Next Article in Journal
Discovery of a Potent Highly Biased MOR Partial Agonist among Diastereomeric C9-Hydroxyalkyl-5-phenylmorphans
Previous Article in Journal
Phytochemical Profiling, Antioxidant and Tyrosinase Regulatory Activities of Extracts from Herb, Leaf and In Vitro Culture of Achillea millefolium (Yarrow)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 12
10.3390/molecules28124794
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Aroma Fingerprint of Various Chinese Pear Cultivars through Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Volatile Compounds Using HS-SPME and GC×GC-TOFMS

by
Wenjun Zhang
1,2,
Mengmeng Yan
1,2,
Xinxin Zheng
3,
Zilei Chen
1,2,
Huidong Li
1,2,
Jiangsheng Mao
1,2,
Hongwei Qin
1,2,
Chao Zhu
1,2,
Hongxia Du
1,2,* and
A. M. Abd El-Aty
4,5
1
Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji’nan 250100, China
2
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory Test Technology on Food Quality and Safety, Ji’nan 250100, China
3
School of Bioengineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Ji’nan 250353, China
4
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza 12211, Egypt
5
Department of Medical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(12), 4794; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124794
Submission received: 18 May 2023 / Revised: 13 June 2023 / Accepted: 13 June 2023 / Published: 15 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Analysis of Flavors and Fragrances: Chemistry, Properties and Applications in Food Quality Improvement)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To comprehensively understand the volatile compounds and assess the aroma profiles of different types of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. Anli, Dongmili, Huagai, Jianbali, Jingbaili, Jinxiangshui, and Nanguoli were detected via headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS). The aroma composition, total aroma content, proportion and number of different aroma types, and the relative quantities of each compound were analyzed and evaluated. The results showed that 174 volatile aroma compounds were detected in various cultivars, mainly including esters, alcohols, aldehydes, and alkenes: Jinxiangshui had the highest total aroma content at 2825.59 ng/g; and Nanguoli had the highest number of aroma species detected at 108. The aroma composition and content varied among pear varieties, and the pears could be divided into three groups based on principal component analysis. Twenty-four kinds of aroma scents were detected; among them, fruit and aliphatic were the main fragrance types. The proportions of aroma types also varied among different varieties, visually and quantitatively displaying changes of the whole aroma of the different varieties of pears brought by the changes in aroma composition. This study contributes to further research on volatile compound analysis, and provides useful data for the improvement of fruit sensory quality and breeding work.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim is a pear species native to northeastern China that is known for its cold and drought resistance and the ability to grow in barren areas [1]. It is the primary pear cultivated in cold regions of China, with oblate or nearly round fruits that can be green, yellow, or yellowish-green, and red on the sunny side. Nanguoli, the most commonly grown cultivar, covers approximately 72,000 hectares of land and yields approximately 400,000 tons in China [2]. The fruits of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim typically require postripening to develop a rich and excellent flavor [3]. Varieties such as Nanguoli and Jianbali are also suitable for producing high-quality frozen pears with good sour and sweet flavors [4]. In addition to its distinctive quality [5], Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim has various beneficial properties, such as acaricidal, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory effects [6,7,8], which can help alleviate cough, gout, and rheumatoid arthritis. Researchers have found that Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim contains higher levels of polyphenols and triterpenic acids than other pear species [9], making it an excellent candidate for breeding purposes.
The scent of fruit is a crucial factor that affects the overall aroma and consumer preference [10]. It originates from the secondary metabolites of plants, which is an essential part of fruit quality and reflects the differences between species and varieties [11]. The analysis and evaluation of fruit aroma can aid in variety identification, quality assessment, breeding, and fruit processing [12,13,14,15]. Numerous studies have explored the composition of volatile aroma in pears and have shown that the aroma of pears is made up of esters, aldehydes, alkenes, alkanes, and other compounds [13]. Various factors, such as pollination, bagging, harvesting period, storage conditions, and calcium regulation, can impact pear aroma [16,17,18,19]. Regarding Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim aroma evaluation, some scholars have evaluated the types, quantity, and volatile content of the aroma in Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim, including Nanguoli, Huaguai, and Jianbali [13,20,21], mainly using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) technology. Some researchers have also studied the physiological mechanism of aroma formation and release in “Nanguoli” fruit and identified relevant candidate genes via calcium regulation, providing valuable data for further research into the molecular mechanism of pear fruit aroma regulation [19]. However, the number of aroma components reported in Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim is still limited, and the analysis of aroma characteristics has not been adequately reported.
The comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) technique was developed in the 1990s to identify volatile substances in a qualitative and quantitative manner. Compared to gas chromatography, GC×GC-TOFMS offers several advantages, including detecting more compounds, having a prominent peak capacity, good sensitivity, high resolution, and fast analysis [22]. Compared to QMS, TOFMS is especially useful in identifying volatile and semi-volatile compounds [23] and providing a comprehensive volatile fingerprint with its higher data acquisition frequency. As a result of these benefits, GC×GC-TOFMS has been widely used in the analysis of wine [24], cloud water [25], and green tea [26]. However, it has not yet been used to analyze Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. Therefore, in order to comprehensively understand and evaluate the aroma quality of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim, this study adopts the HS-SPME combined with GC×GC-TOFMS to demonstrate aroma fingerprint information of Anli, Dongmili, Huagai, Jianbali, Jingbaili, Jinxiangshui, Nanguoli. This study will characterize comprehensively volatile compounds, and provide more information on Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim aroma fingerprint. A comprehensive evaluation will be performed for each variety for the aspect of the concentration and number of volatile substances, volatile aroma biosynthetic, and aroma characteristic percentage distributions. Ultimately, we expect to provide valuable data for promoting pear fruit aroma quality, deep processing, and genetic breeding.

2. Results

2.1. Analysis of Aroma Composition in Different Pear Fruits

The GC×GC-TOFMS total ion flow diagram of aroma components of different cultivars pears is shown in Figure 1. After retrieving and analyzing data from the NIST/WILEY spectrum database, the main aroma components of pears were identified and are listed in Table S1. A total of 174 volatile organic compounds were identified in the seven pear cultivars, comprising 102 esters, 14 alcohols, 20 aldehydes, 5 ketones, 18 alkenes, 8 alkanes, and 7 other substances. Hexyl acetate, ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, ethyl caproate, methyl caproate, methyl acetate, ethyl butyrate, ethyl caprylate, ethyl 2-methyl butyrate, octyl acetate, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, heptyl acetate, pentyl acetate, ethyl phenylacetate, 1-hexanol, 1-octanol, (Z,E)-α-farnesene, and hexanal were detected in all seven pear cultivars, in relatively high contents. Among the pear cultivars, Jinxiangshui had the highest total content of aroma substances at 2825.59 ng/g, which was 1.5–5 times higher than those of the other six pear cultivars. Anli (1877.71 ng/g), Dongmili (1799.46 ng/g), and Jianbali (1158.07 ng/g) had higher total contents of aroma substances than Nanguoli (657.67 ng/g), Huagai (608.53 ng/g), and Jingbaili (568.84 ng/g). Nanguoli had the largest number of aroma species (108), followed by Jiangubali (93) and Huagai (91), while Dongmili, Jinxiangshui, and Anli had the smallest numbers of aroma species (66, 64, and 64, respectively).
Esters were found to be the main aroma substances in the seven types of pears by comparing the number and relative percentages of different aroma types. The number of esters identified ranged from 40 to 72 (as shown in Figure 2), with the relative content percentage accounting for 56.68–94.92% (as shown in Figure 3). Although only 48 types of esters were identified in Jinxiangshui, its content was the highest, and the total amount of aroma substances was also higher than the other six types of pears (Table S1). This suggests that the relative content of primary esters in Jinxiangshui was generally higher than that in the other six types of pears, which was further supported by the clustering heatmaps (as shown in Figure 4). The first cluster in Figure 4 shows that hexyl acetate, ethyl acetate, ethyl butyrate, ethyl caproate, methyl caproate, methyl acetate, and ethyl butyrate in Jinxiangshui were significantly higher than in the other six types of pears. These aroma components were also the main ester substances in all pear cultivars, as shown in Table S1.
The relative percentages of esters in Anli, Dongmili, Huagai, and Nanguoli ranged from 85% to 91%, while in Jianbali and Jingbaili, these were less than 80%. Dongmili had the second-highest percentage of esters (91.17%) after Jinxiangshui, and the number of ester species was 50. Butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, hexyl acetate, ethyl crotonate, methyl acetate, and heptyl acetate were the main ester components of Dongmili. Heptyl acetate and isobutyl acetate had the highest relative content in Dongmili, according to Figure 4 and Table S1. Anli had a percentage of esters of 90.96%, and the number of species was the same as that of Jinxiangshui. Hexyl acetate, ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, ethyl caproate, methyl caproate, methyl crotonate, methyl acetate, and ethyl butyrate were the main ester components of Anli. The relative content of hexyl acetate was significantly higher in Anli than in the other six types of pears (Figure 4 and Table S1). Huagai had a percentage of esters of 87.80%, and the number of species was the same as that of Dongmili. The primary esters were hexyl acetate, butyl acetate, and (Z)-hex-2-enyl acetate, with the highest relative content of (Z)-hex-2-enyl acetate in Huagai, as shown in Figure 4 and Table S1. Nanguoli had the largest number of ester species at 72, but the relative proportion was 85.87%. The main ester components were ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, methyl acetate, methyl butyrate, ethyl caprylate, ethyl 2-methyl butyrate, hex-2-enyl acetate, and methyl octanoate. The relative contents of ethyl octylate and methyl octylate were the highest in Nanguoli, as shown in Figure 4 and Table S1. Jianbali had a lower proportion of esters (77.42%) and contained 59 esters. The main ester components were hexyl acetate, ethyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, ethyl caproate, methyl acetate, butyl acetate, and propyl acetate. Isoamyl acetate was only detected in Jianbali, as shown in Table S1. Jingbaili had the lowest proportion of esters (56.68%) and the lowest number of species (Figure 3).
The percentage of alcohols varied between 3.43% and 21.94%, and the number of species ranged from 4 to 10 (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Ethanol, 1-hexanol, and 1-octanol were present in all seven types of pears and had higher relative contents than other alcohols (Table S1). Jingbaili had the highest alcohol percentage (21.94%); the relative contents of (E)-2-hexanol were higher than those of the other six types of pears, and 4-methyl-1-pentanol (26.08 ng/g) was only detected in Jingbaili (Table S1). The second was Jianbali, accounting for 11.41%, of which (±)-2-methyl-1-butanol was only detected (Table S1). Nanguoli, Huaguai, and Dongmili had proportions of alcohols ranging from 7.54% to 5.06%. Only Nanguoli contained 1-nonanol (Table S1), and only Huagai had 3,7,11-trimethyl-6,10-dodecadiene-1-ol and 3-octanol (Table S1). The proportion of alcohols in Anli and Jinxiangshui were all below 4%. (Z)-2-hexene-1-ol was only present in these two pear species, with a higher content in Jinxiangshui (5.52 ng/g) (Table S1 and Figure 4).
In the seven types of pears, aldehydes were also found to be critical volatile compounds, accounting for 1.08%–7.56%, and the number of detected species ranged from 4 to 14 (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The most abundant aldehydes detected were hexaldehyde and (E)-2-hexenal. Jingbaili had the highest proportion of aldehydes (7.56%) and the largest number of species (14) (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Croton aldehyde was found only in Jingbaili (Table S1). Huagaili (5.45%) and Jianbali (5.11%) were second, with 10 and 13 aldehyde species, respectively (Figure 2 and Figure 3). (Z)-3-hexenal and (E)-2-heptenal were only detected in Jianbali (Table S1). Dongmili had a lower proportion of aldehydes (3.35%), with only five species identified (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Anli (1.08%), Nanguoli (1.28%), and Jinxiangshui (1.31%) had low aldehyde percentages with 4, 10, and 4 species, respectively (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Although there were many aldehydes in Nanguoli, the content was low, among which 2-methylbut-2-enal and 2-methyl propenal were unique aldehydes in Nanguoli.
Alkenes accounted for 0.18–12.98% in the different types of pears (Figure 3), and the number of alkenes detected varied from 3 to 10 (Figure 2). Among the alkenes, (Z,E)-α-farnesene and α-farnesene were found in all seven pear types with higher contents. Additionally, (Z,Z)-α-farnesene and (E)-β-farnesene, other isomers of the above two substances, were also identified. (Z,Z)-α-farnesene was only detected in Nanguoli (Table S1), and (E)-β-farnesene was detected in the five other pear species except for Dongmili and Jinxiangshui and had the highest content in Anli (2.91 ng/g). The highest percentage of alkenes (12.98%) was in Jingbaili, which also had the highest number of alkenes (10) (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Anli (4.09%) and Jianbali (4.74%) had alkenes in proportions above 4% (Figure 3), and their respective numbers of alkenes were 4 and 7. Dongmili (0.23%), Huagai (1.04%), Jinxiangshui (0.18%), and Nanguoli (3.35%) all had alkenes below 4%, with the number of species ranging from 3 to 9 (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Similar to the aldehydes, Nanguoli had a large number of alkenes but a low relative content (Figure 2 and Table S1). Furthermore, some alkenes, such as 3-(4-methylpent-3-enyl)furan, (Z)-1,3-pentadiene, (E)-1,4-hexadiene, (E)-3-hexene, and (E)-1-methyl-4-(6-methylhept-5-en-2-ylidene) cyclohex-1-ene, were only detected in Jingbaili, Jianbali, and Huagai (Table S1). Additionally, α-curcumene was only found in Jinxiangshui (Table S1). Finally, this study identified three monoterpenes, limonene, β-myrcene, and (E)-β-ocimene, and although their concentration was low, they still played an important role in fruit flavor [27]. Limonene was only present in Huagai (0.04 ng/g) and Nanguoli (0.19 ng/g), while β-myrcene (0.04 ng/g) and (E)-β-ocimene (0.03 ng/g) were only detected in Nanguoli (Table S1).
The content and species of ketones in seven types of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim were lower; the percentage of ketones ranged from 0.01% to 0.34%. The higher proportions of ketones were found in Jingbaili (0.34%) and Nanguoli (0.30%), which accounted for over 0.3% (Figure 3). Jingbaili had both methyl heptenone and butenone, while methyl heptenone, a crucial volatile component of Fuzhuan tea [28], was detected in all types except Dongmili. Butenone was only present in Jingbaili and Nanguoli. Moreover, Nanguoli had (E)-6,10-dimethyl-5,9-undecadien-2-one, which is commonly found in tobacco and tea and has a distinct floral and woody fragrance [29]. The proportions of ketones in Huagai (0.11%) and Jianbali (0.19%) were all above 0.1% (Figure 3), and the number of ketones in pear species was 3 and 2, respectively (Figure 2). Huagai contained methyl heptenone, (E)-6,10-dimethyl-5,9-undecadien-2-one, and 2,3-dioctyl ketone, the latter of which was only detected in Huagai. The ketone substances in Jianbali were methyl heptenone and 2,3-butanedione, with the latter being exclusively found in Jianbali (Table S1). The percentages of ketones in Anli (0.06%) and Jinxiangshui (0.01%) were relatively low, accounting for less than 0.1% (Figure 3), and only methyl heptenone was detected (Table S1).
The content of alkanes in seven types of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim was lower, and the proportion ranged from 0.03% to 0.39% (Figure 3). Except for Anli, different types of alkanes were detected in the six other pears (Table S1). Only o-xylene was identified in Dongmili, which has a distinctive aromatic odor [30]. Both Jianbali and Nanguoli contained p-xylene, a compound with a sweet and fruity aroma [31]. Denderalasin, which has not been previously reported in pear aroma identification, was the only compound belonging to alkanes detected in Huagai.

2.2. Principal Component Analysis

A total of 174 volatile components present in seven types of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim were analyzed by SIMCA14.1 software. The variance contribution rate, cumulative variance contribution rate and characteristic value of each principal component are shown in Table 1. The results indicate that the six principal components, which had eigenvalues greater than 1 and an accumulative variance contribution rate of 97.0%, reflect all the information of the original variable. Based on the identified aroma substances and their relative content in different types of pears, the seven types were categorized into three groups (Figure 5). The gray spheres in Figure 5 represent the aroma substances, and the closer they are to the hexagon representing the samples, the greater the contribution to sample classification. Table S4 indicates the primary substances contributing to the grouping. Group 1 comprises Jianbali and Jingbaili, which were clustered in the first quadrant, and 2-methylbutyl acetate(E)-2-hexenoic acid methyl ester, diethyl carbonate, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, ethyl tiglate, and other substances played a crucial role in the grouping. Nanguoli was the only pear type in Group 2, clustered in the third quadrant with some C6 and C9 compounds, such as 2-hexenal, (E)-2-nonenal, 1-nonanol, some unsaturated esters, alkenes, sulfur-containing ester compounds, hexyl ester compounds, and ethyl compounds, such as (Z)-4-decenoic acid methyl ester, limonene, β-myrcene, (E)-β-ocimene, (Z,Z)-α-farnesene, 3-(Methylthio)propanoic acid ethyl ester, hexyl caprylate, and ethyl heptanoate, which significantly affected the separation between Nanguoli and other pear cultivars. Group 3 comprises Anli, Huagai, Dongmili, and Jinxiangshui, clustered in the fourth quadrant, characterized by high concentrations of hexyl acetate, ethyl (2Z)-but-2-enoate, (Z)-hex-2-enyl acetate, ethyl (E)-hex-3-enoate, methyl tiglate, 1-octanol, n-heptanol, and other substances.

2.3. Analysis of Aroma Characteristic Percentage Distributions

In seven varieties of pears, a total of 24 types of flavors were identified, with 18 common flavors including aliphatic, ice, citrus, dairy, edible, fruit, green, herb, konifer, it-chem, narcotic, orchid, phenol, rose, animal, wood, earthy, and solvent flavors. Anli, Dongmili, and Jinxiangshui exhibited a higher total distribution values of all aroma characteristics, with Jianbali following closely behind, and the remaining pear varieties had lower values (Table S3). Among all the flavors, fruit aroma, accounting for a significant portion of the total flavor profile (44.12–82.90%), was the most prominent aroma of the seven pear varieties compared with aliphatic aroma (2.79–19.46%), green aroma (5.18–16.76%), dairy aroma (1.81–5.22%), and solvent aroma (1.25–5.67%). Anli had the highest proportion of fruit flavor, followed by Jinxiangshui (76.90%), Huagai (75.94%), Jianbali (71.31%), Dongmili (66.10%), Nanguoli (62.45%), and Jingbaili (44.12%). The main contributors to fruit flavor were short-chain saturated esters, particularly ethyl ester compounds such as hexyl acetate, ethyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, and butyl acetate (Table S1), with the percentage of relative contents of approximately 77.87% and 76.05% in Jinxiangshui and Anli, respectively. The second most abundant aroma types were aliphatic and green. Jingbaili had the highest aliphatic aroma percentage (19.46%), followed by Dongmili (17.38%) and Nanguoli (11.43%), while it was below 10% in the other pear cultivars (Figure 6). Dongmili had a high proportion (75.99%) of saturated esters. However, it also contained a higher proportion of saturated alcohols (5.06%) and aldehydes (3.35%), which significantly contributed to aliphatic and other scents, compared to Jinxinagshui (3.43%, 1.31%) and Anli (3.69%, 1.08%) (Table S1). Therefore, this could reduce the proportion of fruit flavor and the “intensity” of the fruit aroma in Dongmili to some extent. Comparative analysis also revealed that although the total value of aliphatic aroma in Dongmili was significantly larger than that in Jingbaili (Table S3), the proportion of aliphatic aroma in Jingbaili was larger than that in Dongmili. This is because the total aroma value of Dongmili is large, which reduces the proportion of aliphatic aroma. These findings suggest that the combined presence of different aroma types has a significant impact on the overall aroma of pears. The green scent accounted for 5.18–16.76% (Figure 6), contributed by ethyl caproate, methyl caproate, methyl acetate, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, heptyl acetate, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, hexanal, and some alkene substances. Jingbaili (16.76%) and Dongmili (10.58%) had a higher proportion of green aroma, which was more than 10% of the total aroma characteristics. The percentage of dairy aroma, accounting for 1.81–5.22%, was also significant, mainly contributed by isoamyl acetate, butyl acetate, ethyl caproate, and methyl acetate. Jinxiangshui (5.22%) and Jianbali (4.46%) had a higher proportion, and the remaining pear species had less than 4% dairy aroma. The percentage of solvent aroma ranged from 1.25% (Dongmili) to 5.67% (Nanguoli) (Figure 6) and was primarily produced by methyl acetate and other short-chain esters, such as n-hexanol. The presence of citrus aroma (as in many citrus fruits [32] and green tea [33]), accounting for 0.003% (Jinxiangshui)–0.25% (Jingbaili), was also detected and mainly emitted by (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoic acid, methyl ester, nonanal, heptanal, and decanal. Similarly, the rose aroma, contributed by phenethyl acetate, diisobutyl phthalate, and n-heptanol, accounted for 0.01% (Jinxiangshui)–0.27% (Dongmili). Narcotic flavors, which were reported in P. communis L. [34] and were found in seven Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim in this study, were present in high proportions in Jinxiangshui, Anli, and Jianbali, accounting for more than 0.5% and contributed by ethyl caproate, ethyl benzoate, methyl benzoate, benzeneacetaldehyde, and benzaldehyde. Conifers and woody aroma types, which are mostly emitted by terpenes [35], were also detected, with Nanguoli (0.55%) having the highest proportion of conifers aroma, and Jingbaili (3.01%), Huagai (2.99%), and Jianbali (1.36%) having the highest proportion of woody aroma.
To summarize, Nanguoli were characterized by a dominant fruit and aliphatic aromas, along with some green, dairy, and solvent fragrances. Jinxiangshui, Jiandaili, Huagai, and Anli had a fruit-forward aroma, with some green, aliphatic, dairy, and solvent fragrances. Huagai and Jianbali had traces of it-chen, woody, and solvent aromas. Jingbaili and Dongmili had a complex aroma profile, with a dominant fruit, aliphatic, and green aromas, and with some edible, it-chen, woody, and solvent flavors. The analysis of aroma substance content and aroma type proportions revealed that the aroma of pears was affected not only by the main contributing substances but also by the composition of different aroma types.
Analyzing the number of aroma types is also a crucial aspect of characterizing aroma profiles. This study revealed that Nanguoli had 24 fragrance types, except for jasmine and spice, and had more iris, smoke, and musk than the other six pear species. Iris has been reported in Pyrus communis L. [17], and β-myrcene, a monoterpene found in Nanguoli and not presenting in the other pear cultivars (Table S1), is responsible for the iris, burnt tobacco, and musk scents. This explains why Nanguoli has a more diverse flavor profile than other pear species to some extent. Moreover, some fragrances were only detected in a few pear species. For instance, the muguet scent, found in Yuluxiangli [17], was detected in Anli, Dongmili, Huagai, Jianbali, and Nanguoli in this study, primarily contributed by ethyl benzoate and diisobutyl phthalate. Balsam scent, detected in mango [36], was found only in Dongmili (0.16%), Huagai (0.0009%), and Nanguoli (0.004%), primarily contributed by diisobutyl phthalate. Vanilla scent, detected in Pyrus communis L. and Yuluxiangli [17], mainly contributed by ethyl phenylacetate and (E)-2-hexen-1-ol, was found in all five other pear species, except Dongmili and Jinxiangshui.

2.4. Main Biosynthesis Pathway of Aroma Components

Linear esters, aldehydes, alcohols, and ketones, the main aroma substances of seven pear cultivars, are derived from fatty acids and included in [16]. Short-chain acetate and medium-chain esters (C6–C12), belonging to linear esters, have relatively high contents in the seven pear varieties, including hexyl acetate (3.05–376.8 ng/g), ethyl acetate (7.14–391.96 ng/g), ethyl caproate (1.72–264.42 ng/g), methyl caproate (9.93–246.00 ng/g), ethyl butyrate (0.22–171.90 ng/g), methyl butyrate (7.88–129.01 ng/g), ethyl caprylate (0.35–42.40 ng/g), and methyl octanoate (4.90–32.96 ng/g) (Table S1). Some of the above compounds give a strong “pear-like” flavor [37]. Volatile substances such as C6 and C9 alcohols, C6 and C9 aldehydes, have a “green grass” flavor, and are also the intermediate products of the fatty acid oxidation pathway. In this study, the seven pear varieties contained high levels of 1-hexanol (11.40–61.26 ng/g) and hexanal (3.03–65.40 ng/g). 1-nonanol and 2-nonanol were also identified in all seven Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim varieties, and nonanal was found in Anli (0.63 ng/g), Huagai (0.12 ng/g), Jianbali (0.52 ng/g), and Jingbaili (0.53 ng/g) (Table S1).
Amino acid-derived compounds include branched-chain compounds, sulfur-containing compounds, and aromatic compounds [17]. In this study, various forms of branched-chain esters, such as 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol, acetate, propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-hydroxyl-2, 2,4-trimethyl pentyl ester, were detected at concentrations ranging from 0.34 to 1.27 ng/g (Table S1), and ethyl 2-methyl butyrate (36.19 ng/g) had a relatively high content in Jianbali (Table S1). The sulfur-containing ester compounds, such as ethyl 3-(methylthio)-(E)-2-propenoate, methyl 3-(methylthio)-(E)-2-propenoate-3-(methylthio), and methyl 3-methylthiopropionate, derived from methionine and cysteine [34], were only detected in Huagai and Nanguoli, with contents ranging from 0.21 to 0.68 ng/g. Diisobutyl phthalate, the only one aromatic ester, was detected in Huagai (0.26 ng/g) and Nanguoli (1.03 ng/g).
Carbohydrate-derived volatile substances are also an important group of compounds that can impact the flavor of pears to some extent [38]. Monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids were the main alkenes detected in the seven pear types. β-myrcene and (E)-β-ocimene, two monoterpene compounds, were identified in Nanguoli, with concentrations ranging from 0.03 ng/g to 0.04 ng/g. (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoic acid, methyl ester, and (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoic acid ethyl ester were esters composed of monoterpenoids. Among these, (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoic acid methyl ester was detected in all pear types except for Jingbaili, with concentrations varying from 0.08 ng/g (Anli) to 1.37 ng/g (Nanguoli). (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoic acid ethyl ester, was only identified in Anli, Jianbali, and Nanguoli, with concentrations ranging from 1.13 ng/g to 3.06 ng/g. Five sesquiterpenoids were also identified: α-farnesene, (Z,E)-α-farnesene, (Z,Z)-α-farnesene, (E)-β-farnesene, and limonene. α-farnesene and (Z,E)-α-farnesene were present in all seven pear types; α-farnesene had the highest content in Jingbaili (66.11 ng/g) and the lowest content in Dongmili (2.34 ng/g); (Z,E)-α-farnesene varied from 0.12 ng/g (Jinxiangshui) to 5.98 ng/g (Nanguoli). (Z,Z)-α-farnesene was only found in Nanguoli (0.25 ng/g). In addition to Dongmili and Jinxiangshui, the other five kinds of pear species all contained (E)-β-farnesene with contents from 0.14 ng/g to 2.91 ng/g, and limonene was detected in Huagai (0.04 ng/g) and Nanguoli (0.19 ng/g).
Based on the relative contents of the main aroma components in seven pear cultivars, the main aroma synthesis pathway of each pear can be preliminarily deduced. The fatty acid pathway was found to be the main pathway in all seven pear cultivars, with short-chain saturated esters making up over 50% of the aroma compounds in Anli, Dongmili, Huagai, Jianbali, Jingbaili, Jinshui, and Nanguoli. Other aroma biosynthesis pathways were also detected in the seven Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim samples besides the fatty acid synthesis pathway. For instance, the relative contents of amino acid derivatives in Huagai and Jianbali were over 3%, indicating the presence of the amino acid aroma biosynthesis pathway. In Jingbaili and Nanguoli, the relative contents of carbohydrate derivatives were 12.49% and 4.5%, respectively, while it accounted for a relatively lower proportion in the five other pear cultivars.

3. Discussion

A total of 174 volatile organic compounds were identified using HS-SPME in conjunction with GC×GC-TOFMS. Esters, primarily containing short-chain saturated acetates and medium-chain esters, were the dominant aroma components in both species in terms of quantity and proportion. Numerous researchers, including Gaihua Qin [13], Liping Zhang [20], and Jie Li [21], have investigated the aroma of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. They discovered that esters were the primary aroma compounds, which is consistent with our findings, but the total number of volatile organic compounds detected was only approximately 30 for Nanguoli, Huagai, Jingbaili, and Jianbali. Ethyl 3-methylthiopropionate was discovered by Takeoka in pineapple in 1989 [39] and was also detected in Nanguoli in this study. Furthermore, methyl 3-methylthiopropionate and ethyl 3-methylsulfonamido-propionate were found in Nanguoli. Other specialists found ethyl tiglate, an uncommon plant aroma compound [40], in Nanguoli. In this study, ethyl tiglate was found in all seven pear cultivars, propyl tigelate was found in Dongmili, and methyl tiglate was found in Huagai (Table S1). Compared to other research, this study provides more detailed aroma fingerprint data, offering more extensive theoretical support for analyzing and assessing Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim germplasm resources and aroma breeding.
The flavor of pears is strongly influenced by the type and amount of aroma components present, which can be objectively evaluated using sensory tests. Numerous studies have employed sensory evaluation tests to investigate aroma properties in different types of fruits. For example, Hayaloglu et al. analyzed the phenolic compounds and sensory characteristics of 12 sweet cherry varieties [41], while Taiti et al. studied traditional and innovative Japanese plum cultivars grown in Italy [42]. Hernandez et al. explored the nutritional composition and sensory profile of Spanish jujube fruits [43]. Moreover, the critical flavor factors of fruits were investigated by integrating the substance content and sensory evaluation attributes. Sung et al. investigated the relationship between the sensory attributes and chemical components of different mango varieties [44]. Ramirez et al. used a quantitative descriptive-analytical method to investigate the sensory characteristics and factors affecting the freshness of seven watermelon varieties [45], while Siebert et al. studied the volatile compounds in Viognier and Chardonnay wines associated with “stone fruit” aroma properties [46]. Aroma characteristic analysis has been utilized in previous studies to assess fruit flavor attributes, such as Wang’s analysis of aroma types in Pyrus communis L. [17], and Zhang’s study of mango aroma attributes using fragrance characteristic analysis [36]. These studies have provided useful approaches for evaluating fruit flavor quality. This study employs aroma characteristic analysis to illustrate the flavor attributes of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. The study identifies fruit aroma, aliphatic aroma, and green aroma as the most important aroma types of the seven pears and quantitatively demonstrates the aroma attributes of different Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. Based on the compound information, the main contributors to aroma types were identified. Through comparison, we found that the relative content of contributors to fruit aroma was basically the same, but the flavor characteristics were still different for Jinxiangshui, Anli, and Dongmili. Therefore, it can be concluded that the aroma characteristics were not only related to the content of the main contributors but also closely related to the proportion of aroma types in the total aroma value. Meanwhile, the change in aroma and the reason for aroma difference can be visually and quantitatively displayed according to the aroma characteristics of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. Thus, the aroma characteristics analysis of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim provides a valuable tool for improving the aroma quality of this species and evaluating germplasm resources. This study also speculates on the major aroma biosynthesis pathways of the seven Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim, with the fatty acid oxidation pathway being the most crucial, in addition to the amino acid and carbohydrate biosynthesis pathways. The analysis of the aroma pathway provides some theoretical basis for the subsequent aroma synthesis pathway research on Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

For this study, seven cultivars of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim were selected for analysis (Table 2 lists the cultivars, their production regions, and harvesting times). The maturity of the pears was determined using standard criteria such as days of growth, appearance, and seed color. All samples were kept refrigerated until treatment. A postripening process was necessary to enhance their flavor and taste. Samples were placed at room temperature before experiments (approximately five days) of this time. In addition, 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS was supplied by Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA). The length of the fiber coating was 1 cm. The internal standard 2-nonanone (>99%) was obtained from Dr. Ehrensorfer (Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany). A mixture of 500 μg/mL C8–C40 n-alkanes was purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Germany), and 2.0 mg/mL C6–C10 n-alkanes were obtained from AccuStandard (New Haven, CT, USA).

4.2. Methods

4.2.1. Preparation of Standard Solution

First, 0.1 g of 2-nonanone (accurate to 0.0001 g) was diluted with 10 mL of methanol (HPLC grade, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to prepare a 10,000 mg/L stock solution. From this, a 10 mg/L working solution of 2-nonanone was prepared using methanol (HPLC grade, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Then, 500 μg/mL of C8–C40 n-alkane mix solutions and 2.0 mg/mL of C6–C10 n-alkanes were diluted to 10 mg/L with acetone (Analytical reagent, Sinopharm, China). All standard solutions were stored at −18 °C.

4.2.2. GC×GC-TOFMS Conditions

An Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph (San Jose, California, USA) coupled with a LECO Pegasus 4D-C time-of-flight mass spectrometer (TOFMS) (Saint Joseph, CA, USA) was utilized for the analysis. Two columns were employed for compound separation, a weak polarity Rxi-5MS column (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) (0.25 µm, 30 m × 250 µm) for the first dimension (1D) and a medium polar Rxi-17Sil MS column (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) (0.25 µm, 2 m × 250 µm) for the second dimension (2D). The helium carrier gas (99.999%) was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1.4 mL/min, while the split ratio was 10:1. The injection port and transmission line temperatures were 270 °C and 280 °C, respectively. The temperature program started at 40 °C for 2 min, heated to 200 °C at 5 °C/min, then rose at 20 °C/min to 280 °C and kept up for 2 min. During the entire collection, the second column temperature was maintained at 5 °C above the first column temperature, and the modulator temperature exceeded 15 °C compared with that of the second column. The modulation cycle was 3 s, and the thermal pulse time was 0.6 s.
The MS parameters were set as follows: the acquisition delay was 60 s, the acquisition rate was 100 spectra/s, the acquisition voltage was 1450 V, and the electron energy was set to −70 V. The ion source temperature was maintained at 250 °C. The mass spectra were collected over a range of 35–550 amu.

4.2.3. Volatile Extraction

The extraction of isolated volatile organic compounds was performed using HS-SPME. A 50/30 µm DVB/CAR/PDMS SPME fiber was selected based on prior testing and published literature [27] and conditioned according to operational instructions before usage. Each pear sample was quartered following the quartic method, and the flesh without cores was cut into pieces measuring 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. Subsequently, 6.0 g of the mixed sample was placed in a 15 mL headspace bottle, 5 μL of 10 mg/L 2-nonanone was added, and the vial was sealed, allowing it to stand for 10 min. The bottle was then kept at 40 °C for 40 min under thermostatic conditions, after which the SPME fiber was immediately placed into the GC injector for desorption. Each pear variety was tested three times in the experiment.

4.2.4. Analysis of Aroma Characteristic Distributions

The aroma characteristics of seven pear varieties were evaluated using the “Training the ABCs of Perfumery” method [17]. In this method, all aroma compounds were categorized into 26 types and quantified using the “scent ABC”. The aroma characteristic percentage (Ac) was calculated using the following formula [36]:
A c = ∑ i n m i × I × P i T
where Ac represents aroma characteristics (%); mi represents the relative amount of the aroma component; I represents the intensity of an aroma component compared to linalool with a fixed value of 100; Pi represents the percentage of the odor of the substance in the 26 odors of A–Z (%); n is the number of aroma components with an ABC value; and T is the total distribution value of all aroma characteristics for each pear cultivar.

4.2.5. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

The NIST/WILEY.11 database was used to search for the mass spectrometry fragments of each chromatographic peak. Volatile aroma substances with matching degrees greater than 700 were selected and quantified using the internal standard method, with 2-nonanone as the standard substance for normalization. The following formula was used for the quantification of aroma substances [27]:
C a = P A a P A i s   × C i s × 5   μ L m
where Ca is the concentration of aroma components (ng/g), PAa is the peak area of aroma components, PAis is the peak area of the internal standard, Cis is the concentration of the internal standard (g/mL), and m is the mass of the sample (g). The concentration of 2-nonanone was 10 mg/L, and the mass of the sample was 6.0 g. The data presented are the means ± standard deviations of three replications.
The retention index was used to further confirm the accuracy of the selected aroma substances with degrees greater than 700. First, five microliters of 10 mg/L n-alkanes were analyzed according to step 2.2.3 to calculate the retention index of each aroma component. Then, the retention index data were confirmed with those searched from the NIST database. Finally, aroma substances were identified. The formula used to calculate the retention index of each aroma component was followed [27]:
R I a = R T a − R T n R T N − R T n 100 N − n + 100 R T n
where RIa is the retention index of the target compound, a is the target compound, n is the carbon number of the lower normal alkane, N is the carbon number of the higher normal alkane, and RT is the retention time.
SIMCA 14.1 was employed to conduct principal component analysis (PCA) and group pear varieties based on the identified volatile components. Tbtools was utilized to perform heatmap and clustering analysis (HCA) to classify all volatile organic compounds and represent their content through color depth. The data were analyzed using variance analysis in SPSS Statistics 19.0, and the mean values were compared using Tukey’s test with a significance level of p < 0.05. The results are presented as the means ± SDs with a sample size of 3.

5. Conclusions

The aroma of fruits is a crucial indicator of their quality and can reveal their flavor characteristics and ripeness. This study employed HS-SPME combined with GC×GC-TOFMS to increase the richness of aroma fingerprints in pear. The analysis identified a total of 174 chemical substances, including esters, alcohols, aldehydes, and alkenes, in seven different pear varieties. Based on this information, it was possible to cluster the pear varieties into groups with similar characteristic substances. Through the analysis of aroma characteristics, this study visually demonstrated how changes in the composition of aroma materials could affect the overall aroma quality of the pear. The results suggest that the flavor of pear is influenced not only by the content of major flavor substances but also by the collective effect of all the substances. The conclusion provides a new method and useful data for evaluating pear flavor quality, and the application of the new assessment format can improve the comprehensiveness and rationality of evaluating pear flavor quality, processing quality, and breeding based on flavor characteristics. It is of great significance for research on pear flavor quality and the development of the pear industry.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28124794/s1, Table S1: Aroma composition and content of different cultivars of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim; Table S2: “ABC” value of scent of aroma substances in different cultivars of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim; Table S3: Aroma value of different cultivars of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim; Table S4: Primary substances contributing to the grouping.

Author Contributions

W.Z. conceived the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and modified the manuscript; X.Z. and H.L. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; J.M., H.Q. and C.Z. sampled and preprocessed pears; A.M.A.E.-A. validation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing. Z.C. and M.Y. helped revise the manuscript; H.D. helped with the use of the GC×GC-TOFMS; M.Y. and H.D. supported the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102088), the Agricultural Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CXGC2018E05, CXGC2021B14 and CXGC2022E05), Shandong Key R & D Plan (2020CXGC010804), and National Pear Industry Technology System (CARS-28-23).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting files.

Acknowledgments

We thank Wenhui Wang and Yanmin Du from the Research Institute of Pomology of CAAS for contributing materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lu, M.Y.; Wu, C.H.; Wang, Q.; Yan, X.K.; Liu, M.H.; Zhang, M.J. Analysis of photosynthetic pigments and mineral elements content of leaves of wild Pyrus ussuriensis Maxin. with different color grown in saline alkali soil. Nonwood For. Res. 2021, 39, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  2. Qiu, D.; Guo, J.; Yu, H.M.; Yan, J.; Yang, S.X.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.M.; Sun, J.J.; Cong, J.; He, S.L.; et al. Antioxidant phenolic compounds isolated from wild Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. Fruit peels and leaves. Food Chem. 2018, 241, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Y.; Wang, W.H.; Jia, X.H.; Tong, W.; Wang, Z.H.; Yang, X.L. Evaluation of frozen fruit quality of different pear cultivars. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2017, 50, 3400–3412. [Google Scholar]
  4. Song, L.; Zhang, Q.; Du, G.D.; Wang, X.Q.; Liu, Z. Present situation and countermeasures of pear industry development in Liaoning Province. North. Fruits 2018, 4, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang, X.L. Physiological Differences and Regulation Mechanism of Different Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim Varieties during Softening. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jeon, J.H.; Yang, J.Y.; Lee, H.S. Acaricidal activities of materials derived from Pyrus ussuriensis fruits against stored food mites. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75, 1258–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Qu, J.H.; Du, B.; Peng, F.; Wang, T.K.; Yang, Y.D. Optimization of triterpenoids extraction from Anli pears (Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim) by pressurized liquid extraction. Qual. Assur. Ssf. Crop 2016, 8, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.; Wang, T.T.; Zhou, B.; Gao, W.Y.; Cao, J.G.; Huang, L.Q. Chemical composition and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential of peels and flesh from 10 different pear varieties (Pyrus spp.). Food Chem. 2014, 152, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, L.Q.; Hao, W.J.; Tang, X.Q.; Wang, K.C.; Zhang, S.L. Analysis of Characteristic Polyphenols and Triterpenic Acids in Ripe Pears of 36 Cultivars by UPLC-MS/MS. Food Sci. 2020, 41, 206–214. [Google Scholar]
  10. Goliáš, J.; Balík, J.; Létal, J. Identification of volatiles formed in Asian pear cultivars subjected to short-term storage using multinomial logistic regression. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021, 97, 103793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Siegmund, B. Biogenesis of aroma compounds: Flavour formation in fruits and vegetables. In Flavor Development, Analysis and Perception in Food and Beverages; Parker, J.K., Elmore, J.S., Methven, L., Eds.; Woodhead Press: Sawston Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 127–149. [Google Scholar]
  12. Senoussi, A.; Rapisarda, T.; Schadt, I.; Chenchouni, H.; Saoudi, Z.; Senoussi, S.; Zitoun, O.A.; Zidoune, M.N.; Carpino, S. Formation and dynamics of aroma compounds during manufacturing ripening of Bouhezza goat cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2022, 129, 105349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qin, G.H.; Tao, S.T.; Cao, Y.F.; Wu, J.Y.; Zhang, H.P.; Huang, W.J.; Zhang, S.L. Evaluation of the volatile profile of 33 Pyrus ussuriensis cultivars by HS–SPME with GC-MS. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 2367–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ndikuryayo, C.; Ndayiragije, A.; Kilasi, N.; Kusolwa, P. Breeding for Rice Aroma and Drought Tolerance: A Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Farag, M.A.; Dokalahy, E.U.; Eissa, T.F.; Kamal, I.M.; Zayed, A. Chemometrics-Based Aroma Discrimination of 14 Egyptian Mango Fruits of Different Cultivars and Origins, and Their Response to Probiotics Analyzed via SPME Coupled to GC-MS. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 2377–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, W.J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.X.; Du, G.Q. Analysis and evaluation of fruit quality and aroma components of ‘Yali’ pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) pollinated with eighteen pollinizers. Food Sci. 2022, 43, 294–302. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, Y.Y. Analysis on Volatile Aroma Constituent Characteristics of Pears with Different Cultivars. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zlatić, E.; Zadnik, V.; Fellman, J.; Demšar, L.; Hribar, J.; Čejić, Ž.; Vidrih, R. Comparative analysis of aroma compounds in ‘Bartlett’ pear in relation to harvest date, storage conditions, and shelf-life. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 117, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, S.W.; Tao, S.T.; Qin, G.H.; Wang, S.M.; Tao, J.H.; Wu, J.; Wu, J.Y.; Zhang, S.L. Transcriptome profiling reveals the candidate genes associated with aroma metabolites and emission of pear (Pyrus ussuriensis cv.). Sci. Hortic. 2016, 206, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, L.P. Effects of Refrigeration and 1-Methylcyclopropene on the Metabolic of Volatile Aroma in Nanguo Pear and Control. Ph.D. Thesis, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, J.; Han, J.C.; Yang, S.M.; Wang, Y. GC-MS Analysis on aroma components of Huagaili Pear fruits. J. Hebei Agric. Sci. 2020, 24, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  22. Farrapeira, R.O.; Andrade, Y.B.; Schena, T.; Schneider, J.K.; Muhlen, C.V.; Bjerk, T.R.; Krause, L.C.; Caramão, E.B. Characterization by Fast–GC×GC-TOFMS of the Acidic/Basic Neutral Fractions of Bio-Oils from Fast Pyrolysis of Green Coconut Fibers. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 61, 9567–9574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, M.; Li, T.; Yang, F.; Cui, X.Y.; Zou, T.T.; Song, H.L.; Liu, Y. Characterization of key aroma-active compounds in Hanyuan Zanthoxylum bungeanum by GC-O-MS and switchable GC×GC-O-MS. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Welke, J.E.; Zanus, M.; Lazzarotto, M.; Pulgati, F.H.; Zini, C.A. Main differences between volatiles of sparkling and base wines accessed through comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection and chemometric tools. Food Chem. 2014, 164, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lebedev, A.T.; Polyakova, O.V.; Mazur, D.M.; Artaev, V.B.; Canet, I.; Lallement, A.; Vaitilingom, M.; Deguillaume, L.; Delort, A.M. Detection of semivolatile compounds in cloud waters by GC×GC-TOF-MS. Evidence of phenols and phthalates as priority pollutants. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 241, 616–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, Y.; Lv, H.P.; Shao, C.Y.; Kang, S.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, L.; Dai, W.D.; Tan, J.F.; Peng, Q.H.; Lin, Z. Identification of key odorants responsible for chestnut-like aroma quality of green teas. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, C.C.; Zhang, W.J.; Li, H.D.; Mao, J.S.; Guo, C.Y.; Ding, R.Y.; Wang, Y.; Fang, L.P.; Chen, Z.L.; Yang, G.S. Analysis of volatile compounds in pears by HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS. Molecules 2019, 24, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Li, Y.D. Study on Characteristic Aroma Compounds during the Process of Fu Brick Tea. Master’s Thesis, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kang, S.Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, X.Q.; Liang, Y.R.; Lin, Z. Multivariate statistical analysis of volatiles compounds in green teas from different harvesting seasons. Food Sci. 2018, 39, 268–275. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, X.N.; Jia, X.H.; Du, Y.M.; Wang, W.H.; Shu, Q. Comparation of fruit quality and aroma components among three red-skinned sand pear varieties. Food Sci. 2022, 39, 366–375. [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, P.P.; Zheng, P.C.; Gong, Z.M.; Wang, S.P.; Teng, J.; Gao, S.W.; Wang, X.P.; Ye, F.; Zheng, L. Analysis of aroma components in Qingzhuan Dark Tea. Food Sci. 2017, 38, 164–170. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, H.; Lu, Z.M.; Wang, J.T.; Guo, X. Comparative aroma components of fruits of four main Citrus varieties. Food Sci. 2017, 38, 192–196. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, J.T.; Shi, J.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, W.J.; Yan, H.; Shao, C.Y.; Wang, M.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, Q.H.; Chen, Y.Q.; et al. Insights into crucial odourants dominating the characteristic flavour of citrus-white teas prepared from citrus reticulata Blanco ‘Chachiensis’ and Camellia sinensis ‘Fudingdabai’. Food Chem. 2022, 377, 132048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, M.P.; Li, C.L.; Wang, H.R.; Zhang, S.W.; Yu, L.G.; Guo, C.X. Analysis of aroma compounds in Red Fragrant pear by headspace solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography–olfactometry–mass spectrometry. Food Res. Dev. 2020, 41, 130–139. [Google Scholar]
  35. Campeloa, P.H.; Alves Filhob, E.G.; Silvac, L.M.A.; Britoc, E.S.; Rodriguesb, S.; Fernandesd, F.A.N. Modulation of aroma and flavor using dielectric barrier discharge plasma technology in a juice rich in terpenes and sesquiterpenes. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 130, 109644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, J. Study on Aroma Characterization of Mango Fruit. Master’s Thesis, Guangxi University, Nanning, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rizzolo, A.; Cambiaghi, P.; Grassi, M.; Zerbini, P.E. Influence of 1-methylcyclopropene and storage atmosphere on changes in volatile compounds and fruit quality of conference pears. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 9781–9789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schwab, W.; Davidovich-Rikanati, R.; Lewinsohn, E. Biosynthesis of plant-derived flavor compounds. Plant J. 2008, 54, 712–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Takeoka, G.; Buttery, R.G.; Flath, R.A.; Teranishi, R.; Wheeler, E.L.; Wieczorek, R.L.; Guentertet, M. Volatile constituents of pineapple (Ananas Comosus [L.] Merr.). In Flavor Chemistry Trends and Development; Teranishi, R., Buttery, R.G., Shahidi, F., Eds.; U.S. ACS Symposium Series Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1989; pp. 223–237. [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen, J.; Zhou, S.; Yan, S.J.; Ma, Y.K.; Hu, X.S. Analysis of aroma components of Fengshui, Dangshan and Nanguo pear by SPME/GC/MS. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2005, 32, 301–303. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hayaloglu, A.A.; Demir, N. Phenolic compounds, volatiles, and sensory characteristics of twelve sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars grown in Turkey. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Taiti, C.; Pandolfi, C.; Caparrotta, S.; Dei, M.; Giordani, E.; Mancuso, S.; Nencetti, V. Fruit aroma and sensorial characteristics of traditional and innovative Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) cultivars grown in Italy. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 2655–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hernández, F.; Noguera-Artiaga, L.; Burló, F.; Wojdyło, A.; Carbonell-Barrachina, Á.A.; Legua, P. Physico-chemical, nutritional, and volatile composition and sensory profile of Spanish jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) fruits. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 2682–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sung, J.; Suh, J.H.; Chambers, A.H.; Crane, J.; Wang, Y. Relationship between Sensory Attributes and Chemical Composition of Different Mango Cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 5177–5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ramirez, J.L.; Du, X.; Wallace, R.W. Investigating sensory properties of seven watermelon varieties and factors impacting refreshing perception using quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Res. Int. 2020, 138, 109681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Siebert, T.E.; Barker, A.; Pearson, W.; Barter, S.R.; de Barros Lopes, M.A.; Darriet, P.; Herderich, M.J.; Francis, I.L. Volatile Compounds Related to ‘Stone Fruit’ Aroma Attributes in Viognier and Chardonnay Wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2838–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 04794 g001 550
Figure 1. Total ion chromatograms of the aromatic components of different pear cultivars. Note: (A): aroma fingerprint of Anli; (B): aroma fingerprint of Dongmili; (C): aroma fingerprint of Huagai; (D): aroma fingerprint of Jianbali; (E): aroma fingerprint of Jingbaili; (F): aroma fingerprint of Jinxiangshui; (G): aroma fingerprint of Nanguoli.
Figure 1. Total ion chromatograms of the aromatic components of different pear cultivars. Note: (A): aroma fingerprint of Anli; (B): aroma fingerprint of Dongmili; (C): aroma fingerprint of Huagai; (D): aroma fingerprint of Jianbali; (E): aroma fingerprint of Jingbaili; (F): aroma fingerprint of Jinxiangshui; (G): aroma fingerprint of Nanguoli.
Molecules 28 04794 g001
Molecules 28 04794 g002 550
Figure 2. The number of different types of aroma substances in pears.
Figure 2. The number of different types of aroma substances in pears.
Molecules 28 04794 g002
Molecules 28 04794 g003 550
Figure 3. Relative content proportions of different volatile compounds in seven pear cultivars.
Figure 3. Relative content proportions of different volatile compounds in seven pear cultivars.
Molecules 28 04794 g003
Molecules 28 04794 g004 550
Figure 4. Cluster heatmap analysis of volatile organic compounds in 7 pear cultivars.
Figure 4. Cluster heatmap analysis of volatile organic compounds in 7 pear cultivars.
Molecules 28 04794 g004
Molecules 28 04794 g005 550
Figure 5. Principal component analysis of volatile organic compounds in 7 pear cultivars.
Figure 5. Principal component analysis of volatile organic compounds in 7 pear cultivars.
Molecules 28 04794 g005
Molecules 28 04794 g006 550
Figure 6. Analysis of aroma characteristic percentage distributions of 7 pear cultivars. Note: A: aliphatic; B: ice; C: citrus; D: dairy; E: edible; F: fruit; G: green; H: herb; I: iris; J: jasmin; K: konifer; L: it-chem; M: muguet; N: narcotic; O: orchid; P: phenol; Q: balsam; R: rose; S: animal; T: smoke; U: animal; W: wood; X: musk; Y: earthy; Z: solvent.
Figure 6. Analysis of aroma characteristic percentage distributions of 7 pear cultivars. Note: A: aliphatic; B: ice; C: citrus; D: dairy; E: edible; F: fruit; G: green; H: herb; I: iris; J: jasmin; K: konifer; L: it-chem; M: muguet; N: narcotic; O: orchid; P: phenol; Q: balsam; R: rose; S: animal; T: smoke; U: animal; W: wood; X: musk; Y: earthy; Z: solvent.
Molecules 28 04794 g006
Table
Table 1. Principal component variance contribution rate.
Table 1. Principal component variance contribution rate.
ComponentProportion (%)Cumulative (%)Eigenvalue
127.027.05.67
219.646.64.11
315.562.13.25
414.076.12.94
510.987.02.3
69.997.02.1
Table
Table 2. The cultivars, producing areas, and sampling times of 7 pear cultivars.
Table 2. The cultivars, producing areas, and sampling times of 7 pear cultivars.
CultivarsProducing RegionSampling Time
AnliHuludaoshi city of Liaoning Province27 September 2020
DongmiliHuludaoshi city of Liaoning Province27 September 2020
HuagaiAnshanshi city of Liaoning Province7 October 2020
JianbaliHuludaoshi city of Liaoning Province15 September 2020
JingbailiHuludaoshi city of Liaoning Province24 August 2020
JinxiangshuiHuludaoshi city of Liaoning Province12 September 2020
NanguoliAnshanshi city of Liaoning Province5 October 2020
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, W.; Yan, M.; Zheng, X.; Chen, Z.; Li, H.; Mao, J.; Qin, H.; Zhu, C.; Du, H.; Abd El-Aty, A.M. Exploring the Aroma Fingerprint of Various Chinese Pear Cultivars through Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Volatile Compounds Using HS-SPME and GC×GC-TOFMS. Molecules 2023, 28, 4794. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124794

AMA Style

Zhang W, Yan M, Zheng X, Chen Z, Li H, Mao J, Qin H, Zhu C, Du H, Abd El-Aty AM. Exploring the Aroma Fingerprint of Various Chinese Pear Cultivars through Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Volatile Compounds Using HS-SPME and GC×GC-TOFMS. Molecules. 2023; 28(12):4794. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124794

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Wenjun, Mengmeng Yan, Xinxin Zheng, Zilei Chen, Huidong Li, Jiangsheng Mao, Hongwei Qin, Chao Zhu, Hongxia Du, and A. M. Abd El-Aty. 2023. "Exploring the Aroma Fingerprint of Various Chinese Pear Cultivars through Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Volatile Compounds Using HS-SPME and GC×GC-TOFMS" Molecules 28, no. 12: 4794. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124794

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop