Next Article in Journal
Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Hyphomycetous Muriform Conidial Taxa from the Tibetan Plateau, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficient Generation of Multiple Seamless Point Mutations Conferring Triazole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus
Previous Article in Journal
Coccidioidal Pulmonary Cavitation: A New Age
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expanding the Toolbox for Functional Genomics in Fonsecaea pedrosoi: The Use of Split-Marker and Biolistic Transformation for Inactivation of Tryptophan Synthase (trpB) Gene
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/jof9050562
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extracellular Vesicles from Candida haemulonii var. vulnera Modulate Macrophage Oxidative Burst

by
Bianca T. M. Oliveira
1,
Thales M. H. Dourado
2,
Patrick W. S. Santos
1,
Tamires A. Bitencourt
1,
Carlos R. Tirapelli
3,
Arnaldo L. Colombo
4 and
Fausto Almeida
1,*
1
Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, SP, Brazil
2
Department of Pharmacology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, SP, Brazil
3
Laboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Psychiatric Nursing and Human Sciences, College of Nursing of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil
4
Special Laboratory of Mycology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(5), 562; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050562
Submission received: 21 April 2023 / Revised: 6 May 2023 / Accepted: 8 May 2023 / Published: 12 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Young Investigators of Human Pathogenic Fungi)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Members of the Candida haemulonii species complex are multidrug-resistant emergent yeast pathogens able to cause superficial and invasive infections in risk populations. Fungal extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a critical role in the pathogenicity and virulence of several species and may perform essential functions during infections, such as carrying virulence factors that behave in two-way communications with the host, affecting survival and fungal resistance. Our study aimed to describe EV production from Candida haemulonii var. vulnera and evaluate whether murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells respond to their stimuli by generating an oxidative response after 24 h. For this purpose, reactive oxygen species detection assays demonstrated that high concentrations of yeast and EVs (1010 particles/mL) of Candida haemulonii did not change macrophage viability. However, the macrophages recognized these EVs and triggered an oxidative response through the classical NOX-2 pathway, increasing O2•− and H2O2 levels. However, this stress did not cause lipid peroxidation in the RAW 264.7 cells and neither lead to the activation of the COX-2–PGE2 pathway. Thus, our data suggest that low concentrations of C. haemulonii EVs are not recognized by the classical pathway of the oxidative burst generated by macrophages, which might be an advantage allowing the transport of virulence factors via EVs, not identified by the host immune system that could work as fine tube regulators during infections caused by C. haemulonii. In contrast, C. haemulonii var. vulnera and high EV concentrations activated microbicidal actions in macrophages. Therefore, we propose that EVs could participate in the virulence of the species and that these particles could be a source of antigens to be exploited as new therapeutic targets.

1. Introduction

Infections caused by Candida spp. are a prone threshold for public health and have emerged as a challenge for proper diagnosis due to their varied virulence profiles [1,2,3,4]. Candida haemulonii is a multifaceted group of species formed by C. haemulonii sensu stricto, C. haemulonii var. vulnera, C. vulturna, and C. duobushaemulonii. These species represent a challenge to correctly identify and treat, owing to their multidrug resistance profile [5,6,7,8]. C. haemulonii var. vulnera can cause diseases with different clinical manifestations, from superficial to deep infections, especially in newborns, patients with diabetes, and critically ill patients exposed to invasive medical procedures and antibiotics, in addition to immunocompromised patients [9,10,11,12]. Their invasiveness could be partially explained by the main virulence factors of this genus, such as the ability to produce extracellular enzymes, such as phospholipases and hemolysin, during candidemia [13,14], formation of biofilms [15], induction of stress responses, acquired multiple mutations in drug efflux pumps, and expression of genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis [16,17], and release of EVs [18,19].
EVs are lipid-bilayer structures released by all organisms [20,21]. Fungal EVs carry many biologically active molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, pigments, toxins, gene regulators, and virulence factors [22,23,24,25]. Thus, they are considered an alternative system for intercellular communication and play essential roles in microbial structure and pathogenesis during host–pathogen interactions [26,27,28,29]. Moreover, fungal EVs modulate the activation of the innate immunity [30,31]. Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that fungal EVs can activate immune responses in effector cells, such as macrophages and neutrophils, modulating phagocytosis, affecting macrophage polarization to M1 or M2, increasing chemokine and cytokine levels, and stimulating the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [32,33,34,35,36,37].
During infections, the balance between ROS production and the fungal stress response is the central axis of the host–pathogen interaction and can define the outcome of the fungal infection. The host response mechanisms include formation of superoxide (O2•−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and nitric oxide (NO) [38,39,40,41]. They participate in cellular systems and processes critical for the microbicidal action of macrophages [42,43]. Furthermore, inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins (PGs), are secreted in high quantities by macrophages, acting as autocrine modulators and regulating cytokine production by activated macrophages [44,45,46,47,48].
In the present study, we describe for the first time that Candida haemulonii produces EVs. Our findings provide experimental evidence for the recognition by murine macrophages of these fungi species and their EVs. Taken together, our results suggest new insights in the pathophysiology of C. haemulonii spp., demonstrating important host–pathogen interactions and providing new therapeutic targets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains and Growth Conditions

The strain Candida haemulonii var. vulnera ATCC 1112 was grown at 30–37 °C in Sabouraud Dextrose medium (dextrose 40 g/L, peptone 10 g/L, agar 20 g/L) Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) at pH 5.6 for 48 h [49]. Four fresh colonies were inoculated into 5 mL of Sabouraud broth and cultured at 30 °C with shaking (150 rpm). Subsequently, an EV isolation experiment was performed.

2.2. Production and Purification of EVs and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA)

C. haemulonii EVs were isolated according to the methodology described by Vallejo et al. for Paracoccidioides brasiliensis [50]. For EV isolation, cells and debris were removed by sequential centrifugation at 5000× g for 15 min and 15,000× g for 15 min. The supernatants were concentrated using an Amicon ultra-concentration system (cutoff 100 kDa; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The resulting supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 µm filter (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The resulting concentrated supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 100,000× g at 4 °C for 1 h. Pellets were collected and resuspended in ultra-pure water (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail 10× (Sigma-Aldrich) (0.2% v/v) and stored at −80 °C. The size and distribution of the particles were evaluated using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) (NanoSight appliance NS300, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) with NTA 3.0. The parameters were set according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The camera level was increased to >14 at which all particles were distinctly visible, and the threshold was determined to capture as many particles as possible within an ideal range of 20 to 100 particles per frame [32].

2.3. Electron Transmission Microscopy (TEM) Images

The pellets obtained from six independent preparations were fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% (v/v) + 4% (v/v) formaldehyde in sodium cacodylate buffer (0.1 M) at pH 7.2. Next, the samples were washed in PBS, incubated for 60 min in 1% osmium tetroxide (v/v), dehydrated in an ethanol series, and embedded in Spurr’s resin. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were obtained using a Leica UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and contrasted using 5% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 20 min and 0.5% (w/v) lead citrate for 5 min. The samples were observed using a JEOL 1200EX transmission electron microscope operating at 80 kV [51,52].

2.4. Cell Culture

RAW 264.7 murine macrophages (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were maintained in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM; Gibco™, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco™), 4 mM glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco™) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere. For all biochemical analyses, DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS exosome-depleted was used according to a previously described protocol [53]. RAW 264.7 cells are particularly sensitive to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). For the positive control, we first assessed RAW 264.7 cell viability in the presence of 1 µg/mL LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) that can be used to activate them [54].

2.5. Cell Viability Assay

RAW 264.7 cell viability after challenge with different concentrations of EVs from C. haemulonii was evaluated using the AlamarBlue® (Sigma-Aldrich) assay to assess their cytotoxic effects. A total of 1 × 105 cells per well were seeded into 96-well microplates for 24 h to allow for adhesion. After 24 h of exposure to EVs, 20 μL of AlamarBlue® was added to each well and the plate was incubated again (4 h/37 °C/5% CO2). The reduction of resazurin was assayed at 570 nm and 600 nm using a microplate ELISA reader (iMark™, Microplate Absorbance Reader, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). DMEM was used as the negative control. All assays were performed in triplicate [55].

2.6. Measurement of ROS and NO Production

Three fluorescent probes, 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA), dihydroethidium (DHE), and 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF), were used to measure ROS, O2•−, and NO production, respectively. Macrophages were seeded into black 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well. After 24 h, the cells were washed twice with sterile PBS and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min with 10 µM H2DCFH-DA, 5 µM DHE, or 10 µM DAF for 45 min. The fluorescence was measured using a microplate reader (iMark™, Microplate Absorbance Reader) (λEx 485 nm, λEm 528 nm for DCFH-DA [56], λEx 540 nm, λEm 590 nm for DHE [57], and λEx 495 nm, λEm 515 nm for DAF) [58] and results are expressed as Relative Fluorescence Units (RFU).

2.7. Western Immunoblotting

The expression of gp91-phox (NOX-2) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) proteins in RAW 264.7 cells was analyzed using the western immunoblotting assay [59]. After incubation, the cells were collected, washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0,.1% SDS (w/v), 1% Triton X-100 (v/v), 1.5 mM diethyl tritol (DTT), Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich)). The protein concentration of the cell lysates was estimated using Bio-Rad Dc reagents for protein assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad Laboratories), and bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as the standard. Thirty micrograms of each protein sample were separated on an SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membrane was blocked with 7% skimmed milk (Molico–Nestle®, Vevey, Switzerland) in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 0.1% (v/v) (TBS-T) for 1 h. After blocking, the membranes were incubated at 4 °C overnight with one of the following primary antibodies: Anti-gp91-phox Mouse monoclonal (1/500, sc-130543, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and Anti-Cox-2 Mouse Polyclonal (1/500, 160126, Cayman, Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). After incubation with the primary antibodies, the membranes were washed three times in TBS-T and incubated with secondary antibodies at room temperature for 90 min. The signals were detected using a chemiluminescent reagent and visualized using ChemiDoc XRS+ (Bio-Rad). The proteins were quantified using densitometry (Image Lab software 6.1, Bio-Rad), and β-actin (1:500, sc-4778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as the internal control. Image Lab software uses a regression method to calculate the molecular weight of protein bands. The area of interest was the same for all other bands, 26.8 mm2. The background was subtracted of the volume of each band. The band quantification was calculated as the ratio of the background-adjusted volume sample divided by the background-adjusted beta-actin volume.

2.8. Measurement of Prostaglandin E2

The supernatants from cells stimulated with EVs and challenged with C. haemulonii were obtained, and the levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were measured by ELISA. PGE2 concentration released into the culture medium was quantified using a specific enzyme immunoassay (EIA Kit) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (514010, Cayman). The results for PGE2 concentrations are expressed in pg/mg.

2.9. Malondialdehyde Concentration

The cells were incubated in 96-well plates at 1 × 105 cells/well for 24 h in all groups (macrophages; C. haemulonii and 105 to 1010 fungal EVs). Culture supernatants (100 μL) were collected in microcentrifuge tubes and Milli-Q® water (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) (100 μL), 8.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (100 μL), acetic acid buffer pH 3.5 (350 μL), and 0.6% thiobarbituric acid (350 μL) were added to each tube. A standard curve of malondialdehyde (MDA) was prepared using concentrations of 22.5, 15, 7.5, 3.75, and 0 mol/L. The samples were then left in a heated bath (95 °C/1 h) and centrifuged (1600× g, 10 min, 4 °C). The supernatant (150 µL) was transferred into a 96-well plate and the concentration of MDA was determined colorimetrically (532 nm) using the standard curve for MDA as a reference. The results are expressed in mmol/mL [60].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate in three independent experimental sets. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1. The results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Bonferroni post-test was performed to detect differences between the values under study. Statistical significance was set at * p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. EV Size and Distribution

The size and distribution profiles of C. haemulonii var. vulnera EVs were determined using NTA, as shown in Figure 1. These EVs ranged in size from 60 to 150 nm, and the average size of those obtained from several cultures was 131.6 nm with a size peak at 102.7 nm (Figure 1A). The size and distribution profiles of these EVs were screened from a video recorded using a NanoSight NS300 system (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) (Figure 1B). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed the presence of spherical structures delimited by electrodense bilayers characteristic of EVs (Figure 1C). Quantification showed that the isolated EVs had the same average diameter as those demonstrated using NTA.

3.2. Viability Assay

The cytotoxicity of C. haemulonii EVs was assessed by measuring the metabolic activity of RAW 264.7 cells using the AlamarBlue® assay (Figure 2). Cell viability was measured after exposure to increasing EV concentrations ranging from 1010 to 105 particles/mL or 1 µg/mL LPS (positive control) and C. haemulonii for 24 h. The results showed that there was an increase in cellular metabolism and no changes in cell viability.

3.3. C. haemulonii EVs Increase ROS Production in RAW 264.7 Macrophages

For C. haemulonii var. vulnera ATCC 1112 and its EV preparations (1010–105 particles/mL) incubated in macrophage culture, we found that only higher EV concentrations (1010 and 109 particles/mL) significantly increased superoxide anion production in RAW 264.7 macrophages (* p < 0.05) (Figure 3). After obtaining the DHE probe results, we used the highest concentrations (1010 and 109 particles/mL) for 24 h as the conditions for further experiments.

3.4. C. haemulonii EVs Increase NOX-2 Expression and H2O2 Levels

Our results showed an increase in NOX-2 expression in macrophages challenged with LPS, C. haemulonii, or high EV concentrations (Figure 4A). Furthermore, our data showed an increase in fluorescence for the H2DCFH-DA probe, indicating a boost in H2O2 levels in all groups (Figure 4B). However, only the LPS group showed increased fluorescence of the DAF probe (Figure 4C). There was no statistical difference in the MDA concentrations between the groups (Figure 4D).

3.5. Evaluation of Prostaglandin E2 Levels and Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression

Our ELISA and Western blot results showed that there was no difference in COX-2 (Figure 5A,B) and PGE2 (Figure 5C) levels, respectively, in RAW 264.7 cells treated with C. haemulonii var. vulnera for 24 h. COX-2 and PGE2 levels were only found to be increased following treatment with LPS (positive control).

4. Discussion

The Candida haemulonii species complex encompass pathogenic yeasts that are all considered phylogenetic relatives of C. auris. They have emerged as dangerous opportunistic pathogens in hospitals owing to their resistance to multiple antifungal agents and phenotypic similarity to other Candida strains [49,61,62,63,64,65]. This challenging scenario highlights the relevance of characterizing virulence factors that may potentially support effective treatment against essential targets during diseases, such as undiscovered machinery for producing fungal EVs. These particles are considered critical carriers of several antigenic biomolecules during infections [50,52,66].
Fungal EVs participate in the immunomodulation of the host and pathogenicity of species [31,67,68]. EVs from Cryptococcus neoformans are phagocytosed by macrophages, inducing cell activation and NO and cytokine production [36], whereas C. albicans EVs activate RAW 264.7 cells resulting in NO production and release of IL-12, IL-10, TGF-β, and TNF-α [69]. Another example of EV interaction with the immune host system is EVs released from Trichophyton interdigitale, which stimulate the release of NO, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, but not IL-10, from murine macrophages and human keratinocytes in a dose-dependent manner [37].
However, to our knowledge, the occurrence of EVs from C. haemulonii group of species is unprecedented, and their functions and composition remain unknown. To characterize these EVs, we evaluated the size, morphology, and recognition of a population of EVs from this pathogenic fungus by RAW 264.7 cells. To elucidate the infection pathway and establish its influence in a mammalian cell model, the dimensions of EVs can be related to specialized functions in their cellular composition [70,71].
Our results demonstrate that EVs comprised a heterogeneous population 60–150 nm in size with a small subpopulation of 200 nm. The profiles are similar to the patterns observed in previous studies for species belonging to the same clade as C. auris [35], the same genus as C. albicans [69], and yeasts of a different genus, such as C. gattii [72]. Furthermore, visualization of these EVs using TEM demonstrated a spherical and globose morphology that was slightly flattened, with dimensions between 60 and 140 nm. These EV characteristics are consistent with those of EVs from C. albicans and C. auris [35].
Previous in vitro studies have shown potential cytotoxic effects of fungi, compromising macrophage viability during co-incubation. For example, Trichophyton rubrum conidia and C. albicans yeast differentiated into hyphae whose populations were increased and induced lysis of RAW 264.7 cells after co-incubation for 8 h [73,74,75,76]. In this study, we demonstrated that C. haemulonii var. vulnera or its EVs did not exhibit cytotoxicity against RAW 264.7 macrophages. On the contrary, these results suggest that the cellular metabolism of these cells was stimulated by the high percentage conversion of resazurin to resofurin in the AlamarBlue assay. In support of our data, previous studies showed that C. neoformans and C. albicans EVs did not modify macrophage viability but could stimulate their functions, mainly by activating their antimicrobial activity [36,69,77,78].
Oxidative burst is a macrophage response to fungal infections. The oxidative molecules produced participate in phagocytosis, fungal killing, and the regulation of physiological processes regarding host immunity [74,79,80,81,82,83]. Thus, we evaluated ROS and NO production using three fluorescent probes: DHE, H2DCFH-DA, and DAF. Thereby, we investigated the ability of macrophages to recognize, become activated, and produce ROS following stimulation with C. haemulonii var. vulnera and its EVs. The results obtained using DHE indicated a concentration-dependent increase in ROS after 24 h of incubation with C. haemulonii EVs. Therefore, we focused only on the high concentrations of EVs (1010 and 109 particles/mL) for the subsequent experiments.
The DHE and H2DCFH-DA probes are sensitive to ROS, such as O2•− and H2O2, whereas the DAF probe responds to NO [54]. Our data suggest that RAW 264.7 macrophages did not effectively recognize C. haemulonii EVs at low concentrations or incubation times shorter than 24 h. Thus, the production of ROS and NO by C. haemulonii is rate limiting and can help the yeast adapt and colonize the host. Other studies corroborate these hypotheses, demonstrating the failure in recognizing Candida sp. cell wall variations, such as singular mannan content with different β-1,2-linkages [84]. The reduced ability of Candida sp. to induce oxidative stress damage caused by phagocytes has also been reported [85,86]. In contrast, the production of NO by murine macrophages stimulated by C. neoformans or C. albicans EVs is concentration dependent [36,69]. However, under the experimental conditions of this study, there was no significant difference in NO production following stimulation with C. haemulonii EVs, even at high concentrations.
ROS in phagosomes damage the fungal cell membrane by causing redox imbalance in the invading pathogen [77,78]. ROS generated by the NADPH-oxidase complex are highly regulated by diverse microenvironmental factors, and NOX-2 is responsible for the oxidative bursts generated against fungal infections [87,88]. Previous in vitro assays demonstrated the microorganism’s ability to harm NOX-2 by interacting with its subunits, or modulate cellular processes through EVs, as displayed by Histoplasma capsulatum EVs, in which protein inhibition was associated with a decrease in ROS production by macrophages [89].
Furthermore, we evaluated whether gp91-phox mediated the oxidative burst caused by C. haemulonii var. vulnera and its EVs. Since this isoform is prevalent in macrophages, a western immunoblotting assay demonstrated increased expression of NOX-2 in this fungal species [42,90]. We hypothesized that classical macrophage activation is critical for recognizing and eliminating the C. haemulonii group of species. For example, in C. albicans infection, NOX-2 promotes phagocyte chemotaxis and intracellular fungal containment restricts hyphae growth [91]. In alveolar macrophages, NOX-2 activation is essential for killing Aspergillus sp. spores and maintaining homeostasis [92].
ROS perform essential functions during infection. However, overproduction of ROS damages phagocytes via lipid peroxidation [93,94]. C. neoformans, C. albicans, and Aspergillus fumigatus strains increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in alveolar macrophages suggesting lipid peroxidation during fungal challenge [95,96]. Our results showed no difference in MDA levels in RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulated with C. haemulonii yeast or its EVs, suggesting that ROS damage against this species was compartmentalized in RAW 264.7 cells.
Cyclooxygenases (especially isoform 2, COX-2) catalyze the stage-limiting step in the synthesis of PGs and thromboxane [44,45]. Previous studies have demonstrated that during infections, activated macrophages secrete prostaglandin E2 by inducing cyclooxygenase-2 expression [88,97]. These molecules participate in acute inflammation by inducing phagocytosis and cell proliferation [98]. Moreover, during C. albicans infections, upregulation of COX-2 and PGE2 signaling stimulates Th2 and Th17 responses to yeast and limits the ability of macrophages to kill Candida sp. [99,100].
We analyzed whether 24 h of incubation with C. haemulonii var. vulnera and its EVs stimulated COX-2 expression and PGE2 production in RAW 264.7 cells. Our results indicated that the COX-2–PGE2 signaling pathway was not activated by the yeast or its EVs. Previous reports have shown that C. albicans mannans are fungal components that directly induce PGE2 production [100]. We hypothesized that the composition of the C. haemulonii cell wall might be different and not effectively recognized by macrophages to activate this inflammatory pathway, which awaits further investigation into whether another signaling pathway could be active during this kind of infection [84,99].
Taken together, our data showed that C. haemulonii can produce and release EVs. These particles are immunogenic and stimulate microbicidal function in murine macrophages by inducing ROS generation. Our findings may widen the knowledge about C. haemulonii infection and the role of EVs in the immunomodulatory landscape.
We suggest C. haemulonii EVs deliver critical biomolecules for the virulence of this species. At high concentrations, they can be recognized and activate the host immune response owing to the presence of particular antigens in these species. Therefore, fungal EVs could be used as new therapeutic targets for efficient vaccines or antifungals. Meanwhile, low concentrations of EVs do not activate the oxidative burst, facilitate bidirectional communication of the fungus, and transport virulence factors for fungal colonization.

5. Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that C. haemulonii var. vulnera produce EVs, particularly those with small diameters. Macrophages recognize these EVs, although no cytotoxicity or induced lipid peroxidation was observed. These EVs stimulated ROS production by increasing NOX-2 activity. However, the COX-2–PGE2 pathway was not stimulated after 24 h of EV exposure. Further studies may elucidate the critical functions in virulence and pathogenicity and the content of C. haemulonii var. vulnera EVs.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the research design and data analyses. B.T.M.O., T.M.H.D., P.W.S.S., T.A.B. and F.A. performed the experiments. A.L.C., C.R.T. and F.A. contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools. B.T.M.O., T.M.H.D., P.W.S.S., T.A.B. and F.A. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, grant numbers 2020/02841-6, 2022/08432-6, and 2021/06794-5), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), and Fundação de Apoio ao Ensino, Pesquisa e Assistência do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FAEPA).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Almeida, F.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Coelho, C. The Still Underestimated Problem of Fungal Diseases Worldwide. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ahangarkani, F.; Shokohi, T.; Rezai, M.S.; Ilkit, M.; Nesheli, H.M.; Karami, H.; Tamaddoni, A.; Alizadeh-Navaei, R.; Khodavaisy, S.; Meis, J.F.; et al. Epidemiological features of nosocomial candidaemia in neonates, infants and children: A multicentre study in Iran. Mycoses 2020, 63, 382–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kotey, F.C.; Dayie, N.T.; Tetteh-Uarcoo, P.B.; Donkor, E.S. Candida Bloodstream Infections: Changes in Epidemiology and Increase in Drug Resistance. Infect. Dis. Res. Treat. 2021, 14, 117863372110269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Martins-Santana, L.; Rezende, C.P.; Rossi, A.; Martinez-Rossi, N.M.; Almeida, F. Addressing Microbial Resistance Worldwide: Challenges over Controlling Life-Threatening Fungal Infections. Pathogens 2023, 12, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cendejas-Bueno, E.; Kolecka, A.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Theelen, B.; Groenewald, M.; Kostrzewa, M.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Gómez-López, A.; Boekhout, T. Reclassification of the Candida haemulonii Complex as Candida haemulonii (C. haemulonii Group, I), C. duobushaemulonii sp. nov. (C. haemulonii Group II), and C. haemulonii var. vulnera var. nov.: Three Multiresistant Human Pathogenic Yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 3641–3651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pérez-Lazo, G.; Morales-Moreno, A.; Soto-Febres, F.; Hidalgo, J.A.; Neyra, E.; Bustamante, B. Liver abscess caused by Candida haemulonii var vulnera. First case report in Peru. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2021, 38, 138–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ramos, L.S.; Figueiredo-Carvalho, M.H.G.; Silva, L.N.; Siqueira, N.L.M.; Lima, J.C.; Oliveira, S.S.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M.; Azevedo, F.S.; Ferreira, A.L.P.; et al. The Threat Called Candida haemulonii Species Complex in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil: Focus on Antifungal Resistance and Virulence Attributes. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sipiczki, M.; Tap, R.M. Candida vulturna pro tempore sp. nov., a dimorphic yeast species related to the Candida haemulonii species complex isolated from flowers and clinical sample. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 4009–4015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Silva, L.N.; Campos-Silva, R.; Ramos, L.S.; Trentin, D.S.; Macedo, A.J.; Branquinha, M.H.; Santos, A.L.S. Virulence of Candida haemulonii complex in Galleria mellonella and efficacy of classical antifungal drugs: A comparative study with other clinically relevant non-albicans Candida species. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018, 18, foy082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Silva, L.N.; Ramos, L.d.S.; Oliveira, S.S.C.; Magalhães, L.B.; Squizani, E.D.; Kmetzsch, L.; Vainstein, M.H.; Branquinha, M.H.; dos Santos, A.L.S. Insights into the Multi-Azole Resistance Profile in Candida haemulonii Species Complex. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pharkjaksu, S.; Boonmee, N.; Mitrpant, C.; Ngamskulrungroj, P. Immunopathogenesis of Emerging Candida auris and Candida haemulonii Strains. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lima, S.L.; Francisco, E.C.; Júnior, J.N.d.A.; Santos, D.W.d.C.L.; Carlesse, F.; Queiroz-Telles, F.; Melo, A.S.d.A.; Colombo, A.L. Increasing Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Candida haemulonii Species Complex among All Yeast Cultures Collected by a Reference Laboratory over the Past 11 Years. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. El-Baz, A.M.; Mosbah, R.A.; Goda, R.M.; Mansour, B.; Sultana, T.; Dahms, T.E.S.; El-Ganiny, A.M. Back to Nature: Combating Candida albicans Biofilm, Phospholipase and Hemolysin Using Plant Essential Oils. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brackin, A.P.; Hemmings, S.J.; Fisher, M.C.; Rhodes, J. Fungal Genomics in Respiratory Medicine: What, How and When? Mycopathologia 2021, 186, 589–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zarnowski, R.; Noll, A.; Chevrette, M.G.; Sanchez, H.; Jones, R.; Anhalt, H.; Fossen, J.; Jaromin, A.; Currie, C.; Nett, J.E.; et al. Coordination of fungal biofilm development by extracellular vesicle cargo. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sanguinetti, M.; Posteraro, B.; Lass-Flörl, C. Antifungal drug resistance among Candida species: Mechanisms and clinical impact. Mycoses 2015, 58, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Du, H.; Bing, J.; Hu, T.; Ennis, C.L.; Nobile, C.J.; Huang, G. Candida auris: Epidemiology, biology, antifungal resistance, and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nett, J.E.; Andes, D.R. Contributions of the Biofilm Matrix to Candida Pathogenesis. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Atiencia-Carrera, M.B.; Cabezas-Mera, F.S.; Tejera, E.; Machado, A. Prevalence of biofilms in Candida spp. bloodstream infections: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Colombo, M.; Raposo, G.; Théry, C. Biogenesis, Secretion, and Intercellular Interactions of Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 30, 255–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tkach, M.; Théry, C. Communication by Extracellular Vesicles: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Cell 2016, 164, 1226–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Amatuzzi, R.F.; Zamith-Miranda, D.; da Rocha, I.F.M.; Lucena, A.C.R.; Martins, S.D.T.; Streit, R.; Staats, C.C.; Trentin, G.; Almeida, F.; Rodrigues, M.L.; et al. Caspofungin Affects Extracellular Vesicle Production and Cargo in Candida auris. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bitencourt, T.A.; Pessoni, A.M.; Oliveira, B.T.M.; Alves, L.R.; Almeida, F. The RNA Content of Fungal Extracellular Vesicles: At the “Cutting-Edge” of Pathophysiology Regulation. Cells 2022, 11, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yáñez-Mó, M.; Siljander, P.R.-M.; Andreu, Z.; Bedina Zavec, A.; Borràs, F.E.; Buzas, E.I.; Buzas, K.; Casal, E.; Cappello, F.; Carvalho, J.; et al. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2015, 4, 27066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liebana-Jordan, M.; Brotons, B.; Falcon-Perez, J.M.; Gonzalez, E. Extracellular Vesicles in the Fungi Kingdom. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Almeida, F.; Wolf, J.M.; da Silva, T.A.; DeLeon-Rodriguez, C.M.; Rezende, C.P.; Pessoni, A.M.; Fernandes, F.F.; Silva-Rocha, R.; Martinez, R.; Rodrigues, M.L.; et al. Galectin-3 impacts Cryptococcus neoformans infection through direct antifungal effects. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bitencourt, T.A.; Hatanaka, O.; Pessoni, A.M.; Freitas, M.S.; Trentin, G.; Santos, P.; Rossi, A.; Martinez-Rossi, N.M.; Alves, L.L.; Casadevall, A.; et al. Fungal Extracellular Vesicles Are Involved in Intraspecies Intracellular Communication. mBio 2022, 13, e03272-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ibrahim, S.R.M.; Sirwi, A.; Eid, B.G.; Mohamed, S.G.A.; Mohamed, G.A. Fungal Depsides—Naturally Inspiring Molecules: Biosynthesis, Structural Characterization, and Biological Activities. Metabolites 2021, 11, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rizzo, J.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Janbon, G. Extracellular Vesicles in Fungi: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. da Silva, T.A.; Roque-Barreira, M.C.; Casadevall, A.; Almeida, F. Extracellular vesicles from Paracoccidioides brasiliensis induced M1 polarization in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Freitas, M.S.; Bonato, V.L.D.; Pessoni, A.M.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Casadevall, A.; Almeida, F. Fungal Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Targets for Immune Interventions. mSphere 2019, 4, e00747-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brauer, V.S.; Pessoni, A.M.; Bitencourt, T.A.; de Paula, R.G.; Rocha, L.D.O.; Goldman, G.H.; Almeida, F. Extracellular Vesicles from Aspergillus flavus Induce M1 Polarization In Vitro. mSphere 2020, 5, e00190-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Reales-Calderón, J.A.; Vaz, C.; Monteoliva, L.; Molero, G.; Gil, C. Candida albicans Modifies the Protein Composition and Size Distribution of THP-1 Macrophage-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 16, 87–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Da Rocha, I.F.M.; Amatuzzi, R.F.; Lucena, A.C.R.; Faoro, H.; Alves, L.R. Cross-Kingdom Extracellular Vesicles EV-RNA Communication as a Mechanism for Host–Pathogen Interaction. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 593160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zamith-Miranda, D.; Heyman, H.M.; Couvillion, S.P.; Cordero, R.J.B.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Nimrichter, L.; Casadevall, A.; Amatuzzi, R.F.; Alves, L.R.; Nakayasu, E.S.; et al. Comparative Molecular and Immunoregulatory Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles from Candida albicans and Candida auris. mSystems 2021, 6, e00822-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oliveira, D.L.; Freire-De-Lima, C.G.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Casadevall, A.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Nimrichter, L. Extracellular Vesicles from Cryptococcus neoformans Modulate Macrophage Functions. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 1601–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bitencourt, T.A.; Rezende, C.P.; Quaresemin, N.R.; Moreno, P.; Hatanaka, O.; Rossi, A.; Martinez-Rossi, N.M.; Almeida, F. Extracellular Vesicles From the Dermatophyte Trichophyton interdigitale Modulate Macrophage and Keratinocyte Functions. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cape, J.L.; Hurst, J.K. The role of nitrite ion in phagocyte function—Perspectives and puzzles. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009, 484, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lewis, L.E.; Bain, J.M.; Lowes, C.; Gow, N.A.; Erwig, L.-P. Candida albicans infection inhibits macrophage cell division and proliferation. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2012, 49, 679–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Winterbourn, C.C.; Kettle, A.J.; Nault, L.; Bouchab, L.; Dupré-Crochet, S.; Nüße, O.; Erard, M.; O’brien, X.M.; Reichner, J.S.; Alvarez, L.A.; et al. Redox Reactions and Microbial Killing in the Neutrophil Phagosome. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 642–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abuaita, B.H.; Schultz, T.L.; O’riordan, M.X. Mitochondria-Derived Vesicles Deliver Antimicrobial Reactive Oxygen Species to Control Phagosome-Localized Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 24, 625–636.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nauseef, W.M. The phagocyte NOX2 NADPH oxidase in microbial killing and cell signaling. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2019, 60, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sung, S.K.; Batbayar, S.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, H.W. Activation of NADPH Oxidase by β-Glucan from Phellinus baumii (Agaricomycetes) in RAW 264.7 Cells. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2017, 19, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Eliopoulos, A.G.; Dumitru, C.D.; Wang, C.-C.; Cho, J.; Tsichlis, P.N. Induction of COX-2 by LPS in macrophages is regulated by Tpl2-dependent CREB activation signals. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 4831–4840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ghannoum, M.A. Potential Role of Phospholipases in Virulence and Fungal Pathogenesis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 122–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Harris, S.G.; Padilla, J.; Koumas, L.; Ray, D.; Phipps, R.P. Prostaglandins as modulators of immunity. Trends Immunol. 2002, 23, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Noverr, M.C.; Phare, S.M.; Toews, G.B.; Coffey, M.J.; Huffnagle, G.B. Pathogenic Yeasts Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans Produce Immunomodulatory Prostaglandins. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 2957–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Noverr, M.C.; Toews, G.B.; Huffnagle, G.B. Production of Prostaglandins and Leukotrienes by Pathogenic Fungi. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 400–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. de Almeida, J.N.; Motta, A.L.; Rossi, F.; Abdala, E.; Pierrotti, L.C.; Kono, A.S.G.; Diz, M.D.P.E.; Benard, G.; Del Negro, G.M.B. First report of a clinical isolate of Candida haemulonii in Brazil. Clinics 2012, 67, 1229–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vallejo, M.C.; Matsuo, A.L.; Ganiko, L.; Medeiros, L.C.S.; Miranda, K.; Silva, L.S.; Freymüller-Haapalainen, E.; Sinigaglia-Coimbra, R.; Almeida, I.C.; Puccia, R. The Pathogenic Fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis Exports Extracellular Vesicles Containing Highly Immunogenic α-Galactosyl Epitopes. Eukaryot. Cell 2011, 10, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rodrigues, M.L.; Nimrichter, L.; Oliveira, D.L.; Frases, S.; Miranda, K.; Zaragoza, O.; Alvarez, M.; Nakouzi, A.; Feldmesser, M.; Casadevall, A. Vesicular Polysaccharide Export in Cryptococcus neoformans Is a Eukaryotic Solution to the Problem of Fungal Trans-Cell Wall Transport. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Albuquerque, P.C.; Nakayasu, E.S.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Frases, S.; Casadevall, A.; Zancope-Oliveira, R.M.; Almeida, I.C.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Vesicular transport in Histoplasma capsulatum: An effective mechanism for trans-cell wall transfer of proteins and lipids in ascomycetes. Cell. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 1695–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kornilov, R.; Puhka, M.; Mannerström, B.; Hiidenmaa, H.; Peltoniemi, H.; Siljander, P.; Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, R.; Kaur, S. Efficient ultrafiltration-based protocol to deplete extracellular vesicles from fetal bovine serum. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1422674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yaker, L.; Tebani, A.; Lesueur, C.; Dias, C.; Jung, V.; Bekri, S.; Guerrera, I.C.; Kamel, S.; Ausseil, J.; Boullier, A. Extracellular Vesicles from LPS-Treated Macrophages Aggravate Smooth Muscle Cell Calcification by Propagating Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. da Luz, J.R.D.; Barbosa, E.A.; Nascimento, T.E.S.D.; de Rezende, A.A.; Ururahy, M.A.G.; Brito, A.D.S.; Araujo-Silva, G.; López, J.A.; Almeida, M.D.G. Chemical Characterization of Flowers and Leaf Extracts Obtained from Turnera subulata and Their Immunomodulatory Effect on LPS-Activated RAW 264.7 Macrophages. Molecules 2022, 27, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Santos, P.W.; Machado, A.R.T.; De Grandis, R.; Ribeiro, D.L.; Tuttis, K.; Morselli, M.; Aissa, A.F.; Pellegrini, M.; Antunes, L.M.G. Effects of sulforaphane on the oxidative response, apoptosis, and the transcriptional profile of human stomach mucosa cells in vitro. Mutat. Res./Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2020, 854–855, 503201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ives, A.; Nomura, J.; Martinon, F.; Roger, T.; LeRoy, D.; Miner, J.N.; Simon, G.; Busso, N.; So, A. Xanthine oxidoreductase regulates macrophage IL1β secretion upon NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zollbrecht, C.; Persson, A.E.G.; Lundberg, J.O.; Weitzberg, E.; Carlström, M. Nitrite-mediated reduction of macrophage NADPH oxidase activity is dependent on xanthine oxidoreductase-derived nitric oxide but independent of S-nitrosation. Redox Biol. 2016, 10, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kuo, C.-E.A.; Wu, S.-Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Lai, Y.-R.; Lu, C.-H.; Chen, P.-C.; Cheng, J.-H.; Tsai, L.-Y.; Yen, K.-T.; Tsao, Y.; et al. Toona sinensis modulates autophagy and cytokines in lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 129, 110386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brazão, V.; Colato, R.P.; Santello, F.H.; Vale, G.T.D.; Gonzaga, N.D.A.; Tirapelli, C.R.; Prado, J.C.D., Jr. Effects of melatonin on thymic and oxidative stress dysfunctions during Trypanosoma cruzii infection. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 65, e12510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Isla, G.; Taverna, C.G.; Szusz, W.; Vivot, W.; García-Effron, G.; Davel, G. Candida haemulonii sensu lato: Update of the Determination of Susceptibility Profile in Argentina and Literature Review. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2017, 11, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Coles, M.; Cox, K.; Chao, A. Candida haemulonii: An emerging opportunistic pathogen in the United States? IDCases 2020, 21, e00900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Rodrigues, D.; Bonfietti, L.; Garcia, R.; Araujo, M.; Rodrigues, J.; Gimenes, V.; Melhem, M. Antifungal susceptibility profile of Candida clinical isolates from 22 hospitals of São Paulo State, Brazil. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2021, 54, e10928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shin, J.H.; Kim, M.-N.; Jang, S.J.; Ju, M.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Shin, M.G.; Suh, S.P.; Ryang, D.W. Detection of Amphotericin B Resistance in Candida haemulonii and Closely Related Species by Use of the Etest, Vitek-2 Yeast Susceptibility System, and CLSI and EUCAST Broth Microdilution Methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1852–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lockhart, S.R.; Lyman, M.M.; Sexton, D.J. Tools for detecting a “superbug”: Updates on Candida auris testing. Clin. Microbiol. 2022, 60, e00808-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ikeda, M.A.K.; De Almeida, J.R.F.; Jannuzzi, G.P.; Cronemberger-Andrade, A.; Torrecilhas, A.C.T.; Moretti, N.S.; da Cunha, J.P.C.; De Almeida, S.R.; Ferreira, K.S. Extracellular Vesicles from Sporothrix brasiliensis Are an Important Virulence Factor That Induce an Increase in Fungal Burden in Experimental Sporotrichosis. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Joffe, L.S.; Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Del Poeta, M. Potential Roles of Fungal Extracellular Vesicles during Infection. mSphere 2016, 1, e00099-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Baltazar, L.M.; Nakayasu, E.S.; Sobreira, T.J.P.; Choi, H.; Casadevall, A.; Nimrichter, L.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Antibody Binding Alters the Characteristics and Contents of Extracellular Vesicles Released by Histoplasma capsulatum. mSphere 2016, 1, e00085-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vargas, G.; Rocha, J.D.B.; Oliveira, D.L.; Albuquerque, P.C.; Frases, S.; Santos, S.S.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Gomes, A.M.O.; Medeiros, L.C.A.S.; Miranda, K.; et al. Compositional and immunobiological analyses of extracellular vesicles released by Candida albicans. Cell. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 389–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bielska, E.; Sisquella, M.A.; Aldeieg, M.; Birch, C.; O’donoghue, E.J.; May, R.C. Pathogen-derived extracellular vesicles mediate virulence in the fatal human pathogen Cryptococcus gattii. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bielska, E.; May, R.C. Extracellular vesicles of human pathogenic fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 52, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Reis, F.C.G.; Costa, J.H.; Honorato, L.; Nimrichter, L.; Fill, T.P.; Rodrigues, M.L. Small Molecule Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles Produced by Cryptococcus gattii: Identification of a Tripeptide Controlling Cryptococcal Infection in an Invertebrate Host Model. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 654574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Campos, M.; Russo, M.; Gomes, E.; Almeida, S. Stimulation, inhibition and death of macrophages infected with Trichophyton rubrum. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Miramón, P.; Kasper, L.; Hube, B. Thriving within the host: Candida spp. interactions with phagocytic cells. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 202, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Uwamahoro, N.; Verma-Gaur, J.; Shen, H.-H.; Qu, Y.; Lewis, R.; Lu, J.; Bambery, K.; Masters, S.; Vince, J.E.; Naderer, T.; et al. The Pathogen Candida albicans Hijacks Pyroptosis for Escape from Macrophages. mBio 2014, 5, e00003-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Honorato, L.; de Araujo, J.F.D.; Ellis, C.C.; Piffer, A.C.; Pereira, Y.; Frases, S.; Araújo, G.R.D.S.; Pontes, B.; Mendes, M.T.; Pereira, M.D.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles Regulate Biofilm Formation and Yeast-to-Hypha Differentiation in Candida albicans. mBio 2022, 13, e00301-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. McKenzie, C.G.J.; Koser, U.; Lewis, L.E.; Bain, J.M.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Barker, R.N.; Gow, N.A.R.; Erwig, L.P. Contribution of Candida albicans Cell Wall Components to Recognition by and Escape from Murine Macrophages. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 1650–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Voelz, K.; Johnston, S.A.; Smith, L.M.; Hall, R.A.; Idnurm, A.; May, R.C. ‘Division of labour’ in response to host oxidative burst drives a fatal Cryptococcus gattii outbreak. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Moore, S.F.; MacKenzie, A.B. NADPH Oxidase NOX2 Mediates Rapid Cellular Oxidation following ATP Stimulation of Endotoxin-Primed Macrophages. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 3302–3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Miranda, J.E.A.; Baronetti, J.L.; Sotomayor, C.E.; Paraje, M.G. Oxidative and nitrosative stress responses during macrophage–Candida albicans biofilm interaction. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. He, W.; Heinz, A.; Jahn, D.; Hiller, K. Complexity of macrophage metabolism in infection. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 68, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wu, M.-Y.; Lu, J.-H. Autophagy and Macrophage Functions: Inflammatory Response and Phagocytosis. Cells 2019, 9, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Netea, M.G.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Van Der Meer, J.W.M.; Kullberg, B.-J.; Van De Veerdonk, F.L. Immune defence against Candida fungal infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yan, L.; Xia, K.; Yu, Y.; Miliakos, A.; Chaturvedi, S.; Zhang, F.; Chen, S.; Chaturvedi, V.; Linhardt, R.J. Unique Cell Surface Mannan of Yeast Pathogen Candida auris with Selective Binding to IgG. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 1018–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Collette, J.R.; Zhou, H.; Lorenz, M.C. Candida albicans Suppresses Nitric Oxide Generation from Macrophages via a Secreted Molecule. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Komalapriya, C.; Kaloriti, D.; Tillmann, A.T.; Yin, Z.; Herrero, C.; Jacobsen, M.D.; Belmonte, R.C.; Cameron, G.; Haynes, K.; Grebogi, C.; et al. Integrative Model of Oxidative Stress Adaptation in the Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0137750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Boncompain, G.; Schneider, B.; Delevoye, C.; Kellermann, O.; Dautry-Varsat, A.; Subtil, A. Production of Reactive Oxygen Species is turned on and rapidly shut down in epithelial cells infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Giroux, M.; Descoteaux, A. Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Macrophages: Modulation by Protein Kinase C-α. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 3985–3991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Baltazar, L.M.; Zamith-Miranda, D.; Burnet, M.C.; Choi, H.; Nimrichter, L.; Nakayasu, E.S.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Concentration-dependent protein loading of extracellular vesicles released by Histoplasma capsulatum after antibody treatment and its modulatory action upon macrophages. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bhattacharya, S.; Idol, R.A.; Yang, W.; Márquez, J.D.R.; Li, Y.; Huang, G.; Beatty, W.L.; Atkinson, J.J.; Brumell, J.H.; Bagaitkar, J.; et al. Macrophage NOX2 NADPH oxidase maintains alveolar homeostasis in mice. Blood 2022, 139, 2855–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Brothers, K.M.; Gratacap, R.L.; Barker, S.E.; Newman, Z.R.; Norum, A.; Wheeler, R.T. NADPH Oxidase-Driven Phagocyte Recruitment Controls Candida albicans Filamentous Growth and Prevents Mortality. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Singel, K.L.; Segal, B.H. NOX2-dependent regulation of inflammation. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Patriota, L.L.S.; Procópio, T.F.; de Souza, M.F.D.; de Oliveira, A.P.S.; Carvalho, L.V.N.; Pitta, M.G.R.; Rego, M.J.B.M.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Pontual, E.V.; Napoleão, T.H. A Trypsin Inhibitor from Tecoma stans Leaves Inhibits Growth and Promotes ATP Depletion and Lipid Peroxidation in Candida albicans and Candida krusei. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ambrozova, G.; Pekarova, M.; Lojek, A. The effect of lipid peroxidation products on reactive oxygen species formation and nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Toxicol. In Vitro 2011, 25, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gross, N.T.; Hultenby, K.; Mengarelli, S.; Camner, P.; Jarstrand, C. Lipid peroxidation by alveolar macrophages challenged with Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida albicans or Aspergillus fumigatus. Med. Mycol. 2000, 38, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hua, X.; Chi, W.; Su, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yuan, X. ROS-induced Oxidative Injury involved in Pathogenesis of Fungal Keratitis via p38 MAPK Activation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Suram, S.; Brown, G.D.; Ghosh, M.; Gordon, S.; Loper, R.; Taylor, P.R.; Akira, S.; Uematsu, S.; Williams, D.L.; Leslie, C.C. Regulation of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2 Activation and Cyclooxygenase 2 Expression in Macrophages by the β-Glucan Receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 5506–5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Park, J.-A.; Kim, Y. Eicosanoid biosynthesis is activated via Toll, but not Imd signal pathway in response to fungal infection. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 110, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mendoza, S.R.; Zamith-Miranda, D.; Takács, T.; Gacser, A.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Guimarães, A.J. Complex and Controversial Roles of Eicosanoids in Fungal Pathogenesis. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Smeekens, S.P.; Van De Veerdonk, F.L.; Van Der Meer, J.W.M.; Kullberg, B.J.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Netea, M.G. The Candida Th17 response is dependent on mannan- and -glucan-induced prostaglandin E2. Int. Immunol. 2010, 22, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 09 00562 g001 550
Figure 1. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) produced by Candida haemulonii var. vulnera. (A) Nanoparticle-tracking analysis of EVs isolated from C. haemulonii culture supernatant was performed using NanoSight NS300. Representative graph depicting the particle-size distribution and concentration of EV profiles from C. haemulonii (EVs × 1011 particles/mL). (B) Screenshot from the video recorded using NanoSight NS300, presenting EV distribution. (C) Image produced using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The EVs from C. haemulonii showed a globose morphology and the diameter of these EVs was in the range of the diameters of EVs obtained using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA).
Figure 1. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) produced by Candida haemulonii var. vulnera. (A) Nanoparticle-tracking analysis of EVs isolated from C. haemulonii culture supernatant was performed using NanoSight NS300. Representative graph depicting the particle-size distribution and concentration of EV profiles from C. haemulonii (EVs × 1011 particles/mL). (B) Screenshot from the video recorded using NanoSight NS300, presenting EV distribution. (C) Image produced using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The EVs from C. haemulonii showed a globose morphology and the diameter of these EVs was in the range of the diameters of EVs obtained using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA).
Jof 09 00562 g001
Jof 09 00562 g002 550
Figure 2. Viability of RAW 264.7 cells stimulated with increasing concentrations of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from Candida haemulonii var. vulnera. RAW 264.7 cells were incubated for 24 h with increasing concentrations of EVs from C. haemulonii var. vulnera. The viability of RAW 264.7 cells incubated without EVs, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or C. haemulonii was defined as 100% (Control). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate, * p < 0.05 vs. control (one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test).
Figure 2. Viability of RAW 264.7 cells stimulated with increasing concentrations of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from Candida haemulonii var. vulnera. RAW 264.7 cells were incubated for 24 h with increasing concentrations of EVs from C. haemulonii var. vulnera. The viability of RAW 264.7 cells incubated without EVs, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or C. haemulonii was defined as 100% (Control). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate, * p < 0.05 vs. control (one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test).
Jof 09 00562 g002
Jof 09 00562 g003 550
Figure 3. Measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in RAW 264.7 cells stimulated with Candida haemulonii and increasing concentrations of their extracellular vesicles (EVs). Superoxide anion concentration after 4 h (A), 8 h (B), and 24 h (C) of incubation was determined by measuring the fluorescence of the dihydroethidium (DHE) probe (λEx 540 nm, λEm 590 nm). LPS: lipopolysaccharide. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate, * p < 0.05 vs. control (one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni).
Figure 3. Measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in RAW 264.7 cells stimulated with Candida haemulonii and increasing concentrations of their extracellular vesicles (EVs). Superoxide anion concentration after 4 h (A), 8 h (B), and 24 h (C) of incubation was determined by measuring the fluorescence of the dihydroethidium (DHE) probe (λEx 540 nm, λEm 590 nm). LPS: lipopolysaccharide. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate, * p < 0.05 vs. control (one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni).
Jof 09 00562 g003
Jof 09 00562 g004 550
Figure 4. Candida haemulonii var. vulnera extracellular vesicles (EVs) induce an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. (A) Representative immunoblot for NOX-2 (gp91-phox). (B) Representative bar graph for NOX-2. Immunoblot results are shown as the mean ± SEM of n = 6. (C) After a 24 h incubation, C. haemulonii and its EVs (1010–109 particles/mL) increased H2O2 levels in RAW 264.7 cells. ROS production was determined by measuring the fluorescence of the 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFH-DA) probe (λEx 485 nm, λEm 528 nm). (D) Nitric oxide levels were measured using the fluorescent probe 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF) (λEx 495 nm, λEm 515 nm). (E) Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in RAW 264.7 cells after 24 h exposure to all stimuli. We demonstrate that oxidative bursts generated from these groups were not harmful to macrophages. LPS: lipopolysaccharide. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate, * p < 0.05 vs. control (one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test).
Figure 4. Candida haemulonii var. vulnera extracellular vesicles (EVs) induce an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. (A) Representative immunoblot for NOX-2 (gp91-phox). (B) Representative bar graph for NOX-2. Immunoblot results are shown as the mean ± SEM of n = 6. (C) After a 24 h incubation, C. haemulonii and its EVs (1010–109 particles/mL) increased H2O2 levels in RAW 264.7 cells. ROS production was determined by measuring the fluorescence of the 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFH-DA) probe (λEx 485 nm, λEm 528 nm). (D) Nitric oxide levels were measured using the fluorescent probe 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF) (λEx 495 nm, λEm 515 nm). (E) Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in RAW 264.7 cells after 24 h exposure to all stimuli. We demonstrate that oxidative bursts generated from these groups were not harmful to macrophages. LPS: lipopolysaccharide. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate, * p < 0.05 vs. control (one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test).
Jof 09 00562 g004
Jof 09 00562 g005 550
Figure 5. Candida haemulonii var. vulnera extracellular vesicles (EVs) did not induce an increase in the expression levels of PGE2 and COX-2. (A) Representative immunoblot for COX-2. (B) Representative bar graph for COX-2. (C) PGE2 levels determined using ELISA. LPS: lipopolysaccharide. Results are shown as the mean ± SEM of n = 6. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test were used to compare groups (* p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Candida haemulonii var. vulnera extracellular vesicles (EVs) did not induce an increase in the expression levels of PGE2 and COX-2. (A) Representative immunoblot for COX-2. (B) Representative bar graph for COX-2. (C) PGE2 levels determined using ELISA. LPS: lipopolysaccharide. Results are shown as the mean ± SEM of n = 6. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test were used to compare groups (* p < 0.05).
Jof 09 00562 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oliveira, B.T.M.; Dourado, T.M.H.; Santos, P.W.S.; Bitencourt, T.A.; Tirapelli, C.R.; Colombo, A.L.; Almeida, F. Extracellular Vesicles from Candida haemulonii var. vulnera Modulate Macrophage Oxidative Burst. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050562

AMA Style

Oliveira BTM, Dourado TMH, Santos PWS, Bitencourt TA, Tirapelli CR, Colombo AL, Almeida F. Extracellular Vesicles from Candida haemulonii var. vulnera Modulate Macrophage Oxidative Burst. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(5):562. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050562

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oliveira, Bianca T. M., Thales M. H. Dourado, Patrick W. S. Santos, Tamires A. Bitencourt, Carlos R. Tirapelli, Arnaldo L. Colombo, and Fausto Almeida. 2023. "Extracellular Vesicles from Candida haemulonii var. vulnera Modulate Macrophage Oxidative Burst" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 5: 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050562

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop