Next Article in Journal
Reperfusion Failure Despite Recanalization in Stroke: New Translational Evidence
Previous Article in Journal
Neuroplasticity in Children and Adolescents in Response to Treatment Intervention: A Systematic Review of the Literature
 
 
Clinical and Translational Neuroscience is published by MDPI from Volume 5 Issue 2 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with SAGE.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Carotid Artery Stenosis–Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations

by
Mandy D Müller
1,2 and
Leo H Bonati
1,3,*
1
Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
3
Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Stroke Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Clin. Transl. Neurosci. 2021, 5(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183x211001654
Submission received: 2 February 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published: 29 April 2021

Abstract

Background: Carotid artery stenosis is an important cause for stroke. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis and to some extent in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. More than 20 years ago, carotid artery stenting (CAS) emerged as an endovascular treatment alternative to CEA. Objective and Methods: This review summarises the available evidence from randomised clinical trials in patients with symptomatic as well as in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Results: CAS is associated with a higher risk of death or any stroke between randomisation and 30 days after treatment than CEA (odds ratio (OR) = 1.74, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.33, p < 0.0001). In a pre-defined subgroup analysis, the OR for stroke or death within 30 days after treatment was 1.11 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.64) in patients <70 years old and 2.23 (95% CI 1.61 to 3.08) in patients ≥70 years old, resulting in a significant interaction between patient age and treatment modality (interaction p = 0.007). The combination of death or any stroke up to 30 days after treatment or ipsilateral stroke during follow-up also favoured CEA (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.85, p < 0.0001). In asymptomatic patients, there is a non-significant increase in death or stroke occurring within 30 days of treatment with CAS compared to CEA (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.97, p = 0.05). The risk of peri-procedural death or stroke or ipsilateral stroke during follow-up did not differ significantly between treatments (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.84, p = 0.22). Discussion and Conclusion: In symptomatic patients, randomised evidence has consistently shown CAS to be associated with a higher risk of stroke or death within 30 days of treatment than CEA. This extra risk is mostly attributed to an increase in strokes occurring on the day of the procedure in patients ≥70 years. In asymptomatic patients, there may be a small increase in the risk of stroke or death within 30 days of treatment with CAS compared to CEA, but the currently available evidence is insufficient and further data from ongoing randomised trials are needed.
Keywords: carotid stenosis; carotid artery stenting; carotid endarterectomy carotid stenosis; carotid artery stenting; carotid endarterectomy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Müller, M.D.; Bonati, L.H. Carotid Artery Stenosis–Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations. Clin. Transl. Neurosci. 2021, 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183x211001654

AMA Style

Müller MD, Bonati LH. Carotid Artery Stenosis–Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations. Clinical and Translational Neuroscience. 2021; 5(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183x211001654

Chicago/Turabian Style

Müller, Mandy D, and Leo H Bonati. 2021. "Carotid Artery Stenosis–Current Evidence and Treatment Recommendations" Clinical and Translational Neuroscience 5, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514183x211001654

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop