Next Article in Journal
Nitrogen Sources Added to Must: Effect on the Fermentations and on the Tempranillo Red Wine Quality
Next Article in Special Issue
Enological Repercussions of Non-Saccharomyces Species 2.0
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Effect of Non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces Non-Cerevisiae Yeasts on Ethanol and Glycerol Levels in Wine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Fermentation
Volume 6
Issue 3
10.3390/fermentation6030078
Review Report
fermentation-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

Printed Edition

A printed edition of this Special Issue is available at MDPI Books....
share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparison of the Glycolytic and Alcoholic Fermentation Pathways of Hanseniaspora vineae with Saccharomyces cerevisiae Wine Yeasts

Fermentation 2020, 6(3), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6030078
by María José Valera 1, Eduardo Boido 1, Eduardo Dellacassa 2 and Francisco Carrau 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Fermentation 2020, 6(3), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6030078
Submission received: 11 July 2020 / Revised: 27 July 2020 / Accepted: 29 July 2020 / Published: 3 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enological Repercussions of Non-Saccharomyces Species 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This study is a comparison of fermentation pathways of Hanseniaspora vineae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and shows differences which can help explain their roles in winemaking. It is a clear and well presented study.

What was the composition of the Chardonnay grape juice used in the study?

Reference 50: Hochmann S is incorrect - should be Hohmann S

line 94:  insert 'have' ... which might have lost the gene ...

line 118-119: should be Figure 1B and 1C?

line 561: should be Table 1, not Table 2

 

 

Author Response

This study is a comparison of fermentation pathways of Hanseniaspora vineae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and shows differences which can help explain their roles in winemaking. It is a clear and well presented study.  THANKS

What was the composition of the Chardonnay grape juice used in the study?

IT WAS ADDED IN THE TRACKING VERSION WHERE YOU CAN FOUND THE CHANGES, WE ADD YAN, SUGARS AND Ph DATA.

Reference 50: Hochmann S is incorrect - should be Hohmann S   DONE

line 94:  insert 'have' ... which might have lost the gene ...DONE

line 118-119: should be Figure 1B and 1C?   CORRECTED.

line 561: should be Table 1, not Table 2   CORRECTED

Reviewer 2 Report

The introduction must clearly state the aim of the study.

The conclusion is not clearly written. It is necessary to specifically describe what are the differences between the groups species of Hanseniaspora genus revealed in the study.

 

I recommend major revisions.

Author Response

The introduction must clearly state the aim of the study.

WE ADDED NOW IN THE TRACKING VERSION YOU CAN SEE THE AIM.  WE ADD A NEW REFERENCE.

The conclusion is not clearly written. It is necessary to specifically describe what are the differences between the groups species of Hanseniaspora genus revealed in the study.

WE MADE A CONCLUSION NOW MORE CLEAR, AND WE THINK IT WAS IMPROVED WITH DIFFERENCES RESUMED. ENGLISH WAS REVISED ALSO.

 

 

Back to TopTop