Next Article in Journal
Minimally Invasive Surgical Repair of a Partial Atrioventricular Canal Defect in a 20-Year-Old Patient—A Case Report and Review of Literature
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel Antithrombotic Agents in Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease: Progress in the Search for the Optimal Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Multimodality Imaging in the Detection of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women
Previous Article in Special Issue
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCDD
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/jcdd9100351
jcdd-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Left Atrial Appendage Thrombosis and Oral Anticoagulants: A Meta-Analysis of Risk and Treatment Response

by
Yun-Yung Cheng
1,†,
Shennie Tan
1,†,
Chien-Tai Hong
1,2,
Cheng-Chang Yang
1,3,* and
Lung Chan
1,2,*
1
Department of Neurology, Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei 235, Taiwan
2
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 235, Taiwan
3
Brain and Consciousness Research Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei 235, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9(10), 351; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9100351
Submission received: 22 August 2022 / Revised: 23 September 2022 / Accepted: 5 October 2022 / Published: 13 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Antithrombotic Therapy for Cardio- and Cerebrovascular Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Application)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) is the main cause of cardioembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Emerging evidence indicates that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be a preferred, safer choice for patients with LAAT. However, current guidelines indicate vitamin K antagonist (VKA) as the preferred treatment for LAAT. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of VKA and DOAC for the treatment of LAAT. Methods: The search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to July 2022, with the language restricted to English. A first analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk of LAAT under VKA or DOAC treatment. A second analysis was conducted to compare the resolution of LAAT under VKA and DOAC treatment. Results: In 13 studies comparing LAAT incidence rates under VKA and DOAC treatment, significant superiority of DOAC was detected (pooled RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.47–0.90, p = 0.009) with moderate heterogeneity being identified in the pooled studies. In 13 studies comparing LAAT resolution under VKA and DOAC use, treatment with DOAC exhibited a significantly increased probability of LAAT resolution compared with VKA (pooled odds ratio = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.02–2.26, p = 0.040). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests a superiority of DOAC over VKA with respect to LAAT incidence in people with AF and the likelihood of LAAT resolution. Due to their established safety profile, DOAC is a preferable choice for anticoagulation, although further randomized controlled studies are warranted to provide further evidence of their suitability as a new recommended treatment.

1. Introduction

Stroke is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide [1]. Ischemic stroke, which accounts for more than 70% of the overall incidence of stroke in developed countries, has various causes, such as large artery atherosclerosis in cerebral circulation, occlusion of cerebral small vessels, and cardiac embolism [2]. Of these causes, cardiac embolism contributes most to the increasing incidence of ischemic stroke [3]. Atrial fibrillation (AF) also independently contributes to the increased occurrence of ischemic stroke and is the most common sustained arrhythmia in older adults. In nonvalvular AF, the left atrial appendage (LAA) is the location most susceptible to thrombus formation, accounting for more than 90% of cases [4].
Even though LAA is the prime location of thrombus formation in AF patients, accumulative evidence shows that LAA thrombus may also occur in patients with sinus rhythm or even subclinical AF [5]. Through the advances and widespread use of medical devices, more cryptogenic strokes have been found to be related to subclinical AF [6].
Identifying the cause of stroke is vital in achieving optimal therapeutic strategies for the treatment and prevention of recurrent stroke [7]. Initiation of anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is the most common and conventional strategy employed for LAA thrombus (LAAT) [8]. However, these practices are slowly changing after the launch of the nonvitamin K direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in 2002. The introduction of the IIa inhibitor, dabigatran, and Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in the millennium year has proved that these anticoagulants were at least as effective as VKA in AF for stroke prevention [9].
The safety profiles of DOAC have been highly recognized in many meta-analytic studies and healthcare databases [10,11]. Given that VKA requires regular coagulation monitoring and the potential effects from its interactions with drugs and food [12], DOAC’s high efficacy and reliable safety profile are preferred over VKA in current clinical settings. Therefore, DOAC is now generally accepted as the treatment of choice over VKA in patients with nonvalvular AF [11,13].
This trend of switching from VKA to DOAC is not limited to the prevention of strokes from nonvalvular AF; it also extends to other forms of thromboembolism, such as deep venous thrombosis. Moreover, many emerging studies assessed the comparability of DOAC against VKA for LAAT prevention and resolution. However, the optimal treatment for LAAT is yet to be established.
To the best of our knowledge, not many large-scale randomized controlled trials have attempted to verify the differences between the roles of VKA and DOAC in the risk of LAAT formation and rate of thrombus resolution. Furthermore, the lack of large-scale cohort studies has impeded guidelines from being developed that would provide high-level recommendations for LAAT medication management.
The present study is a systematic review of the outcomes of VKA and DOAC use and was performed through an examination of real-world evidence. Further, a meta-analysis of available data was also performed to compare the effectiveness of VKA and DOAC for primary prevention and resolution of LAAT. In this meta-analysis, we included studies providing specific data on the incidence of LAAT and the LAAT resolution rate under VKA or DOAC use.

2. Methods

2.1. Research Question and Objectives

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to synthesize evidence to systematically review real-world evidence for a comparison of VKAs and DOAC with respect to their influence on the (i) risk of LAAT and (ii) resolution of LAAT.

2.2. Selection of Articles

Relevant studies, including case series and clinical trials published before July 2022 were identified from the PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Only publications in English were included. We used the following sets of terms in our search: (warfarin (Title/Abstract)) OR (novel oral anticoagulant (Title/Abstract)) OR (oral anticoagulant (Title/Abstract)) OR (anticoagulant (Title/Abstract)) OR (direct oral anticoagulant (Title/Abstract)) OR (vitamin K anticoagulant (Title/Abstract)) OR (non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (Title/Abstract)) OR (dabigatran (Title/Abstract)) OR (rivaroxaban (Title/Abstract)) OR (apixaban (Title/Abstract)) OR (edoxaban (Title/Abstract)) AND (left atrial appendage thrombus (Title/Abstract)) OR (left atrial thrombus (Title/Abstract)).
The syntax used in the database searches is detailed in the Supplementary Information (Table S1). Duplicate articles from different databases were excluded. The selection process is illustrated in Figure 1. All search records from all databases were downloaded and merged into Endnote.

2.3. Study Design

We included studies (1) with LAA thrombus diagnosed using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE); (2) with clear records of VKA or DOAC anticoagulant use and in which patients were appropriately anticoagulated; (3) that were cohort studies published as original articles, or case series; and (4) that were publications in English.

2.4. Data Extraction

The selected studies were independently retrieved by two reviewers (Y-Y.C. and C-C.Y.) and were further reviewed by another author (S.T.). The selected studies were reviewed to identify the type of study, year of publication, total patient population, mean patient age, percentage of patients taking VKA, percentage of patients taking DOAC, percentage of male participants, and mean duration of anticoagulant use. Any disagreements were resolved by a fourth reviewer (C-T.H.).

3. Outcomes

The efficacy of the primary prevention method was evaluated based on the risk of LAAT. A second comparison was made of the potency of VKA and DOAC in resolving LAAT.

3.1. Synthesis of Results and Measures of Inconsistency

A random-effects model was implemented to assess LAAT incidence and resolution under VKA and DOAC use. Q and I2 were used to assess the level of heterogeneity between the included studies [14]. Q is a measure of the weighted sum of the squared deviations of the effect size of each study from the overall mean effect size and thereby serves as a test of heterogeneity significance (p ≤ 0.05) [15]. I2 is a measure of relative heterogeneity, estimating the percentage of the variability of effect estimates that occurs due to heterogeneity rather than due to chance. I2 ranges from 0% to 100%, with a value of 0% indicating no observed heterogeneity and a value greater than 50% representing moderate heterogeneity [16]. Furthermore, tau-squared (T2) measures the variance of the true effect as an estimate of absolute heterogeneity in effect sizes. When the observed variance increases or when the variance within studies decreases, T2 increases accordingly [15].

3.2. Publication Bias

We used funnel plots [17], Egger’s test [18], and the Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test [19] to assess publication bias.

3.3. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 17. The meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022319759) and was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [20]. Standard deviation was calculated using the provided confidence interval (CI) limits, standard errors, or interquartile ranges. The overall risk/odds ratios were pooled using a random-effects model. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot of each study’s effect size against precision (1/SE). Publication bias was investigated using Egger’s test at p < 0.10.

4. Results

4.1. Study Selection

After removing duplicate studies, we identified 811 articles for screening. After the exclusion of ineligible studies, 48 studies were included in the full-article assessment, and additional 23 studies were excluded because they were case reports, animal studies, or did not contain original data. Finally, 25 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. We further segregated the 25 studies into two categories: (1) cross-sectional risk analysis of developing LAAT under VKA or DOAC use and (2) analysis of LAAT resolution under VKA or DOAC use.

4.2. Study Characteristics

The characteristics of the included studies on the incidence of LAAT under VKA or DOAC use are listed in Table 1, and the characteristics of those on the LAAT resolution rate under VKA or DOAC use are listed in Table 2. 13 studies were cross-sectional analyses of the incidence of LAAT under VKA and DOAC use (involving 8609 individuals), and 13 were longitudinal analyses of the LAAT resolution rate under VKA and DOAC use (involving 922 individuals).

4.3. LAAT Incidence under VKA and DOAC

A total of 13 cross-sectional analyses involving 8609 individuals were included in the first meta-analysis of the associations between VKA and DOAC use with LAAT. These studies were published between 2016 and 2022. Among the studies, four were conducted in Poland [27,29,30,33], two were conducted in Japan [25,32], two were conducted in the United States [24,28], and one was conducted each in the EU [26], Germany [31], Canada [21], Turkey [23], and Italy [22]. The selected studies were mostly conducted in Western countries, and only two were conducted in an Asian population (Japan). Six studies were prospective [21,22,23,26,29,33], and seven were retrospective [24,25,27,28,30,31,32].
Only the ENSURE-AF trial was a randomized, multicenter, global investigation [26]. The others were mainly single-center studies. Generally, patients were considered sufficiently anticoagulated after at least 3 or 4 weeks of administration of VKA or DOAC. TEE was performed for all study participants to detect the presence of LAAT. The allocation methods for VKA and DOAC were based on the clinician’s decision.
The studies included different parameters for predicting the risk of LAAT. A higher CHA2DS2-VASc score [22,23,25,33], reduced left ventricular ejection fraction [22,23,27,33], reduced left atrial flow velocity [23,25,30,32], reduced B-type natriuretic peptide, and larger left atrium [25] were associated with the risk of LAAT. The demographic predictors of the risk of LAAT included aging, a lower body weight, lower creatinine clearance, heart failure, and diuretic treatment were also listed. [26].

4.4. LAAT Resolution Rate under VKA and DOAC Use

A total of 13 studies involving 922 patients were included in the second meta-analysis. These studies included three in Japan [25,38,40], five in European countries [30,37,39,43,44], three in China [34,36,42], and two in the United States [35,41]. One of the studies, the X-TRA study, was a multinational large-scale, prospective, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study. The X-TRA study evaluated a 6-week rivaroxaban treatment for left atrial and LAA thrombus resolution. Another study, the CLOT-AF study, retrospectively examined standard anticoagulation care provided to patients with left atrial and LAA thrombus for 3 to 12 weeks. These studies were published between 2015 and 2022. When the included study period was extended to 7 months, nine patients were identified as having LAAT [42]. When the included duration and dosage of anticoagulation were increased and considering the transition to DOAC, 12 patients (5%) were identified as experiencing LAAT resolution [41]. Of the 13 included studies, Kawabata, Karwowski, Durmaz, Feickert, and Shiraki studies contained data on the use of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. Edoxaban was used less frequently than the other three DOACs.

4.5. LAAT Incidence under VKA and DOAC Use

In the meta-analysis, 2963 patients were in the VKA arm, and 5646 were in the DOAC arm. The overall risk of LAAT under either VKA or DOAC treatment was 5.56% (479/8609). The risk ratio was derived from individual studies. The respective relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs are listed on the right side of the forest plot (Figure 2A). The meta-analysis of 13 studies on LAAT incidence revealed significant superiority for DOACs (pooled RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.47–0.90, p = 0.009). Nearly moderate and significant heterogeneity (Q12 = 22.97, p = 0.028; I2 = 47.8%; T2 = 0.13) was identified. The funnel plot (Figure 2B) revealed symmetric distribution. Egger’s test (intercept = 0.684, t = 0.97, 2-tailed p = 0.352) and Begg’s test (z = 0.18, p = 0.855) did not reveal any publication bias. The meta-regression analysis showed that none of the between-study variables significantly predicted the LAAT incidence under VKA and DOAC use (mean age of participants: β = 0.071, p = 0.333; male ratio: β = 0.354, p = 0.808).

4.6. LAAT Resolution Rate under VKA and DOAC Use

The VKA and DOAC arms included 484 and 438 patients, respectively. The summarized mean percentages of LAAT resolution for VKA and DOAC were 55.4% (268/484) and 67.6% (296/438), respectively. The odds ratio was derived from the individual studies (Figure 3A). This meta-analysis revealed that DOAC significantly increased the probability of LAAT resolution compared with VKA (pooled odds ratio = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.02–2.26, p = 0.040). In addition, no significant heterogeneity (Q12 = 17.62, p = 0.128; I2 = 31.9%; T2 = 0.16) was identified. The funnel plot (Figure 3B), although slightly asymmetric, did not indicate a high risk of publication bias. Egger’s test (intercept = 0.383, t = 0.44, 2-tailed p = 0.671) and Begg’s test (z = 0.55, p = 0.583) did not reveal any publication bias. The meta-regression analysis showed that none of the between-study variables significantly predicted the LAAT resolution rate for VKA and DOAC (mean age of participants: β = −0.042, p = 0.343; male ratio: β = 0.248, p = 0.860).

5. Discussion

Various guidelines recommend DOAC as a preferable anticoagulant option to VKA for stroke prevention in AF. However, evidence on optimal anticoagulant selection in patients with LAAT is lacking. Although DOACs are safer than VKAs, their efficacy remains unverified. After analyzing pooled data from studies conducted in the past decade, we discovered that DOACs showed superiority over VKAs in increasing the likelihood of LAAT resolution and reducing the chances of LAAT development in high-risk patients. By monitoring patients taking anticoagulants, the incidence of thrombus formation in patients taking DOACs was lower than in those taking VKAs. In addition, patients with LAAT showed a higher thrombus resolution rate with DOACs use in comparison to VKAs. The superiority of the safety of DOAC compared with VKA is well established; these findings provide evidence for developing future treatment recommendations.
AF is associated with a high incidence of LAAT [45]. Previous reports have demonstrated that the CHADS2 score is an independent predictor of LAAT, and the prevalence of LAAT increases with the CHADS2 score [46,47]. However, this parameter does not have a significant skew; therefore, its exclusion from this meta-analysis did not affect the risk of LAAT and resolution obtained from each included study.
Clinically, when the efficacy of anticoagulants in LAAT resolution is comparable, safety concerns, including the risk of bleeding and drug–drug interactions, become the priority of medicine choice. DOACs have not yet been approved for patients with mechanical mitral valves, thrombus in locations other than the LAA, and antiphospholipid syndrome. However, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that DOACs lead to fewer bleeding complications than VKAs. Therefore, DOACs are more likely to be selected for the prevention of thromboembolism events in people with LAAT.
Many large-scale clinical phase III trials have demonstrated that the efficacy of DOACs in preventing stroke is superior to VKAs and that DOACs have lower rates of bleeding. However, conclusive data on the recommended type and duration of anticoagulant use in LAAT is limited. Two recent meta-analyses have demonstrated that DOACs are as efficacious as and safer than VKAs in the treatment of LAAT in patients with nonvalvular AF. In addition, two ongoing prospective randomized trial registry studies are seeking to compare DOAC and VKA in patients with LAAT. One of these is a randomized control trial in China (NCT03792152), in which the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and VKA are compared. The other randomized control trial (RE-LATED AF (NCT02256683)) is a comparison of dabigatran and VKA in patients with nonvalvular AF of LAAT.
The strength of this study is its analyses of both the risk of LAAT development in high-risk patients and the likelihood of LAAT resolution with the use of VKAs and DOACs. The development of LAAT is an indicator of subsequent systemic thromboembolism events, which require anticoagulation therapy. However, the presence of LAAT requires emergent anticoagulation therapy until the thrombus resolves. The comparable efficacy of DOAC and VKA indicates an opportunity to provide patients with safer prescriptions. This study has several limitations. First, no subgroup analyses were performed for the different classes of DOAC in the 18 studies due to the small number of studies for each DOAC. Further studies are warranted to investigate the effectiveness of different DOACs in patients with different comorbidities. Second, several studies reported adverse effects, bleeding risk, and thromboembolism events, which prevented these events from being included in the meta-analysis. Third, the relative weight of the included studies varied in analyses, which is why the random-effects model was employed. Fourth, although the anti-IIa/Xa activity effectiveness and possible drug–drug interactions are crucial in the issues investigated in the current study, it is not feasible to conduct relevant analyses considering the very limited information provided in the included studies. Another related concern is the ratio/period of the effective therapeutic range, such as the international normalized ratio (INR) values in patients taking VKA. The distinctive ways of reporting INRs in the included studies also hinder further analyses from examining the underlying origins of heterogeneity.

6. Conclusions

This meta-analysis of observation data revealed significant differences in LAAT development in high-risk patients and the likelihood of LAAT resolution in patients treated with DOAC or VKA. With respect to safety profiles, DOACs are preferable to VKAs in patients with LAAT and without absolute DOAC contraindication. As the role of DOACs expands, further studies should be conducted to provide clinicians with a practical reference for optimization of the selection of appropriate DOACs and the duration of treatment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcdd9100351/s1, Table S1: Search history and results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-Y.C., S.T. and L.C.; methodology, S.T., C.-C.Y. and L.C.; software, C.-C.Y.; validation, C.-C.Y. and L.C.; formal analysis, S.T., C.-T.H., C.-C.Y. and L.C.; investigation, S.T. and C.-T.H.; resources, S.T. and C.-T.H.; data curation, Y.-Y.C., S.T. and C.-C.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-Y.C. and S.T.; writing—review and editing, C.-T.H., C.-C.Y. and L.C.; visualization, S.T. and C.-C.Y.; supervision, C.-T.H.; project administration, S.T., C.-T.H. and L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the nature of this meta-analytic study. All the included studies have been approved by their IRBs.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the nature of this meta-analytic study. No identifiable personal information was obtained in the included studies.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feigin, V.L.; Stark, B.A.; Johnson, C.O.; Roth, G.A.; Bisignano, C.; Abady, G.G.; Abbasifard, M.; Abbasi-Kangevari, M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abedi, V.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021, 20, 795–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adams, H.P.; Bendixen, B.H.; Kappelle, L.J.; Biller, J.; Love, B.B.; Gordon, D.L.; Marsh, E.E. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993, 24, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wolf, P.A.; Abbott, R.D.; Kannel, W.B. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: The Framingham Study. Stroke 1991, 22, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Arboix, A.; Alio, J. Cardioembolic stroke: Clinical features, specific cardiac disorders and prognosis. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2010, 6, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Naksuk, N.; Padmanabhan, D.; Yogeswaran, V.; Asirvatham, S.J. Left Atrial Appendage: Embryology, Anatomy, Physiology, Arrhythmia and Therapeutic Intervention. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol 2016, 2, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kamel, H.; Healey, J.S. Cardioembolic Stroke. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 514–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Campbell, B.C.V.; De Silva, D.A.; Macleod, M.R.; Coutts, S.B.; Schwamm, L.H.; Davis, S.M.; Donnan, G.A. Ischaemic stroke. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2019, 5, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. European Atrial Fibrillation Trial Study, G. Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and recent cerebral ischemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kleindorfer, D.O.; Towfighi, A.; Chaturvedi, S.; Cockroft, K.M.; Gutierrez, J.; Lombardi-Hill, D.; Kamel, H.; Kernan, W.N.; Kittner, S.J.; Leira, E.C.; et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2021, 52, e364–e467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hart, R.G.; Pearce, L.A.; Aguilar, M.I. Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2007, 146, 857–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ruff, C.T.; Giugliano, R.P.; Braunwald, E.; Hoffman, E.B.; Deenadayalu, N.; Ezekowitz, M.D.; Camm, A.J.; Weitz, J.I.; Lewis, B.S.; Parkhomenko, A.; et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2014, 383, 955–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Steffel, J.; Braunwald, E. Novel oral anticoagulants: Focus on stroke prevention and treatment of venous thrombo-embolism. Eur. Heart J. 2011, 32, 1968–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hindricks, G.; Potpara, T.; Dagres, N.; Arbelo, E.; Bax, J.J.; Blomström-Lundqvist, C.; Boriani, G.; Castella, M.; Dan, G.A.; Dilaveris, P.E.; et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 373–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Borenstein, M.; Hedges, L.V.; Higgins, J.P.; Rothstein, H.R. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods 2010, 1, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Higgins, J.P.T.; Altman, D.G.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Jüni, P.; Moher, D.; Oxman, A.D.; Savović, J.; Schulz, K.F.; Weeks, L.; Sterne, J.A.C. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Egger, M.; Smith, G.D. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 1995, 310, 752–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Egger, M.; Davey Smith, G.; Schneider, M.; Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997, 315, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Begg, C.B.; Mazumdar, M. Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias. Biometrics 1994, 50, 1088–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alqarawi, W.; Birnie, D.H.; Spence, S.; Ramirez, F.D.; Redpath, C.J.; Lemery, R.; Nair, G.M.; Nery, P.B.; Davis, D.R.; Green, M.S.; et al. Prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus detected by transoesophageal echocardiography before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients anticoagulated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. EP Eur. 2019, 21, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bursi, F.A.-O.; Santangelo, G.; Ferrante, G.; Massironi, L.; Carugo, S. Prevalence of left atrial thrombus by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A contemporary cohort study. Echocardiography 2021, 38, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Durmaz, E.A.-O.; Karpuz, M.H.; Bilgehan, K.; Ikitimur, B.; Ozmen, E.; Ebren, C.; Polat, F.; Koca, D.; Tokdil, K.O.; Kandemirli, S.G.; et al. Left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation and under oral anticoagulant therapy; 3-D transesophageal echocardiographic study. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 36, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Frenkel, D.; D’Amato, S.A.; Al-Kazaz, M.; Markowitz, S.M.; Liu, C.F.; Thomas, G.; Ip, J.E.; Sharma, S.K.; Yang, H.; Singh, P.; et al. Prevalence of Left Atrial Thrombus Detection by Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Comparison of Continuous Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Versus Warfarin Therapy in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2016, 2, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kawabata, M.; Goya, M.; Sasaki, T.; Maeda, S.; Shirai, Y.; Nishimura, T.; Yoshitake, T.; Shiohira, S.; Isobe, M.; Hirao, K. Left Atrial Appendage Thrombi Formation in Japanese Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients During Anticoagulation Therapy―Warfarin vs. Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Circ. J. 2017, 81, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Merino, J.L.; Lip, G.Y.H.; Heidbuchel, H.; Cohen, A.A.; De Caterina, R.; de Groot, J.R.; Ezekowitz, M.D.; Le Heuzey, J.Y.; Themistoclakis, S.; Jin, J.; et al. Determinants of left atrium thrombi in scheduled cardioversion: An ENSURE-AF study analysis. Europace 2019, 21, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Uziębło-Życzkowska, B.; Krzesiński, P.; Jurek, A.; Kapłon-Cieślicka, A.; Gorczyca, I.; Budnik, M.; Gielerak, G.; Kiliszek, M.; Gawałko, M.; Scisło, P.; et al. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Is Associated with the Risk of Thrombus in the Left Atrial Appendage in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2020, 2020, 3501749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wyrembak, J.; Campbell, K.B.; Steinberg, B.A.; Bahnson, T.D.; Daubert, J.P.; Velazquez, E.J.; Samad, Z.; Atwater, B.D. Incidence and Predictors of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Patients Treated with Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Before Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 2017, 119, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kapłon-Cieślicka, A.; Gawałko, M.; Budnik, M.; Uziębło-życzkowska, B.; Krzesiński, P.; Starzyk, K.; Gorczyca-Głowacka, I.; Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz, L.; Kaufmann, D.; Wójcik, M.; et al. Left Atrial Thrombus in Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Patients in Relation to Anticoagulation Strategy: LATTEE Registry. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Karwowski, J.; Rekosz, J.; Mączyńska-Mazuruk, R.; Wiktorska, A.; Wrzosek, K.; Loska, W.; Szmarowska, K.; Solecki, M.; Sumińska-Syska, J.; Dłużniewski, M. Left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent oral anticoagulation. Cardiol. J. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feickert, S.; D’Ancona, G.; Ince, H.; Graf, K.; Kugel, E.; Murero, M.; Safak, E. Routine transesophageal Echocardiography in atrial fibrillation before electrical cardioversion to detect left atrial thrombosis and echocontrast. J. Atr. Fibrillation 2020, 13, 2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shiraki, H.; Tanaka, H.; Yamauchi, Y.; Yoshigai, Y.; Yamashita, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Sumimoto, K.; Shono, A.; Suzuki, M.; Yokota, S.; et al. Characteristics of non-valvular atrial fibrillation with left atrial appendage thrombus who are undergoing appropriate oral anticoagulation therapy. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2022, 38, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Turek, Ł.; Sadowski, M.; Janion-Sadowska, A.; Kurzawski, J.; Jaroszyński, A. Left atrial appendage thrombus in patients referred for electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: A prospective single-center study. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 2022, 132, 16214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hao, L.; Zhong, J.Q.; Zhang, W.; Rong, B.; Xie, F.; Wang, J.T.; Yue, X.; Zheng, Z.T.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, Y. Uninterrupted dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of intracardiac thrombus in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 190, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hussain, A.; Katz, W.E.; Genuardi, M.V.; Bhonsale, A.; Jain, S.K.; Kancharla, K.; Saba, S.; Shalaby, A.A.; Voigt, A.H.; Wang, N.C. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for left atrial appendage thrombus resolution in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or flutter. Pacing. Clin. Electrophysiol. 2019, 42, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ke, H.-H.; He, Y.; Lv, X.-W.; Zhang, E.-H.; Wei, Z.; Li, J.-Y. Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban on the resolution of left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombus in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2019, 48, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lip, G.Y.; Hammerstingl, C.; Marin, F.; Cappato, R.; Meng, I.L.; Kirsch, B.; Morandi, E.; van Eickels, M.; Cohen, A. Rationale and design of a study exploring the efficacy of once-daily oral rivaroxaban (X-TRA) on the outcome of left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombus in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter and a retrospective observational registry providing baseline data (CLOT-AF). Am. Heart J. 2015, 169, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mitamura, H.; Nagai, T.; Watanabe, A.; Takatsuki, S.; Okumura, K. Left atrial thrombus formation and resolution during dabigatran therapy: A Japanese Heart Rhythm Society report. J. Arrhythm. 2015, 31, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nelles, D.; Lambers, M.; Schafigh, M.; Morais, P.; Schueler, R.; Vij, V.; Tiyerili, V.; Weber, M.; Schrickel, J.W.; Nickenig, G.; et al. Clinical outcomes and thrombus resolution in patients with solid left atrial appendage thrombi: Results of a single-center real-world registry. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2021, 110, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Niku, A.D.; Shiota, T.; Siegel, R.J.; Rader, F. Prevalence and Resolution of Left Atrial Thrombus in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter with Oral Anticoagulation. Am. J. Cardiol. 2019, 123, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, M.S.; Gabriels, J.; Khan, M.; Shaban, N.; D’Amato, S.A.; Liu, C.F.; Markowitz, S.M.; Ip, J.E.; Thomas, G.; Singh, P.; et al. Left atrial thrombus despite continuous direct oral anticoagulant or warfarin therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights into rates and timing of thrombus resolution. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. 2018, 53, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, Y.; Du, X.; Dong, J.; Ma, C. Outcome of Anticoagulation Therapy of Left Atrial Thrombus or Sludge in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 358, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mazur, E.S.; Mazur, V.V.; Bazhenov, N.D.; Orlov, Y.A. Efficiency of the left atrial appendage thrombus dissolution in patients with persistent nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants therapy. Ration. Pharmacother. Cardiol. 2021, 17, 724–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Faggiano, P.; Dinatolo, E.; Moreo, A.; De Chiara, B.; Sbolli, M.; Musca, F.; Curnis, A.; Belli, O.; Giannattasio, C.; Tomasi, C.; et al. Prevalence and Rate of Resolution of Left Atrial Thrombus in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Two-Center Retrospective Real-World Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. McCready, J.W.; Nunn, L.; Lambiase, P.D.; Ahsan, S.Y.; Segal, O.R.; Rowland, E.; Lowe, M.D.; Chow, A.W. Incidence of left atrial thrombus prior to atrial fibrillation ablation: Is pre-procedural transoesophageal echocardiography mandatory? Europace 2010, 12, 927–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Scherr, D.; Dalal, D.; Chilukuri, K.; Dong, J.U.N.; Spragg, D.; Henrikson, C.A.; Nazarian, S.; Cheng, A.; Berger, R.D.; Abraham, T.P.; et al. Incidence and Predictors of Left Atrial Thrombus Prior to Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2009, 20, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Puwanant, S.; Varr, B.C.; Shrestha, K.; Hussain, S.K.; Tang, W.H.; Gabriel, R.S.; Wazni, O.M.; Bhargava, M.; Saliba, W.I.; Thomas, J.D.; et al. Role of the CHADS2 score in the evaluation of thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing transesophageal echocardiography before pulmonary vein isolation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 2032–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcdd 09 00351 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study selection and search results.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study selection and search results.
Jcdd 09 00351 g001
Jcdd 09 00351 g002a 550Jcdd 09 00351 g002b 550
Figure 2. (A) The forest plot of random-effect meta-analysis of the incidence of left arterial appendage thrombus formation under the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). (B) The funnel plot of the studies included in the meta-analysis of the incidence of left arterial appendage thrombus formation under the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
Figure 2. (A) The forest plot of random-effect meta-analysis of the incidence of left arterial appendage thrombus formation under the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). (B) The funnel plot of the studies included in the meta-analysis of the incidence of left arterial appendage thrombus formation under the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
Jcdd 09 00351 g002aJcdd 09 00351 g002b
Jcdd 09 00351 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) The forest plot of random-effect meta-analysis of the likelihood of resolution of left arterial appendage thrombus under the use of VKA and DOACs. (B) The funnel plot of the studies included in the meta-analysis of the likelihood of resolution of left arterial appendage thrombus under the use of VKA and DOACs.
Figure 3. (A) The forest plot of random-effect meta-analysis of the likelihood of resolution of left arterial appendage thrombus under the use of VKA and DOACs. (B) The funnel plot of the studies included in the meta-analysis of the likelihood of resolution of left arterial appendage thrombus under the use of VKA and DOACs.
Jcdd 09 00351 g003
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of included studies for systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of left arterial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation under vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of included studies for systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of left arterial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation under vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment.
Author (Year)/
Country, Study Type		Age (Years Old, Mean ± SD), Male (n/%)CHA2DS2-VASC Score (Mean ± SD)Anticoagulant
(Duration)
Alqarawi (2019)/
Canada, prospective [21]		64 ± 11, (478/72%)1.9 ± 1.4VKA (INR ≥ 2) and DOAC: 258 Dab, 184 Riv, and 54 Api (>4 weeks)
Bursi (2021)/
Italy, prospective [22]		71 ± 10, (177/64%)3.1 ± 1.4VKA (8.1% INR < 2) and DOAC (>3 weeks)
Durmaz (2020)/Turkey, prospective [23]69.9 ± 12.4 (LAAT) and
65.1 ± 12.1 (nLAAT),
(45.6%)		3.44VKA (INR not specified) and DOAC (>3 weeks) (61 VKA, 32 Dab, 62 Riv, 29 Api)
Frenkel (2016)/
US, retrospective [24]		65, (287/74%)2VKA (INR median 3.0 (IQR: 2.5 to 3.2)) and DOAC: 93 Dab, 62 Riv, and 28 Api (>4 weeks)
Kawabata (2017)/
Japan, retrospective [25]		62 ± 11, (445/79.6%)1.9 ± 1.5VKA (INR available in 90% of participants but not specified) and DOAC: 145 Dab, 121 Riv, 40 Api, and 5 Edo (>4 weeks)
Merino (2019)/
Europe, prospective [26]		67.3 ± 9.4 (LAAT) and
64.2 ± 10.8 (nLAAT),
(733)		3.0 ± 1.4 (LAAT)
2.7 ± 1.5 (nLAAT)		VKA (INR 1.51 ± 0.61 at baseline) and DOAC (>30 days)
Uziębło-Życzkowska (2020)/Poland, retrospective [27]63.35, (61%)2.48 ± 1.53VKA (INR 1.69 ± 0.86 at baseline) and DOAC (>3 weeks) (VKA 227, 240 Dab, 279 Riv, 4 Api)
Wyrembak (2017)/
US, retrospective [28]		65, (618/66%)3.1 ± 2VKA (INR 2.32 ± 0.59) and DOAC (>4 weeks)
Kapłon-Cie’slicka (2022)/
Poland, prospective [29] 		67, (1731/63%)3VKA (INR not specified) and DOAC (>3 weeks) 814 Dab, 1060 Riv, 388 Api
Karwowski (2022)/
Poland, retrospective [30]		73.4 ± 10.3 (80, 50%)3.83 ± 1.64VKA (6 warfarin, 22 acenocoumarol; INR not reported) and DOAC (25 Dab, 83 Riv, 16 Api, and 8 Edo) (>4 weeks)
Feickert (2020)/
Germany, retrospective [31]		71.3 ± 9.0 (68, 48.2%)4.03 ± 1.53VKA (INR ≥2, n = 74; INR <2, n = 20) and DOAC (>3 weeks) (32 VKA, 14 Dab, 7 Api, 13 Riv, 1 Edo)
Shiraki (2022)/
Japan, retrospective [32]		65.2 ± 10.1 (193, 26.2%)nilVKA (INR not specified) and DOAC (>3 weeks) (120 Dab, 213 Riv, 199 Api, and 108 Edo)
Turek (2022)/
Poland, prospective [33]		65.4 (182, 61.5%)nilVKA (INR ≥ 2) and DOAC (>3 weeks) (145 Dab, 80 Riv, 10 Api)
nLAAT, patients without LAAT; Dab, dabigatran; Riv, rivaroxaban; Api, apixaban; Edo, edoxaban; INR, ≥ international normalized ratio.
Table
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of included studies for systematic review and meta-analysis of LAAT resolution in patients under VKA or DOAC treatment.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of included studies for systematic review and meta-analysis of LAAT resolution in patients under VKA or DOAC treatment.
Author (Year),
Country/Continent, Study Type		Age, Overall (Mean ± SD)Male, n (%)CHA2DS2-VASc
(Median/Mean)		Anticoagulant (Type, Duration)
Hao (2015), China,
Retrospective [34]		57.7 ± 7.436 (87.8)VKA: 1.41 ± 1.01
Dab: 1.16 ± 1.01		VKA (INR not reported) and Dab
(4.2 months, median)
Hussain (2019), US,
retrospective [35]		63.231 (69)3.4 ± 1.7DOAC (60 days, median)
VKA (INR not reported; 116 days, median)
Kawabata (2017), Japan, retrospective [25]649 (60)3.7 ± 1.8VKA (INR not specified) and 1 Dab
(>3 weeks)
Ke (2019),
China, prospective [36]		VKA: 64.2 ± 10.5
Riv: 63.7 ± 8.6		66 (82.5)1.46VKA (INR not reported) and Riv (12 weeks)
Lip (2015), Europe,
prospective (X-TRA) and retrospective (CLOT-AF) [37]		X-TRA: 69.6 ± 11
CLOT-AF: 67.7 ± 9.6		X-TRA: 30 (50)
CLOT-AF: 103 (66)		X-TRA: 4.0
CLOT-AF: 3.0		VKA (INR not reported) and DOAC: 12 Dab, 1 Riv, and 7 Api
(X-TRA: 6 weeks;
CLOT-AF: 3–12 weeks)
Mitamura (2015), Japan, retrospective [38]67.3 ± 12.77 (87.5)1.88VKA (INR not reported) and Dab (21–308 days)
Nelles (2021), Germany, retrospective [39]76.1 ± 8.345 (57.7)4.3 ± 1.1VKA (INR 2.2 ± 0.2) and DOAC: 15 Dab, 12 Api, 11 Riv and 1 Api (116 ± 79 days)
Niku (2019), Japan, retrospective [40]71.9 ± 11.952 (44)3.4VKA (59% had INR values ≥ 2.0) and DOAC: 2 Dab, 12 Riv, and 16 Api
(96 ± 72 days)
Wu (2018),
US, retrospective [41]		6733 (75)3VKA (INR median 2.7 (IQR 2.2, 3.2) at baseline) and DOAC: 12 Dab, 1 Riv, and 7Api (≥4 weeks)
Yang (2019),
China, retrospective [42]		63.5 ± 10.952 (72.2)2VKA (INR not reported) and DOAC: 26 Dab and 29 Riv (101.5 days)
Mazur (2021)
Russia, retrospective [43]		59.7± 9.841 (60.3)2.22 ± 1.40VKA (INR between 2 and 3) and DOAC (>3 weeks): 14 Dab, 14 Riv, 3 Api
Faggiano (2022)
Italy, retrospective [44]		71175 (66)4VKA (INR not reported) and DOAC: 18 Riv, Api 24, Dab 24, Edo 5
Karwowski (2022) Poland, retrospective [30]76.7 ± 8.25 (50)4.58 ± 1.00VKA (2 warfarin, 5 acenocoumarol; INR not reported) and DOAC 5 Api
Dab, dabigatran; Riv, rivaroxaban; Api, apixaban; Edo, edoxaban; INR, ≥ international normalized ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, Y.-Y.; Tan, S.; Hong, C.-T.; Yang, C.-C.; Chan, L. Left Atrial Appendage Thrombosis and Oral Anticoagulants: A Meta-Analysis of Risk and Treatment Response. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9100351

AMA Style

Cheng Y-Y, Tan S, Hong C-T, Yang C-C, Chan L. Left Atrial Appendage Thrombosis and Oral Anticoagulants: A Meta-Analysis of Risk and Treatment Response. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2022; 9(10):351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9100351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Yun-Yung, Shennie Tan, Chien-Tai Hong, Cheng-Chang Yang, and Lung Chan. 2022. "Left Atrial Appendage Thrombosis and Oral Anticoagulants: A Meta-Analysis of Risk and Treatment Response" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 9, no. 10: 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9100351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop