Next Article in Journal
Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis of Mice: Enzymatic Cross Site-Specific Hydrolysis of H4 Histone by IgGs against Histones and Myelin Basic Protein
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Autotaxin in High Glucose-Induced Human ARPE-19 Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 16
10.3390/ijms23169179
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Kinetic Activity of Chromosomes and Expression of Recombination Genes in Achiasmatic Meiosis of Tityus (Archaeotityus) Scorpions

by
Bruno Rafael Ribeiro de Almeida
1,2,
Renata Coelho Rodrigues Noronha
1,
Adauto Lima Cardoso
3,
Cesar Martins
3,
Jonas Gama Martins
4,
Rudi Emerson de Lima Procópio
5,
Cleusa Yoshiko Nagamachi
1 and
Julio Cesar Pieczarka
1,*
1
Laboratório de Citogenética, Centro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Avenida Perimetral da Ciência, km 01, Guamá, Belem 66075-750, PA, Brazil
2
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Pará, Campus Itaituba, R. Universitário, s/n, Maria Magdalena, Itaituba 68183-300, PA, Brazil
3
Laboratório Genômica Integrativa, Departamento de Morfologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Distrito de Rubião Júnior, s/n, Rubião Júnior, Botucatu 18618970, SP, Brazil
4
Pós-Graduação em Genética, Conservação e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Avenida André Araújo, 2936-Petrópolis, Manaus 69067-375, AM, Brazil
5
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia e Recursos Naturais da Amazônia, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas (UEA), Avenida Carvalho Leal, 1777-Cachoeirinha, Manaus 69065-170, AM, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 9179; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169179
Submission received: 1 July 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Several species of Tityus (Scorpiones, Buthidae) present multi-chromosomal meiotic associations and failures in the synaptic process, originated from reciprocal translocations. Holocentric chromosomes and achiasmatic meiosis in males are present in all members of this genus. In the present study, we investigated synapse dynamics, transcriptional silencing by γH2AX, and meiotic microtubule association in bivalents and a quadrivalent of the scorpion Tityus maranhensis. Additionally, we performed RT-PCR to verify the expression of mismatch repair enzymes involved in crossing-over formation in Tityus silvestris gonads. The quadrivalent association in T. maranhensis showed delay in the synaptic process and long asynaptic regions during pachytene. In this species, γH2AX was recorded only at the chromosome ends during early stages of prophase I; in metaphase I, bivalents and quadrivalents of T. maranhensis exhibited binding to microtubules along their entire length, while in metaphase II/anaphase II transition, spindle fibers interacted only with telomeric regions. Regarding T. silvestris, genes involved in the recombination process were transcribed in ovaries, testes and embryos, without significant difference between these tissues. The expression of these genes during T. silvestris achiasmatic meiosis is discussed in the present study. The absence of meiotic inactivation by γH2AX and holo/telokinetic behavior of the chromosomes are important factors for the maintenance of the quadrivalent in T. maranhensis and the normal continuation of the meiotic cycle in this species.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The centromere is the region of the genome in which the kinetochore is inserted, whose function is to allows the union of the spindle microtubules to the chromosomes and promote their segregation during cell division [1]. In several lineages of arthropods, nematodes, plants, and protists, holocentric chromosomes are observed, whose kinetochore proteins are distributed along their length [2]. In mitosis, this chromosomal form is identified by the absence of primary constriction [3]. Another characteristic attributed to mitotic holocentric chromosomes is the holokinetic behavior of sister chromatids, which migrate in a parallel arrangement to each other at the cell poles during anaphase [2]. The union of microtubules along the chromosomes also helps in the conservation of fragments generated by fission, which in this way are transmitted to daughter cells [4].
Scorpions Tityus (Buthidae) have holocentric chromosomes, with extensive karyotype reorganization generated by reciprocal translocations and fusions/fissions [5,6,7]. Direct consequences of such alterations are observed during the meiotic events of prophase I of these arachnids, since anomalies in the pairing and synapse of homologs are recorded, for example, asynaptic regions, loop-like structures, and high frequency of heterosynapses [5,8,9,10], as well as the formation of multi-chromosomal associations during metaphase I [7,11]. Thus, the presence of trivalents, quadrivalents, and other complex forms of pairing is commonly observed in several members of the Tityus genus [9,12]. In these species, changes in the synaptonemal complex (gaps, non-synaptic lateral elements) were observed using ultrastructural microscopy [10]. Analysis of the behavior of the synaptonemal complex in Tityus and other arthropods can also be inferred by the structural maintenance of chromosome protein 3 (SMC3) immunofluorescence, a component of the cohesins axis that bind to the lateral elements during prophase I [13]. Despite this, to date, no study has investigated the occurrence of meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin (MSUC) during Tityus prophase I. This phenomenon has been investigated in mice [14], pigs [15], birds [16], anurans [17], and insects [18], among other organisms. MSUC is important for spermatogenesis progression by signaling failures in the synaptic process and in the repair of double strand-breaks (DSBs) and consists of recruitment of proteins such as BRCA1 and ATR, which generate chromatin remodeling through γH2AX phosphorylation, inactivating genes present in asynaptic chromosomal regions [19].
The alternate segregation of elements of these meiotic associations in Tityus has been demonstrated through the analysis of cells in metaphase II [6,7]. In organisms bearing holocentric chromosomes, the geometry of quadrivalent associations (originated via reciprocal translocation between two nonhomologous pairs) may require modifications in the structure or behavior of the chromosomes rearranged during meiosis I to segregate correctly, similar to cruciform holocentric meiotic bivalents [20]. In plants and invertebrates, the presence of inverted meiosis [21], redistribution of CENH3 proteins [22], or restriction of kinetic activity has been reported; in the latter, only the chromosome ends join the spindle microtubules [23].
Achiasmate meiosis was previously confirmed to be associated only with heterogametic sex in plants, tardigrades, crustaceans, insects, and arachnids or in both gonads (testis and ovary) of some annelids, flatworms, and hermaphroditic mollusks [24]. Among scorpion species, cytogenetically investigated males showed achiasmatic meiosis [10,12,13]. Regarding females, the presence of chiasmata is questionable, most being considered achiasmatic, with only one case of chiasma-like structures in Zabius (Buthidae) [8,25,26]. The absence of chiasmata in Tityus, as in other genera, is considered an adaptation to the high incidence of rearrangements, since the decrease in the rate of crossing-over favors the correct segregation of homologous components of meiotic multivalents [10,13]. The molecular processes that generate achiasmatic meiosis are poorly understood and vary among the groups mentioned above. In Drosophila, male achiasmia may result from the differential expression of several recombination genes between the sexes [27]. In the scorpion Tityus silvestris, initial events of the recombination process, such as the formation of DSBs and their association with Rad51, occur during zygotene and pachytene [13]. However, no study has evaluated the activity of mismatch repair enzymes (MLH1- MutL homolog 1, MLH3- MutL homolog 3, MSH4- MutS homolog 4, MSH5- MutS homolog 5), and MUS81 (crossover junction endonuclease MUS81) in this species, which are responsible for stabilizing and resolving the Holliday junction, created from the action of Rad51 and Dmc1, giving rise to recombinant chromosomes [28].
In the present study, we evaluated through immunocytogenetics the synaptic behavior, occurrence of MSUC by γH2AX, and the distribution pattern of tubulin along bivalents and quadrivalents of the scorpion Tityus (Archaeotityus) maranhensis. Additionally, we investigated by RT-PCR the expression of meiotic proteins involved in the process of crossing-over formation in Tityus (Archeotityus) silvestris. The results obtained contributed to a better understanding of the molecular and cytological mechanisms that maintain the achiasmatic and holocentric system of Buthidae scorpions.

2. Results

2.1. Karyotype and Synaptonemal Complex Formation in T. maranhensis

The chromosomes of T. maranhensis did not show primary constriction, typical of holocentric condition (Figure 1). The karyotype of this species showed diploid number 2n = 20 (Figure 1a). During metaphase I, the two males of T. maranhensis had one quadrivalent and eight bivalents (Figure 1a), while in metaphase II, only 10 chromosomes were observed (Figure 1b). Telomeric sequences were recorded only at the chromosome ends (Figure 1a,b).
Meiotic analysis in T. maranhensis revealed that in the leptotene/zygotene transition, the terminal region of SMC3 axes (evidenced by telomeres) were polarized in the cell nucleus (Figure 2a). In late zygotene, synapse advancement was observed along the chromosomes (Figure 2b). In early pachytene, bivalents were noted to complete the synapse, while quadrivalent components still had long asynaptic regions (Figure 2c,d). This asynaptic condition of the quadrivalent in relation to bivalents was observed until the end of the pachytene stage (Figure 2e–g). During metaphase I, the SMC3 axis was visible along the bivalents and quadrivalent, suggesting that in both synaptic conditions, the synaptonemal complex remained preserved (Figure 2h). At the beginning of anaphase I, early dissociation of the quadrivalent in relation to the bivalents was also recorded (Figure 2i).

2.2. Distribution of γH2AX throughout Prophase I of T. maranhensis

Cells in leptotene evidenced conspicuous γH2AX signals throughout the nucleus (Figure 3a–c). During the leptotene/zygotene transition, γH2AX were observed organized near the periphery of the cell nucleus (Figure 3d–f). At the end of the zygotene, γH2AX signals were evident on chromatin more densely stained with DAPI, indicating regions of pairing/synapse (Figure 3g–i). Cells in early stages of pachytene showed highly concentered γH2AX near the terminal regions of chromosomes (Figure 3j–l). In late pachytene and post-pachytene stages, no γH2AX signals were observed (Figure 3m–o).

2.3. Binding of Microtubules along the Chromosomes of T. maranhensis

The dynamics of microtubule binding to the kinetochore was evaluated in bivalent and quadrivalent of T. maranhensis. During zygotene, tubulin fibers were observed to interact exclusively with telomeric regions (Figure 4a–d). In pachytene, this pattern still occurred, although some microtubules associated with non-terminal regions were visualized (Figure 4e–h). On the other hand, in metaphase I, spindle fibers were visualized along the bivalents as well as in the four component chromosomes of the quadrivalent (Figure 4i–l,a’–b”). No differential distribution of microtubules between terminal and interstitial regions was observed at this stage (Figure 4i–l,a’–b”). This pattern was also recorded in anaphase I (Figure 4m–p). In metaphase II, our results showed that microtubules united both along the chromosomes and at the ends (Figure 4q–t). In anaphase II, the spindle fibers were visualized only interacting with telomeres (Figure 4u–z,c’,c”).
To confirm the divergence regarding the distribution of tubulin along the chromosomes during meiosis of T. maranhensis, we quantified the number of associations between telomeres and tubulin in metaphases I and II (Figure 5). In metaphase I, an average of 3.1 ± 1729 was observed, while in metaphase II, we obtained an average of 14.10 ± 3247. When compared using the unpaired Student’s t-test, they were statistically significant (p < 0.001) (Figure 5).

2.4. Expression of Mismatch Repair Enzymes in T. silvestris

Specimens of T. silvestris from the municipalities of Manaus-AM and Belém-PA showed a karyotype consisting of 2n = 24 (Figure 6a). In meiosis I, 12 regular achiasmatic bivalents were observed in male individuals (Figure 6a). A conspicuous heterochromatic block was recorded in pair 1 (Figure 6a), co-localized with 45S rDNA (Figure 6b). Telomeric sequences were recorded only at chromosomal ends (Figure 6c).
To evaluate differential expression of repair enzymes involved in crossing over formation (MLH1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, and Mus81) between sexes and different developmental stages, we performed RT-PCR in embryos and between both adult gonads (testis and ovary) of T. silvestris individuals. Our data showed expression of all genes studied in the three types of tissues analyzed, although no statistically significant difference was detected between the tissues studied (Figure 7). Nevertheless, regarding the MLH3 gene, we observed a lower expression in gonads compared to embryonic tissues, suggesting a tendency of decreased transcription of this gene throughout the development of T. silvestris (Figure 7).

3. Discussion

The diploid numbers recorded in the present study for T. maranhensis and T. silvestris are in agreement with those already described in the literature [9,13]. In several genera of Buthidae, meiotic multi-chromosomal associations, as observed in T. maranhensis, are frequently documented [6,12,27]. They originate through reciprocal translocations and their constitution may show geographic variation [7,9]. Analysis of the synaptonemal complex in specimens of T. maranhensis showed delay in the synaptic process of quadrivalent compared to bivalent. This feature has been previously reported in other species of scorpions [10,11], insects [29], mammals [30,31], and amphibians [17]. This phenomenon can be explained by mechanical stress, generated by telomere movements of chromosomes involved in multivalent, associated with regions far from the nuclear envelope [32]. Additionally, we suggest that two other events may be contributing (at distinct stages of prophase I) to the delay in quadrivalent synapse in this species: (1) resolution of interlocks and other failures in the pairing process during zygotene; (2) lack of homology between translocated segments during pachytene, as recorded previously [9].
In several animal taxa, asynaptic regions of sex chromosomes or autosomes, involved in multivalents, are transcriptionally inactivated during prophase I [17,33,34]. In mammals, this process involves the BRCA1 repair protein, which recruits the ATR kinase, responsible for phosphorylating histone H2A making it γH2AX, the main epigenetic mark of meiotic chromatin silencing [35,36]. Our results showed that γH2AX signals are present in terminal regions during zygotene and pachytene, but do not co-localize with asynaptic regions of the quadrivalent in T. maranhensis. In other arthropods, despite the occurrence of γH2AX during the early stages of prophase I, transcriptional activity of autosomes remains constant from leptotene to diakinesis, differing from the pattern observed in vertebrates [13,37,38]. Thus, we propose that this histone variant does not perform MSUC on multivalent asynaptic chromosomal segments in T. maranhensis. On the other hand, similar distribution pattern of this epigenetic mark was observed during meiosis in T. silvestris [13]. Similar to T. silvestris, in the present study, γH2AX was associated with chromosomal regions that initiate the synapse process and were not observed at late pachytene stages, where the quadrivalent is not yet fully synapsed (Figure 2e–g); for this reason, we suggest that γH2AX signals in T. maranhensis are related to sites of SPO11-induced DSBs, which correspond to early events in the meiotic recombination process, with an important role for homolog pairing.
In T. maranhensis, we observed distinct forms of attachment of microtubules to meiotic chromosomes. In zygotene and pachytene, the association of spindle fibers to telomeres denotes the action of microtubules in the mobility of these genomic regions during organization/disorganization of the telomeric bouquet and homologous pairing [39]. In metaphase I, the pattern of tubulin binding to T. maranhensis bivalents corresponds to that expected for holokinetic chromosomes [21,40]. Regarding the quadrivalent observed in this species, we initially hypothesized that this association might require meiotic adaptations, similar to those observed for holocentric bivalents with cruciform configuration [23,41]. However, we visualized adhered tubulin fibers along the entire length of the chromosomes involved in the meiotic quadrivalent of T. maranhensis. On the other hand, T. maranhensis (present study) showed chromosomes with telokinetic behavior in metaphase II/anaphase II. Restriction of kinetic activity is observed in both metaphases I and II in nematodes and insects of the orders Hemiptera and Odonata [42]. The molecular mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon are poorly understood. In most organisms with restricted kinetochore activity, CENH3 and kinetochore are noted to be absent during meiosis, and thus microtubules are inserted directly into chromatin, interacting especially with terminal heterochromatic regions [43,44,45]. These studies suggest that the kinetochore may be dispensable for meiotic segregation in holocentric organisms with telokinetic activity. In Tityus bahiensis, the kinetochore is present in both metaphase I and II, but does not completely cover the chromosomes [46]. The functional significance of telokinetic activity in meiosis II in T. maranhensis is not yet understood, but it may be related to an intrinsic process of degradation of the cohesin complex present between the sister chromatids of the chromosomes of this species, which allow their correct arrangement in the metaphase plate and segregation to daughter cells, similar to that described previously for C. elegans [47] and Triatoma infestans [23].
Our results revealed transcription of mismatch repair enzymes in gonads and embryos of T. silvestris; despite this, we did not detect a significant difference in the expression levels of these genes between sexes (see Figure 7). This result differs from the pattern observed in Drosophila, which shows differential expression of meiotic genes involved in the recombination process between males (achiasmatic) and females (chiasmatic) [27]. This indicates that achiasmia in T. silvestris and Drosophila may originate and be maintained by distinct processes. During meiosis I of various eukaryotes, MLH1, MLH3, MSH4, and MSH5 are components of recombination nodules, and they perform the processing of DSBs by homologous recombination, generating chiasma in bivalents during prophase I [28]. Recombination nodules are absent in Tityus bahiensis and Tityus fasciolatus, corroborating the achiasmia in Tityus males [10]. Similar findings have been reported in other Scorpiones [48] and achiasmatic females of Lepidoptera [49]. Thus, considering the absence of chiasma and recombination nodule during meiosis in Tityus males, we conclude that mismatch repair genes are expressed in T. silvestris testis, but their functions related to the recombination process may be inhibited in gonads of this scorpion. The expression of Mus81 was detected in T. silvestris; this resolvase is not a component of recombination nodules and may promote crossing-over formation by cleaving the Holliday junction in a manner distinct from other repair enzymes [50]. Thus, its mechanism of action in achiasmatic scorpions needs to be investigated. Additionally, part of the expression of these genes observed in testis of T. silvestris may be related to DNA repair in spermatogonia and spermatozoa [51].
Our results confirmed the karyotype characteristics described previously for T. maranhensis and T. silvestris, with the presence of a quadrivalent meiotic association in the former, resulting from reciprocal translocation in heterozygosity. Our data allow us to conclude that (1) there is a delay in the synaptic process of quadrivalent during pachytene and post-pachytene; (2) γH2AX does not act in the inactivation of non-synapsed chromatin of multivalents of T. maranhensis; (3) the chromosomes of T. maranhensis exhibit holo- and telokinetic behavior, respectively, in metaphases I and II; (4) expression of mismatch repair genes is observed in both sexes in T. silvestris, despite the absence of chiasmata. Collectively, our data highlight that Tityus may be a model taxon for studies of achiasmatic meiosis in holocentric organisms.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Karyotype Analysis

Two species of Tityus were considered in this study. Information regarding the species, number, and sex of individuals and collection localities of the sample used in the present are described in Table 1. Taxonomic identification was performed according to the specialized literature [52]. Specimens were deposited in the collection of the Laboratory of Medical Entomology and Venomous Arthropods (LEMAP/UFPA). Gonads and embryos were hypotonized in 0.075M KCl and subsequently fixed in methanol:acetic acid solution (3:1). Cell suspension generated from digestion of gonads and embryos in 60% acetic acid was spread on slides at 45 °C. Chromosomes were stained with 5% Giemsa.

4.2. Probes

Probe of arthropod telomeric repeats (TTAGG) was obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using described primers [53]. The PCR reaction consisted of 17.25 µL of sterile water, 2.5 µL of 10× Taq polymerase buffer, 2 µL of DNTP mix (2 mM), 1 µL of MgCl2 (50 mM), 1 µL of forward primer (10 mM), 1 µL of reverse primer (10 mM), 0.25 µL of 1U Taq polymerase. The thermal configurations of the PCR were 1 cycle of 94 °C (5 min); 35 cycles of 94 °C (1 min), 55 °C (1 min) and 72 °C (1 min); 1 cycle of 72 °C (10 min); 1 cycle of 4 °C (hold). To obtain the 45S rDNA probe, the plasmid pTa71 [54] was used. Probes were labeled by nick translation with digoxigenin-14-dUTP (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) or biotin-11-dATP (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA).

4.3. Immunodetection of Meiotic Proteins

Obtaining synaptonemal complexes was performed according to the literature [13]. Gonads were hypotonized with 0.075 M KCl and macerated in 200 μL of 100 mM sucrose using needles until they formed a suspension of cells, which was spread on slides previously coated with 2% paraformaldehyde (pH 8.2). Slides were incubated for 2 h in a humid chamber, then washed in Photo-Flo (pH 8.2) and stored at −80 °C.
The primary antibodies used and their respective dilutions in PBS were rabbit anti-SMC3 (Abcam, ab9263) in 1:200; mouse anti-α-tubulin (Santa Cruz, sc-23948) in 1:50; rabbit anti-γH2AX (Abcam, ab2893) in 1:50. For immunodetection of meiotic proteins, blocking with 5% BSA (containing 0.01% Triton-20, and PBS1x) was performed for 30 min. Then, the slides were incubated with primary antibodies for 2 h (37 °C). After washing in PBS1X, they were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies, diluted 1:100, at 37 °C for 2 h. Finally, chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI, contained in VECTASHIELD antifading (Vector). Images were captured using a DS-Qi1Mc camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) attached to a Nikon H550S epifluorescence microscope (Nis-Elements AR software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan); all images were photographed using 100× magnification objective lenses.

4.4. Immuno-FISH

Immuno-FISH with telomeric probe was performed sequentially to the immunodetection of meiotic proteins, according to the protocol described [55]. Denaturation of chromosomal DNA and probes occurred at 70 °C and 100 °C, respectively. Slides were kept at 37 °C, overnight, for hybridization. Subsequently, slides were washed with 2xSSC and 4xSSC-Tween to remove nonspecific hybridizations. Probes were detected with anti-digoxigenin-FITC. Chromosomes were counterstained with 4-6-diamidino-2-phenylindol (DAPI) in VECTASHIELD antifading solution (Vector). Images were captured using an AxioCam MRm CCD camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) attached to a Nikon H550S epifluorescence microscope (Nis-Elements AR program (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan)) and the Nis-Elements software; all images were photographed using 100× magnification objective lenses.

4.5. RT-PCR

RT-PCR analysis was performed to investigate the expression of MLH1, MLH3, MSH5, and MUS81 enzymes. Total RNA was isolated from embryos (n = 4), testes (n = 4), and ovaries (n = 4) of T. silvestris using Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. After quantification and quality analysis of the RNA samples, they were treated with DNAse I. Reverse transcription was performed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit from Applied Biosystems. Quantitative PCR was performed using the GoTaq qPCR Master Mix kit (Promega), using the primer sets as illustrated in Table 2. The reactions were composed of 7.5 µL of SYBR Green Mix, 0.6 µL of forward and reverse primers (400 nM), 5.8 µL of sterile water, and 0.5 µL of cDNA. The thermal conditions were 1 cycle of 95 °C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Primers from the β-actin gene [56] were used endogenously in order to normalize the relative expression of the others. Measurement of expression levels was performed on the Step One Plus system (Life). Data were normalized using the Q-Gene program [57].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: B.R.R.d.A. and J.C.P.; methodology: B.R.R.d.A., R.C.R.N., J.G.M., R.E.d.L.P., A.L.C. and C.M.; investigation: B.R.R.d.A., J.C.P., R.C.R.N., C.Y.N., J.G.M., R.E.d.L.P., A.L.C. and C.M.; validation and formal analysis: B.R.R.d.A., J.C.P., R.C.R.N., J.G.M., R.E.d.L.P., C.Y.N., A.L.C. and C.M.; writing—preparation of original draft: B.R.R.d.A. and J.C.P.; writing and review: B.R.R.d.A., J.C.P., R.C.R.N., C.Y.N., J.G.M., R.E.d.L.P., A.L.C. and C.M.; resources: J.C.P., C.Y.N. and C.M.; funding: J.C.P. and C.Y.N.; supervision: J.C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) to C.Y.N. (047/2012) and Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social to J.C.P. (2.318.697.0001). This study is part of the doctoral thesis of B.R.R.d.A., a fellow of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) in Genetics and Molecular Biology at the Federal University of Pará (UFPA). C.Y.N. (305880/2017-9) and J.C.P. (305876/2017-1) thank CNPq for the productivity grants.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. J.C.P. has permanent field authorization, number 13248, from Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. The Cytogenetics Laboratory of the Federal University of Pará has permit number 19/2003 from the Ministry of Environment for transportation of samples and permit 52/2003 for use of the samples for research. The animal study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Pará (Permit 68/2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are found in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are especially grateful to Roberta B. Sciurano (Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina) and Maria Auxiliadora Ferreira Pantoja for donating, respectively, the anti-γH2AX and anti-tubulin antibodies, used for immunofluorescence assay in the present article. Similarly, we thank Jorge Rissino, Shirley Nascimento, and Maria da Conceição for their assistance in the laboratory work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bloom, K.; Costanzo, V. Centromere Structure and Function. Prog. Mol. 2017, 56, 515–539. [Google Scholar]
  2. Melters, D.P.; Paliulis, L.V.; Korf, I.F.; Chan, S.W.F. Holocentric chromosome: Convergent evolution, meiotic adaptations, and genomic analysis. Chromosome Res. 2012, 20, 579–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mola, L.A.; Papeschi, A.G. Holokinetic chromosome an glance. BAG J. Basic Appl. Genet. 2006, 17, 17–33. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zedek, F.; Bureš, P. Holocentric chromosomes: From tolerance to fragmentation to colonization of the land. Ann. Bot. 2017, 121, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schneider, M.C.; Zacaro, A.A.; Pinto-Da-Rocha, R.; Candido, D.M.; Cella, D.M. Complex meiotic configuration of the holocentric chromosomes: The intriguing case of the scorpion Tityus bahiensis. Chromosome Res. 2009, 17, 883–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mattos, V.F.; Carvalho, L.S.; Carvalho, M.A.; Schneider, M.C. Insights into the origin of the high variability of multivalent-meiotic associations in holocentric chromosomes of Tityus (Archaeotityus) scorpions. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adilardi, R.S.; Ojanguren-Affilastro, A.A.; Martí, D.A.; Mola, L.M. Chromosome puzzle in the southernmost populations of the medically important scorpion Tityus bahiensis (Perty 1833) (Buthidae), a polymorphic species with striking structural rearrangements. Zoo. Anz. 2020, 288, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shanahan, C.M. Cytogenetics of Australian scorpions I. Interchange polymorphism in the family Buthidae. Genome 1989, 32, 882–889. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mattos, V.F.; Cella, D.M.; Carvalho, L.S.; Candido, D.M.; Schneider, M.C. High chromosome variability and the presence of multivalent associations in buthid scorpions. Chromosome Res. 2013, 21, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schneider, M.C.; Mattos, V.F.; Carvalho, L.S.; Cella, D.M. Organization and behavior of the synaptonemal complex during achiasmatic meiosis of four buthid scorpions. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015, 144, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Almeida, B.R.R.; Milhomem-Paixão, S.S.R.; Noronha, R.C.R.; Nagamachi, C.Y.; Costa, M.J.R.; Pardal, P.P.O.; Coelho, J.S.; Pieczarka, J.C. Karyotype diversity and chromosomal organization of repetitive DNA in Tityus obscurus (Scorpiones, Buhidae). BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Adilardi, R.S.; Ojanguren-Affilastro, A.A.; Mola, L.M. Sex-linked chromosome heterozygosity in males of Tityus confluens (Buthidae): A clue about the presence of sex chromosomes in scorpions. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0164427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Almeida, B.R.R.; Noronha, R.C.R.; Costa, M.J.R.; Nagamachi, C.Y.; Pieczarka, J.C. Meiosis in the scorpion Tityus silvestris: New insights into achiasmatic chromosomes. Biol. Open 2019, 8, bio04352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Manterola, M.; Page, J.; Vasco, C.; Berríos, S.; Parra, M.T.; Viera, A.; Rufas, J.S.; Zuccotti, M.; Garagna, S.; Fernández-Donoso, R. A high incidence of meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin is not associated with substantial pachytene loss in heterozygous male mice carrying multiple simple robertsonian translocations. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mary, N.; Calgaro, A.; Barasc, H.; Bonnet, N.; Ferchaud, S.; Raymond-Letron, I.; Ducos, A.; Pinton, A. Meiotic Silencing in Pigs: A Case Study in a Translocated Azoospermic Boar. Genes 2021, 12, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Schoenmakers, S.; Wassenaar, E.; Laven, J.S.; Grootegoed, J.A.; Baarends, W.M. Meiotic silencing and fragmentation of the male germline restricted chromosome in zebra finch. Chromosoma 2010, 119, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Noronha, R.C.R.; Almeida, B.R.R.; Costa, M.J.R.; Nagamachi, C.Y.; Martins, C.; Pieczarka, J.C. Meiotic analyses show adaptations to maintenance of fertility in X1Y1 × 2Y2 × 3Y3 × 4Y4 × 5Y5 system of amazon frog Leptodactylus pentadactylus (Laurenti, 1768). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Viera, A.; Parra, M.T.; Rufas, J.S.; Page, J. Transcription reactivation during the first meiotic prophase in bugs is not dependent on synapsis. Chromosoma 2017, 126, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Turner, J.M.; Mahadevaiah, S.K.; Fernandez-Capetillo, O.; Nussenzweig, A.; Xu, X.; Deng, C.X.; Burgoyne, P.S. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marques, A.; Pedrosa-Harand, A. Holocentromere identity: From the typical mitotic linear structure to the great plasticity of meiotic holocentromeres. Chromosoma 2016, 125, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Heckmann, S.; Jankowska, M.; Schubert, V.; Kumke, K.; Ma, W.; Houben, A. Alternative meiotic chromatid segregation in the holocentric plant Luzula elegans. Nat. Commun 2014, 5, 4979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wignall, S.; Villeneuve, A. Lateral microtubule bundles promote chromosome alignment during acentrosomal oocyte meiosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pérez, R.; Rufas, J.S.; Suja, J.A.; Page, J.; Panzera, F. Meiosis in holocentric chromosomes: Orientation and segregation of an autosome and sex chromosomes in Triatoma infestans (Heteroptera). Chromosome Res. 2000, 8, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kazuhiro, S.; Naoki, O.; Toshinori, E. Achiasmy and sex chromosome evolution. Ecol. Genet. Genom. 2019, 13, 100046. [Google Scholar]
  25. Adilardi, R.S.; Ojanguren-Affilastro, A.A.; Mattoni, C.I.; Mola, L.M. Male and female meiosis in the mountain scorpion Zabius fuscus (Scorpiones, Buthidae): Heterochromatin, rDNA and TTAGG telomeric repeats. Genetica 2015, 143, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ubinski, C.V.; Carvalho, L.S.; Schneider, M.C. Mechanisms of karyotype evolution in the Brazilian scorpions of the subfamily Centruroidinae (Buthidae). Genetica 2018, 146, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. John, A.; Vinayan, K.; Varghese, J. Achiasmy: Male fruit flies are not ready to mix. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moens, P.B.; Marcon, E.; Shore, J.S.; Kochakpour, N.; Spyropoulos, B. Initiation and resolution of interhomolog connections: crossover and non-crossover sites along mouse synaptonemal complexes. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120, 1017–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arana, P.; Santos, J.L.; Henriques-Gil, N. Interference relationships in grasshopper reciprocal translocation heterozygotes. Heredity 1987, 59, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oliver-Bonet, M.; Benet, J.; Sun, F.; Navarro, J.; Abad, C.; Liehr, T.; Starkes, H.; Greene, C.; Ko, E.; Martin, R.H. Meiotic studies in two human reciprocal translocations and their association with spermatogenic failure. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ribagorda, M.; Berríos, S.; Solano, E.; Ayarza, E.; Martín-Ruiz, M.; Gil-Fernández, A.; Parra, M.T.; Viera, A.; Rufas, J.S.; Capanna, E.; et al. Meiotic behavior of a complex hexavalent in heterozygous mice for Robertsonian translocations: Insights for synapsis dynamics. Chromosoma 2019, 128, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Berríos, S.; Fernández-Donoso, R.; Ayarza, E. Synaptic configuration of quadrivalents and their association with the XY bivalent in spermatocytes of Robertsonian heterozygotes of Mus domesticus. Biol. Res. 2017, 50, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Checchi, P.M.; Engebrecht, J. Caenorhabditis elegans histone methyltransferase MET-2 shields the male X chromosome from checkpoint machinery and mediates meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mahadevaiah, S.K.; Bourc’his, D.; DE Rooij, D.G.; Bestor, T.H.; Turner, J.M.; Burgoyne, P.S. Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonises meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 182, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Garcia-Cruz, R.; Roig, I.; Robles, P.; Scherthan, H.; Garcia Caldés, M. ATR, BRCA1 and gammaH2AX localize to unsynapsed chromosomes at the pachytene stage in human oocytes. Reprod Biomed. Online 2009, 18, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Subramanian, V.V.; Hochwagen, A. The meiotic checkpoint network: Step-by-step through meiotic prophase. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014, 6, a016675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Traut, W.; Schubert, V.; Daliková, M.; Marec, F.; Sahara, K. Activity and inactivity of moth sex chromosomes in somatic and meiotic cells. Chromosoma 2019, 128, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Viera, A.; Parra, M.T.; Arévalo, S.; García De La Vega, C.; Santos, J.L.; Page, J. X Chromosome Inactivation during Grasshopper Spermatogenesis. Genes 2021, 12, 1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, C.Y.; Horn, H.F.; Stewart, C.L.; Burke, B.; Bolcun-Filas, E.; Schimenti, J.C.; Dresser, M.E.; Pezza, R.J. Mechanism and regulation of rapid telomere prophase movements in mouse meiotic chromosomes. Cell Rep. 2015, 11, 551–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Claycomb, J.M.; Batista, P.J.; Pang, K.M.; Gu, W.; Vasale, J.J.; Van Wolfswinkel, J.C.; Chaves, D.A.; Shirayama, M.; Mitani, S.; Ketting, R.F.; et al. The Argonaute CSR-1 and its 22G-RNA cofactors are required for holocentric chromosome segregation. Cell 2009, 139, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bongiorni, S.; Fiorenzo, P.; Pippoletti, D.; Prantera, G. Inverted meiosis and meiotic drive in mealybugs. Chromosoma 2004, 112, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mandrioli, M.; Manicardi, G.C. Holocentric chromosomes. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1008918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Goday, C.; Pimpinelli, S. Centromere organization in meiotic chromosomes of Parascaris univalens. Chromosoma 1989, 98, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Comings, D.E.; Okada, T.A. Holocentric chromosomes in Oncopeltus: Kinetochore plates are present in mitosis but absent in meiosis. Chromosoma 1972, 37, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Drinnenberg, I.A.; Young, D.; Henikoff, S.; Malik, H.S. Recurrent loss of cenH3 is associated with independent transitions to holocentricity in insects. Elife 2014, 3, e03676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Benavente, R. Holocentric chromosomes of arachnids: Presence of kinetochore plates during meiotic divisions. Genetica 1982, 59, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schvarzstein, M.; Wignall, S.M.; Villeneuve, A.M. Coordinating cohesion, co-orientation, and congression during meiosis: Lessons from holocentric chromosomes. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shanahan, C.M.; Hayman, D.L. Synaptonemal complex formation in male scorpions exhibiting achiasmate meiosis and structural heterozygosity. Genome 1990, 33, 914–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marec, F.; Traut, W. Synaptonemal complexes in female and male meiotic prophase of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera). Heredity 1993, 71, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Osman, F.; Dixon, J.; Doe, C.L.; Whitby, M.C. Generating Crossovers by Resolution of Nicked Holliday Junctions. Molecular Cell 2003, 12, 761–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gunes, S.; Al-Sadaan, M.; Agarwal, A. Spermatogenesis, DNA damage and DNA repair mechanisms in male infertility. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2015, 31, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lourenço, W.R. Amazonian Arachnida and Miryapoda: Identification Keys to All Classes, Orders, Families, Some Genera an List of Know Terrestrial Species; Pensoft Publishes: Moscow, Russia, 2002; pp. 399–438. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ijdo, J.W.; Wells, R.A.; Baldini, A.; Reeders, S.T. Improved telomere detection using a telomere repeat probe (TTAGGG)n generated by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gerlach, W.L.; Bedbrook, J.R. Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979, 7, 1869–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Araya-Jaime, C.; Serrano, É.A.; Andrade Silva, D.M.; Yamashita, M.; Iwai, T.; Oliveira, C.; Foresti, F. Surface-spreading technique of meiotic cells and immunodetection of synaptonemal complex proteins in teleostean fishes. Mol. Cytogenet 2015, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Guo, J.; Wang, L.; Wu, H.; Cao, Y.; Xiao, R.; Lai, X.; Liu, J.; Yi, J.; Zhang, G. Molecular characterization and expression of vitellogenin genes from the wolf spider Pardosa pseudoannulata (Araneae: Lycosidae). Physiol. Entomol. 2018, 43, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Simon, P. Q-Gene: Processing quantitative real-time RT-PCR data. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1439–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 09179 g001 550
Figure 1. FISH with telomeric probe in meiotic chromosome of T. maranhensis (blue: DAPI; green: telomeres): (a) metaphase I (arrow indicates quadrivalent); (b) metaphase II. Bar: 10 µm.
Figure 1. FISH with telomeric probe in meiotic chromosome of T. maranhensis (blue: DAPI; green: telomeres): (a) metaphase I (arrow indicates quadrivalent); (b) metaphase II. Bar: 10 µm.
Ijms 23 09179 g001
Ijms 23 09179 g002 550
Figure 2. Organization of the synaptonemal complex in T. maranhensis. Immuno-FISH with SMC3 (red) and telomeres (green) at (a,c). (a) Leptotene/zygotene transition; SMC3 axes and telomeres arranged in bouquet configuration. (b) Late zygotene; synaptic and asynaptic segments of the synaptonemal complex were characterized by the presence, respectively, of thicker and thinner SMC3 filaments. (c) Early pachytene (arrows indicate asynaptic regions of the quadrivalent). (d) Schematic representation of SMC3 axes (black) and telomeres (red) pointed by arrows in (c). (e) Intermediate pachytene (arrows indicate regions of the quadrivalent in synapse process). (f) Schematic representation of the SMC3 axes (black) indicated by the arrows in (e). (g) Late pachytene (arrows indicate regions of the quadrivalent in synapse process). (h) Metaphase I (arrow indicates the quadrivalent). (i) Early anaphase I (arrows indicate quadrivalent components initiating segregation). Bar: 10 µm.
Figure 2. Organization of the synaptonemal complex in T. maranhensis. Immuno-FISH with SMC3 (red) and telomeres (green) at (a,c). (a) Leptotene/zygotene transition; SMC3 axes and telomeres arranged in bouquet configuration. (b) Late zygotene; synaptic and asynaptic segments of the synaptonemal complex were characterized by the presence, respectively, of thicker and thinner SMC3 filaments. (c) Early pachytene (arrows indicate asynaptic regions of the quadrivalent). (d) Schematic representation of SMC3 axes (black) and telomeres (red) pointed by arrows in (c). (e) Intermediate pachytene (arrows indicate regions of the quadrivalent in synapse process). (f) Schematic representation of the SMC3 axes (black) indicated by the arrows in (e). (g) Late pachytene (arrows indicate regions of the quadrivalent in synapse process). (h) Metaphase I (arrow indicates the quadrivalent). (i) Early anaphase I (arrows indicate quadrivalent components initiating segregation). Bar: 10 µm.
Ijms 23 09179 g002
Ijms 23 09179 g003 550
Figure 3. Visualization of DSBs through immunodetection of γH2AX in prophase I of T. maranhensis (blue: DAPI; red: γH2AX): (a–c) leptotene; (d–f) early zygotene; (g–i) late zygotene; (j–l) early/intermediate pachytene; (m–o) late pachytene. Bar: 10µm.
Figure 3. Visualization of DSBs through immunodetection of γH2AX in prophase I of T. maranhensis (blue: DAPI; red: γH2AX): (a–c) leptotene; (d–f) early zygotene; (g–i) late zygotene; (j–l) early/intermediate pachytene; (m–o) late pachytene. Bar: 10µm.
Ijms 23 09179 g003
Ijms 23 09179 g004 550
Figure 4. Immunodetection of tubulin along prophase I in T. maranhensis. In red tubulin and in green telomeres: (a–d) zygotene (arrows indicate union of telomeres and tubulin fibers); (e–h) pachytene (arrows indicate union of telomeres and tubulin fibers); (i–l) metaphase I; (m–p) anaphase I (arrow indicates quadrivalent). (q–t) metaphase II; (u–z) anaphase II (arrows indicate union of telomeres and tubulin fibers). Panel with enlarged bivalent (a’,a”) and quadrivalent (b’,b”) metaphase I; (c’,c”) sister chromatids at the beginning of anaphase II. In a’–c” tubulin (red), telomeres (green) and DAPI-stained chromosomes (blue). Bar: 10 µm.
Figure 4. Immunodetection of tubulin along prophase I in T. maranhensis. In red tubulin and in green telomeres: (a–d) zygotene (arrows indicate union of telomeres and tubulin fibers); (e–h) pachytene (arrows indicate union of telomeres and tubulin fibers); (i–l) metaphase I; (m–p) anaphase I (arrow indicates quadrivalent). (q–t) metaphase II; (u–z) anaphase II (arrows indicate union of telomeres and tubulin fibers). Panel with enlarged bivalent (a’,a”) and quadrivalent (b’,b”) metaphase I; (c’,c”) sister chromatids at the beginning of anaphase II. In a’–c” tubulin (red), telomeres (green) and DAPI-stained chromosomes (blue). Bar: 10 µm.
Ijms 23 09179 g004
Ijms 23 09179 g005 550
Figure 5. Quantification of associations of telomere–tubulin in metaphase I and metaphase II of T. maranhensis (n = 10 of each). (* p < 0.001).
Figure 5. Quantification of associations of telomere–tubulin in metaphase I and metaphase II of T. maranhensis (n = 10 of each). (* p < 0.001).
Ijms 23 09179 g005
Ijms 23 09179 g006 550
Figure 6. Meiotic chromosomes in cytotype A (2n = 24) of T. silvestris (blue: DAPI; green: 45S rDNA; red: telomeres): (a) C-banding; (b) FISH with 45S rDNA probe (arrow); (c) FISH with telomeric probe. Bar: 10 µm.
Figure 6. Meiotic chromosomes in cytotype A (2n = 24) of T. silvestris (blue: DAPI; green: 45S rDNA; red: telomeres): (a) C-banding; (b) FISH with 45S rDNA probe (arrow); (c) FISH with telomeric probe. Bar: 10 µm.
Ijms 23 09179 g006
Ijms 23 09179 g007 550
Figure 7. Relative expression of mismatch repair genes and MUS81 in gonads and embryos of T. silvestris (2n = 24). Expression values were obtained using the transcription of beta-actin gene as normalizer.
Figure 7. Relative expression of mismatch repair genes and MUS81 in gonads and embryos of T. silvestris (2n = 24). Expression values were obtained using the transcription of beta-actin gene as normalizer.
Ijms 23 09179 g007
Table
Table 1. General data about the specimens sampled in this study.
Table 1. General data about the specimens sampled in this study.
SpeciesNumber of IndividualsCollection Location
Tityus silvestris Pocock, 18971 male, 1 female, and 4 embryos Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil (3°06′10″ S/59°58′42″ O)
3 males and 3 femalesBelém, Pará, Brazil (1°28′06″ S/48°26′24″ O)
Tityus maranhensis Lourenço de Jesus Junior e Limeira-de-Oliveira, 20061 maleMarapanim, Pará, Brazil (0°56′12″ S/47°38′39″ O)
1 male and 1 femaleCuruçá, Pará, Brazil (0°46′40″ S/47°49′40″ O)
Table
Table 2. Primer set used for quantitative PCR.
Table 2. Primer set used for quantitative PCR.
GenePrimersTm (°C)Amplicon Size
MLH1F:5′-GATAGCGAGGAGAGTGGATGG-3′59.588 bp
R: 5′-CCGCCTTTGTCTGTAGGAAATC-3′59.3
MHL3F:5′-CCTCTGCCTTCCGAAGTTGTT-3′60.5118 bp
R: 5′-CGCAAACATTCGTAGCAAAAGC-3′59.9
MSH5F:5′-GCGGGACCTAACGAACATTC-3′59117 bp
R: 5′-GATGTCAACGGGCAACTCG-3′59.2
MUS81F:5′-CGTACCTGGATCGGGAAGC-3′59.9161 bp
R:5′-AAGCAGTGTAATGGCTACCAGG-3′60.4
β-ActinF:5′-TGCGGTGGACAATGGAAGG-3′62 °C109 bp
R:5′-GTCTGGATTGGTGGCTCTATCT-3′60 °C
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Almeida, B.R.R.d.; Noronha, R.C.R.; Cardoso, A.L.; Martins, C.; Martins, J.G.; Procópio, R.E.d.L.; Nagamachi, C.Y.; Pieczarka, J.C. Kinetic Activity of Chromosomes and Expression of Recombination Genes in Achiasmatic Meiosis of Tityus (Archaeotityus) Scorpions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9179. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169179

AMA Style

Almeida BRRd, Noronha RCR, Cardoso AL, Martins C, Martins JG, Procópio REdL, Nagamachi CY, Pieczarka JC. Kinetic Activity of Chromosomes and Expression of Recombination Genes in Achiasmatic Meiosis of Tityus (Archaeotityus) Scorpions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(16):9179. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169179

Chicago/Turabian Style

Almeida, Bruno Rafael Ribeiro de, Renata Coelho Rodrigues Noronha, Adauto Lima Cardoso, Cesar Martins, Jonas Gama Martins, Rudi Emerson de Lima Procópio, Cleusa Yoshiko Nagamachi, and Julio Cesar Pieczarka. 2022. "Kinetic Activity of Chromosomes and Expression of Recombination Genes in Achiasmatic Meiosis of Tityus (Archaeotityus) Scorpions" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16: 9179. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169179

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop