Next Article in Journal
Mechanism of Apoptosis Induced by Curcumin in Colorectal Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Melatonin MT1 and MT2 Receptors Exhibit Distinct Effects in the Modulation of Body Temperature across the Light/Dark Cycle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 10
10.3390/ijms20102453
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overexpression of a Multiprotein Bridging Factor 1 Gene DgMBF1 Improves the Salinity Tolerance of Chrysanthemum

by
Qian Zhao
,
Ling He
,
Bei Wang
,
Qinglin Liu
*,
Yuanzhi Pan
,
Fan Zhang
,
Beibei Jiang
and
Lei Zhang
Department of Ornamental Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, 211 Huimin Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(10), 2453; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102453
Submission received: 17 April 2019 / Revised: 7 May 2019 / Accepted: 13 May 2019 / Published: 17 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Soil salinity represents a major constraint in the growth of chrysanthemum. Therefore, improving salinity tolerance of chrysanthemum has become an important research direction in tolerance breeding. Multiprotein bridging factor 1 (MBF1) is an evolutionarily highly conserved transcriptional co-activator in archaea and eukaryotes and has been reported to play important roles to respond to abiotic stresses. Here, a MBF1 gene induced by salt stress was isolated and functionally characterized from Dendranthema grandiflorum and name as DgMBF1. Overexpression of DgMBF1 in chrysanthemum increased the tolerance of plants to high salt stress compared to wild type (WT). It also showed fewer accumulations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O2−), higher activities of antioxidant enzymes, more content of proline and soluble sugar (SS) and more favorable K+/Na+ ratio than those of WT under salt stress. In addition, the expression level of genes related to antioxidant biosynthesis, proline biosynthesis, glyco-metabolism and K+/Na+ homeostasis was statistically significant higher in the DgMBF1-overexpressed lines than that in WT. These results demonstrated that DgMBF1 is a positive regulator in response to salt stress and could serve as a new candidate gene for salt-tolerant plant breeding.

1. Introduction

Land salinization is a worldwide ecological issue. As one of the limiting factors, it severely hampers the growth of plants and the production of crops [1,2]. It has been determined that plants can effectively respond to environmental stress by identifying a series of complex biological signals and activating its transduction mechanism [3]. Generally, two phases of stress are revealed after the occurrence of salt stress: a rapid osmotic stress and a slower ionic stress [4]. Accordingly, there are three major physiological adaptive mechanisms of salt tolerance: osmotic stress tolerance, maintenance of ions homeostasis, and compartmentalization of Na+ to reduce cytosolic Na+ concentrations [5]. In addition, reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays a key role in the response to salt stress. ROS is a kind of toxic molecules that causes oxidative damage to proteins, DNA and lipids [6]. Under normal conditions, ROS was produced at a low level in organelles such as chloroplasts, mitochondria and peroxisomes. Under salt stress, the production rate of ROS is dramatically elevated. The balance between production and elimination of ROS determines its accumulation greatly [7].
At present, billions of hectares of various saline-alkali land exist globally, accounting for one-tenth of the world’s arable land. Twenty-three percent of cultivated land is salt-affected. [8] Chrysanthemums are produced mainly by facility cultivation. Due to the continuous increase of irrigation times in the facility, the transpiration of chrysanthemum speeds. However, the rainwater cannot take the salt away in time. Deep in the soil layer, the salt remains completed [9]. The continuous planting makes the salt accumulate year by year in soil. It poses a serious impact on the production and quality of chrysanthemums. Therefore, our question is how to cultivate and breed chrysanthemums under strong salt tolerance became a botanical concern. Genetic engineering methods can be used to transfer salt-tolerant genes into plants, which significantly improve the salt tolerance in transgenic plants.
Transcriptional regulatory proteins were involved in a variety of biological processes, especially in the expression of genomic information [10,11,12]. Among these proteins, transcriptional co-activators interacted with transcription factors, regulatory elements and the basal transcription machinery to complete the eukaryotic gene expression [13]. MBF1 proteins functioned as a non-DNA binding transcriptional co-activator. By bridging TATA box binding proteins, specific transcription factors were activated. The transcription of its target genes was enhanced to bind to target promoters in eukaryotes and to participate in multiple growth and developmental processes [14,15].
MBF1s elevated the regulation of multiple biological processes in yeast and animals [16,17]. MBF1s were also known to participate in a variety of abiotic and biotic stresses responses in plants [18]. There were three different homologs that could encode MBF1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Their existence complemented the deletion of MBF1 in yeast [19]. The expression of AtMBF1a and AtMBF1b were regulated by plant development. The overexpression of AtMBF1a improved salt tolerance, fungal resistance and glucose insensitivity in transgenic Arabidopsis plants [20]. AtMBF1c was highly induced by high salt, dehydration, heat, H2O2, methyl viologen and pathogen infection [20,21,22]. Overexpression of CaMBF1 decreased high salt and cold stresses tolerance in Arabidopsis [23]. The expression level of StMBF1 in potato stems was enhanced by heat shock and H2O2 treatments [24]. Simultaneous treatment with high temperature and drought could induce the expression of MBF1 in tobacco [21].
Chrysanthemum is a world famous kind of cut flower and is susceptible to salt stress [25]. An et al. [26] demonstrated that overexpression of CcSOS1 improved the salt tolerance capacity in chrysanthemum. DgNAC1-overexpressed chrysanthemum held a higher survival rate under drought and salt stresses [27,28]; Overexpression of DgWRKY2, DgWRKY4 and DgWRKY5 genes enhanced salt tolerance in chrysanthemum [12,29,30]. To better understand the role MBF1 played in response to salt stress in chrysanthemum, we isolated a MBF1 gene from chrysanthemum and called it DgMBF1. Overexpression of DgMBF1 in chrysanthemum enhanced salt tolerance in plants, indicating that the DgMBF1 could be served as a new positive regulator of plants under salt stress.

2. Results

2.1. DgMBF1 Clone and Sequence Analysis

A salt-responsive multiprotein bridging factor gene identified from chrysanthemum was named as DgMBF1. The full-length cDNA of DgMBF1 was determined through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and inserted into pCAMBIA 2300 controlled by the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. The obtained vector was transformed into the leaf disc of chrysanthemum by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The expression level of DgMBF1 was measured through quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Two fully overexpressed (OE) lines (OE-3, OE-34) was selected for subsequent experiments independently.
The full-length DgMBF1 gene was 733 bp, in which a 438 bp open reading frame (ORF) consisted. The ORF could encode 153 amino acids. Sequence alignments by DNAMAN showed that the DgMBF1 protein contained an MBF1 domain at the N-terminal region and a helix-turn-helix (HTH) domain at the C-terminal region (Figure 1a). DgMBF1 shared 92% identity with AaMBF1c (Artemisia annua, PWA60867.1), 83% with HaMBF1c (Helianthus annuus, XP_022027306.1) and LaMBF1c (Lactuca sativa, XP_023735987.1), 76% with LnMBF1c (Lpomoea nil, XP_019191938.1), 73% with AtMBF1c (Arabidopsis thaliana, AEE76905.1), and 71% identity with MtMBF1 (Medicago truncatula, AES76734.2) (Figure 1b). Phylogenetic analysis indicated that DgMBF1 was significantly more homologous to MBF1c than to MBF1a and MBF1b. Therefore, DgMBF1 was classified as a member of the plant group II MBF1c protein.

2.2. Expression Analysis of DgMBF1

The expression profile of DgMBF1 in different tissues was detected by qRT-PCR. The result suggested that the relative expression of DgMBF1 was highest in leaves, followed by stems, and lowest in roots, and DgMBF1 was expressed in the flowers (Figure 2a). Expression patterns of DgMBF1 gene in leaves under salt stress were also detected by qRT-PCR. Under salinity, DgMBF1 transcript increased continuously until 24 h and remained at a higher level compared to untreated control (Figure 2b). The result indicated that DgMBF1 was involved in salt tolerance.

2.3. Observation of Callus and Phenotype

The growth of small buds on the infested leaf disc in chrysanthemum leaves is shown in Figure 3a. Positive plants were screened through DNA detection. Under normal conditions, there was no significant difference in phenotype between WT and transgenic chrysanthemum plants (Figure 3b).

2.4. Overexpression of DgMBF1 in Chrysanthemum Enhanced the Salt Tolerance

To further verify the function of DgMBF1, we generated chrysanthemum transgenic plants. Two independent OE lines (OE-3, OE-34) were obtained and the transcript abundance of DgMBF1 in leaves were determined by qRT-PCR (Figure 4a). The result indicated that DgMBF1 transcript expression in two OE lines was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that in WT. Under normal conditions, no obvious differences in phenotypes were observed between OE lines and WT lifelong (Figure 4d). Under salt treatment, leaves of WT plants turned yellow and even wilted with the gradual increase of salinity. While OE lines remained green and exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) higher survival rate than that of WT (Figure 4c,d). Moreover, the survival rates of OE-3 and OE-34 were 78.65% and 80.92%, respectively. In contrast, the WT was only 32.13% (Figure 4b).

2.5. Influence of Salt Stress on the Growth and Development of Chrysanthemum

To study the salt impact on the growth and development of chrysanthemum, the root length and fresh weight were measured. Salinity inhibited the growth of chrysanthemum; all lines exhibited the atrophy of root and the reduction of fresh weight. While the reduction rate of OE lines was far (p < 0.05) smaller compared with WT (Figure 5).

2.6. Overexpression of DgMBF1 Enhanced Oxidation Tolerance under Salt Stress

The accumulation of H2O2 and O2− in leaves was determined by diaminobenzidine (DAB) and nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) staining in both WT and OE lines to measure the oxidation of chrysanthemum directly. The OE lines accumulated less H2O2 and O2− than the WT with NaCl solutions treatment, for less brown and blue spots were observed (Figure 6c,d). Quantitative analysis also indicated that H2O2 and O2− contents in leaves increased under salt stress in both WT and OE lines. OE lines (p < 0.05) accumulated less H2O2 and O2− than WT. Under 15 days of salt stress, the content of H2O2 in OE lines increased to 2.11- and 2.36-fold, while the WT increased to 2.93-fold. The content of O2− in OE lines increased by 31.08% and 23.52% than day 0, less than that in WT (Figure 6a,b). In addition, antioxidant enzymes including superoxide Anion (APX), peroxidase (POD), superoxide (SOD) and catalase (CAT) in leaves also exhibited higher activities in OE lines than that in WT plants (Figure 7a,d). Moreover, we examined the relative expression of DgCuZnSOD, DgCAT and DgAPX, which related to ROS-scavenging system in leaves. The results revealed that the transcript accumulation of DgCuZnSOD, DgCAT, and DgAPX were statistically (p < 0.05) higher in OE lines than that in WT under salt stress (Figure 7e,g).
Taken together, through regulating the expression of these antioxidant-related genes, overexpressed DgMBF1 respond to against ROS persecution. Less H2O2 and O2− contents and higher antioxidant enzyme activities would eliminate stress-induced ROS. Thus, the salt tolerance in transgenic chrysanthemum would be elevated.

2.7. Overexpression of DgMBF1 Promoted the Accumulation of Osmotic Substances under Salt Stress

Proline and SS contents in leaves were measured to determine the regulation of osmotic mechanism in chrysanthemum under salt stress. The OE lines and WT exhibited little differences in the contents of proline and SS under normal conditions. However, the contents of these two osmotic regulatory factors both increased in OE lines and WT under salinity. The proline and SS highly accumulated in the OE lines (p < 0.05). By day 10, proline and SS contents in transgenic chrysanthemum reached a maximum; and by day 15, proline content was proximately 1.53- and 1.85-fold greater than that in WT. SS content was about 1.6- and 1.53-fold greater than that in WT. (Figure 8a,b). The relative expression of genes in leaves, related to proline biosynthesis and glycol-metabolism, including DgP5CS, Dg6PGDH, and DgMDH were also significantly (p < 0.05) up-regulated in OE lines compared with that in WT plants under salt stress (Figure 8c,e).
These results showed that overexpression of DgMBF1 conferred a higher osmotic pressure on transgenic chrysanthemum to cope with the dehydration stress caused by salinity.

2.8. Overexpression of DgMBF1 Enhanced the K+/Na+ Selectivity under Salt Stress

The contents of K+ and Na+ in leaves were measured, without obvious differences under normal conditions. Having been exposed to salinity, the Na+ content of OE lines was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that of WT, whereas the OE lines maintained a significantly (p < 0.05) higher level of K+ content compared to WT plants. Na+ content in OE lines increased approximately by 15.54- and 17.1-fold, respectively, while in WT, Na+ content was 25.45-fold higher than day 0. K+ content in OE lines revealed approximately 1.6- and 1.74-fold higher than day 0, respectively, while in WT decreased by 46%. In addition, the K+/Na+ ratio was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in OE lines than that in WT, which was about 4.95- and 4.46-fold greater compared with WT. (Figure 9a–c).
Moreover, some ion transporter genes, which served to regulate the K+/Na+ homeostasis, were found in chrysanthemum leaves, including the vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter DgNHX, the plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter DgSOS, the potassium channel protein DgAKT and the high-affinity potassium ion transporter protein DgHAK. The expression levels of these genes were all statistically significantly (p < 0.05) up-regulated in OE lines than that in WT under salt stress (Figure 9d–g).
Overall, through regulating the expression of ion transporter genes, the OE lines excluded Na+ and imported K+ more effectively than did WT in response to salt stress.

3. Discussion

Chrysanthemum belonged to the herbaceous perennial plants. Because of Its high medicinal and aesthetic value, the chrysanthemum-related industry thrived. However, salinity hampered the production badly [19].
Therefore, transgenic technology would be applied to improve the salinity tolerance of chrysanthemum. In this study, a multiprotein bridging factor 1 gene DgMBF1 from chrysanthemum was isolated. The results showed that overexpression of DgMBF1 elevated the salt tolerance of chrysanthemum.
Phylogenetic analysis of DgMBF1 and MBF1s in other plant species indicated sharp differences between MBF1c (plant group II) and MBF1a/b (MBF1a and MBF1b, plant group I) proteins. However, the functional differences between the two branches have not been discovered yet. Both members were acclaimed to be involved in stress response. Our results indicated that DgMBF1 belonged to the group II (Figure 1b) [31,32]. The transcription of DgMBF1 in chrysanthemum leaves was dramatically promoted under salinity (Figure 2b), indicating that DgMBF1 might participate salt stress respondence.
To further verify the function of DgMBF1, this gene was overexpressed in chrysanthemum. The OE lines exhibited higher salt tolerance compared with WT. Salt stress inhibited the growth and development of plants, reducing root length and decreasing fresh weight [30]. In our study, the gradually increased salinity inhibited the root length and fresh weight of chrysanthemum. The growth inhibition of OE lines was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that of WT (Figure 5). These results accorded with previous studies of MBF1 genes in other plant species. For instance, overexpression of TaMBF1c conferred heat tolerance in rice and yeast [33]. VvMBF1 was induced by dehydration stress and ABA treatment, and overexpression of VvMBF1 improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis [34].
Excessive ROS could cause severe damage to plants. The antioxidant system of plants would reduce cell damage caused by ROS while maintain ROS balance [35,36]. The analyses showed that the contents of H2O2 and O2− in OE lines were lower than that in WT, and the activities of ROS scavengers (SOD, POD, APX, CAT) were statistically significant (p < 0.05) higher than that of WT under salt stress (Figure 6 and Figure 7a–d), which was consistent with the significant up-regulation of antioxidant related genes (DgCuZnSOD, DgCAT and DgAPX) (Figure 6e–g). Cu/ZnSOD was a metal enzyme that acted as a major superoxide scavenger. The overexpression of the AhCu/ZnSOD gene improved drought and salt tolerance in tobacco [37]. The highly activated CAT, as the plant’s cleaning agents, spared plants from the harm of reactive oxygen. It has been reported that overexpression of GhCAT1 could raise the salt tolerance in cotton [38]. APX was an enzyme that removed H2O2 in plants. The overexpression of TsApx6 increased the survival rate of Arabidopsis thaliana under drought and high salinity stress [39].
The results above indicated that ROS accumulation was less in DgMBF1-overexpressed chrysanthemum than that in WT plants under salt stress. The overexpression of DgMBF1 activated ROS-scavenging system, increasing the salinity tolerance of chrysanthemum.
Salt stress accounted for cytoplasmic water loss, which led to osmotic stress [40]. As two important intracellular osmotic regulatory factors: proline and SS functioned well in osmotic stress response [41]. In this study, the OE lines accumulated more contents of proline and SS than that of WT plants under salt stress (Figure 8a,b). Additionally, the expression of the related genes, such as DgP5CS, Dg6PGDH and DgMDH, which functioned in osmotic adjustment, were statistically significant (p < 0.05) up-regulated in OE lines (Figure 8c–e). This was in accord with the raised contents of proline and SS. P5CS was the rate-limiting enzyme, which functioned in botanical proline biosynthesis. Overexpression of P5CS genes could increase proline production so that confer salt tolerance in transgenic plants, such as tobacco, wheat, rice and potato [42,43,44,45].
These results indicated that by regulating the osmotic adjustment ability of transgenic chrysanthemum, DgMBF1 could improve its salt tolerance.
By regulating K+/Na+ homeostasis, DgMBF1 conferred salt tolerance in chrysanthemum. In terms of salt tolerance, the ability to maintain a relatively high cytoplasmic K+/Na+ ratio was considered a crucial determinant [46]. Ion transporter genes played a critical role in the transport of Na+ in plant cells and vacuoles [47]. Salt tolerance levels were linked with the capacity to discharge Na+ and to maintain a relative high K+/Na+ ratio in the cells [48]. The K+/Na+ ratio exhibited little differences in OE lines and WT plants under normal conditions, while the ratio in OE lines was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that in WT under salt conditions (Figure 9c). These results were supported by significant differences (p < 0.05) in the expression levels of certain ion transporter genes (DgNHX, DgSOS, DgAKT and DgHAK) (Figure 9a,b,d–g). In Arabidopsis thaliana, ion homeostasis was largely mediated by the SOS signaling pathway [49]. NHX transporters involved in cytoplasmic detoxification by vacuolar Na+ accumulation, osmotic adjustment by Na+ or K+ accumulation. It has been reported that LeNHX genes served as determinants of salt tolerance in tomato [50]. A plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 influenced the export of Na+. The overexpression of AtSOS1 enhanced the salt tolerance [51]. For plants growing under salt stress, it was important to maintain a Na+/K+ ratio by favoring the accumulation of potassium over sodium [52]. AKT genes encoded the root K+ uptake channels. The expression of a AKT1-type K+ channel gene PutAKT1 enhanced salt tolerance in Arabidopsis [53]. K+ absorption and distribution in plants under salt conditions are mediated by potassium channels and transporters. The high-affinity K+ transporter (HAK) family was among the major K+ acquisition systems in plants [54]. Overexpression of OsHAK5 increased the accumulation of K+ and improved the salinity tolerance in tobacco [55]. McHAKs in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum were significantly induced by salt stress [56].
The obvious changes in the contents of K+ and Na+, and the expression levels of DgNHX, DgSOS, DgAKT and DgHAK in the chrysanthemum together indicated that DgMBF1 could enhance the salt tolerance of chrysanthemum by maintaining a higher K+/Na+ ratio.
At the current stage, the salt-tolerant genetic engineering technology has made major breakthrough in chrysanthemum. A variety of transgenic chrysanthemums have been proven to have better tolerance to salt stress. Due to the transgenes belonging to different families, there was no comparison with salt tolerance among various transgenic lines. High-quality genes should be the target of further study. By comparing salt tolerance to screen out the best gene, the production and cultivation of chrysanthemums would be increased.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Stress Treatment

The chrysanthemum cv. ‘Jinba’ were potted in a 1:1 mixture of peat and perlite, and grown in an incubator with a 16h photoperiod (200 μmol·m−2·s−1 illumination), 23 ± 2 °C, 70% relative humidity. Seedlings at the 6–7 leaf stage were treated with 200 mM NaCl solutions to create salt stress. Seedlings were sampled at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h time points from all the treatments and stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction.

4.2. DgMBF1 Clone and Sequence Analyses

Total RNA was extracted from chrysanthemum leaves by the TRIzol reagent (Mylab, Beijing, China), the first-strand cDNA was synthesized with the PrimeScript™RT reagent kit (Takara, Beijing, China). A complete DgMBF1 ORF which prepared for the inclusion of an XbaI and a SacI cloning sites was amplified from this cDNA template using the primer pair (DgMBF1-F/R) designed from the putative 5′ and 3′ untranslated region. The PCR products were purified by agarose gel and cloned into pMD18-T vector (Takara, Beijing, China) for sequencing.

4.3. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

The BLAST online tool was used to search homologous protein sequences in the NCBI protein database. Sequences with over 90% coverage were selected. Sequence alignment of DgMBF1 was performed using ClustalX. The phylogenetic tree was constructed through MEGA5.

4.4. Expression Vector Constructs and Chrysanthemum Transformations

Initially, the complete ORF of DgMBF1 was cleaved by restriction with XbaI and SacI and inserted into XbaI and SacI digested the plant expression vector pCAMBIA2300 to produce pCAMBIA2300-DgMBF1. This pCAMBIA2300-DgMBF1 vector was driven by the CaMV 35S promoter and transmuted into LB4404 strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and following the protocol documented by An et al. [57].
Middle and upper leaves of the chrysanthemum “Jinba” were cut into a square centimeter pieces and cultured on Murashige and skoog (MS) medium. These pieces were used as transformation receptors, pre-cultured for 3 days, the single colonies of agrobacterium LB4404 of pCAMBIA2300-DgMBF1 were transformed into Agrobacterium liquid (cultured at 28 °C until the OD600 was 0.5) infecting leaf discs for 10 min, co-cultured for 3 days, delay-cultured for 3 days, the specific method according to Cui et al. [58]. Transformants were initially selected through DNA detection, chrysanthemum genomic DNA was isolated from medium-sized leaves using a DNA extraction kit (Takara, Beijing, China), primers used for DNA detection are listed in Table 1.

4.5. Gene Expression Levels Analysis

The expression level of DgMBF1 was detected by qRT-PCR using the SsoFast EvaGreen supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and Bio-Rad CFX96TM detection system, 20 μL qRT-PCR reaction system consisted of 10μL coloring agent, 2 μL cDNA template and 300 nM primes. The settings for qRT-PCR were as follows, 95 °C 30 s, 95 °C 15 s, 60 °C 30 s, circulating for 40 times. The analyzing approach of 2−ΔΔCt was applied in the experiment, using EF1α as the reference gene [59]. The primers used in qRT-PCR are listed in Table 1.

4.6. Determination of Salt Tolerance

Six transgenic strains were eventually obtained, and two independent OE lines (OE-3, OE-34) were included. The OE lines exhibited relatively high expression. These samples were reproduced through asexual propagation for salt treatment. The root, stem, leaf and flower tissues of chrysanthemum under normal condition were collected for tissue-specific expression analysis of DgMBF1 gene.
Totally, each line contained 120 seedlings. To avoid salt shock, the method according to Chen et al. [60] was used to irrigate the chrysanthemum seedlings with an increasing concentration of NaCl solutions. Chrysanthemum seedlings at 6–7 leaves stage were irrigated with NaCl solutions: 100 mM on day 1–5, 200 mM on day 6–10, 400 mM on day 11–15, and sampled at 0, 5, 10 and 15 days.
One third of these seedlings were sampled for staining experiments, root length and fresh weight measurements. The roots were rinsed clean. The whole seedling was put into a container of known weight. The fresh weight was measured with an analytical balance. The ascending fourth and fifth leaves were cut and stained immediately. The length of 30 cm was drawn and the shallow water layer was set on the table. Stretching the wet root with the mark, the length of root was calculated. The whole root length was the sum of each sample.
One third of seedlings were applied to statistical survival. When the salt stress treatment process was completed, the roots were rinsed with deionized water and transplanted in a new culture medium. The survival rate was counted after two-week recovery. The ascending fourth and fifth leaves collected on last one third of seedlings were used for qRT-PCR and physiological experiments.

4.7. Determination of Physiological Indexes of Chrysanthemum under Salt Stress

H2O2, proline and SS contents, APX, POD, SOD and CAT activities were measured with the Nanjing Jiancheng test kit, the content of O2− was measured with the Suzhou Keming test kit. Both procedures were performed strictly following the instructions. In situ accumulation of H2O2 and O2− were measured through histochemical staining, using DAB and NBT, respectively, following Zhao et al [28]. The Na+ and K+ concentrations were measured following An et al. [26].

4.8. Expression of Stress-Related Genes

Total RNA of OE lines and WT plants were isolated and converted to cDNA as described above. The expression of stress-related genes in chrysanthemum was measured by qRT-PCR. DgCuZnSOD, DgCAT, DgAPX, DgP5CS, Dg6PGDH, DgMDH, DgNHX, DgSOS, DgAKT and DgHAK were monitored, and EF1α as a reference. The primers used in qRT-PCR are listed in Table 1.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted in three biological repetitions. All data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 program, the significance discriminate analysis (p < 0.05) was performed according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

5. Conclusions

To conclude, our study identified a multiprotein bridging factor 1 DgMBF1 as a salt-tolerant positive regulatory gene. DgMBF1 was induced by salinity. The overexpressed DgMBF1 enhanced the salt tolerance in transgenic chrysanthemum through maintaining a higher K+/Na+ ratio, greater activities of antioxidant enzymes, higher accumulation of osmotic regulatory factors. Therefore, DgMBF1 could be served as a candidate gene for salt-tolerant plant breeding. The next step was to conduct an in-depth study of the downstream target genes of DgMBF1 to understand its deeper molecular mechanisms in salt stress response.

Author Contributions

Q.Z. and Q.L. conceived and designed the experiments. Q.Z., L.H. and B.W. performed the experiments. Q.Z., Y.P., B.J., L.Z. and F.Z. analyzed and interpreted the sequence data. Q.Z. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by: 1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770742); 2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2019YJ0512).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

APXsuperoxide Anion
CaMVcauliflower mosaic virus
CATcatalase
DABdiaminobenzidine
HTHhelix-turn-helix
H2O2hydrogen peroxide
MBF1multiprotein bridging factor 1
NBTnitro blue tetrazolium
O2−superoxide anion
OEoverexpressed
ORFopen reading frame
PCRpolymerase chain reaction
PODperoxidase
qRT-PCRquantitative real-time PCR
ROSreactive oxygen species
SODsuperoxide
SSsoluble sugar
WTwild type

References

  1. Zhu, J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 247–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, Q.; He, L.; Wang, B.; Liu, Q.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, F.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, L.; Liu, G.; Jia, Y. Transcriptome Comparative Analysis of Salt Stress Responsiveness in Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum) Roots by Illumina and Single-Molecule Real-Time-Based RNA Sequencing. DNA Cell Biol. 2018, 37, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaleem, F.; Shabir, G.; Aslam, K.; Rasul, S.; Manzoor, H.; Shah, M.; Khan, A. An overview of the genetics of plant response to salt stress: present status and the way forward. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 2018, 9, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Deinlein, U.; Stephan, A.; Horie, T.; Luo, W.; Xu, G.; Schroeder, J. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tripathy, B.; Ralf, O. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1621–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Prabucki, A.; Serek, M.; Andersen, A.S. Influence of salt stress on stock plant growth and cutting performance of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 1999, 74, 132–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, M.; Iersel, M. Sodium chloride effects on growth, morphology, and physiology of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum X morifolium). HortScience 2008, 43, 1888–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lindemose, S.; O’Shea, C.; Jensen, M.; Skriver, K. Structure, function and networks of transcription factors involved in abiotic stress responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 5842–5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakashima, K.; Ito, Y.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, K.; Wu, Y.; Tian, X.; Bai, Z.; Liang, Q.; Liu, Q.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, B. Overexpression of DgWRKY4 enhances salt tolerance in chrysanthemum seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1592–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alavilli, H.; Lee, H.; Park, M.; Lee, B. Antarctic moss multiprotein bridging factor 1c overexpression in Arabidopsis resulted in enhanced tolerance to salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1206–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, M.; Lim, G.; Kim, E.; Ko, C.; Yang, K.; Jeong, J.; Lee, M.; Kim, C. Abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis overexpressing the multiprotein bridging factor 1a (MBF1a) transcriptional co-activator gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 354, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mauro, M.; Iglesias, M.; Arce, D.; Valle, E.; Arnold, B.; Tsuda, K.; Yamazaki, K.; Casalongué, C.; Godoy, A. MBF1s regulate ABA-dependent germination of Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brendel, C.; Gelman, L.; Auwerx, J. Multiprotein bridging factor-1 (MBF-1) is a cofactor for nuclear receptors that regulate lipid metabolism. Mol. Endocrinol. 2002, 16, 1367–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Takemaru, K.; Harashima, S.; Ueda, H.; Hirose, S. Yeast co-activator MBF1 mediates GCN4-dependent transcriptional activation. Mol. Cell Biol. 1998, 18, 4971–4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fan, G.; Zhang, K.; Huang, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, A.; Chen, L.; Chen, R.; Li, G.; Wang, Z.; Lu, G. Multiprotein-bridging factor 1 regulates vegetative growth, osmotic stress, and virulence in magnaporthe oryzae. Curr. Genet. 2017, 63, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tsuda, K.; Tsuji, T.; Hirose, S.; Yamazaki, K. Three Arabidopsis MBF1 homologs with distinct expression profiles play roles as transcriptional co-activator. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tsuda, K.; Yamazaki, K. Structure and expression analysis of three subtypes of Arabidopsis MBF1 genes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1680, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rizhsky, L.; Liang, H.; Mittler, R. The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Suzuki, N.; Rizhsky, L.; Liang, H.; Shuman, J.; Mittler, R. Enhanced tolerance to environmental stress in transgenic plants expressing the transcriptional co-activator multiprotein bridging factor 1c. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, W.; Chen, R.; Du, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, Y.; Gong, Z.; Wang, G. Reduced tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing a Capsicum annuum multiprotein bridging factor 1. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arce, D.; Tonón, C.; Zanetti, M.; Godoy, A.; Hirose, S.; Casalongué, C. The potato transcriptional co-activator StMBF1 is up-regulated in response to oxidative stress and interacts with the TATA-box binding protein. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Biophys. 2006, 39, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, K.; Liang, Q.; Bai, Z.; Liu, Q.; Pan, Y.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, L. Comparative analysis of the chrysanthemum leaf transcript profiling in response to salt stress. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. An, J.; Song, A.; Guan, Z.; Jiang, J.; Chen, F.; Lou, W.; Fang, W.; Liu, Z.; Chen, S. The over-expression of Chrysanthemum crassum CcSOS1 improves the salinity tolerance of chrysanthemum. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 41, 4155–4162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, K.; Zhong, M.; Wu, Y.; Bai, Z.; Liang, Q.; Liu, Q.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, B.; Jia, Y.; et al. Overexpression of a chrysanthemum transcription factor gene DgNAC1, improves the salinity tolerance in chrysanthemum. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, Q.; Zhong, M.; He, L.; Wang, B.; Liu, Q.; Pan, Y.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, L. Overexpression of a chrysanthemum transcription factor gene DgNAC1, improves drought tolerance in chrysanthemum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2018, 135, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. He, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, B.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, L. Chrysanthemum DgWRKY2 gene enhances tolerance to salt stress in transgenic chrysanthemum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Wang, K.; Bai, Z.; Liu, Q.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, B. Chrysanthemum WRKY gene DgWRKY5 enhances tolerance to salt stress in transgenic chrysanthemum. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4799–4808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Suzuki, N.; Sejima, H.; Tam, R.; Schlauch, K.; Mittler, R. Identification of the MBF1 heat-response regulon of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2011, 66, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Dong, Y.; Guo, J.; Huang, L.; Kang, Z. Cloning and characterization of a MBF1 transcriptional co-activator factor in wheat induced by stripe rust pathogen. Acta Agron. Sin. 2009, 35, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qin, D.; Wang, F.; Geng, X.; Zhang, L.; Yao, Y.; Ni, Z.; Peng, H.; Sun, Q. Overexpression of heat stress-responsive TaMBF1c, a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) multiprotein bridging factor, confers heat tolerance in both yeast and rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 87, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yan, Q.; Hou, H.; Singer, S.; Yan, X.; Guo, R.; Wang, X. Grape VvMBF1 gene improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2014, 118, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pan, Y.; Wu, L.; Yu, Z. Effect of salt and drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities and SOD isoenzymes of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis fisch). Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 49, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Negi, N.; Shrivastava, D.; Sharma, V.; Sarin, N. Overexpression of CuZnSOD from Arachis hypogaea alleviates salinity and drought stress in tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1109–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Luo, X.; Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Nan, Z.; Xing, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, A.; Wang, Z.; Xia, G.; Tian, Y. Synergistic effects of GhSOD1 and GhCAT1 overexpression in cotton chloroplasts on enhancing tolerance to methyl viologen and salt stresses. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Li, H.; Zhang, G. The functional and regulatory mechanisms of the Thellungiella Salsuginea ascorbate peroxidase 6 (TsAPX6) in response to salinity and water deficit stresses. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, Y.; Shah, J.; Klessig, D. Signal perception and transduction in plant defense responses. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 1621–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Watanabe, S.; Kojima, K.; Ide, Y.; Sasaki, S. Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ 2000, 63, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yamchi, A.; Rastgar, J.; Mousavi, A.; Karkhane, A.; Renu. Proline accumulation in transgenic tobacco as a result of expression of Arabidopsis 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) during osmotic stress. J. Plant Biochem. Biot. 2007, 16, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vendruscolo, E.; Schuster, I.; Pileggi, M.; Scapim, C.; Molinari, H.; Marur, C.; Vieira, L. Stress-induced synthesis of proline confers tolerance to water deficit in transgenic wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 1367–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kumar, V.; Shriram, V.; Kavi, K.; Jawali, N.; Shitole, M. Enhanced proline accumulation and salt stress tolerance of transgenic Indica rice by over-expressing P5CSF129A gene. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2010, 4, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hmida-Sayari, A.; Gargouri-Bouzid, R.; Bidani, A.; Jaoua, L.; Savouré, A.; Jaoua, S. Overexpression of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers salt tolerance in transgenic potato plants. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 746–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maathuis, F.; Amtmann, A. K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: the basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Ann. Bot. 1999, 84, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rus, A.; Estan, M.; Gisbert, C.; Garcia-Sogo, B.; Serrano, R.; Caro, M. Expressing the yeast HAL1 gene in tomato increases fruit yield and enhances K+/Na+ selectivity under salt stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 24, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yue, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Duan, L.; Li, Z. SOS1, gene overexpression increased salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco by maintaining a higher K+/Na+ ratio. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rodriguez-Rosales, M.; Galvez, F.J.; Huertas, R.; Aranda, M.N.; Baghour, M.; Cagnac, O.; Venema, K. Plant NHX cation/proton antiporters. Plant Signal Behav. 2009, 4, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Galvez, F.J.; Baghour, M.; Hao, G.; Cagnac, O.; Rodríguez-Rosales, M.; Venema, K. Expression of LeNHX isoforms in response to salt stress in salt sensitive and salt tolerant tomato species. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2012, 51, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, Q.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, X.; Yin, H.; Li, X.; Xin, X.; Hong, X.; Zhu, J.K.; Gong, Z. Overexpression of SOS (Salt Overly Sensitive) genes increases salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fuchs, I.; Stolzle, S.; Ivashikina, N.; Hedrich, R. Rice K+uptake channel OsAKT1 is sensitive to salt stress. Planta 2005, 221, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ardie, S.W.; Liu, S.; Takano, T. Expression of the AKT1-type K+ channel gene from Puccinellia tenuiflora, PutAKT1, enhances salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shen, Y.; Shen, L.; Shen, Z.; Jing, W.; Ge, H.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W. The potassium transporter OsHAK21 functions in the maintenance of ion homeostasis and tolerance to salt stress in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 38, 2766–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Horie, T.; Sugawara, M.; Okada, T.; Taira, K.; Kaothien-Nakayama, P.; Katsuhara, M.; Shinmyo, A.; Nakayama, H. Rice sodium-insensitive potassium transporter, OsHAK5, confers increased salt tolerance in tobacco BY2 cells. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 111, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Su, H.; Golldack, D.; Zhao, C.; Bohnert, H.J. The expression of HAK type K+ transporters is regulated in response to salinity stress in common ice plant. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 1482–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. An, G.; Watson, B.; Chiang, C. Transformation of tobacco, tomato, potato, and Arabidopsis thaliana using a binary Ti vector system. Plant Physiol. 1986, 81, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Cui, X.; Chen, F.; Chen, S. Establishment of regeneration and transformation system of ground cover chrysanthemum Yuhuaxunzhang. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. 2009, 32, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Livak, K.; Schmittgen, T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Chen, L.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, J.; Chen, S.; Chen, F.; Guan, Z.; Fang, W. The constitutive expression of Chrysanthemum dichrum ICE1 in Chrysanthemum grandiflorum improves the level of low temperature, salinity and drought tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1747–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 02453 g001 550
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of DgMBF1. (a) Multiple alignments of predicted amino acid sequences of DgMBF1 with other plant MBF1 proteins. The shade of colors is used to distinguish the degree of consistency. Dark blue: completely consistent; pink:≥ 75%; light blue: ≥ 50%. Red frame is used to circle their domains. (b) Phylogenetic analysis of DgMBF1 protein sequence with other plant MBF1 proteins. DgMBF1 is highlight with a red frame. MBF1 proteins used in this analysis were as follows: AaMBF1c (Artemisia annua, PWA60867.1), HaMBF1c (Helianthus annuus, XP_022027306.1), LaMBF1c (Lactuca sativa, XP_023735987.1), AtMBF1c (Arabidopsis thaliana, AEE76905.1), LnMBF1c (Lpomoea nil, XP_019191938.1), SoMBF1c (Spinacia oleracea, XP_021838271.1), PaMBF1c (Polytrichastrum alpinum, AJG41867.1), MtMBF1 (Medicago truncatula, AES76734.2), OsMBF1c-like (Oryza sativa, XP_015641831.1), VvMBF1 (Vitis vinifera, XP_002280992.1), GmMBF1a (Glycine max, XP_003527342.1), TaMBF1 (Triticum aestivum, ACO36694.1), ZmMBF1 (Zea mays, ACG33346.1), StMBF1 (Solanum tuberosum, AF232062.1), CaMBF1 (Capsicum annuum, JX402927.1), NtMBF1 (Nicotiana tabacum, BAB88859.1), AtMBF1a (Arabidopsis thaliana, AF370280), AtMBF1b (Arabidopsis thaliana, AF326909.1). LeMBF1 (L. esculentum, AF096246).
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of DgMBF1. (a) Multiple alignments of predicted amino acid sequences of DgMBF1 with other plant MBF1 proteins. The shade of colors is used to distinguish the degree of consistency. Dark blue: completely consistent; pink:≥ 75%; light blue: ≥ 50%. Red frame is used to circle their domains. (b) Phylogenetic analysis of DgMBF1 protein sequence with other plant MBF1 proteins. DgMBF1 is highlight with a red frame. MBF1 proteins used in this analysis were as follows: AaMBF1c (Artemisia annua, PWA60867.1), HaMBF1c (Helianthus annuus, XP_022027306.1), LaMBF1c (Lactuca sativa, XP_023735987.1), AtMBF1c (Arabidopsis thaliana, AEE76905.1), LnMBF1c (Lpomoea nil, XP_019191938.1), SoMBF1c (Spinacia oleracea, XP_021838271.1), PaMBF1c (Polytrichastrum alpinum, AJG41867.1), MtMBF1 (Medicago truncatula, AES76734.2), OsMBF1c-like (Oryza sativa, XP_015641831.1), VvMBF1 (Vitis vinifera, XP_002280992.1), GmMBF1a (Glycine max, XP_003527342.1), TaMBF1 (Triticum aestivum, ACO36694.1), ZmMBF1 (Zea mays, ACG33346.1), StMBF1 (Solanum tuberosum, AF232062.1), CaMBF1 (Capsicum annuum, JX402927.1), NtMBF1 (Nicotiana tabacum, BAB88859.1), AtMBF1a (Arabidopsis thaliana, AF370280), AtMBF1b (Arabidopsis thaliana, AF326909.1). LeMBF1 (L. esculentum, AF096246).
Ijms 20 02453 g001
Ijms 20 02453 g002 550
Figure 2. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of DgMBF1 expression in different tissues and in response to salt treatment. (a) Expression patterns of DgMBF1 in leaves, stems and roots. (b) Salt treatment. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. Different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) on the basis of Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 2. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of DgMBF1 expression in different tissues and in response to salt treatment. (a) Expression patterns of DgMBF1 in leaves, stems and roots. (b) Salt treatment. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. Different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) on the basis of Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 20 02453 g002
Ijms 20 02453 g003 550
Figure 3. Callus transformation process and phenotypic observation. (a) Transgenic chrysanthemum callus transformation process. (b) Phenotypic observation of WT and transgenic chrysanthemums.
Figure 3. Callus transformation process and phenotypic observation. (a) Transgenic chrysanthemum callus transformation process. (b) Phenotypic observation of WT and transgenic chrysanthemums.
Ijms 20 02453 g003
Ijms 20 02453 g004 550
Figure 4. Overexpression of DgMBF1 in transgenic chrysanthemum resulted in enhanced tolerance to salt stress. (a) Transcript levels of DgMBF1 in WT and OE lines. (b) The survival rates of OE lines and WT after two weeks’ recovery. (c) Phenotypic comparison of OE lines and WT under salt stress. (d) OE lines and WT grown under normal (control) and salt stress conditions, followed by a recovery. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 4. Overexpression of DgMBF1 in transgenic chrysanthemum resulted in enhanced tolerance to salt stress. (a) Transcript levels of DgMBF1 in WT and OE lines. (b) The survival rates of OE lines and WT after two weeks’ recovery. (c) Phenotypic comparison of OE lines and WT under salt stress. (d) OE lines and WT grown under normal (control) and salt stress conditions, followed by a recovery. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 20 02453 g004
Ijms 20 02453 g005 550
Figure 5. Assay of root length, fresh weight in OE lines and WT under salt stress. (a) Relative root length. (b) Relative fresh weight. Root length and fresh weight are relative to that of WT for 0 days. The different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 5. Assay of root length, fresh weight in OE lines and WT under salt stress. (a) Relative root length. (b) Relative fresh weight. Root length and fresh weight are relative to that of WT for 0 days. The different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 20 02453 g005
Ijms 20 02453 g006 550
Figure 6. Analysis of ROS accumulation levels under salt stress. (a,b) Quantitative measurement of H2O2 and O2− contents. (c,d) Analysis of H2O2 and O2− contents by NBT staining and DAB staining. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 6. Analysis of ROS accumulation levels under salt stress. (a,b) Quantitative measurement of H2O2 and O2− contents. (c,d) Analysis of H2O2 and O2− contents by NBT staining and DAB staining. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 20 02453 g006
Ijms 20 02453 g007 550
Figure 7. Overexpression of DgMBF1 conferred enhanced antioxidant activities. (a–d) The SOD, POD, APX and CAT activities in WT and OE lines under salt stress. (e–g) Expression of antioxidant enzymes related genes in WT and OE lines under salt stress. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 7. Overexpression of DgMBF1 conferred enhanced antioxidant activities. (a–d) The SOD, POD, APX and CAT activities in WT and OE lines under salt stress. (e–g) Expression of antioxidant enzymes related genes in WT and OE lines under salt stress. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 20 02453 g007
Ijms 20 02453 g008 550
Figure 8. Overexpression of DgMBF1 promotes the accumulation of osmotic substances. (a,b) The proline and SS contents in WT and OE lines under salt stress. (c–e) Relative expression level of genes involved in metabolism of proline and soluble sugars in WT and OE lines under salt stress. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 8. Overexpression of DgMBF1 promotes the accumulation of osmotic substances. (a,b) The proline and SS contents in WT and OE lines under salt stress. (c–e) Relative expression level of genes involved in metabolism of proline and soluble sugars in WT and OE lines under salt stress. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 20 02453 g008
Ijms 20 02453 g009 550
Figure 9. Overexpression of DgMBF1 enhances the K+/Na+ selectivity. (a) Relative Na+ content. (b) Relative K+ contents. (c) K+/Na+ ratio. (d–g) Relative expression level of ion transporter genes in WT and OE lines under salt stress. Na+ and K+ contents are relative to that of WT for 0 days. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 9. Overexpression of DgMBF1 enhances the K+/Na+ selectivity. (a) Relative Na+ content. (b) Relative K+ contents. (c) K+/Na+ ratio. (d–g) Relative expression level of ion transporter genes in WT and OE lines under salt stress. Na+ and K+ contents are relative to that of WT for 0 days. Data represent means and standard errors of three replicates. The different letters above the columns indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ijms 20 02453 g009
Table
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Forward PrimersReverse Primers
Primers used for cloning of DgMBF1
DgMBF1TCCAGACCCTCAACTCCTAACAAACTCGACACAATACAAAG
DNA detectionGAGTCAAAGATTCAAATAGAGGACCTACAAACTCGACACAATACAAAG
Primers used for qRT-PCR
DgMBF1TGCCGACAAGACCAATGGGTGGACAACTTGCGGCCTTT
EF1αTTTTGGTATCTGGTCCTGGAGCCATTCAAGCGACAGACTCA
DgCuZnSODCCATTGTTGACAAGCAGATTCCACTCAATCATCAGGATCAGCATGGACGACTAC
DgCATTACAAGCAACGCCCTTCAAGACCTCTGTTCCCAACAGTCA
DgAPXGTTGGCTGGTGTTGTTGCTGATGGTCGTTTCCCTTAGTTG
DgP5CSTTGGAGCAGAGGTTGGAATGCAGGTCTTTGTGGGTGTAG
Dg6PGDHCGAGGTACTTCGTTCTCCGGCTCCCTTCTTCCCCGGTAGA
DgMDHGGTTGCCCCAGATGATCACAGTTGGTCATCCAGATCGCCA
DgNHXTGGTGGTAAAAGCTCGCACATCATTAACAACGCCCTCCCC
DgSOSAGCTTCGACAAAGGGATGGGGCTTTCTCGTCGGCTACCTT
DgAKTATTGCAGCACTTTCAGCAGCACTTGCCAAAGGTCCAACCA
DgHAKTGGAACTTGCCATGGCCAAGGCTTCCAACAACTGCAGC

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Q.; He, L.; Wang, B.; Liu, Q.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, F.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, L. Overexpression of a Multiprotein Bridging Factor 1 Gene DgMBF1 Improves the Salinity Tolerance of Chrysanthemum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102453

AMA Style

Zhao Q, He L, Wang B, Liu Q, Pan Y, Zhang F, Jiang B, Zhang L. Overexpression of a Multiprotein Bridging Factor 1 Gene DgMBF1 Improves the Salinity Tolerance of Chrysanthemum. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(10):2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102453

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Qian, Ling He, Bei Wang, Qinglin Liu, Yuanzhi Pan, Fan Zhang, Beibei Jiang, and Lei Zhang. 2019. "Overexpression of a Multiprotein Bridging Factor 1 Gene DgMBF1 Improves the Salinity Tolerance of Chrysanthemum" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 10: 2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102453

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop