Next Article in Journal
Multi-Sensor System for Saffron Quality Identification
Previous Article in Journal
Inductive Sensor with Contactless Interrogation for Conductive Target Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Comparative Evaluation of a Dietary Fiber Mixture in an Intestinal Screening Platform and a Crossover Intervention Study †

by
Femke P. M. Hoevenaars
1,*,
Tim J. van den Broek
1,
Boukje Eveleens Maarse
2,
Matthijs Moerland
2,
Ines Warnke
3,
Hannah Eggink
1 and
Frank H. J. Schuren
1
1
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), 2333BE Leiden, The Netherlands
2
Centre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), 2333BE Leiden, The Netherlands
3
DSM-Firmenich., 4303 Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–17 November 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 91(1), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091418
Published: 27 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023)

Abstract

:
In personalized nutrition, specific recommendations are often based on extensive phenotyping. In the world of microbiome research, classification is often based on the bacteriological composition of gut microbiota and enterotypes. We investigated if there is a possibility of translating outcomes from an intestinal screening platform to an intervention study that makes use of phenotyping. A 12-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover intervention study (8-week wash-out period) with a dietary fiber mixture of acacia gum and carrot powder (ratio 3.33:1) was performed in healthy volunteers (N = 54, 45–70 years, BMI 27.3 ± 1.4) to modulate their microbiome. Fecal samples were collected every 4 weeks during the 32-week study period. Before and after the intervention a standardized mixed meal challenge was performed and plasma samples were taken (0, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min). Postprandial responses were used for sub-group cluster analysis to identify the metabolic phenotype. The individual participants’ samples were cultured anaerobically for 24 h with the mixture and the individual fibers. Compositional 16s rRNA data of exposed in vitro (24 h) and in vivo samples (4, 8, and 12 weeks) was compared and linked to the metabolic cluster analysis. The comparison between the clinical intervention’s effect on microbiota composition after 12 weeks and a single 24 h exposure in vitro showed a statistically significant association in microbiome effects between in vivo and in vitro exposures (p < 0.05) for the fiber intervention. Analysis of the metabolic postprandial responses revealed a division between improvement and deterioration in response to the fiber intervention indicating two distinct clusters (metabolic phenotypes). Cluster 1 contained the lowest triglycerides-, total cholesterol-, and non-esterified fatty acids responses, while cluster 2 contained the highest triglycerides- and total cholesterol responses. Interestingly, the beta diversity of the microbiota was linked to these two clusters, resembling two different responses to the fiber intervention. Our study in healthy individuals demonstrates that a short-term in vitro exposure of individual microbiome samples to the fiber mixture is predictive of a long-term in vivo effect and relates to a distinct phenotypic cluster. This paves the way for using the in vitro platform as a pre-screen for intervention studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.P.M.H. and F.H.J.S.; methodology, T.J.v.d.B. and B.E.M.; formal analysis, T.J.v.d.B. and B.E.M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.P.M.H.; writing—review and editing, F.H.J.S., T.J.v.d.B., H.E., I.W., B.E.M. and M.M.; supervision, M.M.; project administration, H.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project was co-funded by the PPP Allowance made available by Top Sector Agri & Food to stimulate public-private partnerships (PPP), and Top Sector Life Sciences & Health. Funding was received from the Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands, dsm-firmenich, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland, and TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study received medical ethical approval and is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04829396.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data described can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoevenaars, F.P.M.; van den Broek, T.J.; Maarse, B.E.; Moerland, M.; Warnke, I.; Eggink, H.; Schuren, F.H.J. Comparative Evaluation of a Dietary Fiber Mixture in an Intestinal Screening Platform and a Crossover Intervention Study. Proceedings 2023, 91, 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091418

AMA Style

Hoevenaars FPM, van den Broek TJ, Maarse BE, Moerland M, Warnke I, Eggink H, Schuren FHJ. Comparative Evaluation of a Dietary Fiber Mixture in an Intestinal Screening Platform and a Crossover Intervention Study. Proceedings. 2023; 91(1):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoevenaars, Femke P. M., Tim J. van den Broek, Boukje Eveleens Maarse, Matthijs Moerland, Ines Warnke, Hannah Eggink, and Frank H. J. Schuren. 2023. "Comparative Evaluation of a Dietary Fiber Mixture in an Intestinal Screening Platform and a Crossover Intervention Study" Proceedings 91, no. 1: 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091418

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop