Next Article in Journal
HPLC Characterization of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Potential of Alnus nitida (Spach) Endl.
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of DnaJ Gene Family in Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Agronomic Biofortification of Garlic through Selenium and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Isolation and Identification of Anthocyanin-Related GSTs in Chrysanthemum

1
College of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zijingang Campus, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Integrative Biology, Zijingang Campus, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3
The State Agriculture Ministry Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Growth, Development and Quality Improvement, Zijingang Campus, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(8), 231; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080231
Submission received: 9 July 2021 / Revised: 3 August 2021 / Accepted: 5 August 2021 / Published: 7 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Horticultural Crops Comparative and Functional Genomics)

Abstract

:
Anthocyanin is the crucial pigment for the coloration of red chrysanthemum flowers, which synthesizes in the cytosol and is transported to the vacuole for stable storage. In general, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) play a vital role in this transport. To date, there is no functional GST reported in chrysanthemums. Here, a total of 94 CmGSTs were isolated from the chrysanthemum genome, with phylogenetic analysis suggesting that 16 members of them were clustered into the Phi subgroup which was related to anthocyanin transport. Among them, the expression of CmGST1 was positively correlated with anthocyanin accumulation. Protein sequence alignment revealed that CmGST1 included anthocyanin-related GST-specific amino acid residues. Further transient overexpression experiments in tobacco leaves showed that CmGST1 could promote anthocyanin accumulation. In addition, a dual-luciferase assay demonstrated that CmGST1 could be regulated by CmMYB6, CmbHLH2 and CmMYB#7, which was reported to be related to anthocyanin biosynthesis. Taken together, we suggested that CmGST1 played a key role in anthocyanin transport and accumulation in chrysanthemums.

1. Introduction

The chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.) is one of the most popular ornamental plants in the world and flower color is a crucial trait for its commercial value [1]. Flower color is mainly contributed to by flavonoids, carotenoids and betalains [2]. Among them, anthocyanins, which belong to flavonoids, accumulate in red chrysanthemums.
Anthocyanins are one of the most important secondary metabolites and serve to protect plants from pathogen attacks and ultraviolet radiation damage [3,4]. Anthocyanins are synthesized in the cytosol and then transported into the vacuole for stable storage [5,6]. Biosynthetic genes in this process include chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), favanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase (F3′H), favonoid 3′, 5′-hydroxylase (F3′5′H), dihydrofavonol 4-reductase (DFR), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS), and UDP-glucose: favonoid-3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT). The studies on the structural genes of the synthesis pathway of anthocyanin are relatively clear, but there are still uncertainties about the transport mechanism of anthocyanin in chrysanthemums. Based on the previous results, there are two modes which have been proposed for anthocyanin transport: vesicle trafficking-mediated transport and membrane transporter-mediated transport [6]. In both modes glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) play a key role [6].
It is generally accepted that GSTs play an important role in the cellular redox control and detoxification of heavy metals, electrophilic xenobiotics, and the control of toxic by-products in normal plant metabolism [7,8]. There are seven subgroups functionally characterized in the GST family, including Tau, Phi, zeta, theta, Dehydroascorbate reductase, TDL, and Lambda [9], where the anthocyanin-related GSTs belong to the Phi subgroup [10]. As for transport mechanisms, several studies suggested that GST promoted the accumulation of anthocyanins such as Bz2 in maize, by catalyzing the formation of the glutathione-conjugated complex [11]. However, more evidence showed that GSTs could not catalyze the formation of the glutathione-conjugated complex but promoted the vacuolar sequestration of anthocyanins, such as AN9 in petunias [12], TT19 in Arabidopsis [10], and VvGST1 and VvGST4 in grapvines [13]. Based on these findings, GSTs might act as a carrier to transport anthocyanin [6,14]. In recent years, many anthocyanin-related GSTs in different species have been identified. The gene MdGSTF6 encoded an important GST transporter of anthocyanins in apple fruit [15]. The gene PpGST1 played an important role in the color difference between ‘Hujingmilu’ and ‘Yulu’ [16]. The genes LhGST and GhGSTF12 played an important role in the transport of anthocyanin in lily and cotton, respectively [17,18]. However, anthocyanin transport-related GSTs were rarely reported in ornamental horticulture. Therefore, an anthocyanin-related GST is reported in chrysanthemums in this study.
In this study, we screened 94 GSTs from the chrysanthemum genome and identified CmGST1 (Cse sc027179.1 g030.1/pd) in relation to anthocyanin in chrysanthemums, according to the transcript level in the flower developmental stages of the red chrysanthemum. It was localized in both the membrane and the nucleus. The gene CmGST1 promoted anthocyanin accumulation via the sequestration of glycosylated anthocyanin, based on the transient overexpression results in tobacco leaves. Furthermore, the transcript activity of the CmGST1 promoter was regulated by anthocyanin-related transcription factors, including CmMYB6, CmbHLH2 and CmMYB#7. Taken together, CmGST1 was responsible for anthocyanin transport in chrysanthemums and affected anthocyanin accumulation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The Chrysanthemum red series cultivar ‘Monalisa pink’ was obtained from Yunnan Fengdao Floriculture Company (Yunnan, China). The flowers were divided into 3 stages, which represented flower bud stage (stage 1, S1), half-bloom stage (stage 2, S2) and full-bloom stage (stage 3, S3), respectively. Among them, S2 and S3 included ray flowers and disc flowers. The ray flowers were named S2-R and S3-R and the disc flowers were named S2-D and S3-D, respectively. Three independent biological replicates were collected for each stage. The collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C until used.

2.2. Extraction of RNA and DNA

Total RNA was extracted from chrysanthemum flowers using the CTAB method [19]. For tobacco leaves, total RNA was extracted using an RNAiso Plus (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was isolated from chrysanthemum leaves by Easy Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Easy-Do, Hangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. cDNA Synthesis and qRT-PCR

First-strand cDNA was synthesized using PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit (Takara, Japan). RT-qPCR reactions were carried out with SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using a CFX96 instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The RT-qPCR program was initiated with the preliminary step of 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 95 °C for 10 s, and then a continuous increase from 65 °C to 95 °C with a ramp rate of 0.5 °C/s for dissociation curve analysis. Data were analyzed and relative expression levels of the genes were calculated using the 2 (−△△Ct) method and using expression of the CmActin [1] as the internal control. The primers for RT-qPCR analysis were listed in Table S1. Three biological replicates were performed in this experiment.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis of CmGSTs

CmGSTs were identified from Chrysanthemum genome (http://mum-garden.kazusa.or.jp Accessed on 6 August 2021). All amino acid sequences were used for constructing a phylogenetic tree, together with anthocyanin-related GSTs from other species. A phylogenetic tree was constructed by IqTree software with a bootstrap value of 1000 using maximum likelihood method.

2.5. Isolation and Sequence Analysis of CmGST1

CmGST1 sequences were isolated from cDNA of ‘Monalisa Pink’ flowers. The primers were designed according to RNA-seq (Table S2). According to a partial cDNA sequence, full-length cDNA sequence of CmGST1 was amplified by RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends, Clontech, Mountain view, CA, USA).
The protein sequences were translated for sequence alignments by ExPASy (https://web.expasy.org/translate/ Accessed on 6 August 2021). The homologous comparison with anthocyanin-related GSTs was analyzed by DNAMAN 8. The anthocyanin-related GSTs from other species were from Genbank.

2.6. Vector Construction

Primers for vector construction were listed in Table S2. For overexpression, CmMYB6-bHLH2 and CmGST1 were cloned and inserted into pGreenII 0029 62-SK vector (CmMYB6-bHLH2-SK, CmGST1-SK). For subcellular location analysis, the CmGST1 full-length coding sequence without the stop codon was fused to the pCAMBIA1300-eGFP vector (CmGST1-eGFP). Then, all of these constructs were electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 by the GenePulser XcellTM Electroporation Systems (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). For dual-luciferase report assay, CmMYB6, CmbHLH2 and CmMYB#7 were cloned and inserted into pGreenII 0029 62-SK vector (CmMYB#7-SK), and the promoter of CmGST1 (2000bp) was constructed into pGreen II 0800-LUC vector (CmGST1-LUC). Then, CmGST1-eGFP, CmMYB6-SK, CmbHLH2-SK, CmMYB#7-SK and CmGST1-LUC were electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by the GenePulser XcellTM Electroporation Systems (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.7. Subcellular Location Analysis

The CmGST1-eGFP-GV3101 was fused to the membrane localization marker ex-pressed transiently in transgenic N. benthamiana (with nucleus-located marker) leaves by infiltration. The cultures were adjusted OD600 to 0.75 with infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, 150 mM acetosyringone, pH 5.6). The N. benthamiana leaves were observed using laser-scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss, lsm 880, Germany) 2 days after injecting.

2.8. Measurement of Anthocyanin

The anthocyanin contents of chrysanthemum flowers and tobacco leaves were detected by the pH differential spectrophotometry method described in our previous study [1]. Flower anthocyanin contents were extracted from 0.1 g samples of methanol/0.05% HCl at an absorbance of 510 and 700 nm. Three biological replicates were performed in this experiment.

2.9. Transient Overexpression on Tobacco Leaves

In order to verify the function of CmGST1 in inducing anthocyanin biosynthesis, transient overexpression in tobacco leaves (Nicotiana tabacum) was conducted as described in previous reports [20]. The Agrobacterium cultures with empty vectors, CmGST1 and CmMYB6-bHLH2, mixed with an empty vector or CmGST1, were infiltrated into tobacco leaves, respectively. The patches in tobacco leaves were photographed 7 days after infiltration, then cut into pieces and frozen in liquid nitrogen before the detection of anthocyanin content. Each assay was carried out in three independent experiments with three biological replicates for each.

2.10. Gene Cloning and Analysis of the Promoter of CmGST1

Genomic DNA sequences were used for amplifying CmGST1 promoter. The promoter region of CmGST1 was amplified using primers designed by Chrysanthemum genome (http://mum-garden.kazusa.or.jp Accessed on 6 August 2021) (Table S2). Cis-elements were predicted using the PlantCARE program (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/ Accessed on 6 August 2021).

2.11. Dual-Luciferase Report Assay

A dual-luciferase assay was widely used to analyze the transcriptional regulatory roles of transcription factors on target promoters [21,22,23]. All constructs were individually electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 (MP90) before being infiltrated into tobacco leaves (Nicotiana benthamiana). The enzyme activities of firefly luciferase (CmGST1:: LUC) to renilla luciferase (35S::REN) were detected using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Wisconsin, MI, USA) and a Modulus Luminometer (Promega, Wisconsin, MI, USA). The ratio of LUC/REN was calculated to analyze the regulatory effect of the transcription factor on the promoter. Three independent experiments were carried out with at least four biological replicates for each.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of CmGSTs

A protein sequence of 94 CmGSTs were screened from the Chrysanthemum genome (http://mum-garden.kazusa.or.jp Accessed on 6 August 2021) based on annotations. A maximum likelihood tree was constructed using the Iqtree program, together with GSTs from Arabidopsis, and reported anthocyanin-related GSTs in other species. These GSTs were mainly divided into eight groups, where anthocyanin-related genes belonged to a Phi subgroup which included 16 CmGSTs (Figure 1). Sixteen GSTs were named in order according to their distance from ScGST3. The gene CmGST1 was clustered into the same branch as many other reported anthocyanin-related GSTs, such as ScGST3, CkmGST3, PhAN9, AcGST1, PpRiant1, FvRAP, and MdGST. Other GSTs were clustered into unknown GSTs from Arabidopsis. Thus, CmGST1 may have been a potential anthocyanin-related GST in chrysanthemums.

3.2. Anthocyanin Analysis in Different Developmental Stages of ‘Monalisa Pink’ Flower

‘Monalisa Pink’, which accumulated anthocyanin in the petals mainly contained three developmental stages during the flower development (Figure 2A). The three stages were named S1, S2 and S3, respectively, where the S2 and S3 were divided into ray flowers (S2-R, S3-R) and disc flowers (S2-D, S3-D). The total anthocyanin content in S1, S2-D, S3-D was undetected, but measured 0.024 mg/g and 0.309 mg/g in S2-R and S3-R, respectively (Figure 2B), consistent with the phenotype in Figure 2A.

3.3. Expression Patterns of CmGSTs of Phi Subgroup in Developmental Stages of ‘Monalisa Pink’ Flower Petals

A total of 16 CmGSTs members were clustered into the Phi subgroup. However, their expression patterns showed significantly differences during the flower developmental stages, based on the results of RT-qPCR (Figure 2C). Among them, CmGST1 and CmGST13 exhibited higher expression levels in S2-R and S3-R, compared to S1, S2-D, and S3-D, which were consistent with a higher phenotype and anthocyanin content (Figure 2A,B), while the transcript levels of other CmGST members showed a weaker correlation with anthocyanin accumulation (Figure 2C). It is worth mentioning that the transcript levels of CmGST1 were 50 times higher than CmGST13 (Figure 2C). Based on these results, there was stronger evidence for CmGST1 being related to anthocyanin, rather that CmGST13.

3.4. Sequence Alignment of CmGST1 and CmGST13 in Chrysanthemum

Based on the previous results, most GSTs members clustered in the Phi subgroup contained GST-N-Phi (Thioredoxin-like superfamily) and GST-C-Phi (GST-C-family superfamily) domains, which included the glutathione binding sites (blue boxes, [24], Figure 3). Furthermore, the GSTs involved with anthocyanin transportation still contained anthocyanin-related GST-specific sites (red boxes) in these domains ([11], Figure 3).
The multiple alignments of GSTs showed that CmGST1 included both glutathione binding sites and anthocyanin-related GST-specific sites, which were highly conserved with the known anthocyanin-related GST members, while CmGST13 only contained glutathione binding sites (Figure 3), which indicated CmGST1 was a potential function of GSTs related to anthocyanin transport.

3.5. Subcellular Localization of CmGST1

To analyze the subcellular localization of CmGST1, a transient expression system in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves labeled with a nuclear localization marker was used. A vacuolar membrane localization marker was injected into tobacco leaves together with 35S::CmGST1-GFP, and the empty vector 35S::GFP was set as a control. The leaves were observed under a laser-scanning confocal microscope 2 days after injection. It showed that CmGST1-GFP fluorescence was detected in both the vacuolar membrane and nucleus, combined with a marker (Figure 4) which suggested that CmGST1 was located in the vacuolar membrane and nucleus.

3.6. Transient Overexpression of CmGST1 in Tobacco Leaves

Transient overexpression was performed in tobacco leaves to examine the function of CmGST1 in vivo. Based on the previous studies, abundant anthocyanin could accumulate in tobacco leaves with the transient overexpression of CmMYB6-bHLH2 which was an activator of anthocyanin transcript regulation [25]. Here, 35S::CmGST1 was injected into tobacco leaves together with 35S:: CmMYB6-bHLH2, and the empty vector with 35S::CmMYB6-bHLH2 was set as a control. It suggested that the leaves’ coloration, when co-injected with 35S::CmGST1 and 35S::CmMYB6-bHLH2, were much darker than the control (Figure 5A), and the anthocyanin content of leaves was 0.3 mg/g and 0.15 mg/g, respectively (Figure 5B).
Moreover, the relative expressions of overexpressed genes and endogenous anthocyanin pathway genes, including biosynthetic and regulatory genes, were measured. The relative expressions of CmMYB6 and CmbHLH2 were almost at the same level between the empty vector and CmGST1 combined with CmMYB6-bHLH2 (Figure 5C). Nearly all structural genes’ relative expressions increased in leaves infiltrated with 35S::CmGST1 and 35S::CmMYB6-bHLH2, compared to the control. When it comes to the transcription factors, only NtAn1a was upregulated after injecting CmGST1 (Figure 6). This suggested that CmGST1 promoted anthocyanin accumulation by sequestration of glycosylated anthocyanin, and then activated the anthocyanin pathway genes.

3.7. CmGST1 Promoter Was Regulated by Anthocyanin Related Transcription Factors

The promoter sequence of CmGST1 which contained a 2,000 bp upstream region of ATG which was analyzed by the PlantCARE online tools (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/ Accessed on 6 August 2021). A total of seven MYB binding sites and 15 bHLH binding sites were found in the promoter (Figure 7A), as well as some cis-elements involved with MeJA, ABA, auxin, and light responsiveness (Table S3).
In the previous study, CmMYB6, CmbHLH2, and CmMYB#7 were confirmed as playing essential roles in anthocyanin biosynthesis regulation. To study their relationship with CmGST1, dual-luciferase assays were performed. These assays suggested that CmMYB6 increased the CmGST1 promoter activity significantly by about 13 times compared to the control, while CmbHLH2 had no effect (Figure 7B). Moreover, the much stronger trans-activation effect, which was approximately 70 higher times than the effect of the control on CmGST1 promoter activity, was obtained by CmMYB6 together with CmbHLH2 (Figure 7B). In addition, CmMYB#7 could reduce these activating effects on the CmGST1 promoter by CmMYB6 and CmbHLH2 (Figure 7B).

4. Discussion

The enzymes encoded by anthocyanin-related structural genes and transport genes play a vital role in plants [26]. In transport-related gene families, the role of GSTs cannot be ignored [6]. The deletion or mutation of GSTs blocks anthocyanin transport and inhibits anthocyanin accumulation. The Arabidopsis mutant tt19 cannot accumulate anthoyanin [10]. The gene PpRiant1 indicates that a small indel mutation in the Riant causes variegated colorations of peach flowers [27]. The gene FvRAP demonstrates that RAP encodes the principal GST transporters of anthocyanins and alters the fruit color in strawberries [28].
In general, the Phi subgroup contained a GST-N-Phi (Thioredoxin-like superfamily) domain and a GST-C-Phi (GST-C-family superfamily) domain [29]. Moreover, functional GSTs contained anthocyanin-related GST-specific sites [11]. In cotton leaves, a lack of partially anthocyanin-related GST-specific sites decreased anthocyanin accumulation [30]. In cyclamen, GSTs without anthocyanin-related sites could not recover anthocyanin accumulation in the Arabidopsis tt19 mutant [11]. In these studies, most anthocyanin-related GSTs were identified by sequence similarity. Here, both CmGST1 and CmGST13 were clustered into the Phi subgroup with the conserved amino acid residues sites of the GST family and specific glutathione binding sites; however, only CmGST1 contained anthocyanin-related GST-specific sites. According to our analysis, CmGST13 was similar to other anthocyanin-nonrelated GSTs, especially at anthocyanin-related GST-specific sites [11]. Therefore, we predicted that CmGST13 could not promote anthocyanin accumulation.
Based on the previous results, there were mainly two modes of anthocyanin transport which included vesicle trafficking-mediated transport and membrane transporter-mediated transport [26,31]. Vesicle trafficking-mediated transport pathways were observed in many species, such as lisianthus, Arabidopsis, Brassica and sorghum, where glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) were proven to be relevant to this transport mode [31,32,33]. For membrane transporter-mediated transport, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters and MATE transporters were a functional protein family involved in anthocyanin transport [26]. MATE transporters were mainly involved in transmembrane transport over short distances, and specifically transported acylated anthocyanin [21,34]. GSTs acted as an aid in the ABC-mediated transport mode for long-distance transport. Moreover, GSTs can function independently as a transporter [26]. This showed that GSTs played a widespread role in anthocyanin transport. In chrysanthemums, GSTs and MATEs were regarded as playing a vital role in flower color [35].
Several studies suggested GSTs were regulated by MYBs and bHLHs [15,16,36]. There were four MYB binding sites in peach (PpGST1), and five MYB binding sites in kiwifruit (AcGST1) [16,35]. In chrysanthemums, seven MYB binding sites were found in the promoter of CmGST1 (Figure 7A). There were also 15 potential bHLH binding sites in the promoter of CmGST1, but CmbHLH2 could not regulate CmGST1 alone, which wasconsistent with other structural genes such as CmDFR and CmUFGT [37]. The gene CmMYB6 could regulate CmGST1, either alone or mixed with CmbHLH2, and CmMYB#7 could regulate CmGST1 by competing with CmMYB6. These results showed that CmMYB6 and CmMYB#7 could regulate not only anthocyanin biosynthesis but also its transport process.

5. Conclusions

The gene CmGST1 was a key anthocyanin-related transporter in chrysanthemums, whose transcript was positively correlated with anthocyanin accumulation during flower development. The overexpression of CmGST1 in tobacco leaves promoted anthocyanin accumulation, and the expression of anthocyanin pathway genes was induced due to the sequestration of glycosylated anthocyanin. Furthermore, CmGST1 was regulated by previously characterized MYBs and bHLHs. Coloration is a crucial trait for ornamental horticulture, and our study provides a new target for flower breeding.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae7080231/s1, Table S1: Primers used for qRT-PCR, Table S2: Primers used for vector construction, Table S3: Cis-elements in promoter of CmGST1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.L. and K.C.; methodology, Y.L. and L.X.; software, Y.L.; validation, Y.L., L.X.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, Y.L.; resources, F.L.; data curation, Y.L., L.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L. and X.L.; writing—review and editing, X.L. and L.X.; visualization, Y.L.; supervision, K.C.; project administration, F.L., K.C. and L.X.; funding acquisition, F.L. and L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program, grant number 2018YFD1000405, and the Zhejiang Province Postdoctoral Foundation, grant number ZJ2020144.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Shi Yanna in the State Agriculture Ministry Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Growth, Development and Quality Improvement for offering advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, X.F.; Xiang, L.L.; Yin, X.R.; Grierson, D.; Li, F.; Chen, K.S. The identification of a MYB transcription factor control ling anthocyanin biosynthesis regulation in Chrysanthemum flowers. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 194, 78–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tanaka, Y.; Sasaki, N.; Ohmiya, A. Biosynthesis of plant pigments: Anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids. Plant J. 2008, 54, 733–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bieza, K.; Lois, R. An Arabidopsis mutant tolerant to lethal ultraviolet-B levels shows constitutively elevated accumulation of flavonoids and other phenolics. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 1105–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Veeriah, S.; Kautenburger, T.; Habermann, N.; Sauer, J.; Dietrich, H.; Will, F.; Pool-Zobel, B.L. Apple flavonoids inhibit growth of HT29 human colon cancer cells and modulate expression of genes involved in the biotransformation of xenobiotics. Mol. Arcinogen. 2006, 5, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Winkel-Shirley, B. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Zhao, J.; Dixon, R.A. The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of flavonoid transport. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Brazier-Hicks, M.; Evans, K.M.; Cunningham, O.D.; Hodgson, D.R.W.; Steel, P.G.; Edwards, R. Catabolism of glutathi one conjugates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Role in metabolic reactivation of the herbicide safener fenclorim. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 21102–21112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Ketterer, B.; Meyer, D.J. Glutathione transferases: A possible role in the detoxication and repair of DNA and lipid hydroper oxides. Mutat. Res. 1989, 214, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Edwards, R.; Dixon, D.P. Plant glutathione transferases. Gluthione Transferases Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidases 2005, 401, 169–186. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kitamura, S.; Shikazono, N.; Tanaka, A. TRANSPARENT TESTA 19 is involved in the accumulation of both anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2004, 37, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kitamura, S.; Akita, Y.; Ishizaka, H.; Narumi, I.; Tanaka, A. Molecular characterization of an anthocyanin-related glutathi one S-transferase gene in cyclamen. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mueller, L.A.; Goodman, C.D.; Silady, R.A.; Walbot, V. AN9, a petunia glutathione S-transferase required for anthocyanin sequestration, is a flavonoid-binding protein. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1561–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Conn, S.; Curtin, C.; Bezier, A.; Franco, C.; Zhang, W. Purification, molecular cloning, and characterization of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) from pigmented Vitis vinifera L. cell suspension cultures as putative anthocyanin transport proteins. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 3621–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sun, Y.; Li, H.; Huang, J.R. Arabidopsis TT19 functions as a carrier to transport anthocyanin from the cytosol to tonoplasts. Mol. Plant. 2012, 5, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, S.; Chen, M.; He, N.B.; Chen, X.L.; Wang, N.; Sun, Q.G.; Zhang, T.H.; Xu, H.F.; Fang, H.C.; Wang, Y.C.; et al. MdGSTF6, activated by MdMYB1, plays an essential role in anthocyanin accumulation in apple. Hortic. Res. 2019, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhao, Y.; Dong, W.Q.; Zhu, Y.C.; Allan, A.C.; Wang, K.L.; Xu, C.J. PpGST1, an anthocyanin-related glutathione S-transfer ase gene, is essential for fruit coloration in peach. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1284–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Cao, Y.W.; Xu, L.F.; Xu, H.; Yang, P.P.; He, G.R.; Tang, Y.C.; Song, M.; Ming, J. LhGST is an anthocyanin-related glutathi one S-transferase gene in Asiatic hybrid lilies (Lilium spp.). Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shao, D.N.; Li, Y.J.; Zhu, Q.H.; Zhang, X.Y.; Liu, F.; Xue, F. GhGSTF12, a glutathione S-transferase gene, is essential for anthocyanin accumulation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Sci. 2021, 305, 110827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chang, S.; Puryear, J.; Cairney, J. A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Mol. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.F.; Yin, X.R.; Allan, A.C.; Kui, L.W.; Shi, Y.N.; Huang, Y.J.; Ferguson, I.B.; Xu, C.J.; Chen, K.S. The role of MrbHLH1 and MrMYB1 in regulating anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in tobacco and Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) during anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2013, 115, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mathews, H.; Clendennen, S.K.; Caldwell, C.G.; Liu, X.L.; Connors, K.; Matheis, N.; Schuster, D.K.; Menasco, D.J.; Wagoner, W.; Lightner, J.; et al. Activation Tagging in Tomato Identifies a Transcriptional Regulator of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis, Modification, and Transport. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1689–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Xu, Q.; Yin, X.R.; Zeng, J.K.; Ge, H.; Song, M.; Xu, C.J.; Li, X.; Ferguson, I.B.; Chen, K.S. Activator- and repressor-type MYB transcription factors are involved in chilling injury induced flesh lignification in loquat via their interactions with the phenylpropanoid pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4349–4359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zeng, J.K.; Li, X.; Xu, Q.; Chen, J.Y.; Yin, X.R.; Ferguson, I.B.; Chen, K.S. EjAP2-1, an AP2/ERF gene, is a novel regulator of fruit lignification induced by chilling injury, via interaction with EjMYB transcription factors. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 1325–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Reinemer, P.; Prade, L.; Hof, P.; Neuefeind, T.; Huber, R.; Zettl, R.; Palme, K.; Schell, J.; Koelln, I.; Bartunik, H.D.; et al. Three-dimensional structure of glutathione S-transferase from Arabidopsis thaliana at 2.2 angstrom resolution: Structural characterization of herbicide-conjugating plant glutathione S-transferases and a novel active site architecture. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 255, 289–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xiang, L.L.; Liu, X.F.; Li, X.; Yin, X.R.; Grierson, D.; Li, F.; Chen, K.S. A Novel bHLH Transcription Factor Involved in Regulating Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Chrysanthemums (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhao, J. Flavonoid transport mechanisms: How to go, and with whom. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cheng, J.; Liao, L.; Zhou, H.; Gu, C.; Wang, L.; Han, Y.P. A small indel mutation in an anthocyanin transporter causes var iegated colouration of peach flowers. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 7227–7239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Luo, H.F.; Dai, C.; Li, Y.P.; Feng, J.; Liu, Z.C.; Kang, C.Y. Reduced Anthocyanins in Petioles codes for a GST anthocyanin transporter that is essential for the foliage and fruit coloration in strawberry. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 2595–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhao, Y.; Dong, W.Q.; Wang, K.; Zhang, B.; Allan, A.C.; Lin, W.K.; Chen, K.S.; Xu, C.J. Differential Sensitivity of Fruit Pigmentation to Ultraviolet Light between Two Peach Cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, S.Y.; Zuo, D.Y.; Cheng, H.L.; Ali, M.; Wu, C.F.; Ashraf, J.; Zhang, Y.P.; Feng, X.X.; Lin, Z.X.; Wang, Q.L.; et al. Glutathione S-transferases GhGSTF1 and GhGSTF2 involved in the anthocyanin accumulation in Gossypium hirsutum L. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 2565–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhao, J.; Dixon, R.A. MATE Transporters Facilitate Vacuolar Uptake of Epicatechin 3′-O-Glucoside for Proanthocyanidin Biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Poustka, F.; Irani, N.; Feller, A.; Lu, Y.H.; Pourcel, L.; Frame, K.; Grotewold, E. A trafficking pathway for Anthocyanins overlaps with the endoplasmic reticulum-to-vacuole protein-sorting route in Arabidopsis and contributes to the formation of vacuolar inclusions. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 1323–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, H.B.; Wang, L.; Deroles, S.; Bennett, R.; Davies, K. New insight into the structures and formation of anthocyanic vacuolar inclusions in flower petals. BMC Plant Biol. 2006, 6, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gomez, C.; Terrier, N.; Torregrosa, L.; Vialet, S.; Fournier-Level, A.; Verries, C.; Souquet, J.M.; Mazauric, J.P.; Klein, M.; Cheynier, V. Grapevine MATE-Type Proteins Act as Vacuolar H+-Dependent Acylated Anthocyanin Transporters. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 402–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Kim, S.H.; Sung, S.Y.; Kim, Y.S.; Jo, Y.D.; Kang, S.Y.; Kim, J.B.; Ahn, J.W.; Ha, B.K.; Kim, D.S. Isolation and characteri zation of differentially expressed genes in petals of chrysanthemum mutant cultivars developed by irradiation. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 189, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Y.F.; Qi, Y.W.; Zhang, A.; Wu, H.X.; Liu, Z.D.; Ren, X.L. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of AcGST1, an anthocyanin-related glutathione S-transferase gene in kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis). Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiang, L.L.; Liu, X.F.; Li, H.; Yin, X.R.; Grierson, D.; Li, F.; Chen, K.S. CmMYB#7, an R3 MYB transcription factor, acts as a negative regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis in chrysanthemum. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 3111–3123. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of 94 CmGSTs with GSTs from Arabidopsis and reported anthocyanin-related GSTs in other species. The 94 CmGSTs proteins were obtained from the Chrysanthemum genome (http://mum-garden.kazusa.or.jp Accessed on 6 August 2021). The GenBank accession numbers were: PpRiant1 (ALE31199), MdGST (NP_001315851.1), FvRAP (XP_004288578), LcGST4 (ALY05893), VvGST4 (AAX81329), CMGSTF12 (ABA42223), ScGST3 (Senecio cruentus), AtTT19 (BAD89984), AcGST (QCQ77644), PhAN9 (CAA68993), CkmGST3 (BAM14584), The tree was constructed with the Maximum Likelihood method (1,000 replications of bootstrap test) using the Iqtree program.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of 94 CmGSTs with GSTs from Arabidopsis and reported anthocyanin-related GSTs in other species. The 94 CmGSTs proteins were obtained from the Chrysanthemum genome (http://mum-garden.kazusa.or.jp Accessed on 6 August 2021). The GenBank accession numbers were: PpRiant1 (ALE31199), MdGST (NP_001315851.1), FvRAP (XP_004288578), LcGST4 (ALY05893), VvGST4 (AAX81329), CMGSTF12 (ABA42223), ScGST3 (Senecio cruentus), AtTT19 (BAD89984), AcGST (QCQ77644), PhAN9 (CAA68993), CkmGST3 (BAM14584), The tree was constructed with the Maximum Likelihood method (1,000 replications of bootstrap test) using the Iqtree program.
Horticulturae 07 00231 g001
Figure 2. Expression patterns of CmGSTs from Phi subclade in disc and ray flowers in developmental stage of ‘Monalisa Pink’. (A) Phenotype of ‘Monalisa Pink’ at S1, S2-D, S3-D, S2-R, S3-R. (B) Anthocyanin contents of disc and ray flowers of different developmental stages. (C) Relative expression of disc and ray flowers. Data were means (±SE) from three independent biological replicates.
Figure 2. Expression patterns of CmGSTs from Phi subclade in disc and ray flowers in developmental stage of ‘Monalisa Pink’. (A) Phenotype of ‘Monalisa Pink’ at S1, S2-D, S3-D, S2-R, S3-R. (B) Anthocyanin contents of disc and ray flowers of different developmental stages. (C) Relative expression of disc and ray flowers. Data were means (±SE) from three independent biological replicates.
Horticulturae 07 00231 g002
Figure 3. Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences for the CmGST1 and CmGST13 protein with other recognized anthocyanin-related GSTs. PpRiant1 (ALE31199), MdGST (NP_001315851.1), FvRAP (XP_004288578), LcGST4 (ALY05893), VvGST4 (AAX81329), VaGST (Vitis amurensis, ACN38271), CMGSTF12 (ABA42223), CsGST (Citrus sinensis, NP_001275781), CaGST (Capsicum annuum, XP_016562106), DcGSTF2 (Dianthus caryophyllus, BAM21533), ScGST3 (Senecio cruentus), AtTT19 (BAD89984), PfGST1 (Perilla frutescens, BAG14300), and PcGST (Pyrus communis, ABI79308). Red boxes indicated amino acid residues that had previously been recognized to be conserved in anthocyanin-related GST. Blue boxes indicated the regions that were involved in glutathione binding. Asterisks indicate a conserved amino acid site.
Figure 3. Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences for the CmGST1 and CmGST13 protein with other recognized anthocyanin-related GSTs. PpRiant1 (ALE31199), MdGST (NP_001315851.1), FvRAP (XP_004288578), LcGST4 (ALY05893), VvGST4 (AAX81329), VaGST (Vitis amurensis, ACN38271), CMGSTF12 (ABA42223), CsGST (Citrus sinensis, NP_001275781), CaGST (Capsicum annuum, XP_016562106), DcGSTF2 (Dianthus caryophyllus, BAM21533), ScGST3 (Senecio cruentus), AtTT19 (BAD89984), PfGST1 (Perilla frutescens, BAG14300), and PcGST (Pyrus communis, ABI79308). Red boxes indicated amino acid residues that had previously been recognized to be conserved in anthocyanin-related GST. Blue boxes indicated the regions that were involved in glutathione binding. Asterisks indicate a conserved amino acid site.
Horticulturae 07 00231 g003
Figure 4. Subcellular localization analysis of CmGST1 in Nicotiana benthamiana. (A) Subcellular localization of 35S::CmGST1-GFP together with the vacuolar membrane localization marker (RFP) and nuclear localization marker (RFP). (B) Subcellular localization of 35S::GFP as control. Bars = 50 µm.
Figure 4. Subcellular localization analysis of CmGST1 in Nicotiana benthamiana. (A) Subcellular localization of 35S::CmGST1-GFP together with the vacuolar membrane localization marker (RFP) and nuclear localization marker (RFP). (B) Subcellular localization of 35S::GFP as control. Bars = 50 µm.
Horticulturae 07 00231 g004
Figure 5. Transient overexpression of 35S::CmMYB6-bHLH2 together with 35S::CmGST1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. (A) A photograph of tobacco was taken at 7 days after injecting. (B) Anthocyanin content of tobacco leaves. (C) Transcriptional factors’ relative expressions of transient overexpression of 35S::CmMYB6-bHLH2 and empty vector or 35S::CmGST1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. Data were means (±SE) from three independent biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* P < 0.05).
Figure 5. Transient overexpression of 35S::CmMYB6-bHLH2 together with 35S::CmGST1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. (A) A photograph of tobacco was taken at 7 days after injecting. (B) Anthocyanin content of tobacco leaves. (C) Transcriptional factors’ relative expressions of transient overexpression of 35S::CmMYB6-bHLH2 and empty vector or 35S::CmGST1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. Data were means (±SE) from three independent biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* P < 0.05).
Horticulturae 07 00231 g005
Figure 6. Structural genes and transcriptional factors’ relative expressions of transient overexpression of CmMYB6-bHLH2 and empty vector or CmGST1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. Data were means (±SE) from three independent biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* P < 0.05).
Figure 6. Structural genes and transcriptional factors’ relative expressions of transient overexpression of CmMYB6-bHLH2 and empty vector or CmGST1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. Data were means (±SE) from three independent biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* P < 0.05).
Horticulturae 07 00231 g006
Figure 7. Regulatory effect of CmMYB6, CmbHLH2 and CmMYB#7 on the CmGST1 promoter. (A) Schematics of CmGST1 promoter, green rectangles meant that MYB recognized cis-elements and red rectangles meant that bHLH recognized cis-elements. TATA was labeled by a red arrow. (B) The regulatory effects of CmMYB6, CmbHLH2 and CmMYB#7 on the CmGST1 promoter used dual-luciferase analysis. Data were means (±SE) from three independent biological replicates.
Figure 7. Regulatory effect of CmMYB6, CmbHLH2 and CmMYB#7 on the CmGST1 promoter. (A) Schematics of CmGST1 promoter, green rectangles meant that MYB recognized cis-elements and red rectangles meant that bHLH recognized cis-elements. TATA was labeled by a red arrow. (B) The regulatory effects of CmMYB6, CmbHLH2 and CmMYB#7 on the CmGST1 promoter used dual-luciferase analysis. Data were means (±SE) from three independent biological replicates.
Horticulturae 07 00231 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, F.; Xiang, L.; Chen, K. The Isolation and Identification of Anthocyanin-Related GSTs in Chrysanthemum. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080231

AMA Style

Li Y, Liu X, Li F, Xiang L, Chen K. The Isolation and Identification of Anthocyanin-Related GSTs in Chrysanthemum. Horticulturae. 2021; 7(8):231. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080231

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yajing, Xiaofen Liu, Fang Li, Lili Xiang, and Kunsong Chen. 2021. "The Isolation and Identification of Anthocyanin-Related GSTs in Chrysanthemum" Horticulturae 7, no. 8: 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080231

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop