Next Article in Journal
Cognitive Profiles of French Individuals with Williams Syndrome and Down Syndrome: What’s Up? What’s Next?
Next Article in Special Issue
Professional and Family Carers’ Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Supported Decision-Making with Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Online Survey
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Coping Strategies and Help-Seeking Behaviors of College Students and Postdoctoral Fellows with Disabilities or Pre-Existing Conditions during COVID-19
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Implementation of Telerehabilitation in an Early Supported Discharge Stroke Rehabilitation Program before and during COVID-19: An Exploration of Influencing Factors

Disabilities 2023, 3(1), 87-104; https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities3010007
by Louis-Pierre Auger 1,2,3,*, Emmanuelle Moreau 3, Odile Côté 3, Rosalba Guerrera 3, Annie Rochette 1,2,3 and Dahlia Kairy 1,2,3
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Disabilities 2023, 3(1), 87-104; https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities3010007
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 16 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disability and COVID-19)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I would like to thank the authors for their hard work. In my humble opinion, despite some limitations that the authors mention and discuss, this is an interesting work, that was responsibly conducted and reported. 

Author Response

Thank you for your comments.

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see file attachment. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for your very well written manuscript. It especially highlights the impact of Covid-19, and the opportunities in adversity that Covid-19 presented for digital health. The manuscript can do with some minor typographical editing and corrections without further review by me. 

Author Response

Thank you for your comments.

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for your attention to the suggested revisions. A major question about the merit of this study lies in the limited number of participants. Thus the overall conclusions are speculative at best. A larger N would significantly improve the validity of this study. 

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop