Next Article in Journal
Extracellular Matrix-Based and Electrospun Scaffolding Systems for Vaginal Reconstruction
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Characterization of Gait Patterns in Individuals with Spinocerebellar Ataxia 38
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Modern Advances in Microendodontics: The State of the Art

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
Bioengineering 2023, 10(7), 789; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070789
Submission received: 12 June 2023 / Accepted: 29 June 2023 / Published: 1 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials)
The concept of “minimally invasive” advances is becoming increasingly popular in the endodontic field. This concept comprises all endodontic treatment stages from diagnosis to root canal filling [1,2,3].
The success of endodontics depends on all phases. Only when every single step is performed perfectly can long-term success be achieved [4,5].
After diagnosis, with the help of modern radiological technologies, such as 3D CBCT and image processing software, it is possible to view every detail of the teeth we must treat.
Moreover, knowing about the problems in advance will allow the clinician to provide a proper treatment plan, even in extreme cases. In this way, the clinician may learn that the tooth cannot be saved and, therefore, must be extracted [6].
Unfortunately, with traditional 2D radiology, difficult and unusual cases cannot be visualised properly. Hence, an accurate treatment plan will be unachievable.
Once the diagnostic phase has been completed, the access cavity phase follows.
For several years, attempts have been made to conservatively carry this out to avoid weakening the residual tooth’s structure. Knowing about endodontic anatomy is important for performing the modern access cavity technique, and it is essential to take advantage of modern technologies, such as operating microscopes, powerful lights, and ultrasound systems with specific ultrasonic tips [7,8,9,10].
Thus, it is possible to achieve success by eliminating iatrogenic errors.
Next, shaping is performed, which involves minimally invasive “conservative shaping”. The latest generation of rotating files are used for this, which are much more flexible, thereby reducing the fracture risk [11,12,13,14].
Modern endodontics aims to eliminate damaged tissue and bacteria from the endodontic space. This goal can be achieved when conservative shaping is combined with powerful active irrigation.
After shaping, the 3D cleaning phase begins. In this phase, irrigants remove the smear layer, vital or necrotic tissues and bacteria in a single or biofilm form. Irrigants alone are not effective at reaching complex areas of the endodontic space. Instead, by employing powerful activation, irrigants can reach even in the most microscopic spaces. Different activation techniques exist, including heat, ultrasound, sonic, subsonic, laser systems, etc. [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
The final stage of endodontic treatment includes filling the spaces that have been shaped and cleaned. Recently, new sealers have been introduced for the obturation phase, such as biosealers, which have unique characteristics.
During the filling phase, it is important to use techniques that seal the entire endodontic anatomy as much as possible, even microscopic ones such as the dentinal tubules [23,24,25,26,27,28].
In conclusion, if they are employed well, modern technologies, materials and recent clinical protocols ensure the success of endodontic treatments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pantaleo, G.; Amato, A.; Iandolo, A.; Abdellatif, D.; Di Spirito, F.; Caggiano, M.; Pisano, M.; Blasi, A.; Fornara, R.; Amato, M. Two-Year Healing Success Rates after Endodontic Treatment Using 3D Cleaning Technique: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yared, G.; Ramli, G. Ex vivo ability of a noninstrumentation technique to disinfect oval-shaped canals. J. Conserv. Dent. 2020, 23, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arbiya, A.S.; Swaroop, H.; Sylvia, M. Minimally invasive endodontics—A review. J. Dent. Orofac. Res. 2019, 15, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  4. Amato, A.; Iandolo, A.; Scelza, G.; Spirito, F.; Martina, S. COVID-19: The Patients’ Perceived Impact on Dental Care. Eur. J. Dent. 2022, 16, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Riccitiello, F.; Maddaloni, G.; D’Ambrosio, C.; Amato, M.; Rengo, S.; Simeone, M. Operating microscope: Diffusion and limits. G. Ital. Endod. 2012, 26, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Patel, S.; Brown, J.; Pimentel, T.; Kelly, R.D.; Abella, F.; Durack, C. Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics—A review of the literature. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 1138–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Plotino, G.; Grande, N.M.; Isufi, A.; Ioppolo, P.; Pedullà, E.; Bedini, R.; Gambarini, G.; Testarelli, L. Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Access Cavity Designs. J. Endod. 2017, 43, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bugea, C.; Pontoriero, D.I.K.; Rosenberg, G.; Suardi, G.M.G.; Calabria, G.; Pedullà, E.; La Rosa, G.R.M.; Sforza, F.; Scarano, A.; Luongo, R.; et al. Maxillary Premolars with Four Canals: Case Series. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Iandolo, A.; Simeone, M.; Riccitiello, F. The preparation of coronal isthmus is a fundamental step for long term success. G. Ital. Endod. 2012, 26, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Iandolo, A.; Pantaleo, G.; Malvano, M.; Simeone, M.; Amato, M. Non surgical management of complex endodontic cases with several periapical lesions: A case series. G. Ital. Endod. 2016, 30, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gambarini, G.; Cicconetti, A.; Di Nardo, D.; Miccoli, G.; Zanza, A.; Testarelli, L.; Seracchiani, M. Influence of different heat treatments on torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary files: A comparative study. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zanza, A.; Russo, P.; Reda, R.; Di Matteo, P.; Donfrancesco, O.; Ausiello, P.; Testarelli, L. Mechanical and Metallurgical Evaluation of 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: An In Vitro and In Laboratory Study. Bioengineering 2022, 20, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yuan, K.; Niu, C.; Xie, Q.; Jiang, W.; Gao, L.; Huang, Z.; Ma, R. Comparative evaluation of the impact of minimally invasive preparation vs. conventional straight-line preparation on tooth biomechanics: A finite element analysis. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2016, 124, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Devi, T.P.; Kaur, A.; Priyadarshini, S.; Deepak, B.S.; Banerjee, S.; Sanjeeta, N. Microscopic Assessment of Dentinal Defects Induced by ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and Hyflex Electric Discharge Machining Rotary File Systems-An in vitro Study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2021, 12, 230–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arias, Z.; Nizami, M.Z.I.; Chen, X.; Chai, X.; Xu, B.; Kuang, C.; Omori, K.; Takashiba, S. Recent Advances in Apical Periodontitis Treatment: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, Q.; Li, Z.; Lyu, P.; Zhou, X.; Fan, Y. Current Applications and Future Directions of Lasers in Endodontics: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Iandolo, A.; Amato, M.; Abdellatif, D.; Barbosa, A.F.A.; Pantaleo, G.; Blasi, A.; Franco, V.; Silva, E.J.N.L. Effect of different final irrigation protocols on pulp tissue dissolution from an isthmus model. Aust. Endod. J. 2021, 47, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Di Spirito, F.; Pisano, M.; Caggiano, M.; Bhasin, P.; Lo Giudice, R.; Abdellatif, D. Root Canal Cleaning after Different Irrigation Techniques: An Ex Vivo Analysis. Medicina 2022, 58, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Di Spirito, F.; Scelza, G.; Fornara, R.; Giordano, F.; Rosa, D.; Amato, A. Post-Operative Endodontic Pain Management: An Overview of Systematic Reviews on Post-Operatively Administered Oral Medications and Integrated Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations. Healthcare 2022, 10, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tay, F.R.; Gu, L.S.; Schoeffel, G.J.; Wimmer, C.; Susin, L.; Zhang, K.; Arun, S.N.; Kim, J.; Looney, S.W.; Pashley, D.H. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yared, G.; Al Asmar Ramli, G. Antibacterial Ability of Sodium Hypochlorite Heated in the Canals of Infected Teeth: An Ex Vivo Study. Cureus 2020, 12, e6975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Munoz, H.R.; Camacho-Cuadra, K. In Vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars. J. Endod. 2012, 38, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Abdellatif, D.; Amato, A.; Calapaj, M.; Pisano, M.; Iandolo, A. A novel modified obturation technique using biosealers: An ex vivo study. J. Conserv. Dent. 2021, 24, 369–373. [Google Scholar]
  24. Farrayeh, A.; Akil, S.; Eid, A.; Macaluso, V.; Mancino, D.; Haïkel, Y.; Kharouf, N. Effectiveness of Two Endodontic Instruments in Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Retreatment. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dong, X.; Xu, X. Bioceramics in Endodontics: Updates and Future Perspectives. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Costa, L.A.; Eiro, N.; Vaca, A.; Vizoso, F.J. Towards a New Concept of Regenerative Endodontics Based on Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Secretomes Products. Bioengineering 2022, 10, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martina, S.; Pisano, M.; Amato, A.; Abdellatif, D.; Iandolo, A. Modern rotary files in minimally invasive endodontics: A case report. Front. Biosci.-Elite 2021, 13, 299–304. [Google Scholar]
  28. Iandolo, A.; Pisano, M.; Scelza, G.; Abdellatif, D.; Martina, S. Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Root Apex of Permanent Maxillary Premolars: A Multicentric Study. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iandolo, A. Modern Advances in Microendodontics: The State of the Art. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070789

AMA Style

Iandolo A. Modern Advances in Microendodontics: The State of the Art. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(7):789. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iandolo, Alfredo. 2023. "Modern Advances in Microendodontics: The State of the Art" Bioengineering 10, no. 7: 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop