Next Article in Journal
Species Diversity of Amanita Section Vaginatae in Eastern China, with a Description of Four New Species
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Genomics and Transcriptomics Analyses Reveal Divergent Plant Biomass-Degrading Strategies in Fungi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Adenylate Cyclase-Encoding Gene crac Is Involved in Clonostachys rosea Mycoparasitism

1
School of Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
2
Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(8), 861; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9080861
Submission received: 13 July 2023 / Revised: 8 August 2023 / Accepted: 14 August 2023 / Published: 18 August 2023

Abstract

:
Clonostachys rosea is an excellent biocontrol fungus against numerous fungal plant pathogens. The cAMP signaling pathway is a crucial signal transduction pathway in fungi. To date, the role of the cAMP signaling pathway in C. rosea mycoparasitism remains unknown. An adenylate cyclase-encoding gene, crac (an important component of the cAMP signaling pathway), was previously screened from C. rosea 67-1, and its expression level was dramatically upregulated during the C. rosea mycoparasitization of the sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. In this study, the function of crac in C. rosea mycoparasitism was explored through gene knockout and complementation. The obtained results show that the deletion of crac influenced the growth rate and colony morphology of C. rosea, as well as the tolerance to NaCl and H2O2 stress. The mycoparasitic effects on the sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum and the biocontrol capacity on soybean Sclerotinia stem rot in ∆crac-6 and ∆crac-13 were both attenuated compared with that of the wild-type strain and complementation transformants. To understand the regulatory mechanism of crac during C. rosea mycoparasitism, transcriptomic analysis was conducted between the wild-type strain and knockout mutant. A number of biocontrol-related genes, including genes encoding cell wall-degrading enzymes and transporters, were significantly differentially expressed during C. rosea mycoparasitism, suggesting that crac may be involved in C. rosea mycoparasitism by regulating the expression of these DEGs. These findings provide insight for further exploring the molecular mechanism of C. rosea mycoparasitism.

1. Introduction

Clonostachys rosea is an important mycoparasite that can control numerous fungal plant pathogens according to different actions, such as mycoparasitism, antagonism, competition, secretion of cell wall-degrading enzymes, and production of secondary metabolites, including toxins and antibiotics [1]. Currently, the main research interests of C. rosea in the biocontrol field are focused on two aspects: the first of which is screening for more C. rosea strains for enhanced biocontrol capabilities under different environments. Another is investigating the molecular mechanism for C. rosea biocontrol, which would be beneficial for further improving the biocontrol ability of C. rosea. Currently, several genes, including MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase), transcription factor, heat shock protein 70, cell wall biogenesis protein phosphatase, nonribosomal peptide synthetase, polyketide synthase, transaldolase, and ABC transporter, have been reported to be involved in C. rosea biocontrol [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Among these reported genes, signal transduction genes (such as MAPK) have drawn wide attention because the signal transduction process is the preliminary step of biocontrol and can regulate other biocontrol actions. In addition to the MAPK signaling pathway, the cAMP signaling pathway is also very important and has not been studied in C. rosea.
The cAMP signaling pathway is conserved in fungi and can regulate their growth, development, and virulence [10,11,12]. The cAMP signaling pathway consists of several components: G-protein coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G-proteins, adenylate cyclase, cAMP-dependent protein kinase, and downstream effectors [13,14]. Adenylate cyclase is a crucial component for the synthesis of cAMP (cyclic adenosine 3′5′monophosphate) [15].
Adenylate cyclase plays an important role in biocontrol. Disruption of the adenylate cyclase-encoding gene tac1 influences the morphology, growth, sporulation, and secondary metabolite production in Trichoderma virens, and the antagonism ability of mutants to pathogens of Sclerotium rolfsii, Pythium sp., and Rhizoctonia solani were affected [16]. The adenylate cyclase-encoding genes BcAC and MrAC from Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium robertsii, respectively, were reported to be involved in the biocontrol of insects. The absence of BcAC and MrAC could affect the biocontrol capacity of B. bassiana to Galleria mellonella larvae and M. robertsii to Tenebrio molitor third-instar larvae, respectively. Moreover, the environmental stress response and conidiation of the two mutants were also affected [17]. Similarly, silencing the adenylate cyclase-encoding gene MaAC could influence the biocontrol ability of M. acridum against Locusta migratoria adults, as well as their growth and tolerance to environmental stresses [18].
C. rosea 67-1 was previously isolated and exhibited excellent ability to control numerous fungal plant diseases [19]. An adenylate cyclase-encoding gene, crac, was previously screened from 67-1 because its expression level was dramatically upregulated during 67-1 parasitization of the sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum [20]. The aim of this research was to investigate the role of crac in C. rosea mycoparasitism and clarify the molecular mechanism of C. rosea biocontrol; in this study, the function of crac in C. rosea mycoparasitism was first investigated through gene knockout and complementation. Then, the transcriptomes of 67-1 and crac deletion mutant parasitizing sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum were sequenced and compared. Finally, differentially expressed genes after crac deletion were explored, and their potential roles associated with crac were analyzed. This study has significance for understanding the cAMP signaling pathway in C. roses and further improving the biocontrol ability of C. rosea.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains

C. rosea 67-1 was originally isolated from a vegetable yard in Hainan Province, China, using a sclerotia baiting method [19]. S. sclerotiorum Ss-H was obtained from Sclerotinia stem rot-infected soybean stems in Heilongjiang Province, China. Sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum were prepared and collected on carrot medium as previously described [21]. C. rosea 67-1 and S. sclerotiorum Ss-H were deposited in the Agricultural Culture Collection of China to obtain numbers ACCC 39160 and ACCC 39161, respectively.

2.2. Gene Cloning and Bioinformatic Analysis

A Biospin fungus genomic DNA extraction kit (Bioer Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) was used to extract the genomic DNA of C. rosea 67-1. Full-length crac was then amplified using primer pairs AC-F and AC-R through PCR (Table 1). The PCR products were detected by electrophoresis and sequenced at Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) Sequence information of crac was submitted to GenBank to obtain accession numbers.
The ExPASy program was used to predict the molecular weight and isoelectric point of crac [22]. SignalP 6.0 and TMPRED software were used to detect the signal peptide and transmembrane regions of crac, respectively [23,24]. MEGA 6.0 software was used to conduct phylogenetic analysis of crac, with 1000 replications under the neighbor-joining method [25,26].

2.3. Gene Knockout

The plasmid pKH-KO, carrying a hygromycin B (hph) resistance gene, was used to construct a gene knockout vector. Primer pairs of CAUF/CAUR and CADF/CADR were used to amplify the upstream and downstream fragments of crac from the genomic DNA of C. rosea 67-1 (Table 1). Then, the upstream and downstream fragments, linearized pKH-KO, and USER enzyme were mixed together to construct the gene knockout vector pKH-KO-crac at 37 °C for 20 min, followed by 25 °C for 20 min, and transferred in Escherichia coli DH5α. Finally, the gene knockout vector pKH-KO-crac was extracted from DH5α and verified using electrophoresis and DNA sequencing.
The protoplasts of C. rosea 67-1 were prepared as previously described [21]. The knockout vector pKH-KO-crac was transformed into protoplasts of C. rosea 67-1, and the mutants were screened on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates containing 300 μg/mL hygromycin B after 5–7 days of cultivation. The positive mutants were verified using PCR through the following strategy. First, the CDS of crac was amplified among the wild-type strain and mutants using primer pairs of ACF and ACR by PCR, with the wild-type strain and false-positive strains amplifying the CDS of crac, while the positive mutants could not amplify the CDS of crac through electrophoresis detection. Then, the fragments beyond the upstream and downstream of crac were amplified and sequenced using the primer pairs FACF and FACR, with the wild-type strain and false-positive strains amplifying a sequence length of 11,621 bp, while the positive mutants amplified 4623 bp.
Copy numbers of hph in knockout mutants were detected using Southern blotting to verify homologous recombination. The DNA probe was prepared with primer pairs of PACF and PACR (Table 1) and then labeled with digoxigenin (DIG) by a PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The genomic DNA of knockout mutants was extracted and then digested with SacI (Takara) and separated using a 0.7% agarose gel. The products were transferred onto a Hybond-N+ nylon membrane (Amersham, NJ, USA) and hybridized with the labeled DNA probe. Finally, chemiluminescence was conducted using a DIG-High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit II (Roche, Penzberg, Germany). Finally, mutants with single band through Southern blot were regarded as positive.

2.4. Gene Complementation

The plasmid pKN, containing a G418 resistance gene, was used to construct the gene complementation vector. Primer pairs of HBACF and HBACR were used to amplify the complementation fragments of crac using PCR (Table 1). The gene complementation vector was constructed through linkage of crac complementation fragments and the linearized pKN plasmid, and then the complementation vector pKN-crac was verified by electrophoresis and vector sequencing.
The complementation vector was transformed into the protoplasts of knockout mutants, and then complementation transformants were screened on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates containing 300 μg/mL G418. The positive transformants were verified using PCR with primer pairs AC-F and AC-R (Table 1), with the positive transformants amplifying the CDS of crac.

2.5. Morphological Characteristics and Stress Tolerance

The C. rosea wild-type strain, knockout mutants, and complementation transformants were inoculated on PDA plates at 26 °C for 10 days. Then, differences in colony morphology and growth rate among the three types of C. rosea strains were examined at the same amount of time growing.
NaCl and H2O2 were used to test the tolerance alteration when crac was absent and complementary in C. rosea 67-1 under environmental stresses. The C. rosea wild-type strain, knockout mutants, and complementation transformants were inoculated on PDA plates containing 1 M NaCl and 20 mM H2O2. The colony diameters of the three types of C. rosea strains were measured at 26 °C for 10 days. Each treatment was conducted in triplicate.

2.6. Mycoparasitic Ability on Sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum

The spore concentrations of the C. rosea wild-type strain, knockout mutants, and complementation transformants were adjusted to 1 × 107 spores/mL. Sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum were surface-sterilized with 75% ethyl alcohol and 1% NaClO and then immersed into the spore suspensions of C. rosea strains for 10 min. Then, sclerotia from different types of C. rosea strains were placed on wet filter paper in a Petri dish at 26 °C for 7 days. The infection severity of C. rosea strains parasitizing sclerotia was investigated under a 4-grade scale: 0 = no C. rosea mycelium were found on the sclerotia; 1 = few C. rosea mycelia were found on the sclerotia; 2 = sclerotia were covered with C. rosea mycelia but not soft; 3 = sclerotia were covered with C. rosea mycelia and soft [4]. All treatments were repeated three times.

2.7. Biocontrol of Soybean Sclerotinia Stem Rot

Soybeans were planted in pots and grown to nine compound leaves for the biocontrol assay. Spore suspensions with equal concentrations (5 × 106 spores/mL) of the C. rosea wild-type strain, knockout mutants, and complementation transformants were sprayed onto soybean leaves. Then, an equivalent amount of S. sclerotiorum suspension was inoculated after 2 h. The negative control in the experiment was sterile distilled water sprays and the positive control was application of the fungicide carbendazim according to supplier’s instructions. The disease index of soybean Sclerotinia stem rot was investigated using a 9-grade scoring system after 7 days based on the lesion areas on soybean leaves: 0, no symptoms; 1, <5%; 3, 5–10%; 5, 11–25%; 7, 26–50%; and 9, > 50%. The disease index was calculated as follows: disease index = [Σ (number of diseased leaves × disease grade)/(total number of leaves × the highest disease grade)] × 100 [21]. The control efficacies of C. rosea strains were also assessed as follows. Control efficacy (%) = [(Disease index of negative control-disease index of experimental group)/disease index of negative group] × 100. All experiments were performed with three replications.

2.8. Preparation of Mycelial Samples of C. rosea Strains Mycoparasitizing Sclerotia

The concentration of spore suspensions of the C. rosea wild-type strain and knockout mutant was adjusted to 1 × 107 spores/mL. A total of 100 μL of spore suspensions of the wild-type strain and knockout mutant were spread on PDA plates using a sterilized glass scraper and cultivated at 26 °C for 48 h. Surface-sterilized sclerotia with uniform size were placed onto and covered the surface of the wild-type strain and knockout mutant plates and cultivated at 26 °C. The sclerotia were removed at 8, 24, and 48 h. Then, mycelia of C. rosea wild-type strains and crac knockout mutants were collected at 8, 24, and 48 h using a sterilized spatula used for RNA extraction. Mycelia of C. rosea wild-type strains parasitizing sclerotia were used as control. Set mycelia of C. rosea crac knockout mutants parasitizing sclerotia were used as treatment. Each treatment was conducted three times.

2.9. cDNA Library Construction and Sequencing

Total RNA of each mycelia sample was extracted, and the quality of RNAs was detected using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer. mRNA from each sample was enriched with oligo (dT) magnetic beads and then broken into small pieces using NEB fragmentation buffer. cDNA fragments with a size of 250–300 bp were selected using AMPure XP beads after cDNA synthesis, purification, end repair, addition of adenine to the 3′ end, and adapter connection. Finally, suitable cDNA fragments were amplified to construct cDNA libraries. The cDNA libraries were monitored and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at Novogene Corporation Inc.
Raw transcriptome sequencing data were filtered to remove adaptor sequences, reads that contained N (unknown bases), and low-quality reads to obtain clean data. HISAT software (v2.0.5) was used to map the clean data onto the genome of C. rosea 67-1. The reads were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database to obtain accession numbers.

2.10. Differentially Expressed Gene Analysis

The FPKM (expected number of fragments per kilobase of transcript sequence per million base pairs sequenced) method was used to calculate the expression level of genes [27,28]. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) after crac deletion in C. rosea strains mycoparasizing sclerotia were screened using DESeq2 software (1.20.0) according to negative binomial distribution [29]. A padj value lower than 0.05 and a fold change higher or lower than 2 were considered significantly differentially expressed. Finally, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were conducted for the DEGs.

2.11. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Validation

To validate the reliability of transcriptomic sequencing, the expression level of 8 genes, containing 4 upregulated expressed and 4 downregulated expressed genes, were randomly selected and quantified through quantitative real-time PCR. Primer pairs of the 8 genes were designed using Primer Premier 6.0 software (Table S1).
The first strand cDNA of mRNA samples was synthesized using a cDNA synthesis kit (TAKARA) according to the producer’s instruction. Quantitative real-time PCR was conducted using CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System, with the program at 95 °C 30 s; 40 cycles of 95 °C 5 s, and 55 °C 30 s. The 2−∆∆Ct method was used to calculate the expression levels of genes, with elongation factor used as internal reference gene. Each experiment was performed in three replications.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

SAS 9.1.3 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to analyze the differences in biological characteristics, tolerance to different stresses, mycoparasitic ability to sclerotia, and biocontrol capacity of soybean Sclerotinia stems among the C. rosea wild-type strain, knockout mutants, and complementation transformants. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to compare the means of each treatment. An amount of p < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Crac

The complete sequence of crac comprises 8477 bp and contains 1220 bp of intronic DNA. The predicted crac protein consisted of 2418 amino acids, with an isoelectric point and predicted molecular weight of 5.81 and 265.4 kDa, respectively. No signal peptide or transmembrane regions were detected within the crac protein. The phylogenetic analysis found that the crac protein was clustered with other closely related adenylate cyclases, indicating that crac from C. rosea belongs to the adenylate cyclase group (Figure 1). The complete sequence of crac was submitted to GenBank and obtained accession number OP978323.

3.2. Screening and Verification of Crac Knockout Mutants and Complementation Transformants

Upstream and downstream fragments of crac were amplified through PCR and linked to the linearized pKH-KO plasmid. Complementation fragments of crac were also amplified through PCR and linked to the linearized pKN plasmid. The knockout and complementation vectors were successfully constructed through electrophoresis and plasmid sequencing verification.
The crac knockout vector was transformed into the C. rosea wild-type strain, and two positive mutants (named ∆crac-6 and ∆crac-13) were obtained and verified through PCR amplification and sequencing (Figure 2). The results of Southern blotting demonstrated that only one copy of the hph fragment was detected in both the ∆crac-6 and ∆crac-13 mutants, which indicated that crac was deleted through homologous recombination in C. rosea 67-1.
The crac complementation vector was transformed into the C. roseacrac-6 and ∆crac-13 mutants, and then complementation transformants named ∆crac-6+ and ∆crac-13+ were obtained and verified through PCR amplification and sequencing (Figure 2).

3.3. Morphological Characteristics and Stress Tolerance

The colony morphology of C. rosea was altered in the ∆crac-6 and ∆crac-13 mutants compared with the wild-type strain. The mycelium of C. rosea on the colony became lesser after crac deletion. The colony morphology was recovered after crac complementation in the two mutants (Figure 3A). Colony diameters were significantly decreased after crac deletion in both C. rosea knockout mutants. After gene complementation, the colony diameters of ∆crac-6+ and ∆crac-13+ showed no significant difference from the wild-type strain (Figure 3B).
In the stress tolerance assay, the tolerance of C. rosea to NaCl and H2O2 was dramatically reduced after crac deletion. The inhibition rate of NaCl and H2O2 in both ∆crac-6 and ∆crac-13 was significantly higher than that in the wild-type strain and complementation transformants (Figure 3C), indicating that crac is associated with tolerance to stress.

3.4. Mycoparasitic Ability on Sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum

The infection severity of sclerotia was reduced in both ∆crac-6 and ∆crac-13 mutants compared with the wild strain after 7 days of cultivation. Sclerotia that were parasitized by the C. rosea wild strain were rotten and reached grade 3. However, sclerotia that were parasitized by ∆crac-6 and ∆crac-13 were still firm and reached grade 2. After crac complementation, the infection severity of sclerotia by ∆crac-6+ and ∆crac-13+ was restored to grade 3, which suggested that crac was crucial in C. rosea mycoparasitism (Figure 4).

3.5. Biocontrol of Soybean Sclerotinia Stem Rot

Serious soybean Sclerotinia stem rot diseases occurred after 7 days in soybean seedlings in the CK treatment (sprayed with sterile distilled water) after inoculation with S. sclerotiorum. The wild strain exhibited excellent biocontrol efficacy against soybean Sclerotinia stem rot (74.1%), which is similar to the biocontrol effects of carbendazim (72.6%). However, the control efficacy was significantly reduced in the treatment of ∆crac-6 and ∆crac-13 (34.2% and 31.6%, respectively). The control efficacy in the complementation transformants ∆crac-6+ and ∆crac-13+ recovered and showed no remarkable difference with the treatment of the wild strain (71.1% and 69.1%, respectively), which demonstrated that crac plays important roles in C. rosea biocontrol (Figure 4, Table 2).

3.6. Transcriptome Sequencing

After transcriptome sequencing and data filtration, the average number of clean reads in the samples was 43,250,676. All samples were mapped onto the genome of C. rosea 67-1, and the map rate was above 93.46% for each sample. All sequence data were uploaded to SRA with the accession numbers SRR22518306, SRR22525956, SRR22540850, SRR22541076, SRR22558352, SRR22572162, SRR22581774, SRR22585856, SRR22671486, SRR22673279, SRR22684623, SRR22702311, SRR22704875, SRR22727039, SRR22730640, SRR22799385, SRR22805652, and SRR22512441.

3.7. DEG Analysis

Through transcriptomic analysis, the crac gene in the wild strain could be detected at three sampling times, but the crac gene could not be detected in both of the crac deletion mutants at three sampling time points. After crac deletion, 1623 and 1371 genes were significantly upregulated and downregulated in C. rosea at 8 h parasitizing sclerotia based on transcriptomic analysis. At 24 h mycoparasitism, the upregulated and downregulated DEGs were 281 and 355, respectively. At 48 h mycoparasitism, the upregulated and downregulated DEGs were 359 and 231, respectively. Among these DEGs, a number of genes with unknown functions dominated at 8, 24, and 48 h. Genes encoding different types of transporters, including sugar transporters, ABC transporters, transmembrane amino acid transporters, oligopeptide transporters, siderophore iron transporters, major facilitator superfamily multidrug transporters, monocarboxylate transporters, vitamin B6 transporters, and riboflavin transporters, were significantly downregulated during the process of C. rosea parasitizing sclerotia after crac disruption. Similarly, genes encoding cell wall-degrading enzymes, including chitinase, endoglucanase and protease, cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, and nonribosomal peptide synthetase, were also dramatically downregulated after crac deletion.
According to GO enrichment analysis, the functions of DEGs were divided into three categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function (Figure 5). At 8 h mycoparasitism, the cellular protein metabolic process term belongs to the biological process category; organelle and intracellular organelle terms belong to the cellular component category; and transmembrane transporter activity, adenyl ribonucleotide binding, and adenyl nucleotide binding terms belong to the molecular function category. The dominant terms in the cellular component category were not altered at 24 and 48 h. However, the dominant terms in the biological process and molecular function categories were quite different at 8, 24, and 48 h. At 24 h, the dominant terms in the biological process and molecular function categories were proteolysis and catalytic activity, acting on a protein, respectively. At 48 h, the dominant terms in the biological process and molecular function categories were phosphate metabolic process and ATP binding, respectively.
KEGG analysis was found to be helpful for understanding the pathways of DEGs involved during C. rosea mycoparasitism (Figure 6). At 8 h, 96 DEGs were involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis pathways. At 24 h, the most dominant pathway was amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism. At 48 h, the most dominant pathway was carbon metabolism. According to KEGG analysis, some DEGs were involved in penicillin and cephalosporin biosynthesis or chitin degradation, which is the main component of the pathogen cell wall. These findings indicated that crac might affect the capacity of antibiotic production or cell wall degradation by regulating the expression levels of these DEGs, therefore influencing the mycoparasitic ability of C. rosea.

3.8. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Validation

Among these DEGs, eight genes, including four upregulated and four downregulated genes, were randomly selected to conduct quantitative real-time PCR. The results showed that the expression level of the eight genes was consistent with transcriptomic analysis during all the time points, which indicated that the expression level of DEGs from transcriptomic sequencing was reliable for further analysis (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

The signal transduction pathways play crucial roles in mycoparasitism. Molecular signals are cascade-amplified through signal transduction pathways and then activate downstream effectors, accomplishing the mycoparasitism behavior [30]. Therefore, exploring signal transduction pathways is important for further understanding the mycoparasitism mechanism of mycoparasites. MAPK and cAMP are the major signal transduction pathways in fungi. Our previous study analyzed the role of some important genes in the MAPK signal transduction pathway during mycoparasitism [2]. As another important signal transduction pathway, the cAMP pathway has seldom been studied in biocontrol. In our previous work, the adenylate cyclase-encoding gene crac, as an important component in the cAMP pathway, was significantly upregulated during C. rosea mycoparasitism [20]. Therefore, to explore the role of crac in C. rosea mycoparasitism, gene knockout and complementation were used to analyze the function of crac. The results obtained that the colony morphology and tolerance to environmental stress were influenced after the deletion of crac, as well as the parasitic activity of C. rosea on sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum and the biocontrol capacity of C. rosea against soybean Sclerotinia stem rot. In order to clarify whether the mycoparasitic ability decline was due to crac deletion, or associated with general fitness defects, and further study the molecular mechanism by which crac regulates C. rosea mycoparasitism, transcriptomes of the C. rosea wild-type strain and knockout mutant parasitizing sclerotia were sequenced, and the DEGs after crac deletion were analyzed. Numerous genes were significantly altered in expression after crac deletion; among these DEGs, mycoparasitic-related genes such as cell wall degrading enzymes were significantly lower, which indicated that crac was involved in C. rosea mycoparasitism. This study provides new insights into the mycoparasitism mechanism of C. rosea.
As a crucial component in the cAMP signal transduction pathway, adenylate cyclase plays important roles in regulating morphological characteristics, vegetative growth, conidiation, sexual development, mating, and resistance to environmental stress in fungi, as well as metabolite production. Moreover, adenylate cyclase has been associated with pathogenicity in fungal pathogens. Disruption of adenylate cyclase genes in S. sclerotiorum, Ustilaginoidea virens, Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium digitatum, and Magnaporthe grisea could attenuate their pathogenicity to tomato leaflets, rice seeds and panicles, Phaseolus vulgaris leaves, citrus fruit, and rice leaves, respectively [31,32,33,34,35]. However, only a few studies of adenylate cyclase involved in biocontrol have been reported. Deletion and silencing of adenylate cyclase genes in T. virens and M. acridum reduced their biocontrol ability against pathogens [16,17]. To date, no study of adenylate cyclase in C. rosea mycoparasitism has been reported. Therefore, studying the role of adenylate cyclase in C. rosea mycoparasitism has significance for deeply exploring the biocontrol mechanism of C. rosea.
Analysis of the DEGs aids in understanding the mechanism by which crac regulates C. rosea mycoparasitism. In this study, 1623 and 1371 genes were significantly upregulated and downregulated in C. rosea parasitizing sclerotia at 8 h after crac deletion based on transcriptomic analysis. However, at 24 and 48 h, the numbers of DEGs were markedly reduced compared with those at 8 h. At 24 h, there were 281 and 355 upregulated and downregulated DEGs, respectively. At 48 h mycoparasitism, the upregulated and downregulated DEGs were 359 and 231, respectively. This may be associated with the property of crac, which belongs to a component of the cAMP signal pathway. Signal transduction commonly occurs at the initial stage of mycoparasitism. As a signal transduction-related gene, deletion of crac would likely lead to more DEG alterations at the initial stage (8 h) of C. rosea mycoparasitism compared with 24 and 48 h.
Among the DEGs, several different types of genes have received considerable attention, including transporter and cell wall-degrading enzymes, which have been reported to be involved in biocontrol. Deletion of the ABC transporter-encoding gene abcG29 in C. rosea reduced the ability to protect Arabidopsis thaliana leaves infected by B. cinerea [9]. Cell wall-degrading enzymes normally refer to chitinase, glucanase, and protease, which can degrade the cell wall of fungal pathogens. Overexpression of the endochitinase-encoding gene Chi67-1 in C. rosea was shown to enhance the mycoparasitic ability to sclerotia and biocontrol capacity to soybean Sclerotinia stem rot [21]. Deletion or overexpression of the beta-1,6-glucanase Tvbgn3 in T. virens significantly reduced and increased the biocontrol ability, respectively [36]. Similarly, disruption of the subtilisin-like protease prC attenuated the nematode infection ability of C. rosea [37]. Moreover, different types of monooxygenase and nonribosomal peptide synthetase also participate in biocontrol. Disruption of the monooxygenase-encoding gene in T. hamatum caused a reduced ability to inhibit S. sclerotiorum growth and sclerotial production [38]. Deletion of the nonribosomal peptide synthetase-encoding gene nps1 reduced the biocontrol ability of C. rosea against wheat foot rot disease caused by Fusarium graminearum [6]. In our study, these DEGs were significantly downregulated after crac deletion, which indicated that crac might be involved in C. rosea mycoparasitism by regulating the expression of these DEGs.
Moreover, several DEGs encoding transcription factors were significantly downregulated during C. rosea after crac deletion. Transcription factors are downstream components of signal transduction pathways. When signals are cascade-amplified through signal transduction pathways, transcription factors become active and combine with related cis-acting elements to regulate the expression of target genes and response to related biological behavior [39]. Transcription factor-encoding genes have been reported to be associated with biocontrol. Disruption of the transcription factor gene crtf in C. rosea could reduce the mycoparasitic ability of sclerotia and biocontrol capacity to soybean Sclerotinia white mold [4]. Similarly, deletion of the NDT80-like transcription factor gene CmNdt80a could significantly diminish the mycoparasitic ability of Coniothyrium minitans on sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum [40]. In this study, some downregulated transcription factor genes were involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites through KEGG analysis, which indicated that crac might affect secondary metabolite production by regulating the expression of transcription factor genes, thereby influencing the mycoparasitic ability of C. rosea. Further study could explore the function of these transcription factor genes in C. rosea biocontrol and seek their cis-acting elements associated with biocontrol.

5. Conclusions

Deletion of crac influenced the colony morphology and growth rate of C. rosea, as well as the tolerance of NaCl and H2O2 stress. The mycoparasitic ability of C. rosea on sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum and the biocontrol capacity of C. rosea on soybean Sclerotinia stem rot were both attenuated in crac knockout mutants. All characteristics were recovered after gene complementation, which indicated that crac was involved in C. rosea biocontrol. Moreover, the deletion of crac caused numerous biocontrol-related genes to be differentially expressed, including genes encoding cell wall-degrading enzymes, transporters, monooxygenase, etc. This study provides a basis for further deep exploration of the molecular mechanism of C. rosea mycoparasitism.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9080861/s1. Table S1. Primers used for quantitative real-time PCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.-B.S. and M.-H.S.; methodology, S.-F.Y., Z.-B.S. and Y.-F.H.; formal analysis, S.-D.L., Q.R., J.-L.X. and H.-J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-F.Y.; writing—review and editing, Z.-B.S.; funding acquisition, Z.-B.S. and M.-H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072478), the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-23-C04), and the Science and Technology general project of the Beijing municipal education commission (KM202110011002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All sequence data were uploaded to SRA with the accession numbers SRR22518306, SRR22525956, SRR22540850, SRR22541076, SRR22558352, SRR22572162, SRR22581774, SRR22585856, SRR22671486, SRR22673279, SRR22684623, SRR22702311, SRR22704875, SRR22727039, SRR22730640, SRR22799385, SRR22805652, and SRR22512441.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, Z.B.; Li, S.D.; Ren, Q.; Xu, J.L.; Lu, X.; Sun, M.H. Biology and applications of Clonostachys rosea. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 486–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sun, Z.B.; Wang, Q.; Sun, M.H.; Li, S.D. The mitogen-activated protein kinase gene crmapk is involved in Clonostachys chloroleuca mycoparasitism. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2020, 33, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sun, Z.B.; Wang, Q.; Sun, M.H.; Li, S.D. The heat shock protein 70 gene is involved for colony morphology, sporulation and mycoparasitism of Clonostachys rosae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, fnz188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sun, Z.B.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, W.Z.; Wang, Q.; Li, S.D.; Ma, G.Z.; Sun, M.H. The transcription factor-encoding gene crtf is involved in Clonostachys chloroleuca mycoparasitism on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 210, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, J.Y.; Li, S.D.; Sun, M.H. Transaldolase gene Tal67 enhances the biocontrol activity of Clonostachys rosea 67-1 against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 474, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Iqbal, M.; Dubey, M.; Broberg, A.; Viketoft, M.; Jensen, D.F.; Karlsson, M. Deletion of the nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene nps1 in the fungus Clonostachys rosea attenuates antagonism and biocontrol of plant pathogenic Fusarium and nematodes. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 1698–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fatema, U.; Broberg, A.; Jensen, D.F.; Karlsson, M.; Dubey, M. Functional analysis of polyketide synthase genes in the biocontrol fungus Clonostachys rosea. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lv, B.; Jiang, N.; Hasan, R.; Chen, Y.; Sun, M.; Li, S. Cell wall biogenesis protein phosphatase CrSsd1 is required for conidiation, cell wall integrity, and mycoparasitism in Clonostachys rosea. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dubey, M.; Jensen, D.F.; Karlsson, M. The ABC transporter ABCG29 is involved in H2O2 tolerance and biocontrol traits in the fungus Clonostachys rosea. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2016, 291, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ding, X.; Cao, C.; Zheng, Q.; Huang, G. The regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (Bcy1) in Candida albicans plays critical roles in filamentation and white-opaque switching but is not essential for cell growth. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schumacher, J.; Kokkelink, L.; Huesmann, C.; Jimenez-Teja, D.; Collado, I.G.; Barakat, R.; Tudzynski, P.; Tudzynski, B. The cAMP-dependent signaling pathway and its role in conidial germination, growth, and virulence of the gray mold Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 1443–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tzima, A.; Paplomatas, E.J.; Rauyaree, P.; Kang, S. Roles of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A in virulence and development of the soilborne plant pathogen Verticillium dahliae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, Z.B.; Yu, S.F.; Wang, C.L.; Wang, L. cAMP Signalling Pathway in Biocontrol Fungi. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 2622–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lin, C.J.; Chen, Y.L. Conserved and divergent functions of the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, G.H.; Huang, Q.; Wei, Y.J.; Wang, Y.; Du, H. Multiple roles and diverse regulation of the Ras/cAMP/protein kinase A pathway in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 2019, 111, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mukherjee, M.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Kale, S.P. cAMP signalling is involved in growth, germination, mycoparasitism and secondary metabolism in Trichoderma virens. Microbiology 2007, 153 Pt 6, 1734–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, J.; Zhou, G.; Ying, S.H.; Feng, M.G. Adenylate cyclase orthologues in two filamentous entomopathogens contribute differentially to growth, conidiation, pathogenicity, and multistress responses. Fungal Biol. 2014, 118, 422–431. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, S.Y.; Peng, G.X.; Xia, Y.X. The adenylate cyclase gene MaAC is required for virulence and multi-stress tolerance of Metarhizium acridum. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.H.; Gao, H.L.; Ma, G.Z.; Li, S.D. Mycoparasitism of Gliocladium roseum 67-1 on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Acta Phytophy. Sin. 2004, 34, 211–214. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun, Z.B.; Sun, M.H.; Li, S.D. Identification of mycoparasitism-related genes in Clonostachys rosea 67-1 active against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Sci. Rep. 2015, 15, 18169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, Z.B.; Sun, M.H.; Zhou, M.; Li, S.D. Transformation of the endochitinase gene Chi67-1 in Clonostachys rosea 67-1 increases its biocontrol activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. AMB Express 2017, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gasteiger, E.; Hoogland, C.; Gattiker, A.; Duvaud, S.; Wilkins, M.R.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy Server. In The Proteomics Protocols Handbook; Walker, J.M., Ed.; Humana Press Inc.: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 571–607. [Google Scholar]
  23. Teufel, F.; Almagro Armenteros, J.J.; Johansen, A.R.; Gíslason, M.H.; Pihl, S.I.; Tsirigos, K.D.; Winther, O.; Brunak, S.; von Heijne, G.; Nielsen, H. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1023–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hofmann, K.; Stoffel, W. TMbase-A database of membrane spanning proteins segments. Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler 1993, 374, 166. [Google Scholar]
  25. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Audic, S.; Claverie, J.M. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res. 1997, 7, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Karlsson, M.; Atanasova, L.; Jensen, D.F.; Zeilinger, S. Necrotrophic mycoparasites and their genomes. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, FUNK-0016-2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jurick, W.M., 2nd; Rollins, J.A. Deletion of the adenylate cyclase (sac1) gene affects multiple developmental pathways and pathogenicity in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2007, 44, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, W.; Gao, Y.; Yu, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H. The adenylate cyclase UvAc1 and phosphodiesterase UvPdeH control the intracellular cAMP level, development, and pathogenicity of the rice false smut fungus Ustilaginoidea virens. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2019, 129, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Klimpel, A.; Gronover, C.S.; Williamson, B.; Stewart, J.A.; Tudzynski, B. The adenylate cyclase (BAC) in Botrytis cinerea is required for full pathogenicity. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, W.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Zhu, C.; Chung, K.R.; Li, H. Adenylyl cyclase is required for cAMP production, growth, conidial germination, and virulence in the citrus green mold pathogen Penicillium digitatum. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Choi, W.; Dean, R.A. The adenylate cyclase gene MAC1 of Magnaporthe grisea controls appressorium formation and other aspects of growth and development. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1973–1983. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Djonović, S.; Pozo, M.J.; Kenerley, C.M. Tvbgn3, a beta-1,6-glucanase from the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma virens, is involved in mycoparasitism and control of Pythium ultimum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 7661–7670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zou, C.G.; Tao, N.; Liu, W.J.; Yang, J.K.; Huang, X.W.; Liu, X.Y.; Tu, H.H.; Gan, Z.W.; Zhang, K.Q. Regulation of subtilisin-like protease prC expression by nematode cuticle in the nematophagous fungus Clonostachys rosea. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 3243–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Carpenter, M.A.; Ridgway, H.J.; Stringer, A.M.; Hay, A.J.; Stewart, A. Characterisation of a Trichoderma hamatum monooxygenase gene involved in antagonistic activity against fungal plant pathogens. Curr. Genet. 2008, 53, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marinho, H.S.; Real, C.; Cyrne, L.; Soares, H.; Antunes, F. Hydrogen peroxide sensing, signaling and regulation of transcription factors. Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 535–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, X.; Huang, X.; Zhang, L.; Du, L.; Liu, Y. The NDT80-like transcription factor CmNdt80a affects the conidial formation and germination, mycoparasitism, and cell wall integrity of Coniothyrium minitans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 808–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of crac from Clonostachys rosea using the neighbor-joining method. Numbers at the nodes indicate the bootstrap values of 1000 bootstraps. Bars (=0.02) represent sequence divergence.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of crac from Clonostachys rosea using the neighbor-joining method. Numbers at the nodes indicate the bootstrap values of 1000 bootstraps. Bars (=0.02) represent sequence divergence.
Jof 09 00861 g001
Figure 2. Verification of crac knockout mutants and complementation transformants. (A) Verification strategy of crac knockout mutants. (B) PCR verification. M: Marker; 1–5: cds of crac in the wild strain, Δcrac-6, Δcrac-13, Δcrac-6+, and Δcrac-13+; 6–8: fragment beyond the upstream and downstream region in the wild strain, Δcrac-6, and Δcrac-13. (C) Number of hph copies detected by Southern blotting. M: Marker; 1: Δcrac-6; 2: Δcrac-13.
Figure 2. Verification of crac knockout mutants and complementation transformants. (A) Verification strategy of crac knockout mutants. (B) PCR verification. M: Marker; 1–5: cds of crac in the wild strain, Δcrac-6, Δcrac-13, Δcrac-6+, and Δcrac-13+; 6–8: fragment beyond the upstream and downstream region in the wild strain, Δcrac-6, and Δcrac-13. (C) Number of hph copies detected by Southern blotting. M: Marker; 1: Δcrac-6; 2: Δcrac-13.
Jof 09 00861 g002
Figure 3. Morphological characteristics among the wild strain, crac knockout mutants, and complementation transformants. (A) Colony morphology. (B) Growth diameter. (C) Tolerance to stress of NaCl and H2O2. Different letters in Figure (B) represent significant difference (p < 0.05) in mycelial diameter (cm). Different letters in Figure (C) represent significant difference (p < 0.05) in growth inhibition (%) under different environmental stress. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD) of three experiments.
Figure 3. Morphological characteristics among the wild strain, crac knockout mutants, and complementation transformants. (A) Colony morphology. (B) Growth diameter. (C) Tolerance to stress of NaCl and H2O2. Different letters in Figure (B) represent significant difference (p < 0.05) in mycelial diameter (cm). Different letters in Figure (C) represent significant difference (p < 0.05) in growth inhibition (%) under different environmental stress. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD) of three experiments.
Jof 09 00861 g003
Figure 4. Mycoparasitic ability and biocontrol capacity among the wild strain, crac knockout mutants, and complementation transformants. (A) Mycoparasitic ability on sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum. (B) Biocontrol capacity on soybean Sclerotinia stem rot. CK: treatment with distilled water; WT represents wild-type strain.
Figure 4. Mycoparasitic ability and biocontrol capacity among the wild strain, crac knockout mutants, and complementation transformants. (A) Mycoparasitic ability on sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum. (B) Biocontrol capacity on soybean Sclerotinia stem rot. CK: treatment with distilled water; WT represents wild-type strain.
Jof 09 00861 g004
Figure 5. Gene ontology (GO) categories of the DEGs. (A) 8 h mycoparasitism. (B) 24 h mycoparasitism. (C) 48 h mycoparasitism. The X-axis represents different GO teams of DEGs belonging to three categories. The Y-axis means number of DEGs.
Figure 5. Gene ontology (GO) categories of the DEGs. (A) 8 h mycoparasitism. (B) 24 h mycoparasitism. (C) 48 h mycoparasitism. The X-axis represents different GO teams of DEGs belonging to three categories. The Y-axis means number of DEGs.
Jof 09 00861 g005
Figure 6. KEGG analysis of the DEGs. (A) 8 h mycoparasitism. (B) 24 h mycoparasitism. (C) 48 h mycoparasitism. The X-axis represents the ratio of DEGs annotated onto KEGG pathways/all DEGs. Y-axis means different types of KEGG pathways. The areas of circle represent number of DEGs, and the color of circle from red to purple represents significance value ranging from lower to higher.
Figure 6. KEGG analysis of the DEGs. (A) 8 h mycoparasitism. (B) 24 h mycoparasitism. (C) 48 h mycoparasitism. The X-axis represents the ratio of DEGs annotated onto KEGG pathways/all DEGs. Y-axis means different types of KEGG pathways. The areas of circle represent number of DEGs, and the color of circle from red to purple represents significance value ranging from lower to higher.
Jof 09 00861 g006
Figure 7. Validation of the DEGs using quantitative real-time PCR. The X-axis represents DEGs, and the Y-axis represents relative expression level of DEGs. Blue column represents the wild strain, and red column represents the crac knockout mutant. The top and bottom panel means up and downregulated DEGs, respectively. Error bars indicated the standard deviation (SD) of three replications.
Figure 7. Validation of the DEGs using quantitative real-time PCR. The X-axis represents DEGs, and the Y-axis represents relative expression level of DEGs. Blue column represents the wild strain, and red column represents the crac knockout mutant. The top and bottom panel means up and downregulated DEGs, respectively. Error bars indicated the standard deviation (SD) of three replications.
Jof 09 00861 g007
Table 1. Primers in this study.
Table 1. Primers in this study.
PrimersSequence (5′-3′)
CAUFGGTCTTAAUCGCCGTGGGATGGATTGGACGAGGA
CAURGGCATTAAUTGTTCAACCTACGGCCGTAGCTGGC
CADFGGACTTAAUGAAGTAGTAGTGCCAGGGCGACACG
CADRGGGTTTAAUCGACCGACTGCGAGAGATTGAAACT
AC-FATGACCAAAAATGAGGCCGTGAG
AC-RTCATCCGCCCTCCCTCGCCTCAT
FACFACCTCCATAAAGGCGTAGGACAGAC
FACRTGCTCAGCCTCCCTACAGACAACCT
PACFCGTTATGTTTATCGGCACT
PACRTTGGCGACCTCGTATTGG
HBACFTGGATCCCCCGGGCTGCAGGAATTCTTGGCGGGCTATTGACTTATGATAA
HBACRCGAGGTCGACGGTATCGATAAGCTTCGACCGACTGCGAGAGATTGAAACT
Table 2. Control efficacy of Clonostachys rosea strains against soybean Sclerotinia stem rot.
Table 2. Control efficacy of Clonostachys rosea strains against soybean Sclerotinia stem rot.
StrainsDisease Index Control Efficacy (%)
CK75.6-
WT19.674.1 a
Carbendazim20.772.6 a
crac-649.734.2 b
crac-1345.931.6 b
crac-6 +22.771.1 a
crac-13 +23.369.1 a
CK: treatment with sterilized water; WT: wild-type strain. Note: Different letters represent significant difference, p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, S.-F.; Sun, Z.-B.; Li, S.-D.; Hu, Y.-F.; Ren, Q.; Xu, J.-L.; Song, H.-J.; Sun, M.-H. The Adenylate Cyclase-Encoding Gene crac Is Involved in Clonostachys rosea Mycoparasitism. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9080861

AMA Style

Yu S-F, Sun Z-B, Li S-D, Hu Y-F, Ren Q, Xu J-L, Song H-J, Sun M-H. The Adenylate Cyclase-Encoding Gene crac Is Involved in Clonostachys rosea Mycoparasitism. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(8):861. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9080861

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Shu-Fan, Zhan-Bin Sun, Shi-Dong Li, Ya-Feng Hu, Qing Ren, Jia-Liang Xu, Han-Jian Song, and Man-Hong Sun. 2023. "The Adenylate Cyclase-Encoding Gene crac Is Involved in Clonostachys rosea Mycoparasitism" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 8: 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9080861

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop