Next Article in Journal
Gastrointestinal Digestion and Absorption of Antioxidant Phenolic Compounds and Caffeine from the Coffee Pulp under Simulated Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Intake of Vitamin D in Daily Food Rations by Students
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Psychological Distress and Its Association with Discretionary Choices Intake in Australian Women of Reproductive Age during COVID-19 †

1
Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
2
Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
3
Austin Health, Performance Reporting and Decision Support, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
4
Ambulance Victoria, 375 Manningham Road, Doncaster, VIC 3108, Australia
5
School of Agriculture and Food Science, Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
6
Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
7
Health Systems and Equity, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Boxhill, VIC 3128, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Nutrients, 15–31 March 2022; Available online: https://iecn2022.sciforum.net/.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 12(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2022-12369
Published: 14 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Nutrients)

Abstract

:
The COVID-19 pandemic has been disruptive to people’s mental health and lifestyle, including dietary intakes. This study aimed to explore psychological distress, lifestyle, and demographic factors and the relationship to discretionary choices in women of reproductive age (18–50 years) during COVID-19 in Australia. Reproductive-aged women (18–50 years) in Australia were invited to participate in a national online survey, between October and November 2020. Targeted recruitment ensured broad national representativeness across age and state of residence. Psychological distress score, socioeconomic characteristics, physical activity, and frequencies of discretionary choices (sugar-sweetened beverages, alcohol, and discretionary foods) were collected. Using the R statistical software (R Core Team, 2020), logistic regression was performed to analyse the data. A total of 1005 women were included in the study. Around 40% of the women reported a high level of psychological distress. About half of all the women had a higher intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (>1/week) (46%) and alcohol (≥2/week) (49%) and 15% reported a higher intake of discretionary foods (≥3/day). Women of Australian, New Zealander, or pacific ethnicity and women with more sitting times were more likely to have higher consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Women of older age (45–50 y), women who reported a higher annual household income (≥AUD100,000), and women who had moderate or high physical activity were more likely to consume high intakes of alcohol. Women with high psychological distress, and those who gained weight during the pandemic, had a greater likelihood of high intake of discretionary foods. Such a high intake of discretionary choices in stressful situations, including the COVID-19 pandemic, needs appropriate public health strategies to avoid further mental and metabolic health issues.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECN2022-12369/s1.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to conception of the idea. J.A.G., N.H. and S.L. developed the research question. H.V. conducted the statistical analysis, with expert guidance from J.E. and S.S. J.A.G. and N.H. drafted the manuscript. S.L. and S.L.O. designed the study. S.L., L.J.M., C.L.H., H.T., J.E. and S.L.O. developed the questionnaire. S.L. organised data collection. All authors contributed to interpretation of the results and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the submission of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (MUHREC project: 25941).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was collected from the participants.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Habibi, N.; Grieger, J.A.; Vo, H.; Sabir, S.; O’Reilly, S.L.; Harrison, C.L.; Moran, L.J.; Enticott, J.; Teede, H.; Lim, S. Psychological Distress and Its Association with Discretionary Choices Intake in Australian Women of Reproductive Age during COVID-19. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 12, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2022-12369

AMA Style

Habibi N, Grieger JA, Vo H, Sabir S, O’Reilly SL, Harrison CL, Moran LJ, Enticott J, Teede H, Lim S. Psychological Distress and Its Association with Discretionary Choices Intake in Australian Women of Reproductive Age during COVID-19. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2022; 12(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2022-12369

Chicago/Turabian Style

Habibi, Nahal, Jessica A. Grieger, Hung Vo, Salman Sabir, Sharleen L. O’Reilly, Cheryce L. Harrison, Lisa J. Moran, Joanne Enticott, Helena Teede, and Siew Lim. 2022. "Psychological Distress and Its Association with Discretionary Choices Intake in Australian Women of Reproductive Age during COVID-19" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 12, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2022-12369

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop