Next Article in Journal
Compost Composition and Application Rate Have a Greater Impact on Spinach Yield and Soil Fertility Benefits Than Feedstock Origin
Next Article in Special Issue
The Main Morphological Characteristics and Chemical Components of Fruits and the Possibilities of Their Improvement in Raspberry Breeding
Previous Article in Journal
Baseline Sensitivity and Resistance of Botrytis cinerea to Penthiopyrad in Hebei Province, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Risk of Extreme Early Frosts in Almond

1
Fruit Breeding Group, (CEBAS-CSIC), Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain
2
ITAP-Instituto Técnico Agronómico Provincial, Segunda Avenida, 02007 Albacete, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(8), 687; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080687
Submission received: 23 June 2022 / Revised: 22 July 2022 / Accepted: 27 July 2022 / Published: 29 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Results in Fruit Tree Breeding and Efficient Use of Cultivars)

Abstract

:
In almond, late frost is the main factor determining the viability of the culture in cold areas, and late flowering remains the key factor in addressing this issue. Climate change is causing an increase in the frequency of extreme weather events. In 2021, the cold period in Spain after the Filomena storm (11–14 January), in which temperatures reached −20 °C in some regions, was a clear expression in this regard. In many almond-growing areas, these low temperatures affected the closed flower buds of most of the cultivars, except for the extra-late and ultra-late cultivars and despite the early stage of development of the buds, leading crop failure. In this work, we show that early extreme frost only affected the extra-early, early and late almond cultivars that had overcome their endodormancy and fulfilled 40%, 31% and 23% of their heat requirements for flowering. Extra-late (with only 2% of their heat requirements covered) and ultra-late (still in endodormancy) cultivars were not damaged. These results show the importance of cultivating extra- and ultra-late almond flowering cultivars to avoid not only the late frost but also the early frost during the very early development of the flower buds.

1. Introduction

Frost is one of the greatest threats endangering the viability of Prunus species, almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A.Webb) included. Damaging frosts, which occur in 20–30% of cultivation years, can severely affect crop viability, making crops unprofitable. Although differing levels of frost resistance between cultivars have been reported [1,2], the most important factor for frost avoidance is late flowering time [3]. Indeed, even small flowering delays when frosts can cause serious injuries (e.g., the end of winter or beginning of spring) can be crucial to ensure profitable production. Due to this, extra- and ultra-late flowering cultivars are key players in the colonization of those areas that suffer from extremely low temperatures throughout these periods [4].
At the end of the summer, almond enters into a dormant period known as endodormancy, which reaches a peak in late October or early November. Endodormancy is a protector state that allows the survival of the tree against the cold temperatures of winter [2,5]. This process is mainly governed by the flower or the vegetative bud itself, inhibiting their growth even under suitable conditions [6,7]. Endodormancy development does not depend on the leaf fall or the photosynthetic rate [8]. However, the time and depth of the endodormancy peak vary according to the cultivar [9].
Once trees reach this peak, they start accumulating chill up to a certain cultivar-dependent amount, known as the chilling requirement (CR) [2,10]. When the CR is fulfilled, trees achieve endodormancy release, passing into the ecodormancy stage [2]. The CR is therefore the most important factor to determine whether a cultivar is eligible for a particular area or not.
In order to measure chill accumulation, different models have been used, the most important being the model dealing with the number of hours during which the temperature is below 7.2 °C [11], the Richardson (also known as the Utah) model [12] and the dynamic model [7]. The Richardson model has proven to be effective for cold areas. This model shows that endodormancy release is promoted by temperatures between 1 and 12 °C and is primarily effective around 7 °C. Temperatures below 1 °C or between 12 and 16 °C are inefficient, whereas values over 16 °C counter endodormancy release [12]. Endodormancy release takes place once buds have reached the B-C state defined by Felipe (1977), in which a small green tip appears on the top of the bud (Figure 1) [13].
Once the CR has been satisfied, trees need to accumulate heat to flower. The heat accumulation is usually quantified using growing degree hours (GDH) [14]. As in the case of the CR, every cultivar has its own heat requirement (HR) after endodormancy release, which must be met in order to flower. In contrast with the CR, the HR presents smaller variations between cultivars and is not as decisive in determining flowering time as the CR [2,15].
As stated above, frost is one of the main threats that affect almond productivity in cold areas; thus, proper cultivar selection is essential to decrease risks of frost. Late flowering time diminishes the probability of frost injury [16]. In terms of breeding, it is desirable to obtain extra- and ultra-late flowering cultivars for these areas.
Many studies have pointed out that frost resistance is mainly related to flower bud development (Figure 1) [17]. Deeply endodormant flower buds are exceptionally resistant (the A state of the Felipe classification [13]), withstanding temperatures of up to −20 °C. The development of the flower bud reduces the resistance to frost, the swelled bud (the B state of the Felipe classification [13]) being less resistant than the deeply endodormant bud [18]. Likewise, flowers and young fruits are extremely susceptible to frost, suffering damage at temperatures below −1 or −2 °C depending on the exposure time. In such states, a couple of hours at these temperatures can produce serious damage and even ruin production for the year [19].
Although most known frosts occur during and after flowering time, there are still slight probabilities of frosts just after endodormancy release. Nevertheless, temperatures during this period are not usually low enough to reach the frost point and damage the tissues (−14 °C) [18,20].
The main objective of this work was to explain the different behaviors of almond cultivars during extreme frost events occurring close to endodormancy release dates in relation to their CR and flowering time.

2. Materials and Methods

The plant material consisted of five representative groups of almond cultivars, selected based on their flowering time and covering all the flowering range in almond: extra-early (represented by Desmayo Largueta), early (Marcona), late (Ferragnès), extra-late (Penta) and ultra-late (Tardona). At least 10 trees from each cultivar were observed to determine the effects of the frost.
The study was carried out in the experimental field of “Las Tiesas” in Barrax (Albacete, Spain; latitude: 39.048755° N, longitude: 2.082894° W) during the cold snap following the Filomena depression (January 2021). Hourly temperatures from early September (2020) to the end of April (2021) were recorded. The frost period took place during the night from 11 to 14 January. In this period the lowest temperature was recorded during the night of 12 January, in which temperatures went down to −20 °C.
Chill accumulation in the experimental orchard started on 30 September. It was measured using the Richardson model, which has been successfully used in the cool temperate zone to determine chill accumulation [21]. This model quantifies the amount of chill accumulated during each hour, establishing equivalence between the hourly temperature and chill accumulation, this equivalence being measured in chill units (CU). In addition, the CRs of the studied cultivar groups have been widely described using this model. The CR for the endodormancy release of each cultivar was established according to previous work on almond in this and other fields (Table 1) [9]. The endodormancy release date for every cultivar group was determined as the day on which the CR was fulfilled.
Moreover, heat accumulation, from endodormancy release to flowering, was calculated using the Anderson GDH model [15], which allowed us to determine the percentage of the heat requirement met at the time of extreme frost (12 January).

3. Results

3.1. Bud Fall

Cultivar monitoring showed that flower buds from extra-early, early and late cultivars suffered great damage, despite apparently being in an early developmental state on 12 January. At the beginning of February, all the flower buds from these cultivars fell from the tree (100% damage) except for the late cultivars, which retained a few buds (95% damage). These damages were not observed in the extra- and ultra-late cultivars, where flowering and fruit setting were normal (0% damage). Vegetative buds did not suffer any damage in any cultivar.

3.2. Chill Accumulation and Endodormancy Release

Extra-early cultivars reached endodormancy release on 21 November (270 CU), early cultivars on 1 December (426 CU), late cultivars on 8 December (558 CU), extra-late cultivars on 29 December (880 CU) and ultra-late cultivars on 25 January (1100 CU) (Table 1, Figure 2). Regarding these results, it is obvious that the frost took place after the expected endodormancy release date of the extra-late cultivars, when ultra-late cultivars were still endodormant.

3.3. Heat Accumulation and Flower Bud Development

The forecasted flowering date (50% opened flowers) according to cultivars’ CRs and HRs set the full blossom date as 24 February for the extra-early cultivars (6038 GDH), 2 March for the early cultivars (6681 GDH), 16 March for the late cultivars (7466 GDH), 5 April for the extra-late cultivars (7181 GDH) and 15 April for the ultra-late cultivars (7892 GDH) (Table 2). By the time of the frost (12 January), the extra-early, early and late cultivars had satisfied 40, 31 and 23% of their HRs, respectively. Extra-late and ultra-late cultivars fulfilled just 2 and 0%, respectively (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

Bud Fall and Heat Accumulation

Among the many elements involved in flower development, heat accumulation after endodormancy release is the main factor for the development of flower buds towards flowering during ecodormancy [14,22]. This development produces a progressive loss of resistance against cold, making the flower buds more susceptible to damage by frost [19,23,24,25].
In recent decades, spring frosts induced by climate change have been the greatest threat for almond in cold areas [23]. In this study, we report how extreme early frost ruined the production of all the extra-early-, early- and late-flowering cultivars in a cold area of Spain, whereas extra-late and ultra-late cultivars remained intact.
Calculation of GHD values after endodormancy release showed that extra-early-, early- and late-flowering cultivars affected by the frost had already met 40, 31 and 23% of their heat requirements, respectively. On the other hand, extra-late cultivars accumulated almost no heat, while ultra-late cultivars had not even reached endodormancy release yet.
These findings agree with those of a previous study, which showed that almond flower buds rapidly lose their cold resistance once flower buds have reached the C state, resisting temperatures of up to −11 °C (Figure 1) [18]. Nevertheless, due to the extremely low temperatures during the frost of 12 January 2021 (−20 °C), only the cultivars that had not developed their flower buds were able to flower and set fruit.
The results of this study demonstrate that extreme temperatures from climate change endanger almond production more than expected. However, extra-late- and ultra-late-flowering cultivars, which are the main solution for late spring frosts due to their flowering time, may also be the solution to avoid the early frosts that threaten this crop because of their late endodormancy release [26]. Moreover, extra- and ultra-late cultivars, such as Penta, Makako and Tardona, have been shown to solve this issue, resulting in optimal flowering and production in both cold and warm years [4,16].

5. Conclusions

In this work, we aimed to study the effects of the early frost that took place after the Filomena depression on cultivars with different CRs. Among all the cultivars, extra- and ultra-late cultivars were the only ones that escaped the effects of severe early frosts when the flower buds were still undeveloped. This means that these kinds of cultivars must always be selected when designing a new plantation in cold areas with risks of early frost.
Future work should focus on detecting whether temperatures between −20 and 0 °C are still able to damage flower buds in the early–mid stages after endodormancy release, as well as on establishing equivalence between the different chill accumulation models.

Author Contributions

J.G.G., F.D., J.E. and J.A.E. wrote the paper. F.M. assayed all the field data. J.G.G. agreed to serve as the author responsible for contact and ensured communication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the project “ALmond Adaptation in NOvel Environments: Multiscale Approach from Genome to Function PrediCtion: ALADINO MAGIC” (MINECO-Spain. REF: PID2020-118008RB-C21). This work was also supported by the project “MEJORA GENETICA DEL ALMENDRO ASISTIDA POR HERRAMIENTAS GENOMICAS” (MICINN-Spain REF: PID2021-1274210B-I00).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

J.G.G. is grateful to “Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno” for a PhD fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Imani, A.; Mousavi, A.; Biat, S.; Rasouli, M.; Tavakoli, R.; Piri, S. Genetic Diversity for Late Frost Spring Resistance in Almond. Acta Hortic. 2011, 912, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Prudencio, A.S.; Martínez-Gómez, P.; Dicenta, F. Evaluation of Breaking Dormancy, Flowering and Productivity of Extra-Late and Ultra-Late Flowering Almond Cultivars during Cold and Warm Seasons in South-East of Spain. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 235, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dicenta, F.; Egea, J. El Cultivo Del Almendro En Zonas Muy Frías Con Variedades de Floración Extra-Tardía. Vida Rural 2013, 368, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dicenta, F.; Ortega, E.; Martinez-Gomez, P.; Sánchez-Pérez, R.; Gambin, M.; Egea, J. Penta and Tardona: Two New Extra-Late Flowering Self-Compatible Almond Cultivars. Acta Hortic. 2009, 814, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guillamón, J.G.; Dicenta, F.; Sánchez-Pérez, R. Advancing Endodormancy Release in Temperate Fruit Trees Using Agrochemical Treatments. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lang, G.A.; Early, J.D.; Matin, G.C.; Darnell, R.L. Endodormancy, Paradormancy, and Ecodormancy—Physiological Terminology and Classification for Dormancy Research. Hortscience 1987, 22, 371–377. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fishman, S.; Erez, A.; Couvillon, G.A. The Temperature Dependence of Dormancy Breaking in Plants: Mathematical Analysis of a Two-Step Model Involving a Cooperative Transition. J. Theor. Biol. 1987, 124, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fadón, E.; Fernandez, E.; Behn, H.; Luedeling, E. A Conceptual Framework for Winter Dormancy in Deciduous Trees. Agronomy 2020, 10, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Egea, J.; Ortega, E.; Martínez-Gómez, P.; Dicenta, F. Chilling and Heat Requirements of Almond Cultivars for Flowering. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2003, 50, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guillamón, J.G.; Prudencio, Á.S.; Yuste, J.E.; Dicenta, F.; Sánchez-Pérez, R. Ascorbic Acid and Prunasin, Two Candidate Biomarkers for Endodormancy Release in Almond Flower Buds Identified by a Nontargeted Metabolomic Study. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rosa, A.M.; Marodin, G.A.B.; Fialho, F.B.; Marchi, V.D.V.; dos Santos, H.P. Alternative Budburst Management in Campanha Gaúcha Vineyards. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2020, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Richardson, E.A.; Seely, S.D.; Walker, D.R. A Model for Estimating the Completion of Rest for “Redhaven” and “Elberta” Peach Trees. HortScience 1974, 9, 331–332. [Google Scholar]
  13. Felipe, A.J. Phenological States of Almond. In Proceedings of the Third GREMPA Colloquium, Bari, Italy, 3–7 October 1977; pp. 101–103. [Google Scholar]
  14. Anderson, J.L.; Richardson, E.A.; Kesner, C.D. Validation of Chill Unit and Flower Bud Phenology Models for “Montmorency” Sour Cherry. Acta Hortic. 1986, 336, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gaeta, L.; Stellacci, A.M.; Losciale, P. Comparison between Two Methods of Estimation of Chilling and Heat Requirements for Flowering in Almond. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1229, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dicenta, F.; Cremades, T.; Martínez-García, P.J.; Martínez-Géomez, P.; Ortega, E.; Rubio, M.; Séanchez-Péerez, R.; Léopez-Alcolea, J.; Egea, J. Penta and Makako: Two Extra-Late Flowering Self-Compatible Almond Cultivars from CEBAS-CSIC. HortScience 2018, 53, 1700–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Julian, C.; Rodrigo, J.; Herrero, M. Stamen Development and Winter Dormancy in Apricot (Prunus Armeniaca). Ann. Bot. 2011, 108, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Miranda, C.; Santesteban, L.G.; Royo, J.B. Variability in the Relationship between Frost Temperature and Injury Level for Some Cultivated Prunus Species. HortScience 2005, 40, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Vitra, A.; Lenz, A.; Vitasse, Y. Frost Hardening and Dehardening Potential in Temperate Trees from Winter to Budburst. New Phytol. 2017, 216, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Rodrigo, J. Spring Frosts in Deciduous Fruit Trees. Morphological Damage and Flower Hardiness. Sci. Hortic. 2000, 85, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dennis, F.G. Problems in Standardizing Methods for Evaluating the Chilling Requirements for the Breaking of Dormancy in Buds of Woody Plants. HortScience 2003, 38, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ruiz, D.; Campoy, J.A.; Egea, J. Chilling and Heat Requirements of Apricot Cultivars for Flowering. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gu, L.; Hanson, P.J.; Post, W.M.; Kaiser, D.P.; Yang, B.; Nemani, R.; Pallardy, S.G.; Meyers, T. The 2007 Eastern US Spring Freeze: Increased Cold Damage in a Warming World? BioScience 2008, 58, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Szalay, L.; Timon, B.; Németh, S.; Papp, J.; Tóth, M. Hardening and Dehardening of Peach Flower Buds. HortScience 2010, 45, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Szalay, L.; Bakos, J.; Tósaki, Á.; Keleta, B.T.; Froemel-Hajnal, V.; Karsai, I. A 15-Year Long Assessment of Cold Hardiness of Apricot Flower Buds and Flowers during the Blooming Period. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 290, 110520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Masip, D.; Torguet, L.; Batlle, I.; Alegre, S.; Miarnau, X. Almond Fruit Tolerance to Frost Temperatures in New Spanish Cultivars. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1219, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Almond phenological states from total endodormant flower bud to open flower. A is a totally endodormant flower bud, B is a swollen flower bud prior to endodormancy release, B-C is considered the endodormancy release state, C is a swollen bud after endodormancy release where sepals are clearly visible, D is a flower when only petals are visible, E is a flower with visible stamens and F is a completely open flower.
Figure 1. Almond phenological states from total endodormant flower bud to open flower. A is a totally endodormant flower bud, B is a swollen flower bud prior to endodormancy release, B-C is considered the endodormancy release state, C is a swollen bud after endodormancy release where sepals are clearly visible, D is a flower when only petals are visible, E is a flower with visible stamens and F is a completely open flower.
Horticulturae 08 00687 g001
Figure 2. Chill accumulation in Barrax during the winter of 2020/21 measured using the Richardson model. The endodormancy release date for each cultivar group is marked with an arrow.
Figure 2. Chill accumulation in Barrax during the winter of 2020/21 measured using the Richardson model. The endodormancy release date for each cultivar group is marked with an arrow.
Horticulturae 08 00687 g002
Figure 3. Percentages of heat requirements needed to flower (GDH) met by each cultivar group during the winter of 2020/21 in Barrax. Each cultivar group started to accumulate heat once they reached endodormancy release and finished flowering. The frost date (12 January) is marked with a blue dashed line.
Figure 3. Percentages of heat requirements needed to flower (GDH) met by each cultivar group during the winter of 2020/21 in Barrax. Each cultivar group started to accumulate heat once they reached endodormancy release and finished flowering. The frost date (12 January) is marked with a blue dashed line.
Horticulturae 08 00687 g003
Table 1. Chill requirements (CU) for endodormancy release and the endodormancy release date for each cultivar group.
Table 1. Chill requirements (CU) for endodormancy release and the endodormancy release date for each cultivar group.
Cultivar GroupCUDate
Extra-early27021 November
Early4261 December
Late5588 December
Extra-late88029 December
Ultra-late110025 January
Table 2. Heat requirements (GDH) needed to flower, percentages of heat requirements met on 12 January (frost date) and flowering date for each cultivar group.
Table 2. Heat requirements (GDH) needed to flower, percentages of heat requirements met on 12 January (frost date) and flowering date for each cultivar group.
Cultivar GroupGDHPercentage of Heat Requirement Met on 12 JanuaryPredicted Flowering Date
Extra-early60384024 February
Early6681312 March
Late74662316 March
Extra-late718125 April
Ultra-late7892015 April
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guillamón, J.G.; Egea, J.; Mañas, F.; Egea, J.A.; Dicenta, F. Risk of Extreme Early Frosts in Almond. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080687

AMA Style

Guillamón JG, Egea J, Mañas F, Egea JA, Dicenta F. Risk of Extreme Early Frosts in Almond. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(8):687. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080687

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guillamón, Jesús Guillamón, José Egea, Fernando Mañas, Jose A. Egea, and Federico Dicenta. 2022. "Risk of Extreme Early Frosts in Almond" Horticulturae 8, no. 8: 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080687

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop