Next Article in Journal
Intelligent Volume Assured Pressure Support (iVAPS) vs. Spontaneous/Timed Mode as a Weaning Strategy for Intubated COPD Patients with Acute Exacerbation
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning-Based COVID-19 Diagnosis by Demographic Characteristics and Clinical Data
 
 
Advances in Respiratory Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 90 Issue 4 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Via Medica.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nasal Insertion Overall Satisfaction with EUS-B (NOSE): Evaluating the Feasibility of Transnasal Diagnostic EUS-B

by
Gonçalo Samouco
1,*,
Michele de Santis
2,
Paulo Matos
2 and
Lourdes Barradas
2
1
Pulmonology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde da Guarda, Guarda, Portugal
2
Pulmonology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adv. Respir. Med. 2022, 90(2), 184-190; https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2022.0023
Submission received: 10 July 2021 / Revised: 10 July 2021 / Accepted: 22 November 2021 / Published: 1 January 2022

Abstract

Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound using an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) broncho-scope (EUS-b) has become an important tool in many bronchoscopy units. The procedure is gener-ally performed through the mouth and there are currently no studies published evaluating the fea-sibility of transnasal EUS-b nor comparing it to the transoral approach. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility, patient comfort and safety of transnasal EUS-b. Material and methods: A single-centre prospective study enrolling patients undergoing diagnostic EUS-b was conducted. Nasal in-sertion was attempted in all cases. Procedure difficulty and perceived patient’s comfort were re-ported by the bronchoscopists. Comfort, overall satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure were reported by the patients. Data regarding demographics, procedure details, patients’ comfort and overall satisfaction, histological analysis and final diagnosis were collected and analysed. Re-sults: A total of 119 patients were consecutively enrolled. Nasal insertion was successful in 87.4% and the mean duration of the procedure was 15.7 ± 4.9 min. No severe complications were reported. Procedure difficulty was usually graded as “simple” or “very simple” (71.4%). Mean values for bronchoscopists’ assessment of patient comfort and patients’ reported comfort were 4.2 and 4.1, respectively, on a 5-point scale. Only moderate correlation between these values was found (τb = 0.301, P = 0.001). Willingness to repeat transnasal EUS-b was very high (99.0%). Adequate samples were obtained in 88.5% of patients and overall diagnostic yield of EUS-b needle aspiration was 85.9%. Conclusions: EUS-b is an effective procedure that can be performed safely through the nasal cavity without significant discomfort for the patient.
Keywords: EUS-b; endoscopic ultrasound; patient comfort; safety; diagnostic yield EUS-b; endoscopic ultrasound; patient comfort; safety; diagnostic yield

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Samouco, G.; de Santis, M.; Matos, P.; Barradas, L. Nasal Insertion Overall Satisfaction with EUS-B (NOSE): Evaluating the Feasibility of Transnasal Diagnostic EUS-B. Adv. Respir. Med. 2022, 90, 184-190. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2022.0023

AMA Style

Samouco G, de Santis M, Matos P, Barradas L. Nasal Insertion Overall Satisfaction with EUS-B (NOSE): Evaluating the Feasibility of Transnasal Diagnostic EUS-B. Advances in Respiratory Medicine. 2022; 90(2):184-190. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2022.0023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Samouco, Gonçalo, Michele de Santis, Paulo Matos, and Lourdes Barradas. 2022. "Nasal Insertion Overall Satisfaction with EUS-B (NOSE): Evaluating the Feasibility of Transnasal Diagnostic EUS-B" Advances in Respiratory Medicine 90, no. 2: 184-190. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2022.0023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop