Next Article in Journal
EDR Peptide: Possible Mechanism of Gene Expression and Protein Synthesis Regulation Involved in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Micelle-in-Liposomes for Sustained Delivery of Anticancer Agents That Promote Potent TRAIL-Induced Cancer Cell Apoptosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Deuteration on the H2 Receptor Histamine Binding Profile: A Computational Insight into Modified Hydrogen Bonding Interactions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial to the Special Issue “Gulliver in the Country of Lilliput: An Interplay of Noncovalent Interactions”

by
Ilya G. Shenderovich
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Regensburg, Universitaetstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
Molecules 2021, 26(1), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010158
Submission received: 22 December 2020 / Accepted: 30 December 2020 / Published: 31 December 2020
Noncovalent interactions allow our world to exist. Their study remains vital to the progress of chemistry and chemical physics. This topic has been specifically addressed in a number of the past and present Special Issues of Molecules, and almost every publication touches on the subject of noncovalent interactions in one way or another.
The overarching goal of this Special Issue was to bring together publications that consider effects caused by an interplay of noncovalent interactions. A common case is the situation when there is one dominant interaction that determines the structure of the molecular system, and a large number of weaker interactions that are forced to adapt to this structure. Although it is clear that this “Gulliver in the Country of Lilliput” model is only a rough approximation, this view implicitly prompts the assumption that the net effect of weak interactions is negligible, at least on the structure of the system, since multiple small contributions can cancel each other out. In some cases, this may turn out to be true. However, since the total strength of the “Lilliputians” can exceed that of the “Gulliver”, a priori conclusions can lose their predictive power. The dominant interaction can be strong and protected from any direct competition, as in the case of the proton-bound homodimer of pyridine, but the geometry of this complex still differs in the gas, solution, and solid phases [1]. Similarly, the result of competition between two strong interactions can be determined by weak interactions [2]. The current challenge is to learn to incorporate multiple competing interactions into effective working models.
The contributions in this Special Issue can be grouped into three thematic areas: (i) specific properties of selected interactions evaluated for bi- or trimolecular complexes, [3,4,5,6] (ii) their role in the crystal packing [7,8], chemical [9,10] and enzymatic [11] reactions as well as (iii) manifestations of competing noncovalent interactions in solution [12] and into porous materials [13].
The experimentally challenging study of Suhm et al. [3] analyses the docking preference of alcohols between the two nonequivalent lone electron pairs of the carbonyl group in pinacolone using supersonic jet expansions of 1:1 solvate complexes. The result of an interplay between the nonequivalence of the lone electron pairs and distant London dispersion and Pauli repulsion was modulated by the size of the alkyl group of the alcohol. The obtained experimental results serve as extremely high level benchmarks for verifying the accuracy of theoretical methods. Some of these methods were tested. It is suggested to note the importance of London dispersion for structure and stability of molecular aggregates [14].
The paper by Szatylowicz et al. [4] describes the effect of substituents on the energy of specific noncovalent interactions in adenine-based bimolecular complexes and the aromaticity of the partners. Understanding these effects is essential for effective control of acid-base interactions in biochemistry, where stronger does not always mean better. Special attention was payed to the comparison of the energies obtained using different models. The reader may be interested in further reading on this subject [15].
The contribution by Filarowski et al. [5] reports on the balance of repulsive and attractive intramolecular interactions between adjacent carboxyl groups in selectively substituted phthalic acids, the dependence of this balance on intramolecular steric crowding, and the effect of these intramolecular properties on intermolecular interactions of these carboxyl groups. This study represents a combination of the Infrared, Raman, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), and Incoherent Inelastic Neutron Scattering spectroscopies and the Car–Parrinello Molecular Dynamics and Density Functional Theory calculations. The structural and energetic parameters of the intra- and intermolecular interactions were estimated for the gas, liquid, and solid phases. Note that despite the originality of the outcomes arising from neutron scattering, the number of molecular systems studied by these methods is limited due to the complexity of the experimental equipment required [16,17].
The paper by Tolstoy et al. [6] describes halogen-bonded complexes formed by trimethylphosphine oxide with 128 different halogen donors of various classes. Correlations between the energetic, geometric and spectral properties of these complexes were established and summarized. These correlations make it possible to estimate the energy and geometry of a given halogen bond from the corresponding experimentally measured spectral parameter. Both the halogen bonding and the acceptor properties of the P=O moiety [18] are of considerable current interest. Therefore, the reported correlations can be very useful.
Vener et al. [7] describe how the calculated structural and spectral parameters of two component crystals of organic salts depend on various parameters of the theoretical approximation used. The experimental parameters of such systems cannot be correctly reproduced using the approximation of small molecular clusters. Using the periodic density functional theory is a reasonable compromise that allows the parameters of complex multicomponent pharmaceuticals to be accurately predicted [19].
The paper by Nenajdenko, Tskhovrebov et al. [8] demonstrates that halogen-halogen interactions play a critical role in self-assembly of highly polarizable molecules in crystals. A series of novel halogenated aromatic dichlorodiazadienes were prepared and characterized using X-ray diffraction and Bader’s Theory of Atoms in Molecules. Although halogen-halogen interactions are not strong, they can be a tool for fine-tuning the crystal structure [20].
The review by Grabowski [9] highlights the role of noncovalent interactions as a preliminary stage of chemical reactions. Hydrogen bonding assisted proton transfer, halogen bonding in solution, molecular hydrogen elimination via a dihydrogen bond, the intramolecular conformational effect of triel bonds, and tetrel bonds involving SN2 reactions were considered. Note that these short-lived interactions can both facilitate and hinder other steps [21,22]. For example, Ke and Lin [10] report on the catalytic effect of hydrogen bonding on the methanol steam reforming reaction on a metal surface. This and other publications on this topic may be directly in demand for practical use [23].
Vianello et al. [11] demonstrate how small alterations in weak interactions can cause significant changes in biological activity. Their molecular dynamic simulations correctly reproduce experimental data on the binding energy of histamine within the H2 receptor and its change caused by deuteration. The fact that deuteration can affect the kinetics of a chemical reaction [24] and result in measurable structural and spectral changes [25] is well known. However, in the paper at hand, the authors were able to identify the mechanism responsible for these changes.
The paper by Shenderovich and Denisov [12] presents an advanced approach to implicitly accounting for the solvent effect. In this adduct-under-field approach, the solvent effect is simulated using an external electric field. It was shown that solute–solvent interactions remarkably affect the geometry of acid-base complexes even if the active sites of these complexes are not accessible for solvent molecules. Note that this approach is applicable to many other molecular systems in solution and in crystal form [26,27].
The review of Buntkowsky and Vogel [13] describes current trends and perspectives in the study of guest molecules in porous silica materials employing solid-state NMR techniques with particular attention to the effect of an interplay between guest–guest and guest–host interactions. It is shown that such interactions can radically change the physicochemical properties of these systems. Solid-state NMR and relaxometry are among the most effective analytical tools in this area of materials chemistry. They can be applied for probing structure or dynamics of materials themselves as well as the behavior of incorporated guests [28,29].

Funding

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by MDPI.

Acknowledgments

I want to sincerely thank everyone that contributed to this Special Issue. Special thanks to the assistant editor Lola Huo and the entire team of Molecules for their motivation, professional expertise, and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kong, S.; Borissova, A.O.; Lesnichin, S.B.; Hartl, M.; Daemen, L.L.; Eckert, J.; Yu Antipin, M.; Shenderovich, I.G. Geometry and Spectral Properties of the Protonated Homodimer of Pyridine in the Liquid and Solid States. A Combined NMR, X-ray Diffraction and Inelastic Neutron Scattering Study. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 8041–8048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lesnichin, S.B.; Tolstoy, P.M.; Limbach, H.-H.; Shenderovich, I.G. Counteranion-Dependent Mechanisms of Intramolecular Proton Transfer in Aprotic Solution. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 10373–10379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zimmermann, C.; Fischer, T.L.; Suhm, M.A. Pinacolone-Alcohol Gas-Phase Solvation Balances as Experimental Dispersion Benchmarks. Molecules 2020, 25, 5095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wieczorkiewicz, P.A.; Szatylowicz, H.; Krygowski, T.M. Mutual Relations between Substituent Effect, Hydrogen Bonding, and Aromaticity in Adenine-Uracil and Adenine-Adenine Base Pairs. Molecules 2020, 25, 3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jóźwiak, K.; Jezierska, A.; Panek, J.J.; Goremychkin, E.A.; Tolstoy, P.M.; Shenderovich, I.G.; Filarowski, A. Inter-vs. Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond Patterns and Proton Dynamics in Nitrophthalic Acid Associates. Molecules 2020, 25, 4720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ostras’, A.S.; Ivanov, D.M.; Novikov, A.S.; Tolstoy, P.M. Phosphine Oxides as Spectroscopic Halogen Bond Descriptors: IR and NMR Correlations with Interatomic Distances and Complexation Energy. Molecules 2020, 25, 1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Voronin, A.P.; Surov, A.O.; Churakov, A.V.; Parashchuk, O.D.; Rykounov, A.A.; Vener, M.V. Combined X-ray Crystallographic, IR/Raman Spectroscopic, and Periodic DFT Investigations of New Multicomponent Crystalline Forms of Anthelmintic Drugs: A Case Study of Carbendazim Maleate. Molecules 2020, 25, 2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nenajdenko, V.G.; Shikhaliyev, N.G.; Maharramov, A.M.; Bagirova, K.N.; Suleymanova, G.T.; Novikov, A.S.; Khrustalev, V.N.; Tskhovrebov, A.G. Halogenated Diazabutadiene Dyes: Synthesis, Structures, Supramolecular Features, and Theoretical Studies. Molecules 2020, 25, 5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grabowski, S.J. Hydrogen Bond and Other Lewis Acid–Lewis Base Interactions as Preliminary Stages of Chemical Reactions. Molecules 2020, 25, 4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ke, C.; Lin, Z. Catalytic Effect of Hydrogen Bond on Oxhydryl Dehydrogenation in Methanol Steam Reforming on Ni(111). Molecules 2020, 25, 1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hok, L.; Mavri, J.; Vianello, R. The Effect of Deuteration on the H2 Receptor Histamine Binding Profile: A Computational Insight into Modified Hydrogen Bonding Interactions. Molecules 2020, 25, 6017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shenderovich, I.G.; Denisov, G.S. Adduct under Field—A Qualitative Approach to Account for Solvent Effect on Hydrogen Bonding. Molecules 2020, 25, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Buntkowsky, G.; Vogel, M. Small Molecules, Non-Covalent Interactions, and Confinement. Molecules 2020, 25, 3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Altnoder, J.; Bouchet, A.; Lee, J.J.; Otto, K.E.; Suhm, M.A.; Zehnacker-Rentien, A. Chirality-dependent balance between hydrogen bonding and London dispersion in isolated (+/-)-1-indanol clusters. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 10167–10180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jezuita, A.; Ejsmont, K.; Szatylowicz, H. Substituent effects of nitro group in cyclic compounds. Struct. Chem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bordallo, H.N.; Boldyreva, E.V.; Buchsteiner, A.; Koza, M.M.; Landsgesell, S. Structure-property relationships in the crystals of the smallest amino acid: An incoherent inelastic neutron scattering study of the glycine polymorphs. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 8748–8759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Piękoś, P.; Jezierska, A.; Panek, J.J.; Goremychkin, E.A.; Pozharskii, A.F.; Antonov, A.S.; Tolstoy, P.M.; Filarowski, A. Symmetry/Asymmetry of the NHN Hydrogen Bond in Protonated 1,8-Bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu Tupikina, E.; Bodensteiner, M.; Tolstoy, P.M.; Denisov, G.S.; Shenderovich, I.G. P = O Moiety as an Ambidextrous Hydrogen Bond Acceptor. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 1711–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Melikova, S.M.; Voronin, A.P.; Panek, J.; Frolov, N.E.; Shishkina, A.V.; Rykounov, A.A.; Tretyakov, P.Y.; Vener, M.V. Interplay of pi-stacking and inter-stacking interactions in two-component crystals of neutral closed-shell aromatic compounds: Periodic DFT study. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 27899–27910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tskhovrebov, A.G.; Novikov, A.S.; Kritchenkov, A.S.; Khrustalev, V.N.; Haukka, M. Attractive halogen···halogen interactions in crystal structure of trans-dibromogold(III) complex. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2020, 235, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grabowski, S.J.; Ruiperez, F. Dihydrogen bond interactions as a result of H2 cleavage at Cu, Ag and Au centres. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 12810–12818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gurinov, A.A.; Rozhkova, Y.A.; Zukal, A.; Čejka, J.; Shenderovich, I.G. Mutable Lewis and Brønsted Acidity of Aluminated SBA-15 as Revealed by NMR of Adsorbed Pyridine-15N. Langmuir 2011, 27, 12115–12123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ke, C.; Lin, Z. Elementary reaction pathway study and a deduced macrokinetic model for the unified understanding of Ni-catalyzed steam methane reforming. React. Chem. Eng. 2020, 5, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mavri, J.; Matute, R.A.; Chu, Z.T.; Vianello, R. Path Integral Simulation of the H/D Kinetic Isotope Effect in Monoamine Oxidase B Catalyzed Decomposition of Dopamine. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 3488–3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Golubev, N.S.; Melikova, S.M.; Shchepkin, D.N.; Shenderovich, I.G.; Tolstoy, P.M.; Denisov, G.S. Interpretation of H/D Isotope Effects on NMR Chemical Shifts of [FHF]- Ion Based on Calculations of Nuclear Magnetic Shielding Tensor Surface. Z. Phys. Chem. 2003, 217, 1549–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shenderovich, I.G.; Denisov, G.S. Solvent effects on acid-base complexes. What is more important: A macroscopic reaction field or solute-solvent interactions? J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 204505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shenderovich, I.G. Electric field effect on 31P NMR magnetic shielding. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 184501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weigler, M.; Winter, E.; Kresse, B.; Brodrecht, M.; Buntkowsky, G.; Vogel, M. Static field gradient NMR studies of water diffusion in mesoporous silica. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 13989–13998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gedat, E.; Schreiber, A.; Findenegg, G.H.; Shenderovich, I.; Limbach, H.-H.; Buntkowsky, G. Stray Field Gradient NMR Reveals Effects of Hydrogen Bonding on Diffusion Coefficients of Pyridine in Mesoporous Silica. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2001, 39, S149–S157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shenderovich, I.G. Editorial to the Special Issue “Gulliver in the Country of Lilliput: An Interplay of Noncovalent Interactions”. Molecules 2021, 26, 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010158

AMA Style

Shenderovich IG. Editorial to the Special Issue “Gulliver in the Country of Lilliput: An Interplay of Noncovalent Interactions”. Molecules. 2021; 26(1):158. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shenderovich, Ilya G. 2021. "Editorial to the Special Issue “Gulliver in the Country of Lilliput: An Interplay of Noncovalent Interactions”" Molecules 26, no. 1: 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010158

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop