Next Article in Journal
Microbial Conversion of Cheese Whey to Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) via Statistically Optimized Cultures
Previous Article in Journal
pH and Heat Pretreatments with Zero-Valent Iron Addition to Enhance Biogas Production from Cassava Pulp Wastewater: Optimization and Comparison of Mathematical Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Streptococcus thermophilus Fermentation on the Flavors and Antioxidant Properties of Barley Juice

1
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
2
School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
3
National Engineering Research Center for Functional Food, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2023, 9(7), 623; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070623
Submission received: 23 April 2023 / Revised: 25 June 2023 / Accepted: 28 June 2023 / Published: 30 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Fermentation for Food and Beverages)

Abstract

:
Lactic fermentation can improve the metabolic profile and functionality of juice, which is beneficial to human health. This study aimed to investigate the effect of Streptococcus thermophilus fermentation on the metabolic profiles and antioxidant activity of barley juice. The results demonstrated that S. thermophilus 7G10 dramatically increased the total titratable acidity and total phenolic and flavonoid contents in the barley juice after 24 h of fermentation. Only sixteen volatile compounds were detected in the fermented barley juice, including six acids, four ketones, three alcohols, and one aldehyde. In addition, based on non-targeted metabolomics, 30 important differential metabolites were screened among the 1460 non-volatile compounds. Notably, the barley juice fermented with S. thermophilus 7G10 had increased free radical (ABTS, DPPH, and O2) scavenging activities. Furthermore, sensory evaluation showed that the barley juice fermented with S. thermophilus 7G10 was most attractive to consumers. These results show that LAB fermentation promotes the formation of volatile compounds and potentially enhances the antioxidant properties of barley juice.

1. Introduction

Barley belongs to the family Poaceae and is the fourth most widely produced cereal worldwide due to its ability to grow in many regions, including Europe, North America, Russia, and Australia. Tibet, Sichuan, Gansu, and Qinghai Provinces are the main sources of barley in China. Barley is largely rich in native phytochemicals, including phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, β-glucans, unsaturated fatty acids, and dietary fiber [1]. According to a previous report, barley has a certain regulatory effect on digestion. Moreover, emerging evidence has demonstrated that daily consumption of barley can reduce the severity of hyperlipidemia, regulate glucose metabolism, ameliorate oxidative stress, and relieve liver inflammatory responses [2]. For example, a barley intervention improved lipid metabolism and maintained liver function in mice fed a high-fat/cholesterol diet [3]. A recent study showed that barley treatment altered the intestinal microbiota structure by increasing the abundance of beneficial bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium fecale, and Akkermansia muciniphila [4]. Traditionally, barley is mainly used for brewing or producing feed [5,6]. It is necessary to develop new methods of barley processing to expand the application field of barley.
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are regarded as important microbes in the modern pharmaceutical and food industries because they can improve flavor and reduce the content of non-digestible substances in raw materials [7]. Over the past decades, LAB, including Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum, have been widely used to ferment milk to further increase its nutritive value and absorptivity. S. thermophilus is a crucial starter in dairy products, which is strongly associated with its rapid acidification capability [8]. Early research confirmed that S. thermophilus fermentation produced a series of functional molecules, including exopolysaccharides, short-chain fatty acids, polypeptides, and vitamins [9]. In addition, S. thermophilus fermentation alters the texture, improves the viscosity, and adjusts the mouthfeel of yogurts. Recently, fermented juice has attracted considerable interest due to its relatively high content of nutrients and unique flavors [10]. A previous study showed that S. thermophilus fermentation increased the contents of organic acids and phenolics as well as the antioxidant capacity of blackberry juices [11]. In addition, S. thermophilus exhibits a strong malolactic conversion ability [12]. However, there are few reports on the effects of S. thermophilus fermentation on the metabolic profiles of juices.
To expand the application field of barley juice, an S. thermophilus strain was selected to ferment barley juice. Fermented barley juice samples were collected at different times, and several physical and chemical indicators were determined, including pH, total titratable acidity, total phenols, and total flavonoids, as well as the volatile and non-volatile compounds. In addition, the antioxidant abilities of the unfermented and fermented barley juices were assessed by measuring their capacities to scavenge of 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and superoxide anion (O2). The acceptance of the barley juice to consumers was revealed based on the sensory analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain

S. thermophilus 7G10 was isolated from fermented bovine milk. The bacterial strain was routinely cultivated in MRS broth and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The bacterial cells were collected via centrifugation at 12,000× g for 5 min. Subsequently, the strain was washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in pasteurized barley juice.

2.2. Fermented Barley Juice Preparation

Barley powder was provided by Xunweixuan Co., Ltd. (Danyang, China). Barley juice fermentation was carried out according to a previously described method with minor modifications [13]. In brief, the barley powder was dried at 65 °C for 1 h and mixed with distilled water at a ratio of 1:9 (w/w). Barley juice (100 mL), glucose (0.15%, w/w), and skim milk (0.075%, w/w) were mixed, pasteurized at 65 °C for 30 min, and then cooled in ice-cold water. Subsequently, S. thermophilus 7G10 was inoculated in 0.1 L of barley juice and fermented at 37 °C for 24 h. The initial number of viable S. thermophilus 7G10 cells was about 106 CFU/mL. The samples were obtained at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h of incubation and kept at −79 ± 1 °C for further analysis. There were three replicates for each time point, and a total of 18 samples were collected.

2.3. Microbiological and Physicochemical Analysis

2.3.1. Determination of Viable Bacterial Counts and pH

Viable counts of S. thermophilus 7G10 were measured using the standard plate count method [14]. Briefly, the sample (0.5 mL) was serially diluted to 10−6, 10−7 and 10−8 with 4.5 mL of sterilized physiological saline water in test tubes. Then, 100 μL of diluted juice was dispensed in triplicate on MRS agar and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Plates containing 30–300 colonies were counted, and the results were recorded as log CFU/mL. The pH of the fermented barley juice was measured using a digital pH meter (Mettle-Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland).

2.3.2. Determination of Total Sugars and Titratable Acidity

The total sugar content in the fermented barley juice is presented as glucose equivalents using the phenol–sulfuric acid method [13]. In brief, 1 mL of the diluted sample (1:5999), 1 mL of phenol (5%, v:v), and 5 mL of sulfuric acid were mixed and kept at 25 °C for 10 min. After vibration, all samples were placed in a 30 °C water bath for 10 min. The absorbance was detected at 490 nm using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The titratable acid content was detected using titration with 0.1 M NaOH and computed using the lactic acid conversion coefficient.

2.3.3. Determination of Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content was determined according to the Folin–Ciocalteu method with slight modifications [14]. In brief, 2.0 mL of 10% Folin–Ciocalteu solution was added to 1.0 mL of diluted samples (1:79) and stored at 25 °C for 3 min. Na2CO3 (2.0 mL; 15% w/v) was added to the reaction solution and then stored in the dark at 25 °C for 30 min. The absorbance at 765 nm was detected using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). The results are presented as equivalents of gallic acid.

2.3.4. Determination Analysis of Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content of the fermented juice was measured using the aluminum chloride colorimetric method with slight modifications [14]. In brief, 5.0 mL of sodium nitrite (50 g/L) was transferred to 1.0 mL of diluted sample (1:19) and stored at 25 °C for 5 min. Then, 1.0 mL of AlCl3 (10%, v:v) was added to the mixture, mixed, vibrated, and stored in a 25 °C incubator for 10 min. Immediately, 2.0 mL of sodium hydroxide (2 mol/L) was added to the mixture at 25 °C for 10 min, and the absorbance at 510 nm was detected using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). The results are presented as rutin equivalents.

2.4. Analysis of the Volatile Compounds

In brief, 2.0 g of NaCl, 5 mL of fermented juice, and 1.0 μL of 2-octanol (5 mg/L) were transferred to a headspace bottle. After incubation at 60 °C for 10 min, volatile compounds of the mixture were collected using 50/30 umcar/polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene. After extraction for 30 min, an extractor was inserted into the GC-MS sample inlet and desorbed at 250 °C for 5 min. Volatile compounds of the fermented juice were measured using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the volatiles were separated using a DB-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 1.0 μm). The conditions of the column oven were as follows: The initial temperature was 50 °C, which was maintained for 3 min and then increased to 240 °C at the speed of 5 °C/min. The final temperature was 240 °C, which was maintained for 10 min. Electron ionization at 70 eV was applied to collect the mass spectra in the range of 40–450 amu. Volatile compounds were analyzed by matching the retention indices of the mass spectra and spectral components in the NIST11 and WILEY 07 libraries. The retention index (RI) was calculated using n-alkanes (C7-C30) as an external reference under the same operating conditions. For semi-quantitative analysis, the relative peak areas of samples were obtained and assumed to be linearly proportional to the compound, and the detector had the same molar response for all compounds. Semi-quantification of the volatile compounds was calculated according to the following formula:
C (mg/L) = Ac × Cis/Ais (mg/L)
where C is the relative concentration of the sample; Cis is the final concentration of the internal standard in the sample; Ac is the peak area of the analyzed sample; Ais is the peak area of the internal standard. In this study, the concentration of 2-octanol (internal standard) was 0.5 mg/L. Principal component analysis (PCA) and construction of the PCA-based loading plots were performed using Simca (v 14.1), based on the abundance of volatile compounds and hierarchical clustering analysis.

2.5. Analysis of the Non-Volatile Compounds

The preliminary treatment of barley juice referred to a previous study with minor modifications [15]. Briefly, the supernatant (400 μL) of the unfermented or fermented barley juice and 80% methanol (800 μL) were mixed, extracted, and then stored at 25 °C for 1 h. After centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was collected and freeze-dried using a vacuum concentrator centrifuge. All samples were reconstituted in 80% methanol (400 μL) and vortexed. After centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was collected and analyzed using UPLC-QTOF-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Raw data were analyzed and filtered using CD software (v 3.3). The obtained data were analyzed using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada) (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca, 22 April 2023).

2.6. Antioxidant Activity Analyses

2.6.1. ABTS Radical Scavenging Ability

ABTS radical scavenging ability was measured using a previously described method with slight modifications [16]. Briefly, ABTS solution (7 mmol/L) and K2SO4 solution (2.45 mmol/L) were mixed in equal volumes and transferred to a dark environment at 25 °C for 16 h. The absorbance of the mixture at 734 nm was adjusted to 0.70 ± 0.01 using PBS and then mixed with fermented juice in equal volumes and kept at 25 °C for 6 min. The absorbance of each sample was detected at 734 nm using an ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectrophotometer. The blank control consisted of distilled water and the mixture. The ABTS radical scavenging ability was calculated using Equation (1):
ABTS radical scavenging ability (%) = (Ablank − Asample)/Ablank × 100

2.6.2. DPPH Radical Scavenging Ability

DPPH radical scavenging ability was determined based on a previous report with slight modifications [16]. Briefly, 3.9 mL of DPPH solution (0.02 mol/L) was added to 0.1 mL fermented juice and then stored in the dark at 25 °C for 30 min. The absorbance at 517 nm was detected using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). Blank controls consisted of absolute ethanol and DPPH solutions. The DPPH radical scavenging ability was calculated using Equation (2):
DPPH radical scavenging ability (%) = (Ablank − Asample)/Ablank × 100

2.6.3. O2 Radical Scavenging Ability

O2 radical scavenging ability was determined according to a previously described method with slight modifications [13]. Briefly, nitroblue tetrazolium salt (NBT, 300 μmol/L), β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH, 936 μmol/L), and phenazine methosulfate (PMS, 120 μmol/L) were prepared in 100 mM PBS (pH 7.4). The reaction mixture consisted of an equal volume of samples or distilled water (control), NBT, NADH, and PMS. After incubation at 37 °C for 5 min, the absorbance at 560 nm was measured using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer. O2 radical scavenging ability was calculated using Equation (3):
O2 radical scavenging ability (%) = (Ablank − Asample)/Ablank × 100

2.7. Sensory Analysis

A total of 23 volunteers aged between 23 and 27 were recruited, including 12 males and 11 females. All the volunteers received 6 h of training according to a previous study [17] and met the requirements for the sensory evaluation panel. Sensory tests were performed in a quiet environment with white fluorescent lights. The unfermented and fermented barley juices were distributed to the volunteers in a random sequence of coded plastic disposable cups. The samples were evaluated according to five sensory attributes, including overall acceptability, sourness, sweetness, odor, and color of the juice. The numbers ranged from 1 (poor) to 9 (excellent), indicating the extent to which the volunteer liked each attribute. The scores for each sample given by the volunteers were collected, and the average value was calculated.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are shown as the means ± standard deviations of three experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range test were used for data analysis, and differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Dynamic Changes in Viable Cell Counts and pH of Barley Juice during Fermentation

Vegetables, fruits, and grains are suitable substrates for LAB growth [18]. A previous report showed that barley was rich in carbohydrates, amino acids, vitamins, minerals, and fatty acids, being very suitable for microbial growth [19]. As illustrated in Figure 1, the initial viable cell count of S. thermophilus 7G10 was about 6.11 log CFU/mL and increased to 8.68 log CFU/mL at the termination of fermentation, suggesting that S. thermophilus 7G10 could utilize the nutrients in barley juice for growth. Meanwhile, S. thermophilus 7G10 fermentation decreased the pH of the barley juice from 6.22 to 4.44.

3.2. Dynamic Changes in Total Sugars, Titratable Acidity, Phenols, and Flavonoids in Barley Juice during Fermentation

Sugar serves as an important carbon source for bacterial growth. Changes in total sugar contents can directly reflect LAB growth [18]. As shown in Figure 2A, the total sugar content of the barley juice was significantly increased after 4 h of fermentation at 37 °C, which may be due to the degradation of polysaccharides in the barley juice by S. thermophilus 7G10. Subsequently, the total sugar content of the barley juice decreased dramatically at 6 h and consequently decreased to 0.38 ± 0.00 mg/mL at 24 h. In addition, LAB fermentation is confirmed to promote the formation of organic acids in vegetables, fruits, and grain juices [20]. In the present study, the total titratable acidity of the barley juice increased rapidly after 6 h and reached the highest concentration at 24 h (Figure 2B). However, high levels of total titratable acidity may suppress LAB growth, resulting in minor changes in the fermented juice quality [21].
Phenols and flavonoids are widely present in vegetables and fruits in the form of bound or free states. Some reports have suggested that LAB fermentation can increase the content of active substances in food, including total phenols and total flavonoids [18,22]. As shown in Figure 2C, the content of total phenols showed an upward trend during fermentation and reached the highest point of 3.86 ± 0.02 mg/mL at 24 h. Complex polyphenols can be decomposed into simple polyphenols via enzymatic breakdown, and the phenolic transformation ability is strongly related to LAB growth [23]. A previous study indicated that LAB fermentation could transform polyphenolic compounds into others with lower molecular weights and release the conjugated phenolic compounds, which is beneficial for increasing the bioavailability of phenols [24]. In addition, the content of total flavonoids decreased from 0.73 ± 0.02 mg/mL to 0.70 ± 0.02 mg/mL (0–4 h) (Figure 2D) and then displayed a stepwise upward trend.

3.3. Volatile Compound Profiles of Unfermented and Fermented Barley Juices

Volatile compounds are regarded as an important index for assessing the quality of fermented juices. The profiles of the volatile compounds in the barley juice were measured using HS-SPME coupled with GC-MS during S. thermophilus 7G10 fermentation. As shown in Figure 3, 71 volatile compounds were detected and identified, including 22 acids, 15 ketones, 13 alcohols, and 9 aldehydes. Among them, 16 new volatile compounds formed during the barley juice fermentation, including 6 acids, 4 ketones, 3 alcohols, and 1 aldehyde.
PCA was performed to reveal the overall changes in the volatile compounds in the barley juice during the fermentation (Figure 4A). The samples of barley juice were spontaneously clustered according to different sampling times (R2X = 0.71, Q2 = 0.44). The first and second principal components of the PCA accounted for 39.4% and 17.6% of the total variability, respectively. The unfermented barley juice was located in the second and third quadrants of the PCA loading plot, whereas the fermented barley juice samples were located in the first and fourth quadrants after 24 h of fermentation, indicating that S. thermophilus 7G10 fermentation significantly altered the volatile compounds in the barley juice. Numerous studies have shown that fruit and vegetable juices fermented with LAB have unique flavors [25]. In addition, the above appearance was further reflected in the HCA analysis (Figure 4B).
A PCA loading plot was constructed to identify the key volatile compounds between the unfermented and fermented barley juices (Figure 5). The main compounds identified in the unfermented barley juice were benzeneethanamine [F3], 1-penten-3-ol [F16], 12,15-octadecadiynoic acid [F15], 3,5-octadien-2-one [F29], 6-hepten-3-ol [F28], 9-octadecenoic acid [F58], octanoic acid [F49], 2-pentenal [F14], 2-hexenal [F17], methyleugenol [F48], and docosanoic acid [F70]. 1-Penten-3-ol is widely present in barley juice, and its contents gradually decrease during fermentation [26]. 9-Octadecenoic acid is usually present in dietary fats and oils, and long-term consumption can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease due to its effects on lipoproteins in plasma [27]. Methyleugenol, an alkenylbenzene compound, is present as a component of leaf and floral essential oils from many plant species, which is consistent with this study [28]. Fermented barley juice is mainly composed of pentanoic acid [F35], vanillin [F66], benzyl alcohol [F43], ethanone [F47], ethanol [F7], 2-pentanone [F9], 2,3-pentanedione [F11], and benzoic acid [F63]. Pentanoic acid is a carboxylic acid produced through microbial fermentation of carbohydrates [29]. Vanillin is a natural aromatic flavoring compound that is widely used to enhance food aromas and antimicrobial properties [30]. Benzyl alcohol is a member of the fragrance structural group of aryl alkyl alcohols and is used as a flavoring substance in foods [31]. In addition, enrichment of 2-pentanone and 2,3-pentanedione can be attributed to the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids in LAB fermentation [32]. These results suggest that LAB fermentation significantly alters the volatile compounds present in barley juice.

3.4. Non-Volatile Compound Profiles of Unfermented and Fermented Barley Juices

The nature and concentration of non-volatile compounds directly affect the organoleptic quality of juice [33]. Therefore, the non-volatile compound profiles of the unfermented and fermented barley juices were analyzed using UPLC-QTOF-MS. A total of 1063 and 397 non-volatile compounds were identified in the unfermented and fermented barley juices, respectively, in positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI-) ion modes using untargeted metabolomics based on UPLC-QTOF-MS. As illustrated in Figure 6A,B, the principal components accounted for 69.0% (PC1 = 50.9% and PC2 = 18.1%) and 86.6% (PC1 = 73.9% and PC2 = 12.7%) of the total variation in the ESI+ and ESI- modes, respectively. The unfermented and fermented barley juices were obviously separated, suggesting that S. thermophilus 7G10 significantly altered the non-volatile compounds in the barley juice. In addition, the above appearance was also reflected in the OPLS-DA scores plots (Figure 6C,D). A previous study showed that S. thermophilus fermentation endowed the juice with more metabolic characteristics, such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, and alkaloids [12].
As illustrated in Table 1, 30 key non-volatile compounds were obtained according to their variable importance in projection (VIP). Compared with the unfermented barley juice, the contents of S-adenosylmethionine, iminoerythrose 4-phosphate, tolycaine, nonane-4,6-dione, 5-methyldeoxycytidine, N-ribosylnicotinamide, uracil, tetramethylene sulfoxide, anatabine, azobenzene, hypoxanthine, inosine, D(+)-phenyllactic acid, DL-lactic acid, pyruvic acid, (2R)-2,3-dihydroxypropanoic acid, hypoxanthine, guanine, 6-hydroxycaproic acid, cytarabine, deoxyguanosine, and pseudouridine in the fermented barley juice were significantly increased. S-Adenosylmethionine is an important substance that plays an important role in regulating glycolysis and alcoholic fermentation, and its content is strongly associated with the abundance of bacteria and fungi [34]. Uracil exists in relatively low amounts in foods, but its content is significantly increased in foods fermented with LAB, which is in accordance with our study [35]. Hypoxanthine, inosine, and guanine are reaction intermediates of purine metabolism and are regarded as potential markers for assessing food freshness [36]. In addition, an increase in the hypoxanthine content may result from an increase in hypoxanthine synthesis and a reduction in hypoxanthine degradation [37]. However, the contents of nicotinamide, L-lysine, L(-)-pipecolinic acid, glyoxylic acid, DL-malic acid, fumaric acid, and (3S)-3_6-diaminohexanoate deoxyguanosine in the barley juice were significantly reduced after S. thermophilus 7G10 fermentation. L-Lysine plays a key role in LAB growth, and its content was reduced in the barley juice after S. thermophilus 7G10 fermentation [38]. DL-Malic and fumaric acids are components of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, which significantly shorten the fermentation time [39].

3.5. Antioxidant Activity of Unfermented and Fermented Barley Juices

LAB are widely used to ferment fruit juices and can enhance their physiological function, which may be due to the formation of bioactive ingredients that suppress the accumulation of free radicals. ABTS, DPPH, and O2 assays are extensively applied to measure the free radical scavenging ability of fermented juice in vitro. A single electron of free radicals can be paired with a radical scavenger, which degrades its violet color and decreases its absorbance at 517 nm [40]. As illustrated in Figure 7, the ABTS free radical scavenging activity of the barley juice was remarkably increased from 88.56 ± 1.13% to 98.69 ± 0.57% after 24 h of fermentation. A previous report showed that the antioxidant ability of pear juice fermented with L. acidophilus CH-2 was significantly increased compared to that of pear juice owing to the increase in the DL-malic acid and fumaric acid contents after fermentation [41]. A dramatic increase in the DPPH free radical scavenging ability in the fermented juice was observed, ranging from 79.96 ± 0.47% to 91.41 ± 0.81%. In addition, the fermented barley juice had a significantly high O2 radical scavenging activity (95.65 ± 1.75%) compared with the unfermented barley juice (85.37 ± 2.75%). These changes in the antioxidant activities of the fermented barley juice are strongly associated with the increases in the total phenolic and flavonoid contents. However, LAB fermentation can change the form and constituents of phenolics, which can increase the antioxidant activity of the juice [42,43].

3.6. Sensory Evaluation

Whether barley juice fermented with S. thermophilus 7G10 has an unpleasant taste must be considered. The sensory evaluation of the barley juice fermented with S. thermophilus 7G10 is shown in Figure 8. The scores for color, odor, and sourness increased in the barley juice fermented with S. thermophilus 7G10, which agrees with a previous study [44]. In contrast, sweetness scores were reduced in the barley juice fermented with S. thermophilus 7G10, which may be due to the low sugar content after fermentation. In addition, S. thermophilus 7G10 fermentation increased the overall acceptability of the barley juice. Sun et al. also found that pumpkin juice fermented with L. plantarum was more popular among consumers, which was associated with its acceptable sugar-to-acid ratio [20]. In addition, benzyl alcohol and phenylethyl alcohol are the principal benzenic compounds that impart fruity and floral/rose-like scents, which is helpful in increasing the diversity of odors [45].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, S. thermophilus 7G10 could grow well in barley juice, which decreased the pH and increased the contents of total polyphenols and flavonoids. The fermentation of barley juice with S. thermophilus 7G10 introduced a variety of volatile compounds (including acids, ketones, alcohols, and aldehydes) and non-volatile compounds (including S-adenosylmethionine, hypoxanthine, inosine, and guanine). In addition, barley juice fermented with S. thermophilus 7G10 displayed strong ABTS, DPPH, and O2 radical scavenging capacities. Taken together, the results of the present study offer a suitable strategy for the further development of fermented barley juice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.M. and W.G.; methodology, M.C.; software and validation, B.M., W.G. and M.C.; formal analysis, investigation, and resources, X.T., Q.Z. and J.Z.; data curation, X.T.; writing—original draft preparation, B.M. and W.G.; writing—review and editing, X.T.; visualization, S.C.; supervision, H.Z.; project administration, S.C.; funding acquisition, B.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2020B020226008), Yongjiang Talent Introduction Programme (2021C-003-T), and Collaborative Innovation Center of Food Safety and Quality Control in Jiangsu Province.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Min Guo for the help with the volatile and non-volatile compound profile analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yan, J.K.; Chen, T.T.; Wang, Z.W.; Wang, C.; Liu, C.; Li, L. Comparison of physicochemical characteristics and biological activities of polysaccharides from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grass at different growth stages. Food Chem. 2022, 389, 133083. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, J.; Wang, P.; Tan, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Bai, J.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, L.; Teng, D.; Tian, J.; et al. Effects of L. plantarum dy-1 fermentation time on the characteristic structure and antioxidant activity of barley β-glucan in vitro. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.; Du, Y.; Tu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wang, L. Highland barley improves lipid metabolism, liver injury, antioxidant capacities and liver functions in high-fat/cholesterol diet mice based on gut microbiota and LC-MS metabonomics. Food Biosci. 2022, 50, 102094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Velikonja, A.; Lipoglavšek, L.; Zorec, M.; Orel, R.; Avguštin, G. Alterations in gut microbiota composition and metabolic parameters after dietary intervention with barley beta glucans in patients with high risk for metabolic syndrome development. Anaerobe 2019, 55, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ge, X.; Jing, L.; Zhao, K.; Su, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Han, L.; Yu, X.; Li, W. The phenolic compounds profile, quantitative analysis and antioxidant activity of four naked barley grains with different color. Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, L.; Liu, B.; Feng, S.; Ma, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y. Correlation between microbe, physicochemical properties of Jiuqu in different plateau areas and volatile flavor compounds of highland barley alcoholic drink. Food Biosci. 2023, 51, 102276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, S.; Wu, T.; Peng, C.; Wang, J.; Sun, T.; Zhang, H. Metabolic footprint analysis of volatile metabolites by gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry to discriminate between different fermentation temperatures during Streptococcus thermophilus milk fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 8541–8553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lecomte, X.; Gagnaire, V.; Lortal, S.; Dary, A.; Genay, M. Streptococcus thermophilus, an emerging and promising tool for heterologous expression: Advantages and future trends. Food Microbiol. 2016, 53, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Korcz, E.; Varga, L.; Kerényi, Z. Relationship between total cell counts and exopolysaccharide production of Streptococcus thermophilus T9 in reconstituted skim milk. LWT 2021, 148, 111775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, K.; Qi, J.; Jin, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, J.; Xu, H. Influence of fruit maturity and lactic fermentation on physicochemical properties, phenolics, volatiles, and sensory of mulberry juice. Food Biosci. 2022, 48, 101782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, Y.; Li, S.; Tao, Y.; Li, D.; Han, Y.; Show, P.L.; Wen, G.; Zhou, J. Fermentation of blueberry and blackberry juices using Lactobacillus plantarum, Streptococcus thermophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum: Growth of probiotics, metabolism of phenolics, antioxidant capacity in vitro and sensory evaluation. Food Chem. 2021, 348, 129083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, J.; Zhao, W.; Pan, X.; Lao, F.; Liao, X.; Shi, Y.; Wu, J. Improvement of antioxidant properties of jujube puree by biotransformation of polyphenols via Streptococcus thermophilus fermentation. Food Chem. X 2022, 13, 100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Wei, Z.; Yin, B.; Man, C.; Jiang, Y. Enhancement of functional characteristics of blueberry juice fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum. LWT 2021, 139, 110590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, W.; Chen, M.; Cui, S.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Mao, B.; Zhang, H. Dynamics changes in physicochemical properties, volatile metabolites, non-volatile metabolites, and physiological functions of barley juice during Bifidobacterium infantis fermentation. Food Chem. 2023, 407, 135201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, L.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, J. Dynamic changes of quality and flavor characterization of Zhejiang rosy vinegar during fermentation and aging based on untargeted metabolomics. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, W.; Chen, M.; Cui, S.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Mao, B.; Zhang, H. Effects of Lacticaseibacillus casei fermentation on the bioactive compounds, volatile and non-volatile compounds, and physiological properties of barley beverage. Food Biosci. 2023, 53, 102695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, T.; Sakamoto, M.; Phacharapan, S.; Inoue, N.; Kamitani, Y. Antioxidant characteristic changes, sensory evaluation, processing and storage of functional water modified juice. Food Biosci. 2023, 52, 102468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Isas, A.S.; Mariotti Celis, M.S.; Pérez Correa, J.R.; Fuentes, E.; Rodríguez, L.; Palomo, I.; Mozzi, F.; Van Nieuwenhove, C. Functional fermented cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) juice using autochthonous lactic acid bacteria. Food Res. Inter. 2020, 138, 109729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al-Ansi, W.; Mushtaq, B.S.; Mahdi, A.A.; Al-Maqtari, Q.A.; Al-Adeeb, A.; Ahmed, A.; Fan, M.; Li, Y.; Qian, H.; Jinxin, L.; et al. Molecular structure, morphological, and physicochemical properties of highlands barley starch as affected by natural fermentation. Food Chem. 2021, 356, 129665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, F.; Jiao, X.; Ma, D.; Zhang, L.; Yang, B.; Zhao, J.; Han, J.; Li, Q. Effects of lactic acid bacteria fermentation on chemical compounds, antioxidant capacities and hypoglycemic properties of pumpkin juice. Food Biosci. 2022, 50, 102126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Han, M.; Liang, J.; Zhang, M.; Bai, X.; Yue, T.; Gao, Z. Evaluating the changes in phytochemical composition, hypoglycemic effect, and influence on mice intestinal microbiota of fermented apple juice. Food Res. Inter. 2022, 155, 110998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Landete, J.M.; Curiel, J.A.; Rodríguez, H.; de las Rivas, B.; Muñoz, R. Aryl glycosidases from Lactobacillus plantarum increase antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 7, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Oh, B.T.; Jeong, S.Y.; Velmurugan, P.; Park, J.H.; Jeong, D.Y. Probiotic-mediated blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) fruit fermentation to yield functionalized products for augmented antibacterial and antioxidant activity. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2017, 124, 542–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Qi, J.; Huang, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, N.; Chen, X.; Jiang, T.; Xu, H.; Lei, H. Insights into the improvement of bioactive phytochemicals, antioxidant activities and flavor profiles in Chinese wolfberry juice by select lactic acid bacteria. Food Biosci. 2021, 43, 101264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ji, G.; Liu, G.; Li, B.; Tan, H.; Zheng, R.; Sun, X.; He, F. Influence on the aroma substances and functional ingredients of apple juice by lactic acid bacteria fermentation. Food Biosci. 2023, 51, 102337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Y.; Yuan, L.; Liu, H.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Li, M.; Gao, R. Analysis of the changes of volatile flavor compounds in a traditional Chinese shrimp paste during fermentation based on electronic nose, SPME-GC-MS and HS-GC-IMS. Food Sci. Hum. Well. 2023, 12, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoshinaga, K.; Asanuma, M.; Mizobe, H.; Kojima, K.; Nagai, T.; Beppu, F.; Gotoh, N. Characterization of cis- and trans-octadecenoic acid positional isomers in edible fat and oil using gas chromatography–flame ionisation detector equipped with highly polar ionic liquid capillary column. Food Chem. 2014, 160, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Choi, Y.K.; Cho, G.S.; Hwang, S.; Kim, B.W.; Lim, J.H.; Lee, J.C.; Kim, H.C.; Kim, W.K.; Kim, Y.S. Methyleugenol reduces cerebral ischemic injury by suppression of oxidative injury and inflammation. Free Radical Res. 2010, 44, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mizuno, N.; Abe, K.; Morishita, Y.; Yamashita, S.; Segawa, R.; Dong, J.; Moriya, T.; Hiratsuka, M.; Hirasawa, N. Pentanoic acid induces thymic stromal lymphopoietin production through Gq/11 and Rho-associated protein kinase signaling pathway in keratinocytes. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 50, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shao, T.; Song, X.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, P.; Sun, S.; Wang, D.; Wei, W. Vanillin-Catalyzed highly sensitive luminol chemiluminescence and its application in food detection. Spectrochim. Acta A 2023, 294, 122535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Scognamiglio, J.; Jones, L.; Vitale, D.; Letizia, C.S.; Api, A.M. Fragrance material review on benzyl alcohol. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, S140–S160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liao, W.; Shen, J.; Manickam, S.; Li, S.; Tao, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, D.; Han, Y. Investigation of blueberry juice fermentation by mixed probiotic strains: Regression modeling, machine learning optimization and comparison with fermentation by single strain in the phenolic and volatile profiles. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cheong, M.W.; Zhu, D.; Sng, J.; Liu, S.Q.; Zhou, W.; Curran, P.; Yu, B. Characterisation of calamansi (Citrus microcarpa). Part II: Volatiles, physicochemical properties and non-volatiles in the juice. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guo, Y.; Wang, H.; Wei, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Li, J.; Liu, J. Utilization of high-K+-cane molasses for enhanced S-Adenosylmethionine production by manipulation of a K+ transport channel in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Eng. J. 2023, 193, 108846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chang, C.J.; Dai, R.Y.; Leu, Y.L.; Tsai, T.Y. Effects of the melanogenic inhibitor, uracil, derived from Lactobacillus plantarum TWK10-fermented soy milk on anti-melanogenesis in B16F0 mouse melanoma cells. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 17, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garg, D.; Singh, M.; Verma, N.; Monika. Review on recent advances in fabrication of enzymatic and chemical sensors for hypoxanthine. Food Chem. 2022, 375, 131839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, H.; Teng, J.; Huang, L.; Wei, B.; Xia, N. Determination of the variations in the metabolic profile and sensory quality of Liupao tea during fermentation through UHPLC–HR–MS metabolomics. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Su, X.; Cui, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, K.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xu, B. Effects of L-lysine and L-arginine on the structure and gel properties of konjac glucomannan. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 137, 108404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yamamoto, E.; Watanabe, R.; Tooyama, E.; Kimura, K. Effect of fumaric acid on the growth of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus during yogurt fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 9617–9626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, W.; Xie, C.; He, Q.; Sun, J.; Bai, W. Improvement in color expression and antioxidant activity of strawberry juice fermented with lactic acid bacteria: A phenolic-based research. Food Chem. X 2023, 17, 100535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, X.; Gao, J.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Wang, X.; Caprioli, G.; Mi, S.; Sang, Y. Effect of fermentation by Lactobacillus acidophilus CH-2 on the enzymatic browning of pear juice. LWT 2021, 147, 111489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhong, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Yu, Q.; Xie, J.; Dong, R.; Xie, Y.; Li, B.; Tian, J.; Chen, Y. Natural variation on free, esterified, glycosylated and insoluble-bound phenolics of Rubus chingii Hu: Correlation between phenolic constituents and antioxidant activities. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162, 112043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ismail, B.B.; Pu, Y.; Guo, M.; Ma, X.; Liu, D. LC-MS/QTOF identification of phytochemicals and the effects of solvents on phenolic constituents and antioxidant activity of baobab (Adansonia digitata) fruit pulp. Food Chem. 2019, 277, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yuasa, M.; Shimada, A.; Matsuzaki, A.; Eguchi, A.; Tominaga, M. Chemical composition and sensory properties of fermented citrus juice using probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Food Biosci. 2021, 39, 100810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. D’Onofrio, C.; Matarese, F.; Cuzzola, A. Effect of methyl jasmonate on the aroma of Sangiovese grapes and wines. Food Chem. 2018, 242, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Photograph of the barley juice during the fermentation (A), and changes in viable cell counts and pH of the barley juice fermented with S. thermophilus 7G10 (B).
Figure 1. Photograph of the barley juice during the fermentation (A), and changes in viable cell counts and pH of the barley juice fermented with S. thermophilus 7G10 (B).
Fermentation 09 00623 g001
Figure 2. Effects of S. thermophilus 7G10 on total sugars (A), total titratable acidity (B), total polyphenols (C), and total flavonoids (D).
Figure 2. Effects of S. thermophilus 7G10 on total sugars (A), total titratable acidity (B), total polyphenols (C), and total flavonoids (D).
Fermentation 09 00623 g002
Figure 3. Heatmap of the volatile compounds in the barley juice during the fermentation. S0: unfermented barley juice; S2, S4, S6, S12, S24: fermented barley juice at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively; “−1, −2, −3”: three replicates for the corresponding samples.
Figure 3. Heatmap of the volatile compounds in the barley juice during the fermentation. S0: unfermented barley juice; S2, S4, S6, S12, S24: fermented barley juice at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively; “−1, −2, −3”: three replicates for the corresponding samples.
Fermentation 09 00623 g003
Figure 4. Score plot (A) and hierarchical cluster plot (B) based on PCA (n = 3) of the volatile compounds in the barley juice during the fermentation. S0: unfermented barley juice; S2, S4, S6, S12, S24: fermented barley juice at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively; “−1, −2, −3”: three replicates for the corresponding samples.
Figure 4. Score plot (A) and hierarchical cluster plot (B) based on PCA (n = 3) of the volatile compounds in the barley juice during the fermentation. S0: unfermented barley juice; S2, S4, S6, S12, S24: fermented barley juice at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively; “−1, −2, −3”: three replicates for the corresponding samples.
Fermentation 09 00623 g004
Figure 5. Loading plot of the two principal components based on PCA. S0: unfermented barley juice; S2, S4, S6, S12, S24: fermented barley juice at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively; “−1, −2, −3”: three replicates for the corresponding samples; F1–F71: the volatile compounds identified in the barley juice during the fermentation.
Figure 5. Loading plot of the two principal components based on PCA. S0: unfermented barley juice; S2, S4, S6, S12, S24: fermented barley juice at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively; “−1, −2, −3”: three replicates for the corresponding samples; F1–F71: the volatile compounds identified in the barley juice during the fermentation.
Fermentation 09 00623 g005
Figure 6. Non-volatile compounds of unfermented and fermented barley juices were detected using UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS. PCA score plots for ESI+ mode (A) and ESI− mode (B). OPLS-DA score plots for ESI+ mode (C) and ESI− mode (D).
Figure 6. Non-volatile compounds of unfermented and fermented barley juices were detected using UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS. PCA score plots for ESI+ mode (A) and ESI− mode (B). OPLS-DA score plots for ESI+ mode (C) and ESI− mode (D).
Fermentation 09 00623 g006
Figure 7. ABTS, DPPH, and O2 radical scavenging abilities (%) of unfermented and fermented barley juices. S0: unfermented barley juice; S24: fermented barley juice. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated with different letters (a, b).
Figure 7. ABTS, DPPH, and O2 radical scavenging abilities (%) of unfermented and fermented barley juices. S0: unfermented barley juice; S24: fermented barley juice. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated with different letters (a, b).
Fermentation 09 00623 g007
Figure 8. Sensory evaluation of unfermented and fermented barley juices. S0: unfermented barley juice; S24: fermented barley juice.
Figure 8. Sensory evaluation of unfermented and fermented barley juices. S0: unfermented barley juice; S24: fermented barley juice.
Fermentation 09 00623 g008
Table 1. Identification of 30 total non-volatile compounds as biomarkers between the unfermented and fermented barley juices.
Table 1. Identification of 30 total non-volatile compounds as biomarkers between the unfermented and fermented barley juices.
No.m/zChemical FormulaCompound NameS24 vs. S0
ESI+
1399.144C15H22N6O5SS-Adenosylmethionineup
2200.032C4H10NO6PIminoerythrose-4-phosphateup
3279.170C15H22N2O3Tolycaineup
4156.115C9H16O2Nonane-4,6-dioneup
5258.228C10H15N3O45-Methyldeoxycytidineup
6255.247C11H14N2O5N-Ribosylnicotinamideup
7112.027C4H4N2O2Uracilup
8104.030C4H8OSTetramethylene sulfoxideup
9122.048C6H6N2ONicotinamidedown
10146.106C6H14N2O2L-Lysinedown
11129.079C6H11NO2L(-)-Pipecolinic aciddown
12160.100C10H12N2Anatabineup
13182.084C12H10N2Azobenzeneup
14136.039C5H4N4OHypoxanthineup
15268.081C10H12N4O5Inosineup
ESI−
1165.055C9H10O3D(+)-Phenyllactic acidup
289.024C3H6O3DL-Lactic acidup
3267.072C10H12N4O5Inosineup
487.008C3H4O3Pyruvic acidup
5135.031C5H4N4OHypoxanthineup
6150.041C5H5N5OGuanineup
7131.071C6H12O36-Hydroxycaproic acidup
8242.077C9H13N3O5Cytarabineup
9313.091C4H5N3O25-Amino-4-imidazolecarboxylateup
10266.088C10H13N5O4Deoxyguanosineup
11133.014C4H6O5DL-Malic aciddown
12115.003C4H4O4Fumaric aciddown
13243.061C9H12N2O6Pseudouridineup
14134.037C6H5N3OHOBTdown
15145.100C6H14N2O2(3S)-3,6-Diaminohexanoatedown
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mao, B.; Guo, W.; Chen, M.; Tang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Cui, S. Effects of Streptococcus thermophilus Fermentation on the Flavors and Antioxidant Properties of Barley Juice. Fermentation 2023, 9, 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070623

AMA Style

Mao B, Guo W, Chen M, Tang X, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Zhang H, Cui S. Effects of Streptococcus thermophilus Fermentation on the Flavors and Antioxidant Properties of Barley Juice. Fermentation. 2023; 9(7):623. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070623

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mao, Bingyong, Weiling Guo, Minxuan Chen, Xin Tang, Qiuxiang Zhang, Jianxin Zhao, Hao Zhang, and Shumao Cui. 2023. "Effects of Streptococcus thermophilus Fermentation on the Flavors and Antioxidant Properties of Barley Juice" Fermentation 9, no. 7: 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9070623

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop