Next Article in Journal
Acclimation of Microbial Consortia to Ammonia and Salt in Methane Fermentation
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Level Secretory Production of Recombinant E2-Spy Antigen Protein via Combined Strategy in Pichia pastoris
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Harvest Date and Concurrent Alkali Pretreatment and Ensiling on Anaerobic Digestion of Pennycress Biomass
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Universal Strategy for the Efficient Expression of Nanobodies in Pichia pastoris
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Glucose Concentration on the Production of Proteolytic Extract by Different Strains of Aspergillus under Solid-State Fermentation

by
Liliana Londoño-Hernández
1,
María de Jesús García-Gómez
2,
Sergio Huerta-Ochoa
3,*,
Anna María Polanía-Rivera
4,
Cristóbal Noé Aguilar
5 and
Lilia Arely Prado-Barragán
3,*
1
BIOTICS Group, School of Basic Sciences, Technology and Engineering, Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia—UNAD, Palmira 763531, Colombia
2
Institute of Biotechnology, Universidad de Papaloapan, Tuxtepec 68301, Oaxaca, Mexico
3
Biotechnology Department, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City 09340, Mexico
4
School of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Valle del Cauca, Tuluá 763028, Colombia
5
Food Research Department, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo 25280, Coahuil, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(2), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020097
Submission received: 12 December 2023 / Revised: 23 December 2023 / Accepted: 8 January 2024 / Published: 7 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Microbial Protein Synthesis)

Abstract

:
Proteases are important enzymes because of their extended uses in several industries, such as food, beverages, pharmacy, detergents, and many others. Aspergillus is one of the most used fungi strains for enzyme production by solid-state fermentation (SSF). Disponibility of the carbon source is a key factor for protease production. In addition, the selection of solid support has great importance, as it must provide suitable airflow through the packed bed and nutrient diffusion inside the fermentable mass. Six Aspergillus strains and two inert supports (Agrolite (AL) and Polyurethane (PUF)) were tested for protease production from fish flour (FF) at different glucose concentrations (0, 5, 10, 15%) by SSF. The FF/PUF mixture at 70/30 (w/w) ratio, with 75.39% moisture, and a critical moisture point of 0.11 gH2O/g, presented a texture that allowed heat and mass transfer and provided enough moisture to make free water available as required for microorganism growth during the fermentation process. Aspergillus oryzae 2095 produced higher amounts of neutral and alkaline proteases with the addition of 5% glucose to the growth medium. Kinetics studies reveal that protease production is partially associated with growth. The extracts obtained can be used in different industries, and especially to prepare fish high-value by-product hydrolysates.

1. Introduction

Proteases are an important group of enzymes whose main function is to catalyze the hydrolysis of proteins into polypeptides or oligopeptides into smaller peptides and amino acids [1]. They represent 25% of the biomolecules produced for industrial applications and 60% of the global enzyme market. The proteases produced by microbes have been used to produce fertilizers, detergents, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, textiles, leather, and food, among many other uses [2,3]. Proteases can be isolated from plants, animals, and microorganisms. Of these, microbial proteases have great potential for industrial production due to their wide biochemical diversity, susceptibility to genetic manipulation, small production spaces, and low nutritional requirements [4]. It is estimated that microbial proteases account for approximately 40% of total worldwide enzyme sales [5,6].
Although there is a wide diversity of commercial proteases, their use on an industrial scale is limited by the high costs of enzymes involved in the processes and because they are limited to a restricted range of biochemical characteristics. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate options to lower the cost of producing microbial proteases and, at the same time, increase biochemical diverse specificity and stability [5,6].
Among the microorganisms of interest to produce fungal proteases, Aspergillus sp. is one of the most important fungi for producing microbial proteases, due to its ability to grow on a wide range of substrates under different environmental conditions. The fungi may secret a large number of hydrolytic enzymes, including proteases, however, only approximately 8.2% of A. niger proteases have been molecularly and biochemically characterized [7]. A. oryzae has been extensively used in the production of a variety of industrial enzymes, such as proteases [8].
Although a large percentage of microbial enzymes is produced by submerged fermentation, solid state fermentation (SSF) is a technique that allows agro-industrial by-products to be used as a substrate to produce biomolecules at lower cost and in an environmentally friendly way. In addition, fungi present a higher growth rate in solid state fermentation when compared to submerged fermentation. The physiology and morphology of filamentous fungi enable them to quickly completely colonize the substrate matrix, to nourish themselves and then secrete high levels of metabolites and enzymes [9]. Other advantages of SSF include low risk of contamination, increased yield, use of low-cost substrates, simplicity of processing, lower energy requirements, and less wastewater production, making it more attractive than submerged fermentation [10,11]. The most common substrates for SSF include food agroindustry residues, but it is also possible to use low-cost by-products of fish processing industries for different enzyme production [12].
Proteases have been used to produce fish protein hydrolysates, which have allowed the use of fish by-products as a substrate, giving the properties of the peptides such as minimizing the oxidation of lipids during the processing and storage of foods, and antioxidant, antiatherosclerosis, anticancer, anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive, and antimicrobial activities. In addition to the above, some functional properties have also been evidenced, such as solubility, emulsifying, and foaming properties, which could be beneficial for industrial applications [13,14,15]. In addition, a high specificity for protein from aquatic sources has been proven.
This work was focused on the evaluation of glucose concentration and the use of two different inert supports for the production of proteolytic extracts by different strains of Aspergillus sp. under solid-state fermentation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganism and Inoculum Preparation

The strains of A. niger ANH-15 from the DIA-UAdeC strain collection, A. niger 2088 and A. oryzae 2095 both from the Spanish Type Culture Collection, Valencia, Spain (STCC), A. niger C28B25, A. niger DAR2, and A. niger AD96-4 from the IRD-UAM collection were grown on potato–dextrose agar (BIOXON®, Monterrey, Mexico) plates. Conidiospores were harvested from a 5-day-old culture by suspending them in sterile water containing 0.1% Tween 80. After counting in a Neubauer chamber, the spore suspension was adjusted to the desired concentration.

2.2. Skimmed Milk Agar Plates

Skimmed milk agar plates were prepared by mixing 20 g L−1 of skimmed milk (Svelty®, Nestlé, Mexico City, Mexico) and 15 g L−1 of Bacto agar (OXOID®, Monterrey, Mexico). The skimmed milk solution was sterilized at 125 °C for 10 min while the Bacto agar solution was sterilized at 125 °C for 15 min. Solutions were left to cool and mixed (1:90 v/v) before agar solidification. The skimmed milk plates were stored at 4 °C until used.

2.3. Strain Selection

Strain selection was performed by monitoring the formation of hydrolysis halos on skimmed milk agar plates. The plates were inoculated by pitting in the center of the inverted Petri dishes and incubated in the same position at 30 °C for 72 h. The plates were observed every 24 h to visualize the formation of hydrolysis halos, and colony and hydrolysis halos diameters were recorded to calculate the potency index (PI) using Equation (1) [16].
P o t e n c y   I n d e x ( P I ) = H y d r o l y s i s   h a l o   d i a m e t e r   ( m m ) C o l o n y   g r o w t h   d i a m e t e r   ( m m )

2.4. Inert Supports

2.4.1. Polyurethane Foam

Polyurethane foam (PUF) (Expomex®, Mexico City, Mexico) with a density of 24 kg m3 was ground (Brandenburg® OHG 880804, Berlin, Germany) to a particle size of 0.5 mm, then washed (3X) with distilled water and then rinsed again with boiling distilled water, drained, and dried at 80 °C until a uniform dryness was achieved.

2.4.2. Agrolite

Agrolite was rinsed thoroughly with tap water, drained as much as possible, rinsed and drained again, then rinsed with boiling distilled water, drained, and dried at 80 °C until a uniform dryness was achieved, then ground (Brandendur® OHG 880804, Berlin, Germany) to a particle size of 0.5 mm.

2.5. Drying Curves and Critical Moisture Point

The kinetics of water removal during drying were obtained by setting 1 g of the sample in a thermo-balance at 120 °C to a stable moisture content (1%) [17].
The critical moisture point (CMP) was calculated after the estimation of the dry rate during the dehydration kinetics of each fish flour/inert support (FF/IS) mixture (50/50, 70/30, and 90/10; w/w %). Subsequently, drying velocities were related to the water removed with time [17,18].

2.6. Culture Medium for Solid-State Fermentation

FF, purchased from a local feed animal shop, was sieved to obtain a homogeneous particle size of 0.84 mm, then mixed with PUF previously ground to a particle size of 0.5 mm. The mixture of FF and PUF at a 70:30 (w/w) ratio was oven-dried for 12 h at 80 °C, then sterilized at 121 °C for 15 min. The raw material/support mixture was moistened with sterile 0.2 M phosphate buffer pH 7, to which the desired inoculum concentration and trace metal (to the desired water content (50%)) were added and then used as an SSF culture medium. The mineral salts composition was (g/L): (NH4)2SO4, 12.6; K2HPO4, 11.8; urea, 3.0; MgSO4.7H2O, 0.2; FeSO4, 0.29; MnSO4, 0.001; CuSO4, 0.001; ZnCl2, 0.001.

2.7. Inocula Preparation

The inoculum was prepared by propagating the strain on 50 mL potato dextrose agar (PDA) in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks incubated at 30 °C for 7 days. The spores were harvested by adding 30 mL of a sterile solution of Tween 80 (0.1%, v/v) to each inoculum flask, and resuspended by stirring with a magnetic rod. For spore counting, a 1mL aliquot was diluted, and spores were quantified using a Neubauer chamber (Brand, Wertheim, Germany). The fermentable mass was inoculated with a spore suspension of 2 × 107 spores g−1dry base (db).

2.8. Fermentation Process

SSF was carried out in packed-bed tubular (2.5 × 22 cm) reactors packed with 30 g of the culture medium described above, previously inoculated with 2 × 107 spores g−1db and incubated (72 h) under static conditions at 30 °C, with an air flux set at 40 cm3 per min. The effect of glucose concentrations (0, 5, 10% w/w) on protease production was determined at 0, 36, and 70 h of fermentation. Fungal growth was followed indirectly by online CO2 detection [19].

2.9. Kinetics of Fermentation

The selected strains (Section 2.3) were subjected to protease production kinetics at the best FF/IS culture media mixture ratio at different glucose concentrations. The fermentation conditions were carried out at 30 °C, with an initial pH of 6, moisture content of 50%, and inoculum of 2 × 107 spores g-1dm, and the bioprocess lasted 72 h. Samples were taken at regular intervals (0, 24, 36, 40, 44, 48, 60, and 72 h). During fermentation, % M, Aw, and proteolytic activity were assayed at different pH values (3.0, 7.0, 10.0). The specific growth rate (μ) was determined by fitting the experimental data of CO2 production to the logistic and Gompertz models (Solver MicroSoft®; Office 365).

2.10. Analytic Methods

2.10.1. pH Determination

One gram of wet fermented matter was suspended in 10 mL of distilled water, homogenized with a vortex, and filtered (Whatman® No. 41, Maidstone, UK) under vacuum, then the pH of filtrates was determined using a Conductronic® pH120 potentiometer (Puebla, Mexico). An average of three determinations was reported.

2.10.2. Determination of Moisture Content (M %) and Water Activity (Aw)

Moisture (M %) was determined by placing 2g of the fermented matter in a thermobalance (OHAUS®, Nänikon, Switzerland). at 130 °C for 15 min. Water activity (Aw) was determined in an AQUA Lab® CX-2 Hygrometer (Decagon, Pullman, WA, USA). An average of three determinations was reported.

2.10.3. Water Absorption Index (WAI)

The water absorption index (WAI) was determined using the method described by Orzua et al. [20]. The sample (1.25 g) was suspended in 15 mL of distilled water in a tared 50 mL Falcon tube, the slurry was stirred with a glass bar for 1 min at room temperature (25 °C) and centrifuged at 3000g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the WAI was calculated from the weight of the remaining gel in the centrifuge tube and expressed as g gel g−1db.

2.10.4. Chemical and Elemental Composition of Fish Flour

Fish flour (FF) was obtained from a local feed animal shop. The nitrogen content was determined by the Micro-Kjeldahl method [21] and total sugars by the phenol-sulfuric method [22]. The elemental analyses of total carbon (C), hydrogen (H), nitrogen (N), and oxygen (O) contents were performed using an Elemental Analyzer® (Perkin Elmer Series II CHNS/O Analyzer 2400, Tucson, AZ, USA).

2.10.5. Protease Assay

Proteolytic activity was determined by the quantification of tyrosine released during the hydrolysis of peptide bonds of a protein substrate by the action of proteases present in the produced crude extract [23]. Briefly described, each sample (1.25 mL) of protease extract, previously diluted in a 1:5 ratio in distilled water, was added with 5 mL of 0.4M Na2CO3, and 1 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu phenol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich®, Mexico City, Mexico). Subsequently, the tubes were stirred in a vortex and incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. Then, absorbance was read on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda25® (PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) UV-Visible spectrophotometer at 660 nm. The experiment was performed in triplicate and the average absorbances were plotted against the tyrosine concentration curve.
A proteolytic unit (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme that produces the color equivalent of 1 µmol of tyrosine in a 1 mL reaction per min at 30 °C assayed at the different pH values tested (pH buffers at 10.0, 7.0, 3.0). The enzyme activity was reported in U/mL.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All tests were performed in triplicate and average values were analyzed and interpreted using Minitab20 Statistical Software®. Estimation of statistical parameters was realized by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA, NCSS 2020).

3. Results

3.1. Fungal Strain Selection

Protease production by the Aspergillus strains was evaluated using a rapid plate test on skimmed milk (Figure 1). Of the 6 strains tested, A. niger ANH-15 (a), A. niger 2088 (b), and A. oryzae 2095 (c) produced a translucent hydrolysis halo on the skimmed-milk agar plates, which is indicative of proteolytic activity [24]. However, A. niger DAR2 (d), A. niger C28B35 (e), and A. niger AD96-4 (f) showed little growth but no proteolytic activity halo was formed. Figure 1 shows typical results obtained on skimmed milk agar plates.
Table 1 shows the potency index (PI) of the best qualitative proteolytic activity results obtained from the skimmed-milk agar plates as determined by Equation (1). A. oryzae 2095, A. niger 2088, and A. niger ANH-15 are protease producers.

3.2. Fish Flour Composition

Table 2 shows the chemical composition of the FF used in this study and for protease production studies.

3.3. Fermentation Medium

3.3.1. Selection of Fish Flour-to-Inert Support Ratio (FF/IS)

Table 3 shows the calculated results for the %M and CMP for the different FF/IS mixtures tested. For the FF/PUF mixture, the highest WAI was 6.022 gH2O/gdm (85.76%H) and occurred in the 50/50 (w/w) mixture. In contrast, the WAI of the FF/AL at the same ratio was 3.172 gH2O/gdm (76.03% M).

3.3.2. Effect of Glucose Concentration on pH, Aw, and M % during Protease Production

Once the optimal substrate/support ratio (FF/PUF; 70/30 w/w) was selected, the effect of glucose concentration (0, 5, 10, and 15%) was evaluated on protease production (Table 4). The pH value increased as the fermentation time elapsed at all glucose concentrations and Aspergillus strains tested. The Aw value showed a slight decrease (<1%) as the glucose concentration increased; in contrast, the moisture content was slightly increased (<4%) at the end of the bioprocess.
The results of the effect of glucose at different concentrations (Figure 2) show that A. oryzae 2095 produced the highest proteolytic activity at 36 h culture (Figure 2a) at glucose concentrations of 0 and 5% (20.0–20.5 U/mL respectively), however, enzyme activity decreased at 72 h (Figure 2b), showing a similar pattern at all glucose concentrations tested.
According to the results, the strain A. oryzae 2095 had the highest production of proteolytic enzymes, both at 36 and 72 h of fermentation, with 5% glucose, therefore it was selected for further kinetic studies.

3.3.3. Protease Production Kinetics

Protease production kinetics and fungi growth as online CO2 production are shown in Figure 3. Protease production starts at 36 h, with A. oryzae 2095 reaching the maximum activity at 44 h, and with alkaline activity (23 U/mL extract) being higher than neutral (17 U/mL extract), as assayed at pH 10.0 and 7.0 respectively. It was observed that protease production starts at pH values of 6.5 and 7.0 for neutral and alkaline proteases, respectively.

4. Discussion

Although the genus Aspergillus is reported as a protease producer, the lack of production of a proteolytic halo in 3 of the 6 strains tested may be due to these strains not having an enzymatic system (protease excretion) that allows them to use casein as the sole carbon source. It should be noted that the enzymatic tests were carried out on skimmed milk agar plates at pH 5 and 8 and that similar results were obtained at both pH values tested (Figure 1). According to the hydrolysis activity halo and PI on skimmed milk plates, A. oryzae 2095 is the best protease producer, so it was selected for further assays. A. oryzae is non-toxic and considered safe for human and animal consumption, having been classified as “Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)” by the FDA.
The composition of the culture medium is a key parameter in the SSF process since the source of carbon, nitrogen, and trace metals can influence growth and metabolites, enzymes, and spore production [25]. Carbon and nitrogen content are essential for microbe development and its metabolic activity. Both components are essential for the construction of macromolecules during microbial growth; therefore, the substrate must provide the basic nutrients to the microorganisms to guarantee the fermentation process [26]. Since the disponibility of the carbon source is a key factor for protease production [27,28], the effect of the addition of different glucose concentrations on the proteolytic extract production by Aspergillus strains was evaluated.
According to the elemental analysis, FF is composed of carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen of 43.25, 10.60 and 6.44%, respectively; however, only 1.45% of the total carbon corresponded to glucose, as determined by the phenol-sulfuric method. The rest of the carbon content is found as a structural part of other macromolecules present in the FF [29]. In comparison with the protein content of the FF used in the present study (62.85%), Ellouz et al. [26] reported values from 45.50 to 80% protein content in the fish section used. Likewise, it was found that the carbohydrate content of the FF was 1.45%, while that reported in the literature is null [26,27], which may indicate that the FF used in this study may have some by-products of other aquatic species.
Most microorganisms prefer glucose as their primary source of carbon. However, if the glucose in the medium is depleted, the microorganisms will start consuming other compounds due to their metabolic activity. This can involve the activation of other metabolic pathways and the synthesis of different enzymes to utilize other sources of carbon, such as starch, cellulose, proteins, and so on. We measured Ctotal/Ntotal and CHO/protein ratios of 4.0 and 0.023, respectively, in contrast to the ratio of 6.6 of CHO/protein reported by Battaglinio et al. [30] for A. oryzae for proteases formed in solid state fermentation. This shows the need to add another source of carbon to meet the initial nutritional and energy requirements to ensure the adequate growth of Aspergillus prior to the initiation of the enzymatic machinery that releases carbon molecules as a result of the proteolytic activity generated by the microorganism itself when a carbon restriction is detected.
FF is an excellent raw material for SSF as it contains all the nutrients for microbial activity [31,32]. However, FF tends to agglomerate when its moisture content increases so the addition of structural support is required; thus, the use of AL and PUF as individual IS was tested (Table 3). The values in Table 3 show that the highest WAI (6.022 gH2O/gdm; 85.76% M) occurred at 50/50 (w/w) with the FF/PUF mixture. In contrast, the WAI of the FF/AL at the same ratio was 3.172 gH2O/gdm (76.03% M). These values are higher than those reported (0.43 gH2O/gdm; 43%M) by Tahli et al. [28] who used oat flour and other cereals as raw material for protease production. For the selection of the best IS and the appropriate FF/IS ratio for optimal growth of the microorganism, drying curves of both IS were constructed [33]. Likewise, texture, critical moisture point (CMP), and water absorption index (WAI) of each FF/IS were evaluated, since these variables directly influence heat and mass transfer phenomena during the SSF processes and, therefore, affect the aeration and nutrient diffusion inside the fermentable mass [34].
To determine the CMP, the rate of water loss was calculated at the constant drying phase, and then the CMP was obtained from the intersection in the change of slopes of the kinetics drying curves [33] obtained for each FF/IS tested [17]. Texture was also considered in the selection of the FF/IS ratio, which improves as the proportion of IS increases in the mixtures, as FF tends to agglomerate at higher moisture content. Likewise, the saturation moisture was calculated, which increases as the proportion of IS increases, especially with PUF due to the WAI of this material.
The FF/PUF mixture ratio at 70/30 (w/w) with a saturation humidity of 75.39% and a CMP of 0.11 gH2O/gss was selected (Table 3). This FF/IS ratio presented a texture that may allow heat and mass transfer and provide enough moisture to make free water available as required for microorganism growth during the fermentation process [20,35]. In addition, the selected ratio provides a higher amount of FF and still has adequate moisture and texture to allow fungi growth, aeration, and nutrient diffusion inside the fermentable mass. As per the studies conducted by Raimbault [35] and Orzua et al. [20], to create a fermentable culture media, the substrate/IS and the IS used must fulfill certain prerequisites. These include: (i) being a solid porous matrix; (ii) having the ability to absorb more water weight than its dry weight; (iii) allowing the flow of gases through the matrix; (iv) providing a conducive habitat at the solid/gas interface for the rapid development of microbes; (v) possessing good mechanical properties for compression or gentle stirring; and (vi) being free from possible contaminants or microbe inhibitors and having the capacity to absorb the necessary nutrients for microbial growth.
The effect of glucose concentration on pH, Aw, and M% during fermentation is shown in Table 4. It can be seen that pH values increase as fermentation time elapses at all glucose concentrations in the three Aspergillus strains selected for their proteolytic activity. This effect is explained by the increase of ammoniacal nitrogen as a result of protein hydrolysis, which causes an increase in pH [36]. Similar results are reported by Huang et al. [37] and Yang et al. [38] using Sofu and Tofu, two fermented soybean products. The slight decrease in Aw (<1%) as glucose concentration increased is explained on the basis that glucose is a polar compound that hydrates in the presence of water through the formation of hydrogen bonds [39], resulting in less water availability for physiological microbial activities. In general, the reduction in initial moisture content during fermentation has been reported in SSF. This is explained as the result of water evaporation and metabolic heat generation, however, this problem has been solved by the addition of saturated air [40]. Nevertheless, in this work, the moisture content was slightly increased (<4%) at the end of the bioprocess, possibly caused by the water generated from metabolic activity or because of the condensed water from the saturated air, which is rapidly absorbed by the PUF [40].
The results of the effect of glucose at different concentrations in protease production showed that A. oryzae 2095 produced the highest proteolytic activity at 36 h culture (Figure 2a) with added glucose concentrations of 0 and 5% (20.0–20.5 U/mL respectively). However, enzyme activity decreased at 72 h (Figure 2b), showing a similar pattern at all glucose concentrations tested. Activity decrease is explained as the result of protease self-hydrolysis, instability of the protease’s activity, or a decrease or even lack of nutrients in the culture medium [37. A similar pattern is observed in all the strains studied, however, A. oryzae 2095 produces 4 and 17 times higher proteolytic activity than A. niger ANH15 and A. niger 2088, respectively, at 5% glucose and 36 h fermentation.
The lower protease activity produced at 10 and 15% glucose (Figure 2a,b) is explained by the preference of the microorganism for easier to assimilate carbon sources, therefore, reducing the production of proteases, as there is no need for carbon source release from protein hydrolysis. Similar results were found by Mamo et al. [41], who evaluated the effect of the addition of different carbon and nitrogen sources on the production of proteases by SSF with A. oryzae, finding that supplementing the culture medium with glucose at a concentration of 5% allows the highest production of proteases, while higher concentrations have the opposite effect; their results are well correlated with our findings. Then, A. oryzae 2095 was used in further kinetic studies.
Enzyme activity was assayed at pH values of 3.0, 7.0, and 10 for acid, neutral, and alkaline proteases (Figure 3). Protease production starts at 36 h, reaching the maximum activity at 44 h, and exhibits higher alkaline (23 U/mL extract) than neutral (17 U/mL extract) activity as assayed at pH 10.0 and 7.0, respectively. Protease production starts at pH values of 6.5 and 7.0 for neutral and alkaline proteases, respectively. A. oryzae has been reported as a producer of acid, neutral, and alkaline proteases [30], however under our study conditions, acid proteolytic activity (pH 3.0) was not detected. This is because the initial pH (5.0) of the fermentation medium favors the production of neutral and alkaline proteolytic extracts [30].
The specific growth rate (μ) of A. oryzae 2095 was determined by fitting the experimental data of CO2 production to the logistic (0.229 h−1, R2 = 0.999) and Gompertz (0.144 h−1, R2 = 0.997) models to calculate the specific rate of CO2 production (μCO2 = 0.151 h−1, R2 = 0.998). From the plot (Figure 3), it is observed that the best fit was obtained with the logistic model, however, the values of the specific growth rate obtained by the Gompertz model and μCO2 are very close to each other. This is explained by Koutinas et al. and Villegas et al. [19,42], who found that fungal growth in heterogeneous media is directly related to the production of CO2. For this reason, the fit with the Gompertz model is closer to the real process. On the other hand, the value of the specific growth rate (µ = 0.144 h−1) is lower than that obtained by Acevedo [43], who reported a value of µ=0.216 when producing proteases using a mixture of FF and wheat bran (60/40 w/w). This could be due to the FF/wheat bran mixture (70/30 w/w) used by Acevedo [43] preventing air diffusion during fermentation by agglutination of the culture medium, since it is known that oxygen and nutrient diffusion influence both growth and enzyme production [31].
On the other hand, by performing an elemental balance (Equation (2)) as reported by Nagel et al. [44], yields can be estimated.
YS/CO2CH1.79O0.66N0.21 + YO2/CO2O2→YX/CO2CH1.72O0.55N0.17 + CO2 + YW/CO2H2O + YN/CO2NH3
For the fermentative system of this work, the reaction described in Equation (3) was proposed, where the terms on the left side of the equation correspond to the elemental composition of the FF, while the terms on the right side indicate the elemental composition of the biomass [4], the production of CO2, water, and ammonia, with the latter being the element that causes the alkalization of the fermented medium [45]. The coefficients are obtained by performing an elemental balance on both members of the reaction, and subsequently, a matrix is solved [46]:
1.96 CH1.79O0.66N0.21 + 0.88 O2 → 0.96 CH1.72O0.55N0.17 + CO2 + 0.54 H2O + 0.25 NH3
From this elemental balance, YS/CO2 (1.96) and YX/CO2 (0.96) were obtained, and by applying the Luedeking-Piret model (Equation (4)), which describes product formation as a function of biomass [47], it was determined that protease production is partially associated with growth because the term of the equation associated with growth is 0.17 and the term independent of growth is 0.06.
d P d t = 0.17 μ X + 0.06 X
In summary, in the production of proteases, the glucose concentration (Figure 2) of the culture medium had an important effect on the growth of the fungus and therefore, on the production of extracts with proteolytic activity. Comparing the obtained results with those reported in the literature, it was found that the proteolytic activity of the extracts obtained (U/mL) was 2 and 4 times higher than those reported by Malathi et al. [48] and Couri et al. [49], respectively. However, reports were also found in which the proteolytic activity was 2.77, 4.42, and 2.29 times lower than the proteolytic activity of the extracts obtained in other works [50,51,52] (Table 5).

5. Conclusions

A. oryzae 2095 produced the highest proteolytic activity both qualitatively and quantitatively. The best mixture of FF/IS for protease production was the FF/PUF at a 70/30 (w/w) ratio. In addition, a low concentration (5%) of glucose favors protease production. A. oryzae 2095 produces neutral and alkaline proteases associated with growth in a short time (44 h). The obtained extracts are suitable for use in the preparation of high-quality fish by-product hydrolysates.

Author Contributions

L.L.-H. Experimental work, results, analysis, discussion. M.d.J.G.-G. experimental work, analyzed results. S.H.-O. Conceived the study, supervised the experimental work; analyzed and discussed results, and reviewed the manuscript. A.M.P.-R. experimental work, analyzed results. C.N.A. conceived the study, reviewed results and manuscript. L.A.P.-B. Conceived the study, coordinated and supervised the experimental work; analyzed, discussed and integrated results, wrote and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bond, J.S. Proteases: History, discovery, and roles in health and disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 1643–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Razzaq, A.; Shamsi, S.; Ali, A.; Ali, Q.; Sajjad, M.; Malik, A.; Ashraf, M. Microbial Proteases Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Novelli, P.K.; Barros, M.M.; Fleuri, L.F. Novel inexpensive fungi proteases: Production by solid state fermentation and characterization. Food Chem. 2016, 198, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Puntambekar, A.; Dake, M. Microbial Proteases: Potential Tools for Industrial Applications. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2023, 18, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dhillon, A.; Sharma, K.; Rajulapati, V.; Goyal, A. Proteolytic Enzymes. In Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Pandey, A., Negi, S., Soccol, C.R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 149–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martínez-Medina, G.A.; Prado Barragán, A.; Ruiz, H.A.; Ilyina, A.; Martínez Hernández, J.L.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Hoyos-Concha, J.L.; Aguilar-González, C.N. Fungal Proteases and Production of Bioactive Peptides for the Food Industry. In Enzymes in Food Biotechnology; Kuddus, M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 221–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, Z.; Yang, S.; Lee, B.H. Bioinformatic mapping of a more precise Aspergillus niger degradome. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Brandelli, A.; Daroit, D.J. Unconventional microbial proteases as promising tools for the production of bioactive protein hydrolysates. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 2022, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. da Silva, O.S.; de Oliveira, R.L.; Souza-Motta, C.M.; Porto, A.L.F.; Porto, T.S. Novel Protease from Aspergillus tamarii URM4634: Production and Characterization Using Inexpensive Agroindustrial Substrates by Solid-State Fermentation. Adv. Enzym. Res. 2016, 4, 125–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Doriya, K.; Jose, N.; Gowda, M.; Kumar, D.S. Solid-State Fermentation vs Submerged Fermentation for the Production of l-Asparaginase. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2016, 78, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sousa, D.; Salgado, J.M.; Cambra-López, M.; Dias, A.; Belo, I. Bioprocessing of oilseed cakes by fungi consortia: Impact of enzymes produced on antioxidants release. J. Biotechnol. 2023, 364, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Novelli, P.K.; Barros, M.M.; Pezzato, L.E.; de Araujo, E.P.; de Mattos Botelho, R.; Fleuri, L.F. Enzymes produced by agro-industrial co-products enhance digestible values for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): A significant animal feeding alternative. Aquaculture 2017, 481, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gajanan, P.G.; Elavarasan, K.; Shamasundar, B.A. Bioactive and functional properties of protein hydrolysates from fish frame processing waste using plant proteases. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 24901–24911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bui, X.D.; Vo, C.T.; Bui, V.C.; Pham, T.M.; Hien Bui, T.T.; Nguyen-Sy, T.; Nguyen, T.D.P.; Chew, K.W.; Mukatova, M.D.; Show, P.L. Optimization of production parameters of fish protein hydrolysate from Sarda Orientalis black muscle (by-product) using protease enzyme. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2021, 23, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cunha, S.A.; Pintado, M.E. Bioactive peptides derived from marine sources: Biological and functional properties. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 119, 348–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaur, H.; Kapoor, S.; Sharma, S. An Efficient Method for Qualitative Screening of Ligninolytic Enzyme Potential of Ganoderma lucidum. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 2442–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Raju, K.M.; Raju, M.P.; Mohan, Y.M. Synthesis and water absorbency of crosslinked superabsorbent polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 85, 1795–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bahadori, A. Chap. 10. Solids Handling Systems and Dryers. In Essentials of Oil and Gas Utilities, Process Design, Equipment, and Operations, 2nd ed.; Bioprocess Engineering Principles; Gulf Professional Publishing as an Imprint of Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2016; ISBN 13 978-0128030882. [Google Scholar]
  19. Koutinas, A.A.; Wang, R.; Webb, C. Estimation of fungal growth in complex, heterogeneous culture. Biochem. Eng. J. 2003, 14, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orzua, M.C.; Mussatto, S.I.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Rodriguez, R.; de la Garza, H.; Teixeira, J.A.; Aguilar, C.N. Exploitation of agro-industrial wastes as immobilization carrier for solid-state fermentation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2009, 30, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Londoño-Hernandez, L.; Ruiz, H.A.; Cristina Ramírez, T.; Ascacio, J.A.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C.N. Fungal detoxification of coffee pulp by solid-state fermentation. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 23, 101467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dubois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ichishima, E. Acid proteinases. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1970; pp. 397–406. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vermelho, A.B.; Meirelles, M.N.L.; Lopes, A.; Petinate, S.D.G.; Chaia, A.A.; Branquinha, M.H. Detection of extracellular proteases from microorganisms on agar plates. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1996, 9, 755–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ooijkaas, L.P.; Weber, F.J.; Buitelaar, R.M.; Tramper, J.; Rinzema, A. Defined media and inert supports: Their potential as solid-state fermentation production systems. Trends Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ellouz, Y.; Bayoudh, A.; Kammoun, S.; Gharsallah, N.; Nasri, M. Production of protease by Bacillus subtilis grown on sardinelle heads and viscera flour. Biores. Technol. 2001, 80, 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pizardi, C.; Gutierrez, M.C.; Fernández, C.D.; Fernández, J.A. Producción piloto de hidrolizado de residuos de pescado por fermentación de sustratos sólidos con hongos filamentosos. In Anales Científicos Universidad Agraria La Molina, Lima, Perú; Red Panamericana de Manejo Ambiental de Residuos (REPAMAR) Centro Panamericano de Ingeniería Sanitaria y Ciencias del Ambiente (CEPIS): Lima, Peru, 1999; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  28. Talhi, I.; Dehimat, L.; Jaouani, A.; Cherfia, R.; Berkani, M.; Almomanid, F.; Vasseghiane, Y.; Chaouche, N.K. Optimization of thermostable proteases production under agro-wastes solid-state fermentation by a new thermophilic Mycothermus thermophilus isolated from a hydrothermal spring Hammam Debagh, Algeria. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Venugopal, V. Production of fish protein hydrolyzates by microorganisms. In Fisheries Processing: Biotechnological Applications; Martin, A.M., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1994; pp. 223–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Battaglino, R.A.; Huergo, M.; Pilosof, A.M.R.; Bartholomai, G.B. Culture requirements for the production of protease by Aspergillus oryzae in solid state fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1991, 35, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sharma, K.M.; Kumar, R.; Panwar, S.; Kumar, A. Microbial alkaline proteases: Optimization of production parameters and their properties. J. Gen. Eng. Biotechnol. 2017, 15, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Villamil, O.; Váquiro, H.; Solanilla, J.F. Fish viscera protein hydrolysates: Production, potential applications and functional and bioactive properties. Food Chem. 2017, 224, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. García-Gómez. M.J. Comparación entre un extracto comercial y un extracto proteolítico fúngico producido por fermentación en medio sólido. Ph.D. Thesis, Ciencias Biológicas y da la Salud, Posgrado en Biotecnología. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City, Mexico, 2008.
  34. Gomez-Ramos, G.A.; Castillo-Araiza, C.O.; Huerta-Ochoa, S.; Couder-García, M.; Prado-Barragan, A. Assessment of hydrodynamics in a novel bench-scale wall-cooled packed bioreactor under abiotic conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 375, 121945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Raimbault, M. General and microbiological aspects of solid substrate fermentation. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 1998, 1, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Adler-Nissen, J. Limited enzymic degradation of proteins: A new approach in the industrial application of hydrolases. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 32, 138–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, X.; Yu, S.; Han, B.; Chen, J. Bacterial community succession and metabolite changes during sufu fermentation. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 97, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, B.; Tan, Y.; Kan, J. Regulation of quality and biogenic amine production during sofu fermentation by pure Mucor strains. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 117, 108637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Badui, S. Química de los Alimentos; 3a Edición, 2a Reimpresión; Pearson Educación: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  40. Anwara, M.F.; Yu, L.J.; Lim, Y.M.; Tarawneh, M.A.; Se Yong, E.N.; Lai, N.Y.G. Water absorption properties of polyurethane foam reinforced with paper pulp. In Materials Today Proceedings; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mamo, J.; Kangwa, M.; Fernandez-Lahore, H.M.; Assefa, F. Optimization of media composition and growth conditions for production of milk-clotting protease (MCP) from Aspergillus oryzae DRDFS13 under solid-state fermentation. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Villegas, E.; Aubague, S.; Alcantara, L.; Auria, R.; Revah, S. Solid state fermentation: Acid protease production in controlled CO2 and O2 environments. Biotechnol. Adv. 1993, 11, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Acevedo, M.C.; Huerta Ochoa, S.; Favela, E.; Prado, A. Proteasas fúngicas obtenidas por fermentación en medio sólido a partir de harina de pescado y su aplicación en la hidrólisis de músculo de carpa dorada (Carassius auratus). In Proceedings of the 10th Congreso Nacional de Biotecnología y Bioingeniería, Puerto Vallarta, México, 8–12 September 2003; p. 3781. [Google Scholar]
  44. Nagel, F.J.; Oostra, J.; Tramper, J.; Rinzema, A. Improved model system for solid-substrate fermentation: Effects of pH, nutrients and buffer on fungal growth rate. Proc. Biochem. 1999, 35, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sparringa, R.A.; Owens, J.D. Causes of alkalinization in tempe solid substrate fermentation. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1999, 25, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Clark, D.S.; Blanch, H.W. Biochemical Engineering, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; ISBN 9780429258732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pirt, S.J. Effect of Chemical Inhibition and Activation of Growth. Principles of Microbe and Cell Cultivation; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1985; ISBN 9780632081509. [Google Scholar]
  48. Malathi, S.; Chakraborty, R. Production of alkaline protease by a new Aspergillus flavus isolate under solid-substrate fermentation conditions for use as a depilation agent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 712–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Couri, S.; da Costa Terzi, S.; Pinto, G.A.S.; Freitas, S.P.; da Costa, A.C.A. Hydrolytic enzyme production in solid-state fermentation by Aspergillus niger 3T5B8. Proc. Biochem. 2000, 36, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tunga, R.; Banerjee, R.; Bhattacharyya, B.C. Studies of some physical parameters for large scale protease production by SSF. Bioproc. Eng. 1999, 21, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tunga, R.; Banerjee, R.; Bhattacharya, B.C. Some studies on optimization of extraction process for protease production in SSF. Bioproc. Eng. 1999, 20, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aikat, K.; Bhattacharyya, B.C. Protease extraction in solid state fermentation of wheat bran by a local strain of Rhizopus oryzae and growth studies by the soft gel technique. Proc. Biochem. 2000, 35, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tunga, R.; Banerjee, R.; Bhattacharyya, B.C. Optimizing some factors affecting protease production under solid state fermentation. Bioproc. Eng. 1998, 9, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Growth of Aspergillus sp. strains on skimmed milk plates: (a) A. niger ANH-15, (b) A. niger 2088, (c) A. oryzae 2095, (d) A. niger DAR2, (e) A. niger C28B35, (f) A. niger AD96-4.
Figure 1. Growth of Aspergillus sp. strains on skimmed milk plates: (a) A. niger ANH-15, (b) A. niger 2088, (c) A. oryzae 2095, (d) A. niger DAR2, (e) A. niger C28B35, (f) A. niger AD96-4.
Fermentation 10 00097 g001
Figure 2. Effect of glucose concentration on protease production from different strains of Aspergillus at 36 h (a) and 72 h (b) by SSF.
Figure 2. Effect of glucose concentration on protease production from different strains of Aspergillus at 36 h (a) and 72 h (b) by SSF.
Fermentation 10 00097 g002
Figure 3. Kinetics of protease production (alkaline, acid, and neutral), CO2 production, and pH during SSF by A. oryzae 2095. Data represents the average of triplicate measures from different experiment sets. The percentage of experimental error was below 3% for all experiments.
Figure 3. Kinetics of protease production (alkaline, acid, and neutral), CO2 production, and pH during SSF by A. oryzae 2095. Data represents the average of triplicate measures from different experiment sets. The percentage of experimental error was below 3% for all experiments.
Fermentation 10 00097 g003
Table 1. Potency index (PI) on skimmed milk agar plates *.
Table 1. Potency index (PI) on skimmed milk agar plates *.
StrainDiameter of Strain Colony
(cm)
Diameter of Hydrolysis Halo
(cm)
Potency Index
(PI)
A. oryzae 20951.12.11.9
A. niger 20881.92.91.5
A. niger ANH-152.23.21.4
* Data represents the average of triplicate measures from different experiment sets. The percentage of experimental error was below 5% for all experiments.
Table 2. Chemical composition of fish flour used for protease production *.
Table 2. Chemical composition of fish flour used for protease production *.
Component %
Carbon 43.25
Nitrogen 10.60
Hydrogen 6.44
Glucose **1.45
Protein 62.85
* Data represents the average of triplicate measures from different experiment sets. ** As referred from the total carbon. The percentage of experimental error was below 5% for all experiments.
Table 3. FF/IS ratio selection parameters (agrolite and polyurethane foam) (+): slightly agglomerated, (++): agglomerated, (+++): highly agglomerated *.
Table 3. FF/IS ratio selection parameters (agrolite and polyurethane foam) (+): slightly agglomerated, (++): agglomerated, (+++): highly agglomerated *.
SupportFF/ISMoisture
Saturation
(%)
Critical Moisture PointTexture
Agrolite 20 50/5076.030.61+
Agrolite 20 70/3065.030.08++
Agrolite 20 90/1053.730.08+++
PUF 50/5085.760.13+
PUF 70/3075.390.11++
PUF 90/1059.880.09+++
* Data represents the average of triplicate measures from different experiment sets. The percentage of experimental error was below 3% for all experiments. (+) little agglomerate; (++) agglomerate; (+++) very agglomerate.
Table 4. Effect of glucose concentration on pH, Aw, and M % during fermentation by the different Aspergillus strains *.
Table 4. Effect of glucose concentration on pH, Aw, and M % during fermentation by the different Aspergillus strains *.
Time
(h)
Glucose Concentration
0%5%10%15%
pHAwM%pHAwM%pHAwM%pHAwM%
Aspergillus niger 2088
05.30.98444.605.40.98050.175.30.97648.135.30.97247.79
366.80.98949.686.90.98946.816.50.98850.646.00.98350.20
728.10.98151.537.70.98251.787.50.97951.517.40.97653.19
Aspergillus nigerANH-15
05.40.99048.595.40.98848.715.40.98348.375.40.97847.75
366.40.99149.216.00.99148.785.30.99048.975.30.98548.20
727.30.99151.537.20.98351.787.30.98251.517.30.98053.19
Aspergillus oryzae 2095
05.50.99249.225.50.98548.715.50.98047.625.40.97546.48
367.50.97849.757.40.97649.346.20.98547.675.850.99154.61
727.70.95949.747.70.96050.817.80.96649.997.70.96450.82
* Data represents the average of triplicate measures from different experiment sets. The percentage of experimental error was below 3% for all experiments.
Table 5. Protease production from agroindustry residues using different fungi strains.
Table 5. Protease production from agroindustry residues using different fungi strains.
ProteaseSubstrateFungi StrainProteolytic ActivityReference
AlkalineFish FlourA. oryzae 209521.77 U/mL
62.2 U/g SS
* Present study
NeutralFish FlourA. oryzae 209517.21 U/mL
51 U/g SS
* Present study
AlkalineWheat branA. flavus10.47 U/mL[48]
AcidWheat branA. niger52 U/g SS[42]
AlkalineWheat branR. oryzae341 U/g SS[53]
AlkalineWheat branR. oryzae60 U/mL or 290 U/g SS[50]
AlkalineWheat branR. oryzae275 U/g SS[51,52]
AcidWheat bran and mango peelA. niger5.27 U/mL[49]
AlkalineWheat branR. oryzae50 U/mL[52]
* SS = solid substrate.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Londoño-Hernández, L.; García-Gómez, M.d.J.; Huerta-Ochoa, S.; Polanía-Rivera, A.M.; Aguilar, C.N.; Prado-Barragán, L.A. Effect of Glucose Concentration on the Production of Proteolytic Extract by Different Strains of Aspergillus under Solid-State Fermentation. Fermentation 2024, 10, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020097

AMA Style

Londoño-Hernández L, García-Gómez MdJ, Huerta-Ochoa S, Polanía-Rivera AM, Aguilar CN, Prado-Barragán LA. Effect of Glucose Concentration on the Production of Proteolytic Extract by Different Strains of Aspergillus under Solid-State Fermentation. Fermentation. 2024; 10(2):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Londoño-Hernández, Liliana, María de Jesús García-Gómez, Sergio Huerta-Ochoa, Anna María Polanía-Rivera, Cristóbal Noé Aguilar, and Lilia Arely Prado-Barragán. 2024. "Effect of Glucose Concentration on the Production of Proteolytic Extract by Different Strains of Aspergillus under Solid-State Fermentation" Fermentation 10, no. 2: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10020097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop