Next Article in Journal
Basics of Mechanical Ventilation for Non-Aneasthetists. Part 2: Clinical Aspects
Previous Article in Journal
High Incidence of Masked Hypertension in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Despite Normal Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement Results
 
 
Advances in Respiratory Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 90 Issue 4 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Via Medica.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Human Factors and Usability of an Incentive Spirometer Patient Reminder (SpiroTimer™)

by
Joshua Pangborn
,
Layla Kazemi
and
Adam E. M. Eltorai
*
Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adv. Respir. Med. 2020, 88(6), 574-579; https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2020.0189
Submission received: 30 June 2020 / Revised: 8 September 2020 / Accepted: 8 September 2020 / Published: 30 December 2020

Abstract

Introduction: To address the problem of incentive spirometry (IS) noncompliance, a use-tracking IS reminder device (SpiroTimer™) was developed. In a recent randomized clinical trial, the SpiroTimer™ improved IS use compliance, length of stay, and mortality. For successful, safe, and effective implementation of a new medical device, human factors and usability must be evaluated. This study aims to evaluate the SpiroTimer™’s human factors as they pertain to intended users, use environments, and uses. Material and methods: Immediately following the completion of the randomized clinical trial of the SpiroTimer™, before the providers were informed of the results of the study, a human factors and usability survey was distributed in-person to all nurses involved in the trial. Variations in nurse user perspectives were evaluated. Results: A total of 52 nurses (100% response rate) completed the survey. In general, most nurses felt IS use compliance is poor (65%; 34/52, p = 0.0265) and should be improved (94%; 49/52, p < 0.001). Nurses agreed the SpiroTimer™ ameliorated patient IS use compliance (82%; 41/50, p < 0.001), IS effectiveness (74 %; 37/50, p < 0.001), and patient engagement in their own care (88%; 44/ 50, p < 0.001). Nurses reported the SpiroTimer™ helped remind them to work with their patients on IS (70%; 35/50, p = 0.0047) while reducing the number of times they had to remind their patients to use their IS (70%; 35/50, p = 0.0047). They felt that they would use the SpiroTimer™ with all their patients (82%; 41/50, p < 0.001) and that they would recommend the SpiroTimer™ to a colleague (74%; 37/50, p < 0.001). Ultimately, most nurses believed the SpiroTimer™ should become part of routine patient care (78%; 39/50, p < 0.001). Discussion: For a new medical technology to a medical device to be effectively implemented, human factors and usability must be demonstrated. Nurses believe the clinically effective SpiroTimer™ helps both patients and nurses and should become part of routine care.
Keywords: incentive spirometry; human factors; innovation; SpiroTimer; respiratory incentive spirometry; human factors; innovation; SpiroTimer; respiratory

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pangborn, J.; Kazemi, L.; Eltorai, A.E.M. Human Factors and Usability of an Incentive Spirometer Patient Reminder (SpiroTimer™). Adv. Respir. Med. 2020, 88, 574-579. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2020.0189

AMA Style

Pangborn J, Kazemi L, Eltorai AEM. Human Factors and Usability of an Incentive Spirometer Patient Reminder (SpiroTimer™). Advances in Respiratory Medicine. 2020; 88(6):574-579. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2020.0189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pangborn, Joshua, Layla Kazemi, and Adam E. M. Eltorai. 2020. "Human Factors and Usability of an Incentive Spirometer Patient Reminder (SpiroTimer™)" Advances in Respiratory Medicine 88, no. 6: 574-579. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.a2020.0189

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop