Next Article in Journal
Chemical Composition and Evaluation of Insecticidal Activity of Calendula incana subsp. maritima and Laserpitium siler subsp. siculum Essential Oils against Stored Products Pests
Next Article in Special Issue
Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibition and Molecular Docking of Isolated Compounds from Traditional Thai Medicinal Plant, Neuropeltis racemosa Wall.
Previous Article in Journal
Innovative Purification Method of Ovatodiolide from Anisomeles indica to Induce Apoptosis in Human Gastric Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beneficial Effects of Laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) and Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) Extract on Rat Health
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules27030585
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The In Vitro Anti-Cancer Activities and Mechanisms of Action of 9-Methoxycanthin-6-one from Eurycoma longifolia in Selected Cancer Cell Lines

by
Nurhanan Murni Yunos
1,*,
Nor Datiakma Mat Amin
1,
Muhammad Haffiz Jauri
2,
Sui Kiong Ling
2,
Nor Hasnida Hassan
3 and
Nor Jannah Sallehudin
1
1
Bioactivity Programme, Natural Products Division, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong 52109, Malaysia
2
Phytochemistry Programme, Natural Products Division, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong 52109, Malaysia
3
Biotechnology Programme, Forestry Biotechnology Division, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong 52109, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(3), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030585
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Revised: 7 January 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2022 / Published: 18 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Discovery of Bioactive Ingredients from Natural Products II)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An alkaloid compound from the hairy root culture of Eurycoma longifolia has been isolated and characterised as 9-methoxycanthin-6-one. The aims of these studies were to investigate the in vitro anti-cancer activities of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one against ovarian cancer (A2780, SKOV-3), breast cancer (MCF-7), colorectal cancer (HT29), skin cancer (A375) and cervical cancer (HeLa) cell lines by using a Sulphorhodamine B assay, and to evaluate the mechanisms of action of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one via the Hoechst 33342 assay and proteomics approach. The results had shown that 9-methoxycanthin-6-one gave IC50 values of 4.04 ± 0.36 µM, 5.80 ± 0.40 µM, 15.09 ± 0.99 µM, 3.79 ± 0.069 µM, 5.71 ± 0.20 µM and 4.30 ± 0.27 µM when tested in A2780, SKOV-3, MCF-7, HT-29, A375 and HeLa cell lines, respectively. It was found that 9-methoxycanthin-6-one induced apoptosis in a concentration dependent manner when analysed via the Hoechst 33342 assay. 9-methoxycanthine-6-one were found to affect the expressions of apoptotic-related proteins, that were proteins pyruvate kinase (PKM), annexin A2 (ANXA2), galectin 3 (LGAL3), heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (HNRNP1A1), peroxiredoxin 3 (PRDX3), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) from the differential analysis of 2-DE profiles between treated and non-treated 9-methoxycanthine-6-one. Proteins such as acetyl-CoA acyltransferase 2 (ACAA2), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1A1), capping protein (CAPG), eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 (EEF1A1), malate dehydrogenase 2 (MDH2), purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), and triosephosphate isomerase 1 (TPI1) were also identified to be associated with A2780 cell death induced by 9-methoxycanthine-6-one. These findings may provide a new insight on the mechanisms of action of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one in exerting its anti-cancer effects in vitro.

1. Introduction

Cancer cases are still on the rise in both developed and developing countries, and it is predicted that 14 million new cancer cases will emerge by 2035, representing almost 60% of the global cancer incidence, as compared to 6.7 million new cancer cases (47.5% of all cancers) reported in 2012 [1]. Cancer may affect more than a hundred types of cells from more than sixty different organs in the body [2]. Hence, there is still a dire need to search for new and alternative treatments for treating various type of cancers. Chemotherapy is still the main modality of treatments for advanced stage of cancers. However, chemotherapy cannot cure various types of cancers via single treatment, and also has drug resistance and toxicity side effects problems. Cancer arises due to malfunctions of certain genes and their translated proteins that are related to the over cell proliferations, divisions and growth and/or suppressions of apoptosis-related proteins [3]. Apoptosis or programmed cell death is a process involving expressions of certain genes and proteins which signal the cells to commit suicide in order to eliminate the potential cancer cells’ development in our body [4]. Most of the cancer cells malfunction in apoptosis and many anti-cancer therapeutic agents were found to re-induce the apoptosis mechanism and produce a better outcome to prevent cancer cells’ proliferation [5]. Thus, phytochemical(s) that enable the re-inducement of the apoptosis mechanism in the cancer cells may have the potential to be studied further towards development of anti-cancer therapeutic agents.
Eurycoma longifolia is a plant species that belongs to the family of Simaroubaceae. It is one of the most well-known herbal folk medicines in southeast Asia [2]. E. longifolia is identified locally as ‘Tongkat Ali’ in Malaysia, ‘Pasak bumi’ or ‘Bidara Pahit’ in Indonesia and ‘Piak’, ‘Tung saw’, ‘Ian-don’ in Thailand and ‘Tho nan’ (Laotian) [2,6]. The root of E. longifolia, which is known for its bitter taste, is most sought after because of its various traditional uses for health maintenance, and is also scientifically investigated to have many medicinal properties. Thus, E. longifolia was named as ‘Cay ba binh’, translated as a tree of a hundred maladies, in Vietnam [7]. For examples, the decoction prepared from the roots were claimed to be used as a tonic after childbirth, to treat intermittent fever and to relieve pain in the bones [6,8]. The poultice was prepared for treating headaches, wounds, ulcers and syphilitic sores [6]. The phytochemicals from the roots of E. longifolia had been reported to have anti-ulcer, anti-bacterial, cytotoxic/anti-cancer, anti-parasitic, anti-malarial, anti-pyretic and aphrodisiac properties [2,9]. Different groups of compounds, such as quassinoids, alkaloids, bipheylneolignans, triterpenes and steroids, are among the phytochemicals that have been reported to be present in different plant parts of E. longifolia [10,11].
Most of the compounds from E. longifolia reported to have anti-cancer effects on the tested cancer cell lines were from quassinoids, alkaloids and triterpenes. Quassinoids are among the major compounds detected in most species belonging to Simaroubaceae, including E. longifolia [12]. Among the quassinoids reported to have in vitro anti-cancer effects are eurycomanone, eurycomalactone, 14,15 β-dihydroxyklaineanone, 6-dehydroxylongilactone and others that will be mentioned later. Eurycomanone was reported to have anti-cancer effects in breast [10,13], colon, fibrosarcoma, lung and melanoma cancer cell lines [13]. Eurycomalactone was reported to have anti-cancer effects in murine lymphocytic leukemia (P388) and epidermoid (KB) [14], lung cancer (A-549), breast cancer (MCF-7) [10] and colon (26-L5), melanoma (B16-BL6), lung (LLC and A-549) cancer cell lines [15]. 14,15 β-dihydroxyklaineanone and 6-dehydroxylongilactone were reported to have anti-cancer effects in murine lymphocytic leukemia (P388), epidermoid (KB) [14], lung cancer (A-549) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines [10]. Other quassinoids had also been reported to have anti-cancer effects in respective cancer cell lines. Longilactone was active in murine lymphocytic leukemia (P388), epidermoid (KB) cancer cell lines and lung cancer (A-549) [10]. Pasakbumin C demonstrated strong anti-cancer activities in lung cancer (A-549) cell line. Pasakbumin B and pasakbumin C had also exhibited strong anti-activities in human breast cancer (MCF-7) cell line [10]. Another two quassinoids (11-dehydroklaineanone, 5,6-dehydroeurycomalactone) and seven tirucallane-type triterpenes (niloticin, dihydroniloticin, piscinidol A, bourjotinolone A, 3-episalin A, melianone, hispidone) from the woods of E. longifolia were found to be active when treated in murine lymphocytic leukemia (P388) and epidermoid (KB) cancer cell lines [14].
Alkaloids are also among the compounds that had been mostly isolated from E. longifolia [11]. Among alkaloids from E. longifolia that had been reported to have anti-cancer effects were 9-methoxycanthin-6-one, canthin-6-one [13,16], 9-methoxycanthin-6-one-N-oxide, 9-hydroxycanthin-6-one, 9-hydroxycanthin-6-one-N-oxide [13]. 9-methoxycanthin-6-one had been reported to have anti-cancer effects in breast [13,16,17], lung [13,16], colon, fibrosarcoma, melanoma, epidermoid [13], prostate (DU-145) and ovarian (CaOV-3) cancer cell lines [17]. Canthin-6-one had been reported to have anti-cancer effects in lung (A-549) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cell lines [16]. 9-methoxycanthin-6-one-N-oxide, 9-hydroxycanthin-6-one, 9-hydroxycanthin-6-one-N-oxide had been reported to have anti-cancer effects in breast, colon, fibrosarcoma, lung, melanoma and epidermoid cancer cell lines [13].
Natural products, including phytochemicals, still remain among the main sources in discovering the anti-proliferative agents for cancer treatments due to their diversity in chemical structures [18]. Over the time frame from around 1981 to 2019, 64.9% either natural products, or those which mimicked or were based on natural products in one form or another, had been developed into cancer drugs [18]. In these studies, our team had pursued on the mechanisms of action studies on 9-methoxycanthin-6-one because this information is still lacking, whereas many mechanisms of action studies had been reported on quassinoids such as eurycomanone [19]. Apoptotic and proteomics analyses on a selected cancer cell line treated with 9-methoxycanthin-6-one may provide us with some evidences on the mechanisms of action of this compound in executing cancer cell death. These studies were among the first steps in determining the anti-cancer potential of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one before embarking on drug discovery and pre-clinical studies.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of 9-Methoxycanthin-6-one

9-methoxycanthin-6-one (1), a yellow amorphous powder, and its molecular formula was determined as C15H10N2O2 by EIMS at m/z 251.3 [M + H]+, 1H and 13C-NMR spectra (as shown in Table 1). The 1H-NMR spectrum of (1), showed a pair of ortho-coupled signals at 6.99 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz) and δ 7.98 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz), δ 8.23 (1H, d, J = 5.2 Hz) and 8.78 (1H, d, J = 5.2 Hz), corresponding to four aromatic protons of monosubtituted indole moiety. A signal resolved at δ 4.04 (3H, s) indicated methoxy protons in compound (1). The 13C-NMR peak assignments showed a methoxy carbon resonated at δ 56.2, a signal at δ 163.41 attributed to carbonyl carbon (C-6), and seven signals, δ 115.66 (C-1), δ 143.81 (C-2), δ 138.05 (C-4), δ 129.69 (C-5), δ 101.45 (C-8), δ 114.76 (C-10) and δ 123.95 (C-12), corresponding to seven aromatic carbons. The known constituent (1) was identified by comparison of its spectral data of 1H, 13C-NMR and MS with those reported in the literature [20,21]. The structure of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one (1) is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. In Vitro Anti-Cancer Activities of 9-Methoxycanthine-6-one on Selected Cancer Cell Lines

The in vitro anti-cancer effects of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one were evaluated against six different cancer cell lines: A2780, SKOV-3, MCF-7, HT29, A375 and HeLa. Cisplatin and paclitaxel were also evaluated on their in vitro anti-cancer effects for comparison studies. 9-methoxycanthin-6-one gave significant in vitro anti-cancer effects, with IC50 values ranging from 3.79 ± 0.069 μM to 15.09 ± 0.99 μM, as illustrated in the dose–response curves in Figure 2 and tabulated in Table 2. Whereas, cisplatin and paclitaxel exerted better in vitro anti-cancer activities with the range of IC50 between 1.38 ± 0.037 to 3.58 ± 0.14 μM and between 0.018 ± 0.00011 to 0.38 ± 0.012 μM, respectively (Figure 2, Table 2). However, 9-methoxycanthin-6-one showed a lower cytotoxicity effect as compared with cisplatin when tested in the cardiomyocyte (H9C2) cell line (Table 2).

2.3. Effect of 9-Methoxycanthin-6-one on Apoptosis

The Hoechst 33342 assay was employed to study the effect of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one on apoptosis at different concentrations and incubation times in HT-29, A2780 and SKOV-3 cancer cell lines. Cells that undergo apoptosis have morphology changes, such as chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation, cell shrinkage, cell membrane blebbing and formation of apoptotic bodies [4]. As shown in Figure 3, the formation of chromatin condensation and apoptotic bodies was observed when HT-29, A2780 and SKOV-3 cancer cells were treated with 9-methoxycanthin-6-one. The percentage of apoptotic indices were shown in Table 3. 9-methoxycanthin-6-one significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic indices in HT-29, A2780 and SKOV-3 cells when the concentrations of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one increased. However, 9-methoxycanthin-6-one treated at different incubation times (6 h, 24 h and 24 h) had no significant difference with the percentage of apoptotic indices when the cancer cells were treated at the same concentration.

2.4. 2-DE Analysis of 9-Methoxycanthin-6-one-treated and Non-Treated A2780 Ovarian Cancer Cells

Approximately more than 922 spots were detected in each Coomassie brilliant blue-stained gels. Fifteen differentially expressed protein spots, derived from the 9-methoxycanthine-6-one-treated and non-treated A2780 cell line, with the selection criteria of a spot intensity of more than 1.5 fold changes and anova p < 0.05 2DE gels, were selected, picked and subjected for protein identifications using MALDI-TOF-MS/MS. The protein spots that were selected for protein identifications on the 2-DE profiles were labelled in Figure 4. From Figure 4, 12 proteins were suppressed and 3 proteins were expressed after A2780 ovarian cancer cell line was treated with 9-methoxycanthin-6-one.

2.5. Protein Identifications

MALDI-TOF/TOF tandem mass spectrometry analysis and a Mascot database search were performed for the 15 proteins that were differentially expressed when the A2780 ovarian cancer cells were treated with 9-methoxycanthine-6-one (as shown from Figure 4). The protein name, Mascot accession number, estimated and theoretical pI/Mwt, sequence coverage and mascot score were listed in Table 4. The proteomics dataset was introduced to Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) for core biochemical pathway analysis. In IPA, the protein was classified according to their biological functions, mechanisms and relevant protein–protein interactions in the form of a global protein interaction network.

2.6. Proteins’ Interaction Analysis

The 15 identified proteins listed from Table 4 were further analysed for protein–protein interactions in IPA. IPA via its Ingenuity® Knowledge Base platform had classified these proteins according to their involvements in certain biochemical/ canonical pathways. Based on IPA analysis, 5 proteins, namely PKM, ANXA2, LGAL3, HNRNP1A1, PRDX3 and GAPDH, were found to be associated with the apoptosis signaling pathway in A2780 ovarian cancer cell line. The involvement of these proteins in the apoptosis signaling pathway may explain the mechanisms of the action of 9-methoxycanthine-6-one when treated in the A2780 cancer cell line, and is shown in Figure 5.
Thirteen proteins, namely ALDH1A1, ANXA2, CAPG, EEF1A1, GAPDH, HNRNPA1, LGALS3, MDH2, PGAM1, PKM, PNP, PRDX3 and TPI1, were primarily associated in the top networks of “Carbohydrate Metabolism, Cellular Movement and Cellular Response to Therapeutics”, which lead towards the execution of ovarian cancer cell death. These networks involved these canonical pathways: glycolysis I, gluconeogenesis I, NADH Repair, Xanthine and Xanthosine Salvage, and Guanine and Guanosine Salvage I (Figure 6). Proteins NVL and ACAA2 that were not involved in the top network and apoptosis signaling pathway, were found to be involved in the network of “Cell-To-Cell Signaling and Interaction, Nervous System Development and Function, and RNA Post-Transcriptional Modification”, that may also lead to ovarian cancer cell death.
Figure 6 showed the top canonical pathways affected after the A2780 ovarian cancer cell line was treated with 9-methoxycanthine-6-one. The proteins involved in the respective pathways were listed in Table 5. IPA results showed that Glycolysis I is the most effected canonical pathway when 9-methoxycanthine-6-one treated the A2780 ovarian cancer cell line.

3. Discussion

From previous studies, 9-methoxycanthin-6-one was detected to be present in wild-derived roots [13,22] as well as in the tissue culture [23,24,25] of E. longifolia. It is interesting to note that plant tissue cultures can be used as an alternative source, rather than wild and cultivated plant sources, to isolate the phytochemical(s) of interests in a short period of time with an improved yield [26]. In our studies, the yield of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one that was isolated from hairy roots’ culture was 0.43% (w/w). Other studies have also supported this finding in which the yield of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one (1) was higher in E. longifolia tissue cultures than in E. longifolia roots collected from the wild. The yield of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one obtained from the callus and tissue culture ranged from 0.41% to 0.71% (w/w) [23,24,25], as compared to the yield of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one from the wild, that was ranged from 0.009% to 0.045% (w/w) [13,22]. It may be noted that other anti-cancer compounds, such as camptothechin and paclitaxel, had also been successfully isolated from the Camptotheca acuminata hairy roots and Taxus cuspidate callus, respectively [27,28].
The in vitro anti-cancer analysis had also shown that this compound had anti-cancer potential, since the IC50 values were less than 50 µM [29]. Previous findings had shown that 9-methoxycanthin-6-one (1) possessed in vitro anti-cancer effects in breast, colon, fibrosarcoma, lung and melanoma cancer cell lines and, [13] with another study, had also supported the anti-cancer activities of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one in lung cancer (A-549) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines [16]. 9-methoxycanthin-6-one was shown to be active in breast (MCF-7), prostate (DU-145) and ovarian (CaOV-3) cancer cell lines [17]. To the best of our knowledge, other than ovarian, breast and colorectal cancer cell lines, 9-methoxycanthin-6-one was the first to be reported to have in vitro anti-cancer effects in cervical cancer (HeLa) and skin cancer (A375) cell lines. Thus, all of these findings may indicate that 9-methoxycanthin-6-one has a wider spectrum of in vitro anti-cancer activities, in targeting various type of cancer cells. 9-methoxycanthin-6-one is an alkaloid. It may be noted that alkaloids are among the most important active components in natural herbs, and some of these compounds have already been successfully developed into chemotherapeutic drugs, that include paclitaxel, vinblastine, vincristine and camptothecin. Besides these drugs, there are a number of novel alkaloids that have been proven to have anti-proliferative effects on the cancer cells, including berberine, evodiamine, matrine, piperine, sanguinarine, and tetrandrine [30].
Colorectal cancer cell lines (HT-29) and ovarian cancer cell lines (A2780, SKOV-3) were used as models to explore the apoptotic mechanism of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one. 9-methoxycanthin-6-one was found to inhibit the cancer cells’ proliferations via apoptosis, when assessed using the Hoechst 33342 assay. Hoechst 33342 is a blue fluorescent dye used to stain DNA as it binds, preferentially to adenine-thymine regions of DNA. Since this fluorescent staining labels DNA, apoptosis from early to late stages occurring within the nucleus can be visualised under a fluorescence microscope [31]. Cells that undergo apoptosis (programmed cell death) have morphology changes, such as chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation, cell shrinkage, cell membrane blebbing and the formation of apoptotic bodies [4], in which some of these appearances had been visualised when 9-methoxycanthin-6-one was used to treated the HT-29, A2780 and SKOV-3 cancer cells. It was found that the number of apoptotic cells increased when the concentrations of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one increased. It may be noted earlier that many anti-cancer drugs re-induced the apoptotic process in executing cell death. For example, alkaloids, such as paclitaxel, had also been reported to induce apoptotic cell death in A2780 ovarian cancer cell line. Hence, the ability of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one to induce apoptosis may indicate its potential to become an anti-cancer agent by doing further validation studies via in vitro and in vivo tests.
The recent advances in genomics and proteomics aid the understanding of the true internal mechanisms of carcinogenesis and, also, the biochemical pathways being affected by any potential drug candidate, towards inducing the death of cancer cells. Proteomics tools, such as 2-DE, databases (i.e., Mascot and SwissProt) and softwares (i.e., Image Master Platinium and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)) enabled us to analyse the proteins’ expressions and interactions, for at least hundreds of proteins in one go. The mechanisms of the action of anti-cancer activity of 9-methoxycanthine-6-one, when treating ovarian cancer cells, were elucidated by performing the differential analysis between 2-DE gel profiles non-treated and 9-methoxycanthin-6-one-treated A2780 ovarian cancer cells. Based on IPA, 5 out of 15 IDed proteins were found to be involved in the apoptosis signaling pathways as shown in Figure 5. These 5 proteins include 1 enzyme (GAPDH), 1 kinase (PKM), and another 3 other proteins that were not classified elsewhere (ANXA2, HNRNPA1A and LGALS3). The selection was made based on a higher number of selected protein interactions with a known drug target (oncoproteins and tumour suppressor proteins) in the Ingenuity pathway Knowledge Base (IPKB), such as p53 [32], BCL-2, BCL-XL and BAX protein [33,34].
ANXA2 was reportedly playing crucial roles in cancer growth and progression. ANXA2 participation was frequently reported in tumour cell adhesion, proliferation, invasion, metastasis and tumour neovascularisation [35,36]. Based on a previous report, ANXA2 knockdown increased the tumour suppressor protein (p53) activity and downstream gene expression, as well as the p53 translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus [36]. p53 protein is the major tumour suppressor and plays an important role in tumour suppression by preventing the division and development of cells with damaged DNA [37,38]. Our findings show that ANXA2 was suppressed in the 9-methoxycanthine-6-one-treated A2780 ovarian cancer cell line. The interference of ANXA2 was reported to increase the expression of p53 [39]. At the same time, LGALS3, an anti-apoptotic protein [40,41] was also found suppressed in this study, and interference of LGALS3 increased the expression of the BAX protein in this pathway. The BAX protein is also known as a apoptosis executioner protein [33,42]. Hypothetically, an increase in the expression of p53 protein leads to the activation of the apoptotic signaling pathway and the death of the apoptotic cell via the activation of the apoptotic regulator, the BAX protein.
BCL-XL and BCL-2 proteins are the family member of the B-cell lymphoma 2 protein (BCL-2), which functioned as anti-apoptotic protein [43,44]. In response to an A2780 ovarian cancer cell line treated with 9-methoxycanthine-6-one, it was noted that 3 proteins, namely GAPDH, HNRNPA1 and PKM, suppressed and interfered with the anti-apoptotic protein, BCL-XL. Suppression of LGALS3 may interfere with the expression of the BCL-2 protein. Interference of BCL-XL and BCL-2 caused an apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) of the ubiquitination protein in the mitochondria [45] which lead to DNA fragmentation, one of the hallmarks of apoptotic events. The details of the biochemical pathways involved were shown in Figure 5.
To the best of our knowledge, this was the first report of 9-methoxycanthine-6-one from E. longifolia affecting the energy pathways such as Glycolysis I and Gluconeogenesis I in ovarian cancer cells. Glycolysis I is a metabolic pathway for energy production in many organisms. A malfunction in energy production can have lethal consequences for the living cells. Cancer cells have a greater need for energy and a ready supply of the building blocks necessary for the synthesis of macromolecules (nucleotides, protein, lipids) in order to duplicate genomes and biomass [46]. Well-known glycolytic enzymes, such as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, also play roles in other cellular processes, such as apoptosis. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that cell death pathways, particularly proteins that are involved in apoptosis, are closely linked to the cell’s bioenergetic mechanisms [47,48].
Gluconeogenesis I is also a metabolic pathway that results in the generation of glucose from non-carbohydrate carbon substrates, such as pyruvate, lactate, glycerol, glucogenic amino acids, and fatty acids [49]. The purpose of the gluconeogenic pathway is to provide the body with a source of glucose that can be converted to energy for cell survival [50,51]. IPA results showed that the reduction of enzymes involved in Glycolysis I and Gluconeogenesis I could be a contributing factor to ovarian cancer cells failure to proliferate. It may be noted that cancer cells display enhanced rates of glucose uptake and glycolysis. Cancer cells formation starts with cancer cells growing vigorously, and as solid tumours grow, they are unable to obtain oxygen efficiently. In other words, they begin to experience hypoxia [48]. Under these conditions, glycolysis leading to lactic acid fermentation becomes the primary source of energy (ATP) for cancer cells [52]. In this study, proteins that play an important role in pathways of Glycolysis I (GAPDH, PGAM1, PKM and TPI1) and Gluconeogenesis I (GAPDH and PGAM1) were suppressed, except for MDH2 that was expressed in the Gluconeogenesis I pathway. The suppression of these enzymes by 9-methoxycanthin-6-one may affect the energy-producing pathway and lead to the A2780 ovarian cancer cells ceasing to proliferate.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Production of E. longifolia Hairy Roots Culture in the Bioreactor

Approximately 23 g of E. longifolia hairy roots from shake flasks were inoculated in the 5 L bioreactor containing 4 litre MS (Murashige & Skoog) basal medium powder with pH 5.8, and maintained in dark condition for 3 months. After 3 months in culture, hairy roots were harvested with fresh weight of about 456 g (20-fold increase) and dried overnight in the oven at 37 °C. Then, the dried roots were ground using pestle and mortar prior to extraction and isolation steps.

4.2. Isolation of 9-Methoxycanthin-6-one from E. longifolia Hairy Root Culture

The hairy root powder of E. longifolia (96 g) was extracted in chloroform (0.5 L) using soxhlet extraction at 35–45 °C for 16 h. The chloroform solution of extract was filtered and evaporated to yield the chloroform extract (5.3 g, 5.5%). The chloroform extract was fractionated using column chromatography on silica gel 60 (70–230 mesh) using n-hexane, n-hexane-dichloromethane (DCM) (9:1, 7:3, 3:7 and 1:9) as mobile phase to obtain 7 fractions (FR1-FR7). A combined 3 fractions (FR1-FR3) (1.172 g, 1.22%) were then re-chromatographed and purified by column chromatography on silica gel 60 and eluted with n-hexane-DCM (9:1, 7:3, 3:7 and 1:9) and DCM-methanol (1:1) to afford 9-methoxycanthin-6-one (1) (415.8 mg, 0.43%).

4.3. Cell Culture and Treatments

The cancer cell lines used for this study were A2780 (ovarian), SKOV-3 (ovarian), MCF-7 (breast), HT-29 (colorectal), HeLa (cervical) and A375 (skin). All cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collections (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) except for A2780, which was purchased from European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (ECACC, Salisbury, UK). These cells were sub-cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma, USA), 1% amphotericin B (Sigma, USA) and 1% gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The cells were seeded in each well of the 96-well plates and incubated in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% carbon dioxide in air for 24 h. Each cell line was then treated with the 9-methoxycanthin-6-one, isolated from E. longifolia at five different concentrations (0.08, 0.4, 2, 10 and 50 µM) in triplicate. Cisplatin and paclitaxel (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), a known chemo-drug, were also treated on these cell lines at five different concentrations (0.08, 0.4, 2, 10, 50 µM for cisplatin and 0.0008, 0.004, 0.02, 0.1, 0.5 µM for paclitaxel) as in the comparative studies. The treated cells were then incubated in the same incubator with the mentioned conditions for 72 h. The experiment was repeated at least three times.

4.4. Cells Viability Assay

Sulphorhodamine B (SRB) assay [53,54] had been performed after the treated cells were incubated for 72 h. Briefly, 50 μL of ice cold tricholoroacetic acid (TCA) was added to each well and allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature, followed by rinsing each well with tap water. Then, 100 μL of 0.4% SRB was added to each well to stain living cells for 30 min, followed by a rinse with 1% acetic acid. Finally, 100 μL of Tris buffer was added to each well and the optical density (OD) of the treated and non-treated cells were read at 492 nm with a Magellan V.4 microtiter plate reader (Tecan, Salzburg, Austria). The percentage of cell viability was calculated based on (OD492nm of the treated cells/ OD492nm of the non-treated cells) × 100. The IC50 values were determined from the dose–response curve of percentage of cell viability versus the concentration of the extracts (µM). Cells’ viability assay for each treatment was performed in triplicate in at least three independent experiments, and the IC50 values are given as the mean ± SEM.

4.5. Apoptotic Hoechst 33342 Assay

Approximately 10 × 104 cells/mL were seeded for 500 μL in each four well of three sets of LabtekTM chamber slide (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and incubated in 5% carbon dioxide in air for 24 h for cells’ attachment. HT-29, A2780 and SKOV-3 cancer cell lines were selected for determining the apoptotic effect of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one by using Hoechst 33342 assay. The cells were treated with the concentrations of IC50/5, IC50 and IC50 x5 values of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one in HT-29, A2780 and SKOV-3 cancer cell lines. After the treatment of 9-methoxycanthine-6-one, the cells were incubated for 6 h, 24 h and 48 h, respectively. Non-treated cells were also included, which acted as a negative control in this study, in separate chamber per slide. Another two sets of these treated chamber slides were prepared. Each of the chamber slide was incubated in the same condition for 6 h, 24 h and 48 h, respectively. Following this, the cells were washed with cold phosphate buffer solution (PBS) twice and 4% of paraformaldehyde was added in each chamber, that were then further incubated for 30 min. The cells were then washed with PBS, Hoechst 33342 solution (100 μg/mL) was added in each chamber, and they were incubated for 30 min in the dark. Following this, the chambers were discarded and the cells were immediately observed under an inverted fluorescence microscope (BX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) using UV excitation at 200× magnification. Nuclear morphology, including chromatin condensation that is one of the events in apoptotic cells where they will emit fluorescent blue colour when stained with Hoechst 33342 [55]. At least 200 total target cells per area for five areas per chamber were counted, and the numbers of fluorescent and non-fluorescent cells were recorded and analysed using fluorescence microscopy for quantification of the percentage of apoptotic index (% of the number of apoptotic cells/total number of cells).

4.6. Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis (2-DE)

Ovarian cancer (A2780) cells were seeded at approximately twenty million cells per 75 cm2 tissue culture flask. The cells were treated with 9-methoxycanthin-6-one at its IC50 value. Non-treated cells were also included in this experiment. Both treated and non-treated cells were incubated for 24 h. Some cells had detached, indicating cell death after the treatment of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one, as compared with the non-treated. Cell pellets were collected and re-suspended in lysis buffer consisting of 6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 65 mM DTT and protease inhibitor cocktail. Following that, the lysed pellets were then spun at 13,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were then collected and protein contents were estimated using 2D-Quant kit (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). The quantification protocol was performed, as described by the manufacturer, using Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) as protein standard. The absorbance was read at 480 nm. The concentration of protein was estimated from the plotted calibration curve. This quantification was assayed in triplicates. The protein samples were stored at −80 °C until further study. For 2DE profiling, proteins of 200 μg from 9-methoxycanthin-6-one-treated and non-treated ovarian cancer cell lines A2780 were separately mixed with rehydration buffer [6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 2% Pharmalyte (pH 3–10)]. Then the Immobiline IPG DryStrips (11 cm, pH 3–10) (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) were re-swelled in the mixtures and rehydrated overnight. The swollen IPG Strips were then isoelectrically focused at 300 V for 1 h, 12,000 V/hr on an IPGphor Electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). After equilibration for 2 × 15 min in equilibration buffer, IPG strips were applied for 12% Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate-Poly Acrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using a SE 600 Ruby (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden).

4.7. Image and Data Analysis

The gels were stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). The protein spots were detected, quantified, and matched using ImageMaster 2D Platinum 7.0 analysis software (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Differences in the expression levels between paired samples were analysed, and protein spots showing at least 1.5-fold changes in intensity and anova p < 0.05 were picked for trypsin digestion and MALDI-TOF MS analysis.

4.8. In-Gel Tryptic Digestion

Protein samples were trypsin digested and peptides were extracted, according to [56]. Briefly, gel samples were de-stained with ammonium bicarbonate/acetonitrile, then underwent a 16 h tryptic digest at 37 °C in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate (10 μL). Peptides were extracted and concentrated by C18 ziptip, spotted onto MALDI AnchorChip plate with 1 μL CHCA matrix. Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation (MALDI) mass spectroscopy was performed using the 4800 plus MALDI TOF/TOF Analyser. An Nd:YAG laser (355 nm) was used to irradiate the sample. Spectra were acquired in reflectron MS scan mode in the mass range of 700 to 4000 Da. The instrument was then switched to MS/MS mode, where the eight or twelve strongest peptides from the MS scan were isolated and fragmented by collision-induced dissociation, then re-accelerated to measure their masses and intensities. A near point calibration was applied and which gives a typical mass accuracy of 50 ppm or better. Spectra were analysed to identify proteins of interest using Mascot (matrix Science Ltd., London, UK) database search and UniProt database.

4.9. Mass Spectrometry and Database Search

The proteomics dataset, which included UniProt identifiers and fold changes of differentially expressed proteins, was submitted to Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) for core analysis. The core analysis was performed using settings in Ingenuity Knowledge Base for direct and indirect relationships between molecules, based on experimental data and IPA data sources. IPA was then used to build protein interactions, pathways, and functional network relationships (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The modulated proteins were grouped by known relationships into the “Functional Analysis” and “Canonical Pathway Analysis” of a network, with significance calculated using Fisher’s exact test (p-value ≤ 0.05) to determine the probability of each biological function and/or disease. For the IPA network analysis, hypothetical protein interaction clusters between the molecules were analysed. IPA computes a p-score to rank networks according to the differentially expressed proteins. The score was calculated as p-score = −log 10 (p-value), which indicates the probability of matching the input proteins in a protein–protein interaction from the Ingenuity Knowledgebase by random chance. A score of 3 or higher indicates at least a 99.9% confidence level for excluding random chance. Based on this, identified proteins were connected with hub proteins, forming a functional protein cluster.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results obtained had confirmed the in vitro anti-cancer effect of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one in the listed cancer cell lines. 9-methoxycanthin-6-one showed potential in inducing apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Proteins that were identified in this apoptotic event when the A2780 ovarian cancer cells were treated with 9-methoxycanthin-6-one were Pyruvate kinase (PKM), annexin A2 (ANXA2), galectin 3 (LGAL3), heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (HNRNP1A1), peroxiredoxin 3 (PRDX3) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Besides the apoptosis pathway, 9-methoxycanthine-6-one may also effect the Glycolysis I and Gluconeogenesis I pathways in ovarian cancer cells. Validation studies will be conducted in the near future on these mentioned proteins using the western blotting technique.

6. Patents

Yunos, N.M. et al. Combination of therapeutic agents for treating ovarian cancer. Malaysia Patent Filed PI2016701034. Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MYiPO). 23 March 2016.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, N.M.Y. and N.D.M.A.; methodology, N.M.Y.; software, N.D.M.A.; validation, N.M.Y., N.D.M.A. and M.H.J.; formal analysis, N.J.S.; investigation, M.H.J.; resources, N.H.H., S.K.L.; data curation, N.D.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, N.M.Y.; writing—review and editing, N.M.Y., N.J.S., S.K.L.; visualisation, N.D.M.A., N.J.S.; supervision, N.M.Y.; project administration, N.M.Y.; funding acquisition, N.M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Malaysia National Key Economy Area (NKEA) Research Grant Scheme (grant number NH1111D005) and the development fund under the 12th Malaysian plan (grant number 24-01070-2001) by the government of Malaysia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are already included in the text.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Abdul Rashih Ahmad in assisting the isolation of the compound, and Ruzana Rabuzin for assisting in the cell culture activities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compound 9-methoxycanthin-6-one and the extract are available from the authors.

References

  1. Pilleron, S.; Sarfati, D.; Janssen-Heijnen, M.; Vignat, J.; Ferlay, J.; Bray, F.; Soerjomataram, I. Global cancer incidence in older adults, 2012 and 2035: A population-based study. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 144, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rehman, S.U.; Choe, K.; Yoo, H.H. Review on a traditional herbal medicine, Eurycoma longifolia Jack (Tongkat Ali): Its traditional uses, chemistry, evidence-based pharmacology and toxicology. Molecules 2016, 21, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tamizhazhagan, V.; Pugazhendy, K. Social and economic burden of cancer on 2020—Mini review. J. Biol. Med. Sci. 2017, 1, 2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Elmore, S. Apoptosis: A review of programmed cell death. Toxicol. Pathol. 2007, 35, 495–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Call, J.A.; Eckhardt, S.G.; Camidge, D.R. Targeted manipulation of apoptosis in cancer treatment. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Burkill, I.H. A Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula; Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operations: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1966; Volume 1(A–H).
  7. Thoi, L.V.; Suong, N.N. Constituents of Eurycoma longifolia. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 1104–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Perry, L.M.; Metzger, J. Medicinal Plants of East and Southeast Asia: Attributed Properties and Uses; M.I.T. Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhat, R.; Karim, A.A. Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia Jack): A review on its ethnobotany and pharmacological importance. Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 669–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kuo, P.C.; Damu, A.G.; Lee, K.H.; Wu, T.S. Cytotoxic and antimalarial constituents from the roots of Eurycoma longifolia. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ulbricht, C.; Conquer, J.; Flanagan, K.; Isaac, R.; Rusie, E.; Windsor, R.C. An evidence-based systematic review of Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia) by the natural standard research collaboration. J. Diet. Suppl. 2013, 10, 54–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, Z.; Vangapandu, S.; Sindelar, R.W.; Walker, L.A.; Sindelar, R.D. Biologically active quassinoids and their chemistry: Potential leads for drug design. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kardono, L.B.S.; Angerhofer, C.K.; Tsauri, S.; Padmawinata, K.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Douglas Kinghorn, A. Cytotoxic and antimalarial constituents of the roots of Eurycoma longifolia. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 1360–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Itokawa, H.; Kishi, E.; Morita, H.; Takeya, K. Cytotoxic quassinoids and tirucallane-type triterpenes from the woods of Eurycoma longifolia. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 1053–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Miyake, K.; Li, F.; Tezuka, Y.; Awale, S.; Kadota, S. Cytotoxic activity of quassinoids from Eurycoma longifolia. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 1009–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kuo, P.C.; Shi, L.S.; Damu, A.G.; Su, C.R.; Huang, C.H.; Ke, C.H.; Wu, J.-B.; Lin, A.J.; Bastow, K.F.; Lee, K.H.; et al. Cytotoxic and antimalarial β-carboline alkaloids from the roots of Eurycoma longifolia. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1324–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nurhanan, M.Y.; Hawariah, L.P.A.; Ilham, A.M.; Shukri, M.A.M. Cytotoxic effects of the root extracts of Eurycoma longifolia Jack. Phyther. Res. 2005, 19, 994–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thu, H.E.; Hussain, Z.; Mohamed, I.N.; Shuid, A.N. Eurycoma longifolia, a potential phytomedicine for the treatment of cancer: Evidence of p53-mediated apoptosis in cancerous cells. Curr. Drug Targets 2017, 19, 1109–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mitsunaga, K.; Koike, K.; Tanaka, T.; Ohkawa, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Sawaguchi, T.; Ohmoto, T. Canthin-6-one alkaloids from Eurycoma longifolia. Phytochemistry 1994, 35, 799–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, M.-X.; Zhou, Y.-J. Canthin-6-one alkaloids from Picrasma quassioides and their cytotoxic activity. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2008, 10, 1009–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choo, C.Y.; Chan, K.L. High performance liquid chromatography analysis of canthinone alkaloids from Eurycoma longifolia. Planta Med. 2002, 68, 382–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mahmood, M.; Normi, R.; Sybramaniam, S. Distribution of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one from the intact plant parts and callus cultures of “Eurycoma longifolia” (Tongkat Ali). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 1565–1569. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ling, A.P.K.; Phua, G.A.T.; Tee, C.S.; Hussein, S. Optimization of protoplast isolation protocols from callus of Eurycoma longifolia. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 1778–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nazirah, A.; Nor-Hasnida, H.; Ismanizan, I.; Norlia, B.; Abdul-Rashih, A.; Muhammad-Fuad, Y.; Mohd-Saifullah, A.W. Production of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one in elicited Eurycoma longifolia. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2018, 30, 606–614. [Google Scholar]
  26. Roja, G.; Rao, P.S. Anticancer compounds from tissue cultures of medicinal plants. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2008, 7, 71–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lorence, A.; Medina-Bolivar, F.; Nessler, C.L. Camptothecin and 10-hydroxycamptothecin from Camptotheca acuminata hairy roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2004, 22, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fett-Neto, A.G.; Dicosmo, F.; Reynolds, W.F.; Sakata, K. Cell culture of taxus as a source of the antineoplastic drug taxol and related taxanes. Bio/Technology 1992, 10, 1572–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boik, J.C.; Newman, R.A. Structure-activity models of oral clearance, cytotoxicity, and LD50: A screen for promising anticancer compounds. BMC Pharmacol. 2008, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lu, J.J.; Bao, J.L.; Chen, X.P.; Huang, M.; Wang, Y.T. Alkaloids isolated from natural herbs as the anticancer agents. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Crowley, L.C.; Marfell, B.J.; Waterhouse, N.J. Analyzing cell death by nuclear staining with Hoechst 33342. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2016, 9, pdb-rot087205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sanz, G.; Singh, M.; Peuget, S.; Selivanova, G. Inhibition of p53 inhibitors: Progress, challenges and perspectives. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 11, 586–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pogmore, J.P.; Uehling, D.; Andrews, D.W. Pharmacological targeting of executioner proteins: Controlling life and death. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 5276–5290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gutschner, T.; Diederichs, S. The hallmarks of cancer: A long non-coding RNA point of view. RNA Biol. 2012, 9, 703–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Christensen, M.V.; Høgdall, C.K.; Umsen, K.M.J.; Høgdall, E.V.S. Annexin A2 and cancer: A systematic review. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 52, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, X.H.; Pan, W.; Kang, L.H.; Feng, H.; Song, Y.Q. Association of Annexin A2 with cancer development (review). Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 2121–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Blagih, J.; Buck, M.D.; Vousden, K.H. P53, Cancer and the immune response. J. Cell Sci. 2020, 133, jcs237453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Liang, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, J. Overexpression of tumor protein p53-regulated apoptosis-inducing protein 1 regulates proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells through the PI3K/Akt pathway. J. Breast Cancer 2019, 22, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Yan, C.H.; Yu, Y.; Bai, J.; Chen, F.; Zhao, Y.Z.; Fu, S.B. Involvement of Annexin A2 in p53 induced apoptosis in lung cancer. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2008, 309, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ruvolo, P.P. Galectin 3 as a guardian of the tumor microenvironment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2016, 1863, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jia, W.; Kidoya, H.; Yamakawa, D.; Naito, H.; Takakura, N. Galectin-3 accelerates M2 macrophage infiltration and angiogenesis in tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 182, 1821–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Luna-Vargas, M.P.A.; Chipuk, J.E. Physiological and pharmacological control of BAK, BAX, and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2016, 26, 906–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lee, E.F.; Fairlie, W.D. The Structural Biology of Bcl-x L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wong, R.S.Y. Apoptosis in cancer: From pathogenesis to treatment. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 30, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lewis, E.M.; Wilkinson, A.S.; Davis, N.Y.; Horita, D.A.; Wilkinson, J.C. Nondegradative ubiquitination of apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) by x-linked inhibitor of apoptosis at a residue critical for AIF-mediated chromatin degradation. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 11084–11096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Antone, P.D. Energy metabolism in cancer cells: How to explain the Warburg and Crabtree effects? Med. Hypotheses 2012, 79, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jiang, X.; Wang, X. Cytochrome C-mediated apoptosis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73, 87–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moreno-Sánchez, R.; Marín-Hernández, A.; Saavedra, E.; Pardo, J.P.; Ralph, S.J.; Rodríguez-Enríquez, S. Who controls the ATP supply in cancer cells? Biochemistry lessons to understand cancer energy metabolism. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 50, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, Z.; Dong, C. Gluconeogenesis in cancer: Function and regulation of PEPCK, FBPase, and G6Pase. Trends Cancer 2019, 5, 30–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grasmann, G.; Smolle, E.; Olschewski, H.; Leithner, K. Gluconeogenesis in cancer cells—Repurposing of a starvation-induced metabolic pathway? Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Rev. Cancer 2019, 1872, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miyamoto, T.; Amrein, H. Gluconeogenesis: An ancient biochemical pathway with a new twist. Fly 2017, 11, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Akram, M. Mini-review on glycolysis and cancer. J. Cancer Educ. 2013, 28, 454–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; Mcmahon, J.; Vistica, D.; Warren, J.T.; Bokesch, H.; Kenney, S.; Boyd, M.R. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nurhanan, M.; Nor Azah, M.; Zunoliza, A.; Siti Humeriah, A.; Siti Syarifah, M.; Nor Hayati, A. In vitro anticancer activity and high-performance liquid chromatography profiles of Aquilaria subintegra fruit and seed extracts. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2017, 29, 208–214. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mahbub, A.A.; Le Maitre, C.L.; Haywood-Small, S.L.; McDougall, G.J.; Cross, N.A.; Jordan-Mahy, N. Differential effects of polyphenols on proliferation and apoptosis in human myeloid and lymphoid leukemia cell lines. Anti-Cancer Agents 2013, 13, 1601–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Bringans, S.; Eriksen, S.; Kendrick, T.; Gopalakrishnakone, P.; Livk, A.; Lock, R.; Lipscombe, R. Proteomic analysis of the venom of Heterometrus longimanus (Asian black scorpion). Proteomics 2008, 8, 1081–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 00585 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of 9-methoxycanthine-6-one.
Figure 1. Structure of 9-methoxycanthine-6-one.
Molecules 27 00585 g001
Molecules 27 00585 g002 550
Figure 2. Dose–response curves of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one when tested in a panel of cancer cell lines (ovarian cancer (A2780, SKOV-3), breast cancer (MCF-7), colorectal cancer (HT-29), cervical cancer (HeLa) and skin cancer (A375)). Data represent the average percentage of cell viability ± SEM, n = 9. The curves for SKOV-3 and A375 are overlapping.
Figure 2. Dose–response curves of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one when tested in a panel of cancer cell lines (ovarian cancer (A2780, SKOV-3), breast cancer (MCF-7), colorectal cancer (HT-29), cervical cancer (HeLa) and skin cancer (A375)). Data represent the average percentage of cell viability ± SEM, n = 9. The curves for SKOV-3 and A375 are overlapping.
Molecules 27 00585 g002
Molecules 27 00585 g003a 550Molecules 27 00585 g003b 550
Figure 3. Visualisation of apoptotic cells under the fluorescence microscope when cancer cells, (A) HT-29, (B) A2780 and (C) SKOV-3 were treated with 9-methoxycanthin-6-one at different concentrations (IC50/5, IC50 and IC50 × 5) and incubation times (6, 24 and 48 h). Cells that underwent apoptosis showed morphology changes such as (1) minimal chromatin condensation, (2) extensive chromatin condensation, (3) compaction of chromatin to a dense mass at the periphery of nuclei, (4) compaction of chromatin into a dense ball, and (5) apoptotic bodies. Magnification: ×200.
Figure 3. Visualisation of apoptotic cells under the fluorescence microscope when cancer cells, (A) HT-29, (B) A2780 and (C) SKOV-3 were treated with 9-methoxycanthin-6-one at different concentrations (IC50/5, IC50 and IC50 × 5) and incubation times (6, 24 and 48 h). Cells that underwent apoptosis showed morphology changes such as (1) minimal chromatin condensation, (2) extensive chromatin condensation, (3) compaction of chromatin to a dense mass at the periphery of nuclei, (4) compaction of chromatin into a dense ball, and (5) apoptotic bodies. Magnification: ×200.
Molecules 27 00585 g003aMolecules 27 00585 g003b
Molecules 27 00585 g004 550
Figure 4. Representative of 2-DE gel profiles of (a) non-treated and (b) 9-methoxycanthin-6-one-treated A2780 ovarian cancer cells. Fifteen protein spots that were differentially expressed (anova p < 0.05) and showed an average expression ratio of at least 1.5 fold in both gels. Green labels represent proteins that were suppressed and red labels represent proteins that were expressed when A2780 cancer cells were treated with 9-methoxycanthin-6-one.
Figure 4. Representative of 2-DE gel profiles of (a) non-treated and (b) 9-methoxycanthin-6-one-treated A2780 ovarian cancer cells. Fifteen protein spots that were differentially expressed (anova p < 0.05) and showed an average expression ratio of at least 1.5 fold in both gels. Green labels represent proteins that were suppressed and red labels represent proteins that were expressed when A2780 cancer cells were treated with 9-methoxycanthin-6-one.
Molecules 27 00585 g004
Molecules 27 00585 g005 550
Figure 5. Diagram shows protein–protein interactions in apoptosis signaling pathway and the involvement of five of the differentially expressed proteins from A2780 ovarian cancer cells treated with 9-methoxycanthine-6-one. Proteins that were labelled in green were proteins that were suppressed by 9-methoxycanthine-6-one.
Figure 5. Diagram shows protein–protein interactions in apoptosis signaling pathway and the involvement of five of the differentially expressed proteins from A2780 ovarian cancer cells treated with 9-methoxycanthine-6-one. Proteins that were labelled in green were proteins that were suppressed by 9-methoxycanthine-6-one.
Molecules 27 00585 g005
Molecules 27 00585 g006 550
Figure 6. IPA graphical representation of the molecular relationships between differentially expressed proteins in A2780 cell lines treated with compound 9-methoxycanthine-6-one. The network is displayed graphically as nodes (proteins) and edges (the biological relationships between the nodes). Nodes in red indicate expressed proteins, nodes in green represent suppressed proteins, nodes in blue indicate predicted inhibition of expression, nodes in orange indicate predicted activation of proteins, and nodes without colours indicate unaltered expression in the network. Various shapes of the nodes represent the functional class of the proteins. The different arrow shapes represent different types of interactions. Edges are displayed with various labels that describe the nature of the relationship between the nodes.
Figure 6. IPA graphical representation of the molecular relationships between differentially expressed proteins in A2780 cell lines treated with compound 9-methoxycanthine-6-one. The network is displayed graphically as nodes (proteins) and edges (the biological relationships between the nodes). Nodes in red indicate expressed proteins, nodes in green represent suppressed proteins, nodes in blue indicate predicted inhibition of expression, nodes in orange indicate predicted activation of proteins, and nodes without colours indicate unaltered expression in the network. Various shapes of the nodes represent the functional class of the proteins. The different arrow shapes represent different types of interactions. Edges are displayed with various labels that describe the nature of the relationship between the nodes.
Molecules 27 00585 g006
Table
Table 1. 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data of 9-methoxychanthin-6-one (1) (400, 100 MHz in CDCl3).
Table 1. 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data of 9-methoxychanthin-6-one (1) (400, 100 MHz in CDCl3).
No1H δ ppm13C δ ppm
18.23 (1H, d)115.660
28.78 (1H, d)143.810
3--
47.98 (1H, d)138.053
56.99 (1H, d)129.685
6-159.376
7--
87.11 (1H, d)101.448
9-163.411
107.91 (1H, d)114.756
118.12 (1H, d)123.949
12-116.775
13-142.084
14-129.691
15-131.150
16-132.362
OCH34.04 (3H, s)56.200
Table
Table 2. The IC50 values (μM) ± SEM (n = 9) of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one (EL50), cisplatin (Cis) and paclitaxel (Tax), tested in a panel of cancer cell lines (ovarian cancer (A2780, SKOV-3), breast cancer (MCF-7), colorectal cancer (HT29), cervical cancer (HeLa) and skin cancer (A375)) and a normal cardiomyocyte cell line (H9C2).
Table 2. The IC50 values (μM) ± SEM (n = 9) of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one (EL50), cisplatin (Cis) and paclitaxel (Tax), tested in a panel of cancer cell lines (ovarian cancer (A2780, SKOV-3), breast cancer (MCF-7), colorectal cancer (HT29), cervical cancer (HeLa) and skin cancer (A375)) and a normal cardiomyocyte cell line (H9C2).
CompoundA2780SKOV-3MCF-7HT-29A375HeLaH9c2
EL504.04 ± 0.365.80 ± 0.4015.09 ± 0.993.79 ± 0.0695.71 ± 0.204.30 ± 0.2737.34 ± 0.91
Cis1.77 ± 0.0182.27 ± 0.103.58 ± 0.141.38 ± 0.0372.42 ± 0.191.54 ± 0.1225.27 ± 0.77
Tax0.018 ± 0.000110.38 ± 0.012>0.50.35 ± 0.00400.37 ± 0.00550.31 ± 0.0078>0.5
Note: SEM (Standard Error of the Mean) < 5%.
Table
Table 3. The percentage of apoptotic indices of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one when treated in HT-29, A2780 and SKOV-3 cancer cell lines at different concentrations and incubation times.
Table 3. The percentage of apoptotic indices of 9-methoxycanthin-6-one when treated in HT-29, A2780 and SKOV-3 cancer cell lines at different concentrations and incubation times.
Cell Line9-Methoxycanthin-6-one (µM)Apoptotic Index (%)
6 h24 h48 h
HT-29Non-treated1.76 ± 0.361.68 ± 0.381.81 ± 0.32
IC50/53.36 ± 0.76 b3.88 ± 1.04 b4.14 ± 0.25 c
IC504.23 ± 0.35 c4.56 ± 0.31 c5.31 ± 0.76 d
IC50x5100.00 ± 0.00 d100.00 ± 0.00 d100.00 ± 0.00 d
A2780Non-treated2.26 ± 0.392.62 ± 0.612.71 ± 0.11
IC50/53.85 ± 0.08 c4.13 ± 0.684.27 ± 0.58 a
IC504.49 ± 0.35 d5.34 ± 1.45 a7.04 ± 1.14 c,w
IC50x5100.00 ± 0.00 d100.00 ± 0.00 dNo cells were detected
SKOV-3Non-treated2.05 ± 0.562.07 ± 0.541.65 ± 0.35
IC50/52.10 ± 0.192.33 ± 0.642.42 ± 0.16 a
IC503.38 ± 0.69 a4.86 ± 0.09 d,w11.20 ± 0.39 d,z
IC50x56.30 ± 0.22 d100.00 ± 0.00 d,z100.00 ± 0.00 d,z
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s comparison test using Graphpad Prism version 7. a,b,c,d letters represent significant differences within the groups when compared to non-treated (dose-dependent experiment) while w,z letters represent significant differences between the groups when compared to 6 h (time-dependent experiment). a and w letters refer to p < 0.05; b letter refers to p < 0.01; c letter refers to p < 0.001; d and z letters refer to p < 0.0001.
Table
Table 4. Identification of differentially expressed proteins induced by 9-methoxycanthine-6-one when treated in A2780 cancer cell line. The information listed in this Table was then subjected for the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) for protein–protein interactions studies.
Table 4. Identification of differentially expressed proteins induced by 9-methoxycanthine-6-one when treated in A2780 cancer cell line. The information listed in this Table was then subjected for the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) for protein–protein interactions studies.
NoProtein Name aGene NameAccession No bpIcmW (Da) cSequence Coverage (%)Mascot ScoreProtein Abundance
1ALDH1A1Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A1P003526.354,82730%233−1.52
2PKMPyruvate kinase isozymes M1/M2P146187.9657,90054%413−2.11
3EEF1A1Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1P681049.1050,10933%153−4.29
4LGALS3Galectin-3P179318.5726,13627%235−6.23
5CAPGCapping actin proteinP401215.8238,47429%167−2.35
6ANXA2Annexin A2P073557.5738,58043%431−5.72
7NVLNuclear valosin-containing protein-likeO153816.1194,99128%64+8.85
8PNPPurine nucleoside phosphorylaseP004916.4532,09742%93−3.78
9PGAM1Phosphoglycerate mutase 1P186696.6728,78657%583−2.94
10TPI1Triosephosphate isomerase 1P601745.6530,77259%556−2.87
11PRDX3Thioredoxin-dependent peroxide reductaseP300487.6727,67525%128−2.80
12HNRNPA1Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1P096519.1738,72345%195−14.65
13GAPDHGlyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseP044068.5736,03022%239−4.29
14MDH2Malate dehydrogenaseP409268.9235,48139%278+4.00
15ACAA2Acetyl-CoA acyltransferase 2P427658.3241,89828%128+4.8
a Measured peptide and fragment ion masses were used to search against the Swiss-Prot/Mascot databases for protein identifications using the Mascot software. Ion scores (based on mass/mass spectrums) were from MALDI-TOF/TOF identification. A Mascot score of >56 was considered as identity (p < 0.05). b Accession numbers were derived from the Mascot database. c Theoretical molecular weight (MW) or isoelectric point (pI) from the Mascot database. Proteins with negative (−) value indicate suppressed proteins, while proteins with positive (+) value indicate expressed protein.
Table
Table 5. Top canonical pathways involved in the mechanism of action of 9-methoxycanthine-6-one when treated in A2780 ovarian cancer cell line.
Table 5. Top canonical pathways involved in the mechanism of action of 9-methoxycanthine-6-one when treated in A2780 ovarian cancer cell line.
NoCanonical Pathwayp-ValueProteins Involved
1Glycolysis I9.38 × 10−9GAPDH, PGAM1, PKM, TPI1
2Gluconeogenesis I2.62 × 10−6GAPDH, PGAM1, MDH2,
3NADH Repair4.69 × 10−3GAPDH
4Xanthine and Xanthosine Salvage5.27 × 10−3PNP
5Guanine and Guanosine Salvage I5.86 × 10−3PNP
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yunos, N.M.; Amin, N.D.M.; Jauri, M.H.; Ling, S.K.; Hassan, N.H.; Sallehudin, N.J. The In Vitro Anti-Cancer Activities and Mechanisms of Action of 9-Methoxycanthin-6-one from Eurycoma longifolia in Selected Cancer Cell Lines. Molecules 2022, 27, 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030585

AMA Style

Yunos NM, Amin NDM, Jauri MH, Ling SK, Hassan NH, Sallehudin NJ. The In Vitro Anti-Cancer Activities and Mechanisms of Action of 9-Methoxycanthin-6-one from Eurycoma longifolia in Selected Cancer Cell Lines. Molecules. 2022; 27(3):585. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yunos, Nurhanan Murni, Nor Datiakma Mat Amin, Muhammad Haffiz Jauri, Sui Kiong Ling, Nor Hasnida Hassan, and Nor Jannah Sallehudin. 2022. "The In Vitro Anti-Cancer Activities and Mechanisms of Action of 9-Methoxycanthin-6-one from Eurycoma longifolia in Selected Cancer Cell Lines" Molecules 27, no. 3: 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27030585

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop