Next Article in Journal
Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha as an Asthma Biomarker in Early Childhood
Previous Article in Journal
What Factors May Influence Epidemiological Situation of Tuberculosis in Poland and in the World?
 
 
Advances in Respiratory Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 90 Issue 4 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Via Medica.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Methods of Airway Resistance Assessment

by
Tomasz Urbankowski
* and
Tadeusz Przybyłowski
Department of Internal Medicinie, Pneumonology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adv. Respir. Med. 2016, 84(2), 134-141; https://doi.org/10.5603/PiAP.2016.0014
Submission received: 17 January 2016 / Revised: 23 March 2016 / Accepted: 23 March 2016 / Published: 23 March 2016

Abstract

Airway resistance is the ratio of driving pressure to the rate of the airflow in the airways. The most frequent methods used to measure airway resistance are whole-body plethysmography, the interrupter technique and the forced oscillation technique. All these methods allow to measure resistance during respiration at the level close to tidal volume, they do not require forced breathing manoeuvres or deep breathing during measurement. The most popular method for measuring airway resistance is whole-body plethysmography. The results of plethysmography include among others the following parameters: airway resistance (Raw), airway conductance (Gaw), specific airway resistance (sRaw) and specific airway conductance (sGaw). The interrupter technique is based on the assumption that at the moment of airway occlusion, air pressure in the mouth is equal to the alveolar pressure . In the forced oscillation technique (FOT), airway resistance is calculated basing on the changes in pressure and flow caused by air vibration. The methods for measurement of airway resistance that are described in the present paper seem to be a useful alternative to the most common lung function test—spirometry. The target group in which these methods may be widely used are particularly the patients who are unable to perform spirometry.
Keywords: lung function tests; airway resistance; plethysmography lung function tests; airway resistance; plethysmography

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Urbankowski, T.; Przybyłowski, T. Methods of Airway Resistance Assessment. Adv. Respir. Med. 2016, 84, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.5603/PiAP.2016.0014

AMA Style

Urbankowski T, Przybyłowski T. Methods of Airway Resistance Assessment. Advances in Respiratory Medicine. 2016; 84(2):134-141. https://doi.org/10.5603/PiAP.2016.0014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Urbankowski, Tomasz, and Tadeusz Przybyłowski. 2016. "Methods of Airway Resistance Assessment" Advances in Respiratory Medicine 84, no. 2: 134-141. https://doi.org/10.5603/PiAP.2016.0014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop