Next Article in Journal
Synchronous Extraction, Antioxidant Activity Evaluation, and Composition Analysis of Carbohydrates and Polyphenols Present in Artichoke Bud
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Fermented Citrus Peel on Ameliorating Obesity in Rats Fed with High-Fat Diet
Previous Article in Journal
Anodic TiO2 Nanotube Layers for Wastewater and Air Treatments: Assessment of Performance Using Sulfamethoxazole Degradation and N2O Reduction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Berberine against Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 24
10.3390/molecules27248961
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Green Blue LED-Driven Two-Liquid-Phase One-Pot Procedure for the Synthesis of Estrogen-Related Quinol Prodrugs

by
Elisa De Marchi
,
Lorenzo Botta
,
Bruno Mattia Bizzarri
and
Raffaele Saladino
*
Department of Biological and Ecological Sciences, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(24), 8961; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248961
Submission received: 16 November 2022 / Revised: 8 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 16 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Product-Inspired Molecules: From Weed to Remedy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Quinol derivatives of estrogens are effective pro-drugs in steroid replacement therapy. Here, we report that these compounds can be synthesized in one-pot conditions and high yield by blue LED-driven photo-oxygenation of parent estrogens. The oxidation was performed in buffer and eco-certified 2-methyltetrahydrofuran as the two-liquid-phase reaction solvent, and in the presence of meso-tetraphenyl porphyrin as the photosensitizer. Two steroidal prodrugs 10β, 17β-dihydroxyestra-1,4-dien-3-one (DHED) and 10β-Hydroxyestra-1,4-diene-3,17-dione (HEDD) were obtained with high yield and selectivity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Estrogens are steroidal hormones characterized by a variety of biological effects, including anti-cancer activity, prevention of heart diseases, and neuroprotection [1]. In addition, they are applied in Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) for the prevention of chronic diseases in post-menopausal women. Unfortunately, current estrogen therapy is limited due to the presence of undesired side effects [2,3,4], such as increased risk of breast cancer [5], thromboembolism, coronary heart disease, and stroke [6,7]. As a result, analogues of estrogens are required to counteract the side effects. Quinol derivatives of estrogens are effective pro-drugs for this HRT. They are converted to corresponding estrogens in the brain, remaining inactive in the rest of the body. This allows the efficient treatment of neurological and psychiatric diseases, without emergence of peripheral side effects [3,8,9]. In this framework, 10β, 17β-dihydroxyestra-1,4-dien-3-one (DHED), received a particular attention as an alternative to 17β-estradiol. In vitro and in vivo studies showed that DHED has the potential to treat menopausal symptoms [9], ocular neurodegenerations (including glaucoma) [10,11], androgen deprivation-associated hot flushes [12], and Alzheimer’s [13] and Parkinson’s neurological disorders [14]. Estrogen-related quinols are synthesized by the oxygenation of the phenolic A-ring of the molecule [15,16,17,18,19,20,21], the procedure being limited by the use of stoichiometric oxidants (e.g., oxone [22], hypervalent iodine [23,24], and excess of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 [25]). As an alternative, dye-sensitized photo-oxygenation of 17β-estradiol 1a has been reported to yield mixtures of the corresponding hydro-peroxide 2a and DHED 3a [26] (the structures of compounds 1a, 2a and 3a are reported in Figure 1), the selectivity of the oxidation being dependent from the reaction solvent, substitution pattern [27,28], flow conditions [29], and photosensitizer properties. The synthesis of DHED by multi-step chrysazine-triggered photo-oxygenation in the presence of 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone (1,8-HOAQ) and PPh3 has been also reported [30].
Recently, we described that singlet oxygen produced from blue-LED irradiation of meso-tetraphenyl porphyrin (meso-TPP) can be trapped by 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF), favoring the oxidative coupling of phenols by Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) [31]. This procedure avoided the inactivation of HRP by excess H2O2, working under experimental conditions simpler than those for in situ reduction of dioxygen [32,33,34,35,36]. Here, we describe the application of this procedure in the synthesis of estrogen-related hydroperoxide and quinol derivatives. The reaction solvent, photosensitizer, and buffer solution have been optimized in order to obtain high conversion of substrate and yield of the desired product.

2. Results and Discussion

17α-Ethinylestradiol 1b was first studied as a model substrate. Compound 1b (0.2 mmoL) was dissolved in 2-MeTHF (32 mL) in the presence of meso-TPP (1.0 mol% with respect to substrate), followed by the addition of HRP (407 U) in sodium phosphate buffer (PBS; 16 mL 0.1 M, pH 6.0). The solution was gently stirred (200 rpm) under blue-LED irradiation (blue-LED stripes, 470 nm) and air atmosphere for 24 h at 28 °C. The photoreactor consisted of an internal jar (4.5 cm diameter) inserted in a supplementary external jar (7.5 cm diameter), and blue-LED strips were wrapped around the external jar and covered by aluminum foil (Figure S1). Under these experimental conditions, the hydro-peroxide 2b was isolated as the only recovered product in low yield, besides the unreacted substrate (Scheme 1; Table 1, entry 1). No trace amounts of dimeric products, possibly derived from oxidative radical homo-coupling processes, were detected in the reaction mixture. The structure of hydro-peroxide 2b was confirmed by spectroscopic and spectrometric analyses (including 2D NMR analysis; SI-Section 8), and by comparison with data previously reported [37].
When the reaction was carried out in the absence of HRP, the hydro-peroxide 2b was again obtained as the only recovered product in acceptable yield, suggesting that the enzyme was not involved in the oxidation of the substrate (Table 1, entry 2). In addition, compound 1b was unreactive when the reaction was carried out in the absence of buffer (Table 1, entry 3), under dark conditions (Table 1, entry 4), and without meso-TPP (Table 1, entry 5) highlighting the key role played by blue-photons, pH, and photosensitizer in the transformation.
The activity of meso-TPP was compared with that of other useful photosensitizers, such as tris(2-phenyl-pyridine) iridium [Ir(ppy)3] and Rose Bengal (structure and UV-vis adsorption spectra of the photosensitizers are in Figures S7–S9). As reported in Table 1, meso-TPP showed the highest activity in the photo-oxygenation of compound 1b (entry 2 versus entries 6 and 7).
The possible formation of 2-MeTHF hydro-peroxide from 2-MeTHF during blue LED irradiation, previously observed by us [31], was evaluated by the pyrogallol assay at different reaction times (1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h) and in the presence—or alternatively in the absence—of compound 1b. As reported in Figure S2, compound 1b lowered the concentration of 2-MeTHF hydro-peroxide, suggesting higher reactivity of compound 1b with singlet oxygen with respect to the organic solvent. To optimize the photo-oxygenation procedure we analyzed the effect played by the concentration of substrate, the amount of the buffer (and relative pH), and the nature of the reaction solvent, on the process. Correspondingly to the other experimental parameters, hydro-peroxide 2b was obtained in higher yield starting from 60 mM of substrate (Table 2, entry 1). This result was in accordance with the effect played by the concentration of the substrate on the intensity of the blue LED-photons in the bulk of the solution [38]. The high yield of hydro-peroxide 2b was retained in the presence of a low amount of buffer (160 µL, 5% v/v with respect to 2-MeTHF) (Table 2, entry 2) at pH 6, while it decreased at pH 8 (5% NaHCO3 ss; Table 2, entry 3), and at pH 2 (AcOH 0.5%; Table 2, entry 4). Finally, we studied the effect of a panel of reaction solvents, characterized by a different stabilization effect for singlet oxygen, including CH2Cl2, EtOAc, and HFIP [39]. The highest yield of hydro-peroxide 2b was obtained in CH2Cl2 (>98%; Table 2, entry 6) confirming the high stabilizing effect previously reported (Table 2, entry 6 versus entries 2, 5 and 7) [40]. The general order of reactivity was as follows: CH2Cl2 > 2-MeTHF > HFIP > EtOAc.
Next, we studied the photo-oxygenation of 17β-estradiol 1a, estrone 1c, and estriol 1d under optimal experimental conditions (that is: 60 mM of substrate, CH2Cl2, PBS, and meso-TPP). Unfortunately, estradiol 1a and estriol 1d showed very low conversion of substrate due to the limited solubility of CH2Cl2, while hydro-peroxide 2c was obtained in quantitative conversion of the substrate and yield of the product (Table 3, entry 1).
The reaction was successively repeated in the second most reactive organic solvent previously observed in the oxidation of compound 1b, 2-MeTHF, also taking advantage of its sustainability [35,36]. Under these experimental conditions, hydro-peroxides 2a and 2c–d were obtained, ranging from acceptable to high yields (Table 3, entry 2 and entries 4–5).
The mechanism of dye-mediated photo-oxygenation of phenols has been reviewed and discussed; it includes the transfer of the excited state from the photosensitizer to the substrate (Type I mechanism), or alternatively the inter-crossing system between the photosensitizer and dioxygen, with formation of singlet oxygen (1O2) (Type II mechanism) [38,41,42,43]. Under our experimental conditions, the Type I mechanism was most probably not operating, as suggested by the loss of reactivity of the substrate in the absence of meso-TPP (Table 1, entry 5), associated with the low absorption coefficient of estrogens in the interaction with blue-LED photons (Figures S3–S6) [44,45,46,47]. Additional experiments were performed to investigate the possible involvement of the Type II mechanism [43,48]. Hydroxy and superoxide radicals were not produced during the reaction as evaluated by the “coumarin” assay [48,49,50,51] (Figure S10) and the TEMPO assay (Figure S11) [52], respectively, while the NaN3 assay (Figure S12) confirmed the involvement of 1O2 [53,54,55]. In addition, the reaction was not effective under an argon atmosphere in the presence of degassed solvents (SI-Section 6). Although the possibility of the Type I mechanism cannot be completely ruled out, these data support the formation of 1O2 as the primary oxidant in the photo-oxygenation of estrogens 1a–d. This result is in accordance with the reported ability of meso-TPP to produce 1O2 in aerated systems [42,43].
The tentative reaction pathway for the photo-oxygenation of compounds 1a–d is reported in Scheme 2, it includes: (i) blue-LED photo-activation of meso-TPP to form the singlet excited state (1meso-TPP*); (ii) intersystem crossing (ISC) to form the triplet excited state (3meso-TPP*); (iii) energy transfer, and formation of singlet oxygen (1O2); (iv) selective insertion of 1O2 on substrate to yield an unstable adduct A (not isolated in our case); and (v) rearrangement of adduct A to yield the corresponding hydro-peroxide.
The reduction of hydro-peroxide 2b was performed with different redox agents, Na2S2O3, KI, and PPh3. In this latter case, the progress of the reduction was monitored by the analysis of the C-10 signal (81.020 ppm) in the 13C NMR spectrum of the substrate, due to the high structural similarity between compound 2b, and the corresponding quinol derivative 3b (experimental procedures are in SI-Section 7). Among the reagents studied, PPh3 afforded quinol 3b in quantitative yield and conversion of substrate. PPh3 was then used for the design of a novel one-pot synthesis of quinol 3b by contemporary oxidation of 17α-ethinylestradiol 1b, and in situ reduction of hydro-peroxide 2b (Scheme 3).
Compound 1b (60 mM) and meso-TPP (1.0 mol% with respect to substrate) were dissolved in 2-MeTHF, followed by addition of PBS (0.1M, pH 6; 5% with respect to organic solvent). The solution was gently stirred under blue-LED irradiation at 28 °C, and PPh3 was added to the reaction mixture at indicated reaction times. The presence of PPh3 at the starting point of the reaction totally inhibited the formation of quinol 3b, with hydro-peroxide 2b being the only recovered product (Table 4, entry 1), probably due to the fast oxidation of PPh3 to triphenyl-phosphinoxide (TPPO). A better result was obtained when PPh3 was added to the reaction mixture after 2 h. In this latter case, quinol 3b was obtained with 50% yield and 70% conversion of substrate (Table 4, entry 2). The addition of PPh3 after 3 h further increased the yield of quinol 3b, and conversion of substrate (Table 4, entry 3). Longer addition times (e.g., 24 h) did not further increase the yield of quinol 3b (Table 4, entry 4).
The one-pot procedure was then applied to estrogens 1a and 1c–d assuming 3 h as the optimal reaction time for the addition of PPh3. As reported in Table 5, quinols 3a and 3c–d were obtained ranging from acceptable to high yield (Table 5, entry 1 and entries 3–4). Quinols 3a (DHED) and 3c (HEDD) are well recognized pro-drugs in Hormone Replacement Therapy [9,10,11,12,13,14].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Considerations

Commercially available reagents were used without further purification. Chromatographic separations were performed on Merck silica gel 60 (230–400 mesh). Rf values are referred to TLC carried out on 0.25 mm silica gel plates (F254) using the eluent indicated for column chromatography. All products were dried in high vacuum (10–3 mbar) before characterization. 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and 2D NMR were recorded on a Bruker Advance DRX400 (400 MHz/100 MHz) spectrometer. Chemical shifts are in parts per million (δ scale) and internally referenced the CD3OD signal at δ 3.31 and 49.00 ± 0.01 ppm, respectively. Coupling constants (J) are reported in Hz. UV-visible (UV-vis) spectra were recorded using Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer, Agilent, Santa Clara, USA. Blue-LED apparatus consisted of a 1.0 m blue-LED strip (wavelength 470 nm, nominal capacity/m 14.4 W) ‘LEDXON MODULAR 9009083 LED.

3.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Hydro-Peroxides 2a–d

The selected estrogen (0.2 mmol) and meso-TPP (1 mol%) were dissolved in 2-Me-THF (3.2 mL), followed by the addition of PBS (0.16 mL; 0.1 M, pH 6), and the mixture was gently stirred (200 rpm) under blue-LED irradiation and air atmosphere at 28 ± 1 °C for 24 h. The reaction mixture was washed with brine (3 × 2 mL), dried over sodium sulphate, and evaporated under vacuum. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography.
10-hydroperoxy-17-hydroxy-13-methyl-6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17-dodecahydro-3H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one (2a):
Rf = 0.18 (PE:AcOEt 1:1); oil (yield 60%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.31 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (dd, J = 8, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (s, 1H), 3.56 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 2.80–2.71 (m, 1H), 2.41 (ddd, J = 12.4, 4.2, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 2.03–1.81 (m, 5H), 1.76–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.66–1.56 (m, 1H), 1.53–1.44 (m, 1H), 1.34 (qd, J = 12.2, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.14–0.92 (m, 4H), 0.80 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 186.6 (C3), 166.9 (C5), 151.9 (C1), 129.4 (C2), 123.9 (C4), 81.1 (C17), 80.6 (C10), 55.6 (C9), 49.9 (C14), 42.8 (C13), 36.2 (C12), 35.4 (C8), 33.3 (C7), 31.7 (C6), 29.1 (C16), 23.0 (C15), 22.7 (C11), 10.0 (C18) ppm; ESIMS m/z 327.1 [M + Na]+. The spectral data were in accordance with the results previously reported [26].
17-ethynyl-10-hydroperoxy-17-hydroxy-13-methyl-6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-3H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one (2b):
Rf = 0.23 (PE:AcOEt 3:2); oil (yield 85%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.317 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (dd, J = 8, 2 Hz, 1H), 6.11 (s, 1H), 2.86 (s, 1H), 2.81–280 (m, 1H), 2.43–2.40 (m, 1H), 2.21–2.20 (m, 1H), 2.04–1.86 (m, 5H), 1.73–1.66 (m, 3H), 1.49–1.37 (m, 2H), 1.23–1.22 (m, 1H), 1.19–1.06 (m, 1H), 0.89 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 186.6 (C3), 166.7 (C5), 151.8 (C1), 129.5 (C2), 124.0 (C4), 87.0 (C20), 81.0 (C10), 78.6 (C17), 73.4 (C21), 55.2 (C9), 49.4 (C14), 46.6 (C15), 38.2 (C8), 36.0 (C16), 33.4 (C6), 32.3 (C12), 31.6 (C7), 22.7 (C11), 11.6 (C18) ppm. ESIMS m/z 351.1 [M + Na]+. The spectral data were in accordance with the results previously reported [26].
10-hydroperoxy-13-methyl-7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16-decahydro-3H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene-3,17(6H)-dione (2c):
Rf = 0.21 (PE:AcOEt 3:2); oil (yield 75%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.30 (d, J = 10, 1H), 6.30 (dd, J = 8.4, 2, 1H), 6.13 (s, 1H), 2.85–2.84 (m, 1H), 2.49–2.42 (m, 2H), 2.17–1.90 (m, 6H), 1.81–1.76 (m, 1H), 1.68–1.62 (m, 1H), 1.38–1.18 (m, 4H), 0.94 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 221.4 (C17), 186.5 (C3), 166.3 (C5), 151.5 (C1), 129.6 (C2), 124.1 (C4), 80.9 (C10), 55.0 (C9), 50.0 (C14), 35.0 (C15), 34.9 (C8), 32.4 (C16), 31.4 (C6), 30.9 (C12), 22.1 (C7), 21.4 (C11), 12.6 (C18) ppm. ESIMS m/z 325.1 [M + Na]+. The spectral data were in accordance with the results previously reported [37].
10-hydroperoxy-16,17-dihydroxy-13-methyl-6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-3H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one (2d):
Rf = 0.26 (CH2Cl2:MeOH 30:3); oil (45%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.22 (d, J = 10.4, 1H), 6.14 (dd, J = 12,8, 2, 1H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 4.03 (t, J = 6, 7.2, 1H), 2.79–2.78 (m, 1H), 2.35 (d, J = 11.2, 1H), 2.02–1.90 (m, 3H), 1.85–1.83 (m, 3H), 1.79–1.69 (m, 1H), 1.54–1.48 (m, 1H), 1.35–1.30 (m, 1H), 1.18–1.04 (m, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 186.8 (C3), 168.9 (C5), 153.5 (C1), 126.3 (C2), 121.4 (C4), 88.9 (C17), 78.7 (C10), 77.1 (C16), 55.3 (C9), 43.5 (C13), 36.1 (C12), 34.4 (C8), 33.9 (C7), 33.2 (C6), 31.7 (C15), 21.9 (C11), 11.2 (C18) ppm. ESIMS m/z 343.1 [M + Na]+.

3.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Estrogen-Related Quinols 3a–d

The selected estrogen (0.2 mmol) and meso-TPP (1.0 mol%) were dissolved in 2-Me-THF (3.2 mL), followed by the addition of PBS (0.16 mL; 0.1 M, pH 6), and the mixture was gently stirred (200 rpm) under blue-LED irradiation and air atmosphere at 28 ± 1 °C for 3 hrs. Then PPh3 (0.3 mmol) was added, and the reaction was left under magnetic stirring for 21 h. After washing with brine (3 × 2 mL), the reaction mixture was dried over sodium sulphate, and evaporated under vacuum. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography.
10,17-dihydroxy-13-methyl-6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-3H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one (3a, DHED):
Rf = 0.17 (CH2Cl2:AcOEt 9:2.5); oil (yield 62%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.23 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 6.14 (dd, J = 8, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (s, 1H), 3.58 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 2.79–2.78 (m, 1H), 2.34 (ddd, J = 12.4, 4.2, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 2.04–1.73 (m, 5H), 1.76–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.706–1.56 (m, 1H), 1.53–1.44 (m, 1H), 1.34 (qd, J = 12.2, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.14–0.92 (m, 4H), 0.84 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 186.8 (C3), 169.1 (C5), 153.7 (C1), 126.3 (C2), 121.3 (C4), 80.8 (C17), 69.72 (C10), 55.46 (C9), 49.7 (C14), 42.9 (C13), 36.2 (C12), 34.9 (C8), 33.3 (C7), 31.6 (C6), 29.1 (C16), 23.1 (C15), 22.3 (C11), 10.1 (C18) ppm. ESIMS m/z 311.1 [M + Na]+. The spectral data were in accordance with the results previously reported [30].
17-ethynyl-10,17-dihydroxy-13-methyl-6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-3H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one (3b):
Rf = 0.18 (CH2Cl2:AcOEt 9:1); oil (yield 84%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.31 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (dd, J = 8, 2 Hz, 1H), 6.11 (s, 1H), 2.86 (s, 1H), 2.81–2.80 (m, 1H), 2.43–2.40 (m, 1H), 2.21–2.20 (m, 1H), 2.04–1.86 (m, 5H), 1.73–1.66 (m, 3H), 1.49–1.37 (m, 2H), 1.23–1.22 (m, 1H), 1.19–1.06 (m, 1H), 0.89 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 186.8 (C3), 168.9 (C5), 153.5 (C1), 126.3 (C2), 121.4 (C4), 87.2 (C20), 78.7 (C17), 73.4 (C21), 69.6 (C10), 55.1 (C9), 49.2 (C14), 46.7 (C13), 38.3 (C15), 35.5 (C8), 33.3 (C16), 32.2 (C6), 31.7 (C12), 22.8 (C7), 22.3 (C11), 11.7 (C18) ppm. ESIMS m/z 335.1 [M + Na]+. The spectral data were in accordance with the results previously reported [56].
10-hydroxy-13-methyl-7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16-decahydro-3H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene-3,17(6H)-dione (3c, HEDD):
Rf = 0.36 (PE:AcOEt 1:1); oil (yield 73%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.23 (d, J = 10, 1H), 6.15 (dd, J = 8.4, 2, 1H), 6.00 (s, 1H), 2.84–2.83 (m, 1H), 2.48–2.39 (m, 2H), 2.19–1.97 (m, 6H), 1.83–1.79 (m, 1H), 1.69–1.63 (m, 1H), 1.39–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.98 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 221.8 (C17), 186.7 (C3), 168.5 (C5), 153.2 (C1), 126.5 (C2), 121.5 (C4), 69.5 (C10), 55.0 (C9), 49.8 (C14), 35.1 (C15), 34.4 (C8), 32.3 (C16), 31.5 (C6), 30.9 (C12), 21.8 (C7), 21.5 (C11), 12.7 (C18) ppm. ESIMS m/z 309.1 [M + Na]+. The spectral data were in accordance with the results previously reported [57].
10,16,17-trihydroxy-13-methyl-6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-3H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one (3d):
Rf = 0.26 (CH2Cl2:MeOH 30:3); oil (yield 46%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.22 (d, J = 10.4, 1H), 6.14 (dd, J = 12,8, 2, 1H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 4.03 (t, J = 6, 7.2, 1H), 2.79–2.78 (m, 1H), 2.35 (d, J = 11.2, 1H), 2.02–1.90 (m, 3H), 1.85–1.83 (m, 3H), 1.79–1.69 (m, 1H), 1.54–1.48 (m, 1H), 1.36–1.30 (m, 1H), 1.18–1.04 (m, 3H), 0.86 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 186.8 (C3), 168.9 (C5), 153.5 (C1), 126.3 (C2), 121.4 (C4), 88.9 (C17), 77.1 (C16), 69.6 (C10), 55.3 (C9), 48.4 (C14), 43.5 (C13), 36.1 (C12), 34.4 (C8), 33.9 (C7), 33.2 (C6), 31.7 (C15), 21.9 (C11), 11.2 (C18) ppm. ESIMS m/z 327.1 [M + Na]+.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we developed a novel one-pot approach for the synthesis of estrogen-related quinols by using blue LED-driven photo-oxygenation in a two-liquid-phase system. The reaction proceeded under mild and sustainable conditions, including with a catalytic amount of meso-TPP, eco-certified 2-MeTHF, and buffer as solvents, and PPh3 as the reducing agent. The reaction pathway involved blue-LED photo-activation of meso-TPP, and the generation of singlet oxygen (1O2) (Type II mechanism), followed by oxidation of estrogen to the corresponding hydro-peroxide, and in situ reduction of hydro-peroxide to the desired quinol. Under these experimental conditions, quinols were synthesized ranging from acceptable to very high yield, including two well recognized pro-drugs in Hormone Replacement Therapy, DHED and HEDD. The irrelevance of the Type I mechanism was suggested by the un-reactivity of the system, in the absence of the photosensitizer associated with the low adsorption capacity of estrogens towards blue-LED photons. The presence of 2-MeTHF hydro-peroxide, OH, and superoxide radicals in the reaction pathway was investigated, and ruled-out by means of different specific assays. The additional scopes and applications of this photocatalytic process will be further investigated in our laboratory.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27248961/s1, Reaction set up; 2-Me-THF hydroperoxide assay; UV-visible analysis; Coumarin assay; Quenching experiments; degassed conditions; Screening of reducing agents; 1D and 2D NMR spectra. Figure S1: reaction set up; Figure S2: 2-MeTHF hydroperoxide assay; Figure S3–S6: estrogens UV-visible spectra; Figures S7–S9: photosensitizers UV-visible spectra; Figure S10: coumarin assay; Figure S11: photo-oxygenation of 1c in presence of TEMPO as radical scavenger; Figure S12: photo-oxygenation of 1c in presence of NaN3 as singlet oxygen scavenger; Figure S13: photo-oxygenation of 1b under degassed conditions; Figure S14: reduction of hydroperoxide 2b by Na2S2O3; Figure S15: reduction of hydroperoxide 2b by KI; Figure S16: reduction of hydroperoxide 2b by PPh3; Figures S17–S28: 1H NMR, 13C NMR and 2D NMR spectra of hydro-peroxides 2a–d; Figures S29–S36: 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of quinols 3a–d.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.B. and R.S.; methodology, E.D.M.; investigation, E.D.M. and B.M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, E.D.M.; writing—review and editing, R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università della Ricerca Italiano (MIUR), PRIN 2017, ORIGINALE CHEMIAE in Antiviral Strategy—Origin and Modernization of Multi-Component Chemistry as a Source of Innovative Broad Spectrum Antiviral Strategy, cod. 2017BMK8JR.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The Centro Grandi Apparecchiture CGA of the University of Tuscia is acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gruber, C.J.; Tschugguel, W.; Schneeberger, C.; Huber, J.C. Production and Actions of Estrogens. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 340–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lobo, R.A. Hormone-replacement therapy: Current thinking. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Prokai, L.; Prokai, K.; Simpkins, J. Preparation of Steroidal Quinols and Their Use for Estrogen Replacement Therapy. U.S. Patent US7300926B2, 27 November 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lobo, R.A. Benefits and risks of estrogen replacement therapy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995, 173, 982–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. D’Alonzo, M.; Bounous, V.E.; Villa, M.; Bigli, N. Current evidence of the oncological benefit-risk profile of hormone replacement therapy. Medicina 2019, 55, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cushman, M.; Larson, J.C.; Rosendaal, F.R.; Heckbert, S.R.; Curb, J.D.; Phillips, L.S.; Baird, A.E.; Eaton, C.B.; Stafford, R.S. Biomarkers, menopausal hormone therapy and risk of venous thrombosis: The Women’s Health Initiative. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 2018, 17, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bassuk, S.S.; Manson, J.E. The timing hypothesis: Do coronary risks of menopausal hormone therapy vary by age or time since menopause onset. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2016, 65, 794–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Prokai, L. A Novel Prodrug Approach for Central Nervous System-Selective Estrogen Therapy. Molecules 2019, 24, 4197–4214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Prokai, L.; Nguyen, V.; Szarka, S.; Garg, P.; Sabnis, G.; Bimonte-Nelson, H.A.; McLaughlin, K.J.; Talboom, J.S.; Conrad, C.D.; Shugrue, P.J.; et al. The prodrug DHED selectively delivers 17β-estradiol to the brain for treating estrogen-responsive disorders. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 297ra113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Nguyen, V.; De La Cruz, D.L.; Guerra, R.; Zaman, K.; Rahlouni, F.; Prokai, L. Retina-Targeted Delivery of 17β-Estradiol by the Topically Applied DHED Prodrug. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Zaman, K.; Nguyen, V.; De La Cruz, D.L.; Prokai, L. Proteomics-Based Retinal Target Engagement Analysis and Retina-Targeted Delivery of 17β-Estradiol by the DHED Prodrug for Ocular Neurotherapy in Males. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1392–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Merchenthaler, I.; Lane, M.; Stennett, C.; Zhan, M.; Nguyen, V.; Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Prokai, L. Brain-Selective Estrogen Therapy Prevents Androgen Deprivation-Associated Hot Flushes in a Rat Model. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tschiffely, A.E.; Schuh, R.A.; Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Prokai, L.; Ottinger, M.A. A comparative evaluation of treatments with 17β-estradiol and its brain-selective prodrug in a double-transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Horm. Behav. 2016, 83, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Thadathil, N.; Xiao, J.; Hori, R.; Alway, S.E.; Khan, M.M. Brain Selective Estrogen Treatment Protects Dopaminergic Neurons and Preserves Behavioral Function in MPTP-induced Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neuroimmune Pharm. 2021, 16, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Quideau, S.; Pouységu, L.; Deffïeux, D. Oxidative Dearomatization of Phenols: Why, How and What For? Synlett 2008, 4, 467–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baker Dockrey, S.A.; Lukowski, A.L.; Becker, M.R.; Narayan, A.R.H. Biocatalytic site-and enantioselective oxidative dearomatization of phenols. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Roche, S.P.; Porco, J.A. Dearomatization Strategies in the Synthesis of Complex Natural Products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4068–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ding, Q.; Ye, Y.; Fan, R. Recent Advances in Phenol Dearomatization and Its Application in Complex Syntheses. Synthesis 2013, 45, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bizzarri, B.M.; Fanelli, A.; Piccinino, D.; De Angelis, M.; Dolfa, C.; Palamara, A.T.; Nencioni, L.; Zippilli, C.; Crucianelli, M.; Saladino, R. Synthesis of Stilbene and Chalcone Inhibitors of Influenza A Virus by SBA-15 Supported Hoveyda-Grubbs Metathesis. Catalysts 2019, 9, 983–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sun, W.; Li, G.; Hong, L.; Wang, R. Asymmetric dearomatization of phenols. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 2164–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, W.T.; Zhang, L.; You, S.L. Catalytic asymmetric dearomatization (CADA) reactions of phenol and aniline derivatives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1570–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carreño, M.C.; González-López, M.; Urbano, A. Oxidative De-aromatization of para-Alkyl Phenols into para-Peroxyquinols and para-Quinols Mediated by Oxone as a Source of Singlet Oxygen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2737–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Moriarty, R.M.; Prakash, O. Oxidation of Phenolic Compounds with Organohypervalent Iodine Reagents. Org. React. 2001, 57, 327–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Parra, A.; Reboredo, S. Chiral Hypervalent Iodine Reagents: Synthesis and Reactivity. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 17244–17260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sels, B.F.; De Vos, D.E.; Jacobs, P.A. Bromide-Assisted Oxidation of Substituted Phenols with Hydrogen Peroxide to the Corresponding p-Quinol and p-Quinol Ethers over WO42−-Exchanged Layered Double Hydroxides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 44, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lupon, P.; Gomez, J.; Bonet, J.J. Photo-oxygenation of Styrenic Estrogens: A New Synthesis of 19-Norsteroids. Angew. Chem. Suppl. 1983, 1025–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lupon, P.; Grau, F.; Bonet, J.J. The photooxygenation of Δ9(11)-dehydroestrone and its 3-methyl ether potochemical reactions XX. Preliminary communication. Helv. Chim. Acta 1984, 67, 332–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Planas, A.; Lupon, P.; Cascallo, M.; Bonet, J.J. Photo-oxygenation of Styrenic Estrogens: Product characterization and kinetics of the dye-sensitized photo-oxygenation of 9,11-didehydroestrone derivatives. Helv. Chim. Acta 1989, 72, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wellauer, J.; Miladinov, D.; Buchholz, T.; Schutz, J.; Stemmler, R.T.; Medlock, J.A.; Bonrath, W.; Sparr, C. Organophotocatalytic Aerobic Oxygenation of Phenols in a Visible-Light Continuous-Flow Photoreactor. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 9748–9752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Afanasenko, A.; Kavun, A.; Thomas, D.; Li, C.J. A One-Pot Approach for Bio-Based Arylamines via a Combined Photooxidative Dearomatization-Rearomatization Strategy. Chem. Eur. J. 2022, 28, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zippilli, C.; Bizzarri, B.M.; Gabellone, S.; Botta, L.; Saladino, R. Oxidative Coupling of Coumarins by Blue-LED-Driven in situ Activation of Horseradish Peroxidase in a Two-Liquid-Phase System ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 4151–4158. [CrossRef]
  32. Bankar, S.B.; Bule, M.V.; Singhal, R.S.; Ananthanarayan, L. Glucose oxidase—An overview. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tieves, F.; Willot, S.J.-P.; van Schie, M.M.C.H.; Rauch, M.C.R.; Younes, S.H.H.; Zhang, W.; Dong, J.; de Santos, P.; Robbins, J.M.; Bommarius, B.; et al. Formate Oxidase (FOx) from Aspergillus oryzae: One Catalyst Enables Diverse H2O2-Dependent Biocatalytic Oxidation Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 7873–7877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Wapshott-Stehli, H.L.; Grunden, A.M. In situ H2O2 generation methods in the context of enzyme biocatalysis. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2021, 145, 109744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Monticelli, S.; Castoldi, L.; Murgia, I.; Senatore, R.; Mazzeo, E.; Wackerlig, J.; Urban, E.; Langer, T.; Pace, V. Recent advancements on the use of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran in organometallic chemistry. Monatsh. Chem. 2017, 148, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ismael, A.; Gevorgyan, A.; Skrydstrup, T.; Bayer, A. Renewable Solvents for Palladium-Catalyzed Carbonylation Reactions. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2020, 24, 2665–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sedee, A.; van Henegouwen, G.B. Photosensitized Decomposition of Contraceptive Steroids: A Possible Explanation for the Observed (Photo)aIIergy of the Oral Contraceptive Pill. Arch. Pharm. 1985, 318, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Noyes, W.A.; Hammond, G.S.; Pittis, J.N. Advances in Photochemistry; Interscience Publishers: New York, NY, USA; London, UK; Sydney, Australia; pp. 1–483. 1968; Volume 6, pp. 1–483. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wilkinson, F.; McGamey, D.J.; Olea, A.F. Factors governing the efficiency of singlet oxygen production during oxygen quenching of singlet and triplet states of anthracene derivatives in cyclohexane solution. J. Am. Chew. SOC. 1993, 115, 12144–12151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wilkinson, F.; Ayman, A.A.-S. Mechanism of Quenching of Triplet States by Molecular Oxygen: Biphenyl Derivatives in Different Solvents. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 5425–5435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fischer, J.; Nun, P.; Coeffard, V. Visible-Light-Driven Transformations of Phenols via Energy Transfer. Catal. Synth. 2020, 52, 1617–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Buzzetti, L.; Crisenza, G.E.M.; Melchiorre, P. Mechanistic Studies in Photocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3730–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pfoertner, K.-H. Photochemistry. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, J.; Mailhot, G.; WuNansheng, F. Deng Photochemical efficiency of Fe(III)-EDDS complex: •OH radical production and 17β-estradiol degradation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2010, 212, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yamamoto, A.; Kodama, S.; Matsunaga, A.; Nakazawa, H.; Hayakawa, K. Fluorescence-Detected Circular Dichroism by Modulated Beam in the Wavelength Axial Direction. A J. Sterochemistry 2002, 7, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Soto, C.; Contreras, D.; Yez, J.; Otipka, R.; Toral, M.I.; Pino, D. Determination and co-estimate of the chlormadinone acetate and 17α-ethinyl estradiol in pharmaceutical formulation and drinking water samples by digital derivative spectrophotometry. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2014, 59, 2485–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Li, W.J.; Chang, L.; Liu, Q.; Ning, D.; Yao, X.Y.; Li, Y.; Ruan, W.J. Enzyme-Assisted Metal–Organic Framework Sensing System for Diethylstilbestrol Detection. Eur. J. Chem. 2017, 23, 15498–15504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Raghavan, N.V.; Steenken, S. Electrophilic reaction of the hydroxyl radical with phenol. Determination of the distribution of isomeric dihydroxycyclohexadienyl radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 3495–3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, J.; Nosaka, Y. Quantitative Detection of OH Radicals for Investigating the Reaction Mechanism of Various Visible-Light TiO2 Photocatalysts in Aqueous Suspension. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 1383–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maier, A.C.; Iglebaek, E.H.; Jonsson, M. Confirming the Formation of Hydroxyl Radicals in the Catalytic Decomposition of H2O2 on Metal Oxides Using Coumarin as a Probe. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 5435–5438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Leandri, V.; Gardner, J.M.; Jonsson, M. Coumarin as a Quantitative Probe for Hydroxyl Radical Formation in Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 6667–6674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, L.; Hao, C.; Zhai, R.; He, W.; Deng, C. Study on the mechanism of free radical scavenger TEMPO blocking in coal oxidation chain reaction. Fuel 2023, 331 Pt 2, 125853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Miyosh, N.; Tomit, G. Quenching of Singlet Oxygen by Sodium Azide in Reversed Micellar Systems. Z. Fur. Naturforsch.–B J. Chem. 1979, 34, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Miyoshia, N.; Uedaa, M.; Fukeb, K.; Tanimotoa, Y.; Itoha, M.; Tomitac, G. Lifetime of Singlet Oxygen and Quenching by NaN3 in Mixed Solvents. Z. Fur. Naturforsch.–B J. Chem. 1982, 37, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bancirova, M. Sodium azide as a specific quencher of singlet oxygen during chemiluminescent detection by luminol and Cypridina luciferin analogues. Luminescence 2011, 26, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Della Greca, M.; Pinto, G.; Pistillo, P.; Pollio, A.; Previtera, L.; Temussia, F. Biotransformation of ethinylestradiol by microalgae. Chemosphere 2008, 70, 2047–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Maumy, M.; Capdevielle, P. Chemical Evidence for Peroxy Radicals Intermediacy in Copper(II) Reaction with Hydroperoxides. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1455–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 08961 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of 17β-estradiol 1a, hydro-peroxide 2a and 10β, 17β-dihydroxyestra-1,4-dien-3-one (DHED) 3a.
Figure 1. Structures of 17β-estradiol 1a, hydro-peroxide 2a and 10β, 17β-dihydroxyestra-1,4-dien-3-one (DHED) 3a.
Molecules 27 08961 g001
Molecules 27 08961 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Blue LED−driven two−liquid−phase photo-oxygenation of estrogens 1a–d to hydro-peroxides 2a–d.
Scheme 1. Blue LED−driven two−liquid−phase photo-oxygenation of estrogens 1a–d to hydro-peroxides 2a–d.
Molecules 27 08961 sch001
Molecules 27 08961 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Tentative reaction pathway for the photo-oxygenation of estrogen 1 by blue-LED irradiation in the presence of meso-TPP and bi-phasic system. “*” represents the excited structure of meso-TPP.
Scheme 2. Tentative reaction pathway for the photo-oxygenation of estrogen 1 by blue-LED irradiation in the presence of meso-TPP and bi-phasic system. “*” represents the excited structure of meso-TPP.
Molecules 27 08961 sch002
Molecules 27 08961 sch003 550
Scheme 3. One−pot synthesis of quinols 3a–d.
Scheme 3. One−pot synthesis of quinols 3a–d.
Molecules 27 08961 sch003
Table
Table 1. Blue LED-driven two-liquid-phase photo-oxygenation of 17α-ethinylestradiol 1b to hydro-peroxide 2b.
Table 1. Blue LED-driven two-liquid-phase photo-oxygenation of 17α-ethinylestradiol 1b to hydro-peroxide 2b.
EntryLightSolventsPhotosensitizer
(1.0 mol%)		Conversion a (%)Yield a (%)
1Blue-LED2-MeTHF:PBS (2:1)meso-TPP2012
2 bBlue-LED2-MeTHF:PBS (2:1)meso-TPP2013
3Blue-LED2-MeTHFmeso-TPP--
4Dark2-MeTHF:PBS (2:1)meso-TPP--
5Blue-LED2-MeTHF:PBS (2:1)---
6Blue-LED2-MeTHF:PBS (2:1)Ir(ppy)31810
7Blue-LED2-MeTHF:PBS (2:1)Rose Bengal192
a Conversion of substrate and yield of product were calculated on the basis of starting mmol of substrate; b Reaction performed under similar experimental conditions in the absence of HRP.
Table
Table 2. Optimization experiments for the synthesis of hydro-peroxide 2b a.
Table 2. Optimization experiments for the synthesis of hydro-peroxide 2b a.
EntrySolventsConversion bYield b(%)
1 c2-MeTHF-PBS (2:1)9087
2 c2-MeTHF (+5% PBS)9085
3 d2-MeTHF (+5% NaHCO3 ss)4840
4 e2-MeTHF (+5% AcOH aq.0.5%)3832
5 cEtOAc (+5% PBS)6556
6 cCH2Cl2 (+5% PBS)>98>98
7 cHFIP (+5% PBS)8674
a The reaction was performed solubilizing 1b (0.2 mmol) and meso-TPP (1.0 mol%) in the organic solvent (3.2 mL) followed by the addition of the PBS. The solution was gently stirred (200 rpm) under blue-LED irradiation (blue-LED stripes, 470 nm) at 28 ± 1 °C for 24 h. b Conversion of substrate and yield of product were calculated on the basis of starting mmol of substrate; c PBS (0.1 M, pH 6); d NaHCO3 saturated aqueous solution (pH 8); e AcOH 0.5% aqueous solution (pH 2).
Table
Table 3. Substrate scope of novel blue LED-driven two-liquid- phase photo-oxygenation a.
Table 3. Substrate scope of novel blue LED-driven two-liquid- phase photo-oxygenation a.
EntryCpdStructureConversion b (%)Product b (%)
1 c1cMolecules 27 08961 i001>98%Molecules 27 08961 i002
21aMolecules 27 08961 i00365Molecules 27 08961 i004
31bMolecules 27 08961 i00590Molecules 27 08961 i006
41cMolecules 27 08961 i00780Molecules 27 08961 i008
51dMolecules 27 08961 i00950Molecules 27 08961 i010
a The reaction was performed solubilizing compound 1 (0.2 mmol) and meso-TPP (1.0 mol%) in 2-MeTHF (3.2 mL), followed by the addition of PBS (160 µL; 0.1M, pH 6). The solution was gently stirred (200 rpm) under blue-LED irradiation (blue-LED stripes, 470 nm) at 28 ± 1 °C for 24 h; b Conversion of substrate and yield of reaction product were calculated on the basis of starting mmol of substrate; c Reaction performed in CH2Cl2.
Table
Table 4. One-pot synthesis of quinol 3b at different times of addition of PPh3 a.
Table 4. One-pot synthesis of quinol 3b at different times of addition of PPh3 a.
EntryAddition Time (h)Reaction Time (h)Conversion b (%)Yield b (%)
10241510 c
22247050
33249084
424489088
a The reaction was performed solubilizing 1b (0.2 mmol) and meso-TPP (1.0 mol%) in 2-MeTHF (3.2 mL), followed by the addition of PBS (0.1 M, pH 6) and of PPh3 (0.3 mmol) at different reaction times. The solution was gently stirred (200 rpm) under blue-LED irradiation (blue-LED stripes, 470 nm) at 28 ± 1 °C; b Conversion of substrate and yield of quinol 3b were calculated on the basis of mmol of starting substrate. c Yield of hydro-peroxide 2b.
Table
Table 5. Substrate scope of novel blue LED-driven two-liquid-phase in One-Pot condition a.
Table 5. Substrate scope of novel blue LED-driven two-liquid-phase in One-Pot condition a.
EntryCpdStructureConversion b (%)Product b (%)
11aMolecules 27 08961 i01166Molecules 27 08961 i012
21bMolecules 27 08961 i01389Molecules 27 08961 i014
31cMolecules 27 08961 i01583Molecules 27 08961 i016
41dMolecules 27 08961 i01753Molecules 27 08961 i018
a The reaction was performed solubilizing 1a–d (0.2 mmol) and meso-TPP (1.0 mol%) in 2-MeTHF (3.2 mL) and finally adding PBS (160 µL; 0.1M, pH 6). The solution was gently stirred (200 rpm) under blue-LED irradiation (blue-LED stripes, 470 nm) at 28 ± 1 °C. After 3 h, the PPh3 (0.3 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture; b Conversion of substrate and yield of reaction product were calculated on the basis of mmol of starting substrate.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Marchi, E.; Botta, L.; Bizzarri, B.M.; Saladino, R. A Green Blue LED-Driven Two-Liquid-Phase One-Pot Procedure for the Synthesis of Estrogen-Related Quinol Prodrugs. Molecules 2022, 27, 8961. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248961

AMA Style

De Marchi E, Botta L, Bizzarri BM, Saladino R. A Green Blue LED-Driven Two-Liquid-Phase One-Pot Procedure for the Synthesis of Estrogen-Related Quinol Prodrugs. Molecules. 2022; 27(24):8961. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248961

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Marchi, Elisa, Lorenzo Botta, Bruno Mattia Bizzarri, and Raffaele Saladino. 2022. "A Green Blue LED-Driven Two-Liquid-Phase One-Pot Procedure for the Synthesis of Estrogen-Related Quinol Prodrugs" Molecules 27, no. 24: 8961. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248961

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop