Next Article in Journal
Impact of Double Covalent Binding of BV in NIR FPs on Their Spectral and Physicochemical Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Catalytic Antibodies in Bipolar Disorder: Serum IgGs Hydrolyze Myelin Basic Protein
Previous Article in Journal
Phosphomimicry on STAU1 Serine 20 Impairs STAU1 Posttranscriptional Functions and Induces Apoptosis in Human Transformed Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) as Partaker in the Modulation of UV-Response in Cultured Human Conjunctival Fibroblasts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms23137345
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TAS2R38 Bitter Taste Receptor Expression in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: New Data on Polypoid Tissue

by
Joanna Jeruzal-Świątecka
1,*,
Edyta Borkowska
2,
Mateusz Łaszczych
3,
Zuzanna Nowicka
3 and
Wioletta Pietruszewska
1
1
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland
2
Department of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland
3
Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(13), 7345; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137345
Submission received: 10 June 2022 / Revised: 24 June 2022 / Accepted: 30 June 2022 / Published: 1 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Studies have shown differences in TAS2R38 receptor expression in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) compared to healthy controls. Known agonists of TAS2R38 stimulate epithelial cells, leading to robust intracellular nitric oxide (NO) production, which damages bacterial membranes, enzymes, and DNA, but also increases ciliary beat frequency. In this study we examined, using qRT-PCR, the expression of TAS2R38 receptor in nasal polyps (NP) of patients with CRS (N = 107) and in inferior turbinate mucosa (ITM) of patients with CRS and controls (N = 39), and confronted it with clinical features and the severity of the disease. The expression was shown in 43 (50.00%) samples of ITM in the study group (N = 107), in 28 (71.79%) in the control group (N = 39) (p = 0.037), and in 43 (46.24%) of NP. There were no differences in levels of the expression in all analyzed tissues. Patients who rated their symptoms at 0–3 showed higher TAS2R38 expression in ITM in comparison to the patients with 8–10 points on the VAS scale (p = 0.020). A noticeable, however not significant, correlation between the TAS2R38 expression in ITM and the Lund–Mackay CT score was shown (p = 0.068; R = −0.28). Patients with coexisting asthma had significantly higher receptor expression in the NP (p = 0.012). Our study is the first to confirm the presence of the TAS2R38 receptor in NP. Expression of the TAS2R38 receptor is reduced in the sinonasal mucosa in patients with more advanced CRS with NP.

1. Introduction

Scientists have been looking very closely at the bitter taste receptors (T2Rs or TAS2Rs) over the past decade. These receptors became the focus of their interest mainly due to their presence in many healthy and pathological tissues of the human body. The presence of TAS2Rs has been proven not only in the oral cavity, but also in upper and lower respiratory system cells, thyroid, skin, gastrointestinal truck, immune system cells, heart, mammary and myometrial cells, semen and testicular cells, and even brain [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The presence of TAS2Rs in many neoplastic cells has also been studied. Jaggupalli et al. studied breast cancer cells and stated that the expression of TAS2R14 and TAS2R20 (49) is much higher in breast cancer cells than in normal mammary tissue [2]. Stern et al. reported expression and functionality of the bitter receptor TAS2R10 in both human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tissue and PDAC-derived cell lines [27]. In a study of Carrai et al., patients with nonfunctional alleles of TAS2R38 receptors had an increased risk of colorectal cancer [28]. Finally, it was established that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TAS2R38 gene may contribute to individual differences in susceptibility to respiratory infections—in particular, to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) [29,30].
CRS is divided into two specific disease entities: chronic rhinosinusitis with (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and it is characterized by the presence of polypous lesions in the nasal cavities and/or paranasal sinuses. The role of allergy, bacterial, fungal and viral infection, congenital immunodeficiencies, ciliary impairments, bacteria forming biofilms, environmental factors, and genetic factors are emphasized in the etiopathogenesis of CRS [31,32]. Research concerning bitter taste receptors is another path in finding the causes of the disease and individual differences in its course. After the confirmation of the protective role of the TAS2R38 receptor located in the sinonasal epithelial cells, studies were undertaken to indicate its role in individual susceptibility to upper respiratory infections [33]. Studies have shown differences in TAS2R38 receptor expression levels in sinus mucosa of patients with CRS compared to healthy controls, as well as differences between CRS with and without nasal polyps [34].
The cascade of receptor responses in the nasal epithelium plays a crucial role in regulation of innate immunity. When epithelial cells are stimulated with known agonists of TAS2R38, they exhibit low-level calcium responses that activate nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS), leading to robust intracellular NO production [35,36]. NO and its derivatives exert detrimental effects on bacterial membranes, enzymes, and DNA. Another mechanism of their action is by increasing the ciliary beat frequency through the activation of guanylyl cyclase and protein kinase G, which are phosphorylate ciliary proteins that accelerate mucociliary clearance (Figure 1). Two major Pseudomonas aeruginosa acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) were identified as agonists of TAS2R38 [33,37,38]. It was demonstrated that TAS2R38 detects physiological concentrations of AHLs, resulting in the activation of calcium-dependent NO production [39]. Many Gram-negative species secrete AHLs, and TAS2R38 is thus likely to function in airway ciliated cells as a sentinel receptor for invading Gram-negative bacteria that are capable of triggering a critical defensive bactericidal response.
Taking all this data under consideration, we hypothesized that the TAS2R38 bitter taste receptors might also be expressed in the pathological tissue of nasal polyps. We wanted to study this issue more carefully by analyzing the expression of the receptor with clinical features and the severity of the disease.

2. Results

The research group included 146 patients, with 107 (63 M/44 F) in the study group and 39 (25 M/14 F) in the control group. More than 60% of patients from both groups felt the bitter taste of phenylthiocarbamide (PTC). A significant majority of both groups admitted to seasonal or year-round allergies (CG: 38/36; SG: 84/78). The median SNOT-22 score in the study group was 32 (27–37), the average score in Lund–Mackey was 9 (6–14), and more than half of the patients marked 0–3 on the VAS scale (51.40%) and had scored 0–2 in Lund–Kennedy scale (55.14%) in endoscopic examination (Table 1).
Previously, different reference genes have been used for qRT-PCR while studying bitter taste receptors expression, with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GAPDH) being the most used [40,41,42,43]. We evaluated expression of 18S ribosomal RNA (18S RNA), β-actin, and GAPDH and found that β-actin was the best normalizer, taking into account the coefficient of variation (CoV) of CT values, difference in expression between polyp and ITM, and the number of samples with non-zero expression (Table 2). Therefore, the expression was normalized to β-actin.
A total of 93 samples of polypoid tissue and 115 samples of inferior turbinate mucosa were analyzed for the TAS2R38 receptor expression. The expression was shown in 43 (50.00%) samples of inferior turbinate mucosa in the study group and in 28 (71.79%) in the control group (p = 0.037). We also confirmed the expression in 43 (46.24%) samples of polypoid tissue. In 15 patients (20.55%) from the study group, the expression of TAS2R38 was confirmed in both polyp and inferior turbinate mucosa. The levels of the expression in all analyzed tissues were similar (Table 3).
No correlation was found between the level of TAS2R38 receptor expression in the polyp tissue or inferior turbinate tissue and the patient’s score on the SNOT-22 scale (p = 0.103 R = 0.25; p = 0.291 R = −0.16, respectively). Patients who rated their symptoms from 0 to 3 points on the VAS scale showed higher expression of the receptor in inferior turbinate mucosa in comparison to the patients with 8–10 points on the VAS scale (Figure 2).
No correlation was found between the level of TAS2R38 receptor expression in the polyp tissue and the patient’s score in the Lund–Mackay scale; however, there was a noticeable relationship between the level of TAS2R38 expression in inferior turbinate mucosa and the Lund–Mackay score, suggesting a negative correlation (p = 0.068; R = −0.28), as shown on Figure 3.
A statistically significant difference in the expression of the receptor in the tissue of the inferior turbinate was demonstrated between the sexes in the study group, where males had significantly lower TAS2R38 expression than females (p = 0.0195) (Figure 4).
Our study group included 21 patients suffering from asthma, 9 of whom showed receptor expression in the polyp tissue. Patients with asthma had significantly higher receptor expression in the polyp tissue (p = 0.030) but not in the inferior turbinate tissue (p = 0.077) (Figure 5).
The age of the diagnosis, BMI, Lund–Kennedy score, the number of previous surgeries, PTC tasting, H-1 blockers usage, topical and systemic steroids usage, and history of allergies did not show any correlation with the TAS2R38 receptor expression (p > 0.05).

3. Discussion

The expression of TAS2R38 bitter teste receptor in sinonasal respiratory epithelial cells and its functionality was first confirmed in 2012 by Lee et al. [33]. Since then, there have been many studies on its importance in the course and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Thus far, most researchers have focused on studying the expression of the TAS2R38 receptor in sinonasal epithelial tissue [8,9,10,33,39,44]. Material was collected from various places, such as the ostiomeatal complex, olfactory cleft area, or middle and inferior turbinate. The expression study methods differed from immunohistochemistry, Western Blot and qPCR. In our study, we collected the epithelial mucosa from the inferior turbinate and the pathological polypoid tissue itself. For the expression measurement technique, we chose qPCR [45]. With this study, to the best of our knowledge, we have confirmed the expression of TAS2R38 receptors in nasal polyp tissue for the first time.
Due to the complex causality, unpredictable course, and varied response to treatment of CRS, we are still looking for more precise tools that would allow us to identify patients who are predisposed to a severe disease course and often require multiple surgeries. It seems that recently the importance of the bitter taste receptor’s role in the inflammatory processes of the upper respiratory tract is rising. Our data confirms the presence of TAS2R38 receptors not only in the sinonasal tissue but also in the pathological polypoid tissue in patients suffering from CRSwNP. We found a significant difference between the expression level of the receptor in the inferior turbinate mucosa and the patient’s subjective symptoms scoring on the VAS scale. We did not, however, confirm a statistically significant difference between the expression levels of the TAS2R38 receptor in the sinonasal mucosa of the control group and the sinonasal mucosa and polyps in the study group. There was also no correlation between the severity of the disease and the TAS2R38 expression levels in our study group; however the Lund–Mackay score showed a tendency indicating a greater advancement of the disease in the CT image in patients with a lower level of expression in the inferior turbinate mucosa. Overall, our results suggest that there might be a correlation between the severity of CRSwNP and the level of the expression of TAS2R38 in the sinonasal mucosa, but a larger study group might be needed to confirm this tendency.
In our study, we found no significant differences in the perception of the bitter taste of PTC between the study and control group. Due to the early discovery of the gene determinant of the bitter taste perception of PTC, this substance became the basic method of studying the perception of this taste [46]. It has also been widely used in research on the relationship between bitter tasting and chronic rhinosinusitis. Rowan et al. in their research indicate that oral PTC-sensing ability may be a convenient marker of increased disease severity in CRS patients without polyps and appears to provide unique phenotypic information [47]. Correlations between the PTC bitter taste sensing and biofilm formation in CRSsNP patients were also found by Adappa et al. [48]. Interestingly, Linn et al. reported that CRS patients demonstrate decreased sensitivity to quinine, which was significant only in the CRSwNP subgroup, whereas there was no difference in PTC tasting in CRSsNP and CRSwNP subgroups [49]. We can therefore assume that appropriate taste tests should be created separately for patients with and without polyps, because, apparently, these groups differ from each other, and the PTC may not be sufficiently unified.
Our study also showed a significant difference in the expression of the TAS2R38 receptor in polyp tissue in patients with CRSwNP suffering from asthma. A similar difference was reported by Orsmark-Pietras et al. in their research concerning the TAS2R expression in mixed-blood leukocyte samples from healthy children and children with severe therapy-resistant asthma [18]. They stated that the expression of most bitter taste receptors analyzed in the study was higher in children with severe asthma compared to the healthy controls. This and the discovery of the bronchodilatory properties of the bitter taste receptors found in airway epithelium opened new possibilities for the search for therapeutic alternatives for diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [50]. Our confirmation of the presence of TAS2R38 receptors in the sinonasal mucosa and the discovery of their presence in the polyp tissue may also be used for further research to expand the therapeutic possibilities for patients with CRSwNP.
Recently, not only have many new substances that activate TAS2R38 receptors been discovered, but also their activation by polyphenols, some antibiotics, and substances produced by bacteria have been proven [51,52,53,54]. Perhaps in the future we will be able to act directly on the bitter taste receptors in the sinonasal mucosa with these substances, preventing the development of chronic inflammation and possibly even reducing the already existing polypoid lesions by acting directly on polyp itself. Such a possibility could be an alternative to the dynamically developing, but very expensive, biological therapy, used more and more widely also in CRS [55].
The present study, however, is limited by the relatively small sample size, which may be the reason why some associations were not statistically significant. We believe that the research on bitter taste receptors should be continued, due to the possibility of their potential use both in the treatment and qualification of patients who require more careful monitoring. Another limitation is the evaluation of expression at the mRNA level, which may not fully reflect the actual protein expression, although more and more studies confirm comparable results for both approaches or indicate the advantage of the approach using more standardized techniques [56,57,58].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients’ Enrollment and Clinical Data Collection

The research included 146 patients. All patients signed voluntary, informed consent to the biopsies and further genetic tests. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz (RNN/05/18/KE).
The study group inclusion criteria involved any patient 18 years old or older of European descent undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for CRSwNP performed in the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Oncology, Medical University of Lodz, The Norbert Barlicki Memorial Teaching Hospital, Lodz, Poland. The control group consisted of any patient 18 years or older of European descent undergoing septoplasty, conchoplasty, or rhinoplasty in the same department, without a history of chronic or acute rhinosinusitis. Patients with known autoimmune dysfunction, immune deficiency, primary ciliary dyskinesia, cystic fibrosis, any history of radiation exposure to the paranasal sinuses, and oncological treatment were excluded from both groups.
In the study group, mucosal tissue was biopsied from the inferior turbinate mucosa and polyps removed from maxillary, ethmoid, or sphenoid sinus during FESS and placed in RNAlater stabilization solution. In the control group, mucosal tissue was biopsied from the inferior turbinate mucosa during septoplasty, conchotomy, or rhinoplasty and placed in RNAlater stabilization solution. The material was collected by an experienced rhinosurgeon and stored in a freezer at −20 °C until transportation to the laboratory and at −80 °C until nucleic acid isolation.
All patients were tested for PTC (phenylthiocarbamide) tasting ability by administering 2 drops of PTC 0.025% aqueous solution to the tongue (Kolchem, Lodz, Poland). As a positive result, we defined the patient’s perception of bitter taste after administration of drops, and negative results as no bitter taste sensation.
Patients’ metrics, such as age, height, weight, patient’s age at the time of first symptoms, the severity of clinical symptoms according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), additional information about asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), allergy, medication applied, and hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), were obtained through a questionnaire. Visual analog scale (VAS) scale was presented to the patients from 0 to 10, where “0” indicated no symptom presence and “10” signified the most severe nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior/posterior nasal drip), facial pain/pressure and reduction or loss of smell. The score was evaluated before surgery. Mild symptoms were defined as a VAS score of 0–3 inclusive, moderate as >3–7 inclusive, and severe as ≥7, based on the results of a validation study [59]. The SNOT-22 test was completed by each patient by answering all 22 questions based on a 0–5 scale, where 0 defines no problems with the given symptom and 5 defines maximal problems [60].
The severity of the disease in endoscopic nasal examination and in the computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses was analyzed according to Lund–Mackay and Lund–Kennedy scales. Endoscopic examination of the nasal cavities was graded in a 3-point classification system (0—absence of polyps; 1—polyps in middle meatus only; 2—polyps beyond middle meatus but not blocking the nose completely; 3—polyps completely obstructing the nose) [61]. The Lund–Mackay system was used to stage the computed tomography (CT) scans conducted before the surgery [33]. Scoring: for all sinus systems, except the ostiomeatal complex: 0 = no abnormalities, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. For the ostiomeatal complex: 0 = not occluded, 2 = occluded. A total score of 0 to 24 is possible, and each side can be considered separately (0 to 12). A mild disease was defined as a CT score of 0–7 inclusive, moderate from 8–15, and severe from 16–24.

4.2. RNA Isolation and TAS2R38 Expression Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from nasal mucosa biopsies using Maxwell® RSC simplyRNA Tissue Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA; cat No AS1340). The RNA was DNAse treated with TURBO DNA-freeTM Kit (Ambion, Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA; cat No AM1907). The concentration and purity of the RNA were measured on Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific; Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Complementary DNA was generated using 500 ng of total RNA and High-capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystem, Waltham, MA, USA Cat No 4374966), according to the manufacturer’s instructions on Thermal Cycler, Bio-Rad T-100 (BioRad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA, cat No 1861096) [62,63].
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed in duplicates using TaqManTM Fast Advanced Master Mix (Applied Biosystem, Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA; cat No 4444556) and TaqManTM Gene expression assays for the TAS2R38 gene (Applied Biosystem Hs00604294_s1, Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA; cat No 4331182) and for reference genes: 18S RNA (Applied Biosystem Hs03928990_g1, Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA; cat No 4331182), β-actin (ACTB, Applied Biosystem Hs4333762T_g1, Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA; cat No 4331182) and GAPDH (Applied Biosystem, Hs02786624_g1, Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA; cat No 4331182) on Bio-Rad CFX 96 (BioRad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) [64].

4.3. Reference Gene Selction

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GAPDH) was the most used previously in studies on bitter taste receptors expression with qRT-PCR [41,42,43,44]. The other reference gene widely studied was 18S ribosomal RNA (18S RNA), but most often it was collated with another gene such as β-actin or, as already mentioned, GAPDH [17,21]. Only in a few publications were the results normalized only to β-actin [12,65]. To select the most suitable gene for our research, we decided to evaluate the expression of all three genes and calculate the coefficient of variation (CoV) of CT values for each gene exclusively for polyp tissue, exclusively for inferior turbinate mucosa (ITM), and for both for polyp and ITM tissues. Additionally, a Wilcoxon test was performed in order to investigate the difference in medians between polyp and ITM CT values for each gene candidate, and the number of samples with non-zero expression of potential normalizer was evaluated.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted in Statistica TIBCO version 13.0 and MS Excel. Continuous variables are presented as arithmetical means with standard deviations or medians with the values of the lower and upper quartile, depending on the normality of the distribution evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Nominal variables are presented as numbers with corresponding percentages. For quantitative variables, differences between groups were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlation coefficients were calculated using the Spearman rank method. For nominal variables, Pearson’s χ2 with Yates correction or Fisher’s exact test was performed, depending on the size of the group. For paired observations, McNemar’s test was performed. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant [66,67].

5. Conclusions

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is one of the diseases that significantly reduce the quality of life of patients. Its complex causality and hard-to-predict course force a constant search for new diagnostic possibilities and alternative methods of treatment. Bitter taste receptors have now become one of the fields of this research, due to their wide presence in the upper and lower respiratory tract and proven immune defense mechanisms. Here, we show that PTC, even though is a widely used substance in the bitter taste research, may not be sufficient in CRS patient studies. We proved the presence of the TAS2R38 receptor not only in the ITM of the control group but also in ITM as well as in polypoid tissue of CRSwNP patients. We also report differences indicating a reduced expression of the TAS2R38 receptor in the ITM in patients with more severe subjective symptoms and more clinically advanced lesions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J.-Ś. and W.P.; methodology, J.J.-Ś. and E.B.; software, J.J.-Ś., E.B., M.Ł. and Z.N.; validation, E.B. and W.P.; formal analysis, J.J.-Ś., M.Ł., Z.N.; investigation, J.J.-Ś.; resources, J.J.-Ś., E.B. and W.P.; data curation, J.J.-Ś.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J.-Ś.; writing—review and editing, E.B., Z.N., M.Ł. and W.P.; visualization, J.J.-Ś. and M.Ł.; supervision, W.P.; project administration, J.J.-Ś.; funding acquisition, W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz (RNN/05/18/KE).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and controls for participating in the study. We also thank Wojciech Fendler and Urszula Smyczyńska for the supervision over statistical calculations and Joanna Morawiec for providing language help and editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CRSChronic rhinosinusitis
CRSwNPChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
CRSsNPChronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps
qRT-PCRReal-time polymerase chain reaction
PDACHuman pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
SNPsSingle nucleotide polymorphisms
NONitric oxide
NOSNitric oxide synthase
AHLsAcyl-homoserine lactones
C4HSLN-butyryl-L-homoserine lactone
C12HSLN-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-L-homoserine lactone
Ca2+Calcium ion
K+Potassium ion
PLCβ2Phospholipase C isoform β2
IP3Inositol trisphosphate
PTCPhenylthiocarbamide
SNOT-22Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22
VASVisual Analog Scale
FFemale
MMale
BMIBody mass index
IQRInterquartile range
COPDChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD
FESSFunctional endoscopic sinus surgery
NSAIDsNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
CTComputed tomography
18S RNA18S ribosomal RNA
ACTBβ-actin
GAPDHGlyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene
CoVCoefficient of variation
ITMInferior turbinate mucosa

References

  1. Mennella, J.A.; Pepino, M.Y.; Reed, D.R. Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences. Pediatrics 2005, 115, e216–e222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jaggupilli, A.; Singh, N.; Upadhyaya, J.; Sikarwar, A.S.; Arakawa, M.; Dakshinamurti, S.; Bhullar, R.P.; Duan, K.; Chelikani, P. Analysis of the expression of human bitter taste receptors in extraoral tissues. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2017, 426, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hariri, B.M.; McMahon, D.B.; Chen, B.; Freund, J.R.; Mansfield, C.J.; Doghramji, L.J.; Adappa, N.D.; Palmer, J.N.; Kennedy, D.W.; Reed, D.R.; et al. Flavones modulate respiratory epithelial innate immunity: Anti-inflammatory effects and activation of the T2R14 receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 8484–8497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Freund, J.R.; Mansfield, C.J.; Doghramji, L.J.; Adappa, N.D.; Palmer, J.N.; Kennedy, D.W.; Reed, D.R.; Jiang, P.; Lee, R.J. Activation of airway epithelial bitter taste receptors by Pseudomonas aeruginosa quinolones modulates calcium, cyclic-AMP, and nitric oxide signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 9824–9840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cont, G.; Paviotti, G.; Montico, M.; Paganin, P.; Guerra, M.; Trappan, A.; Demarini, S.; Gasparini, P.; Robino, A. TAS2R38 bitter taste genotype is associated with complementary feeding behavior in infants. Genes Nutr. 2019, 14, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shah, A.S.; Ben-Shahar, Y.; Moninger, T.O.; Kline, J.N.; Welsh, M.J. Motile cilia of human airway epithelia are chemosensory. Science 2009, 325, 1131–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cohen, N.A. The genetics of the bitter taste receptor T2R38 in upper airway innate immunity and implications for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2017, 127, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Adappa, N.D.; Howland, T.J.; Palmer, J.N.; Kennedy, D.W.; Doghramji, L.; Lysenko, A.; Reed, D.R.; Lee, R.J.; Cohen, N.A. Genetics of the taste receptor T2R38 correlates with chronic rhinosinusitis necessitating surgical intervention. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013, 3, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adappa, N.D.; Zhang, Z.; Palmer, J.N.; Kennedy, D.W.; Doghramji, L.; Lysenko, A.; Reed, D.R.; Scott, T.; Zhao, N.W.; Owens, D.; et al. The bitter taste receptor T2R38 is an independent risk factor for chronic rhinosinusitis requiring sinus surgery. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014, 4, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Adappa, N.D.; Farquhar, D.; Palmer, J.N.; Kennedy, D.W.; Doghramji, L.; Morris, S.A.; Owens, D.; Mansfield, C.; Lysenko, A.; Lee, R.J.; et al. TAS2R38 genotype predicts surgical outcome in nonpolypoid chronic rhinosinusitis. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016, 6, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Clark, A.A.; Dotson, C.D.; Elson, A.E.T.; Voigt, A.; Boehm, U.; Meyerhof, W.; Steinle, N.I.; Munger, S.D. TAS2R bitter taste receptors regulate thyroid function. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Wölfle, U.; Elsholz, F.A.; Kersten, A.; Haarhaus, B.; Müller, W.E.; Schempp, C.M. Expression and functional activity of the bitter taste receptors TAS2R1 and TAS2R38 in human keratinocytes. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2015, 28, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shaw, L.; Mansfield, C.; Colquitt, L.; Lin, C.; Ferreira, J.; Emmetsberger, J.; Reed, D.R. Personalized expression of bitter ‘taste’ receptors in human skin. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rozengurt, N.; Wu, S.; Chen, M.C.; Huang, C.; Sternini, C.; Rozengurt, E. Co-localization of the {alpha} subunit of gustducin with PYY and GLP-1 in L cells of human colon. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2006, 291, G792–G802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Le Neve, B.; Foltz, M.; Daniel, H.; Gouka, R. The steroid glycoside H.g.-12 from Hoodia gordonii activates the human bitter receptor TAS2R14 and induces CCK release from HuTu-80 cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010, 299, G1368–G1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jeon, T.I.; Seo, Y.K.; Osborne, T.F. Gut bitter taste receptor signalling induces ABCB1 through a mechanisminvolving CCK. Biochem. J. 2011, 438, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Latorre, R.; Huynh, J.; Mazzoni, M.; Gupta, A.; Bonora, E.; Clavenzani, P.; Chang, L.; Mayer, E.A.; De Giorgio, R.; Sternini, C. Expression of the Bitter Taste Receptor, T2R38, in Enteroendocrine Cells of the Colonic Mucosa of Overweight/Obese vs. Lean Subjects. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Orsmark-Pietras, C.; James, A.; Konradsen, J.R.; Nordlund, B.; Soderhall, C.; Pulkkinen, V.; Pedroletti, C.; Daham, K.; Kupczyk, M.; Dahlén, B.; et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals upregulation of bitter taste receptors in severe asthmatics. Eur. Respir. J. 2013, 42, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lund, T.C.; Kobs, A.J.; Kramer, A.; Nyquist, M.; Kuroki, M.T.; Osborn, J.; Lidke, D.S.; Low-Nam, S.T.; Blazar, B.R.; Tolar, J. Bone Marrow Stromal and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Have Chemosensory Capacity via Bitter Taste Receptor Expression. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Tran, H.; Herz, C.; Ruf, P.; Stetter, R.; Lamy, E. Human T2R38 Bitter Taste Receptor Expression in Resting and Activated Lymphocytes. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Foster, S.R.; Porrello, E.R.; Purdue, B.; Chan, H.W.; Voigt, A.; Frenzel, S.; Hannan, R.D.; Moritz, K.M.; Simmons, D.G.; Molenaar, P.; et al. Expression, Regulation and Putative Nutrient-Sensing Function of Taste GPCRs in the Heart. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Singh, N.; Chakraborty, R.; Bhullar, R.P.; Chelikani, P. Differential expression of bitter taste receptors in non-cancerous breast epithelial and breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 446, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zheng, K.; Lu, P.; Delpapa, E.; Bellve, K.; Deng, R.; Condon, J.C.; Fogarty, K.; Lifshitz, L.M.; Simas, T.M.; Shi, F.; et al. Bitter taste receptors as targets for tocolytics in preterm labor therapy. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 4037–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Governini, L.; Semplici, B.; Pavone, V.; Crifasi, L.; Marrocco, C.; De Leo, V.; Arlt, E.; Gudermann, T.; Boekhoff, I.; Luddiet, A.; et al. Expression of Taste Receptor 2 Subtypes in Human Testis and Sperm. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Garcia-Esparcia, P.; Schluter, A.; Carmona, M.; Moreno, J.; Ansoleaga, B.; Torrejon-Escribano, B.; Gustincich, S.; Pujol, A.; Ferrer, I. Functional genomics reveals dysregulation of cortical olfactory receptors in Parkinson disease: Novel putative chemoreceptors in the human brain. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2013, 72, 524–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ansoleaga, B.; Garcia-Esparcia, P.; Pinacho, R.; Haro, J.M.; Ramos, B.; Ferrer, I. Decrease in olfactory and taste receptor expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in chronic schizophrenia. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2014, 60, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stern, L.; Giese, N.; Hackert, T.; Strobel, O.; Schirmacher, P.; Felix, K.; Gaida, M.M. Overcoming chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer cells: Role of the bitter taste receptor T2R10. J. Cancer 2018, 9, 711–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Carrai, M.; Steinke, V.; Vodicka, P.; Pardini, B.; Rahner, N.; Holinski-Feder, E.; Morak, M.; Schackert, H.K.; Görgens, H.; Stemmler, S.; et al. Association between TAS2R38 gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: A case-control study in two independent populations of Caucasian origin. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, U.; Wooding, S.; Ricci, D.; Jorde, L.B.; Drayna, D. Worldwide haplotype diversity and coding sequence variation at human bitter taste receptor loci. Hum. Mutat. 2005, 26, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mfuna Endam, L.; Filali-Mouhim, A.; Boisvert, P.; Boulet, L.P.; Bossé, Y.; Desrosiers, M. Genetic variations in taste receptors are associated with chronic rhinosinusitis: A replication study. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014, 4, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oton-Gonzalez, L.; Rotondo, J.C.; Cerritelli, L.; Malagutti, N.; Lanzillotti, C.; Bononi, I.; Ciorba, A.; Bianchini, C.; Mazziotta, C.; De Mattei, M.; et al. Association between oncogenic human papillomavirus type 16 and Killian polyp. Infect. Agents Cancer 2021, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fokkens, W.J.; Lund, V.J.; Hopkins, C.; Hellings, P.W.; Kern, R.; Reitsma, S.; Toppila-Salmi, S.; Bernal-Sprekelsen, M.; Mullol, J.; Alobid, I.; et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology 2020, 58 (Suppl. S29), 1–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lee, R.J.; Xiong, G.; Kofonow, J.M.; Chen, B.; Lysenko, A.; Jiang, P.; Abraham, V.; Doghramji, L.; Adappa, N.D.; Palmer, J.N.; et al. T2R38 taste receptor polymorphisms underlie susceptibility to upper respiratory infection. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 4145–4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zborowska-Piskadło, K.; Stachowiak, M.; Rusetska, N.; Sarnowska, E.; Siedlecki, J.; Dżaman, K. The expression of bitter taste receptor TAS2R38 in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Arch. Immunol. Et Ther. Exp. 2020, 68, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Carey, R.M.; Workman, A.D.; Yan, C.H.; Chen, B.; Adappa, N.D.; Palmer, J.N.; Kennedy, D.W.; Lee, R.J.; Cohen, N.A. Sinonasal T2R-mediated nitric oxide production in response to Bacillus cereus. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2017, 31, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ahmad, R.; Dalziel, J.E. G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Taste Physiology and Pharmacology. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 587664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jimenez, P.N.; Koch, G.; Thompson, J.A.; Xavier, K.B.; Cool, R.H.; Quax, W.J. The multiple signaling systems regulating virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2012, 76, 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Maurer, S.; Wabnitz, G.H.; Kahle, N.A.; Stegmaier, S.; Prior, B.; Giese, T.; Gaida, M.M.; Samstag, Y.; Hansch, G.M. Tasting Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: Human neutrophils express the bitter receptor T2R38 as sensor for the quorum sensing molecule N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lee, R.J.; Hariri, B.M.; McMahon, D.B.; Chen, B.; Doghramji, L.; Adappa, N.D.; Palmer, J.N.; Kennedy, D.W.; Jiang, P.; Margolskee, R.F.; et al. Bacterial d-amino acids suppress sinonasal innate immunity through sweet taste receptors in solitary chemosensory cells. Sci. Signal. 2017, 10, eaam7703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lipchock, S.V.; Mennella, J.A.; Spielman, A.I.; Reed, D.R. Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 1136–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Grassin-Delyle, S.; Abrial, C.; Fayad-Kobeissi, S.; Brollo, M.; Faisy, C.; Alvarez, J.C.; Naline, E.; Devillier, P. The expression and relaxant effect of bitter taste receptors in human bronchi. Respir. Res. 2013, 14, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Martin, L.; Nachtigal, M.W.; Selman, T.; Nguyen, E.; Salsman, J.; Dellaire, G.; Dupré, D.J. Bitter taste receptors are expressed in human epithelial ovarian and prostate cancers cells and noscapine stimulation impacts cell survival. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 454, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Douglas, J.E.; Lin, C.; Mansfield, C.J.; Arayata, C.J.; Cowart, B.J.; Spielman, A.I.; Adappa, N.D.; Palmer, J.N.; Cohen, N.A.; Reed, D.R. Tissue-Dependent Expression of Bitter Receptor TAS2R38 mRNA. Chem. Senses 2019, 44, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Piskadło-Zborowska, K.; Stachowiak, M.; Sarnowska, E.; Jowik, R.; Dżaman, K. Assessment of the effect of inflammatory changes and allergic reaction on TAS2R38 receptor expression in patients with chronic sinusitis (CRS). Otolaryngol. Pol. 2020, 74, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Garuti, A.; Rocco, I.; Cirmena, G.; Chiaramondia, M.; Baccini, P.; Calabrese, M.; Palermo, C.; Friedman, D.; Zoppoli, G.; Ballestrero, A. Quantitative Real Time PCR assessment of hormonal receptors and HER2 status on fine-needle aspiration pre-operatory specimens from a prospectively accrued cohort of women with suspect breast malignant lesions. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 132, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fox, A.L. The relationship between chemical constitution and taste. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1932, 18, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Rowan, N.R.; Soler, Z.M.; Othieno, F.; Storck, K.A.; Smith, T.L.; Schlosser, R.J. Impact of bitter taste receptor phenotype upon clinical presentation in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018, 8, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Adappa, N.D.; Truesdale, C.M.; Workman, A.D.; Doghramji, L.; Mansfield, C.; Kennedy, D.W.; Palmer, J.N.; Cowart, B.J.; Cohen, N.A. Correlation of T2R38 taste phenotype and in vitro biofilm formation from nonpolypoid chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016, 6, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lin, C.; Civantos, A.M.; Arnold, M.; Stevens, E.M.; Cowart, B.J.; Colquitt, L.R.; Mansfield, C.; Kennedy, D.W.; Brooks, S.G.; Workman, A.D.; et al. Divergent bitter and sweet taste perception intensity in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021, 11, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Deshpande, D.A.; Wang, W.C.; McIlmoyle, E.L.; Robinett, K.S.; Schillinger, R.M.; An, S.S.; Sham, J.S.K.; Liggett, S.B. Bitter taste receptors on airway smooth muscle bronchodilate by localized calcium signaling and reverse obstruction. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 1299–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Meyerhof, W.; Batram, C.; Kuhn, C.; Brockhoff, A.; Chudoba, E.; Bufe, B.; Appendino, G.; Behrens, M. The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem. Senses 2010, 35, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Soares, S.; Silva, M.S.; García-Estevez, I.; Groβmann, P.; Brás, N.; Brandão, E.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V.; Behrens, M.; Meyerhof, W. Human Bitter Taste Receptors Are Activated by Different Classes of Polyphenols. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 8814–8823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jaggupilli, A.; Singh, N.; De Jesus, V.C.; Gounni, M.S.; Dhanaraj, P.; Chelikani, P. Chemosensory bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are activated by multiple antibiotics. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Verbeurgt, C.; Veithen, A.; Carlot, S.; Tarabichi, M.; Dumont, J.E.; Hassid, S.; Chatelain, P. The human bitter taste receptor T2R38 is broadly tuned for bacterial compounds. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Boyle, J.V.; Lam, K.; Han, J.K. Dupilumab in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Immunotherapy 2020, 12, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jiang, H.; Bai, X.; Meng, F.; Zhang, X. Comparison of immunohistochemistry and mRNA in situhybridization in detecting thyroid transcription factor-1 expression in non-small cell lung carcinomas tissue. Oncol. Lett. 2015, 10, 3581–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Noske, A.; Loibl, S.; Darb-Esfahani, S.; Roller, M.; Kronenwett, R.; Müller, B.M.; Steffen, J.; von Toerne, C.; Wirtz, R.; Baumann, I.; et al. Comparison of different approaches for assessment of HER2 expression on protein and mRNA level: Prediction of chemotherapy response in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial (NCT00544765). Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 126, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Narrandes, S.; Xu, W. Gene Expression Detection Assay for Cancer Clinical Use. J. Cancer 2018, 9, 2249–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hopkins, C.; Browne, J.P.; Slack, R.; Lund, V.; Brown, P. The Lund-Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: How is it used and what does it predict? Otolaryngol.—Head Neck Surg. 2007, 137, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hopkins, C.; Gillett, S.; Slack, R.; Lund, V.J.; Browne, J.P. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2009, 34, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lund, V.J.; Kennedy, D.W. Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol.—Head Neck Surg. 1997, 117, S35–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Borkowska, E.M.; Konecki, T.; Pietrusinński, M.; Borowiec, M.; Jabłonowski, Z. MicroRNAs Which Can Prognosticate Agressiveness of Bladder Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Gavazaj, F.Q.; Mikerezi, I.I.; Morina, V.H.; Cakaj, F.A.; Maloku, E.B.; Gavazaj, B.B.; Kastrati, D.S.; Duriqi-Maloku, D.A. Optimization of DNA concentration to amplify short tandem repeats of human genomic DNA. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2012, 12, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Malik, B.; Elkaddi, N.; Turkistani, J.; Spielman, A.I.; Ozdener, M.H. Mammalian Taste Cells Express Functional Olfactory Receptors. Chem. Senses 2019, 44, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kaji, I.; Karaki, S.; Fukami, Y.; Terasaki, M.; Kuwahara, A. Secretory effects of a luminal bitter tastant and expressions of bitter taste receptors, T2Rs, in the human and rat large intestine. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2009, 296, G971–G981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. McNemar, Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947, 12, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pearson, K. Test chi2. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1990, 50, 157–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 07345 g001 550
Figure 1. TAS2R38 bitter taste receptor regulation in human sinonasal epithelial innate immunity. AHLs = acyl-homoserine lactones; Ca2+ = calcium ion; NO = nitric oxide; NOS = nitric oxide synthase; PLCβ2 = phospholipase; IP3 = inositol trisphosphate.
Figure 1. TAS2R38 bitter taste receptor regulation in human sinonasal epithelial innate immunity. AHLs = acyl-homoserine lactones; Ca2+ = calcium ion; NO = nitric oxide; NOS = nitric oxide synthase; PLCβ2 = phospholipase; IP3 = inositol trisphosphate.
Ijms 23 07345 g001
Ijms 23 07345 g002 550
Figure 2. Level of TAS2R38 receptor expression in inferior turbinate mucosa within patient subgroups divided according to VAS scale ranges. Kruskal–Wallis’s analysis of variance p = 0.020; post hoc Dunn’s test p = 0.0158 between VAS 0–3 and VAS 8–10.
Figure 2. Level of TAS2R38 receptor expression in inferior turbinate mucosa within patient subgroups divided according to VAS scale ranges. Kruskal–Wallis’s analysis of variance p = 0.020; post hoc Dunn’s test p = 0.0158 between VAS 0–3 and VAS 8–10.
Ijms 23 07345 g002
Ijms 23 07345 g003 550
Figure 3. Relation between level of TAS2R38 expression in inferior turbinate mucosa and Lund–Mackay score. Spearman R = −0.28; p = 0.068.
Figure 3. Relation between level of TAS2R38 expression in inferior turbinate mucosa and Lund–Mackay score. Spearman R = −0.28; p = 0.068.
Ijms 23 07345 g003
Ijms 23 07345 g004 550
Figure 4. Difference between the sexes in TAS2R38 expression level in inferior turbinate mucosa p = 0.0195.
Figure 4. Difference between the sexes in TAS2R38 expression level in inferior turbinate mucosa p = 0.0195.
Ijms 23 07345 g004
Ijms 23 07345 g005 550
Figure 5. Difference between groups divided according to asthma state in TAS2R38 expression level in inferior turbinate mucosa (A) and polyp tissue (B).
Figure 5. Difference between groups divided according to asthma state in TAS2R38 expression level in inferior turbinate mucosa (A) and polyp tissue (B).
Ijms 23 07345 g005
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the study (N = 107) and the control (N = 39) groups. F = female, M = male, BMI = body mass index, PTC = phenylthiocarbamide, SNOT-22 = Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22, VAS = visual analog scale, SD—standard deviation, IQR—interquartile range.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study (N = 107) and the control (N = 39) groups. F = female, M = male, BMI = body mass index, PTC = phenylthiocarbamide, SNOT-22 = Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22, VAS = visual analog scale, SD—standard deviation, IQR—interquartile range.
Control Group
(N = 39)		Study Group
(N = 107)
GenderF14 (35.90%)44 (51.12%)
M25 (64.10%)63 (58.88%)
Mean Age (SD) 37.90 (12.29)46.27 (13.74)
Weight 78.92 (11.92)80.59 (16.52)
Height 172 (9.81)173 (9.23)
BMI 26.68 (4.46)26.89 (4.61)
PTC tasting013 (33,33%)35 (32.71%)
126 (66.67%)72 (67.29%)
H-1 blockers037 (94.87%)66 (61.68%)
12 (5.13%)41 (38.32%)
Topical steroids036 (92.31%)44 (41.12%)
13 (7.69%)63 (58.88%)
Systemic steroids039 (100.00%)101 (94.39%)
10 (0.00%)6 (5.61%)
Seasonal allergies038 (97.44%)84 (78.50%)
11 (2.56%)23 (21.50%)
Year-round allergies036 (92.31%)78 (72.90%)
13 (7.69%)29 (27.10%)
Tobacco usage 12 (30.77%)16 (14.95%)
Median SNOT-22 score (IQR) 32 (27–37)
VAS score0–3 55 (51.40%)
4–7 29 (27.10%)
8–10 23 (21.50%)
Lund Kennedy score0–2 59 (55.14%)
3–4 45 (42.06%)
5–6 3 (2.80%)
Median Lund-Mackay score (IQR) 9 (6–14)
Table
Table 2. Coefficients of variations (CoV) calculated for inferior turbinate mucosa (ITM), polyp, and all samples. Assessed differences for cycle thresholds between polyp and inferior turbinate mucosa samples are presented as Wilcoxon p values.
Table 2. Coefficients of variations (CoV) calculated for inferior turbinate mucosa (ITM), polyp, and all samples. Assessed differences for cycle thresholds between polyp and inferior turbinate mucosa samples are presented as Wilcoxon p values.
Count of Non-Zero Expression SamplesCoV ITMCoV PolypCoV TotalWilcoxon p
β-actin21910.96%19.62%16.14%0.092
GAPDH1909.15%10.92%10.07%0.335
18S22621.84%27.01%28.30%0.003
Table
Table 3. Median (25–75%) of TAS2R38 receptor expression levels normalized to β-actin in polypoid tissue and inferior turbinate tissue.
Table 3. Median (25–75%) of TAS2R38 receptor expression levels normalized to β-actin in polypoid tissue and inferior turbinate tissue.
Control Group (N = 28)Study Group (N = 43)
Inferior turbinate mucosa0.000123 (0.00042–0.00078)0.00013 (0.00006–0.00028)
PolypX0.00017 (0.00004–0.00078)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeruzal-Świątecka, J.; Borkowska, E.; Łaszczych, M.; Nowicka, Z.; Pietruszewska, W. TAS2R38 Bitter Taste Receptor Expression in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: New Data on Polypoid Tissue. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137345

AMA Style

Jeruzal-Świątecka J, Borkowska E, Łaszczych M, Nowicka Z, Pietruszewska W. TAS2R38 Bitter Taste Receptor Expression in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: New Data on Polypoid Tissue. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(13):7345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137345

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeruzal-Świątecka, Joanna, Edyta Borkowska, Mateusz Łaszczych, Zuzanna Nowicka, and Wioletta Pietruszewska. 2022. "TAS2R38 Bitter Taste Receptor Expression in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: New Data on Polypoid Tissue" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 13: 7345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137345

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop