Next Article in Journal
Positional Distribution of Fatty Acids in Processed Chinook Salmon Roe Lipids Determined by 13C Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR)
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study of Planar Octahedron Molecular Structure via Eccentric Invariants
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Gefitinib-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carrier as a Biomedical Tool in the Treatment of Metastatic Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Some Novel Results Involving Prototypical Computation of Zagreb Polynomials and Indices for SiO4 Embedded in a Chain of Silicates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Entropy Related to K-Banhatti Indices via Valency Based on the Presence of C6H6 in Various Molecules

by
Muhammad Usman Ghani
1,*,
Francis Joseph H. Campena
2,*,
Muhammad Kashif Maqbool
3,
Jia-Bao Liu
4,*,
Sanaullah Dehraj
5,
Murat Cancan
6 and
Fahad M. Alharbi
7
1
Institute of Mathematics, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Abu Dhabi Road, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila 1004, Philippines
3
The Government Sadiq Egerton College Bahwalpur, University Chowk, Bahawalpur Cantt, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
4
School of Mathematics and Physics, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
5
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Sakrand Road, Nawabshah 67480, Pakistan
6
Faculty of Education, Yuzuncu Yil University, 65090 Van, Turkey
7
Department of Mathematics, Al-Qunfudah University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca 24382, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(1), 452; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010452
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 18 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 3 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Study of Molecules in the Light of Spectral Graph Theory)

Abstract

:
Entropy is a measure of a system’s molecular disorder or unpredictability since work is produced by organized molecular motion. Shannon’s entropy metric is applied to represent a random graph’s variability. Entropy is a thermodynamic function in physics that, based on the variety of possible configurations for molecules to take, describes the randomness and disorder of molecules in a given system or process. Numerous issues in the fields of mathematics, biology, chemical graph theory, organic and inorganic chemistry, and other disciplines are resolved using distance-based entropy. These applications cover quantifying molecules’ chemical and electrical structures, signal processing, structural investigations on crystals, and molecular ensembles. In this paper, we look at K-Banhatti entropies using K-Banhatti indices for C 6 H 6 embedded in different chemical networks. Our goal is to investigate the valency-based molecular invariants and K-Banhatti entropies for three chemical networks: the circumnaphthalene ( C N B n ), the honeycomb ( H B n ), and the pyrene ( P Y n ). In order to reach conclusions, we apply the method of atom-bond partitioning based on valences, which is an application of spectral graph theory. We obtain the precise values of the first K-Banhatti entropy, the second K-Banhatti entropy, the first hyper K-Banhatti entropy, and the second hyper K-Banhatti entropy for the three chemical networks in the main results and conclusion.

1. Introduction

In the late 1990s, researchers began investigating the information content of complex networks, [1] and graphs based on Shannon’s entropy work [2]. Numerous quantitative measures for analyzing complex networks have been proposed [3,4] spanning a wide range of issues in discrete mathematics, computer science, information theory, statistics, chemistry, biology, and other fields [5,6]. Graph entropy measures, for example, have been widely used to characterize the structure of graph-based systems [7,8] in mathematical chemistry, biology, and computer science-related areas. The concept of graph entropy [9], developed by Rashevsky [10] and Trucco [11] has been used to quantify the structural complexity of graphs [12,13].
Chemical indices are important tools for studying different physico-chemical properties of molecules without having to conduct several tests. In the investigation of medicines, quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) use mathematical computations to decipher the chemical properties [14,15]. Some researchers have analyzed the topological and K-Banhatti indices in [16,17]. Mowshowitz [18] introduced the entropy of a graph as an information-theoretic quantity. The complexity is evident here. The well-known Shannon’s entropy [2] is used to calculate the entropy of a graph. Importantly, Mowshowitz interpreted his graph entropy measure as a graph’s structural information content and demonstrated that this quantity satisfies important properties when used with product graphs [18]. Inspired by Dehmer and Kraus [19], it was discovered that determining the minimal values of graph entropies is difficult due to a lack of analytical methods to address this specific problem.
The first-order valence-based K-Banhatti indices [17,20,21] are, respectively, as follows:
B 1 ( G , x ) = a i a j x ( V a i + V a j ) a n d B 1 ( G ) = a i a j ( V a i + V a j ) .
where a i and a j denote the atoms of a molecule, V a i and V a j represent the valency of each atom, and, if a i and a j are connected or have atom bonds, then we denote this by a i a j . Accordingly, the second valence-based K-Banhatti index [22] and polynomial are as follows:
B 2 ( G , x ) = a i a j x ( V a i × V a j ) a n d B 2 ( G ) = a i a j ( V a i × V a j )
The hyper K-Banhatti index and first and second polynomial types [21] are as follows:
H B 1 ( G , x ) = a i a j x ( V a i + V a j ) 2 a n d H B 1 ( G ) = a i a j ( V a i + V a j ) 2
H B 2 ( G , x ) = a i a j x ( V a i × V a j ) 2 a n d H B 2 ( G ) = a i a j ( V a i × V a j ) 2
The Banhatti indices were proposed by the Indian mathematician Kulli as a result of Milan Randic’s 1972 Zagreb indices. With various techniques, such as modified and hyper-Banhatti indices, Kulli offered a number of studies on Banhatti indices. These indices have excellent associations with several chemical and nonchemical graph properties. The amount of thermal energy per unit temperature in a system that cannot be used for useful work is known as entropy [23,24]. In this article, we investigate the graphs of different molecules, namely the pyrene network, the circumnaphthalene series of benzenoid, and the honeycomb benzenoid network, to determine the K-Banhatti entropies’ use of K-Banhatti indices [21,25].

2. Definitions of Entropies via K-Banhatti Indices

Manzoor et al. in [26] and Ghani et al. in [27] recently offered another strategy that is a little bit novel in the literature: applying the idea of Shannon’s entropy [28] in terms of topological indices. The following formula represents the valency-based entropy:
E N T μ ( G ) = a i a j μ ( V a i V a j ) a i a j μ ( V a i V a j ) log { μ ( V a i V a j ) a i a j μ ( V a i V a j ) } .
where a 1 , a 2 represents the atoms, E G represents the edge set, and μ ( V a i V a j ) represents the edge weight of edge ( V a i V a j ) .
  • The first K-Banhatti entropy
Let μ ( V a i V a j ) = V a i + V a j . The first-order K-Banhatti index (1) is thus provided as
B 1 ( G ) = a i a j { V a i + V a j } = a i a j μ ( V a i V a j ) .
The use of (5), the first K-Banhatti entropy, is shown below:
E N T B 1 ( G ) = log ( B 1 ( G ) ) 1 B 1 ( G ) log { a i a j [ V a i + V a j ] [ V a i + V a j ] } .
  • The Second K-Banhatti entropy
Let μ ( V a i V a j ) = V a i × V a j . Then, the second K-Banhatti index (2) is given by
B 2 ( G ) = a i a j { ( V a i × V a j ) } = a i a j μ ( V a i V a j ) .
The use of (5), the second K-Banhatti entropy, is shown below:
E N T B 2 ( G ) = log ( B 2 ( G ) ) 1 B 2 ( G ) log { a i a j [ V a i × V a j ] [ V a i × V a j ] } .
  • Entropy related to the first K-hyper Banhatti index
Let μ ( V a i V a j ) = ( V a i + V a j ) 2 . Then, the first K-hyper Banhatti index (3) is given by
H B 1 ( G ) = a i a j { ( V a i + V a j ) 2 } = a i a j μ ( V a i V a j ) .
The use of (5), the first K-hyper Banhatti entropy, is shown below:
E N T H B 1 ( G ) = log ( H B 1 ( G ) ) 1 H B 1 ( G ) log { a i a j [ V a i + V a j ] 2 [ V a i + V a j ] 2 } .
  • Entropy related to the second K-hyper Banhatti index
Let μ ( V a i V a j ) = ( V a i × V a j ) 2 . Then, the second K-hyper Banhatti index (4) is given by
H B 2 ( G ) = a i a j { ( V a i × V a j ) 2 } = a i a j μ ( V a i V a j ) .
The use of (5), the second K-hyper Banhatti entropy, is shown below:
E N T H B 2 ( G ) = log ( H B 1 ( G ) ) 1 H B 1 ( G ) log { a i a j [ V a i × V a j ] 2 [ V a i × V a j ] 2 } .

3. The Pyrene Network

The precise arrangement of rings in the benzenoid system offers a transformation within a sequence of benzenoid structures of the benzenoid graph, which changes the structure. The Pyrene network P Y n is a collection of hexagons, and it is a simple, connected 2D planner graph, where n represents the number of hexagons in any row of P Y n (see Figure 1). Accordingly, the Pyrene network is a series of benzenoid rings, and the total number of benzenoid rings is n 2 in P Y ( n ) . We sum up the Zagreb polynomial and topological indices of P Y ( n ) in this section.
Results and discussion
The number of atoms and the total number of atomic bonds for P Y n are now determined. Let us consider the line of symmetry that divides P Y n into two symmetric parts, as shown in Figure 1. Let us denote the number of atoms in one symmetric portion of P Y n by x and the number of layers by l. In one symmetric part of P Y n , there are l layers of carbon atoms for 1 l n , as indicated in Figure 1. Then, an lth layer contains 2 l + 1 carbon atoms. Accordingly, we have
x = l = 1 n ( 2 l + 1 ) = 3 + 5 + 7 + + ( 2 n + 1 ) = n 2 { 2 ( 3 ) + ( n 1 ) 2 } = n 2 + 2 n ( t h e s u m o f a n a r i t h m e t i c s e r i e s )
The number of atoms in P Y n is 2 x = 2 n 2 + 4 n because of the two symmetric parts in P Y n . Furthermore, a P Y n corner atom and an atom other than a corner atom have valencies two and three, respectively. Thus, out of 2 n 2 + 4 n atoms, 4 n + 2 atoms have valency two, and 2 ( n 2 1 ) atoms have valency three. So, by using Formula (1), the number of atomic bonds in P Y n is 3 n 2 + 4 n 1 . According to the valencies (two and three) of the atoms, there are three types of atomic bonds, which are (2,2), (2,3), and (3,3) in P Y n . On the basis of valency, Table 1 provides the partition of the set of atomic bonds.
The edge partition of P Y n is:
V 2 2 = { e = V i V j , f o r a l l V i , V j c o n t a i n e d i n E ( P Y n ) , w h e n e v e r d V i = 2 , d V j = 2 } , V 2 3 = { e = V i V j , f o r a l l V i , V j c o n t a i n e d i n E ( P Y n ) , w h e n e v e r d V i = 2 , d V j = 3 } , V 3 3 = { e = V i V j , f o r a l l V i , V j c o n t a i n e d i n E ( P Y n ) , w h e n e v e r d V i = 3 , d V j = 3 } .
This partition provides:
  • Entropy related to the first K-Banhatti index of P Y n
Let P Y n be the Pyrene network of C 6 H 6 . The first K-Banhatti polynomial is calculated using Equation (1) and Table 1.
B 1 ( P Y n , x ) = V ( 2 2 ) x 2 + 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x 2 + 3 + V ( 3 3 ) x 3 + 3 = 6 x 4 + 8 ( n 1 ) x 5 + ( 3 n 2 4 n + 1 ) x 6 .
Following the simplification of Equation (10), we obtain the first K-Banhatti index, which is given at x = 1 via differentiation.
B 1 ( P Y n ) = 2 ( 9 n 2 + 8 n 5 )
Here, we calculate the first K-Banhatti entropy of P Y n using Table 1 and Equation (11) inside Equation (6) in the following manner:
E N T B 1 ( P Y n ) = log ( B 1 ) 1 B 1 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i + V a j ) ( V a i + V a j ) × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) ( V a i + V a j ) × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) ( V a i + V a j ) = log 2 ( 9 n 2 + 8 n 5 ) 1 29 n 2 + 8 n 5 log { 16 ( 4 ) 4 × 8 ( n 1 ) ( 5 ) 5 × ( 3 n 2 4 n + 1 ) ( 6 ) 6 .
  • The second K-Banhatti entropy of P Y n
Let P Y n be the Pyrene network of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (2) and Table 1, the second K-Banhatti polynomial is
B 2 ( P Y n ) = V ( 2 2 ) x 2 × 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x 2 × 3 + V ( 3 3 ) x 3 × 3 = 6 x 4 + 8 ( n 1 ) x 6 + ( 3 n 2 4 n + 1 ) x 9 .
To differentiate (34) at x = 1 , we obtain the second K-Banhatti index:
B 2 ( P Y n ) = 3 ( 9 n 2 + 4 n 5 ) .
Here, we calculate the second K-Banhatti entropy of P Y n using Table 1 and Equation (13) in Equation (7) as described below:
E N T B 2 ( P Y n ) = log ( B 2 ) 1 B 2 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i × V a j ) ( V a i × V a j ) × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) ( V a i × V a j ) × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) ( V a i × V a j ) = log 3 ( 9 n 2 + 4 n 5 ) 1 3 ( 9 n 2 + 4 n 5 ) log { 16 ( 6 6 ) × 8 ( n 1 ) 9 9 × ( 3 n 2 4 n + 1 ) 12 12 × 2 ( 2 s t s t ) 16 16 } .
  • Entropy related to the first K-hyper Banhatti index of P Y n
Let P Y n be the Pyrene network of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (3) and Table 1, the first K-hyper Banhatti polynomial is
H B 1 ( P Y n ) = V ( 2 2 ) x ( 2 + 2 ) 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x ( 2 + 3 ) 2 + V ( 3 3 ) x ( 3 + 3 ) 2 = 6 x 16 + 8 ( n 1 ) x 25 + ( 3 n 2 4 n + 1 ) x 36
To differentiate (15) at x = 1 , we obtain the first K-hyper Banhatti index
H B 1 ( P Y n ) = 2 ( 54 n 2 + 28 n 34 ) .
Here, we calculate the first K-hyper Banhatti entropy of P Y n using Table 1 and Equation (16) in Equation (9) as described below:
E N T H B 1 ( P Y n ) = log ( H B 1 ) 1 H B 1 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i + V a j ) 2 ( V a i + V a j ) 2 × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) 2 ( V a i + V a j ) 2 × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) 2 ( V a i + V a j ) 2 = log 2 ( 54 n 2 + 28 n 34 ) 1 2 ( 54 n 2 + 28 n 34 ) log { 16 ( 5 50 ) × 8 ( n 1 ) ( 6 72 ) × ( 3 n 2 4 n + 1 ) ( 7 98 ) × 2 ( 2 s t s t ) ( 8 128 ) .
  • Entropy related to the second K-hyper Banhatti index P Y n
Let P Y n be the Pyrene network of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (4) and Table 1, the second K-hyper Banhatti polynomial is
H B 2 ( P Y n ) = V ( 2 2 ) x ( 2 × 2 ) 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x ( 2 × 3 ) 2 + V ( 3 3 ) x ( 3 × 3 ) 2 = 6 x 16 + 8 ( n 1 ) x 36 + ( 3 n 2 4 n + 1 ) x 81 .
To differentiate (18) at x = 1 , we obtain the second K-hyper Banhatti index
H B 2 ( P Y n ) = 3 ( 81 n 2 12 n 37 ) .
Here, we calculate the second K-hyper Banhatti entropy of P Y n using Table 1 and Equation (19) in Equation (9) as described below:
E N T H B 1 ( P Y n ) = log ( H B 1 ) 1 H B 1 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i × V a j ) 2 ( V a i × V a j ) 2 × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) 2 ( V a i × V a j ) 2 × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) 2 ( V a i × V a j ) 2 = log 3 ( 81 n 2 12 n 37 ) 1 3 ( 81 n 2 12 n 37 ) log { 16 ( 6 ) 72 × 8 ( n 1 ) 9 81 × ( 3 n 2 4 n + 1 ) 12 288 × 2 ( 2 s t s t ) 16 512

Characteristics of K-Banhatti Indices of P Y n

Here, we contrast the K-Banhatti indices, namely B 1 , B 2 , H B 1 , and H B 2 for P Y n quantitatively and visually in Table 2 and Figure 2, respectively.

4. Circumnaphthalene Series of Benzenoid

Circumnaphthalene is similar to the benzenoid polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with the formula C 32 H 14 and the ten peri-fused six-member rings in figure C N B 2 . Ovalene is a chemical that is reddish-orange in color. It is only slightly soluble in solvents, such as benzenoid, toluene, and dichloromethane. The circumnaphthalene series of benzenoids is designated by C N B n , where “n” is the number of benzenoid rings in the corner, as seen in Figure 3.
Results and Discussion
In Figure 3, we have the following three partitions of the carbon atoms in C N B n :
V 2 2 = { V i V j = e , V i , V j E ( C N B n ) | d C N B n ( u ) = 2 , d C N B n ( v ) = 2 } , V 2 3 = { V i V j = e , V i , V j E ( C N B n ) | d C N B n ( u ) = 2 , d C N B n ( v ) = 3 } , V 3 3 = { V i V j = e , V i , V j E ( C N B n ) | d C N B n ( u ) = 3 , d C N B n ( v ) = 3 } .
These partitions provide us with the atomic bond partition of the C N B n network (see Table 3).
  • Entropy related to the 1st K-Banhatti index of C N B n
Let C N B n be the circumnaphthalene series of benzenoid of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (1) and Table 3, the first K-Banhatti polynomial is
B 1 ( C N B n , x ) = V ( 2 2 ) x 2 + 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x 2 + 3 + V ( 3 3 ) x 3 + 3 = 6 x 4 + 4 ( 3 n 5 ) x 5 + ( 9 n 2 27 n + 19 ) x 6 .
Following the simplification of Equation (21), we obtain the first K-Banhatti index, which is given at x = 1 via differentiation.
B 1 ( C N B n ) = 2 ( 27 n 2 51 n + 19 ) .
Here, we calculate the first K-Banhatti entropy of C N B n using Table 1 and Equation (24) in Equation (6) in the following manner:
E N T B 1 ( C N B n ) = log ( B 1 ) 1 B 1 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i + V a j ) ( V a i + V a j ) × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) ( V a i + V a j ) × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) ( V a i + V a j ) = log 2 ( 27 n 2 51 n + 19 ) 1 2 ( 27 n 2 51 n + 19 ) log { 16 ( 4 ) 4 × 4 ( 3 n 5 ) ( 5 ) 5 × ( 9 n 2 27 n + 19 ) ( 6 ) 6 .
  • The second K-Banhatti entropy of C N B n
Let C N B n be the circumnaphthalene series of benzenoid of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (2) and Table 1, the second K-Banhatti polynomial is
B 2 ( C N B n ) = V ( 2 2 ) x 2 × 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x 2 × 3 + V ( 3 3 ) x 3 × 3 = 6 x 4 + 4 ( 3 n 5 ) x 6 + ( 9 n 2 27 n + 19 ) x 9 .
To differentiate (23) at x = 1 , we obtain the second K-Banhatti index
B 2 ( C N B n ) = 3 ( 27 n 2 57 + 25 ) .
Here, we calculate the second K-Banhatti entropy of C N B n using Table 3 and Equation (24) in Equation (7) as described below:
E N T B 2 ( C N B n ) = log ( B 2 ) 1 B 2 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i × V a j ) ( V a i × V a j ) × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) ( V a i × V a j ) × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) ( V a i × V a j ) = log 3 ( 27 n 2 57 + 25 ) 1 3 ( 27 n 2 57 + 25 ) log { 6 ( 4 4 ) × 4 ( 3 n 5 ) 6 6 × ( 9 n 2 27 n + 19 ) 9 9 } .
  • Entropy related to the first K -hyper Banhatti index of CNB n
Let C N B n be the circumnaphthalene series of benzenoid of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (3) and Table 3, the first K-hyper Banhatti polynomial is
H B 1 ( C N B n ) = V ( 2 2 ) x ( 2 + 2 ) 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x ( 2 + 3 ) 2 + V ( 3 3 ) x ( 3 + 3 ) 2 = 6 x 16 + 4 ( 3 n 5 ) x 25 + ( 9 n 2 27 n + 19 ) x 36
To differentiate (26) at x = 1 , we obtain the first K-hyper Banhatti index
H B 1 ( C N B n ) = 4 ( 81 n 2 168 n + 70 ) .
Here, we calculate the first K-hyper Banhatti entropy of C N B n using Table 1 and Equation (27) in Equation (9) as described below:
E N T H B 1 ( C N B n ) = log ( H B 1 ) 1 H B 1 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i + V a j ) 2 ( V a i + V a j ) 2 × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) 2 ( V a i + V a j ) 2 × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) 2 ( V a i + V a j ) 2 = log 4 ( 81 n 2 168 n + 70 ) 1 4 ( 81 n 2 168 n + 70 ) log { 6 ( 4 32 ) × 4 ( 3 n 5 ) 5 50 × ( 9 n 2 27 n + 19 ) ( 6 72 )
  • Entropy related to the second K-hyper Banhatti index CNBn
Let C N B n be the circumnaphthalene series of benzenoid of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (4) and Table 3, the second K-hyper Banhatti polynomial is
H B 2 ( C N B n ) = V ( 2 2 ) x ( 2 × 2 ) 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x ( 2 × 3 ) 2 + V ( 3 3 ) x ( 3 × 3 ) 2 = 6 x 16 + 4 ( 3 n 5 ) x 36 + ( 9 n 2 27 n + 19 ) x 81 .
To differentiate (29) at x = 1 , we obtain the second K-hyper Banhatti index
H B 2 ( C N B n ) = 3 ( 243 n 2 585 n + 305 ) .
Here, we calculate the second K-hyper Banhatti entropy of C N B n using Table 3 and Equation (30) in Equation (9) as described below:
E N T H B 2 ( C N B n ) = log ( H B 2 ) 1 H B 2 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i × V a j ) 2 ( V a i × V a j ) 2 × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) 2 ( V a i × V a j ) 2 × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) 2 ( V a i × V a j ) 2 = log 3 ( 243 n 2 585 n + 305 ) 1 3 ( 243 n 2 585 n + 305 ) log { 6 ( 4 ) 32 × 4 ( 3 n 5 ) 6 72 × ( 9 n 2 27 n + 19 ) 9 162

Characteristics of K-Banhatti Indices of C N B n

Here, we contrast the K-Banhatti indices, namely B 1 , B 2 , H B 1 , and H B 2 for C N B n quantitatively and visually in Table 4 and Figure 4, respectively.

5. The Honeycomb Benzenoid Network

In this section, we introduce a chemical compound that has received more and more attention in recent years, partly due to its applications in chemistry. Honeycomb networks are formed when hexagonal tiling is used recursively in a specific pattern. H B n denotes an n-dimensional honeycomb network, where n is the number of Benzene rings from center to top, center to bottom, or center to each corner of H B n , as shown in Figure 5.
Results and Discussion
The honeycomb network H B n is created by adding a layer of hexagons around the boundary of H B ( n 1 ) . In the honeycomb benzenoid network, a 6 n amount of atoms has valency two, and 6 n 2 6 n atoms have valency three. According to the valency of each atom in H B n , the atomic bonds are classified into three types: 2 2 , 2 3 , and 3 3 (see Figure 5).
E G 2 2 = { e = u v , u , v E ( H B n ) | d u = 2 , d v = 2 } , E G 2 3 = { e = u v , u , v E ( H B n ) | d u = 2 , d v = 3 } , E G 3 3 = { e = u v , u , v E ( H B n ) | d u = 3 , d v = 3 } .
Thus, according to the above partition of the atomic bonds, there is 3 n ( 3 n 1 ) total number of atomic bonds used in the honeycomb benzenoid network. The atomic bond partition of H B n is shown in Table 5.
  • Entropy related to the first K-Banhatti index of H B n
Let H B n be the honeycomb benzenoid network of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (1) and Table 5, the first K-Banhatti polynomial is
B 1 ( H B n , x ) = V ( 2 2 ) x 2 + 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x 2 + 3 + V ( 3 3 ) x 3 + 3 = 6 x 4 + 12 ( n 1 ) x 5 + ( 9 n 2 15 n + 6 ) x 6 .
Following the simplification of Equation (32), we obtain the first K-Banhatti index given at x = 1 via differentiation.
B 1 ( H B n ) = 2 ( 27 n 2 15 n 26 ) .
Here, we calculate the first K-Banhatti entropy of H B n using Table 5 and Equation (33) in Equation (6) in the following manner:
E N T B 1 ( H B n ) = log ( B 1 ) 1 B 1 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i + V a j ) ( V a i + V a j ) × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) ( V a i + V a j ) × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) ( V a i + V a j ) = log 2 ( 27 n 2 15 n 26 ) 1 2 ( 27 n 2 15 n 26 ) log { 6 ( 4 ) 4 × 12 ( n 1 ) ( 5 ) 5 × ( 9 n 2 15 n + 6 ) ( 6 ) 6 .
  • The second K-Banhatti entropy of H B n
Let H B n be the honeycomb benzenoid network of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (2) and Table 5, the second K-Banhatti polynomial is
B 2 ( H B n ) = V ( 2 2 ) x 2 × 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x 2 × 3 + V ( 3 3 ) x 3 × 3 = 6 x 4 + 12 ( n 1 ) x 6 + ( 9 n 2 15 n + 6 ) x 9 .
To differentiate (34) at x = 1 , we obtain the second K-Banhatti index
B 2 ( H B n ) = 81 n 2 87 n + 30 .
Here, we calculate the second K-Banhatti entropy of H B n using Table 5 and Equation (35) in Equation (7) as described below
E N T B 2 H B n = log ( B 2 ) 1 B 2 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i × V a j ) ( V a i × V a j ) × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) ( V a i × V a j ) × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) ( V a i × V a j ) = log ( 81 n 2 87 n + 30 ) 1 81 n 2 87 n + 30 log { 6 ( 4 4 ) × 12 ( n 1 ) 6 6 × ( 9 n 2 15 n + 6 ) 9 9 } .
  • Entropy related to the first K-hyper Banhatti index of H B n
Let H B n be the honeycomb benzenoid network of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (3) and Table 5, the first K-hyper Banhatti polynomial is
H B 1 ( H B n ) = V ( 2 2 ) x ( 2 + 2 ) 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x ( 2 + 3 ) 2 + V ( 3 3 ) x ( 3 + 3 ) 2 = 6 x 16 + 12 ( n 1 ) x 25 + ( 9 n 2 15 n + 6 ) x 36
To differentiate (37) at x = 1 , we obtain the first K-hyper Banhatti index
H B 1 ( H B n ) = 12 ( 27 n 2 20 n + 1 ) .
Here, we calculate the first K-hyper Banhatti entropy of H B n using Table 5 and Equation (38) in Equation (9) as described below:
E N T H B 1 H B n = log ( H B 1 ) 1 H B 1 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i + V a j ) 2 ( V a i + V a j ) 2 × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) 2 ( V a i + V a j ) 2 × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i + V a j ) 2 ( V a i + V a j ) 2 = log 12 ( 27 n 2 20 n + 1 ) 1 12 ( 27 n 2 20 n + 1 ) log { 6 ( 4 32 ) × 12 ( n 1 ) ( 5 50 ) × ( 9 n 2 15 n + 6 ) ( 6 72 ) } .
  • Entropy related to the second K-hyper Banhatti index H B n
Let H B n be the honeycomb benzenoid network of C 6 H 6 . Then, using Equation (4) and Table 5, the second K-hyper Banhatti polynomial is
H B 2 ( H B n ) = V ( 2 2 ) x ( 2 × 2 ) 2 + V ( 2 3 ) x ( 2 × 3 ) 2 + V ( 3 3 ) x ( 3 × 3 ) 2 = 6 x 4 + 12 ( n 1 ) x 36 + ( 9 n 2 15 n + 6 ) x 81 .
To differentiate (40) at x = 1 , we obtain the second K-hyper Banhatti index
H B 2 ( H B n ) = 3 ( 243 n 2 261 n + 26 ) .
Here, we calculate the second K-hyper Banhatti entropy of H B n using Table 5 and Equation (41) in Equation (9), as described below:
E N T H B 1 H B n = log ( H B 1 ) 1 H B 1 log { V ( 2 , 2 ) ( V a i × V a j ) 2 ( V a i × V a j ) 2 × V ( 2 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) 2 ( V a i × V a j ) 2 × V ( 3 , 3 ) ( V a i × V a j ) 2 ( V a i × V a j ) 2 = log 3 ( 243 n 2 261 n + 26 ) 1 3 ( 243 n 2 261 n + 26 ) log { 6 ( 4 ) 32 × 12 ( n 1 ) 6 72 × ( 9 n 2 15 n + 6 ) 9 162 .

Characteristics of K-Banhatti Indices of H B n

Here, we contrast the K-Banhatti indices, namely B 1 , B 2 , H B 1 , and H B 2 for H B n quantitatively and visually in Table 6 and Figure 6, respectively.

6. Conclusions

By using Shannon’s entropy and the entropy definitions of Chen et al., we looked into the graph entropies connected to a novel information function and assessed the link between degree-based topological indices and degree-based entropies in this work. Industrial chemistry has a strong foundation in the concept of distance-based entropy. The Pyrene network, P Y n ; the circumnaphthalene series of benzenoid, C N B n ; and the honeycomb benzenoid network, H B n were studied, and their valency-based K-Banhatti indices were estimated using four K-Banhatti polynomials with a set partition and an atom bonds approach. The acquired results are valuable for anticipating numerous molecular features of chemical substances, such as boiling point, π electron energy, pharmaceutical configuration, and many more concepts. Our results can be applied to determine the electronic structure, signal processing, physicochemical reactions, and complexity of molecules and molecular ensembles for P Y n , C N B n , and H B n . Together with chemical structure, thermodynamic entropy, energy, and computer sciences, the K-Banhatti entropy can be crucial to linking different fields and serving as the basis for future interdisciplinary research. We intend to extend this idea to different chemical structures in the future, opening up new directions for study in this area.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.U.G. and F.J.H.C.; methodology, M.K.M.; software, J.-B.L.; validation, F.M.A.; formal analysis, F.M.A.; investigation, F.M.A., S.D.; resources, F.J.H.C.; data curation, M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.U.G.; writing—review and editing, F.J.H.C.; visualization, M.U.G.; supervision, M.K.M.; project administration, M.U.G.; funding acquisition, F.J.H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicabl for studies not involving humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data available to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

No data available.

References

  1. Tag El Din, E.S.M.; Sultan, F.; Ghani, M.U.; Liu, J.B.; Dehraj, S.; Cancan, M.; Alharbi, F.M.; Alhushaybari, A. Some Novel Results Involving Prototypical Computation of Zagreb Polynomials and Indices for SiO 4 Embedded in a Chain of Silicates. Molecules 2022, 28, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shannon, C.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1949. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali, A.; Furtula, B.; Redžepović, I.; Gutman, I. Atom-bond sum-connectivity index. J. Math. Chem. 2022, 60, 2081–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ghani, M.U.; Kashif Maqbool, M.; George, R.; Ofem, A.E.; Cancan, M. Entropies Via Various Molecular Descriptors of Layer Structure of H3BO3. Mathematics 2022, 10, 4831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, J.B.; Arockiaraj, M.; Arulperumjothi, M.; Prabhu, S. Distance based and bond additive topological indices of certain repurposed antiviral drug compounds tested for treating COVID-19. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2021, 121, e26617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, J.B.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Hayat, S. Further results on computation of topological indices of certain networks. IET Control Theory Appl. 2017, 11, 2065–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Liu, J.B.; Gao, W.; Siddiqui, M.K.; Farahani, M.R. Computing three topological indices for Titania nanotubes TiO2 [m, n]. AKCE Int. J. Graphs Comb. 2016, 13, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, J.B.; Shafiq, M.K.; Ali, H.; Naseem, A.; Maryam, N.; Asghar, S.S. Topological Indices of m th Chain Silicate Graphs. Mathematics 2019, 7, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Alam, A.; Ghani, M.U.; Kamran, M.; Shazib Hameed, M.; Hussain Khan, R.; Baig, A.Q. Degree-Based Entropy for a Non-Kekulean Benzenoid Graph. J. Math. 2022, 2022, 2288207. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rashevsky, N. Life, information theory, and topology. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1955, 17, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Trucco, E. A note on the information content of graphs. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1956, 18, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chu, Y.M.; Khan, A.R.; Ghani, M.U.; Ghaffar, A.; Inc, M. Computation of Zagreb Polynomials and Zagreb Indices for Benzenoid Triangular & Hourglass System. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2022, 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, J.B.; Younas, M.; Habib, M.; Yousaf, M.; Nazeer, W. M-Polynomials and Degree-Based Topological Indices of VC 5 C 7 [p, q] and HC 5 C 7 [p, q] Nanotubes. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 41125–41132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghani, M.U.; Sultan, F.; El Sayed, M.; Cancan, M.; Ali, S. SiO4 characterization in a chain and C6 H6 embedded in a Non-kekulean structure for Kulli Temperature indices. Res. Square 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Y.F.; Ghani, M.U.; Sultan, F.; Inc, M.; Cancan, M. Connecting SiO 4 in Silicate and Silicate Chain Networks to Compute Kulli Temperature Indices. Molecules 2022, 27, 7533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hamid, K.; Muhammad, H.A.B.; Iqbal, M.W.; Hamza, M.A.; Bhatti, S.U.; Aqeel, M. Topological analysis empowered bridge network variants by dharwad indices. Online Open Access 2022, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, W.; Naeem, M.; Rauf, A.; Riasat, A.; Aslam, A.; Anoh Yannick, K. On Analysis of Banhatti Indices for Hyaluronic Acid Curcumin and Hydroxychloroquine. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 7468857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mowshowitz, A. Entropy and the complexity of graphs: I. An index of the relative complexity of a graph. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1968, 30, 175–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dehmer, M.; Varmuza, K.; Borgert, S.; Emmert-Streib, F. On entropy-based molecular descriptors: Statistical analysis of real and synthetic chemical structures. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1655–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hamid, K.; Iqbal, M.W.; Arif, E.; Mahmood, Y.; Khan, A.S.; Kama, N.; Azmi, A.; Ikram, A. K-Banhatti Invariants Empowered Topological Investigation of Bridge Networks. CMC-Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 73, 5423–5440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kulli, V. On K Banhatti indices of graphs. J. Comput. Math. Sci. 2016, 7, 213–218. [Google Scholar]
  22. Anjum, M.S.; Safdar, M.U. K Banhatti and K hyper-Banhatti indices of nanotubes. Eng. Appl. Sci. Lett. 2019, 2, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Amigó, J.M.; Balogh, S.G.; Hernández, S. A brief review of generalized entropies. Entropy 2018, 20, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tsai, M.H. Physical properties of high entropy alloys. Entropy 2013, 15, 5338–5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gao, W.; Muzaffar, B.; Nazeer, W. K-Banhatti and K-hyper Banhatti indices of dominating David derived network. Open J. Math. Anal. 2017, 1, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Manzoor, S.; Chu, Y.M.; Siddiqui, M.K.; Ahmad, S. On topological aspects of degree based entropy for two carbon nanosheets. Main Group Met. Chem. 2020, 43, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghani, M.U.; Sultan, F.; Tag El Din, E.S.M.; Khan, A.R.; Liu, J.B.; Cancan, M. A Paradigmatic Approach to Find the Valency-Based K-Banhatti and Redefined Zagreb Entropy for Niobium Oxide and a Metal–Organic Framework. Molecules 2022, 27, 6975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, W.; Xu, K.; Lian, J.; Ma, C.; Bin, L. Integrated flood vulnerability assessment approach based on TOPSIS and Shannon entropy methods. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 89, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pyrene network P Y n .
Figure 1. Pyrene network P Y n .
Molecules 28 00452 g001
Figure 2. Graphical representation of K-Banhatti indices of P Y n .
Figure 2. Graphical representation of K-Banhatti indices of P Y n .
Molecules 28 00452 g002aMolecules 28 00452 g002b
Figure 3. Circumnaphthalene series of benzenoid C N B n .
Figure 3. Circumnaphthalene series of benzenoid C N B n .
Molecules 28 00452 g003
Figure 4. Graphical representation of K-Banhatti indices of C N B n .
Figure 4. Graphical representation of K-Banhatti indices of C N B n .
Molecules 28 00452 g004
Figure 5. The honeycomb benzenoid network.
Figure 5. The honeycomb benzenoid network.
Molecules 28 00452 g005
Figure 6. Graphical representation of K-Banhatti indices of H B n .
Figure 6. Graphical representation of K-Banhatti indices of H B n .
Molecules 28 00452 g006
Table 1. Atomic bond partition of P Y n .
Table 1. Atomic bond partition of P Y n .
Atomic Bond Type V 2 2 V 2 3 V 3 3
Number of atom bonds6 8 ( n 1 ) 3 n 2 4 n + 1
Table 2. Numerical values of K-Banhatti indices of P Y n .
Table 2. Numerical values of K-Banhatti indices of P Y n .
Values of n23456789101112
B 1 9420034252073498412701592195023442774
B 2 1172644657201029139218092280280533844017
H B 1 476107218842912415656167292918411,29213,61616,156
H B 2 789196836335784842111,54415,15319,24823,82928,89634,449
Table 3. Atomic bond partition of C N B n network.
Table 3. Atomic bond partition of C N B n network.
Types of Atomic Bond V 2 2 V 2 3 V 3 3
m V i V j 6 4 ( 3 n 5 ) 9 n 2 27 n + 19
Table 4. Numerical comparison of topological indices of C N B n .
Table 4. Numerical comparison of topological indices of C N B n .
Values of n23456789101112
B 1 5021849487871370197026783494441854506590
B 2 75572916781245196528473891509764657995
H B 1 280232118027765020781211,45215,64020,47625,96032,092
H B 2 9153212211555910,36516,62924,35133,53144,16956,26569,819
Table 5. Atomic bond partition of H B n .
Table 5. Atomic bond partition of H B n .
Types of Atomic Bonds E G 2 2 E G 2 3 E G 3 3
Cardinality of atomic bonds6 12 ( n 1 ) ( 9 n 2 15 n + 6 )
Table 6. Numerical comparison of topological indices of H B n .
Table 6. Numerical comparison of topological indices of H B n .
Values of n23456789101112
B 1 10434469211481712238431644052504861527364
B 2 180498978162024243390451858087260887410650
H B 1 82822084236691210,23614,20818,82824,09630,01236,57643,788
H B 2 14284290861014,38821,62430,31840,47052,08065,14879,67495,658
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghani, M.U.; Campena, F.J.H.; Maqbool, M.K.; Liu, J.-B.; Dehraj, S.; Cancan, M.; Alharbi, F.M. Entropy Related to K-Banhatti Indices via Valency Based on the Presence of C6H6 in Various Molecules. Molecules 2023, 28, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010452

AMA Style

Ghani MU, Campena FJH, Maqbool MK, Liu J-B, Dehraj S, Cancan M, Alharbi FM. Entropy Related to K-Banhatti Indices via Valency Based on the Presence of C6H6 in Various Molecules. Molecules. 2023; 28(1):452. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010452

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghani, Muhammad Usman, Francis Joseph H. Campena, Muhammad Kashif Maqbool, Jia-Bao Liu, Sanaullah Dehraj, Murat Cancan, and Fahad M. Alharbi. 2023. "Entropy Related to K-Banhatti Indices via Valency Based on the Presence of C6H6 in Various Molecules" Molecules 28, no. 1: 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010452

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop