Next Article in Journal
Antioxidants Were Efficient in Reducing Browning and Increasing the Shelf Life in Minimally Processed Arracacha (Arracacia xanthorrhiza Bancroft)
Previous Article in Journal
Raman Spectroscopy as a Useful Tool for Tentative Identification of Nutritional Ingredients and Distinction of Allium Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

LED Lighting in Vertical Farming Systems Enhances Bioactive Compounds and Productivity of Vegetables Crops †

by
Cinthia Nájera
1,2,*,
Victor M. Gallegos-Cedillo
3,4,
Margarita Ros
2 and
José Antonio Pascual
2
1
Department of Agronomy, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain
2
Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, CEBAS-CSIC, 30100 Murcia, Spain
3
Research and Innovation Vicerectorate, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain
4
Department of Agronomical Engineering, Technical University of Cartagena, 30203 Murcia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Horticulturae, 16–30 April 2022; Available online: https://iecho2022.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 16(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECHo2022-12514
Published: 15 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Horticulturae)

Abstract

:
One of the greatest challenges of modern agriculture is to produce more with less, to produce healthier, safer food under sustainable systems. This includes a focus on increasing the efficiency of finite resources such as water and nutrients and increasing the sustainable productivity of crops under innovative systems with LED lights on soilless cultures. The aim of this research was to perform a bibliometric analysis on the benefits of vertical farming production systems on the nutraceutical quality parameters of horticultural crops. Additionally, the main parameters used to evaluate the quality and productivity of crops were identified. The methodology and results were analysed over a period of 5 years using the different quality parameters of lighting-LED as the main light source. The main plant species studied were lettuce, cabbage, cucumber, and spinach. The results showed that use of 16 h light photoperiods increased nutritional compounds such as antioxidants, phenols, and total sugar concentration, but in general a moderately positive effect on plant growth and development was observed. The most used light intensities were between the range of 150 and 300 µmol m−2 s−1, and the specific spectrum-LED peaks between 450–495 nm (blue) and 620–700 nm (red). Therefore, the use of LED lights on vertical farming systems as an alternative to increase the nutritional parameters of horticultural plants is a viable option as, in a short period of time and without geographical differentiation, it contributes to the production of nutraceutical compounds. It also contributes to a reduction of natural resource use such as water, as one hundred percent of the research was carried out on crops that utilized hydroponic systems, which have the capacity to reuse water and nutrients.

1. Introduction

Trends in agriculture have been increasing in recent years, mainly due to the need to improve growing conditions with few natural resources [1]. In recent years, agriculture has faced major challenges (e.g., pollution caused by leachate from irrigation of crops and, in turn, the increasingly limited space available for production) [2]. The climate change crisis has become a threat to agricultural sustainability, with rising temperatures, droughts, and floods [3]. In addition, consumers are increasingly demanding healthier and more sustainable food. This is why farmers themselves have seen the need to make drastic changes in the way they produce look for solutions to make more efficient use of natural resources. However, concerns about food shortages are growing [4,5,6,7].
To cover all these external needs of the crop, alternatives must be sought that also cover the photosynthetic needs of the plants. Solar energy, therefore, is an indispensable tool to take into account for the growth, development, and reproduction of plants, not only because of the intensity of light it provides to crops, but also because of the spectral quality it emits [8]. Natural light conditions vary depending on geographical location, which is another constraint to having more sustainable vegetables because of the cost of importing food to certain places that are not able to have the ideal natural conditions to activate the plants’ photoreceptors.
Recently, a solution has been found to curb the constraints on the development of sustainable agriculture and food supply worldwide, irrespective of geographical location. This solution is the creation of indoor or vertical farming, which include technologies such as temperature control, light, and the automation of irrigation and supply of nutrient solutions [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. These systems always depend on artificial light (light intensity, photoperiod, and light quality), which controls the photosynthetic process, plant physiology, biochemistry, and morphology [4,9,10,11]. LED lighting has become allied to these systems, as they are energy efficient and can have a specific spectrum for each agricultural need. However, it has been shown that not only the development and growth of the plants is solved by this system, but also that the crops suffer changes, improvements, or damages that cause the increase or decrease of nutritional compounds in the crops [12,13]. Therefore, the aim of this research was to perform a bibliometric analysis on the benefits of vertical farming production systems on the nutraceutical quality parameters of horticultural crops. Additionally, the main parameters used to evaluate the quality and productivity of crops were identified.

2. Materials and Methods

The period between 2013–2022 was considered to search the Scopus database for articles of interest to be analysed, using Boolean operators (AND and OR) [14]. Quantitative analyses were performed for the keywords “vertical agriculture” and “led” by searching by “Article title, Abstract, and Keywords”, resulting in 64 articles and 476 keywords in total.
To visualize the most relevant research topics, a bibliometric map was made based on the co-occurrence of the resulting keywords, where author keywords and indexed keywords were considered, and greater than or equal to 5 frequency keywords (number of times a keyword appears in the selected publications) were established according to the criteria established by Chen et al. [15]. To identify the evolution of keywords, a visualization map was made using a methodology similar to the previous one. To eliminate repeated data, a thesaurus file with synonyms was constructed to increase the consistency of the main research topics [14]. These data were processed and analysed using VOSviewer® version 1.6.15 software (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands).
From the total number of articles obtained (n = 64), a random and representative sample (47 articles) was extracted and analysed in the Scopus database for the period 2018-2022. A quantitative, detailed, and meticulous analysis of the 47 articles was performed to collect the data of interest, such as plant species under study, the main goal of each study. In addition, the nutritional parameters, spectra, light intensity, photoperiod, and conclusions of each article were identified, described, and quantified.

3. Results

3.1. Crops

Table 1 shows the varieties used in the literature in vertical crops. It can be seen that lettuce is the most demanded for use in this type of cultivation (more than 20 different varieties). Therefore, lettuce is a crop for which there may be clearer data on its performance in vertical farming. This high demand for lettuce crops in vertical farming can be attributed to the fact that it is a species with short cycles, in which a quick response to its performance can be obtained, as well as the fact that it is an economically and agronomically viable crop [16,17,18].

3.2. Clustering

Figure 1 shows the visualization map of the main descriptors used as keywords in the publications analysed in this study. The elements were grouped into three different clusters, represented by colours on the map. Each cluster (colour) shows a set of closely related words belonging to the same field of research. Authors such as Chen et al. [15] performed a bibliometric study based on the analysis of keywords, size, and number of clusters, and have indicated differences between research lines.
The results show that the keywords most frequently visualized in the network are vertical agriculture, plant factory, light emitting diodes, artificial lighting, sustainability, and agriculture, which show that these are the main research topics in the studies due to their close relationship. In addition, within the study period, the map shows a line of research with 4 items (cluster 1; red) that includes studies related to vertical agriculture including terms such as sustainability, plant factory, light-emitting diode, artificial lighting, and agriculture.
Figure 2 shows the world distribution of research studies conducted by country in which the vertical farming has been used as a method of production and have also conducted nutritional research under this system. Studies conducted in China, South Korea, and Japan are the countries where more than 60% of the research on nutritional quality of vegetables grown in vertical farming.
These countries correspond to the countries with the highest socio-economic level and technological development in agriculture according to the FAO.

3.3. Nutritional Parameters

Among the main parameters, chlorophyll content was the main evaluated in than 20% of the article samples analysed in this study (Figure 3). In addition, 12% of the articles focused on the effect of LED lights on sugar content and 10% on the effect of nitrate content. Nitrate is highly correlated with chlorophyll content in plants. According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [49], nitrate is a source of carcinogenic nitrosamines via nitrites [8], which can seriously compromise human health; moreover, the consumption of nitrate-accumulating vegetables in children under 6 years of age is especially worrisome according to the European Food Safety Authority [50], as 75% of the nitrates consumed are supplied by vegetables [51].

3.4. Light and Spectral Parameters

The results showed that the most commonly used spectrum-LED peaks are between 450–495 nm (blue colour) (Figure 4A). In addition, this wavelength was considered an element essential element in all spectral combinations evaluated. On the other hand, blue spectrum peak has been shown to increase the content of antioxidants and total phenols; however, it also increases chlorophyll and nitrate. With respect to productivity, blue spectrum light is one of the best performing spectra for crop growth and development [52].
The intensity of reflected light is an element to take into account when research is concerned with analysing nutritional parameters and in plant production. Figure 4B shows that 40% of the researchers have considered intensities of 150 and 200 µmol m−2 s−1 for their experiments, which have given them clear and significant results.
The use of specific spectra fitting within the ranges of maximum photosynthetic efficiency significantly enhances the nutraceutical quality of a wide range of vegetable species. This review has gathered the reference values of light intensity for more than 25 species of agronomic interest. The recommended intensity light for vegetables crops is in the range of 150 and 200 µmol m−2 s−1.
The combined effect of LED lighting through vertical farming systems is an alternative to increase the nutritional parameters and productivity of vegetables crops and optimising the raw resource use, such as water and energy.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECHo2022-12514/s1.

Author Contributions

C.N., M.R. and J.A.P. conceived and designed the review; C.N. and V.M.G.-C. did the bibliographic research and analysed the data; C.N. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has received Margarita Salas postdoctoral external funding from the Ministry of Universities and the European Union-NextGenerationEU, pursuant to the regulatory Bases approved by Order UNI/551/2021, of 26 May, which grants the subsidies provided for in Royal Decree 289/2021, of 20 April, regulating the direct award of subsidies to Decree 289/2021, of April 20, regulating the direct awarding of subsidies to public universities for the public universities for the requalification of the Spanish university system.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in tables and figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, J.H.; Shibata, S.; Goto, E. Time-course of changes in photosynthesis and secondary metabolites in canola (brassica napus) under different UV-B irradiation levels in a plant factory with artificial light. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 786555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Noh, K.; Jeong, B.R. Increased carbon dioxide by occupants promotes growth of leafy vegetables grown in indoor cultivation system. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nguyen, T.K.L.; Cho, K.M.; Lee, H.Y.; Cho, D.Y.; Lee, G.O.; Jang, S.N.; Lee, Y.; Kim, D.; Son, K.-H. Effects of white LED lighting with specific shorter blue and/or green wavelength on the growth and quality of two lettuce cultivars in a vertical farming system. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tang, D.; Huang, Q.; Wei, K.; Yang, X.; Wei, F.; Miao, J. Identification of differentially expressed genes and pathways involved in growth and development of Mesona chinensis benth under red and blue-light conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 761068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, R.; Gao, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Song, S.; Su, W.; Liu, H. Supplemental UV-A Affects growth and antioxidants of Chinese kale baby-leaves in artificial light plant factory. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zheng, J.; Gan, P.; Ji, F.; He, D.; Yang, P. Growth and energy use efficiency of grafted tomato transplants as affected by led light quality and photon flux density. Agriculture 2021, 11, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lam, V.P.; Choi, J.; Park, J. Enhancing growth and glucosinolate accumulation in watercress (Nasturtium officinale L.) by regulating light intensity and photoperiod in plant factories. Agriculture 2021, 11, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nájera, C.; Urrestarazu, M. Effect of the Intensity and Spectral Quality of LED Light on Yield and Nitrate Accumulation in Vegetables. HortScience 2019, 54, 1745–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, M.; He, R.; Shi, R.; Li, Y.; Song, S.; Zhang, Y.; Su, W.; Liu, H. Combination of Selenium and UVA radiation affects growth and phytochemicals of broccoli microgreens. Molecules 2021, 26, 4646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, J.; Wu, T.; Huang, K.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M.; Wang, J. Effect of LED Spectrum on the quality and nitrogen metabolism of lettuce under recycled hydroponics. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, M.; He, R.; Shi, R.; Zhang, Y.; Song, S.; Su, W.; Liu, H. Differential Effects of low light intensity on broccoli microgreens growth and phytochemicals. Agronomy 2021, 11, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, W.; Lu, N.; Kikuchi, M.; Takagaki, M. Continuous lighting and high daily light integral enhance yield and quality of mass-produced Nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus L.) in plant factories. Plants 2021, 10, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cui, J.; Song, S.; Yu, J.; Liu, H. Effect of daily light integral on cucumber plug seedlings in artificial light plant factory. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gallegos-Cedillo, V.M.; Diánez, F.; Nájera, C.; Santos, M. Plant Agronomic Features Can Predict Quality and Field Performance: A Bibliometric Analysis. A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Wu, D.; Xie, Y.; Li, J. Mapping the research trends by co–word analysis based on keywords from funded project. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 91, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ohtake, N.; Ishikura, M.; Suzuki, H.; Yamori, W.; Goto, E. Continuous irradiation with alternating red and blue light enhances plant growth while keeping nutritional quality in lettuce. HortScience 2018, 53, 1804–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tamura, Y.; Mori, T.; Nakabayashi, R.; Wang, N.; Kusano, M. Metabolomic evaluation of the quality of leaf lettuce grown in practical plant factory to capture metabolite signature. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, X.; He, D.; Niu, G.; Yan, Z.; Song, J. Effects of environment lighting on the growth, photosynthesis, and quality of hydroponic lettuce in a plant factory. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2018, 11, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Larsen, D.H.; Woltering, E.J.; Nicole, C.C.S.; Marcelis, L.F.M. Response of Basil growth and morphology to light intensity and spectrum in a vertical farm. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meng, Q.; Runkle, E.S. Far-red radiation interacts with relative and absolute blue and red photon flux densities to regulate growth, morphology, and pigmentation of lettuce and basil seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 255, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pennisi, G.; Orsini, F.; Landolfo, M.; Pistillo, A.; Crepaldi, A.; Nicola, S.; Fernández, J.A.; Marcelis, L.F.M.; Gianquinto, G. Optimal photoperiod for indoor cultivation of leafy vegetables and herbs. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2020, 85, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wittmann, S.; Jüttner, I.; Mempel, H. Indoor farming marjoram production—quality, resource efficiency, and potential of application. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Palmer, S.; van Iersel, M.W. Increasing growth of lettuce and mizuna under sole-source LED lighting using longer photoperiods with the same daily light integral. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, J.-Y.; Shimano, A.; Hikosaka, S.; Ishigami, Y.; Goto, E. Effects of photosynthetic photon flux density and light period on growth and camptothecin accumulation of ophiorrhiza pumila under controlled environments. J. Agric. Meteorol. 2020, 76, 180–187. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, Y.J.; Nguyen, T.K.L.; Oh, M.-M. Growth and ginsenosides content of ginseng sprouts according to LED-based light quality changes. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nguyen, D.T.P.; Lu, N.; Kagawa, N.; Kitayama, M.; Takagaki, M. Short-Term root-zone temperature treatment enhanced the accumulation of secondary metabolites of hydroponic coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) grown in a plant factory. Agronomy 2020, 10, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hwang, H.; An, S.; Lee, B.; Chun, C. Improvement of growth and morphology of vegetable seedlings with supplemental far-red enriched led lights in a plant factory. Horticulturae 2020, 6, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. An, S.; Park, S.W.; Kwack, Y. Growth of cucumber scions, rootstocks, and grafted seedlings as affected by different irrigation regimes during cultivation of ‘Joenbaekdadagi’ and ‘Heukjong’ seedlings in a plant factory with artificial lighting. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kang, W.H.; Kim, J.; Yoon, H.I.; Son, J.E. Quantification of spectral perception of plants with light absorption of photoreceptors. Plants 2020, 9, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, D.I.; Jeong, H.K.; Park, Y.G.; Jeong, B.R. Flowering and morphogenesis of kalanchoe in response to quality and intensity of night interruption light. Plants 2019, 8, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bantis, F.; Fotelli, M.; Ilić, Z.S.; Koukounaras, A. Physiological and phytochemical responses of spinach baby leaves grown in a pfal system with LEDs and saline nutrient solution. Agriculture 2020, 10, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Azad, M.O.K.; Kjaer, K.H.; Adnan, M.; Naznin, M.T.; Lim, J.D.; Sung, I.J.; Park, C.H.; Lim, Y.S. The evaluation of growth performance, photosynthetic capacity, and primary and secondary metabolite content of leaf lettuce grown under limited irradiation of blue and red LED light in an urban plant factory. Agriculture 2020, 10, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gao, W.; He, D.; Ji, F.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, J. Effects of daily light integral and LED spectrum on growth and nutritional quality of hydroponic spinach. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zou, T.; Huang, C.; Wu, P.; Ge, L.; Xu, Y. Optimization of artificial light for spinach growth in plant factory based on orthogonal test. Plants 2020, 9, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Takasu, S.; Shimizu, H.; Nakashima, H.; Miyasaka, J.; Ohdoi, K. Photosynthesis and morphology of leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. Cv. Greenwave) grown under alternating irradiation of red and blue light. Environ. Control. Biol. 2019, 57, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Han, S.J.; Choi, I.L.; Kim, J.Y.; Wang, L.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, K.-Y.; Kim, Y.; Islam, M.; Lee, Y.-T.; Kang, H.-M. Various light quality including QD-LED affect growth and leaf color of red romaine baby leaf lettuce. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2019, 47, 757–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Okazaki, S.; Yamashita, T. A manipulation of air temperature and light quality and intensity can maximize growth and folate biosynthesis in leaf lettuce. Environ. Control. Biol. 2019, 57, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chung, H.; Chang, M.; Wu, C.; Fang, W. Quantitative evaluation of electric light recipes for red leaf lettuce cultivation in plant factories. HortTechnology 2018, 28, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Song, J.; Huang, H.; Hao, Y.; Song, S.; Zhang, Y.; Su, W.; Liu, H. Nutritional quality, mineral and antioxidant content in lettuce affected by interaction of light intensity and nutrient solution concentration. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Y.; Shi, R.; Jiang, H.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Song, S.; Su, W.; Liu, H. End-Of-Day LED Lightings influence the leaf color, growth and phytochemicals in two cultivars of lettuce. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, L.; Tong, Y.; Lu, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, Q. Lettuce growth, nutritional quality, and energy use efficiency as affected by red–blue light combined with different monochromatic wavelengths. HortScience 2020, 55, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kovács, B.; Kotroczó, Z.; Kocsis, L.; Biró, B. Potentials of indoor lettuce production in natural forest soil at limited watering. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2020, 21, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yan, Z.; He, D.; Niu, G.; Zhou, Q.; Qu, Y. Growth, nutritional quality, and energy use efficiency in two lettuce cultivars as influenced by white plus red versus red plus blue LEDs. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2020, 13, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mao, H.; Hang, T.; Zhang, X.; Lu, N. Both multi-segment light intensity and extended photoperiod lighting strategies, with the same daily light integral, promoted Lactuca sativa L. growth and photosynthesis. Agronomy 2019, 9, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yan, Z.; He, D.; Niu, G.; Zhou, Q.; Qu, Y. Growth, nutritional quality, and energy use efficiency of hydroponic lettuce as in-fluenced by daily light integrals exposed to white versus white plus red Light-emitting Diodes. HortScience 2019, 54, 1737–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saito, K.; Ishigami, Y.; Goto, E. Evaluation of the light environment of a plant factory with artificial light by using an optical simulation. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maeda, K.; Ito, Y. Effect of different PPFDs and photoperiods on growth and yield of everbearing strawberry ‘elan’ in plant factory with white LED lighting. Environ. Control. Biol. 2020, 58, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zheng, J.F.; He, D.X.; Ji, F. Effects of light intensity and photoperiod on runner plant propagation of hydroponic strawberry transplants under LED lighting. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2019, 12, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. ATSDR. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 2015 Public health summary: Nitrate and nitrite. Division of Tox-icology and Health Sciences. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/es/phs/es_phs204.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2022).
  50. EFSA. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific Opinion. Statement on possible public health risks for infants and young children from the presence of nitrates in leafy vegetables. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1935. Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1935 (accessed on 10 February 2022).
  51. Addiscott, T. Is it nitrate that threatens life or the scare about nitrate. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 2005–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Saengtharatip, S.; Joshi, J.; Zhang, G.; Kozai, T.; Yamori, W. Optimal light wavelength for a novel cultivation system with a supplemental upward lighting in plant factory with artificial lighting. Environ. Control. Biol. 2021, 59, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bibliometric map generated from an analysis of the most repeated keywords in articles published during period 2013–2021. The different colours represent the diversity of thematic clusters found and the associated keywords: red (cluster 1), green (cluster 2), and blue (cluster 3).
Figure 1. Bibliometric map generated from an analysis of the most repeated keywords in articles published during period 2013–2021. The different colours represent the diversity of thematic clusters found and the associated keywords: red (cluster 1), green (cluster 2), and blue (cluster 3).
Blsf 16 00024 g001
Figure 2. Global distribution of the main countries in which researchers have used the vertical farming and bioactive compounds in vegetables crops studies.
Figure 2. Global distribution of the main countries in which researchers have used the vertical farming and bioactive compounds in vegetables crops studies.
Blsf 16 00024 g002
Figure 3. Research topics in the vertical farming on nutritional parameters. Values are expressed as percentages (n = 100).
Figure 3. Research topics in the vertical farming on nutritional parameters. Values are expressed as percentages (n = 100).
Blsf 16 00024 g003
Figure 4. Type of spectra and colour (A) and light intensity (µmol m-2 s−1) (B) used in the analysed research. Data are expressed as percentage (n = 118). B (blue 450–495 nm); R (red 620–700 nm); FR (far-red 700–800 nm); G (green 500–560 nm); O (orange 600-620).
Figure 4. Type of spectra and colour (A) and light intensity (µmol m-2 s−1) (B) used in the analysed research. Data are expressed as percentage (n = 118). B (blue 450–495 nm); R (red 620–700 nm); FR (far-red 700–800 nm); G (green 500–560 nm); O (orange 600-620).
Blsf 16 00024 g004
Table 1. Crops used in vertical farming.
Table 1. Crops used in vertical farming.
CropsVarietyCropsVariety
Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) [19,20,21]“Genovese”Marjoram (Origanum majorana) [22]*
Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) [9,11]“lvhua”Mizuna (Brassica rapa nipposinica) [23]*
Canola (Brassica napus L.) [1]“Kizakino-natane”Nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus L.) [12]*
Chicory (Cichorium intybus) [21]“Bionda a foglie larghe”Ophiorrhiza pumila [24]*
Chinese kale (Brassica alboglabra Bailey) [5]*Panax ginseng [25]*
Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) [26]*Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) [27]“Shinhong”
Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) [13,23,28]“Yuexiu No.3” “Tantan”
“Joenbaekdadagi”Platostoma palustre (Mesona chinensis) [29]*
“Heukjong”Pumpkin (Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché) [6,27]“Heukjong”
“Joeunbaegdadagi” “Bulrojangsaeng”
Kalanchoe (Kalanchoe blossfeldiana) [23,24,30,31]“Lipstick”Rocket (Eruca vesicaria ssp. sativa) [8,27,32]“Coltivata”
“Spain”Spinach (Spinacia oleraciea L.) [8,31,33,34]“Geant D’ Hiver”
“Romaine” “BJC009”
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) [2,3,8,10,16,17,18,20,21,23,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]Butterhead “Asia Butter Head” “Disease-resistant 388”
Romaine “Asia Heuk Romaine”Ssamchoo (Brassica Lee ssp. namai) [46]*
“Yidali”Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) [47,48]Duch. “Elan”
“Romaine” “Benihoppe”
“Little Gem”Sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) [46]*
“Red butter”Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) [6,13]“Zhezhan No.1”
“Green butter” “Dongfeng No.1”
“Tiberius” “Dotaerangdia”
“Lollo rosso” “B-blocking”
“Rebelina”Watercress (Nasturtium officinale L.) [7]
“Capitata”Watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris L.) [27]“Sambokkul”
“Lvdie and Ziya”
“Longifolia”
“Rex”
“Cherokee”
“Ziwei”
“Greenwave”
“Red Romaine”
“Crispa”
“Summer Surge”
“Red Oak”
* n.d.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nájera, C.; Gallegos-Cedillo, V.M.; Ros, M.; Pascual, J.A. LED Lighting in Vertical Farming Systems Enhances Bioactive Compounds and Productivity of Vegetables Crops. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 16, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECHo2022-12514

AMA Style

Nájera C, Gallegos-Cedillo VM, Ros M, Pascual JA. LED Lighting in Vertical Farming Systems Enhances Bioactive Compounds and Productivity of Vegetables Crops. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2022; 16(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECHo2022-12514

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nájera, Cinthia, Victor M. Gallegos-Cedillo, Margarita Ros, and José Antonio Pascual. 2022. "LED Lighting in Vertical Farming Systems Enhances Bioactive Compounds and Productivity of Vegetables Crops" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 16, no. 1: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECHo2022-12514

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop