Next Article in Journal
Development of Combretastatin A-4 Analogues as Potential Anticancer Agents with Improved Aqueous Solubility
Next Article in Special Issue
GC Analysis, Anticancer, and Antibacterial Activities of Secondary Bioactive Compounds from Endosymbiotic Bacteria of Pomegranate Aphid and Its Predator and Protector
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Understanding and Practical In Silico Catalyst Design in Computational Organocatalysis and Phase Transfer Catalysis—Challenges and Opportunities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effect of Brazilian Green Propolis Aqueous Extract against Dental Anaerobic Bacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Production of Active Photosynthetic and Biochemical Molecules in Silybum marianum L. Using Biotic and Abiotic Elicitors in Hydroponic Culture

by
Bismillah Mubeen
1,2,†,
Ammarah Hasnain
1,2,*,
Wang Jie
1,*,†,
Hanxian Zheng
1,
Willie J. G. M. Peijnenburg
3,4,
Shahril Efzueni Rozali
5,
Rabia Rasool
2,
Syed Atif Hasan Naqvi
6,*,
Muhammad Junaid Rao
7,
Muhammad Amir Sohail
8,
Mahmoud Moustafa
9,10,
Mohammed Al-Shehri
9 and
Sally Negm
11,12
1
Tobacco Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao 266101, China
2
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
3
Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands
4
National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Center for the Safety of Substances and Products, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
5
School of Science and Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, International University of Malaya-Wales, City Campus, Kuala Lumpur 50480, Malaysia
6
Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
7
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530006, China
8
Hubei Key Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
9
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
10
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt
11
Department of Life Sciences, College of Science and Art MahyelAseer, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
12
Unit of Food Bacteriology, Central Laboratory of Food Hygiene, Ministry of Health, Branch in Zagazig, Sharkia 11118, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2023, 28(4), 1716; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041716
Submission received: 5 January 2023 / Revised: 3 February 2023 / Accepted: 8 February 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023

Abstract

:
Elicitors are stressors that activate secondary pathways that lead to the increased production of bioactive molecules in plants. Different elicitors including the fungus Aspergillus niger (0.2 g/L), methyl jasmonate (MeJA, 100 µM/L), and silver nanoparticles (1 µg/L) were added, individually and in combination, in a hydroponic medium. The application of these elicitors in hydroponic culture significantly increased the concentration of photosynthetic pigments and total phenolic contents. The treatment with MeJA (methyl jasmonate) (100 µM/L) and the co-treatment of MeJA and AgNPs (silver nanoparticles) (100 µM/L + 1 µg/L) exhibited the highest chlorophyll a (29 µg g−1 FW) and chlorophyll b (33.6 µg g−1 FW) contents, respectively. The elicitor MeJA (100 µM/L) gave a substantial rise in chlorophyll a and b and total chlorophyll contents. Likewise, a significant rise in carotenoid contents (9 µg/g FW) was also observed when subjected to meJA (100 µM/L). For the phenolic content, the treatment with meJA (100 µM/L) proved to be very effective. Nevertheless, the highest production (431 µg/g FW) was observed when treated with AgNPs (1 µg/L). The treatments with various elicitors in this study had a significant effect on flavonoid and lignin content. The highest concentration of flavonoids and lignin was observed when MeJA (100 mM) was used as an elicitor, following a 72-h treatment period. Hence, for different plant metabolites, the treatment with meJA (100 µM/L) and a co-treatment of MeJA and AgNPs (100 µM/L + 1 µg/L) under prolonged exposure times of 120–144 h proved to be the most promising in the accretion of valuable bioactive molecules. The study opens new insights into the use of these elicitors, individually or in combination, by using different concentrations and compositions.

1. Introduction

Herbs are plants or plant parts used to treat many physiological diseases as they possess various phytochemical and remedial properties [1]. In different countries, local physicians used different herbal remedies as therapeutic agents. The herbal plant Silybum marianum L. has been found very effective to cure liver disorders. S. marianum L. (Milk thistle) is a herbaceous broadleaf plant that grows both annually and biennially and is a member of the Asteraceae family [2]. S. marianum has recently gained much attention from the scientific community as it possesses medicinal and therapeutic value [3]. The significance of S. marianum and subsequently its active constituents are evident from the list of diseases for which the plant extracts have been used as therapeutic agents [4]. The diseases such as cancer, anorexia, diabetes, hepatitis, hemorrhoids, cirrhosis, malaria, spleen disease, and estrogen-related diseases are found to be treated with the pharmacologically important metabolites obtained from S. marianum [2,3,4,5]. This plant is well-known for curing biliary and liver conditions, including liver cancer [6].
Chlorophyll pigments (chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b) are photosynthetic pigments that give plants their green color. Chlorophyll has antioxidant properties in human nutrition, and its bright color makes food more appealing to eat [7,8]. It has also been found to have anti-cancer qualities because it can prevent some carcinogenic substances from being absorbed into the gastrointestinal system [9].
Photosystems in plants are protected by carotenoids, which allow them to engage in photosynthesis [10]. Carotenoids are potent antioxidants with a wide range of health benefits, including pro-vitamin A activity, cancer prevention, improved cognitive function, and improved eye and cardiovascular health [11,12]. Immunomodulation and the prevention of degenerative diseases have also been connected to carotenoids [13]. Carotenoid-rich diets have also been linked to a lower incidence of various diseases in epidemiological studies [14].
Phenolics are a wide category of phytochemicals that includes, among other things, phenolic acids and flavonoids [15]. They are powerful antioxidants with anti-inflammatory, anti-obesity, and anti-cancer activities [12,13,14,15,16]. They have also been demonstrated to help prevent diabetes and cardiovascular disease [16]. It is the main bioactive ingredient in S. marianum to cure numerous deadly illnesses because it includes flavonoids and flavonolignans, which are recognized to have therapeutic potential in S. marianum [17,18]. Photosynthetic pigments play a fundamental role in plant defense response by increasing phenolic contents in plants [19]. In plant cells, phenolic compounds play a variety of roles, including defense against insect attack and infection by disease agents such as fungi, bacteria, and viruses [20,21], DNA protection from oxidative damage, and reductions in photo-oxidative damage to photosystems [22,23].
Lignin and flavonoids have antioxidant and antimicrobial properties and have potential use in the production of pharmaceuticals and biomedical applications. Its biocompatibility, ability to absorb UV light, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, and ability to improve the mechanical strength of processed biomaterials make it a promising candidate for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Research suggests that lignin and flavonoids could be used in the development of biomedical hydrogels, drug delivery vehicles, or biocomposites for tissue engineering and wound healing [24,25,26].
Genetic, physiological, ecological, and environmental variables all have an impact on the S. marianum secondary compounds’ production that was grown in vivo [27,28]. All of these factors cause variations in the quality and quantity of S. marianum medicinal formulations that are commercially available. As a result, a strategy for growing S. marianum in vitro with standardized quantities of physiologically active substances is needed to optimize its production [29,30]. The use of culture media has been the most popular strategy employed in recent decades to obtain improved yields in the production system [31]. Recent research suggests that several bioactive molecules and plant secondary metabolites along with various reactive oxygen species are involved in signal transduction at the cellular level when a host plant is faced with any type of biotic or abiotic stress [30].
Different elicitor treatments can be used to induce the formation of secondary metabolites in plant cells in vitro [32]. In response to elicitors, plants produce bioactive chemicals as a natural defensive mechanism. Elicitors are stressors that activate secondary pathways that lead to the production of bioactive substances. Elicitors are classified as either abiotic or biotic based on their natural state. Physical agents (e.g., UV irradiation, temperature, mechanical injury) and chemical compounds (e.g., salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and methyl jasmonate) are examples of non-biological elicitors (MeJA) [33,34,35,36]. Biotic elicitors come from a microbial or plant source, such as yeast extract, and have a biological origin [37]. In vitro, abiotic and biotic elicitors were used to rapidly produce a large number of bioactive chemicals [33]. Elicitation can also affect the creation of other bioactive substances such as vitamins and plant pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids), affecting plant organoleptic quality, particularly color [14].
Nanotechnology is an emerging technology, and the use of nanoparticles (NPs) as elicitors shows promising effects to increase secondary products in the body of plants [38]. The authors of reference [39] observed nine different types of mono- and bimetallic alloy metal NPs including gold (Au), copper (Cu), silver (Ag), silver–copper (1:3), silver–copper (3:1), silver–copper (1:3), silver–copper (3:1), silver–gold (1:3), and silver–gold (3:1) which exerted their influence on the stem and root growth, seed growth, and biochemical levels of the plant S. marianum. When the seeds were given NP suspension treatment, their growth was noticeably enhanced especially with silver nanoparticle (AgNP) suspension. The effect of AgNPs was found to be more significant among all the NPs used in mapping the conclusions of different mono- and bimetallic NPs on medicinal plant species. NPs have a significant impact on the development of hairy roots and seeds of many plants such as Lactuca sativa, Brassica napus, Zea mays, Raphanus sativus, Cucumis sativus, and Lolium multiflorum. The authors of reference [40] observed that AgNPs have a favorable impact on S. marianum as the concentration of secondary metabolites was remarkably increased in the medium. In another study, AgNPs used for Brassica juncea seeds increased seedling vigor, root, shoot height, and weight [41]. Hence, AgNPs are crucial for plant growth because they regulate numerous metabolic tracks which significantly affect phyto- chemical levels in plant cells.
Aspergillus niger is also known to play an important role as a biotic fungal elicitor for the enhancement of the synthesis of secondary metabolites in laboratory cultures [39,40]. In addition to this, methyl jasmonate (MeJA), a plant growth regulator, is also regarded as a useful biotic elicitor against different stresses. When there is any damage in plant cells, jasmonic acid and MeJA are produced in the damaged part of the plant [42].
Using a soilless growing method called hydroponics, highly nutritious media are used to cultivate plants with enough dissolved oxygen [43,44]. It is a method of soilless cultivation where the roots are submerged in water H2O enriched with mineral elements while being fixed by growing materials such as pebbles, clay, or perlite [45]. Precise and regular surveillance is necessary to improve the formation of liquid fertilizer to enhance plant production [46]. A hydroponic system can be employed to augment the production of medicinally important compounds in plants by using different elicitors. Elicitation is a promising technique for increasing phytochemical contents by activating the defense mechanism of plants [34].
There is however little information on the effects of elicitors on these metabolites in medicinal plants, specifically S. marianum (L.). This study aimed to investigate the response of S. marianum (L.) to elicitors in a hydroponics culture. Considering the medicinal importance of S. marianum’s bioactive compounds and due to the lack of information on the effects of elicitors’ application on chlorophyll, carotenoid, and total phenolic contents in S. marianum, the current study was designed to investigate biotic and abiotic elicitors’ effects on the accretion of these bioactive compounds. Moreover, a combination of different elicitors has not been studied previously on hydroponically grown medicinal plants. Therefore, in the current study, three different elicitors, i.e., MeJA, fungal elicitors, and AgNPs, were utilized to examine their impact on the buildup of bioactive chemicals in hydroponic environments, both singly and even in mixture form.

2. Results

The applied treatments had a significant impact on the chlorophyll a, b, ab, total chlorophyll, carotenoids, lignins, and flavonoid contents in S. marianum under hydroponic culture.

2.1. Weight of Treated Plants

For different treatments, no significant change in plant weight was observed, and a pairwise comparison was performed which showed no significance among the treatments used under hydroponics.

2.2. Chlorophyll a, b, ab and Total Chlorophyll Contents in Treated Plants

All the treatments showed a significant effect on chlorophyll content. The highest chlorophyll content was found in control plants after 48 h. However, as the treatment time increased, the highest chlorophyll content was found in plants treated with methyl jasmonate (100 µM/L) after 144 h. Both primacy and insignificance among the replications were revealed by the pairwise comparison of the harvests and therapies (Figure 1a and Figure 2a).
A considerable impact of various treatments was found on chlorophyll b content. The commodity with the highest concentration of chlorophyll b was AgNP (1 ppm/L)-treated plants after 120 h, whereas, after 144 h, the co-treatment of MeJA and AgNPs (100 µM/L + 1 ppm/L) was found to be more effective in enhancing chlorophyll b content. The fungal elicitors (0.2 g/L) also caused an increase in chlorophyll b content after 72 h and 120 h of treatment. MeJA (100 µM/L) also caused an increase in chlorophyll b content after 72 h of treatment. Both primacy and insignificance among the replications were revealed by the pairwise comparison of the harvests and therapies (Figure 1b and Figure 2b).
All the treatments showed a significant effect on chlorophyll a and b content. The highest concentration of chlorophyll ab was noted under the combined treatment of MeJA (100 µM/L) and fungal elicitors after 72 h. However, after long-term exposure of 144 h, MeJA (100 µM/L) application was more effective in enhancing chlorophyll ab. The combined treatment of fungal elicitors (0.2 g/L) and AgNPs (1 ppm) and MeJA (100 µM/L) also increased chlorophyll ab content after 72 h of treatment. Moreover, the combined effect of fungal elicitors (0.2 g/L) and AgNPs (1 ppm) also showed an increase in chlorophyll ab content after 72 h and 96 h of treatment. Both primacy and insignificance among the replications were revealed by the pairwise comparison of the harvests and therapies (Figure 1c and Figure 2c).
All the treatments showed a significant effect on the total chlorophyll content. Treatments were found effective only after 120 h, and among these, individual methyl jasmonate (100 µM/L) application showed the highest total chlorophyll content. Both primacy and insignificance among the replications were revealed by the pairwise comparison of the harvests and therapies (Figure 1d and Figure 2d).

2.3. Carotenoid, Total Phenolics, Lignins, and Flavonoids Content in Treated Plants

A substantial outcome of various treatments was found on carotenoid material. The highest carotenoid production has been observed under combined treatment of MeJA (100 µM/L) and silver nanoparticles (1 ppm) after 48 h of treatment. MeJA (100 µM/L) treatment also showed significantly increased production after 72 h and 120 h of treatment. Combined treatment of MeJA (100 µM/L) and fungal elicitors (0.2 g/L) also showed an increase in the carotenoid content after 72 h of treatment. AgNPs (1 ppm) showed a relentless increase in carotenoid content from 24 h to 72 h of treatment. An increase in carotenoid content was also observed under the combined treatment of fungal elicitors (0.2 g/L) and AgNPs (1 ppm) after 144 h. Both primacy and insignificance among the replications were revealed by the pairwise comparison of the harvests and therapies (Figure 3a and Figure 4a).
Under hydroponic conditions, various treatments showed a discernible increase in overall phenolics. Among different treatments, MeJA (100 µM/L), MeJA (100 µM/L) and fungal elicitors (0.2 g/L), and MeJA(100 µM/L) and AgNPs (1 ppm/L) implementations displayed an enhanced total phenolic concentration following 24 h. After 72 h, MeJA (100 µM/L) was more phenolic in total than other treatments. However, after 120 h, MeJA (100 µM/L) and MeJA (100 µM/L) and fungal elicitors (0.2 g/L) had been the most successful in increasing the total phenolic content. The highest total phenolic content was noticed after 144 h under AgNP treatment (1 ppm/L). Both primacy and insignificance among the replications were revealed by the pairwise comparison of the harvests and therapies. Pearson correlation for different phytochemical analyses of S. marianum in hydroponics culture with different treatments and principle component analysis of the effect of various treatments application in hydroponics culture to enhance phytochemicals of S. marianum has also been portrayed (Figure 3b and Figure 4b).
All the treatments showed a significant effect on the flavonoid content. The highest content was found in the plants after 72 h of treatment of MeJA (100 µM) and the control. All of the treatments almost showed good results in flavonoid production. The pairwise comparison of treatments and harvests showed both significance and non-significance among the treatments. Different letters on the bars show significant differences at p ≤ 0.05; Tukey test. The chord diagram is showing the average contribution of different treatments for the enhancement of flavonoid contents (Figure 3c and Figure 4c).
All the treatments showed a significant effect on the lignin content. The highest content was found in plants after 96 h under the combined treatment of MeJA and fungal elicitors (100 µM/L + 0.2 g/L). This treatment showed the best effect on lignin production in all six harvests. Fungal elicitors (0.2 g/L) and green-synthesized nanoparticles (1 ppm/L) separately also showed increased lignin content. Under fungal elicitor (0.2 g/L) treatment, the highest content was observed after 144 harvests. Green-synthesized nanoparticles (1 ppm/L) treatment showed the highest lignin content in harvest after 24 h. The combined treatment of MeJA and green-synthesized AgNPs (100 µM/L + 1 ppm/L) and fungal elicitors and green-synthesized AgNPs (0.2 g/L + 1 ppm/L) showed increased lignin content production in comparison to the control. The pairwise comparison of treatments and harvests showed both significance and non-significance among the treatments. Different letters on the bars show significant differences at p ≤ 0.05; Tukey test. The chord diagram shows the average contribution of different treatments for the enhancement of lignin content (Figure 3d and Figure 4d).

2.4. Principal Component Analysis

There is a high correlation among the various treatments, viz., (T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors) and the enhanced production of various secondary molecules in S. marianum. The first principal component (PC1) revealed 20.5% of the total variation. The PC2 explained 16.7% of the total variation in the enhanced production of various molecules by different treatments. The loading plots demonstrate that the relationships among various treatments with the enhanced production of various secondary molecules at different locations with a <90° angle of vectors are positively correlated and with a >90°angle of vectors are not correlated (Figure 5a,b).

3. Discussion

It has been a long-standing practice to treat patients using medicinal plants to treat a variety of ailments. Plant small molecules such as photosynthetic pigments and carotenoids play a key role in photosynthesis. The elicitation technique has commonly been used to increase the production of plants’ important bioactive compounds in parts of plant cells with special reference to medicinal plants [47]. In the present study, different types of elicitors (abiotic and biotic) have been used to enhance the production of these valuable compounds by S. marianum [48,49]. The most commonly used and effective elicitors for the stimulation of secondary metabolite production are methyl jasmonate (MeJA), fungal cells, and metallic nanoparticles [50,51]. Moreover, among different culture systems, scientists and growers claim that hydroponic systems allow plants to increase their capabilities for continuous production in a short growing period, require less space, and allow plants to be grown anywhere with a regulated growth environment [52,53]. The hydroponic technique is not seasonal, and just a few investigations on S. marianum in hydroponics have been conducted [54]. The use of elicitors under such controlled conditions is very useful for the enhanced production of secondary metabolites. MeJA and fungal elicitors increased bioactive compound production in in vitro cultures of Stemona sp. due to the increased production of stamina alkaloids [55]. Our findings are in line with the authors of references [21,56], where MeJA significantly increased the production of secondary metabolites such as total phenolics and flavonoid contents [34,57].
MeJA is considered a signaling molecule that stimulates the accumulation of essential phyto-compounds including chlorophyll and carotenoids [37]. Our results show enhanced photosynthetic pigments under the influence of MeJA, which coincides with the authors of reference [58] who reported a similar study of increased photosynthetic activity by enhancing the photosystem II machinery under MeJA application. Similar findings were observed by [55] where jasmonic acid application led to the accretion of plant pigments [56]. The results of the present study are also supported by different research groups who studied the impact of MeJA application, and the results showed that the treatment with MeJA led to increases in photosynthetic pigments under drought stress conditions compared to control plants [39,57,58,59,60]. When MeJA and AgNPs were used together, chlorophyll ab concentration reached a maximum after 72 h of exposure which was far more than the control. Hence, MeJA is proved to be an important determinant in enhancing chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in most plants [61,62].
Phenolic compounds play an important role in scavenging free radicals and protecting plants from the damaging effects of elevated ROS levels due to stress. A substantial upsurge in phenolic compounds by MeJA application has also been observed in various studies [63,64]. The maximum increase in phenolic compounds was observed in Giza 35 (soybean genotype) under MeJA treatment [1,65]. The authors of reference [66] also found that the formation of phenols in plant tissues increases under conditions of biotic stress [67]. Previous reports by the authors of reference [68] showed an increase in phenolic compounds under the effect of MeJA treatment. Therefore, our study suggested that MeJA could be used as a potential growth regulator to enhance the synthesis of these essential compounds in plants [68].
MeJA accumulates phenolic content in plant cells by regulating phenylpropanoid metabolism. MeJA stimulates three important enzymes in phenylpropanoid metabolism: Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, and 4-coumarin coenzyme A ligase [20]. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase changes L-phenylalanine into trans-cinnamic acid, and then, trans-cinnamic acid is converted into coumaric acid by cinnamate 4-hydroxylase in the presence of oxygen molecules and NADPH. Later, coumaric acid is converted into 4-country-CoA by the enzyme 4-coumarin co-enzyme A ligase. Then, 4-coumaryl co-enzyme A further acts as a substrate for the synthesis of phenols. Moreover, the enzyme polyphenol oxidase is inhibited by MeJA. This enzyme oxidizes phenolic content into highly reactive quinones. With its inhibition, the phenolic content starts to accumulate and increase in concentration. In a study by the authors of reference [69], a considerable increase in antioxidant phenolic compounds and carotenoids was found while studying the effect of exogenous MeJA application on sweet potatoes. Another study performed on Romaine lettuce also showed similar results of increased phenolic content under the effect of MeJA [70]. In Braeburn apple, the phenolic content with some other bioactive compounds increased in concentration upon the exogenous application of MeJA [39].
Metallic nanoparticles have an impact on plant photosynthetic system structure and functions. Different plant species have shown a favorable impact of NPs on various photosynthetic metrics [58,59]. In Linum usitatissimum L., AgNPs increased photosynthetic pigments. Likewise, our findings of using AgNPs as elicitors are supported by the authors of reference [71] who studied the stimulatory effect of AgNPs on potted oriental lilies where they found the accumulation of chlorophyll a and b and carotenoids in the leaves of treated plants. Our results, which show a substantial increase in all photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids) in response to treatment with AgNPs, are in agreement with the results of the authors of reference [72].
According to the authors of reference [73], AgNPs considerably boost the photosynthesis process as a result of the altered nitrogen metabolism. Furthermore, the authors of reference [74] described that the chlorophyll content of corn plants was enhanced at low concentrations (10–50 μL/L) of AgNP treatment, whereas it was suppressed at higher concentrations of AgNPs. The authors of reference [67] reported that metallic nanoparticles induce chemical energy in photosynthetic systems. The higher contents of photosynthetic pigments, i.e., chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids increase the rate of photosynthesis which, in turn, increases the weight and growth of the plant as observed in the study [67]. The author of reference [75] studied the effect of AgNPs on the fenugreek plant and discovered a rise in photosynthetic pigments as well as phenolics. The effect of biogenically generated AgNPs at appropriate concentrations on rice plant carotenoid and chlorophyll levels was explored by the authors of reference [76], and there was a considerable increase in their production. The authors of reference [77] investigated the effect of AgNPs on Linum usitatissimum L. and found that they were effective in raising carotenoid contents, and AgNPs showed a significant rise in chlorophyll concentration in recent research by the author of reference [78].
In the current study, Aspergillus niger was shown to be an effective elicitor for increasing photosynthetic pigments and total phenolics. According to a study on tomato plants, fungal elicitors showed an increase in chlorophyll, flavonoid, and total phenolic contents as well as plant dry mass [79]. A substantial rise in the chlorophyll content of plants treated with fungal elicitors was also observed. Another study by the authors of references [80,81,82,83] presented likewise results where the total phenolics were improved by Aspergillus niger. The authors of references [84,85,86,87] investigated the impact of Aspergillus niger on apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) production and discovered a 30% increase in total phenolics. Similarly, the authors of reference [88] also found a significant increase in phenolics production in sunflower and soybean crops by the application of biotic elicitors. However, there has not been much research in this area in recent years, and this research might be of potential reference to help in this case.
Our results showed that the exogenous application of MeJA in hydroponics increased flavonoid contents, which is consistent with the findings of [89], which observed increased levels of quercetin and rutin in all soybean genotypes with MeJA application. Flavonoids play a role in plant defense mechanisms [90]. These results suggest that total flavonoid contents can be controlled and modified by MeJA application, which may help plants withstand different abiotic stresses [91]. MeJA has also been found to regulate secondary metabolism by stimulating the accumulation of flavonoids, alkaloids, and phenols in plant cells [92]. The methyl ester and jasmonic acid components of MeJA are believed to be involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites like flavonoids [93]. Increased flavonoid and antioxidant activity were also observed in a study of blackberries by [94]. MeJA can regulate the expression of flavonoid genes in response to wounds, leading to increased flavonoid concentration [95]. MeJA is involved in the formation of 4-coumaryl coenzyme-A, which, when combined with malonyl coenzyme-A, forms naringeninchalcone in the presence of the enzyme naringeninchalcone synthase. Chalconoids, which are the precursors to flavonoids, have a structure similar to flavonoids, with two phenyl rings and a three-ringed structure. In a study on tomato plants, fungal elicitors increased chlorophyll contents, flavonoids, and total phenolic contents, as well as plant dry mass [96].
Lignin is a major component of plant cell walls and is a natural high molecular weight phenolic polymer with a complex composition and structure. It plays a significant role in plant growth, tissue and organ development, lodging resistance, and responses to various biotic and abiotic stresses. It also helps to prevent the spread of pathogens [97]. The elicitation of plants with elicitor molecules activates a series of defense responses, including the reinforcement of the cell wall through lignin deposition, the induction of defense enzyme activity, and the production of phenolics [98,99]. MeJA has been found to increase lignin accumulation in tea plants [100]. Histochemical staining has demonstrated the ability of AgNPs to induce lignin deposition in vascular bundles in Triticum aestivum L. Treatment with silver nanoparticles has also been shown to stimulate more intensive lignin accumulation in cell walls and improve the quality of in vitro-propagated Thymus daenensis Celak seedlings [101,102].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material, Experimental Design, Sterilization of Seeds and Sand

Seeds of S. marianum were obtained from the National Agriculture Research Centre (NARC) in Islamabad, Pakistan. The seeds were disinfected with 70% ethanol (C2H5OH) for 1 min after being washed with distilled water initially. Washing with alcohol was performed, and to remove any remaining ethanol, the seeds were once again washed 3 times with distilled water. Next, 0.01% mercuric chloride solution was employed for two min, and 4 to 5 repetitions of distilled water washing were then performed (81–82). The sand used in the study was also sterilized. For this purpose, it was repeatedly washed with distilled water. After rinsing, it was addressed with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 5 min and then washed to completely remove any sodium hypochlorite traces, repeating the process three to five times with distilled water. The sand was then dried in an oven set to 70 °C [103].

4.2. Seed Germination and Shifting to Hydroponic System

After sowing the seeds in sterile sand, the pots were kept under controlled conditions (24–25 °C, 20–700 µMol m−2s−1). The seedlings received regular watering and Hoagland solution supplements after emergence. After a fortnight of germination, the plants were reduced to 1 plant per pot and placed in a hydroponic system [104]. A setup of an air pump was added to ensure a continuous supply of oxygen [105]. The seedlings were then given 7 distinct treatments to develop in, 1 of which was designated as control (Table 1). Different elicitors were used for each treatment, whereas the control solution, devoid of the elicitors, used solely Hoagland solution as a supplement. In a completely randomized design (CRD), 5 replications for every treatment were used. For each treatment, thirty plants were placed in a hydroponic system for this objective. For each treatment, six pickups were performed, and 5 seedlings were cultivated for each harvest. The 1st harvest was completed after one day of treatment; the 2nd was completed after two days; the 3rd was completed after 3 days; the 4th was completed after 96 h; the 5th was completed after 120 h; and the 6th harvest was completed after 144 h of therapy. The treatment procedure started on 19 May 2022 (12:00 pm) and ended on 25 May 2022 (12:00 pm). The fresh weight of the leaves was measured in grams using an electronic balance.
In the research, various elicitors were applied to encourage the synthesis of secondary products. To do this in the hydroponic medium, the addition of methyl jasmonate (Sigma-Aldrich, Waltham, MA, USA) (100 µM/L), fungal elicitors (200 mg/L), and sonicated green-synthesized AgNPs (1 ppm/L) was performed singly and as a mixture of all these compounds. The green synthesis of AgNPs was performed by the reaction of silver nitrate and Fortunella margarita by slight modification in the method as described by the authors of reference [106]. For every hydroponic replication, Hoagland’s solution was already added to the pots (Figure 6). Different treatments of elicitors and their combinations are shown in Table 1. A controlled environment was provided to the plants with 24–25 °C of temperature. A pictorial representation of the study in question has been presented in Figure 1.

4.3. Phytochemical Analyses

The plants were exposed to phytochemical evaluations after harvest. The plant leaves were examined for a variety of phytochemical assays, including those for phenolic, carotenoid, and chlorophyll contents.

4.4. Chlorophyll and Carotenoid Content

Chlorophyll (a, b) and carotenoid contents were determined according to the authors of reference [107]. One gram of finely chopped fresh leaves was ground with 20–40 mL of acetone at a concentration of 80%. The sample was centrifuged for 5 min at 5000–10,000 rpm. The supernatant was transferred, and the operation was repeated until the residue was colorless, at which point, the absorbance was measured in a spectrophotometer at 663 and 645 nm. Chlorophyll a and Chlorophyll b concentrations were calculated using the formulae below for total chlorophyll and carotenoids.
Chlorophyll   a   µ g / g   FW = { 12.7   ( OD 663 2.69   OD 645 ×   V / 1000 ×   W }
Chlorophyll   b   µ g / g   FW = { 12.9   ( OD 645 4.68   OD 663 ×   V / 1000 ×   W } }
Total   chlorophyll   µ g / g   FW = [ 20.2   OD 645 8.02   OD 663 ×   V / 1000 ×   W
Carotenoids   µ g / g   FW =   OD 480 + 0.114 ×   OD 663 0.638 ×   OD 645
where, OD = Optical density; V = Volume of sample; W = Fresh weight of sample

4.5. Total Phenolic Content

The Folin–Ciocalteu method was slightly modified to determine the entire phenol concentration [108]. One gram of crushed leaves was homogenized in 80 percent aqueous ethanol at room temperature, and centrifuged in cold at 10,000× g for 15 min. The supernatants were collected, deposited on evaporating plates, and dried at room temperature after two extractions with 80 percent ethanol. The residue was 5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (previously diluted to 1:10 v/v with water) and 4 mL (75 g/L) of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3). Vortexing the material for 15 s was performed, and it was incubated at 40 °C for thirty minutes for color development. The absorbance was measured at 765 nanometers by a spectrophotometer, and the amount of total phenol content was calculated in mg/g of tannic acid (C76H52O46) equivalent using the following equation based on the calibration curve:
y = 0.1216x, r2 = 0.9365,
where x is the absorbance and y is the tannic acid equivalent (mg/g).

4.6. Determination of Lignin Content

Lignin has antioxidant and antimicrobial properties and has potential use in the production of pharmaceuticals and biomedical applications. Its biocompatibility, ability to absorb UV light, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, and ability to improve the mechanical strength of processed biomaterials make it a promising candidate for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Research suggests that lignin could be used in the development of biomedical hydrogels, drug-delivery vehicles, or bio composites for tissue engineering and wound healing [26].

4.7. Determination of Flavonoids

To measure the total flavonoid content, a protocol developed by the authors of reference [24] was followed. The extract was placed in a 10 mL volumetric flask, and distilled water was added to forma volume of 5 mL. After 5 min, 0.3 mL of sodium nitrite (NaNO2) and 0.3 mL of aluminum chloride (AlCl3) were added. After an additional 6 min, 2 mL of 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was added, and the volume was brought up to 10 mL with distilled water. The solution was mixed well, and the absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at 510 nm, with a blank as the reference. A calibration curve was used to determine the flavonoid content, which was expressed as a percentage of quercetin (C15H10O7) in the extract [25].

4.8. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis

The experiment was conducted in five replicates for each treatment, including a control, using a completely randomized design (CRD). The plants were harvested at 24 h intervals up to 144 h of exposure. Data calculations were completed using Microsoft Excel 2019®, and Origin 2021 b was used for one-way ANOVA statistical analysis. The Tukey test at the 0.05 probability level was used to determine whether there was a difference between the treatment means. Pearson correlation among treatments and variables and principal component analysis were also performed using Origin 2021b [109].

5. Conclusions

The results of this study show that several elicitors, such as the fungus Aspergillus niger (0.2 g/L), methyl jasmonate (100 M/L), and silver nanoparticles (1 ppm), had a favorable influence on the levels of photosynthetic pigments and total phenolics, both alone and in combination. Photosynthetic pigments were produced in significant amounts under MeJA, AgNPs, and a combination of MeJA and fungal elicitors and MeJA and AgNPs. Carotenoid production was also substantial under MeJA and a combination of MeJA and AgNPs and MeJA and fungal elicitors, respectively. However, in the case of total phenolics, AgNPs, a combination of meJA and fungal elicitors, and MeJA treatment showed the best result among all other combinations. We may, therefore, infer that using elicitors to treat S. marianum in hydroponic culture could be a useful method for researching how plants quickly increase metabolite synthesis in reaction to diverse stress events to control their metabolism. Increasing the production of medicinally important bioactive molecules and compounds is the need of the hour. It is, therefore, recommended that the elicitors which produced promising results can be used for further studies in different concentrations and on different pharmacologically important plants to augment the synthesis of phytocompounds that have medicinal and therapeutic importance. In contrast to other biotechnological processes, hydroponics is inexpensive and less time-consuming. These elicitors ought to be used with a variety of medicinally effective crops cultivated in a variety of growth mediums and environments, such as tissue culture, sand culture, Petriplate culture, soil culture, and hydroponics. Additionally, there is avariety of other kinds of nanoparticles in a range of sizes that can be used in numerous investigations. Hence, extraordinary results might be achieved in future studies with the use of various cultural techniques and types of elicitors. Furthermore, a study on the combined application of elicitors is required, as novel compositions of potential elicitors might be explored by experimenting with different combinations of elicitors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: B.M., A.H., W.J. and R.R.; Methodology: B.M., A.H. and R.R.; Software: S.A.H.N.; Validation: A.H., Formal analysis: S.A.H.N.; Investigation: A.H., B.M. and R.R.; Resources: A.H.; Writing—original draft: B.M., A.H., R.R. and S.A.H.N.; Review and editing: W.J.G.M.P., S.E.R., W.J., H.Z., M.A.-S., M.J.R., M.M., M.A.S. and S.N.; Supervision: W.J., A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and APC was funded by Wang Jie and Hanxian Zheng (YDZX2022162) through the Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Shandong and Gansu and Mahmoud Moustafa, Mohammed Al-Shehri and Sally Negm (RGP. 2/90/43) by the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Shandong and Gansu (YDZX2022162), and the authors extend sincere thanks to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia for funding this work under grant No. (RGP. 2/90/43).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmad, N.; Fazal, H.; Abbasi, B.H.; Anwar, S.; Basir, A. DPPH free radical scavenging activity and phenotypic difference in hepatoprotective plant (Silybum marianum L.). Toxicol. Ind. Health 2013, 29, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Roustakhiz, J.; Saboki, E. Plant tissue culture of Silybum marianum L. and check out elicitor effect on the amount of silymarin. J. Nov. Appl. Sci. 2016, 5, 161–168. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jain, S.K.; DeFilipps, R.A. Medicinal Plants of India; Reference Publications: Algonac, MI, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali, M.; Khan, T.; Fatima, K.; Ali, Q.U.A.; Ovais, M.; Khalil, A.T.; Ullah, I.; Raza, A.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Idrees, M. Selected hepatoprotective herbal medicines: Evidence from ethnomedicinal applications, animal models, and possible mechanism of actions. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sprouse, A.A.; van Breemen, R.B. Pharmacokinetic interactions between drugs and botanical dietary supplements. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2016, 44, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Karkanis, A.; Bilalis, D.; Efthimiadou, A. Cultivation of milk thistle (Silybum marianum L. Gaertn.), a medicinal weed. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 34, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ventura, Y.; Wuddineh, W.A.; Myrzabayeva, M.; Alikulov, Z.; Khozin-Goldberg, I.; Shpigel, M.; Samocha, T.M. Effect of seawater concentration on the productivity and nutritional value of annual Salicornia and perennial Sarcocornia halophytes as leafy vegetable crops. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 128, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pangestuti, R.; Kim, S.-K. Biological activities and health benefit effects of natural pigments derived from marine algae. J. Funct. Foods 2011, 3, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Egner, P.A.; Muñoz, A.; Kensler, T.W. Chemoprevention with chlorophyllin in individuals exposed to dietary aflatoxin. Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2003, 523, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Souza, M.M.; Mendes, C.R.; Doncato, K.B.; Badiale-Furlong, E.; Costa, C.S. Growth, phenolics, photosynthetic pigments, and antioxidant response of two new genotypes of sea asparagus (Salicornia neei Lag.) to salinity under greenhouse and field conditions. Agriculture 2018, 8, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eggersdorfer, M.; Wyss, A. Carotenoids in human nutrition and health. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2018, 652, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ksouri, R.; Ksouri, W.M.; Jallali, I.; Debez, A.; Magné, C.; Hiroko, I.; Abdelly, C. Medicinal halophytes: Potent source of health promoting biomolecules with medical, nutraceutical and food applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2012, 32, 289–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bernal, J.; Mendiola, J.; Ibáñez, E.; Cifuentes, A. Advanced analysis of nutraceuticals. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2011, 55, 758–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Złotek, U.; Świeca, M.; Jakubczyk, A. Effect of abiotic elicitation on main health-promoting compounds, antioxidant activity and commercial quality of butter lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Food Chem. 2014, 148, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Castañeda-Loaiza, V.; Oliveira, M.; Santos, T.; Schüler, L.; Lima, A.R.; Gama, F.; Salazar, M.; Neng, N.R.; Nogueira, J.M.F.; Varela, J.; et al. Wild vs. cultivated halophytes: Nutritional and functional differences. Food Chem. 2020, 333, 127536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Khoddami, A.; Wilkes, M.A.; Roberts, T.H. Techniques for analysis of plant phenolic compounds. Molecules 2013, 18, 2328–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sun, J.; Li, X.; Yu, X. Antioxidant activities, total flavonoids and phenolics content in different parts of Silybum marianum plants. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2016, 55, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  18. Marceddu, R.; Dinolfo, L.; Carrubba, A.; Sarno, M.; Di Miceli, G. Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum L.) as a Novel Multipurpose Crop for Agriculture in Marginal Environments: A Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, P.; Fang, Y. Composition of photosynthetic pigments and photosynthetic characteristics in green and yellow sectors of the variegated Aucuba japonica ‘Variegata’ leaves. Flora 2018, 240, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guan, Y.; Hu, W.; Jiang, A.; Xu, Y.; Sa, R.; Feng, K.; Zhao, M.; Yu, J.; Ji, Y.; Hou, M.; et al. Effect of methyl jasmonate on phenolic accumulation in wounded broccoli. Molecules 2019, 24, 3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ho, T.-T.; Murthy, H.N.; Park, S.-Y. Methyl jasmonate induced oxidative stress and accumulation of secondary metabolites in plant cell and organ cultures. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdelgawad, Z.; Khalafaallah, A.A.; Abdallah, M. Impact of methyl jasmonate on antioxidant activity and some biochemical aspects of maize plant grown under water stress condition. Agric. Sci. 2014, 5, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, J.; Davis, L.C.; Verpoorte, R. Elicitor signal transduction leading to production of plant secondary metabolites. Biotechnol. Adv. 2005, 23, 283–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Iiyama, K.; Wallis, A.F.A. Determination of lignin in herbaceous plants by an improved acetyl bromide procedure. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1990, 51, 145–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Domínguez-Robles, J.; Stewart, S.A.; Rendl, A.; Gonzalez, Z.; Donnelly, R.F.; Larraneta, E. Lignin and cellulose blends as pharmaceutical excipient for tablet manufacturing via direct compression. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Domínguez-Robles, J.; Cárcamo-Martínez, Á.; Stewart, S.A.; Donnelly, R.F.; Larrañeta, E.; Borrega, M. Lignin for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications–Could this become a reality? Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2020, 18, 100320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maggini, R.; Kiferle, C.; Pardossi, A. Hydroponic production of medicinal plants. In Medicinal Plants: Antioxidant Properties, Traditional Uses and Conservation Strategies; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 91–116. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mahanom, J. Enhancement and Isolation of Zerumbone in Zingiber zerumbet (L.) Smith Cell Suspension and Adventitious Root Cultures. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malasiya, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  29. Graf, T.N.; Wani, M.C.; Agarwal, R.; Kroll, D.J.; Oberlies, N.H. Gram-scale purification of flavonolignan diastereoisomers from Silybum marianum (Milk Thistle) extract in support of preclinical in vivo studies for prostate cancer chemoprevention. Planta Med. 2007, 73, 1495–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bekheet, S. In vitro biomass production of liver-protective compounds from Globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) and Milk thistle (Silybum marianum) plants. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2011, 23, 473. [Google Scholar]
  31. Del Campo, J.A.; García-González, M.; Guerrero, M.G. Outdoor cultivation of microalgae for carotenoid production: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 74, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weathers, P.J.; Towler, M.J.; Xu, J. Bench to batch: Advances in plant cell culture for producing useful products. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 1339–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Welchen, E.; Canal, M.V.; Gras, D.E.; Gonzalez, D.H. Cross-talk between mitochondrial function, growth, and stress signalling pathways in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 4102–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Naik, P.M.; Al-Khayri, J.M. Abiotic and Biotic Elicitors-role in Secondary Metabolites Production through In Vitro Culture of Medicinal Plants. In Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants—Recent Advances and Future Perspectives; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2016; pp. 247–277. [Google Scholar]
  35. Alsoufi, A.S.M.; Pączkowski, C.; Długosz, M.; Szakiel, A. Influence of selected abiotic factors on triterpenoid biosynthesis and saponin secretion in marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) in vitro hairy root cultures. Molecules 2019, 24, 2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Makowski, W.; Tokarz, K.M.; Tokarz, B.; Banasiuk, R.; Witek, K.; Królicka, A. Elicitation-based method for increasing the production of antioxidant and bactericidal phenolics compounds in Dionaea muscipula J. Ellis tissue. Molecules 2020, 25, 1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Donaldson, K.; Stone, V.; Tran, C.; Kreyling, W.; Borm, P.J. Nanotoxicology. Occup. Environ. Med. 2004, 61, 727–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Khan, I.; AbdElsalam, N.M.; Fouad, H.; Tariq, A.; Ullah, R.; Adnan, M. Application of ethnobotanical indices on the use of traditional medicines against common diseases. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 635371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Miclea, I.; Suhani, A.; Zahan, M.; Bunea, A. Effect of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid on growth and biochemical composition of in-vitro-propagated Lavandula angustifolia Mill. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma, P.; Bhatt, D.; Zaidi, M.; Saradhi, P.P.; Khanna, P.; Arora, S. Silver nanoparticle-mediated enhancement in growth and antioxidant status of Brassica juncea. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167, 2225–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Öztürk, B.; Özkan, Y.; Yildiz, K. Methyl jasmonate treatments influence bioactive compounds and red peel color development of Braeburn apple. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2014, 38, 688–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thakur, M.; Sohal, B.S. Role of elicitors in inducing resistance in plants against pathogen infection: A review. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2013, 2013, 762412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sharma, T.; Velmurugan, N.; Patel, P.; Chon, B.; Sangwai, J. Use of oil-in-water pickering emulsion stabilized by nanoparticles in combination with polymer flood for enhanced oil recovery. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2015, 33, 1595–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, C.; Chen, K.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Shen, C.; Zhu, Y.; Dai, M.; Qiu, X.; Yang, R.; Xing, D.; et al. Identification of genes for salt tolerance and yield-related traits in rice plants grown hydroponically and under saline field conditions by genome-wide association study. Rice 2019, 12, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Roberto, K. How-to Hydroponics; Futuregarden, Inc.: Lindenhurst, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lee, J.Y.; Yang, H.; Lee, T.K.; Lee, C.H.; Seo, J.W.; Kim, J.-E.; Kim, S.Y.; Park, J.H.Y.; Lee, K.W. A short-term, hydroponic-culture of ginseng results in a significant increase in the anti-oxidative activity and bioactive components. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 1007–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Maucieri, C.; Nicoletto, C.; Van Os, E.; Anseeuw, D.; Van Havermaet, R.; Junge, R. Hydroponic technologies. Aquaponics Food Prod. Syst. 2019, 10, 77. [Google Scholar]
  48. Jung, D.-H.; Kim, H.-J.; Cho, W.-J.; Park, S.H.; Yang, S.-H. Validation testing of an ion-specific sensing and control system for precision hydroponic macronutrient management. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 156, 660–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mabel, T.-G.D.; Javier, S.-A.E.; Cynthia, G.-P.I.; Jorge, W.-P.; Romeo, R.; Guadal, M.-Á.G.C. Antioxidant profile of different types of herbal infusions and teas commercially available in Mexico. Am. Acad. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2017, 31, 67–77. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ashtiani, S.R.; Hasanloo, T.; Bihamta, M. Enhanced production of silymarin by Ag+ elicitor in cell suspension cultures of Silybum marianum. Pharm. Biol. 2010, 48, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Asma, M.; Lingakumar, K. Jasmonate foliar spray induced vegetative growth and pigment composition in Vigna Radiata, L. WILCZEK. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 3, 664–669. [Google Scholar]
  52. Li, X.; Sun, H.; Mao, X.; Lao, Y.; Chen, F. Enhanced photosynthesis of carotenoids in microalgae driven by light-harvesting gold nanoparticles. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 7600–7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tighe-Neira, R.; Carmora, E.; Recio, G.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Reyes-Diaz, M.; Alberdi, M.; Rengel, Z.; Inostroza-Blancheteau, C. Metallic nanoparticles influence the structure and function of the photosynthetic apparatus in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 130, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rivero-Montejo, S.d.J.; Vargas-Hernandez, M.; Torres-Pacheco, I. Nanoparticles as novel elicitors to improve bioactive compounds in plants. Agriculture 2021, 11, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Aires, A. Hydroponic production systems: Impact on nutritional status and bioactive compounds of fresh vegetables. In Vegetables: Importance of Quality Vegetables to Human Health; InTech Open: London, UK, 2018; p. 55. [Google Scholar]
  56. Partap, M.; Rattan, S.; Sood, A.; Kumar, P.; Warghat, A.R. Hydroponic and Aeroponic Cultivation of Economically Important Crops for Production of Quality Biomass. In Agricultural Biotechnology: Latest Research and Trends; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 573–585. [Google Scholar]
  57. Paradiso, R.; Arena, C.; De Micco, V.; Giordano, M.; Aronne, G.; De Pascale, S. Changes in leaf anatomical traits enhanced photosynthetic activity of soybean grown in hydroponics with plant growth-promoting microorganisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chaichana, N.; Dheeranupattana, S. Effects of methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid onalkaloid production from in vitro culture of Stemona sp. Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinform. 2012, 2, 146. [Google Scholar]
  59. Creelman, R.A.; Mullet, J.E. Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1997, 48, 355–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ghanati, F.; Bakhtiarian, S.; Parast, B.M.; Behrooz, M.K. Production of new active phytocompounds by Achillea millefolium L. after elicitation with silver nanoparticles and methyl jasmonate. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2014, 11, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sirhindi, G.; Mushtaq, R.; Gill, S.S.; Sharma, P.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Ahmad, P. Jasmonic acid and methyl jasmonate modulate growth, photosynthetic activity and expression of photosystem II subunit genes in Brassica oleracea L. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Govorov, A.O.; Carmeli, I. Hybrid structures composed of photosynthetic system and metal nanoparticles: Plasmon enhancement effect. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 620–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kim, H.-J.; Fonseca, J.M.; Choi, J.-H.; Kubota, C. Effect of methyl jasmonate on phenolic compounds and carotenoids of romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10366–10372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Luo, H.; He, W.; Li, D.; Bao, Y.; Riaz, A.; Xiao, Y.; Song, J.; Liu, C. Effect of methyl jasmonate on carotenoids biosynthesis in germinated maize kernels. Food Chem. 2020, 307, 125525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mei, X. Production of Taxol by Taxus chinensis Cell Culture; Press of the Scientific University of Central China: Wuhan, China, 2003; p. 89. [Google Scholar]
  66. Chen, D.; Mubeen, B.; Hasnain, A.; Rizwan, M.; Adrees, M.; Naqvi, S.A.H.; Iqbal, S.; Kamran, M.; El-Sabrout, A.M.; Elansary, H.O.; et al. Role of Promising Secondary Metabolites to Confer Resistance Against Environmental Stresses in Crop Plants: Current Scenario and Future Perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 881032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Racuciu, M.; Creanga, D.-E. TMA-OH coated magnetic nanoparticles internalized in vegetal tissue. Rom. J. Phys. 2007, 52, 395. [Google Scholar]
  68. Afaq, F.; Adhami, V.M.; Ahmad, N.; Mukhtar, H. Botanical antioxidants for chemoprevention of photocarcinogenesis. Front. Biosci. A J. Virtual Libr. 2002, 7, d784–d792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, J.W.; Wu, J.Y. Effective elicitors and process strategies for enhancement of secondary metabolite production in hairy root cultures. Biotechnol. Hairy Root Syst. 2013, 134, 55–89. [Google Scholar]
  70. Petridis, A.; Therios, I.; Samouris, G.; Koundouras, S.; Giannakoula, A. Effect of water deficit on leaf phenolic composition, gas exchange, oxidative damage and antioxidant activity of four Greek olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 60, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yoshida, C.H.P.; Pacheco, A.C.; Lapaz, A.d.M.; Gorni, P.H.; Vítolo, H.F.; Bertoli, S.C. Methyl jasmonate modulation reduces photosynthesis and induces synthesis of phenolic compounds in sweet potatoes subjected to drought. Bragantia 2020, 79, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Salachna, P.; Byczyńska, A.; Zawadzińska, A.; Piechocki, R.; Mizielińska, M. Stimulatory effect of silver nanoparticles on the growth and flowering of potted oriental lilies. Agronomy 2019, 9, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Farghaly, F.A.; Nafady, N.A. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using leaf extract of Rosmarinus officinalis and its effect on tomato and wheat plants. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 7, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lateef, A.; Ojo, S.A.; Elegbede, J.A.; Azeez, M.A.; Yekeen, T.A.; Akinboro, A. Evaluation of some biosynthesized silver nanoparticles for biomedical applications: Hydrogen peroxide scavenging, anticoagulant and thrombolytic activities. J. Clust. Sci. 2017, 28, 1379–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sadak, M.S. Impact of silver nanoparticles on plant growth, some biochemical aspects, and yield of fenugreek plant (Trigonella foenum-graecum). Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019, 43, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sultana, T.; Javed, B.; Raja, N.I. Silver nanoparticles elicited physiological, biochemical, and antioxidant modifications in rice plants to control Aspergillus flavus. Green Process. Synth. 2021, 10, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Khalofah, A.; Kilany, M.; Migdadi, H. Phytostimulatory influence of Comamonas testosteroni and silver nanoparticles on Linum usitatissimum L. under salinity stress. Plants 2021, 10, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hajian, M.H.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Abtahi, F.; Hadian, J. Differential effects of biogenic and chemically synthesized silver-nanoparticles application on physiological traits, antioxidative status and californidine content in California poppy (Eschscholzia californica Cham). Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ghorbani, A.; Razavi, S.; Omran, V.G.; Pirdashti, H. Piriformospora indica alleviates salinityby boosting redox poise and antioxidative potential of tomato. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 65, 898–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shawky, B.T.; Nagah, M.; Ghareeb, M.A.; El-Sherbiny, G.M.; Moghannem, S.A.; Abdel-Aziz, M.S. Evaluation of antioxidants, total phenolics and antimicrobial activities of ethyl acetate extracts from Fungi grown on rice straw. J. Renew. Mater. 2019, 7, 662–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dulf, F.V.; Vodnar, D.C.; Dulf, E.-H.; Pintea, A. Phenolic compounds, flavonoids, lipids and antioxidant potential of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) pomace fermented by two filamentous fungal strains in solid state system. Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ismail; Hamayun, M.; Hussain, A.; Iqbal, A.; Khan, S.A.; Lee, I.-J. Aspergillus niger boosted heat stress tolerance in sunflower and soybean via regulating their metabolic and antioxidant system. J. Plant Interact. 2020, 15, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ramakrishna, N.; Lacey, J.; Smith, J. Effect of surface sterilization, fumigation and gamma irradiation on the microflora and germination of barley seeds. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1991, 13, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ahmad, M.; Nangyal, H.; Imran, M.; Ullah, F. Optimization of protocol for surface sterilization and callus induction for three rice varieties. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2016, 16, 357–361. [Google Scholar]
  85. Mohamed, H.I.; Latif, H.H. Improvement of drought tolerance of soybean plants by using methyl jasmonate. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2017, 23, 545–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dixon, R.A.; Paiva, N.L. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Karami, A.; Shahbazi, M.; Niknam, V.; Shobbar, Z.S.; Tafreshi, R.S.; Abedini, R.; Mabood, H.E. Expression analysis of dehydrin multigene family across tolerant and susceptible barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in response to terminal drought stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 2289–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yan, Y.; Borrego, E.; Kolomiets, M.V. Jasmonate biosynthesis, perception and function in plant development and stress responses. In Lipid Metabolism; InTech: London, UK, 2013; pp. 393–442. [Google Scholar]
  89. Jasim, B.; Thomas, R.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E. Plant growth and diosgenin enhancement effect of silver nanoparticles in Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Saudi Pharm. J. 2017, 25, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jiang, H.S.; Qiu, X.N.; Li, G.B.; Li, W.; Yin, L.Y. Silver nanoparticles induced accumulation of reactive oxygen species and alteration of antioxidant systems in the aquatic plant Spirodelapolyrhiza. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 1398–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Harinasut, P.; Poonsopa, D.; Roengmongkol, K.; Charoensataporn, R. Salinity effects on antioxidant enzymes in mulberry cultivar. Sci. Asia 2003, 29, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Horbowicz, M.; Chrzanowski, G.; Koczkodaj, D.; Mitrus, J. The effect of methyl jasmonate vapors on content of phenolic compounds in seedlings of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2011, 80, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, S.Y.; Bowman, L.; Ding, M. Methyl jasmonate enhances antioxidant activity and flavonoid content in blackberries (Rubus sp.) and promotes antiproliferation of human cancer cells. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tamari, G.; Borochov, A.; Atzorn, R.; Weiss, D. Methyl jasmonate induces pigmentation and flavonoid gene expression in petunia corollas: A possible role in wound response. Physiol. Plant. 1995, 94, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hossain, S.A.A.M.; Lixue, W.; Taotao, C.; Zhenhua, L. Leaf area index assessment for tomato and cucumber growing period under different water treatments. Plant Soil Environ. 2017, 63, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, C.F.; Yang, N.; Teng, R.M.; Li, J.W.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Z.H.; Li, T.; Zhuang, J. Exogenous methyl jasmonate and cytokinin antagonistically regulate lignin biosynthesis by mediating CsHCT expression in Camellia sinensis. Protoplasma 2022, 259, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Desender, S.; Andrivon, D.; Val, F. Activation of defence reactions in Solanaceae: Where is the specificity? Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chandra, S.; Chakraborty, N.; Chakraborty, A.; Rai, R.; Bera, B.; Acharya, K. Abiotic elicitor-mediated improvement of innate immunity in Camellia sinensis. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liu, Q.; Luo, L.; Zheng, L. Lignins: Biosynthesis and biological functions in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Bernard, F.; Moghadam, N.N.; Mirzahani, F. The effect of colloidal silver nanoparticles on the level of lignification and hyperhydricity syndrome in Thymus deanensis vitro shoots: A possibile involvement of bonded polyamines. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2015, 51, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mishra, S.; Singh, B.R.; Singh, A.; Keswani, C.; Naqvi, A.H.; Singh, H.B. Biofabricated silver nanoparticles act as a strong fungicide against Bipolaris sorokiniana causing spot blotch disease in wheat. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Baenas, N.; García-Viguera, C.; Moreno, D.A. Elicitation: A tool for enriching the bioactive composition of foods. Molecules 2014, 19, 13541–13563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fukuzaki, S. Mechanisms of actions of sodium hypochlorite in cleaning and disinfection processes. Biocontrol Sci. 2006, 11, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mubeen, B.; Ali, Q.; Hasnain, A.; Malik, A. Enrichment of Therapeutically Significant Flavonolignans of Silybum marianum in Vegetative Parts by Applying Fungal Elicitors, Methyl Jasmonate and Silver Nanoparticles as Elicitor in Hydroponic Culture. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 2021, 33, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Nguyen, N.T.; McInturf, S.A.; Mendoza-Cózatl, D.G. Hydroponics: A versatile system to study nutrient allocation and plant responses to nutrient availability and exposure to toxic elements. J. Vis. Exp. 2016, 113, e54317. [Google Scholar]
  106. Al-Kalifawi, E.J.; Hasan, S.A.; Al-Saadi, T.M.; AlObodi, E.E. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles by kumquat (Fortunella margaarita) fruit extract and efficacy the antimicrobial activity. J. Al-Fath 2015, 97, 977–983. [Google Scholar]
  107. Arnon, D.I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Portu, J.; López, R.; Santamaría, P.; Garde-Cerdán, T. Methyl jasmonate treatment to increase grape and wine phenolic content in Tempranillo and Graciano varieties during two growing seasons. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 240, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Steel, R.G.; Torrie, J.H.; Dickey, D.A. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: Biometrical Approach, 3rd ed.; McGraw Hill Book International Co.: Singapore, 1997. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effect of different treatments of elicitors on chlorophyll a (a), b (b), and ab (c) and total chlorophyll (d) contents of Silybum marianum in hydroponics where harvest time on x-axis, first = one day (24 h), second = 48 h, third = 72 h, fourth = 96 h, fifth = 120 h, sixth = 144 h, where (T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors); different letters on the bars indicate a difference that was significant at p > 0.05; Tukey test.
Figure 1. Effect of different treatments of elicitors on chlorophyll a (a), b (b), and ab (c) and total chlorophyll (d) contents of Silybum marianum in hydroponics where harvest time on x-axis, first = one day (24 h), second = 48 h, third = 72 h, fourth = 96 h, fifth = 120 h, sixth = 144 h, where (T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors); different letters on the bars indicate a difference that was significant at p > 0.05; Tukey test.
Molecules 28 01716 g001
Figure 2. Chord diagram showing effect of different treatments of elicitors on chlorophyll a (a), b (b), and ab (c) and total chlorophyll (d) contents of Silybum marianum in hydroponics where harvest time on x-axis, first = one day (24 h), second = 48 h, third = 72 h, fourth = 96 h, fifth = 120 h, sixth = 144 h, where (T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors).
Figure 2. Chord diagram showing effect of different treatments of elicitors on chlorophyll a (a), b (b), and ab (c) and total chlorophyll (d) contents of Silybum marianum in hydroponics where harvest time on x-axis, first = one day (24 h), second = 48 h, third = 72 h, fourth = 96 h, fifth = 120 h, sixth = 144 h, where (T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors).
Molecules 28 01716 g002
Figure 3. Effect of different treatments of elicitors on Carotenoids (a), Phenolics (b), Flavonoids (c), and Lignin (d) contents of Silybum marianum in hydroponics where harvest time on x-axis, first = one day (24 h), second = 48 h, third = 72 h, fourth = 96 h, fifth = 120 h, sixth = 144 h, where (T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors); different letters on the bars indicate a difference that was significant at p > 0.05; Tukey test.
Figure 3. Effect of different treatments of elicitors on Carotenoids (a), Phenolics (b), Flavonoids (c), and Lignin (d) contents of Silybum marianum in hydroponics where harvest time on x-axis, first = one day (24 h), second = 48 h, third = 72 h, fourth = 96 h, fifth = 120 h, sixth = 144 h, where (T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors); different letters on the bars indicate a difference that was significant at p > 0.05; Tukey test.
Molecules 28 01716 g003
Figure 4. Chord diagram showing effect of different treatments of elicitors on Carotenoids (a), Phenolics (b), Flavonoids (c), and Lignin (d) contents of Silybum marianum in hydroponics where Harvest time on x-axis, First = One day (24 h), second = 48 h. Third = 72 h. Fourth = 96 h. Fifth = 120 h. Six = 144 h.where(T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors).
Figure 4. Chord diagram showing effect of different treatments of elicitors on Carotenoids (a), Phenolics (b), Flavonoids (c), and Lignin (d) contents of Silybum marianum in hydroponics where Harvest time on x-axis, First = One day (24 h), second = 48 h. Third = 72 h. Fourth = 96 h. Fifth = 120 h. Six = 144 h.where(T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors).
Molecules 28 01716 g004
Figure 5. (a) Pearson correlation for different phytochemical analysesof Silybum marianum in hydroponics culture with different treatments where (T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors). (b) Principal component analysis of the effect of various treatments application in hydroponics culture to enhance phytochemicals of Silybum marianum.
Figure 5. (a) Pearson correlation for different phytochemical analysesof Silybum marianum in hydroponics culture with different treatments where (T0 = control, T1 = methyl jasmonate, T2 = silver nanoparticles, T3 = fungal elicitors, T4 = methyl jasmonate + fungal elicitors, T5 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles, T6 = fungal elicitors + silver nanoparticles, T7 = methyl jasmonate + silver nanoparticles + fungal elicitors). (b) Principal component analysis of the effect of various treatments application in hydroponics culture to enhance phytochemicals of Silybum marianum.
Molecules 28 01716 g005
Figure 6. Schematic representation of experiments conducted for study in hydroponics.
Figure 6. Schematic representation of experiments conducted for study in hydroponics.
Molecules 28 01716 g006
Table 1. All the treatments with tags used for the experiment.
Table 1. All the treatments with tags used for the experiment.
Sr. No. TreatmentsTags
1ControlT0
2MeJAT1
3Fungal elicitorsT2
4Green-synthesized AgNPsT3
5MeJA + Fungal elicitorsT4
6MeJA + Green-synthesized AgNPsT5
7Fungal elicitors + Green-synthesized AgNPsT6
8Fungal elicitors + Green-synthesized AgNPs + MeJAT7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mubeen, B.; Hasnain, A.; Jie, W.; Zheng, H.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M.; Rozali, S.E.; Rasool, R.; Naqvi, S.A.H.; Rao, M.J.; Sohail, M.A.; et al. Enhanced Production of Active Photosynthetic and Biochemical Molecules in Silybum marianum L. Using Biotic and Abiotic Elicitors in Hydroponic Culture. Molecules 2023, 28, 1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041716

AMA Style

Mubeen B, Hasnain A, Jie W, Zheng H, Peijnenburg WJGM, Rozali SE, Rasool R, Naqvi SAH, Rao MJ, Sohail MA, et al. Enhanced Production of Active Photosynthetic and Biochemical Molecules in Silybum marianum L. Using Biotic and Abiotic Elicitors in Hydroponic Culture. Molecules. 2023; 28(4):1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041716

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mubeen, Bismillah, Ammarah Hasnain, Wang Jie, Hanxian Zheng, Willie J. G. M. Peijnenburg, Shahril Efzueni Rozali, Rabia Rasool, Syed Atif Hasan Naqvi, Muhammad Junaid Rao, Muhammad Amir Sohail, and et al. 2023. "Enhanced Production of Active Photosynthetic and Biochemical Molecules in Silybum marianum L. Using Biotic and Abiotic Elicitors in Hydroponic Culture" Molecules 28, no. 4: 1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041716

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop