Next Article in Journal
What Do You Need to Know before Studying Chagas Disease? A Beginner’s Guide
Previous Article in Journal
Overlapping Infection by Strongyloides spp. and Cytomegalovirus in the Immunocompromised Host: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Seropositivity of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii and Anti-Neospora caninum Antibodies in Cattle Intended for Human Consumption in an Amazonian Area of North Brazil

by
Victor Hugo Alves Sousa Formiga
1,
Felipe Boniedj Ventura Alvares
1,
Mariana Moreira Anjos
2,
Jefferson Vieira Freitas
2,
Daiane Peixer Silva
2,
Roberta Nunes Parentoni
3,
Arthur Willian Lima Brasil
3,
Gláucia Diojânia Azevêdo Medeiros
1,
Thais Ferreira Feitosa
1 and
Vinícius Longo Ribeiro Vilela
1,*
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Instituto Federal da Paraíba—IFPB, Sousa 58807-630, Paraíba, Brazil
2
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal de Rondônia—UNIR, Rolim de Moura 76940-000, Rondônia, Brazil
3
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa 58059-900, Paraíba, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8(7), 359; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8070359
Submission received: 1 June 2023 / Revised: 6 July 2023 / Accepted: 7 July 2023 / Published: 10 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum are obligate intracellular intestinal coccidia distributed worldwide, and are causative agents of toxoplasmosis and neosporosis, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anti-T. gondii and anti-N. caninum antibodies and the factors associated with infections in beef cattle intended for human consumption in an Amazonian area of North Brazil. We collected blood samples of 387 cattle from 50 herds located in different municipalities of the State of Rondônia. An epidemiological questionnaire was distributed to farmers, with regard to nutritional, sanitary and reproductive herd management. The samples were identified, refrigerated and sent for serological analyses via IFAT (Immunofluorescent Antibody Test). Among the 387 analyzed animals, 91 (23.5%; CI 95%: 18.8–27.2) were positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies, with titers varying from 1:64 (75.8%) to 1:512 (2.2%). For anti-N. caninum antibodies, only four animals (1%; CI 95%: 0–2.7) were positive, with titers ranging from 1:400 (50%) to 1:1600 (25%). We observed a significant rate of anti-T. gondii antibodies in the variables “pure breed” and “contact with free-range chickens” (p < 0.2). There were no risk factors associated with the presence of anti-T. gondii or anti-N. caninum antibodies. In conclusion, there was a high prevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in beef cattle intended for human consumption in the State of Rondônia, Brazil, and a low prevalence of anti-N. caninum antibodies. Longitudinal studies can better elucidate the cause of these prevalence levels and how they could be better prevented and controlled.

1. Introduction

Cattle farming constitutes one of the primary economic activities in Brazil, playing a significant role in its economy. As reported by ABIEC [1], the beef cattle industry in Brazil made a substantial contribution to the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020, accounting for 10% of the total. This was achieved through the slaughter of 41.5 million heads, yielding an impressive 10.32 million tons of meat, valued at approximately USD 150.37 billion. Consequently, Brazil has secured its position as the second-largest beef producer globally. Notably, the North Region of Brazil, as documented by IBGE [2], has experienced a noteworthy surge in its cattle population, boasting a remarkable increase of 5.5%. The region’s total cattle population now stands at 52.4 million heads, with particular prominence observed in the States of Pará (22.2 million) and Rondônia (14.8 million).
In the North Region of Brazil, beef cattle ranching predominantly adopts an extensive system, whereby efforts are being made by producers to mitigate deforestation and promote sustainable livestock practices on more productive pastures within the Amazon region [3]. The productivity of Brazilian herds is influenced by multiple factors, including seasonal fluctuations in pasture availability, nutritional deficiencies, suboptimal management practices and the prevalence of parasites [4,5]. The presence of parasites, in particular, significantly hampers productive rates and reproductive performance, and leads to involuntary culling and increased mortality rates [6].
Among the parasites that infect cattle, two prominent species are Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum, which are obligate intracellular coccidia responsible for causing toxoplasmosis and neosporosis, respectively. T. gondii primarily utilizes felids, particularly domestic cats, as definitive hosts, where it undergoes its sexual phase. During this phase, immature oocysts are excreted in the feces, and upon sporogony, they transform into infectious sporulated oocysts, which can be ingested by cattle and other intermediate hosts [7]. Although cattle exhibit natural resistance to these infections, the presence of T. gondii in bovine tissues highlights the significance of this infection and the potential for transmission to humans [8]. As for N. caninum, canids, both domestic and wild, are recognized as definitive hosts and play a crucial role in neosporosis transmission by shedding immature oocysts in their feces [9]. Nonetheless, the transplacental route is considered the primary mode of N. caninum transmission in cattle, leading to abortion and neonatal mortality. The endogenous route also holds importance in maintaining the parasite within cattle herds [7,10,11,12]. While neosporosis is not classified as a zoonosis, the presence of the parasite’s DNA in human umbilical cord blood, as reported by Duarte et al. [13], indicates its potential for vertical transmission and suggests the possibility of human infection.
Toxoplasmosis and neosporosis have a global distribution [10]. In Brazil, studies have revealed varying frequencies of anti-T. gondii antibodies in cattle, ranging from 1% to 89% [8]. However, there is a scarcity of epidemiological studies on T. gondii infections in cattle, specifically in the North Region of Brazil. In the State of Rondônia, the only conducted study reported a prevalence of 5.3% [14]. Regarding neosporosis, seroprevalence percentages ranging from 9.5% to 11.2% were observed in the State of Rondônia [15]. Given the significance of beef cattle ranching in the North Region, particularly in Rondônia, the zoonotic potential of bovine toxoplasmosis and the limited information available on the infection rates of T. gondii and N. caninum in cattle, the present study aimed to describe the prevalence of antibodies against these parasites and explore associated factors in cattle intended for human consumption.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Sampling

We used cattle serological samples from a slaughterhouse with Federal Inspection Service in the municipality of Cacoal, State of Rondônia, between February and May of 2019. To determine the minimum sample number to be used, simple random sampling was applied, as recommended by Thrusfield [16]:
n = z 2 × P 1 P d 2
where:
n = number of cattle selected;
z = normal distribution value for the 95% confidence level;
P = expected prevalence of 50%;
d = 5% sampling error.
To perform adjustments for finite populations, the following formula was applied:
n a j u s = N × n N + n
where:
najus = adjusted sample size;
N = total population size;
n = initial sample size.

2.2. Sample Population

We selected 387 cattle aged up to 24 months, from 50 different herds. The collections were conducted during 10 visits to the slaughterhouse and, in each visit, blood samples of approximately 39 animals were collected via external jugular venepuncture. Animal selection was based on systematic sampling, through which one sample was collected from every four slaughter animals. The samples were identified and stored at −20 °C until serological analyses.

2.3. Serological Analyses

The analyses were performed by the Laboratory of Immunology and Infectious Diseases (LIID), at the Instituto Federal da Paraíba (IFPB), Sousa campus, through immunofluorescence antibody tests (IFATs). To detect anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies, according to Camargo [17], tachyzoites of the ME-49 strain were used as antigens fixed in slides, with a cut-off of 1:64 [18]. To anti-N. caninum IgG antibodies, according to Gondim et al. [19], tachyzoites of the Nc-1 strain were used as antigens fixed on slides, with a cut-off of 1:200 [20]. The conjugate (anti-bovine IgG, labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate, Sigma®, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used at a 1:700 dilution in pH 7.2 phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) containing 0.01% Evans blue. Positivity was confirmed when tachyzoites showed total peripheral fluorescence. Positive samples were submitted to two-fold sequential dilutions to determine the antibody titration.

2.4. Epidemiological Questionnaire

We consulted owners’ registers at the Agência de Defesa Sanitária Agrosilvopastoril de Rondônia (IDARON) to contact participants and distribute the epidemiological questionnaire, aiming to assess of possible risk factors associated with the positivity of anti-T. gondii and anti-N. caninum antibodies. The variables and categories were the management system (intensive, semi-intensive or extensive); type of exploitation (meat, milk or mixed); type of milking (manual or mechanical); number of milkings per day (none, once a day or twice a day); presence of other animal species (cattle, horses, goats/sheep, pigs, poultry, dogs or cats); presence of wildlife (yes or no); occurrences of miscarriages during the last 12 months (yes or no); presence of rodents (yes or no); use of rodent control (yes or no); feeding on native pasture (yes or no); water source (drinking troughs or watering points); animal purchases (yes or no); pasture rental (yes or no); presence of flooded areas (yes or no); presence of maternity pens (yes or no); separation of young from adult animals (yes or no); and presence of veterinary assistance (yes or no).

2.5. Statistical Analyses

To assess the association between the variables from the epidemiological questionnaire and the results of the serological analyses, a Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was conducted. Variables with a p-value ≤ 0.2 were selected for further analysis through robust Poisson regression in a multivariate model. To examine potential collinearity among the data, a correlation test was performed. If the correlation coefficient exceeded 0.9, one of the variables was removed based on biological plausibility criteria [21]. To evaluate the adequacy of the model, the Chi-square parameters and an Omnibus test were employed. The multivariate analysis was conducted at a significance level of 5% using SPSS version 23.0 software.

3. Results

Among the 387 animals analyzed, 23.5% (91/387; 95% CI: 18.8–27.2) tested positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies, with titrations ranging from 1:64 to 1:512. The seroprevalence of N. caninum was 1% (4/387; 95% CI: 0–2.7), with titrations ranging from 1:400 to 1:1600. Two animals (0.5%) tested positive for both infections (Table 1).
Among the 50 analyzed herds, 37 (74%) had at least one animal positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies. In two herds (4%), there were animals positive for anti-N. caninum antibodies, both of which were also positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies. The geographical locations and seropositivity status are shown in Figure 1.
From the univariate analysis, the significant variables (p ≤ 0.2) associated with T. gondii infections are presented in Table 2. However, no risk factors for animal infection were identified through multiple logistic regression. For N. caninum infections, no significant variables were found in the univariate analysis, indicating the absence of associated risk factors.

4. Discussion

The observed prevalence of 23.5% for anti-T. gondii antibodies was similar to that in studies conducted in South Brazil, where the prevalence rates were 29.1% in the State of Santa Catarina [22], 26% in the State of Paraná [23] and 17.4% in the State of Rio Grande do Sul [24]. In Southeast Brazil, specifically in the State of São Paulo, the prevalence was reported as 18% [25]. In Northeast Brazil, in the State of Paraíba, the prevalence was also 18% [26]. On the other hand, states closer to Rondônia showed higher prevalence percentages. For example, in Pará, located in North Brazil, the prevalence was 54.4% [18], while in Mato Grosso, in the Midwest region, it reached 71% [27]. In the eastern region of Rondônia, Souza et al. [14] reported a prevalence of 5.3%. It is important to note that the comparison of data can vary due to the use of different serological tests, variations in age, differences in sanitary management practices and regional factors that may contribute to the parasites’ life cycle, thereby increasing their transmission within herds.
The observed prevalence of anti-N. caninum antibodies was 1% (4/387). In Brazil, seropositivity values vary from 2.45% in the State of Mato Grosso [28] to 91.5% in the State of Minas Gerais [29]. In a previous study, the seroprevalence of N. caninum in the State of Rondônia was 10.4% [30], albeit using a lower cut-off of 1:25. This discrepancy in results could be attributed to differences in the diagnostic method protocols. It is important to note that lower cut-offs may result in an increased number of false-positive samples. Although there are debates about the ideal cut-off for the diagnosis of anti-T. gondii positivity in cattle, the most commonly used threshold is 1:200, which is considered more reliable [31,32,33,34].
The most frequent titers of anti-T. gondii antibodies were 1:64 (75.8%) and 1:128 (15.4%). Similar results were reported by Carmo et al. [35], who observed mostly low titers of 1:64 (55.2%) and 1:128 (33.5%). Cattle with low antibody titers may be in the chronic phase and could harbor viable cysts of the parasite in their tissues [36,37]. This phenomenon occurs because during acute infection, the immune response of the animal primarily involves CD4 Th1 cells targeting T. gondii tachyzoites. These tachyzoites then transform into bradyzoites and form cysts in a latent form to evade the immune system. Subsequently, a shift in the immune response occurs, leading to the predominance of CD4 Th2 cells, which aim to produce antibodies. As time progresses, antibody titers gradually decline to baseline levels since the body no longer requires the production of large quantities of antibodies [37,38].
Tissue cysts can remain viable for an indefinite period, representing the final stage in intermediate hosts, such as cattle [8]. It is important to note that meat from farmed animals is one of the primary sources of T. gondii infections in humans. However, the isolation of the parasite from cattle’s tissues is hindered by their strong resistance to infection. As beef is often consumed undercooked, it can pose a risk to the human population [8,39,40].
There was also a predominance of low titers of anti-N. caninum antibodies in the evaluated animals. In two animals, the titers were ≥1:800, which, according to Dubey [41], correspond to active infections, demonstrating that N. caninum is infecting cattle in the region, albeit in only 4% (2/50) of the evaluated herds.
The variable “contact with free-range chicken” showed significance in infection with T. gondii (p ≤ 0.05). Rizzo et al. [42] also reported an increased risk of T. gondii infection in sheep, associated with the presence of birds. Birds can attract hunting cats, which may subsequently excrete oocysts into the environment. According to Santos et al. [27], a single feline can shed and contaminate the environment with millions of oocysts. The cattle used in this study were raised under extensive management in a region surrounded by extensive forested areas. Therefore, the role of wild felines as potential transmitters of the parasite becomes noteworthy, particularly considering that 74% (37/50) of the assessed herds had at least one animal testing positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies.
Similarly, Chiebao et al. [43] conducted a survey to identify potential variables influencing the prevalence of N. caninum, and found that raising domestic poultry was a factor associated with infection in herds. Additionally, Rodrigues et al. [44] stated that domestic avians can serve as reliable indicators of the presence of T. gondii oocysts in the soil, making them valuable sentinel animals, particularly in areas with a high prevalence. This association can be attributed to the natural behavior of these animals, as they can mechanically transport oocysts from the environment to cattle’s food and water sources, thereby facilitating their dissemination.
The variable “pure breed” was selected in the univariate analysis of T. gondii infection (p ≤ 0.2). Biologically, there is limited understanding of the factors that could explain the correlation between purebred animals and T. gondii infections. Consistent with our own findings, Garcia et al. [45] observed a higher risk of toxoplasmosis infection among purebred Holstein cattle compared to crossbred animals. Similarly, Snak and Osaki [46] reported a significant association between purebred Jersey cows and seropositivity for anti-N. caninum, a pathogen similar to T. gondii. These observations highlight the potential influence of breed characteristics on susceptibility to these infections.

5. Conclusions

These study findings suggest a high prevalence of T. gondii infections among beef cattle in the Amazonian region of Rondônia, North Brazil. Considering the zoonotic nature of the parasite, the importance of cattle infections in the transmission of toxoplasmosis to humans should not be underestimated. However, the observed prevalence of N. caninum was relatively low. Conducting longitudinal studies would contribute to a better understanding of the factors influencing these prevalence values and aid in the development of more effective prevention and control measures.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of this study. Material preparation, data collection and analyses were carried out by V.H.A.S.F., F.B.V.A., M.M.A., J.V.F., D.P.S., R.N.P., A.W.L.B., G.D.A.M., T.F.F. and V.L.R.V. The first version of the manuscript was written by V.H.A.S.F. and V.L.R.V., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This paper was reviewed by the Ethics Committee on the use of animals of the Federal University of Rondônia—UNIR, n◦ 98/2018.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ABIEC. Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carnes. Perfil da Pecuária no Brasil. 2021. Available online: http://abiec.com.br/publicacoes/beef-report-2021/ (accessed on 7 May 2023).
  2. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Pecuária Municipal. 2020. Available online: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/agricultura-e-pecuaria/9107-producao-da-pecuaria-municipal.html?edicao=31709&t=resultados (accessed on 7 May 2023).
  3. Dias-Filho, M.B. Manejo Profissional da Pastagem: Fundamento para uma Pecuária Empresarial; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental: Belém, PA, USA, 2017; Available online: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/1069803 (accessed on 7 May 2023).
  4. Alves, D.P.; Santiliano, F.C.; Almeida, B.R. Epidemiologia das helmintoses gastrointestinais em bovinos. PUBVET 2012, 6, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Oliveira, P.A.; Ruas, J.L.; Riet-Correa, F.; Coelho, A.C.B.; Santos, B.L.; Marcolongo-Pereira, C.; Sallis, E.S.V.; Schild, A.L. Doenças parasitarias em bovinos e ovinos no sul do Brasil: Frequência e estimativa de perdas econômicas. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2017, 37, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Stotzer, E.S.; Lopes, L.B.; Eckstein, C.; de Moraes, M.C.; Rodrigues, D.S.; Bastianetto, E. Impacto econômico das doenças parasitárias na pecuária. Uma Revisão. Rev. Bras. Hig. San. Anim. 2014, 8, 198–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stelzer, S.; Basso, W.; Silván, J.B.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Maksimov, P.; Gethmann, J.; Conraths, F.J.; Schares, G. Toxoplasma gondii infection and toxoplasmosis in farm animals: Risk factors and economic impact. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 12, e00037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gomes, D.F.C.; Krawczak, F.S.; Oliveira, C.H.S.; Ferreira Júnior, Á.; Fernandes, É.K.K.; Lopes, W.D.Z.; Sevá, A.P.; Genari, S.M. Toxoplasma gondii in cattle in Brazil: A review. Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 29, e015719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Silva, S.S.; Oliveira, L.V.S.; Oliveirar, R.R.A.; Alcântara, E.T.; Oliveira, P.R.F.; Brasil, A.W.L.; Rinaldo Aparecido Mota, R.A.; Feitosa, T.F.; Vilela, V.L.R. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Neospora caninum infectionin dogs of rural areas of the Brazilian Semi-arid Region. Acta Vet. Brasilica. 2020, 14, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lindsay, D.S.; Dubey, J.P. Neosporosis, Toxoplasmosis, and Sarcocystosis in Ruminants: An Update. Vet. Clin. Food. Anim. 2020, 36, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oliveira, C.M.; Andresa dos Santos Veras, A.S.; Coury, L.F.F.; Bessa, L.A.; Miranda, R.L.; Souza, M.A.; Castro, J.R. Situação da neosporose na bovinocultura brasileira. PUBVET 2020, 14, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Souza, G.G.; Amatti, L.Z.; Garcia, L.V.; Costa, L.R.; Minutti, A.F.; Martins, T.A.; Bogado, A.L.G.; Ignácio, F.S.; Almeida, B.F.M.; Garcia, J.L.; et al. Neospora caninum infection and reproductive problems in dairy cows from Brazil: A case-control study. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2022, 28, 100683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Duarte, P.O.; Oshiro, L.M.; Zimmermann, N.P.; Csordas, B.G.; Dourado, D.M.; Barros, J.C.; Andreotti, R. Serological and molecular detection of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in human umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Souza, J.B.R.; Soares, V.E.; Maia, M.O.; Pereira, C.M.; Ferraudo, A.S.; Cruz, B.C.; Gonçalves Junior, W.A.; Costa, A.J.; Lopes, W.D.Z. Spatial distribution and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity in cattle slaughtered for human consum tion in Rondônia, North region, Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 226, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Cerqueira-Cézar, C.K.; Calero-Bernal, R.; Dubey, J.P.; Gennari, S.M. All about neosporosis in Brazil. Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 26, 253–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Thrusfield, M. Veterinary Epidemiology; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. Camargo, M.E. Improvised technique of indirect immunofluorescence for serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. 1964, 6, 117–118. [Google Scholar]
  18. Silva, J.B.; Nicolino, R.R.; Fagundes, G.M.; Bomjardim, H.A.; Reis, A.S.B.; Lima, D.H.S.; Oliveira, C.M.C.; Barbosa, J.D.; Fonseca, A.H. Serological survey of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in cattle (Bos indicus) and water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in ten provinces of Brazil. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 52, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gondim, L.F.P.; Sartor, I.F.; Hasegawa, M.; Yamane, I. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in dairy cattle in Bahia, Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 1999, 86, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Amaral, R.L.G.; Silva, L.B.G.; Pinheiro Júnior, J.W.; Souza Neto, O.L.; Leal, C.A.S.; Porto, W.J.N.; Barbosa, J.M.P.; Mota, R.A. Neospora caninum em bovinos em matadouros de Pernambuco e Alagoas. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2012, 32, 963–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dohoo, I.R.; Ducrot, C.; Fourichon, C.; Donald, A.; Hurnik, D. An overview of techniques for dealing with large numbers of independent variables in epidemiologic studies. Prevent. Vet. Med. 1996, 29, 221–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Macedo, M.F.S.B.; Macedo, C.A.B.; Barros, L.D.; Martins, G.F.; Sandeski, L.M.; Zulpo, D.L.; Cunha, I.A.L.; Taroda, A.; Cardim, S.T.; Garcia, J.L. Serum occurrence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dairy cows slaughtered in an abattoir for human consume. Ciência Rural. 2012, 42, 1065–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ogawa, L.; Freire, R.L.; Vidotto, O.; Gondim, L.F.P.; Navarro, I.T. Occurrence of antibodies to Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in dairy cattle from the northern region of the Paraná State, Brazil. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2005, 57, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Santos, L.M.J.F.; Damé, M.C.F.; Cademartori, B.G.; Cunha Filho, N.A.; Farias, N.A.R.; Ruas, J.L. Ocorrência de anticorpos para Toxoplasma gondii em bubalinos e bovinos de corte no Rio Grande do Sul, sul do Brasil. Acta Parasita. 2013, 58, 334–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Costa, G.H.N.; Costa, A.J.; Lopes, W.D.Z.; Bresciani, K.D.S.; Santos, T.R.; Esper, C.R.; Santana, Á.E. Toxoplasma gondii: Infection natural congenital in cattle and an experimental inoculation of gestating cows with oocysts. Exp Parasitol. 2011, 127, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Maia, A.R.A.; Bezerra, R.A.B.; Silva, S.S.; Alvares, F.B.V.; Santos, C.S.A.B.; Alves, C.J.; Clementino, I.J.; Feitosa, T.F.; Vilela, V.L.R.; Azevedo, S.S. Herd-level based seroprevalence and associated factors for Toxoplasma gondii in cows in the state of Paraíba, Northeastern Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2023, 32, e017222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Santos, T.R.; Costa, A.J.; Toniollo, G.H.; Luvizotto, M.C.R.; Benetti, A.H.; Santos, R.R.; Matta, D.H.; Lopes, W.D.Z.; Oliveira, J.A.; Oliveira, G.P. Prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dairy cattle, dogs, and humans from the Jauru micro-region, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 161, 324–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rodrigues, R.S.; Igarashi, M.; Muraro, L.S.; Gomes, A.H.B.; Aguiar, D.M.; Pacheco, T.A.; Okano, W.; Barros, M.P.; Santos, M.D. The occurrence of anti-Neospora caninum in bovine female animals and bovine fetuses in Nossa Senhora do Livramento County, Mato Grosso. Semin. Ciências Agrárias. 2016, 37, 4161–4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Guedes, M.H.P.; Guimarães, A.M.; Rocha, C.M.B.M.; Hirsch, C. Frequência de anticorpos anti-Neospora caninum em vacas e fetos provenientes de municípios do sul de Minas Gerais. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2008, 17, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Aguiar, D.M.; Cavalcante, G.T.; Rodrigues, A.A.R.; Labruna, M.B.; Camargo, L.M.A.; Camargo, E.P.; Gennari, S.M. Prevalence of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle and dogs from Western Amazon, Brazil, in association with some possible risk factors. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 142, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sartor, I.F.; Hasegawa, M.Y.; Canavessi, A.M.O.; Pinckney, R.D. Ocorrence of Neospora caninum antibody in dairy cows assayed by ELISA and IFAT from Avaré county, SP. Semin. Ciências Agrárias. 2003, 24, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Martins, N.É.X.; Freschi, C.R.; Baptista, F.; Machado, R.Z.; Freitas, F.L.C.; Almeida, K.S. Ocorrência de anticorpos anti-Neospora caninum em vacas lactantes do município de Araguaína, Estado do Tocantins, Brasil. Rev. Patolog. Trop. 2011, 40, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lorenzentt, M.P.; Lucca, N.J.; Henker, L.C.; Machado, G.; Gomes, D.C.; Mendes, R.E.; Driemeier, D.; Casagrande, R.A. Ocorrência de anticorpos anti-Neospora caninum em bovinos leiteiros no oeste do estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Med. Vet. 2016, 38, 243–249. [Google Scholar]
  34. Brilhante, A.B.C.; Beloti, L.J.; Bonuti, M.R. Determination and correlation of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in dairy cattle and dogs from the microregion of Fernandópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Res. Soc. Dev. 2022, 11, e6011527853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Carmo, E.L.; Morais, R.A.P.B.; Lima, M.S.; Moraes, C.C.G.; Albuquerque, G.R.; Silva, A.V.; Póvoa, M.M. Anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in beef cattle slaughtered in the metropolitan region of Belém, Brazilian Amazon. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2017, 26, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Daguer, H.; Vicente, R.T.; Costa, T.; Virmond, M.P.; Hamann, W.; Amendoeira, M.R.R. Seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in cattle and slaughterhouse workers in the region of Pato Branco, Paraná, Brazil. Ciência Rural. 2004, 34, 1133–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  38. Khan, I.A.; Ouellette, C.; Chen, K.; Moretto, M. Toxoplasma: Immunity and Pathogenesis. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2019, 6, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Duarte, P.O.; Oshiro, L.M.; Dittrich, R.L.; Andreotti, R. Toxoplasmose na Cadeia Produtiva da Carne; Embrapa Gado de Corte: Brasília, DF, USA, 2018; Available online: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/1096471 (accessed on 7 May 2023).
  40. Dubey, J.P.; Lago, E.G.; Gennari, S.M.; Su, C.; Jones, J.L. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: High prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology 2012, 139, 375–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dubey, J.P. Recent advances in Neospora and Neosporosis. Vet. Parasitol. 1999, 84, 349–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rizzo, H.; Villalobos, E.M.C.; Meira Júnior, E.B.S.; Marques, E.C.; Beraldi, F.; Gregory, L. Ocorrência de anticorpos anti-Toxoplasma gondii e anti-Neospora caninum em ovinos com distúrbios reprodutivos e fatores de risco. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2018, 38, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chiebao, D.P.; Valadas, S.Y.O.B.; Minervino, A.H.H.; Castro, V.; Romaldini, A.H.C.N.; Calhau, A.S.; Souza, R.A.B.; Gennari, S.M.; Keid, L.B.; Soares, R.M. Variables Associated with Infections of Cattle by Brucella abortus., Leptospira spp. and Neospora spp. In Amazon Region in Brazil. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2015, 62, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rodrigues, N.J.L.; Manzini, S.; Pereira, J.K.F.; Cruz, T.S.; Bertozzo, T.V.; Moraes, G.N.; Abbade, J.F.; Langoni, H. Updates and standards of human and animal toxoplasmosis. Vet. Zootec. 2022, 29, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Garcia, L.J.; Navarro, I.T.; Ogawa, L.; Oliveira, R.C. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in swine, bovine, ovine and equine, and their correlation with human, felines and canines, from farms in North Region of Paraná State, Brazil. Ciência Rural. 1999, 29, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Snak, A.; Osaki, S.C. Uma revisão sobre três importantes agentes causadores de aborto em bovinos: Neospora caninum, Leptospira sp. e Trypanosoma vivax. Rev. Ciência Veterinária Saúde Pública 2018, 6, 160–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Geographical localization and serological status of anti-T. gondii and anti-N. caninum antibodies in 50 beef cattle herds from an Amazonian region of the State of Rondônia, North Brazil.
Figure 1. Geographical localization and serological status of anti-T. gondii and anti-N. caninum antibodies in 50 beef cattle herds from an Amazonian region of the State of Rondônia, North Brazil.
Tropicalmed 08 00359 g001
Table 1. Distribution of anti-T. gondii and anti-N. caninum antibody titration according to immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) in beef cattle intended for human consumption in an Amazonian region of North Brazil.
Table 1. Distribution of anti-T. gondii and anti-N. caninum antibody titration according to immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) in beef cattle intended for human consumption in an Amazonian region of North Brazil.
Positivity for Anti-T. gondii Antibodies
Titration1:641:1281:2561:512
Total (%)69 (75.8)14 (15.4)6 (6.6)2 (2.2)
Positivity for Anti-N. caninum Antibodies
Titration1:2001:4001:8001:1600
Total (%)-2 (50)1 (25)1 (25)
Table 2. Univariate analysis of anti-T. gondii antibody positivity in beef cattle intended for human consumption in an Amazonian region of the North Brazil. Variables that present p-values ≤ 0.2 according to Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.
Table 2. Univariate analysis of anti-T. gondii antibody positivity in beef cattle intended for human consumption in an Amazonian region of the North Brazil. Variables that present p-values ≤ 0.2 according to Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.
VariableCategoryTotal AnimalsPositive (%)p
BreedPure20559 (28.8)0.149
Mixed18232 (17.6)
Contact with free-range chickenNo20139 (19.4)0.049
Yes18652 (28)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sousa Formiga, V.H.A.; Alvares, F.B.V.; Anjos, M.M.; Freitas, J.V.; Silva, D.P.; Parentoni, R.N.; Lima Brasil, A.W.; Medeiros, G.D.A.; Feitosa, T.F.; Vilela, V.L.R. Seropositivity of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii and Anti-Neospora caninum Antibodies in Cattle Intended for Human Consumption in an Amazonian Area of North Brazil. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023, 8, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8070359

AMA Style

Sousa Formiga VHA, Alvares FBV, Anjos MM, Freitas JV, Silva DP, Parentoni RN, Lima Brasil AW, Medeiros GDA, Feitosa TF, Vilela VLR. Seropositivity of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii and Anti-Neospora caninum Antibodies in Cattle Intended for Human Consumption in an Amazonian Area of North Brazil. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023; 8(7):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8070359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sousa Formiga, Victor Hugo Alves, Felipe Boniedj Ventura Alvares, Mariana Moreira Anjos, Jefferson Vieira Freitas, Daiane Peixer Silva, Roberta Nunes Parentoni, Arthur Willian Lima Brasil, Gláucia Diojânia Azevêdo Medeiros, Thais Ferreira Feitosa, and Vinícius Longo Ribeiro Vilela. 2023. "Seropositivity of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii and Anti-Neospora caninum Antibodies in Cattle Intended for Human Consumption in an Amazonian Area of North Brazil" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 8, no. 7: 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed8070359

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop