Next Article in Journal
Possible Early Generation of Physiological Helical Flow Could Benefit the Triflo Trileaflet Heart Valve Prosthesis Compared to Bileaflet Valves
Previous Article in Journal
Best of Both Hydrogel Worlds: Harnessing Bioactivity and Tunability by Incorporating Glycosaminoglycans in Collagen Hydrogels
Previous Article in Special Issue
Degradation of Veterinary Antibiotics in Swine Manure via Anaerobic Digestion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Anaerobic Digestion in the 21st Century

by
Marcell Nikolausz
1,* and
Jörg Kretzschmar
2
1
Department of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
2
Department of Biochemical Conversion, DBFZ Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Torgauer Strasse 116, 04347 Leipzig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2020, 7(4), 157; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7040157
Submission received: 2 December 2020 / Accepted: 2 December 2020 / Published: 7 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in Anaerobic Digestion Technology)
Despite being a mature biotechnological process, anaerobic digestion is still attracting considerable research attention, mainly due to its versatility both in substrate and product spectra, as well as being a perfect test system for the microbial ecology of anaerobes. This Special Issue highlights some key topics of this research field.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) originally refers to biomass degradation under anoxic conditions in both natural and engineered systems. AD is one of the oldest biotechnologies used to produce an energy carrier, i.e., biogas, from organic waste. Therefore, it can be considered as one of the earliest approaches to a circular bioeconomy. Technological development was sparse until the beginning of the 20th century; however, with increasing industrial interest, research into anaerobic microbial processes was also intensified with the aim of identifying the important process parameters and to promote methane production from all kinds of residual organic matter, especially agricultural residues such as manure and slurry. Technological progress has been made, particularly with the development of the UASB reactor at the end of 1970s [1], which facilitated AD of substrates with a very low content of total solids such as municipal or industrial wastewater (reviewed in this Special Issue by Mainardis et al. [2]). From the industrial perspective of electrical power production, with 19 GW installed capacity worldwide and 6,586 TWh electrical power production in 2018, biogas plants are major players even if not reaching the podium of top three renewables. The majority of biogas plants are located in Asia (40%), Europe (20%) and North America (19%).
Extending the definition of AD, in addition to solid and liquid substrates, it can also convert gases rich in hydrogen and carbon dioxide into methane via hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. This pathway can be used for biological upgrading of biogas, as reviewed in this Special Issue by Adnan and co-workers [3]. The resulting methane can substitute natural gas, which opens new opportunities by a direct link to traditional petrochemistry. Due to the wide substrate spectrum, AD is an ideal end-of-pipe technology for waste treatment and energy recovery in several (bio)technological applications. Furthermore, AD can be coupled with emerging biotechnological applications, such as microbial electrochemical technologies or the production of medium chain fatty acids by anaerobic fermentation. Ultimately, because of the wide range of applications, AD is still a very vital field in science. This is impressively shown by the number of scientific publications in 2019, which has been, with more than 2800 publications, the year with the most contributions in this field since the beginning of records in 1945. In the last five years, 12,529 papers on AD were published, accounting for 49.54 % of the total publications on that topic (Web of Science, www.webofknowledge.com, accessed 05.11.2020).
However, today, the AD sector faces new challenges, such as limited feedstock availability at increased price, the reduction of subsidies as well as the low competitiveness of the current products. Therefore, the techno-economical assessment of current and future technologies is important for investors in the waste management sector, which is addressed by Bhatt and Tao in this issue [4]. To avoid competition with food and feed production, the AD feedstock spectrum is currently being extended to waste products either rich in recalcitrant lignocellulose or containing inhibitory substances such as ammonia (see the studies of Wedwitschka et al. [5] and Mahato et al. [6] in this Special Issue). The development and evaluation of various pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic biomass is a hot topic of AD research that several articles in this Special Issue deal with (see the studies of Müller et al. [7], Schumacher et al. [8], and Monlau et al. [9]). The effect of the inoculum on the microbial community structure and performance of the AD process is still an enigma. The study of Moestedt et al. [10] in this issue sheds some light on the microbiology of process inoculation and start-up, which was handled as a black box in the past. Although academic knowledge about the microbiome, the engine driving the AD process, has been accumulating, the use of this knowledge for the innovation of AD technologies is still scarce. With the rapid development of novel sequencing technologies, we also expect changes on that and the emergence of new reactor systems or technology concepts based on ecological knowledge in the future.
The fate of veterinary antibiotics, microorganisms resistant to antibiotics, resistance genes and pathogenic microorganisms in AD is a further important topic due to the massive application of antibiotics in livestock farming (see the studies of Hosseini Taleghani et al. [11] and Russel at al. [12]). We see AD plants more as treatment options than a threat, when the process parameters are properly adjusted to maximize attenuation. Aquacultures are also hotspots of direct antibiotics usage or indirect input from untreated manure and human wastes that are still applied in many Asian shrimp and tilapia farms. In general, the sludge from aquacultures is a very specific and problematic waste but AD technology can also contribute to its treatment (an example of reactor system development is presented in this issue by Chiumenti and co-workers [13]).
Germany is one of the European leaders in biogas technology, with regards to the number of large-scale plants and their installed capacity, partially due to the generous subsidy system of the German energy transition (Renewable Energy Sources Act). However, this support has gradually decreased in recent years. This situation, in addition to comparably high feedstock prices, enhances the competition with other renewables. Otherwise, AD plants are able to provide power on demand, thus balancing the fluctuations in power generation from wind turbines and photovoltaics. Therefore, the AD plants of the 21st century should be more flexible in terms of power generation, the substrate as well as the product spectra.
All of these examples highlight that there is still an enormous potential in AD to be an important engine of new biorefinery concepts and renewable power generation and to contribute substantially to greenhouse gas reduction as well as to a circular bioeconomy.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lettinga, G.; Van Velsen, A.F.M.; Hobma, S.W.; De Zeeuw, W.; Klapwijk, A. Use of the upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980, 22, 699–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mainardis, M.; Buttazzoni, M.; Goi, D. Up-Flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) Technology for Energy Recovery: A Review on State-of-the-Art and Recent Technological Advances. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Adnan, A.I.; Ong, M.Y.; Nomanbhay, S.; Chew, K.W.; Show, P.L. Technologies for Biogas Upgrading to Biomethane: A Review. Bioengineering 2019, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bhatt, A.H.; Tao, L. Economic Perspectives of Biogas Production via Anaerobic Digestion. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wedwitschka, H.; Ibanez, D.G.; Schäfer, F.; Jenson, E.; Nelles, M. Material Characterization and Substrate Suitability Assessment of Chicken Manure for Dry Batch Anaerobic Digestion Processes. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mahato, P.; Goyette, B.; Rahaman, S.; Rajagopal, R. Processing High-Solid and High-Ammonia Rich Manures in a Two-Stage (Liquid-Solid) Low-Temperature Anaerobic Digestion Process: Start-Up and Operating Strategies. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Müller, L.; Engler, N.; Rostalsky, K.; Müller, U.; Krebs, C.; Hinz, S.W.A. Influence of Enzyme Additives on the Rheological Properties of Digester Slurry and on Biomethane Yield. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schumacher, B.; Zerback, T.; Wedwitschka, H.; Weinrich, S.; Hofmann, J.; Nelles, M. The Influence of Pressure-Swing Conditioning Pre-Treatment of Cattle Manure on Methane Production. Bioengineering 2019, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Monlau, F.; Sambusiti, C.; Barakat, A. Comparison of Dry Versus Wet Milling to Improve Bioethanol or Methane Recovery from Solid Anaerobic Digestate. Bioengineering 2019, 6, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Moestedt, J.; Sánchez-Laforga, A.M.; Isaksson, S.; Schnürer, A. Inoculum Source Determines Acetate and Lactate Production during Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Food Waste. Bioengineering 2019, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Taleghani, A.H.H.; Lim, T.-T.; Lin, C.-H.; Ericsson, A.C.; Vo, P.H. Degradation of Veterinary Antibiotics in Swine Manure via Anaerobic Digestion. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Russell, L.; Whyte, P.; Zintl, A.; Gordon, S.; Markey, B.; De Waal, T.; Cummins, E.; Nolan, S.; O’Flaherty, V.; Abram, F.; et al. A Small Study of Bacterial Contamination of Anaerobic Digestion Materials and Survival in Different Feed Stocks. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chiumenti, A.; Fait, G.; Limina, S.; Da Borso, F. Performances of Conventional and Hybrid Fixed Bed Anaerobic Reactors for the Treatment of Aquaculture Sludge. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikolausz, M.; Kretzschmar, J. Anaerobic Digestion in the 21st Century. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7040157

AMA Style

Nikolausz M, Kretzschmar J. Anaerobic Digestion in the 21st Century. Bioengineering. 2020; 7(4):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7040157

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikolausz, Marcell, and Jörg Kretzschmar. 2020. "Anaerobic Digestion in the 21st Century" Bioengineering 7, no. 4: 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7040157

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop