Next Article in Journal
Novel Imidazole Liquid Crystals; Experimental and Computational Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Protopine through MAPK and NF-κB Signaling Regulation in HepG2 Cell
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 14
10.3390/molecules27144602
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microfluidic Nanomaterial Synthesis and In Situ SAXS, WAXS, or SANS Characterization: Manipulation of Size Characteristics and Online Elucidation of Dynamic Structural Transitions

by
Anan Yaghmur
1,* and
Islam Hamad
2
1
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
2
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Madaba, Madaba 11821, Jordan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(14), 4602; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144602
Submission received: 18 June 2022 / Revised: 11 July 2022 / Accepted: 14 July 2022 / Published: 19 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microfluidics in Physical Chemistry Research Areas: Current Status and Recent Advances)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With the ability to cross biological barriers, encapsulate and efficiently deliver drugs and nucleic acid therapeutics, and protect the loaded cargos from degradation, different soft polymer and lipid nanoparticles (including liposomes, cubosomes, and hexosomes) have received considerable interest in the last three decades as versatile platforms for drug delivery applications and for the design of vaccines. Hard nanocrystals (including gold nanoparticles and quantum dots) are also attractive for use in various biomedical applications. Here, microfluidics provides unique opportunities for the continuous synthesis of these hard and soft nanomaterials with controllable shapes and sizes, and their in situ characterization through manipulation of the flow conditions and coupling to synchrotron small-angle X-ray (SAXS), wide-angle scattering (WAXS), or neutron (SANS) scattering techniques, respectively. Two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) microfluidic devices are attractive not only for the continuous production of monodispersed nanomaterials, but also for improving our understanding of the involved nucleation and growth mechanisms during the formation of hard nanocrystals under confined geometry conditions. They allow further gaining insight into the involved dynamic structural transitions, mechanisms, and kinetics during the generation of self-assembled nanostructures (including drug nanocarriers) at different reaction times (ranging from fractions of seconds to minutes). This review provides an overview of recently developed 2D and 3D microfluidic platforms for the continuous production of nanomaterials, and their simultaneous use in in situ characterization investigations through coupling to nanostructural characterization techniques (e.g., SAXS, WAXS, and SANS).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Microfluidic platforms have emerged as attractive, powerful, and versatile tools for various biomedical and pharmaceutical applications, including nanomaterial synthesis, drug delivery, vaccine design, cell analysis, personalized medicine development, and diagnosis [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Among these, the continuous production of monodispersed nanomaterials (including soft lipid and polymer nanoparticles) and hard nanocrystals with controllable sizes and shapes is considered one of the frontline applications of microfluidics in recent years [1,5,7,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Schematic illustrations on the microfluidic synthesis of different nanoparticles attractive for use in the development of nanomedicines or functional food nanocarriers are presented in Figure 1. In addition to the microfluidic synthesis of monodispersed liposomes and their remote loading with therapeutics (Figure 1A), Figure 1B–D shows the employed microfluidic synthesis methods for the continuous production of cubosomes and other non-lamellar liquid crystalline nanoparticles (including hexosomes). These nanoparticles were produced through the use of a staggered herringbone mixer (Figure 1B) and hydrodynamic flow-focusing (HFF) microfluidic devices (Figure 1C,D), respectively. For further detailed information on these microfluidic methods for nanomaterial synthesis and recent advances in this research area, the interested reader is directed to the following recent review articles [5,20,21,24,25,26].
In addition to the high reproducibility and possible implantation of automation steps, microfluidics offers unique opportunities for online chemical and biological analyses, rheological characterization, and structural screening and analysis [5,8,9,21,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. These opportunities include short measurement times, a high precision of liquid modulation and control of timing and flow parameters, and use of minimal input sample volumes (particularly important for minimizing the consumption of expensive materials) [4,7,12,16,31,32,38]. Here, 2D and 3D microfluidic platforms are attractive for real-time tracking analysis of nucleation and monitoring of growth mechanisms of hard metal nanocrystals [39,40,41,42,43], in situ (online), high-throughput protein structure screening and analysis during crystallization processes and under various conditions [44,45], real-time monitoring of structural dynamic events during the generation of nano-self-assemblies [5,28,30,31,46,47], and online self-assembly behavior of amphiphiles or macromolecules under flow conditions [44,46,48,49,50,51]. Further, the use is extended to other research areas, including in situ characterization studies for monitoring the dynamic structural events during the digestion of drug formulations [52], the exposure of charged nano-self assemblies to divalent ions [53,54], the spinning process of artificial fibers [55], the generation of single domain supercrystals [56], the precipitation of crystals in moving droplets [57], and the nanoparticle agglomeration [58].
There is a growing interest in coupling SAXS (or SANS) to light sources, stopped-flow devices, pressure cells, and optical tweezers, among others, for online structural characterization investigations [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. However, in this review, we exclusively focus on in situ characterization of nano-self-assemblies under flow conditions through coupling of 2D or 3D microfluidic platforms to nanostructural characterization scattering techniques (namely synchrotron SAXS, WAXS, and SANS). Recent advancements in the fabrication of specialized microfluidic platforms with reduced attenuation and background scattering compatible to these techniques are discussed. Limitations, challenges, and opportunities in this research area are also highlighted. Different recent examples on in situ characterization studies (SAXS/WAXS-on-chip and microfluidic-SANS) are presented. The current number of such studies is limited, but it is expected to rapidly grow in the future.

2. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Specialized and Compatible Microfluidic Chips for In Situ Characterization Studies

Coupling microfluidics to SAXS (or SANS) provides unique opportunities for investigating self-assemblies under confined and continuous flow conditions. In this section, we describe the main microfluidic characteristic features of 2D and 3D X-ray- and neutron-compatible microfluidic platforms designed for online (in situ) investigations on nanomaterials during their continuous productions or for real-time monitoring of phase behavior of surfactant solutions under flow conditions. Table 1 presents different examples from the literature on such online investigations and briefly describes the reported advantages of the employed microfluidic platforms. However, certain common microfluidic advantages (including simplicity, low cost, ease and rapid fabrication, reproducibility, flexibility, adaptability, and minimization of material consumption) are not mentioned in the table.
The X-ray-compatible microfluidic platforms typically have different main characteristic features and advantages including: (i) X-ray transparency and compatibility; (ii) reduction of attenuation and background scattering and achievement of a good signal-to-noise ratio; (iii) reproducibility and negligible platform-to-platform variations; (iv) prevention the adsorption of lipids, proteins, and other compounds onto the interfaces of the microfluidic walls that may cause clogging and reduce the quality of measurements; (v) elimination of potential radiation damage; (vi) compatibility to organic solvents; (vii) ease of cleaning between measurements; and (vii) durability [28,42,43,49,57,70,71,72,73].
To guarantee successful SAXS analysis, it is important when employing HFF devices or similar microfluidic platforms to ensure that the channel width, through which the X-ray travels, is bigger than that of the X-ray beam for preventing parasitic scattering from the microfluidic channel walls [31]. Here, SAXS measurements at different positions along the channel should be conducted under flow conditions by maintaining the X-ray beam confined between the channel walls. The use of such devices with relatively bigger channel widths can compromise the microfluidic efficacy in controlling the nanoparticle size characteristics [31].
For online SANS investigations, it is important to use microfluidic chips with a low neutron absorption and a low neutron activation [37]. For further information, the interested reader is directed to the recent review of Cabral and co-workers [37]. It presents different microfluidic requirements (including some commonly shared with X-ray-compatible chips) [37].
For special and certain applications, we may need to consider additional microfluidic characteristic features for online SAXS (or SANS) studies [37].
Table
Table 1. Examples of X-ray- and neutron-compatible microfluidics and their reported uses in online structural investigations.
Table 1. Examples of X-ray- and neutron-compatible microfluidics and their reported uses in online structural investigations.
Microfluidics Features, Advantages, and Reported Main DrawbacksCharacterization and Phase MappingRef.
2D HFF  
platform based  
on thiol-ene 		Suitability for X-ray studies; lipid adsorption prevention; and  
disposability. 
Main drawback: low efficacy in  
controlling the nanoparticle size characteristics.
➢
Effect of Ca2+ ions on negatively charged cubosomes: synchrotron SAXS study.
➢
Continuous production and characterization of MLVs: synchrotron SAXS study.
➢
Mixing nanoparticles and micellar solutions: production of lamellar and non-lamellar liquid crystalline nanoparticles: synchrotron SAXS study.
[53] 
 
 
[31] 
 
 
[30]
Different  
polyimide- 
based chips		Good resistance to X-ray; suitability for SAXS-scanning studies: investigation  
of orientation and structural features of self-assemblies; thermal stability; and  
compatibility to organic solvents.
➢
Provision of in situ structural information on different soft matters (including orientation aspects).
➢
Behavior of lamellar and hexagonal phase under flow conditions.
[34] 
 
[74]
Cyclic olefin  
copolymer  
(COC) devices		Prevention of leakage (fabrication from COCs only, no need for gluing between  
interfaces); suitability for X-ray studies;  
and high X-ray transmission and  
radiation resistance.  
Main drawbacks: incompatibility with  
tetrahydrofuran and instability at 
relatively high temperatures [49].
➢
Monitoring early formation stage of well-ordered structures from self-organized intermediate filament proteins.
[73]
Laser  
lithography  
(LL) chips		High transparency and low X-ray background scattering; and suitability for  
X-ray studies.
➢
Characterization of phospholipid nanodispersion as a proof of concept.
[72]
3D polyimide chipsA more efficient and uniform mixing as compared to 2D polyimide chips; 
a combination of suitability for X-ray  
studies and compatibility to organic solvents with 3D focusing. The employed  
laser micromachining procedure is  
also reliable.
➢
In situ SAXS-on-chip investigations: mapping phase transitions within millisecond time scales under flow conditions.
[49]
Platform based  
on thiol-ene		Pressure and temperature resistance;  
capability to handle viscous fluids;  
suitability for X-ray studies. Interesting  
features: SAXS set-up allows controlling the temperature and conducting SAXS 
experiments at relatively high  
temperature.
➢
In situ SAXS-on-chip investigations on the structure and orientation of lamellar phases and MLVs based on surfactant solution. The online experiments are conducted at 70 °C.
[71]
A custom-built crown glass  
contraction– 
expansion  
device 		Suitability for SANS studies; enabling  
tubular flow in continuous and  
oscillatory modes, relevance to  
industrial continuous and tubular flow  
processes.
➢
In situ SANS-on-chip investigations on transformation of lamellar phase to MLVs: structural elucidation and alignment behavior of a flow-responsive surfactant solution.
[51]
3D Kapton- 
based  
flow-focusing  
device		Compatibility to organic solvents;  
suitability for SAXS studies; a high  
spatial and temporal resolution; and  
rapid and efficient mixing of solvents.
➢
In situ SAXS-on-chip investigations on early clustering behavior of gold nanoparticles under flow conditions.
[43]
Droplet-based  
device		Suitability for X-ray studies; a high-throughput analysis; automatic  
screening of variable crystallization  
conditions.
➢
In situ SAXS-on-chip investigations on protein interactions and crystallization from solution.
[45]
Silicon/glass  
chips		High cost; suitability for SAXS and  
SANS studies; compatibility to organic  
solvents; and a time-consuming  
fabrication.
➢
In situ SAXS-on-chip investigations on lipid nanocapsules.
[47]
Epoxy-based  
chips		Good conditions for SAXS studies;  
X-ray and optical transparency;  
pressure resistance up to 2.9 bar;  
chemical resistance to certain solvents.  
Main drawbacks: incompatibility to  
some organic solvents, including  
tetrahydrofuran.
➢
SAXS-on-chip tests in absence of any sample.
[70]
Thiol-ene- 
epoxy  
(OSTE+)  
droplet devices		Suitability for SAXS/WAXS studies;  
X-ray transparency; X-ray signal quality  
of OSTE+ material as compared to  
typically used polyimide (Kapton).
➢
SAXS-on-chip investigations on gold nanoparticles.
➢
In situ characterization of cerium oxalate.
[57]

3. Continuous Production and In Situ Characterization of Nano-Self-Assemblies Attractive for Drug or Functional Food Delivery, or Vaccine Development

This section presents different examples on coupling microfluidics with SAXS (or SANS) for the online characterization of nano-self-assemblies. Here, it is worth noting that the in situ characterization of nano-self-assemblies during their microfluidic synthesis, or on exposure of already off-chip-prepared ones to an external trigger (such as divalent ions), or an environmental change at different measurement time points (reaction times) and under confined microfluidic geometries, is still in its infancy. The number of articles on such online characterization investigations is still very modest. Clearly, there is need to expand the research efforts in this direction for gaining further insight into the dynamic structural events occurring during the continuous production of lipidic or polymeric nanoparticles that are attractive for use in various technological applications, including the development of drug (or functional food) nanocarriers, vaccines, and nanoreactors for chemical and enzymatic reactions. These studies will improve our understanding of the involved dynamic structural pathways and formation kinetics during the microfluidic nanoparticle synthesis process. They will also provide further insight into the behavior of already off-chip-prepared lipid formulations (including emulsions, liposomes, and solid lipid nanoparticles) during their digestion, interactions with biologically relevant media (such as human plasma), or on exposure to an external trigger. In this section, different studies on in situ characterization of nano-self-assemblies during their continuous production through use of microfluidic platforms are presented. Figure 2 shows a few different examples on such in situ nanostructural investigations through coupling of X-ray-compatible microfluidic platforms to synchrotron SAXS. Figure 3 presents an illustration of an employed X-ray-compatible HFF microfluidic chip with different probed SAXS measurement positions along the microchannel, and the employed experimental synchrotron SAXS set-up, respectively.
As noted above, coupling synchrotron SAXS to X-ray-compatible microfluidic platforms, as illustrated in Figure 2A, provides a powerful in situ characterization tool for studying the early dynamic events of the microfluidic nanoparticle synthesis process. It is attractive for use for gaining insight into the dynamic phase behavior by mapping structural alterations and transitions and detecting in real-time the involved intermediate phases. For example, Khaliqi et al. [30] reported on coupling of synchrotron SAXS with an X-ray-compatible microfluidic device for online characterization of the early dynamic structural events, occurring on mixing an already chip-off-prepared citrem nanodispersion with a micellar solution of soybean phospholipid (Figure 2B). Such interfacing of a thiol-ene-based hydrodynamic flow-focusing (HFF) chip with synchrotron SAXS allowed, at different reaction (mixing) times (different corresponding positions along the microchannel), for in situ monitoring of fast nonlamellar–lamellar transitions within fractions of seconds (Figure 2B). These results demonstrated the rapid lipid exchange among citrem nanoparticles and micelles. Through varying lipid composition and ethanol concentration, and precise control of the experimental flow parameters, this microfluidic method is attractive for generation of lamellar (vesicles) and non-lamellar nano-self-assemblies (such as cubosomes and hexosomes) by rapidly mixing micelles with citrem nanoparticles prepared chip-off. The latter sample was prepared by employing a low-energy emulsification method (vortexing citrem in excess buffer). The same HFF chip was also coupled with synchrotron SAXS by Ghazal et al. [31] for online characterization of multi-lamellar vesicles (MLVs) during their microfluidic synthesis process at a constant flow rate ratio (FRR) of 17.2, which is the ratio of the sheath streams to the center stream, and total volumetric flow rates (TFRs) of 5 or 10 μL/min (Figure 2C). It was reported on rapid generation of MLVs on exposure of an ethanol solution containing a binary lipid mixture to excess buffer [31]. Herein, the vesicle microfluidic synthesis process involves most likely the pathways suggested by Lasic [75] and Jahn et al. [14,15]. These include the generation of dynamic intermediate flat and disk-shaped nanoobjects (bilayered lipid (or phospholipid) fragments (BPFs)) and their self-closure to vesicles (Figure 2D). It was proposed that the growth of these intermediate nanoobjects and their self-closure to vesicles are attributed to the self-assembly of the lipids with simultaneous diffusion out of the organic solvent (ethanol) molecules into the continuous aqueous medium. This is associated with mutual lipid and water diffusion with simultaneous environmental changes in the composition of the continuous medium on exposure of the organic solution of the lipids to excess buffer [15,31]. Further, it is worth considering the plausibility of the formation of an asymmetric curved state bilayer with non-zero spontaneous curvature (C0 ≠ 0) due to an uneven distribution of the embedded lipid molecules at the lipid–water interfacial film, leading eventually to the self-closure to vesicles [31,76,77,78]. The fast generation of the continuously produced vesicles is clearly seen in Figure 2E. They start to be evolved at approximately 0.43 s and their structures are fully developed within around 1–2 s.
In a recent study, Boyd and co-workers [52] reported on online characterization of lipid formulations during their digestion through coupling a simple T-junction microcapillary system, HFF microfluidic chip (Figure 2F), or pH-stat apparatus to synchrotron SAXS. They reported on the suitability of both microfluidic devices for the in situ SAXS characterization investigations of lipid nanoparticulate formulations. Figure 2G shows the SAXS patterns at different reaction times, indicating the generation of an inverse cubic Pn3m phase on digesting a lipid formulation containing phytantriol [52].
It is worth also noting that the flow strains and the employed shear stresses in microfluidics may lead to the alignment of vesicles and affect the orientation of lamellar and hexagonal phases under shear flow, resulting in the appearance of anisotropic SAXS (or SANS) patterns [31,71,74,79]. For instance, a slight alignment was detected during the microfluidic synthesis of MLVs on increasing TFR from 5 to 15 μL/min (Figure 4A,B). A shear-induced deformation of MLVs was also detected under shear flow during their formation from a lamellar phase [79]. Through a microfluidic SAXS scanning study, Liebi and co-workers [74] reported on the flow-induced transformation of the lamellar (Lα) phase to an aligned lamellae region via MLVs to an extended lamellae region by increasing the shear rates (Figure 4D). A significant effect of the microfluidic constriction, leading to an orientation of the lamellar phase under flow, was also reported (Figure 4E,F) in another study [71].

4. In Situ Phase Behavior and Structural Dynamics Investigations of Amphiphilic Polymers and Lipids

In addition to the aforementioned reports on the in situ characterization of soft lipid (mainly vesicles) and polymer-based nano-self-assemblies under flow conditions, it is worth presenting different studies on coupling synchrotron SAXS (or SANS) with microfluidics for investigating the phase behavior of amphiphiles (including amphiphilic lipids and polymers).
There is a growing interest in designing different microfluidic platforms for accurate and rapid mapping of phases of surfactant solutions [48,50,80]. For instance, a rapid phase-mapping method based on a microfluidic device with a stepped temperature profile was recently reported, and the identified phases were validated through the use of optical microscopy and SANS analyses [80]. In this section, we only focus on investigations conducted by coupling microfluidics to synchrotron SAXS or SANS. Among these online investigations, we mention the work of Kenis and co-workers [48] on on-chip formation and in situ SAXS characterization of lyotropic non-lamellar liquid crystalline phases through the use of four different microfluidic platforms with active-mixing capabilities and suitability for X-ray experiments [48]. This microfluidic method led to a significant reduction in materials used in lyotropic liquid crystalline preparations, and the obtained phases (including lamellar and inverse bicontinuous cubic phases) and their structural features agreed well with those produced chip-off [48]. In another study, it was reported on online scanning SAXS of lamellar (Lα) and normal hexagonal (H1) phases in microfluidic channels [74]. It was found that these phases are aligned under flow, but the flow-induced changes are not identical. Increasing the shear rate was associated with the observation of a perpendicularly oriented H1 phase to the flow, and the presence of flow-induced orientation in the flow direction at relatively high shear rates. However, the flow-induced alignments and involved transitions were different for the Lα phase as discussed above (see Figure 4D). Other published examples on flow-induced orientations of liquid crystals (including lamellar and nematic phases) and cylindrical micelles are presented in the review of B. Silva [28] and the report of Trebbin et al. [81], respectively.
There are also different recent studies on combining SAXS with 2D or 3D microfluidic platforms for investigating phase transitions in solutions based on amphiphilic co-polymers [49,50,82]. Among these studies, we mention the use of a 3D Kapton microfluidic device in combination with SAXS for online investigations of self-assembly of amphiphilic copolymers under flow conditions [49]. In another study, it was reported on fast self-assembly of an amphiphilic copolymer in microfluidics, leading to the formation of micelles and an FCC liquid crystalline phase [50].
For online SANS investigations, different microfluidic platforms were suggested for phase mapping of surfactant solutions [9,37,51,83,84,85]. For instance, a transformation of the lamellar liquid–crystalline phase to MLVs was recently investigated by employing microfluidic-SANS [51]. Further information on compatible microfluidics with SANS and recent online structural investigations is presented in the recent review of Lopez et al. [37].

5. In Situ Structural Dynamics and Kinetic Formation Investigations of Hard Solid Nanoparticles

In addition to the aforementioned online investigations, it is worth mentioning the growing interest in coupling SAXS (or SANS) with suitable microfluidic devices for the in situ characterization of hard solid nanoparticles, including nanocrystals, silk fibers, and millimeter-sized supercrystals [41,42,43,55,56,57,86]. For instance, Chen et al. reported through in situ UV–vis, and time-resolved microfocus SAXS experiments on the formation process of monodispersed gold nanoparticles with different sizes in a stopped-flow microfluidics (Figure 5A) [86]. They found that the nucleation and growth process are controlled by the binding affinity of the investigated ligands to the gold nanoparticles [86]. In another recent study, a 3D flow-focusing microfluidic reactor was combined with SAXS and UV–vis–NIR spectroscopy for the online characterization of gold nanoparticles coated with polystyrene. At an early stage, it was possible using this experimental set-up to gain important information on the collapse of the polymer shell and the clustering behavior of the nanoparticles (Figure 5B,C). A similar approach was also followed in the work of Herbst et al. [41]. They reported on coupling microfluidics to SAXS/WAXS and UV–vis spectroscopy for gaining insight into the nucleation and growth kinetics of ZnO nanoparticles. They introduced a microfluidic method for preparing monodispersed ZnO nanoparticles and discussed the involved intermediate states during their microfluidic synthesis.
Another use of microfluidic-SAXS is in studies of the early-stage agglomeration of nanoparticles and their interactions on varying the composition or properties of the surrounding aqueous media of the investigated suspensions [58].
In addition to SAXS and SANS, coupling microfluidics to X-ray absorption microscopy (XAS) is another option with unique opportunities for the in situ monitoring of reactions and crystallization processes [87,88,89]. For instance, deMello and co-workers reported on the integration of a droplet-based microfluidic platform with XAS for in situ monitoring of calcium carbonate precipitation [87].

6. Conclusions

Microfluidics has various advantages (including versatility, small sample volumes, scale-up ease, and precise control over fluid conditions). It offers, therefore, unique opportunities for various technological applications and opens up new possibilities for uses in analytical and material science research fields. Among others, microfluidic platforms are powerful and attractive tools for the continuous production of nanomaterials with controllable sizes (including drug nanocarriers and solid crystalline and amorphous nanoobjects).
Thanks to recent advances in the microfluidic research area, there is a growing interest in the use of 2D and 3D microfluidics in numerous online characterization investigations of soft and hard nanoparticles. Among different state-of-the-art tools, we present here recent advances on coupling SAXS (or SANS) to compatible microfluidics for gaining insight into the involved structural pathways and formation kinetics of soft nanoparticles and solid nanoobjects. Such in situ SAXS (or SANS)-on-chip studies provide also important information on the behavior of nanomaterials under confined geometries and flow conditions.
Despite the attractiveness of microfluidic devices and the expected significant increase in their uses in in situ SAXS (or SANS)-on-chip research investigations in the next 10 years, the design and use of suitable microfluidic platforms for such studies pose a major challenge. In this research area, these studies generally require experts with highly specialized skills, particularly when using microfluidics with complex structures, or when the operation and control of flow conditions involve multiple steps. In addition, it is worth noting the reported microfluidic platforms for online SAXS (or SANS) studies in the literature are typically custom-built or home-made systems, and accessible to relatively few research groups. However, different synchrotron SAXS and SANS facilities recently focus on the engagement of a larger community of researchers through the provision of access to X-ray- and neutron-compatible microfluidic platforms for performing time-resolved experiments during the beamtimes.
We should take into account that this area is multidisciplinary, and, therefore, further research progress is expected through the integration and collaboration of scientists with different backgrounds. It is also worth noting that the potential uses of SAXS (or SANS)-on-chip for online investigations are mainly explored in academic studies, whereas the engagement of industry is very limited. Here, more industry engagement and further industry–academia collaborations will contribute to this research area.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Y.; Analysis, A.Y.; Discussion, A.Y. and I.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Y.; review and editing, I.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support to A.Y. by the Danish Council for Independent Research | Technology and Production Sciences, reference 1335-00150b and the Danish Natural Sciences Research Council (DanScatt) for SAXS experiments are gratefully acknowledged.

Acknowledgments

A.Y. acknowledges the financial support from the Neutron and X-ray Techniques (CoNeXT) initiative (Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark) in 2013–2016 for PhD project with Kell Mortensen (Copenhagen University, Denmark) on coupling synchrotron SAXS to microfluidics. A.Y. further thanks Sine Larsen (principal coordinator of CoNeXT), and three of his former students (Aghiad Ghazal, Mark Gontsarik, and Kirstin Khaliqi) involved in the CoNeXT project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maeki, M.; Kimura, N.; Sato, Y.; Harashima, H.; Tokeshi, M. Advances in microfluidics for lipid nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles and applications in drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 128, 84–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khan, I.U.; Serra, C.A.; Anton, N.; Vandamme, T.F. Production of nanoparticle drug delivery systems with microfluidics tools. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2015, 12, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ahadian, S.; Civitarese, R.; Bannerman, D.; Mohammadi, M.H.; Lu, R.; Wang, E.; Davenport-Huyer, L.; Lai, B.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Organ-On-A-Chip Platforms: A Convergence of Advanced Materials, Cells, and Microscale Technologies. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1700506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sanjay, S.T.; Zhou, W.; Dou, M.; Tavakoli, H.; Ma, L.; Xu, F.; Li, X. Recent advances of controlled drug delivery using microfluidic platforms. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 128, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ilhan-Ayisigi, E.; Yaldiz, B.; Bor, G.; Yaghmur, A.; Yesil-Celiktas, O. Advances in microfluidic synthesis and coupling with synchrotron SAXS for continuous production and real-time structural characterization of nano-self-assemblies. Colloid Surf. B 2021, 201, 111633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mao, K.; Min, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, K.; Cao, H.; Guo, Y.; Yang, Z. Paper-based microfluidics for rapid diagnostics and drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2020, 322, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Damiati, S.; Kompella, U.B.; Damiati, S.A.; Kodzius, R. Microfluidic devices for drug delivery systems and drug screening. Genes 2018, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Briones, J.; Espulgar, W.; Koyama, S.; Takamatsu, H.; Tamiya, E.; Saito, M. The future of microfluidics in immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021, 28, 895–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Del Giudice, F. A Review of Microfluidic Devices for Rheological Characterisation. Micromachines 2022, 13, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiong, Q.; Lim, C.Y.; Ren, J.; Zhou, J.; Pu, K.; Chan-Park, M.B.; Mao, H.; Lam, Y.C.; Duan, H. Magnetic nanochain integrated microfluidic biochips. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ha, J.H.; Shin, H.H.; Choi, H.W.; Lim, J.H.; Mo, S.J.; Ahrberg, C.D.; Lee, J.M.; Chung, B.G. Electro-responsive hydrogel-based microfluidic actuator platform for photothermal therapy. Lab Chip 2020, 20, 3354–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ahn, J.; Ko, J.; Lee, S.; Yu, J.; Kim, Y.; Jeon, N.L. Microfluidics in nanoparticle drug delivery; From synthesis to pre-clinical screening. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 128, 29–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hickey, J.W.; Santos, J.L.; Williford, J.M.; Mao, H.Q. Control of polymeric nanoparticle size to improve therapeutic delivery. J. Control. Release 2015, 219, 536–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Jahn, A.; Stavis, S.M.; Hong, J.S.; Vreeland, W.N.; Devoe, D.L.; Gaitan, M. Microfluidic Mixing and the Formation of Nanoscale Lipid Vesicles. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 2077–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jahn, A.; Vreeland, W.N.; DeVoe, D.L.; Locascio, L.E.; Gaitan, M. Microfluidic directed formation of liposomes of controlled size. Langmuir 2007, 23, 6289–6293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Firmino, P.C.; Vianna, S.S.; da Costa, O.M.; Malfatti-Gasperini, A.A.; Gobbi, A.L.; Lima, R.S.; Lucimara, G. 3D micromixer for nanoliposome synthesis: A promising advance in high mass productivity. Lab Chip 2021, 21, 2971–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ilhan-Ayisigi, E.; Ghazal, A.; Sartori, B.; Dimaki, M.; Svendsen, W.E.; Yesil-Celiktas, O.; Yaghmur, A. Continuous Microfluidic Production of Citrem-Phosphatidylcholine Nano-Self-Assemblies for Thymoquinone Delivery. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, H.; Sung, J.; Chang, Y.; Alfeche, A.; Leal, C. Microfluidics Synthesis of Gene Silencing Cubosomes. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 9196–9205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yaghmur, A.; Ghazal, A.; Ghazal, R.; Dimaki, M.; Svendsen, W.E. A hydrodynamic flow focusing microfluidic device for the continuous production of hexosomes based on docosahexaenoic acid monoglyceride. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 13005–13013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sebastian, V. Toward continuous production of high-quality nanomaterials using microfluidics: Nanoengineering the shape, structure and chemical composition. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 4411–4447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pilkington, C.P.; Seddon, J.M.; Elani, Y. Microfluidic technologies for the synthesis and manipulation of biomimetic membranous nano-assemblies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 3693–3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Streck, S.; Hong, L.; Boyd, B.J.; McDowell, A. Microfluidics for the production of nanomedicines: Considerations for polymer and lipid-based systems. Pharm. Nanotechnol. 2019, 7, 423–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, P.H.; Zhao, S.; Bachman, H.; Nama, N.; Li, Z.; Chen, C.; Yang, S.; Wu, M.; Zhang, S.P.; Huang, T.J. Acoustofluidic synthesis of particulate nanomaterials. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, Y.; Yang, G.; Hui, Y.; Ranaweera, S.; Zhao, C.X. Microfluidic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Small 2022, 2106580, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tian, F.; Cai, L.; Liu, C.; Sun, J. Microfluidic technologies for nanoparticle formation. Lab Chip 2022, 22, 512–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Prakash, G.; Shokr, A.; Willemen, N.; Bashir, S.M.; Shin, S.R.; Hassan, S. Microfluidic fabrication of lipid nanoparticles for the delivery of nucleic acids. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 184, 114197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hood, R.; Vreeland, W.; DeVoe, D.L. Microfluidic remote loading for rapid single-step liposomal drug preparation. Lab Chip 2014, 14, 3359–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Silva, B.F.B. SAXS on a chip: From dynamics of phase transitions to alignment phenomena at interfaces studied with microfluidic devices. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 23690–23703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Martin, H.P.; Brooks, N.J.; Seddon, J.M.; Luckham, P.F.; Terrill, N.J.; Kowalski, A.J.; Cabral, J.T. Microfluidic processing of concentrated surfactant mixtures: Online SAXS, microscopy and rheology. Soft Matter 2016, 12, 1750–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Khaliqi, K.; Ghazal, A.; Azmi, I.D.M.; Amenitsch, H.; Mortensen, K.; Salentinig, S.; Yaghmur, A. Direct monitoring of lipid transfer on exposure of citrem nanoparticles to an ethanol solution containing soybean phospholipids by combining synchrotron SAXS with microfluidics. Analyst 2017, 142, 3118–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ghazal, A.; Gontsarik, M.; Kutter, J.P.; Lafleur, J.P.; Ahmadvand, D.; Labrador, A.; Salentinig, S.; Yaghmur, A. Microfluidic Platform for the Continuous Production and Characterization of Multilamellar Vesicles: A Synchrotron Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS) Study. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Silva, B.F.B.; Zepeda-Rosales, M.; Venkateswaran, N.; Fletcher, B.J.; Carter, L.G.; Matsui, T.; Weiss, T.M.; Han, J.; Li, Y.L.; Olsson, U.; et al. Nematic Director Reorientation at Solid and Liquid Interfaces under Flow: SAXS Studies in a Microfluidic Device. Langmuir 2015, 31, 4361–4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schwemmer, F.; Blanchet, C.E.; Spilotros, A.; Kosse, D.; Zehnle, S.; Mertens, H.D.T.; Graewert, M.A.; Rossle, M.; Paust, N.; Svergun, D.I.; et al. LabDisk for SAXS: A centrifugal microfluidic sample preparation platform for small-angle X-ray scattering. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 1161–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lutz-Bueno, V.; Zhao, J.G.; Mezzenga, R.; Pfohl, T.; Fischer, P.; Liebi, M. Scanning-SAXS of microfluidic flows: Nanostructural mapping of soft matter. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 4028–4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Buscema, M.; Deyhle, H.; Pfohl, T.; Zumbuehl, A.; Müller, B. Spatially resolved small-angle X-ray scattering for characterizing mechanoresponsive liposomes using microfluidics. Mater. Today Bio 2019, 1, 100003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Haider, R.; Marmiroli, B.; Gavalas, I.; Wolf, M.; Matteucci, M.; Taboryski, R.; Boisen, A.; Stratakis, E.; Amenitsch, H. Laser ablation and injection moulding as techniques for producing micro channels compatible with Small Angle X-Ray Scattering. Microelectron. Eng. 2018, 195, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lopez, C.G.; Watanabe, T.; Adamo, M.; Martel, A.; Porcar, L.; Cabral, J.T. Microfluidic devices for small-angle neutron scattering. J. Appl. Cryst. 2018, 51, 570–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hertzog, D.E.; Michalet, X.; Jäger, M.; Kong, X.; Santiago, J.G.; Weiss, S.; Bakajin, O. Femtomole mixer for microsecond kinetic studies of protein folding. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 7169–7178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Polte, J.; Erler, R.; Thunemann, A.F.; Sokolov, S.; Ahner, T.T.; Rademann, K.; Emmerling, F.; Kraehnert, R. Nucleation and growth of gold nanoparticles studied via in situ small angle X-ray scattering at millisecond time resolution. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lignos, I.; Maceiczyk, R.; deMello, A.J. Microfluidic technology: Uncovering the mechanisms of nanocrystal nucleation and growth. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 1248–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Herbst, M.; Hofmann, E.; Förster, S. Nucleation and growth kinetics of ZnO nanoparticles studied by in situ microfluidic SAXS/WAXS/UV–Vis experiments. Langmuir 2019, 35, 11702–11709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Radajewski, D.; Hunter, L.; He, X.; Nahi, O.; Galloway, J.M.; Meldrum, F.C. An innovative data processing method for studying nanoparticle formation in droplet microfluidics using X-rays scattering. Lab Chip 2021, 21, 4498–4506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Merkens, S.; Vakili, M.; Sánchez-Iglesias, A.; Litti, L.; Gao, Y.; Gwozdz, P.V.; Sharpnack, L.; Blick, R.H.; Liz-Marzán, L.M.; Grzelczak, M. Time-resolved analysis of the structural dynamics of assembling gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 6596–6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Brennich, M.E.; Nolting, J.-F.; Dammann, C.; Nöding, B.; Bauch, S.; Herrmann, H.; Pfohl, T.; Köster, S. Dynamics of intermediate filament assembly followed in micro-flow by small angle X-ray scattering. Lab Chip 2011, 11, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pham, N.; Radajewski, D.; Round, A.; Brennich, M.; Pernot, P.; Biscans, B.; Bonneté, F.; Teychené, S. Coupling high throughput microfluidics and small-angle X-ray scattering to study protein crystallization from solution. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 2282–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Martin, H.P.; Brooks, N.J.; Seddon, J.M.; Terrill, N.J.; Luckham, P.F.; Kowalski, A.J.; Cabral, J.T. Complex fluids under microflow probed by SAXS: Rapid microfabrication and analysis. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010, 247, 012050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rolley, N.; Bonnin, M.; Lefebvre, G.; Verron, S.; Bargiel, S.; Robert, L.; Riou, J.; Simonsson, C.; Bizien, T.; Gimel, J.-C. Galenic Lab-on-a-Chip concept for lipid nanocapsules production. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 11899–11912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khvostichenko, D.S.; Kondrashkina, E.; Perry, S.L.; Pawate, A.S.; Brister, K.; Kenis, P.J. An X-ray transparent microfluidic platform for screening of the phase behavior of lipidic mesophases. Analyst 2013, 138, 5384–5395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Vakili, M.; Merkens, S.; Gao, Y.; Gwozdz, P.V.; Vasireddi, R.; Sharpnack, L.; Meyer, A.; Blick, R.H.; Trebbin, M. 3D micromachined polyimide mixing devices for in situ X-ray imaging of solution-based block copolymer phase transitions. Langmuir 2019, 35, 10435–10445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. With, S.; Trebbin, M.; Bartz, C.B.; Neuber, C.; Dulle, M.; Yu, S.; Roth, S.V.; Schmidt, H.-W.; Fӧrster, S. Fast diffusion-limited lyotropic phase transitions studied in situ using continuous flow microfluidics/microfocus-SAXS. Langmuir 2014, 30, 12494–12502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Donina, L.; Rafique, A.; Khodaparast, S.; Porcar, L.; Cabral, J.T. Lamellar-to-MLV transformation in SDS/octanol/brine examined by microfluidic-SANS and polarised microscopy. Soft Matter 2021, 17, 10053–10062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hong, L.; Sesen, M.; Hawley, A.; Neild, A.; Spicer, P.T.; Boyd, B.J. Comparison of bulk and microfluidic methods to monitor the phase behaviour of nanoparticles during digestion of lipid-based drug formulations using in situ X-ray scattering. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 9565–9578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ghazal, A.; Gontsarik, M.; Kutter, J.P.; Lafleur, J.P.; Labrador, A.; Mortensen, K.; Yaghmur, A. Direct monitoring of calcium-triggered phase transitions in cubosomes using small-angle X-ray scattering combined with microfluidics. J. Appl. Cryst. 2016, 49, 2005–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Komorowski, K.; Schaeper, J.; Sztucki, M.; Sharpnack, L.; Brehm, G.; Köster, S.; Salditt, T. Vesicle adhesion in the electrostatic strong-coupling regime studied by time-resolved small-angle X-ray scattering. Soft Matter 2020, 16, 4142–4154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Lu, L.; Fan, S.; Geng, L.; Lin, J.; Yao, X.; Zhang, Y. Flow analysis of regenerated silk fibroin/cellulose nanofiber suspensions via a bioinspired microfluidic chip. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021, 6, 2100124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Garcia-Lojo, D.; Modin, E.; Gomez-Graña, S.; Imperor-Clerc, M.; Chuvilin, A.; Pastoriza-Santos, I.; Perez-Juste, J.; Constantin, D.; Hamon, C. Structure and formation kinetics of millimeter-size single domain supercrystals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2101869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lange, T.; Charton, S.; Bizien, T.; Testard, F.; Malloggi, F. OSTE+ for in situ SAXS analysis with droplet microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 2020, 20, 2990–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Anaraki, N.I.; Sadeghpour, A.; Iranshahi, K.; Toncelli, C.; Cendrowska, U.; Stellacci, F.; Dommann, A.; Wick, P.; Neels, A. New approach for time-resolved and dynamic investigations on nanoparticles agglomeration. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 2847–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Narayanan, T.; Konovalov, O. Synchrotron scattering methods for nanomaterials and soft matter research. Materials 2020, 13, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Yaghmur, A.; Paasonen, L.; Yliperttula, M.; Urtti, A.; Rappolt, M. Structural elucidation of light activated vesicles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 962–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yaghmur, A.; Sartori, B.; Rappolt, M. The role of calcium in membrane condensation and spontaneous curvature variations in model lipidic systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 3115–3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yaghmur, A.; Rappolt, M. Structural characterization of lipidic systems under nonequilibrium conditions. Eur. Biophys. J. 2012, 41, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Paasonen, L.; Sipila, T.; Subrizi, A.; Laurinmaki, P.; Butcher, S.J.; Rappolt, M.; Yaghmur, A.; Urtti, A.; Yliperttula, M. Gold-embedded photosensitive liposomes for drug delivery: Triggering mechanism and intracellular release. J. Control. Release 2010, 147, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Grillo, I. Applications of stopped-flow in SAXS and SANS. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 14, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yaghmur, A.; Laggner, P.; Sartori, B.; Rappolt, M. Calcium triggered L alpha-H2 phase transition monitored by combined rapid mixing and time-resolved synchrotron SAXS. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jensen, G.V.; Lund, R.; Gummel, J.; Monkenbusch, M.; Narayanan, T.; Pedersen, J.S. Direct observation of the formation of surfactant micelles under nonisothermal conditions by synchrotron SAXS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7214–7222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Angelov, B.; Angelova, A.; Drechsler, M.; Lesieur, S. Rapid mixing stopped-flow small-angle X-ray scattering study of lipoplex formation at beamline ID02@ ESRF. J. Surf. Investig. X-ray Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2015, 9, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yaghmur, A.; Kriechbaum, M.; Amenitsch, H.; Steinhart, M.; Laggner, P.; Rappolt, M. Effects of pressure and temperature on the self-assembled fully hydrated nanostructures of monoolein-oil systems. Langmuir 2010, 26, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kulkarni, C.V.; Yaghmur, A.; Steinhart, M.; Kriechbaum, M.; Rappolt, M. Effects of high pressure on internally self-assembled lipid nanoparticles: A synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) study. Langmuir 2016, 32, 11907–11917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Raffy, S.; Palleau, E.; Calvignac, B.; Brotons, G.; Lefebvre, G.; Rolley, N.; Teychene, S.; Viguier, B.; Cerezo, S.C.; Truan, G. “All in One” Epoxy-Based Microfluidic Chips at Your Fingertips. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Poulos, A.S.; Nania, M.; Lapham, P.; Miller, R.M.; Smith, A.J.; Tantawy, H.; Caragay, J.; Gummel, J.; Ces, O.; Robles, E.S.J.; et al. Microfluidic SAXS Study of Lamellar and Multilamellar Vesicle Phases of Linear Sodium Alkylbenzenesulfonate Surfactant with Intrinsic Isomeric Distribution. Langmuir 2016, 32, 5852–5861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Trantidou, T.; Friddin, M.S.; Gan, K.B.; Han, L.Y.; Bolognesi, G.; Brooks, N.J.; Ces, O. Mask-Free Laser Lithography for Rapid and Low-Cost Microfluidic Device Fabrication. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 13915–13921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Denz, M.; Brehm, G.; Hémonnot, C.Y.; Spears, H.; Wittmeier, A.; Cassini, C.; Saldanha, O.; Perego, E.; Diaz, A.; Burghammer, M. Cyclic olefin copolymer as an X-ray compatible material for microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Rodriguez-Palomo, A.; Lutz-Bueno, V.; Cao, X.; Kadar, R.; Andersson, M.; Liebi, M. In Situ Visualization of the Structural Evolution and Alignment of Lyotropic Liquid Crystals in Confined Flow. Small 2021, 17, 2006229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lasic, D.D. The mechanism of vesicle formation. Biochem. J. 1988, 256, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Azmi, I.D.; Wibroe, P.P.; Wu, L.P.; Kazem, A.I.; Amenitsch, H.; Moghimi, S.M.; Yaghmur, A. A structurally diverse library of safe-by-design citrem-phospholipid lamellar and non-lamellar liquid crystalline nano-assemblies. J. Control. Release 2016, 239, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shearman, G.C.; Ces, O.; Templer, R.H.; Seddon, J.M. Inverse lyotropic phases of lipids and membrane curvature. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S1105–S1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lasic, D.D. Spontaneous vesiculation and spontaneous liposomes. J. Liposome Res. 1999, 9, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gentile, L.; Behrens, M.A.; Porcar, L.; Butler, P.; Wagner, N.J.; Olsson, U. Multilamellar vesicle formation from a planar lamellar phase under shear flow. Langmuir 2014, 30, 8316–8325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Wang, H.; Khodaparast, S.; Carroll, J.; Kelly, C.; Robles, E.S.; Cabral, J.T. A microfluidic-multiwell platform for rapid phase mapping of surfactant solutions. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2020, 91, 045109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Trebbin, M.; Steinhauser, D.; Perlich, J.; Buffet, A.; Roth, S.V.; Zimmermann, W.; Thiele, J.; Förster, S. Anisotropic particles align perpendicular to the flow direction in narrow microchannels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6706–6711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Fürst, C.; Zhang, P.; Roth, S.V.; Drechsler, M.; Förster, S. Self-assembly of block copolymers via micellar intermediate states into vesicles on time scales from milliseconds to days. Polymer 2016, 107, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lopez, C.G.; Watanabe, T.; Martel, A.; Porcar, L.; Cabral, J.T. Microfluidic-SANS: Flow processing of complex fluids. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 7727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Adamo, M.; Poulos, A.S.; Lopez, C.G.; Martel, A.; Porcar, L.; Cabral, J.T. Droplet microfluidic SANS. Soft Matter 2018, 14, 1759–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Adamo, M.; Poulos, A.S.; Miller, R.M.; Lopez, C.G.; Martel, A.; Porcar, L.; Cabral, J.T. Rapid contrast matching by microfluidic SANS. Lab Chip 2017, 17, 1559–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Pan, R.; Roth, S.; Fӧrster, S. Insights into Growth Kinetics of Colloidal Gold Nanoparticles: In Situ SAXS and UV–Vis Evaluation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Probst, J.; Borca, C.N.; Newton, M.A.; van Bokhoven, J.; Huthwelker, T.; Stavrakis, S.; deMello, A. In Situ X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Droplet-Based Microfluidics: An Analysis of Calcium Carbonate Precipitation. ACS Meas. Au 2021, 1, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Brenker, J.; Henzler, K.; Borca, C.N.; Huthwelker, T.; Alan, T. X-ray compatible microfluidics for in situ studies of chemical state, transport and reaction of light elements in an aqueous environment using synchrotron radiation. Lab Chip 2022, 22, 1214–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Raj, P.M.; Barbe, L.; Andersson, M.; Moreira, M.D.A.; Haase, D.; Wootton, J.; Nehzati, S.; Terry, A.E.; Friel, R.J.; Tenje, M. Fabrication and characterisation of a silicon-borosilicate glass microfluidic device for synchrotron-based hard X-ray spectroscopy studies. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 29859–29869. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 27 04602 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustrations of continuous production of drug-free and drug-loaded lipid nanoparticles including liposomes, cubosomes, and hexosomes. (A) Multifunctional microfluidic device for rapid single-step microfluidic synthesis of monodispersed liposomes and their remote loading with therapeutics. Reprinted with permission from [27]. 2014, the Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Staggered herringbone mixer for microfluidic synthesis of siRNA-loaded cubosomes. The continuous production includes additional chip-off step for evaporation of ethanol. Adapted with permission from [18]. 2018, the American Chemical Society. (C) Hydrodynamic flow-focusing (HFF) polyimide microfluidic device for microfluidic synthesis of Pluronic F127-stabilized hexosomes based on docosahexaenoic acid monoglyceride (MAG-DHA). Reprinted with permission from [19]. 2019, the Royal Society of Chemistry. (D) Continuous production of lamellar and non-lamellar liquid crystalline nano-self-assemblies (liposomes and cubosomes) for delivering the therapeutic agent thymoquinone by using a simple commercial microfluidic. Reprinted from [17]. 2021, MDPI.
Figure 1. Schematic illustrations of continuous production of drug-free and drug-loaded lipid nanoparticles including liposomes, cubosomes, and hexosomes. (A) Multifunctional microfluidic device for rapid single-step microfluidic synthesis of monodispersed liposomes and their remote loading with therapeutics. Reprinted with permission from [27]. 2014, the Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Staggered herringbone mixer for microfluidic synthesis of siRNA-loaded cubosomes. The continuous production includes additional chip-off step for evaporation of ethanol. Adapted with permission from [18]. 2018, the American Chemical Society. (C) Hydrodynamic flow-focusing (HFF) polyimide microfluidic device for microfluidic synthesis of Pluronic F127-stabilized hexosomes based on docosahexaenoic acid monoglyceride (MAG-DHA). Reprinted with permission from [19]. 2019, the Royal Society of Chemistry. (D) Continuous production of lamellar and non-lamellar liquid crystalline nano-self-assemblies (liposomes and cubosomes) for delivering the therapeutic agent thymoquinone by using a simple commercial microfluidic. Reprinted from [17]. 2021, MDPI.
Molecules 27 04602 g001
Molecules 27 04602 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Schematic illustration of an experimental set-up of coupling X-ray-compatible microfluidic platform to synchrotron SAXS. Reprinted with permission [5]. 2021, Elsevier. (B) SAXS patterns at different reaction times (different corresponding positions along the center channel of thiol-ene-based hydrodynamic flow-focusing (HFF) chip coupled to synchrotron SAXS. It indicates nonlamellar–lamellar phase transitions on exposure of citrem nanoparticles to an ethanol solution of soybean phospholipid. Adapted with permission from [30]. 2017, the Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Continuous production of multi-lamellar vesicles (MLVs) through use of thiol-ene-based HFF chip. (D) Schematic illustration of the formation mechanism of vesicles in the HFF microfluidic chip. (E) In situ synchrotron SAXS characterization: SAXS patterns at different corresponding reaction times for SAXS measurements conducted at different positions along the center channel of the HFF chip (different corresponding reaction times) and compared with the black SAXS pattern of already prepared chip-off samples. Panels (C–E) reprinted with permission from [31]. 2017, the American Chemical Society. (F) In situ SAXS characterization of nano-self-assemblies generated during digestion of lipid formulations by coupling synchrotron SAXS to serpentine HFF microfluidic chip. SAXS measurements were conducted at different positions along the microchannel. (G) Digestion of lipid formulation containing phytantriol, leading to the evolvement of inverse cubic Pn3m phase after an elapsed time of about 90 s. Panels (F,G) reprinted with permission from [52]. 2019, the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 2. (A) Schematic illustration of an experimental set-up of coupling X-ray-compatible microfluidic platform to synchrotron SAXS. Reprinted with permission [5]. 2021, Elsevier. (B) SAXS patterns at different reaction times (different corresponding positions along the center channel of thiol-ene-based hydrodynamic flow-focusing (HFF) chip coupled to synchrotron SAXS. It indicates nonlamellar–lamellar phase transitions on exposure of citrem nanoparticles to an ethanol solution of soybean phospholipid. Adapted with permission from [30]. 2017, the Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Continuous production of multi-lamellar vesicles (MLVs) through use of thiol-ene-based HFF chip. (D) Schematic illustration of the formation mechanism of vesicles in the HFF microfluidic chip. (E) In situ synchrotron SAXS characterization: SAXS patterns at different corresponding reaction times for SAXS measurements conducted at different positions along the center channel of the HFF chip (different corresponding reaction times) and compared with the black SAXS pattern of already prepared chip-off samples. Panels (C–E) reprinted with permission from [31]. 2017, the American Chemical Society. (F) In situ SAXS characterization of nano-self-assemblies generated during digestion of lipid formulations by coupling synchrotron SAXS to serpentine HFF microfluidic chip. SAXS measurements were conducted at different positions along the microchannel. (G) Digestion of lipid formulation containing phytantriol, leading to the evolvement of inverse cubic Pn3m phase after an elapsed time of about 90 s. Panels (F,G) reprinted with permission from [52]. 2019, the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 04602 g002
Molecules 27 04602 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Schematic illustration of an X-ray-compatible HFF microfluidic device for in situ SAXS characterization of lipid nanoparticles at 4 different positions along the microchannel. (B) Synchrotron SAXS set-up employed by coupling SAXS to an X-ray-compatible HFF microfluidic device for in situ characterization studies. The figure is reprinted with permission from [30]. 2017, the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 3. (A) Schematic illustration of an X-ray-compatible HFF microfluidic device for in situ SAXS characterization of lipid nanoparticles at 4 different positions along the microchannel. (B) Synchrotron SAXS set-up employed by coupling SAXS to an X-ray-compatible HFF microfluidic device for in situ characterization studies. The figure is reprinted with permission from [30]. 2017, the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 04602 g003
Molecules 27 04602 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) 2D isotropic SAXS pattern during the formation of MLVs at TFR of 5 μL/min. (B) A light alignment of the MLVs (slightly distorted) at relatively high TFR (>15 μL/min). Slightly anisotropic SAXS pattern, indicating a slight deformation of the continuously produced MLVs as illustrated in (C). Panels (A–C) reprinted with permission from [31]. 2017, the American Chemical Society. (D) Left: 2D SAXS patterns of lamellar structures in three areas (A–C) with different orientations: an aligned lamellae structure, MLVs, and stretched MLVs in the flow direction. Right: Corresponding radial SAXS profiles in the three areas (A–C). Adapted with permission from [74]. 2021, Wiley. (E) SAXS measurements at the positions A–C along the centerline of the microchannel. (F) 2D SAXS patterns at three measurement positions (A–C): an isotropic pattern at position A; whereas a strong anisotropy was detected at positions B and C, indicating bilayers alignment upon entering the microfluidic constriction and upon exiting, respectively. Panels (E,F) reprinted with permission from [71]. 2016, the American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. (A) 2D isotropic SAXS pattern during the formation of MLVs at TFR of 5 μL/min. (B) A light alignment of the MLVs (slightly distorted) at relatively high TFR (>15 μL/min). Slightly anisotropic SAXS pattern, indicating a slight deformation of the continuously produced MLVs as illustrated in (C). Panels (A–C) reprinted with permission from [31]. 2017, the American Chemical Society. (D) Left: 2D SAXS patterns of lamellar structures in three areas (A–C) with different orientations: an aligned lamellae structure, MLVs, and stretched MLVs in the flow direction. Right: Corresponding radial SAXS profiles in the three areas (A–C). Adapted with permission from [74]. 2021, Wiley. (E) SAXS measurements at the positions A–C along the centerline of the microchannel. (F) 2D SAXS patterns at three measurement positions (A–C): an isotropic pattern at position A; whereas a strong anisotropy was detected at positions B and C, indicating bilayers alignment upon entering the microfluidic constriction and upon exiting, respectively. Panels (E,F) reprinted with permission from [71]. 2016, the American Chemical Society.
Molecules 27 04602 g004
Molecules 27 04602 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) SAXS patterns at different time points during the formation of gold nanoparticles in a stopped-flow microfluidic platform. (B) On-chip SAXS experiments and real-time UV–vis–NIR measurements for online studies of the self-assembly of gold nanoparticles and their clustering behavior upon mixing with water by using 3D flow-focusing microfluidic reactor. (C) On-chip characterization of nanoparticle clustering behavior. At 3 flow rate ratios (FFRs) of 2, 4, and 10, SAXS patterns are recorded at different downstream microfluidic channel positions. (B) reprinted with permission from [86]. 2021, the American Chemical Society. Panels (B,C) reprinted with permission from [43]. 2019, (the American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. (A) SAXS patterns at different time points during the formation of gold nanoparticles in a stopped-flow microfluidic platform. (B) On-chip SAXS experiments and real-time UV–vis–NIR measurements for online studies of the self-assembly of gold nanoparticles and their clustering behavior upon mixing with water by using 3D flow-focusing microfluidic reactor. (C) On-chip characterization of nanoparticle clustering behavior. At 3 flow rate ratios (FFRs) of 2, 4, and 10, SAXS patterns are recorded at different downstream microfluidic channel positions. (B) reprinted with permission from [86]. 2021, the American Chemical Society. Panels (B,C) reprinted with permission from [43]. 2019, (the American Chemical Society.
Molecules 27 04602 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yaghmur, A.; Hamad, I. Microfluidic Nanomaterial Synthesis and In Situ SAXS, WAXS, or SANS Characterization: Manipulation of Size Characteristics and Online Elucidation of Dynamic Structural Transitions. Molecules 2022, 27, 4602. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144602

AMA Style

Yaghmur A, Hamad I. Microfluidic Nanomaterial Synthesis and In Situ SAXS, WAXS, or SANS Characterization: Manipulation of Size Characteristics and Online Elucidation of Dynamic Structural Transitions. Molecules. 2022; 27(14):4602. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144602

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yaghmur, Anan, and Islam Hamad. 2022. "Microfluidic Nanomaterial Synthesis and In Situ SAXS, WAXS, or SANS Characterization: Manipulation of Size Characteristics and Online Elucidation of Dynamic Structural Transitions" Molecules 27, no. 14: 4602. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144602

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop