Co-Creating Interdisciplinary Integrated Powerful Knowledge
Definition
:1. Introduction
2. Influence of IIPK in Informed Decisions
3. Aspects of Co-Creating IIPK
- Conduct a needs assessment of the required changes in practices based on the current situation and the desired outcomes, with the active participation and input of all key stakeholders from different sectors and backgrounds.
- Identify the relevant disciplinary domains and experts that can contribute to the co-creation process and establish a common understanding and framework for integrating their knowledge bases into a coherent whole.
- Analyze the existing policies that affect or relate to the co-creation process, identify the gaps, challenges, and opportunities for policy innovation, and develop new or revised policies that explicitly support and guide the changes in practice towards sustainability goals.
- Create an interdisciplinary knowledge base that can inform and inspire action for change. This knowledge base should include both theoretical and practical insights from various disciplines, as well as tools and methods that can facilitate collaboration and implementation.
- Apply and evaluate the co-created IIPK in real-world contexts, generate innovations that can enhance the sustainability of the plane, and engage in continuous learning and improvement based on feedback and reflection.
4. The Overall Picture
- Identify a societal issue that requires innovation and potential solutions that address its root causes and its consequences.
- Involve society and the citizens in recognising and valuing the traditional knowledge base and practices that are relevant to the issue and its solutions.
- Formulate a disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge base and practice that incorporates and respects the traditional aspects while also expanding and enriching them with new perspectives and methods.
- Generate and co-create a powerful IIPK that is acceptable to all stakeholders and that can inform decision making for effective action. In this context, dissemination of IIPK using various platforms, such as encyclopedias and social medias plays an important role.
- Produce a toolkit with policies that can facilitate changes in practice based on the powerful IIPK.
- Overall, a collaborative platform including all stakeholders could use a toolkit of co-created IIPK to solve social issues and problems, and it would result in changes in practices. These practices would be long lasting and sustainable, and they would not only produce advanced technological development but would also affect the practices, polices and protocols of every aspect of daily life of everyone on this planet. Essentially, the co-created IIPK would produce scope for a sustainable use of natural resources, and it would keep the natural dynamic equilibrium in balance.
5. Conclusions and Prospects
- Empowering all stakeholders with the 21st-century skills that are essential components in moving forward, and making changes to the practices of the industrial revolution and the damages that ensued.
- Building a capacity of informed decision making in all forms of issues.
- The ability to accept people participatory co-creating and approaches such as the 5P one for dealing with personal or societal issues.
- Facilitating agentic actions, and using IIPK to ensure commitment to, participation in, and co-creation of changes in practice.
- Create people participatory and co-creating approaches to societal issues, and generate toolkits for resolving these issues. In this context, the dissemination of IIPK through encyclopedias and social media will play a vital role.
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kurup, P.M.; Li, X. Building Preservice Teachers’ Confidence for Teaching and Learning STEM, Incorporating Innovative, Interdisciplinary, and Integrated (3I) Initiatives. In Encyclopedia of Teacher Education; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, M.; Muller, J. Three Educational Scenarios for the Future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. Eur. J. Educ. 2010, 45, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niemelä, M.A. Crossing curricular boundaries for powerful knowledge. Curric. J. 2020, 32, 359–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurup, P.M.; Levinson, R.; Li, X. Informed-Decision Regarding Global Warming and Climate Change Among High School Students in the United Kingdom. Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ. 2021, 21, 166–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawson, R. The Science of Evaluation; Sage: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Pountney, R.; McPhail, G. Crossing boundaries: Exploring the theory, practice and possibility of a ‘Future 3’ curriculum. Br. Educ. Res. J. 2019, 45, 483–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siskin, L.S. Restructuring knowledge: Mapping (Inter)disciplinary change. In Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Challenges to Implementation; Wineburg, S., Grossman, P.L., Eds.; Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 171–190. [Google Scholar]
- Young, M. Curriculum theory and the question of knowledge: A response to the six papers. J. Curric. Stud. 2015, 47, 820–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fensham, P.J. The Future Curriculum for School Science: What Can Be Learnt from the Past? Res. Sci. Educ. 2022, 52, 81–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bybee, R.W. The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities; National Science Teachers Association: Arlington, VA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Drake, S.; Reid, J. Integrated Curriculum as an Effective Way to Teach 21st Century Capabilities. Asia Pac. J. Educ. Res. 2018, 1, 31–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Korkmaz, G.; Toraman, Ç. Are We Ready for the Post-COVID-19 Educational Practice? An Investigation into What Educators Think as to Online Learning. Int. J. Technol. Educ. Sci. 2020, 4, 293–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2021: Times of Crisis and Opportunity; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Tiwari, S.P. COVID-19: Knowledge Development, Exchange, and Emerging Technologies. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Res. Rev. 2022, 5, 310–314. [Google Scholar]
- National Research Council. Assessing 21st Century Skills: Summary of a Workshop; National Research Council: North Tarrytown, NY, USA, 2011.
- Xiao, J. Decoding new normal in education for the post-COVID-19 world: Beyond the digital solution. Asian J. Distance Educ. 2021, 16, 141–155. [Google Scholar]
- Yates, L.; Millar, V. Powerful knowledge’ curriculum theories and the case of physics. Curric. J. 2016, 27, 298–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drake, S.M.; Savage, M. Negotiating accountability and integrated curriculum from a global perspective. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 2016, 15, 127–144. [Google Scholar]
- Alderson, P. Powerful knowledge and the curriculum: Contradictions and dichotomies. Br. Educ. Res. J. 2019, 46, 26–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kothari, A.; Wathen, C.N. A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy 2013, 109, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hordern, J. Recontextualisation and the teaching of subjects. Curric. J. 2021, 32, 592–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winch, C. Dimensions of Expertise: A Conceptual Exploration of Vocational Knowledge; Continuum: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Stier, J.; Smit, S.E. Co-creation as an innovative setting to improve the uptake of scientific knowledge: Overcoming obstacles, understanding considerations and applying enablers to improve scientific impact in society. J. Innov. Entrep. 2021, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Young, M.F.D.; Muller, J. On the powers of powerful knowledge. Rev. Educ. 2013, 1, 229–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlgren, I. Powerful knowns and powerful knowings. J. Curric. Stud. 2020, 52, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gronvad, J.F.; Hvidtfeldt, R.; Budtz Pedersen, D. Analysing Cocreation in Theory and Practice: A Systematic Review of the SSH Impact Literature; ACCOMPLISH Publication: Boston, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, S.; Scheller, D.; Schröder, S. Co-creation in citizen social science: The research forum as a methodological foundation for communication and participation. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2021, 8, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, J.; Young, M. Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge. Curric. J. 2019, 28, 196–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oates, T. Powerful knowledge: Moving us all forwards or backwards? In Sociology, Curriculum Studies and Professional Knowledge; Guile, D., Lambert, D., Reiss, M., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 157–168. [Google Scholar]
- Chauhan, S.; Yadav, A.; Kurup, P.M.; Li, X.; Swarnakar, P.; Gupta, R.K. Devising a people-friendly test kit for overcoming challenges in the assessment of water quality and analysis of water pollution in the river Ganga. RSC Sustain. 2023, 1, 418–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Jiang, L.; Xu, C.; Luo, F.; Zhao, G.; Kurup, P.M. Requesting a commitment in school teachers to teach in unprecedented ways: The mediating role of teacher agency. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2023, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kurup, P.M.; Li, X.; Dong, Y.; Bhardwaj, M.; Yang, Y. Co-Creating Interdisciplinary Integrated Powerful Knowledge. Encyclopedia 2023, 3, 964-971. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030069
Kurup PM, Li X, Dong Y, Bhardwaj M, Yang Y. Co-Creating Interdisciplinary Integrated Powerful Knowledge. Encyclopedia. 2023; 3(3):964-971. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030069
Chicago/Turabian StyleKurup, Premnadh M., Xia Li, Yan Dong, Meenu Bhardwaj, and Yunying Yang. 2023. "Co-Creating Interdisciplinary Integrated Powerful Knowledge" Encyclopedia 3, no. 3: 964-971. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030069