Next Article in Journal
Epidemiological Characteristics and Outcomes from 187 Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to 6 Reference Centers in Greece: An Observational Study during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Risk Factors for Complicated Community-Acquired Pneumonia Course in Patients Treated with β-Lactam Monotherapy
 
 
Advances in Respiratory Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 90 Issue 4 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Via Medica.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotypes. One Center Prospective Study

1
Faculty of Medicine, Pulmonary Medicine Department, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
2
Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Pathology Department, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adv. Respir. Med. 2021, 89(4), 369-377; https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2021.0086
Submission received: 6 November 2020 / Revised: 19 July 2021 / Accepted: 19 July 2021 / Published: 2 September 2021

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical outcome of different chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotypes is still unclear. Objectives: This study was designed to detect the effect of different COPD phenotypes on disease outcomes. Material and methods: One hundred stable COPD patients were included. They were divided into 3 phenotypes; 45 patients in exacerbator phenotype, 37 patients in non-exacerbator, and 18 patients in asthma COPD overlap (ACO) phenotype. Patient demo-graphics, respiratory symptoms, grading of COPD, co-morbidities, spirometry, six minute walk test, and systemic inflammatory markers were measured. Also, exacerbation frequency and severity were assessed throughout the study period. Results: COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score was significantly higher in exacerbator phenotype versus the other phenotypes(14.7 ± 1.5; p = 0.04).In addition, about 60% and 42% of exacerbator phenotype were in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) class D and C respectively which were significantly higher than the other phenotypes(p = 0.001), while 58% and 50% of non-exacerbator and ACO patients respectively were in class B of GOLD. Twenty eight percent of patients of ACO had no comorbidity and this was significantly higher versus the other phenotypes (p = 0.03), while 40% of non-exacerbator had one comorbidity (p = 0.003) and 86% of exacerbator had ≥ 2 comorbidities (p = 0.002). COPD comorbidity index was significantly higher in exacerbator phenotype (2.5 ± 0.8; p = 0.01). Although patients of exacerbator phenotype had more and severe form of exacerbations than the other phenotypes, no significant difference in in-hospital outcome was found (p = 0.3). Conclusions: Exacerbator phenotype has worse disease outcome than those of non-exacerbator and ACO phenotypes. These results support the need for more treatment options to alleviate the morbidity of COPD especially among exacerbator phenotype.
Keywords: COPD severity; co-morbidity; exacerbation COPD severity; co-morbidity; exacerbation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Said, A.; Esmail, M.; Naiem, E.A.; Zaki, Z.; Raouf, R. Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotypes. One Center Prospective Study. Adv. Respir. Med. 2021, 89, 369-377. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2021.0086

AMA Style

Said A, Esmail M, Naiem EA, Zaki Z, Raouf R. Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotypes. One Center Prospective Study. Advances in Respiratory Medicine. 2021; 89(4):369-377. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2021.0086

Chicago/Turabian Style

Said, Azza, Mernal Esmail, Emad Abdel Naiem, Zaki Zaki, and Rasha Raouf. 2021. "Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotypes. One Center Prospective Study" Advances in Respiratory Medicine 89, no. 4: 369-377. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2021.0086

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop