Next Article in Journal
Improving the Reader’s Attention and Focus through an AI-Driven Interactive and User-Aware Virtual Assistant for Handheld Devices
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Web Technology and IoT to Contribute to the Management of Blood Banks in Developing Countries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Flexible Resistive Random Access Memory

1
State Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
2
Department of Intelligent Manufacturing, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China
3
Guangxi Key Lab of Agricultural Resources Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yulin Normal University, Yulin 537000, China
4
Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Clean Energy and Materials, Huangpu Hydrogen Innovation Center, Institute of Clean Energy and Materials, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Syst. Innov. 2022, 5(5), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5050091
Submission received: 11 July 2022 / Revised: 26 August 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering)

Abstract

:
Flexible electronic devices have received great attention in the fields of foldable electronic devices, wearable electronic devices, displays, actuators, synaptic bionics and so on. Among them, high-performance flexible memory for information storage and processing is an important part. Due to its simple structure and non-volatile characteristics, flexible resistive random access memory (RRAM) is the most likely flexible memory to achieve full commercialization. At present, the minimum bending radius of flexible RRAM can reach 2 mm and the maximum ON/OFF ratio (storage window) can reach 108. However, there are some defects in reliability and durability. In the bending process, the cracks are the main cause of device failure. The charge trap sites provided by appropriate doping or the use of amorphous nanostructures can make the conductive filaments of flexible RRAM steadier. Flexible electrodes with high conductivity and flexible dielectric with stable storage properties are the main development directions of flexible RRAM materials in the future.

1. Introduction

Flexible RRAM is a new non-volatile information storage technology [1] which has the characteristics of high speed, durability, stability, low power consumption, the non-volatile and a wide selection of materials, and it is regarded as one of the important candidates for future flexible memory devices. The integration of flexible RRAM is usually divided into the active array and passive array [2]. The active array eliminates cross-talk between storage cells but requires high-temperature preparation and cannot achieve three-dimensional (3D) integration [3,4]. In contrast, the passive array has a simple fabrication process and can realize 3D multilayer integration. Meanwhile, the minimum storage unit of the passive array is smaller than that of the active array. Therefore, the passive array with a cross structure is the lowest cost integration of memory devices at present, and it is also the focus of flexible RRAM research in the future [5,6,7]. The organic-inorganic composite medium has both stable storage performance and good flexibility. The metal electrode has good conductivity, the conductive oxide electrode has high transmittance, and the carbon/nitrogen electrode has excellent flexibility. It can be seen that the material system of flexible RRAM has great development potential. In this paper, the research status of flexible RRAM is summarized. The second part summarizes its basic working principle, the third part focuses on the current research status of the flexible RRAM material system, the fourth part briefly introduces the preparation process of flexible RRAM and the fifth part summarizes the challenges and opportunities for the further development of flexible RRAM.

2. Basic Working Principle of Flexible RRAM

2.1. Structure of Flexible RRAM

Unlike transistor-based memory, RRAM does not need a complex cell structure such as a thin film transistor (TFT) to integrate with complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology. Although both TFT and RRAM are devices composed of several layers of films, a TFT is a device based on transistor structure, which is generally composed of a gate electrode, dielectric layer, active layer, source electrode, drain electrode and substrate. The structure is relatively complex, which makes it difficult to be flexible. RRAM is a simple “electrode/dielectric/electrode” sandwich structure, where the dielectric is the carrier for resistance transformation, so it is also called storage medium. Flexible RRAM uses a passive cross-array structure (a cross-array structure is considered to have the highest theoretical integration). Each cross node occupies only a 4F2 area (F: minimum characteristic size) of the storage cell (Figure 1), thus easily achieving high-density integration to improve storage density [8]. The storage medium uses the high-resistance state (HRS) and low-resistance state (LRS) to represent the 0 and 1 of binary code, respectively [9]. The switch category can be divided into write-once-read-many-times (WORM) [10], the unipolar switch [11] and the bipolar switch [12,13].

2.2. Resistance Transition Mechanism of Flexible RRAM

In flexible RRAM, the main resistance transition mechanisms are the interface barrier mechanism [14,15,16] and conductive filaments mechanism [17,18].
The interface barrier mechanism means that the resistance change in devices is controlled by the height of the Schottky barrier or the width of the depletion layer at the interface, that is, the higher the Schottky barrier or the width of the depletion layer, the higher the resistance of devices, showing HRS. Conversely, the device exhibits LRS. The change in barrier height is usually caused by the accumulation of charge or migration of oxygen ions under the action of the electric field [16]. The mechanism is based on the quantum tunneling effect, and its LRS and HRS correspond to Poole–Frenkel carrier transport [14] and Schottky launches [15], respectively.
The conductive filament mechanism means that the device forms conductive filaments that run through the whole dielectric material and connect the two electrodes, depending on the migration of metal ions or oxygen vacancies. When the forward voltage is applied to the active metal electrode, the metal atoms will become metal ions (M − ze Mz+) and then migrate to the inert electrode under the action of the electric field. When the metal ions pass through the dielectric and reach the inert electrode, they will go back to metal atoms (Mz+ + ze M). Depending on the migration of metal ions, the device forms conductive metal filaments that connect the two electrodes, and the device is at LRS. If the voltage is applied in the opposite direction, it will disconnect the conductive filaments and transform the device to HRS. Another conductive filament based on oxygen vacancy is mainly used to explain the resistance transition mechanism of oxide. Under the action of the electric field, oxygen ions migrate in the dielectric and form oxygen vacancies, resulting in conductive channels. The device of Ag/HfO2/Pt was studied to research the conductive filament mechanism by Saadi [17]. It was found that the implanted electrons generate oxygen vacancy on the inert electrode (Pt) and the active electrode (Ag) through the formation of Ag+ to form conductive filaments so that the device has bistable characteristics.

2.3. Failure Mechanism of Flexible RRAM

Flexible RRAM is bound to be bent repeatedly during use. In the process of bending, the device is prone to cracks, delamination, thermal effect accumulation and other problems, so the device loses the bistable characteristics, resulting in the failure phenomenon.
Shang [19] found that the generation of cracks in the electrode and dielectric layers affect carrier transport during the bending process, which is the main cause of device failure. The generation of cracks makes it difficult to form conductive filaments, and the formed conductive filaments will also break under the influence of cracks (Figure 2). With the increase in bending times, the density of cracks will increase, which will destroy the formation and stability of conductive filaments and then affect the stability of devices. On the other hand, according to the research of Zou [20], when the opening current is large, the conductive filaments are relatively thick, which will produce large Joule heat. At the same time, with the increase in bending times and cyclic scanning times, the Joule heat generated in the device will accumulate. The conductive filaments formed in the device will be partially dissolved due to the Joule heat effect, resulting in device failure. In addition, if the device is in the same state for a long time, it may cause the electrode material to deposit to the electrode at the other end, which will cause delamination and lead to device failure.

3. Material System of Flexible Resistive Memory

3.1. Flexible Dielectric Materials

As the carrier of resistance transformation and information storage, the choice of storage media is very important to device performance. Flexible RRAM has a wide selection of media layers, which can be divided into three categories: inorganic materials, organic materials and organic-inorganic composite materials.

3.1.1. Flexible Inorganic Materials

In recent years, a large number of flexible inorganic materials with resistance transformation effects have been applied to the dielectric layer of flexible RRAM, including binary metal oxides (TiO2 [21], NiOx [22,23], ZnOx [24], AlOx [13,25,26,27], WOx [15,28,29], HfOx [17,27,30,31], MoOx [32,33], etc.), multimetal oxides (HfTiO4 [34], ZnSnOx [35], etc.), solid electrolyte (Ag2Se [36], Ge2Sb2Te5 [37], MoS2 [38], etc.) and other flexible inorganic materials (C3N4 [39], BN [8], ZrN [40], Si3N4 [41], SiOx [42], amorphous silicon [43], graphene oxide [39,44,45,46,47], etc.).
In flexible inorganic medium materials, binary metal oxides with simple chemical composition and excellent resistance are the most common. Binary metal oxides are favored by researchers because of their simple structure, controllable composition, simple preparation, stable chemical properties, high ON/OFF ratio and compatibility with CMOS technology. The resistance transformation effect of most binary metal oxides is based on the valence state change caused by oxygen ion migration under an electric field or the conductive channel generated by oxygen vacancy accumulation. Few show the resistance transformation effect by forming metal conductive filaments, such as Ti-doped ZnO dielectric [48] and Al-doped HfOx dielectric [18]. At present, there is a flexible RRAM based on binary metal oxides with excellent performance. The characteristics of the binary metal oxides are shown in Table 1 below:
As shown in Table 1 above, the resistive memory based on binary metal oxides has an excellent performance in retention time, flexibility and other aspects. The ON/OFF ratios of NiOx, ZnOx and AlOx are high, owing to the high interface barrier with the electrode. LRS and HRS are easy to distinguish in the working process, resulting in small errors, but the flexibility of these is relatively low and is not conducive to the application of flexible devices. The material of HfOx has an outstanding advantage in flexibility, with the lowest bending radius and the highest number of bending cycles. Although the ON/OFF ratio is relatively low, it is within the acceptable range. In general, HfOx is the most widely used as flexible inorganic medium because of the best mechanical properties. Hf2+ has large mobility and solid solution rate, which makes it form conductive filaments more easily, so it can withstand greater bending strain. However, the more detailed resistance transition mechanism of these binary metal materials is not clear, so it could still be a hot spot in this field to research the resistance transition mechanism for guiding the selection principle of flexible dielectric materials.
The multimetal oxides used in flexible RRAM are usually transitioning metal oxides, and these oxides have good performance. For example, a two-layer TiO2:HfO2 film for flexible storage media was reported by Ismail [34]. The storage medium exhibits superb 103 direct-current (DC) switching cycles, outstanding 107 pulse endurance and high-thermal stability (105 s at 125 °C), and its cross-array memory even has the potential to be used in biomimetic neuromorphic systems (Figure 3). Flexible RRAM based on multimetal oxides is mostly used in the field of synaptic bionics, which requires high durability. The requirements for its flexibility are low, relatively. However, the composition content of RRAM based on multicomponent oxides is difficult to control in the fabrication process, the fabrication process is complex and most of them are incompatible with the CMOS process, so multicomponent metal oxides are rarely used as dielectric materials.
Solid electrolytes are usually ionic conductors with high electron mobility. The resistance transformation mechanism of the material is based on the formation and disconnection of conductive metal filaments caused by the redox reaction of cations in electrolytes. Its outstanding characteristic is high flexibility, and it is also a kind of flexible RRAM with great potential. The chalcogenides most commonly used as solid electrolytes, including Ag2Se [36], Ge,2Sb2Te5 [37], WSe2 [38], etc., are all storage media with excellent performance. Their ON/OFF ratio is generally more than 104 and their durability is generally more than 106. In order to further improve the mechanical properties of flexible RRAM devices, a kind of inorganic sulfide compound and its composite materials with inorganic oxides have been developed. Using Al2O3 and CdS as the storage medium by Ju [49], the medium can withstand 100 times of repeated bending, and the minimum bending radius can be reduced to 5 mm (Figure 4). The Al2O3 layer between the Ag top electrode and the CdS layer act as the barrier that prevents Ag from significantly migrating into the CdS layer. The Al2O3 layer with appropriate thickness prevents the unnecessary migration of a large amount of Ag into the CdS layer to control the thickness of filaments, which prevents delamination and reduces thermal effects. Although solid electrolytes have excellent performance, chalcogenides are not easy to manufacture. They are complex and costly, and their performance is similar to that of binary metal oxides. Therefore, solid electrolytes are not widely used relatively.
As for other flexible dielectric materials, SiOx-based flexible RRAM was reported by Li [42], with the ON/OFF ratio of 105 after 2000 bending cycles at a 2.5 mm bending radius. The device uses vacuum ultraviolet irradiation to prepare SiOx films from perhydropolysilazane. The report inferred the flexibility is attributed to the high uniformity and compactness of the SiOx layer from vacuum ultraviolet irradiation. The SiOx layer prepared by this approach not only avoids interface mismatch but also guarantees low internal stress inherently due to its mass increment process. In addition, another material that is ideal for use as flexible RRAM is graphene oxide (GO). In the latest study, high-performance flexible RRAM with GO was reported by Tariq [46]. This graphene together with its distinctive inter-layer oxygen diffusion path enables excellent oxygen ion/vacancy diffusion. Without an interfacial redox reaction, oxygen ions can diffuse to form conductive filaments with two inert metal electrodes by applying bias voltage. Meanwhile, the hydroxyl increases the bending modulus of GO, making it more flexible than graphene [50]. The device has shown superior performance, including a high ON/OFF ratio of 105, a long-term retention of 106 s, reproducibility over 104 cycles and long-term flexibility at a bending radius of 4 mm, indicating that the material has great potential for flexible RRAM.
Figure 4. Al2O3/CdS film: (a) R = 5 mm; (b) the I–V characteristics before and after 40 or 100 bending cycles; (c) endurance characteristics up to 100 bending cycles [51].
Figure 4. Al2O3/CdS film: (a) R = 5 mm; (b) the I–V characteristics before and after 40 or 100 bending cycles; (c) endurance characteristics up to 100 bending cycles [51].
Asi 05 00091 g004
Although inorganic storage media have standard semiconductor compatibility, stable chemical properties and high ON/OFF ratios, their inherent fragility makes devices work only under relatively low bending conditions, which cannot meet the bending radius requirements of flexible memory [51,52]. To improve the flexibility of inorganic storage media, researchers have introduced nanostructures. Ji [52] used an electrochemical anodizing process to convert the metal film into metal oxide, which makes WOx resulting in nano porous (NP) structures. NP structures have the potential to be used in flexible RRAM as mobile ion or charge trap sites and vacancy-assisted switching materials. The device using this structure shows an ON/OFF ratio of 105 and a stable retention time over 5 × 105 s, with an endurance over 103 cycles. More importantly, the device has a bending radius of 5.53 mm and shows robust switching behavior after 103 bending cycles (Figure 5). A novel HfOx medium with amorphous nanostructures was developed by Shang [19]. The device can continuously erase more than 107 at a bend radius of 6 mm, and the randomness of resistance is less than 4.3%, but at the bending radius of 4.5 mm, the reset voltage fluctuates and the device becomes unstable. In addition, according to the report’s extrapolation results, the device can stably store data at a bend radius of 6 mm for more than 10 years (about 3 × 108 s). In these nanostructures, amorphous regions often appear between the nanograin boundaries, which accumulate defects such as oxygen vacancies. They help to release the strain accumulated during the bending operation and induce the stable evolution of the nano conductive filaments, thus improving the bending performance of the device.

3.1.2. Flexible Organic Materials

In order to make flexible RRAM more flexible, organic materials with excellent mechanical properties are increasingly being used as resistance dielectric layers. Flexible organic materials have excellent flexibility due to the strong cross-linking between their molecules. Moreover, they have become important candidates for flexible electronic devices due to their characteristics of high flexibility, large-area film forming and light weight. This material relies on functional groups to produce ions to form conductive filaments. To date, many materials have been used in flexible RRAM, including polymer materials (chitosan [53], lignin [54], polyparaxylene [55], polyimide (PI) [56], polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate (pEGDMA) [57], poly (1,3,5-trimethyl-1,3,5-trivinyl cyclotrisiloxane) (pV3D3) [58], starch [59], nitrocellulose (NC) [60], conjugated polyrotaxane (CPR1) [61], etc.) and organic composite materials (P3HT:OD [62], PMMA:P3HT [63], PMMA:PCBM [64,65], PI:PCBM [66], PS:PCBM [67], PAA:PEI [68], Rhodamine B:Rhodamine 6G (Rh B:R 6G) [69], etc.). The performance comparison is shown in Table 2:
Figure 5. Nano porous (NP) structure of WOx: (a) the current-voltage characteristics; (b) change of ON/OFF ratio after multiple bending cycles [54].
Figure 5. Nano porous (NP) structure of WOx: (a) the current-voltage characteristics; (b) change of ON/OFF ratio after multiple bending cycles [54].
Asi 05 00091 g005
Compared with flexible inorganic materials, flexible organic materials show a little weakness in electrical properties, but better flexibility. An Al/CPR1/ITO device prepared by Zhou [61] has higher flexibility due to the hydrogen bond of CPR1. The favorable solubility and intrinsic flexibility of CPR1 allow for the large-scale fabrication of flexible CPR1 RRAM device arrays by full-printing technology with an endurance of 103 bending cycles at a minimum bending radius of 3 mm and a high ON/OFF ratio of 108. The Cu/pEGDMA/ITO/PET device prepared by Lee [57] has a typical I-V characteristic curve (Figure 6a—1). Its retention time exceeds 106 s and its ON/OFF ratio reaches 102 (Figure 6a—2). It also maintains good storage performance at the bending radius of 4 mm (Figure 6a—3). On the other hand, pV3D4 was selected as the storage medium to prepare Cu/pV3D4/Al/PES flexible RRAM by Jang [58], which also has a typical I-V characteristic curve (Figure 6b—1), and its steady-state hold time exceeds 105 s, the ON/OFF ratio is 107 (Figure 6b—2) and the minimum bending radius is close to 3 mm (Figure 6b—3). These two storage media materials show excellent performance in terms of durability, retention time and flexibility. According to the latest report, an ITO/PAA:PEI/ITO device with high flexibility and excellent storage performance was prepared by Ren [68] (Figure 7). An ON/OFF ratio of 50 can be maintained without degradation for up to 2 × 104 cycles (flat state) and over 4 × 103 cycles (bending to 2 mm radius 104 times) in the direct-current sweep mode. Although organic materials have their unique advantages of flexibility, these organic media have some disadvantages, such as poor thermal stability, relatively low cycle times, poor fatigue resistance and incompatibility with CMOS, which limits the application and development of organic storage media.

3.1.3. Flexible Organic-Inorganic Composite Materials

Considering the excellent flexibility of organic materials and the electrical reliability of inorganic materials, using organic-inorganic composite materials seems to be a good choice. The resistance transition of inorganic dielectric materials is usually stable, but the flexibility is poor. Organic materials have good flexibility but poor stability of resistance transition. Therefore, organic-inorganic composite materials can be selected as storage media, in order to combine the stability of the storage performance of inorganic materials with the flexibility of organic materials. HKUST-1 (Cu3(BTC)2, BTC = benzo-1,3,5-tricarboxy acid), a composite material based on a metal-organic framework, was used by Pan [70]. This kind of material has the characteristics of high porosity, three-dimensional highly ordered structure, stable physical properties, easy design, easy film and so on. It is expected to realize flexible and stable resistance devices. In their study, they found that Au/HKUST-1/Au/PET devices can maintain uniform resistance over a temperature range of ±70 °C. Moreover, it has a minimum bending radius of 3.2 mm and an excellent durability of more than 107 cycles (Figure 8). Metal-organic frameworks, which are formed by the association of metal cations or clusters of cations (“nodes”) with soft organic bridging ligands (“linkers”), are a fascinating class of flexible crystalline composite materials offering a potential strategy for the construction of flexible RRAM.
Moreover, poly (4-vinylphenol): graphene oxide (PVP:GO) and ultrathin HfOx were composited by Varun [71]. Under the scanning of AC and DC, the endurance can be over 1400 and 800 cycles, respectively. The same device configuration realized over a flexible PET substrate exhibited an ON/OFF ratio of >103 even after undergoing large mechanical strain (corresponding to a 5 mm bending radius). According to this report, the incorporation of GO into the PVP solution resulted in achieving better control over conductive filament growth and, therefore, improved repeatability and reliability.
At present, there are other organic-inorganic composite materials (black phosphorous quantum dots: PMMA [72], graphene quantum dots: PVP [73], boron nitride: polyvinyl alcohol [74], copper phthalocyanine: PMMA [75], (CH3NH3)2PbI2(SCN)2 [76], MnO2/activated carbon fibers [77], MoS2/zeolitic imidazolate frameworks [78], Al/CH3NH3PbI3 [79], Fe/reduced graphene oxide [80], hybrid organic-inorganic perovskite [81], etc.) have excellent flexibility in organic materials and overcome the shortcomings of poor fatigue resistance in organic materials but also have good storage performance and stability in inorganic materials. However, their fabrication process is complex, and the resistance transition mechanism is not very clear.

3.1.4. Further Discussion of the Material Systems

As shown in Figure 9, through the comparison of several typical inorganic and organic materials, it can be found that the inherent brittleness of inorganic storage media makes the device only work under relatively low bending conditions, usually the bending radius is not less than 5 mm and the number of bending cycles is generally less than 1000 times. Compared with flexible inorganic materials, flexible organic materials are slightly inferior in electrical properties but exhibit better mechanical flexibility: higher bending cycles (>1000) and smaller bending radii (<4 mm).
Therefore, researchers began to look for a suitable material system. Organic-inorganic composite materials have the excellent flexibility of organic materials and at the same time have the good storage performance and stability of inorganic materials, and thus they have been developed.

3.2. Flexible Electrode Materials

In the flexible RRAM device, flexible electrodes not only play the role of conducting currents but also play an important role in resistance transformation, which can directly participate in resistance transformation. Meanwhile, the electrode materials have crucial influence on the mechanical properties of the devices. Depending on their chemical composition, flexible electrode materials can be divided into metal electrodes, conductive oxide electrodes, carbon/nitrogen electrodes and other electrodes. So far, a large number of flexible electrode materials have been used to fabricate flexible RRAM, among which flexible metal electrodes are widely used at present because of their good electrical conductivity and great influence on resistance transformation.

3.2.1. Flexible Metal Electrode

Flexible metal electrodes include pure electrode (Pt [13,17,28,36,47,82,83,84,85], Au [32,36,38,54,70,84,85,86,87,88], W [17,34,36,89,90], Ag [8,17,21,22,43,62,73,74,87,88,91,92], Al [18,24,27,44,45,55,58,79], Ni [23,63,93], Ti [47,94], Mg [53,90], Cu [41,58,94], etc.) and alloy electrode (Au/Ni [95], Pt/Ti [19], Ni/Ti [96], CdTeSb [25], GaInSn [97], etc.), with excellent electrical conductivity and mechanical properties, being easy to manufacture and easy to connect with the advantages of power. Using numerical simulations based on finite element analysis, Li [98] demonstrated that the defects, the cracks and the delamination of the electrode/active layer (storage medium) interface influences the formation of the conduction path (Figure 10). According to this report, the interface of metal/oxide/metal device has a high Schottky barrier to ensure the electrical stability generally. Zhang [99] has proved that the barrier height between the metal electrode and storage medium is an important factor affecting the resistance transition, and the higher the Schottky barrier is, the more stable the bipolar device is observed. On the other hand, the surface of the metal electrode provides ions to form conductive filaments by undergoing a redox reaction, which ensures the progress of resistance transition.

3.2.2. Conductive Oxide Electrode and Carbon/Nitrogen Electrode

The metal electrode is widely used because of its good electrical conductivity, but its transmittance is relatively poor. Therefore, with the development of flexible transparent electronic technology, conductive oxide electrodes (ZnO [100], indium zinc oxide (IZO) [26,101], ITO [10,18,21,22,27,44,54,68,69,74,76,92,102,103], GO [30,39,103,104,105], etc.) are gradually increasing because of their high transmittance. Using ITO as the top and bottom, the flexible RRAM device reported by Ren [68], shows an excellent transmittance of more than 85% in the whole visible region (Figure 7c). The carbon/nitrogen electrodes are characterized by high flexibility, including TaN [34], TiN [17,40,102], carbon powder [106], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [107,108] and so on. The carbide electrode and nitride electrode have similar characteristics (high conductivity, good stability, excellent plasticity, good mechanical properties and hydrophilicity). The resistance transition mechanism of these electrodes is based on the formation and fracture of conductive filaments in the dielectric layer due to carbon or nitrogen vacancies.
Compared with metal electrodes, the conductivity of conductive oxide electrodes and carbon/nitrogen electrodes is still not ideal. Under long hours of work, the calorific value is much bigger than the metal electrode, causing serious device heating and affecting the stability of the device working. Thus, it is hard to meet the development trend of low power consumption, and They are not widely used.

3.2.3. Other Flexible Electrode Materials

Other flexible electrode materials include silver nanowire (AgNW) [91,105,109], ZnS [110,111], poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) [15,109,112], Si [13,43,113] and so on. According to the report of Jang [105], the AgNW electrode exhibits a light transmittance of more than 85% at a 550 nm light source, as well as excellent flexibility and stability (after bending 104 times at a 4 mm radius, the resistivity changes only 0.2%). ITO is widely used due to its low resistivity and high light transmittance. However, ITO has many problems such as high raw material price, high manufacturing cost and high technological requirements (it easily deteriorates when exposed to plasma in the process of treatment, resulting in characteristic changes). Therefore, AgNW becomes an excellent alternative material for ITO. The AgNW’s grid layer exhibits high optical transparency, excellent flexibility and conductivity, and has the advantages of mass production by the solution process, which is suitable for transparent electrode.
Using ZnS as a flexible electrode, it was proved that multishell ZnS can provide quantum dot sites according to the report by Kim [111]. When the device is in HRS, all traps in the quantum dots are fully filled, enhancing the charge storage capability of the device and making the formation of conductive filaments in the device more rapid and stable. Meanwhile, the ZnS electrode also has the characteristics of transparency and flexibility, and its transmittance in the visible light band is more than 70%. After bending at a 10 mm radius 100 times, there was no significant change in conductivity.
PEDOT:PSS is one of the common polymers with excellent stretchability [109]. This polymer has the characteristics of a simple fabrication process at room temperature, low cost, good flexibility and strong compatibility with flexible substrates, but it is not resistant to high temperature, which is a common shortcoming of organic materials. It is often used together with AgNW as an electrode of the device. As shown in Figure 11a, AgNWs were placed randomly with each other. Due to having overlapping parts of AgNWs, the contact resistance between AgNW layers was very high, resulting in an increase in the resistivity of AgNW layers. The stacking of PEDOT:PSS layers on the AgNW layer can improve the contact between them (Figure 11b). The PEDOT:PSS layer was deposited on AgNW film by spin coating, which not only helped to improve the conductivity of AgNW but also improved the surface uniformity of AgNW electrode and reduced its roughness (Figure 11c,d). Meanwhile, the maximum transmittance of the PEDOT:PSS/AgNW composite layer is 89% (the highest transmittance for electrode). As for Si electrodes, p-doped and n-doped monocrystalline silicon are generally used as the top and bottom electrodes, respectively. Such electrodes can be used to prepare flexible memory with self-rectification resistance transformation characteristics. The self-rectifying effect is due to the different doping types in the silicon disk that forms a self-sufficiency diode within each junction.
In addition, the effect of the flexible electrodes on the mechanical properties of the device was studied by Shang [19]. The devices of ITO/HfOx/ITO and ITO/HfOx/Pt were prepared separately. The result shows that the minimum bending radius of the device is 3 mm when the top and bottom electrodes are ITO electrodes, while the minimum bending radius of the device can be reduced to 2 mm when the top electrode is ITO and the bottom electrode is Pt. The mechanical properties of the device can be improved by using Pt as the electrode, mainly because there is a great difference between the crack formed by Pt fracture and the crack formed by ITO fracture when the curvature exceeds the critical value. The ITO electrode will form a crack through the whole film, which makes it lose the ability to conduct current. Pt electrodes, on the other hand, form a maze of cracks, which affects the conductivity, but still retain the ability to conduct currents. It can be seen that the mechanical properties of electrode materials are one of the keys to affecting the flexibility of the device.

3.3. Flexible Substrate Materials

In the practical use of flexible RRAM, devices will inevitably undergo frequent deformations such as bending, twisting and folding, which makes them vulnerable to mechanical damage. Therefore, the choice of flexible substrate material is very important.
Flexible substrates shall have the following characteristics: (1) Mechanical properties: Strong mechanical flexibility is the most essential requirement of flexible substrates to comply with deformable transformation under severe stress and strain, in addition to the efficient stress-release property while maintaining the original functionality. Moreover, the substrate is the carrier of flexible RRAM memory cells and plays the role of mechanical support. Therefore, the substrate is required to have good dimensional stability, that is, the ability of the material to maintain its original size under different processing conditions and uses. (2) Chemical stability: In the process of device preparation and use, the substrate will be exposed to a variety of chemical atmospheres, so the substrate must have high chemical inertness to ensure the normal production and normal operation of the device. (3) Barrier characteristics: Although the electrode materials and dielectric materials composed of the device have good electrical properties, they are often susceptible to the corrosion of oxygen, moisture and other atmospheres, resulting in the degradation of the functional layer and device performance. Therefore, the substrate material is needed as a protective layer to prevent or delay the corrosion of the functional layer. (4) Heat resistance: Including thermal transition temperature and coefficient of thermal expansion. The maximum temperature should not exceed the temperature of glass transition (Tg) during work and processing. The difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion between adjacent layers in a multilayer device will exert additional stress on the lattice, resulting in the strain and cracking of the device during heating or cooling. (5) Surface uniformity: A good substrate should have a smooth surface. The electrode is directly deposited or grown on the substrate surface, so the excessive roughness of the substrate surface will lead to uneven electrode thickness, which may lead to short circuits and other problems. In addition, issues such as machinability, cost and weight should also be considered.
Flexible substrate materials can be roughly divided into polymer materials, metal materials and other materials based on their physical properties. In the development of flexible electronic devices, polymer substrates have always been the primary material of choice because they have excellent mechanical properties, stable chemical properties and good processability.

3.3.1. Flexible Polymer Substrate

Polymer materials are currently the most commonly and widely used flexible substrates, including polyimide (PI) [23,24,37,42,49,56,66,82,91,114], polyethylene naphthalenediate (PEN) [15,30,36,102,111,114,115], polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [8,10,18,19,22,25,26,27,40,45,51,52,53,54,59,68,70,71,73,74,75,76,86,87,88,90,93,95,101,104,105,109,110,112,114], polycarbonate (PC) [116], polyethersulfone (PES) [58,117] and so on. The comparison of their mechanical properties is shown in Table 3:
These polymer materials have good mechanical flexibility, which can withstand repeated bending and twisting, and they also have stable physical and chemical properties. PEN (Figure 12a) and PET (Figure 12b) are currently the most popular polymer substrates in the field of flexible electronic devices, which possess great flexibility and chemical stability. However, their relatively low temperature of glass transition and melting temperatures limit them from producing and operating. In addition, they have high water vapor transmittance (1.1 g/m2 per day at 45 °C for 100 μm thickness [131]), resulting in the role of protecting the functional layer being small, which may lead to the unstable performance of the functional layer. Therefore, if the device requires long-term stability, it is necessary to carry out appropriate packaging, which involves the packaging process and cost. PI (Figure 12c) has a relatively high temperature of glass transition and melting temperature, but its low transmittance and high cost make it difficult to meet the application requirements of low cost and high transparency in industrialization. PC has a high transmittance but also has flame retardant and oxidation resistance, which can play a very protective role on the functional layer. The main defect of PC is low hydrolysis resistance, easy to be corroded by organic chemical solvents or atmosphere, resulting in performance decline or material degeneration. PES has high transparency, but it has problems of poor flexibility and low operating temperature. Moreover, PES has a high coefficient of thermal expansion, which may cause material strain due to mismatching with the thermal properties of electrode materials during cooling or heating up. In a word, the unique advantage of polymer materials is excellent flexibility, but the disadvantage is low operating temperature.

3.3.2. Flexible Metal Substrates and Other Flexible Substrates

Metal materials used as flexible substrates include titanium foil [115], copper foil [94], tungsten foils [89], Ni-Cr foil [83], stainless steel foil [132,133] and so on. Polymer materials generally do not withstand high temperatures, so metal foil is a good substitute for polymer substrates because of their high-temperature resistance and chemical stability. However, metal materials are less flexible than polymer materials and almost opaque. Meanwhile, they will affect the work of the functional layer of the device because of their conductivity. Moreover, the density of metal materials is generally high, so the weight is heavy, which is not conducive to the development of lightweight devices.
Other flexible substrates include flexible mica [84,85,100,134], flexible glass [135], SiO2 [65,90] and so on. Flexible mica is a natural transparent crystalline material with high flexibility due to the layered framework structure of aluminosilicate. It also has a low cost, light weight, high transmittance (>90%), high-temperature resistance (~600 °C) and low coefficient of thermal expansion (10−6 per centigrade). According to the report by Ke [134], the performance of ITO electrode depositing on flexible mica has no obvious change after being bent 103 times. However, the compatibility between flexible mica and metal electrodes is poor due to its unique structure. For flexible RRAM, flexible metal materials are the most commonly used electrode materials, so flexible mica is not widely used as substrate material. Flexible glass and SiO2 were used only as substrate material under special circumstances. In the vast majority of cases, the substrate material obviously has better choices. All in all, flexible substrates, as the carriers of the flexible RRAM memory, need to be considered comprehensively and chosen carefully.

3.4. Summary of the Material System

In flexible dielectric materials, the inorganic dielectric has good electrical properties and stable storage properties. The organic dielectric has good flexibility and can basically withstand more than 103 bending cycles under the minimum bending radius. The organic-inorganic composite material not only has excellent electrical properties and stable storage properties but also has good flexibility. In terms of material structures, there are nano porous structures, amorphous nanostructures and the metal-organic framework to be used. As mentioned above, the electrical properties and flexibility of dielectric materials can be significantly improved by using these structures.
In the flexible electrode materials, metal electrodes are the most used flexible electrode materials. Metal electrodes have excellent conductivity and good flexibility, conductive oxide electrodes have high transmittance and carbon/nitrogen electrodes have excellent flexibility. In addition, the grid layer structure of metal nanowires can not only improve the light transmittance but also improve the electrical conductivity and flexibility of the metal electrode. On the other hand, the shape of the crack formed by the electrode material under multiple bending cycles will also affect the function of the electrode material. For example, the labyrinth crack formed by the Pt electrode can still conduct currents although its conductivity will be reduced.
In the flexible substrate materials, polymer substrates have been the first choice among flexible substrates, with PET and PEN being the most popular. These polymer materials have good mechanical flexibility, which can withstand repeated bending and twisting, and they also have stable physical and chemical properties. Although metal substrates and other types of substrates are used, polymer substrates are clearly the best choice in non-special cases.

3.5. Flexibility of RRAM

In flexible thin film transistors (TFT), the neutral plane concept or island structure concept are well developed in order to realize a flexible device.
Likewise, the flexibility and elasticity of RRAM has attracted increasing attention from the scientific community. An in-depth understanding of the mechanical and electrical failure mechanisms of RRAM is of great significance for realizing its flexible integration. Organic elastic polymers are used as resistive switching media, which have poor resistance to the rotation of molecular chains and environmental water and oxygen under stretching, and the electrical stability of the prepared resistive memory under strain is generally poor. Li et al. [61] further proposed to use organic-inorganic hybrid metal-organic framework (MOF) materials as resistive switching media to construct RRAM devices to simultaneously improve the storage performance, elastic mechanical properties and thermal stability of flexible RRAM devices. MOF materials are organic-inorganic hybrid crystal framework materials constructed by organic ligands and metal ions or clusters through coordination bonds. Through the rational selection of organic and inorganic constituent units, MOF materials can achieve material deformation (breathing effect) through the change in the coordination bond angle and the regular change in the framework structure. This characteristic provides more space for the flexible elasticization of a resistive medium. Zhou et al. [97] have made new progress in the field of high-performance flexible resistive memory. The CPR1-based RRAM device has a simple sandwich structure and has excellent non-volatile memory performance: it has a very high switching ratio (108), a super fast 29 ns fast response, good reliability and reproducibility and long-term stability. Finally, the flexible RRAM device array fabricated by the all-printing technique exhibits high RRAM performance and robustness.
Compared with flexible TFT, the simple sandwich structure of RRAM is usually not the main factor affecting its flexibility. The currently reported work on flexible RRAM mainly considers the material structure and process to achieve good device flexibility.

4. Fabrication Process of Flexible RRAM

The typical steps in making flexible RRAM are shown in Figure 13:
As a typical film electronic device, the fabrication of flexible RRAM mainly relies on various film deposition methods. Generally speaking, the fabrication process of flexible RRAM is divided into dry methods (DMs) and wet methods (WMs) [136]. DMs are mainly vacuum evaporation, including chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [137,138], physical vapor deposition (PVD) [22,139] and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) [140,141]. These methods are less affected by impurities because they are operated in a vacuum environment. In the process of industrialization, the flexible film can be improved by changing the gas flow rate, gas pressure, ambient temperature and operating voltage. However, these methods have high costs, long synthesis times and difficulty in mass production; hence the emergence of WMs. WMs include coatings (spin coatings [142], spraying [143] and casting [144]), printing (screen printing [145], inkjet printing [15,146] and nano imprinting [147]) and immersion (dipping method [142], Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) method [148] and self-assembly [88]). WMs are inexpensive and easy to manufacture in large areas, but these methods often introduce impurities, resulting in less uniform films and less flexibility. On the other hand, they are difficult to graph, making them difficult for operations that require high precision and resolution. Table 4 below summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each method:
In recent years, some new fabrication methods have been developed, such as atomic layer deposition (ALD) [9,17,149,150], pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [151,152], layer-by-layer (LBL) [108,153], the sol-gel process (SGP) [21,85,92] and drop-on-demand (DOD) [154]. ALD can be used for the deposition of metal, dielectric, polymers, etc. The uniformity and density of the film are very good with this method, and the films have also excellent flexibility, but it needs high temperature to deposit film (up to 500 °C), so using this method needs to use high-temperature-resistant materials as substrate. In addition, the deposition directivity is very poor and the deposition rate is slow. PLD has a higher deposition rate and lower temperature for substrate, and it can accurately control stoichiometry. Its disadvantage lies in that, in the process of deposition, there is micrometer-scale particle pollution such as molten small particles or target fragments, which leads to a reduction in uniformity and flexibility. At the same time, this method is very difficult for the fabrication of large-area films. LBL assembly is one of the most widely studied WMs in recent years. Due to its simple process and high controllability, the process can be used to produce uniform and multifunctional films. Moon [108] prepared the flexible single-wall carbon nanotubes electrode by this method, and the relationship between the deposition layer and the electrode morphology, thickness, transparency and resistivity was investigated. SGP is a simple method for the deposition of high-quality pure metal oxide layers. By introducing two or three precursors, the structure of metal oxide products can be easily adjusted to improve their electrical properties and flexibility. However, this method can only be carried out at low temperature and the period of fabrication is very long. DOD also has considerable potential in the future of film manufacturing as a printing technology for contactless direct prototyping and rapid manufacturing.
In actual production, the different fabrication processes can be combined to obtain the best performance. On the other hand, the prepared films are usually subjected to subsequent optimization processes such as annealing [92] or pattern [155] to eliminate the defects of the film or meet special requirements, improving the performance of the device.

5. Conclusions and Challenges

To sum up, as the next generation of flexible RRAM with the most development potential, the research of flexible RRAM materials has made great progress. However, in order to meet the higher requirements of high flexibility, small size, high durability and low cost, flexible RRAM still faces some important challenges: Firstly, it is urgent to explore the resistance transition mechanism and failure mechanism of flexible RRAM and the three-dimensional configuration of devices (such as vertical cross array and stacked cross array), so as to further guide device performance optimization. Secondly, material cracks are the main cause of device failure under severe bending conditions, so it is urgent to explore materials with better flexibility (liquid materials are also a development direction). Finally, since the practical application environment of flexible devices is usually more complex than the bending conditions in the laboratory, the performance of flexible RRAM under torsion and tensile conditions needs to be emphasized and strengthened. In the research direction, the research on dielectric materials with both stable storage performance and good flexibility, the research on electrode materials with good conductivity, mechanical stability and flexibility and the research on the regulation of electrode/dielectric interface has achieved initial results, but there is still a lack of more in-depth research. Another question is whether the test of flexibility is too ordinary. The test in the laboratory has a very great deal of difference with the actual use, so a more effective testing method needs to be explored. If the above challenges can be well solved, it can be expected that flexible RRAM, as an important component of flexible electronic products, will bring great convenience to people’s lives and promote the further development of society.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft, validation, P.T. and J.C.; formal analysis, T.Q.; resources, X.F.; data curation, M.L.; writing—review and editing, H.N.; visualization, Z.X.; supervision, D.L.; project administration, R.Y.; funding acquisition, J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22090024 and 62174057), Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (No. 2020B010183002), Special Fund for Science and Technology Innovation Strategy of Guangdong Province in 2021 (“Big Special Project+Task List”) Project (No. 210908174533730), Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (No. 2019B030302007), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62074059), the Science Foundation of Yulin Normal University (No. G2020ZK01) and Ji Hua Laboratory Scientific Research Project (X190221TF191).

Data Availability Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhou, L.; Mao, J.; Ren, Y.; Han, S.T.; Roy, V.A.L.; Zhou, Y. Recent Advances of Flexible Data Storage Devices Based on Organic Nanoscaled Materials. Small 2018, 14, 1703126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Han, S.T.; Zhou, Y.; Roy, V.A. Towards the development of flexible non-volatile memories. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5425–5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jeong, H.; Shi, L. Memristor devices for neural networks. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 52, 023003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, S.S.; Yong, S.K.; Kim, W.; Kang, S.; Park, H.W.; Yoon, K.J.; Sheen, D.S.; Lee, S.; Hwang, C.S. Review of Semiconductor Flash Memory Devices for Material and Process Issues. Adv. Mater. 2022, e2200659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shi, Q.; Wang, J.; Aziz, I.; Lee, P.S. Stretchable and Wearable Resistive Switching Random-Access Memory. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2020, 2, 2000007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dongale, T.D.; Kamble, G.U.; Kang, D.Y.; Kundale, S.S.; An, H.-M.; Kim, T.G. Recent Progress in Selector and Self-Rectifying Devices for Resistive Random-Access Memory Application. Phys. Status Solidi RRL-Rapid Res. Lett. 2021, 15, 2100199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mu, B.; Hsu, H.-H.; Kuo, C.-C.; Han, S.-T.; Zhou, Y. Organic small molecule-based RRAM for data storage and neuromorphic computing. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 12714–12738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, Y.; Wen, D.; Sun, F. Boron nitride and molybdenum disulfide as 2D composite element selectors with flexible threshold switching. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 869, 159321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, T.Y.; Meng, J.L.; Chen, L.; Zhu, H.; Sun, Q.Q.; Ding, S.J.; Bao, W.Z.; Zhang, D.W. Flexible 3D memristor array for binary storage and multi-states neuromorphic computing applications. InfoMat 2020, 3, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, D. Flexible Nonvolatile Bioresistive Random Access Memory with an Adjustable Memory Mode Capable of Realizing Logic Functions. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, W.; Kim, Y.; Song, Y.; Cho, K.; Yoo, D.; Ahn, H.; Kang, K.; Lee, T. Investigation of Time-Dependent Resistive Switching Behaviors of Unipolar Nonvolatile Organic Memory Devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1801162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, K.-J.; Chang, Y.-C.; Lee, C.-J.; Wang, L.-W.; Wang, Y.-H. Bipolar Resistive Switching Characteristics in Flexible Pt/MZT/Al Memory and Ni/NbO2/Ni Selector Structure. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2018, 6, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lei, J.; Ding, W.-J.; Liu, C.; Wu, D.; Li, W.-M.; Li, A.-D. Polymerized hybrid Hf-based hydroquinone/Al2O3 bilayer structure by molecular/atomic layer deposition for non-volatile resistive random access memory. APL Mater. 2021, 9, 121110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghosh, S.K.; Perla, V.K.; Mallick, K.; Pal, T. Ammonium phosphomolybdate: A material for dielectric crossover and resistive switching performance. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 5343–5351. [Google Scholar]
  15. Delfag, M.; Katoch, R.; Jehn, J.; Gonzalez, Y.; Schindler, C.; Ruediger, A. Sinter-free inkjet-printed PEDOT:PSS/WO3/PEDOT:PSS flexible valency change memory. Flex. Print. Electron. 2021, 6, 035011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Resende, J.; Sekkat, A.; Nguyen, V.H.; Chatin, T.; Jimenez, C.; Burriel, M.; Bellet, D.; Munoz-Rojas, D. Planar and Transparent Memristive Devices Based on Titanium Oxide Coated Silver Nanowire Networks with Tunable Switching Voltage. Small 2021, 17, e2007344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Saadi, M.; Gonon, P.; Vallée, C.; Jomni, F.; Jalaguier, E.; Bsiesy, A. Ag/HfO2-based conductive bridge memories elaborated by atomic layer deposition: Impact of inert electrode and HfO2 crystallinity on resistive switching mechanisms. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 13487–13495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Paul, A.D.; Biswas, S.; Das, P.; Edwards, H.J.; Dalal, A.; Maji, S.; Dhanak, V.R.; Mondal, A.; Mahapatra, R. Improved resistive switching characteristics of Ag/Al:HfOx/ITO/PET ReRAM for flexible electronics application. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2021, 36, 065006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shang, J.; Xue, W.; Ji, Z.; Liu, G.; Niu, X.; Yi, X.; Pan, L.; Zhan, Q.; Xu, X.-H.; Li, R.-W. Highly flexible resistive switching memory based on amorphous-nanocrystalline hafnium oxide films. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 7037–7046. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ahmad, M.W.; Soren, K.; Dey, B.; Khan, M.S.; Choudhury, A. Synergistic reinforcement effect of 3D graphene@multi-walled carbon nanotube hybrid nanofiller in enhancing the electrical, EMI-shielding, and mechanical properties of polyethersulfone. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2021, 26, 754–771. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zou, L. Multilevel resistive switching performance of TiO2-based flexible memory prepared by low-temperature sol-gel method with UV irradiation. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2021, 24, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, T.-Y.; Meng, J.-L.; Li, Q.-X.; Chen, L.; Zhu, H.; Sun, Q.-Q.; Ding, S.-J.; Zhang, D.W. Forming-free flexible memristor with multilevel storage for neuromorphic computing by full PVD technique. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 60, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yun, H.-W.; Woo, H.K.; Oh, S.J.; Hong, S.-H. Flexible NiO nanocrystal-based resistive memory device fabricated by low-temperature solution-process. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2020, 20, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tsai, Y.N.; You, H.C.; Wu, C.Y.; Wu, H.K.; Tsai, M.H. Fabrication of Zinc Oxide Resistive Random-Access Memory on a Flexible Polyimide Substrate with Different Thicknesses. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 083012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xie, C.; Nie, B.; Zhu, L.; Zeng, L.H.; Yu, Y.Q.; Wang, X.H.; Fang, Q.L.; Luo, L.B.; Wu, Y.C. High-performance nonvolatile Al/AlO(x)/CdTe:Sb nanowire memory device. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 355203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yeom, S.W.; Shin, S.C.; Kim, T.Y.; Ha, H.J.; Lee, Y.H.; Shim, J.W.; Ju, B.K. Transparent resistive switching memory using aluminum oxide on a flexible substrate. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 07LT01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Biswas, S.; Paul, A.D.; Das, P.; Tiwary, P.; Edwards, H.J.; Dhanak, V.R.; Mitrovic, I.Z.; Mahapatra, R. Impact of AlOy Interfacial Layer on Resistive Switching Performance of Flexible HfOx/AlOy ReRAMs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 3787–3793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biju, K.P.; Liu, X.; Kim, S.; Siddik, M.; Shin, J.; Lee, J.; Hwang, H. Bipolar resistance switching in the Pt/WOx/W nonvolatile memory devices. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2011, 11, e62–e65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, Y.; Zeng, T.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Liu, W.; Ma, J.; Liu, Y. Transferable and Flexible Artificial Memristive Synapse Based on WOx Schottky Junction on Arbitrary Substrates. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 4, 1800373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, Y.; Huang, H.; Han, J.; Chen, K.; Ye, C.; Xu, Z.; Liang, S.; Xiong, W.; Chen, X.; Song, Z.; et al. Flexible HfO2/Graphene Oxide Selector With Fast Switching and High Endurance. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2019, 7, 1125–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Paul, A.D.; Biswas, S.; Dalal, A.; Mondal, A.; Mahapatra, R. Impact of Stack Engineering on HfOx/Al:HfOx-Based Flexible Resistive Memory Devices and Its Synaptic Characteristics. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2022, 69, 1842–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, J.; Wang, F.; Yin, L.; Sendeku, M.G.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, R.; Wang, Z.; Li, N.; Huang, W.; He, J. A unipolar nonvolatile resistive switching behavior in a layered transition metal oxide. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 20497–20506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bessonov, A.A.; Kirikova, M.N.; Petukhov, D.I.; Allen, M.; Ryhanen, T.; Bailey, M.J. Layered memristive and memcapacitive switches for printable electronics. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ismail, M.; Chand, U.; Mahata, C.; Nebhen, J.; Kim, S. Demonstration of synaptic and resistive switching characteristics in W/TiO2/HfO2/TaN memristor crossbar array for bioinspired neuromorphic computing. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 96, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ismail, M.; Mahata, C.; Abbas, H.; Choi, C.; Kim, S. Bipolar, complementary resistive switching and synaptic properties of sputtering deposited ZnSnO-based devices for electronic synapses. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 862, 158416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jang, J.; Pan, F.; Braam, K.; Subramanian, V. Resistance switching characteristics of solid electrolyte chalcogenide Ag(2)Se nanoparticles for flexible nonvolatile memory applications. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 3573–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Deleruyelle, D.; Putero, M.; Ouled-Khachroum, T.; Bocquet, M.; Coulet, M.V.; Boddaert, X.; Calmes, C.; Muller, C. Ge2Sb2Te5 layer used as solid electrolyte in conductive-bridge memory devices fabricated on flexible substrate. Solid-State Electron. 2013, 79, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ge, R.; Wu, X.; Kim, M.; Shi, J.; Sonde, S.; Tao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Lee, J.C.; Akinwande, D. Atomristor: Nonvolatile Resistance Switching in Atomic Sheets of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, F.; Cheng, H.; Hu, Y.; Song, L.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Qu, L. Functionalized Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Metal-free, Flexible and Rewritable Nonvolatile Memory Device via Direct Laser-Writing. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, D.; Chand, U.; Siang, L.W.; Tseng, T. ZrN-Based Flexible Resistive Switching Memory. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2020, 41, 705–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vasileiadis, N.; Loukas, P.; Karakolis, P.; Ioannou-Sougleridis, V.; Normand, P.; Ntinas, V.; Fyrigos, I.-A.; Karafyllidis, I.; Sirakoulis, G.C.; Dimitrakis, P. Multi-level resistance switching and random telegraph noise analysis of nitride based memristors. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 153, 111533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, P.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Jiang, L.; Xu, C. Room-Temperature, Solution-Processed SiOx via Photochemistry Approach for Highly Flexible Resistive Switching Memory. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 56186–56194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Moon, T.; Jung, J.C.; Han, Y.; Jeon, Y.; Koo, S.M.; Kim, S. Flexible Logic Gates Composed of Si-Nanowire-Based Memristive Switches. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59, 3288–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hong, S.K.; Kim, J.E.; Kim, S.O.; Choi, S.; Cho, B.J. Flexible Resistive Switching Memory Device Based on Graphene Oxide. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2010, 31, 1005–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hmar, J.J.L. Non-volatile resistive switching memory device based on ZnO-graphene oxide embedded in a polymer matrix fabricated on a flexible PET substrate. Microelectron. Eng. 2020, 233, 111436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aziz, T.; Wei, S.; Sun, Y.; Ma, L.-P.; Pei, S.; Dong, S.; Ren, W.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, H.-M.; Sun, D.-M. High-performance flexible resistive random access memory devices based on graphene oxidized with a perpendicular oxidation gradient. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 2448–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nagareddy, V.K.; Barnes, M.D.; Zipoli, F.; Lai, K.T.; Alexeev, A.M.; Craciun, M.F.; Wright, C.D. Multilevel Ultrafast Flexible Nanoscale Nonvolatile Hybrid Graphene Oxide–Titanium Oxide Memories. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3010–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Isyaku, U.B.; Khir, M.H.B.M.; Nawi, I.M.; Zakariya, M.A.; Zahoor, F. ZnO Based Resistive Random Access Memory Device: A Prospective Multifunctional Next-Generation Memory. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 105012–105047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ju, Y.C.; Kim, S.; Seong, T.G.; Nahm, S.; Chung, H.; Hong, K.; Kim, W. Resistance random access memory based on a thin film of CdS nanocrystals prepared via colloidal synthesis. Small 2012, 8, 2849–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, L.; Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Dai, S.; Huang, X.; Zhao, J. Tunable bending modulus and bending limit of oxidized graphene. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 1623–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Miao, X.; Su, L.; Bai, F.; Qiu, T.; Liu, J.; Yuan, G. Ultrathin Cs3Bi2I9 Nanosheets as an Electronic Memory Material for Flexible Memristors. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1700131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ji, Y.; Yang, Y.; Lee, S.-K.; Ruan, G.; Kim, T.-W.; Fei, H.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, D.-Y.; Yoon, J.; Tour, J.M. Flexible Nanoporous WO3–x Nonvolatile Memory Device. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7598–7603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hosseini, N.R.; Lee, J.-S. Biocompatible and Flexible Chitosan-Based Resistive Switching Memory with Magnesium Electrodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 5586–5592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Park, Y.; Lee, J.-S. Flexible Multistate Data Storage Devices Fabricated Using Natural Lignin at Room Temperature. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 6207–6212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cai, Y.; Tan, J.; YeFan, L.; Lin, M.; Huang, R. A flexible organic resistance memory device for wearable biomedical applications. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 275206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gao, J.Y.; Chen, C.K.; Lin, Y.C.; Kuo, C.C.; Chen, W.C. Highly Thermal Stable Polyimides Applied in Flexible Resistive Memory. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021, 306, 2100512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, B.-H.; Bae, H.; Seong, H.; Lee, D.-I.; Park, H.; Choi, Y.J.; Im, S.-G.; Kim, S.O.; Choi, Y.-K. Direct Observation of a Carbon Filament in Water-Resistant Organic Memory. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 7306–7313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jang, B.C.; Seong, H.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Koo, B.J.; Choi, J.; Yang, S.Y.; Im, S.G.; Choi, S.-Y. Flexible Nonvolatile Polymer Memory Array on Plastic Substrate via Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 12951–12958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Raeis-Hosseini, N.; Lee, J.-S. Controlling the Resistive Switching Behavior in Starch-Based Flexible Biomemristors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 7326–7332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, J.H.; Park, S.P.; Park, K.; Kim, H.J. Flexible and Waterproof Resistive Random-Access Memory Based on Nitrocellulose for Skin-Attachable Wearable Devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 30, 1907437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhou, J.; Feng, H.; Sun, Q.; Xie, Z.; Pang, X.; Minari, T.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L. Resistance-switchable conjugated polyrotaxane for flexible high-performance RRAMs. Mater. Horiz. 2022, 9, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sherazi, S.S.H.; Rehman, M.M.; Ur Rehman, H.M.M.; Kim, W.Y.; Siddiqui, G.U.; Karimov, K.S. Electroforming-free flexible organic resistive random access memory based on a nanocomposite of poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) and orange dye with a low threshold voltage. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2020, 35, 125012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lai, Y.-C.; Wang, Y.-X.; Huang, Y.-C.; Lin, T.-Y.; Hsieh, Y.-P.; Yang, Y.-J.; Chen, Y.-F. Rewritable, Moldable, and Flexible Sticker-Type Organic Memory on Arbitrary Substrates. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 1430–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ho Lee, M.; Yeol Yun, D.; Min Park, H.; Whan Kim, T. Flexible organic bistable devices based on [6,6]-phenyl-C85 butyric acid methyl ester clusters embedded in a polymethyl methacrylate layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 183301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, Q.; Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Jin, L.; Zhao, H.; Li, J.; Yao, J. Photoerasable Organic Field-Effect Transistor Memory Based on a One-Step Solution-Processed Hybrid Floating Gate Layer. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 23343–23351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jang, J.; Song, Y.; Yoo, D.; Cho, K.; Kim, Y.; Pak, J.; Min, M.; Lee, T. Energy Consumption Estimation of Organic Nonvolatile Memory Devices on a Flexible Plastic Substrate. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2015, 1, 1500186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jo, H.; Ko, J.; Lim, J.A.; Chang, H.J.; Kim, Y.S. Organic nonvolatile resistive switching memory based on molecularly entrapped fullerene derivative within a diblock copolymer nanostructure. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ren, J.; Liang, H.; Li, J.; Li, Y.C.; Mi, W.; Zhou, L.; Sun, Z.; Xue, S.; Cai, G.; Zhao, J.S. Polyelectrolyte Bilayer-Based Transparent and Flexible Memristor for Emulating Synapses. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 14541–14549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, J.; Cheng, X.-F.; Qian, W.-H.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; He, J.-H.; Xu, Q.-F.; Li, H.; Chen, D.-Y.; Li, N.-J.; Lu, J.-M. Conjugated zwitterion-inspired flexible ternary resistive memory from rhodamine dyes. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 7658–7662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pan, L.; Ji, Z.; Yi, X.; Zhu, X.; Chen, X.; Shang, J.; Liu, G.; Li, R.-W. Metal-Organic Framework Nanofilm for Mechanically Flexible Information Storage Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 2677–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Varun, I.; Bharti, D.; Mahato, A.K.; Raghuwanshi, V.; Tiwari, S.P. High-Performance Flexible Resistive RAM With PVP:GO Composite and Ultrathin HfOx Hybrid Bilayer. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2020, 67, 949–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xu, Y.; Wang, W.; Ge, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; Deng, Y.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, H. Stabilization of Black Phosphorous Quantum Dots in PMMA Nanofiber Film and Broadband Nonlinear Optics and Ultrafast Photonics Application. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1702437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ali, S.; Bae, J.; Lee, C.H.; Choi, K.H.; Doh, Y.H. All-printed and highly stable organic resistive switching device based on graphene quantum dots and polyvinylpyrrolidone composite. Org. Electron. 2015, 25, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Siddiqui, G.U.; Rehman, M.M.; Yang, Y.-J.; Choi, K.H. A two-dimensional hexagonal boron nitride/polymer nanocomposite for flexible resistive switching devices. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 862–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Das, B.; Samanta, M.; Sarkar, P.; Ghorai, U.K.; Mallik, A.; Chattopadhyay, K.K. Copper (II) Phthalocyanine (CuPc) Based Optoelectronic Memory Device with Multilevel Resistive Switching for Neuromorphic Application. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2021, 7, 2001079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cheng, X.F.; Hou, X.; Zhou, J.; Gao, B.J.; He, J.H.; Li, H.; Xu, Q.F.; Li, N.J.; Chen, D.Y.; Lu, J.M. Pseudohalide-Induced 2D (CH3 NH3 )2 PbI2 (SCN)2 Perovskite for Ternary Resistive Memory with High Performance. Small 2018, 14, e1703667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Li, H.; Liang, J.; Li, H.; Zheng, X.; Tao, Y.; Huang, Z.-H.; Yang, Q.-H. Activated carbon fibers with manganese dioxide coating for flexible fiber supercapacitors with high capacitive performance. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 31, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Huang, X.; Zheng, B.; Liu, Z.; Tan, C.; Liu, J.; Chen, B.; Li, H.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Z.; et al. Coating Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials with Metal–Organic Frameworks. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8695–8701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shu, P.; Cao, X.; Du, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, J.; Xu, S.; Liu, Y.; Cao, S. Resistive switching performance of fibrous crosspoint memories based on an organic–inorganic halide perovskite. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 12865–12875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhou, J.; Feng, H.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Cao, S. Flexible random resistive access memory devices with ferrocene–rGO nanocomposites for artificial synapses. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 5749–5757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gogoi, H.J.; Bajpai, K.; Mallajosyula, A.T.; Solanki, A. Advances in Flexible Memristors with Hybrid Perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 8798–8825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Vidiš, M.; Shpetnyi, I.O.; Roch, T.; Satrapinskyy, L.; Patrnčiak, M.; Plecenik, A.; Plecenik, T. Flexible hydrogen gas sensor based on a capacitor-like Pt/TiO2/Pt structure on polyimide foil. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 19217–19228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lee, T.K.; Kong, D.S.; Jin, D.W.; Yun, S.; Yang, C.-H.; Jung, J.H. Proton-irradiated Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 thick films for flexible non-volatile memory applications. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2019, 19, 728–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yang, C.; Han, Y.; Qian, J.; Lv, P.; Lin, X.; Huang, S.; Cheng, Z. Flexible, Temperature-Resistant, and Fatigue-Free Ferroelectric Memory Based on Bi(Fe0.93Mn0.05Ti0.02)O3 Thin Film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12647–12655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Liu, C.-F.; Tang, X.-G.; Wang, L.-Q.; Tang, H.; Jiang, Y.-P.; Liu, Q.-X.; Li, W.-H.; Tang, Z.-H. Resistive Switching Characteristics of HfO2 Thin Films on Mica Substrates Prepared by Sol-Gel Process. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, W.; Song, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, R.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, C.; He, J.; Xiao, X. Design of wafer-scale uniform Au nanotip array by ion irradiation for enhanced single conductive filament resistive switching. Nano Energy 2020, 67, 104213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Raeis-Hosseini, N.; Rho, J. Solution-Processed Flexible Biomemristor Based on Gold-Decorated Chitosan. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 5445–5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Han, X.; Xu, R.; Sun, B.; Xu, J.; Hong, W.; Cai, G.; Qian, K. Conductive Silver Grid Electrode for Flexible and Transparent Memristor Applications. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 7, 2000948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lee, S.; Yun, K.H.; Kim, D. Electroforming-less and multi-level resistive switching characteristics in tungsten oxide thin film. Thin Solid Films 2019, 674, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ji, X.; Song, L.; Zhong, S.; Jiang, Y.; Lim, K.G.; Wang, C.; Zhao, R. Biodegradable and Flexible Resistive Memory for Transient Electronics. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 16909–16915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yao, J.; Li, T.; Ma, S.; Qian, G.; Song, G.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, H.; Liu, G. Highly thermally stable and flexible conductive film electrodes based on photo-responsive shape memory polyimide. Smart Mater. Struct. 2020, 29, 115040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kim, H.-J.; Kim, D.-W.; Lee, W.-Y.; Kim, K.; Lee, S.-H.; Bae, J.-H.; Kang, I.-M.; Kim, K.; Jang, J. Flexible Sol-Gel—Processed Y2O3 RRAM Devices Obtained via UV/Ozone-Assisted Photochemical Annealing Process. Materials 2022, 15, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Park, K.; Lee, J.-S. Flexible resistive switching memory with a Ni/CuOx/Ni structure using an electrochemical deposition process. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 125203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, H.; Zou, C.; Zhou, L.; Tian, C.; Fu, D. Resistive switching characteristics of thin NiO film based flexible nonvolatile memory devices. Microelectron. Eng. 2012, 91, 144–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, T.; Yu, L.; Chen, L.; Liu, H.; Zhu, H.; Sun, Q.; Ding, S.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, D.W. Atomic layer deposited Hf0.5Zr0.5O2-based flexible RRAM. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on ASIC (ASICON), Guiyang, China, 25–28 October 2017; pp. 203–206. [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhao, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zang, L.; You, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, C. In situ growth of submicron polypyrrole on NiTi alloy wire as electrodes for recoverable and flexible quasi-solid-state supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 888, 161646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yi, X.; Yu, Z.; Niu, X.; Shang, J.; Mao, G.; Yin, T.; Yang, H.; Xue, W.; Dhanapal, P.; Qu, S.; et al. Intrinsically Stretchable Resistive Switching Memory Enabled by Combining a Liquid Metal-Based Soft Electrode and a Metal-Organic Framework Insulator. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019, 5, 1800655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Li, J.-c.; Zhang, C.; Shao, S.-J. Effect of bottom electrode materials on resistive switching of flexible poly(N-vinylcarbazole) film embedded with TiO2 nanoparticles. Thin Solid Films 2018, 664, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, K.-l.; Wu, C.-q.; Wang, F.; Miao, Y.-p.; Liu, K.; Zhao, J.-s. Effects of electrodes on resistance switching characteristics of TiO2 for flexible memory. Optoelectron. Lett. 2013, 9, 263–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tang, Z.-X.; Tang, W.-W.; Tang, X.-G.; Liu, Q.-X.; Jiang, Y.-P.; Li, W.-H.; Tang, Z.-H.; Guo, X.-B.; Tang, Z.-F. Analog-type resistive switching behavior of Au/HfO2/ZnO memristor fabricated on flexible Mica substrate. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2020, 120, 114047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yeom, S.-W.; Ha, H.J.; Park, J.; Shim, J.W.; Ju, B.-K. Transparent bipolar resistive switching memory on a flexible substrate with indium-zinc-oxide electrodes. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2016, 69, 1613–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liang, A.; Zhang, J.; Wang, F.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, K.; Shan, X.; Liu, Q.; Song, Z.; Zhang, K. Transparent HfO x -based memristor with robust flexibility and synapse characteristics by interfacial control of oxygen vacancies movement. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 145202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Qian, K.; Tay, R.Y.; Lin, M.-F.; Chen, J.; Li, H.; Lin, J.; Wang, J.; Cai, G.; Nguyen, V.C.; Teo, E.H.T.; et al. Direct Observation of Indium Conductive Filaments in Transparent, Flexible, and Transferable Resistive Switching Memory. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 1712–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ren, S.; Li, Z.; Tang, L.; Su, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, H.; Cao, G.; Zhao, J. Conduction Response in Highly Flexible Nonvolatile Memory Devices. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 6, 2000151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Jang, J.; Choi, J.-Y.; Jeon, J.; Lee, J.; Im, J.; Lee, J.; Jin, S.-W.; Park, H.-J.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, D.-B.; et al. Flexible Transparent Electrode Characteristics of Graphene Oxide/Cysteamine/AgNP/AgNW Structure. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Lien, D.-H.; Kao, Z.-K.; Huang, T.-H.; Liao, Y.-C.; Lee, S.-C.; He, J.-H. All-Printed Paper Memory. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 7613–7619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hong, S.; Lee, J.; Do, K.; Lee, M.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.-H. Stretchable Electrode Based on Laterally Combed Carbon Nanotubes for Wearable Energy Harvesting and Storage Devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1704353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Moon, G.; Jang, W.; Son, I.; Cho, H.A.; Park, Y.T.; Lee, J.H. Fabrication of New Liquid Crystal Device Using Layer-by-Layer Thin Film Process. Processes 2018, 6, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sung, S.; Kim, T.W. Flexible nonvolatile memory devices based on Au/PMMA nanocomposites deposited on PEDOT:PSS/Ag nanowire hybrid electrodes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 411, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kim, M.; Choi, K.C. Transparent and Flexible Resistive Random Access Memory Based on Al2O3 Film With Multilayer Electrodes. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 3508–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kim, D.H.; Wu, C.; Park, D.H.; Kim, W.K.; Seo, H.W.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, T.W. Flexible Memristive Devices Based on InP/ZnSe/ZnS Core–Multishell Quantum Dot Nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 14843–14849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wang, T.-Y.; He, Z.-Y.; Chen, L.; Zhu, H.; Sun, Q.-Q.; Ding, S.-J.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, D.W. An Organic Flexible Artificial Bio-Synapses with Long-Term Plasticity for Neuromorphic Computing. Micromachines 2018, 9, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Li, C.; Han, L.; Jiang, H.; Jang, M.H.; Lin, P.; Wu, Q.; Barnell, M.; Yang, J.J.; Xin, H.L.; Xia, Q. Three-dimensional crossbar arrays of self-rectifying Si/SiO2/Si memristors. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Jung, H.S.; Han, G.S.; Park, N.-G.; Ko, M.J. Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells. Joule 2019, 3, 1850–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Xiao, Y.; Han, G.; Zhou, H.; Wu, J. An efficient titanium foil based perovskite solar cell: Using a titanium dioxide nanowire array anode and transparent poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) electrode. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 2778–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ha, Y.-M.; Kim, Y.-O.; Ahn, S.; Lee, S.-K.; Lee, J.-S.; Park, M.; Chung, J.W.; Jung, Y.C. Robust and stretchable self-healing polyurethane based on polycarbonate diol with different soft-segment molecular weight for flexible devices. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 118, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wu, H.-Y.; Lin, C.-C.; Lin, C.-H. Characteristics of graphene-oxide-based flexible and transparent resistive switching memory. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, S823–S828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zeng, J.-J.; Zhuge, Y.; Liang, S.-D.; Bai, Y.-L.; Liao, J.; Zhang, L. Durability assessment of PEN/PET FRP composites based on accelerated aging in alkaline solution/seawater with different temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 327, 126992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dhaka, V.; Singh, S.; Anil, A.G.; Sunil Kumar Naik, T.S.; Garg, S.; Samuel, J.; Kumar, M.; Ramamurthy, P.C.; Singh, J. Occurrence, toxicity and remediation of polyethylene terephthalate plastics. A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 1777–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sim, J.-H.; Lee, S.H.; Yang, J.-Y.; Lee, W.-C.; Mun, C.; Lee, S.; Park, S.-G.; Cho, Y.-R. Plasmonic hotspot engineering of Ag-coated polymer substrates with high reproducibility and photothermal stability. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 354, 131110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yan, G.; Zhang, L.; Hong, R. High quality transparent conductive hydrogenated AZO with embedded Ag films deposited on PEN flexible substrate. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 13161–13166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lin, P.-C.; Hsieh, C.-T.; Liu, X.; Chang, F.-C.; Chen, W.-C.; Yu, J.; Chueh, C.-C. Fabricating efficient flexible organic photovoltaics using an eco-friendly cellulose nanofibers/silver nanowires conductive substrate. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chen, S.; Zheng, F.; Huang, C.; Zhang, Y. Measurement of Thermal Diffusivity of Thin Film in Thickness Direction Using an Ordinary Dielectric Film as the Sensor. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 71, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Li, Y.; Li, W.; Deng, Y.; Shao, J.; Ma, J.; Kou, H. Theoretical model for the tensile strength of polymer materials considering the effects of temperature and particle content. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 6, 015315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Choi, J.-Y.; Jin, S.-W.; Kim, D.-M.; Song, I.-H.; Nam, K.-N.; Park, H.-J.; Chung, C.-M. Enhancement of the Mechanical Properties of Polyimide Film by Microwave Irradiation. Polymers 2019, 11, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chiang, J.-L.; Li, S.-W.; Yadlapalli, B.K.; Wuu, D.-S. Deposition of high-transmittance ITO thin films on polycarbonate substrates for capacitive-touch applications. Vacuum 2021, 186, 110046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Krausz, T.; Serban, D.A.; Negru, R.M.; Radu, A.G.; Marsavina, L. The effect of strain rate and temperature on the mechanical properties of polycarbonate composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 45, 4211–4215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pradhan, S.S.; Unnikrishnan, L.; Mohanty, S.; Biswal, M.; Nayak, S.K. Thermally conducting hybrid polycarbonate composites with enhanced electromagnetic shielding efficiency. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Harshavardhan, B.; Ravishankar, R.; Suresha, B.; Srinivas, S.; Arun, C.; Dixit, U. Influence of short carbon fiber content on thermal properties of polyethersulfone composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 43, 1268–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kim, J.H.; Lan, N.X.V.; Kulkarni, U.; Kim, C.; Cho, S.M.; Yoo, P.J.; Kim, D.; Schroeder, M.; Yi, G.R. Optically Transparent and Low-CTE Polyethersulfone-Based Nanocomposite Films for Flexible Display. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 2001422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Xie, H.; Yin, X.; Guo, Y.; Liu, J.; Que, W.; Wang, G. Recent Progress of Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells. Phys. Status Solidi RRL-Rapid Res. Lett. 2019, 13, 1800566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yan, X.; Wang, J.; Zhao, M.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Lu, C.; Ren, D. Artificial electronic synapse characteristics of a Ta/Ta2O5-x/Al2O3/InGaZnO4 memristor device on flexible stainless steel substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113, 013503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhang, L.; Yu, H.; Xiong, L.; Si, J.; Wang, L.; Zhu, W. Flexible and thermally stable resistive switching memory in a Ta/TaOx/stainless steel structure. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2020, 35, 115021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ke, S.; Chen, C.; Fu, N.; Zhou, H.; Ye, M.; Lin, P.; Yuan, W.; Zeng, X.; Chen, L.; Huang, H. Transparent Indium Tin Oxide Electrodes on Muscovite Mica for High-Temperature-Processed Flexible Optoelectronic Devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 28406–28411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Li, L.; Lin, H.; Michon, J.; Huang, Y.; Li, J.; Du, Q.; Yadav, A.; Richardson, K.; Gu, T.; Hu, J. A new twist on glass: A brittle material enabling flexible integrated photonics. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 2016, 8, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wang, T.; Lu, K.; Xu, Z.; Lin, Z.; Ning, H.; Qiu, T.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Yao, R.; Peng, J. Recent Developments in Flexible Transparent Electrode. Crystals 2021, 11, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Jeong, J.; Kim, M.J.; Hwang, W.S.; Cho, B.J. Copolymer-Based Flexible Resistive Random Access Memory Prepared by Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition Process. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2021, 7, 2100375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Tummala, P.P.; Martella, C.; Molle, A.; Lamperti, A. Ambient Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition of Flat and Vertically Aligned MoS2 Nanosheets. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Carlos, E.; Branquinho, R.; Martins, R.; Kiazadeh, A.; Fortunato, E. Recent Progress in Solution-Based Metal Oxide Resistive Switching Devices. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2004328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Nunn, W.; Truttmann, T.K.; Jalan, B. A review of molecular-beam epitaxy of wide bandgap complex oxide semiconductors. J. Mater. Res. 2021, 36, 4846–4864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Nanishi, Y.; Yamaguchi, T. Plasma-excited MBE—Proposal and achievements through R&D of compound semiconductor materials and devices. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 61, SA0810. [Google Scholar]
  142. Rathanasamy, R.; Sahoo, S.; Lee, J.H.; Das, A.K.; Somasundaram, M.; Palaniappan, S.K.; Sivaraj, S. Carbon-based Multi-layered Films for Electronic Application: A Review. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50, 1845–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Nascimento, M.R.; Vieira, D.H.; Nogueira, G.L.; Alves, N. Low-Cost, Printed Memristor Using Indigo and a Dispersion of Colloidal Graphite Deposited by Spray Coating. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2021, 42, 1468–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ye, H.; Sun, B.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Tan, X.; Shi, T.; Tang, Z.; Liao, G. High performance flexible memristors based on a lead free AgBiI4 perovskite with an ultralow operating voltage. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 14155–14163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Gonçalves, S.; Serrado-Nunes, J.; Oliveira, J.; Pereira, N.; Hilliou, L.; Costa, C.M.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Environmentally Friendly Printable Piezoelectric Inks and Their Application in the Development of All-Printed Touch Screens. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2019, 1, 1678–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Vukmirović, J.; Nesterović, A.; Stijepović, I.; Milanović, M.; Omerović, N.; Bajac, B.; Bobić, J.; Srdić, V.V. Fabrication of BaTiO3-based thin film heterostructures with ring electrodes by low cost deposition techniques. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 14995–15004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Park, J.; Sung, Y.H.; Son, S.; Jun, J.; Huh, D.; Lee, H. Fabrication of Al2O3 nano-micro patterns by Al2O3 dispersion resin using UV imprint lithography. Thin Solid Films 2018, 660, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kim, W.Y.; Song, D.S.; Jeon, G.J.; Kang, I.K.; Shim, H.B.; Kim, D.K.; Lee, H.C.; Park, H.; Kang, S.W.; Bae, J.H. Characterisation of ferroelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride–trifluoroethylene) film prepared by Langmuir-Blodgett deposition. Micro Nano Lett. 2015, 10, 384–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ding, S.-J.; Wu, X. Superior Atomic Layer Deposition Technology for Amorphous Oxide Semiconductor Thin-Film Transistor Memory Devices. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 1343–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chen, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yuan, P.; Jiang, P.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Lv, S.; Ding, Y.; Dang, Z.; Gao, Z.; et al. Flexible Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 ferroelectric thin films on polyimide with improved ferroelectricity and high flexibility. Nano Res. 2021, 15, 2913–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lakshmi-Narayana, A.; Prakash, N.G.; Dhananjaya, M.; Hussain, O.M.; Jun Qiu, Y.; Julien, C.M. Pulsed laser–deposited Li2TiO3 thin film electrodes for energy storage. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2020, 24, 1371–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sharma, S.; Gupta, S.; Gupta, R.; Borkar, H.; Kumar, A.; Gupta, V.; Tomar, M. Bipolar Resistive Switching in Magnetostrictive Ni/PZT/Pt Structure for Non-Volatile Memory Applications. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 071001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Jung, H.W. Special Issue on “Thin Film Processes”. Processes 2020, 8, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Guo, D.; Ning, H.; Zhou, S.; Liang, Z.; Yao, R.; Wang, Y.; Lu, X.; Peng, J. Functional Metal Oxide Ink Systems for Drop-on-Demand Printed Thin-Film Transistors. Langmuir 2020, 36, 8655–8667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kim, G.W.; Shin, D.; Yang, M. Optical Property Change of Silver Nanowire Thin Films in Laser Patterning Process. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2020, 21, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of a flexible crossbar resistive switching memory array bent with radius R; (b) schematic memory cell structure with measurement configuration.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of a flexible crossbar resistive switching memory array bent with radius R; (b) schematic memory cell structure with measurement configuration.
Asi 05 00091 g001
Figure 2. Reason of flexible RRAM failure: the generation of cracks.
Figure 2. Reason of flexible RRAM failure: the generation of cracks.
Asi 05 00091 g002
Figure 3. W/TiO2/HfO2/TaN device: (a) schematic illustration displaying the cross-array structure; (b) DC endurance characteristics for 103 cycles; (c) excellent pulse endurance for over 107 switching cycles attained with 10 µs programming pulses; (d) retention tests made at LRS and HRS show no evident change for over 104 s at 125 °C [34].
Figure 3. W/TiO2/HfO2/TaN device: (a) schematic illustration displaying the cross-array structure; (b) DC endurance characteristics for 103 cycles; (c) excellent pulse endurance for over 107 switching cycles attained with 10 µs programming pulses; (d) retention tests made at LRS and HRS show no evident change for over 104 s at 125 °C [34].
Asi 05 00091 g003
Figure 6. Flexible RRAM based on pEGDMA (a) and pV3D3 (b): dielectric materials: 1—typical I-V curve (the inset is a real cross-section TEM image of the device); 2—cycle test and retention time of HRS and LRS; 3—relationship between resistance status (HRS/LRS) and bending radius [57,58].
Figure 6. Flexible RRAM based on pEGDMA (a) and pV3D3 (b): dielectric materials: 1—typical I-V curve (the inset is a real cross-section TEM image of the device); 2—cycle test and retention time of HRS and LRS; 3—relationship between resistance status (HRS/LRS) and bending radius [57,58].
Asi 05 00091 g006
Figure 7. (a) Device structure, (b) molecular structures and (c) transmittance of a polyelectrolyte-based device; AFM topographic images of (d) bare ITO, (e) PEI/ITO and (f) PAA/PEI/ITO surfaces; current voltage characteristics (g); endurance performance (h) and retention characteristics (i) of polymer synaptic device [68].
Figure 7. (a) Device structure, (b) molecular structures and (c) transmittance of a polyelectrolyte-based device; AFM topographic images of (d) bare ITO, (e) PEI/ITO and (f) PAA/PEI/ITO surfaces; current voltage characteristics (g); endurance performance (h) and retention characteristics (i) of polymer synaptic device [68].
Asi 05 00091 g007
Figure 8. Storage performances of Au/Cu3(BTC)2/Au/PET device based on MOF: (a) current-voltage characteristics; (b) evolution of the HRS and LRS resistances; (c) threshold voltages (VSET and VRESET) as a function of the bending radius or strain level [70].
Figure 8. Storage performances of Au/Cu3(BTC)2/Au/PET device based on MOF: (a) current-voltage characteristics; (b) evolution of the HRS and LRS resistances; (c) threshold voltages (VSET and VRESET) as a function of the bending radius or strain level [70].
Asi 05 00091 g008
Figure 9. The reported bending radii and bending cycles with different material systems: inorganic and organic.
Figure 9. The reported bending radii and bending cycles with different material systems: inorganic and organic.
Asi 05 00091 g009
Figure 10. Finite element analysis of poly(N-vinylcarbazole)-TiO2/Cu/PET sample under tension stress [98].
Figure 10. Finite element analysis of poly(N-vinylcarbazole)-TiO2/Cu/PET sample under tension stress [98].
Asi 05 00091 g010
Figure 11. Scanning electron microscopy images of the (a) AgNW film and the (b) PEDOT: PSS/AgNW hybrid film. Atomic force microscopy images of the (c) AgNW film and the (d) PEDOT:PSS/AgNW hybrid film [109].
Figure 11. Scanning electron microscopy images of the (a) AgNW film and the (b) PEDOT: PSS/AgNW hybrid film. Atomic force microscopy images of the (c) AgNW film and the (d) PEDOT:PSS/AgNW hybrid film [109].
Asi 05 00091 g011
Figure 12. Structural formula of common polymer substrates: (a) PEN; (b) PET; (c) PI.
Figure 12. Structural formula of common polymer substrates: (a) PEN; (b) PET; (c) PI.
Asi 05 00091 g012
Figure 13. Typical steps in making flexible RRAM.
Figure 13. Typical steps in making flexible RRAM.
Asi 05 00091 g013
Table 1. Performance comparison of several representative binary metal oxide dielectric materials.
Table 1. Performance comparison of several representative binary metal oxide dielectric materials.
Dielectric MaterialsPolarityON/OFF RatioDurabilityRetention TimeNumber of Bending CyclesBending Radius
TiO2 [21]bipolar1031022 × 103 s409 mm
NiOx [22,23]bipolar106102104 s12010 mm
ZnOx [24]bipolar106102104 s9820 mm
AlOx [25,26]bipolar106303 × 104 s10010 mm
WOx [28,29]bipolar1052 × 103105 s10015 mm
HfOx [30,31] bipolar1.2 × 1035 × 108104 s1035 mm
MoOx [32,33]unipolar2.38 × 105502 × 105 s10010 mm
Durability is measured by the number of switching cycles the device undergoes under DC conditions; N/R: not reported.
Table 2. Comparison of properties of organic dielectric materials.
Table 2. Comparison of properties of organic dielectric materials.
Organic Materials ON/OFF RatioDurability/TimesRetention TimeNumber of Bending CyclesBending Radius
chitosan [53]102102104 s1035 mm
lignin [54]103102103 s10215 mm
polyparaxylene [55]1045 × 1022 × 105 s5 × 10210 mm
PI [56]1061034 × 103 s1035 mm
pEGDMA [57]1025 × 102106 s1034 mm
pV3D3 [58]107105105 s1033.8 mm
starch [59]103102104 s1035 mm
NC [60]103102104 s5 × 10210 mm
CPR1 [61]1081033 × 107 s1033 mm
P3HT:OD [62]5 × 102102104 s2550 mm
PMMA:P3HT [63]105808 × 103 sN/R10 mm
PMMA:PCBM [64,65]1031051.2 × 104 s10410 mm
PI:PCBM [66]1042 × 102104 s10210 mm
PS:PCBM [67]10443103 sN/R4 mm
PAA:PEI [68]502 × 104104 s1042 mm
Rh B:R 6G [69]103WORM5 × 103 s1038.8 mm
Durability is measured by the number of switching cycles the device undergoes under DC conditions; WORM refers to a device of write-once-read-many-times; P3HT: poly real (3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl); OD: orange dye; PMMA: poly (methyl methacrylimide); PCBM: 6,6-phenyl-C85-butyric acid methyl ester; PS: polystyrene; PAA: poly (acrylic acid); PEI: polyethylenimine; N/R: not reported.
Table 3. Mechanical properties of flexible RRAM polymer substrates.
Table 3. Mechanical properties of flexible RRAM polymer substrates.
FeaturesPET [118,119,120]PEN [121,122,123,124]PI [120,125]PC [126,127,128]PES [129,130]
tensile strength (flexibility, MPa)7427081446044
Young’s modulus (elasticity, GPa)2.89.02.52.50.64
temperature of glass transition (°C)84129320150220
melting temperature (°C)255~265260590220~230330
thermal conductivity (W/m·K)0.30.1640.80.20.17
coefficient of thermal expansion (ppm/°C)6018.45155065
transmittance90.4%88.18%60%90%89%
corrosion resistancegoodgoodgoodpoorgood
dimensional stabilitygoodgoodfairfairgood
Table 4. Advantages and disadvantages of various film deposition methods.
Table 4. Advantages and disadvantages of various film deposition methods.
MethodsAdvantagesDisadvantages
CVD [137,138]Pure film and good density and uniformityHigh temperature of reaction, difficulty in mass production and toxic byproducts
PVD [22,139]Low temperature of reaction and high degree of process automationPoor uniformity and difficulty in mass production
MBE [140,141]Pure film, grows at low temperatures and has atomic interfacesHigh cost and difficulty in mass production
spin coatings [142]Uniform film thicknessMass solution loss
spraying [143]No solution loss and quick film forming Difficulties in process optimization of solvent mixing and solution adjustment
casting [144]High degree of crystallinityPoor uniformity and long molding cycle
screen printing [145]Simple manufacturing process and wide range of applicationThe large thickness is not conducive to miniaturization
inkjet printing [15,146]Automatic control, small material loss, rapid production of multilayer structure and no selectivity for substratesHigh requirements for ink conditions and droplets coalesce easily
nano imprinting [147]Composition of tens of nanometers can be achieved under normal temperature and pressureImmature technology and expensive equipment
dipping [142]Large area of film formingLarge thickness relatively and inability to perform fine manipulation
LB [148]Single-layer controlled production and nanoscale accuracyCorresponding materials are limited and poor mechanical properties
self-assembly [88]Highly oriented monolayer and quick film forming High requirements of process and strict conditions of preparation
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, P.; Chen, J.; Qiu, T.; Ning, H.; Fu, X.; Li, M.; Xu, Z.; Luo, D.; Yao, R.; Peng, J. Recent Advances in Flexible Resistive Random Access Memory. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2022, 5, 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5050091

AMA Style

Tang P, Chen J, Qiu T, Ning H, Fu X, Li M, Xu Z, Luo D, Yao R, Peng J. Recent Advances in Flexible Resistive Random Access Memory. Applied System Innovation. 2022; 5(5):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5050091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Peng, Junlong Chen, Tian Qiu, Honglong Ning, Xiao Fu, Muyun Li, Zuohui Xu, Dongxiang Luo, Rihui Yao, and Junbiao Peng. 2022. "Recent Advances in Flexible Resistive Random Access Memory" Applied System Innovation 5, no. 5: 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5050091

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop