Next Article in Journal
Metallurgical Preparation of Nb–Al and W–Al Intermetallic Compounds and Characterization of Their Microstructure and Phase Transformations by DTA Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Saturated Steam Heat Treatment on Physical and Chemical Properties of Bamboo
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules25082000
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC)-Based Neurodegenerative Disease Models for Phenotype Recapitulation and Drug Screening

by
Chia-Yu Chang
1,2,3,
Hsiao-Chien Ting
1,
Ching-Ann Liu
1,2,3,
Hong-Lin Su
1,4,
Tzyy-Wen Chiou
1,5,
Shinn-Zong Lin
1,6,
Horng-Jyh Harn
1,7,* and
Tsung-Jung Ho
8,9,10,*
1
Bioinnovation Center, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 970, Taiwan
2
Department of Medical Research, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien 970, Taiwan
3
Neuroscience Center, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien 970, Taiwan
4
Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
5
Department of Life Science, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 974, Taiwan
6
Department of Neurosurgery, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien 970, Taiwan
7
Department of Pathology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital and Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
8
Department of Chinese Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien 970, Taiwan
9
Integration Center of Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien 970, Taiwan
10
School of Post-Baccalaureate Chinese Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(8), 2000; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25082000
Submission received: 29 March 2020 / Revised: 20 April 2020 / Accepted: 21 April 2020 / Published: 24 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phenotypic Drug Discovery)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Neurodegenerative diseases represent a significant unmet medical need in our aging society. There are no effective treatments for most of these diseases, and we know comparatively little regarding pathogenic mechanisms. Among the challenges faced by those involved in developing therapeutic drugs for neurodegenerative diseases, the syndromes are often complex, and small animal models do not fully recapitulate the unique features of the human nervous system. Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are a novel technology that ideally would permit us to generate neuronal cells from individual patients, thereby eliminating the problem of species-specificity inherent when using animal models. Specific phenotypes of iPSC-derived cells may permit researchers to identify sub-types and to distinguish among unique clusters and groups. Recently, iPSCs were used for drug screening and testing for neurologic disorders including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), spinocerebellar atrophy (SCA), and Zika virus infection. However, there remain many challenges still ahead, including how one might effectively recapitulate sporadic disease phenotypes and the selection of ideal phenotypes and for large-scale drug screening. Fortunately, quite a few novel strategies have been developed that might be combined with an iPSC-based model to solve these challenges, including organoid technology, single-cell RNA sequencing, genome editing, and deep learning artificial intelligence. Here, we will review current applications and potential future directions for iPSC-based neurodegenerative disease models for critical drug screening.

1. Neurodegenerative Diseases: the Unmet Medical Need

Neurological disorders represent a substantial unmet medical need, notably as the population ages worldwide. Many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), spinocerebellar atrophy (SCA), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) lack any significant or truly effective treatments.
Genetically modified human neuronal cell lines and primary animal neuronal cells are typically the first target for drug screening; animal models are typically used for documenting pre-clinical efficacy. The pathogenic mechanisms underlying neurodegenerative diseases are complex and still largely unknown. Most human cell lines and animal models were established with artificial methods and/or genetic overexpression strategies that may not fully represent human disease pathology. Injected or overexpressed amyloid peptides may elicit a substantial inflammatory response in a mammalian brain, but this finding may or may not have relevance to the mechanisms underlying AD. Furthermore, the human central nervous system is substantially different from those of standard laboratory animals, and primate testing is of course prohibitive. As such, novel disease models with iPSCs derived from human somatic tissues may be able to recapitulate disease phenotypes and mechanisms to facilitate drug development.

2. iPSC-Derived Neurons and Glia as in Vitro Models of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Human iPSCs were first established in 2007 in the laboratory of Professor Shinya Yamanaka [1,2]. Overall, iPSCs are similar to embryonic stem cells (ESCs) [3], as they are pluripotent and are capable of self-renewal in vitro. Notably, various types of somatic cells such as skin fibroblast and peripheral blood mononuclear cells can be induced to revert back to an ESC-like state by the delivery of specific reprogramming genes [4,5,6]. As such, iPSC technology can address issues related to the shortage of and complex social issues involved with the use of ESCs, which can only be obtained from abandoned embryos that were to be used for in vitro fertilization.
Within 10 years, iPSCs have been featured in developmental studies, cell transplantation trials, and disease modeling. Among the complex and varied conditions addressed by iPSC technology, they have been used for transplantation to treat macular degeneration, corneal transplants, PD, heart failure, diabetes, and immunotherapy [7]. For in vitro disease modeling, patient-derived iPSCs are in wide use for the study of all aspects of cell biology of disease, phenotype studies, analysis of genetic function, and ongoing drug screening (Figure 1) [8]. Previous neurodegenerative disease models, including transgenic animals and immortal neuronal cells that overexpressed human cytopathic mutated proteins, might have identified disease mechanisms that differed from those in patients. Using patients’ somatic cell-derived iPSCs, researchers can obtain pathogenic cell types directly from patients that may potentially share the same disease mechanisms for drug discovery.
For neurodegenerative disease modeling, iPSCs were sequentially differentiated into various kinds of neurons and glia with an effort made to mimic the process of central nervous system (CNS) development. iPSC-derived differentiated neurons and glia were evaluated for their capacity to model several challenging neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, HD, PD, ALS, SCA, and SMA, among others (briefly summarized in Table 1) [8].

3. iPSCs Can Differentiate into Neurons and Glia to Model Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems

For neurodegenerative disease modeling, iPSCs were differentiated into pathogenic cell types in an attempt to recapitulate disease phenotype. To promote differentiation of iPSCs into CNS neurons and glia, the expression of activin/nodal and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) are inhibited; this will prohibit differentiation into mesoderm or endoderm and promote the generation of neuroectoderm tissue. The most widely used neural stem cell (NSC) differentiation protocol was developed by Professor Lorenz Studer, who called it “dual SMAD inhibition” (dSMADi); using this method, one can generate CNS NSCs to greater than 95% purity [9]. The fate of naïve dSMADi-derived NSC was the dorsal forebrain; then, these cells could develop into cortical neurons. To guide these NSCs into other CNS neurons to their final destination, an additional step called “patterning” is applied. Basically, the CNS neural tube development takes place along a dorsal-ventral (D-V) and anterior-posterior (A-P) axis; the D-V axis is controlled by signals from wingless-int (Wnt), BMP, and sonic hedgehog (Shh) factors; the A-P axis is controlled by Wnt and retinoic acid signaling pathways. Dosed combinations of these morphogens provide patterning information and promote the generation of ganglionic eminence neurons, serotonin neurons, dopaminergic neurons, Purkinje cells, and motor neurons [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. For region-specific glial cell differentiation, patterned NSCs should be maintained for several months and ultimately switched from neurogenesis to gliogenesis [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]; high levels of nuclear factor 1A (NF1A) undergo a decline during this transition [46,47,48].
For generating cells for the peripheral nervous system (PNS), the iPSCs are induced to generate neural crest cells (NCCs), which can then develop into peripheral neurons, glia, and non-neural cell types. In response to the low-level activation of Wnt and BMP and the inhibition of activin/nodal, Tchieu and colleagues reported that more than 60% of the iPSC-derived NCCs [49,50] ultimately differentiate into enteric neurons, sensory neurons, and Schwann cells, which are useful for disease modeling [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].

4. Patient iPSCs to Modeling and Drug Screening for AD

At the time of writing, approximately 5% of those over 65 years of age suffer from dementia and 50–60% of those with dementia will ultimately be diagnosed with AD. Currently, there are only two approved clinical treatments for AD, acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors and the N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist; both have very limited therapeutic effects. As an effort toward developing novel therapeutic compounds, iPSCs from patients with AD or Down Syndrome (DS) were induced to differentiate into cortical neurons; this resulted in a recapitulation of characteristic AD phenotypes, including amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregates and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Likewise, iPSC-derived neurons from patients with DS exhibited accelerated AD-related pathologies, including the Aβ aggregates and dysregulation of Tau protein; degenerating synaptic functions and stress vulnerabilities were also observed in these neurons [59,60,61]. These findings suggested that iPSC-derived neurons from patients with DS neurons may serve as an important model for screening novel compounds for the capacity to inhibit Aβ aggregates and Tau dysregulation. In our previous work, we demonstrated that “n-butylidenephthalide”, a major compound from the neuroprotective Chinese herb Angelica sinensis, could rescue DS induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)-derived neurons from Tau-related pathology and enhance canonical Wnt pathway activation [59]. Furthermore, iPSC-derived forebrain neurons from APP and PSEN1 mutated AD patients were evaluated in phenotype studies and revealed a higher Aβ42/40 ratio and Aβ oligomer accumulations [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. Increased Tau and hyper-phosphorylated Tau protein levels, early endosome accumulation, GSK3β overactivation, and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production were also observed in amyloid precursor protein (APP)-mutated forebrain neurons [62,63,65,66,70]. AD-associated astrocytes were themselves neurotoxic and capable of damaging healthy neurons by reducing lactate secretion, increasing Aβ release and cytokine production, and inducing abnormal calcium flux [63,71,72]. Although there are many publications that suggest that iPSC-derived neurons from AD patients have reproduced disease-associated phenotypes, the complexity and poor characterization of AD itself limits the use of iPSCs in in vitro models for drug screening. In 2013, Kondo and colleagues demonstrated that iPSC-derived neurons from familial versus sporadic AD cases exhibit different cytopathic phenotypes and drug responsiveness. Furthermore, the neurons displayed different levels of cellular stress and exhibited different responses to docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 unsaturated fatty acid with protective effects against ROS, depending on the degree of Aβ oligomer accumulation. Specifically, DHA rescued the APP-E693ΔAD neurons from damage to reactive oxygen species (ROS), synaptic degeneration, and cell death [63]. These results suggest that AD may have multiple sub-types with clinical different responses. With this understanding, we might keep in mind that several agents that failed in global clinical trials may still have potential to treat some AD sub-types. Toward that end, iPSC-based models have the potential to become personal precision models which may recapitulate early processes related to AD process and ultimately assist with the identification of suitable treatment strategies. In 2017, this group of researchers used 13 iPSC-derived lines from AD patients for drug screening. In response to the transient expression of neurogenin 2 (NGN2), neurons were generated within approximately one week. A library that included 1258 pharmaceutical compounds was applied to the iPSC-derived AD neurons with outputs including Aβ40 and Aβ42 secretion and the Aβ42/40 ratio. After two rounds of screening, 27 potential therapeutic compounds were grouped into 10 clusters; 6 lead compounds were chosen due to their capacity to reduce Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in most of the 13 sets of AD neurons. Finally, the cocktail containing bromocriptine (a dopamine receptor activator), cromolyn (a compound for preventing eye allergy), and topiramate (a clinical compound for epilepsy therapy) was revealed to reduce the Aβ42/40 ratio. Unfortunately, the cocktail of three lead compounds had the capacity to reduce the Aβ42/40 ratio in iPSC-derived neurons from patients with familial AD and not those from patients with sporadic AD [64]. Furthermore, in recent years, the role of the Aβ aggregates as the major therapeutic target of AD has been questioned. Therefore, the definition of appropriate AD phenotypic markers has become a major goal of drug screening procedures.

5. iPSCs for Modeling and Molecular Mechanism Studies for PD

Approximately 1–2% of those 60 years and older may carry a diagnosis of PD, which is a CNS neurodegenerative disorder that results in the loss of motor function. More than one-third of current PD patients may also be diagnosed with dementia, depression, anxiety, and other emotional symptoms that as a group are called Parkinsonism. The loss of dopaminergic neurons (DA-neurons) in the midbrain is the major cause of motor symptoms in PD. Levodopa and dopamine agonists are provided to supply dopamine and delay degeneration secondary to PD; at later stages, deep brain stimulation results in prolonged motor functions and improved quality of life for PD patients. However, there is still no treatment that delays DA neuron death; the cause of this disease is also largely unknown. To explore the mechanisms underlying PD and PD-related dysfunction, PD-associated iPSCs were differentiated into DA neurons for disease modeling. For familial PD, iPSC-derived DA-neurons with mutations in SNCA, LRRK2, PINK1, and Parkin were characterized by cytosolic phenotypes [73,74,75,76,77]. LRRK2-mutated DA-neurons displayed mitochondrial DNA damage and dysfunction, DA neuron degeneration, and deficient autophagy [73,76,77]. PINK1 and Parkin mutations might cause neurite degeneration, mitochondrial enlargement with inclusions, and DNA damage and dysfunction in DA neurons [73,75]. SNCA mutations result in α-synuclein protein accumulation [74]. Some DA neurons were excessively vulnerable to cell stress in long-term in vitro culture. Astrocytes derived from LRRK2 G2019S progenitors exhibited autophagy dysregulation, as α-synuclein accumulation and secretion phenotypes result in neuronal toxicity [78]. Coenzyme Q10, rapamycin (mTOR inhibitor), and GW5074 (cRaf1 kinase inhibitor) could rescue PINK1 and LRRK2 DA neurons from mitochondrial dysfunction [73]. Similar phenotypes were also observed in some sporadic cases. However, there were still some sporadic PD iPSC-derived DA neurons did not exhibit these cytopathic phenotypes. Environmental factors and aging may be associated with the PD phenotype that are not recapitulated in the iPSC-based models. Neurons derived from iPSCs overexpressing progerin, a truncated version of lamin A that contributes to the underlying pathology of the premature aging disease Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS), exhibited accelerated aging, appearing suitable for specific phenotype recapitulation [75]. Of note, the HGPS patients did not exhibit early neuronal aging phenotypes, and as such, the similarity between natural and progerin-induced neural aging is still unclear. Furthermore, the progerin-induced aging DA neurons did not express classical PD cytopathies such as α-synuclein accumulation. Until now, the PD specific cytopathies are observed only in iPSC-derived neurons from patients with familial PD and few sporadic ones.

6. iPSCs for Screening of Therapeutic Compounds for ALS

ALS is a relatively rare disease associated with the progressive loss of motor function; fewer than 20% ALS patients survive for 5 years after diagnosis. Five to 10% of the cases of ALS are familial, and more than 90% of ALS cases are sporadic with unclear etiology. iPSC-derived motor neurons from patients with sporadic ALS carrying mutations in genes including SOD1, TDP-43, FUS, and c9orf72 were used for drug screening and mechanistic studies [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91]. The observed neuron-specific cytopathies included nerve fiber dysregulation and neurite degeneration [81,88,91,92]. Misfolded protein aggregates were detected in iPSC-derived motor neurons with mutations in TDP-43, SOD1, and FUS [80,81,82,83,91]. FUS mutation also caused axonal transport defects and stress granule formation [82]. Astrocytes and oligodendrocytes derived from iPSCs from patients with ALS were also highly neurotoxic, promoting motor neuron death [86,93,94]. Tyzack and colleagues found that the SOD1 mutation disrupted the EphB1 pathway, which can mediate anti-inflammation response for neural protection, in astrocytes [95]. Anacardic acid and HDAC6 inhibitors exerted protective effects and rescued TDP-43 and FUS motor neurons from phenotypes [82]. Two strategies were recently described by Imamura and Fujimori for novel drug screening. Specifically, the group established 12 ALS-derived iPSCs that were differentiated into motor neurons within 7 days using a gene overexpression method. After screening 1416 compounds, they identified 7 compounds that target the Src/c-Abl pathway and have the capacity to improve motor neuron survival [92]. Fujimori and colleagues established more than 40 ALS iPSC lines. An automatic imaging process was applied to identify motor neuron pathology and showed that iPSCs from ALS clustered into several unique phenotypes. Four major markers of neuropathology (neurite regression, protein aggregates, stress granules, and cytotoxicity) were measured in response to 1232 compounds, and 9 compounds were identified as resulting in improvements in FUS- and TDP-43-mutant motor neurons. Phenotypes of 32 sporadic ALS iPSC-derived motor neurons were measured and clustered into FUS, TDP-43, and SOD1 mutated-like groups and then screened for responses to various compounds. The repurposed drug, ropinirole (a dopamine receptor activator), was identified in this study and has been in clinical trials for ALS since 2018 [88]. Neuromuscular junction (NMJ) degeneration is the early cytopathy of ALS that directly influences motor function. Reports also suggested that cytopathic cells, motor neurons, and skeletal muscles in the NMJ influenced each other to promote the progression of ALS [96,97]. Thus, NMJ models represent in vitro tools for clarifying the early progression of ALS. For NMJ models, iPSC-derived motor neurons and skeletal muscle were used [89,90]. Osaki and colleagues applied a chip microfluidic device, which assembled iPSC-derived skeletal muscle together with iPSC-derived motor neurons. With the optogenetic control of gene expression, neuronal firing was elicited by light, and the resulting muscle contraction response was measured as an index of neuromuscular function. Two compounds, rapamycin and bosutinib (Src/c-Abl pathway inhibitor), exhibited a therapeutic impact on NMJ responses [90].

7. Modeling of Rare Neurodegenerative Diseases from iPSCs

Models featuring iPSCs have been used to explore mechanisms underlying Huntington’s disease (HD) [98,99,100,101], spinocerebellar atrophy (SCA) [102,103,104], spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) [105,106,107,108], Hirschsprung disease [49], and familial dysautonomia [57]. Disease-specific phenotypes and vulnerabilities were described in iPSCs derived from patient cells in most reports. For example, Ishida and colleagues demonstrated that SCA6 Purkinje cells were associated with vulnerability to thyroid hormone depletion-specific neurite degeneration. The clinical ALS therapeutic compound riluzole and thyrotropin-releasing hormone may rescue Purkinje cells from disease phenotypes [102]. Htt aggregates, autophagy, lysosome and metabolism dysregulation, and dysregulated adhesion were observed in HD γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurons, ultimately leading to caspase activation and cell death [98,99,100,101]. Decreased survival motor neuron (SMN) protein levels, degenerated neurites, and delayed neural differentiation were found in SMA motor neurons [105,106,107,108]. SMA iPSC-derived astrocytes had an abnormal morphology, reduced neurotrophic factor secretion, and elevated calcium flux, which are suggested to lead to motor neuron damage [109]. Valproic acid, an Histone deacetylases (HDAC) inhibitor used to treat epilepsy, could protect motor neurons against SMA cytopathies [105,108]. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) mutation resulted in protein aggregation in astrocytes from models of Alexander disease. Thus, these astrocytes secreted higher levels of inflammatory cytokines and other molecules that caused immunoreactivity and inhibited myelination [110,111].

8. Current and Future Challenges: Use of iPSCs for Drug Screening for Neurodegenerative Diseases

8.1. Challenges and Strategies to Accelerate Neural Maturation

Although the iPSC technology is a powerful tool, there are various challenges ahead (Figure 2). Among these challenges, collecting samples from patients, establishing iPSC cultures, and inducing specific neuron and glial differentiation is extremely time-consuming (>30 d) and effort-intensive, which are two points that reduce enthusiasm and feasibility for drug screening. To overcome this challenge, Notch and γ-secretase inhibitors have been shown to shorten the maturation period of most neuronal cell types [112,113]. Another approach includes the overexpression of neural specific genes; the overexpression of Ngn2 accelerates the production of both forebrain and motor neuron cells to within 10 days [64,92]. However, the authors did not measure the gene expression patterns or overall disease cytopathies to clarify whether Ngn2 overexpression influences the neuronal properties or disease phenotypes. Moreover, the usage of a lentivirus-mediated transgene strategy to deliver Ngn2 may damage the cell genome at multiple sites of chromosomes [64,92]. Thus, the accuracy of Ngn2-induced neuronal maturation in disease modeling remains questionable.

8.2. Challenges to Recapitulate Disease Phenotypes in Sporadic and Late-Onset Neurodegenerative Disease Models

Various reports have suggested that iPSC-derived neurons can reproduce the phenotypes of neurodegenerative disease. However, most of these cases were from the familial cases associated with specific genetic mutations. For sporadic neurodegenerative diseases, generating cytopathic cells with disease-related phenotypes remain a challenge. In familial cases, because of genetic mutations, the phenotypes may be dominant and serious, thereby causing early-onset disease pathology in both patients and iPSC models. Moreover, it is not difficult to speculate the potential disease phenotypic markers with familial cases according to the genetic database. However, in sporadic cases, the causes of disease may be associated with genetic risks, epigenetics, aging, and environmental factors, resulting in a late-onset phenotype that is difficult to be recapitulated in tissue culture. Furthermore, the progression of sporadic neurodegenerative diseases is extremely complex, making it difficult to identify causes and discover ideal disease markers.

8.3. Induce Aging in Late-Onset Neurodegenerative Disease Models to Recapitulate Phenotypes

We know that environmental factors and aging may be two major factors associated with the development of sporadic neurodegenerative diseases. However, the generation of iPSCs erases the epigenetic markers from somatic cells and reverts the cells to the “fetal” stage. iPSC-derived neurons do not exhibit aging-related features such as genomic instability, telomere degeneration, or mitochondria function decay. Therefore, strategies for accelerating aging are needed to mimic sporadic or late-onset neurological diseases. To date, the most workable strategy is the overexpressing of proteins that are associated with aging such as progerin to accelerate cellular aging [75]. However, this strategy does not fully recapitulate natural aging. For example, few early neurodegenerative phenotypes exist in the CNS neurons of patients with HGPS, and nuclear aging is not always observed in normal neuronal aging processes. However, it is still a helpful strategy for recapitulating PD-like phenotypes in sporadic iPSC-derived DA-neurons. Another potential strategy is “transdifferentiation.” Many reports suggested that the direct conversion of somatic cells (such as skin fibroblasts) into neurons (called induced neurons [iNs]) without back-processing into iPSCs permitted the retention of epigenetic markers and disease phenotypes in iN-based models [114]. However, the induction efficiency, purity, and cell numbers from iN-based strategies are not sufficient for detailed studies and drug screening.

8.4. Environmental Factors Promote Disease-Specific Vulnerabilities in iPSC-Based Sporadic Neurodegenerative Disease Models

The extent of the dominance of environmental factors on neurodegenerative disease remains unclear. Although environmental factors are complex and multi-aspect variables, some researchers concluded that environmental factors could finally lead to oxidative stress. Clinically, oxidative stress markers were observed in cerebrospinal fluid or blood plasma from patients with neurodegenerative diseases. To mimic environmental influences on iPSC models as much as possible, ROS, neurotoxins, the induction of overexcitation, and the depletion of medium components have all been applied, and specific vulnerabilities have been identified in various iPSC-based neurodegenerative disease models [75]. These reports suggested that environmental factors could promote the appearance of disease-specific phenotypes in iPSC-based sporadic models, making them potentially useful for drug screening.

8.5. Disease Subtype Grouping Provides Reliable Phenotypes for Drug Screening and Precision Medicine

For drug screening, the choice of an appropriate and early-onset major phenotype as the marker to measure the therapeutic effect of tested drugs is extremely important. Most neurological diseases display one or more associated phenotypes including protein aggregates, stress granules, apoptosis, membrane leakage, neurite degeneration, and functional loss in the late stage. Sporadic neurodegenerative diseases may also have various different associated phenotypes according to the initial causes of the diseases, similarly as familial neurodegenerative diseases. However, this is difficult to address because of our limited knowledge on neurodegenerative diseases. For example, in both DS and AD, both Tau hyperphosphorylation (the initial stage of neurofibrillary tangles) and abnormal Aβ42/40 ratio (a measure of early cytopathy) were observed, although neither of these cytopathies were identified to be correlated with late stage neuronal toxicity. To discover the relationship between early and late phenotypes, a large amount of mechanism studies should be undertaken before applying the findings to drug screening. Another potential strategy is identifying disease indices from multi-aspects/disease stages to sub-group sporadic cases into clusters for drug screening before we completely understand the disease mechanisms. Fujimori and colleagues first demonstrated that the speed of the progression of phenotypes in sporadic ALS iPSC models could be correlated with patients’ clinical disease progression to increase the reliability of iPSC models on ALS [88]. Moreover, sporadic ALS motor neurons can be classified into FUS-ALS-, TDP43-ALS-, and SOD1-ALS–like sub-groups according to the progression of the associated phenotypes. The repurposed drug ropinirole has therapeutic effects on FUS- or TDP-43-like ALS motor neurons but not SOD1-like sporadic ALS motor neurons [88]. This research suggested that associated disease markers (e.g., neurite degeneration, cytosolic stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, cell leakage, protein accumulation, metabolism dysregulation, cell apoptosis, and electrophysiological function degeneration) should be discovered and fully identified to group the sporadic types of ALS into clusters. Research using clustered sporadic cases may provide reliable materials for further drug discovery and permit the development of personalized therapeutic strategies.

8.6. Glial Cells and Microglia Play Key Roles in Disease Progression

Another major barrier to recapitulating neurodegenerative disease phenotypes is the establishment of interactions among neurons, glial cells, and immune cells in in vitro models. Until recently, most iPSC-based neurodegenerative models were relatively primitive in nature. For example, cortical neurons or forebrain astrocytes from iPSC-derived cells from patients with AD, motor neurons derived from patient with ALS, and DA neurons associated with PD were fairly simple and were unable to mediate complex cell–cell interactions within CNS, especially for challenging cortical brain diseases such as AD, as mentioned previously. Glial cells including astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the CNS and Schwann cells in the PNS provide several important functions such as nutrition transfer, neurite prune, waste clearance, and neurite myelination. Several studies demonstrated the neurodegenerative disease iPSC-derived CNS glial cells expressed disease-related phenotypes, as described previously. However, months are required to differentiate CNS glial cells, even with the overexpression of the novel gliogenesis gene NF1A [46,47,48]. This drawback limits the application of iPSC-derived glial cells for disease modeling and drug screening. Thus, discovering the novel strategy for promoting gliogenesis is extremely important for large-scale drug screening. Schwann cells are derived from NCCs instead of NSCs. A high-efficiency differentiation method for Schwann cells requires further development [50,51,52,54,55,58,115].
Microglia are the resident macrophages in the brain that regulate the CNS immune responses. Many neurodegenerative diseases were reported to be related to CNS immune dysregulation and chronic inflammation. People with metabolic problems may have more immune proteins in the plasma and thus higher accumulation of such proteins in the CNS via the blood–brain barrier (BBB), thereby causing CNS immune response and increasing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases. Differentiation protocols for generating iPSC-derived microglia were recently established. The major sources of microglia are the yolk sac, an extra-embryonic membrane, and mesoderm-derived hematopoietic stem cells. However, some issues exist concerning the characteristics of cells derived from these two sources, and the differentiation efficiency requires further improvements for application to CNS disease modeling or drug screening. Some reports applied patient macrophages for neurological disease modeling, but microglia are not yet available for this purpose [116].

8.7. Generation of 3D Tissue-Like Organoids for CNS Drug Screening

To construct a complex and organized CNS-like model, organoid generation, tissue engineering, 3D printing, and chip technologies should be included into the disease models. Self-organized brain organoid technology provides an integrated brain tissue-like structure containing neurons, glial cells, and sometimes microglia and other CNS cell types [117,118,119,120]. With this technology, there is no need to differentiate various cells types individually and place them together with chip or 3D printing. However, although numerous methods have been developed to improve the reproducibility of CNS organoid systems, there is still need for additional studies to improve the quality and consistency of this approach [66,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134]. Qian and colleagues designed a small bioreactor to separate each organoid into a single chamber, which permitted a high level of quality control [135]. However, for drug screening, methods will be needed for generation of large-scale, high-quality, highly reproducible organoids. Likewise, recent publications report successful applications that combine iPSC and chip technologies to model the BBB [136], neural–glia interactions [136], and neuromuscular junction [90] models. Two or more types of iPSC-derived cells can be placed together in well-designed microfluid channels to mimic specific cell–cell interaction niches in the CNS. Most chips were sufficiently small and thin to permit the observation of the cell morphologies, and assays such as immunofluorescence, apoptosis, and neuroelectronic response analyses can be performed directly on the chip. For application to large-scale preparation, an automatic system could be introduced for medium replacement, cell seeding, and high throughput candidate compound screening [137]. For disease phenotype measurements, deep learning technologies may have the potential to use phenotype imaging and calculation in combination with chip methodologies for large-scale screening.

8.8. Novel Biomolecular Technologies Benefit Neurodegenerative Disease Research

For detailed disease mechanistic studies, the novel genome editing tools such as zinc finger nuclease, transcription activator-like effector nucleases, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat/CRISPR associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9), piggybac transposon, and bacterial artificial chromosomes provide genetic tools that facilitate gene modifications. Next-generation sequencing technologies provide tools to assess the whole-genome information and transcriptome of each single cell. Single-cell transcriptome information can improve the differentiation protocols and purification efficiency for obtaining specific cell types to generate precise disease models with cytopathic cell types. For disease modeling, single-cell RNA sequencing can help researchers identify and classify sporadic cases into sub-types for precise drug screening, as similarly performed for other diseases such as cancer [138]. The large-scale and systemic cross-comparison of sporadic iPSC-based neural disease phenotypes with whole genome sequencing (WGS) or whole exome sequencing (WES) could also help researchers address the correlations between specific disease phenotypes and genetic polymorphism. This combined strategy may be critical for the discovery of novel single nucleotide polymorphisms that are associated with the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.

8.9. Conclusions

Overall, current publications suggest that phenotypes could be recapitulated for most iPSC-based familial neurodegenerative diseases, as well as some sporadic diseases. Challenges such as the differentiation efficiency, maturation period, recapitulation of sporadic/late-onset disease phenotypes, construction of CNS-like tissues, and stable systems for large-scale drug screening remain to be resolved. Single-cell RNA sequencing may provide a novel tool for obtaining high-purity cytopathic specific cell lineages that overcome the limitations learned from human CNS developmental principles. Small compounds enhance the speed of neuronal maturation, but more efficient compounds are needed. For disease phenotype recapitulation, aging and environmental factors should be included in iPSC-based models. The present strategies include the genetic induction of cellular aging and environmental factor-like treatments. Disease sub-grouping is extremely important for drug screening, especially for neurodegenerative diseases. Without this process, cases with similar symptoms could be incorrectly categorized as the same disease, leading to unreliable results in drug discovery or clinical studies. Grouping sub-types into clusters may also provide insights to explain the failure of clinical drugs that may target some specific disease sub-types. To generate cell–cell circuits within different cell types, coculture systems, microfluid chips, and 3D organoids containing neurons, glial cells, and immune cells should be developed for drug screening. Among them, chip systems may have the best potential for drug screening to reduce cell/reagent use; they can be combined with automatic robotic systems for large-scale applications. Among current models, 3D organoids are most similar to human tissues, but further research is needed to improve the modeling stabilities. In addition, knowledge learned from patients and models should be updated for more reliable model design for screening clinically effective drugs.
Although there are several challenges to be solved, iPSC-based neurodegenerative disease models are used for drug screening. Novel compounds found from iPSC-based models are already applied to clinical trials. Recent work has demonstrated the potential of iPSC-based models for research and discovery focused on neurodegenerative disease.

Author Contributions

T.-J.H. and H.-J.H. initiated this project. C.-Y.C. edited, organized and wrote the article. H.-C.T. draw figures. C.-Y.C. and C.-A.L. wrote the paragraphs. H.-L.S., T.-W.C., S.-Z.L., H.-J.H. and T.-J.H. organized and proof the article. All authors reviewed this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by The Bioinnovation Center and financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 106-2320-B-303-001-MY3, MOST 106-2320-B-303-002-MY3, MOST 107-2314-B-303-003-MY3 and MOST 108-2314-B-303-009-), Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital (TCRD108-64), Hualien, Taiwan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Takahashi, K.; Tanabe, K.; Ohnuki, M.; Narita, M.; Ichisaka, T.; Tomoda, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Takahashi, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Thomson, J.A.; Itskovitz-Eldor, J.; Shapiro, S.S.; Waknitz, M.A.; Swiergiel, J.J.; Marshall, V.S.; Jones, J.M. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998, 282, 1145–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Chen, G.; Gulbranson, D.R.; Hou, Z.; Bolin, J.M.; Ruotti, V.; Probasco, M.D.; Smuga-Otto, K.; Howden, S.E.; Diol, N.R.; Propson, N.E.; et al. Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nakagawa, M.; Taniguchi, Y.; Senda, S.; Takizawa, N.; Ichisaka, T.; Asano, K.; Morizane, A.; Doi, D.; Takahashi, J.; Nishizawa, M.; et al. A novel efficient feeder-free culture system for the derivation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Beers, J.; Gulbranson, D.R.; George, N.; Siniscalchi, L.I.; Jones, J.; Thomson, J.A.; Chen, G. Passaging and colony expansion of human pluripotent stem cells by enzyme-free dissociation in chemically defined culture conditions. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 2029–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chang, C.Y.; Ting, H.C.; Su, H.L.; Jeng, J.R. Combining induced pluripotent stem cells and genome editing technologies for clinical applications. Cell Transplant. 2018, 27, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chang, C.Y.; Ting, H.C.; Liu, C.A.; Su, H.L.; Chiou, T.W.; Harn, H.J.; Lin, S.Z. Induced pluripotent stem cells: a powerful neurodegenerative disease modeling tool for mechanism study and drug discovery. Cell Transplant. 2018, 963689718775406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chambers, S.M.; Fasano, C.A.; Papapetrou, E.P.; Tomishima, M.; Sadelain, M.; Studer, L. Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tao, Y.; Zhang, S.C. Neural subtype specification from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 19, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Boldog, E.; Bakken, T.E.; Hodge, R.D.; Novotny, M.; Aevermann, B.D.; Baka, J.; Borde, S.; Close, J.L.; Diez-Fuertes, F.; Ding, S.L.; et al. Transcriptomic and morphophysiological evidence for a specialized human cortical GABAergic cell type. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1185–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Brafman, D.; Willert, K. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling during early vertebrate neural development. Dev. Neurobiol. 2017, 77, 1239–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Deverman, B.E.; Patterson, P.H. Cytokines and CNS development. Neuron 2009, 64, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Du, Z.W.; Chen, H.; Liu, H.; Lu, J.; Qian, K.; Huang, C.L.; Zhong, X.; Fan, F.; Zhang, S.C. Generation and expansion of highly pure motor neuron progenitors from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hu, B.Y.; Weick, J.P.; Yu, J.; Ma, L.X.; Zhang, X.Q.; Thomson, J.A.; Zhang, S.C. Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4335–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kim, T.G.; Yao, R.; Monnell, T.; Cho, J.H.; Vasudevan, A.; Koh, A.; Peeyush, K.T.; Moon, M.; Datta, D.; Bolshakov, V.Y.; et al. Efficient specification of interneurons from human pluripotent stem cells by dorsoventral and rostrocaudal modulation. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 1789–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kirkeby, A.; Grealish, S.; Wolf, D.A.; Nelander, J.; Wood, J.; Lundblad, M.; Lindvall, O.; Parmar, M. Generation of regionally specified neural progenitors and functional neurons from human embryonic stem cells under defined conditions. Cell Rep. 2012, 1, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kriks, S.; Shim, J.W.; Piao, J.; Ganat, Y.M.; Wakeman, D.R.; Xie, Z.; Carrillo-Reid, L.; Auyeung, G.; Antonacci, C.; Buch, A.; et al. Dopamine neurons derived from human ES cells efficiently engraft in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Nature 2011, 480, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Le Dreau, G.; Marti, E. Dorsal-ventral patterning of the neural tube: A tale of three signals. Dev. Neurobiol. 2012, 72, 1471–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lekven, A.C.; Buckles, G.R.; Kostakis, N.; Moon, R.T. Wnt1 and wnt10b function redundantly at the zebrafish midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Dev. Biol. 2003, 254, 172–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, X.J.; Hu, B.Y.; Jones, S.A.; Zhang, Y.S.; Lavaute, T.; Du, Z.W.; Zhang, S.C. Directed differentiation of ventral spinal progenitors and motor neurons from human embryonic stem cells by small molecules. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 886–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Li, X.J.; Zhang, X.; Johnson, M.A.; Wang, Z.B.; Lavaute, T.; Zhang, S.C. Coordination of sonic hedgehog and Wnt signaling determines ventral and dorsal telencephalic neuron types from human embryonic stem cells. Development 2009, 136, 4055–4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Sauvey, C.; Yao, L.; Zarnowska, E.D.; Zhang, S.C. Directed differentiation of forebrain GABA interneurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1670–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, Y.; Weick, J.P.; Liu, H.; Krencik, R.; Zhang, X.; Ma, L.; Zhou, G.M.; Ayala, M.; Zhang, S.C. Medial ganglionic eminence-like cells derived from human embryonic stem cells correct learning and memory deficits. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Lu, J.; Zhong, X.; Liu, H.; Hao, L.; Huang, C.T.; Sherafat, M.A.; Jones, J.; Ayala, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, S.C. Generation of serotonin neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Maroof, A.M.; Keros, S.; Tyson, J.A.; Ying, S.W.; Ganat, Y.M.; Merkle, F.T.; Liu, B.; Goulburn, A.; Stanley, E.G.; Elefanty, A.G.; et al. Directed differentiation and functional maturation of cortical interneurons from human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Maury, Y.; Come, J.; Piskorowski, R.A.; Salah-Mohellibi, N.; Chevaleyre, V.; Peschanski, M.; Martinat, C.; Nedelec, S. Combinatorial analysis of developmental cues efficiently converts human pluripotent stem cells into multiple neuronal subtypes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Merkle, F.T.; Maroof, A.; Wataya, T.; Sasai, Y.; Studer, L.; Eggan, K.; Schier, A.F. Generation of neuropeptidergic hypothalamic neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Development 2015, 142, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Muguruma, K.; Nishiyama, A.; Ono, Y.; Miyawaki, H.; Mizuhara, E.; Hori, S.; Kakizuka, A.; Obata, K.; Yanagawa, Y.; Hirano, T.; et al. Ontogeny-recapitulating generation and tissue integration of ES cell-derived Purkinje cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 1171–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nicholas, C.R.; Chen, J.; Tang, Y.; Southwell, D.G.; Chalmers, N.; Vogt, D.; Arnold, C.M.; Chen, Y.J.; Stanley, E.G.; Elefanty, A.G.; et al. Functional maturation of hPSC-derived forebrain interneurons requires an extended timeline and mimics human neural development. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sunmonu, N.A.; Li, K.; Guo, Q.; Li, J.Y. Gbx2 and Fgf8 are sequentially required for formation of the midbrain-hindbrain compartment boundary. Development 2011, 138, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Ulloa, F.; Marti, E. Wnt won the war: Antagonistic role of Wnt over Shh controls dorso-ventral patterning of the vertebrate neural tube. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xi, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, H.; Emborg, M.E.; Zhang, S.C. Specification of midbrain dopamine neurons from primate pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 2012, 30, 1655–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yan, Y.; Yang, D.; Zarnowska, E.D.; Du, Z.; Werbel, B.; Valliere, C.; Pearce, R.A.; Thomson, J.A.; Zhang, S.C. Directed differentiation of dopaminergic neuronal subtypes from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Krencik, R.; Weick, J.P.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.J.; Zhang, S.C. Specification of transplantable astroglial subtypes from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Krencik, R.; Zhang, S.C. Directed differentiation of functional astroglial subtypes from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6, 1710–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Shaltouki, A.; Peng, J.; Liu, Q.; Rao, M.S.; Zeng, X. Efficient generation of astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells in defined conditions. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Douvaras, P.; Wang, J.; Zimmer, M.; Hanchuk, S.; O’Bara, M.A.; Sadiq, S.; Sim, F.J.; Goldman, J.; Fossati, V. Efficient generation of myelinating oligodendrocytes from primary progressive multiple sclerosis patients by induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2014, 3, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Goldman, S.A.; Kuypers, N.J. How to make an oligodendrocyte. Development 2015, 142, 3983–3995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gorris, R.; Fischer, J.; Erwes, K.L.; Kesavan, J.; Peterson, D.A.; Alexander, M.; Nothen, M.M.; Peitz, M.; Quandel, T.; Karus, M.; et al. Pluripotent stem cell-derived radial glia-like cells as stable intermediate for efficient generation of human oligodendrocytes. Glia 2015, 63, 2152–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, B.Y.; Du, Z.W.; Li, X.J.; Ayala, M.; Zhang, S.C. Human oligodendrocytes from embryonic stem cells: Conserved SHH signaling networks and divergent FGF effects. Development 2009, 136, 1443–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Izrael, M.; Zhang, P.; Kaufman, R.; Shinder, V.; Ella, R.; Amit, M.; Itskovitz-Eldor, J.; Chebath, J.; Revel, M. Human oligodendrocytes derived from embryonic stem cells: Effect of noggin on phenotypic differentiation in vitro and on myelination in vivo. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2007, 34, 310–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nistor, G.I.; Totoiu, M.O.; Haque, N.; Carpenter, M.K.; Keirstead, H.S. Human embryonic stem cells differentiate into oligodendrocytes in high purity and myelinate after spinal cord transplantation. Glia 2005, 49, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Piao, J.; Major, T.; Auyeung, G.; Policarpio, E.; Menon, J.; Droms, L.; Gutin, P.; Uryu, K.; Tchieu, J.; Soulet, D.; et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitors remyelinate the brain and rescue behavioral deficits following radiation. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 16, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, S.; Bates, J.; Li, X.; Schanz, S.; Chandler-Militello, D.; Levine, C.; Maherali, N.; Studer, L.; Hochedlinger, K.; Windrem, M.; et al. Human iPSC-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cells can myelinate and rescue a mouse model of congenital hypomyelination. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Li, X.; Tao, Y.; Bradley, R.; Du, Z.; Tao, Y.; Kong, L.; Dong, Y.; Jones, J.; Yan, Y.; Harder, C.R.K.; et al. Fast generation of functional subtype astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 11, 998–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Canals, I.; Ginisty, A.; Quist, E.; Timmerman, R.; Fritze, J.; Miskinyte, G.; Monni, E.; Hansen, M.G.; Hidalgo, I.; Bryder, D.; et al. Rapid and efficient induction of functional astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Methods 2018, 15, 693–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tchieu, J.; Calder, E.L.; Guttikonda, S.R.; Gutzwiller, E.M.; Aromolaran, K.A.; Steinbeck, J.A.; Goldstein, P.A.; Studer, L. NFIA is a gliogenic switch enabling rapid derivation of functional human astrocytes from pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fattahi, F.; Steinbeck, J.A.; Kriks, S.; Tchieu, J.; Zimmer, B.; Kishinevsky, S.; Zeltner, N.; Mica, Y.; El-Nachef, W.; Zhao, H.; et al. Deriving human ENS lineages for cell therapy and drug discovery in Hirschsprung disease. Nature 2016, 531, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tchieu, J.; Zimmer, B.; Fattahi, F.; Amin, S.; Zeltner, N.; Chen, S.; Studer, L. A modular platform for differentiation of human pscs into all major ectodermal lineages. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 21, 399–410 e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Cai, S.; Han, L.; Ao, Q.; Chan, Y.S.; Shum, D.K. Human induced pluripotent cell-derived sensory neurons for fate commitment of bone marrow-derived schwann cells: Implications for Remyelination therapy. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2017, 6, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Clark, A.J.; Kaller, M.S.; Galino, J.; Willison, H.J.; Rinaldi, S.; Bennett, D.L.H. Co-cultures with stem cell-derived human sensory neurons reveal regulators of peripheral myelination. Brain 2017, 140, 898–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Huang, X.; Saint-Jeannet, J.P. Induction of the neural crest and the opportunities of life on the edge. Dev. Biol. 2004, 275, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Kim, H.S.; Lee, J.; Lee, D.Y.; Kim, Y.D.; Kim, J.Y.; Lim, H.J.; Lim, S.; Cho, Y.S. Schwann cell precursors from human pluripotent stem cells as a potential therapeutic target for myelin repair. Stem Cell Rep. 2017, 8, 1714–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Okawa, T.; Kamiya, H.; Himeno, T.; Kato, J.; Seino, Y.; Fujiya, A.; Kondo, M.; Tsunekawa, S.; Naruse, K.; Hamada, Y.; et al. Transplantation of neural crest-like cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells improves diabetic polyneuropathy in mice. Cell Transplant. 2013, 22, 1767–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Shakhova, O.; Sommer, L. Neural crest-derived stem cells. In StemBook; IOS Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zeltner, N.; Fattahi, F.; Dubois, N.C.; Saurat, N.; Lafaille, F.; Shang, L.; Zimmer, B.; Tchieu, J.; Soliman, M.A.; Lee, G.; et al. Capturing the biology of disease severity in a PSC-based model of familial dysautonomia. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 1421–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ziegler, L.; Grigoryan, S.; Yang, I.H.; Thakor, N.V.; Goldstein, R.S. Efficient generation of schwann cells from human embryonic stem cell-derived neurospheres. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2011, 7, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chang, C.Y.; Chen, S.M.; Lu, H.E.; Lai, S.M.; Lai, P.S.; Shen, P.W.; Chen, P.Y.; Shen, C.I.; Harn, H.J.; Lin, S.Z.; et al. N-butylidenephthalide attenuates Alzheimer’s disease-like cytopathy in down syndrome induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Shi, Y.; Kirwan, P.; Smith, J.; MacLean, G.; Orkin, S.H.; Livesey, F.J. A human stem cell model of early Alzheimer’s disease pathology in Down syndrome. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 124ra29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Weick, J.P.; Held, D.L.; Bonadurer, G.F., 3rd; Doers, M.E.; Liu, Y.; Maguire, C.; Clark, A.; Knackert, J.A.; Molinarolo, K.; Musser, M.; et al. Deficits in human trisomy 21 iPSCs and neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 9962–9967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Israel, M.A.; Yuan, S.H.; Bardy, C.; Reyna, S.M.; Mu, Y.; Herrera, C.; Hefferan, M.P.; Van Gorp, S.; Nazor, K.L.; Boscolo, F.S.; et al. Probing sporadic and familial Alzheimer’s disease using induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2012, 482, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kondo, T.; Asai, M.; Tsukita, K.; Kutoku, Y.; Ohsawa, Y.; Sunada, Y.; Imamura, K.; Egawa, N.; Yahata, N.; Okita, K.; et al. Modeling Alzheimer’s disease with iPSCs reveals stress phenotypes associated with intracellular Abeta and differential drug responsiveness. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Kondo, T.; Imamura, K.; Funayama, M.; Tsukita, K.; Miyake, M.; Ohta, A.; Woltjen, K.; Nakagawa, M.; Asada, T.; Arai, T.; et al. iPSC-Based compound screening and in vitro trials identify a synergistic anti-amyloid beta combination for Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 2304–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Muratore, C.R.; Rice, H.C.; Srikanth, P.; Callahan, D.G.; Shin, T.; Benjamin, L.N.; Walsh, D.M.; Selkoe, D.J.; Young-Pearse, T.L. The familial Alzheimer’s disease APPV717I mutation alters APP processing and Tau expression in iPSC-derived neurons. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 3523–3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Raja, W.K.; Mungenast, A.E.; Lin, Y.T.; Ko, T.; Abdurrob, F.; Seo, J.; Tsai, L.H. Self-organizing 3D Human neural tissue derived from induced pluripotent stem cells recapitulate Alzheimer’s disease phenotypes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Sproul, A.A.; Jacob, S.; Pre, D.; Kim, S.H.; Nestor, M.W.; Navarro-Sobrino, M.; Santa-Maria, I.; Zimmer, M.; Aubry, S.; Steele, J.W.; et al. Characterization and molecular profiling of PSEN1 familial Alzheimer’s disease iPSC-derived neural progenitors. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yagi, T.; Ito, D.; Okada, Y.; Akamatsu, W.; Nihei, Y.; Yoshizaki, T.; Yamanaka, S.; Okano, H.; Suzuki, N. Modeling familial Alzheimer’s disease with induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 4530–4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Penney, J.; Ralvenius, W.T.; Tsai, L.H. Modeling Alzheimer’s disease with iPSC-derived brain cells. Mol. Psychiatry 2020, 25, 148–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ko, H.J.; Chiou, S.J.; Wong, Y.H.; Wang, Y.H.; Lai, Y.; Chou, C.H.; Wang, C.; Loh, J.K.; Lieu, A.S.; Cheng, J.T.; et al. GSKIP-Mediated anchoring increases phosphorylation of Tau by PKA but not by GSK3beta via cAMP/PKA/GSKIP/GSK3/Tau axis signaling in cerebrospinal fluid and iPS Cells in Alzheimer disease. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Chen, C.; Jiang, P.; Xue, H.; Peterson, S.E.; Tran, H.T.; McCann, A.E.; Parast, M.M.; Li, S.; Pleasure, D.E.; Laurent, L.C.; et al. Role of astroglia in Down’s syndrome revealed by patient-derived human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Oksanen, M.; Petersen, A.J.; Naumenko, N.; Puttonen, K.; Lehtonen, S.; Gubert Olive, M.; Shakirzyanova, A.; Leskela, S.; Sarajarvi, T.; Viitanen, M.; et al. PSEN1 mutant iPSC-Derived Model reveals severe astrocyte pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Stem Cell Rep. 2017, 9, 1885–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Cooper, O.; Seo, H.; Andrabi, S.; Guardia-Laguarta, C.; Graziotto, J.; Sundberg, M.; McLean, J.R.; Carrillo-Reid, L.; Xie, Z.; Osborn, T.; et al. Pharmacological rescue of mitochondrial deficits in iPSC-derived neural cells from patients with familial Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 141ra90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Devine, M.J.; Ryten, M.; Vodicka, P.; Thomson, A.J.; Burdon, T.; Houlden, H.; Cavaleri, F.; Nagano, M.; Drummond, N.J.; Taanman, J.W.; et al. Parkinson’s disease induced pluripotent stem cells with triplication of the alpha-synuclein locus. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Miller, J.D.; Ganat, Y.M.; Kishinevsky, S.; Bowman, R.L.; Liu, B.; Tu, E.Y.; Mandal, P.K.; Vera, E.; Shim, J.W.; Kriks, S.; et al. Human iPSC-based modeling of late-onset disease via progerin-induced aging. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Sanchez-Danes, A.; Richaud-Patin, Y.; Carballo-Carbajal, I.; Jimenez-Delgado, S.; Caig, C.; Mora, S.; Di Guglielmo, C.; Ezquerra, M.; Patel, B.; Giralt, A.; et al. Disease-specific phenotypes in dopamine neurons from human iPS-based models of genetic and sporadic Parkinson’s disease. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012, 4, 380–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sanders, L.H.; Laganiere, J.; Cooper, O.; Mak, S.K.; Vu, B.J.; Huang, Y.A.; Paschon, D.E.; Vangipuram, M.; Sundararajan, R.; Urnov, F.D.; et al. LRRK2 mutations cause mitochondrial DNA damage in iPSC-derived neural cells from Parkinson’s disease patients: Reversal by gene correction. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014, 62, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. di Domenico, A.; Carola, G.; Calatayud, C.; Pons-Espinal, M.; Munoz, J.P.; Richaud-Patin, Y.; Fernandez-Carasa, I.; Gut, M.; Faella, A.; Parameswaran, J.; et al. Patient-specific iPSC-Derived astrocytes contribute to non-cell-autonomous neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Stem Cell Rep. 2019, 12, 213–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Alves, C.J.; Dariolli, R.; Jorge, F.M.; Monteiro, M.R.; Maximino, J.R.; Martins, R.S.; Strauss, B.E.; Krieger, J.E.; Callegaro, D.; Chadi, G.; et al. Gene expression profiling for human iPS-derived motor neurons from sporadic ALS patients reveals a strong association between mitochondrial functions and neurodegeneration. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Burkhardt, M.F.; Martinez, F.J.; Wright, S.; Ramos, C.; Volfson, D.; Mason, M.; Garnes, J.; Dang, V.; Lievers, J.; Shoukat-Mumtaz, U.; et al. A cellular model for sporadic ALS using patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 56, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Egawa, N.; Kitaoka, S.; Tsukita, K.; Naitoh, M.; Takahashi, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Adachi, F.; Kondo, T.; Okita, K.; Asaka, I.; et al. Drug screening for ALS using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 145ra104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Guo, W.; Naujock, M.; Fumagalli, L.; Vandoorne, T.; Baatsen, P.; Boon, R.; Ordovas, L.; Patel, A.; Welters, M.; Vanwelden, T.; et al. HDAC6 inhibition reverses axonal transport defects in motor neurons derived from FUS-ALS patients. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ichiyanagi, N.; Fujimori, K.; Yano, M.; Ishihara-Fujisaki, C.; Sone, T.; Akiyama, T.; Okada, Y.; Akamatsu, W.; Matsumoto, T.; Ishikawa, M.; et al. Establishment of in vitro fus-associated familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis model using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2016, 6, 496–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Kiskinis, E.; Sandoe, J.; Williams, L.A.; Boulting, G.L.; Moccia, R.; Wainger, B.J.; Han, S.; Peng, T.; Thams, S.; Mikkilineni, S.; et al. Pathways disrupted in human ALS motor neurons identified through genetic correction of mutant SOD1. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14, 781–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Mitne-Neto, M.; Machado-Costa, M.; Marchetto, M.C.; Bengtson, M.H.; Joazeiro, C.A.; Tsuda, H.; Bellen, H.J.; Silva, H.C.; Oliveira, A.S.; Lazar, M.; et al. Downregulation of VAPB expression in motor neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells of ALS8 patients. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 3642–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Serio, A.; Bilican, B.; Barmada, S.J.; Ando, D.M.; Zhao, C.; Siller, R.; Burr, K.; Haghi, G.; Story, D.; Nishimura, A.L.; et al. Astrocyte pathology and the absence of non-cell autonomy in an induced pluripotent stem cell model of TDP-43 proteinopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 4697–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Zhang, K.; Donnelly, C.J.; Haeusler, A.R.; Grima, J.C.; Machamer, J.B.; Steinwald, P.; Daley, E.L.; Miller, S.J.; Cunningham, K.M.; Vidensky, S.; et al. The C9orf72 repeat expansion disrupts nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nature 2015, 525, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Fujimori, K.; Ishikawa, M.; Otomo, A.; Atsuta, N.; Nakamura, R.; Akiyama, T.; Hadano, S.; Aoki, M.; Saya, H.; Sobue, G.; et al. Modeling sporadic ALS in iPSC-derived motor neurons identifies a potential therapeutic agent. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1579–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Steinbeck, J.A.; Jaiswal, M.K.; Calder, E.L.; Kishinevsky, S.; Weishaupt, A.; Toyka, K.V.; Goldstein, P.A.; Studer, L. Functional connectivity under optogenetic control allows modeling of human neuromuscular disease. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 18, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Osaki, T.; Uzel, S.G.M.; Kamm, R.D. Microphysiological 3D model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) from human iPS-derived muscle cells and optogenetic motor neurons. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat5847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Chen, H.; Qian, K.; Du, Z.; Cao, J.; Petersen, A.; Liu, H.; Blackbourn, L.W.T.; Huang, C.L.; Errigo, A.; Yin, Y.; et al. Modeling ALS with iPSCs reveals that mutant SOD1 misregulates neurofilament balance in motor neurons. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Imamura, K.; Izumi, Y.; Watanabe, A.; Tsukita, K.; Woltjen, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Hotta, A.; Kondo, T.; Kitaoka, S.; Ohta, A.; et al. The Src/c-Abl pathway is a potential therapeutic target in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Ferraiuolo, L.; Meyer, K.; Sherwood, T.W.; Vick, J.; Likhite, S.; Frakes, A.; Miranda, C.J.; Braun, L.; Heath, P.R.; Pineda, R.; et al. Oligodendrocytes contribute to motor neuron death in ALS via SOD1-dependent mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E6496–E6505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Wada, T.; Goparaju, S.K.; Tooi, N.; Inoue, H.; Takahashi, R.; Nakatsuji, N.; Aiba, K. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis model derived from human embryonic stem cells overexpressing mutant superoxide dismutase 1. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2012, 1, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tyzack, G.E.; Hall, C.E.; Sibley, C.R.; Cymes, T.; Forostyak, S.; Carlino, G.; Meyer, I.F.; Schiavo, G.; Zhang, S.C.; Gibbons, G.M.; et al. A neuroprotective astrocyte state is induced by neuronal signal EphB1 but fails in ALS models. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Pradat, P.F.; Bruneteau, G.; Gonzalez de Aguilar, J.L.; Dupuis, L.; Jokic, N.; Salachas, F.; Le Forestier, N.; Echaniz-Laguna, A.; Dubourg, O.; Hauw, J.J.; et al. Muscle Nogo-A expression is a prognostic marker in lower motor neuron syndromes. Ann. Neurol. 2007, 62, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Lin, C.Y.; Wu, C.L.; Lee, K.Z.; Chen, Y.J.; Zhang, P.H.; Chang, C.Y.; Harn, H.J.; Lin, S.Z.; Tsai, H.J. Extracellular Pgk1 enhances neurite outgrowth of motoneurons through Nogo66/NgR-independent targeting of NogoA. Elife 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. An, M.C.; Zhang, N.; Scott, G.; Montoro, D.; Wittkop, T.; Mooney, S.; Melov, S.; Ellerby, L.M. Genetic correction of Huntington’s disease phenotypes in induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 11, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. HD iPSC Consortium. Induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with Huntington’s disease show CAG-repeat-expansion-associated phenotypes. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 11, 264–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Jeon, I.; Lee, N.; Li, J.Y.; Park, I.H.; Park, K.S.; Moon, J.; Shim, S.H.; Choi, C.; Chang, D.J.; Kwon, J.; et al. Neuronal properties, in vivo effects, and pathology of a Huntington’s disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 2012, 30, 2054–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nekrasov, E.D.; Vigont, V.A.; Klyushnikov, S.A.; Lebedeva, O.S.; Vassina, E.M.; Bogomazova, A.N.; Chestkov, I.V.; Semashko, T.A.; Kiseleva, E.; Suldina, L.A.; et al. Manifestation of Huntington’s disease pathology in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons. Mol. Neurodegener. 2016, 11, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Ishida, Y.; Kawakami, H.; Kitajima, H.; Nishiyama, A.; Sasai, Y.; Inoue, H.; Muguruma, K. Vulnerability of Purkinje cells generated from spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 patient-derived iPSCs. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 1482–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Koch, P.; Breuer, P.; Peitz, M.; Jungverdorben, J.; Kesavan, J.; Poppe, D.; Doerr, J.; Ladewig, J.; Mertens, J.; Tuting, T.; et al. Excitation-induced ataxin-3 aggregation in neurons from patients with Machado-Joseph disease. Nature 2011, 480, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ou, Z.; Luo, M.; Niu, X.; Chen, Y.; Xie, Y.; He, W.; Song, B.; Xian, Y.; Fan, D.; OuYang, S.; et al. Autophagy Promoted the degradation of mutant ATXN3 in neurally differentiated spinocerebellar Ataxia-3 Human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 6701793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Ebert, A.D.; Yu, J.; Rose, F.F., Jr.; Mattis, V.B.; Lorson, C.L.; Thomson, J.A.; Svendsen, C.N. Induced pluripotent stem cells from a spinal muscular atrophy patient. Nature 2009, 457, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Fuller, H.R.; Mandefro, B.; Shirran, S.L.; Gross, A.R.; Kaus, A.S.; Botting, C.H.; Morris, G.E.; Sareen, D. Spinal Muscular atrophy patient iPSC-Derived motor neurons have reduced expression of proteins important in neuronal development. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Lin, X.; Li, J.J.; Qian, W.J.; Zhang, Q.J.; Wang, Z.F.; Lu, Y.Q.; Dong, E.L.; He, J.; Wang, N.; Ma, L.X.; et al. Modeling the differential phenotypes of spinal muscular atrophy with high-yield generation of motor neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 42030–42042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Yoshida, M.; Kitaoka, S.; Egawa, N.; Yamane, M.; Ikeda, R.; Tsukita, K.; Amano, N.; Watanabe, A.; Morimoto, M.; Takahashi, J.; et al. Modeling the early phenotype at the neuromuscular junction of spinal muscular atrophy using patient-derived iPSCs. Stem Cell Rep. 2015, 4, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. McGivern, J.V.; Patitucci, T.N.; Nord, J.A.; Barabas, M.A.; Stucky, C.L.; Ebert, A.D. Spinal muscular atrophy astrocytes exhibit abnormal calcium regulation and reduced growth factor production. Glia 2013, 61, 1418–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Kondo, T.; Funayama, M.; Miyake, M.; Tsukita, K.; Era, T.; Osaka, H.; Ayaki, T.; Takahashi, R.; Inoue, H. Modeling Alexander disease with patient iPSCs reveals cellular and molecular pathology of astrocytes. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2016, 4, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Li, L.; Tian, E.; Chen, X.; Chao, J.; Klein, J.; Qu, Q.; Sun, G.; Sun, G.; Huang, Y.; Warden, C.D.; et al. GFAP Mutations in astrocytes impair oligodendrocyte progenitor proliferation and myelination in an hiPSC model of alexander disease. Cell Stem Cell 2018, 23, 239–251 e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Borghese, L.; Dolezalova, D.; Opitz, T.; Haupt, S.; Leinhaas, A.; Steinfarz, B.; Koch, P.; Edenhofer, F.; Hampl, A.; Brustle, O.; et al. Inhibition of notch signaling in human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells delays G1/S phase transition and accelerates neuronal differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cells 2010, 28, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Chambers, S.M.; Qi, Y.; Mica, Y.; Lee, G.; Zhang, X.J.; Niu, L.; Bilsland, J.; Cao, L.; Stevens, E.; Whiting, P.; et al. Combined small-molecule inhibition accelerates developmental timing and converts human pluripotent stem cells into nociceptors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Mertens, J.; Reid, D.; Lau, S.; Kim, Y.; Gage, F.H. Aging in a dish: iPSC-Derived and directly induced neurons for studying brain aging and age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2018, 52, 271–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Barber, K.; Studer, L.; Fattahi, F. Derivation of enteric neuron lineages from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 1261–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Haenseler, W.; Rajendran, L. Concise review: Modeling Neurodegenerative diseases with human pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia. Stem Cells 2019, 37, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Eiraku, M.; Watanabe, K.; Matsuo-Takasaki, M.; Kawada, M.; Yonemura, S.; Matsumura, M.; Wataya, T.; Nishiyama, A.; Muguruma, K.; Sasai, Y.; et al. Self-organized formation of polarized cortical tissues from ESCs and its active manipulation by extrinsic signals. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 3, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Kelava, I.; Lancaster, M.A. Stem cell models of human brain development. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 18, 736–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Lancaster, M.A.; Knoblich, J.A. Generation of cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 2329–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Lancaster, M.A.; Renner, M.; Martin, C.A.; Wenzel, D.; Bicknell, L.S.; Hurles, M.E.; Homfray, T.; Penninger, J.M.; Jackson, A.P.; Knoblich, J.A.; et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 2013, 501, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Garcez, P.P.; Loiola, E.C.; Madeiro da Costa, R.; Higa, L.M.; Trindade, P.; Delvecchio, R.; Nascimento, J.M.; Brindeiro, R.; Tanuri, A.; Rehen, S.K.; et al. Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science 2016, 352, 816–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Muffat, J.; Li, Y.; Omer, A.; Durbin, A.; Bosch, I.; Bakiasi, G.; Richards, E.; Meyer, A.; Gehrke, L.; Jaenisch, R.; et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived glial cells and neural progenitors display divergent responses to Zika and dengue infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 7117–7122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Qian, X.; Nguyen, H.N.; Jacob, F.; Song, H.; Ming, G.L. Using brain organoids to understand Zika virus-induced microcephaly. Development 2017, 144, 952–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Zhou, T.; Tan, L.; Cederquist, G.Y.; Fan, Y.; Hartley, B.J.; Mukherjee, S.; Tomishima, M.; Brennand, K.J.; Zhang, Q.; Schwartz, R.E.; et al. High-Content screening in hPSC-Neural progenitors identifies drug candidates that inhibit Zika Virus infection in fetal-like organoids and adult brain. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 21, 274–283 e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Bershteyn, M.; Nowakowski, T.J.; Pollen, A.A.; Di Lullo, E.; Nene, A.; Wynshaw-Boris, A.; Kriegstein, A.R. Human iPSC-Derived cerebral organoids model cellular features of lissencephaly and reveal prolonged mitosis of outer radial glia. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 20, 435–449 e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Cakir, B.; Xiang, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Kural, M.H.; Parent, M.; Kang, Y.J.; Chapeton, K.; Patterson, B.; Yuan, Y.; He, C.S.; et al. Engineering of human brain organoids with a functional vascular-like system. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 1169–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Cederquist, G.Y.; Asciolla, J.J.; Tchieu, J.; Walsh, R.M.; Cornacchia, D.; Resh, M.D.; Studer, L. Specification of positional identity in forebrain organoids. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Giandomenico, S.L.; Mierau, S.B.; Gibbons, G.M.; Wenger, L.M.D.; Masullo, L.; Sit, T.; Sutcliffe, M.; Boulanger, J.; Tripodi, M.; Derivery, E.; et al. Cerebral organoids at the air-liquid interface generate diverse nerve tracts with functional output. Nat. Neurosci. 2019, 22, 669–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Jo, J.; Xiao, Y.; Sun, A.X.; Cukuroglu, E.; Tran, H.D.; Goke, J.; Tan, Z.Y.; Saw, T.Y.; Tan, C.P.; Lokman, H.; et al. Midbrain-like organoids from human pluripotent stem cells contain functional dopaminergic and neuromelanin-producing neurons. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 19, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Lancaster, M.A.; Corsini, N.S.; Wolfinger, S.; Gustafson, E.H.; Phillips, A.W.; Burkard, T.R.; Otani, T.; Livesey, F.J.; Knoblich, J.A. Guided self-organization and cortical plate formation in human brain organoids. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Mansour, A.A.; Goncalves, J.T.; Bloyd, C.W.; Li, H.; Fernandes, S.; Quang, D.; Johnston, S.; Parylak, S.L.; Jin, X.; Gage, F.H.; et al. An in vivo model of functional and vascularized human brain organoids. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Monzel, A.S.; Smits, L.M.; Hemmer, K.; Hachi, S.; Moreno, E.L.; van Wuellen, T.; Jarazo, J.; Walter, J.; Bruggemann, I.; Boussaad, I.; et al. Derivation of Human midbrain-specific organoids from neuroepithelial stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2017, 8, 1144–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Watanabe, M.; Buth, J.E.; Vishlaghi, N.; de la Torre-Ubieta, L.; Taxidis, J.; Khakh, B.S.; Coppola, G.; Pearson, C.A.; Yamauchi, K.; Gong, D.; et al. Self-organized cerebral organoids with human-specific features predict effective drugs to combat Zika virus infection. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 517–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Xiang, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Patterson, B.; Kang, Y.J.; Govindaiah, G.; Roselaar, N.; Cakir, B.; Kim, K.Y.; Lombroso, A.P.; Hwang, S.M.; et al. Fusion of regionally specified hPSC-derived organoids models human brain development and interneuron migration. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 21, 383–398 e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Qian, X.; Nguyen, H.N.; Song, M.M.; Hadiono, C.; Ogden, S.C.; Hammack, C.; Yao, B.; Hamersky, G.R.; Jacob, F.; Zhong, C.; et al. Brain-Region-specific organoids using mini-bioreactors for modeling ZIKV exposure. Cell 2016, 165, 1238–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Vatine, G.D.; Barrile, R.; Workman, M.J.; Sances, S.; Barriga, B.K.; Rahnama, M.; Barthakur, S.; Kasendra, M.; Lucchesi, C.; Kerns, J.; et al. Human iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier chips enable disease modeling and personalized medicine applications. Cell Stem Cell 2019, 24, 995–1005 e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Ingber, D.E. Developmentally inspired human ‘organs on chips’. Development 2018, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Patel, A.P.; Tirosh, I.; Trombetta, J.J.; Shalek, A.K.; Gillespie, S.M.; Wakimoto, H.; Cahill, D.P.; Nahed, B.V.; Curry, W.T.; Martuza, R.L.; et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 2014, 344, 1396–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Molecules 25 02000 g001 550
Figure 1. Apply induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)-derived neurons/glia for neurological disease phenotype confirmation, mechanism study, and drug test.
Figure 1. Apply induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)-derived neurons/glia for neurological disease phenotype confirmation, mechanism study, and drug test.
Molecules 25 02000 g001
Molecules 25 02000 g002 550
Figure 2. Combine novel technologies and iPSCs for disease model improvement, genetic studies, make complex neuronal organoids, and large-scale drug screening. scRNA: single cell RNA, SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism, BBB: blood–brain barrier, NMJ: neuromuscular junction.
Figure 2. Combine novel technologies and iPSCs for disease model improvement, genetic studies, make complex neuronal organoids, and large-scale drug screening. scRNA: single cell RNA, SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism, BBB: blood–brain barrier, NMJ: neuromuscular junction.
Molecules 25 02000 g002
Table
Table 1. List of publications that applied pluripotent stem cells for neurodegenerative disease modeling.
Table 1. List of publications that applied pluripotent stem cells for neurodegenerative disease modeling.
DiseaseGene MutationPhenotypeCell TypePotential CompoundReference
DSTrisomy 21Aβ accumulation
Aβ aggregates
increased pTau and total Tau
Tau redistribution		FB neuronF127-Bdph[59]
DSTrisomy 21Aβ accumulation
Aβ aggregates
increased pTau and total Tau
Tau redistribution		FB neuron [60]
DSTrisomy 21reduced synaptic activity
dysregulated synapses		FB neuron [61]
DSTrisomy 21toxicity to neurons
fails to promote neuronal ion channel maturation and synapse formation		astrogliaminocycline[71]
ADAPP
SR		Aβ40 accumulation
increased pTau
activated GSK3B
large early endosomes accumulation		FB neuron [62]
ADAPP
SR		Aβ accumulation
increased Aβ42/40 ratio
Aβ oligomer accumulation
increased ROS
increased apoptosis		FB neuron
astrocyte		DHA[63]
ADPSEN1Aβ accumulation
increased Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio		FB neuronAnti-Aβ cocktail
(bromocriptine, cromolyn,
topiramate)		[64]
ADAPPincreased APP
Aβ accumulation
increased total and pTau		FB neuron [65]
ADAPP
PSEN1		Aβ accumulation
increased pTau		FB neuron [66]
ADPSEN1increased Aβ42/40 ratioFB neuron [67]
ADPSENAβ42 accumulationFB neuron [68]
ADAPPincreased pPKA
increased pTau		FB neurons [70]
ADPSEN1Aβ accumulation
altered cytokine release
dysregulated calcium homeostasis
increased oxidative stress
reduced lactate secretion		astrocyte [72]
PDPINK1
LRRK2		mitochondrial dysfunctionDA neuronrapamycin
coenzyme Q10
GW5074		[73]
PDSNCAincreased α-SYNDA neuron [74]
PDPINK1
Parkin		dendrite degeneration
decreased tyrosine hydroxylase
enlarged mitochondria
α-SYN inclusions		DA neuron [75]
PDLRRK2
SR		α-SYN accumulation
neuron degeneration
neurons maturation defects
autophagic dysregulation		DA neuron [76]
PDLRRK2mitochondrial DNA damageNeuron and DA neuron [77]
PDLRRK2α-SYN accumulation
autophagy dysregulation		astrocyte [78]
ALSSRdysregulation of mitochondrial gene expressionMN [79]
ALSSRTDP-43 aggregatesMN [80]
ALSTDP43neurite degeneration
increased TDP-43
TDP-43 aggregations
MN death		MNanacardic acid[81]
ALSFUSFUS redistribution
MN hypoexcitability
axonal transport defects		MNHDAC6 inhibitor
(tubastatin A, ACY-738)		[82]
ALSFUSFUS redistribution
formation of stress granules		MN [83]
ALSSOD1increased oxidative stress
mitochondrial dysfunction
increased ER stress		MN [84]
ALSVAPBreduced VAPBMN [85]
ALSTDP43increased TDP-43
TDP-43 redistribution
induce MN death		astrocyte [86]
ALSC9ORF72nucleocytoplasmic transport defectsMN [87]
ALSFUS
TDP-43
SOD1
SR		protein aggregates/redistribution
caspase activation
LDH leakage
neurite degeneration
increased ROS
mitochondrial dysfunction
MN death		MNropinirole[88]
ALSSRfewer muscle contractions
MN degradation
apoptosis increased in the muscle		NMJrapamycin
bosutinib		[90]
ALSSOD1SOD1 aggregates
neurofilament dysregulation		MN [91]
ALSSOD1
TDP43 C9ORF72
SR		MN death
autophagy dysregulation		MNSrc/c-Abl pathway inhibitor
(bosutinib)		[92]
ALSSOD1induce MN deatholigodendrocyte [93]
ALSSOD1 OESOD1 inclusion
neurite degeneration
astrocyte induced MN death		MN
astrocyte		 [94]
ALSSOD1disrupted EphB1–ephrin-B1 pathwayastrocyte [95]
HDHTTdecreased cadherin, TGF-β, BDNF
caspase activation		FB neuron [98]
HDHTTelectrophysiology change
metabolism dysregulation
decreased cell adhesion
neuron death		NSC
GABA neuron		 [99]
HDHTTproteasome inhibitionGABA neuron [100]
HDHTTHTT aggregates
increased lysosomes/autophagosomes
increased nuclear indentations
neuron death		GABA neuron [101]
SCA6CACNA1Aincreased Cav2.1
decreased α1ACT
TH depletion induced vulnerability		Purkinje cellTRH
Riluzole		[102]
SCA3ATXN3ATXN3 aggregatesnon-Purkinje
neuron		 [103]
SCA3ATXN3autophagy dysregulationnon-Purkinje
neuron		 [104]
SMASMNdecreased SMN
decreased neurite
decreased synaptic maturation		neuronVPA and tobramycin[105]
SMASMNdecreased UBA1
UBA1 redistribution
decreased MN differentiation.		MN [106]
SMASMNdecreased SMN
neurite degeneration
excitability dysfunction		MN [107]
SMASMNimpaired AChRNMJVPA and PMOs[108]
SMASMNabnormal calcium regulation
reduced neurotrophic factors		astrocyte [109]
AxDGFAPRosenthal fiber-like structures
increased inflammatory cytokine release		astrocyte [110]
AxDGFAPGFAP aggregates
inhibit proliferation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells
reduce oligodendrocyte progenitor cells myelination potential		astrocyte [111]
AChR: acetylcholine receptor; AD: Alzheimer’s disease; AxD: Alexander disease; ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; APP: amyloid precursor protein; ATXN3: ataxin 3; Aβ: amyloid beta; α1ACT: C-terminal of Cav2.1; α-SYN: α-synuclein; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Bdph: n-butylidenephthalide; Cav2.1: Cav2.1 P/Q voltage-dependent calcium channel; DA neuron: dopaminergic neuron; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid; DS: Down syndrome; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; FB: forebrain; FUS: RNA-binding protein FUS/TLS; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; HD: Huntington’s disease; HDAC6: histone deacetylase 6; HTT: huntingtin; LDH: lactic dehydrogenase; MN: motor neuron; NSC: neural stem cell; NMJ: neuromuscular junction; OE: overexpression; PD: Parkinson’s disease; PKA: protein kinase A; PMOs: phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligonucleotides; p-Tau: phosphorylated Tau protein; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SCA: spinocerebellar ataxia; SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; SMN: survival motor neuron protein; SOD1: superoxide dismutase 1; SR: sporadic; TDP-43: transactive response DNA binding protein 43; TGF-β: transforming growth factor beta; TH: thyroid hormone; TRH: thyrotropin releasing hormone; UBA1: ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1; VAPB: vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B/C; VPA: valproic acid.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, C.-Y.; Ting, H.-C.; Liu, C.-A.; Su, H.-L.; Chiou, T.-W.; Lin, S.-Z.; Harn, H.-J.; Ho, T.-J. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC)-Based Neurodegenerative Disease Models for Phenotype Recapitulation and Drug Screening. Molecules 2020, 25, 2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25082000

AMA Style

Chang C-Y, Ting H-C, Liu C-A, Su H-L, Chiou T-W, Lin S-Z, Harn H-J, Ho T-J. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC)-Based Neurodegenerative Disease Models for Phenotype Recapitulation and Drug Screening. Molecules. 2020; 25(8):2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25082000

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Chia-Yu, Hsiao-Chien Ting, Ching-Ann Liu, Hong-Lin Su, Tzyy-Wen Chiou, Shinn-Zong Lin, Horng-Jyh Harn, and Tsung-Jung Ho. 2020. "Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC)-Based Neurodegenerative Disease Models for Phenotype Recapitulation and Drug Screening" Molecules 25, no. 8: 2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25082000

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop