Next Article in Journal
Energy-Harvesting Smart Tiles for Human–Machine Interface Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Dimensional Localization of an Aluminum Tag Using the Electromagnetic Shielding Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Efficient Methods for Training and Validation of Odor Sensors †

1
Department for Sensory Analytics and Technology, Fraunhofer-Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, Giggenhauser Str. 35, 85354 Freising, Germany
2
Department of Systems Engineering, Saarland University, Campus A5 1, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 97(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097037
Published: 18 March 2024

Abstract

:
The correlation between a gas sensor pattern and its corresponding odor impression on human noses remains a scientific challenge for the development of technical odor detection systems. Small, inexpensive gas sensors, for example, those based on a metal oxide semiconductor (MOS), offer a versatile platform for the development of application-specific sensor systems for odor detection or monitoring. The training of MOS sensors for odor detection remains a challenging task that has been addressed by recent advances. We hereby present a comprehensive method and instrumentation for the characterization and validation of MOS sensors using a gas chromatograph with a mass spectrometer and odor detection port.

1. Introduction

The detection of a characteristic pattern of gases and volatiles plays an important role in fast and non-destructive analyses, with numerous applications. In medicine, specific volatiles are used as markers for emerging diseases; in indoor and outdoor air quality analyses, volatiles give insights into health risks; in the food industry, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be used to monitor the storage and production processes of food and feed. A multitude of scientific reports, demonstrators and even ready-to-market sensor systems are available for many of these applications. For an especially challenging subtask, the mimicking of the human nose, however, research seems to have stagnated. The idea of transferring the human olfactory system to a technical sensor (array) has fueled sensor research since the early 90s [1]. Among many promising detection principles, metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) gas sensors have stood out for their small size, low-cost mass production and wide applicability, with high sensitivity for broadband VOC detection.
However, even a reliable, application-specific detection of VOC patterns for describing an odor is still a very challenging venture that requires high-effort training. Recent advances in miniaturized sensor arrays [2], in the increase in their sensitivity and selectivity due to their dynamic operation [3], and in methods for the determination of a minimal set of training data [4] herald an era of the new generation of VOC sensors.
Until present, these methods did not allow for an efficient correlation between odor impression and VOC-pattern variability. Herein, we present a comprehensive method and instrumentation for the sensor characterization and sensor validation of on-site odorant detection applications.

2. MOS Sensor Signals, Single Compound Identification and Odor Impressions—Sensor Characterization and Validation

The overall odor impression of a product or material usually consists of several chemical compounds in varying concentrations that are embedded in other volatiles emerging from the matrix.
A qualitative and quantitative description of the overall odor impression can be given by analysis techniques that amplify the human nose as a sensor, e.g., the sensory profiling of odorants, or olfactometry. With a laboratory analysis performed using a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer and an odorant detection port (GC-MS/O), a correlation between the individual compounds of a gas mixture, their specific odor impressions and the impact of a single compound on the overall odor impression can be made. Thereby, key odorant compounds are identified that are unique to the underlying chemical or biological processes (e.g., spoilage, fatty acid oxidation) or correlate with product changes. Once the minimal subset of VOCs that contain the application-specific information about an odor impression is identified, the sensor’s training can be minimized by specifying the training to the identified subset of key compounds.
Therefore, the GC-MS/O instrument can be equipped for sensor characterization using three synchronized ports at the outlet. The first port is for the mass spectrometer, for the identification of compounds; the second one is for the odorant detection port (a heated outlet for sniffing single compounds with the human nose); and the last one is for the gas sensor [5,6]. This instrumentation allows for simulating the sensor’s performance with different system configurations.
In order for sensors to learn to detect these key odor compounds, even in difficult gas compositions, it is important to validate these key compounds in different concentrations and compositions, on the one hand, but also to test them with typical interfering gases from the application, on the other. For this purpose, suitable sensitive sensors are tested using a gas-mixing apparatus with varying conditions (e.g., humidity).
In a proof-of-concept test we demonstrated a GC sensor system with a traditional gas chromatographic separation column and a MOS sensor for the detection of the plant ripening hormone ethene [7].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.Z. and T.S.; methodology, T.S.; validation, G.Z.; investigation, M.K. and G.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, G.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.K. and T.S.; supervision, T.S.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and the APC were funded by the Bavarian State Ministry of Economic Affairs, Regional Development and Energy (StMWi), within the project “Campus of the Senses” (grant no. 20-3410-2-14-3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Michael Czerny for his administrative and technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gardner, J.W.; Bartlett, P.N. A brief history of electronic noses. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1994, 18, 210–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rüffer, D.; Hoehne, F.; Bühler, J. New Digital Metal-Oxide (MOx) Sensor Platform. Sensors 2018, 18, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schütze, A.; Sauerwald, T. Dynamic operation of semiconductor sensors. In Semiconductor Gas Sensors, 2nd ed.; Jaaniso, R., Tan, O.K., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2020; pp. 385–412. [Google Scholar]
  4. Robin, Y.; Amann, J.; Goodarzi, P.; Schneider, T.; Schütze, A.; Bur, C. Deep Learning Based Calibration Time Reduction for MOS Gas Sensors with Transfer Learning. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kohl, C.D.; Heinert, L.; Bock, J.; Hofmann, T.; Schieberle, P. Systematic studies on responses of metal-oxide sensor surfaces to straight chain alkanes, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, acids and esters using the SOMMSA approach. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000, 70, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wehrenfenning, C.; Schott, M.; Gasch, T.; Sauerwald, T.; Düring, R.A.; Vilcinskas, A.; Kohl, C.D. Laboratory characterization of metal-oxide sensors intended for in situ analyses of pheromones-SOMMSA approach. Phys. Status Solidi A 2012, 209, 935–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Koehne, M.; Schmidt, C.; Singh, S.; Grasskamp, A.; Sauerwald, T.; Zeh, G. Development of a low-cost MOS sensor coupled gas chromatography system with compensation of the temperature effects on the column for the measurement of ethene. J. Sens. Sens. Syst. 2023, 12, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeh, G.; Koehne, M.; Sauerwald, T. Efficient Methods for Training and Validation of Odor Sensors. Proceedings 2024, 97, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097037

AMA Style

Zeh G, Koehne M, Sauerwald T. Efficient Methods for Training and Validation of Odor Sensors. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeh, Gina, Maximilian Koehne, and Tilman Sauerwald. 2024. "Efficient Methods for Training and Validation of Odor Sensors" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop