Next Article in Journal
The Arnold Arboretum’s Campaign for the Living Collections: A Case Study in Living Collection Development
Previous Article in Journal
Body Shape Analysis in Reticulated Giraffe, Okapi, and Black Rhinoceros Using Three-Dimensional Laser Measurements
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

A Review of Two Decades of In Situ Conservation Powered by Public Aquaria

1
MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ESTM, Politécnico de Leiria, 2520-641 Peniche, Portugal
2
Flying Sharks, Rua Farrobim do Sul 116, 9900-361 Horta, Portugal
3
German Oceanographic Museum, Katharinenberg 14-20, 18439 Stralsund, Germany
4
European Association of Zoos and Aquaria, Plantage Middenlaan 45, 1018 DC Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5
Royal Burgers’ Zoo, Anton van Hooffplein 1, 6816 SH Arnhem, The Netherlands
6
Bristol Zoological Society, Bristol Zoo Gardens, Clifton, Bristol BS8 3HA, UK
7
Vienna Zoo, Maxingstraße 13b, 1130 Wien, Austria
8
Oceanário de Lisboa, Esplanada D. Carlos I, 1990-005 Lisboa, Portugal
9
Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, Koningin Astridplein 20-26, 2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Zool. Bot. Gard. 2024, 5(1), 90-118; https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg5010007
Submission received: 7 November 2023 / Revised: 19 December 2023 / Accepted: 12 January 2024 / Published: 2 February 2024

Abstract

:
The European Union of Aquarium Curators (EUAC) boasts a membership of 150 dedicated individuals, standing as a vital cornerstone within the European public aquarium community. Since 2004, the EUAC Conservation Fund has granted over a quarter of a million euros to approximately 50 conservation projects spanning the globe. These initiatives, diverse in nature and scale, have yielded tangible impacts on local populations and their focal species. This paper delves into the outcomes of these conservation endeavors and proposes enhancements to ensure that the funding is unequivocally channeled towards conservation efforts. One resounding observation gleaned from the array of projects spotlighted in this study is the profound community engagement that emerges, irrespective of the final project outcomes. These endeavors serve as a catalyst for local communities, shedding light on subjects that would otherwise remain shrouded in obscurity. Furthermore, the EUAC-backed projects illuminate the expansive reach of public aquarium initiatives, transcending the confines of acrylic tank walls and institutional boundaries to resonate globally, heightening local awareness about the imperative to safeguard biodiversity. These findings underscore a prospective trajectory for both the EUAC and the public aquaria it comprises: an intensified advocacy and collaboration with legislative bodies to fortify in situ conservation measures. In essence, it is imperative that the public comprehends the pivotal role played by aquaria in preserving a multitude of species and acknowledges that their visits directly contribute to funding projects aimed at safeguarding species within their natural habitats.

1. Background

Public aquaria emerged in the mid-nineteenth century as vital portals into the natural world, providing access to wonders otherwise beyond public reach. Over the ensuing century, their mission evolved to center on the conservation of wildlife diversity, as well as serving as hubs for biological education and research [1,2]. Despite occasional calls for closure and the release of captive animals, it is crucial to recognize the pivotal role public aquaria play in in situ conservation efforts. These institutions stand as bastions against the relentless encroachment and degradation of natural habitats due to human activities.
For instance, seabeds teeming with marine biodiversity are imperiled by destructive trawling practices [3,4,5]. Freshwater ecosystems, including rivers, springs, lakes, and rainforests, have faced systematic degradation, endangering thousands of species [6,7,8]. Additionally, escalating water temperatures and stressors have led to widespread coral bleaching events globally [9]. Destructive fisheries, pollution, runoff, and unregulated tourism have severely impacted coral reefs [10]. Climate change, a sustained threat over the past century, exerts additional pressures on these fragile ecosystems [11].
Public aquaria contribute significantly to species conservation through expert species management and robust public engagement. They serve as advocates for fostering a harmonious relationship between nature and society, providing a platform for conservation communication, and actively participating in both in situ and ex situ conservation projects, with multiple examples provided by [12]. While compliance with modern legislation, such as the European Union’s ‘Zoo Directive (https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/zoos/index_en.htm accessed 1 June 2023)’, is imperative (Council Directive 1999/22/EC), many institutions have exceeded its scope (op. cit.).
The role of public aquaria has evolved from mere recreation and the exhibition of exotic wildlife to encompass three vital functions: education, scientific research, and conservation [1,2]. As emphasized by the European Commission, the Zoos Directive seeks to bolster the role of zoos and aquaria in the conservation of biodiversity, with a primary focus on measures in the wild [12].
While the Zoos Directive places responsibility on member states for enforcement, both the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA (https://www.eaza.net/about-us/eazadocuments/ accessed 1 June 2023)) and the North American Association of Zoos and Aquaria (AZA) have actively disseminated ‘Good Practices’ manuals to enhance their members’ contributions to biodiversity conservation. Additionally, specialized resources like the ‘Elasmobranch Husbandry Manual’ [13] and ‘Advances in Coral Husbandry’ [14,15] are freely available to professionals in the field, further underlining the collaborative efforts in advancing conservation endeavors [16].

2. The European Union of Aquarium Curators

Within the framework of conservation-focused initiatives, the European Union of Aquarium Curators (EUAC) emerged during a symposium convened at Basel Zoo on 24–25 May 1972. This visionary gathering of aquarium curators resolved to establish the EUAC, thereby fostering closer collaboration among professionals in the field. The primary objective of this union was to convene regular symposia where pressing topics and challenges of broad interest in the realm of conservation could be addressed. Since its inception, the EUAC has steadfastly convened annual—occasionally biennial—meetings, witnessing a steady rise in both participant numbers and presentations. In a pivotal juncture in 2004, the organization’s financial robustness culminated in the establishment of a conservation fund, empowering members to champion in situ conservation initiatives.
These conservation endeavors may take the form of direct action by aquaria or entail intimate partnerships with existing in situ conservation projects. Funding may originate directly from the EUAC or indirectly through other sources dedicated to in situ conservation activities. This support can be facilitated by individual institutions or associations, often bolstered by dedicated public fundraising endeavors. Annually, EUAC members are encouraged to submit their proposals, a process facilitated through a comprehensive application form.
Project categories encompass a wide spectrum, encompassing biological and ecological research, veterinary and conservation medicine, animal welfare, captive breeding, reintroduction, restocking, and translocation efforts, human–wildlife conflict mitigation, education and public awareness initiatives, training and workshops, community-based and social policy interventions, ecotourism and sustainable development ventures, sustainable resource utilization, wardening and law enforcement, as well as protected areas management. These projects are strongly encouraged to involve local communities and secure approval from local authorities. Detailed documentation, including information on the study species, its IUCN Red List status, project objectives, and a budget breakdown, is a prerequisite. Moreover, applicants are mandated to demonstrate match funding, exemplifying a proportionate commitment to the project.
Subsequent to the submission of applications, a dedicated review panel meticulously assesses each proposal, assigning scores based on predefined criteria. The EUAC Committee then scrutinizes these evaluations and, contingent on current funding allocations, extends financial support to one or more meritorious proposals. Recipients of funds bear the responsibility of presenting their results orally and submitting a comprehensive written report detailing the accomplishments of their projects.
Hereafter, we present a compendium of achievements spanning nearly two decades of EUAC funding support (refer to Figure A1 and Figure A2 in the Appendix A), illustrating how targeted, short-term financial backing can serve as a catalyst for conservation efforts and provide crucial backing to dedicated teams worldwide, engendering innovative methods for species survival. Figure A1, compiled in 2019, documents forty-two projects, while Figure A2 (in the Appendix A) introduces an additional seven endeavors. Through sustained dialogue with project managers, we have been able to amalgamate additional results, culminating in the compilation of Figure A3 (Appendix A).

3. Action—Projects

Below are more detailed explanations on some of the projects funded thus far, including outcomes and results.

3.1. Title of Project: Assessing the Condition of the Noble Pen Shell (Pinna nobilis Linnaeus, 1758) in the South Adriatic Sea

Project leader: Milena Mičić EUAC member: Aquarium Pula
Year supported: 2019 Amount supported: 9000 €

3.2. Summary of Project

The primary goal of this project was to evaluate the status of the noble pen shell population (Figure 1) in the South Adriatic with a focus on conservation efforts. Findings from the surveyed regions revealed alarmingly high mortality rates, sometimes reaching 100%. In response, healthy individuals were carefully relocated from their natural habitat and placed in controlled ex situ environments. The noble pen shell population has been severely impacted by a devastating disease in its native habitats, resulting in the decline of populations in Spanish and Mediterranean waters.
The urgency of addressing this critical issue, along with the disappearance of other populations, served as the driving force behind this project, which garnered strong support from the Croatian Ministry of Environmental Protection. Within the controlled aquarium system at Aquarium Pula, dedicated efforts were made to facilitate natural reproduction among the pen shells. The knowledge and insights gained from this endeavor have significantly contributed to our understanding of the species’ biology and how best to care for them under human supervision.
This initiative saw fruitful collaboration between Aquarium Pula and universities in Zagreb, Pula, and Hungary, alongside the Croatian Veterinarian Institution. Together, these partners worked tirelessly to advance the cause of noble pen shell conservation. Throughout the project, regular media coverage was maintained to ensure that the broader public was informed and engaged in our conservation efforts.

3.3. Title of Project: In Search of the Last Remaining Representatives of the Only Recently Described and Already Critically Endangered Spotted Softshell Turtle, Pelodiscus Variegatus, in Vietnam

Project leader: Thomas Ziegler EUAC member: Cologne Zoo
Year supported: 2018 Amount supported: 4900 €
Website: https://www.koelnerzoo.de/en/artenschutz-3/#eigeneprojekte (accessed on 18 December 2023)

3.4. Summary of Project

A groundbreaking discovery has unveiled a new species of softshell turtle (Figure 2), identified through comprehensive genetic and morphological analyses. This significant finding spurred a dedicated conservation initiative focused on assessing the current status of wild softshell turtle populations.
To accomplish this mission, the project managers meticulously explored potential freshwater habitats, engaged with local fishermen to gather valuable insights, and thoroughly investigated farms and local markets where turtle trade occurs. Through rigorous genetic screening conducted in a specialized molecular laboratory, individuals were carefully examined to confirm the presence of distinctive markings on their bellies, indicative of this unique species.
When a genetically pure specimen was identified, it was swiftly relocated to a designated local rescue station, where a specialized conservation breeding program was established. This critical step ensures the preservation and future prosperity of this newly discovered softshell turtle species. By taking these proactive measures, this project actively contributes to the safeguarding of this remarkable and ecologically important species.

3.5. Title of Project: Mapping the Mediterranean Pillow Coral (Cladocora caespitosa) Habitats in Medulin Bay, Istria, Croatia

Project leader: Milena Mičić EUAC member: Aquarium Pula
Year supported: 2018 Amount supported: 7000 €
Website: not available

3.6. Summary of Project

The core objective of this project was to meticulously assess the well-being of coral colonies in light of the numerous anthropogenic threats they face, including nautical tourism, pollution, and unsustainable fishing practices. Furthermore, the mission extended to the formulation of comprehensive guidelines for the sustainable management of Medulin Bay (Figure 3), ensuring the enduring protection of these invaluable colonies.
In the project’s commitment to amplify the urgency of coral conservation, it conceived an impactful outdoor poster exhibition, hosted at Aquarium Pula, with the intent of reaching a broad audience and fostering awareness. This exhibition served as a powerful visual testament to the profound impact of unsustainable human activities on the degradation of corals and their interconnected ecosystems. Through this initiative, the team endeavors to inspire collective action for the preservation of these vital marine habitats, both locally and on a global scale.

3.7. Title of Project: Coral Husbandry Workshops, Maldives

Project leaders: Nicole Kube and Pablo Montoto Gasser EUAC members: German Oceanographic Museum and Zoo Aquarium Madrid, Spain
Year supported: 2017 and 2018 Amount supported: 12,000 € (total)

3.8. Summary of Project

In the Maldives archipelago, the well-being of local communities hinges on the health of coral reefs, which serve as the backbone of their livelihoods through fisheries and tourism. However, the alarming decline of coral reefs, exacerbated by anthropogenic impacts, coral bleaching, and habitat loss due to construction activities, has spurred urgent efforts for reef restoration. This imperative extends to both resort islands and local communities alike.
This project was dedicated to empowering local individuals (Figure 4) with the knowledge and skills required for effective coral husbandry and restoration techniques, thereby enhancing the success of restoration endeavors and fostering greater community involvement in the protection of coral reefs. The workshops covered a range of essential topics, including in-depth understanding of coral reef ecology, biodiversity, and the imminent threats they face. Additionally, participants gained valuable insights into the diverse coral species found on the islands and their current conservation status. Emphasis was placed on implementing a mindful sampling strategy (Figure 5) that minimizes reef impact while maximizing species collection.
Practical lessons in fragmentation techniques, various attachment methods, and optimal growth locations were also provided, complementing the theoretical knowledge shared. These workshops took place in Maafushi, Ukulhas, and Rasdhoo (Alif Alif Atoll, Maldives) and encompassed both classroom instruction and hands-on work beneath the waves. Ultimately, the overarching aim of this project was to mobilize local communities in safeguarding the invaluable coral reefs right at their doorstep. Through these workshops, participants were equipped to independently continue this crucial work once the team’s involvement concluded. This collaborative effort serves as a beacon of hope for the sustained health and vitality of the Maldives’ coral ecosystems.

3.9. Title of Project: Project Batagur baska

Project leader: Anton Weissenbacher EUAC member: Vienna Zoo
Year supported: 2019/2017 Amount supported: 5000 €

3.10. Summary of Project

The primary objective of this conservation project was to gain critical insights into the migration patterns and overall survival of the northern river terrapin (Batagur baska) within its native habitat (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Building on the release of five males in a prior initiative, this submission marked the release of an additional five individuals into the Sundarbans mangrove forest in Bangladesh. To monitor their movements and behaviors, satellite transmitters were carefully affixed to each terrapin.
The collective data gathered from the 10 males released in 2018 and 2019 will play a pivotal role in determining the viability of a sustainable reintroduction program. This information, particularly survival rates, will directly influence management recommendations for the ex situ population bred and raised in captivity.
This project serves as a testament to the vital support provided by EUAC funding. The northern river terrapin (Batagur baska) has suffered a devastating decline, to the point where its existence in the wild can be considered ecologically nonviable. The initial breeding success at the Vienna Zoo in 2010 provided a beacon of hope for this Critically Endangered species. Through collaborative efforts, a breeding population was established in the terrapin’s native environment in Bangladesh. A designated conservation area was created within Bhawal National Park, initially housing 84 juveniles [17].
Thanks to EUAC’s financial backing, the project was able to optimize its conservation strategy by establishing a second breeding facility in the historical range of the species, the Sundarbans. To mitigate risk, the breeding group was divided, and dedicated hatcheries, ponds, and breeding grounds were established within the Karamjal conservation center under the Bangladesh Forest Department. By early 2021, Project Batagur had successfully head-started 406 juveniles in both Bhawal National Park and Karamjal Center, thereby securing the survival of this critically endangered species.
Furthermore, EUAC funding played a pivotal role in advancing the project’s scope, enabling the first-ever quantitative and qualitative observations of migration routes of adult terrapins within the brackish river system and coastal areas of Bangladesh. Over two consecutive years, ten males were equipped with satellite transmitters and released into the Sundarbans mangrove forest. Initial findings illuminated the precarious status of terrapin survival in their natural habitat, providing a data-driven foundation for discussions surrounding sustainable reintroduction and management strategies. This comprehensive effort underscores the invaluable role of EUAC funding in driving forward critical conservation initiatives.

3.11. Title of Project: Conservation of Achondrostoma Occidentale: A Freshwater Fish Endemic to the Westernmost Tip of Europe (2017)

Project leader: Maria de Fátima Santos Gil EUAC member: Aquário Vasco da Gama
Year supported: 2017 Amount supported: 8800 €
Website: not available
Social media: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cv2yDrhNE-1/?igshid=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng%3D%3D (accessed on 18 December 2023)

3.12. Summary of Project

Achondrostoma occidentale, a small cyprinid species, is endemic to three small river basins (<40 km) situated in the westernmost region of Europe. This unique species has been isolated from its closest relatives for over 7 million years, over the course of multiple geological changes that eliminated a once giant basin within the Iberian Peninsula. As this basin grew smaller and smaller it eventually dwindled down to multiple small rivers, where species such as A. occidentale became isolated. It thrives in characteristic Mediterranean-type intermittent rivers, experiencing winter floods and summer droughts of varying intensity. The dry season poses a significant threat to these fish, as it leads to habitat reduction and population fragmentation, resulting in genetic bottlenecks. This situation exposes them to heightened competition for limited resources and deteriorating water quality. Additionally, habitat destruction, pollution, and the spread of the exotic crayfish Procambarus clarkii further jeopardize their survival.
The severe drought-induced risk of extinction for A. occidentale prompted the initiation of an ex situ conservation program in 2007. Captive populations, established with wild-caught adults, are meticulously cared for at the Aquário Vasco da Gama (AVG) and no mortalities occurred during transfers to the aquarium. Reproduction is carefully managed under natural conditions to prevent the relaxation of natural selection. To date, over 8000 captive-bred fish have been released (Figure 8 and Figure 9) back into their natural habitat, reinforcing the population and consequently reducing the risk of in situ extinction. This was achieved over three different seasons (three springs), and three distinct populations of wild breeders and captive-bred young were released to their original grounds. This was done to prevent losing genetic diversity. As this program was pioneering in Portugal, it garnered significant attention from the media and local communities, who were actively engaged in restocking efforts and environmental education initiatives.
This project has successfully achieved its original objectives:
  • Evaluate the in situ impact of recent restocking efforts by monitoring current population density and comparing it with previously collected baseline data.
  • Provide logistical support for a third restocking effort.
  • Implement in situ conservation measures, involving local students, to emphasize the importance of community involvement in the protection of the riverine ecosystem. Without this funding, restocking efforts would lack formal engagement from society.
  • Allocate resources for genetic analyses to advance the captive breeding program for this species. Assessing potential losses in genetic diversity is crucial for informing future procedures. While this objective has been partially met, ongoing DNA analyses are being conducted to determine if current genetic diversity levels are satisfactory.

3.13. Title of Project: Safeguarding the Critically Endangered Siamese crocodile (Crocodylus siamensis) through Combined In Situ and Ex Situ Conservation Measures (2016)

Project leader: Thomas Ziegler EUAC member: Cologne Zoo
Year supported: 2016 Amount supported: 5000 €
Website: https://www.koelnerzoo.de/en/artenschutz-3/#eigeneprojekte (accessed on 18 December 2023)

3.14. Summary of Project

The dedicated efforts of the author, Thomas Ziegler, generously supported by EUAC funding, have resulted in a series of impactful conservation projects. These initiatives have not only expanded our understanding of various endangered species, but have also laid the groundwork for their protection and survival:
  • Investigation of the Anthropogenic and Environmental Behaviors of the Endangered Crocodile Lizard (Figure 10) in Vietnam, with Direct Implications for Species Conservation (2015)
  • Conservation Translocation Program of Shinisaurus crocodilurus to Bolster the Drastically Diminished Wild Population in Vietnam (2014)
  • Ecological Research and Population Analysis of the Chinese Crocodile Lizard in Vietnam (2012)
  • Assessment of the Freshwater Fish Community Ecology in the Menangat-Kenohan Suwi Wetlands of Kalimantan, Indonesia (2012)
  • Preliminary Assessment of the Siamese Crocodile Population in Indonesia (2010)
  • Breeding and Research Program for Rare and Endangered Amphibians from Vietnam (2008)
The collective findings from these projects culminated in a comprehensive publication [18]. The following summary specifically pertains to the 2016 project.
The Siamese crocodile (Crocodylus siamensis) is classified as critically endangered on the IUCN Red List, as natural populations within its range have experienced an alarming 80% reduction in recent decades. Historically, this species thrived in mainland southeast Asia, spanning Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, and Vietnam. However, due to rampant hunting, populations in Vietnam have likely been eradicated. Those in Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Thailand face severe fragmentation and imminent threats. Many populations consist of fewer than ten individuals, raising concerns about their long-term viability.
Recent surveys conducted by the project team near Ban Soc, Bualapha District, Khammouane Province, Lao PDR, led to the discovery of a previously unknown population of Siamese crocodiles. This significant find also marked the rediscovery of the species in Khammouane Province. Similar to previous observations, this population comprises only a handful of documented individuals. Based on external morphology, these individuals were identified as pure Siamese crocodiles. Insights from local interviews further corroborated that the observed crocodiles represent remnants of a once-thriving natural population. To confirm their purity and rule out any potential escapees from farm hybrids, molecular testing of non-invasively collected samples from the site is currently underway.
One of the most economically viable conservation strategies for this species involves restocking depleted wild populations across its range, and potentially reintroducing it in specific cases to suitable habitats where it has become locally extinct. Notably, in Vietnam, the first population was introduced in Cat Tien National Park in the early 2000s, with subsequent breeding documented, showcasing initial success. A critical challenge in bolstering restocking and reintroduction efforts lies in identifying purebred individuals from captive programs in the range countries. This process was meticulously implemented in the introduction program in Cat Tien National Park through genetic screening of captive individuals using microsatellite markers and mitochondrial genes. However, the remaining captive colonies in Vietnam and Laos have not been subject to sufficient monitoring to affirm the purity of Siamese crocodile individuals held in these facilities.

3.15. Title of Project: In Search of the “Red Girl” in Madagascar

Project leader: Brian Zimmerman EUAC member: Zoological Society of London
Year supported: 2016 Amount supported: 9045€
Website: not available

3.16. Summary of Project

The expedition’s central objective was to empower and enhance the conservation efforts at the Andapa aquaculture facility, a vital haven for a range of critically endangered Malagasy endemic freshwater fish species. This facility not only serves as a sanctuary for these precious species but also supports the livelihoods of its owner and the local workforce he employs. The training provided encompassed essential aspects such as water quality analysis, pond design and infrastructure enhancements, responsible fish handling and transport, as well as a comprehensive review of species-specific diets and nutrition, all tailored to meet specific requests.
Furthermore, the expedition team revisited the collection site in the Amboaboa River to evaluate any alterations in the habitat and to secure additional members of the focal species. This strategic effort was aimed at fortifying the genetic diversity and integrity of the captive population in Andapa (Figure 11), thereby contributing to the long-term conservation of these invaluable aquatic species.
The central mission of this project was to champion the conservation of over twenty critically endangered Malagasy freshwater endemic species housed at the Andapa aquaculture facility. The key objectives were carefully designed to ensure the well-being and future sustainability of these invaluable species:
  • Elevate the welfare: enhance the care and well-being of the diverse collection of Malagasy freshwater species at the Andapa facility, ensuring their physical and mental health are prioritized.
  • Foster breeding success: implement a comprehensive review of environmental triggers for spawning and ecological requirements, aiming to significantly bolster the breeding success of each species within the Andapa facility.
  • Secure genetic health: establish and maintain robust, genetically healthy populations of each threatened Malagasy species, safeguarding their long-term viability for future restocking programs and conservation efforts.
  • Expand captive populations: acquire and safeguard stable captive populations of currently unmanaged threatened Malagasy freshwater fish species, including an adequate number of Paretroplus gymnopreopercularis.
  • Raise awareness: amplify awareness of Madagascar’s unique endemic freshwater fish species, both locally and globally, emphasizing their ecological importance and cultural value to the community.
  • Enhance husbandry practices: provide specialized training in husbandry techniques to the Andapa aquaculture facility, aiming to enhance breeding success and establish sustainable, sizable populations for future generations.
  • Proficient fish handling: equip employees at the Andapa facility with advanced skills in fish handling and transport to optimize survival rates during translocation exercises, minimizing stress and ensuring successful relocations.
  • Water quality management: deliver training on effective water quality management to facility employees, promoting vigilant monitoring of critical parameters and preventing potential losses due to suboptimal conditions.
  • Collaborative workshop: facilitate a collaborative workshop in Madagascar, bringing together relevant stakeholders to develop a conservation management plan focused on safeguarding threatened freshwater fish species. This collective effort will serve as a blueprint for their long-term preservation.

3.17. Title of Project: Marine Fishes of São Tomé and Príncipe

Project leader: Nuno V. Rodrigues EUAC member: Flying Sharks
Year supported: 2015 Amount supported: 10,000 €
Website: not available

3.18. Summary of Project

São Tomé and Príncipe, a sovereign African nation nestled in the Gulf of Guinea and straddled by the equator, boasts a rich tapestry of marine life, featuring unique endemic species of extraordinary beauty. Recognized as a marine biodiversity hotspot by researchers [19,20,21], this island nation’s marine fauna remains one of the least explored in the world. Sadly, signs of overexploitation persist, with local authorities expressing concern over the dearth of information gleaned from recent scientific expeditions.
In light of this, urgent action was imperative to (1) advance scientific understanding of fish communities in São Tomé and Príncipe, (2) cultivate environmental consciousness to facilitate responsible resource management, and (3) critically, enhance knowledge dissemination to local authorities and relevant stakeholders.
The majority of São Tomé and Príncipe’s populace directly relies on artisanal fishing for sustenance. Recent studies have unveiled distressing evidence of coastal fish overexploitation and its detrimental ripple effects. Notably, large species like sharks, groupers, and snappers are on a declining trajectory, while reefs grapple with an escalation of lost fishing equipment. The market has witnessed an upsurge in small, previously non-edible species such as filefish and boxfish. Based on the applicant’s firsthand observations and input from local fishermen, overfishing can be attributed to heightened fishing activity, increased boat and engine capacity, and the adoption of destructive practices like the deployment of mosquito nets or scuba divers in seine-net fisheries. Consequently, local authorities have called for collaborative efforts to augment environmental awareness and bolster local capacity for sustainable resource management, including the establishment of marine protected areas.
In the course of this project, an illustrative poster showcasing all commercially harvested species (Figure 12) was created, featuring high-resolution photographs captured by the applicant. Additionally, the bilingual book Coastal Marine Fishes of São Tomé and Príncipe (Figure 13) was published, comprising 123 pages in Portuguese and English, with a print run of 1200 copies. The book launch, hosted at the Oceanário de Lisboa, drew a diverse audience of marine biology enthusiasts, naturalists, and journalists.
Furthermore, around 100 copies of both the poster and the book were generously distributed to government officials, notably those from the Fisheries Board, with whom Flying Sharks (the applicant) established a partnership agreement for future collaboration. While concrete cooperation did not immediately materialize, numerous lectures were delivered across São Tomé, in schools and dive clubs, sounding the alarm on the perils of overfishing. Local dive clubs played a pivotal role in disseminating this crucial message, as did various NGOs, including ‘ATM—Associação de Tartarugas Marinhas’, ‘Projecto Tatô’, ‘MARAPA’, and ‘Príncipe Trust’, who rallied alongside the project in pursuit of a shared conservation vision.

3.19. Title of Project: Integrating Freshwater Fish into Biodiversity Conservation in Turkey (2010)

Project leaders: Anton Weissenbacher and Brian Zimmerman EUAC members: Vienna Zoo and Zoological Society of London
Year supported: 2010 Amount supported: 1522 €
Website: https://www.zsl.org/what-we-do/projects/fish-net (accessed on 18 December 2023)

3.20. Summary of Project

The genus Aphanius encompasses several species with exceedingly restricted distributions, making them highly vulnerable to threats. These small fish, measuring a maximum of 6 cm, are found in fresh and hypersaline waters surrounding the Mediterranean Sea, the Arabian Peninsula, and regions of Africa, Turkey, Pakistan, and India. Remarkably, Aphanius thrive in extreme environments, displaying resilience to elevated salt and sulfur levels, as well as enduring daily temperature fluctuations of up to 20 °C. Despite their tenacity, nearly all Aphanius species and subspecies face significant endangerment, with some members of the group already extinct. This perilous situation is exacerbated by habitat destruction, including coastal areas repurposed for hotel developments, extensive water extraction for agricultural and drinking water needs, and the introduction of non-native fish species.
These economically inconspicuous fish lack advocacy and often find themselves at odds with national interests such as mass tourism and conventional economic progress. Initiatives to safeguard Aphanius only began a decade ago. Presently, Vienna Zoo houses and successfully breeds approximately twenty species and six subspecies of this genus, three of which are already extinct in the wild. Offspring from these successful breeding programs are distributed to other zoos and organizations as part of broader conservation efforts.
The research project focusing on the Azraq killifish, Aphanius sirhani, has yielded invaluable insights into its temperature requirements and egg development. These findings are pivotal in informing appropriate measures for the long-term conservation and restoration of this species’ natural habitat.
In collaboration with the Zoological Society London, the University of Ankara, and Birdlife Turkey, Vienna Zoo initiated a research endeavor to assess the conservation status of Aphanius species in Turkey. This comprehensive project encompassed genetic and morphological studies conducted in partnership with the University of Vienna and other esteemed institutions. The outcomes revealed that at least one of the examined populations was identified as an independent, previously undescribed species. This discovery underscores the importance of continued research and conservation efforts to safeguard the rich diversity within the Aphanius genus.

3.21. Title of Project: Fish Net Greece

Project leader: Brian Zimmerman EUAC member: Zoological Society of London
Year supported: 2005 Amount supported: 7715 €
Website: https://www.zsl.org/what-we-do/projects/fish-net (accessed on 18 December 2023)
In 2005, the EUAC Conservation Fund played a pivotal role in supporting the inaugural survey of the entire known and suspected range of the critically endangered killifish, Valencia letourneuxi, across western Greece and the Ionian Islands [22]. Subsequently, the species was taxonomically split into two distinct species (V. letourneuxi and V. robertae), constituting two out of only three species from the Valenciidae family, exclusively confined to the Mediterranean Basin in Europe [23]. These remarkable fish are exclusively found in lowland spring habitats, with the third species restricted to spring areas along the Mediterranean Spanish coast [24].
The EUAC-funded survey was executed through two expeditions, meticulously sampling 92 sites across multiple basins, ranging from Corfu Island in the north to the Pinios River basin in the south Peloponnese region (Figure 14). The invaluable findings of this survey were documented in a report produced by the Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters (IMBRIW). This report, in turn, served as the foundation for numerous subsequent monitoring expeditions and publications detailing the distributional findings and imminent threats to the species [25,26].
This pioneering expedition laid the groundwork for the establishment of an enduring partnership, ‘Fish Net Greece’, uniting the Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR) and the Zoological Society of London (ZSL), which endured until 2020. At that point, the UK component of the partnership transitioned to the Bristol Zoological Society (BZS). Throughout this collaborative effort, subsequent funding streams catalyzed multiple research and conservation initiatives. These ranged from supporting several PhD studies and orchestrating a conservation translocation operation to conducting live teleconferencing sessions for school-based conservation education and establishing safeguarded populations of both Balkan Valencia species in ex situ facilities within Greece.
The initial seed funding from EUAC precipitated a substantial surge in knowledge acquisition, which was widely disseminated within the scientific and conservation community, particularly for these two species. A PhD student’s specialized focus on utilizing environmental DNA (eDNA) for monitoring cryptic species, such as the Valencia killifish, led to the widespread adoption of this protocol for monitoring freshwater basins in Greece for endemic and highly imperiled species [27]. The EUAC’s investment in a species-based conservation endeavor, targeting a relatively obscure yet critically threatened freshwater teleost, serves as a resounding testament to the profound impact that seed funding for small-scale projects can yield over time.

4. Consequences—Discussion

Since 2004, the EUAC Conservation Fund has been a beacon of support, awarding over a quarter of a million euros to 49 projects spanning the globe (Figure A1 and Figure A2 in Appendix A). Many of these projects have demonstrated a significant positive impact on local populations and their focal species, as highlighted in their descriptions earlier. While a few were less extensive in scope, the majority exhibited meaningful contributions to conservation efforts. A total of 19 projects were part of larger initiatives, with 11 of them initially receiving funding from EUAC, and 14 subsequently receiving follow-up support. In 2020, five projects were temporarily on hold, largely due to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated financial constraints.
Nearly 70% of the projects (Figure A3 in Appendix A) continue to make strides in conservation, securing additional funding and resources. Some projects have even witnessed remarkable expansions, such as the transformation of the turtle rescue station in Naples into an Excellence Centre with an annual research budget of 100,000 €. Similarly, Aquarium Pula in Croatia secured an additional 600,000 € to invest in a new turtle rescue station. Freshwater fish projects have thrived, obtaining further funding to sustain their work in Greece, Turkey, and Madagascar, receiving an additional 100,000 €, 15,000 €, and 80,000 €, respectively. Others have found enduring support, like the Vasco da Gama Aquarium project in Portugal.
Projects led by Zoo Vienna, Cologne Zoo, and Zoo Leipzig benefit from steady funding through their respective zoos’ conservation funds. Around 50% of the projects have produced numerous peer-reviewed articles (Figure A3 in Appendix A), while roughly 50% are directly involved in species protection programs, often targeting imperiled species.
The results from previously mentioned projects unequivocally demonstrate that conservation goals were indeed achieved through the funding provided by EUAC. It is also crucial to acknowledge the high-quality outcomes attained with limited financial support, as projects typically received less than 10,000 € in funding.
Furthermore, a majority of funded projects reported that they successfully accomplished their goals, many of which centered around raising awareness within local populations about threatened species. While the direct impact on species conservation is not entirely clear, one could argue that, at least during the duration of each project, local communities were actively engaged with the researchers involved.
Projects such as the conservation of Achondrostoma occidentale in Portugal, Batagur baska in Bangladesh, Crocodylus siamensis in Indonesia, Valencia letourneuxi in Western Greece, and initiatives related to corals in the Maldives and Croatia, as well as fisheries in São Tomé and Príncipe, all exemplify this trend. While these projects may not have entirely resolved the underlying conservation issues, they undeniably raised significant awareness about the subject during their duration. They also advanced knowledge on conservation solutions and provided training to local stakeholders.
The project on Crocodylus siamensis stands out as a notable example, since Professor Thomas Ziegler’s extensive involvement in conservation initiatives across southeast Asia has significantly contributed to the preservation of biodiversity in the region. These endeavors stand as testament to the crucial role of research and funding in safeguarding our natural heritage for future generations. Through projects funded by EUAC, dedicated efforts have not only led to tangible conservation outcomes but also generated a valuable and extensive body of published work [18,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107].
Such projects—and likely others not included in this report—could greatly benefit from continued efforts on two fronts: (1) evaluating whether any progress can be attributed to efforts conducted during the project, in collaboration with the local communities originally involved, and (2) advocating for legislation that aligns with the project’s goals, in partnership with local governments.
It is evident that a major challenge facing conservation efforts, not just EUAC’s, lies in the effective translation of financial aid into tangible species conservation. While EUAC-funded programs largely focus on gathering fundamental scientific knowledge and raising awareness within local communities, future endeavors could/should consider assisting local populations in establishing sustainable businesses that derive a positive use of species, generating revenue for the community. This approach mirrors the successful conservation efforts for sharks and sea turtles, where activities like shark diving and turtle-related ecotourism have yielded far more revenue than previous practices centered around harming these animals. Notable examples of such conservation strategies can be found in works by Anderson and Waheed [108] (p. 3), Topelko and Dearden [109] (pp. 108–128), Clua et al. [110] (pp. 764–770), Conte [111] (pp. 1–33), Tanner [104] (pp. 9–12), Mieras et al. [112] (121–153), and Gonzáles-Mantilla et al. [113].
Conservation projects must become more embedded in the real world, capable of operating within the sphere of human impact. This entails recognizing our limitations in conserving untouched environments, while also actively engaging local communities, particularly younger generations, in conservation efforts. This inclusive approach can foster innovative strategies to counteract the escalating loss of biodiversity.
Simultaneously, small-scale funding sources like EUAC play a vital role by providing swift and targeted options when scientific knowledge is scarce. Ecological understanding, behavior, and community dynamics remain pivotal factors in the success of conservation initiatives, offering an informed and quantifiable means to preserve biological diversity and educate others. Short-term funds similarly offer crucial opportunities to explore new conservation directions in specific habitats or pioneer ex and in situ research as building blocks for larger future projects. The streamlined application process of small-scale funding options also enables projects to respond promptly to imminent extinction risks, swiftly implement new scientific findings, or address unforeseen events in a reasonable timeframe.
From an operational standpoint, project leaders of EUAC-funded programs have consistently highlighted the challenge of balancing their conservation efforts with their primary responsibilities. These projects often serve as secondary undertakings, with their main focus primarily directed towards the care and management of animals within their affiliated institutions. It would greatly benefit the cause of conservation if more public aquariums and zoos designated dedicated staff to handle conservation-related matters, including the pursuit of funding and the hands-on implementation of projects, followed by comprehensive follow-up actions. A notable example is the Zoological Society of London, where the team working on Valencia letourneuxi has seamlessly integrated conservation responsibilities into their job descriptions. Unfortunately, this level of integration is not commonplace in most other institutions, where limited staff and resources hinder the establishment of a department exclusively focused on in situ and/or ex situ conservation efforts.
The limitations imposed by these circumstances were evident even during the preparation of this manuscript. It is acknowledged that the document may fall short in providing an exhaustive account of every single project. Various factors contributed to this, ranging from the lack of project updates to challenges in evaluating project outcomes and potential loss of information stemming from projects conducted many years ago. Most projects also lacked a dedicated website, or even social media coverage, which severely hinders these efforts’ outreach to the general public. Recognizing this, the establishment of a dedicated ‘Conservation Department’ within EUAC is underway. This department will be tasked with closely monitoring the activities of funded programs and evaluating their true impact on local communities. This development is likely to be one of the more tangible outcomes resulting from the preparation of this report and the compilation of essential information.

5. Conclusions

The projects outlined in this work underscore a crucial point: they actively engage local communities in the preservation of species, a subject that might otherwise remain unfamiliar to them. It is also important to recognize that EUAC-funded projects extend well beyond the confines of the aquarium walls. They have a global reach and play a vital role in raising awareness within local communities about the importance of biodiversity conservation. This emphasizes the need for EUAC and its member public aquariums to take a more assertive stance in lobbying legislative bodies. This advocacy is essential for ensuring the implementation of robust and effective in situ conservation measures. In light of various debates surrounding the role of aquaria and zoos, it is imperative that the public understands the significant contribution of aquaria in conserving numerous species. Visiting these facilities also directly supports the funding of critical projects dedicated to safeguarding species in their natural habitats.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C., N.K. and L.F.; methodology, J.C., N.K. and J.N.; software, J.C., N.K. and J.N.; Validation, J.C., N.K., J.N. and D.P.; formal analysis, J.C., N.K. and J.N.; Investigation, all authors; resources, all authors; data curation, all authors; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C. and D.P.; visualization, all authors; supervision, J.C.; project administration J.C.; funding acquisition, not applicable. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Dataset available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

We extend our heartfelt gratitude to the dedicated staff at the Oceanário de Lisboa for their invaluable assistance in compiling Figure A1. We would also like to acknowledge the tireless efforts of João Falcato and Isabel Koch in advancing this funding program during their tenures as EUAC President and Secretary, respectively. A special appreciation goes to Brian Zimmerman for his outstanding leadership of the EUAC Conservation Funding initiative for over a decade, which has enabled the support of numerous conservation programs, both listed in this paper and others that are not mentioned here.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Projects funded by EUAC between 2004 and 2019 (42). The number in the small circle next to a country represents the project number. Example: number 7 next to Mexico means project number 7 in the list next to the map in the freshwater fish table.
Figure A1. Projects funded by EUAC between 2004 and 2019 (42). The number in the small circle next to a country represents the project number. Example: number 7 next to Mexico means project number 7 in the list next to the map in the freshwater fish table.
Jzbg 05 00007 g0a1
Figure A2. Projects funded by EUAC between 2004 and 2020 (49). Funding: initial funding (I); part of bigger project (P); follow-up (F). Running: project still running? (Y/N). Follow-up: follow-up funding received? (Y/N). Amount: additional funding received. Publications: peer-reviewed publications from project? (Y/N). Extinction risk: involvement in protection of threatened species? (Y/N).
Figure A2. Projects funded by EUAC between 2004 and 2020 (49). Funding: initial funding (I); part of bigger project (P); follow-up (F). Running: project still running? (Y/N). Follow-up: follow-up funding received? (Y/N). Amount: additional funding received. Publications: peer-reviewed publications from project? (Y/N). Extinction risk: involvement in protection of threatened species? (Y/N).
Jzbg 05 00007 g0a2
Notes
(1) Bagnoli station is closed but a new facility opened at Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn in Naples, now a center for excellence in sea turtle Rescue and Research with much bigger facility and veterinary unit. Annual budget: 20,000 € without personnel plus 100,000 € p.a. for Research Projects (1 + 1 Life).
(2) NGO is still active: https://www.facebook.com/naturetropicaleong/ (accessed on 18 December 2023).
(3) Project grew into a long series of projects in Afresh, Pacim, and Decagon under the umbrella of ‘Fish Net Greece’.
(4) A total of 13 new species (one frog, six lizards (Echsen), sox snakes), scientifically described, Building of Rescue Centre together with Zoological Society Frankfurt, region became NP with enlargement, UNESCO World Heritage site, EAZA Conservation Award for Cologne Zoo.
(5) EUAC support was more important than the actual money, specifically networking and acknowledgement opportunities; annual budget in 2022 is 2 million euros; SECORE is a prime example of how public aquaria can be a platform for research and conservation.
(6) A significant ZSL project with an abundance of funders but contribution of EUAC money helped with certain questions.
(7) NGO is still active: https://www.facebook.com/naturetropicaleong/ (accessed on 18 December 2023)
(8) Part of Greek Fish Net Project.
(9) Yielded a PhD and publication; total project budget was 250,000 €.
(10) Yielded a PhD and publications; total project budget was 300,000 €.
(11) Received Darwin Scoping grant.
(12) EDGE projects are done with foreign students and have limited duration.
(13) Project duration 2 years.
(14) Led to red list status of this species and CITES level was raised from WA II to WA I; project focused on Vietnam with separate population unit, genetic screening for species protection and identification, ex situ in Zoo Köln (Vietnamese form) bred to F2 generation; conservation breeding in Cologne Zoo and Melinh Station for Biodiversity in Vietnam; monitoring of wild population in Vietnam ongoing.
(15) Fish list being compiled together with ZFMK (Zoological Research Museum Alexander König).
(16) EDGE projects are done with foreign students and have limited duration.
(17) Zoo Leipzig and Universität Chile, built a station from a container.
(18) Led to red list status of this species and CITES level was raised from WA II to WA I; project focused on Vietnam with separate population unit, genetic screening for species protection and identification, ex situ in Zoo Köln (Vietnamese form) bred to F2 generation.
(19) Follow-up from 2010.
(20) Part of a fixed termed project.
(21) Yielded a book, poster, multiple lectures to locals, and a partnership with the Fisheries Board of São Tomé.
(22) Yielded Vietnamese population ex situ breeding up to F2 generation, exchange with European zoos, extensive new enclosure, positive outcome of the project result as member of staff now works for the German Ministry for Conservation.
(23) Yielded offspring of genetically tested Siamese crocodiles in Laos, raised for conservation breeding network/release.
(24) Sea turtle program still running, with the construction of a new rescue station to begin immediately.
(25) Predominantly yielded educational outputs and increased networking; the Portuguese navy finances the project, which also receives support from the municipality.
(26) Exhibition; option to continue.
(27) 150 people educated in three workshops, exhibition, and presentation, follow-up with sexual reproduction currently in progress.
(28) Search for genetically pure individuals, ex situ breeding successful, specimen for rescue stations, exchange with zoos and release to wild, One Plan Approach and habitat analysis.
(29) Contribution to project purpose.
(30) Predominantly yielded educational outputs and increased networking; the Portuguese navy finances the project, which also receives support from the municipality.
(31) Project will be shifted to Azores/Portugal due to political issues in East Timor after the pandemic.
Figure A3. Status of 49 projects funded from 2004 to 2020 by the European Union of Aquarium Curators. Funding: initial funding (I); part of bigger project (P); follow-up (F). Running: project still running? (Y/N). Follow-up: follow-up funding received? (Y/N). Publications: peer-reviewed publications from project? (Y/N). Extinction risk: involvement in protection of endangered species? (Y/N). n.a.: information not available; n.c.: not counted; standby: project on hold (usually due to COVID-19 pandemic).
Figure A3. Status of 49 projects funded from 2004 to 2020 by the European Union of Aquarium Curators. Funding: initial funding (I); part of bigger project (P); follow-up (F). Running: project still running? (Y/N). Follow-up: follow-up funding received? (Y/N). Publications: peer-reviewed publications from project? (Y/N). Extinction risk: involvement in protection of endangered species? (Y/N). n.a.: information not available; n.c.: not counted; standby: project on hold (usually due to COVID-19 pandemic).
Jzbg 05 00007 g0a3

References

  1. Packer, J.; Ballantyne, R. The role of zoos and aquariums in education for a sustainable future. New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ. 2010, 2010, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gusset, M.; Dick, G. The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo. Biol. 2011, 30, 566–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thrush, S.F.; Dayton, P.K. Disturbance to marine benthic habitats by trawling and dredging: Implications for marine biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002, 33, 449–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Clark, M.R.; Althaus, F.; Schlacher, T.A.; Williams, A.; Bowden, D.A.; Rowden, A.A. The impacts of deep-sea fisheries on benthic communities: A review. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2015, 73, i51–i69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Carlson, R.R.; Foo, S.A.; Asner, G.P. Land Use Impacts on Coral Reef Health: A Ridge-to-Reef Perspective. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Reid, A.J.; Carlson, A.K.; Creed, I.F.; Eliason, E.J.; Gell, P.A.; Johnson, P.T.J.; Kidd, K.A.; MacCormack, T.J.; Olden, J.D.; Ormerod, S.J.; et al. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 2019, 94, 849–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dudgeon, D. Multiple threats imperil freshwater biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, R960–R967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Darwall, W.; Smith, K.; Allen, D.; Seddon, M.; Reid, G.M.; Clausnitzer, V.; Kalkman, V.J. Freshwater biodiversity: A hidden resource under threat. In Wildlife in a Changing World–An Analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; Lyrix Edidona: Barcelona, Spain, 2009; Volume 43. [Google Scholar]
  9. Van Woesik, R.; Shlesinger, T.; Grottoli, A.G.; Toonen, R.J.; Vega Thurber, R.; Warner, M.E.; Marie Hulver, A.; Chapron, L.; McLachlan, R.H.; Albright, R.; et al. Coral-bleaching responses to climate change across biological scales. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2022, 28, 4229–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. McClanahan, T.R. A coral reef ecosystem-fisheries model: Impacts of fishing intensity and catch selection on reef structure and processes. Ecol. Model. 1995, 80, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cinner, J.E.; McClanahan, T.R.; Graham, N.A.J.; Daw, T.M.; Maina, J.; Stead, S.M.; Wamukota, A.; Brown, K.; Bodin, Ö. Vulnerability of coastal communities to key impacts of climate change on coral reef fisheries. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2012, 22, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Correia, J.P.S. Marine Animals and Human Care Toward Effective Conservation of the Marine Environment. In Life Below Water; Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 563–575. [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith, M.; Warmolts, D.; Thoney, D.; Hueter, R. The Elasmobranch Husbandry Manual: Captive Care of Sharks, Rays and Their Relatives; Ohio Biological Survey: Columbus, OH, USA, 2004; p. 589. [Google Scholar]
  14. Leewis, R.J.; Janse, M. Advances in Coral Husbandry in Public Aquariums; Burgers’ Zoo: Arnhem, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  15. Leewis, R.J. Advances in coral husbandry in public aquariums. In Proceedings of the International Symposium of Coral Husbandry in Public Aquaria, Arnheim; Burgers’ Zoo: Arnhem, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith, M.; Warmolts, D.; Thoney, D.; Hueter, R.; Murray, M.; Ezcurra, J. The Elasmobranch Husbandry Manual II: Recent Advances in the Care of Sharks, Rays and their Relatives; Ohio Biological Survey, Inc.: Columbus, OH, USA, 2017; p. 504. [Google Scholar]
  17. Weissenbacher, A.; Preininger, D.; Ghosh, R.; Morshed, A.G.J.; Praschag, P. Conservation breeding of the Northern river terrapin Batagur baska at the Vienna Zoo, Austria, and in Bangladesh. Int. Zoo. Yearb. 2015, 49, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Behler, N.; Kopsieker, L.; Staniewicz, A.; Darmansyah, S.; Stuebing, R.; Ziegler, T. Population size, demography and diet of the Siamese crocodile, Crocodylus siamensis (Schneider, 1801) in the Mesangat Swamp in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Raffles Bull. Zool. 2018, 66, 506–516. [Google Scholar]
  19. Afonso, P.; Porteiro, F.M.; Santos, R.S.; Barreiros, J.P.; Worms, J.; Wirtz, P. Coastal marine fishes of São Tomé Island (Gulf of Guinea). Arquipélago Life Mar. Sci. 1999, 17, 65–92. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wirtz, P.; Ferreira, C.E.L.; Floeter, S.R.; Fricke, R.; Gasparini, J.L.; Iwamoto, T.; Rocha, L.; Sampaio, C.L.; Schliewen, U.K. Coastal fishes of São Tomé and Príncipe islands, gulf of Guinea (eastern Atlantic Ocean)—An update. Zootaxa 2007, 1523, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Floeter, S.R.; Rocha, L.A.; Robertson, D.R.; Joyeux, J.C.; Smith-Vaniz, W.F.; Wirtz, P.; Edwards, A.J.; Barreiros, J.P.; Ferreira, C.E.L.; Gasparini, J.L.; et al. Atlantic reef fish biogeography and evolution. J. Biogeogr. 2008, 35, 22–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Crivelli, A.J. Valencia letourneuxi. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; Lyrix Edidona: Barcelona, Spain, 2006; p. e.T22830A9393054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Freyhof, J.; Kärst, H.; Geiger, M. Valencia robertae, a new killifish from southern Greece (Cyprinodontiformes: Valenciidae). Ichthyol. Explor. Freshw. 2014, 24, 289–298. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bianco, P. Précision sur la distribution de Cobitis taenia Linnaeus, 1758 (Cobitidae) et de Valencia hispanica (Valenciennes, 1846) (Cyprinodontidae) dans les eaux douces d’Italie. Cybium 1987, 11, 207–212. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kalogianni, E.; Giakoumi, S.; Zogaris, S.; Chatzinikolaou, Y.; Zimmerman, B.; Economou, A.N. Current distribution and ecology of the critically endangered Valencia letourneuxi in Greece. Biologia 2010, 65, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Giakoumi, S.; Zimmerman, B.; Zogaris, S.; Economou, A.N.; Kalogianni, E. Current population status of Valencia letourneuxi (Sauvage 1880) in the Mornos River Delta. In Proceedings of the 8th Pan-Hellenic Symposium on Oceanography and Fisheries, Thessaloniki, Greece, 4–6 June 2006. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mauvisseau, Q.; Kalogianni, E.; Zimmerman, B.; Bulling, M.; Brys, R.; Sweet, M. eDNA-based monitoring: Advancement in management and conservation of critically endangered killifish species. Environ. DNA 2020, 2, 601–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bernardes, M.; Rödder, D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; T, Z. Verknüpfung ökologischer Nischenmodellierung mit naturschutzrelevanter in-situ-Forschung: Verbreitung und Bestandssituation des IUCN-gelisteten und endemischen Vietnamesischen Krokodilmolch Tylototriton vietnamensis im Norden Vietnams. Elaphe/Terraria 2012, 12, 118–119. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bernardes, M.; Rödder, D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Ziegler, T. Habitat characterization and potential distribution of Tylototriton vietnamensis in northern Vietnam. J. Nat. Hist. 2013, 47, 1161–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bernardes, M.; Pham, T.C.; Nguyen, Q.T.; Ziegler, T. Newt beginnings: How EAZA has facilitated public awareness training and in situ research of an IUCN listed newt species endemic to Vietnam. Zooquaria 2011, 73, 23. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bernardes, M.; Rödder, D.; Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Ziegler, T. Integration of species distribution modeling with in situ research for the conservation of the endemic Vietnamese crocodile newt (Tylototriton vietnamensis). Froglog 2012, 20, 21–23. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gawor, A.; Hendrix, R.; Vences, M.; WOLFGANG, B.; Ziegler, T. Larval morphology in four species of Hylarana from Vietnam and Thailand with comments on the taxonomy of H. nigrovittata sensu latu (Anura: Ranidae). Zootaxa 2009, 2051, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gawor, A.; van der Straeten, K.; Karbe, D.; Manthey, U.; Ziegler, T. Reproduction and development of the dark-sided frog Hylarana nigrovittata sensu lato at the Cologne Zoo. Salamandra 2011, 47, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gawor, A.; Rauhaus, A.; Karbe, D.; Van Der Straeten, K.; Lötters, S.; Ziegler, T. Is there a chance for conservation breeding? Ex situ management, reproduction, and early life stages of the Harlequin toad Atelopus flavescens Duméril & Bibron, 1841 (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae). Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 2012, 5, 29–44. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gawor, A.; Chapuis, S.; Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Schmitz, A.; Ziegler, T. Larval morphology of two species of the genus Theloderma (Tschudi, 1838) from Vietnam (Anura: Rhacophoridae: Rhacophorinae). Zootaxa 2012, 3395, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gawor, A.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Nguyen, T.T.; Sschmitz, A.; Ziegler, T. The herpetofauna of the Bai Tu Long National Park, northeastern Vietnam. Salamandra 2016, 52, 23–41. [Google Scholar]
  37. Geissler, P.; Hartmann, T.; Ihlow, F.; Rödder, D.; Poyarkov, N.A., Jr.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Ziegler, T.; Böhme, W. The Lower Mekong: An insurmountable barrier to amphibians in southern Indochina? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2015, 114, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Geissler, P.; Poyarkov, N.A.; Grismer, L.; Nguyen, T.Q.; An, H.T.; Neang, T.; Kupfer, A.; Ziegler, T.; Böhme, W.; Müller, H. New Ichthyophis species from Indochina (Gymnophiona, Ichthyophiidae): 1. The unstriped forms with descriptions of three new species and the redescriptions of I. acuminatus Taylor, 1960, I. youngorum Taylor, 1960 and I. laosensis Taylor, 1969. Org. Divers. Evol. 2015, 15, 143–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hecht, V.L.; Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Bonkowski, M.; Ziegler, T. First report on the herpetofauna of Tay Yen Tu nature reserve, northeastern Vietnam. Biodivers. J. 2013, 4, 507–552. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hendrix, R.; Gawor, A.; Vences, M.; Ziegler, T. The tadpole of the narrow-mouthed frog Microhyla fissipes from Vietnam (Anura: Microhylidae). Zootaxa 2008, 1675, 67–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hendrix, R.; Nguyen, Q.; Böhme, W.; Ziegler, T. New anuran records from Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, Truong Son, central Vietnam. Herpetol. Notes 2008, 1, 23–31. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hendrix, R.; Böhme, W.; Ziegler, T. The tadpole of the helmeted toad, Ingerophrynus galeatus (Günther, 1864), from Vietnam (Anura: Bufonidae). Herpetol. Notes 2009, 2, 155–160. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hendrix, R.; Grosjean, S.; Quyet, L.; Vences, M.; Thanh, V.N.; Ziegler, T. Molecular identification and description of the tadpole of the Annam Flying Frog, Rhacophorus annamensis Smith, 1924 (Anura: Rhacophoridae). Salamandra 2007, 43, 11. [Google Scholar]
  44. Le, D.T.; Pham, A.V.; Nguyen, S.H.L.; Ziegler, T.; Nguyen, T.Q. First Records of Megophrys daweimontis Rao and Yang, 1997 and Amolops vitreus (Bain, Stuart and Orlov, 2006)(Anura: Megophryidae, Ranidae) from Vietnam. Asian Herpetol. Res. 2015, 6, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Le, D.T.; Van Pham, A.; Nguyen, S.H.L.; Ziegler, T.; Nguyen, T.Q. Babina lini (Chou, 1999) and Hylarana menglaensis Fei, Ye et Xie, 2008, two additional anuran species for the herpetofauna of Vietnam. Russ. J. Herpetol. 2014, 21, 315–321. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lötters, S.; Ellwein, D.; Karbe, D.; Van Der Staeten, K.; Luger, M.; Rautenberg, J.; Rödder, D.; Venegas, P.J.; Werner, P.; Ziegler, T. Erforschung und Schutz der letzten Harlekinfrösche. Elaphe 2011, 19, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  47. Luu, V.; Nguyen, T.; Pham, C.; Dang, K.; Vu, T.; Miskovic, S.; Bonkowski, M.; Ziegler, T. No end in sight? Further new records of amphibians and reptiles from Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, Quang Binh Province, Vietnam. Biodivers. J. 2013, 4, 285–300. [Google Scholar]
  48. Luu, V.Q.; Calame, T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Ohler, A.; Bonokowski, M.; Ziegler, T. First records of Gracixalus supercornutus (Orlov, Ho and Nguyen, 2004) and Rhacophorus maximus Günther, 1858 from Laos. Herpetol. Notes 2014, 7, 419–423. [Google Scholar]
  49. Luu, V.Q.; Le, C.X.; Do, H.Q.; Hoang, T.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Bonkowski, M.; Ziegler, T. New records of amphibians from Thuong Tien Nature Reserve, Hoa Binh Province, Vietnam. Herpetol. Notes 2014, 7, 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nguyen, T.; Dang, T.; Pham, C.; Nguyen, T.; Ziegler, T. Amphibian breeding station in Hanoi: A trial model for linking conservation and research with sustainable use. Froglog 2009, 91, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  51. Nguyen, T.Q.; Hendrix, R.; Boehme, W.; Vu Ngoc, T.; Ziegler, T. A new species of the genus Philautus (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae) from the Truong Son Range, Quang Binh Province, central Vietnam. Zootaxa 2008, 1925, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nguyen, T.Q.; Le, M.D.; Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Bonkowski, M.; Ziegler, T. A new species of Gracixalus (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae) from northern Vietnam. Org. Divers. Evol. 2013, 13, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nguyen, T.Q.; Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Ngo, H.N.; Ziegler, T. A new species of Theloderma (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae) from Vietnam. Zootaxa 2016, 4168, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nguyen, T.Q.; Phung, T.M.; Le, M.D.; Ziegler, T.; Böhme, W. First Record of the Genus Oreolalax (Anura: Megophryidae) from Vietnam with Description of a New Species. Copeia 2013, 2, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nguyen, T.Q.; Phung, T.M.; Schneider, N.; Botov, A.; Tran, D.T.A.; Ziegler, T. New records of amphibians and reptiles from southern Vietnam. Bonn. Zool. Bull. 2014, 63, 148–156. [Google Scholar]
  56. Nguyen, T.Q.; Ziegler, T. Amphibian research and conservation in Vietnam. FrogLog 2012, 20, 21. [Google Scholar]
  57. Pham, A.V.; Le, D.T.; Nguyen, S.H.L. First records of Leptolalax eos Ohler, Wollenberg, Grosjean, Hendrix, Vences, Ziegler et Dubois, 2011 and Hylarana cubitalis (Smith, 1917)(Anura: Megophryidae, Ranidae) from Vietnam. Russ. J. Herpetol. 2014, 21, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
  58. Pham, A.V.; Le, D.T.; Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, S.L.H.; Ziegler, T.; Nguyen, T.Q. Two additional records of megophryid frogs, Leptobrachium masatakasatoi Matsui, 2013 and Leptolalax minimus (Taylor, 1962), for the herpetofauna of Vietnam. Rev. Suisse Zool. 2016, 123, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pham, C.T.; Dogra, A.; Gawor, A.; Rauhaus, A.; Kloeble, G.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Ziegler, T. First record of Amolops cremnobatus from Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam, including an extended tadpole description and the first larval staging for Amolops. Salamandra 2015, 51, 111–120. [Google Scholar]
  60. Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Bernardes, M.; Nguyen, T.T.; Ziegler, T. First records of Bufo gargarizans Cantor, 1842 and Odorrana lipuensis Mo, Chen, Wu, Zhang et Zhou, 2015 (Anura: Bufonidae, Ranidae) from Vietnam. Russ. J. Herpetol. 2016, 23, 103–107. [Google Scholar]
  61. Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Le, M.D.; Bonkowski, M.; Ziegler, T. A new species of Odorrana (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae) from Vietnam. Zootaxa 2016, 4084, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Van Hoang, C.; Ziegler, T. New records and an updated list of amphibians from Xuan Lien Nature Reserve, Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam. Herpetol. Notes 2016, 9, 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  63. Phung, T.M.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Rauhaus, A.; Ziegler, T. The first record of the middle back-stripe bullfrog, Kaloula mediolineata (Anura: Microhylidae), from Phu Qui Island, Binh Thuan Province, southern Vietnam. Herpetol. Notes 2013, 6, 463–465. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rauhaus, A.; Gawor, A.; Perl, R.; Scheld, S.; Van Der Straeten, K.; Karbe, D.; Pham, C.; Nguyen, T.; Ziegler, T. Larval development, stages and an international comparison of husbandry parameters of the Vietnamese Mossy Frog Theloderma corticale (Boulenger, 1903)(Anura: Rhacophoridae). Asian J. Conserv. Biol. 2012, 1, 51–66. [Google Scholar]
  65. Rowley, J.J.; Tran, D.T.; Le, D.T.; Dau, V.Q.; Peloso, P.L.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Hoang, H.D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Ziegler, T. Five new, microendemic Asian Leaf-litter Frogs (Leptolalax) from the southern Annamite mountains, Vietnam. Zootaxa 2016, 4085, 63–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Scheld, S.; Bina Perl, R.; Rauhaus, A.; Karbe, D.; Van der Straeten, K.; Hauswaldt, S.; Randrianiania, R.; Gawor, A.; Vences, M.; Ziegler, T. Larval morphology and development of the Malagasy frog Mantidactylus betsileanus. Salamandra 2013, 49, 186–200. [Google Scholar]
  67. Strauß, S.; Ziegler, T.; Allmeling, C.; Reimers, K.; Frank-Klein, N.; Seuntjens, R.; Vogt, P. In vitro culture of skin cells from biopsies from the Critically Endangered Chinese giant salamander, Andrias davidianus (Blanchard, 1871) (Amphibia, Caudata, Cryptobranchidae). Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 2013, 5, 51–63. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ten Hagen, L.; Rodríguez, A.; Menke, N.; Göcking, C.; Bisping, M.; Frommolt, K.-H.; Ziegler, T.; Bonkowski, M.; Vences, M. Vocalizations in juvenile anurans: Common spadefoot toads (Pelobates fuscus) regularly emit calls before sexual maturity. Sci. Nat. 2016, 103, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tran, D.T.A.; Le, Q.K.; Le, K.V.; Vu, T.N.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Böhme, W.; Ziegler, T. First and preliminary frog records (Amphibia: Anura) from Quang Ngai province, Vietnam. Herpetol. Notes 2010, 3, 111–119. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tran, D.T.A.; Nguyen, T.T.; Phung, T.M.; Ly, T.; Böhme, W.; Ziegler, T. Redescription of Rhacophorus chuyangsinensis Orlov, Nguyen & Ho, 2008 (Anura: Rhacophoridae) based on new collections from new south Vietnamese provincial records: Lam Dong and Khanh Hoa. Rev. Suisse Zool. 2011, 118, 413. [Google Scholar]
  71. Van Der Straeten, K.; Karbe, D.; Olbort, S.; Ziegler, T. First record of the Asian horned frog, Megophrys nasuta, in the Aquarium of the Cologne Zoo. Terraria 2007, 62, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  72. Wildenhues, M.; Rauhaus, A.; Bach, R.; Karbe, D.; Van der Straeten, K.; Hertwig, S.; Ziegler, T. Husbandry, captive breeding, larval development and stages of the Malayan horned frog Megophrys nasuta (Schlegel, 1858) (Amphibia: Anura: Megophryidae). Amphib. Reptile Conserv. 2012, 5, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wildenhues, M.J.; Bagaturov, M.F.; Schmitz, A.; Tran, D.A.T.; Hendrix, R.; Ziegler, T. Captive management and reproductive biology of Orlov’s Treefrog, Rhacophorus orlovi Ziegler & Köhler, 2001 (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae), including larval description, colour pattern variation and advertisement call. Der Zool. Garten 2011, 80, 287–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wildenhues, M.J.; Gawor, A.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Nguyen, T.T.; Schmitz, A.; Ziegler, T. First description of larval and juvenile stages of Rhacophorus maximus Günther, 1859 “1858” (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from Vietnam. Rev. Suisse Zool. 2010, 117, 679–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ziegler, T. In situ and ex situ amphibian conservation projects of the Cologne Zoo: Research and breeding as our contribution towards species protection. Z. Des Kölner Zoos 2008, 51, 67–88. [Google Scholar]
  76. Ziegler, T. Protecting amphibian diversity. The Federal Government Informs, Magazine of Development Policy 03/2008 062 2008; Federal Government Press and Information Office: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 27–29.
  77. Ziegler, T. Batrachological basis research within the nature conservation project of the Cologne Zoo in Vietnam. In Amphibians Deserve Our Support. A Contribution for the Implementation of the WAZA Resolution Concerning Measures against Amphibian Decline; Dollinger, P., Ed.; Phong Nha–Ke Bang National Park and Cologne Zoo: Quang Binh, Viet Nam, 2009; Volume 10, p. 124. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ziegler, T. Breeding and Diversity Research: “Ex Situ” and “In Situ” Asian Amphibian Projects of the Cologne Zoo; Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, University Hamburg: Hambung, Germany, 2009; Volume 25. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ziegler, T. Breeding, Research & Conservation of Tropical Herpetodiversity: Linking ex situ with in situ Approaches. In Proceedings of the 65th Annual Conference WAZA, Cologne, Germany, 17–21 October 2010; pp. 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  80. Ziegler, T. Research as important challenge of Zoological Gardens to preserve biodiversity. In Proceedings of the Verhandlungsbericht des IV. Rigi-Symposiums, Goldau-Rigi, Vietnam, 28–30 January 2010; pp. 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ziegler, T. Erhalt der Amphibienvielfalt. Projekte des Kölner Zoos. Z. Des Kölner Zoos 2012, 62, 111. [Google Scholar]
  82. Ziegler, T. Two decades of herpetodiversity research in Vietnam and Laos: A review of a German-Vietnamese long-term cooperation. In Proceedings of the 3rd National Scientific Conference on Amphibians and Reptiles in Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam, 26 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ziegler, T.; Dang, T.T.; Nguyen, T.Q. Breeding, natural history and diversity research: Ex situ and in situ Asian amphibian projects of the Cologne Zoo and the In-stitute of Ecology and Biological Resources. In Proceedings of the Amphibian Conference of the Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia, 28–30 September 2011; pp. 137–146. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ziegler, T.; Hartmann, T.; Van der Straeten, K.; Karbe, D.; Böhme, W. Captive breeding and larval morphology of Tylototriton shanjing Nussbaum, Brodie & Yang, 1995, with an updated key of the genus Tylototriton (Amphibia: Salamandridae). Der Zool. Garten 2008, 77, 246–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ziegler, T.; Nguyen, T.Q. Amphibian and Reptile breeding-The amphibian and reptilian breeding station at Hanoi. WAZA News 2008, 9, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  86. Ziegler, T.; Nguyen, T.Q. New discoveries of amphibians and reptiles from Vietnam. Bonn. Zool. Bull. 2010, 57, 137–147. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ziegler, T.; Nguyen, T.Q. Gracixalus waza: May we introduce the WAZA Treefrog? A recently discovered amphibian species from northern Vietnam and named in honour of WAZA. WAZA News 2013, 13, 2–3. [Google Scholar]
  88. Ziegler, T.; Pagel, T. The contribution of the Cologne Zoo towards the Amphibian Ark: Breeding projects, research and education for the protec-tion of amphibians. Draco 2008, 34, 87–96. [Google Scholar]
  89. Ziegler, T.; Pagel, T.; Vogt, M.; Forster, B.; Marcordes, B. Conserving Vietnam’s biodiversity-The Cologne Zoo’s nature conservation programme in Vietnam. WAZA Mag. 2008, 9, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ziegler, T.; Rauhaus, A. Erste herpetologische Amtshilfe aus Köln im Zoo Saigon. Terraria/Elaphe 2015, 54, 72–80. [Google Scholar]
  91. Ziegler, T.; Rauhaus, A.; Karbe, D.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Pham, C.T.; Huy, P.D. New amphibian keeping and breeding facilities created at the Me Linh Station for Biodiversity, northern Vietnam. Amphib. Ark. Newsl. 2013, 23, 14–15. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ziegler, T.; Rauhaus, A.; Mutschmann, F.; Dang, P.H.; Pham, C.T.; Nguyen, T.Q. Building up of keeping facilities and breeding projects for frogs, newts and lizards at the Me Linh Station for Biodiversity in northern Vietnam, including improvement of housing conditions for confiscated reptiles and primates. Der Zool. Garten 2016, 85, 91–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ziegler, T.; Rauhaus, A.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Nguyen, K.V. Südlichster Nachweis von Gekko badenii Szczerbak & Nekrasova, 1994, mit Bemerkungen zur Herpetofauna der Hon Me-Auffangstation in der Provinz Kien Giang, Südvietnam. Sauria 2015, 37, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ziegler, T.; Rauhaus, A.; Tran, T.; Pham, C.; Van Schingen, M.; Dang, P.; Le, M.; Nguyen, T. Die Amphibien-und Reptilienfauna der Me-Linh-Biodiversitätsstation in Nordvietnam. Sauria 2015, 37, 11–44. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ziegler, T.; Thanh, V.N. Mười Năm Nghiên Cứu đa Dạng Lưỡng Cư Bò Sát Tại Vườn Quốc Gia Phong Nha-Kẻ Bàng; Hue University Publishing House: Hue, Vietnam, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  96. Ziegler, T.; Tran, D.T.A.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Perl, R.G.B.; Wirk, L.; Kulisch, M.; Lehmann, T.; Rauhaus, A.; Nguyen, T.T.; Le, Q.K. New amphibian and reptile records from Ha Giang Province, northern Vietnam. Herpetol. Notes 2014, 7, 185–201. [Google Scholar]
  97. Ziegler, T.; Van der Straeten, K.; Karbe, D. The Asian Horned Frog Megophrys Nasuta; NTV-Verlag: Münster, Deutschland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  98. Ziegler, T. Batrachologische Basisforschung im Naturschutzprojekt des Kölner Zoos in Vietnam. In Amphibien Brauchen Unsere Hilfe. Ein Beitrag Zur Umsetzung Der WAZA-Resolution über Massnahmen Gegen Das Amphibiensterben; Dollinger, P., Ed.; WAZA Meetings, Verhandlungsbericht des Amphibienkurses gemeinsam organisiert mit den Zooverbänden im deutschsprachigen Raum: Chemnitz, Germany, 2007; p. 124. [Google Scholar]
  99. Ziegler, T. The IUCN/SSC CPSG’s One Plan approach and the role of progressive zoos in conservation: Case studies from herpetology. In Proceedings of the 14th national congress of the Italian Society for Herpetology, Turino, Italy, 14–17 September 2023; pp. 195–222. [Google Scholar]
  100. Geiger, C.C.; Schmidt, B.R. Laboratory tests of antifungal agents to treat tadpoles against the pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2013, 103, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Geiger, C.C.; Schmidt, B.R.; Origgi, F.C. Accumulation of the pathogenic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis on the regressing tail of midwife toads Alytes obstetricans undergoing metamorphosis. Amphib-Reptilia 2013, 34, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ohler, A.; Wollenberg, K.C.; Grosjean, S.; Hendrix, R.; Vences, M.; Ziegler, T.; Dubois, A. Sorting out Lalos: Description of new species and additional taxonomic data on megophryid frogs from northern Indochina (genus Leptolalax, Megophryidae, Anura). Zootaxa 2011, 3147, 1–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Woodhams, D.C.; Geiger, C.C.; Reinert, L.K.; Rollins-Smith, L.A.; Lam, B.; Harris, R.N.; Briggs, C.J.; Vredenburg, V.T.; Voyles, J. Treatment of amphibians infected with chytrid fungus: Learning from failed trials with itraconazole, antimicrobial peptides, bacteria, and heat therapy. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2012, 98, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tanner, C. Sea turtle conservation in Ghana’s western region: The bigger picture. Mar. Turt. Newsl. 2013, 136, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  105. Geiger, C.; Küpfer, E.; Schär, S.; Wolf, S.; Schmidt, B. Elevated temperature clears chytrid fungus infections from tadpoles of the midwife toad, Alytes obstetricans. Amphib-Reptilia 2011, 32, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Rodrigues, N.V.; Andrade, A.B.; Fontes, J. Peixes Marinhos Costeiros de São Tomé e Príncipe (Costal Marine Fishes of São Tomé and Príncipe); Flying Sharks: Lisbon, Portugal, 2018; p. 123. [Google Scholar]
  107. Ziegler, T.; Thanh, V.N. Ten years of herpetodiversity research in Phong Nha—Ke Bang National Park, central Vietnam. In Vo Van Tri, Nguyen Tien Dat, Dang Ngoc Kien & Pham Thi Hai Yen; Phong Nha—Ke Bang National Park and Cologne Zoo, 10 years of Cooperation (1999–2009): Quang Binh, Vietnam, 2009; pp. 103–124. [Google Scholar]
  108. Anderson, C.; Waheed, A. The economics of shark and ray watching in the Maldives. Newsl. IUCN Shark Spec. Group Shark News 2001, 3, 3. [Google Scholar]
  109. Topelko, K.N.; Dearden, P. The shark watching industry and its potential contribution to shark conservation. J. Ecotourism 2005, 4, 108–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Clua, E.; Buray, N.; Legendre, P.; Mourier, J.; Planes, S. Business partner or simple catch? The economic value of the sicklefin lemon shark in French Polynesia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2011, 62, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Conte, A. What is the Value of a Sea Turtle?: A Case Study of the Conservation Ethics of Sea Turtle Fishermen in the Caribbean. Coast Nicar. 2011, 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  112. Mieras, P.A.; Harvey-Clark, C.; Bear, M.; Hodgin, G.; Hodgin, B. Chapter Five—The Economy of Shark Conservation in the Northeast Pacific: The Role of Ecotourism and Citizen Science. In Advances in Marine Biology; Larson, S.E., Lowry, D., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 78, pp. 121–153. [Google Scholar]
  113. Gonzáles-Mantilla, P.G.; Gallagher, A.J.; León, C.J.; Vianna, G.M.S. Economic impact and conservation potential of shark-diving tourism in the Azores Islands. Mar. Policy 2022, 135, 104869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pinna nobilis in the south Adriatic Sea. Photo: Aquarium Pula.
Figure 1. Pinna nobilis in the south Adriatic Sea. Photo: Aquarium Pula.
Jzbg 05 00007 g001
Figure 2. Thomas Ziegler with Pelodiscus variegatus at Melinh Station for Biodiversity in Vietnam. Photo: C. T. Pham.
Figure 2. Thomas Ziegler with Pelodiscus variegatus at Melinh Station for Biodiversity in Vietnam. Photo: C. T. Pham.
Jzbg 05 00007 g002
Figure 3. Cladocora caespitosa in Medulin Bay, Istria, Croatia. Photo: Pula Aquarium.
Figure 3. Cladocora caespitosa in Medulin Bay, Istria, Croatia. Photo: Pula Aquarium.
Jzbg 05 00007 g003
Figure 4. Practical lesson for attaching coral fragments with school class in Ukulhas, 2019. Photo: Coral Doctors Association.
Figure 4. Practical lesson for attaching coral fragments with school class in Ukulhas, 2019. Photo: Coral Doctors Association.
Jzbg 05 00007 g004
Figure 5. Lesson about planting coral fragments directly in the reef, Konotta. Photo: Coral Doctors Association.
Figure 5. Lesson about planting coral fragments directly in the reef, Konotta. Photo: Coral Doctors Association.
Jzbg 05 00007 g005
Figure 6. Project Batagur baska—transmitter being fixed on a male. Photo: Rupali-Ghosh, Vienna Zoo.
Figure 6. Project Batagur baska—transmitter being fixed on a male. Photo: Rupali-Ghosh, Vienna Zoo.
Jzbg 05 00007 g006
Figure 7. Project Batagur baska—Male with transmitter being released in the Sundarbans. Photo: Rupert Kainradl.
Figure 7. Project Batagur baska—Male with transmitter being released in the Sundarbans. Photo: Rupert Kainradl.
Jzbg 05 00007 g007
Figure 8. Fish release in Alcabrichel. Photo: Aquário Vasco da Gama.
Figure 8. Fish release in Alcabrichel. Photo: Aquário Vasco da Gama.
Jzbg 05 00007 g008
Figure 9. Presenting fish to school children. Photo: Aquário Vasco da Gama.
Figure 9. Presenting fish to school children. Photo: Aquário Vasco da Gama.
Jzbg 05 00007 g009
Figure 10. Thomas Ziegler with Crocodylus siamensis at Saigon Zoo, Vietnam. Photo: D. A. T. Tran.
Figure 10. Thomas Ziegler with Crocodylus siamensis at Saigon Zoo, Vietnam. Photo: D. A. T. Tran.
Jzbg 05 00007 g010
Figure 11. Searching for the critically endangered Mangarahara cichlid and taking water quality samples from one of the locations, with the help of the local community. Photo: Tim McCaskie.
Figure 11. Searching for the critically endangered Mangarahara cichlid and taking water quality samples from one of the locations, with the help of the local community. Photo: Tim McCaskie.
Jzbg 05 00007 g011
Figure 12. Poster with commercially exploited marine fish species in São Tomé and Príncipe.
Figure 12. Poster with commercially exploited marine fish species in São Tomé and Príncipe.
Jzbg 05 00007 g012
Figure 13. The book Coastal Marine Fishes of São Tomé and Príncipe bilingual (Portuguese and English) edition.
Figure 13. The book Coastal Marine Fishes of São Tomé and Príncipe bilingual (Portuguese and English) edition.
Jzbg 05 00007 g013
Figure 14. Sampling for the critically endangered Corfu killifish, Valencia letourneuxi. Photo: Yannis Kapakos.
Figure 14. Sampling for the critically endangered Corfu killifish, Valencia letourneuxi. Photo: Yannis Kapakos.
Jzbg 05 00007 g014
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Correia, J.; Kube, N.; Florisson, L.; Janse, M.; Zimmerman, B.; Preininger, D.; Nowaczek, J.; Weissenbacher, A.; Batista, H.; Jouk, P. A Review of Two Decades of In Situ Conservation Powered by Public Aquaria. J. Zool. Bot. Gard. 2024, 5, 90-118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg5010007

AMA Style

Correia J, Kube N, Florisson L, Janse M, Zimmerman B, Preininger D, Nowaczek J, Weissenbacher A, Batista H, Jouk P. A Review of Two Decades of In Situ Conservation Powered by Public Aquaria. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens. 2024; 5(1):90-118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg5010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Correia, João, Nicole Kube, Lauren Florisson, Max Janse, Brian Zimmerman, Doris Preininger, Jonas Nowaczek, Anton Weissenbacher, Hugo Batista, and Philippe Jouk. 2024. "A Review of Two Decades of In Situ Conservation Powered by Public Aquaria" Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens 5, no. 1: 90-118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg5010007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop