Next Article in Journal
Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Network for Accurate Corneal Segmentation in Early Detection of Fungal Keratitis
Next Article in Special Issue
Update on Dihydropteroate Synthase (DHPS) Mutations in Pneumocystis jirovecii
Previous Article in Journal
Changing Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Disease in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bias of the Immune Response to Pneumocystis murina Does Not Alter the Ability of Neonatal Mice to Clear the Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selection of Pneumocystis jirovecii Inosine 5′-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Mutants in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Implication of Mycophenolic Acid

1
Laboratoire de Parasitologie et Mycologie, Hôpital de La Cavale Blanche, CHU de Brest, 29609 Brest, France
2
Groupe d’Etude des Interactions Hôte-Pathogène (GEIHP), Université d’Angers, Université de Brest, 29238 Brest, France
3
Département de Néphrologie, CHU de Brest, 29609 Brest, France
4
Groupe d’Etude des Interactions Hôte-Pathogène (GEIHP), Université de Brest, Université d’Angers, 49035 Angers, France
5
UMR1227, Lymphocytes B et Autoimmunité, Université de Brest, Inserm, Labex IGO, 20609 Brest, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2021, 7(10), 849; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7100849
Submission received: 15 September 2021 / Revised: 4 October 2021 / Accepted: 6 October 2021 / Published: 10 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pneumocystis Infection)

Abstract

:
Mycophenolic acid (MPA) targets the inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) of human lymphocytes. It is widely used as an immunosuppressant to prevent rejection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients who, incidentally, are at risk for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). We hypothesized that MPA exerts selective pressure on P. jirovecii microorganisms considering its in vitro antifungal activity on other fungi. Thus, we analysed impdh gene in P. jirovecii isolates from SOT recipients. P. jirovecii specimens from 26 patients diagnosed with PCP from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively examined: 10 SOT recipients treated with MPA and 16 non-SOT patients without prior exposure to MPA. The P. jirovecii impdh gene was amplified and sequenced. Nucleotide sequences were aligned with the reference sequences retrieved from available P. jirovecii whole genomes. The deduced IMPDH protein sequences were aligned with available IMPDH proteins from Pneumocystis spp. and other fungal species known to be in vitro sensitive or resistant to MPA. A total of nine SNPs was identified. One SNP (G1020A) that results in an Ala261Thr substitution was identified in all SOT recipients and in none of the non-SOT patients. Considering that IMPDHs of other fungi, resistant to MPA, harbour Thr (or Ser) at the analogous position, the Ala261Thr mutation observed in MPA-treated patients was considered to represent the signature of P. jirovecii exposure to MPA. These results suggest that MPA may be involved in the selection of specific P. jirovecii strains that circulate in the SOT recipient population.

1. Introduction

Pneumocystis jirovecii (P. jirovecii) is a transmissible, uncultivable fungus responsible for severe pneumonia in immunosuppressed patients. Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) remains the most frequent AIDS defining infection in HIV-infected patients in developed countries. In France, PCP represents 30% of the annually reported 1200 AIDS cases [1]. PCP also affects immunosuppressed patients not infected with HIV [2,3]. PCP occurs in 5–15% of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients in the absence of prophylaxis, with a mortality rate up to 49% [4,5]. The frequency of PCP seems to increase in SOT recipients, specifically in renal transplant recipients (RTR), particularly when the transplantation is not recent, when the patients are no longer subjected to PCP prophylaxis and when the acquisition of P. jirovecii is nosocomial [6].
Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a widely used anti-rejection treatment included in immunosuppressive regimens for SOT recipients. It targets the inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), an enzyme involved in de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis. MPA specifically inhibits the proliferation of B and T lymphocytes, since these cells synthesize de novo purines while other human cells can use alternate pathways for this synthesis [7]. Therefore, MPA is a powerful immunosuppressive drug. The resulting immunosuppression leads to opportunistic infection occurrence [8]. Nevertheless, data on the occurrence of PCP in patients treated with MPA are contradictory. MPA may have an antifungal activity on Pneumocystis. Oz and Hughes used a rat model which demonstrated that none of the animals treated with MPA alone or in association with dexamethasone developed PCP whereas 90% of rats treated with dexamethasone or tacrolimus alone developed PCP after 4 weeks of treatment [9]. Husain and Singh showed that PCP frequency in RTR treated with MPA was significantly lower than in RTRs without MPA treatment (0/1068 vs. 10/563, p = 0.00006) [8]. On the other hand, we have published three series of PCP case clusters in RTR and heart transplant recipients (HTR) and noted the occurrence of 38 PCP cases in patients effectively treated with MPA [10,11,12]. Considering these aforementioned observations, the putative antifungal activity of MPA on P. jirovecii remains a subject of debate. Conversely, MPA is known to have an in vitro antifungal activity on other fungal species which is useful in fundamental mycology [13].
The emergence of pathogen strains under selection pressure is widespread in microbiology and also observed for P. jirovecii [11,14]. In this context, the hypothesis of the emergence of particular genotypes/phenotypes of P. jirovecii under MPA selection pressure is relevant. The objective of the present study was to investigate this field and we retrospectively sequenced the impdh gene of P. jirovecii isolates from SOT recipients treated with MPA and a control group of non-SOT recipients with no prior exposure to MPA.

2. Methods

2.1. Hospital Settings

Brest University hospital is a 2500-bed healthcare facility, characterized by 460,000 outpatient visits and 120,000 inpatients monitored per year. Specialized care is provided for about 550 renal transplant recipients.

2.2. Patients and P. jirovecii Specimens

Twenty-six P. jirovecii specimens from 26 patients diagnosed with PCP, between 2010 and 2020, were retrospectively examined. They consisted of one group of 10 SOT recipients (T1 to T10) (sex ratio M/F 7/3; median age 65 years (55–78 years)) and another group of 16 patients who were not transplant recipients (C1 to C16) (sex ratio M/F 12/4; median age 60 years (30–89 years)). The first group had undergone MPA treatment since the day of transplantation, with a median duration of exposure of 51 months (range: 8–216 months) conversely to the second group who did not have any prior exposure to MPA (control group). Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. Biological diagnoses of PCP were initially based on microscopic detection of P. jirovecii and/or DNA amplification using a qPCR assay targeting the gene encoding the mitochondrial large subunit of ribosomal RNA which was performed after DNA extraction using NucliSens easyMag (bio-Mérieux, France) as we previously described [15]. P. jirovecii DNA specimens were stored at −80 °C for further analysis. The study was non-interventional and did not require inform consents and ethical approval according to French laws and regulations (CSP Art L1121e1.1). Specimen collection was registered with the French Ministry of Research (No. DC-2008-214).

2.3. P. jirovecii IMPDH Gene Analysis

The IMPDH protein of Pneumocystis carinii (the rat-derived Pneumocystis species) (NCBI accession number AAA97462.1) [16] was used as the query sequence in a BLASTp search against P. jirovecii proteomes at https://www.uniprot.org/blast/ (accessed on 14 September 2021). A single putative ortholog was detected in each proteome available, i.e., one ortholog (UniProt identifier A0A0W4ZU90) in the proteome from Ma and colleagues (BioProject PRJNA223510) [17] and one ortholog (UniProt identifier L0P7N3) in the proteome from Cisse and colleagues (BioProject PRJEA68827) [18]. The P. jirovecii gene sequences encoding the IMPDH protein were then retrieved from the European Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena, accessed on 14 September 2021). The impdh gene corresponds to the T551_00631 locus in the P.jirovecii genome assembly version Pneu-jiro_RU7_V2 (BioProject PRJNA223510) [17] and to the PNEJI1_002926 locus in the P.jirovecii genome assembly version ASM33397v2 (BioProject PRJEA68827) [18].
Six primer pairs were designed using PrimerQuest© software (Integrated DNA Technology, https://www.idtdna.com/Primerquest/Home/Index, accessed on 14 September 2021) in order to sequence the whole IMPDH gene, which is 2070 bp long. Primer specificity was checked using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 14 September 2021). Each primer pair amplifies a DNA fragment from 376 to 915 bp in size (Table S1). Each fragment partially spanned at least one other fragment (Figure S1). The six fragments of the impdh gene were amplified under the same PCR conditions. PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 50 µL containing 0.5 µM of reverse and forward primers, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dNTPs (dNTP set, Eurogentec, Belgium) and 2 U of polymerase (HotGoldStar Diamond Taq®, Eurogentec, Belgium). Amplification was carried out with activation step at 95 °C for 10 min followed by 45 cycles including denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 45 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. To avoid contamination, reagent preparations and amplification procedures were performed in separate rooms with different sets of micropipettes. Negative control was included in each PCR. PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide to visualize the expected band sizes (Table S1). PCR products were purified and sequenced from the two strands with the dideoxy chain termination method on the ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (BigDye® terminator v1.1 cycle sequencing kit, Applied Biosystem, USA). Electropherograms were analysed using PreGap and Gap software (Staden package version 2.0.0b11-2016, Staden Group). The six fragments were assembled to create the consensus sequence of the impdh gene from each specimen. Nucleotide and protein sequences were aligned with the reference sequences retrieved from complete P. jirovecii genomes as described above using BioEdit software (Version 7.0.0, Thomas Hall, Ibis Biosciences, USA) with the Clustal®W program. The identification of putative IMPDH alleles was based on the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
Sequence logos were created using Weblogo application (https://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi, accessed on 14 September 2021) [19].
The deduced IMPDH protein sequences of P. jirovecii were aligned with available IMPDH protein sequences of Pneumocystis carinii (Uniprot identifier A0A0W4ZEI8), Pneumocystis murina (Uniprot identifier M7NKD5), Candida albicans (Uniprot identifier Q59Q46 and GenBank accession number AAW65379.1), Meyerozyma guilliermondii (Uniprot identifiers A5DL50 and A5DLR4), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Uniprot identifiers P38697 and P50095), Penicillium brevicompactum (Uniprot identifier G4WT15) and Aspergillus nidulans (Aspergillus Genome Database identifier AN12478) using T-coffee [20]. These protein sequences were retrieved from Uniprot, GenBank and Aspergillus Genome databases (Table S2).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Frequencies of P. jirovecii IMPDH alleles and potential mixed infections, which were defined by the presence of more than one allele in the same specimen, were compared in the two patient groups using Fisher’s exact test. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.

2.5. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Number

The nucleotide sequences of the impdh gene obtained in the present study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers from MZ272376 to MZ272401.

3. Results

A single IMPDH protein was identified within each of the two available P. jirovecii proteomes by a search of homology with the IMPDH protein of P. carinii. The two P. jirovecii impdh gene sequences were identical, except two synonymous SNPs at positions 1850 and 1952 (Figure S2). The P. jirovecii impdh gene is 2070 bp long, encompassing eight introns. The six fragments of the impdh gene were successfully amplified using the six designed primer pairs and afterward sequenced in all 26 patients. Consensus sequences of the P. jirovecii impdh gene were compared to the impdh gene sequence from P. jirovecii genome assembly version Pneu-jiro_RU7_V2 (T551_00631 locus), which was used as a reference sequence to identify SNPs [17]. Nine SNPs were identified at positions 76 (G76T), 914 (G914A), 1020 (G1020A), 1269 (C1269T), 1329 (A1329T), 1737 (G1737A), 1754 (C1754T), 1850 (T1850C) and 1952 (G1952A) (Figure S2; Figure S3; Table 3). SNP at positions 1020, 1269, 1329, 1737, 1754, 1850 and 1952 were found in at least two patients each (Table 3). SNP at positions 76 and 914 were found in only one patient each (G76T in C10 and G914A in C13) and were confirmed with a second PCR-sequencing experiment. Eight putative IMPDH alleles were defined based on these polymorphisms (Table 4). The sequence of the impdh gene from Ma and colleagues (T551_00631 locus) [17] corresponds to allele IMPDH-1. This allele was identified in two SOT recipients (T3 and T9) and four control patients (C1, C8, C14 and C15). The sequence of the impdh gene from Cissé and colleagues (PNEJI1_002926 locus) [18] corresponds to allele IMPDH-2. This allele was only identified in six control patients (C3, C4, C7, C9, C12 and C15). Interestingly, allele IMPDH-3 was only identified in the 10 SOT recipients. Allele IMPDH-4 was only identified in three control patients (C6, C14 and C16). Allele IMPDH-5 was only identified in nine control patients (C2, C5, C7, C8, C10, C11, C12, C13, C16). Alleles IMPDH-6, IMPDH-7 and IMPDH-8 were only identified in one patient each (respectively, C2, C10 and C13).
To sum up, allele IMPDH-3 was only identified in SOT recipients (10/10 vs. 0/16, p < 0.0001). Only two alleles, IMPDH-1 and IMPDH-3 were identified in the SOT group, whereas seven alleles, IMPDH-1, IMPDH-2, IMPDH-4, IMPDH-5, IMPDH-6, IMPDH-7 and IMPDH-8, were identified in the control group. IMPDH-1 was the sole common allele found in both SOT and control group. Mixed infections were observed in 2 out of 10 SOT recipients and 9 out of 16 control patients (p = 0.11). An overall lower diversity of alleles in SOT recipients than in control patients was observed (2 alleles in 10 patients vs. 7 alleles in 16 patients).
Consensus sequences of P. jirovecii impdh gene in each patient were also aligned with the coding DNA sequences (CDS) of the two reference impdh genes (T551_00631 and PNEJI1_002926 loci) [17,18]. SNP at positions 1269 and 1329 were located within introns (Figure S2). SNP at position 76, 914, 1020, 1737, 1754, 1850 and 1952 were located within exons. Deduced protein sequences were compared to the reference protein sequences (UniProt ID A0A0W4ZU90 and L0P7N3) [17,18]. Four synonymous mutations and 3 missense mutations were identified. Missense mutations were observed at nucleotide positions 76, 1020 and 1737. The first mutation corresponds to a transversion from G to T (G76T) and an amino acid substitution from alanine (Ala) to serine (Ser) at codon 26 (Ala26Ser) (Figure S2; Figure 1). This change characterising the allele IMPDH-7 was found in one control patient (C10). The second mutation corresponds to a transition from G to A (G1020A) and an amino acid substitution from alanine to threonine (Thr) at codon 261 (Ala261Thr) (Figure S2; Figure 1). It is noteworthy that this change characterising the allele IMPDH-3 was exclusively found in the SOT recipients and in all of those. The third mutation, found in three control patients (C6, C14 and C16) but not in SOT recipients, corresponds to a transition from G to A (G1737A) and an amino acid substitution from glycine to serine at codon 439 (Gly439Ser) (Figure S2; Figure 1). This change characterising the allele IMPDH-4 was found in three control patients (C6, C14 and C16) and was not found in SOT recipients.
P. jirovecii IMPDH protein sequences were aligned with available IMPDH proteins from relevant fungi, i.e., the IMPDH of other species of the Pneumocystis genus (P. carinii, P. murina) [17], C. albicans [21], M. guilliermondii [22], S. cerevisiae [23], P. brevicompactum [24] and A. nidulans [24] (Table S2) (Figure 1). The two IMPDHs of P. jirovecii that were retrieved from the two available proteomes (one from Ma and colleagues, the other from Cissé and colleagues) are identical and can be considered as the wild type of IMPDH [17,18]. Among the three aforementioned missense mutations identified in the present study, the mutations Ala26Ser and Gly439Ser are located within non-conserved regions (Figure 1) [24,25]. Conversely, mutation Ala261Thr is located in a strongly conserved region, Ala261 being itself a strongly conserved residue (Figure 1) [24]. Indeed, an Ala was observed at the analogous positions within the IMPDHs of P. jirovecii (wild type), P. carinii (Ala256), P. murina (Ala256), C. albicans (CaIMPDH-MPAS; Ala251), A. nidulans (Ala267) and the MPA-sensitive IMPDHs of M. guilliermondii (MgIMPDH1-MPAS; Ala251) and S. cerevisiae (ScIMPDH2-MPAS; Ala253) (Figure 1). Conversely, a Thr was observed at the analogous position within the IMPDH of an MPA-resistant C. albicans strain (CaIMPDH-MPAR; Thr251) and a Ser was observed at the analogous position within the MPA-resistant IMPDHs of M. guilliermondii (MgIMPDH2-MPAR; Ser251), S. cerevisiae (ScIMPDH2-MPAR; Ser253) and P. brevicompactum (Ala267).

4. Discussion

In this study, the first data on P. jirovecii impdh gene diversity were obtained. To the best of our knowledge, data on the diversity of the impdh gene in the most studied Pneumocystis species, specifically P. carinii, from rats and P. murina, from mice, are not available. Nonetheless, IMPDH of P. carinii as a potential drug target of MPA was previously evaluated by O’Gara and colleagues [16]. P. carinii’s sensitivity to MPA was established using a short-term culture of P. carinii [16]. This sensitivity was confirmed using an IMPDH-deficient strain of Escherichia coli complemented with a plasmid containing the P. carinii impdh gene [16].
Among the nine SNP identified in the overall P. jirovecii specimens from 26 patients, 6 were synonymous mutations, whereas 3 others, Ala26Ser, Ala261Thr and Gly439Ser, resulted in missense mutations. Since the two first mutations Ala26Ser and Gly439Ser are located within non-conserved regions, they might represent natural polymorphisms that might not affect protein function as it has been established in the human IMPDH1 (hIMPDH1) [7,26]. Nonetheless, since the mutation Gly439Ser is located in a hinge region, an effect on enzymatic activity cannot be ruled out.
The mutation Ala261Thr is located in a highly conserved region in fungal IMPDHs, Ala being itself a highly conserved residue, considering our alignments (Figure 1) combined with data reported by Freedman and colleagues [24] who aligned 20,000 fungal IMPDHs and found that the residues at analogous position 261 (the position identified in P. jirovecii IMPDH in the present study) were 91% Ala, 7.3% Gly, 1.2% Ser, 0.1% Thr and 0.1% Val [24]. Interestingly, fungi displaying natural or acquired resistance to MPA or at least naturally exposed to MPA in their environment were previously described to harbour a Ser or a Thr residue at the corresponding position in the IMPDH protein sequence. For example, a substitution from Ala to Thr (Ala251Thr) has been identified in an MPA-resistant strain of C. albicans selected under a high concentration of MPA (10 µg/mL) (Figure 1) [21]. Similarly, P. brevicompactum IMPDH-A (PbIMPDHA-MPAR), S. cerevisiae IMPDH2 (ScIMPDH2-MPAR) and M. guillermondii IMPDH2 (MgIMPDH2-MPAR) harbour a substitution from Ala to Ser at the analogous position (Ala267Ser, Ala253Ser and Ala251Ser, respectively) [22,23,24] (Figure 1), these three fungi being naturally resistant to MPA. Consequently, the Ala to Ser or Thr substitution in IMPDHs thus, stands out as a critical determinant of MPA-resistance in fungi [22,23,24]. Moreover, the in vitro substitution of Ala267 with Ser made the IMPDH of Aspergillus nidulans, a naturally MPA-sensitive fungus, resistant to MPA [24].
Interestingly, the mutation Ala261Thr in P. jirovecii IMPDH was found only in the 10 SOT recipients enrolled in the study, all of them being still subject to anti-rejection treatment with MPA at the date of PCP diagnosis. Nonetheless, putative resistance of P. jirovecii to MPA is probably not a risk factor for PCP occurrence. Indeed, the patients developed PCP because none of them were undergoing chemoprophylaxis when P. jirovecii infections occurred. In fact, the post-transplantation period ranged from 8 months to 216 months, whereas the duration of recommended prophylaxis is limited to 6–12 months after transplantation [5]. However, the mutation Ala261Thr among P. jirovecii isolates from SOT patients may represent a signature of MPA exposure and the circulation and transmission of specific P. jirovecii strains in susceptible patient populations. This signature of MPA exposure was previously pointed out in environmental fungal species such as Aspergillus glaucus, Aspergillus clavatus, Aspergillus terreus, which encode IMPDHs harbouring Ser or Thr at the analogous position [24]. These environmental moulds have probably been confronted with MPA during their evolution since they are known to develop in natural niches shared with Penicillium species that naturally produce MPA [24].
Consequently, MPA may have favoured the emergence of specific strains of P. jirovecii revealed by this specific mutation in SOT recipients. It is noteworthy that SOT recipients T3 and T9 harboured allele IMPDH-3 (characterised by the G1020A mutation resulting in Ala261Thr) in combination with allele IMPDH-1, whereas the remaining eight SOT recipients harboured IMPDH-3 solely. These mixed infections may be explained by an in-progress process of selection of P. jirovecii organisms under MPA pressure, wild P. jirovecii strains being not entirely replaced by a predominant mutant P. jirovecii strain. While MPA was initially considered to protect against P. jirovecii in the 1990s [8], an increase in PCP cases in SOT recipients has been reported, particularly in RTR, in a context of nosocomial infection over the past 15 years [6,27]. At present, MPA is identified as one of risk factors for PCP [28]. This paradigm shift could be explained in part by MPA pressure on P. jirovecii populations, selection of specific strains characterised by potentially lower sensitivity to MPA and acquisition/transmission of these specific strains among susceptible SOT recipients.
The phenomenon of P. jirovecii selection under drug pressure has already been reported with the description of specific genotypes/phenotypes of dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) in patients treated with sulfonamides that target the DHPS [14,29,30]. Prior exposure to these drugs was identified as the main predictor of P. jirovecii DHPS mutants [14,29,30]. The patients’ city of residence, whether or not they had prior exposure to sulfonamides, has been identified as another predictor of P. jirovecii DHPS mutants [14,29]. This observation was explained by possible P. jirovecii transmission from infected, treated patients to susceptible, untreated patients. Similarly, we recently described a P. jirovecii mutant of the gene of cytochrome b (CYB), which is the target of atovaquone [11]. This mutant was spread in HTR who were effectively subject to PCP prophylaxis by atovaquone, but also in HTR without prior exposure to atovaquone, in a context of PCP outbreak [11]. For these reasons, analysis of DHPS locus and CYB genes serves as a marker of P. jirovecii circulation within human communities.
The presence of allele IMPDH-3 (characterised by the G1020A mutation resulting in Ala261Thr) and the low diversity of the P. jirovecii impdh gene in SOT recipients suggest a common identical source of the fungus in this patient group. Conversely, the high diversity of impdh gene, as well as the absence of the IMPDH-3 allele suggest several different sources of P. jirovecii in the control group. This diversity resulted in the identification of nine SNPs and eight alleles.
Considering the potential of impdh gene analysis in contributing to a method of P. jirovecii genotyping, we evaluated the Hunter index at 0.6952 (<0.95) [31]. This value is insufficient to distinguish P. jirovecii isolates in a genotyping approach based on this sole locus. Nonetheless, impdh gene analysis could be added to the highly discriminative multilocus sequence typing (MLST) method combining mtLSUrRNA, CYB and superoxide dismutase gene analysis, that we have used to investigate Pneumocystis case clusters in hospital [32]. Impdh gene analysis could provide an additional marker of P. jirovecii circulation among SOT recipients who are specifically at risk for PCP occurrence in a context of nosocomial acquisition of P. jirovecii and PCP outbreaks. MLST analysis including impdh gene may strengthen the concept of acquisition and transmission of specific P. jirovecii strains in SOT recipients, which has previously been discussed [6,33,34].
To sum up, we pointed out a missense mutation Ala261Thr in SOT recipients treated with MPA, whereas this change was not found in a control group without prior exposure to MPA. This mutation may represent the signature of MPA exposure and the selection of specific P. jirovecii strains under selection pressure that circulate in the SOT recipient population. A multicentre study, combining the enrolment of patients from diverse geographical regions and the genotyping of P. jirovecii specimens based on the aforementioned MLST approach is now warranted.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof7100849/s1, Figure S1: Description of PCR products obtained using the six primer pairs designed for Pneumocystis jirovecii impdh gene amplification, Figure S2: Alignment of impdh CDS and genomic sequences of the two P.jirovecii genome assemblies, Figure S3: Diversity of the impdh gene of Pneumocystis jirovecii based on the analysis of 26 specimens, Table S1: Nucleotide sequences of primers used for amplification of Pneumocystis jirovecii impdh gene, Table S2: List of the IMPDH protein sequences from Pneumocystis species and other fungi that were aligned with the IMPDH sequences obtained in the present study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.N., N.P., J.-P.B. and S.L.G.; Methodology, G.N. and S.L.G.; Validation, C.V.H. and S.L.G.; Formal Analysis, C.V.H. and S.L.G.; Investigation, C.V.H., N.L.N. and S.L.G.; Resources, D.Q., M.-C.M. and Y.L.M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, C.V.H., S.L.G. and G.N.; Writing—Review and Editing, all authors; Visualization, C.V.H. and S.L.G.; Supervision, S.L.G. and G.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, in accordance with the French public health law (CSP Art L1121e1.1), because this study was non-interventional, focused on P. jirovecii specimens and used samplings and data obtained from the patients’ standard routine care.

Informed Consent Statement

Patients’ consent were not required for this study, in accordance with the French public health law, because this protocol only used samplings and data obtained from the patients’ standard routine care.

Data Availability Statement

The nucleotide sequences of the impdh gene obtained in the present study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers from MZ272376 to MZ272401.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors report no conflict of interest relevant to this article. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. Cazein, F.; Lot, F.; Pillonel, J.; Le Strat, Y.; Sommen, C.; Pinget, R.; Le Vu, S.; Brunet, S.; Thierry, D.; Brand, D.; et al. Découvertes de séropositivité VIH et de SIDA, France, 2003–2013. Bull. Epidemiol. Hebd 2015, 9–10, 152–161. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bitar, D.; Lortholary, O.; Le Strat, Y.; Nicolau, J.; Coignard, B.; Tattevin, P.; Che, D.; Dromer, F. Population-Based Analysis of Invasive Fungal Infections, France, 2001–2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1163–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Roux, A.; Canet, E.; Valade, S.; Gangneux-Robert, F.; Hamane, S.; Lafabrie, A.; Maubon, D.; Debourgogne, A.; Le Gal, S.; Dalle, F.; et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Patients with or without AIDS, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1490–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gordon, S.M.; LaRosa, S.P.; Kalmadi, S.; Arroliga, A.C.; Avery, R.K.; LaRosa, T.; Longworth, D.L. Should prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients ever be discontinued? Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999, 28, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Green, H.; Paul, M.; Vidal, L.; Leibovici, L. Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in non-HIV immunocompromised patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007, 2014, CD005590. [Google Scholar]
  6. Le Gal, S.; Toubas, D.; Totet, A.; Dalle, F.; Bacar, A.A.; Le Meur, Y.; Nevez, G.; Anofel Association. Pneumocystis Infection Outbreaks in Organ Transplantation Units in France: A Nation-Wide Survey. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 2216–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hedstrom, L. IMP Dehydrogenase: Structure, Mechanism, and Inhibition. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 2903–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Husain, S.; Singh, N. The impact of novel immunosuppressive agents on infections in organ transplant recipients and the in-teractions of these agents with antimicrobials. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002, 35, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Oz, H.S.; Hughes, W.T. Novel anti-Pneumocystis carinii effects of the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil in contrast to provocative effects of tacrolimus, sirolimus, and dexamethasone. J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 175, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Le Gal, S.; Damiani, C.; Rouille, A.; Grall, A.; Tréguer, L.; Virmaux, M.; Moalic, E.; Quinio, D.; Moal, M.-C.; Berthou, C.; et al. A cluster of Pneumocystis infections among renal transplant recipients: Molecular evidence of colonized patients as potential infectious sources of Pneumocystis jirovecii. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, e62–e71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Argy, N.; Le Gal, S.; Coppée, R.; Song, Z.; Vindrios, W.; Massias, L.; Kao, W.-C.; Hunte, C.; Yazdanpanah, Y.; Lucet, J.-C.; et al. Pneumocystis Cytochrome b Mutants Associated With Atovaquone Prophylaxis Failure as the Cause of Pneumocystis Infection Outbreak Among Heart Transplant Recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 67, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nevez, G.; Le Gal, S.; Noel, N.; Wynckel, A.; Huguenin, A.; Le Govic, Y.; Pougnet, L.; Virmaux, M.; Toubas, D.; Bajolet, O. Investigation of nosocomial pneumocystis infections: Usefulness of longitudinal screening of epidemic and post-epidemic pneumocystis genotypes. J. Hosp. Infect. 2018, 99, 332–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Staib, P.; Michel, S.; Köhler, G.; Morschhäuser, J. A molecular genetic system for the pathogenic yeast Candida dubliniensis. Gene 2000, 242, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Matos, O.; Esteves, F. Epidemiology and clinical relevance of Pneumocystis jirovecii Frenkel, 1976 dihydropteroate synthase gene mutations. Parasite 2010, 17, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Le Gal, S.; Robert-Gangneux, F.; Pepino, Y.; Belaz, S.; Damiani, C.; Guéguen, P.; Pitous, M.; Virmaux, M.; Lissilour, E.; Pougnet, L.; et al. A misleading false-negative result of Pneumocystis real-time PCR assay due to a rare punctual mutation: A French multicenter study. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. O’Gara, M.J.; Lee, C.H.; Weinberg, G.A.; Nott, J.M.; Queener, S.F. IMP dehydrogenase from Pneumocystis carinii as a potential drug target. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ma, L.; Chen, Z.; Huang, D.W.; Kutty, G.; Ishihara, M.; Wang, H.; Abouelleil, A.; Bishop, L.; Davey, E.; Deng, R.; et al. Genome analysis of three Pneumocystis species reveals adaptation mechanisms to life exclusively in mammalian hosts. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cissé, O.H.; Pagni, M.; Hauser, P.M. De Novo Assembly of the Pneumocystis jirovecii Genome from a Single Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Specimen from a Patient. mBio 2013, 4, e00428-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Crooks, G.E.; Hon, G.; Chandonia, J.-M.; Brenner, S.E. WebLogo: A Sequence Logo Generator. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1188–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Di Tommaso, P.; Moretti, S.; Xenarios, I.; Orobitg, M.; Montanyola, A.; Chang, J.-M.; Taly, J.-F.; Notredame, C. T-Coffee: A web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W13–W17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Köhler, G.A.; Gong, X.; Bentink, S.; Theiss, S.; Pagani, G.M.; Agabian, N.; Hedstrom, L. The functional basis of mycophenolic acid resistance in Candida albicans IMP dehydro-genase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 11295–11302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Defosse, T.A.; Mélin, C.; Clastre, M.; Besseau, S.; Lanoue, A.; Glévarec, G.; Oudin, A.; Dugé de Bernonville, T.; Vandeputte, P.; Linder, T.; et al. An additional Meyerozyma guilliermondii IMH3 gene confers mycophenolic acid re-sistance in fungal CTG clade species. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016, 16, fow078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jenks, M.H.; Reines, D. Dissection of the molecular basis of mycophenolate resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2005, 22, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Freedman, R.; Yu, R.; Sarkis, A.W.; Hedstrom, L. A structural determinant of mycophenolic acid resistance in eukaryotic inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenases. Protein Sci. 2019, 29, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hansen, B.G.; Genee, H.J.; Kaas, C.S.; Nielsen, J.B.; Regueira, T.B.; Mortensen, U.H.; Frisvad, J.C.; Patil, K.R. A new class of IMP dehydrogenase with a role in self-resistance of mycophenolic acid producing fungi. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gensburger, O.; Van Schaik, R.H.; Picard, N.; Le Meur, Y.; Rousseau, A.; Woillard, J.-B.; Van Gelder, T.; Marquet, P. Polymorphisms in type I and II inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase genes and association with clinical outcome in patients on mycophenolate mofetil. Pharm. Genom. 2010, 20, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Dellière, S.; Gits-Muselli, M.; Bretagne, S.; Alanio, A. Outbreak-Causing Fungi: Pneumocystis jirovecii. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 783–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Neff, R.T.; Jindal, R.M.; Yoo, D.Y.; Hurst, F.P.; Agodoa, L.Y.; Abbott, K.C. Analysis of USRDS: Incidence and Risk Factors for Pneumocystis jiroveci Pneumonia. Transplantation 2009, 88, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hauser, P.M.; Nahimana, A.; Taffe, P.; Weber, R.; Francioli, P.; Bille, J.; Rabodonirina, M. Interhuman transmission as a potential key parameter for geographical variation in the prevalence of Pneumocystis jirovecii dihydropteroate synthase mutations. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 51, e28–e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Nahimana, A.; Rabodonirina, M.; Helweg-Larsen, J.; Meneau, I.; Francioli, P.; Bille, J.; Hauser, P.M. Sulfa resistance and dihydropteroate synthase mutants in recurrent Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 864–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hunter, P.R. Reproducibility and indices of discriminatory power of microbial typing methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990, 28, 1903–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Vindrios, W.; Argy, N.; Le Gal, S.; Lescure, F.-X.; Massias, L.; Le, M.P.; Wolff, M.; Yazdanpanah, Y.; Nevez, G.; Houze, S.; et al. Outbreak of Pneumocystis jirovecii Infection among Heart Transplant Recipients: Mo-lecular Investigation and Management of an Inter-human Transmission. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 65, 1120–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Alanio, A.; Gits-Muselli, M.; Guigue, N.; Desnos-Ollivier, M.; Calderon, E.J.; Di Cave, D.; Dupont, D.; Hamprecht, A.; Hauser, P.M.; Helweg-Larsen, J.; et al. Diversity of Pneumocystis jirovecii Across Europe: A Multicentre Observational Study. EBioMedicine 2017, 22, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Sassi, M.; Ripamonti, C.; Mueller, N.J.; Yazaki, H.; Kutty, G.; Ma, L.; Huber, C.; Gogineni, E.; Oka, S.; Goto, N.; et al. Outbreaks of Pneumocystis Pneumonia in 2 Renal Transplant Centers Linked to a Single Strain of Pneumocystis: Implications for Transmission and Virulence. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 1437–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sequence alignment of IMPDH proteins of Pneumocystis jirovecii, Pneumocystis carinii, Pneumocystis murina, Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans, Penicillium brevicompactum and Aspergillus nidulans. Identical, strongly and weakly conserved residues are indicated by asterisks, double points and single points, respectively. Dashes indicate gaps. Polymorphic residues of P. jirovecii IMPDH and the analogous residues in other fungi are indicated in bold. PjIMPDH-A261T: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii with a missense mutation Ala261Thr identified in the present study; PjIMPDH-A26S: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii with a missense mutation Ala26Ser identified in the present study; PjIMPDH-G439S: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii with a missense mutation Gly439Ser identified in the present study; PjIMPDH-Ma: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii retrieved from Ma and colleagues’ proteome [17]; PjIMPDH-Cissé: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii retrieved from Cissé and colleagues’ proteome [18]; PcIMPDH: IMPDH sequence of Pneumocystis carinii; PmIMPDH: IMPDH sequence of Pneumocystis murina; MgIMPDH1-MPAS: MPA-sensitive IMPDH1 of Meyerozyma guilliermondii; MgIMPDH2-MPAR: MPA-resistant IMPDH2 of Meyerozyma guilliermondii; ScIMPDH2-MPAR: MPA-resistant IMPDH2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; ScIMPDH3-MPAS: MPA-sensitive IMPDH3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; CaIMPDH-MPAR: IMPDH of a MPA-resistant strain of Candida albicans; CaIMPDH-MPAS: MPA-sensitive IMPDH of Candida albicans; PbIMPDHA-MPAR: MPA-resistant IMPDH-A of Penicillium brevicompactum; AnIMPDH-MPAS: MPA-sensitive IMPDH of Aspergillus nidulans.
Figure 1. Sequence alignment of IMPDH proteins of Pneumocystis jirovecii, Pneumocystis carinii, Pneumocystis murina, Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans, Penicillium brevicompactum and Aspergillus nidulans. Identical, strongly and weakly conserved residues are indicated by asterisks, double points and single points, respectively. Dashes indicate gaps. Polymorphic residues of P. jirovecii IMPDH and the analogous residues in other fungi are indicated in bold. PjIMPDH-A261T: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii with a missense mutation Ala261Thr identified in the present study; PjIMPDH-A26S: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii with a missense mutation Ala26Ser identified in the present study; PjIMPDH-G439S: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii with a missense mutation Gly439Ser identified in the present study; PjIMPDH-Ma: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii retrieved from Ma and colleagues’ proteome [17]; PjIMPDH-Cissé: IMPDH sequence of P. jirovecii retrieved from Cissé and colleagues’ proteome [18]; PcIMPDH: IMPDH sequence of Pneumocystis carinii; PmIMPDH: IMPDH sequence of Pneumocystis murina; MgIMPDH1-MPAS: MPA-sensitive IMPDH1 of Meyerozyma guilliermondii; MgIMPDH2-MPAR: MPA-resistant IMPDH2 of Meyerozyma guilliermondii; ScIMPDH2-MPAR: MPA-resistant IMPDH2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; ScIMPDH3-MPAS: MPA-sensitive IMPDH3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; CaIMPDH-MPAR: IMPDH of a MPA-resistant strain of Candida albicans; CaIMPDH-MPAS: MPA-sensitive IMPDH of Candida albicans; PbIMPDHA-MPAR: MPA-resistant IMPDH-A of Penicillium brevicompactum; AnIMPDH-MPAS: MPA-sensitive IMPDH of Aspergillus nidulans.
Jof 07 00849 g001aJof 07 00849 g001bJof 07 00849 g001cJof 07 00849 g001d
Table 1. Characteristics of the 10 solid organ transplant recipients treated with mycophenolic acid.
Table 1. Characteristics of the 10 solid organ transplant recipients treated with mycophenolic acid.
Patient CodeUnderlying ConditionsPost-Transplantation Period (Duration in Months) aDate of PCP Diagnosis (Year)Examined Specimensfor PCP Diagnosis Results of
P. jirovecii
Detection in
Pulmonary
Specimens Using
Microscopy b/PCR c
PCP TreatmentOutcome
T1RTR732010BAL+/+SMX-TMPDeath
T2RTR572010BAL+/+SMX-TMPDeath
T3HTR82011BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
T4RTR392011BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
T5RTR332016BAL+/+SMX-TMP d Atovaquone + corticosteroids eDeath
T6RTR432017BAL+/+SMX-TMPDeath
T7RTR1512017SputumND/+SMX-TMPRecovery
T8RTR492017BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
T9RTR532019BAL−/+SMX-TMPRecovery
T10RTR + LTR2162020SputumND/+SMX-TMPDeath
The male/female ratio was 7/3, the median age was 65 (range 55–78); Age and sex were not indicated in extenso, since it could be identifiable patient information; BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage; ND: not determined; +/−: positive/negative; HTR, heart transplant recipient; LTR, liver transplant recipient; RTR: renal transplant recipient; SMX-TMP: sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. a The post-transplantation period is also the duration of MPA exposure. b Microscopic detection of P. jirovecii was performed using Wright–Giemsa staining and, until December 2017, an immunofluorescence assay (MonofluoKit P. jirovecii, Bio-Rad). c PCR detection of P. jirovecii was performed using a real-time PCR assay, targeting the mitochondrial large subunit ribosomal RNA gene [15]. d First-line treatment. e Second-line treatment.
Table 2. Characteristics of the 16 control patients without prior exposure to mycophenolic acid.
Table 2. Characteristics of the 16 control patients without prior exposure to mycophenolic acid.
Patient CodeUnderlying ConditionsDate of PCP Diagnosis (Year)Examined Specimensfor PCP DiagnosisResults of
P. jirovecii
Detection in
Pulmonary
Specimens Using
Microscopy a/PCR b
PCP TreatmentOutcome
C1HM
(mantle cell lymphoma)
2010BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C2HIV2011BAL+/+SMX-TMP Death
C3HM
(B cell lymphoma)
2012SputumND/+AtovaquoneDeath
C4IS c2014BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C5Cancer
(glioblastoma)
2016SputumND/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C6HIV2016BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C7HIV2017BAL+/+SMX-TMP Recovery
C8Cancer
(bronchial carcinoma)
2018BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C9IS d 2018BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C10HIV2018SputumND/+AtovaquoneDeath
C11HM
(acute myeloid leukemia)
2018BAL-/+SMX-TMPDeath
C12HIV2019BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C13Cancer
(breast adenocarcinoma)
2019BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C14HIV2019BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C15Cancer
(bronchial carcinoma)
2019SputumND/+SMX-TMPRecovery
C16IS e 2020BAL+/+SMX-TMPRecovery
The male/female ratio was 12/4, the median age was 60 (range 30–89); age and sex were not indicated in extenso since it could be identifiable patient information; BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage; ND: not determined; +/−: positive/negative; HM: haematological malignancy; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; IS: immunosuppressive therapy; SMX-TMP: sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. a Microscopic detection of P. jirovecii was performed using Wright–Giemsa staining and, until December 2017, an immunofluorescence assay (MonofluoKit P. jirovecii, Bio-Rad). b PCR detection of P. jirovecii was performed using a real-time PCR assay, targeting the mitochondrial large subunit ribosomal RNA gene [15]. c Azathioprine, anti-TNFα and corticosteroids treatments for Crohn’ disease. d Methotrexate and corticosteroids treatments Horton’s disease. e Methotrexate treatment for psoriasis.
Table 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of Pneumocystis jirovecii impdh gene in 10 solid organ transplant recipients with prior exposure to mycophenolic acid and 16 control patients which were not SOT recipients and had no prior exposure to MPA.
Table 3. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of Pneumocystis jirovecii impdh gene in 10 solid organ transplant recipients with prior exposure to mycophenolic acid and 16 control patients which were not SOT recipients and had no prior exposure to MPA.
Patient CodeNucleotide Position (bp)IMPDH Allele
769141020126913291737175418501952
SOT recipients
T1GGACAGCTGIMPDH-3
T2GGACAGCTGIMPDH-3
T3GGA/G aCAGCTGIMPDH1 + IMPDH-3
T4GGACAGCTGIMPDH-3
T5GGACAGCTGIMPDH-3
T6GGACAGCTGIMPDH-3
T7GGACAGCTGIMPDH-3
T8GGACAGCTGIMPDH-3
T9GGA/G aCAGCTGIMPDH-1 + IMPDH-3
T10GGACAGCTGIMPDH-3
Control patients
C1GGGCAGCTGIMPDH-1
C2GGGCA/T aGCTG/AaIMPDH-5 + IMPDH-6
C3GGGCAGCCAIMPDH-2
C4GGGCAGCCAIMPDH-2
C5GGGCTGCTGIMPDH-5
C6GGGTAATTGIMPDH-4
C7GGGCA/T aGCC/T aG/A aIMPDH-2 + IMPDH-5
C8GGGCA/T aGCTGIMPDH-1+ IMPDH-5
C9GGGCAGCCAIMPDH-2
C10G/TGGCA/T aGCTGIMPDH-5 + IMPDH-7
C11GGGCTGCTGIMPDH-5
C12GGGCA/T aGCC/T aG/A aIMPDH-2 + IMPDH-5
C13GA/GGCA/T aGCTGIMPDH-5 + IMPDH-8
C14GGGC/T aAA/G aC/T aTGIMPDH-1 + IMPDH-4
C15GGGCAGCC/T aG/A aIMPDH-1 + IMPDH-2
C16GGGC/T aA/T aA/G aC/T aTGIMPDH-4 + IMPDH-5
a Two nucleotides were identified at this position on sequence electropherograms.
Table 4. Pneumocystis jirovecii IMPDH alleles defined in the present study.
Table 4. Pneumocystis jirovecii IMPDH alleles defined in the present study.
Nucleotide Positions (bp)IMPDH Allele
769141020126913291737175418501952
GGGCAGCTGIMPDH-1
GGGCAGCCAIMPDH-2
GGACAGCTGIMPDH-3
GGGTAATTGIMPDH-4
GGGCTGCTGIMPDH-5
GGGCAGCTAIMPDH-6
TGGCAGCTGIMPDH-7
GAGCAGCTGIMPDH-8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoffmann, C.V.; Nevez, G.; Moal, M.-C.; Quinio, D.; Le Nan, N.; Papon, N.; Bouchara, J.-P.; Le Meur, Y.; Le Gal, S. Selection of Pneumocystis jirovecii Inosine 5′-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Mutants in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Implication of Mycophenolic Acid. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7100849

AMA Style

Hoffmann CV, Nevez G, Moal M-C, Quinio D, Le Nan N, Papon N, Bouchara J-P, Le Meur Y, Le Gal S. Selection of Pneumocystis jirovecii Inosine 5′-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Mutants in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Implication of Mycophenolic Acid. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(10):849. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7100849

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoffmann, Claire V., Gilles Nevez, Marie-Christine Moal, Dorothée Quinio, Nathan Le Nan, Nicolas Papon, Jean-Philippe Bouchara, Yannick Le Meur, and Solène Le Gal. 2021. "Selection of Pneumocystis jirovecii Inosine 5′-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Mutants in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Implication of Mycophenolic Acid" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 10: 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7100849

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop