent T3 homozygous lines were obtained. After sterilization and vernalization, the seeds of T3 transgenic and wild-type (Col-0) Arabidopsis were grown on 1/2 MS medium and 1/2 MS medium containing different concentrations of NaCl, ABA, and mannitol. All seedlings were grown in a chamber under a photoperiod of 16 h light/8 h dark, 22 °C, 60% humidity, light intensity: 30 μmol/m2/s.

4.7. Determination of Subcellular Localization of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d in Rice Protoplast

The open reading frame (ORF) sequences of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d genes, which contained the homologous arms of pAN580-GFP, were PCR-amplified from the rice cDNA of Nipponbare, and cloned into the XbaI/BamHI-digested pAN580-GFP vector. The nuclear localization marker gene AtHY5 (gene ID: AT5G11260) was PCR-amplified from the cDNA of Arabdopsis cultivar Col-0 and cloned into the XbaI/BamHI-digested 35S-mCherry vector. The extraction and transformation steps of rice protoplast were done as described previously [70]. The fluorescence of the transformed protoplast were observed under a Zeiss LSM710 (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) confocal microscope. The primer sequences were listed in Table S2.

4.8. Expression Analysis Using RT-qPCR

To confirm the expression patterns of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d genes, the total RNA of rice leaves was isolated using RNAiso Plus (TaKaRa, 9108). The reverse transcription was performed using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) (TaKaRa, RR047A). RT-qPCR for examination of the expression levels of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d was performed with 2× SYBR Green qPCR MasterMix II (Universal) (Sevenbio, Beijing, China) and a Roche Lightcyler480 instrument (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The gene expression levels were analyzed with three technical replicates. The expression levels of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d genes were normalized against that of Actin1 (Os03g0718100) and Actin2 (Os10g0510000). The primers used in gene expression analysis were designed using the NCBI Primer-BLAST tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/ accessed on 20 March 2022) and listed in the Table S2.

4.9. Go Enrichment

The eggNOG-mapper tool (http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de/ accessed on 20 March 2022) [71] was utilized to functionally annotate the OsHsf family genes with Gene Ontology (GO) terms in three main categories (CC, BP, and MF). Then, the diagram of GO enrichment was visualized using TBtools software.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics 26 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) software was used to analyzed the data. Comparisons were performed according to the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey’s test. Different lowercase letters indicated significant differences (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

In this present study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the Hsf gene family in rice. We report, for the first time, that tandem duplication and fragment replication are two important driving forces in the evolution and expansion of OsHsf family genes. We verified that the OsHsfB4b protein was located in the nucleus and the OsHsfB4d protein was located in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. In addition, over-expression of OsHsfB4b in Arabidopsis and rice can increase tolerance to drought stress. These findings provide a better understanding of the potential functional roles of Hsf genes in rice. However, the potential regulatory mechanisms of OsHsfB4b genes in drought stress require further characterization.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms231810830/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.Z. and X.Z. conceived and designed this research; Y.Z., C.W. (Changyu Wang), L.Y. and L.S. performed the experiment; Y.Z., C.W. (Chen Wang), J.Y., C.W. (Changyu Wang), H.L. and Q.Z. analyzed the data; Y.Z. wrote the manuscript. Y.Z., J.G., M.I. and Z.Z. completed the writing review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Treats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products: No: 2021DG700024-KF202218 and the High-level talents of Henan Agricultural University (No. 30601733).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all lab members for their useful suggestions, support, and encouragement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Yang, J.; Lin, R.; Sullivan, J.; Hoecker, U.; Liu, B.; Xu, L.; Deng, X.W.; Wang, H. Light Regulates COP1-Mediated Degradation of HFR1, a Transcription Factor Essential for Light Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 804–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nakashima, K.; Takasaki, H.; Mizoi, J.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. NAC transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1819, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pirkkala, L.; Nykänen, P.; Sistonen, L. Roles of the heat shock transcription factors in regulation of the heat shock response and beyond. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 1118–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhou, R.; Li, B.; Liu, H.; Sun, D. Progress in the participation of Ca2+–calmodulin in heat shock signal transduction. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2009, 19, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lata, C.; Prasad, M. Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 4731–4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nover, L.; Bharti, K.; Döring, P.; Mishra, S.K.; Ganguli, A.; Scharf, K. Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: How many heat stress transcription factors do we need? Cell Stress Chaperon. 2001, 6, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boston, R.S.; Viitanen, P.V.; Vierling, E. Molecular chaperones and protein folding in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 32, 191–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morimoto, R.I. Proteotoxic stress and inducible chaperone networks in neurodegenerative disease and aging. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 1427–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Scharf, K.D.; Berberich, T.; Ebersberger, I.; Nover, L. The plant heat stress transcription factor (Hsf) family: Structure, function and evolution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arsène, F.; Tomoyasu, T.; Bukau, B. The heat shock response of Escherichia coli. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 55, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodrigues, J.L.; Rodrigues, L.R. Potential applications of the Escherichia coli heat shock response in synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Scharf, K.D.; Rose, S.; Zott, W.; Schöffl, F.; Nover, L. Three tomato genes code for heat stress transcription factors with a region of remarkable homology to the DNA-binding domain of the yeast HSF. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 4495–4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duan, S.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G.; Guo, X. Genome-wide identification and abiotic stress-responsive pattern of heat shock transcription factor family in Triticum aestivum L. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, M.; Zheng, S.; Liu, R.; Lu, J.; Lu, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Z.; Luo, C.; Zhang, L.; Yant, L.; et al. Genome-wide identification, phylogenetic and expression analysis of the heat shock transcription factor family in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, Y.-X.; Jiang, H.-Y.; Chu, Z.-X.; Tang, X.-L.; Zhu, S.-W.; Cheng, B.-J. Genome-wide identification, classification and analysis of heat shock transcription factor family in maize. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Guo, J.; Wu, J.; Ji, Q.; Wang, C.; Luo, L.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Genome-wide analysis of heat shock transcription factor families in rice and Arabidopsis. J. Genet. Genom. 2008, 35, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mittal, D.; Enoki, Y.; Lavania, D.; Singh, A.; Sakurai, H.; Grover, A. Binding affinities and interactions among different heat shock element types and heat shock factors in rice (Oryza sativa L.). FEBS J. 2011, 278, 3076–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chauhan, H.; Khurana, N.; Agarwal, P.; Khurana, P. Heat shock factors in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Genome-wide expression analysis during reproductive development and abiotic stress. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2011, 286, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lohani, N.; Golicz, A.A.; Singh, M.B.; Bhalla, P.L. Genome-wide analysis of the Hsf gene family in Brassica oleracea and a comparative analysis of the Hsf gene family in B. oleracea, B. rapa and B. napus. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2019, 19, 515–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, L.; Ma, M.; Liu, L. Identification of genetic locus underlying easy dehulling in rice-tartary for easy postharvest pro-cessing of tartary buckwheat. Genes 2020, 11, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hsu, S.-F.; Lai, H.-C.; Jinn, T.-L. Cytosol-Localized Heat Shock Factor-Binding Protein, AtHSBP, Functions as a Negative Regulator of Heat Shock Response by Translocation to the Nucleus and Is Required for Seed Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ikeda, M.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Arabidopsis HsfB1 and HsfB2b Act as Repressors of the Expression of Heat-Inducible Hsfs But Positively Regulate the Acquired Thermotolerance. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1243–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Guo, L.; Chen, S.; Liu, K.; Liu, Y.; Ni, L.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, L. Isolation of Heat Shock Factor HsfA1a-Binding Sites in vivo Revealed Variations of Heat Shock Elements in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 1306–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kotak, S.; Larkindale, J.; Lee, U.; von Koskull-Döring, P.; Vierling, E.; Scharf, K.-D. Complexity of the heat stress response in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lyck, R.; Harmening, U.; Höhfeld, I.; Treuter, E.; Scharf, K.D.; Nover, L. Intracellular distribution and identification of the nuclear localization signals of two plant heat-stress transcription factors. Planta 1997, 202, 117–125. [Google Scholar]
  26. Williams, A.; Pétriacq, P.; Schwarzenbacher, R.E.; Beerling, D.J.; Ton, J. Mechanisms of glacial-to-future atmospheric CO2 effects on plant immunity. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 752–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shim, D.; Hwang, J.U.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Choi, Y.; An, G.; Martinoia, E.; Lee, Y. Orthologs of the class A4 heat shock tran-scription factor HsfA4a confer cadmium tolerance in wheat and rice. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 4031–4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, H.-C.; Charng, Y.-Y. Acquired thermotolerance independent of heat shock factor A1 (HsfA1), the master regulator of the heat stress response. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 547–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mishra, S.K.; Tripp, J.; Winkelhaus, S.; Tschiersch, B.; Theres, K.; Nover, L.; Scharf, K.D. Development, In the complex family of heat stress transcription factors, HsfA1 has a unique role as master regulator of thermotolerance in tomato. Gene Dev. 2002, 16, 1555–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yoshida, T.; Ohama, N.; Nakajima, J.; Kidokoro, S.; Mizoi, J.; Nakashima, K.; Maruyama, K.; Kim, J.-M.; Seki, M.; Todaka, D.; et al. Arabidopsis HsfA1 transcription factors func-tion as the main positive regulators in heat shock-responsive gene expression. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2011, 286, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nishizawa-Yokoi, A.; Nosaka, R.; Hayashi, H.; Tainaka, H.; Maruta, T.; Tamoi, M.; Ikeda, M.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Yoshimura, K.; Yabuta, Y.; et al. HsfA1d and HsfA1e Involved in the Transcriptional Regulation of HsfA2 Function as Key Regulators for the Hsf Signaling Network in Response to Environmental Stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Charng, Y.-Y.; Liu, H.-C.; Liu, N.-Y.; Chi, W.-T.; Wang, C.-N.; Chang, S.-H.; Wang, T.-T. A Heat-Inducible Transcription Factor, HsfA2, Is Required for Extension of Acquired Thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 143, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhu, M.-D.; Zhang, M.; Gao, D.-J.; Zhou, K.; Tang, S.-J.; Zhou, B.; Lv, Y.-M. Rice OsHSFA3 Gene Improves Drought Tolerance by Modulating Polyamine Biosynthesis Depending on Abscisic Acid and ROS Levels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, H.; Hwang, J.E.; Lim, C.J.; Kim, D.Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Lim, C.O. Arabidopsis DREB2C functions as a transcriptional activator of HsfA3 during the heat stress response. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 401, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yoshida, T.; Sakuma, Y.; Todaka, D.; Maruyama, K.; Qin, F.; Mizoi, J.; Kidokoro, S.; Fujita, Y.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis heat-shock transcription factor HsfA3 in the transcriptional cascade downstream of the DREB2A stress-regulatory system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 368, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Baniwal, S.K.; Chan, K.Y.; Scharf, K.-D.; Nover, L. Role of Heat Stress Transcription Factor HsfA5 as Specific Repressor of HsfA4. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 3605–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hwang, S.M.; Kim, D.W.; Woo, M.S.; Jeong, H.S.; Son, Y.S.; Akhter, S.; Choi, G.J.; Bahk, J.D. Functional characterization of Arabidopsis HsfA6a as a heat-shock transcription factor under high salinity and dehydration conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 37, 1202–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Prieto-Dapena, P.; Almoguera, C.; Personat, J.-M.; Merchan, F.; Jordano, J. Seed-specific transcription factor HSFA9 links late embryogenesis and early photomorphogenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zinsmeister, J.; Berriri, S.; Basso, D.P.; Ly-Vu, B.; Dang, T.; Lalanne, D.; da Silva, E.A.A.; Leprince, O.; Buitink, J. The seed-specific heat shock factor A9 regulates the depth of dormancy in Medicago truncatula seeds via ABA signalling. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 2508–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, M.; Busch, W.; Birke, H.; Kemmerling, B.; Nürnberger, T.; Schöffl, F. Heat Shock Factors HsfB1 and HsfB2b Are Involved in the Regulation of Pdf1.2 Expression and Pathogen Resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 152–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, W.; Ju, Y.; Zuo, L.; Shang, L.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Feng, S.; Ding, X.; Chu, Z. OsHsfB4d Binds the Promoter and Regulates the Expression of OsHsp18.0-CI to Resistant Against Xanthomonas Oryzae. Rice 2020, 13, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fragkostefanakis, S.; Simm, S.; El-Shershaby, A.; Hu, Y.; Bublak, D.; Mesihovic, A.; Darm, K.; Mishra, S.K.; Tschiersch, B.; Theres, K.; et al. The repressor and co-activator HsfB1 regulates the major heat stress transcription factors in tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 42, 874–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, A.-L.; Zou, J.; Liu, C.-F.; Zhou, X.-Y.; Zhang, X.-W.; Luo, G.-Y.; Chen, X.-B. Over-expression of OsHsfA7 enhanced salt and drought tolerance in transgenic rice. BMB Rep. 2013, 46, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pernas, M.; Ryan, E.; Dolan, L. Schizoriza Controls Tissue System Complexity in Plants. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 818–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Colette, A.; Willemsen, V.; de Vries, W.J.; van Dijken, A.; Scheres, B.; Heidstra, R. Schizoriza encodes a nuclear factor regulating asymmetry of stem cell divisions in the Arabidopsis root. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 452–457. [Google Scholar]
  46. Begum, T.; Reuter, R.; Schöffl, F. Overexpression of AtHsfB4 induces specific effects on root development of Arabidopsis. Mech. Dev. 2013, 130, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wunderlich, M.; Groß-Hardt, R.; Schöffl, F. Heat shock factor HSFB2a involved in gametophyte development of Arabidopsis thaliana and its expression is controlled by a heat-inducible long non-coding antisense RNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 85, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fragkostefanakis, S.; Mesihovic, A.; Simm, S.; Paupière, M.J.; Hu, Y.; Paul, P.; Mishra, S.K.; Tschiersch, B.; Theres, K.; Bovy, A.; et al. HsfA2 Controls the Activity of Developmentally and Stress-Regulated Heat Stress Protection Mechanisms in Tomato Male Reproductive Tissues. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 2461–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Mittal, D.; Chakrabarti, S.; Sarkar, A.; Singh, A.; Grover, A. Heat shock factor gene family in rice: Genomic organization and transcript expression profiling in response to high temperature, low temperature and oxidative stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 47, 785–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kong, H.; Landherr, L.L.; Frohlich, M.W.; Leebens-Mack, J.; Ma, H.; Depamphilis, C.W. Patterns of gene duplication in the plant SKP1 gene family in angiosperms: Evidence for multiple mechanisms of rapid gene birth. Plant J. 2007, 50, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tyagi, S.; Shumayla; Madhu; Singh, K.; Upadhyay, S.K. Molecular characterization revealed the role of catalases under abiotic and arsenic stress in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 403, 123585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; De Barry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.-H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Ji, L.; Wang, J.; Ye, M.; Li, Y.; Guo, B.; Chen, Z.; Li, H.; An, X. Identification and Characterization of the PopulusAREB/ABF Subfamily. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lavania, D.; Dhingra, A.; Grover, A. Analysis of transactivation potential of rice (Oryza sativa L.) heat shock factors. Planta 2018, 247, 1267–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fujimoto, M.; Nakai, A. The heat shock factor family and adaptation to proteotoxic stress. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 4112–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bharti, K.; von Koskull-Doring, P.; Bharti, S.; Kumar, P.; Tintschl-Korbitzer, A.; Treuter, E.; Nover, L. Tomato Heat Stress Transcription Factor HsfB1 Represents a Novel Type of General Transcription Coactivator with a Histone-Like Motif Interacting with the Plant CREB Binding Protein Ortholog HAC1. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1521–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bian, X.H.; Li, W.; Niu, C.F.; Wei, W.; Hu, Y.; Han, J.Q.; Lu, X.; Tao, J.J.; Jin, M.; Qin, H.; et al. A class B heat shock factor selected for during soybean domes-tication contributes to salt tolerance by promoting flavonoid biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 268–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, J.-G.; Qin, Q.-L.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, R.-H.; Xiong, A.-S.; Chen, J.-M.; Yao, Q.-H. OsHSF7 gene in rice, Oryza sativa L., encodes a transcription factor that functions as a high temperature receptive and responsive factor. BMB Rep. 2009, 42, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mylona, P.; Linstead, P.; Martienssen, R.; Dolan, L. SCHIZORIZA controls an asymmetric cell division and restricts epidermal identity in the Arabidopsis root. Development 2002, 129, 4327–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bukau, B.; Weissman, J.; Horwich, A. Molecular chaperones and protein quality control. Cell 2006, 125, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Singh, A.; Mittal, D.; Lavania, D.; Agarwal, M.; Mishra, R.C.; Grover, A. OsHsfA2c and OsHsfB4b are involved in the transcriptional regulation of cytoplasmic OsClpB (Hsp100) gene in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Cell Stress Chaperon. 2011, 17, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Schmidt, R.; Schippers, J.; Welker, A.; Mieulet, D.; Guiderdoni, E.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Transcription factor OsHsfC1b regulates salt tolerance and development in Oryza sativa ssp. japonica. AoB Plants 2012, 2012, pls011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gad, M.; Ron, M.J. Could Heat Shock Transcription Factors Function as Hydrogen Peroxide Sensors in Plants? Ann. Bot.-Lond. 2006, 98, 279–288. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kotak, S.; Port, M.; Ganguli, A.; Bicker, F.; Von Koskull-Döring, P. Characterization of C-terminal domains of Arabidopsis heat stress transcription factors (Hsfs) and identification of a new signature combination of plant class A Hsfs with AHA and NES motifs essential for acti-vator function and intracellular localization. Plant J. 2004, 39, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Liu, J.; Sun, N.; Liu, M.; Liu, J.; Du, B.; Wang, X.; Qi, X. An autoregulatory loop controlling Arabidopsis HsfA2 expression: Role of heat shock-induced alternative splicing. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform. 2004, 5, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. He, Z.; Zhang, H.; Gao, S.; Lercher, M.; Chen, W.-H.; Hu, S. Evolview v2: An online visualization and management tool for customized and annotated phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W236–W241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, C.J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.H.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sakai, H.; Lee, S.S.; Tanaka, T.; Numa, H.; Kim, J.; Kawahara, Y.; Wakimoto, H.; Yang, C.-C.; Iwamoto, M.; Abe, T.; et al. Rice Annotation Project Database (RAP-DB): An Integrative and Interactive Database for Rice Genomics. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, Y.; Su, J.; Duan, S.; Ao, Y.; Dai, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Liu, B.; Feng, D.; et al. A highly efficient rice green tissue protoplast system for transient gene expression and studying light/chloroplast-related processes. Plant Methods 2011, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cantalapiedra, C.P.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Letunic, I.; Bork, P.; Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional Annotation, Orthology Assignments, and Domain Prediction at the Metagenomic Scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5825–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Complex phylogenetic tree of Hsf proteins in rice (Oryza sativa L. Os), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana L. At), and maize (Zea mays L. Zm). The tree was generated using the protein sequences of rice (pink triangle), Arabidopsis (red circle), and maize (blue square). The tree shows three major groups (A–C) and 15 subgroups with different colored backgrounds.
Figure 1. Complex phylogenetic tree of Hsf proteins in rice (Oryza sativa L. Os), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana L. At), and maize (Zea mays L. Zm). The tree was generated using the protein sequences of rice (pink triangle), Arabidopsis (red circle), and maize (blue square). The tree shows three major groups (A–C) and 15 subgroups with different colored backgrounds.
Ijms 23 10830 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representations for chromosomal localization and gene duplication events of OsHsf genes. Twenty-five OsHsf genes were unevenly mapped on the 10 chromosomes. The lines represent the gene density in each chromosome. * indicated the tandem duplication events of OsHsfs.
Figure 2. Schematic representations for chromosomal localization and gene duplication events of OsHsf genes. Twenty-five OsHsf genes were unevenly mapped on the 10 chromosomes. The lines represent the gene density in each chromosome. * indicated the tandem duplication events of OsHsfs.
Ijms 23 10830 g002
Figure 3. Synteny analysis of OsHsf genes. (a) Interchromosomal relationships of OsHsf genes. Grey lines indicate all synteny blocks of rice, and red lines indicate links beween OsHsf syntenic genes; (b) Synteny analysis of OsHsf genes between maize, rice, and wheat. Red triangles indicate the positions of OsHsfs. All collinearity blocks and collinearity blocks of Hsf gene pairs within rice, maize, and wheat are indicated by grey lines and blue lines, respectively.
Figure 3. Synteny analysis of OsHsf genes. (a) Interchromosomal relationships of OsHsf genes. Grey lines indicate all synteny blocks of rice, and red lines indicate links beween OsHsf syntenic genes; (b) Synteny analysis of OsHsf genes between maize, rice, and wheat. Red triangles indicate the positions of OsHsfs. All collinearity blocks and collinearity blocks of Hsf gene pairs within rice, maize, and wheat are indicated by grey lines and blue lines, respectively.
Ijms 23 10830 g003
Figure 4. Expression profiles of the OsHsf genes. (a) Hierarchical clustering of expression profiles of OsHsf genes in 48 samples including developmental stages of different tissues. DAF: day after fertilization; (b) Expression analysis of some OsHsf genes in different tissues (leaf, root, and stem) by qRT-PCR. Data were normalized to OsActin1 and OsActin2. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 according to one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test.
Figure 4. Expression profiles of the OsHsf genes. (a) Hierarchical clustering of expression profiles of OsHsf genes in 48 samples including developmental stages of different tissues. DAF: day after fertilization; (b) Expression analysis of some OsHsf genes in different tissues (leaf, root, and stem) by qRT-PCR. Data were normalized to OsActin1 and OsActin2. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 according to one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test.
Ijms 23 10830 g004
Figure 5. Expression levels of OsHsfB4d and OsHsfB4d in response to cold, heat, NaCl, ABA, and PEG treatments. Relative expression levels of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d in response to drought for 1 h to 24 h in the leaves at the three-leaf stage of rice. Data were normalized to OsActin1 and OsActin2. Values were the mean ± standard deviation of three biological replicates. ANOVA and Tukey’s test (ns inditated non-significant. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5. Expression levels of OsHsfB4d and OsHsfB4d in response to cold, heat, NaCl, ABA, and PEG treatments. Relative expression levels of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d in response to drought for 1 h to 24 h in the leaves at the three-leaf stage of rice. Data were normalized to OsActin1 and OsActin2. Values were the mean ± standard deviation of three biological replicates. ANOVA and Tukey’s test (ns inditated non-significant. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 23 10830 g005
Figure 6. Subcellular localization of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d proteins in rice protoplast. OsHsfB4b-GFP and OsHsfB4d-GFP fusion protein driven by the 35S promoter were transformed into the rice protoplast. GFP and mCherry signals are represented by a green and red color, respectively. Scale bars = 5 μM.
Figure 6. Subcellular localization of OsHsfB4b and OsHsfB4d proteins in rice protoplast. OsHsfB4b-GFP and OsHsfB4d-GFP fusion protein driven by the 35S promoter were transformed into the rice protoplast. GFP and mCherry signals are represented by a green and red color, respectively. Scale bars = 5 μM.
Ijms 23 10830 g006
Figure 7. Over-expression of the OsHsB4b gene in Arabidopsis and rice enhances plants resistance to drought stress. Photographs of 7-day-old WT and OsHsB4b-over-expressed Arabidopsis seedlings grown on 1/2 MS (a) and 1/2 MS containing 300 mM Mannitol (b); The germination rates (c,d) and root lengths (e) of seedlings in (a,b); (f) Percentage of B (big), M (moderate), and S (small) seedlings in (a,b). According to the one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test, the significant differences were indicated by different letters in (e), n ≥ 40. Statistical comparisons were performed by two-tailed independent sample t-test (*** p < 0.001) in (f); (g) Photographs of WT and OE rice plants exposed to 20% PEG treatment. Fourteen-day-old rice seedlings were treated with 20% PEG 6000 for 8 days followed by recovering for 7 days. Thirty plants per line were used per replicate; (h,i) The fresh weight (h) and the chlorophyll content (i) of rice seedlings in (g); (jl) The expression levels of APX2, CAT2, and DREB in leaves of WT or OE rice lines upon PEG treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 according to one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test.
Figure 7. Over-expression of the OsHsB4b gene in Arabidopsis and rice enhances plants resistance to drought stress. Photographs of 7-day-old WT and OsHsB4b-over-expressed Arabidopsis seedlings grown on 1/2 MS (a) and 1/2 MS containing 300 mM Mannitol (b); The germination rates (c,d) and root lengths (e) of seedlings in (a,b); (f) Percentage of B (big), M (moderate), and S (small) seedlings in (a,b). According to the one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test, the significant differences were indicated by different letters in (e), n ≥ 40. Statistical comparisons were performed by two-tailed independent sample t-test (*** p < 0.001) in (f); (g) Photographs of WT and OE rice plants exposed to 20% PEG treatment. Fourteen-day-old rice seedlings were treated with 20% PEG 6000 for 8 days followed by recovering for 7 days. Thirty plants per line were used per replicate; (h,i) The fresh weight (h) and the chlorophyll content (i) of rice seedlings in (g); (jl) The expression levels of APX2, CAT2, and DREB in leaves of WT or OE rice lines upon PEG treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 according to one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test.
Ijms 23 10830 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, C.; Yun, L.; Song, L.; Idrees, M.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, J.; Zheng, X.; et al. OsHsfB4b Confers Enhanced Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis and Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10830. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810830

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Wang C, Wang C, Yun L, Song L, Idrees M, Liu H, Zhang Q, Yang J, Zheng X, et al. OsHsfB4b Confers Enhanced Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis and Rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(18):10830. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810830

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yan, Chen Wang, Changyu Wang, Liu Yun, Linhu Song, Muhammad Idrees, Huiying Liu, Qianlong Zhang, Jingyu Yang, Xu Zheng, and et al. 2022. "OsHsfB4b Confers Enhanced Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis and Rice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 18: 10830. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810830

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop