Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Link between Smartphone Use, Recorded Violence, and Social Sharing in 80 Case Studies in Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Control–Value Appraisals and Achievement Emotions: A Moderation Analysis
 
 
Please note that, as of 22 March 2024, Psych has been renamed to Psychology International and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

What Is Psychological Spin? A Thermodynamic Framework for Emotions and Social Behavior

Department of Anatomy, Histology, and Embryology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
Psych 2023, 5(4), 1224-1240; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5040081
Submission received: 28 September 2023 / Revised: 18 November 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Brain Disorders)

Abstract

:
One of the most puzzling questions in neuroscience is the nature of emotions and their role in consciousness. The brain’s significant energy investment in maintaining the resting state indicates its essential role as the ground state of consciousness, the source of the sense of self. Emotions, the brain’s homeostatic master regulators, continuously measure and motivate the recovery of the psychological equilibrium. Moreover, perception’s information-energy exchange with the environment gives rise to a closed thermodynamic cycle, the reversible Carnot engine. The Carnot cycle forms an exothermic process; low entropy and reversible resting state turn the focus to the past, causing regret and remorse. The endothermic reversed Carnot cycle creates a high entropy resting state with irreversible activations generating novelty and intellect. We propose that the cycle’s direction represents psychological spin, where the endothermic cycle’s energy accumulation forms up-spin, and the energy-wasting exothermic cycle represents down-spin. Psychological spin corresponds to attitude, the determining factor in cognitive function and social life. By applying the Pauli exclusion principle for consciousness, we can explain the need for personal space and the formation of hierarchical social structures and animals’ territorial needs. Improving intuition about the brain’s intelligent computations may allow new treatments for mental diseases and novel applications in robotics and artificial intelligence.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The intricate relationship between cognition and physics is a subject of philosophical contemplation and scientific inquiry [1]. Perlovsky’s [2] musing, “Is it possible to describe the mind based on the few first principles as physics does?” expresses the need for a falsifiable, systematic, and predictive consciousness hypothesis achieved through scientific method or observation. In this quest, we must consider how the brain is an integral part of the environment’s energy-information exchange.
From the most primitive animals to humans, sensory abilities play a fundamental role in perceiving and understanding the environment. These sensory perceptions are often deeply intertwined with memory, learning [3], and temporal orientation, creating varied experiences and cognitive processes [4,5].
According to the scientific definition, perception is the process whereby sensory stimulation is translated into organized experience, whereas cognition is the process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, intellect, experience, and the senses. Therefore, although cognition is highly abstract and flexible [6], it shows a systematic relationship with perception [7].
Perception is an adaptive interface [8] shaped by natural selection to guide adaptive behaviors that improve evolutionary fitness. Intelligent response to stimulus requires a veridical modeling of the physical environment, centering on the intuition of the physical laws. The lion’s ability to catch its prey requires superior management of the muscles against gravity. “Space-time tells particles how to move” according to John Wheeler’s famous quote. Similarly, gravity also instructs the lion’s well-coordinated movements.
Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory in physics that describes the behavior of nature at the scale of atoms and their constituent particles, like electrons. The brain’s parallel and ultrafast evaluation of the relations between probabilistic variables resembles quantum systems. For example, the sensory cycle can produce superposition, interference, and entanglement, allowing the mathematical tools of quantum mechanics to explain problems in consciousness science [9,10,11]. While context clues can dramatically modify what we hear, see, or perceive [9], they turn the potential of memory and perception into actual properties [12] of discrete thoughts and decisions. Therefore, cognition shows a point-like (discrete) or wave-like character, i.e., complementarity.
Therefore, quantum cognition is widely accepted in cognitive science in explaining problems in psychology and social sciences and mathematical tools from quantum mechanics find utility in explaining complex problems in consciousness science, further blurring the boundaries between the quantum world and the cognitive realm [9,10]. Although superpositions of mental states are created by complex networks of neurons (classical neural networks), the activity of such neural networks can produce effects formally described as interference (of probabilities) and entanglement.
In quantum mechanics, the “spin” of the electron is intrinsic angular momentum without classical understanding [13]. Fermions, like electrons, have half-integer spin values, which determine their characteristic behavior. For example, the Pauli exclusion principle affects only particles with half-integer spin, dictating that no two identical fermions occupy the same quantum state simultaneously. This principle is responsible for the organization of electrons in atomic orbitals, giving rise to the diverse chemistry and properties we observe in the macroscopic world. When electrons move around, they contribute to macroscopic magnetic fields.
Similar to fermions’ permanent feature of the half spin, consciousness’ constant accompaniments are emotions. Although there is no scientific consensus on a definition [14], emotions are thought of as mental states brought on by neurophysiological changes, thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of pleasure or displeasure. In our discussion, we will use a narrower definition, as deviations from the psychological balance of the mind. In this definition, emotions represent the homeostatic regulators, which aid in the recovery of the resting state [14,15]. The above conclusion gains more significance by understanding that the autonomic nervous system, responsible for encoding the novelty and significance of stimuli, operates involuntarily and regulates arousal, thus influencing the intensity and nature of emotional responses [15,16].
Like temperature, which indexes internal energy, psychological temperature measures the intensity of emotions and arousal [15,17,18,19]. While arousal is the physiological and psychological state of the sense organs stimulated to the point of perception, psychological temperature includes the intention to respond. For example, low arousal stabilizes focus, but high arousal causes oscillating information processing. Emotions’ varied personal histories, cultural and brain activity profiles [20,21] represent only positive or negative motivation [22,23]. For example, physiological need, such as hunger or thirst, gives rise to an increasingly positive time error illuminating objects relevant to that need [24], where the expectation influences the perception [25] of stimulus. Although emotions are multidimensional representations due to personal history, social context, and the qualities of the stimulus, they can be pared down to instant feelings for or against, with a surprising analogy to the photon spin [10].
In addition, emotional clues interfere with and modify what we hear, see, or perceive [9], assuming a fundamental role in mental and psychological balance at the top of the homeostatic hierarchy [26,27]. The resting state’s brain activity consumes most of the brain’s energy [28], indicating its central role in self-determination [29]. Arousal-dependent inputs shape dynamics in occipital cortex circuitries by suppressing α limit cycle activity in favor of the simultaneous emergence of γ oscillations [30], indicating the thermodynamic consequences of perception.
Human history is characterized by conflicts, revolutions, and wars. Walter Scheidel [31] has shown that inequality and competition for limited resources can trigger social conflict with devastating consequences for the social fabric. What factors make these conflicts necessary? In the following, we will show that competition and conflict in stressed populations can be traced back to a fundamental principle of physics. Our earlier work introduced the fermionic mind hypothesis [32,33], a cohesive theory of consciousness. It defines consciousness as the awareness of being separate from the environment. The organism’s reliance on the sensory system for survival embeds the brain within its environment. Intelligent response to stimuli is possible because the brain adopts the physical laws for its operation. In the following, we investigated whether the brain’s reversible perception cycle, which represents endothermic or exothermic conditions, acts analogously to particle spin.

2. Mental Unity

Conscious perception is never fractured [34]; ambiguity forces a non-deterministic, quantum-like fluctuation between two concepts, or decisions. For example, two different images presented to the two eyes [35,36] or two different smells registered by the two nostrils [37] do not form averages in perception but trigger a quantum-like fluctuation between the two possibilities. Therefore, the mind is the smallest unit of intellect (Deli, 2020b) that is only meaningful in its unity [38].
Sensory activation evokes involuntary potentials and electric flows in primary sensory regions, forming spatiotemporal symmetry vis-à-vis the brain’s resting modules [39], which orients consciousness in time [40]. As response restores the brain’s resting state, personal experiences and momentary expectations evolve the resting equilibrium. The limited work produced by one cycle turns mental evolution into a stepwise process, giving rise to discrete understanding and beliefs, which supports self-consciousness’ “quantized” character. For example, the evoked cycle discretizes the wave function, analogous to the particle’s wave function in a “box”.
The frequency of the oscillations through space and time is given by the wavenumber k and the angular frequency ω , respectively. These are both related to the total energy of the particle by the expression
E = ω = 2 k 2 2 m
where is the reduced Planck constant, and m is the particle’s mass. In human psychology, mental energy k is the ability or willingness to perform cognitive tasks, like problem-solving, focusing, and making decisions. Similarly, energy is inversely proportional to attachments, which is analogous to physical mass.
Normalizing the wave function turns the total probability density of finding the particle or making a decision to one, as the mind always seeks meaning. At the boundary points at x = 0 and x = B.
0 B | Ψ ( t ) | 2 d x = 1
where Ψ is the wave function, representing the evolution of a thought.
The connection between the brain and body allows homeostatic self-regulation [38,41], with bodily signals supporting the sense of self. This dynamic system involves perception and response, with a flexible organization that generates unified perception even in confusing situations [42]. The fermionic mind hypothesis establishes this unity as a fundamental feature of consciousness and intellect [32,33]. Emotions also play a significant role in this system, triggering changes in behavior, hormones, and the body [43] to maintain a constant psychological state. Therefore, emotions form subjective guidance, representing master regulators that adjust internal physiology with expectations.

3. Discussion

3.1. Mental Homeostasis

The physical world obeys the second law of thermodynamics, but life secures a low entropy internal stability against external conditions. From the simplest organisms to humans, homeostasis seems to be a fundamental requirement of life. Cells keep their internal structure, pH, salt concentration, and membrane potential constant. In vertebrates, the heart and the kidneys maintain the body’s internal parameters within a very tight range. The brain is a central regulator responsible for thought, memory, emotion, touch, motor skills, vision, breathing, temperature, hunger, and bodily processes.
Stimulus rapidly collapses the high-dimensional resting state into a lower-dimensional substrate [44,45]. The microscopic membrane potentials and neurotransmitter fluctuations give rise to large-scale functional magnetic resonance signals [46]. Cortical oscillations reflect the priors in the network architecture, stored in the anatomical layout and the weights of synaptic connections [45].
The mind represents an independent inner world with highly personal experiences, memories, and ideas. Moreover, the unified, subjective, and conscious experience of stimulus modifies the synaptic connection map in an expertise and learning-dependent manner (Figure 1). Although perception can be conscious or unconscious, and response can be cognitive or behavioral, it represents an energy-dependent change in synaptic and, thus, cognitive complexity.
Our emotional state is closely tied to both our physical and psychological well-being. Disruption of this balance can trigger a range of emotions, which, in turn, serve as a motivating force to restore equilibrium. For instance, hunger prompts food seeking, and even the elation over winning the lottery represents only a temporary departure from our psychological equilibrium.
Furthermore, the actions to regain our unique, personal, and psychological balance are driven by emotions. For example, the excision of the cerebral cortex leads to violent reactions to external stimuli, the so-called sham rage, which underscores emotions, energy nature, and motivational power (Figure 2, top). While our cortical memory library imbues emotions with a multidimensional and nuanced meaning, they fundamentally represent polar states [22,23] (Figure 2, bottom).
A tightly controlled emotional integration restores the resting, neutral position [47,48]. Its relative distance from the primary sensory areas allows the formation of cognitive stability. The cognitive “ground state’s” non-computable and often ungovernable thought processes enable a subjective, transcendental, and privileged first-person experience [49] and psychological, emotional, and mental constancy throughout life [50]. The constantly changing, complex, and elaborate mental world can only be accessed from the inside; for outside observers, it is a holographic projection that continuously changes while appearing strangely constant from childhood to old age.
The autonomic stress pathway connects the corticolimbic stress circuits to the hypothalamus [51] by activating the sweat glands and controlling blood pressure and blood vessel dilation to the muscles, the so-called “fight-or-flight” reaction [52]. Motivation can increase noise resistance [53]. Therefore, emotions can be utilized to maintain culturally prescribed cognitive comfort [54,55]. We will turn our attention to this aspect next.

3.2. The Thermodynamic Analysis of the Evoked Cycle

In the words of Conant and Ashby, “Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system” [56]. The ability to produce an intelligent response to a stimulus requires a model of that stimulus [45,57]. Learning continuously improves the fit between incoming sensory signals and available mental models or predictions [48] through a thermodynamic modification of the synaptic connections. For example, increased functional connectivity lowers the resting entropy in the parietal cingulate cortex and amygdala [58]. However, information erasure improves contentment and resting synaptic flexibility [59].
Therefore, the brain is a thermodynamic system that partakes in the energy/information cycle of the physical world via the sensory system. In computation theory, dissipative processes reconstruct the past, and intelligent ones control the future [19,60,61]. While exothermic processes dump entropy and energy into the environment, endothermic systems reduce entropy and require energy to operate. In sum, exothermic cycles make endothermic ones possible. Intelligent functions consist of complex metabolic decision-making networks, fueled by endothermic information erasal [62,63].
A closed system changes only energy (as heat or work), not matter, with its surroundings. When the cycle repeats with constant parameters, such as entropy and temperature, it forms a thermodynamic cycle. Therefore, the stimulus and its response form a closed and reversible thermodynamic cycle with discrete processing centering on the resting state [18,19,61,64,65].
In information theory, Shannon entropy represents the amount of information needed to characterize a random variable, roughly its surprise potential [60]. Because Shannon entropy considers discrete random variables, and the brain’s intelligent computation relies on uninterrupted energy flow, brain entropy represents a discretization of a continuous time series. In the maximum entropy situation, the signal-to-energy ratio is very high [66]. For example, access to a significant number of neural states affords high degrees of freedom, fluid intelligence [16,67], trust, and confidence [68,69]. Therefore, the brain’s thermodynamic cycle can represent the psychology of motivation.
The endothermic cycle requires an energy input, such as thalamic neurotensin production and release [70]. Because most brain operations modulate what we see, hear, and think behind conscious awareness, emotions have irresistible power over behavior, leading to the belief in free will. Attentional focus, responsibility, compassion, and love [71,72] represent energy needed for an endothermic cycle, whereas the exothermic cycle is “free” of initial mental investment. Therefore, tiredness, lack of preparation, or stress often triggers the exothermic cycle. The above arguments can explain the compounded nature of attitude in long-term well-being [73,74].

3.3. Quantum Cognition

The mind cannot be assessed as a classical object because the mental state is inaccessible until decision-making, which turns initial potentials into actual features. The response, even opening the eyes, disrupts and changes the brain. Stimulus (measurement) cannot establish motivation because it decisively changes the emotional state, leaving us uncertain about the original condition. Quantum cognition is based on the idea that chaotic and noisy brain activations give rise to quantum characteristics (Table 1) requiring corresponding mathematical explanations.
Like waves on a pond, thoughts move with considerable liberty; the brain’s wave-like electric activities [75,76] are challenging to govern and almost impossible to retrace. They represent the neural underpinning of response [77]. Therefore, mental history is just as crucial in determining the quality of neuronal activation as the stimulus itself [78]. Thus, in analogy to Shannon understanding of entropy, the stimulus information value and the degree and quality of comprehension depend on the observer [79]. Therefore, the observer effect in the measurement problem associates consciousness with the most debated problem in quantum physics.
Cognition alternates between a fluid charge flow [80] versus thermodynamic balance, continuous unconscious processing, versus discrete conscious percepts and beliefs [4], reminiscent of the quantum and classical divide. The brain’s probabilistic temporal rhythms (Table 1) formulate discrete processing as decision resolves cognitive uncertainty. Continuous and bidirectional body–brain states with a hierarchical but flexible functional organization formulate a dynamic interactive system consisting of perception and response [38]. The bottom-up evidence and top-down expectations [81] and the reversibility of the perception cycle coalesce via decision-making. The incremental switches of beliefs, decisions, and cognitive changes (Table 2) are analog to the quantized energy transformations of decoherence [82].
The actual outcome of decision-making and social behaviors is based on the squares of the probability amplitudes [83,84,85,86]. Analogous to the Born rule, which expresses the probability density of finding a particle at a given point, the medial prefrontal cortex (P.F.C.) efficiently represents hierarchically related choice-outcome associations [57], corresponding to the “position” of latent association.
Superposition between network nodes bears similarities to the simultaneous and probabilistic spontaneous activity priors’ evaluation [45]. Furthermore, the superposed psychological states cannot be defined precisely; instead, all possible values within the superposition have some potential for expression [87]. Ambiguity forces a non-deterministic, quantum-like fluctuation between two possibilities, concepts, or economic decisions [88].
The Social Laser can model the Bandwagon Effect. Content filtering algorithms on social networks create polarized “echo chambers” [89], where the coupling strength of decision-making agents is enhanced within the network [90]. In this case, the mass media pump supports additional reinforcement and acceleration of cascade growth, significantly increasing the speed at which a viral message spreads through social media.
Behaviors and emotions lead to the reflexive production of similar behaviors and emotions in others [91]. The coherent energy flow of high-amplitude information waves can sway public opinion and influence behavior. For example, sentiment contagion is a spontaneous spread of emotions among members of social groups due to the propagation of social energy [92,93]. The phenomenon is analog to the temperature-dependent diffusion process in liquids.
The charge, parity, and time (C.P.T.) theorem states that the quantum field is invariant under the inversion of time direction, charge, and parity [94]. Therefore, the inputs and outputs of physical processes are symmetric: The laws of quantum mechanics are indifferent to the direction of time. Similar to entangled photons’ superposition running forward and backward in time [95,96], emotions are in a limbo between the future and the past [60,61]. Measurement or decision-making settles the superposition.

3.4. Psychological Spin

Elementary particles have spin, which turns them into little magnets. The spin representation of information processing follows the Born rule [97,98], which states that the system’s measured value is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the system’s wave function at that state. Let α be an observable vector with eigenvalue λ i for an eigenvector e i from an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors { e i } . If a system such as a brain is in state ψ , then the probability Pr( α = λ i ψ ) that λ i is observed for α equals e , ψ 2 . Furthermore, let B 2 H 4 , i.e., B is a collection of vectors that is a subset of a 4-dimensional Hilbert vector field (each vector in this Hilbert space has coordinates (x, y, z, t), t = instant in time). The Born rule for an observable is
Pr α = λ i   ψ )   B 1 ψ   ( x ) 2 d x
which is the probability that the particle x is found in region B in brain state ψ .
Recent investigations learned that emotions are multidimensional representations of attitude, representing an instant inclination toward or against an idea, drawing intriguing parallels with electron spin [10]. For example, a dog’s wagging tail and raised hackles are analogous to electric polarities. Similarly, people with enemies want their friends to share their anger or hatred toward them [99]. Like electrons in an electromagnetic field, highly emotional messages and environments force people to take sides by embracing or rejecting them [100,101], which can cause political polarization [102,103]. Furthermore, like electric charges, attraction can switch to repulsion instantly, thus, a simple spin model can explain market frictions and herding behavior in economics [104]. Moreover, a modification of the above idea, the Ising model, can account for decision-making in social and business situations [105,106,107,108].
Attitude or disposition represents the direction and magnitude of intention or orientations in a Hilbert space (an abstract vector space) [10,109]. Moreover, the evoked cycle’s thermodynamics [18,19,61] permit the psychological interpretation of the cycle’s direction as a psychological spin. Thus, the evoked cycle is an abstract, multidimensional “spin space” (Figure 3).

3.5. The Interpretation of Spinor Psychology

Spin is an intrinsic angular momentum that can change signs. Therefore, spin characterizes the particle, but the connection to the field introduces spinor properties. For example, a spinor transforms to its negative when space is rotated through a complete 360° turn. Likewise, partiality (shown by prior stimulus and after-error negativity), which inverts the thermodynamic cycle, overturns the stimulus’ meaning, the pain disappears when serving a noble cause, and sincere words and loving caresses turn into cynicism and abuse [110,111], and tragedy into a farce. At the neural level, reciprocal pairwise comparisons do not satisfy commutativity and associativity [112]. These processes thus represent the division algebra of the octonions, turning into their negative after a 360-degree turn.
A consequence of spinor is that only one electron can exist for each state in an atom, leading to the buildup of the periodic table of the elements. Psychological spinor may originate in the brainstem proximate and distal sensory projections [16]. In this framework, social comparisons function as the “inner eye” for reflexive consciousness [112], with higher-power individuals perceived at a more pronounced social distance from others [113,114]. The hierarchic organization in career achievement [115,116] often also infuses families and social relationships [117,118].
Even in the non-verbal language of the body, emotional valence and intensity communicate something essential about a person’s credibility, popularity, and other qualities. Therefore, although emotions often remain hidden from conscious awareness, they provide feedback on every aspect of welfare [119], supporting cognitive processes and decision-making [120]. The involuntary nature and action-producing power of attitude are perhaps the best indications of the energy nature and fundamental motivating power of emotions. For example, traditional psychotherapy cannot successfully relieve angry feelings, but acceptance effectively changes one’s physiological response [121].
A representational example of the contrasting spin is a soldier facing the enemy. In the up spin condition, the soldier races toward the enemy [122], but in the down spin condition, the resting activations time-reversal symmetry [46,123] initiate exothermic back-and-forth vacillations canceling progress [16,124]. Rather than being a coward, the soldier fears the future [19,33,65,125]. In the following, we will consider the two spin states in turn.

3.6. The Psychological Down Spin

A Carnot cycle acts as a heat engine. Similarly, the thermodynamic cycle of perception transfers heat between two information reservoirs. Therefore perception, including resting state recovery, imposes an energy need, depending on experience, education, and mood, i.e., the information value of the incoming stimulus.
Although it is difficult to distinguish particular emotions, frequency-based binary emotion classification (positive and negative) can achieve 96.81% accuracy [126,127]. Therefore, based on brain activation profiles, lower frequencies have more positive emotional valence than information-heavy higher ones [22].
Unlike positive emotions, stress and fear occur spontaneously without needing attentional control [70]. In addition, negative emotions have a long tail due to their cumulative effects in the frontal lobe [127], causing guilt, remorse, anxiety, rumination [128], and adverse mind-wandering [129,130,131].
Negative facial expressions increase arousal [132] and narrow focus. Increased functional connectivity reduces the degrees of freedom [16,58,133], corrupting information processing [134] and lowering resting entropy in proportion to the severity of cognitive impairment [135]. Thus, negative emotions represent unprocessed information, which remains part of the cognitive space. The sense of permanence enhances negative emotions’ stress-inducing power [70,127,136], causing erratic and attack behavior and criticism [128,129,130].
As speeding reduces the engine’s fuel economy, cognitive information accumulation overwhelms the neural system [127,132], causing significant energy costs [23,137]. For example, glutamate accumulation during long, demanding work corrupts decision control [138] behavior [139], compromising post-error correction [140].
Energy and immune dysregulation trigger stress hormones [141,142,143], a precursor of pathologic brain conditions [58,144,145], mental and other health problems [23,146,147]. Stress aftereffects in the D.M.N. [148] reduce plasticity within the medial prefrontal cortex (P.F.C.) to drive depressive behavior [70,136]. In anxious youth, amygdala reactivity can induce long-term impulsivity [149]. In addition, cognitive rigidity (putamen and cerebellum) [150] corrupts temporal coherence and self-identity [151].
The exothermic cycle (Table 2) can increase stress sensitivity [138,146] through a Bayesian process. In turn, criticism and violence lead to anxiety [46,123] and depression. Their excessive energy requirements are highly corrosive to mental welfare [23,137,152]. Therefore, mental diseases might have a thermodynamic origin.

3.7. The Psychological Up Spin

The sense of progress is a psychological need for the temporal mind. For that reason, mistakes, which represent a failure to move forward, are painful. Therefore, corrections, achievement, well-being, healthy behavior, and planning [70,153] require future focus [33,60,65]. Mental slowing down to correct mistakes requires persistent mental effort [68] that eliminates negative cognitive burdens [27,46,154]. Likewise, intelligent processing, flexibility [155], and optimism require low psychological temperature [15]. For example, acceptance removes the emotional weight of suffering by turning it into confidence and wisdom [156,157,158].
The reversed Carnot cycle supports a high entropy resting state [127], which is associated with intelligence [28,159,160], openness [161], and creativity [162]. Slow frequencies can access broader cortical areas (microstates), supporting associative representations and adaptive strategies [163]. Inversely, goal-directed and purposeful action [68,69] increases the degrees of freedom [18,19,61].
Positive psychology recognizes the role of a supportive environment or a positive mind in achievement [71,72]. Optimism reinforces itself through a Bayesian process (Table 2), predisposing the endothermic cycle [48]. For example, novelty (high surprise value) inflates reward expectations through thalamic neurotensin production and release [70] and increases confidence [164]. Therefore, positive emotions have a pivotal role in meaning-making, social relationships [115,116], self-reliance, and academic performance [165].
Cognitive efficiency is the function of the brain network dynamics [79] and organization. Endothermic activity economizes cognitive resources [166], allowing better fractal power (the power-law exponent) in diverse cortical areas, i.e., the ability to formulate a full range of emotions [53,69,167].
Therefore, mental energy is the brain’s structural quality [3,168,169], which permits wholesome experiences [170] and optimism. Thus, the thermodynamics of emotions can explain the compounded nature of attitude in long-term well-being [73,74]. Therefore, mental progress and freedom of action might be fundamental psychological requirements for healthy mental function.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

Consciousness science attempts to answer how the neural system produces psychology and social phenomena. Following Conant and Ashby [56], we show that intelligent computation models the physical environment [45,57]. The Fermionic mind hypothesis ascertains the integration of the physical laws into the brain’s temporal organization. Therefore, physical principles can explain consciousness, human psychology, and social phenomena. Furthermore, the hypothesis shows that the reversible perception cycle can institute rapid shifts in orientation and decision-making based on incoming information and environmental context. This notion parallels quantum mechanics and leads to many dynamic and probabilistic characteristics of cognition.
Life relies on homeostatic regulation occurring on many levels. In endotherms, cognition, centered on the resting state, sits at the top of this hierarchy. Perception is a thermodynamic cycle that accumulates memory, lending predictive abilities. The mind’s (and living organization’s) orthogonal organization vis-à-vis the physical environment turns it into a highly efficient energy and entropy absorber, leading to increasing complexity throughout evolution. This perspective provides a thermodynamic argument for the emergence of intellect, as an orthogonal system. The emotional master regulation maintains a genetically, culturally, and personally determined cognitive comfort. While the cortical library turns emotions into multidimensional experiences, their regulatory potency originates in their energy nature. For example, removing the cerebral cortex (sham rage) triggers violent movements in response to stimulus, uncovering motivation action-producing capacity. Therefore, emotions are the forces of motivation.
Therefore, the brain’s endothermic or exothermic cognitive cycle forms emotional polarities, analogous to particle spin. The endothermic cycle parallels psychological up spin, forming mental expansion through optimism and creativity. Like a tiny bar magnet, healthy psychology resists disturbances in its orientation toward the future, permitting social convergence.
In contrast, the exothermic cycle corresponds to down spin. For example, when stress accumulates in synaptic connections, the action space dimensionality reduction leads to impulsivity. Therefore, the exothermic cycle disperses energy and entropy onto the environment through repetitive thinking, criticism, aggravation, or physical violence. The fear-based, insecure orientation requires a defensive or conflict-seeking stance, leading to polarization, and divergence.
By structuring the social environment based on fear or trust, the psychological spin has wider consequences. For example, cynicism, which destroys goodwill, represents a psychological spinor, analogous to the fermionic capacity to transform the wave function into its negative when space is rotated through a complete 360° turn.
The Pauli exclusion principle describes the behavior of all fermions, including consciousness (particles with half-integer spin). The principle shapes matter and leads to territorial or personal space needs in social animals. Because stress acts as time pressure, it causes contradictory tendencies to dominate. The resulting competition can explain the hierarchic social structures and the increasing inequality over history.
Using category theory, computer simulations, and empirical studies can validate the fermionic mind hypothesis. For example, activating the amygdala should cause contradictory tendencies, proving the existence of psychologic spin.
In conclusion, the fermionic mind hypothesis explains the physics of the mind as the wholesale adoption of the physical laws into a temporal organization. The Pauli exclusion principle outlines the devastating consequences of stress on human welfare. A better understanding of consciousness and emotions has potential applications in education, social policy, psychiatry, animal husbandry, and artificial intelligence research.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mitko, A.; Fischer, J. When it all falls down: The relationship between intuitive physics and spatial cognition. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 2020, 5, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Perlovsky, L.I. Physics of the Mind. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dabaghian, Y. Through synapses to spatial memory maps via a topological model. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Herzog, M.H.; Drissi-Daoudi, L.; Doerig, A. All in Good Time: Long-Lasting Postdictive Effects Reveal Discrete Perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2020, 24, 826–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fingelkurts, A.A.; Fingelkurts, A.A. Present Moment, Past, and Future: Mental Kaleidoscope. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nes, A.; Sundberg, K.; Watzl, S. The perception/cognition distinction. Inquiry 2021, 66, 165–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Montemayor, C.; Haladjian, H.H. Perception and Cognition Are Largely Independent, but Still Affect Each Other in Systematic Ways: Arguments from Evolution and the Consciousness-Attention Dissociation. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hoffman, L.; Vallejos, L.; Cleare-Hoffman, H.P.; Rubin, S. Emotion, relationship, and meaning as core existential practice: Evidence-based foundations. J. Contemp. Psychother. Cut. Edge Mod. Dev. Psychother. 2015, 45, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, A.J.; Schwarz, N. How One Thing Leads to Another: Spillover Effects of Behavioral Mind-Sets. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2018, 27, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Surov, I.A. Quantum Core Affect. Color-Emotion Structure of Semantic Atom. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 838029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pothos, E.M.; Busemeyer, J.R. Quantum Cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2022, 73, 749–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dennett, D.C. Facing up to the hard question of consciousness. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 373, 20170342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ohanian, H.C. What is spin? Am. J. Phys. 1986, 54, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reisenzein, R. What is a definition of emotion? And are emotions mental-behavioral processes? Soc. Sci. Inf. 2007, 46, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. O’Neill, J.; Schoth, A. The Mental Maxwell Relations: A Thermodynamic Allegory for Higher Brain Functions. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 827888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, D.J.J.; Jann, K.; Fan, C.; Qiao, Y.; Zang, Y.-F.; Lu, H.; Yang, Y. Neurophysiological Basis of Multi-Scale Entropy of Brain Complexity and Its Relationship With Functional Connectivity. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Escobar, F.B.; Velasco, C.; Motoki, K.; Byrne, D.V.; Wang, Q.J. The temperature of emotions. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0252408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Déli, E.; Kisvárday, Z. The thermodynamic brain and the evolution of intellect: The role of mental energy. Cogn. Neurodyn. 2020, 14, 743–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deli, E.; Kisvarday, Z.; Peters, J.F. The Thermodynamics of Cognition: A Mathematical Treatment. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Suhaimi, N.S.; Mountstephens, J.; Teo, J. EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: A State-of-the-Art Review of Current Trends and Opportunities. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2020, 2020, 8875426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Torres, E.P.; Torres, E.A.; Hernández-Álvarez, M.; Yoo, S.G. EEG-Based BCI Emotion Recognition: A Survey. Sensors 2020, 20, 5083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hesp, C.; Smith, R.; Parr, T.; Allen, M.; Friston, K.J.; Ramstead, M.J.D. Deeply Felt Affect: The Emergence of Valence in Deep Active Inference. Neural Comput. 2021, 33, 398–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kao, F.C.; Wang, S.P.R.; Huang, C.H.; Chen, C.C.; Lin, Y.K. Brainwave analysis of positive and negative emotions. In Management, Information and Educational Engineering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilchrist, J.C.; Nesberg, L.S. Need and perceptual change in need-related objects. J. Exp. Psychol. 1952, 44, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bruner, J.S.; Minturn, A.L. Perceptual Identification and Perceptual Organization. J. Gen. Psychol. 1955, 53, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Babaev, O.; Chatain, C.P.; Krueger-Burg, D. Inhibition in the amygdala anxiety circuitry. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bechler, C.J.; Tormala, Z.L.; Rucker, D.D. Perceiving Attitude Change: How Qualitative Shifts Augment Change Perception. Stanford Graduate School of Business. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2019, 83, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z. The Neurocognitive Correlates of Brain Entropy Estimated by Resting State fMRI-ScienceDirect. NeuroImage 2021, 232, 117893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fang, H.; He, B.; Fu, H.; Zhang, H.; Mo, Z.; Meng, L. A Surprising Source of Self-Motivation: Prior Competence Frustration Strengthens One’s Motivation to Win in Another Competence-Supportive Activity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hutt, A.; Lefevre, J. Arousal Fluctuations Govern Oscillatory Transitions Between Dominant γ and α Occipital Activity During Eyes Open/Closed Conditions. Brain Topogr. 2022, 35, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Scheidel, W. The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Deli, E. Can the Fermionic Mind Hypothesis (FMH) Explain Consciousness? The Physics of Selfhood. Act. Nerv. Super. 2020, 62, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Deli, E. Thermodynamic Implications of the Fermionic Mind Hypothesis. Act. Nerv. Super. 2020, 62, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bayne, T. Unity of consciousness. Scholarpedia 2009, 4, 7414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Binocular Rivalry; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 1–373.
  36. Tong, F.; Meng, M.; Blake, R. Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, W.; Chen, D. Binaral rivalry between the nostrils and in the cortex. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 1561–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Criscuolo, A.; Schwartze, M.; Kotz, S.A. Cognition through the lens of a body–brain dynamic system. Trends Neurosci. 2022, 45, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bastos, A.M.; Litvak, V.; Moran, R.; Bosman, C.A.; Fries, P.; Friston, K.J. A DCM study of spectral asymmetries in feedforward and feedback connections between visual areas V1 and V4 in the monkey. NeuroImage 2015, 108, 460–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Huang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Mashour, G.A.; Hudetz, A.G. Temporal circuit of macroscale dynamic brain activity supports human consciousness. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz0087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guterstam, A.; Abdulkarim, Z.; Ehrsson, H. Illusory Ownership of an Invisible Body Reduces Autonomic and Subjective Social Anxiety Responses. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, Y.-C.; Spence, C. Assessing the role of the ‘unity assumption’ on multisensory integration: A review. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Min, J.; Nashiro, K.; Yoo, H.J.; Cho, C.; Nasseri, P.; Bachman, S.L.; Porat, S.; Thayer, J.F.; Chang, C.; Lee, T.-H.; et al. Emotion Downregulation Targets Interoceptive Brain Regions While Emotion Upregulation Targets Other Affective Brain Regions. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2022, 42, 2973–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bányai, M.; Lazar, A.; Klein, L.; Klon-Lipok, J.; Stippinger, M.; Singer, W.; Orbán, G. Stimulus complexity shapes response correlations in primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 2723–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Singer, W. Recurrent Dynamics in the Cerebral Cortex: Integration of Sensory Evidence with Stored Knowledge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2101043118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Stringer, C.; Pachitariu, M.; Steinmetz, N.; Carandini, M.; Harris, K.D. High-Dimensional Geometry of Population Responses in Visual Cortex. Nature 2019, 571, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Northoff, G.; Tumati, S. “Average is good, extremes are bad”–Non-linear inverted U-shaped relationship between neural mechanisms and functionality of mental features. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019, 104, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schoeller, F.; Perlovsky, L.I. Aesthetic Chills: Knowledge-Acquisition, Meaning-Making, and Aesthetic Emotions. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kolvoort, I.R.; Wainio-Theberge, S.; Wolff, A.; Northoff, G. Temporal integration as ‘common currency’ of brain and self-scale-free activity in resting-state EEG correlates with temporal delay effects on self-relatedness. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2020, 41, 4355–4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wolff, A.; Di Giovanni, D.A.; Gómez-Pilar, J.; Nakao, T.; Huang, Z.; Longtin, A.; Northoff, G. The temporal signature of self: Temporal measures of resting-state EEG predict self-consciousness. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019, 40, 789–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kataoka, N.; Shima, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Nakamura, K. A central master driver of psychosocial stress responses in the rat. Science 2020, 367, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fadok, J.P.; Krabbe, S.; Markovic, M.; Courtin, J.; Xu, C.; Massi, L.; Botta, P.; Bylund, K.; Müller, C.; Kovacevic, A.; et al. A competitive inhibitory circuit for selection of active and passive fear responses. Nature 2017, 542, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Manohar, S.G.; Muhammed, K.; Fallon, S.J.; Husain, M. Motivation dynamically increases noise resistance by internal feedback during movement. Neuropsychologia 2019, 123, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Caruana, F.; Gerbella, M.; Avanzini, P.; Gozzo, F.; Pelliccia, V.; Mai, R.; O Abdollahi, R.; Cardinale, F.; Sartori, I.; Russo, G.L.; et al. Motor and emotional behaviours elicited by electrical stimulation of the human cingulate cortex. Brain J. Neurol. 2018, 141, 3035–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ellard, K.K.; Barlow, D.H.; Whitfield-Gabrieli, S.; Gabrieli, J.D.E.; Deckersbach, T. Neural correlates of emotion acceptance vs worry or suppression in generalized anxiety disorder. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2017, 12, 1009–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Conant, R.C.; Ross Ashby, W. Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 1970, 1, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Witkowski, P.P.; Park, S.A.; Boorman, E.D. Neural Mechanisms of Credit Assignment for Inferred Relationships in a Structured World. Neuron 2022, 110, 2680–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rowe, A.; Fitness, J. Understanding the Role of Negative Emotions in Adult Learning and Achievement: A Social Functional Perspective. Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shukuroglou, M.; Roseman, L.; Wall, M.; Nutt, D.; Kaelen, M.; Carhart-Harris, R. Changes in music-evoked emotion and ventral striatal functional connectivity after psilocybin therapy for depression. J. Psychopharmacol. 2023, 37, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shannon, C.E. Probability of Error for Optimal Codes in a Gaussian Channel. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1959, 38, 611–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Deli, E.; Kisvarday, Z.; Peters, J.F. How the Brain Becomes the Mind: Can Thermodynamics Explain the Emergence and Nature of Emotions. Entropy 2022, 24, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Seebacher, F. Is Endothermy an Evolutionary By-Product? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2020, 35, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Grigg, G.; Nowack, J.; Bicudo, J.E.P.W.; Bal, N.C.; Woodward, H.N.; Seymour, R.S. Whole-body endothermy: Ancient, homologous and widespread among the ancestors of mammals, birds and crocodylians. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2022, 97, 766–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Northoff, G. Is Our Brain an Open or Closed System? Prediction Model of Brain and World–Brain Relation. In The Spontaneous Brain: From the Mind-Body to the World-Brain Problem; MIT Press Scholarship Online|Oxford Academic: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; Available online: https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/31439/chapter-abstract/289623328?redirectedFrom=fulltext (accessed on 13 November 2023).
  65. Deli, E.; Peters, J.F.; Tozzi, A. The thermodynamic analysis of neural computation. J. Neurosci. Clin Res. 2018, 3, 2. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zheng, J.; Wang, R.; Kong, W.; Zhang, J. A new patterns of self-organization activity of brain: Neural energy coding. Inf. Sci. Int. J. 2022, 608, 1747–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Saxe, G.N.; Calderone, D.; Morales, L.J. Brain entropy and human intelligence: A resting-state fMRI study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA; Available online: https://www.guilford.com/books/Self-Determination-Theory/Ryan-Deci/9781462538966 (accessed on 13 November 2023).
  69. Van Cappellen, P.; Rice, E.L.; Catalino, L.I.; Fredrickson, B.L. Positive affective processes underlie positive health behaviour change. Psychol. Health 2018, 33, 77–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zhao, W.; Sun, Y.; Wen, D.; Xie, Y.; Liu, X.; Niu, H.; Han, Y. Decreased Resting-State Brain Signal Complexity in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Multiscale Entropy Analysis. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2018, 9, 1916–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Buckwalter, W. Implicit Attitudes and the Ability Argument. Philos. Stud. 2019, 176, 2961–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Schubert, T.; Eloo, R.; Scharfen, J.; Morina, N. How Imagining Personal Future Scenarios Influences Affect: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2020, 75, 101811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chang, H.; Olson, S.L. Examining Early Behavioral Persistence as a Dynamic Process: Correlates and Consequences Spanning Ages 3–10 Years. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2016, 44, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pleeging, E.; Burger, M.; van Exel, J. The Relations between Hope and Subjective Well-Being: A Literature Overview and Empirical Analysis. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2021, 16, 1019–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Basieva, I.; Cervantes, V.H.; Dzhafarov, E.N.; Khrennikov, A. True contextuality beats direct influences in human decision making. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2019, 148, 1925–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chang, L.W.; Gershman, S.J.; Cikara, M. Comparing value coding models of context-dependence in social choice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2019, 85, 103847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Friston, K.J.; Wiese, W.; Hobson, J.A. Sentience and the Origins of Consciousness: From Cartesian Duality to Markovian Monism. Entropy 2020, 22, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Piscopo, D.M.; Weible, A.P.; Rothbart, M.K.; Posner, M.I.; Niell, C.M. Changes in white matter in mice resulting from low-frequency brain stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E6339–E6346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tomasi, D.G.; Shokri-Kojori, E.; Volkow, N.D. Brain Network Dynamics Adhere to a Power Law. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tozzi, A.; Peters, J.F. From Abstract Topology to Real Thermodynamic Brain activity. Cogn Neurodyn. 2017, 11, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Prentner, R. Consciousness and Topologically Structured Phenomenal Spaces. Conscious. Cogn. 2019, 70, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Libet, B.; Gleason, C.A.; Wright, E.W.; Pearl, D.K. Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential). The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary Act. Brain 1983, 106, 623–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Landé, A. Unity in quantum theory. Found. Phys. 1971, 1, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lubashevsky, I. Psychophysical Laws as Reflection of Mental Space Properties. Phys. Life Rev. 2019, 31, 276–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Selesnick, S.A.; Piccinini, G. Quantum-Like Behavior without Quantum Physics II. A Quantum-Like Model of Neural Network Dynamics. J. Biol. Phys. 2018, 44, 501–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Luck, S.J.; Gaspelin, N.; Folk, C.L.; Remington, R.W.; Theeuwes, J. Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Vis. Cogn. 2021, 29, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Busemeyer, J.R.; Wang, Z. What is quantum cognition, and how is it applied to psychology? Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2015, 24, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fioretti, M.; Vostroknutov, A.; Coricelli, G. Dynamic Regret Avoidance. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 2022, 14, 70–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pariser, E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You; Penguin Books Limited: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  90. Alodjants, A.P.; Bazhenov, A.Y.; Khrennikov, A.Y.; Bukhanovsky, A.V. Mean-field theory of social laser. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Panksepp, J. Behavior. Empathy and the laws of affect. Science 2011, 334, 1358–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Smith, M.L.; Asada, N.; Malenka, R.C. Anterior Cingulate Inputs to Nucleus Accumbens Control the Social Transfer of Pain and Analgesia. Science 2021, 371, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zeng, R.; Zhu, D. A Model and Simulation of the Emotional Contagion of Netizens in the Process of Rumor Refutation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Greaves, H.; Thomas, T. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/studies-in-history-and-philosophy-of-science-part-b-studies-in-history-and-philosophy-of-modern-physics (accessed on 14 November 2023).
  95. Guo, Y.; Liu, Z.; Tang, H. Experimental Demonstration of Input-Output Indefiniteness in a Single Quantum Device. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.17046 (accessed on 14 November 2023).
  96. Viermann, C.; Sparn, M.; Liebster, N.; Hans, M.; Kath, E.; Parra-López, A.; Tolosa-Simeón, M.; Sánchez-Kuntz, N.; Haas, T.; Strobel, H.; et al. Quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved space-time. Nature 2022, 611, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Born, M. Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgange Quantum Mechanics of Collision in Zeitschrift fur Physik 37 pp. 863–867, 1926. Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgange in Zeitschrift fur Physik 38 pp. 803–827, 1926. Das Adiabatenprinzip in. Atticus Rare Books. Available online: https://www.atticusrarebooks.com/pages/books/596/max-born/zur-quantenmechanik-der-stossvorgange-quantum-mechanics-of-collision-in-zeitschrift-fur-physik (accessed on 8 November 2023).
  98. Don, A.P.H.; Peters, J.F.; Ramanna, S.; Tozzi, A. Topological View of Flows Inside the BOLD Spontaneous Activity of the Human Brain. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 34. [Google Scholar]
  99. Kremps, J.A.; Hahnel-Peeters, R.K.; Merrie, L.A.; Williams, K.E.; Sznycer, D. Sometimes We Want Vicious Friends: People Have Nuanced Preferences for How They Want Their Friends to Behave Toward Them Versus Others. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2023, 44, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Khrennikov, A. Social Laser Model for the Bandwagon Effect: Generation of Coherent Information Waves. Entropy 2020, 22, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Khrennikov, A. Social Laser as a Tool for Social Engineering with Illustration by COVID19 Protests, Pro-War and Anti-War Beaming[v1]|Preprints.org. Available online: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202210.0343/v1 (accessed on 14 November 2023).
  102. Boxell, L.; Gentzkow, M.; Shapiro, J.M. Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2022, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. McCoy, J.; Rahman, T.; Somer, M. Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. Am. Behav. Sci. 2018, 62, 16–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kristoufek, L.; Vosvrda, M. Herding, minority game, market clearing and efficient markets in a simple spin model framework. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2018, 54, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. León-Medina, F.J. Endogenous Changes in Public Opinion Dynamics. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 2019, 22, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zha, Q.; Kou, G.; Zhang, H.; Liang, H.; Chen, X.; Li, C.C.; Dong, Y. Opinion Dynamics in Finance and Business: A Literature Review and Research Opportunities. Financ. Innov. 2020, 6, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Vazquez, F.; Saintier, N.; Pinasco, J.P. Role of Voting Intention in Public Opinion Polarization. Phys. Rev. E 2020, 101, 012101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Salehi, S.; Taghiyareh, F. Introspective Agents in Opinion Formation Modeling to Predict Social Market. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR), Tehran, Iran, 24–25 April 2019. [Google Scholar]
  109. Yih, J.; Uusberg, A.; Taxer, J.L.; Gross, J.J. Better Together: A Unified Perspective on Appraisal and Emotion Regulation. Cogn. Emot. 2019, 33, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Stavrova, O.; Ehlebracht, D. The cynical genius illusion: Exploring and debunking lay beliefs about cynicism and competence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2019, 45, 254–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, Q.; Sun, S.; Zheng, X.; Liu, W. The Role of Cynicism and Personal Traits in the Organizational Political Climate and Sustainable Creativity. Sustainability 2019, 11, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Saaty, T.L.; Vargas, L.G. Origin of Neural Firing and Synthesis in Making Comparisons. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2017, 10, 602–613. [Google Scholar]
  113. Magee, J.C.; Smith, P.K. The Social Distance Theory of Power. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2013, 17, 158–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Maglio, S.J.; Trope, Y.; Liberman, N. Distance from a distance: Psychological distance reduces sensitivity to any further psychological distance. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2013, 142, 644–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Du, J.; An, Y.; Ding, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, W. State mindfulness and positive emotions in daily life: An upward spiral process. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2019, 141, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Phan, H.P.; Ngu, B.H.; Lin, R.-Y.; Wang, H.-W.; Shih, J.-H.; Shi, S.-Y. Predicting and enhancing students’ positive emotions: An empirical study from a Taiwanese sociocultural context. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Sato, W.; Kochiyama, T.; Uono, S.; Sawada, R.; Yoshikawa, S. Amygdala activity related to perceived social support. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Van Berkel, L.; Crandall, C.S.; Eidelman, S.; Blanchar, J.C. Hierarchy, Dominance, and Deliberation: Egalitarian Values Require Mental Effort. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2015, 41, 1207–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Peil, K.T. Emotion: The Self-regulatory Sense. Glob. Adv. Health Med. 2014, 3, 80–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Beall, A.T.; Tracy, J.L. Emotivational psychology: How distinct emotions facilitate fundamental motives. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 2017, 11, e12303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Troy, A.S.; Shallcross, A.J.; Brunner, A.; Friedman, R.; Jones, M.C. Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance: Effects on emotion, physiology, and perceived cognitive costs. Emotion 2018, 18, 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Roberts, B.W. Time Reversal. Available online: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15033/ (accessed on 14 November 2023).
  123. Zanin, M.; Güntekin, B.; Aktürk, T. Time Irreversibility of Resting-State Activity in the Healthy Brain and Pathology. Front. Physiol. 2020, 10, 1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sanacora, G.; Yan, Z.; Popoli, M. The Stressed Synapse 2.0: Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Stress-Related Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2022, 23, 86–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Fayolle, S.; Gil, S.; Droit-Volet, S. Fear and time: Fear speeds up the internal clock. Behav. Processes 2015, 120, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Esghaei, M.; Treue, S.; Vidyasagar, T. Dynamic Coupling of Oscillatory Neural Activity and Its Roles in Visual Attention. Trends Neurosci. 2022, 45, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Gao, Z.; Cui, X.; Wan, W.; Zheng, W.; Gu, Z. Long-range correlation analysis of high frequency prefrontal electroencephalogram oscillations for dynamic emotion recognition. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2022, 72, 103291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Baez-Lugo, S.; Deza-Araujo, Y.I.; Maradan, C.; Collette, F.; Lutz, A.; Marchant, N.L.; Vuilleumier, P.; Klimecki, O.; Arenaza-Urquijo, E.; André, C.; et al. Exposure to negative socio-emotional events induces sustained alteration of resting-state brain networks in older adults. Nat. Aging 2023, 3, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Laws, B. The return of the suppressed: Exploring how emotional suppression reappears as violence and pain among male and female prisoners. Punishm. Soc. 2019, 21, 560–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ruan, Y.; Reis, H.T.; Zareba, W.; Lane, R.D. Does suppressing negative emotion impair subsequent emotions? Two experience sampling studies. Motiv. Emot. 2020, 44, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sedighimornani, N. Is Shame Managed Through Mind-Wandering? Eur. J. Psychol. 2019, 15, 717–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dureux, A.; Zanini, A.; Everling, S. Perception of Dynamic Facial Expressions Activates a Cortico-Subcortico-Cerebellar Network in Marmosets. bioRxiv. 2022. Available online: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.08.02.502528v1.full (accessed on 14 November 2023).
  133. Apazoglou, K.; Küng, A.-L.; Cordera, P.; Aubry, J.-M.; Dayer, A.; Vuilleumier, P.; Piguet, C. Rumination related activity in brain networks mediating attentional switching in euthymic bipolar patients. Int. J. Bipolar Disord. 2019, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Flechsenhar, A.; Levine, S.; Bertsch, K. Threat induction biases processing of emotional expressions. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 967800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wang, Z. Brain Entropy Mapping in Healthy Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease-PMC. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020, 12, 596122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ye, L.; Yang, Q.; Cui, Q.; He, Z.; Li, L.; Yang, X.; Zou, Q.; Yang, P.; et al. Spatial complexity of brain signal is altered in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 246, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Saarimäki, H.; Ejtehadian, L.F.; Glerean, E.; Jääskeläinen, I.P.; Vuilleumier, P.; Sams, M.; Nummenmaa, L. Distributed affective space represents multiple emotion categories across the human brain. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2018, 13, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Wiehler, A.; Branzoli, F.; Adanyeguh, I.; Mochel, F.; Pessiglione, M. A neuro-metabolic account of why daylong cognitive work alters the control of economic decisions. Curr. Biol. 2022, 32, 3564–3575.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Aberg, K.C.; Toren, I.; Paz, R. Irrelevant Threats Linger and Affect Behavior in High Anxiety. J. Neurosci. 2023, 43, 656–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Nuno-Perez, A.; Trusel, M.; Lalive, A.L.; Congiu, M.; Gastaldo, D.; Tchenio, A.; Lecca, S.; Soiza-Reilly, M.; Bagni, C.; Mameli, M. Stress Undermines Reward-Guided Cognitive Performance through Synaptic Depression in the Lateral Habenula. Neuron 2021, 109, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Alhussien, M.N.; Dang, A.K. Interaction between stress hormones and phagocytic cells and its effect on the health status of dairy cows: A review. Vet. World 2020, 13, 1837–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kekic, M.; McClelland, J.; Bartholdy, S.; Chamali, R.; Campbell, I.C.; Schmidt, U. Bad things come to those who do not wait: Temporal discounting is associated with compulsive overeating, eating disorder psychopathology and food addiction. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 10, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Koomen, R.; Grueneisen, S.; Herrmann, E. Children Delay Gratification for Cooperative Ends. Psychol. Sci. 2020, 31, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Contreras, A.; Valiente, C.; Heeren, A.; Bentall, R. A temporal network approach to paranoia: A pilot study. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Greene, T.; Gelkopf, M.; Fried, F.; Robinaugh, D.J.; Pickman, L.L. Dynamic Network Analysis of Negative Emotions and DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Clusters During Conflict. J. Trauma Stress. 2020, 33, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Picard, M.; McEwen, B.S.; Epel, E.S.; Sandi, C. An energetic view of stress: Focus on mitochondria. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018, 49, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Trevisiol, A.; Saab, A.S.; Winkler, U.; Marx, G.; Imamura, H.; Möbius, W.; Kusch, K.; Nave, K.-A.; Hirrlinger, J. Monitoring ATP dynamics in electrically active white matter tracts. eLife 2017, 6, e24241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Xu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, D.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, L.; Huang, G.; Liu, X.; Becker, B.; et al. Functional connectivity profiles of the default mode and visual networks reflect temporal accumulative effects of sustained naturalistic emotional experience. NeuroImage 2023, 269, 119941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sollenberger, N.A.; Kimbler, A.; Cummings, L.R.; Pettit, J.W.; Hayes, T.; Patriarca, G.C.; Vázquez, A.L.; Shumway, P.; Yegüez, C.E.; Rey, Y.; et al. Sleep fails to depotentiate amygdala-reactivity to negative emotional stimuli in youth with elevated symptoms of anxiety. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2023, 23, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Huang, J.P.Y.; Trull, T.J.; Merrill, A.M.; Myers, O.T.; Straub, K.T.; Kerns, J.G. Daily-Life Negative Affect in Emotional Distress Disorders Associated with Altered Frontoinsular Emotion Regulation Activation and Cortical Gyrification. Cogn. Ther. Res. 2021, 45, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  151. Sugimura, K.; Iwasa, Y.; Kobayashi, R.; Honda, T.; Hashimoto, J.; Kashihara, S.; Zhu, J.; Yamamoto, K.; Kawahara, T.; Anno, M.; et al. Association between Long-Range Temporal Correlations in Intrinsic EEG Activity and Subjective Sense of Identity. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Saarimäki, H.; Gotsopoulos, A.; Jääskeläinen, I.P.; Lampinen, J.; Vuilleumier, P.; Hari, R.; Sams, M.; Nummenmaa, L. Discrete neural signatures of basic emotions. Cereb. Cortex 2016, 26, 2563–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Kooij, D.T.A.M.; Kanfer, R.; Betts, M.; Rudolph, C.W. Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 2018, 103, 867–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Wang, Y.; Dai, Y.; Hao, L.; Song, L. Social Media and Attitude Change: Information Booming Promote or Resist Persuasion? Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 596071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Haimovitz, K.; Dweck, C.S.; Walton, G.M. Preschoolers find ways to resist temptation after learning that willpower can be energizing. Dev. Sci. 2020, 23, e12905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Huang, Y.; Wu, R.; Wu, J.; Yang, Q.; Zheng, S.; Wu, K. Psychological resilience, self-acceptance, perceived social support and their associations with mental health of incarcerated offenders in China. Asian J. Psychiatry 2020, 52, 102166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Jans-Beken, L.; Jacobs, N.; Janssens, M.; Peeters, S.; Reijnders, J.; Lechner, L.; Lataster, J. Gratitude and health: An updated review. J. Posit. Psychol. 2020, 15, 743–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Ng, R.; Allore, H.G.; Levy, B.R. Self-Acceptance and Interdependence Promote Longevity: Evidence from a 20-Year Prospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Keshmiri, S. Entropy and the Brain: An Overview. Entropy. 2020, 22, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Yang, S.; Zhao, Z.; Cui, H.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, L.; He, Z.; Liu, H.; Guo, L.; Liu, T.; Becker, B.; et al. Temporal Variability of Cortical Gyral-Sulcal Resting State Functional Activity Correlates With Fluid Intelligence. Front. Neural Circuits 2019, 13, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Zmigrod, L.; Zmigrod, S.; Rentfrow, P.J.; Robbins, T.W. The psychological roots of intellectual humility: The role of intelligence and cognitive flexibility. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2019, 141, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Shi, L.; Beaty, R.E.; Chen, Q.; Sun, J.; Wei, D.; Yang, W.; Qiu, J. Brain Entropy is Associated with Divergent Thinking. Cereb. Cortex 2020, 30, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Brockman, R.; Ciarrochi, J.; Parker, P.; Kashdan, T. Emotion regulation strategies in daily life: Mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 2017, 46, 91–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Cockburn, J.; Man, V.; Cunningham, W.A.; O’doherty, J.P. Novelty and uncertainty regulate the balance between exploration and exploitation through distinct mechanisms in the human brain. Neuron 2022, 110, 2691–2702.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Carmona–Halty, M.; Salanova, M.; Llorens, S.; Schaufeli, W.B. How Psychological Capital Mediates Between Study–Related Positive Emotions and Academic Performance. J. Happiness Stud. 2019, 20, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Gutiérrez-Zamora Velasco, G.; Fernández, T.; Silva-Pereyra, J.; Reynoso-Alcántara, V.; Castro-Chavira, S.A. Higher Cognitive Reserve Is Associated with Better Working Memory Performance and Working-Memory-Related P300 Modulation. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Bongers, A.; Flynn, A.B.; Northoff, G. Is learning scale-free? Chemistry learning increases EEG fractal power and changes the power law exponent. Neurosci. Res. 2020, 156, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Debatin, T. A Revised Mental Energy Hypothesis of the g Factor in Light of Recent Neuroscience. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2019, 23, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Dupree, E.J.; Goodwin, A.; Darie, C.C.; Boolani, A. A Pilot Exploratory Proteomics Investigation of Mental Fatigue and Mental Energy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1140, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Deak, A.; Bodrogi, B.; Orsi, G.; Perlaki, G.; Bereczkei, T. Emotional Intelligence Not Only Can Make Us Feel Negative, but Can Provide Cognitive Resources to Regulate It Effectively: An fMRI Study. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 866933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The cognitive perception cycle. The cycle is centered on the recurring resting state. A stimulus (external or internal) activates the cycle, which becomes conscious perception at a certain threshold. Finally, response, a mental process or behavioral action, recovers the resting state. The cognitive cycle, by definition, changes the synaptic connection map.
Figure 1. The cognitive perception cycle. The cycle is centered on the recurring resting state. A stimulus (external or internal) activates the cycle, which becomes conscious perception at a certain threshold. Finally, response, a mental process or behavioral action, recovers the resting state. The cognitive cycle, by definition, changes the synaptic connection map.
Psych 05 00081 g001
Figure 2. The role of the cortex in emotion formation. Emotions’ multidimensional manifestation can be separated into positive and negative conditions [23]. Stimulus triggers sham rage, a directionless motivation. Emotions’ meaning and directionality emerge from the brain’s memory library.
Figure 2. The role of the cortex in emotion formation. Emotions’ multidimensional manifestation can be separated into positive and negative conditions [23]. Stimulus triggers sham rage, a directionless motivation. Emotions’ meaning and directionality emerge from the brain’s memory library.
Psych 05 00081 g002
Figure 3. The thermodynamic origin of spin. Sensory interaction with the environment triggers the evoked cycle, a thermodynamic cycle representing discrete steps from A through D, which recovers the starting conditions. The endothermic reversed cognitive cycle (top), which requires attentional focus, absorbs energy from the environment, representing up spin. The energy flow supports mental growth and parallels up spin (top right). Stress triggers the exothermic cycle that degrades mental energy (bottom). The energy flow toward the environment parallels down spin (bottom right).
Figure 3. The thermodynamic origin of spin. Sensory interaction with the environment triggers the evoked cycle, a thermodynamic cycle representing discrete steps from A through D, which recovers the starting conditions. The endothermic reversed cognitive cycle (top), which requires attentional focus, absorbs energy from the environment, representing up spin. The energy flow supports mental growth and parallels up spin (top right). Stress triggers the exothermic cycle that degrades mental energy (bottom). The energy flow toward the environment parallels down spin (bottom right).
Psych 05 00081 g003
Table 1. Analysis of quantum cognition in comparison to fermionic characteristics.
Table 1. Analysis of quantum cognition in comparison to fermionic characteristics.
Particle TypeFermionsConsciousness
Quantum state Wave functionQuantum cognition
Quantum mechanicsIndividual particle behaviorPsychology and social sciences
SpinAn intrinsic angular momentum The thermodynamic cycle’s direction
Pauli exclusion principleFermions cannot simultaneously occupy the same quantum stateA need for personal space and territorial needs
ComplementarityThe context generated by the first measurement influences the next oneThe context of the first question modulates subsequent responses
Wave-particle dualityThe wave function collapses Chaotic and probabilistic thoughts resolve into unified decisions
Table 2. The thermodynamic and psychological consequences of basic emotions.
Table 2. The thermodynamic and psychological consequences of basic emotions.
The Thermodynamic Cycle of
Cognition
Endothermic: Reversed Carnot Cycle Exothermic: Carnot Cycle
EntropyHigh entropy resting stateLow entropy resting state
Mental statePositive emotions, noveltyNegative emotions, repetitious thinking, aggravation, and violence
Temporal orientationFuture orientationPast focus
Degrees of freedom Expanding degrees of freedom Loss of degrees of freedom
Thermodynamic consequencesAn endothermic cycle absorbs energy and entropy from the environment. An exothermic cycle dumps energy and entropy onto the environment.
Consequences for the organismMental energy accumulation (intellect)Mental energy degradation → insecurity, mental and immune problems, depression
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deli, E.K. What Is Psychological Spin? A Thermodynamic Framework for Emotions and Social Behavior. Psych 2023, 5, 1224-1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5040081

AMA Style

Deli EK. What Is Psychological Spin? A Thermodynamic Framework for Emotions and Social Behavior. Psych. 2023; 5(4):1224-1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5040081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deli, Eva K. 2023. "What Is Psychological Spin? A Thermodynamic Framework for Emotions and Social Behavior" Psych 5, no. 4: 1224-1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5040081

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop