Self-Refereeing System in Ultimate during the Joint Junior Ultimate Championship in Three Different Divisions—A Different Way to Promote Fair-Play?
, LuĂs Coelho 1,2, Henrietta Papp 3, Felipe Costa 4, Efstathios Christodoulides 5, Wouter Cools 6,7, Zoltán ErdĹ‘si 8, James E. Moore, Jr. 9 and Guilherme Eustáquio Furtado 10,11,*
Gerhard Thonhauser
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
It is great to see that self-refereeing in Ultimate receives more attention in academic research and this paper is a valuable contribution to this trend. Both the introduction/conclusion and the empirical study are well-conceived and clearly presented.
My only concern is that the two aspects are not perfectly connected. A key claim of the more theoretical part is to promote Ultimate (or self-refereeing more general) as a valuable tool in pedagogic contexts. However, the empirical study is not in a position to support that claim. The same also holds for some other claims in the introduction, discussion, and conclusion. I nevertheless think that this is a valuable contribution that warrants publication.
I noticed some typos (e.g.: “SOTG time sheet” -> “SOTG score sheet”, “If a team gives a zero on four” -> “If a team gives a zero or four”) I am sure there are more so I recommend another round of careful proofreading.
Author Response
Dear reviewer, the comments and answers to the questions are in the attached document.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Please see the attachment
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer, the comments and answers to the questions are in the attached document.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
