Next Article in Journal
Expression and Purification along with Evaluation of Serological Response and Diagnostic Potential of Recombinant Sap2 Protein from C. parapsilosis for Use in Systemic Candidiasis
Previous Article in Journal
Tr-milRNA1 Contributes to Lignocellulase Secretion under Heat Stress by Regulating the Lectin-Type Cargo Receptor Gene Trvip36 in Trichoderma guizhouence NJAU 4742
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 7
Issue 12
10.3390/jof7120998
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Candidiasis by Candida glabrata, Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis in Galleria mellonella: Virulence and Therapeutic Responses to Echinocandins

by
Ainara Hernando-Ortiz
,
Elena Eraso
,
Guillermo Quindós
and
Estibaliz Mateo
*
Department of Immunology, Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), P.O. Box 699, 48080 Bilbao, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(12), 998; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7120998
Submission received: 22 October 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 19 November 2021 / Published: 23 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Pathogenesis and Disease Control)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Candida albicans is the major etiological agent of invasive candidiasis but the increasing prevalence of emerging species of Candida, such as Candida glabrata and phylogenetically closely related species, Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis, requires special attention. Differences in virulence among these species and their therapeutic responses using in vivo non-mammalian models are scarcely analysed. The aim of this study was analyse the survival of G. mellonella and host-pathogen interactions during infection by C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis. Moreover, therapeutic responses to echinocandins were also assessed in the G. mellonella model of candidiasis. These three species produced lethal infection in G. mellonella; C. glabrata was the most virulent species and C. bracarensis the less. Haemocytes of G. mellonella phagocytised C. bracarensis cells more effectively than those of the other two species. Treatment with caspofungin and micafungin was most effective to protect larvae during C. glabrata and C. nivariensis infections while anidulafungin was during C. bracarensis infection. The model of candidiasis in G. mellonella is simple and appropriate to assess the virulence and therapeutic response of these emerging Candida species. Moreover, it successfully allows for detecting differences in the immune system of the host depending on the virulence of pathogens.

1. Introduction

There is a substantial change in the aetiology of candidiasis worldwide, with an increasing prevalence of non-Candida albicans species, such as Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei and Candida auris. C. glabrata is an emerging pathogen and the second cause of candidaemia in the USA, Canada, Australia and Northern and Eastern Europe. In Latin America, Africa, and the European Mediterranean countries such as Spain, candidiasis due to C. glabrata are the third most frequent, behind those caused by C. albicans and C. parapsilosis [1]. Candida bracarensis and Candida nivariensis are species phylogenetically close to C. glabrata that should be identified by molecular methods, including MALDI-TOF MS (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry), due to their high phenotypic similarities and genetic closeness [2,3,4,5].
C. glabrata often develops resistance to widely used azoles, especially fluconazole [6]. Since the echinocandins, anidulafungin (AND), caspofungin (CAS), and micafungin (MCF), present high activity against C. glabrata, there are the treatment of choice for C. glabrata invasive infections. These antifungal drugs inhibit the synthesis of cell wall β-1,3-glucan, which is encoding in FKS1, FKS2, and FKS3 genes. However, echinocandin resistance, associated with FKS genes mutations, has been reported in C. glabrata [7,8,9,10], specifically in the hot spot mutations of FKS1 and FKS2 genes [6,11,12]. Moreover, differences in the expression of these two FKS genes were detected between young and old C. glabrata cells [13]. Besides point mutations, overexpression of FKS genes were also noted in 14-generation-old cells of C. glabrata resistant to MCF and in the biofilms formed by this specie after contact with MCF [13,14]. Frequency of C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis candidiasis is low (0.05–0.2%) and evidence on echinocandins activities against these species is scarce [15,16,17]. However, it is necessary a deeper knowledge to avoid therapeutic failures [18].
Common mammalian models of infection are linked to ethical concerns that recommend limiting their use. Models in invertebrate animals, such as those developed in Caenorhabditis elegans (Rhabditida: Rhabditidae) and in Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), are being increasingly introduced for studying host-pathogen interactions and for evaluating antimicrobial efficacy of conventional antimicrobial agents and new molecules [18,19,20,21]. The caterpillar larvae of G. mellonella, commonly known as the greater wax moth, is a useful model for studying host-pathogen interactions because its immune system has conserved similarities with the mammal innate defences [22,23,24]. These interactions can be evaluated by assessing the larvae response against pathogens and the phagocytic capacity of haemocytes present in the haemolymph of the larvae [25,26]. Furthermore, the G. mellonella model of candidiasis has been successfully applied to monitor the difference virulence between young and old cells of C. glabrata [27,28].
In this work, we analyse the virulence of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis in G. mellonella, and the interactions between these Candida species and the G. mellonella haemocyte density and phagocytic response. Moreover, the effectiveness of echinocandins, AND, CAS, and MCF, for treating invasive candidiasis caused by these Candida species was evaluated in the G. mellonella host model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Candida Strains and Growth Conditions

Six commercially available reference strains, including two strains of each species C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis, were obtained from different culture collections (Table 1).
Yeasts were cultured overnight in yeast extract peptone dextrose broth (YEPD; 1% yeast extract, 2% bacteriological peptone, 2% d-glucose) medium (Panreac, Spain) at 30 °C under shaking conditions. Then, yeast cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) and resuspended in PBS supplemented with ampicillin (20 mg/L) to prevent infection with bacteria naturally present on the surface of G. mellonella larvae. Cell counting was performed by microscopy using a Burker haemocytometer and three concentrations of 1 × 107, 1 × 108 and 1 × 109 yeast cells/mL were prepared in PBS-ampicillin (20 mg/L) to use as inocula.

2.2. Survival of Galleria mellonella

Larvae of G. mellonella weighing between 0.3 and 0.5 g (Bichosa, Spain) were placed in groups of 20 individuals in Petri plates to perform the experiments. The last left pro-leg of larvae was cleaned with ethanol 70% before injecting 10 μL of Candida suspension into the larvae haemocele with a precision syringe (ref. P/N 5190-1493, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The final inocula tested were 1 × 105, 1 × 106 and 1 × 107 cells/larva. Two uninfected larvae groups were used as controls in all trials: a group of untouched larvae and a group of larvae injected with 10 µL of PBS-ampicillin to control the possible impact of the injection and the effect of the PBS-ampicillin buffer on larvae survival (sham group). The larvae were incubated at 37 °C in dark for 120 h, and survival was monitored every 24 h by visual inspection of melanisation and the absence of movement. Each trial was performed at least three times on different days. A total of 180 larvae were used to assess the infection caused for each of the six Candida strains and 40 larvae were used as control in each trial.

2.3. Haemocyte Density Determination

Groups of five larvae of G. mellonella were inoculated with 1 × 105, 1 × 106 and 1 × 107 cells/larva. As control, a group of uninfected larvae inoculated with 10 µL PBS-ampicillin was used (sham group). Larvae were incubated at 37 °C in dark for 3 h and then, 50 µL of haemolymph was collected from each larva and mixed with insect physiological saline buffer (IPS buffer; 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 mM potassium chloride, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.9, 10 mM EDTA and 30 mM sodium citrate) to avoid melanisation and coagulation of haemolymph. Haemocyte density was determined by microscopy counting using a haemocytometer. Each assay was performed at least three times on different days.

2.4. Phagocytic Activity of Haemocytes

Five G. mellonella larvae were used for each Candida strain. Yeast cells were stained with 0.4 mg/mL of Calcofluor white (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min at 30 °C and washed twice with PBS before inoculated in each larva 1 × 106 cells/larva. Larvae were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h and afterwards, 50 µL of haemolymph of each larva was collected in the same volume of IPS buffer. Phagocytosis quantification was performed by fluorescence microscope Nikon Eclipse 80i (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) counting a minimum of 100 haemocytes with and without yeast phagocytised from each larva. Trials were performed at least three times on different days.

2.5. Antifungal Treatments with Echinocandins

Groups of 20 larvae of G. mellonella were inoculated with 1 × 106 cells/larva. These infected larvae were treated with the echinocandins, AND (Pfizer SA, Madrid, Spain), CAS (Merk & Com Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA) and MCF (Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at concentrations of 4 and 8 μg/g larva. The stock solutions of the three echinocandins were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and then, the doses of antifungal drugs for treatments were prepared with PBS-ampicillin. The treatments were administrated with the pathogen inocula in a final volume of 10 μL per larva, 20 larvae were included in each condition. Moreover, three control groups with uninfected larvae were included, a group of untouched larvae, a group of larvae injected with PBS-ampicillin (sham group), and a third group of larvae injected with each antifungal drug to evaluate their possible toxicity. The larvae were incubated at 37 °C in dark for 120 h, and survival was monitored every 24 h by visual inspection of melanisation and the absence of movement. Each trial was performed at least three times on different days. A total of 780 larvae were used to assess the effect of the different treatments against each of the six Candida strains and 100 larvae were used as control in each trial.

2.6. Statistics

The results obtained of haemocytes production and phagocytic activity were analysed using one-way ANOVA with the statistical program SPSS v24.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Survival analysis curves were prepared with the Kaplan-Meier method using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences in G. mellonella survival infected with the Candida strains and exposed to the different antifungal treatments were analysed by the log-rank test using SPSS v24.0. The value of p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Virulence of Candida in the G. mellonella Model

C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis caused invasive candidiasis in the G. mellonella model. Significant differences were observed in the survival of infected and uninfected larvae used as controls (p ≤ 0.003). Survivals of untouched larvae and those PBS-ampicillin injected larvae were 87% ± 1.45% and 88.5% ± 1.5%, respectively, without significant differences among them (p = 0.663).
Three inocula were assayed to evaluate the virulence of the strains of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis observing that larval mortality was inoculum-dependent. Mortality rate was directly proportional to the injected inoculum: 34.7% ± 7.1%, 55.9% ± 6.4% and 76.8% ± 10.3% from lowest to highest inocula, respectively. Moreover, there were significant differences among the three species (p ≤ 0.001) (Figure 1). The virulence of these species in the G. mellonella model was categorised as C. glabrata > C. nivariensis > C. bracarensis, in all the cases regardless of the inoculum applied. However, there were mortality rate differences among the injected inocula with the strains of each species.
The infection caused by 1 × 107 cells/larva showed that C. glabrata was significantly more virulent than C. nivariensis (p ≤ 0.024) and C. bracarensis (p ≤ 0.001), showing differences in their killing kinetics. At 48 h of infection, larvae inoculated with C. glabrata achieved mortality rates above 80%, while the mortality rate was 50–60% for those inoculated with C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis. However, during the next 72 h of infection, C. glabrata killed 8% more larvae, and C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis killed more than 20% (Figure 2a). There were also significant differences between the C. nivariensis CBS 9984 strain and the C. bracarensis NCYC 3133 strain, being the last one the least virulent of tested strains (p = 0.048).
Strikingly, there were no significant differences in virulence among the three species when larvae were inoculated with 1 × 106 and 1 × 105 cells/larva, except for the C. bracarensis NCYC 3133 strain that achieved the highest survival rate (55.7% and 75%, respectively) at 120 h post-infection. Survival of G. mellonella inoculated with 1 × 106 cells/larva was lower than 55% at 48 h post-infection except with the C. bracarensis NCYC 3133 strain, which it took more than 120 h to reach a mortality rate of 44% (Figure 2b). This latter and the C. nivariensis CECT 11998 strains did not kill more than 28% of the larvae after 120 h with the inoculum of 1 × 105 cells/larva, and the remaining Candida strains failed to kill more than 42% of the larvae (Figure 2c).
No differences in the larvae survival were found within the two C. glabrata strains or within both C. nivariensis strains, regardless of the inoculum used. However, the survival for larvae infected with 1 × 106 cells of C. bracarensis strain NCYC 3397 was significantly lower than that of larvae infected with the C. bracarensis NCYC 3133 strain (p = 0.013).

3.2. Haemocyte Production during Candidiasis

G. mellonella larvae were injected with 1 × 105, 1 × 106 and 1 × 107 cells/larva and haemocytes density was calculated at 3 h post-infection (Figure 3). The injection of PBS-ampicillin and the two lowest inocula of all species, except 1 × 106 cells/larva of both C. nivariensis strains (p ≤ 0.492), induced a significant increase (p ≤ 0.005) in the number of haemocytes compared with the control group of untouched larvae. It is noteworthy that the density of haemocytes from larvae infected with the highest inoculum (1 × 107 cells/larva) of both strains of C. glabrata, and C. nivariensis strain CECT 11998 was significantly lower in comparison to that from larvae infected with both C. bracarensis strains (p ≤ 0.041).
Larvae infected with C. bracarensis showed the highest haemocyte density to overcome the infection caused with any of the three inocula tested, without significant differences among them. Neither was difference between the haemocyte densities of the larvae infected with the three inocula of the C. nivariensis CBS 9984 strain. However, larvae infected with 1 × 105 and 1 × 106 cells of C. glabrata showed a higher haemocyte number than those infected with 1 × 107 yeasts (p ≤ 0.004).

3.3. Phagocytic Activity of G. mellonella Haemocytes during Candidiasis

Phagocytosis was evaluated with larvae infected with 1 × 106 Candida cells/larva, which was considered, according to the results of haemocyte density determination, the most suitable inoculum because of the adequate number of haemocytes and yeasts.
The three Candida species were phagocytosed after 2 h of the infection (Figure 4). C. bracarensis was more effectively phagocytosed than C. glabrata and C. nivariensis. The percentage of haemocytes that phagocytosed C. bracarensis strain NCYC 3397 was the highest observed (11.26% ± 0.91%) and it was significantly different to the other two species (p ≤ 0.041). In contrast, cells of C. nivariensis strain CECT 11998 were the least phagocytosed (5.31% ± 0.71%, p ≤ 0.001).

3.4. Efficacy of Echinocandins Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis in G. mellonella

In a previous study we reported the in vitro antifungal activity of echinocandins against these six strains of Candida. All strains were susceptible to the three echinocandins tested. MIC values for AND of 0.06 µg/mL and 0.03 µg/mL for MCF were obtained against all strains. MIC values for CAS of 0.5 µg/mL were observed against the C. glabrata ATCC 90030 strain and 0.25 µg/mL against the other five Candida strains [15].
Treatment with three different echinocandins was analysed in vivo after the injection of 1 × 106 cells/larva in G. mellonella. This inoculum was selected as the most appropriate because the larvae survival was similar during the infection by all six strains, so the effect of the antifungal treatment could be more accurately assessed. The antifungal drugs were not toxic for G. mellonella; survivals of larvae injected with antifungal drugs were 86% ± 3.4%, without significant differences among the other two controls (p ≥ 0.29).
Echinocandin treatment was very effective against C. glabrata candidiasis. After 120 h there was a reduction in larvae mortality of between 33% and 45.8% (Table 1). However, the efficacies of these echinocandins against C. glabrata infection were strain-dependent (Table 1 and Figure 5a,b).
Candidiasis caused by both C. glabrata strains responded to MCF at the two concentrations tested, achieving a significant increased larvae survival with respect to infected and untreated larvae (p = 0.000). Specifically, treatment with MCF (8 µg/larva) against ATCC 90030 strain infection increased larvae survival from 38.7 to 73.3%. During treatment against CBS 3203 strain candidiasis, survival increased from 39.2 to 81.7% compared to the survival of infected and untreated larvae.
CAS was also effective against C. glabrata candidiasis: the larvae survival was significantly higher than that of infected and untreated larvae (p ≤ 0.004). Treatment of NCPF 3203 strain infection with 4 µg/g larva of CAS reached a 39.1% increase in survival of larvae. This survival increase was higher (42.5%) using 8 μg/g larva of CAS. However, when candidiasis caused by ATCC 90030 was treated with 8 μg/g larva of CAS the survival of G. mellonella increased to 18%, while with 4 μg/g larva of CAS, it increased up to 33%.
C. glabrata NCPF 3203 infection only responded adequately to 4 µg/g larva of AND. An increase of larvae survival of 45.8% with respect to infected and untreated control group was achieved (p ≤ 0.011). The G. mellonella larvae infected with the ATCC 90030 strain showed no improvement with AND treatment. Although the mortality of larvae infected with this strain and treated with 8 μg/g larva of AND increased up to 7%, there were no differences in the survival when compared with infected and untreated control larvae group (Figure 5a).
C. nivariensis infection was successfully treated with MCF and CAS (Figure 5c,d). The survival rates of larvae infected with both strains of C. nivariensis and treated with CAS ranged from 61.6% to 65.8%, and there were significant differences compared to those infected and untreated larvae (p = 0.000). A statistically significant increase in larvae survival was also detected when G. mellonella infected with C. nivariensis was treated with MCF (p ≤ 0.001). Larvae survival increased up to 41.7% with 4 µg/g larva of MCF against the infection by the C. nivariensis CBS 9984 strain. Strikingly, this significant difference was not detected in larvae infected with the C. nivariensis CBS 9984 strain and treated with MCF at the highest concentration (8 µg/g larva) that only got a survival increase of 8.4%.
AND treatment of C. nivariensis infection was the least effective. Only 4 µg/g larva of AND significantly increased G. mellonella survival (33.4%) during infection with the C. nivariensis CBS 9984 strain (p = 0.000) (Figure 5c). The treatment of candidiasis by C. nivariensis strain CECT 11998 with AND even increased the larvae mortality (28.3% with 4 µg/g larva of AND, and 38.3% with 8 µg/g larva of AND) (Figure 5d).
C. bracarensis infection was the least susceptible to treatment with echinocandins (Figure 5e,f). It is noteworthy that AND was the most effective during G. mellonella infection with this Candida species. The concentration of 4 µg/g larva of AND presented the highest protective effect during larvae infection with the C. bracarensis NCYC 3397 strain: infected and untreated larvae survival was 42.5% and treatment with AND increased survival to 71.7%. The therapeutic agents MCF (4 µg/g larva) and AND (8 µg/g larva) reached also high effect against C. bracarensis NCYC 3133 infection: larvae survival rate significantly increased by 24.3% (p = 0.002) and 21% (p = 0.008), respectively. Although the rest of MCF treatments achieved mortality reductions between 5.8% and 11%, there were no differences with the infected and untreated control group. The antifungal agent CAS during C. bracarensis infection reduced the larvae mortality rate between 6.3% and 19.2%, and there were also no differences with untreated larvae, except in larvae infected with the C. bracarensis NCYC 3397 strain and treated with 8 µg/g larva of CAS (19.2% of survival increase) (p = 0.015).

4. Discussion

Alternative animal models, such as those in C. elegans and G. mellonella, have been explored as a useful option to study the pathogenesis and treatment of invasive candidiasis. The use of G. mellonella has acquired relevance as larva size makes possible to control the infection development and treatment more easily, since it allows the injection of microorganism suspensions and antimicrobial treatments at specific concentrations [19,25,26,29]. However, there are few studies about C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis candidiasis using in vivo non-mammalian models [18,20,22]. These three species present similar phenotypic characteristics and are difficult to differentiate from each other without molecular methods based on PCR, sequencing or MALDI_TOF MS; they are taxonomically different, and their pathogenesis and antifungal susceptibility can also be very different. Although the incidence of candidiasis caused by C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis is low, several authors consider that the difficulty in achieving a correct identification may be causing a misjudgment of the real medical importance of these species [2,3,4]. In addition, the emergence of isolates resistant to antifungal drugs, such as amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole and even echinocandins, makes it necessary to deepen the knowledge on C. glabrata and these two closely related species [15,30,31,32,33].
Therefore, in the present study the usefulness of G. mellonella model to assess the pathogenicity of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis was analysed. The six strains studied of these Candida species developed invasive candidiasis in larvae of G. mellonella: C. glabrata and C. bracarensis were the most and less virulent species, respectively, just as we had previously observed in a model of candidiasis in C. elegans in which C. glabrata killed the highest percentage of nematodes followed by C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis [20].
A notable difference between these two models, C. elegans and G. mellonella, is the yeast inoculum administered. In the case of G. mellonella model, Candida cells are injected into haemolymph, allowing a more precise control and better knowledge of the effect of yeast inocula [29]. In an attempt to detect the most appropriate inoculum, three different Candida concentrations were evaluated. The highest concentration (1 × 107 cells/larva) showed significant virulence differences between the three Candida species. Ames et al. [18] also reported that the highest injected dose tested (7.5 × 106 cells/larva) was the best for studying C. glabrata virulence in G. mellonella. Nevertheless, other Candida species such as C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. krusei and C. parapsilosis complex required lower yeast inocula to cause candidiasis in this model, even detecting higher larvae mortality rates than those observed for C. glabrata [21,22,25]. Furthermore, and in agreement with previous studies, an increase in mortality was observed in G. mellonella as the injected fungal load was higher [18,19,26].
An additional highlight of the G. mellonella model of invasive candidiasis is the analysis of host-pathogen interactions. This lepidopteran uses different mechanisms to combat pathogens, such as a variable production of haemocytes and the phagocytic activity of haemocytes according to the virulence of pathogens [33]. Larvae of G. mellonella infected with C. glabrata and C. nivariensis produced fewer haemocytes than those infected with C. bracarensis, and the latter species was the most effectively phagocytized by haemocytes. This was consistent with the ability of these three species to develop infection in G. mellonella. Several authors have attributed the decrease of haemocytes in haemolymph to the formation of nodules at the sites of infection in order to contain the spread of pathogens [19,26,33]. The haemocyte production observed in other studies during the infection caused by C. albicans, C. krusei, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis or C. orthopsilosis was even lower, likely due to a higher virulence of these species [19,25,26]. C. bracarensis as well as other not so virulent species, such as C. metapsilosis, generated a low G. mellonella haemocyte response. Although the phagocytic rate detected in larvae infected with C. parapsilosis complex was higher than that detected with C. glabrata, a significant difference was observed in the less virulent species, C. metapsilosis and C. bracarensis, respectively, compared to other close-related species [25]. Nevertheless, it has been reported that the presence of C. glabrata enhances the activity of G. mellonella haemocytes enough to protect larvae against subsequent lethal fungal infections by C. albicans, C. tropicalis and Cryptococcus neoformans [21]. The increased expression of redox related proteins, the presence of multidrug transporter such as CgTpo4 or the expression of the transcription factor CgTog1 to survive upon phagocytosis are determinant mechanisms of virulence recently described in C. glabrata; and this species requires them to survive host defence, quickly develop resistance to drugs and kill G. mellonella [23,24,34,35]. On this issue, both species closely related to C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis, are very poorly studied, therefore, their research using the great potential of the G. mellonella model of candidiasis is promising and encouraging.
In vitro antifungal susceptibility has been widely studied in C. glabrata, C. nivariensis, and C. bracarensis, indicating a reduced susceptibility or even resistance to azoles and amphotericin B [30,31]. Specifically, the six strains of these three closely related species, used in the current study, were in vitro susceptible to amphotericin B, azoles (posaconazole and voriconazole) and all three echinocandins [20].
Echinocandins are mainly indicated for the treatment of candidiasis caused by C. glabrata [11,36,37]. However, an increase in echinocandin resistance has been described, mainly due to acquired FKS mutations associated to previous exposure to these drugs. Although the incidence of these mutations is still low, it could be useful to know the local resistance patterns to establish adequate empirical treatment strategies [7,8,17]. Echinocandins treatment was effective against the infection caused by these three Candida species in G. mellonella host model. CAS and MCF showed in vivo efficacy during C. glabrata and C. nivariensis infections while AND during C. bracarensis candidiasis. These findings are strongly consistent with those previously observed in the C. elegans model of candidiasis [20]. Treatment with CAS protected the larvae during C. glabrata infection, maintaining survival above 72% after 120 h infection. Ames et al. [18] also detected up to 80% survival rate in C. glabrata infection treated with 4 µg/g larva of CAS. This effectiveness of CAS has also been reported in C. glabrata murine models of invasive candidiasis [38,39,40]. However, Healy et al. [41] reported that administration of high doses of CAS (20 mg/kg) to murine for 5–9 days selected C. glabrata strains with FKS mutations resistant to echinocandins. Although in time-kill studies echinocandins showed a lower effect against C. nivariensis [42], we observed that CAS achieved a reduction in larval mortality during C. nivariensis infection. Lopez-Soria et al. [43] observed that CAS was very effective in resolving a catheter-associated fungemia caused by C. nivariensis. Moreover, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis have been susceptible to CAS in vitro [15,17,31].
The effectiveness of treatment with MCF of candidiasis caused by C. glabrata in murine was also reported [44,45]. However, in these studies a higher MCF concentration than those used of CAS was required to achieve the same effect. In the present study, MCF was also effective against C. nivariensis infection confirming the in vitro susceptibility of this species to the MCF [15,38,46].
Treatment with AND was the least effective against infection caused by C. glabrata and C. nivariensis in G. mellonella. Strikingly, larvae infected with C. glabrata ATCC 90030 and C. nivariensis CECT 11998 strains and treated with AND showed an increase in mortality up to six times higher than that of infected and untreated larvae. This lower effect of AND treatment has also been reported in a murine model of C. glabrata infection [38]. However, infected larvae treated with AND showed a reduction in mortality rates higher than with CAS and MCF in C. bracarensis infection in G. mellonella. This is consistent with observations reported in other C. bracarensis candidiasis models and in vitro susceptibility [15,20,31].
In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that G. mellonella is a suitable model to analyse the virulence and host-pathogen interactions caused by emerging species of Candida and to assess the efficacy of echinocandins as therapy. This study contributes to encourage future research to extend this model in the studying of candidiasis by C. albicans and other emerging Candida species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H.-O., E.M., E.E. and G.Q.; methodology, A.H.-O., E.E. and E.M.; software, A.H.-O. and E.E.; validation, A.H.-O. and E.M.; formal analysis, A.H.-O.; investigation, A.H.-O., E.E. and E.M.; resources, E.M., G.Q. and E.E.; data curation, A.H.-O.; writing—original draft preparation, A.H.-O. and E.M.; writing—review & editing, A.H.-O., E.E., G.Q. and E.M.; visualization, A.H.-O., E.E., G.Q. and E.M.; supervision, E.M. and G.Q.; project administration, E.M. and G.Q.; funding acquisition, G.Q., E.E. and E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [SAF2017-86188-P and PID2020-117983RB-I00] and from the Consejería de Educación, Universidades e Investigación of Gobierno Vasco-Eusko Jaurlaritza [GIC15/78 IT-990-16]. Ainara Hernando-Ortiz was funded by Ph.D. grants from the University of the Basque Country (PIF 16/39).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of UPV/EHU CEIAB (protocol code M30_2015_248, date of approval 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Quindós, G.; Marcos-Arias, C.; San-Millán, R.; Mateo, E.; Eraso, E. The continuous changes in the aetiology and epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: From familiar Candida albicans to multiresistant Candida auris. Int. Microbiol. 2018, 21, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bishop, J.A.; Chase, N.; Magill, S.S.; Kurtzman, C.P.; Fiandaca, M.J.; Merz, W.G. Candida bracarensis detected among isolates of Candida glabrata by peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization: Susceptibility data and documentation of presumed infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Asadzadeh, M.; Alanazi, A.F.; Ahmad, S.; Al-Sweih, N.; Khan, Z. Lack of detection of Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis among 440 clinical Candida glabrata sensu lato isolates in Kuwait. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cartier, N.; Chesnay, A.; N’Diaye, D.; Thorey, C.; Ferreira, M.; Haillot, O.; Bailly, E.; Desoubeaux, G. Candida nivariensis: Identification strategy in mycological laboratories. J. Mycol. Med. 2020, 30, 101042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kaan, Ö.; Koç, A.N.; Atalay, M.A.; Sarigüzel, F.M. Molecular epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility and virulence factors of Candida glabrata complex strains in Kayseri/Turkey. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 154, 104870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhattacharya, S.; Sae-Tia, S.; Fries, B.C. Candidiasis and Mechanisms of Antifungal Resistance. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Beyda, N.D.; John, J.; Kilic, A.; Alam, M.J.; Lasco, T.M.; Garey, K.W. FKS mutant Candida glabrata: Risk factors and outcomes in patients with candidemia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 56, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mccarty, T.P.; Lockhart, S.R.; Moser, S.A.; Whiddon, J.; Zurko, J.; Pham, C.D.; Pappas, P.G. Echinocandin resistance among Candida isolates at an academic medical centre 2005–15: Analysis of trends and outcomes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1677–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Coste, A.T.; Kritikos, A.; Li, J.; Khanna, N.; Goldenberger, D.; Garzoni, C.; Zehnder, C.; Boggian, K.; Neofytos, D.; Riat, A.; et al. Fungal Infection Network of Switzerland (FUNGINOS). Emerging echinocandin-resistant Candida albicans and glabrata in Switzerland. Infection 2020, 48, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Baqsami, Z.F.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z. Antifungal drug susceptibility, molecular basis of resistance to echinocandins and molecular epidemiology of fluconazole resistance among clinical Candida glabrata isolates in Kuwait. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Katiyar, S.K.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Healey, K.; Johnson, M.E.; Perlin, D.; Edlind, T.D. Fks1 and Fks2 are functionally redundant but differentially regulated in Candida glabrata: Implications for echinocandin resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 6304–6309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Shields, R.K.; Kline, E.G.; Healey, K.R.; Kordalewska, M.; Perlin, D.S.; Nguyen, M.H.; Clancy, C.J. Spontaneous Mutational Frequency and FKS Mutation Rates Vary by Echinocandin Agent against Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 63, e01692-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Bhattacharya, S.; Fries, B.C. Enhanced Efflux Pump Activity in Old Candida glabrata Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02227-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Rodrigues, C.F.; Henriques, M. Portrait of Matrix Gene Expression in Candida glabrata Biofilms with Stress Induced by Different Drugs. Genes 2018, 9, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lockhart, S.R.; Messer, S.A.; Gherna, M.; Bishop, J.A.; Merz, W.G.; Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D. Identification of Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis in a large global collection of Candida glabrata isolates: Comparison to the literature. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 1216–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Arastehfar, A.; Daneshnia, F.; Salehi, M.-R.; Zarrinfar, H.; Khodavaisy, S.; Haas, P.-J.; Roudbary, M.; Najafzadeh, M.J.; Zomorodian, K.; Charsizadeh, A.; et al. Molecular characterization and antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida nivariensis from blood samples—An Iranian multicentre study and a review of the literature. J. Med. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Garzón, A.C.; Amado, D.; Robert, E.; Giraldo, C.M.P.; Le Pape, P. Impact of calmodulin inhibition by fluphenazine on susceptibility, biofilm formation and pathogenicity of caspofungin-resistant Candida glabrata. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 1187–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ames, L.; Duxbury, S.; Pawlowska, B.; Ho, H.-L.; Haynes, K.; Bates, S. Galleria mellonella as a host model to study Candida glabrata virulence and antifungal efficacy. Virulence 2017, 8, 1909–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mesa-Arango, A.C.; Forastiero, A.; Bernal-Martínez, L.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Mellado, E.; Zaragoza, O. The non-mammalian host Galleria mellonella can be used to study the virulence of the fungal pathogen Candida tropicalis and the efficacy of antifungal drugs during infection by this pathogenic yeast. Med. Mycol. 2013, 51, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hernando-Ortiz, A.; Mateo, E.; Ortega-Riveros, M.; De-La-Pinta, I.; Quindós, G.; Eraso, E. Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model System To Assess Candida glabrata, Candida nivariensis, and Candida bracarensis Virulence and Antifungal Efficacy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00824-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, X.-W.; Xu, M.-N.; Zheng, H.-X.; Wang, M.-L.; Li, L.; Zeng, K.; Li, D.-D. Pre-exposure to Candida glabrata protects Galleria mellonella against subsequent lethal fungal infections. Virulence 2020, 11, 1674–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marcos-Zambrano, L.; Bordallo-Cardona, M.; Borghi, E.; Falleni, M.; Tosi, D.; Muñoz, P.; Escribano, P.; Guinea, J. Candida isolates causing candidemia show different degrees of virulence in Galleria mellonella. Med. Mycol. 2020, 58, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pais, P.; Vagueiro, S.; Mil-Homens, D.; Pimenta, A.I.; Viana, R.; Okamoto, M.; Chibana, H.; Fialho, A.M.; Teixeira, M.C. A new regulator in the crossroads of oxidative stress resistance and virulence in Candida glabrata: The transcription factor CgTog1. Virulence 2020, 11, 1522–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cavalheiro, M.; Romão, D.; Santos, R.; Mil-Homens, D.; Pais, P.; Costa, C.; Galocha, M.; Pereira, D.; Takahashi-Nakaguchi, A.; Chibana, H.; et al. Role of CgTpo4 in Polyamine and Antimicrobial Peptide Resistance: Determining Virulence in Candida glabrata. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gago, S.; Garcia-Rodas, R.; Cuesta, I.; Mellado, E.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis virulence in the non-conventional host Galleria mellonella. Virulence 2014, 5, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Scorzoni, L.; De Lucas, M.P.; Mesa-Arango, A.C.; Fusco-Almeida, A.M.; Lozano, E.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Mendes-Giannini, M.J.; Zaragoza, O. Antifungal Efficacy during Candida krusei Infection in Non-Conventional Models Correlates with the Yeast In Vitro Susceptibility Profile. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bouklas, T.; Alonso-Crisóstomo, L.; Székely, T., Jr.; Navarro, E.D.; Orner, E.P.; Smith, K.; Munshi, M.A.; Del Poeta, M.; Balazsi, G.; Fries, B.C. Generational distribution of a Candida glabrata population: Resilient old cells prevail, while younger cells dominate in the vulnerable host. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bhattacharya, S.; Bouklas, T.; Fries, B.C. Replicative Aging in Pathogenic Fungi. J. Fungi 2020, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hernando-Ortiz, A.; Mateo, E.; Perez-Rodriguez, A.; de Groot, P.W.; Quindós, G.; Eraso, E. Virulence of Candida auris from different clinical origins in Caenorhabditis elegans and Galleria mellonella host models. Virulence 2021, 12, 1063–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Borman, A.M.; Petch, R.; Linton, C.J.; Palmer, M.; Bridge, P.D.; Johnson, E.M. Candida nivariensis, an emerging pathogenic fungus with multidrug resistance to antifungal agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hou, X.; Xiao, M.; Chen, S.C.-A.; Wang, H.; Yu, S.-Y.; Fan, X.; Kong, F.; Xu, Y.-C. Identification and antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis in a multi-center Chinese collection of yeasts. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Alobaid, K.; Asadzadeh, M.; Bafna, R.; Ahmad, S. First isolation of Candida nivariensis, an emerging fungal pathogen, in Kuwait. Med. Princ. Pract. 2021, 30, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bergin, D.; Brennan, M.; Kavanagh, K. Fluctuations in haemocyte density and microbial load may be used as indicators of fungal pathogenicity in larvae of Galleria mellonella. Microbes Infect. 2003, 5, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Romão, D.; Cavalheiro, M.; Mil-Homens, D.; Santos, R.; Pais, P.; Costa, C.; Takahashi-Nakaguchi, A.; Fialho, A.; Chibana, H.; Teixeira, M.C. A New Determinant of Candida glabrata Virulence: The Acetate Exporter CgDtr1. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Filler, E.E.; Liu, Y.; Solis, N.V.; Wang, L.; Diaz, L.F.; Edwards, J.E.; Filler, S.G.; Yeaman, M.R. Identification of Candida glabrata Transcriptional Regulators That Govern Stress Resistance and Virulence. Infect. Immun. 2021, 89, e00146-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pham, C.D.; Iqbal, N.; Bolden, C.B.; Kuykendall, R.J.; Harrison, L.H.; Farley, M.M.; Schaffner, W.; Beldavs, Z.G.; Chiller, T.M.; Park, B.J.; et al. Role of FKS mutations in Candida glabrata: MIC values, echinocandin resistance, and multidrug resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4690–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Morales, S.; Dudiuk, C.; Vivot, W.; Szusz, W.; Córdoba, S.B.; Garcia-Effron, G. Phenotypic and molecular evaluation of echinocandin susceptibility of Candida. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Spreghini, E.; Orlando, F.; Sanguinetti, M.; Posteraro, B.; Giannini, D.; Manso, E.; Barchiesi, F. Comparative effects of micafungin, caspofungin, and anidulafungin against a difficult-to-treat fungal opportunistic pathogen, Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1215–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fernández-Silva, F.; Lackner, M.; Capilla, J.; Mayayo, E.; Sutton, D.; Castanheira, M.; Fothergill, A.W.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Guarro, J. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida glabrata to caspofungin and the presence of FKS mutations correlate with treatment response in an immunocompromised murine model of invasive infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3646–3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Domán, M.; Kovács, R.; Perlin, D.; Kardos, G.; Gesztelyi, R.; Juhász, B.; Bozó, A.; Majoros, L. Dose escalation studies with caspofungin against Candida glabrata. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 998–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Healey, K.R.; Nagasaki, Y.; Zimmerman, M.; Kordalewska, M.; Park, S.; Zhao, Y.; Perlin, D.S. The gastrointestinal tract is a major source of echinocandin drug resistance in a murine model of Candida glabrata colonization and systemic dissemination. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01412-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Gil-Alonso, S.; Jauregizar, N.; Cantón, E.; Eraso, E.; Quindós, G. In Vitro fungicidal activities of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against Candida glabrata, Candida bracarensis, and Candida nivariensis evaluated by time-kill studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 3615–3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. López-Soria, L.M.; Bereciartua, E.; Santamaría, M.; Soria, L.M.; Hernández-Almaraz, J.L.; Mularoni, A.; Nieto, J.; Montejo, M. Primer caso de fungemia asociada a catéter por Candida nivariensis en la Península Ibérica. Rev. Iberoam. Micol 2013, 30, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mariné, M.; Serena, C.; Pastor, F.J.; Guarro, J. Combined antifungal therapy in a murine infection by Candida glabrata. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 1295–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Howard, S.J.; Livermore, J.; Sharp, A.; Goodwin, J.; Gregson, L.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Perlin, D.; Warn, P.A.; Hope, W.W. Pharmacodynamics of echinocandins against Candida glabrata: Requirement for dosage escalation to achieve maximal antifungal activity in neutropenic hosts. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 4880–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Warren, T.A.; McTaggart, L.; Richardson, S.E.; Zhang, S.X. Candida bracarensis bloodstream infection in an immunocompromised patient. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 4677–4679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jof 07 00998 g001 550
Figure 1. Mortality rate at 120 h post-infection of G. mellonella larvae infected with 1 × 107, 1 × 106 and 1 × 105 cells/larva of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis strains. Statistically significant differences compared to larvae infected with the inoculum 1 × 107 cells/larva (*) and, between inocula 1 × 105 and 1 × 106 cells/larva (#).
Figure 1. Mortality rate at 120 h post-infection of G. mellonella larvae infected with 1 × 107, 1 × 106 and 1 × 105 cells/larva of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis strains. Statistically significant differences compared to larvae infected with the inoculum 1 × 107 cells/larva (*) and, between inocula 1 × 105 and 1 × 106 cells/larva (#).
Jof 07 00998 g001
Jof 07 00998 g002 550
Figure 2. Survival curves of G. mellonella infected with 1 × 107 cells/larva (a), 1 × 106 cells/larva (b), and 1 × 105 cells/larva (c) of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis strains.
Figure 2. Survival curves of G. mellonella infected with 1 × 107 cells/larva (a), 1 × 106 cells/larva (b), and 1 × 105 cells/larva (c) of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis strains.
Jof 07 00998 g002
Jof 07 00998 g003 550
Figure 3. Haemocytes production from G. mellonella larvae infected with 1 × 107, 1 × 106 and 1 × 105 cells/larva of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis. Statistically significant differences compared to larvae infected with C. bracarensis (*), 1 × 107 cells/larva of C. glabrata (**), and 1 × 107 and 1 × 106 cells/larva of C. nivariensis strain CECT 1198 (#).
Figure 3. Haemocytes production from G. mellonella larvae infected with 1 × 107, 1 × 106 and 1 × 105 cells/larva of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis. Statistically significant differences compared to larvae infected with C. bracarensis (*), 1 × 107 cells/larva of C. glabrata (**), and 1 × 107 and 1 × 106 cells/larva of C. nivariensis strain CECT 1198 (#).
Jof 07 00998 g003
Jof 07 00998 g004 550
Figure 4. Phagocytic activity of G. mellonella at two hours post-infection with 1 × 106 cells/larva of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis. Statistically significant differences compared to larvae infected with C. nivariensis CECT 11998 (*) and C. bracarensis NCYC 3397 (**).
Figure 4. Phagocytic activity of G. mellonella at two hours post-infection with 1 × 106 cells/larva of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis. Statistically significant differences compared to larvae infected with C. nivariensis CECT 11998 (*) and C. bracarensis NCYC 3397 (**).
Jof 07 00998 g004
Jof 07 00998 g005a 550Jof 07 00998 g005b 550
Figure 5. Activity of echinocandins in the treatment of G. mellonella infection by C. glabrata ATCC 90030 (a), C. glabrata NCPF 3203 (b), C. nivariensis CBS 9984 (c), C. nivariensis CECT 11998 (d), C. bracarensis NCYC 3397 (e), and C. bracarensis NCYC 3133 (f). Larvae were inoculated with 1 × 106 cells/larva and treated with anidulafungin (AND), caspofungin (CAS) and micafungin (MCF) at concentrations of 4 and 8 µg/g larva.
Figure 5. Activity of echinocandins in the treatment of G. mellonella infection by C. glabrata ATCC 90030 (a), C. glabrata NCPF 3203 (b), C. nivariensis CBS 9984 (c), C. nivariensis CECT 11998 (d), C. bracarensis NCYC 3397 (e), and C. bracarensis NCYC 3133 (f). Larvae were inoculated with 1 × 106 cells/larva and treated with anidulafungin (AND), caspofungin (CAS) and micafungin (MCF) at concentrations of 4 and 8 µg/g larva.
Jof 07 00998 g005aJof 07 00998 g005b
Table
Table 1. Survival of G. mellonella larvae infected with 1 × 106 cells/larva of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis with and without treatment with echinocandins.
Table 1. Survival of G. mellonella larvae infected with 1 × 106 cells/larva of C. glabrata, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis with and without treatment with echinocandins.
StrainOriginCollection ReferenceSurvival Percentages of
G. mellonella at 120 h		Most Effective Antifungal Treatments (Survival Rate Increase of
G. mellonella at 120 h)
Candida glabrata
ATCC 90030BloodAmerican Type Culture Collection38.7%Micafungin, 8 µg/larva (34.6%)
Micafungin, 4 µg/larva (33%)
Caspofungin, 4 µg/larva (33%)
NCPF 3203BloodNational Collection of Pathogenic Fungi39.2%Anidulafungin, 4 µg/larva (45.8%)
Micafungin, 8 µg/larva (42.5%)
Caspofungin, 8 µg/larva (42.5%)
Candida nivariensis
CBS 9984Bronchoalveolar
lavage		Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute43.3%Micafungin, 4 µg/larva (41.7%)
Caspofungin, 8 µg/larva (38.4%)
Caspofungin, 4 µg/larva (35%)
CECT 11998BloodSpanish Type Culture45.8%Caspofungin, 4 µg/larva (35.9%)
Caspofungin, 8 µg/larva (34.2%)
Micafungin, 4 µg/larva (29.2%)
Candida bracarensis
NCYC 3397BloodNational Collection of Yeast Cultures42.5%Anidulafungin, 4 µg/larva (29.2%)
Caspofungin, 8 µg/larva (19.2%)
Anidulafungin, 8 µg/larva (14.2%)
NCYC 3133CatheterNational Collection of Yeast Cultures55.7%Micafungin, 4 µg/larva (24.3%)
Anidulafungin, 8 µg/larva (21%)
Caspofungin, 8 µg/larva (14.6%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernando-Ortiz, A.; Eraso, E.; Quindós, G.; Mateo, E. Candidiasis by Candida glabrata, Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis in Galleria mellonella: Virulence and Therapeutic Responses to Echinocandins. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7120998

AMA Style

Hernando-Ortiz A, Eraso E, Quindós G, Mateo E. Candidiasis by Candida glabrata, Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis in Galleria mellonella: Virulence and Therapeutic Responses to Echinocandins. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(12):998. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7120998

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernando-Ortiz, Ainara, Elena Eraso, Guillermo Quindós, and Estibaliz Mateo. 2021. "Candidiasis by Candida glabrata, Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis in Galleria mellonella: Virulence and Therapeutic Responses to Echinocandins" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 12: 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7120998

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop