Next Article in Journal
Quality of Electronic TB Register Data Compared with Paper-Based Records in the Kyrgyz Republic
Previous Article in Journal
Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Sodium Stibogluconate and Allopurinol in a Routine Setting in Ethiopia: Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Operational Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Epidemiology of Human Blastocystis spp. Infection in Malaysia

by
Vinoth Kumarasamy
1,
Arutchelvan Rajamanikam
2,
Deepa Anbazhagan
3,
Wahib Mohammed Atroosh
2,
Meram Azzani
4,
Vetriselvan Subramaniyan
5,6 and
Syamsa Rizal Abdullah
1,*
1
Department of Parasitology & Medical Entomology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
2
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
3
Department of Medical Microbiology, International Medical School (IMS), Management & Science University (MSU), Shah Alam 40100, Selangor, Malaysia
4
Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh 47000, Selangor, Malaysia
5
Pharmacology Unit, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
6
Center for Transdisciplinary Research, Department of Pharmacology, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8(8), 415; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8080415
Submission received: 6 July 2023 / Revised: 29 July 2023 / Accepted: 31 July 2023 / Published: 15 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Vector-Borne Diseases)

Abstract

:
Blastocystis spp. is a unicellular enteric protozoan parasite in humans with a controversial role in disease etiology. It is common in developing countries among immunocompromised patients and people who have close contact with animals. In this study, we have systematically reviewed previous studies on the distribution and genotypes of human Blastocystis infection in Peninsular Malaysia. Studies examining the prevalence of Blastocystis in diverse demographics, including rural, urban, comorbid conditions, and high-risk populations, were taken into consideration. The infection has been reported in nine states; the total percentage of infection was 17.8% (1671/9397), with the most cases in Pahang (27.3%) and the least in Johor (3.4%). Molecular studies revealed the presence of six subtypes: ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4, ST5, and ST6. ST3 was reported as the predominant subtype in all the states, with a prevalence of 54.7% (338/618). The findings provide greater clarity on the epidemiology of Blastocystis in Malaysia, which will help in policy making towards planning and strategizing control measures against the parasite.

1. Introduction

Intestinal parasite–related illnesses constitute one of the key global public health issues [1,2]. Children from underdeveloped nations and indigenous communities frequently contract these diseases [3]. Often, environmental contamination with human feces is associated with the transmission of these microorganisms [4].
Blastocystis spp. (Blastocystis) is a polymorphic organism having several morphological forms [5,6]. The primary forms of Blastocystis are the amoeboid, vacuolar, granular, and cyst [5]. Humans usually contract Blastocystis through the fecal–oral route [5]. Person-to-person and zoonotic transmission are common routes of Blastocystis transmission [7]. Blastocystis divides by binary fission and colonises the large intestine [8]. When attached to the intestinal mucosal layer, Blastocystis can produce cysteine proteases that help with pathogenesis [9]. Human-associated Blastocystis infection was classified as Blastocystis hominis, according to the traditional classification [8]. However, it is already evident that there is cryptic host specificity and large genetic diversity among human Blastocystis, and currently DNA sequencing has revealed this organism to be a stramenopile [10]. Recently, the prevalence of Blastocystis has been extensively studied in various parts of the world, revealing the various host populations and geographic distribution of this intestinal protozoan parasite [11,12].
Blastocystis was initially thought to be a harmless protozoan, but it gained significance as a potential diarrheal pathogen following various reports of its prevalence [13,14]. Although the possible pathogenic mechanism of Blastocystis is not fully understood, it remains one of the most frequently identified enteric parasites in humans in developed and developing countries [15,16]. Epidemiological studies globally have demonstrated the distribution of these microorganisms in both healthy and immunocompromised individuals, which suggests low host specificity and has fueled the controversy on the pathogenic nature of this parasite [17]. Blastocystis has been associated with various gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, especially in immunocompromised hosts, exhibiting a characteristic opportunistic pathogenesis [18]. However, Blastocystis infections have also been associated with a variety of GI symptoms in immunocompetent individuals, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and flatulence [19,20].
Studies have reported increased genetic diversity of Blastocystis in humans and animals [21,22,23]. Recent findings based on 16S rRNA have grouped this organism into 28 subtypes (STs) [24]. ST1, ST2, ST3, and ST4 are frequently found in humans [25,26]. ST1 and ST3 are known to infect humans globally [27,28,29] and are known as the most pathogenic genotypes [30,31]. In several rural villages, ST3 was the most prevalent subtype [32,33]. Previous reports have demonstrated that the prevalence of ST3 is very common among children [34,35]. Even though numerous investigations have been carried out, it is still unclear if a specific subtype is related to a particular clinical characteristic. According to previous studies, ST1 and ST3 can infect a wide range of domestic animal species, suggesting that they may spread via zoonotic transmission [36,37].
The many studies of the prevalence of Blastocystis infection in Malaysia have indicated that it is an epidemiologically significant intestinal protozoan in the country. People of various racial backgrounds and religions live in Malaysia. Three major races—the Malays, Chinese, and Indians—make up the majority of Malaysians. However, ethnicity has little impact on the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Malaysia. The prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Malaysia is more significantly associated with living conditions [38]. Besides Blastocystis, other protozoan parasites such as Entamoeba histolytica, Cryptosporidium parvum, Isospora belli, Cyclospora cayetanensis, and Giardia duodenalis are also commonly identified in the Malaysian population [14]. However, immunosuppressed patients have been known to frequently contract these infections [39].
Consolidated data on the prevalence of Blastocystis, its subtypes, and its association with diseases in various groups in Malaysia are not currently available. The collated information would provide a better understanding of the epidemiology of Blastocystis in Malaysia and help in informed decision making for implementing and evaluating control strategies. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data to assess the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis infections in Malaysia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

This review was conducted according to the Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) [40]. In November 2021, we searched the relevant articles from the CINAHL, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus databases. A manual search of the reference lists of the included articles was also performed to retrieve additional papers that met the eligibility criteria. All the search keywords were identified using the authors’ knowledge and the keywords of published articles on the topic. The keywords used were: Blastocystis infection, epidemiology, Malaysia, and their terms and synonyms. There were no restrictions on language or on publication year.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

Original published studies that reported the prevalence of Blastocystis among the population in Malaysia and were published before 11 November 2021 were included. There was no restriction on the type of participants or the study setting.

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

Articles that reported only the detection of Blastocystis without specific findings on epidemiology or prevalence were excluded, as were conference proceedings, case reports, animal studies, and review papers.

2.4. Data Extraction

The data extracted from the included articles comprised authors and year of publication, sampling, setting, the method used to detect Blastocystis, primary results, conclusion, and quality scoring (Table S1).

2.5. Identification

Figure 1 shows the flowchart of selecting the included papers as agreed upon by all the authors. First, two authors created a search strategy using various keywords and their synonyms. All the search results were moved to the EndNote software (version X9.3.3) (741), and duplicate papers were eliminated (111). Two independent authors screened the titles and abstracts of the remaining 630 papers. Subsequently, a total of 64 papers were selected for full-text analysis. Another two authors assessed the eligibility of the retained papers. Bibliographies of all the papers were searched for pertinent works that fit the eligibility requirements for systematic review but had not been found by searching the various research databases. After thoroughly reviewing the 64 papers, a final 26 papers were selected [15,19,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63].
The meta-analysis random-effect model was applied to analyze the pooled prevalence, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of Blastocystis infection. The quality of all the included papers was assessed using the BSA Medical Sociology Group survey-based studies. This tool consists of seven questions. Every question answered with a “yes” was given one point, and every question answered with a “no” was given zero points. A score of 1 or 2 was considered low-quality, 3–5 moderate quality, and 6–7 good quality. However, only moderate and high-quality papers were included in the analysis (Table S1).

3. Results

The initial study of Blastocystis infection in Malaysia was reported in rural areas among the Malay and Orang Asli (indigenous people of Malaysia) ethnic groups [41]. Subsequently, studies were conducted throughout Malaysia, mostly among school children and animal handlers, between 1992 and 1999 [41,52,57,59]. The 26 studies included in this review evaluated the prevalence of Blastocystis among school children and adults from rural and urban areas; patients with comorbidities (pediatric, cancer, HIV, dengue patients, etc.); and high-risk groups such as prisoners, migrant workers, and animal handlers. A total of 9596 stool samples were collected as seen in the 26 included studies, with an overall Blastocystis prevalence of 17.6%. There were 338 samples that tested positive for ST3, 170 for ST1, 62 for ST2, 27 for ST4, 10 for ST5, 1 for ST6, and 10 for mixed ST.
Most of the studies (n = 18) investigated the prevalence of parasitic infections among individuals from rural areas [35,38,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. The prevalence of Blastocytis ranged from 1.1% to 83.7% in these areas. Eight of the 26 studies provided molecular characterization of Blastocystis subtypes using small subunit ribosomal (SSU rRNA) gene sequencing [15,35,42,44,45,61,62,63]. The remaining 17 studies used direct fecal microscopy as their gold-standard diagnostic method [35,38,41,43,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60].
Peninsular Malaysia comprises 11 states, and Blastocystis infection has been reported in most of the states. Only one study reported the prevalence of Blastocystis across various states in Malaysia [35]. The rest of the studies were conducted in specific locations in different states; ten were performed in Selangor [15,35,41,52,56,57,58,60,61,62,63], seven in Pahang [35,42,43,44,45,46,51,53,54,55], three in Perak [35,47,48,49], and one each in Kelantan [59], Terengganu, [50], and Negeri Sembilan [38].
Since 2009, more Malaysian studies have used PCR-based analysis, making statistics on the prevalence of Blastocystis subtypes available [61]. Based on PCR analyses, Pahang showed the highest prevalence of Blastocystis (48.4%), followed by Selangor (36.4%) (Figure 2). The sequence analysis of the Malaysian isolate’s SSU rRNA gene barcode region revealed six Blastocystis subtypes (Table 1). Most of the samples represented infections with a single subtype (ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4, ST5, or ST6). Among these, ST3 was the most prevalent Blastocystis subtype, seen in the most studies in Malaysia (54.7%, 338/618) (Figure 2). ST1 and ST3 were detected in most of the states in Malaysia including Selangor, Pahang, Perak, Johor, and Kedah. The ST6 subtype was the least prevalent (0.2%) and was reported in the state of Selangor among prisoners (Table 1). In the state of Perak and Selangor, the highest number of subtypes were identified, including ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4, and ST5. In the state of Pahang, four different subtypes were found, including ST1, ST2, ST3, and ST4. In the states of Kedah and Johor, three different subtypes were identified, including ST1, ST3, and ST4 (Figure 2).
The pooled prevalence was evaluated using the random-effect model with the Generalized Linear Mixed Model. The pooled prevalence was evaluated with different groupings on the basis of state, diagnosis method, and type of population (Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5, respectively). We observed that the pooled prevalence was highest in the state of Pahang with about 25% (95% CI: 17–35%) (Figure 3). The pooled prevalence was also notably high in high-risk populations, with about 27% (95% CI: 8–62%) with a wide confidence interval (Figure 4). The method of diagnosis was grouped into direct microscopy (DM) and PCR, in vitro cultivation, and direct stool smear (PID). Both DM and PID demonstrated a similar prevalence of 15% (95% CI: 9–25%) and 13% (95% CI: 9–19%), respectively (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Amidst a myriad of microorganisms inhabiting the gut flora, Blastocystis, the only stramenopile infecting humans [64], appears to be one of the most common protozoan parasites [65], with colonization reported as being as high as 100% in some developing countries [66]. Nine out of the at least 17 subgroups of this parasite that have been described by phylogenetic analysis were found in humans [11]. The ST3 isolate is responsible for the most human infections globally [27,67,68]. Numerous cases of Blastocystis infection have been documented in several Asian nations [69]. Although humans and a few other animal species were the most frequently reported hosts, this parasite have also been found in various water sources [70]. In addition, there have been studies showing foodborne transmission of this parasite [71]. One of the major risk factors for Blastocystis carriage appears to be the immunological status of the hosts. Populations with compromised immune systems are more vulnerable to Blastocystis carriage [72]. There have been many in vitro and in vivo studies associating Blastocystis with pathogenesis. Recently, Blastocystis has been associated with the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells in vitro [73], and exacerbation of colon carcinogenesis in infected Wistar rats has been shown [74]. To the contrary, most research on the gut microbiota has shown that Blastocystis is a typical component of the healthy gut microbiota, that it is linked to higher bacterial populations, and that chronic asymptomatic infection is typical [75].
Studies on the prevalence of Blastocystis in different states or populations in Malaysia have surfaced sporadically over the years. However, a systematic collection of such prevalence data and a statistical conclusion that could contribute to controlling and managing Blastocystis infection is unavailable. Thus, the present study has consolidated epidemiological data from different states and cohort groups to present an overview of Blastocystis infections and their subtype distributions in Peninsular Malaysia.
Numerous elements, including the immune health of the host, geographic regions, and host age and dietary habits, may impact the occurrence of Blastocystis infection. Moreover, the sensitivity of the screening methods used is another crucial variable that can have an impact on the prevalence rate. Wet mount smears have been used to identify Blastocystis as a gold-standard method in the majority of previous studies. This was carried out by looking for vacuolar, granular, amoebic, or cystic forms of the parasite in the stool samples microscopically [76]. However, detecting these parasites via this technique was made more difficult by the irregular shedding feature of Blastocystis [77]. Therefore, more advanced techniques such as molecular methods were utilized in recent studies [78,79]. The results obtained from this systematic review showed that some studies used only direct microscopy (DM) as their identification method whereas other studies used three different methods including PCR, in vitro cultivation, and direct stool smear (PID) in their studies. However, the prevalence rate of Blastocystis infection was almost similar using DM alone or with a combination of different diagnostic methods. Hence, it can be seen that direct microscopy is just as sensitive as other techniques like PCR. However, the molecular method was useful in various studies to identify genotype distributions.
Most of the prevalence studies included in this systematic review did not report specific gastrointestinal symptoms associated with Blastocystis. Two studies that were carried out among pediatric patients with gastrointestinal symptoms showed a low prevalence of Blastocystis of about only 4% [52,59]. In another study, both symptomatic and asymptomatic Blastocystis infection was reported among children from rural settings and aborigines from the state of Pahang [54]. Infection with Blastocystis was found to be significantly associated with gastrointestinal symptoms among these schoolchildren, with abdominal pain and diarrhea being the most common symptoms [46,54]. Similarly, abdominal discomfort was discovered to be the primary symptom in a study conducted in Switzerland that revealed high Blastocystis infection in symptomatic children [19]. Among aborigines of mixed ages, more people with Blastocystis infection were asymptomatic than symptomatic, and the symptoms primarily included fever and diarrhea [46]. Therefore, the pathogenic role of Blastocystis is still debatable [17]. Many clinical and epidemiological studies concluded that Blastocystis is a commensal organism and, when found, is probably not the cause of any clinical symptoms [25,80,81]. Whether Blastocystis exerts subliminal influence in a host is not known. Yet some studies have indicated an association between certain gastrointestinal symptoms and Blastocystis infection [19,20]. Moreover, several studies found a higher incidence of Blastocystis infection among immunocompromised individuals, including AIDS patients [18].
The inferred pooled prevalence of Blastocystis in the Malaysian population based on the 26 publications (43 datasets) was 14% (95% CI: 10–19%). Due to the unavailability of a previously published meta-analysis of Blastocytis infection in Malaysia, a direct comparison of our findings is not possible. Previously, a meta-analysis among the Iranian and Brazilian populations demonstrated a pooled prevalence of 9.1% (95% CI: 8.2–10.1%) in Iran [82] and 24% (95% CI: 22–27%) in Brazil [11]. The different detection methods or the differences in living conditions of the populations were likely the cause for these variations. Direct microscopy, PCR, and/or in vitro cultivation are often used in the detection of Blastocystis prevalence; however, in Malaysia, in vitro cultivation is the most common method.
The pooled prevalence based on state was highest in the states of Pahang and Terengganu (25%), followed by Selangor (15%), Perak (8%), Kedah (6%), and Johor (1%). Negeri Sembilan and Kelantan were excluded from the comparison, since only one prevalence study was reported in these states. Moreover, there are no reports on the prevalence of Blastocystis in Penang, Perlis, Melaka, Sabah, or Sarawak. Most of the studies were conducted in Selangor, with up to 17 datasets and 4543 samples. We found that the pooled prevalence of this state was 15% (95% CI: 8.0–25.0%). According to the Malaysian Department of Statistics (DOSM), Selangor is the most populous state and is regarded as an economic powerhouse, contributing a large portion of the nation’s gross domestic product. The maintenance of public health in this fast-industrialized state could drive more research interest. Also, the presence of established research institutes and universities in the region drives research activity, thus resulting in more scientific outputs. However, compared to Pahang, the prevalence of Blastocystis was lower in Selangor. This could be attributed to the higher socioeconomic development in Selangor, contributing to improved hygiene practices and sanitation. A recent study demonstrated that industrialization contributed to the influx of migration [83]. These researchers noted that the highest rural-to-urban migration rate in Malaysia was in Selangor. Thus, migration may be contributing to Selangor’s high Blastocystis prevalence despite its socioeconomic development. According to Rashid [83], Malaysia is still experiencing social landscape changes; thus, a continual increase in migration can be expected. The influx of foreign migrants is rising due to the increasing demand for factory workers in Selangor. These foreigners have been shown to have a high parasitic burden upon arrival in the country [62]. This observation implies the need for adequate support and planning in managing migration, especially involving foreign migrant workers and changes in the internal social landscape.
A previous epidemiological study across Malaysia showed that Blastocystis infection is more prevalent in the rural (13.7%) than in the urban population (3.4%) [35]. Similarly, in the present study, the pooled prevalence of Blastocystis in rural areas was higher than in the urban areas, i.e.,18.0% (95% CI: 11.0–27.0%) and 7.0% (95% CI: 13.0–21.0%), respectively (Figure 4). In rural areas, a higher Blastocystis prevalence was observed among indigenous individuals than Malay villagers. Among Orang Asli school children, a higher prevalence was found in Selangor and Pahang compared to Perak, even though the living conditions in both provinces are similar [47,48,51,53,54,56]. According to earlier studies, the disparity in prevalence is primarily caused by a wide range of risk factors for Blastocystis infections. Drinking water was reported to be the main source of Blastocystis infection among rural primary school children in Pahang [51]. In the past, it was discovered that the ingestion of unboiled water was associated with a high prevalence of Blastocystis infections in other countries [84,85]. In addition to drinking untreated water, the presence of other Blastocystis-infected family members was the main reason for the high prevalence of Blastocystis among indigenous people in Negeri Sembilan, Perak, and Pahang [38,41].
The high pooled prevalence of Blastocystis observed in Pahang and Terengganu may thus be due to their high rural population. In a recent report by DOSM, these states comprised a relatively high percentage of the rural population, i.e., 47.2% in Pahang and 35.8% in Terengganu. However, we also noted an imbalance in the number of reports and sample size based on states. Only one study reported on the urban and rural population in Terengganu by sampling 340 people [50]. In contrast, there were 11 studies with a total of 2886 samples in Pahang. Other states with limited or no reported data on Blastocystis infection may contribute to bias in conclusions. The high heterogeneity and the small number of studies also may impact the statistical power of these tests. Thus, more research is needed to determine the prevalence of Blastocystis in the various states in Malaysia.
Investigations of the prevalence of Blastocystis infections in Malaysia’s various communities have mostly been conducted in Peninsular Malaysia, but little is known about the prevalence and risk factors of the disease among general populations in Sabah and Sarawak. Between 2010 and 2015, the bulk of research on Blastocystis was carried out in Peninsular Malaysia and mostly involved school children, aborigines, and rural residents. Fewer studies were carried out among individuals from high-risk groups. High-risk-group individuals such as animal handlers, prisoners, and migrant workers are the most prone to contracting Blastocystis, i.e., at 27% (95% CI: 8.0–62.0%). Prisoners and migrant workers primarily exhibited nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms. Comparable outcomes were seen in food handlers and immigrant laborers who were routinely tested in Iran and Qatar, respectively, for Blastocystis [86,87]. Their studies proved that there was a risk of Blastocystis infection among those who worked closely with animals. In this systematic review, ten individuals with ST5 infection in a mixed population and one ST6 case in a prisoner were documented [63]. ST5 was found among school children from rural areas (n = 3), in a mixed-age population from urban areas (n = 6), and in a colorectal cancer patient (n = 1). Previously, these subtypes were associated with domestic animals [88,89]. In the past, ST6 was seen among chicken slaughterhouse workers in Lebanon [88], and ST5 was seen among pig handlers in Thailand [89]. Other subtypes, such as ST7–ST14, were also frequently found in domestic animals and wild animals in prior studies conducted in Malaysia and elsewhere [90,91] but were not observed in humans in our systematic review. The presence of ST5 and ST6 among various cohorts in Malaysia indicates zoonotic transmission, as these subtypes have been reported among the domestic animals [92].
The controversial pathogenic nature of Blastocystis prevents incriminating it as having a direct causative role in symptomatic cases. According to several studies, this parasite frequently leads to opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients, producing various gastrointestinal symptoms [61]. Migrant workers and prisoners live in close proximity, often overcrowded, with low sanitation levels; thus, they are continuously exposed to Blastocystis infection [62], leading to increased symptomatic infections in these populations. A similar finding was reported previously in Qatar whereby more than 70% newly arriving immigrant workers were detected positive for Blastocystis [87]. Similar to Qatar, once a worker in Malaysia receives a work permit, they are not required to go through any additional health inspections, unless they work in the food business, in which case an annual re-examination is required. Therefore, housekeepers and other migrant workers may act as a possible reservoir and point of infection for gastrointestinal infections among locals.
Our study corroborates other reports on the opportunistic nature of Blastocystis infection [93,94]. The pooled prevalence of 11% was seen in individuals who were comorbid with cancer, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and suffered from chronic diarrhea (Figure 4). Although these individuals were mainly from urbanized areas, the prevalence of Blastocystis was greater than in healthy urbanites, who had a pooled prevalence of 7%. Studies have previously reported the ability of Blastocystis to influence host immune responses by triggering inflammatory cytokines [95] and degradation of IgA [96]. The current understanding of opportunistic Blastocystis infection highlights its occurrence in immunocompromised individuals; however, the direct influence of this organism and the mechanism involved in its role as an opportunistic infection is still not understood.
Recent Blastocystis knowledge has evolved to identify subtype level differences [82] and even variations within subtypes [83]. The distribution of Blastocystis subtypes was based on reports from Selangor, Perak, Kedah, Pahang, and Johor. It comprises primarily ST3 (more than 50% prevalence), followed by ST1 (27.5%). The absence of subtype information in many studies restricts the complete elucidation of subtype distribution in Malaysia. Nevertheless, our finding parallels another study that showed ST3 as the predominant subtype in the Southeast Asia region [97] and in tropical underdeveloped nations [67,94,98]. Also, a prior study of patients in a Singaporean hospital found that Blastocystis ST3 was the most prevalent genotype isolated [99]. Similarly, ST3 was the most identified genotype among aborigines living in the state of Pahang and Perak. In contrast, in a study carried out in Brazil among an indigenous population, ST3 was found to be the least prevalent genotype [100]. According to reports, Blastocystis ST3 has a human origin as being part of healthy gut microbiota [25]. Detection of other subtypes such ST1, ST2, ST4, and ST5 in other states, particularly Selangor and Perak, shows the high possibility of zoonotic transmission. These STs have been previously commonly identified in zoo animals in France and Malaysia [101,102].
Subtype–symptom association is still unclear, and several studies have attempted to link pathogenicity to a specific Blastocystis subtype. A study by Nithyamathi et al. [35] found that ST3 is predominant in symptomatic infection. A more palatable explanation is that not all strains of a subtype are pathogenic and that subtype is not the sole factor influencing pathogenicity [103,104]. A recent study has demonstrated variation due to the source of isolation in a single subtype. This suggests the influence of the microenvironment on Blastocystis and its infection [105]. Hence, to understand the dynamics of Blastocystis infection and its association with pathogenesis, it is necessary to include subtype information in all future epidemiological studies.

5. Conclusions

Our study has provided a better understanding of the current Blastocystis epidemiology in Malaysia. Human infection has been reported in various states in Malaysia, mainly in Selangor, Pahang, and Perak. The overall prevalence is high (17.8%), with reports of up to 25%, especially in patients with comorbidities. There are six distinct subtypes of Blastocystis isolated from humans, with ST3 being the most prevalent. Although there is evidence of fecal–oral transmission of Blastocystis cysts, the precise means of transmission across the different hosts and/or between animals and people has not yet been proven. More research is needed to assess and understand the pathogenicity, mode of transmission, and host specificity of various Blastocystis subtypes. Currently, it is clear that there is a growing interest in studies related to Blastocystis and its pathogenesis. This interest is important for understanding the vast amount of information on the epidemiology and pathogenicity of this microorganism, which are as yet little known.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed8080415/s1, Table S1: Data extraction table.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.K. and M.A.; methodology, D.A.; software, A.R. and V.S.; validation, S.R.A., W.M.A. and V.K.; formal analysis, D.A. and V.S; investigation, A.R. and V.K; resources, M.A.; data curation, S.R.A.; writing—original draft preparation, V.K., M.A., D.A., A.R, W.MA. and S.R.A.; writing—review and editing, S.R.A.; visualization, V.K. and V.S; supervision, M.A.; project administration, W.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The full data supporting this systematic review are available in the included studies in the References section. The analyzed data presented in this study are available in Table S1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, H.; Yoon, Y. Etiological agents implicated in foodborne illness worldwide. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2021, 41, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, J.; Ding, W.; Li, Z.; Zhou, D.D.; Yang, P.; Wang, R.B.; Zheng, B.; Sheng, H.F.; Guan, Y.Y.; Xiao, N.; et al. From parasitic disease control to global health: New orientation of the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, China CDC. Acta Trop. 2020, 201, 105219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chelkeba, L.; Mekonnen, Z.; Alemu, Y.; Emana, D. Epidemiology of intestinal parasitic infections in preschool and school-aged Ethiopian children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Osafo, R.; Balali, G.I.; Amissah-Reynolds, P.K.; Gyapong, F.; Addy, R.; Nyarko, A.A.; Wiafe, P. Microbial and parasitic contamination of vegetables in developing countries and their food safety guidelines. J. Food Qual. 2022, 2022, 4141914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stenzel, D.; Boreham, P. Blastocystis hominis revisited. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 9, 563–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tan, K.S.; Singh, M.; Yap, E.H. Recent advances in Blastocystis hominis research: Hot spots in terra incognita. Int. J. Parasitol. 2002, 32, 789–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Skotarczak, B. Genetic diversity and pathogenicity of Blastocystis. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2018, 25, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Paniker, C.J.; Ghosh, S. Paniker’s Textbook of Medical Parasitology; JP Medical Ltd.: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ajjampur, S.S.; Tan, K.S. Pathogenic mechanisms in Blastocystis spp.—Interpreting results from in vitro and in vivo studies. Parasitol. Int. 2016, 65, 772–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Clark, C.G. Extensive genetic diversity in Blastocystis hominis. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1997, 87, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zanetti, A.D.S.; Malheiros, A.F.; De Matos, T.A.; Longhi, F.G.; Moreira, L.M.; Silva, S.L.; Castrillon, S.K.I.; Ferreira, S.M.B.; Ignotti, E.; Espinosa, O.A. Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. infection in several hosts in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kataki, M.M.; Tavalla, M.; Beiromvand, M. Higher prevalence of Blastocystis hominis in healthy individuals than patients with gastrointestinal symptoms from Ahvaz, southwestern Iran. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 65, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yakoob, J.; Abbas, Z.; Khan, R.; Tariq, K.; Awan, S.; Beg, M.A. Association of Helicobacter pylori and protozoal parasites in patients with chronic diarrhoea. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2018, 75, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kesuma, Y.; Firmansyah, A.; Bardosono, S.; Sari, I.P.; Kurniawan, A. Blastocystis ST-1 is associated with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhoea (IBS-D) in Indonesian adolescences. Parasite Epidemiol. Control 2019, 6, e00112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumarasamy, V.; Roslani, A.C.; Rani, K.U.; Govind, S.K. Advantage of using colonic washouts for Blastocystis detection in colorectal cancer patients. Parasit. Vectors 2014, 7, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Jiménez, P.A.; Jaimes, J.E.; Ramírez, J.D. A summary of Blastocystis subtypes in North and South America. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khorshidvand, Z.; Khazaei, S.; Amiri, M.; Taherkhani, H.; Mirzaei, A. Worldwide prevalence of emerging parasite Blastocystis in immunocompromised patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 152, 104615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumarasamy, V.; Anbazhagan, D.; Subramaniyan, V.; Vellasamy, S. Blastocystis sp., parasite associated with gastrointestinal disorders: An overview of its pathogenesis, immune modulation and therapeutic strategies. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 3172–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Légeret, C.; Rüttimann, C.; Furlano, R.I.; Ruf, T.; Poppert, S.; Fankhauser, H.; Köhler, H. Blastocystis in Swiss children: A practical approach. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2020, 179, 979–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Robles-Cabrera, M.X.; Maguiña, J.L.; Gonzales-Huerta, L.; Panduro-Correa, V.; Dámaso-Mata, B.; Pecho-Silva, S.; Navarro-Solsol, A.C.; Rabaan, A.A.; Rodríguez-Morales, A.J.; Arteaga-Livias, K. Blastocystis species and gastrointestinal symptoms in Peruvian adults attended in a public hospital. Infect. Chemother. 2021, 53, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yowang, A.; Tsaousis, A.D.; Chumphonsuk, T.; Thongsin, N.; Kullawong, N.; Popluechai, S.; Gentekaki, E. High diversity of Blastocystis subtypes isolated from asymptomatic adults living in Chiang Rai, Thailand. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 65, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Qi, M.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, R. Genetic diversity of Blastocystis in kindergarten children in southern Xinjiang, China. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maloney, J.G.; da Cunha, M.J.; Molokin, A.; Cury, M.C.; Santin, M. Next-generation sequencing reveals wide genetic diversity of Blastocystis subtypes in chickens including potentially zoonotic subtypes. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 2219–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Popruk, S.; Adao, D.E.V.; Rivera, W.L. Epidemiology and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in humans: A review. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 95, 105085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ramírez, J.D.; Sánchez, L.V.; Bautista, D.C.; Corredor, A.F.; Flórez, A.C.; Stensvold, C.R. Blastocystis subtypes detected in humans and animals from Colombia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 22, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Deng, L.; Chai, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhong, Z.; Hu, Y.; Fu, H.; Yue, C.; Peng, G. Epidemiology of Blastocystis sp. infection in China: A systematic review. Parasite 2019, 26, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Salehi, R.; Haghighi, A.; Stensvold, C.R.; Kheirandish, F.; Azargashb, E.; Raeghi, S.; Kohansal, C.; Bahrami, F. Prevalence and subtype identification of Blastocystis isolated from humans in Ahvaz, Southwestern Iran. Gastroenterol Hepatol. Bed. Bench 2017, 10, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Scanlan, P.D.; Stensvold, C.R.; Cotter, P.D. Development and application of a Blastocystis subtype-specific PCR assay reveals that mixed-subtype infections are common in a healthy human population. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 4071–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Osorio-Pulgarin, M.I.; Higuera, A.; Beltran-Álzate, J.C.; Sánchez-Jiménez, M.; Ramírez, J.D. Epidemiological and molecular characterization of Blastocystis infection in children attending daycare centers in Medellín, Colombia. Biology 2021, 10, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Souppart, L.; Moussa, H.; Cian, A.; Sanciu, G.; Poirier, P.; El Alaoui, H.; Delbac, F.; Boorom, K.; Delhaes, L.; Dei-Cas, E.; et al. Subtype analysis of Blastocystis isolates from symptomatic patients in Egypt. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 106, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Moosavi, A.; Haghighi, A.; Mojarad, E.N.; Zayeri, F.; Alebouyeh, M.; Khazan, H.; Kazemi, B.; Zali, M.R. Genetic variability of Blastocystis sp. isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in Iran. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 111, 2311–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ahmed, S.A.; El-Mahallawy, H.S.; Mohamed, S.F.; Angelici, M.C.; Hasapis, K.; Saber, T.; Karanis, P. Subtypes and phylogenetic analysis of Blastocystis sp. isolates from West Ismailia, Egypt. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 19084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aykur, M.; Calıskan Kurt, C.; Dirim Erdogan, D.; Biray Avcı, C.; Vardar, R.; Aydemir, S.; Girginkardesler, N.; Gunduz, C.; Dagci, H. Distribution and Phylogenetic Analysis of Subtypes and Alleles of Blastocystis sp. in the Stool Samples Collected from Patients with Gastrointestinal Complaints in İzmir, Turkey. Acta Parasitol. 2023, 68, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Abu, A.; Sutthikornchai, C.; Mahittikorn, A.; Koompapong, K.; Chiabchalard, R.; Arthan, D.; Soonthornworasiri, N.; Popruk, S. Prevalence and Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis Isolated from School-Aged Children in the Thai-Myanmar Border, Ratchaburi Province, Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nithyamathi, K.; Chandramathi, S.; Kumar, S. Predominance of Blastocystis sp. infection among school children in Peninsular Malaysia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0136709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, H.; Hao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhang, W.; Li, H.; Yang, F. The frequency and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in humans and domestic animals in households in Heilongjiang Province, China. Acta Trop. 2023, 240, 106844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rudzińska, M.; Kowalewska, B.; Kurpas, M.; Szostakowska, B. Rare occurrence of Blastocystis in pet animals and their owners in the Pomeranian Voivodeship in Poland in the light of literature data. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Anuar, T.S.; Ghani, M.K.A.; Azreen, S.N.; Salleh, F.M.; Moktar, N. Blastocystis infection in Malaysia: Evidence of waterborne and human-to-human transmissions among the Proto-Malay, Negrito and Senoi tribes of Orang Asli. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Asma, I.; Johari, S.; Sim, B.L.; Lim, Y.A. How common is intestinal parasitism in HIV-infected patients in Malaysia? Trop. Biomed. 2011, 28, 400–410. [Google Scholar]
  40. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; Group, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2010, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lai, K.P. Intestinal protozoan infections in Malaysia. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1992, 23, 578–586. [Google Scholar]
  42. Noradilah, S.A.; Moktar, N.; Anuar, T.S.; Lee, I.L.; Salleh, F.M.; Manap, S.N.A.A.; Nordin, A.; Mohtar, N.S.H.M.; Azrul, S.M.; Abdullah, W.O.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystosis in Malaysia: Does seasonal variation play an important role in determining the distribution and risk factors of Blastocystis subtype infections in the Aboriginal community? Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mohammad, N.A.; Al-Mekhlafi, H.M.; Moktar, N.; Anuar, T.S. Prevalence and risk factors of Blastocystis infection among underprivileged communities in rural Malaysia. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2017, 10, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mohammad, N.A.; Al-Mekhlafi, H.M.; Anuar, T.S. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolated from humans and associated animals in an indigenous community with poor hygiene in Peninsular Malaysia. Trop. Biomed. 2018, 35, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Mohammad, N.A.; Al-Mekhlafi, H.M.; Anuar, T.S. Genetic diversity of Blastocystis isolates from symptomatic and asymptomatic Orang Asli In Pahang, Malaysia. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. 2018, 49, 189–197. [Google Scholar]
  46. Noor Azian, M.Y.; San, Y.M.; Gan, C.C.; Yusri, M.Y.; Nurulsyamzawaty, Y.; Zuhaizam, A.H.; Maslawaty, M.N.; Norparina, I.; Vythilingam, I. Prevalence of intestinal protozoa in an aborigine community in Pahang, Malaysia. Trop. Biomed. 2007, 24, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Sinniah, B.; Sabaridah, I.; Soe, M.; Sabitha, P.; Awang, I.; Ong, G.; Hassan, A. Determining the prevalence of intestinal parasites in three Orang Asli (Aborigines) communities in Perak, Malaysia. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 29, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Gee, H.T.S.; Kamel, M.A.G. Intestinal protozoan infections of schoolchildren in an Aboriginal (Orang Asli) settlement in Perak, Malaysia. Int. Med. J. 2020, 27, 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hakim, S.L.; Gan, C.C.; Malkit, K.; Azian, M.N.; Chong, C.K.; Shaari, N.; Zainuddin, W.; Chin, C.N.; Sara, Y.; Lye, M.S. Parasitic infections among orang asli (aborigine) in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. 2007, 38, 415. [Google Scholar]
  50. Elyana, F.N.; Al-Mekhlafi, H.M.; Ithoi, I.; Abdulsalam, A.M.; Dawaki, S.; Nasr, N.A.; Atroosh, W.M.; Abd-Basher, M.H.; Al-Areeqi, M.A.; Sady, H. A tale of two communities: Intestinal polyparasitism among Orang Asli and Malay communities in rural Terengganu, Malaysia. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Abdulsalam, A.M.; Ithoi, I.; Al-Mekhlafi, H.M.; Ahmed, A.; Surin, J.; Mak, J.W. Drinking water is a significant predictor of Blastocystis infection among rural Malaysian primary schoolchildren. Parasitology 2012, 139, 1014–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Sinniah, B.; Rajeswari, B. Blastocystis hominis infection, a cause of human diarrhea. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1994, 25, 490–493. [Google Scholar]
  53. Abd Ghani, M.K.; Alharazi, T. Blastocystosis amongst the Orang Asli (Aborigine) schoolchildren at Pos Senderut, Pahang, Malaysia. Int. Med. J. 2016, 23, 639–640. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kamel, M.A.G.; Najah, F. Blastocystosis amongst the Orang Asli (Aborigine) schoolchildren at Pos Senderut, Kuala Lipis, Malaysia. Int. Med. J. 2021, 28, 217–219. [Google Scholar]
  55. Al-Delaimy, A.K.; Al-Mekhlafi, H.M.; Nasr, N.A.; Sady, H.; Atroosh, W.M.; Nashiry, M.; Anuar, T.S.; Moktar, N.; Lim, Y.A.L.; Mahmud, R. Epidemiology of intestinal polyparasitism among Orang Asli school children in rural Malaysia. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Adli, M.N.; Kamel, M.A.G. Blastocystosis amongst the Orang Asli (Aborigine) school children of SKTAR Kuala Kubu Bharu, Selangor, Malaysia. Int. Med. J. 2020, 27, 412–414. [Google Scholar]
  57. Salim, H.R.; Kumar, G.S.; Vellayan, S.; Mak, J.; Anuar, A.K.; Init, I.; Vennila, G.; Saminathan, R.; Ramakrishnan, K. Blastocystis in animal handlers. Parasitol. Res. 1999, 85, 1032–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Suresh, K.; Salim, H.R.; Jamaiah, I.; Anuar, A.K. Blastocystis hominis in high-rise flat dwellers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. 2001, 95, 377–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Menon, B.S.; Abdullah, M.S.; Mahamud, F.; Singh, B. Intestinal parasites in Malaysian children with cancer. J. Trop. Pediatr. 1999, 45, 241–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Thergarajan, G.; Kumar, S.; Bhassu, S.; Omar, S.F.B.S.; Rampal, S. Effect of Blastocystis sp. in dengue patients—Increase in the treatment cost and exacerbation of symptoms. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Tan, T.; Ong, S.; Suresh, K. Genetic variability of Blastocystis sp. isolates obtained from cancer and HIV/AIDS patients. Parasitol. Res. 2009, 105, 1283–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sahimin, N.; Meor Termizi, F.H.; Rajamanikam, A.; Mohd Nazri, N.A.; Govind, S.K.; Mohd Zain, S.N. Prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis among migrant workers from different working sectors in Peninsular Malaysia. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3555–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Angal, L.; Mahmud, R.; Samin, S.; Yap, N.J.; Ngui, R.; Amir, A.; Ithoi, I.; Kamarulzaman, A.; Lim, Y.A.L. Determining intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) in inmates from Kajang Prison, Selangor, Malaysia for improved prison management. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Arisue, N.; Hashimoto, T.; Yoshikawa, H.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakamura, G.; Nakamura, F.; Yano, T.A.; Hasegawa, M. Phylogenetic position of Blastocystis hominis and of stramenopiles inferred from multiple molecular sequence data. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2002, 49, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Scanlan, P.D.; Stensvold, C.R. Blastocystis: Getting to grips with our guileful guest. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 29, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. El Safadi, D.; Gaayeb, L.; Meloni, D.; Cian, A.; Poirier, P.; Wawrzyniak, I.; Delbac, F.; Dabboussi, F.; Delhaes, L.; Seck, M. Children of Senegal River Basin show the highest prevalence of Blastocystis sp. ever observed worldwide. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pandey, P.K.; Verma, P.; Marathe, N.; Shetty, S.; Bavdekar, A.; Patole, M.S.; Stensvold, C.R.; Shouche, Y.S. Prevalence and subtype analysis of Blastocystis in healthy Indian individuals. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 31, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gabrielli, S.; Furzi, F.; Sulekova, L.F.; Taliani, G.; Mattiucci, S. Occurrence of Blastocystis-subtypes in patients from Italy revealed association of ST3 with a healthy gut microbiota. Parasite Epidemiol. Control 2020, 9, e00134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nemati, S.; Reza Zali, M.; Johnson, P.; Mirjalali, H.; Karanis, P. Molecular prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Asia and Australia. J. Water Health 2021, 19, 687–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rauff-Adedotun, A.A.; Meor Termizi, F.H.; Shaari, N.; Lee, I.L. The Coexistence of Blastocystis spp. in Humans, Animals and Environmental Sources from 2010–2021 in Asia. Biology 2021, 10, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Noël, C.; Dufernez, F.; Gerbod, D.; Edgcomb, V.P.; Delgado-Viscogliosi, P.; Ho, L.C.; Singh, M.; Wintjens, R.; Sogin, M.L.; Capron, M. Molecular phylogenies of Blastocystis isolates from different hosts: Implications for genetic diversity, identification of species, and zoonosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Asghari, A.; Sadeghipour, Z.; Hassanipour, S.; Abbasali, Z.; Ebrahimzadeh-Parikhani, H.; Hashemzaei, M.; Alimardani, V.; Hatam, G. Association between Blastocystis sp. infection and immunocompromised patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 60308–60328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kumarasamy, V.; Kuppusamy, U.R.; Samudi, C.; Kumar, S. Blastocystis sp. subtype 3 triggers higher proliferation of human colorectal cancer cells, HCT116. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 3551–3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kumarasamy, V.; Kuppusamy, U.R.; Jayalakshmi, P.; Samudi, C.; Ragavan, N.D.; Kumar, S. Exacerbation of colon carcinogenesis by Blastocystis sp. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Deng, L.; Wojciech, L.; Gascoigne, N.R.J.; Peng, G.; Tan, K.S.W. New insights into the interactions between Blastocystis, the gut microbiota, and host immunity. PLoS Pathogens 2021, 17, e1009253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Basak, S.; Rajurkar, M.N.; Mallick, S.K. Detection of Blastocystis hominis: A controversial human pathogen. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vennila, G.; Suresh Kumar, G.; Khairul Anuar, A.; Rajah, S.; Saminathan, R.; Sivanandan, S.; Ramakrishnan, K. Irregular shedding of Blastocystis hominis. Parasitol. Res. 1999, 85, 162–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Öner, T.Ö.; Karabey, M.; Can, H.; Döşkaya, A.D.; Karakavuk, M.; Gül, A.; Gökmen, A.A. Molecular investigation of Blastocystis sp. and its subtypes in cancer patients under chemotherapy in Aegean region, Turkey. Acta. Trop. 2022, 233, 106577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wakid, M.H.; Aldahhasi, W.T.; Alsulami, M.N.; El-Kady, A.M.; Elshabrawy, H.A. Identification and genetic characterization of Blastocystis species in patients from Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kim, M.J.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, T.J.; Won, E.J. Gut microbiome profiles in colonizations with the enteric protozoa Blastocystis in Korean populations. Microorganisms 2021, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kim, M.J.; Won, E.J.; Kim, S.H.; Shin, J.H.; Chai, J.Y. Molecular detection and subtyping of human Blastocystis and the clinical implications: Comparisons between diarrheal and non-diarrheal groups in Korean populations. Korean J. Parasitol. 2020, 58, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Javanmard, E.; Niyyati, M.; Ghasemi, E.; Mirjalali, H.; Aghdaei, H.A.; Zali, M.R. Impacts of human development index and climate conditions on prevalence of Blastocystis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Trop. 2018, 185, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Leelayoova, S.; Siripattanapipong, S.; Thathaisong, U.; Naaglor, T.; Taamasri, P.; Piyaraj, P.; Mungthin, M. Drinking water: A possible source of Blastocystis spp. subtype 1 infection in schoolchildren of a rural community in central Thailand. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008, 79, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Lee, I.L.; Tan, T.C.; Tan, P.C.; Nanthiney, D.R.; Biraj, M.K.; Surendra, K.M.; Suresh, K.G. Predominance of Blastocystis sp. subtype 4 in rural communities, Nepal. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 110, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Rashid, M.F.A. Characteristics, trends and spatial distribution of urban migration in Malaysia: A case study of the Klang Valley region. UPLanD 2017, 2, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sharif, M.; Daryani, A.; Kia, E.; Rezaei, F.; Nasiri, M.; Nasrolahei, M. Prevalence of intestinal parasites among food handlers of Sari, Northern Iran. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. 2015, 57, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Abu-Madi, M.; Aly, M.; Behnke, J.M.; Clark, C.G.; Balkhy, H. The distribution of Blastocystis subtypes in isolates from Qatar. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Greige, S.; El Safadi, D.; Bécu, N.; Gantois, N.; Pereira, B.; Chabé, M.; Benamrouz-Vanneste, S.; Certad, G.; El Hage, R.; Chemaly, M.; et al. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. isolates from poultry in Lebanon and evidence of zoonotic potential. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Pintong, A.R.; Sunyanusin, S.; Prasertbun, R.; Mahittikorn, A.; Mori, H.; Changbunjong, T.; Komalamisra, C.; Sukthana, Y.; Popruk, S. Blastocystis subtype 5: Predominant subtype on pig farms, Thailand. Parasitol. Int. 2018, 67, 824–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Parkar, U.; Traub, R.J.; Vitali, S.; Elliot, A.; Levecke, B.; Robertson, I.; Geurden, T.; Steele, J.; Drake, B.; Thompson, R.C. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis isolates from zoo animals and their animal-keepers. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Sanggari, A.; Komala, T.; Rauff-Adedotun, A.A.; Awosolu, O.B.; Attah, O.A.; Farah Haziqah, M.T. Blastocystis in captivated and free-ranging wild animals worldwide: A review. Trop. Biomed. 2022, 39, 338–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mokhtar, A.; Youssef, A. Subtype analysis of Blastocystis spp. isolated from domestic mammals and poultry and its relation to transmission to their in-contact humans in Ismailia governorate, Egypt. Parasitol. United J. 2018, 11, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chandramathi, S.; Suresh, K.; Anita, Z.B.; Kuppusamy, U.R. Infections of Blastocystis hominis and microsporidia in cancer patients: Are they opportunistic? Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2012, 106, 267–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bednarska, M.; Jankowska, I.; Pawelas, A.; Piwczyńska, K.; Bajer, A.; Wolska-Kuśnierz, B.; Wielopolska, M.; Welc-Falęciak, R. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium, Blastocystis, and other opportunistic infections in patients with primary and acquired immunodeficiency. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 2869–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Puthia, M.K.; Lu, J.; Tan, K.S. Blastocystis ratti contains cysteine proteases that mediate interleukin-8 response from human intestinal epithelial cells in an NF-κB-dependent manner. Eukaryot. Cell 2008, 7, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Puthia, M.K.; Vaithilingam, A.; Lu, J.; Tan, K.S. Degradation of human secretory immunoglobulin A by Blastocystis. Parasitol. Res. 2005, 97, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Alfellani, M.A.; Stensvold, C.R.; Vidal-Lapiedra, A.; Onuoha, E.S.U.; Fagbenro-Beyioku, A.F.; Clark, C.G. Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop. 2013, 126, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Ben Abda, I.; Maatoug, N.; Ben Romdhane, R.; Bouhelmi, N.; Zallegua, N.; Aoun, K.; Viscogliosi, E.; Bouratbine, A. Prevalence and Subtype Identification of Blastocystis sp. in Healthy Individuals in the Tunis Area, Tunisia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017, 96, 202–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Wong, K.H.; Ng, G.C.; Lin, R.T.; Yoshikawa, H.; Taylor, M.B.; Tan, K.S. Predominance of subtype 3 among Blastocystis isolates from a major hospital in Singapore. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 102, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Malheiros, A.F.; Stensvold, C.R.; Clark, C.G.; Braga, G.B.; Shaw, J.J. Short report: Molecular characterization of Blastocystis obtained from members of the indigenous Tapirapé ethnic group from the Brazilian Amazon region, Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 85, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cian, A.; El Safadi, D.; Osman, M.; Moriniere, R.; Gantois, N.; Benamrouz-Vanneste, S.; Delgado-Viscogliosi, P.; Guyot, K.; Li, L.L.; Monchy, S.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis sp. in various animal groups from two French zoos and evaluation of potential zoonotic risk. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Lim, Y.A.; Ngui, R.; Shukri, J.; Rohela, M.; Mat Naim, H.R. Intestinal parasites in various animals at a zoo in Malaysia. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 157, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Wawrzyniak, I.; Poirier, P.; Viscogliosi, E.; Dionigia, M.; Texier, C.; Delbac, F.; Alaoui, H.E. Blastocystis, an unrecognized parasite: An overview of pathogenesis and diagnosis. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2013, 1, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Roberts, T.; Stark, D.; Harkness, J.; Ellis, J. Update on the pathogenic potential and treatment options for Blastocystis sp. Gut Pathog. 2014, 6, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Rajamanikam, A.; Hooi, H.S.; Kudva, M.; Samudi, C.; Govind, S.K. Distinct phenotypic variation of Blastocystis sp. ST3 from urban and Orang Asli population—An influential consideration during sample collection in surveys. Biology 2022, 11, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of the included studies.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of the included studies.
Tropicalmed 08 00415 g001
Figure 2. Blastocystis subtype distributions across various states in Peninsular Malaysia based on molecular studies.
Figure 2. Blastocystis subtype distributions across various states in Peninsular Malaysia based on molecular studies.
Tropicalmed 08 00415 g002
Figure 3. Forest plot of pooled prevalence of Blastocystis in 7 states of Peninsular Malaysia using a random-effects model and 95% CI.
Figure 3. Forest plot of pooled prevalence of Blastocystis in 7 states of Peninsular Malaysia using a random-effects model and 95% CI.
Tropicalmed 08 00415 g003
Figure 4. Forest plot of pooled prevalence of Blastocystis in various cohorts in Malaysia using a random-effects model and 95% CI.
Figure 4. Forest plot of pooled prevalence of Blastocystis in various cohorts in Malaysia using a random-effects model and 95% CI.
Tropicalmed 08 00415 g004
Figure 5. Forest plot of pooled prevalence of Blastocystis based on the method of diagnosis in Malaysia using a random-effects model and 95% CI.
Figure 5. Forest plot of pooled prevalence of Blastocystis based on the method of diagnosis in Malaysia using a random-effects model and 95% CI.
Tropicalmed 08 00415 g005
Table 1. Studies on the prevalence of Blastocystis in Malaysia.
Table 1. Studies on the prevalence of Blastocystis in Malaysia.
No. Year of StudyStatesMethods No. ExaminedNo. PositivePrevalence (%)Gastrointestinal SymptomsSubtypesAuthor/Year
ST1ST2ST3ST4ST5ST6MIXED
Rural population Rural population
1General population from rural area1982–1992 SelangorDM963565.8Asymptomatic Lai, 1992 [41]
2Aborigines 2014–2015PahangPID47319140.4Asymptomatic6327983000Noradilah et al., 2017 [42]
3Aborigines 2015PahangDM 25310340.7Asymptomatic Mohammad et al., 2017 [43]
4Aborigines 2016PahangPID2434518.5Asymptomatic147240000Mohammad et al., 2018 [44]
5Aborigines 2015PahangPID2537830.8Symptomatic & Asymptomatic147240000Mohammad et al., 2018 [45]
6Aborigines 2006PahangDM 1306852.3Asymptomatic Noor Azian et al., 2007 [46]
7Aborigines 2011PerakDM 7745.2Asymptomatic Sinniah et al., 2012 [47]
8Aborigines 2011Negeri SembilanDM 50010220.4Asymptomatic Anuar et al., 2013 [38]
9Aborigines 2018PerakDM 11621.7Asymptomatic Gee & Kamel, 2020 [48]
10Aborigines 2004PerakDM 24312.5Asymptomatic Hakim et al., 2007 [49]
11Aborigines 2014–2015TerengganuDM 1655734.5Asymptomatic Elyana et al., 2016 [50]
12Malays2014–2015TerengganuDM 1753117.7Asymptomatic Elyana et al., 2016 [50]
13Schoolchildren from rural area2012–2013PerakPID1885830.9Asymptomatic127325200Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
14Schoolchildren from rural area2012–2013JohorPID145106.9Asymptomatic2052000Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
15Schoolchildren from rural area2012–2013Selangor PID3493710.6Asymptomatic103221100Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
16Schoolchildren from rural area2012–2013PahangPID921112.1Asymptomatic2170000Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
17Schoolchildren from rural area2012–2013KedahPID148106.8Asymptomatic4041000Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
18Schoolchildren from rural area2010PahangDM 3007725.7Symptomatic & Asymptomatic Abdulsalam et al., 2012 [51]
19Schoolchildren from rural area1990Selangor DM 72981.1Asymptomatic Sinniah & Rajeswari, 1994 [52]
20Aborigine School Children2008PahangDM 3076521.2Asymptomatic Abd Ghani & Alharazi, 2016 [53]
21Aborigine School Children2014PahangDM 2086832.7Asymptomatic Kamel & Najah, 2021 [54]
22Aborigine School Children2012PahangDM 4987515.1Asymptomatic Al-Delaimy, 2014 [55]
23Aborigine School Children2017SelangorDM 927783.7Asymptomatic Adli & Kamel, 2020 [56]
Urban population Urban population
1General population from flats in city1998SelangorDM 1632817Asymptomatic Salim et al., 1999 [57]
2General population from flats in city1998SelangorDM 1872814.9Asymptomatic Suresh et al., 2001 [58]
3Schoolchildren from urban area2012–2013PerakPID1291814Asymptomatic50101000Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
4Schoolchildren from urban area2012–2013JohorPID15300Asymptomatic0000000Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
5Schoolchildren from urban area2012–2013Selangor PID380328.2Asymptomatic62173200Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
6Schoolchildren from urban area2012–2013PahangPID12986.2Asymptomatic3130100Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
7Schoolchildren from urban area2012–2013KedahPID4724.3Asymptomatic0020000Nithyamathi et al., 2016 [35]
8General population from urban area2010–2012SelangorPID221229.95Asymptomatic91260304Kumarasamy et al., 2014 [15]
Patients with comorbidities
1Children with diarrhea1990SelangorDM 11354.4Diarrhea Sinniah & Rajeswari, 1994 [52]
2Patients with chronic diarrhea1982–1992 SelangorDM 831619.3Diarrhea Lai, 1992 [41]
3Children with cancer1996–1997KelantanDM 5024Diarrhea Menon et al., 1999 [59]
4Dengue patients2015–2016SelangorPID892123.6Gastrointestinal symptoms Thergarajan et al., 2019 [60]
5Cancer patients2008SelangorPID311247.7Not reported31115000Tan et al., 2009 [61]
6HIV patients2008SelangorPID2474919.8Not reported2196000Tan et al., 2009 [61]
7Colorectal cancer patients2010–2012SelangorPID2044321.08Gastrointestinal symptoms6270106Kumarasamy et al., 2014 [15]
8Acute diarrhea and hospitalized2004PerakDM 2713.7Gastrointestinal symptoms Hakim et al., 2007 [49]
9Diarrhea but not hospitalized2004PerakDM 2428.3Gastrointestinal symptoms Hakim et al., 2007 [49]
High Risk Group
1Animal handlers1998SelangorDM1054341Not reported Salim et al., 1999 [57]
2Migrant workers2014–2015SelangorPID2126830.9Gastrointestinal symptoms82120000Sahimin et al., 2020 [62]
3Prisoners2012–2013SelangorPID2944314.6Gastrointestinal symptoms70250010Angal et al., 2015 [63]
PID: Detection of Blastocystis via PCR, in vitro cultivation, and direct stool smear. DM: Detection of Blastocystis via direct microscopy.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumarasamy, V.; Rajamanikam, A.; Anbazhagan, D.; Atroosh, W.M.; Azzani, M.; Subramaniyan, V.; Abdullah, S.R. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Epidemiology of Human Blastocystis spp. Infection in Malaysia. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8080415

AMA Style

Kumarasamy V, Rajamanikam A, Anbazhagan D, Atroosh WM, Azzani M, Subramaniyan V, Abdullah SR. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Epidemiology of Human Blastocystis spp. Infection in Malaysia. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023; 8(8):415. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8080415

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumarasamy, Vinoth, Arutchelvan Rajamanikam, Deepa Anbazhagan, Wahib Mohammed Atroosh, Meram Azzani, Vetriselvan Subramaniyan, and Syamsa Rizal Abdullah. 2023. "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Epidemiology of Human Blastocystis spp. Infection in Malaysia" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 8, no. 8: 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8080415

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop