Next Article in Journal
Aotearoa New Zealand Climate and Environmental Journalists: Profiles, Practices, and Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Black Lives Matter and Partisan Media
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Journalism and Media
Volume 5
Issue 1
10.3390/journalmedia5010007
journalmedia-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Smart Technologies in French Hospitals’ Branding Strategies

by
Pablo Medina Aguerrebere
1,*,
Eva Medina
2 and
Toni Gonzalez Pacanowski
2
1
Department of Communication, Faculty of Communication, Canadian University of Dubai, Dubai 116715, United Arab Emirates
2
Department of Communication, School of Communication, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Journal. Media 2024, 5(1), 92-107; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5010007
Submission received: 24 December 2023 / Revised: 18 January 2024 / Accepted: 19 January 2024 / Published: 22 January 2024
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hospitals resort to different initiatives to build their brands, including media relations, events, and marketing campaigns. However, they face several challenges related to legal frameworks, patients’ new demands, and hospitals’ digital transformation. This paper analyzes how the best hospitals in France manage smart technologies to enhance their relationships with stakeholders and reinforce their brands. We resorted to the World’s Best Hospitals 2023 to identify the 150 best hospitals in this country. Then, we defined 34 branding indicators to evaluate how each hospital managed smart technologies for branding purposes. We adapted these criteria to different platforms and targets: homepage (patients), online newsroom (media companies), About Us section (suppliers, shareholders, and public authorities), and artificial intelligence department (employees). When analyzing these criteria, we resorted to a binary system and only considered hospitals’ official websites. Our results proved that 98% of hospitals had a website, but not all respected the criteria related to the homepage (4.54 of 11), online newsroom (2.52 of 11), or About Us section (1.56 of 6). The best hospitals in France, according to the number of criteria respected, were Institut Curie-Oncology (20), Institut Gustave Roussy–Oncology (19), and Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph (19). We concluded that French hospitals should implement collective branding processes that include all stakeholders, not just patients: media companies, public authorities, suppliers, shareholders, and employees. Moreover, these organizations should implement an in-house artificial intelligence department that leads a digital transformation from a medical, branding, and communication perspective. Finally, French hospitals’ branding efforts on smart platforms should focus more on content about the brand so that stakeholders understand the uniqueness of these organizations.

1. Introduction

Hospitals implement corporate communication initiatives to reinforce their relationships with stakeholders and promote their brands. However, these organizations face several challenges. On the one hand, they interact with many stakeholders, such as employees, patients, suppliers, shareholders, public authorities, and media companies. On the other hand, they respect strict legal and ethical frameworks that determine their communication initiatives: content, language, and images. These legal frameworks are different in each country. Still, all include several principles about public health, patients’ rights, respect for truth, the use of doctors’ images, and the role of scientific language. Despite these barriers, most hospitals use corporate communication to promote their brands. This activity is essential to efficiently face some of the main challenges affecting these organizations: the development of international hospital groups, digital transformation, limited budgets, and an increase in chronic diseases and outbreaks. In this framework, some hospitals have decided to transform their corporate communication initiatives and focus on smart technologies such as mobile applications or social media platforms. This way, they establish better relationships with stakeholders and build their brand more efficiently.
This paper analyzes how hospitals manage smart technologies to implement corporate communication initiatives and promote their brands. To do that, we reviewed literature about how these organizations implement corporate communication and branding initiatives, especially those based on smart technologies (social media, mobile apps, artificial intelligence). Then, we resorted to the World’s Best Hospitals 2023 to identify the 150 best hospitals in France. Subsequently, we analyzed how each hospital used smart technologies to promote its brand. To do so, we defined 34 branding indicators that we grouped into four main categories: homepage (patients), online newsroom (media companies), About Us section (suppliers, shareholders, and public authorities), and artificial intelligence department (employees). Finally, we presented our results and three main conclusions. French hospitals could consider transforming their communication initiatives and becoming more reputed brands.

2. Branding Hospitals through Smart Technologies

2.1. Corporate Communication in Hospitals

Health communication combines expertise from the communication sciences, social sciences, and physical sciences with professional fields of study—medicine, nursing, and pharmacy—to examine the powerful influences of communication on healthcare (Kreps 2020). This area is essential for citizens and contributes to improving societies (De Las Heras-Pedrosa et al. 2020). Health communication experts respect five main principles: first, promoting human values, such as compassion or empathy, to establish meaningful relationships among healthcare organizations and their stakeholders (Shafiee et al. 2022); second, respecting ethical standards and legal frameworks to reinforce these organizations’ scientific credibility (Merminod and Benaroyo 2021); third, implementing health education initiatives to change people’s behaviors and strengthen their empowerment (Finset et al. 2020); fourth, integrating cultural elements, such as language or history, into health communication strategies to efficiently influence stakeholders’ perceptions about healthcare organizations (Tong et al. 2021); fifth, implementing initiatives that fulfill the needs of these organizations’ stakeholders from a medical, social, and emotional perspective (Tsai et al. 2021).
In this framework, hospitals are among the most critical organizations implementing health communication initiatives. These organizations interact with external stakeholders, such as patients, patients’ associations, public authorities, journalists, and suppliers. They share medical information with patients to reinforce their skills in health literacy; this way, hospitals become credible sources of scientific information (Stellefson et al. 2020). On the other hand, hospitals organize corporate events addressed to patients’ associations to help them in different ways: health education programs, legal support services, and social initiatives (Lungu et al. 2021). Besides patients and patients’ associations, hospitals interact with public authorities and collaborate in different areas, such as health education campaigns or emergency plans against outbreaks (Bilbatua et al. 2020). Finally, hospitals also establish communication relationships with media companies to reinforce their doctors’ and nurses’ scientific credibility (Ren and Ma 2021) and with suppliers—pharmaceutical companies, technology companies—to improve organizational processes and protect patients’ rights (Elrod and Fortenberry 2020). Thanks to these communication relationships with patients, patients’ associations, public authorities, media companies, and suppliers, hospitals influence society, promote health values, and contribute to the common good (Correa et al. 2021).
Besides external stakeholders, hospitals implement communication initiatives to improve their relationships with internal targets, especially doctors and nurses (Merminod and Benaroyo 2021). The first face different barriers that prevent them from interacting efficiently with patients: short consultation timings, limited budgets, and patients’ lack of skills in health literacy (Parker et al. 2021). For this reason, many hospitals implement initiatives to help doctors improve their communication skills, such as workshops in interpersonal communication and corporate use of online platforms for internal communication (Driever et al. 2020). Nurses face similar issues when interacting with patients (Rodrigues et al. 2020), which is why many hospitals organize training sessions about cultural communication, scientific divulgation, or emotional support techniques (Godsey et al. 2020). Thanks to these communication initiatives, hospitals establish better relationships with patients (Ancker et al. 2020; Tong et al. 2021), positively influencing the collective decision-making processes among patients, doctors, and nurses (Mackert et al. 2020).

2.2. Branding Initiatives in Hospitals

Communicating health messages clearly and openly among stakeholders constitutes a challenge for hospitals because each stakeholder has different perceptions and backgrounds (Jenkins et al. 2020a). This situation is especially complicated with patients: they need to understand their diseases and want to participate in the hospital system, which is why they need professional content (Godsey et al. 2020). To achieve this goal, health communication experts adapt their messages to each stakeholder’s emotional, social, and information needs (Merminod and Benaroyo 2021). In other words, they focus on content that helps them improve their quality of life and understanding of healthcare (Lithopoulos et al. 2021). This way, hospitals establish better relationships with their stakeholders (Jenkins et al. 2020b) and strengthen their credibility as a source of scientific information (Reitsamer and Brunner-Sperdin 2021). This scientific credibility helps hospitals become meaningful brands and influence stakeholders’ perceptions (Adebesin and Mwalugha 2020).
The hospital brand is an intangible asset determining this organization’s relationships with its stakeholders (Rahman et al. 2021). Building a reputed brand constitutes a challenge for these organizations since they must implement collective processes involving all stakeholders, share scientific content, and respect strict legal frameworks (Medina Aguerrebere et al. 2020). For this reason, hospitals develop integrated branding strategies that consider medical, organizational, and medical elements (Odoom et al. 2019). Based on these strategies, they define their identity, mission statement, purposes, and beliefs (Singla and Sharma 2021). These elements must be consistent with the organization’s original roots (Rindell and Santos 2021) and become a reference when the organization implements collective branding processes (Xifra 2020). This way, these collective branding processes can help organizations become reputed brands (Govers 2020). This is the case of the Cleveland Clinic and Mayo Clinic (United States). Both organizations have focused their branding efforts on health education initiatives that allow them to reinforce their relationships with stakeholders, especially patients and patient associations.
Besides promoting launching communication initiatives, hospitals also implement in-house corporate communication departments to manage these initiatives professionally (Medina Aguerrebere et al. 2020). This department analyzes each stakeholder’s needs regarding information and emotional support (Odoom et al. 2019), and, based on that, they define a unique brand positioning that determines the hospital’s communication efforts (Khosravizadeh et al. 2021). To efficiently implement this brand positioning, hospitals can resort to storytelling (Li and Zhao 2021) and personal branding: both initiatives help these organizations build more human relationships with patients (Zhang et al. 2021). Finally, hospitals evaluate the impact of each communication initiative on the organizations’ brand positioning and define proposals to improve these initiatives in the coming years (Confente and Kucharska 2021). When hospitals follow this logic, they reinforce their stakeholders’ loyalty to the brand (Rahman et al. 2021).

2.3. Smart Branding Initiatives in Hospitals

Social media platforms are crucial in hospitals’ organizational processes since they help doctors and nurses improve patient relationships (Farsi 2021). Furthermore, these platforms are also helpful in making hospitals’ branding processes more dynamic and innovative (Lithopoulos et al. 2021). Indeed, many hospitals have implemented Social Media Units within their Corporate Communication Departments to manage these platforms as branding tools (Medina Aguerrebere et al. 2020). Thanks to social media, hospitals accelerate their collective branding processes: online events with journalists, online patient services, and online employee training tools (Yantian et al. 2022). These organizations can also use social media to implement personal branding campaigns and reinforce their doctors’ and nurses’ social visibility (Sotto et al. 2020; Kordzadeh and Young 2018). In other words, using social media allows hospitals to promote their brand more creatively (Shieh et al. 2020).
Besides social media, hospitals can also use mobile applications. These organizations manage mobile applications for medical purposes: education, prevention, and monitoring (Chamberlain et al. 2021). Moreover, they can use these apps to implement branding initiatives (Crossley et al. 2020). Thanks to mobile apps, hospitals enhance their relationships with patients and help them improve their skills in health literacy (Zou et al. 2021), which positively influences the hospital’s social legitimacy (Piculell et al. 2021). On the other hand, hospitals use mobile applications to share medical resources with public health authorities, and this way, they reinforce their corporate relations (Mackert et al. 2020). Finally, hospitals use these applications to establish more dynamic relationships with media companies by sharing medical content or organizing online interviews with doctors (Chou 2021). In other words, mobile applications make hospitals’ relationships with stakeholders more dynamic, which contributes to building a more credible brand (Khosravizadeh et al. 2021).
Besides social media platforms and mobile applications, hospitals use artificial intelligence-based tools to establish new relationships with their stakeholders (Burr et al. 2020). Artificial intelligence allows hospitals to analyze enormous amounts of data cost-effectively and implement more efficient branding initiatives (Butow and Hoque 2020). Thanks to artificial intelligence, hospitals can implement five medical initiatives that positively influence their stakeholders’ perceptions about the hospital brand: first, using telemedicine services and video consultations to establish new patient communication relationships based on trust, respect and data (Bassan 2020); second, managing medical robots to improve internal processes and reinforce patients’ rights to quality healthcare (Ramon Fernández 2021); third, implementing health wearables that help patients monitor their treatments and strengthen their empowerment (Adebesin and Mwalugha 2020); fourth, integrating chatbots on the hospital’s website to make patients’ experience more pleasant (Tsai et al. 2021); fifth, implementing online appointment systems and data recording services on their websites to help patients optimize their time (Dhagarra et al. 2020).

3. Methodology

Using mobile apps, social media platforms, and artificial-intelligence-based tools constitutes an opportunity for hospitals to implement more dynamic branding initiatives. However, it also represents a communication, medical, and legal challenge. To analyze how these organizations manage smart technologies to execute smart branding actions, we resorted to the World’s Best Hospitals 2023, a global ranking published by Statista and Newsweek. Both institutions implemented a quantitative methodology to evaluate 2300 hospitals from 28 countries. They considered four main criteria: (a) 80,000 online surveys to medical experts working in hospitals from 28 different countries, (b) patients’ opinions about these organizations, (c) hospitals’ quality metrics, and (d) PROM questionnaires about patients’ quality of life. Each criterion had a different weight: online surveys to doctors (54%), patients’ opinions (14.5%), hospitals’ quality metrics (29%), and PROM questionnaires (2.5%). Based on these criteria and weights, they defined each hospital’s position in the ranking. Then, a Global Board of Medical Experts—United States, Germany, Israel, France, and Switzerland—evaluated and confirmed these results (Newsweek 2023).
Based on this ranking, we identified the 150 best hospitals in France (see Appendix A). We analyzed how each hospital used smart technologies to interact with stakeholders: (a) patients; (b) media companies; (c) public authorities, suppliers, and shareholders; and (d) employees. We focused on patients and media companies because the first plays a crucial role in hospitals’ collective branding processes (Cham et al. 2021), and the second influences public opinion about healthcare-related issues (Medina Aguerrebere et al. 2020). We included public authorities since they determine the hospital’s scientific credibility (Etheredge and Fabian 2022). Finally, we considered employees because they represent the hospital brand and interact with many other stakeholders, such as patients or media companies (Basha et al. 2022).
From 2nd November to 5th December 2023, we conducted quantitative research to evaluate how the 150 best hospitals in France managed smart technologies to interact with their stakeholders and promote their brands. Based on the main highlights from our literature review about smart branding in hospitals, we defined thirty-four brand criteria that we grouped into four categories according to the platforms most commonly used by each stakeholder: (a) homepage (patients); (b) online newsroom (media companies); (c) About Us section (public authorities, suppliers, shareholders); and (d) Department of Artificial Intelligence (employees) (Medina Aguerrebere et al. 2023)—see Table 1. We resorted to the binary system to analyze each criterion and only considered hospitals’ official websites.

4. Results

Most French hospitals resorted to smart technologies to promote their brands and improve their relationships with stakeholders, especially patients. However, our results revealed that many hospitals can still improve in this area and implement more efficient branding initiatives. We present our results grouped into five main categories: (1) homepage, (2) online newsroom, (3) About Us section, (4) Department of Artificial Intelligence, and (5) global results.
Homepage. Our results proved that 147 out of 150 hospitals had a website. However, most hospitals having a website did not fulfill the indicators considered: podcasts (51.02%), patient portal (49.66%), interactive health library (34.01%), virtual tours (25.85%), interactive maps (19.05%), video consultation with doctors (18.38%), symptom checkers (0%) and chatbot (0%). Concerning podcasts, many hospitals managed this tool to spread scientific knowledge about treatments, diseases, and prevention. Conversely, most hospitals used patient portals to share medical reports and facilitate internal processes such as online appointments or reminders. On the other hand, the only criteria that most hospitals met referred to having a homepage (100%), using social media platforms (93.88%), and managing mobile apps (63.95%). On average, these organizations respected 4.56 out of 11 applicable criteria. The best in this category were CHU Bordeaux, Institut Curie, and Institut Gustave Roussy (see Table 2).
Online newsroom. Our quantitative results showed that 87.07% of hospitals had an online newsroom, and most displayed digital press archives (90.63%). However, most press archives focused on hospitals’ medical services rather than branding elements: identity, history, and social legacy. Nevertheless, most hospitals did not meet other indicators: B-roll videos (29.69%), interactive corporate reports (21.88%), news alerts (7.81%), online translation services (1.56%), interactive infographics (0.78%), podcasts (0%), online interviews with doctors (0%), online press conferences (0%) and mobile apps for journalists (0%). On the other hand, most interactive corporate reports analyzed organizational aspects, such as economic results, business plans, or human resource challenges, which means that most hospitals did not use these reports to promote content about their brands, corporate values, or communication activities. On average, these organizations respected 2.52 out of 11 applicable criteria, and the hospital respecting the most criteria was Institut Curie-Oncology (6 criteria).
About Us section. All hospitals had implemented this section; many shared interactive corporate documents (29.93%) and videos (24.5%). Nevertheless, only 2.05% showcased interactive infographics. Moreover, no hospital proposed a platform for suppliers or shareholders. This last aspect is essential since hospitals collaborate with suppliers (pharmaceutical companies, technology organizations) and must respect strict legal frameworks concerning the information they share. Using these platforms could help hospitals improve their communication relationships with suppliers. Finally, on average, hospitals respected 1.56 out of 6 applicable criteria (see Table 3).
Department of Artificial Intelligence. Only one hospital had implemented a department specializing in this area: Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph. Its Biomedical Engineering Lab conducted three main activities: integrating artificial intelligence into medical protocols, training employees in this area, and implementing research projects. This department collaborated with technology companies (GE Healthcare, Nuance), universities, and research centers (Université Paris Saclay, Institut Polytechnique de Paris) to do so.
On the other hand, our results proved that 67 hospitals did not have an artificial intelligence department. Still, they developed research projects in this area in collaboration with universities, research centers (29), and technology companies (64)—see Table 4. Each hospital focused on different areas, such as oncology, cardiology, or neurology; moreover, they tried to use artificial intelligence in different ways, such as diagnosis, monitoring, or health education. On the other hand, 29 hospitals did not have a department of Artificial Intelligence, but they had implemented in-house research projects in this area. Finally, 53 hospitals did not mention artificial intelligence on their corporate websites.
Global results. This research revealed that most French hospitals respected, on average, 8.79 out of 34 applicable criteria and that the best hospital was Institute Curie (see Table 5 below).

5. Discussion

Health communication experts implement branding initiatives based on three central values: accuracy, engagement, and credibility (Li and Xu 2020). These values are essential to promoting hospitals’ brands and helping patients protect their right to quality information (Ancker et al. 2020). In other words, these experts focus branding initiatives on assisting patients to improve their skills in health literacy and reinforcing their empowerment (Parker et al. 2021). However, our results about French hospitals’ homepages proved that some hospitals are not following this principle; indeed, they did not use essential tools to help patients reinforce their understanding of healthcare: interactive health library (34.01%), video consultations with doctors (18.38%) or symptom checkers (0%). These results revealed that most French hospitals can still improve in this area. Instead of developing websites focused on administrative information and legal requirements, these organizations should use these platforms to fulfill patients’ data and emotional needs and build the hospital brand more efficiently.
On the other hand, experts in health communication working in hospitals play a crucial role since they educate patients on healthy habits and contribute to building more sustainable societies (De Las Heras-Pedrosa et al. 2020). However, patients and citizens behave differently according to their cultural backgrounds and beliefs (Zhao 2021). For this reason, hospitals need to collaborate with media companies to adapt health communication messages to citizens’ needs (Castiglia and Dettori 2022). Nevertheless, our analysis of French hospitals’ online newsrooms revealed that most of them had not implemented true collaborations with media companies to achieve these goals. Even if most hospitals displayed digital press archives (90.63%), they did not propose initiatives to reinforce their relationships with media companies: online translation services for journalists (1.56%), online press conferences (0%), online interviews with doctors (0%), and mobile app or platform for journalists (0%). These facts demonstrated that most French hospitals did not integrate media companies into their collective branding processes, representing a reputation risk for these organizations.
Besides media companies, most hospitals develop social communities integrated with other stakeholders (patients, employees, and public authorities) to reinforce their credibility and implement collective branding processes (Confente and Kucharska 2021). To efficiently implement these processes, hospitals promote several values, such as trust and social engagement (Barredo Ibáñez et al. 2021): this way, these organizations can achieve more significant communication goals (Finset et al. 2020). Despite the importance of integrating all stakeholders into the hospital’s branding processes, our paper proved that most French hospitals did not use their About Us sections to improve their relationships with public authorities, shareholders, and suppliers. Indeed, no hospital proposed a platform addressed to suppliers and shareholders. Moreover, most hospitals only displayed basic information about the hospital. French hospitals should professionalize their About Us sections and explain corporate elements such as branding architecture (identity, values, mission, vision, and culture), history, or social engagements with social groups.
Patients view doctors and nurses as human brands with unique personalities (Shafiee et al. 2022). Doctors’ and nurses’ behaviors determine patients’ perceptions about the hospital’s brand (Zhao 2021). One element influencing most of these perceptions is doctors’ and nurses’ professional performance in medical technologies, such as artificial intelligence-based tools (Zegers et al. 2021). Despite this, our quantitative analysis of French hospitals’ artificial intelligence department revealed that only 1 out of 150 hospitals had implemented this structure. Moreover, 53 hospitals did not mention any initiative about artificial intelligence on their websites. These facts proved that French hospitals should institutionalize artificial intelligence by establishing in-house departments, recruiting specialized employees, training doctors and nurses, developing annual plans to accelerate digital transformation, and improving patients’ perceptions about the hospital’s brand. In other words, implementing this department could help French hospitals lead a digital transformation in a coordinated way, optimize resources, change employees’ mentalities, and achieve medical, organizational, and branding goals.
This paper analyzed how the best hospitals in France managed smart technologies to enhance their relationships with stakeholders and thus reinforce their brands. Despite the quantitative results, we should highlight three main limitations affecting this paper. First, we could not consult each hospital’s corporate communication plan, which prevented us from understanding the role of smart technologies in their branding initiatives. Second, we found no publication analyzing patients’ perceptions of the impact of smart technologies on branding campaigns. Third, we did not consider legal, ethical, or economic frameworks existing in France, which highly determine hospitals’ corporate communication initiatives. We recommend researchers interested in this area focus their future projects on different topics, such as the use of mobile apps to make hospitals’ medical protocols more dynamic, the impact of telemedicine on doctors’ scientific credibility, and the use of artificial intelligence to build more reputed hospital brands.

6. Conclusions

Building a reputed brand constitutes a challenge since hospitals interact with different stakeholders (patients, employees, public authorities) and respect strict ethical and legal frameworks that determine their organizational processes. Moreover, hospitals must constantly update their business models to efficiently overcome several barriers, such as digital transformation, the development of international hospital groups, or the increase in chronic diseases and outbreaks. Among all these barriers, digital transformation is the most important since it affects hospitals from an economic, technological, management, medical, and communication perspective. In this framework, hospitals resort to smart technologies, such as mobile apps or social media platforms, to establish new relationships with stakeholders and provide them with meaningful content. This way, they try to reinforce their brands. Nevertheless, these practices constitute a communication, medical, and legal challenge.
This paper evaluated how the best hospitals in France managed smart technologies to promote their brands. To conclude this reflection, we would like to highlight three final ideas. First, French hospitals should implement collective branding processes that include all stakeholders, not only patients. Our results proved that most French hospitals respected criteria related to the homepage (patients) (4.56 out of 11) but not those related to the online newsroom (journalists) (2.52 out of 11) or the About Us section (public authorities, suppliers and shareholders) (1.56 out of 6). Second, hospitals should implement an in-house artificial intelligence department, including doctors, engineers, and communication experts, who lead a digital transformation to make the hospital’s organizational processes more efficient. The fact that only 1 hospital out of 150 had implemented this structure proved that most French hospitals can still improve in this area. Third, French hospitals should use their websites, social media platforms, and mobile apps to share branding elements that highlight their uniqueness and social legitimacy. Nevertheless, our analysis proved that most hospitals used these platforms to display administrative information (processes, internal documents, and legal requirements).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.M.A.; methodology, P.M.A.; software, E.M.; validation, E.M.; formal analysis, E.M.; investigation, E.M. and T.G.P.; resources E.M. and T.G.P.; data curation, T.G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.M.A., E.M. and T.G.P.; writing—review and editing, P.M.A.; visualization, T.G.P.; supervision, P.M.A.; project administration, P.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. List of Hospitals Analyzed

  • AP-HP—Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
  • CHU Lille—Hôpital Claude-Huriez
  • CHU Bordeaux—Groupe hospitalier Pellegrin
  • Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph
  • ELSAN—Santé Atlantique
  • AP-HM—Hôpital de la Timone
  • CHU Toulouse—Hôpital Purpan
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon—Hôpital Lyon Sud
  • Hôpital Louis Pradel
  • AP-HM—Hôpital Nord
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Cochin
  • Clinique Pasteur
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon—Hôpital Edouard Herriot
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard
  • CHU Grenoble—Site Nord
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Saint-Antoine
  • CHU Nantes—Site Hôtel-Dieu
  • CHRU Nancy—Hôpital Central
  • Hôpital Européen
  • ELSAN—Clinique Saint-Augustin
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Henri-Mondor
  • Hôpital Saint-Joseph
  • AH-HP—Hôpital Antoine Béclère
  • Clinique Francois Chenieux
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon—Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
  • Clinique de l’Anjou
  • Ramsay Santé—Hôpital Prive Jean Mermoz
  • UNEOS—Hôpitaux Privés de Metz—Hôpital Belle-Isle
  • CHU Strasbourg—Hôpital de Hautepierre
  • Hôpital Albert Schweitzer
  • UNEOS—Hôpitaux Privés de Metz—Hôpital Robert Schuman
  • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
  • CHU Tours—Hôpital Bretonneau
  • Clinique de L’Europe Rouen
  • CHU Nice—Hôpital Pasteur
  • CHU Dijon-Bourgogne—Hôpital François Mitterand
  • Centre Hospitalier de Bligny
  • CHU Lyon—Hôpital Renée Sabran
  • CHU Strasbourg—Hôpital Civil
  • Hôpital Américain
  • Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon
  • CHU Nîmes—Hôpital Carémeau
  • CH Privé Saint-Grégoire
  • Ramsay Santé—Hôpital Privé La Louvière
  • ELSAN—Polyclinique de Gentilly
  • Centre Hospitalier Lourdes
  • Centre Hospitalier Toulon—Hôpital Sainte Musse
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Bicêtre
  • Hôpital Prive Cannes Oxford
  • Médipôle de Savoie
  • CHU Montpellier—Hôpital Lapeyronie
  • Hôpital Privé de Provence—Polyclinique du Parc Rambot
  • Clinique Rhena Association
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Saint-Louis
  • Clinique Mutualiste Jules-Vernes
  • Hôpital d’Instruction Des Armées Clermont-Tonnerre
  • CHU Grenoble—Site Sud
  • CHU Toulouse—Hôpital Rangueil
  • Centre Hospitalier Grasse
  • Hôpital Foch
  • Clinique Saint-George
  • Clinique Internationale Parc Monceau
  • Clinique Mutualiste de La Sagesse
  • CHU Bordeaux—Hôpital Saint-André
  • Ramsay Santé—Hôpital Privé Clairval
  • Pôle santé Oréliance
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand—CHU Gabriel-Montpied
  • CH Valenciennes
  • Clinique Saint Germain
  • ELSAN—Hôpital Privé la Châtaigneraie
  • Ramsay Santé—Hôpital Privé Bois Bernard
  • Ramsay Santé—Hôpital Privé Le Bois
  • Ramsay Santé—Hôpital Prive de La Loire
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Lariboisière
  • ELSAN—CHP Brest—Polyclinique de Keraudren
  • Polyclinique Saint-Roch
  • Clinique Rive-Gauche
  • Groupement des Hôpitaux de l’Institut Catholique de Lille—Hôpital Saint-Philibert
  • CH Annecy Genevois—Site Annecy
  • Nouvelle Clinique Bel-Air
  • Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph et Saint Luc
  • Hôpital de La Croix Saint Simon
  • Hôpital Privé du Confluent
  • Centre Hospitalier Ouest Reunion
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Tenon
  • ELSAN—Polyclinique Médipôle Saint-Roch
  • CHI Créteil
  • Ramsay Santé—Clinique de l’Union
  • CHU Rouen Normandie—Hôpital Charles-Nicolle
  • CHU Lille—Hôpital Salengro
  • CHRU Nancy—Hôpitaux de Brabois
  • Centre Hospitalier Privé Sainte Marie
  • Clinique Sainte-Anne
  • CH Dunkerque
  • CHU Saint-Étienne—Hôpital Bellevue
  • Clinique Louis Pasteur
  • CHU Toulouse—Hôpital Larrey
  • CH Colmar—Hôpital Louis Pasteur
  • Centre Hospitalier de Cornouaille—Site de Laënnec
  • Groupement des Hôpitaux de l’Institut Catholique de Lille—Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Albert Chenevier
  • CH Calais—Hôpital Jean Eric Techer
  • Centre Hospitalier Le Mans
  • Centre Hospitalier Henri Dunant La Charite-Sur-Loire
  • AP-HM—Hôpital Sainte Marguerite
  • Centre Hospitalier de Cannes
  • CHR Metz-Thionville—Hôpital de Mercy
  • ELSAN—Polyclinique Vauban
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Avicenne-Bobigny
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Armand-Trousseau
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Beaujon
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Fernand-Widal
  • Clinique Mutualiste Porte de L’Orient
  • Clinique de Saint Joseph
  • Centre Hospitalier d’Arcachon
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire Lille
  • ELSAN—Polyclinique Les Fleurs
  • ELSAN—Clinique Saint-Pièrre
  • CHU Poitiers—La Milétrie
  • Centre Hospitalier Chartres Louis Pasteur-Le Coudray
  • CHU Besançon—Hôpital Jean Minjoz
  • La Clinique Beau Soleil
  • CH Châteaubriant-Nozay-Pouance—Site Châteaubriant
  • Ramsay Santé—Clinique La Croix du Sud
  • ELSAN—Hôpital Privé Saint-Martin
  • Centre Hospitalier Albi
  • CH Métropole Savoie—Hôpital de Chambéry
  • Ramsay Santé—Clinique Belharra
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Robert-Debré
  • Hôpital La Porte Verte
  • AP-HP—Hôpital Joffre Dupuytren
  • ELSAN—Polyclinique de Poitiers
  • GH Seclin Carvin—CH de Seclin
  • CH de Roanne
  • ELSAN—Hôpital Privé Océane
  • ELSAN—Hôpital-Clinique Claude Bernard
  • CHU Caen Normandie—Hôpital Côte de Nacre
  • CH Bretagne Atlantique—Site de Vannes
  • Ramsay Santé—Clinique Aguilera
  • CHU Rennes—Site Pontchaillou
  • Pôle Santé Léonard-de-Vinci
  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne—Oncology
  • Centre Léon-Bérard—Oncology
  • Hôpital Necker—Enfants malades—Pediatrics
  • Hôpital Paul Brousse—Geriatrics
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon—Hôpital Femme-Mere-Enfant—Gynecology & Maternity
  • Institut Curie—Oncology
  • Institut Gustave Roussy—Oncology
  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes—Oncology

References

  1. Adebesin, Funmi, and Revingston Mwalugha. 2020. The Mediating Role of Organizational Reputation and Trust in the Intention to Use Wearable Health Devices: Cross-Country Study. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth 8: e16721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ancker, Jessica, Lissa Grossman, and Natalie Benda. 2020. Health Literacy 2030: Is It Time to Redefine the Term? Journal of General Internal Medicine 35: 2427–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Barredo Ibáñez, Daniel, Pedro Molina Rodríguez-Navas, Narcisa Medranda Morales, and Vanessa Rodríguez Breijo. 2021. Health Transparency and Communication on the Government Websites of Ibero-American Countries: The Cases of Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 6222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Basha, Abzal, N. Rajitha, and Ruhi Afreen. 2022. Employer Branding: A New Facet of Health Care Sector. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research 9: 224–28. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bassan, Sharon. 2020. Data Privacy Considerations for Telehealth Consumers amid COVID-19. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 7: lsaa075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bilbatua, Jon, Jawad Mudaber, Dennis Jiménez-Vargas, and Brandon Arrieta. 2020. Sobre las Estrategias y Campañas de Comunicación en Salud Pública: ¿qué sabes del 2019-nCoV? Revista Española de Salud Pública 94: e1–e2. [Google Scholar]
  7. Burr, Christopher, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi. 2020. The Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Thematic Review. Science and Engineering Ethics 26: 2313–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Butow, Phyllis, and Ehsan Hoque. 2020. Using artificial intelligence to analyse and teach communication in healthcare. Breast 50: 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Castiglia, Paolo, and Marco Dettori. 2022. Second Edition of Special Issue “Strategies and Evidence in Health Communication: Evidence and Perspectives”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cham, Tat, Yet Lim, and Marianna Sigala. 2021. Marketing and social influences, hospital branding, and medical tourists’ behavioral intention: Before- and after-service consumption perspective. International Journal of Tourism Research 24: 140–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chamberlain, Sara, Priyanka Dutt, Anna Godfrey, Radharani Mitra, Amnesty Lefevre, Kerry Scott, Jai Mendiratta, Vinod Chauhan, and Salil Arora. 2021. Ten lessons learned: Scaling and transitioning one of the largest mobile health communication programs in the world to a national government. BMJ Global Health 6: e005341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chou, Weng. 2021. Using content analysis to inform health communication efforts on social media: Is popularity the goal? Mhealth 7: 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Confente, Ilenia, and Wioleta Kucharska. 2021. Company versus consumer performance: Does brand community identification foster brand loyalty and the consumer’s personal brand? Journal of Brand Management 28: 8–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Correa, Erika, Sandra Palacio López, Javier Sánchez-Torres, Juan Arrubla-Zapata, Luisa Gaviria-Martinez, Yuri Hernandez, and Carolina Lopera. 2021. Effectiveness of social responsibility marketing in young millennials—Generation Y: Analysis of three cases for brand positioning. Heliyon 7: e08150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Crossley, Scott, Renu Balyan, Jennifer Liu, Andrew Karter, Danielle McNamara, and Dean Schillinger. 2020. Predicting the readability of physicians’ secure messages to improve health communication using novel linguistic features: Findings from the ECLIPPSE study. Journal of Community Health 13: 344–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. De Las Heras-Pedrosa, Carlos, Dolores Rando-Cueto, Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado, and Francisco Paniagua-Rojano. 2020. Exploring the Social Media on the Communication Professionals in Public Health. Spanish Official Medical Colleges Case Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17: 4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dhagarra, Devendra, Mohit Goswami, and Gopal Kumar. 2020. Impact of Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics 11: 104164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Driever, Ellen, Anne Stiggelbout, and Paul Brand. 2020. Shared decision making: Physicians’ preferred role, usual role, and their perception of its key components. Patient Education and Counseling 103: 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Elrod, James, and John Fortenberry. 2020. Integrated marketing communications: A strategic priority in health and medicine. BMC Health Services Research 20: 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Etheredge, Harriet, and June Fabian. 2022. Communication in Healthcare: Global challenges in the 21st Century. Hamostaseologie 42: 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Farsi, Deema. 2021. Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23: e23205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Finset, Arnstein, Hayden Bosworth, Phyllis Butow, Pall Gulbrandsen, Robert Hulsman, Arwen Pieterse, Richard Street, Robing Tschoetschel, and Julia van Weert. 2020. Effective health communication is a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Education and Counselling 103: 873–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Godsey, Judi, David Houghton, and Tom Hayes. 2020. Registered nurse perceptions of factors contributing to the inconsistent brand image of the nursing profession. Nursing Outlook 68: 808–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Govers, Robert. 2020. Imaginative communities and place branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 16: 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jenkins, Eva, Jasmina Ilicic, Amy Barklamb, and Tracy McCaffrey. 2020a. Assessing the credibility and authenticity of social media content. Lessons and applications for health communication: A scoping review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22: e17296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jenkins, Eva, Jasmina Ilicic, Annika Molenaar, Shinyi Chin, and Tracy McCaffrey. 2020b. Strategies to Improve Health Communication: Can Health Professionals be Heroes? Nutrients 12: 1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Khosravizadeh, Omid, Soudabeh Vatankhah, Najmeh Baghian, Saeed Shahsavari, Mozhgan Ghaemmohamadi, and Bahman Ahadinezhad. 2021. The branding process for healthcare centers: Operational strategies from consumer’s identification to market development. International Journal of Healthcare Management 14: 956–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kordzadeh, Nima, and Diana Young. 2018. Exploring Hospitals’ Use of Facebook: Thematic Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20: e190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kreps, Gary. 2020. The value of health communication scholarship: New directions for health communication inquiry. International Journal of Nursing Sciences 10: 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Zhenyi, and Jing Xu. 2020. Medicine together with humanities and media: An MHM model to move forward for health communication studies. International Journal of Nursing Sciences 7: S1–S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Yalin, and Min Zhao. 2021. Underdog or Top Dog Brand Story? The Role of Self-Construal and Need of Uniqueness. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 765802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lithopoulos, Alexander, Guy Faulkner, Douglas Evans, and Ryan Rhodes. 2021. Marketing Physical Activity? Exploring the Role of Brand Resonance in Health Promotion. Journal of Health Communication 26: 675–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lungu, Daniel, Jo Røislien, Siri Wiig, Marie Shortt, Francesca Ferrè, Siv Berg, Henriette Thunem, and Kallesten Brønnick. 2021. The Role of Recipient Characteristics in Health Video Communication Outcomes: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23: e30962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mackert, Michael, Dorothy Mandell, Erin Donovan, Lorraine Walker, Mike Garcia, and Lindsay Bouchacourt. 2020. Mobile Apps as Audience-Centered Health Communication Platforms. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 9: e25425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Medina Aguerrebere, Medina, Eva Pablo, and Toni Gonzalez Pacanowski. 2023. Building reputed brands through smart technologies: A quantitative analysis of the best hospitals in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 2: 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Medina Aguerrebere, Pablo, Toni Gonzalez Pacanowski, and Eva Medina. 2020. Stakeholders’ participation in hospitals’ branding initiatives on social media: A proposal model for building collective brands. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud 11: 129–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Merminod, Gilles, and Lazare Benaroyo. 2021. Ethical issues in public health communication: Practical suggestions from a qualitative study on campaigns about organ donation in Switzerland. Patient Education and Counseling 105: 881–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Newsweek. 2023. World’s Best Hospitals 2023. Available online: https://www.newsweek.com/rankings/worlds-best-hospitals-2023/france (accessed on 1 September 2023).
  39. Odoom, Priscilla, Bedman Narteh, and Raphael Odoom. 2019. Healthcare branding: Insights from Africa into health service customers’ repeat patronage intentions. International Journal of Healthcare Management 14: 663–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Parker, Lisa, Rebecca Ryan, Suellen Young, and Sophie Hill. 2021. Medications and doctor-patient communication. Australian Journal of General Practice 50: 709–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Piculell, Erik, Lisa Skär, Johan Sanmartin, Peter Anderberg, and Doris Bohman. 2021. Using a Mobile Application for Health Communication to Facilitate a Sense of Coherence: Experiences of Older Persons with Cognitive Impairment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 11332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rahman, Renée, Tobias Langner, and Dirk Temme. 2021. Brand love: Conceptual and empirical investigation of a holistic causal model. Journal of Brand Management 28: 609–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ramon Fernández, Francisca. 2021. Inteligencia artificial en la relación médico-paciente: Algunas cuestiones y propuestas de mejora. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología 10: 329–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Reitsamer, Bernd, and Alexandra Brunner-Sperdin. 2021. It’s all about the brand: Place brand credibility, place attachment, and consumer loyalty. Journal of Brand Management 28: 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ren, Dixuan, and Baalong Ma. 2021. Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health Care Communities: Social Exchange Theory Perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23: e21892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rindell, Anne, and Fernando Santos. 2021. What makes a corporate heritage brand authentic for consumers? A semiotic approach. Journal of Brand Management 28: 545–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rodrigues, Maria, Adriana Belarmino, Livia Custódio, Ilvana Gomes, and Antonio Ferreira. 2020. Communication in health work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería 38: e09. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Shafiee, Reza, Fahimeh Ansari, and Hossein Mahjob. 2022. Physicians’ Brand Personality: Building Brand Personality Scale. Services Marketing Quarterly 43: 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shieh, Gow, Shi Wu, Che Tsai, Chi Chang, Tsung Chang, Ping Lui, Yuh Yao, and Wayne Sheu. 2020. A Strategic Imperative for Promoting Hospital Branding: Analysis of Outcome Indicators. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 9: e14546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Singla, Vikas, and Nidhi Sharma. 2021. Understanding the Role of Fonts in Linking Brand Identity to Brand Perception. Corporate Reputation Review 25: 272–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sotto, Sylk, Sacha Sharp, and Jacqueline Mac. 2020. The Power of Social Media in the Promotion and Tenure of Clinician Educators. MedEdPORTAL 16: 10943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Stellefson, Michael, Samantha Paige, and Don Chaney. 2020. Evolving Role of Social Media in Health Promotion: Updated Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17: 1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tong, Vivien, Ines Krass, Stephen Robson, and Parissa Aslani. 2021. Opt-in or opt-out healthcare communication? A cross-sectional study. Health Expectations 24: 776–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tsai, Wan, Di Lun, Nicholas Carcioppolo, and Ching Chuan. 2021. Human versus chatbot: Understanding the role of emotion in health marketing communication for vaccines. Psychology and Marketing 38: 2377–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xifra, Jordi. 2020. Comunicación corporativa, relaciones públicas y gestión del riesgo reputacional en tiempos del Covid-19. El Profesional de la Información 29: e290220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yantian, Mi, Zubair Ahmad, Ibrahim Alkhairy, Hassan Alsuhabi, Morad Alizadeh, and M. Mouhamed. 2022. Brand Awareness via Online Media: An Evidence Using Instagram Medium with Statistical Analysis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2022: 2739685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zegers, Catharina, Annemieke Witteveen, Mieke Schulte, Julia Henrich, Anouk Vermeij, Brigit Klever, and Andre Dekker. 2021. Mind Your Data: Privacy and Legal Matters in eHealth. JMIR Formative Research 5: e17456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhang, Tingting, Xiangbin Yan, William Wang, and Qin Chen. 2021. Unveiling physicians’ personal branding strategies in online healthcare service platforms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 171: 120964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhao, Xin. 2021. Challenges and Barriers in Intercultural Communication between Patients with Immigration Backgrounds and Health Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review. Health Communication 38: 824–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zou, Wenxue, Wanjiang Zhang, and Lu Tang. 2021. What Do Social Media Influencers Say about Health? A Theory-Driven Content Analysis of Top Ten Health Influencers’ Posts on Sina Weibo. Journal of Health Communication 26: 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Brand indicators.
Table 1. Brand indicators.
1. Homepage:
Patients		2. Online Newsroom:
Media Companies		3. About Us Section:
Public Authorities, Suppliers, and Shareholders		4. Department of Artificial Intelligence:
Employees
1. Hospital’s homepage
2. Patient Portal
3. Mobile apps
4. Symptom checker
5. Video consultations with doctors
6. Chatbot
7. Interactive maps
8. Virtual tours
9. Interactive health library
10. Podcasts
11. Social media platforms		1. Newsroom
2. Digital press archives
3. Interactive infographics
4. B-roll videos
5. Podcasts
6. Interactive corporate reports
7. Online translation services
8. Online interviews with doctors
9. Online press conferences
10. News alerts
11. Mobile apps or platforms for journalists		1. About Us section
2. Videos
3. Interactive infographics
4. Interactive corporate documents
5. Suppliers platform
6. Shareholders platform		1. Department of Artificial Intelligence
2. Integrating AI into medical protocols
3. Training employees
4. Conducting research projects
5. Collaborations with universities or research centers
6. Collaborations with technology companies
Source: Authors’ elaboration.
Table 2. Best hospitals.
Table 2. Best hospitals.
HospitalNumber of Criteria
CHU Bordeaux—Groupe hospitalier Pellegrin *9
CHU Bordeaux—Hôpital Saint-André *
Institut Curie—Oncology
Institut Gustave Roussy—Oncology
CHU Tours—Hôpital Bretonneau8
Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon
Clinique Saint-George
* Both hospitals used the same website.
Table 3. Indicator distribution.
Table 3. Indicator distribution.
Number of CriteriaNumber of Hospitals
60
50
40
327
229
191
03
Table 4. Hospitals and external partners.
Table 4. Hospitals and external partners.
HospitalUniversities, Research CentersTechnological Companies
1AP-HP—Hôpital Européen Georges PompidouUniversité Paris-Descartes
2CHU Lille—Hôpital Claude-Huriez, CHU Lille—Hôpital Salengro, CHU Lille (1). Lifelines
3CHU Bordeaux—Hôpital Saint-André, CHU Bordeaux—Groupe hospitalier Pellegrin (2).Inserm Bordeaux Public HealthSynapse Medicine and Deski.
4Hôpital Paris Saint-JosephUniversité Paris Saclay, Institut Polytechnique de Paris.GE Healthcare, Nuance.
5ELSAN—Santé Atlantique, ELSAN—Clinique Saint-Augustin, ELSAN—Polyclinique de Gentilly, ELSAN—Hôpital Privé la Châtaigneraie, ELSAN—CHP Brest—Polyclinique de Keraudren, ELSAN—Polyclinique Médipôle Saint-Roch, ELSAN—Polyclinique Vauban, ELSAN—Polyclinique Les Fleurs, ELSAN—Clinique Saint-Pierre, ELSAN—Hôpital Privé Saint-Martin, ELSAN—Polyclinique de Poitiers, ELSAN—Hôpital Privé Océane, ELSAN—Hôpital-Clinique Claude Bernard (3). Collective Thinking, Incepto, Better World, Docapost, Softway Medical.
6AP-HM—Hôpital de la Timone Incepto, Milvue, Canfield Scientific
7CHU Toulouse—Hôpital PurpanUniversité de Toulouse, Centre National des Etudes Spatiales, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-OncopoleRT Saint Exupéry, BotDesign, Collective Thinking, Dedalus, Nuance
8Hospices Civils de Lyon—Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon—Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon—Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon—Hôpital Femme-Mere-Enfant—Gynecology & Maternity, Hospices Civils de Lyon—Hôpital Louis Pradel, CHU Lyon—Hôpital Renée Sabran (4) Intuitive Surgical, Philips, Eurekam
9AP-HM—Hôpital Nord Incepto, Milvue, Canfield Scientific, Accuray
10AP-HP—Hôpital CochinUniversité Paris CitéMilvue, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Gleamer
11CHU Grenoble—Site Nord, CHU Grenoble—Site Sud (5)Université Grenoble Alpes, Multidisciplinary Institute in Artificial Intelligence
12AP-HP—Hôpital Saint-Antoine Calmedica, Augmented Endoscopy, Erganeo.
13CHU Nantes—Site Hôtel-DieuInstitut Curie, Ecole Polytechnique, Université de NantesCapacites, Sigma, Schneider, Phillips, Altran, Sopra.
14CHRU Nancy—Hôpital Central, CHRU Nancy—Hôpitaux de Brabois (6) Microsoft, Philips, Incepto.
15AP-HP—Hôpital Henri-MondorInserm, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Frédéric Joliot Institute for Life SciencesOwkin
16CHU Strasbourg—Hôpital Civil Nextmed
17Hôpital AméricainColumbia University (United States)Duomed
18CHU Nîmes—Hôpital CarémeauIMT Mines AlesMedtronic
19AP-HP—Hôpital BicêtreINRIAOwkin, Gleamer
20Médipôle de Savoie Cisco
21CHU Montpellier—Hôpital LapeyronieUniversité de Montpellier, CapgeminiSATT, Bracco, Sanofi, Aviitam.
22AP-HP—Hôpital Saint-LouisUniversité Paris Cite, MSDAvenir.Copan Diagnostics
23CHU Toulouse—Hôpital RangueilUniversité de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-OncopoleIRT Saint Exupéry, Intuitive Surgical, Collective Thinking, Dedalus, Nuance
24Hôpital Foch Siemens Healthineers, Incepto.
25Pôle santé Oréliance Cardiologs
26CH Valenciennes Arterys, GE Healthcare, Lifen.
27AP-HP—Hôpital Lariboisière Gleamer, Azmed, Milvue, IBM, OpthAI, Medvir
28Polyclinique Saint-Roch Medacta
29Hôpital Privé du Confluent Volta Medical
30AP-HP—Hôpital TenonUniversité Paris-Est CréteilGleamer
31CHU Saint-Étienne—Hôpital BellevueUniversité de Saint-Etienne, Centre Ingénierie Santé, Institut Régional de Médecine et d’Ingénierie du Sport
32CHU Toulouse—Hôpital LarreyUniversité de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-OncopoleCollective Thinking, Dedalus, Nuance.
33AP-HP—Hôpital Albert ChenevierUniversité Paris-Est CréteilGleamer
34AP-HM—Hôpital Sainte Marguerite Genomis, Incepto, Milvue, Canfield Scientific.
35AP-HP—Hôpital Armand-TrousseauAgence Nationale de la Performance SanitaireGleamer
36AP-HP—Hôpital BeaujonCNRS, École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, École Polytechnique, CapgeminiQuantum Surgical, Owkin, Median Technologies.
37AP-HP—Hôpital Fernand-Widal GE Healthcare, MSDAvenir.
38CHU Besançon—Hôpital Jean MinjozUniversité de Franche-Comté, Heig-VD (Switzerland), CHUV (Switzerland)Aprogsys, Nanomedicine Lab, Elliadd, TechWan, Femto-St, Maincare Solutions.
39AP-HP—Hôpital Robert-DebréCNRS, École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, École Polytechnique, CapgeminiOwkin, Intuitive Surgical.
40CHU Rennes—Site Pontchaillou Incepto, Digi-Newb.
41Centre Antoine Lacassagne—OncologyUniversité Côte d’Azur, INRIA.3IA Côte d’Azur
42Centre Léon-Bérard—OncologyUnicancer, École Polytechnique, Institut Curie, Université Paris Descartes, Gustave RoussyIntel, Owkin, Apricity, Tribun Health, PathAI, Creatis, Health Data Hub, Gleamer, Therapanacea.
43Hôpital Necker—Enfants malades—PediatricsUniversité de Paris, INSERM.Sonio and Health Data Hub.
44Institut Curie—OncologyMines ParisIbex Medical, Owkin.
45Institut Gustave Roussy—OncologyUnicancerOwkin, Tribun Health, Cypath, Therapanacea.
46Institut Paoli-Calmettes—Oncology Medtronic, Health Data Hub.
(1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6). All hospitals in each group collaborated with the same internal and external partners.
Table 5. Best hospitals.
Table 5. Best hospitals.
HospitalNumber of Criteria (Out of 34)
Institut Curie—Oncology20
Institut Gustave Roussy—Oncology19
Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph19
CHU Bordeaux—Groupe hospitalier Pellegrin *18
CHU Bordeaux—Hôpital Saint-André *18
* Both hospitals used the same website.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Medina Aguerrebere, P.; Medina, E.; Gonzalez Pacanowski, T. The Role of Smart Technologies in French Hospitals’ Branding Strategies. Journal. Media 2024, 5, 92-107. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5010007

AMA Style

Medina Aguerrebere P, Medina E, Gonzalez Pacanowski T. The Role of Smart Technologies in French Hospitals’ Branding Strategies. Journalism and Media. 2024; 5(1):92-107. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Medina Aguerrebere, Pablo, Eva Medina, and Toni Gonzalez Pacanowski. 2024. "The Role of Smart Technologies in French Hospitals’ Branding Strategies" Journalism and Media 5, no. 1: 92-107. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5010007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop