Next Article in Journal
Enzymatic Hydrolysis Optimization of Yak Whey Protein Concentrates and Bioactivity Evaluation of the Ultrafiltered Peptide Fractions
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advancements in the Utilization of s-Block Organometallic Reagents in Organic Synthesis with Sustainable Solvents
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing the Luminescence of La3Mg2NbO9:Mn4+ Phosphor through H3BO3 and Charge Compensator Co-Doping for Use in Plant Growth Lamps
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enantioselective Catalytic Aldol Reactions in the Presence of Knoevenagel Nucleophiles: A Chemoselective Switch Optimized in Deep Eutectic Solvents Using Mechanochemistry
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 6
10.3390/molecules29061399
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Sustainable Synthetic Approach to Tacrine and Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Deep Eutectic Solvents under Aerobic Conditions

by
Luciana Cicco
*,
Filippo Maria Perna
,
Vito Capriati
* and
Paola Vitale
Dipartimento di Farmacia—Scienze del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale “Metodologie e Processi Innovativi di Sintesi” (C.I.N.M.P.I.S.), Via E. Orabona 4, I-70125 Bari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(6), 1399; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061399
Submission received: 28 February 2024 / Revised: 15 March 2024 / Accepted: 18 March 2024 / Published: 21 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Reactions in Deep Eutectic Solvents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An enhanced, sustainable, and efficient method for synthesizing tacrine, achieving a 98% yield, has been developed by replacing volatile organic compounds with more eco-friendly solvents such as deep eutectic solvent (DESs). The optimized protocol scales easily to 3 g of substrate without yield loss and extends successfully to tacrine derivatives with reduced hepatotoxicity. Particularly notable is the synthesis of novel triazole-based derivatives, yielding 90–95%, by integrating an in situ preparation of aryl azides in DESs with N-propargyl-substituted tacrine derivatives. Quantitative metrics validate the green aspects of the reported drug development processes.

1. Introduction

In a world with dwindling petroleum resources, researchers are continuously nurturing the development of safer methodologies and waste prevention as a response to the growing demand for sustainable and environmentally friendly processes with a low carbon footprint. In particular, owing to the heavy impact of solvents on pollution and the organic waste produced (over 80%), green and sustainable solvents are progressively replacing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in several chemical and extraction processes both in academia and industry [1,2]. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) are among the latest breakthroughs in the realm of green solvents due to their low volatility, nonflammability, and tunability properties. Additionally, the remarkably low toxicity of some of them (particularly those derived from bio-based components) aligns well with their suitability for use in the pharmaceutical field [3,4,5,6]. They are usually obtained by the combination of safe, inexpensive, and nature-inspired components (Brønsted or Lewis acids and bases, anionic and/or cationic species) that, when mixed in a proper molar ratio and heated, give rise to eutectic mixtures with a eutectic point temperature lower to that of an ideal liquid mixture [7].
Nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds are a valuable source of therapeutic agents in medicinal chemistry. Thanks to their broad chemical structure, they can play the role of “spacers” and/or bioisosteres of various functional groups, often interacting effectively with receptors, enzymes, and biological targets [8]. DESs have been widely used in organic synthesis [9], in particular for the preparation of N-containing heterocyclic scaffolds because of their dual solvent–catalyst role [10,11,12]. Over the last decade, valuable sustainable methodologies have been introduced in the literature, both by our group and others, for the synthesis of pharmacologically active heterocycles with central nervous system activity or anti-inflammatory or antiproliferative properties (e.g., functionalized triazoles, pyrimidines, imidazoles, pyrazones, benzoxazines, tetrahydrofuran, and tetrahydropyran derivatives) [13,14,15,16,17,18] and of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) like COX-1 inhibitors [19] and antihistamine drugs (e.g., thenfadyl and some analogs, such as dimethindene) [20,21].
Tacrine is a cholinesterase inhibitor that increases the synaptic levels of acetylcholine in the treatment of neurological disorders. Moreover, it was also found to act as an anticancer inhibitor of topoisomerases and DNA transcription [22]. The preparation of tacrine derivatives with reduced toxicity (e.g., by modification of the heterocyclic ring or the chemical structure or by increasing or decreasing the ring size with new functional groups) is currently an active research area. Conventional approaches to synthesize tacrine (3a) often rely on intermolecular cyclodehydration reactions between anthranilonitrile (1a) (Scheme 1a) [23,24,25] or anthranilic acid [26] (1b) (Scheme 1b) [via 9-chlorotetrahydroacridine (3b)] and cyclohexanone (2a); however, these often use energy-intensive conditions with long reactions times (16–48 h), toxic VOCs (e.g., POCl3, toluene), and laborious work-up procedures based on VOCs (e.g., CHCl3, Et2O, MeOH), with 3a being often purified by column chromatography. The reaction between 1a and 2a has also been documented to occur in xylene with the aid of p-toluensulfonic acid (PTSA), yielding 48% under reflux for 3 h [27], or utilizing a solid catalyst combination of PTSA/silica gel under microwave irradiation, achieving a 70% yield [28].
Herein, we report that the Friedländer annulation en route to quinoline skeletons of the type of 3a,c can straightforwardly be realized by reacting 2a with 2-aminobenzonitrile derivatives 1a,c, using DESs as privileged reactions media, with tacrine derivatives 3a,c being isolated in 95–98% yield, after short reaction times (3 h) at 120 °C, with no further purification required. In addition, the practicality of the proposed protocol was demonstrated by setting up a sustainable preparation of pharmacologically relevant N-substituted derivatives 4 (Scheme 1c) [29,30,31,32,33]. Typical metrics applied at First and Second Pass, according to the Chem21 Metrics Toolkit [34], have also been calculated for the synthesis of 3a to demonstrate a significant advance in sustainability with respect to the state of the art.

2. Results and Discussion

Given the importance of Lewis acids (e.g., BF3, SnCl2 ZnCl2) in cyclodehydration processes [23,24,35], we began our investigation by studying the condensation reaction between an equimolar amount of 1a and 2a in some prototypical eutectic mixtures, namely choline chloride (ChCl)/glycerol (Gly) (1:2 mol mol−1) and ChCl/urea (1:2 mol mol−1) in the presence of ZnCl2 (20 mol%). Under these conditions, however, the desired adduct 3a could be isolated in up to 20% yield (120 °C, 3 h) (Table 1, entries 1,2). Subsequent optimization of the eutectic mixture composition with acidic DESs (ADESs) [36] (Table 1, entries 3–6) revealed that a productive (98% yield) condensation could be achieved with either a ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1) or a FeCl3·6H2O/Gly (3:1 mol mol−1) eutectic mixture, representative of type I and type IV Lewis acidic DESs (LADESs), respectively, each one acting as a solvent and catalyst (Table 1, entries 4,5). Of note, these reactions have proven to be faster (3 h, 120 °C) with respect to similar condensation reactions reported in the literature, which required a longer reaction time (16 h) and an excess cyclohexanone, the latter being used as a solvent and a reagent [24].
In order to prove the applicability of the method, we also carried out the synthesis of 3a on a 3 g scale. The condensation reaction between 1a and 2a (25.4 mmol, 3 g; 25.4 mmol, 2.6 mL) in a ZnCl2/ChCl LADES (15 g) proceeded to uneventfully provide 3a in 98% yield (4.9 g) as a yellow solid. The product was isolated by filtration after the addition of a 10% solution of NaOH, with no requirement for chromatography (Table 1, entry 4) (see details in the Materials and Methods Section). Similarly, the condensation between 1c and 2a (1 mmol each), working either in ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1) or in FeCl3·6H2O/urea (2:1) (1 g) LADESs, furnished tacrine derivative 3c in a 98% yield after 3 h at 120 °C (Scheme 2).
We next focused on primary amine functionalization, as this has been proven to lead to derivatives with fewer side effects, especially in the liver district, while opening up the way for the inclusion of pharmacophores to identify a suitable molecular platform for a multitargeting approach on muscarinic agonists and antagonists. N-propargyl derivatives, in particular, are potent acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibitors [IC50 values: 11.2–51.3 (electric eel) and 77.6–83.5 (equine serum) nM, respectively) [37] with lower cytotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in vitro than tacrine itself [38]. After screening several DES mixtures [e.g., ChCl/Gly (1:2), ChCl/urea (1:2), ChOAc/Gly (1:2)], other environmentally friendly solvents [e.g., 2-MeTHF and ciclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)] (see ESI), and various alkaline bases [e.g., KOH, K2CO3, Cs2CO3, NaH, LiOH) (see ESI), we found that CPME [39] allowed for the isolation of derivative 4a,c in 50–60% yield when treating 3a,c (1 mmol) with propargyl bromide (1.5 equiv.) in the presence of KOH (2 equiv.) as the base, and when stirring the resulting mixture at room temperature (RT) for 12 h (Scheme 3).
Building on our recent achievements in the synthesis of functionalized triazoles by Cu-catalyzed cycloaddition reactions in DESs [40], we envisaged a truly green methodology to target pharmacologically relevant tacrine derivatives 7a–c, which are effective for the treatment of neuro-degenerative diseases. The inhibitory activity of chloro derivative 7c, in particular, is noteworthy, with IC50 values of 0.52 and 0.05 μM against AChE and BChE, respectively. Notably, while the removal of chloride resulted in a fourfold reduction in AChE inhibitory activity, compound 7b exhibited a striking increase in BChE inhibitory activity, surpassing that of 7c by 37-fold [41]. To this end, benzyl azides 6a,b were first synthesized by reacting the corresponding benzyl bromides 5a,b (1 mmol) with NaN3 (2.3 equiv.) in ChCl/Gly (1:2) or ChCl/urea (1:2) (1 g) (98% yield by 1H NMR analysis after 12 h at RT). The latter compound, without isolation, was then straightforwardly subjected to a cycloaddition reaction with N-propargyl-substituted tacrine derivatives 4a,c (0.5 mmol) in the presence of CuI (7 mol%), thereby smoothly providing derivatives 7a–c in 90–95% yield while working under aerobic conditions and vigorous stirring at RT for 24 h (Scheme 4).
To better quantify the green credentials of the synthetic pathways developed for the synthesis of tacrine and its analogs, we have calculated the Sheldon’s E-factor [42] and also have made use of some of the First and Second Pass CHEM21 Metrics Toolkit developed by Clark et al. [34], calculating atom economy (AE), reaction mass efficiency (RME), effective mass yield (EM), optimum efficiency (OE), renewable intensity (RI), renewable percentage (RP), and process mass intensity (PMI) metrics, with a breakdown of the latter for “chemicals” (reactants, reagents, and catalyst) (PMIrxn) and work-up and reaction solvents (PMIWU), and these values were compared with the corresponding ones related to the last available synthetic procedure developed in VOCs [24] (Table 2).
The classical Friedländer condensation method for the synthesis of 3a yields an E-factor of 20 [24], whereas utilizing a ChCl-based DES reduces this value significantly to 7. An in-depth examination of the derived parameters reveals the markedly lower environmental impact of the DES-based synthetic route outlined in this study. This is particularly evident when comparing the following metrics: RME (89% in DES vs. 15% in VOCs), OE (97% in DES vs. 16% in VOCs), EM (36.3% in DES vs. 8.3% in VOCs), and RP (66.5% in DES vs. 25.2% in VOCs). It is also noteworthy that the sustainable synthetic pathway devised for tacrine synthesis eschews the use of VOCs during the isolation/purification step, which is characteristic of the traditional method employed by Dallanoce et al. [24]. This is particularly evident when comparing the PMIWU values, which stand at 48.3 in VOCs versus 20.0 in DES.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Methods

Deep eutectic solvents [choline chloride (ChCl)/glycerol (Gly) (1:2 mol mol−1); FeCl3·6H2O/urea (2:1 mol mol−1); ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1); ChCl/urea (1:2 mol mol−1); FeCl3·6H2O/Gly (3:1 mol mol−1); and p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA)/ChCl (2:1 mol mol−1)] were prepared by heating under stirring the corresponding individual components at 60–80 °C for 10–30 min until a clear solution was obtained. For 1H NMR (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (150 MHz), CDCl3 was used as the solvent; chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (δ). FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 681 spectrometer. GC analyses were performed on an HP 6890 model, Series II by using an HP1 column (methyl siloxane; 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm film thickness). Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on pre-coated 0.25 mm thick plates of Kieselgel 60 F254; visualization was accomplished by UV light (254 nm) or by spraying a solution of 5% (w/v) ammonium molybdate and 0.2% (w/v) cerium(III) sulfate in 100 mL 17.6% (w/v) aq. sulphuric acid and heating to 473 K until blue spots appeared. Chromatography was run by using silica gel 60 with a particle size distribution of 40–63 μm and 230–400 ASTM. GC-MS analyses were performed on an HP 5995C model. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analyses were performed using a Bruker microTOF QII mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion source (ESI). Cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) was provided by Zeon Europe GmbH and was used as a solvent. Other reagents and solvents, unless otherwise specified, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and were used without any further purification. Full characterization data, including copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra, have been reported for both the newly synthesized compounds and the known compounds. The following abbreviations have been used to explain the multiplicities: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, m = multiplet, br = broad, and dd = double doublet.

3.2. Synthesis of Tacrine 3a in ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1) LADES

2-Aminobenzonitrile (1a) (1 mmol, 118 mg) and cyclohexanone (2a) (1 mmol, 98 mg were added to ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1) LADES (1 g). The reaction was kept at 120 °C for 3 h, then cooled to RT, and the volatiles evaporated under reduced pressure. A 10% solution of NaOH (300 µL) was added to the residue, and the mixture was stirred for an additional 3 h. After filtration, the cake was washed with water and then kept under stirring for 1 h with iPrOH (1 mL). The solid was filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to give tacrine 3a as a yellow solid in 98% yield (194 mg).
m.p = 178–181 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.89 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.53–7.51 (m, 1 H), 7.33–7.28 (m, 1 H), 4.96 (br s, 2 H), 3.05–3.00 (m, 2 H), 2.59–2.48 (m, 2 H), 1.88–1.83 (m, 4 H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.5, 146.6, 146.4, 128.9, 128.4, 123.8, 119.6, 117.2, 110.4, 34.1, 23.7, 22.9, 22.8 ppm; FT-IR (KBr): 3334, 3329, 2931, 2858, 1660, 1573, 1504, 1441, 1374, 1299, 976, 755 cm−1; GC MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 198 (M+, 100), 182 (22), 169 (20), 155 (5), 144 (5), 128 (6), 115 (6), 102 (7), 91 (11), 77 (9); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C13H14N2 + H]+: 199.1235, found 199.1229.

3.3. Synthesis of Tacrine Analogue 3c in ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1) or FeCl3·6H2O/urea (2:1 mol mol−1) LADES

4-Chloro-2-aminobenzonitrile (1c) (1 mmol, 152 mg) and cyclohexanone (2a) (1 mmol, 98 mg, were added to ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1) or FeCl3·6H2O/urea (2:1 mol mol−1) LADES (1 g). The reaction was kept at 120 °C for 3 h, then cooled to RT, and the volatiles evaporated under reduced pressure. A 10% solution of NaOH (300 µL) was added to the residue, and the mixture was stirred for an additional 3 h. After filtration, the cake was washed with water and then kept under stirring for 1 h with iPrOH (1 mL). The solid was filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to give tacrine 3c as a yellow solid in 98% yield (227 mg).
m.p = 260–263 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.81 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.66 (s, 1 H), 7.49 (dd, 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.59 (br s, 2 H), 3.00 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2 H), 2.61 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.95–1.92 (m, 4 H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.0, 145.5, 145.0, 130.6, 129.5, 129.2, 118.9, 117.9, 111.3, 34.1, 23.8, 22.8, 22.7 ppm; FT-IR (KBr): 3431, 3324, 3254, 2933, 2853, 2829, 1655, 1573, 1561, 1494, 1445, 1408, 1373, 1295, 934, 877, 823 cm−1; GC MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 234 (M+ + 2, 34), 232 (M+, 100), 216 (16), 204 (14), 197 (11), 180 (5), 169 (2), 152 (2), 140 (5), 128 (4), 115 (7), 108 (8), 98 (7), 91 (7), 77 (7); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C13H13ClN2 + H]+: 233.0767, found 233.0840.

3.4. Scale-Up Synthesis of Tacrine 3a in ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1) LADES

2-Aminobenzonitrile (1a) (25.4 mmol, 3 g) and cyclohexanone (2a) (25.4 mmol, 2.6 mL) were added to ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1) LADES (15 g). The reaction was kept at 120 °C for 3 h, then cooled to RT, and the volatiles evaporated under reduced pressure. A 10% solution of NaOH (7 mL) was added to the residue, and the mixture was stirred for an additional 3 h. After filtration, the cake was washed with water and then kept under stirring for 1 h with 25 mL of iPrOH. The solid was filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to give tacrine 3a as a yellow solid in 98% yield (4.9 g).

3.5. Representative Procedure for the Synthesis of N-Propargyl-Substituted Tacrine Derivatives 4a,c in CPME: Synthesis of 4a

To a solution of tacrine 3a (1 mmol, 198 mg), in CPME (2 mL), KOH (2 equiv., 112 mg) was added at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 10 min. Then, propargyl bromide (1.5 eq., 114 µL) was added at RT, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 12 h. After the addition of 2 mL of water, the reaction mixture was extracted with CPME (3 × 1 mL). The collected organic phases were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (EtOAc as the eluent) to afford N-propargyl-substituted tacrine derivative 4a as a brown solid in 50% yield (118 mg).
(4a) m.p = 211–213 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.93 (dd, J = 14.9, 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.6, 1 H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.6, 1 H), 4.21–4.15 (m, 3 H), 3.09 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.82 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2 H), 2.27 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.95–1.89 (m, 4 H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.0, 149.2, 147.4, 129.0, 128.4, 124.4, 122.3, 121.0, 118.9, 81.2, 72.5, 38.4, 34.1, 24.7, 22.9, 22.7 ppm; FT-IR (KBr): 3291, 3063, 2926, 2855, 2113, 1633, 1582, 1562, 1496, 1434, 1407, 1384, 1329, 1295, 1109, 874, 762 cm−1; GC MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 236 (M+, 89), 221 (19), 207 (100), 195 (34), 182 (44), 167 (17), 154 (9), 140 (10), 128 (9), 115 (13), 103 (14), 91 (7), 77 (14); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C16H16N2 + H]+: 237.1313, found 237.1129.
(4c) white solid, (162 mg, 60% yield), m.p = 125–127 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.89 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.86 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.50 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.13 (s, 2 H), 3.06 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2 H), 2.83 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2 H), 1.94–1.89 (m, 4 H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.2, 148.3, 145.7, 130.5, 130.0, 129.0, 121.7, 121.3, 119.9, 80.7, 72.5, 38.3, 33.8, 24.5, 22.6, 22.4 ppm; FT-IR (KBr): 3301, 3055, 2938, 2865, 1669, 1585, 1557, 1485, 1434, 1373, 1246, 1113, 1046, 834, 739 cm−1; GC MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 272 (M+ + 2, 6), 270 (M+, 17), 253 (9), 241 (32), 232 (100), 216 (20), 206 (16), 195 (15), 180 (10), 164 (8), 140 (10), 126 (8), 116 (13), 103 (11), 91 (10), 77 (9); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C16H15ClN2 + H]+: 271.0996, found 271.0991.

3.6. Representative Procedure for the Synthesis of Triazole-Based Tacrine Derivatives 7a–c: Synthesis of 7a

NaN3 (2.3 equiv., 82 mg) was added to a solution of benzyl bromide (0.55 mmol, 65 µL) dissolved in either ChCl/Gly (1:2 mol mol−1) or ChCl/urea (1:2 mol mol−1) (1 g). The resulting mixture was vigorously stirred at RT for 12 h. After this time, tacrine derivative 4a (0.5 mmol) and CuI (7 mol%) were added to the reaction mixture, working under aerobic conditions and with vigorous stirring at RT. Subsequently, the mixture was allowed to stir for an additional 24 h. Upon completion of the reaction (confirmed by TLC analysis), water was added to the mixture, and the resulting aqueous phase was extracted with CPME (3 × 1 mL). The collected organic layers were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was finally purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc as the eluent), affording the desired product 7a as a brown solid in 90% yield (166 mg).
(7a) mp 65–67 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.00 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.37–7.34 (m, 4 H), 7.19–7.17 (m, 2 H), 5.47 (s, 2 H), 4.75 (s, 2 H), 3.05 (br s, 2 H), 2.67 (br s, 2 H), 1.85–1.82 (m, 4H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 157.6, 150.5, 145.6, 142.2, 134.3, 129.0, 128.8, 128.6, 127.7, 127.5, 124.2, 122.6, 121.0, 120.0, 117.1, 54.0, 44.1, 33.0, 24.4, 22.5, 22.2 ppm; FT-IR (KBr): 3374, 3142, 3053, 2934, 2861, 1614, 1563, 1496, 1265, 1126, 1050, 736 cm−1; GC MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 369 (M+, 3), 197 (100), 182 (7), 91 (41), 77 (3); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C23H23N5 + H]+: 370.2032, found 370.2028.
(7b) white solid (189 mg, 95% yield), mp 75–78 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.10 (dd, J = 17.0, 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.85 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.34 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 5.40 (s, 2 H), 4.84 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.77 (s, 3 H), 3.10–3.04 (m, 2 H), 2.70–2.63 (m, 2 H), 1.85–1.77 (m, 4 H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.1, 156.3, 152.0, 145.3, 144.2, 129.7, 129.5, 126.4, 125.9, 124.6, 123.2, 121.3, 119.1, 116.0, 114.6, 55.3, 55.8, 44.1, 32.0, 24.4, 22.5, 22.0 ppm; FT-IR (KBr): 3399, 3128, 3061, 2921, 2850, 1612, 1586, 1563, 1514, 1251, 1210, 1032, 763 cm−1; GC MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 399 (M+, 16), 197 (100), 182 (3), 121 (54), 77 (5); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C24H25N5O + H]+: 400.2059, found 400.2140.
(7c) white solid (201 mg, 93% yield), mp 85–87 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.93 (s, 1 H), 7.86 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.46 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 5.38 (s, 2 H), 4.63 (s, 2 H), 3.78 (s, 3 H), 3.00 (s, 2 H), 2.65 (s, 2 H), 1.83–1.78 (m, 4 H) ppm; 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.9, 159.6, 159.2, 149.3, 145.6, 130.4, 129.7, 129.5, 129.2, 127.3, 126.3, 121.9, 114.5, 114.2, 113.8, 55.3, 53.7, 44.3, 29.7, 24.6, 22.7, 22.5 ppm; FT-IR (KBr): 3363, 3138, 2931, 2858, 1614, 1584, 1557 cm−1; GC MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 433 (M+, 9), 399 (12), 231 (45), 197 (75), 121 (100), 47 (25); HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C24H24ClN5O + H]+: 434.1748, found 434.1712.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we present an enhanced, environmentally sustainable, and highly efficient method for synthesizing tacrine, achieving a remarkable 98% yield by replacing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with environmentally responsible solvents such as Lewis acidic DESs (LADESs). Our optimized protocol demonstrates seamless scalability up to 3 g of substrate without compromising the final yield. Moreover, it proves adaptable to the synthesis of other tacrine derivatives with reduced hepatotoxicity.
Of particular significance is the synthesis of novel pharmacologically relevant triazole-based tacrine derivatives. This was achieved by integrating the in situ preparation of aryl azides in DESs with N-propargyl-substituted tacrine derivatives in a single reaction vessel, resulting in the isolation of the desired adducts with yields ranging from 90% to 95%. Quantitative metrics substantiate the eco-friendliness of the drug development processes detailed herein, underscoring their sustainability and environmental responsibility.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29061399/s1, Table S1: Solvent and base screening for the synthesis of N-propargyl-substituted tacrine derivative 4a; E-factor calculations; green metrics; 1H and 13C NMR spectra.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C.; methodology, L.C.; validation, L.C.; formal analysis, L.C., P.V. and F.M.P.; investigation, L.C.; resources, F.M.P., P.V. and V.C.; data curation, L.C., P.V. and F.M.P.; visualization, L.C.; supervision, P.V. and V.C.; project administration: V.C.; funding acquisition, V.C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C. and V.C.; writing—review and editing, L.C., P.V., F.M.P. and V.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by MUR (National PRIN projects codes: 2022KMS84 and 2020SBNHLH_003), the Interuniversity Consortium C.I.N.M.P.I.S., and the University of Bari Aldo Moro.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supplementary Material of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out under the framework of the Regione Puglia call “Research for Innovation—REFIN”, on the topic “Eco-sustainable and Innovative Synthetic Methodologies of New Compounds with Potential Application in Neurodegenerative Diseases Treatment in Environmentally Friendly Solvents (Deep Eutectic Solvents, DESs)” (POR Puglia FESR-FSE 2014/2020).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sheldon, R.A. Green solvents for sustainable organic synthesis: State of the art. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lipshutz, B.H.; Gallou, F.; Handa, S. Evolution of Solvents in Organic Synthesis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 5838–5849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sanches, M.V.; Freitas, R.; Oliva, M.; Mero, A.; De Marchi, L.; Cuccaro, A.; Fumagalli, G.; Mezzetta, A.; Dugoni, G.C.; Ferro, M.; et al. Are natural deep eutectic solvents always a sustainable option? A bioassay-based study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 17268–17279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lomba, L.; Ribate, M.P.; Sangüesa, E.; Concha, J.; Garralaga, M.P.; Errazquin, D.; García, C.B.; Giner, B. Deep Eutectic Solvents: Are They Safe? Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martínez Martínez, G.; Guillena Townley, G. Controversy on the toxic nature of deep eutectic solvents and their potential contribution to environmental pollution. Heliyon 2022, 8, e12567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zainal-Abidin, M.H.; Hayyan, M.; Ngoh, G.C.; Wong, W.F.; Looi, C.Y. Emerging frontiers of deep eutectic solvents in drug discovery and drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 2019, 316, 168–195. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Hansen, B.B.; Spittle, S.; Chen, B.; Poe, D.; Zhang, Y.; Klein, J.M.; Horton, A.; Adhikari, L.; Zelovich, T.; Doherty, B.W.; et al. Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Review of Fundamentals and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 1232–1285. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Majee, S.; Shilpa; Sarav, M.; Banik, B.K.; Ray, D. Recent Advances in the Green Synthesis of Active N-Heterocycles and Their Biological Activities. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perna, F.M.; Vitale, P.; Capriati, V. Organic Synthesis in DESs in Deep Eutectic Solvents: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications, 1st ed.; Ramón, D.J., Guillena, G., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co: Weinheim, Germany, 2020; Volume 7, pp. 111–134. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gore, S.; Baskaran, S.; König, B. Fischer Indole Synthesis in Low Melting Mixtures. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4568–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shaibuna, M.; Sreekumar, K. Dual solvent-catalyst role of deep eutectic solvents in Hantzsch dihydropyridine synthesis. Synth. Commun. 2021, 51, 1742–1753. [Google Scholar]
  12. Alvi, S.; Ali, R. An expeditious and highly efficient synthesis of substituted pyrroles using a low melting deep eutectic mixture. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 9732–9745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vitale, P.; Cicco, L.; Cellamare, I.; Perna, F.M.; Salomone, A.; Capriati, V. Regiodivergent synthesis of functionalized pyrimidines and imidazoles through phenacyl azides in deep eutectic solvents. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020, 16, 1915–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Capua, M.; Perrone, S.; Perna, F.M.; Vitale, P.; Troisi, L.; Salomone, S.; Capriati, V. An Expeditious and Greener Synthesis of 2-Aminoimidazoles in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Molecules 2016, 21, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Perrone, S.; Capua, M.; Messa, F.; Salomone, A.; Troisi, L. Green synthesis of 2-pyrazinones in deep eutectic solvents: From α-chloro oximes to peptidomimetic scaffolds. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 6193–6198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Behalo, M.S.; Bloise, E.; Mele, G.; Salomone, A.; Messa, F.; Carbone, L.; Mazzetto, S.E.; Lomonaco, D. Bio-based benzoxazines synthesized in a deep eutectic solvent: A greener approach toward vesicular nanosystems. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2020, 57, 768–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dilauro, G.; Cicco, L.; Vitale, P.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Ligand-Free Pd-Catalyzed Reductive Mizoroki-Heck Reaction Strategy for the One-Pot Synthesis of Functionalized Oxygen Heterocycles in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 26, e202200814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cicco, L.; Perna, F.M.; Falcicchio, A.; Altomare, A.; Messa, F.; Salomone, A.; Capriati, V.; Vitale, P. 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of Alkanone Enolates with Azides in Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Metal-Free Regioselective Synthesis of Densely Functionalized 1,2,3-Triazoles. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 36, e202200843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cicco, L.; Hernández-Fernández, J.A.; Salomone, A.; Vitale, P.; Ramos-Martín, M.; González-Sabín, J.; Presa Soto, A.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V.; García-Álvarez, J. Copper-catalyzed Goldberg-type C-N coupling in deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and water under aerobic conditions. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 1773–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Quivelli, A.F.; Rossi, F.V.; Vitale, P.; García-Álvarez, J.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Sustainable and Scalable Two-Step Synthesis of Thenfadil and Some Analogs in Deep Eutectic Solvents: From Laboratory to Industry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 4065–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Quivelli, A.F.; Rossi, F.V.; Alario, C.; Sannicolò, F.; Vitale, P.; García-Álvarez, J.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Green Solvents for Eco-Friendly Synthesis of Dimethindene: A Forward-Looking Approach. Molecules 2022, 27, 7594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Janočková, J.; Plšíková, J.; Koval’, J.; Jendželovský, R.; Mikeš, R.; Kašpárková, J.; Brabec, V.; Hamuľaková, S.; Fedoročko, P.; Kožurková, M. Tacrine derivatives as dual topoisomerase I and II catalytic inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2015, 59, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gulati, H.K.; Choudhary, S.; Kumar, N.; Ahmed, A.; Bhagat, K.; Singh, J.V.; Singh, A.; Kumar, A.; Bedi, P.M.S.; Singh, H. Design, Synthesis, biological investigations and molecular interactions of triazole linked tacrine glycoconjugates as Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with reduced hepatotoxicity. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 118, 105479. [Google Scholar]
  24. Maspero, M.; Volpato, D.; Cirillo, D.; Chen, N.Y.; Messerer, R.; Sotriffer, C.; De Amici, M.; Holzgrabe, U.; Dallanoce, C. Tacrine-xanomeline and tacrine-iperoxo hybrid ligands: Synthesis and biological evaluation at acetylcholinesterase and M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 96, 103633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tang, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Ma, S.; Shi, D.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, C. The Divergent Transformations of Aromatic o-Aminonitrile with Carbonyl Compound. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2012, 49, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qin, Q.-P.; Wang, S.-L.; Tan, M.-X.; Wang, Z.-F.; Luo, D.-M.; Zou, B.-Q.; Liu, Y.-C. Novel tacrine platinum(II) complexes display high anticancer activity via inhibition of telomerase activity, dysfunction of mitochondria, and activation of the p53 signaling pathway. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 158, 106–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Broichhagen, J.; Jurastow, I.; Iwan, K.; Kummer, W.; Trauner, D. Optical Control of Acetylcholinesterase with a Tacrine switch. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7657–7660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Khalilzadeh, M.A.; Hosseini, A.; Tajbakhsh, M. Synthesis of Tacrine Derivatives Under Solventless Conditions. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 2007, 44, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fernández-Bachiller, M.I.; Pérez, C.; Campillo, N.E.; Páez, J.A.; González-Muñoz, G.C.; Usan, P.; García-Palomero, E.; López, M.G.; Villarroya, M.; García, A.G.; et al. Tacrine–Melatonin Hybrids as Multifunctional Agents for Alzheimer’s Disease, with Cholinergic, Antioxidant, and Neuroprotective Properties. ChemMedChem 2009, 4, 828–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Fernández-Bachiller, M.I.; Pérez, C.; González-Munoz, G.C.; Conde, S.; López, M.G.; Villarroya, M.; García, A.G.; Rodríguez-Franco, M.I. Novel Tacrine–8-hydroxyquinoline hybrids as multifunctional agents for the treatment of alzheimer’s disease, with neuroprotective, cholinergic, antioxidant, and copper-complexing properties. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 4927–4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Fernández-Bachiller, M.I.; Pérez, C.; Monjas, L.; Rademann, J.; Rodríguez-Franco, M.I. New tacrine-4-oxo-4H-chromene hybrids as multifunctional agents for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, with cholinergic, antioxidant, and β-amyloid-reducing properties. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 1303–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xie, S.-S.; Lan, J.-S.; Wang, X.-B.; Jiang, N.; Dong, G.; Li, Z.-R.; Wang, K.D.; Guo, P.-P.; Kong, L.-Y. Multifunctional tacrine– trolox hybrids for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease with cholinergic, antioxidant, neuroprotective and hepatoprotective properties. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 93, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xie, S.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Su, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Huang, L.; Li, X. Synthesis and evaluation of selegiline derivatives as monoamine oxidase inhibitor, antioxidant and metal chelator against Alzheimer’s disease. Biorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 3722–3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McElroy, C.R.; Constantinou, A.; Jones, L.C.; Summerton, L.; Clark, J.H. Towards a holistic approach to metrics for the 21th century pharmaceutical industry. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 3111–3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, H.; Song, L.; Fang, Q.; Zheng, J.; Meng, Z.; Luo, Y. Tin (IV) chloride-promoted one-pot synthesis of novel tacrine analogues. Molecules 2011, 22, 1878–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Qin, H.; Hu, X.; Wang, J.; Cheng, H.; Chen, L.; Qi, Z. Overview of the acidic deep eutectic solvents on synthesis, properties and applications. Green Energy Environ. 2020, 5, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mao, F.; Li, J.; Wei, H.; Huang, L.; Li, X. Tacrine–propargylamine derivatives with improved acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity and lower hepatotoxicity as a potential lead compound for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2015, 30, 995–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chrienova, Z.; Nepovimova, E.; Andrys, R.; Dolezal, R.; Janockova, J.; Muchova, L.; Fabova, L.; Soukup, O.; Oleksak, P.; Korabecny, J.; et al. Privileged multi-target directed propargyl-tacrines combining cholinesterase and monoamine oxidase inhibition activities. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022, 37, 2605–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Azzena, U.; Carraro, M.; Pisano, L.; Monticelli, S.; Bartolotta, R.; Pace, V. Cyclopentyl Methyl Ether: An Elective Ecofriendly Ethereal Solvent in Classical and Modern Organic Chemistry. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 40–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vitale, P.; Lavolpe, F.; Valerio, F.; Di Biase, M.; Perna, F.M.; Messina, E.; Agrimi, G.; Pisano, I.; Capriati, V. Sustainable chemo-enzymatic preparation of enantiopure (R)-β-hydroxy-1,2,3-triazoles via lactic acid bacteria-mediated bioreduction of aromatic ketones and a heterogeneous “click” cycloaddition reaction in deep eutectic solvents. React. Chem. Eng. 2020, 5, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rastegari, A.; Safavi, M.; Vafadarnejad, F.; Najafi, Z.; Hariri, R.; Bukhari, S.N.A.; Iraji, A.; Edraki, N.; Firuzi, O.; Saeedi, M.; et al. Synthesis and evaluation of novel arylisoxazoles linked to tacrine moiety: In vitro and in vivo biological activities against Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 409–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sheldon, R.A.; Bode, M.L.; Akakios, S.G. Metrics of green chemistry: Waste minimization. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 33, 100569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 01399 sch001
Scheme 1. Synthetic pathways for tacrine 3a and its derivatives (3a,c and 4) via Friedländer annulation reaction in VOCs (a,b) and (Lewis acidic) DESs (c).
Scheme 1. Synthetic pathways for tacrine 3a and its derivatives (3a,c and 4) via Friedländer annulation reaction in VOCs (a,b) and (Lewis acidic) DESs (c).
Molecules 29 01399 sch001
Molecules 29 01399 sch002
Scheme 2. Synthesis of tacrine analogue 3c from 1c and 2a in LADESs.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of tacrine analogue 3c from 1c and 2a in LADESs.
Molecules 29 01399 sch002
Molecules 29 01399 sch003
Scheme 3. Synthesis of N-propargyl-substituted tacrine derivatives (4a,c) in environmentally friendly CPME.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of N-propargyl-substituted tacrine derivatives (4a,c) in environmentally friendly CPME.
Molecules 29 01399 sch003
Molecules 29 01399 sch004
Scheme 4. Straightforward synthesis of triazole-based tacrine derivatives 7a–c by Cu-catalyzed cycloaddition reactions of N-propargyl-substituted derivatives 4a,c and in situ-formed benzyl azides 6a,b in DES.
Scheme 4. Straightforward synthesis of triazole-based tacrine derivatives 7a–c by Cu-catalyzed cycloaddition reactions of N-propargyl-substituted derivatives 4a,c and in situ-formed benzyl azides 6a,b in DES.
Molecules 29 01399 sch004
Table 1. Synthesis of tacrine 3a in eutectic mixtures a.
Table 1. Synthesis of tacrine 3a in eutectic mixtures a.
Molecules 29 01399 i001
EntryAcidic Deep Eutectic Solvents (ADESs)Yield 3a (%) b
1ChCl/Gly (1:2 mol mol−1) + ZnCl2 (20 mol%)20
2ChCl/urea (1:2 mol mol−1) + ZnCl2 (20 mol%)18
3FeCl3·6H2O/Gly (3:1 mol mol−1)23
4ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1)98 c
5FeCl3·6H2O/urea (2:1 mol mol−1)98
6PTSA/ChCl (2:1 mol mol−1)83
a General conditions: reactions performed under aerobic conditions; 1a and 2a: 1 mmol each; ADES: 1 g; ChCl: choline chloride; Gly: glycerol; PTSA: p-toluenesulfonic acid. b Isolated yield. c Reaction carried out on a 3 g scale (1a and 2a: 25.4 mmol each; DES: 15 g): 98% yield of 3a.
Table 2. Quantitative metrics calculated for both classical and DES-based approaches for the synthesis of tacrine 3a a.
Table 2. Quantitative metrics calculated for both classical and DES-based approaches for the synthesis of tacrine 3a a.
Reaction SolventYield (%)AE (%)RME (%)OE (%)EM (%)PMIRXN c
(g g−1)		PMIWU d
(g g−1)		RI eRP (%)E-Factor f
Cy, EtOAc, MeOH b989215168.37.248.312.225.220
ZnCl2/ChCl g9892899736.34.220.013.366.57
a Each synthesis of 3a was run on 25 mmol substrates. b Classical synthesis of 3a, as outlined in ref. [24]; Cy: cyclohexanone. c Process mass intensity (PMI)RXN: chemicals and reaction solvents. d Process mass intensity (PMI)WU: chemicals and reaction solvents, solvents, and reagents in workup. e Renewable sources: water, DES. f This value does not consider the amount of water solution used for work-up. g ZnCl2/ChCl (1:1 mol mol−1).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cicco, L.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V.; Vitale, P. A Sustainable Synthetic Approach to Tacrine and Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Deep Eutectic Solvents under Aerobic Conditions. Molecules 2024, 29, 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061399

AMA Style

Cicco L, Perna FM, Capriati V, Vitale P. A Sustainable Synthetic Approach to Tacrine and Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Deep Eutectic Solvents under Aerobic Conditions. Molecules. 2024; 29(6):1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cicco, Luciana, Filippo Maria Perna, Vito Capriati, and Paola Vitale. 2024. "A Sustainable Synthetic Approach to Tacrine and Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Deep Eutectic Solvents under Aerobic Conditions" Molecules 29, no. 6: 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061399

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop