Next Article in Journal
Crown Position and Rootstock Genotype Influence Leaf Stomatal Density in Macadamia sp.
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Origanum vulgare subsp. hirtum Essential Oil on Metabolite Profile of Solanum tuberosum 
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Comparison and Consumer’s Preference on Jam and Jelly from “Mastrantonio” Sweet Cherry Fruits †

1
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy
2
I Peccatucci di Mamma Andrea S.r.l., Via Caduti Dell’8 Luglio 1960 n. 4, 90124 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Foods—“Future Foods and Food Technologies for a Sustainable World”, 15–30 October 2021; Available online: https://foods2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 6(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10990
Published: 14 October 2021

Abstract

:
The Sicilian territory is characterized by many peculiarities of both an environmental and biological nature that result in unique features in the cherry growing along the slopes of volcano Etna. Particular attention is paid to the typical varieties of sweet cherry ‘Donnantonio’ or ‘Mastrantonio’ which, since 2011, is specifically included among those recognized in the disciplinary for the use of the “Ciliegia dell’Etna” DOP trademark. The fruit of this cultivar is well known and appreciated by consumers for its specific characteristics: medium-large size, dark red skin, and bright, sweet, crunchy, and very pleasant pulp. Moreover, they are an excellent source of many nutrients and phytochemicals, which contribute to a healthy diet. Jam and jelly were handcrafted produced from ‘Mastrantonio’ sweet cherry; agave syrup was used in both products, which has a much lower glycemic index than common sugar. Therefore, jam was divided in two batches. The first was kept as control (jam1) while to the second half of jam had locust bean gum (LBG) added to it as thickener (jam2). During jelly production, a part was cooked following the traditional recipe (jelly1) whereas, in the other part, an aliquot of lemon juice was added during cooking (jelly1). We decided to apply a discriminating sensory test, a paired-comparison preference test, an analytical method commonly used to identify if there are any perceptible differences between products. Randomized samples were evaluated by 30 judges, who indicated the best thickness between jams (α = 0.05; β = 0.3 pd = 40%) and the highest sweetness between jellies (α = 0.2; β = 0.1 pd = 40%); all participants were chosen among sweet cherry’s producer. Jam with the addition of LBG was statistically recognized as different and selected as the best choice for texture achieved, while no statistical difference was found between tested jellies. Results underlined how the LBG use, although still not very common in traditional recipes, is a good thickener as perceived by consumers, while for jelly, the test’s result highlighted how the aliquot of lemon juices added was not enough to induce a difference in consumers taste.

1. Introduction

Fruits and vegetables are often seasonal, and their shelf life, as well as their presence on the market, are often limited. Moreover, their economic value is also very different and related to their abundance. For these reasons, and to overcome both aspects, they can be processed to improve their quality and their economic value.
The Sicilian territory is characterized by many peculiarities of both an environmental and biological nature that result in unique features in the agronomical production along the slopes of volcano Etna. Particular attention is paid to the typical varieties of sweet cherry ‘Donnantonio’ or ‘Mastrantonio’ which, since 2011, is specifically included among those recognized in the disciplinary for the use of the “Ciliegia dell’Etna” DOP trademark. Fresh sweet cherry ‘Mastrantonio’ are on the market for a short period, usually from June to August. The fruit of this cultivar is well known and appreciated by consumers for its specific characteristics: medium-large size, dark red skin, and bright, sweet, crunchy, and very pleasant pulp. Moreover, they are an excellent source of many nutrients and phytochemicals, which contribute to a healthy diet.
Cooking jams, jellies, and marmalades using fruits, sugar, pectin, and edible acids is one of the oldest food preserving processes known to mankind, allowing fruit consumption in the off-season [1]. Fruit jams and jellies are very popular among consumers; they are appreciated for their sweetness, flavor, taste, texture, color, and aromatic profile. Usually in those productions, pectin or agar-agar are used as thickeners. The flour obtained from the industrial transformation of the carob seeds of locust bean gum (LBG), reported in the European list of foods additives as E 410, is used as a thickening and stabilizing agent in food preparations due to its ability to form viscous solutions and to stabilize emulsions and dispersion. Often, lemon juice is added to food preparations to slow down acidity (pH) and to control the microbial population, but also to improve the color, contributing to a clearer and more colorful product. Fruits are generally rich in bioactive compounds such as phenolics, flavonoids, carotenoids, vitamins, etc., which are heat-labile components. Some researchers studied how the loss of bioactive compounds during processing may be elevated or retarded by the product (jam/jelly) composition features, such as sugar, type and concentration of pectin, fruit and its cultivar, and pH [2].
This study was conducted to find a new opportunity to allocate a valuable by-product obtained from sweet cherry “Mastrantonio”, in order to determine the best jam recipe using LBG as thickener and identify the suitable amount of lemon juice to add to the jelly.

2. Materials and Methods

Locally grown sweet cherry “Mastrantonio” (Prunus avium L.) were collected directly from producers. Prior to processing, fruits were stored at ambient temperature. The ingredients used for jam and jelly production were: sweet cherry pulp, sweet cherry juice, agave syrup, lemon juice, pectin, and locust bean gum (LBG) in variable proportions.
Figure 1 shows general processing steps for jam and jelly production.
As reported in Figure 1, the difference between jam and jelly was the ingredients. In jam, we added pectin or locust bean gum (LBG) as thickener; in jelly, in part of the production we added an aliquot of lemon juice. The experimental design of jam and jelly variables are reported in Table 1.

Consumer Evaluation

Panelists were chosen from producers, staff, students, and visitors who attended the seminar titled “Sustainable innovation to improve the DOP “Ciliegia dell’Etna” organized by University of Catania and partners. They were selected based on their knowledge of sweet cherry fruits, as well as their regular consumption of jams and jellies. We decided to apply a discriminating sensory test, a paired-comparison preference test, an analytical method commonly used to identify if there are any perceptible differences between products [3]. Randomized samples were prepared organizing samples X and Y (jam) and A and B (jelly) in the corrected way to ensure that combination XY and YX (jam) as well as AB and BA appeared the same number of times and simultaneously; they were assigned casually among judges [4]. The panelists were each given a questionnaire and one plate; the latter was divided in four parts, reporting four numerical codes, one for each quarter. The upper half part was for jellies and lower half part was for jams. Panelists were also instructed to rinse their mouths with water between different samples. The questionnaire had two questions: (a) to write which sample had the highest sweetness between jellies; (b) to write which sample had the best thickness between jams. Everyone had to indicate a preference, even if not perceptible.
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS package version 11.0 (SPSS for window, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was accepted at p value less than 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

Results were elaborated calculating the amount of each preference expressed and were considered significant for the following one-way values [4].
Statistical values were recorded and analyzed as suggested by Pellegrini [4] and reported in Table 2.
Jam with the addition of LBG was statistically recognized as different and selected as the best choice for texture achieved (23 answers); LBG is confirmed as having high technological value. Results underlined how the LBG, although still not very common in traditional jam recipes where pectin and agar are often preferred for their lower cost, can be considered a good thickener, as perceived by consumers. The interest of the food industry in LBG is wide and proven by many studies; it is useful to know rheological properties of LBG and the potential applications in food technologies [5].
Between tested jellies, no statistical difference was found (19 answers); it is likely that not enough lemon juice was added to induce a difference in consumer taste.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, it is possible to state that locust bean gum (LBG, E 410) used as thickening agent in food preparations could be positively utilized in sweet cherry jam recipe, lending a good texture positively perceived by consumers. It is noteworthy to underline how each ingredient used in jelly preparation should be adopted in the correct amount to avoid a misuse of money and to generate an appreciation by consumers.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/Foods2021-10990/s1, Poster: Comparison and Consumer’s Preference on Jam and Jelly from “Mastrantonio” Sweet Cherry Fruits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M. and P.S.; methodology, V.R. and P.S.; formal analysis, F.C. and V.R.; resources, S.B.; data curation, F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, V.R.; writing—review and editing, V.R. and G.M.; project administration, S.B.; and funding acquisition, S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was a part of the project: “Innovazioni sostenibili per il miglioramento della DOP ‘Ciliegia dell’Etna’, action 16.1 PSR Sicilia 2014–2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Carmelo Spina as president of “Consorzio per la Tutela della Ciliegia dell’Etna DOP”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Figueroa, L.E.; Genovese, D.B. Fruit jellies enriched with dietary fibre: Development and characterization of a novel functional food product. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 111, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shinwari, K.J.; Rao, P.S. Stability of bioactive compounds in fruit jam and jelly during processing and storage: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 75, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. UNI EN ISO 5495.2016—Sensory Analysis—Methodology—Paired Comparison Test. Available online: http://store.uni.com/catalogo/uni-en-iso-5495-2016 (accessed on 14 March 2022).
  4. Pagliarini, E. Valutazione Sensoriale; Hoepli Milano: Milano, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rizzo, V.; Tomaselli, F.; Gentile, A.; La Malfa, S.; Maccarone, E. Rheological Properties and Sugar Composition of Locust Bean Gum from Different Carob Varieties (Ceratonia siliqua L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 7925–7930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. General processing steps for jam and jelly production.
Figure 1. General processing steps for jam and jelly production.
Blsf 06 00035 g001
Table 1. Ingredients used and codification of samples.
Table 1. Ingredients used and codification of samples.
Jam 1Jam 2Jelly 1Jelly 2
ThickenerpectinLBG *--
Acidifying ---Lemon juice
* LBG: locust bean gum.
Table 2. Statistical parameters.
Table 2. Statistical parameters.
JamJelly
α0.050.2
β0.30.1
pd40%40%
α = I species statistic error; β = II species statistic error; pd = judges’ proportion who distinguished between products.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rizzo, V.; Celano, F.; Sorci, P.; Barbagallo, S.; Muratore, G. Comparison and Consumer’s Preference on Jam and Jelly from “Mastrantonio” Sweet Cherry Fruits. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 6, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10990

AMA Style

Rizzo V, Celano F, Sorci P, Barbagallo S, Muratore G. Comparison and Consumer’s Preference on Jam and Jelly from “Mastrantonio” Sweet Cherry Fruits. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 6(1):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rizzo, Valeria, Francesca Celano, Pietro Sorci, Salvatore Barbagallo, and Giuseppe Muratore. 2021. "Comparison and Consumer’s Preference on Jam and Jelly from “Mastrantonio” Sweet Cherry Fruits" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 6, no. 1: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-10990

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop