Next Article in Journal
The Suppression of Columnar π-Stacking in 3-Adamantyl-1-phenyl-1,4-dihydrobenzo[e][1,2,4]triazin-4-yl
Next Article in Special Issue
Naturally Inspired Molecules as Multifunctional Agents for Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Developments in Solid-Phase Extraction for Near and Attenuated Total Reflection Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Navigating the Chemical Space of Multitarget-Directed Ligands: From Hybrids to Fragments in Alzheimer’s Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Benzochromenopyrimidinones as Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Potent Antioxidant, Non-Hepatotoxic Agents for Alzheimer’s Disease

1
Laboratory of Applied Chemistry, Heterocycles, Lipids and Polymers, Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, University of Sfax, B.P. 802, Sfax 3000, Tunisia
2
Laboratoire de Chimie Organique et Thérapeutique, Neurosciences Intégratives et Cliniques, EA 481, UFR SMP, Univ. Franche-Comté, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 19, rue Ambroise Paré, Besançon F-25000, France
3
Laboratory of Cell Toxicology, EA 4267, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 19 rue Ambroise Paré, Besançon Cedex 25030, France
4
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
5
Department of Physicochemical Drug Analysis, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 9 Street, Krakow 30-688, Poland
6
Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry (IQOG, CSIC) C/Juan de la Cierva 3, Madrid 28006, Spain
7
Biomedical Research Center, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, 500 05 Hradec Králove, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Present Address: Centre de Recherche de Gif-sur-Yvette, Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, UPR 2301, CNRS, Avenue de la Terrasse, Gif-sur-Yvette 91198, France.
Molecules 2016, 21(5), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050634
Submission received: 18 February 2016 / Revised: 19 April 2016 / Accepted: 4 May 2016 / Published: 14 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecules against Alzheimer)

Abstract

:
We report herein the straightforward two-step synthesis and biological assessment of novel racemic benzochromenopyrimidinones as non-hepatotoxic, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with antioxidative properties. Among them, compound 3Bb displayed a mixed-type inhibition of human acetylcholinesterase (IC50 = 1.28 ± 0.03 μM), good antioxidant activity, and also proved to be non-hepatotoxic on human HepG2 cell line.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has emerged as the main cause of memory and cognitive deficiency in aged persons. The Alzheimer’s disease International (ADI) Association report from 2015 estimates that over 46 million people are currently affected by dementia. Given the epidemic expansion of AD, this number is expected to drastically increase in the future, reaching 131.5 million cases by 2050 [1]. Many efforts have been devoted to comprehend the complex etiology of AD, yet certain aspects of the pathogenesis are still not well understood. Nevertheless, several histopathologic features have been clearly identified in AD patients such as intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, composed of hyperphosphorylated tau protein and toxic amyloid plaques of aggregated β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide. Moreover, different levels of neuronal loss have been observed in the Locus coeruleus [2], Nucleus basalis [3] and Substantia nigra [4] brain areas, leading to substantial perturbations in several neurotransmission systems such as the cholinergic, serotoninergic, GABAergic, glutamatergic, noradrenergic or dopaminergic system.
Oxidative stress holds a fundamental position in the onset and development of AD. Several studies have confirmed that the constant accumulation of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species leads inevitably to serious oxidative damage in neuronal tissues [5]. This oxidative stress can be triggered by different underlying factors such as mitochondrial dysfunction [6], loss of metal homeostasis (e.g., Cu2+, Fe2+, Zn2+), the involvement of the later ions in Aβ aggregation [7], and neuroinflammation [8]. Globally, there is unanimity to consider these different biological events all at once, and address the unmet need for an efficient anti-AD agent.
In terms of medication use, the currently marketed drugs are mainly inhibitors of cholinesterases (ChEIs) (acetylcholinesterase, AChE; and butyrylcholinesterase, BuChE). These are donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine [9], which enhance the levels of neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the synaptic cleft. The only drug with a different mechanism of action is memantine, a N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist [10]. One of the first marketed ChEI, tacrine, was rapidly withdrawn, principally because of its hepatotoxicity [11]. Globally, the therapeutic efficacy of pure ChEIs may be brought into question since only scarce improvements in memory and cognitive functions have been reached in AD patients, with no signs of clear reversal of the disease. Therefore, the design of new multitarget-directed ligands represents one of the most promising approaches for the development of new disease-modifying agents for AD therapy [12,13,14]. Indeed, compounds capable to simultaneously modulate various biological systems in relation with AD pathogenesis might be a winning strategy in the future by furnishing fine-tuned drug candidates for the clinics.
Several series of quinazolinone derivatives have already been developed, inspired by naturally occurring alkaloids deoxyvasicinone (Ia), dehydroevodiamine chloride (II), evodiamine (III) and rutaecarpine (IV) (Figure 1), with promising inhibition of ChEs [15,16,17]. Further SAR investigations were done and revealed that some new carbamate analogues of evodiamine were selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors (BuChEIs), potent antioxidants and neuroprotective agents against glutamate-induced oxidative stress in HT-22 cells [16].
In relation with these antecedents and with our earlier work [18,19], we applied a multicomponent reaction approach to further explore the chemical space based on the quinazolinone scaffold. Thus, we have designed new benzochromenopyrimidinones of type V and VI (abbreviated as BCPOs, Figure 1), where a benzochromene motif was fused to the pyrimidinone motif present in alkaloids IaIV. As a result, eighteen new BCPOs were synthesized and evaluated for their antioxidant activity, ChE inhibition, and their in vitro toxicity in liver HepG2. From these studies, we have identified compound 3Bb as a promising derivative potentially useful in further AD drug discovery steps.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

The synthesis of the target BCPOs 3 and 4 has been carried out in two steps, and good overall yields as outlined in Scheme 1. First, a microwave-assisted multicomponent reaction of ethyl cyanoacetate, selected aromatic aldehydes, and 2- or 1-naphthol, in the presence of a catalytic amount of piperidine in ethanol, at 80 °C, for 10 min, gave the corresponding ethyl 3-amino-1-phenyl-1H-benzo[f]chromene-2-carboxylates 1AC or ethyl 2-amino-4-phenyl-4H-benzo[h]chromene-3-carboxylates 2AC, respectively, in good yields (68%–90%). The second step was the condensation of adducts 1AC or 2AC with the appropriate commercial lactams, in the presence of phosphorus oxytrichloride in 1,2-dichloroethane, under microwave irradiation for 15 min at 80 °C, to give compounds 3 and 4 in high yields (70%–96%). All new compounds displayed satisfactory analytical and spectroscopic data correlating with their structure, and with the data reported in the literature for comparable molecules (see Experimental Section).

2.2. Evaluation of the Antioxidant Power

First of all, we evaluated the antioxidant activity of compounds 3 and 4 using the oxygen radical absorbance capacity by fluorescence (ORAC-FL) method [20,21]. Trolox was used as standard, fluorescein as fluorescent probe and 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) as the peroxyl radical source. Ferulic acid was used as a positive control [22]. Data were expressed as Trolox equivalents (TE), and as shown in table 1, all compounds were able to scavenge the peroxyl radical with ORAC values ranging between 2.3 and 4.7 TE. The unsubstituted adducts 3Aac, 4Aac were found to be slightly less potent than the analogues bearing methoxy and methyl groups at the aromatic ring, with values ranging between 2.1 and 2.6 TE. However, when the phenyl moiety was substituted by a methoxy group, we globally observed a better antioxidant activity, compound 3Bb being the most active (4.7 TE) and displaying enhanced antioxidant activity compared to ferulic acid (3.7 TE).

2.3. Evaluation of AChE and BuChE Inhibition

For the preliminary screening of the inhibitory potencies, Electrophorus electricus AChE (EeAChE) and horse serum BuChE (eqBuChE) were used following the Ellman’s assay [23]. Tacrine, able to inhibit both ChEs, was selected as a control. First of all, compounds 3 and 4 were poor eqBuChEIs, and due to the limited solubility in the assay medium, only the percentage of inhibition at 10 µM was determined. However, these compounds exhibited encouraging inhibitory potencies against EeAChE with IC50 values ranging from 30.5 to 518.4 nM. The most potent EeAChEIs, in decreasing order, were compounds 3Bb, 3Ab, 3Cb and 3Ba with IC50 30.5, 55.5, 55.9 and 60.7 nM values, respectively, showing activities comparable to that of tacrine (IC50 = 44.3 nM). Very interestingly, and for comparative purposes, related natural alkaloids Ia [24] or II [15], and synthetic compounds Ib,c [24] are poorer EeAChEIs than BCPOs 3 and 4 (Table 1).
When examining the structure-activity relationships (SAR), we could observe that the four most active compounds (3Ab, 3Bb, 3Cb and 3Ba) belong to the V family (Figure 1). Concerning the size of the saturated carbocyclic ring attached to the pyrimidinone moiety and considering the same substituent on the aromatic ring attached at the stereogenic center, the most potent AChEIs were compounds bearing a piperidine-fused ring (3Ab, 3Bb, and 3Cb) for the V family. For the VI type derivatives, no evident SAR could have been established. Finally, we can notice that BCPOs of type V, with a methoxy-substituted benzene ring had IC50 values for the inhibition of EeAChE much higher than non-substituted analogues.
Based on these findings, we selected compounds 3Ab, 3Bb, 3Cb and 3Ba for the Aβ1–42 aggregation inhibition studies. Unfortunately, only compound 3Ab showed a weak inhibition power (Supplementary Materials). Next, we investigated the ability of compounds 3Ab, 3Bb, 3Cb and 3Ba to inhibit human recombinant AChE (hAChE), and their liver toxicity.

2.4. Kinetic Study of the hAChE Inhibition by Compound 3Bb

As shown in Table 1, we found significantly lower inhibition for hAChE in comparison with EeAChE, the IC50 values ranging from 1279 to 3657 nM. Compound 3Bb was the most potent inhibitor with an IC50 value of 1279 nM.
To get insight into the mode of inhibition, the kinetic mechanism of hAChE inhibition by compound 3Bb was investigated through classical Lineweaver-Burk double reciprocal plots. Analysis of this plot (Figure 2) showed the interception of the lines above the x-axis indicating that 3Bb is able to interact with both the free and acylated enzyme, and therefore behaves as mixed-type inhibitor of hAChE. The inhibitor dissociation constants Ki (dissociation constant for the enzyme-inhibitor complex) and K’i (dissociation constant for the enzyme-inhibitor-substrate complex) were estimated and were 0.38 and 1.12 μM, respectively.

2.5. In Vitro Toxicity of Compounds 3Ab, 3Bb, 3Cb and 3Ba in HepG2 Cells

A prerequisite for any effective lead drug is to keep its cytotoxicity at the lowest possible level. In this regard, we submitted the four most promising compounds (3Ab, 3Bb, 3Cb and 3Ba) to an in vitro toxicologic evaluation (MTT assay) using human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2) which represents a good probe to evaluate hepatotoxic effects. As shown in Table 2, tacrine was safe up to 100 µM but significantly decreased cell viability above 300 μM. The four tested BCPOs had no toxic effects on the HepG2 cells (Table 2) measured in concentrations up to 1000 μM [25] and could therefore be considered as non-hepatotoxic.

2.6. Blood Brain Barrier Penetration PAMPA Assay

Prediction of blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration is summarized in Table 3. Compound 3Ab showed the highest probability to cross the BBB via passive diffusion. Compound 3Ba seems to be also central nervous systems (CNS) available according to the results obtained, however Pe value is on the lower limit for permeable compounds. Compounds 3Bb and 3Cb were not satisfactorily distinguished. Whereas Pe value for the compound 3Bb fails into the uncertain interval, the value for the compound 3Cb was not determined due to the low solubility of the compound and therefore low UV/Vis absorption.
Data obtained for the new compounds correlate well with values for controls drugs, where CNS availability is known and also reported using the PAMPA assay [26,27]. Our data show high resemblance with previously reported results as well as with a general knowledge about the CNS availability for these drugs.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry Methods

Melting points were determined on a Kofler apparatus (Wagner Munz, München, Germany), and are uncorrected. Progress of the reactions was monitored with TLC using aluminium sheets with silica gel 60 F254 from Merck (Kenilworth, NJ, USA). IR spectra were recorded on a PARAGON FT-IR spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) covering field 400–4000 cm−1. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR were recorded on a Bruker spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Fällanden, Switzerland) (1H-NMR at 300 MHz, 13C-NMR at 75 MHz) using CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 as solvents. The chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm), using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal reference. The multiplicities of the signals are indicated by the following abbreviations: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quadruplet; and m, multiplet coupling constants are expressed in Hz. Elemental analysis were performed on Flash EA 1112 Thermo Finnigan, (Thermo scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The microwave assisted reactions were carried out in synthesis microwave (Anton Paar 300, Peseux, Switzerland) with a maximum power of 300 W.

3.1.1. General Procedure for the Compounds 1AC and 2AC

A mixture of appropriate aromatic aldehyde (0.01 mol), ethyl cyanoacetate (0.01 mol), 1-naphthol (or 2-naphthol) (0.01 mol) in ethanol (20 mL) in the presence of piperidine (0.2 equiv) was irradiated for 10 min in a sealed tube. The irradiation was programed to maintain a constant temperature (80 °C, 150 W). The obtained precipitate was filtered, washed with cold ethanol and dried, to give the desired compounds.
Ethyl 3-amino-1-phenyl-1H-benzo[f]chromene-2-carboxylate (1A) [27]: Yield 90%; mp 168–170 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 3300–3438, 1685 cm1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) 1.23–1.28 (m, 3H), 4.08–4.17 (m, 2H), 5.51 (s, 1H), 7.00–8.02 (m, 11H, arom.), 7.67 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) 14.9, 37.0, 59.3, 78.2, 117.2, 119.3, 123.6, 125.2, 126.4, 127.5, 128.2, 128.5, 129.0, 129.4, 130.7, 131.2, 147.2, 147.3, 160.9, 168.6.
Ethyl 3-amino-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)-1H-benzo[f]chromene-2-carboxylate (1B): Yield 73%; mp 168–170 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 3339–3425, 1690 cm1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) 1.14–1.20 (m, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 4.01–4.12 (m, 2H), 5.82 (s, 1H), 6.72–8.25 (m, 10H, arom.), 7.68 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) 14.7, 31.3, 55.8, 59.1, 77.5, 111.6,117.1, 119.5, 120.8, 123.7, 125.0, 127.3, 127.7, 128.9, 128.9, 130.5, 131.0, 131.3, 135.5, 147.3, 156.1, 161.4, 169.0.
Ethyl 3-amino-1-p-methylphenyl-1H-benzo[f]chromene-2-carboxylate (1C) [28]: Yield 75%; mp 194–196 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 3320–3440 (NH2), 1687 (CO) cm1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) 1.24–1.31 (m, 3H), 2.10 (s, 3H), 4.09–4.23 (m, 2H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 6.93–8.01 (m, 10H, arom.), 7.68 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) 14.9, 20.9, 36.6, 59.3, 78.3, 117.1, 119.4, 123.6, 125.2, 127.4, 128.0, 129.0, 129.1, 129.3, 130.8, 131.2, 135.3, 144.4, 147.2, 160.9, 168.7.
Ethyl 2-amino-4-phenyl-4H-benzo[h]chromene-3-carboxylate (2A) [29]: Yield 88%; mp 160-162 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 3372–3260, 1692 cm1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) 1.10–1.18 (m, 3H), 4.01–4.11 (m, 2H), 5.04 (s, 1H), 7.04–8.33 (m, 11H, arom.), 7.64 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) 14.7, 40.5, 59.0, 76.8, 121.1, 121.4, 123.2, 124.1, 126.4, 126.9, 126.9, 127.0, 127.7, 128.1, 128.6, 132.9, 143.2, 148.2, 161.2, 168.7.
Ethyl 2-amino-4-m-methoxyphényl-4H-benzo[h] chromene-3-carboxylate (2B): Yield 75%; mp 156–158 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 3393–3280, 1663 cm1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) 1.09–1.18 (m, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 4.02–4.14 (m, 2H), 5.01 (s, 1H), 6.67–8.32 (m, 10H, arom.), 7.63 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C-NMR (DMSO- d6) 14.2, 40.0, 54.8, 58.6, 76.2, 110.7, 113.5, 119.5, 120.6, 120.8, 122.7, 123.6, 126.4, 126.4, 126.5, 127.6,129.2, 132.4, 142.8, 149.3, 159.0, 160.8, 168.2.
Ethyl-2-amino-4-p-methylphenyl-4H-benzo[h]chromene-3-carboxylate (2C) [29]: Yield 68%; mp 158–160 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 3315–3452, 1672 cm1; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) 1.10–1.17 (m, 3H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 4.00–4.09 (m, 2H), 4.98 (s, 1H), 6.98–8.29 (m, 10H, arom.), 7.62 (s, 2H, NH2); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) 14.7, 20.9, 40.8, 59.0, 76.9, 121.2, 121.8, 123.3, 124.1, 126.8, 126.9, 127.0, 127.6, 128.0, 129.2,132.9, 135.4, 143.2, 145.3, 161.2, 168.7.

3.1.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Benzochromenopyrimidinones (BCPOs)

POCl3 (0.14 mL, 0.23 g, 1.5 equiv) was added dropwise to a mixture of the corresponding ethyl aminobenzochromene-2-carboxylate and the appropriate lactam (1.5 equiv) in 1,2-dichloroethane (20 mL). After microwave irradiation, approximately 80% of the solvent was evaporated and water (10 mL) was added. The solution was basified with 20% aqueous NaOH, then the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2, washed with water (20 mL), and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was evaporated, the solid obtained was washed with ether and filtered to give benzochromenopyrimidinones 3 and 4.
14-Phenyl-10,11-dihydro-14H-benzo[5,6]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-13(9H)-one (3Aa): Yield 80%; mp ˃ 260 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1667, 1587 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 2.18–2.22 (m, 2H, H10), 2.28–2.36 (m, 2H, H9), 3.20–3.29 (m, 2H, H11), 5.31 (s, 1H, H14), 6.64 (d, J = 7.8 Hz 1H, H6), 7.19–7.48 (m, 7H, H2, H3, H2′,H5′,H3′,H6′,H4′), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, H4, H5), 7.96 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,1H,H1); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 18.6 (CH2, C10), 32.0 (CH2, C9), 36.0 (CH, C14), 46.6 (CH, C11), 100.8 (C, C13a), 115.9 (CH, C6), 116.9 (CH, C1), 123.1 (CH, C3), 124.4 (CH, C2), 126.1 (CH, C4), 126.3 (CH, C5), 126.6 (CH, C4′), 127.8 (2 CH, C2′, C6′), 127.9 (2 CH, C3′, C5′), 128.8 (C, C14b), 130.6 (C, C14a), 131.0 (C, C4a), 143.3 (C, C1′), 147.8 (C, C6a), 160.5 (C, C8a), 160.9 (C, C7a), 162.1 (C, C13). Anal. Calcd. for C24H18N2O2: C, 78.67; H, 4.95; N, 7.65. Found: C, 78.61; H, 4.98; N, 7.69.
15-Phenyl-10,11,12,15-tetrahydro-9H-benzo[5,6]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrido[1,2-a]pyrimidin-14-one (3Ab): Yield 96%; mp 236 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1669, 1587 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.83–1.94 (m, 4H, H11, H10), 2.91–2.94 (m,H9, 2H), 3.87–3.93 (m, H12, 2H), 5.76 (s, H15, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H6, 1H), 7.16–7.52 (m, H2, H3, H5, H2′,H5′,H3′,H6′,H4′, 8H), 7.97 d (J = 8.4 Hz, H1, H4, 2H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 18.2 (CH2, C10), 20.9 (CH2, C11), 30.9 (CH2, C9), 35.9 (CH, C15), 42.4 (CH, C12), 99.6 (CH, C14a), 116.4 (C, C6), 117.3 (CH, C1), 123.3 (CH, C3), 124.9 (CH, C2), 126.4 (CH, C4), 127.1 (CH, C5), 128.1 (CH,C4′), 128.2 (2 CH, C2′, C6′), 128.5 (2 CH, C3′, C5′), 129.4 (C, C15b), 130.4 (C, C15a), 130.9 (C, C4a), 144.2 (C, C1′), 147.7 (C, C6a), 158.9 (C, C8a), 159.4 (C, C7a), 161.4 (C,C14). Anal. Calcd. for C25H20N2O2: C, 78.93; H, 5.30; N, 7.36. Found: C, 78.92; H, 5.32; N, 7.32.
16-Phenyl-10,11,12,13,-tetrahydro-16H-benzo[5,6]chromeno[2′,3′,4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-15(9H)-one (3Ac): Yield 85%; mp 242 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1660, 1589 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.78–1.83 (m, H12, H11, H10, H9, 8H), 2.97–2.99 (m, H13, 2H), 5.89 (s, H16, 1H), 7.09 d (J = 7.8 Hz, H6, 1H), 7.19–7.48 m (m, H2, H3, H2′, H5′, H3′, H6′,H4, 7H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H4, H5, 2H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 24.0 (CH2,C10), 26.7 (CH2,C11), 29.1 (CH2, C12), 36.4 (CH2,C16), 36.8 (CH, C9), 42.6 (CH, C13), 100.6 (CH,C15a), 116.2 (C,C6), 117.0 (CH, C1), 123.2 (CH,C3), 124.3(CH,C2), 126.0 (CH,C4), 126.5 (CH, C5), 127.9 (2 CH, C2′, C6′), 128.0 (2 CH, C3′, C5′), 128.4 (CH, C4′), 128.7 (C, C16b), 130.6 (C, C16a), 130.9 (C, C4a), 143.4 (C, C1′), 147.7 (C, C6a), 158.8 (C, C8a), 161.6 (C, C7a), 162.5 (C, C15). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22N2O2: C, 79.17; H, 5.62; N, 7.10. Found: C, 79.25; H, 5.60; N, 7.17.
14-(3′Methoxyphenyl)-10,11-dihydro-14H-benzo[5,6]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-13(9H)-one (3Ba): Yield 81%; mp 211 °C; IR (KBr) νmax1660, 1591cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 2.22–2.27 (m, H10, 2H), 3.01–3.14 (m, H9, 2H), 3.71 (s, OCH3, 3H), 4.13–4.17 (m, H11, 2H), 5.92 (s, H14, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H6, 1H), 6.99–7.48 (m, H2, H3, H2′,H5′, H6′, H4′, 6H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H4, H5, 2H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 18.6 (CH, C10), 31.9 (CH, C9), 35.9 (CH, C14), 46.5 (CH, C11), 55.0 (OCH3), 100.7 (C, C13a), 111.3 (CH, C4′), 114.0 (CH, C2′), 115.9 (CH,C5), 116.9 (CH,C6′), 120.4 (C, C14a), 123.1 (CH, C1), 124.4 (CH, C3), 126.5 (CH, C2), 127.9 (CH, C6), 128.7 (CH, C4), 128.8 (C, C4a), 130.6 (CH, C5′), 131.0 (C, C14b), 144.9 (C, C1′), 147.8 (C, C6a), 158.1 (C, C8a), 160.6 (C, C7a), 161.0 (C, C13), 162.0 (C, C3′). Anal. Calcd. for C25H20N2O3: C, 75.74; H, 5.09; N, 7.07. Found: C, 75.69; H, 5.12; N, 7.11.
15-(3′-Methoxyphenyl)-10,11,12,15-tetrahydro-9H-benzo[5,6]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrido[1,2-a]pyrimidin-14-one (3Bb): Yield 90%; mp 212 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1658, 1583 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.85–1.94 (m, H9, H10, H11, 6H), 2.86–2.94 (m, H12, 2H), 3.71 (s, OCH3, 3H), 5.89 (s, H15, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H6, 1H), 6.99–7.46 (m, H2, H3, H2′, H5′, H6′, H4′, 6H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H4, H5, 2H), 7.98 (d, J = 8.1 Hz,H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 19.0 (CH,C10), 21.8 (CH, C11), 31.5 (CH, C9), 36.6 (CH, C15), 42.9 (CH, C12), 55.0 (C, OCH3), 100.8 (C,C14a), 114.6 (CH, C2′), 116.6 (CH, C5), 117.1 (CH, C4′), 117.5 (CH, C6′), 121.0 (C, C15a), 123.7 (CH, C1), 124.8 (CH, C3), 127.0 (CH, C2), 128.4 (CH, C6), 129.1 (CH, C4), 129.3 (C, C4a), 131.0 (C, C15b), 131.2 (CH, C5′), 145.5 (C, C1′), 148.2 (C, C6a), 158.5 (C,C8a), 159.0 (C, C7a), 159.5 (C, C14), 162.4 (C, C3′). Anal. Calcd. or C26H22N2O3: C, 76.08; H, 5.40; N, 6.82. Found: C, 76.13; H, 5.36; N, 6.85.
16-(3′-Methoxyphenyl)-10,11,12,13-tetrahydro-16H-benzo[5,6]chromeno[2′,3′,4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-15(9H)-one (3Bc): Yield 82%; mp 206 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1662, 1585 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.79–2.33 (m, H9, H10, H11, H12, H8), 2.92–2.99 (m, H13, 2H), 3.71 (s, OCH3, 3H), 5.87 (s, H16, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H6, 1H), 6.84–7.49 (m, H2, H3, H2′,H5′, H6′, H4′, 6H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H4,H5, 2H), 7.98 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 24.5 (CH, C10), 27.2 (CH, C11), 29.7 (CH, C12), 36.9 (CH, C16), 37.4 (CH, C9), 43.2 (CH, C13), 55.0 (OCH3), 101.0 (C, C15a), 111.6 (C, C4′), 114.6 (CH, C2′), 116.6 (CH, C5), 117.5 (CH, C6′), 121.1 (C, C16a), 123.7 (CH, C1), 124.9 (CH, C3), 127.0 (CH, C2), 128.4 (CH, C6), 129.2 (CH, C4), 129.3 (C, C4a), 131.1 (CH, C5′), 131.4 (C, C16b), 145.4 (C, C1′), 148.1 (C, C6a), 159.3 (C, C8a), 159.5 (C, C7a), 162.1 (C, C15), 163.5 (C, C3′). Anal. Calcd. for C27H24N2O3: C, 76.40; H, 5.70; N, 6.60. Found: C, 76.36; H, 5.73; N, 6.64.
14-(4′-Methylphenyl)-10,11-dihydro-14H-benzo[5,6]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-13(9H)-one (3Ca): Yield 82%; mp > 260 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1661, 1594 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.21–1.25 (m, H10, 2H), 2.2 (s, CH3, 3H), 3.06–3.12 (m, H9, 2H), 4.05–4.11 (m, H11, 2H), 5.90 (s, H14, 1H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, H3′, H5′, 2H), 7.28–7.47 (m, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, 5H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, H2′, H6′, 2H),7.97 d (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 19.1 (CH2, C10), 20.9 (CH3), 32.4 (CH, C9), 36.0 (CH, C14), 47.0 (CH, C11), 101.5 (C, C13a), 116.7 (CH, C6), 117.5 (CH, C1), 123.7 (CH, C3), 124.8 (CH, C2), 127.0 (CH, C4), 128.3 (CH, C5), 128.4 (2CH, C2′, C6′), 129.0 (2CH, C3′, C5′), 129.2 (C, C14b), 131.1 (C, C14a), 131.5 (C, C4a), 136.2 (C, C4′), 141.0 (C, C1′), 148.2 (C, C6a), 161.1 (C, C8a), 161.4 (C, C7a), 162.4 (C, C13). Anal. Calcd. for C25H20N2O2: C, 78.93; H, 5.30; N, 7.36. Found: C, 78.97; H, 5.27; N, 7.33.
15-(4′-Methylphenyl)-10,11,12,15-tetrahydro-9H-benzo[5,6]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrido[1,2-a]pyrimidin-14-one (3Cb): Yield 94%; mp ˃ 260 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1658, 1586 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.83–1.88 (m, H10, 2H), 1.90–1.95 (m, H11, 2H), 2.22 (s, CH3, 3H), 2.92–2.96 (m, H9, 2H), 3.90–3.97 (m, H12, 2H), 5.86 (s, H15, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, H3′, H5′, 2H), 7.28–7.48 (m, H2, H3,H4,H5,H6, 5H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H2′, H6′, 2H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 19.0 (CH2, C10), 21.0 (CH3), 21.7 (CH, C11), 31.4 (CH, C9), 36.2 (CH, C15), 43.0 (CH, C12), 101.1 (C, C14a), 116.7 (CH, C6), 117.5 (CH, C1), 123.7 (CH, C3), 124.9 (CH, C2), 127.1 (CH, C4), 128.4 (CH, C5), 128.9 (2CH, C2′, C6′), 129.1 (2CH, C3′, C5′), 129.2 (C, C15b), 131.1 (C, C15a), 131.4 (C, C4a), 136.2 (C, C4′), 141.0 (C, C1′), 148.1 (C, C6a), 158.5 (C, C8a), 159.0 (C, C7a), 162.3 (C, C14). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22N2O2: C, 79.17; H, 5.62; N, 7.10. Found: C, 79.12; H, 5.65; N, 7.14.
16-(4’-Methylphenyl)-10,11,12,13-tetrahydro-16H-benzo[5,6]chromeno[2′,3′,4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-15(9H)-one (3Cc): Yield 86%; mp ˃ 260 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1659, 1589 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.82–2.04 (m, H9, H10, H11, H12, 8H), 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3, 3H), 4.05–4.11 (m, H13, 2H), 5.86 (s, H16, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, H3′, H5′, 2H), 7.28–7.48 (m, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, 5H), 7.80 (d, J = 9 Hz, H2′,H6′, 2H), 7.98 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 21.0 (CH, C11), 24.5 (CH3), 27.2 (CH2, C10), 29.6 (CH, C12), 36.5 (CH, C9), 37.3 (CH, C16), 43.1 (CH, C13), 101.3 (C, C15a), 116.9 (CH, C6), 117.5 (CH, C1), 123.0 (CH, C3), 123.7 (CH, C2), 124.8 (CH, C4), 127.0 (CH, C5), 128.4 (2CH, C2′, C6′), 129.0 (2CH, C3′, C5′), 129.1 (C, C16b), 131.1 (C, C16a), 131.5 (C, C4a), 136.1 (C, C4′), 141.0 (C, C1′), 148.1 (C, C6a), 159.3 (C, C8a), 162.1 (C, C7a), 163.3 (C, C15). Anal. Calcd. for C27H24N2O2: C, 79.39; H, 5.92; N, 6.86. Found: C, 79.41; H, 5.90; N, 6.89.
7-Phenyl-11,12-dihydro-7H-benzo[7,8]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-8(10H)-one (4Aa): Yield 79%; mp ˃ 260 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1666, 1577 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 2.41–2.51 (m, 2H, H11), 3.07–3.17 (m, H12, 2H), 3.71–3.94 (m, H10, 2H), 5.31 (s, H7, 1H), 6.93–7.81 (m, H4, H2, H3, H5, H2′, H5′, H3′, H6′, H4′, H6, 10 H), 8.49 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 19.0 (CH2, C11), 32.5 (CH2, C12), 39.9 (CH, C7), 47.0 (CH2, C10), 100.2 (C, C7a), 118.6 (CH, C5), 121.6 (CH, C1), 123.8 (C, C6a), 124.7 (CH, C3), 126.4 (CH, C6), 126.5 (C, C14b), 126.8 (CH, C4′), 127.5 (CH, C2), 128.4 (CH, C4), 128.5 (2CH, C3′, C5′), 129.1 (2CH, C2′, C6′), 144.6 (C, C1′), 144.9 (C, C14a), 161.2 (C, C12a), 161.9 (C, C13a), 162.8 (C, C8). Anal. Calcd. for C24H18N2O2: C, 78.67; H, 4.95; N, 7.65. Found: C, 78.63; H, 4.97; N, 7.69.
7-Phenyl-10,11,12,13-tetrahydro-7H-benzo[7,8]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrido[1,2-a]pyrimidin-8-one (4Ab): Yield 90%; mp 259 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1667, 1572 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.92–1.94 (m, H10, 2H), 2.99–3.03 (m, H13, 2H), 3.88–3.91 (m, H11, H12, 4H), 5.33 (s, H7, 1H), 7.14–7.62 (m, H2, H3, H5, H2′, H5′, H3′, H6′, H4′, H6, 9H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H4, 1H), 8.51 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 18.6 (CH2, C12), 21.3 (CH2, C11), 39.6 (CH, C7), 42.3 (CH2, C10), 45.2 (CH2, C13), 99.9 (C, C7a), 118.2 (CH, C5), 121.2 (CH, C1), 123.4 (C, C6a), 124.0 (CH, C3), 125.8 (CH, C6), 126.0 (C, C15b), 126.1 (CH, C4′), 126.2 (CH, C2), 127.0 (CH, C4), 127.9 (2CH, C2′, C6′), 128.1 (2CH, C3′, C5′), 132.7 (C, C4a), 144.1 (C, C1′), 144.5 (C, C15a), 158.2 (C, C13a), 162.0 (C, C14a), 177.3 (C, C8). Anal. Calcd. for C25H20N2O2: C, 78.93; H, 5.30; N, 7.36. Found: C, 78.97; H, 5.27; N, 7.32.
7-Phenyl-11,12,13,14-tetrahydro-7H-benzo[7,8]chromeno[2′,3′,4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-8(10H)-one (4Ac): Yield 87%; mp 228 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1659, 1589 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.76–1.87 (m, H14,H13, H11, H12, 8H), 3.02–3.04 (m, H10, 2H), 5.34 (s, 1H, H7, 1H), 7.14–7.62 (m, H2, H3, H5, H2′, H5′, H3′, H6′, H4′, H6, 9H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H4, 1H), 8.51 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 27.3 (CH, C13), 29.6 (CH2,C12), 30.5 (CH2, C11), 37.3 (CH2,C14), 40.4 (CH,C7), 43.0 (CH2,C10), 100.6 (C, C7a), 118.7 (CH, C5), 121.7 (CH, C1), 123.8 (C, C6a), 124.5 (CH, C3), 126.3 (CH, C6), 126.5 (C, C16b), 126.6 (CH, C4′), 126.7 (CH, C2), 127.5 (CH, C4), 128.4 (2CH, C3′, C5′), 128.5 (2CH, C2′, C6′), 133.2 (C, C4a), 144.5(C, C1′), 145.0 (C, C16a), 159.8 (C, C14a), 162.2 (C, C15a), 163.6 (C, C8). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22N2O2: C, 79.17; H, 5.62; N, 7.10. Found: C, 79.12; H, 5.64; N, 7.15.
7-(3′-Methoxyphenyl)-11,12-dihydro-7H-benzo[7,8]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-8(10H)-one (4Ba): Yield 81%; mp 224 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1663, 1577 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 2.22–2.27 (m, H11, 2H), 3.18–3.20 (m, H12, 2H), 3.74 (s, OCH3, 3H), 4.09–4.16 (m, H10, 2H), 5.36 (s, H7, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H6, 1H), 6.91–7.60 (m, H2, H3, H5, H2′, H5′, H6′, H4′, 7H), 7.81 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H4, 1H), 8.49 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 19.1 (CH, C11), 32.5 (CH, C12), 39.9 (CH, C7), 47.0 (CH, C10), 55.1 (OCH3), 100.7 (C, C7a), 111.9 (CH, C4′), 114.1 (CH, C2′), 118.4 (CH, C5), 120.9 (CH, C6′), 121.6 (C, C6a), 123.8 (CH, C1), 124.7 (C, C14b), 126.4 (CH, C3), 126.6 (2CH, C2, C6), 127.5 (CH, C4), 129.3 (CH, C5′), 133.3 (C, C4a), 144.5 (C, C1′), 146.5 (C, C14a), 159.6 (C, C12a), 161.1 (C, C13a), 161.8 (C, C8), 162.8 (C, C3′). Anal. Calcd. for C25H20N2O3: C, 75.74; H, 5.09; N, 7.07. Found: C, 75.72; H, 5.11; N, 7.12.
7-(3′-Methoxyphenyl)-10,11,12,13-tetrahydro-7H-benzo[7,8]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrido[1,2-a]pyrimidin-8-one (4Bb): Yield 90%; mp 238 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1661, 1572 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3)1.89–1.94 (m, 4H, H11, H12, 4H), 2.88–2.95 (m, H13, 2H), 3.71 (s, OCH3, 3H), 3.87–3.89 (m, H10, 2H), 5.31 (s, H7, 1H), 6.69 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H6, 1H), 6.89–7.59 (m, H2, H3, H5, H2′, H5′, H6′, H4′, 7H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H4, 1H), 8.48 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 18.6 (CH, C12), 21.3 (CH, C11), 31.1 (CH,C13), 39.6 (CH, C7), 42.4 (CH, C10), 54.6 (OCH3), 99.7 (C, C7a), 111.3 (CH, C4′), 114.1 (CH, C2′), 118.1 (CH, C5), 120.5 (CH, C6′), 121.2 (C, C6a), 123.4 (CH, C1), 124.0 (C, C15b), 125.8 (CH, C3), 126.0 (2CH, C2, C6), 127.0 (CH, C4), 128.8 (CH, C5′), 132.7 (C, C4a), 143.9 (C, C1′), 146.2 (C, C15a), 158.2 (C, C13a), 159.1 (C, C14a), 159.4 (C, C8), 162.0 (C, C3′). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22N2O3: C, 76.08; H, 5.40; N, 6.82. Found: C, 76.12; H, 5.37; N, 6.79.
7-(3′-Methoxyphenyl)-11,12,13,14-tetrahydro-7H-benzo[7,8]chromeno[2′,3′,4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-8(10H)-one (4Bc): Yield 79%; mp 215 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1662, 1577 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.80–2.11 (m, H14, H11, H13, H12, 8H), 3.10–3.17 (m, H10, 2H), 4.10 (s, OCH3, 3H), 5.29 (s, H7, 1H), 6.70 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H6, 1H), 6.89–7.62 (m, H2, H3, H5, H2′, H5′, H6′, H4′, 7H), 7.79 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H4, 1H), 8.51 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 24.0 (CH, C12), 26.7 (CH, C13), 29.1 (CH, C11), 36.4 (CH, C14), 39.8(CH, C7), 42.6 (CH, C10), 54.6 (OCH3), 100.0 (C, C7a), 111.4 (CH, C4′), 114.1 (CH, C2′), 118.0 (CH, C5), 120.5 (CH, C6′), 121.2 (C, C6a), 123.3 (CH, C1), 124.1 (C, C16b), 125.2 (CH, C3), 125.9 (2CH, C2,C6), 126.1 (CH, C4), 126.9 (CH, C5′), 128.8 (C, C4a), 132.7 (C, C1′), 143.8 (C, C16a), 146.0 (C, C14a), 159.1 (C, C15a), 161.4 (C, C8), 163.3 (C, C3′). Anal. Calcd. for C27H24N2O3: C, 76.40; H, 5.70; N, 6.60. Found: C, 76.37; H, 5.72; N, 6.63.
7-(4′-Methylphenyl)-11,12-dihydro-7H-benzo[7,8]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-8(10H)-one (4Ca): Yield 78%; mp ˃ 260 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1661, 1589 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 2.14–2.21 (m, H11, 2H), 2.27 (s, CH3, 3H), 3.11–3.22 (m,H12, 2H), 4.05–4.12 (m, H10, 2H), 5.35 (s, H7, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H3′, H5′, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, H6, 1H), 7.25 (d, J= 7.8 Hz, H2′, H6′, 2H), 7.51–7.62 (m, H2, H3, H5, 3H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H4, 1H) 8.49 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 19.11 (CH2, C11), 21.0 (CH3), 32.5 (CH2, C12), 39.5 (CH, C7), 46.9 (CH2, C10), 101.0 (C, C7a), 118.7 (CH, C5), 121.5 (CH, C1), 124.6 (C, C6a), 126.5 (CH, C3), 126.6 (CH, C6), 127.1 (CH, C2), 127.5 (C, C14b), 128.4 (CH, C4), 129.1 (2CH, C2′, C6′), 129.8 (2CH, C3′, C5′), 133.2 (C, C4a), 136.4 (C, C4′), 142.1 (C, C1′), 144.5 (C, C14a), 161.2 (C, C12a), 161.8 (C, C13a), 162.7 (C, C8). Anal. Calcd. for C25H20N2O2: C, 78.93; H, 5.30; N, 7.36. Found: C, 78.97; H, 5.27; N, 7.38.
7-(4′-Methylphenyl)-10,11,12,13-tetrahydro-7H-benzo[7,8]chromeno[2,3-d]pyrido[1,2-a]pyrimidin-8-one (4Cb): Yield 86%; mp 224 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1667, 1571 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.92–1.99 (m, H11,H12, 4H), 2.27 (s, CH3, 3H), 3.02–3.10 (m, H13, 2H), 3.90–3.96 (m, H10, 2H), 5.29 (s, H7, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H3′, H5′, 2H), 7.14 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H6, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H2′, H6′, 2H), 7.52–7.63 (m, H2, H3, H5, 3H), 7.79 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H4, 1H), 8.52 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 18.9 (CH2, C12), 21.0 (CH3), 21.7 (CH2, C11), 31.2 (CH2, C13), 39.6 (CH, C7), 42.9 (CH2, C10), 100.6 (C, C7a), 118.7 (CH, C5), 123 (CH, C1), 124.7 (C, C6a), 126.5 (2CH, C3, C6), 127.0 (CH, C2), 127.5 (C, C15b), 127.8 (CH, C4), 128.4 (2CH, C2′, C6′), 129.1 (2CH, C3′, C5′), 133.2 (C, C4a), 136.4 (C, C4′), 141.9 (C, C1′), 144.3 (C, C15a), 158.9 (C, C13a), 159.1 (C, C14a), 162.1 (C, C8). Anal. Calcd. for C26H22N2O2: C, 79.17; H, 5.62; N, 7.10. Found: C, 79.21; H, 5.59; N, 7.14.
17-(4′-Methylphenyl)-11,12,13,14-tetrahydro-7H-benzo[7,8]chromeno[2′,3′,4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-8(10H)-one (4Cc): Yield 70%; mp > 260 °C; IR (KBr) νmax 1664, 1593 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) 1.74–1.81 (m, H12, 2H), 1.85–1.96 (m, H11, H13, H14, 6H), 2.27 (s, CH3, 3H), 3.02–3.11 (m, H10, 2H), 5.30 (s, H7, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H3′, H5, 2H′), 7.14 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H6, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H2′, H6′, 2H), 7.50–7.62 (m, H2, H3, H5, 3H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H4, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 8 Hz, H1, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) 21.0 (CH3), 24.6 (CH2, C12), 27.3 (CH2, C13), 29.6 (CH2,C11), 37.3 (CH2, C14), 40.0 (CH, C7), 43.0 (CH2, C10), 100.7 (C, C7a), 118.9 (CH, C5), 121.7 (CH, C1), 123.9 (C, C6a), 124.5 (CH, C3), 126.6 (CH, C6), 127.2 (C, C16b), 127.8 (CH, C4), 128.4 (2CH, C2′, C6′), 129.1 (2CH, C3′,C5′), 133.2 (C,C4a), 136.3 (C, C4′), 142.2 (C, C1′), 144.4 (C, C16a), 159.7 (C, C14a), 162.1 (C, C15a), 163.5 (C, C8). Anal. Calcd. For C27H24N2O2: C, 79.39; H, 5.92; N, 6.86. Found: C, 79.35; H, 5.94; N, 6.89.

3.2. Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity Assay

The antioxidant power of BCPOs was determined following the ORAC-FL method using fluorescein as the fluorescent probe [20,21]. (±)-6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), fluorescein (FL) and AAPH were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). A Varioskan Flash plate reader with built-in injectors (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used. The final volume reaction mixture was 200 µL and the reaction was carried out at 37 °C in 75 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The tested compounds and Trolox standard were dissolved in DMSO to 10 mM and further diluted in phosphate buffer. The final concentrations were 0.1–1 µM for the tested compounds and 1–8 µM for Trolox standard. The blank was composed of 120 µL of FL, 60 µL of AAPH and 20 µL of phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4) and was added in each assay. The antioxidant (20 µL) and fluorescein (FL, 120 µL, final concentration of 70 nM) were incubated in a black 96-well microplate Nunc, purchazed from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ecublens, Switzerland) for 15 min at 37 °C. Then, AAPH, 60 µL, final concentration of 12 mM) solution was added quickly using the built-in injector. The fluorescence decay was measured every minute for 60 min at λex = 485 nm and λem = 535 nm. The microplate was automatically shaken prior to each reading. All the experiments were made in triplicate and at least three different assays were performed for each sample. Antioxidant curves (fluorescence versus time) were first normalized to the curve of the blank (without antioxidant) and then, the area under the fluorescence decay curve (AUC) was calculated as:
AUC = 1 + sum (fi/f0)
where f0 is the initial fluorescence reading at 0 min and fi is the fluorescence value at time i. The net AUC corresponding to the sample was calculated as follows:
Net AUC = AUCantioxidant − AUCblank
Using MS Excel software, regression equations were extrapolated by plotting the net AUC against the antioxidant concentration. The ORAC values were then obtained by dividing the slope of the latter curve between the slope of the Trolox curve obtained in the same assay. Final ORAC values were expressed as Trolox equivalents. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.

3.3. Inhibition of EeAChE and EqBuChE

Assessment of the inhibitory power of BCPOs was performed following the spectrophotometric method of Ellman [23] using purified AChE from Electrophorus electricus (Type V-S, Sigma-Aldrich) or BuChE from horse serum (lyophilized powder, Sigma-Aldrich). Enzymes were first dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) and then aliquoted in small vials for easy handling. Compounds stock solutions in DMSO (10 mM) were diluted when necessary with DMSO to prepare appropriate dilutions of each compound. The assay was performed in a final volume of 3 mL of a 0.1 M phosphate-buffered solution at pH 8.0, containing 5,5′-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB, 2625 µL, 0.35 mM, final concentration), EeAChE (29 µL, 0.035 U/mL final concentration) or eqBuChE (60 µL, 0.05 U/mL final concentration) tested compound (3 µL, different concentrations) and 1% (w/v) Bovine Albumin Serum phosphate-buffered (pH 8.0) solution (BSA, 40 µL). The inhibition in comparison to control without compound was determined by pre-incubating this blend at room temperature with each compound at nine different concentrations for 10 min. Then, acetylthiocholine iodide (105 µL, 0.35 mM, final concentration) or butyrylthiocholine iodide (150 µL, 0.5 mM final concentration) was added and incubated for another 15 min at rt. The absorbances were measured at 412 nm in a plate reader (iEMS Reader MF, Labsystems, Thermo fisher scientific Ecublens, Switzerland). The percentage of inhibition of the enzyme was calculated in comparison with the blank sample (100% enzyme activity). Calculation of IC50 values was performed with GraphPad Prism 5. Each concentration was measured in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.

3.4. Inhibition of hAChE

Ellman’s assay was followed to evaluate the anticholinesterasic potency of BCPOs [23] using human recombinant AChE (Sigma-Aldrich). 500 U of hAChE were dissolved in 1 mL of a gelatine solution (1% in water) and diluted with demineralized water to give a stock solution of 5 U/mL. The 12.5 mM 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB, Ellman’s reagent) solution containing 0.15% (w/v) sodium carbonate and 18.75 mM acetylthiocholine (ATC) iodide solution were prepared in demineralized water. All assays were performed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 8.0. The assayed compounds or blank (water) (25 µL) were incubated with the enzyme (20 µL) for 5 min at 37 °C in 765 µL of phosphate buffer prior to start the reaction. Then, 20 µL of DTNB and 20 µL of ATC were added. After 5 min, absorbances were measured at 412 nm with an EnSpire Multimode microplate reader (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The percentage of inhibition of the enzyme was calculated by comparison with a blank sample (100% enzyme activity). IC50 values were determined with GraphPad Prism 5. Each concentration was measured in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.

3.5. Kinetic Characterization of hAChE Inhibition

To estimate the type of inhibition of hAChE, we performed the same experimental protocol as reported for hAChE inhibition. Different concentrations of the substrate ATC (0.067–0.5 mM) were used to create Lineweaver-Burk plots by plotting the inverse initial velocity (1/V) as a function of the inverse of the substrate concentration (1/[S]). The stock solution of ATC (0.5 mM in a well) was prepared in demineralized water and diluted before use to obtain 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1 and 0.067 mM substrate solutions. The double reciprocal plots were analysed by a weighted least square procedure that assumed the variance of V to be constant. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. To confirm the mode of inhibition, Cornish-Bowden plots were obtained by plotting S/V (substrate/velocity ratio) versus the inhibitor concentration [23,28]. Data analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 5. Inhibition constant (Ki) values were determined by re-plotting slopes from the Lineweaver-Burk plot versus the inhibitor concentration where Ki was determined as the intersect of the line with the x-axis [29].

3.6. In vitro Toxicity of Compounds 3Ab, 3Bb, 3Cb and 3Ba in HepG2 Cells

HepG2 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. The cells were cultured in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (Ozyme, France) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1X non-essential amino acids, 100 units/mL penicillin and 10 mg/mL streptomycin (Dutscher, Brumath, France). Cultures were kept under a CO2/air (5%/95%) humidified atmosphere at 37 °C. Prior to the experiment, cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates at a density of 0.1 × 106 cells per well. After 24 h of incubation, the culture medium was refreshed and 100 µL of the test compounds or DMSO (0.1%) were added. Compounds were tested at 4 concentrations (1–30 µM) in triplicate. For the MTT assay [25], after 24 h of treatment, cells were incubated with 50 µL MTT (0.5 mg/mL, Sigma Aldrich, city, France) at 37 °C for 2 h. Plates were centrifuged, MTT was removed and 100 µL DMSO was distributed per well. The absorbance at 570 nm was measured using microplate reader (brand). Cell viability was expressed as percentage of cell viability compared to controls (DMSO, 0.1%).

3.7. PAMPA Assay

Penetration across the BBB is an essential property for compounds targeting the CNS. In order to predict passive blood-brain penetration of novel compounds modification of the PAMPA has been used based on reported protocol [26,27]. The filter membrane of the donor plate was coated with PBL (Polar Brain Lipid, Avanti, AL, USA) in dodecane (4 µL of 20 mg/mL PBL in dodecane) and the acceptor well was filled with 300 µL of PBS pH 7.4 buffer (VD). Tested compounds were dissolved first in DMSO and that diluted with PBS pH 7.4 to reach the final concentration 100 µM in the donor well. Concentration of DMSO did not exceed 0.5% (v/v) in the donor solution. 300 µL of the donor solution was added to the donor wells (VA) and the donor filter plate was carefully put on the acceptor plate so that coated membrane was “in touch” with both donor solution and acceptor buffer. Test compound diffused from the donor well through the lipid membrane (Area = 0.28 cm2) to the acceptor well. The concentration of the drug in both donor and the acceptor wells was assessed after 3, 4, 5 and 6 h of incubation in quadruplicate using the UV plate reader Synergy HT (Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA) at the maximum absorption wavelength of each compound. Concentration of the compounds was calculated from the standard curve and expressed as the permeability (Pe) according the Equation (1) [30,31]:
log P e = log   { C × l n ( 1 [ d r u g ] a c c e p t o r [ d r u g ] e q u i l i b r i u m ) }   w h e r e   C =   ( V D × V A ( V D + V A ) × A r e a × t i m e )

4. Conclusions

We have synthesized and evaluated eighteen new benzochromenopyrimidinones as promising multitarget-directed ligands with marked selectivity for AChE and good antioxidant activity. Particularly, compounds 3Ab, 3Bb, 3Cb and 3Ba were found to be non-hepatotoxic and moderate hAChEIs. Among them, although compound 3Bb showed a Pe value in an uncertain interval and consequently, a compromised permeability, this benzochromenopyrimidinone is a micromolar mixed-type hAChE inhibitor (IC50 = 1.28 μM) and a potent antioxidant (4.7 TE). To sum up, this small library of benzochromenopyrimidinones constitutes an additional step in our laboratory towards the search for lead compounds with polypharmacological properties as potential new anti-AD agents.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/21/5/634/s1.

Acknowledgments

JMC thanks Government of Spain for support (SAF2016-65586-R), JJ and OS thank MH CZ- DRO (UHHK 00179906).

Author Contributions

Y.D. did the synthesis; O.M.B.-A. evaluated the inhibition potency on the cholinesterases; M.B. carried out the antioxidant power analysis of the hybrids and corrected the manuscript. D.K. performed the Aβ test and corrected the manuscript. A.B. did the hepatotoxicity study, H.M. designed the HepG2 test and analyzed the results. J.G. performed the hAChE and the kinetic study. B.M. supervised the hAChE assay, kinetic study and corrected the manuscript. S.G. supervised the Aβ test and corrected the manuscript. F.C. conceived the project and supervised the synthesis. M.C. and J.M.-C. corrected the manuscript. J.J. and O.S. did the PAMPA assay. L.I. supervised and coordinated the pharmacological studies in Besançon (France), wrote and corrected the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Alzheimer Report 2015. Available online: http://www.worldalzreport2015.org/ (accessed on 3 February 2016).
  2. Liu, L.; Luo, S.; Zeng, L.; Wang, W.; Yuan, L.; Jian, X. Degenerative alterations in noradrenergic neurons of the locus coeruleus in Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2013, 8, 2249–2255. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Mesulam, M.-M. Cholinergic circuitry of the human nucleus basalis and its fate in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Comp. Neurol. 2013, 521, 4124–4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zarow, C.; Lyness, S.A.; Mortimer, J.A.; Chui, H.C. Neuronal loss is greater in the locus coeruleus than nucleus basalis and substantia nigra in alzheimer and parkinson diseases. Arch. Neurol. 2003, 60, 337–341. [Google Scholar]
  5. Praticò, D.; Sung, S. Lipid peroxidation and oxidative imbalance: Early functional events in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. JAD 2004, 6, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Yan, M.H.; Wang, X.; Zhu, X. Mitochondrial defects and oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 62, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Greenough, M.A.; Camakaris, J.; Bush, A.I. Metal dyshomeostasis and oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem. Int. 2013, 62, 540–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Candore, G.; Bulati, M.; Caruso, C.; Castiglia, L.; Colonna-Romano, G.; di Bona, D.; Duro, G.; Lio, D.; Matranga, D.; Pellicanò, M.; et al. Inflammation, cytokines, immune response, apolipoprotein E, cholesterol, and oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease: Therapeutic implications. Rejuvenation Res. 2010, 13, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Bond, M.; Rogers, G.; Peters, J.; Anderson, R.; Hoyle, M.; Miners, A.; Moxham, T.; Davis, S.; Thokala, P.; Wailoo, A.; et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (review of Technology Appraisal No. 111): A systematic review and economic model. Health Technol. Assess. 2012, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wilkinson, D.; Wirth, Y.; Goebel, C. Memantine in Patients with Moderate to Severe Alzheimer’s Disease: Meta-Analyses Using Realistic Definitions of Response. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2014, 37, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Watkins, P.B.; Zimmerman, H.J.; Knapp, M.J.; Gracon, S.I.; Lewis, K.W. Hepatotoxic effects of tacrine administration in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. JAMA 1994, 271, 992–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bolea, I.; Juárez-Jiménez, J.; de los Rı́os, C.; Chioua, M.; Pouplana, R.; Luque, F.J.; Unzeta, M.; Marco-Contelles, J.; Samadi, A. Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and Molecular Modeling of Donepezil and N-[(5-(Benzyloxy)-1-methyl-1H-indol-2-yl)methyl]-N-methylprop-2-yn-1-amine Hybrids as New Multipotent Cholinesterase/Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 8251–8270. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Samadi, A.; Chioua, M.; Bolea, I.; de los Ríos, C.; Iriepa, I.; Moraleda, I.; Bastida, A.; Esteban, G.; Unzeta, M.; Gálvez, E.; et al. Synthesis, biological assessment and molecular modeling of new multipotent MAO and cholinesterase inhibitors as potential drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 4665–4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ismaili, L.; Refouvelet, B.; Benchekroun, M.; Brogi, S.; Brindisi, M.; Gemma, S.; Campiani, G.; Filipic, S.; Agbaba, D.; Esteban, G.; et al. Multitarget compounds bearing tacrine- and donepezil-like structural and functional motifs for the potential treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Decker, M. Novel inhibitors of acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterase derived from the alkaloids dehydroevodiamine and rutaecarpine. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 40, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Huang, G.; Kling, B.; Darras, F.H.; Heilmann, J.; Decker, M. Identification of a neuroprotective and selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor derived from the natural alkaloid evodiamine. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 81, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Darras, F.H.; Wehle, S.; Huang, G.; Sotriffer, C.A.; Decker, M. Amine substitution of quinazolinones leads to selective nanomolar AChE inhibitors with “inverted” binding mode. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 4867–4881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Benchekroun, M.; Ismaili, L.; Pudlo, M.; Luzet, V.; Gharbi, T.; Refouvelet, B.; Marco-Contelles, J. Donepezil–ferulic acid hybrids as anti-Alzheimer drugs. Future Med. Chem. 2015, 7, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Benchekroun, M.; Bartolini, M.; Egea, J.; Romero, A.; Soriano, E.; Pudlo, M.; Luzet, V.; Andrisano, V.; Jimeno, M.-L.; López, M.G.; et al. Novel Tacrine-Grafted Ugi Adducts as Multipotent Anti-Alzheimer Drugs: A Synthetic Renewal in Tacrine-Ferulic Acid Hybrids. ChemMedChem 2015, 10, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ou, B.; Hampsch-Woodill, M.; Prior, R.L. Development and validation of an improved oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay using fluorescein as the fluorescent probe. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 4619–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dávalos, A.; Gómez-Cordovés, C.; Bartolomé, B. Extending Applicability of the Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC−Fluorescein) Assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fang, L.; Kraus, B.; Lehmann, J.; Heilmann, J.; Zhang, Y.; Decker, M. Design and synthesis of tacrine–ferulic acid hybrids as multi-potent anti-Alzheimer drug candidates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2905–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V.; Feather-Stone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Decker, M.; Krauth, F.; Lehmann, J. Novel tricyclic quinazolinimines and related tetracyclic nitrogen bridgehead compounds as cholinesterase inhibitors with selectivity towards butyrylcholinesterase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 1966–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Esquivias-Pérez, M.; Maalej, E.; Romero, A.; Chabchoub, F.; Samadi, A.; Marco-Contelles, J.; Oset-Gasque, M.J. Nontoxic and neuroprotective β-naphthotacrines for Alzheimer’s disease. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2013, 26, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Di, L.; Kerns, E.H.; Fan, K.; McConnell, O.J.; Carter, G.T. High throughput artificial membrane permeability assay for blood–brain barrier. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lemes, L.F.N.; de Andrade Ramos, G.; de Oliveira, A.S.; da Silva, F.M.R.; de Castro Couto, G.; da Silva Boni, M.; Guimarães, M.J.R.; Souza, I.N.O.; Bartolini, M.; et al. Cardanol-derived AChE inhibitors: Towards the development of dual binding derivatives for Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 108, 687–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cornish-Bowden, A. A Simple graphical method for determining the inhibition constants of mixed, uncompetitive and non-competitive inhibitors (Short Communication). Biochem. J. 1974, 137, 143–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Silverman, R.B. The Organic Chemistry of Enzyme-catalyzed Reactions; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sugano, K.; Hamada, H.; Machida, M.; Ushio, H. High Throughput Prediction of Oral Absorption: Improvement of the Composition of the Lipid Solution Used in Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeation Assay. J. Biomol. Screen. 2001, 6, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wohnsland, F.; Faller, B. High-Throughput Permeability pH Profile and High-Throughput Alkane/Water log P with Artificial Membranes. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 3A–C and 4A–C are available from the authors.
Figure 1. The quinazolinone alkaloids IaIV and designed BCPOs V and VI.
Figure 1. The quinazolinone alkaloids IaIV and designed BCPOs V and VI.
Molecules 21 00634 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of BCPOs 3 and 4.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of BCPOs 3 and 4.
Molecules 21 00634 sch001
Figure 2. Lineweaver–Burk double reciprocal plot demonstrating mixed-type of hAChE inhibition by compound 3Bb. S = acetylthiocholine; V = initial velocity rate.
Figure 2. Lineweaver–Burk double reciprocal plot demonstrating mixed-type of hAChE inhibition by compound 3Bb. S = acetylthiocholine; V = initial velocity rate.
Molecules 21 00634 g002
Table 1. Inhibitions of EeAChE, eqBuChE, hAChE and ORAC-FL values for compounds 3 and 4. Molecules 21 00634 i001
Table 1. Inhibitions of EeAChE, eqBuChE, hAChE and ORAC-FL values for compounds 3 and 4. Molecules 21 00634 i001
BCPOEeAChE 1 (IC50, nM)eqBuChE (% Inhibition at 10 µM)hAChE (IC50, nM)ORAC 2
3Aa518.4 ± 87.912.1 ± 1.4n.d.2.6 ± 0.1
3Ab55.5 ± 7.131.2 ± 1.83657 ± 592.3 ± 0.3
3Ac300.8 ± 6.528.4 ± 7.3n.d.2.5 ± 0.2
3Ba60.7 ± 4.551.0 ± 4.01527 ± 253.4 ± 0.2
3Bb30.5 ± 2.843.0 ± 1.91279 ± 324.7 ± 0.2
3Bc107.5 ± 7.2n.a.n.d.3.5 ± 0.3
3Ca111.9 ± 21.717.4 ± 1.8n.d.2.7 ± 0.3
3Cb55.9 ± 12.719.0 ± 2.01591 ± 243.9 ± 0.3
3Cc166.6 ± 7.8n.a.n.d.3.1 ± 0.2
4Aa317.8 ± 26.023.1 ± 3.1n.d.2.1 ± 0.1
4Ab383.5 ± 19.454.6 ± 1.8n.d.2.3 ± 0.2
4Ac290.5 ± 8.324.2 ± 3.1n.d.2.5 ± 0.1
4Ba326.7 ± 38.938.0 ± 1.6n.d.3.8 ± 0.1
4Bb153.2 ± 3.1n.a.n.d.3.7 ± 0.2
4Bc195.3 ± 6.231.1 ± 2.1n.d.3.4 ± 0.2
4Ca115.8 ± 6.226.8 ± 2.9n.d.3.2 ± 0.1
4Cb193.4 ± 18.724.4 ± 1.2n.d.2.9 ± 0.1
4Cc173.8 ± 5.9n.a.n.d.3.6 ± 0.2
Tacrine44.3 ± 1.5 [19]IC50 = 5.1 ± 0.2 nM [19]131 ± 20.2 ± 0.1 [22]
Ia82.5 M [24]IC50 = 25.1 [24]n.d.n.d.
Ib38.6 M [24]>500 [24]n.d.n.d.
Ic279 M [24]>500 [24]n.d.n.d.
II6.3 M [15]IC50 = 8.4 M [15]n.d.n.d.
Ferulic acidn.d.n.d.n.d.3.7 ± 0.1 [22]
1 IC50 values were obtained by nonlinear regression. Ee: electric eel, eq: serum horse, h: human. Each IC50 value is the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. 2 Data are expressed as Trolox equivalents and are shown as mean ± SD. n.a.: Not active (any inhibition was observed). n.d.: not determined.
Table 2. In vitro toxicity (% cell viability) of selected 3Ab, 3Bb, 3Cb and 3Ba and tacrine in HepG2 cells.
Table 2. In vitro toxicity (% cell viability) of selected 3Ab, 3Bb, 3Cb and 3Ba and tacrine in HepG2 cells.
BCPO1 µM3 µM10 µM30 µM100 µM300 µM1 mM
3Ab99.3 ± 4.095.3 ± 2.398.5 ± 2.591.5 ± 4.5100.8 ± 3.1110.5 ± 5.5110.4 ± 4.4
3Bb107.7 ± 2.4111.1 ± 8.7104.7 ± 4.2104.1 ± 5.0111.8 ± 2.3118.0 ± 7.3127.8 ± 5.0
3Cb105.8 ± 7.0102.9 ± 10.8110.2 ± 9.1112.7 ± 5.8103.1 ± 5.7113.0 ± 5.2110.2 ± 8.0
3Ba108.6 ± 2.0107.7 ± 4.8106.2 ± 3.599.2 ± 4.297.0 ± 5.4107.6 ± 2.8119.5 ± 6.8
Tacrine105.2 ± 4.6103.5 ± 8.797.0 ± 6.593.0 ± 2.795.2 ± 6.047.6 ± 5.6 ***13.9 ± 0.8 ***
Means ± SEM of triplicates from at least three different cultures. *** p < 0.001, as compared to the control cultures (one-way ANOVA).
Table 3. Prediction of BBB penetration of drugs expressed as Pe ± SEM (n = 6–8).
Table 3. Prediction of BBB penetration of drugs expressed as Pe ± SEM (n = 6–8).
CompoundBBB Penetration Estimation
Pe ± SEM (×10−6 cm s−1)CNS (+/−)
3Ab7.2 ± 0.6CNS (+)
3Bb3.6 ± 0.57CNS (+/−)
3CbND *
3Ba4.6 ± 0.77CNS (+)
Donepezil7.3 ± 0.9CNS (+)
Rivastigmine6.6 ± 0.5CNS (+)
Tacrine5.3 ± 0.19CNS (+)
Testosterone11.3 ± 1.6CNS (+)
Chlorpromazine5.6 ± 0.6CNS (+)
Hydrocortisone2.85 ± 0.1CNS (+/−)
Piroxicam2.2 ± 0.15CNS (+/−)
Theophyline1.07 ± 0.18CNS (−)
Atenolol1.02 ± 0.37CNS (−)
‘CNS (+)’ (high BBB permeability predicted); Pe (10−6 cm·s−1) > 4.0. ‘CNS (−) (low BBB permeability predicted); Pe (10−6 cm·s−1) < 2.0. ‘CNS (+/−) (BBB permeability uncertain); Pe (10−6 cm·s−1) from 4.0 to 2.0. * Not Determined due to a low solubility; CNS (+)= Molecules 21 00634 i002; CNS (+/−)= Molecules 21 00634 i003; CNS (−)= Molecules 21 00634 i004.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dgachi, Y.; Bautista-Aguilera, O.M.; Benchekroun, M.; Martin, H.; Bonet, A.; Knez, D.; Godyń, J.; Malawska, B.; Gobec, S.; Chioua, M.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Benzochromenopyrimidinones as Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Potent Antioxidant, Non-Hepatotoxic Agents for Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecules 2016, 21, 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050634

AMA Style

Dgachi Y, Bautista-Aguilera OM, Benchekroun M, Martin H, Bonet A, Knez D, Godyń J, Malawska B, Gobec S, Chioua M, et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Benzochromenopyrimidinones as Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Potent Antioxidant, Non-Hepatotoxic Agents for Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecules. 2016; 21(5):634. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dgachi, Youssef, Oscar M. Bautista-Aguilera, Mohamed Benchekroun, Hélène Martin, Alexandre Bonet, Damijan Knez, Justyna Godyń, Barbara Malawska, Stanislav Gobec, Mourad Chioua, and et al. 2016. "Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Benzochromenopyrimidinones as Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Potent Antioxidant, Non-Hepatotoxic Agents for Alzheimer’s Disease" Molecules 21, no. 5: 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050634

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop